#ip_rights_violations
1 messages · Page 11 of 1
@manic laurel is there a channel directly for reporting bugs like this?
Because I’ve got a long list of bugs from 1.3
Including the fact polylines can no longer generate walls
https://feedback.bistudio.com/ would be the place
that one is known, see #enfusion_terrain 🙂
^gotcha
does this page look sketchy to anyone else?
just such a wide range of very high quality assets... maybe it's a real team that is very good.idk
A quick scan through the models they have and looks ok to me. The prices seem realistic and fit the license (editorial only, so not allowed in games!).
Pretty sure if you contact the seller for a license to be used in an Arma mod the price will be at least 10x of what's displayed there 😉
Ahhh see the licensing is the catch there I guess. That is kinda crazy they have all of those models in their library. They are sitting on a gold mine lol
game companies etc can still buy those with different licensing by contacting the author
the listing could be considered a catalogue
@midnight compass
report it to the associated email
it was removed
Are these not RHS assets ? https://www.cgtrader.com/designers/warden1#reviews
Warden is an RHS contributor
can be seen on the RHS homepage
Thanks
What a beautiful day today. Hmm
Let’s start it with…
Something real.
Only thing real about project realism is the real assets stolen from WoT/War thunder
And im sure we should talk about this one
Do people do any reasearch on their models anymore?
I swear it’s like once in a blue moon someone actually takes the time to ensure they aren’t using ripped assets
Challenger is debatable looks like a modification to hide it but the T-90 is dead giveaway
The specific red fire extinguishers really sell it on the fact
compare the meshes instead of just working off of eye, t90 is identical to the war thunder model but still gotta be sure beyond a reasonable doubt
i was gonna report it but didn’t wanna spend time sourcing the WT model
Retopo is a thing.
if they didn’t even visually change the model the odds they retopo’d it are very low
Right... These are very clearly ripped and modified models to me.
I don't know if they know they're ripped or not. I do know the war thunder tank models are commonly sold on asset stores.
There are things that you don't get similar when you 3d model something from the ground up. Such as the bolt exact rotation and placement on the AH64 case. These nuances are present on both of these.
It's also a difficult sale that you can 3d model vehicles like this but can't texture them beyond what they are.
But that's speculation.
thats not stolen i paid for the t90
you guys want proof
well it is also possible you got scammed to buy stolen model. it would not be first time
its not stolen
an doesnt even look like the war thunder model so i dont know how you guys come up with that
look man there diffrent models
i have the war thunder models im using for refrences for parts i can tell you there diffrent
it is suspiciously cheap for game high quality ready asset. 
we dont tolerate that kind of stuff
dont tolereate it then my models not stolen you cant just say that without no proof
Lmao it’s so obvious
Yes just because you payed for a model doesn’t mean it’s not ripped
jelouse
$29 for 500 poly war thunder model
you are clearly stupid
I’m not jealous of violating Bohemia interactives ToS and the model holders rights
becouse there diffrent
You’re openly admitting to owning ripped assets
🤷♂️
yh i have a war thunder t90 that was giving to me but its not the same as my t90 i paid for
theres not one peice of it thats from there so proof what your saying
Hmm idk I think the guy with the ripped assets should do some comparing
I don’t buy ripped assets sorry
whats ripped tho
I’ll find the original model and owner if I have to to prove my point but someone selling 6 tanks on their account for $29 each with crazy amounts of detail and polys
You’re asking to be scammed
this is the only other post your gunner find on it
he even states he has it up for sale on his george acount on cgtrader
read the comments on that sketchfab
a tank that high poly with no interior and you say its ripped from war thunder, your joking
You’ve never played war thunder then
Because you don’t know how they handle interiors
Anyway. @twin crane you can hit up gaijin legal email with the info
they got to do the verification
I’ll have my guy send it.
But even in the sketchfab comments people are saying the same thing “Reminds me of war thunder” @spice owl
Also get out of my DMs
im asking for proof of what your acusing me of
prove it im sure its not ripped but you cant prove it or the othe 2 cant either so your telling me you guys are jealus or somehting
Jealous of what lol
i dont know mabe a nice t90 for soo cheap
I can throw together a tank in 3 hours I’m not jealous of anything
excuse me?
have you ever seen the war thunder challenger? its 300k pollys with a terrible interior. ours is sub 60k pollys, interior fully modeled...
Who modeled it?
happy to answer any questions in dms since this isnt needed in this chat since it has nothing to do with ip rights.
The question directly relates to IP rights.
thats for bi to investigate. im not gonna fill this chat with shit.
Not to be content police or anything but this isn't behavior reflective of innocence or negligence.
as i said i can chat about it in dms further
ill take it as a compliment though that you think my challenger is a ripped asset lol
So you modeled it?
no. i didnt say that did i
That is what this implies. Since the discussion is the model itself.
well comparing it to wt is a compliment regardless who modeled it
if you care so much and want to know about the model dm me. im not gonna fill up this chat.
This is the place to discuss these matter hence why this chat is always a mess
Lol
This also provides staff in here insights on potential and or active violations
Everything falls back on bohemias legal especially stolen assets that’s why it’s our jobs as modders to ensure we correctly follow ToS
but your incorrectly assuming without any evidence bro, quite funny.
No worries @spice owl email and attached evidence is sent to gaijin
I’ll let them handle it from here and you’ll get your answer
same way i saw people tryna say the wcs apache is from wt with clearly different meshes, scalling and quality
Anyone can smack something out of shape with a hammer and splash paint on it.
some things do add up
but your acting so confident without compsring meshes [ wireframe meshes ] side by side
Do you actually have empirical evidence or are you just eyeballing it? The way you are going about this in this chat, assuming people are guilty without definitive proof, is wrong.
i get where your coming from, no hostility from me towards you as ive done this same thing before as i respect the TOS. but without actual evidince i find this slightly laughable
ive reported violations myself. im not stupid enough to break tos.
CGTrader is a cesspit of stolen models and shit, so being suspicious is fine -- but you're genuinely just coming in here shooting first and not even giving people a chance to defend themselves
i spend many hours reasearching any models i buy or plan to buy.
cg trader can be a trap sometimes
same with turbosquid and fab
literally didnt even know about this to defend myself till turd msg me lol
To be fair I fire the warning shots the arguments come next
you need proof with this kind of shit
The usual as any sane human would react the same way
Gaijin has it I will give you the answer they provide
i can go and compare it wth the wt mesh rn lol
If you're genuinely concerned email the legal departments and leave it at that. Your approach to this screams more that you just want to blast people in a public forum, not that you actually care about the legal rights of those models being represented.
pretty sure i have the wireframe pic on my phone
i can view the wt wireframe on sketchfab bro...
i paid for mine an did research on it, so if it turns out ripped then i will take it down, simple
The T90 is definitely ripped.
You don't need comparisons for that lil bro.
wt mesh
our mesh
sorry bro, not wt
wt is 300k polly, ours over 500k
you were so confidently wrong.
The idea that retopo, sellers altering things prior to selling, and kitbashing not existing to you is laughable.
^
i model myself. u can tell its not a retopo
Looking at those two side by side like that tells me with confidence that model was ripped from war thunder.
look at the scale difference on certain parts
That means nothing.
Again, do you actually have evidence that it's ripped?
Homie just posted it.
since turd bought it he should be protected by cg trader for a refund or someshit if it turns out to be ripped, but at the most its probs a close copy using the wt as a reference
You still haven't proven anything
If grabbing an item using the L key and scaling it suddenly makes something not ripped I've been going about modding all wrong.
...... by scaling i dont mean that. things that have been modeled at a weird scale not true to the real one. small discrepencies and errors
its not my model, its my friends mod. im here to defend my challenger and myself. and my mate ofc.
i havent disputed that it could very well be ripped or a close copy based on the wt mesh
but i myself dont think its a retopo. maybe a copy which isnt morral but isnt a rip just a close copy
The amount of this is the same model is ascenine. Can you seriously not see these two models are the same with slight alterations? Or are you just trying to get away with ripping?
have you just read a word i typed??
Regardless I don't think it's fair to just accuse outright without evidence, especially when in this community many people (in my opinion, quite understandably) purchase a model expecting it to be legitimate, just for it turn out that it's a scam, and their money has pretty much been stolen from them. Bizentine's mod has clearly had a lot of work done as well -- stuff that couldn't have been ripped such as the interior etc, I think he deserved at least a direct message or a heads up, rather than just coming in here and trying to fire up the crowd around him.
buying models is relatively new thing
the mesh dinsity and tracks are quite different. but i havent said its not ripped or is ripped. ive only said i myself dont know.
Exactly what more evidence other than what homie just provided do you need?
Do you need me to circle the parts for you?
I can rip out microsoft paint right quick and do a little circle here and circle there.
There's about 60 messages of discussion around this before any images were even posted.
bro your just angry for no reason. go outside
None of the accusers actually provided any evidence.
I'm not even arguing about whether or not the model is stolen. Just the way this discussion has been made is all wrong.
The 2 images sent say more then enough
...okay, read what i said again
You didn't post any evidence of your own accord. You just accused straight away.
"You caught the guy who robbed me wrong that isn't fair you gotta let him go"
honestly though why are you so pressed about this? let bi investigate the t90 as it is their job...
actually Gaijin is who should do that
Which I have them doing^
if it turns out to be ripped then thats the answer isnt it?
and then request BI to take it down it its their model
Provided them that email if required
And could have been done without all the attention-seeking fanfare in this channel.
Attention? Due diligence
Well at least you wont be surprised if it ends up being rip
You can call it whatever you want. I think you should have direct messaged the guy first.
Last time I direct messaged a guy he ignored everything I told him and went about doing it anyway
no it does seem very attention seeking at this point. from the both of you. not very mature tbh
i already said this if it turns out ripped il take it down, i paid for it an done my own investigation, an you provided none just acused
being positive beyond a reasonable doubt with undeniable evidence would’ve avoided any form or plausible deniability thus avoiding the entire kerfuffle
ive literally offered to speak in dms to avoid this shit. ik how this chat ends up
The T90 is pretty cut and dry.
I can circle the parts where the dirty modder touched me on the tank.
Bruh
I can say for having seen this happen over and over for the past 10 years. such cheap game ready models honestly dont really seem to exist
ik my challenger is not from wt. i dont need to provide evidence here as if bi wish to investigate it they will. but i can provide any evidence in dms if you really seek to know.
I'm more shocked that an address that something is ripped has been met with such arrogant defence to go as far as posting evidence something is ripped as evidence it's not.
there are very common red flags in these
Honestly I wish there was cheaper models. My KA-52 was nearly $200
I myself fell prey to one of these models and the moment the accusation was made with even the slightest of agreeable comparrison I pulled the project. Wiremesh or not it's obvious.
$700 in total for my AH-1Z and I lost the time to work on it 
can you like leave this be for bi to deal with now?
flexing the prices of your modles and continuing this is super childish n attention seeking
Imagine thinking that was about you.
I’m done arguing it?
i mean its clearly directed that way...
I’m letting the respective legal teams handle it from here
good for you. didnt need a whole sop though did we..
I was planning on doing literally anything else with my day.
But I guess i'm taking pictures of the challenger's tow hooks and gunner port.
😦
this channel always has some fucking pearls I'll tell you that
always
not to be that guy but he did kinda start the insults yk
hes literally baiting a reaction...
Dont take the bait
all I've seen in this channel recently are baseless accusations followed with some pretty rude finger pointing and insults left and right. people get scammed sometimes and it is understandable to be mad when your model gets acused of being stolen. and being upset to see a ripped mod in the workshop is also understandable. but the accusations without evidence (like textures and meshs matching for example), the accusatory almost malicious nature of some comments and the rebuttals are kinda sad. if it is ripped they'll figure it out. there's no need for childish behavior.
it is not from WT.
it is however made by vigilante studios that have and unreal exclusive license don’t they
license changed. no mention of unreal in their eula as of now
same for their models on fab
also as a general rule, that includes all parties, especially @twin crane
please keep it civil. want something to report, my dms are open. Also there is an email you can use pinned to this channel
I think it's pretty crazy that the moderation continues to allow this channel to act like the neighbourhood watch, it seems to only generate drama. I think these things should be sorted out by:
a) Just emailling the relevant legal department with their concern, or,
b) Getting in contact with the author with an approach like "Hi, I have concerns your model has been ripped/stolen/etc, my reasons for thinking so are X and Y"
that’s new, i’ll ask them directly since i sort of know some of them
if you could clarify it with them would be great. if it turns out i cannot use the model im happy to take the mod down. [ its very broken after 1.3 anyway ]
interesting.
classic @terse current the reddit predator crying about ripped assets
you probably missed what I said about the insults
Sorry sir I will never do it again. If you want me to remove the message and send him a personal apology message please let me know sir. I can also forward you a message and apologize on my behalf making you take the time out of your day to warn me sir.
that would be nice so I dont have to take time to issue official warning
Sounds good sir, I can start that process and have it finalized in 1-2 business days
That's a crazy accusation coming from someone on the sex offender registry.
@faint nacelle can you please warn the proven predator for calling me a sex offender
i can show valid proof that I am actually a multi millionaire living in a miami penthouse
You should send me your address. I'll stop by tomorrow and I'll confirm that for you. Don't need to trouble bohemia with nonsense.
That would work if my concierge didn't exist but sadly they do and they don't let small minded homeless individuals in my building :/
Cute. Whenever you're ready to be a man about your beef my DM's are always open and my gas tank is always full.
Who would've thought that a single USB would be worth as much as your mommas house
!mute @queen vine @terse current 7d despite given change continuing insults and petty arguing.
Silence!! ò_ó
...
I keel u, @terse current and @queen vine!! Ò_Ó
bmr_staghorn#0000 now has 8 infractions.
anyway
I dont understand why creators are posting here instead of just emailing the infringements@bistudio.com.
This is what it turns into, if you let people come in here and just instigate arguments you are asking for this kind of thing. The discord team should really not encourage this behaviour and tell people who want to make reports, to make reports. If not it's just virtue signaling.
Does not look that good for $200 i would pay something like $30/$40
yh right completly agree blake i come here an found my t90 being talked about with no evidence to back it up
Sue him for defamation
It just shouldnt be allowed to go on here, especially in a condescending manner. if you want to report it, report it. Let the people who get paid to make that call do it. Calling out creators in here is just childish. You can DM them if you want to help them, but if you dont care then: infringements@bistudio.com
iv got him in my dm too but hes a rude guy, takes my information an told me im wrong but then does what i tell him to do
@halcyon bobcat
!Mute @light lodge @hollow dagger @spice owl @halcyon bobcat @umbral marlin 4d spam in chat. Will deal with you in the morning.
Silence!! ò_ó
...
I keel u, @halcyon bobcat, @hollow dagger, @umbral marlin, @spice owl and @light lodge!! Ò_Ó
troylemm24#0000 now has 2 infractions.
And risk having it be stolen that’s a huge market issue right now with models
do you know how many hours would go into something like a ka-52?
at the rate you just said thats like 1$ an hour
Been nothing but civil so far. don’t know where that’s coming from but yeah the conversations been heated which is fair.
I'm just a bystander here and I know literally shit about modern 3d modeling, so here's my 2 cents: this entire convo appears like witch hunting and virtue signalling, with both sides arguments being "it's stolen, i'm telling you!" - "no, it's not!".
hold on your thoughts, this channel's topic is not about that, it is about discussing BI IP reports before sending them
#other_ip_topics may be more suited 🙂
fair point, will redact that part and repost in there!
sorry and thanks 🍻
That post is deceptive.
The first thing I notice are the tracks having a solid piece on the inside, whereas your model has all the small "hooks" (don't know what they're called").
And the WT one clearly has a smaller bag on the machinegun than yours.
But, if you look at actual images of the actual WT tank (and not YOUR image of what you call is the WT tank's mesh), you will see that the hook thingies are on there (like in yours), and also that the machinegun bag is larger (like in yours)
https://warthunder.com/en/news/6931-development-t-90a-boris-the-bullet-dodger-en
You would also notice that the position/orientation of all the track wheels, including the back sprocket is exactly the same.
It surely took alot of inspiration of the WT one.
If we look at other models that "creator" has created, the Merkeva MK2D for example.
Compare it to the war thunder model, on first look, it looks the same.
And when you concentrate on "loose" things like hooks/shackles on the model, that in real world just hang around in random positions. They are all in the same position as on the WT model, including the ones that hang up, even though gravity would dictate it would normally hang down.
Even down to the rotation of bolts. They are all the same, even when they appear to be "randomly" rotated in the model.
That simply does not happen when making your own models. That's not a thing that you coincidentally get all the loose parts oriented the exact same way.
On the right side, inbetween the track guard plates, above the track height.
There are little 3-element chains between the elements, 4 in total.
In war thunder, the first 3 hang down and the last one hangs up. That is totally random between every picture that's taken of a real life tank, and its completely left over to the modellers creativity of how to orient these chains.
On Georgy's model, the first 3 hang down, the last one hangs up.
On the war thunder model, the first one is tilted left, the second tilted right, the third about horizontal and the last horizontal.
On Georgy's model, first left, second right, third horizontal, last horizontal.
Things like that just don't happen.
Clearly Georgy spent alot of effort in adjusting the model, but clearly his and the WT model have the same baseline.
That presents a couple options.
Georgy and WT purchased the same model, and made some adjustments.
WT purchased the model from Georgy and made some adjustments.
Georgy ripped the WT model and made some adjustments.
War Thunder posted about their T-90 in 2020, Georgy posted it in 2023 and his fab listing is from 2025. (Curious how
No, WT didn't buy it from him.
great breakdown, thank you!
Taking a look at similar random things that are up to the creator on the T-90 model.
Like the layout of wires, the twist randomly, never lay down quite the same, which wire lays over another is just a creative decision. Its very random in real life.
Images: Georgy, WT, The discussed workshop upload, A real T90a, A real t90a from other angle
Coincidendce that Georgy's and the workshop upload model have the exact same layout of wires, including orientation of the left attachment point.
And it not matching an example real t90a tank?
Surely if you were modeling a highly realistic tank model, you wouldn't go to the effort to lay out your wires the same way as War Thunder does.
Notably also including that weird way that the cable coming from the receptacle on the left, just "merges" into the bigger cable.
https://warthunder.com/en/news/6931-development-t-90a-boris-the-bullet-dodger-en
https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/tank-t-90a-c9a5bbaf23ad47ad90586395629a2d1c
https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/t-90a-war-thunder-839db392cec74bd7bdff207cdc5d3d7e
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/04/15/05/69855549-0-image-a-48_1681533457667.jpg
poor guy, hes already dead!
I also don't think its fair to accuse without evidence.
Sometimes its obvious by just looking at it, so there is no need to provide detailed evidence.
But sometimes, there are people that pretend to be blind and not be able to see. So you have to serve it to them on a silver platter.
where ban 0
Georgy: Tied on top, makes a little wave and goes down.
WT: Tied on top, makes a little wave and goes down.
Workshop: Tied on top, makes a little wave and goes down.
Real tank: Immediately disappears behind the Armor.
You want more proof? Look at it yourself, you'll find more.
(have* thought 😆 my eyes!)
cant agree with this view. if the case is obvious, that means collecting evidence is quick and simple. you wouldn’t go to court and say “sir, just lock him, its obvious”.
you have to have evidence, at the very least to make the case unambiguous for the general public (especially when throwing accusations in the open)
I believe he means "if it is obvious to everyone"
this is not a court of justice, and if it is ULTRA obvious then yeah, boom, out
however as a matter of law and such then yes, if it is obvious, evidence collection and listing are easy
true to that, but without evidence such cases lead to useless back-and-forth like the one above, which to me appeared like a bunch of jerks on both sides throwing crap at each other.
on the other hand, the stuff Dedmen wrote gives no room to argue, and there’s educational value in it too. my point is about not provoking useless drama and bad blood, even if the OP has good intentions.
anyhow, enough of offtopic from me 😇
I believe we agree all in all - cheers 😄
Posting things here, aside from being used to start drama, actually leads to action taken quicker than using the e-mail or in-game report button
Me thinks

sad thing is though, that those that are ripping model, are learning from such posts and will try to change things listed above. Seen that once with one notorious RHS ripper who basically used prof to improve his rips and sell it under yet another account
yes
Man I was not expecting a bomb shell of information that hard holy
Right LOL. Even in the beginning sizing up the two wireframes I was thinking, It looks like he just hit the tris to quad button in Blender and called it a day 
It’s just dead obvious but dedman just hit the nail hard thing went right through the wood.
i have compared the WT model with the one that was bought. they overlap. it is the very same model with small changes to hide the fact that it is ripped.
case closed
@spice owl-> please remove the ripped model from the workshop ASAP.
Time to add more hidden watermarks into one´s models I suppose 🤔
can always be removed and overwrited with texture by the buyer (/stealer)
From a quick google search War Thunder outsourced many of their models from studios. Here are examples from ArtVostok a Siberian based Studio https://www.artstation.com/artvostok/albums/1501523 Is there evidence War Thunder has sole rights to their model?
you can do smarter things with the 3d model
yes, outsourcing is the practice in the industry (BI does it too), however game studios order a model for their own, they do own the IPs and the model
that file is never sold again btw
So somebody contacted Gaijin and confirmed that for this specfic model? Or the information is public?
you have to prove that you have the rights, not the other way around.
diffrent in many places it may of been used as ref but its not the model im sure of it
That makes sense, but it feels like a slippery slope. For example, if you buy an asset from a seller on CGTrader, they might have the rights to sell it through a studio agreement. While you can provide proof of your purchase, confirming that the seller actually has those rights could be much more difficult.
I'm not denying that there are plenty of ripped models on CGTrader, just trying to understand the burden of proof for future reference.
correct. buying models is not surefire way to have something to work with
once you upload to the workshop, you attest you have sufficient rights to do so (not infringing on anyone's else IP and copyrights) as per TOS
get some shots of close up in edit mode so we can see the actrull diffrence
understand that 3d modelling is like art making. Drawing on top of a painting doesn't make you an author of said painting, it is still a breach of copyrights
i am more interested in the fact that the position of all the details are the same as the two meshes perfectly overlap, which as i have told you via DMs, it is 100% not possible
do you understand what reference means? referance doesn't mean exactly the same
it has its difrrences iv already stated, but the question is you guys say its ripped with no real evidence
apart from what i give you
i am not saying you ripped it
i am saying whoever bought you the model from used the ripped WT model, and changed parts to hide that
thats not what i meant you say its the war thunder model but its diffrent in loads places you just dont understand what i mean
Not if I make the watermark a part of the model, no? 
this is not how it works
you know you can look at the meshes i gave you see what im talking about but your choosing to not
i am choosing to look at what is preciselly the same, not on what is different
It seems like you do not understand how creating models works.
PuFu is just repeating what I already wrote above.
The WT model was taken, and slightly edited.
Yes, some parts are different. Doesn't change the fact that it is the WT model.
thats alot to say without any proof
The proof is above, posted by two different people by now
You not wanting to accept it, is different than it not existing
im not acepting becouse noone proved to me its actrully ripped, i still think its been built of a ref
Okey. I accept your opinion. And wish you luck with that.
i even provided you with a comparison between the model you bought and it is using a WT ripped mesh, the actual WT mesh, and my own mesh that is done based on pictures and 2d drawings
while similar, things are different, they do not overlap
the fact that you cannot understand the simplest of things = you cannot have the exact same positions for 3d meshes, including preciselly the same dimensions, the same rotations etc without being the same exact mesh
i disagree with that you telling me i couldnt build it exaclty like the WT with Wt right there
just because some parts are different it doesn't make it a new mesh.
i have used 3d CAD data for work as referance a lot of time and it still wasn't precisely the same in the end
You are free to disagree.
I hear lots of people also disagree with pictures showing them sitting in their car and exceeding the speedlimit, saying that while it looks like their car, has their license plate and shows someone who looks exactly like them sitting in it, there is no proof that it is actually them.
I wish you people good luck with your opinion. Same as I do to people who get a speeding ticket.
you say details perfecly overlap but they dont, they are very close but they will not line up no what what you do to it
It is very clear that further discussions will not change any opinions here.
This was sent yesterday, but @echo orchid said the mod should be taken down ASAP. Has the position changed now given the evidence provided?
For all and any who are interested in reporting a mod with evidence.
Also pinned in this channels description
BI can take it down on their own for sure.
That’s clear. But didn’t really answer my question. Are you guys just throwing out opinions or do discord mods control the workshop?
To be clear I could care less about the tank, I will never use it. I would just like to understand the process
anyone can provide insight into the raised questions.
the discord moderators moderate just the discord
BI does their decision based on available information
Is my understanding on the matter anyway
Copy , thank you
Mmm in some cases
PuFu being that exception
Which is nice to have someone to refer to sometimes
He still dont control workshop. he can make valid points though
due to experience
No I know but usually he’s a good contact to reach out to regarding mods and stuff
i got a question, when you make your clothing in marvelous, do you just do it of the top of your head or do you like have a actual blueprint of the clothing your making?
@faint nacelle @soft egret
@spice owl
Usually there’s a blueprint to follow that modelers use
Both, depending on my mood. Sometimes I just use visual references and other times I’ll trace over 2D garment prints. @narrow mantle
This is a 2D garment pattern. Back on topic though.
if I found a game on steam that might be using A3 assets would emailing infringements@bistudio.com be the right course of action?
woah thats new, yes it would be, and can i has a link
yes that is the place
it has happenend few times before too I think
gib link pls i am geniunely interested
im not 100% but i included the reddit ad, the steam page links and screenshots. it was sus slightly.
and sorry if I'm right I don't want to give them free advertising.
dm
we had strike from someone who claimed our assets werent ours and it was.. fraudulent strike. and i want to see how ligeitimate stealing looks like
if you think that models are ripped, it should be fairly close to refunder models, and i never seen such thing
np, sorry ujust didn't want randoms to see
Look up in the chat and you’ll see
mm?
You said you want to see what ripping looks like go look up at the last day or 2
the warthunder thing?
Yes
i duno man, something is off there
Off about what?
about whole situatuion, something is off
i did not follow it closely, but i have gut feeling
My guy
I’m not even gonna argue with you
You wanted to see legit stealing there it is choose to believe it or not lol
im not arguing lol
The 3D modeller is the whole reason why this came about but they uploaded that model and defended it
Gaijin is already taking action
What @cedar bone said
Conversation is over
^^
the email just says they're investigating
that's also some sort of action, isn't it?
I mean you could put it that way, just seems a bit misleading
I just don’t understand the concept of posting it in here, it just seems like virtue signaling to me.
this channel is to discuss BOHEMIA INTERACTIVE intellectual properties' issues
Yeah, none of which are being discussed
It’s just screenshots of reports or callouts
also lot of completely unrelated people commenting.
hence why it should not happen here
there was legit BI related question too just earlier though
so stay out of the channel. if you got inappropriate content to report you can use #discord_tickets
good afternoon, which channel can I contact about the server using monetization, the war between the Russian Federation and Ukraine, and the mod in which there are 15 author's mods (RHS CBA_3 CUP). I would appreciate a reply.
Hi, #other_ip_topics can be the one - if it is "only" about reporting, see infringements@bistudio.com
Can I hold the server accountable for violating copyrights and selling the Wagner PMCs uniform?
Report to RHS and CUP teams. CBA_A3 is GPLv2
Yes if they are taking money in exchange for mods you can report it to that email as he said.
Okay, thanks
Need to clarify that
Because it just states properly violations
yes
@pliant oar ?
It should be obvious enough but even I didn’t know or probably a lot of people tbh I actually didn’t have other IP topics originally in my list there are so many channels here. So apologies
erm it was to discuss all IP violations related to BI games / workshops, the non violations discussions go to the other channel
oh, good then 😄
why my photo get removed then
i get that but my topic has been shared across both groups,
thankyou, and where do you get your 2d patterns from?
Depending on what you want to model just type into google “cargo pants 2D garment pattern”. Also the best place believe it or not for 2D garment patterns is Pinterest. DM me for any other questions though.
is there anyone i can DM regarding possible game TOS violations?
Not me, but what is the context?
Email in the channel description, if you are unsure if it is a violation please give us some details to work with here
is it allowed to offer donators to a server a notification and ping about 20 seconds before a server is about to restart to let them know when to skip the queue?
to me it is giving donators an incentive to donate with a function ingame. seems like it wouldn't be allowed just as giving donators priority queue isn't allowed per the no commercialization of enfusion policy.
(i have evidence of servers doing this which is why i am asking)
You mean e.g. posting a discords notification to a close group you pay for? Donation is not the right term there, as you need to pay to access this information then? Donation would mean everyone gets this info regardless if they paid or not.
Yes, only people who pay can see this notification.
you need to donate to see this, also they advertise it in public channels to incentivise people to donate.
i guess donation isnt the right term but you know what i mean.
This is actually an interesting question. I will discuss it with our lawyers and get back to you. Feel free to send off an email with the info contained so if we decide we have some ground to act on we can do it. Include a link to the discord, screenshots of the kind of info not publicly available, where and how people get access to it etc
will do!
For anyone else following the thread: We have determined that case is still commercial use of our IP, even if it is facilitated through external software. In the end some kind of access to our server software is exchanged for money. So something like this is right now not allowed. We are working on updates to the legal framework to introduce similar ways for monetization like in DayZ and Arma 3, but until then its not allowed nor tolerated to do so.
email sent, thanks for the quick response.
This sounds weird to me; as server providers also ask money to gain access to a server, and those are allowed (obviously).
You can argue that you pay for the hardware/connection and get Arma Server for "free", but that's IMHO more commercial than paying for an early notification that the server is restarted 🤷
It is about the subject of the payment and if our IP is involved or not. What you say is not remotely associated with it - so much so that I do not even know where to start explaining it, so I won't in this case.
Give monetizers an inch and they will hoover up as much cash as they can in all manner of intricate schemes
It's kind of like raising a teenager, the more you try to restrict them, the sneakier, and more creative they get about things
In other words, y'all really need to hurry along this monetization stuff so folks can stop being shut down for trying to keep their servers operational without spending hundreds out of pocket every month, they'll just keep getting creative and finding loopholes

Well, since a lot of servers are monetizing anyway, making it so they can do it legally is the way to go here
Either that or develop measures to better moderate it, since right now you can't pin a server to an owner
So everyone can do it with no repercussions, really
I mean it is like tough sometimes to pay server bills and expect the other admins to help and such over the years. Theres time my server bills were over 1k a month as I have to pay for my servers my community plays on. Some big server communities get there servers for free but atleast for communities like mine it would be great if we could legally do anything to offset the costs at times. I understand nobody is forcing anyone to host them and such but providing popular places for players to play does benefit BI. Content creators that play on these servers sell copies of the game to players and are basically free advertising. Regardless it would be cool if there was something out there, even a paid whitelist that could be regulated somehow.
Right, donations don't motivate people because they'd love to get something in return, and their favorite community continuing to exist thanks to their donation is worthless to them I guess, an in-game hat would be worth it! because you have to show other people you're better for donating than they are!
the ideal would be if BIS could own and maintain the monetisation platform the same way they've verticalised the workshop, but that's a lot of work and liability
let's see what happens if/when BI implements again server monetization with all the mods that do not allow it....prime example = RHS
Heh, saw one of the WCS guys pleading for monetization and I did wonder what they'd replace RHS with 🤣
That said, I see no reason why Reforger should not have the same rules for server monetization as ARMA 3 and DayZ, with the same limitations. But mod monetization is a whole new deal that will create imbalances within the community and if people thought BI Legal took too long to deal with issues in the past, they ain't seen anything yet...
luckily not a worry for me but still either way something would be better than nothing
because the A3 and DayZ monetization rules are ok.ish, but there is no oversight
and it created a lot of issues
Agreed. I have hoped every January that the monetization policy would be revoked, given it renews each year
i am for no monetization whatsoever, or full monetization for both servers and mods. Is that feasable? unlikely to be fair, because it would require a proper way to maintain and check both servers and mods
Those really are the only options, BI has neither the resources, nor I suspect the inclination, to properly manage limited monetization of servers (as demonstrated in the past) or mods
I bet it would encourage more in house modding
More modders and more players for the game is the goal here right?
..right?
Now that the workshop is in house, oversight issues should not be as much of a problem as they were
That's a copout if it's brought up for AR
How ever did ARMA 3 manage? 🤦
No monetization of mods I mean...
Ya steam workshop probably
Not at all... Of course people got their game removed from Steam or banned on BE, but when you can just buy it again for a few bucks there's no real impact.
Given that video content creators get paid by BI for streaming Reforger though, it seems like it's only fair for server owners and modders to rake in some cash too 😭
Where is the proof?
Has this been stated before?
And even if it was true (big if) then at least the game is very good
Lurkit... DayZ and Reforger are proud members of the Lurkit program...
Streamers get paid for bringing players to the game and these servers, but then servers can't monetize and pay for this increased traffic and need for more servers 😅 
Streamers get paid by the platform they stream on
What is the lurkit program?
First I’m hearing of it
And the Lurkit program gives them keys for giveaways which boosts their platform revenues. https://www.lurkit.com/company/arma-reforger-creator-program Also, what exactly is the ARMA Reforger Regiment ("a small group of community creators who have been hand-picked due to the quality of their content and/or community contributions") and what is their reward?
Seems interesting
@coral torrent Would you be open for a chat about @carmine folio ‘s complaint?
Over DMs or whatever is most convenient for you.
We are a community that did this and stopped as soon as we saw your message about it, and would like to seek clarification to ensure we’re acting in the best interests of BIs defined rules.
The rules right now are are simple, you may not accept any money in return of anything that has to do with our game. You can sell them colorful discord names or what ever else, but thats it.
Technically the damage has been done
Would appreciate your grace, and I acknowledge that ignorance is not an excuse for violations.
Cool story vape take it easy man
Well no. You didn’t read the ToS lol
Not worth it Winters, lol
Yea I stopped myself seems like bait
It’s not I’m just stating regardless you still breached ToS
It’s BIs discretion to allow that or not
Even with corrective action
Tbf, I don't think the ToS covered that, thus the question and Legal's response through Arkensor. For sure, that is not a monetization issue in ARMA 3 or DayZ...
It does
Anything relating to their property or assets even YouTube monetization must be done with permission or correct terms of use
Giving people stuff in game requires you to utilize bohemias assets for profit
You could argue that it is a monetization issue with discord... What if an individual is just manually putting timed messages in that channel...?
Negative that’s just how it works you cannot profit off any of BIs assets
Dayz and Arma 3 were a horrible example of right and wrong and that’s why reforger has this issue
Many people came over here thinking this is no man’s land
Just like the many spawn wall DZE sellers
If you cannot afford to run a server don’t
Think grahme said that best in #other_ip_topics or up in here
I can't argue with that 😉 I was surprised at Legal's answer though because the only connection to the server or BI software was someone knowing when a server restart happened. As I read it it was discord pings in a donator channel for server restarts
Idk the way you have responded makes it feel like doing anything in this game is like walking on egg shells
Arkensor has made it clear probably a million times now I actually feel bad for the countless emails his teams side has to deal with.
Just don’t make money off the game boom and don’t infringe on others copyrighted work
Man it’s almost like you need a lawyer on retainer to do anything nowadays
even YouTube monetization must be done with permission or correct terms of use
That's country dependant, not every country runs the laws the same way
No just read the ToS it’s pretty clear
Like any game when you load it up for the first time there’s that long list you ignore
Yeah that’s what you need to read
When you hit check without reading you’re agreeing to these things
Just one thing on Youtube monetization, there is a very little known blanket permission for YT that no one seems to follow (but is applicable to Reforger): https://www.bohemia.net/community/game-content-usage-rules/monetization-youtube
Don't think I have ever noticed anyone putting in those lines in the video's description...
Despite what this yapologist is going on about, I don’t see Reforger here: https://www.bohemia.net/community/licenses/
I see Arma3?
Reforger == ARMA (for this use case, though not in game terms 😉 )
But the thing is like literally titled ARMA 3
This is not that game
Is all I’m saying
So i’m looking for the Arma Reforger End User License Agreement
Not what you linked isn't
Link on Steam Store page and presumably in the install folder on your PC
Told ya 😉
I just want to read where the above discussion is covered in legal terms
No hate or anything, looking to re-educate myself.
ToS are equivalent to a contract between two parties, in France for example:
- If a contract has an "abusive" close said close is void an null in it's entirety (even if it's only part of it that's wrong).
- Other laws dictate how you can restrict someone money making and content production about your IP, which doesn't allow you to restrict youtube monetization as long as it doesn't tarnish your company or someone.
- If you sell a product/service on French soil, you're bound to follow local law.
Due to previous points, in France you can make videos of yourself playing arma, get paid for said videos and as long as you don't tarnish BI they can't say much.
In another country same story wouldn't end the same way, that's why ToS and EULA are so long and indigest but still miss the spot
Pretty clear policy: `BOHEMIA INTERACTIVE a.s. hereby grants to any third party a personal, non-exclusive, non-transferable permission to use and display game content and to create derivative works (“Work”) based upon audio & video capture/recording of game content on the website: www.youtube.com, for worldwide commercial use based on full or demo versions of games from BOHEMIA INTERACTIVE a.s., under the following conditions:
There needs to be included into every Work and it's description the following notice:
"This video was created using content of Bohemia Interactive a.s."
"Copyright © 2025 Bohemia Interactive a.s. All rights reserved."
"See www.bistudio.com for more information."`
Yeah ToS isn’t really universal in the legal world.
My company has like 50 different license agreements based on origin country of business
Anyway, back on topic
You have permission to monetize on YT, just include the three lines in the description, which I don't remember anyone doing 🙂
If anyone can provide Reforger EULA about server notifications (server restart, not arma server restarts) in discord, i’d love to educate myself
Because the agreement i have with my provider which is running the script that does that doesn’t seem to have an issue with it
Since we pay them $1200/mo
This isn’t a mod that does that from Reforger, which I can see being a clear monetization violation
This is a script that monitors my Docker fleet.
Personally I think Legal overreached on that but I don't play Reforger neither do I have donator channels. That said, a donation in principle is supposed to have NO benefits over other players, so in BI's definition of donations vs monetization a separate channel where donators get a message would be monetization
I agree that it is overreach.
But Arma has rights over Arma and their IP, not my game server by OVH.
Is there a legal channel?
Appreciate you btw @paper prawn
Nope. Also the answer is just a chat message from Arkensor passing on Legal's decision, in a channel that has a lot of traffic at times, not pinned and not mentioned elsewhere 🤷 If you saw it you know BI's policy, if you missed it and didn't go back a couple hundred messages then you don't... BI need to tighten up their messaging and actually make it easier for people to find things like this!
Yeah the more accessible the better.
Not asking to talk to a BI lawyer, but documenting their decisions on common issues would be beneficial for both parties, imo.
I would think that if you indicate that server is restarting you're ok, if you indicate the reforger instance state you're not.
However that would be walking on a gray very thin line
Sure but such is the world of legal.
It’s all a big song and dance to ensure everyone walks away happy.
Just allow server monetization under the same rules as ARMA 3 and DayZ, no more. Don't allow modders to monetize and things will be much clearer. Maybe also remove the restriction on ARMA 2 monetization (not allowed)
Personally I think that Reforger server monetization is held up by the linkage with modding monetization (a much more thorny issue), but what do I know? 🤷
Totally, and if this was done by a mod, I’d be far more understanding.
Personally cannot wait for all the server owners who run RHS coming in here and crying because they cannot monetize 🤣
RHS historically and to this day forbids the use of their mods on monetized servers. As do CUP and others in ARMA 3 and many mods in DayZ do the same now...
Felt and heard. We’re up to like $1200 all said and done.
Does a script reading a log file created by the game fall under the EULA and is a game log created by the game considered to be Bohemia's property?
@delicate grove please inform your community that you are discussing the matter with BI and they should not come in here to cause ruckus.
Nobody has asked them to come in here, and they are aware of this discussion. They are all paying customers of BI's commercial/consumer services, just like myself. We're appreciative of the platform for open discussion, and I, along with that community, acknowledge that your folks' own rules, policies, and staff discretion will govern this Discord, not ours.
If you are asking if you can provide paid access to e.g. killfeed or other ingame data, the answer is the same right now. No. Also subject to change, but until then you have to wait please
why perpetuate a free service to the public if you can't afford it? If the public is not willing to support you with free donations without perks then obviously they don't value your service, so why continue it if it puts this amount of financial stress?
That is not what I am asking, respectfully. I am asking if we are allowed to:
- Use Ubuntu on a paid dedicated host with ssh access to execute a script.
- Use Docker to provide telemetry about containerized workloads, including but not limited to,
stdoutfrom processes running inside/files stored within said container - Use Discord Webhooks to inform players who give their money in support of our community and staff when those containers enter a "restarting" state.
so you want to incentivize people to donate by giving them a webhook telling them when a server restarts?
I'm asking BI.
you are selling a service based on artifact of the game
what do you think the answer is gonna be?
But I do not use anything from the game to determine that the container has entered that state. So how is that?
", including but not limited to, stdout from processes running inside/files stored within said container"
And not explicitly Arma Reforger. Again, the state of the container is determined by the Docker Daemon. Not Arma. Not Enfusion.
This feels like trying to put a stranglehold on any sort of anything in proximity to Arma.
well why are you giving that notification? so people can join on restart?
the stronghold is already there, it feels like you are trying to wiggle out of it by vague wording
you said this: Does a script reading a log file created by the game fall under the EULA and is a game log created by the game considered to be Bohemia's property?
It's not vague at all. I've explicitly described, to a "T", how I am reaching the information that is used to inform our community.
Sure, and I've elaborated a bit, but a definite answer on this would be awesome.
Stranglehold*
you guys also run RHS right? do you think this complies with their EULA?
this would definately not comply with our EULA
well they run RHS 
I think there's a disconnect somewhere, here, lol.
How does RHS come in to this?
Soul Assassin, are you a representative of Bohemia Interactive in this discussion?
(genuine question)
no I'm representitive of Soul_Assasin
since we have again reached this part of the conversation @delicate grove its your time to write to BI legal department an email.
Can do.
the monetization mail address might also work
Thank you for that direction.
ack
But a s a representative of RHS I can tell you right now that we do see the scenario you described as monetization, and therefore would be in breach of our EULA
You're welcome to join our community and explain that, or if you're willing to tell me where I can find your EULA to share with counsel for review, I can do that too.
if you are using RHS on that server
they use RHS on all of their servers.
I assume just on the mod page?
i DM'd it to you.
Baller, ty.
with your councel lol? you should have read the EULA when you accepted to start using it
Some people who play on our servers like to apply their profession in support of the community 
Look, respectfully
Nobody here (at our community) is interested in doing anything but the right thing. I personally disagree, however, with being told I can't do X or Y on a host I pay good money for. If i was touching anything to do with Arma or RHS, I would immediately walk away from the concept.
But I'm being rubbed the wrong way by this "well you run X so you will bow to Y" or "well that's kinda like what's in this line from our TOS, but I can't validate it, so stop"
When the reality is that this is all done completely abstract from BI or RHS.
you are being told that something that was given to you for free cannot be used by you to make money
But I'm going to end the conversation there and ensure I follow the proper channel for a concrete answer, on which I will base my decision.
you can do whatever you want, but then you will have to do it without RHS
you seem to think that the supply chain stops with you. You got the game server for free, the mods for free. You think these were free to make? You pay for your infrastructure, and you feel like you need to recoup. But that game server and those mods came with an agreement that you can use them only if you don't charge people for services.
Turn on donations, give your service to all your community members, paying and nonpaying, give better and better services with time for all and you are good to go
noone will bother you
dont sell your donations, sell yourself
I hear you, but no need to be presumptous.
I do not make any of those assumptions.
Thank you so much, genuinely, for your creative contributions to the modding community for this game.
Top notch stuff, explains why it's so widely used.
Wish I could offer compensation for it.
Since you are a rep for yourself and RHS while we wait for email confirmation you can rest your eyes because we will be suspending this service
(Even tho this doesn't effect your mod what so ever in any aspect at all regardless how you spin it)
It doesn't matter if it "affects" his mod, what matters it that by USING his mod on your server you agree to comply with the RHS EULA which states you are not allowed to monitize your server
It's not monetized plain and simple we will wait for BI legal to respond and not have this handled in a discord thank you
It also does affect RHS because they explicitly say in their EULA that they forbid any monetization including donate-reward systems, which this would be
(Even tho this doesn't effect your mod what so ever in any aspect at all regardless how you spin it)
This tells me plenty about your intentions already, You are trying to circumvent Reforger EULA rules on monetization by trying to be smart. Just don't, its that simple.
wait for the monetisation rules to be established like they have been for A3 and DayZ. people like you ruin it for the rest
"people like you" is crazy lol, but again, you are heard.
Sounds like a review of EULA is in order to include supporting infrastructure.
Well you aren't the first and definitely not the last to ask here about some roundabout way of providing monetisation, nothing personal
Probably annoying, and I hear that.
Really not looking to profit of your teams work.
At all.
Or anyone's, for that matter.
to clarify, wasn’t it confirmed by a BI employee at one point that the RHS EULA is unenforceable outside of removing mods which use RHS as a dependency from the workshop, as you can not dictate who or what server is allowed to use your mods? genuinely just curious on the scope of RHS eula enforceability and whether this is correct or i may be misremembering
From this message I gather that is in the works, but I wouldn't know.
#ip_rights_violations message
Appreciate your acknowledgement, nonetheless.
Regardless of what is said here
Service is suspended as I stated
until BI legal team emails us back because this is not a discussion for discord mods or mod devs to have unless they speak for BI legal team
So we're enforcing "would-be" EULA's though, correct?
As RUMOR states, we've simply opened it up to our entire Discord community to "sell ourselves", as I quite liked that comment from Soul Assassin.
It seems pretty straightforward to me and most everyone else(Including B.I.). Selling access to files created by the game is against the EULA, pretty simple to comprehend tbh.
You can refuse to allow specific servers from running your mod...
BI just won't enforce that from their end iirc
Nobody is selling access to files. Not trying to continue conversation, but I want to make that clear.
so then it won’t be enforced? and as such you can’t refuse them ?
We had a bash script that would poll the docker daemon and send a discord message when the container was in a restarting state. Because of the grey area according to BI, we've opted to simply open that up to the entire community while we await response.
Yeah, even though this has been discussed all day and new folks seem to be coming in and interpreting things, let's not lose track of the original question this morning (that was asked of BI whether it was acceptable). These folks at least came and asked
so then how would it be enforced it that’s not the case ? @paper prawn
maybe we move this question to other ip actually
RHS, WCS, and BI all work together pretty closely. I can promise if RHS asks for a mod not to be used, and you refuse, you will face BI.
No idea why that's the case, but.
It is the trend in my own personal experience.
Probably has to do with RHS operating under a license agreement with BI, but IANAL.
Nah, you have the license with RHS, RHS can enforce their license terms and have legal advisors to do so...
regardless of such, just looking for clarification on how the external EULA can be enforced if not by BI
Ah, neat-o.
But in ARMA 3 mods have had scripted solutions to deal with this
A lawyer approaching someone over Discord sounds like comedy gold
not permissible to inhibit the functioning/launch of the game/server anymore if that’s what you’re referring to
I doubt that they would have even noticed... However, now they have...
It has most definitely happened before
And if it happened to me you damn well know I’m laughing their ass right outta my DMs
Honestly, the solution to this is Reforger server monetization in line with other games. You won't be able to use RHS if you do, many servers seem to have alternatives and you can sell priority queues removing the need for notifications
Except RHS is subject to Reforger's workshop licenses (right?) like anyone else, so I'm not sure they'd have a choice unless paid mods became a thing (not saying they will, only theoretical)
Reforger Workshop allows any license afaik
Legitimate license that is
Oh fr?
I though it was only what is outlined on their workshop wiki
Which is a set of BI-issued licenses
As it's still ultimately their game
Yeah, RHS can use their's, if CUP ever did something they can use CUP's license and Anvil (Reforger ACE) uses GNUPL
Wonder how enforcement works, there.
I have the best license
Personally I'd advise against any use of an APL license... too many inconsistencies and the licenses were written in the days before Steam Workshop...
Mod teams enforce their license, but just like on Steam, they can show the workshop owner their license, show the infringement and demand action...
Cause BI are legally responsible for the Reforger workshop. Valve are responsible for the ARMA3/DZSA workshops...
If your server is bare metal, what if your discord notification just notified when the server turned back on, not nessesarily when the Reforger server starts?
We've decided to just follow what's being said in here, rather than fighting with EULA. Seems like the best way forward, as we'd like to keep a working relationship with the team here on their preferred terms.
even if that was the case, RHS uses custom factions and arsenals so to get any of their gear in regular conflict you need to make a dependent mod.
smart choice 
Still don’t agree with your precedent, but that’s neither here nor there.
“outside of removing mods which use RHS as a dependency”
and i dont think a servers entire history being around bending EULAs and TOS's is good for the game either, but that is also neither here nor there.
im saying its kinda not possible to use RHS in conflict unless you run their scenarios or make dependent mods, i have a hypothesis that it was intentionally done this way for this exact reason, which is very smart ngl. 
Haven’t been associated with Stolen Liberty for a while now. Literally before me, and I’ve done a lot where I can for these guys. If anyone has any qualms, i’m pretty reasonable. We’re trying to shoot straight, here. I’m paying a good chunk out of pocket, and I’ve realized I’m cool with that reality. Somehow servers still run Bakhmut, though.
hypothetically you could just find an arsenal mod created by someone else on the workshop to counteract this (even though i highly advise against skirting rules, EULA, or TOS) and yeah i think you’re right about the second part aswell
imagine if DG just used WCS_Arsenal 🤣
prob should stop not the topic of the channel lul
shhhhh how did you know lmao
Or I just make darkgru_arsenal for dark gru
then RHS would have the ability to take it down. 
Who said it had anything to do with WCS or RHS
or any of their work
I have yet to witness a takedown over arsenal configs.
Additionally to my understanding of custom licenses is that Bohemia will only enforce their own liscenses. They provide a short list to choose from and that is what they are legally obligated to uphold. Anything outside of that they won't pursue. Meaning unless you're planning on lawyering up for an international lawsuit for violating your custom license you're probably SOL. This is my understanding based on many conversations in here.
Your TL:DR is No, they would not have that ability.
I would love to be corrected by a member of Bohemia Legal as it would be personally beneficial.
@clear marlin
@restive inlet why such ping?
It is the person who is involved in self-proclaiming himself the owner of mods that are not his.
And the ping is because I don't understand why you still have it here. Kind regards.
How many linked XBox accounts in that profile 👀
unlimited 😂
Meant the guy you pinged... bloody hell that's a lot 😉
That guy only makes up lies, I expelled him from my community and he left in pain
Of all the things he says about me and my community, we only say it as sarcasm and he uses that to tell lies and look good, but the mod seller is the one
According to this, it is prohibited and he is dedicated to selling mods, you can check it in the workshop
My community also bought mods from him and ended up deleting them because we don't let him sell his mods on my server.
This was the reason for the expulsion
Now it's up to Arma Reforger management to take action. They banned me once and realized I didn't break any rules; it was all a misunderstanding.
I didn't want to report anyone, but there is the evidence, so they stop telling lies about me and my community.
id like to see the attempt lmao
Considering Darkgru removed RHS prior to that going up because they don't want to run RHS you wont see an attempt.
exactly🤣
@clear marlin
At no point was there any mention of your community. It's about how you behave as a moderner, whether you respect the moderner's food or not.
Did he also plagiarize a mod from you?
@clear marlin @open frost @restive inlet @terse current I see you guys have read the channel description wrong. This isnt the #air_your_drama channel. this is the #ip_rights_violations channel. if someone is violating your rights or breaking BI rules you can use the email listed in the channel description to send the details to BI
Oh that's good, I have it, I'll send the evidence.
Say it for yourself, you're stealing content and ideas from Reloadz, you use GTA content and say they're your creations.
Stop making things up to get attention, you're too old for that.
@faint nacelle here right?
Is it also possible to report harassment against a member of my community? They're exposing their identity and creating false publicity using arma reforger a means of communication.
They are using photos, real names, exposing family and friends
Such harassment/doxxing is not our job unless it came through this server (publicly either/or DM), but likely Discord, better to report them directly
The user filed a complaint, but the lawyer first sent it to the media outlet where the problem originated, in this case the Doberman Studios server.
I understand, I know that toxicity is inevitable but they used Arma Reforger as a trigger for this problem, they continue to make explicit content about it and share it on social media.
that becomes police matter I suppose
we handle only matters in this discord
It hasn't scaled that much but that's the point, we just want to avoid that kind of problems
I'll make the report then, thanks for the explanation
Hasn't it escalated that far? This guy is literally playing the victim after destroying the entire Hispanic community, stealing money from RHS, for which he's already received several warnings from the BI modding team.
Now he comes here saying we're the bad guys. After carrying out DDoS attacks, he threatened me directly on FB and is looking for any excuse to destroy what my community has achieved, leaving this 30-year-old baby aside.
I apologize for continuing with the topic, but I simply can't stay silent. I just want my server to thrive, but another guy comes along saying his mod was stolen just like mine. Believe me, it's quite infuriating, especially if it's the same guy who makes the same arguments just because he has psychological problems.
But as they say in my army, "give me solutions, not problems."
I propose that you silence me and this guy, Jic, so you can listen to and address Jimmy's case.
Lol
This guy isn't sane. He says they've exposed information about one of his members. But he actually passed along a photo with all of Doberman personal information.
Just send evidence of buying and selling mods, this is illegal in Arma Reforger, if this does not serve as evidence, i send it directly to technical support.
you may have missed this message.
I understand that, that's why I didn't continue with the topic. I will fix everything directly with Bohemian support.
(was meant for above)
Not looking to snitch or anything, but just wanted to reach out and confirm this with the RHS folks.
To the untrained eye, I'd say that is 100% the model from Arma 3 which is being ported over into Reforger by another creator.
It is not my intention to witch hunt him or send y'all looking for his info, but more or less to hopefully clarify for him and let him know that the work he is doing might not be worth his time if it will just be removed right when he posts it.
I appreciate the time that everyone takes to clarify this for him and me.
Also looking to bring this to the attention of y'all incase you can do some action against this creator on CGTrader; as it seems it is taking advantage of folks who don't understand the whole "Game ready model" trope.
@echo orchid @native narwhal
ah luisb, classic
will be handled thanks
Do these models look sus? https://www.cgtrader.com/3d-models/vehicle/military-vehicle/btr-152-337c82f8-18e8-44ba-982d-47fd8197dcef
someone uploaded the Nimitz to steam workshop: http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=596414636 What do I need to do to have it taken down there?
This is despite him assigning credit to you EDIT: instead of passing it off as his own work, I take it? If so, then sign into Steam and flag it with the icon in the lower right under the screenshot.
Chortles, thanks, I'll wait til tomorrow and have a good nights sleep before taking any further action
Is it legal in reforger to make captures to the textures of another mod and upload them to yours without referencing the author (me in this case) or use it as a dependency?
I found a mod who has literally taken screenshots of my RHS retextures and uploaded them as his own to the workshop without even contacting me.
My textures uploaded since 8/8/24
The mod textures uploaded this afternoon, every spot of the camo is the same and is clearly a screenshot of mine (Look at the resolution, he dont even try to make it proportional)
what license have you released your mod with?
Same as RHS
and what does the original texture look like in comparison
This is the original
Is not the only one texture, he have it for uniforms and vest, all the same, screenshot with strange image proportions
For clarification this is unreleased content atm for this exact reason and I currently am unable to access my computer
To delete it. I think I published it but I don’t know how vehicle arsenal configs work so you can’t even use em. Guess I’m kinda fucked considering i can’t use my puter and I already have a strike for a fallout scenario I made a year ago 😭
If the license does not permit credited reuploads then the answer is no. You may file a DMCA takedown against the mod then
Already did that through the game system, is not the first time this user do something like this, is know in the Spanish Community. Is it necessary to do it also through the web or something? This is the mod
https://reforger.armaplatform.com/workshop/651A6C5B51F035F0-Spanish_Reorger_Mod_RHS
Seeing what he did with the textures of my mod, I'm surprised that the models are his own, I even think that the G36K he has is ripped, just look at the model in workbench
He changed but ok
Luis? Haha no
He did. He made a model for me that is 100% legit.
But of course once someone gone bad means he is always bad
That’s not the issue think about all the users that were punished because he wanted some cash
That doesn’t make you a good person after
Most of his models dont even have interior so they are not even suitable for Arma at all.
It seems he still offers ripped stuff for sale so doing something legit will not redeem him.
So he shold get rid of all those models and do a fresh start ?
Well. Yes?
That would be only way to start redeeming his reputation
I see
I know defending someone who used to be bad is bad. But i can assure you, that guy is a very kind and helpful person.
So if he makes a fresh start and gets redeemed thats fair.
https://reforger.armaplatform.com/news/workshop-licenses-and-ip-faq all the way at the bottom. ingame reports are processed at low priority and may take a while
Just don't defend him before there's properly something to defend. If he still sells rips, nothing has changed.
Copy
He said he got rid off all the ripped models a long time ago, the ones that are on his CG now are all 100% legit, he even offered to send the models so that RHS or the ones who dmcad him can check it
@echo orchid sorry to ping you, would you be open for a chat with Luis ?
Done, let's hope this works and this user stops doing this nonsense, at least with public mods. Thanks!
Too much time is spent talking about what's wrong rather than what's right around here, so let's try changing that:
Ryzhkov is imo the perfect example of what a trustworthy cgtrader creator looks like for using their work in Arma. Long time creator, with regular uploads of assets of a consistent (but growing) quality bar, based around a clear and specific niche, with lots of social credit accrued on the platform, with prices that clearly aren't too good to be true (but still a good deal!). They show their workings and process via their Youtube channel too.
Also already associated with and vouches for their work being used in arma reforger https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRJX9uZ0TPE
My 3d-models of Varta MRAP and KBA-105 Shkval turret in mod for game Arma Refoger.
Game Server: Conflict in Europe
Discord: https://discord.gg/jbjZHmdSEy
My personal Discord server about 3d art: https://discord.gg/UWUuq34FrV
well, the channel is for discussing violations. so by nature the chat can be rather depressing in that sense
as unfortunate as that is
I can see that Luisb has deleted a lot of his listings, and that searching his username in Google -- it does appear that there has been a previous attempt at being a legitimate modeller.
However, the reputation is finished. He's scammed a lot of money out of people. That luisbcompany name is going to be tarnished forever.
And still, his listings are very suspiciously cheap or have a weird pricing pattern. $39.99 gets me a small radio, or entire vehicles? An extra $10 for something even mroe detailed?
I don't buy it.
I don't consider 2 months ago to be a "long time" > #ip_rights_violations message
? what for?
To redeem himself, he even said he can send you the models to show proof that these are 1000% made by himself
But false reporting legitimate models is fair to you ?
Honestly, given the amount of people he has screwed over, all the hundreds of hours wasted because of ripped models, I'm much more inclined to believe in the RHS team than anything from Luis.
If he wants to start fresh he should probably start by chosing a different name.
There doesn't really seem to be an earnest attempt at rebranding as a legitimate artist...
He made models for me and a friend who is 1000% legitimate.
He worked for flightsims aswell
honest question, how can you be so sure of this?
The real danger with Luis is that he's obviously familiar enough with 3d modelling tools to know how to obfuscate certain details.
I hope for your sake it is as you say, 1000% legitimate, but if someone sells 9 scam products and claims the 10th is legit, I wouldn't trust it personally
Because i saw WIP Pictures, he made the model exactly like i wanted, with changes if something was not right.
He used real life reference to model.
I hope you're right. But to me and I imagine most others, there's no way they will ever trust him on history alone. I have nothing else to add to this conversation beyond that
my dms are open
i only reported the models that were ripped
also, please stop defending proved rippers, thanks
I love you
I'm curious, is the code stolen the code you are charging premium for? Or is this different code that was stolen?
copy past my code, almost everything
Is it because you are charging people for premium features?
no
Wonder why then
Because people think they can do anything that doesn't belong to them 🤷
Where do I email about a server that paid for a mod they only use
I was being sarcastic haha, context:
||https://reforger.armaplatform.com/workshop/64C4C79C66472DE8-DISCORD_MOD||
lil bit of summer sale as well:
if (Premium.isPremium() == false && Premium.runningPromotion())
formattedMessage += "PREMIUM 25% OFF - Until April, 5th | HereGoesThePersonIWasRespondingTooPaymentLink";
Send Arma Reforger data to Discord.
Need help setting up the mod?
Discord: https://discord.gg/mCssmbfQmv
report to the infringement email thanks
yaa, all done now
what happen if the mod is just a connector to a bot, and the bot has premium features?
i mean the "premium" part its not in the game side ( im not saying this is the case, just asking)
I see your point, I would say something's (not just this) do cross into a grey area. So I can not offer you an answer on that unfortunately
imho if you can use the bot for basic use for free, and premium involves things like using the database ( store stuff like kills, playtime and other stuff)
its fine.
i dont know what says the EULA about "ads" in the game.
Displaying an advertisement is a commercial use of it's supports
It's bot allowed because you can't sufficiently disconnect the two. It's the same bad way to try to get around the ban as "I'll make the full mod for you, but only the model part in Blender is paid, the rest is free"
Hi, a few days ago I reported here and on BI's DMCA mail a report that a user had taken screenshots of my textures and used them as his own. I would like to know how to remove the report, since I have managed to reach an agreement with the author and he will use my mod as a dependency for the content he wants
Hi, you can email them again 🙂
Power of communication 🦾
Power of inside man
@native narwhal there is a mod in GTA5 that uses RHS Stuff are you guys aware on this ?
Ni, send links pls
I send it via DM
Curious how many people works on the infringements team ?
Whyd the Dragger mod get banned off the workshop?
This is not why mod got banned channel.
We dont have that information
also the maker might have just removed it. youll have to ask from that direction what has happened
I would like to ask a clarifying question on Donations, is this okay to ask here?
Specifically in regards to people purchasing an asset and giving it to a mod team.
giving bought asset is usually against its license
you would have to contact the seller to make sure thats ok
it is essentially you who buy yourself the right to use the asset
Tracking.. That makes sense.
if explained many makers/sellers probably are fine with it.
but you cant do it without permission
So to lay it out cleanly.
If an asset is purchased by a person then permission requested and granted for them to offer that asset to the mod team, it is all within the acceptable bounds for Reforger?
generally speaking that sounds like its ok. maker/seller has got their money and you have permission to transfer the license and asset you brought to a mod team to use. Im not in a position to give you a green light though 😅 I just moderate the discord
I'm tracking, I just want to be crystal clear as things are sort of muddy atm.
Of course the safe option is just to pay for it ourselves or use any money donated to do so.
that would be less of a hassle
I would think (not being a lawyer) that a donation of a model - so long as it meets all the criteria of what is a donation - is no different from a cash one 🤔 BI's definition is Donation is a voluntary gift without any counter-value. You do not offer any perks or rewards for such donations and players do not expect anything back. This is allowed and does not require our approval.
That said, given the hassle of making sure that the mod people actually have permission from the licensor, it is a lot easier on a modder's side to just get a pure cash donation to cover the cost to license the model directly...
Yeah much less of a hassle just to use cash.
3d asset licenses typically dont allow giving the material to anyone else. donation or sale
Okay if I have a donations tab for my Milsim unit and under one of the incentives it says “we will make you a custom patch that you can wear in our server” is that breaking the no monetary modding rule?
No money would go directly to the modder only to the organization they are attached to
Yeah, that's not allowed, not a donation if you get something that others don't get
Not allowed under the server monetization policy not the modding no-monetization policy...
You could apply for server monetization and that would be not a problem, but then there would be certain mods that you cannot use unless you get explicit permission from them to do so, notably CUP mods (other than Terrains) and the RHS mods.
Definitely can’t because it’s transactional in a way
For the simple reason that the buyer would be able to "donate" the model to multiple people, undercutting the whole pay model of selling it on a marketplace in the first place.
Has Bohemia ever clarified why they don't currently support these actions and isn't interested in changing their licenses to do so?
Nvm, chatgpt came through on this one. 🙂
I’d like to enquire about something that I’m not sure of if it violates tos or not
If that’s ok
sure, the channel is here for that
So it involves a discord server
So it’s a command for checking a players lifetime stats on an in game server (kills, deaths, kd, stuff like that) yet it is only available to people who pay a monthly fee to it
I’m unsure if it violates TOS or not
I’ll get a screenshot
This isn’t the whole thing but it’s most of it
I’m just unsure on where it sits because as far as I’m aware it’s not available to other members of the discord
Reforger servers cannot be monetized at this time and this seems to be just a way to circumvent that tbh. Could ask Legal for a definitive answer though
Doesn’t affect anything In the game server though, it’s only a discord perk
Currently there is no differentiation between the two situations, people ask about that a lot
There have been suggestions by BI employees that at some point in the future (we don't know when) there will be revisions to allow server hosts to offer something but we don't know what that is for now
Look at the forwarded message
Server EULA says that you may not use the content or any parts of for comercial purposes. So no, @prime stratus. It is NOT allowed.
Cool
But if it were available to non paying members it would be?
If the perk stays there only if anybody pays then no
You can't for example keep the feature hostage if people do not pay/donate to it
So what if it was available to only specific non paying members? Like people who joined the server in a particular time frame
If there is any commercial transaction, for personal use or global/community use then it is not allowed. Plain and simple
So if it can be accessed through payment, then it’s not allowed
How do you enforce the no server monetization rule?
I’m assuming how it’s done now
Someone reports it to bi -> bi investigates -> any violations of tos or other stuff will be dealt with accordingly
I’ve never done this before just guessing that’s how it’s done
@midnight compass do I go ahead and use the email in the pins now?
Hang on I can’t find it
How about this? The mod got removed from WS, but now the bloke thinks just because the user is uploading the mod themselves, it is not against the rules?
So they’re selling the source code of a mod?
Yeah because they got banned when they had a paywall up for additional features, so now they give you instructions when you purchase
Yea that violates tos
The selling classes thing I’m not sure on personally
I mean you wouldn't be able to make the classes without workbench, so that's why I think it's a no no
Also his work is banned so anyone reuploading it is ban evading.
But detecting it would prove to be a challenge, no?
Sure. Probably so. But it's still that if he and his work has been banned.
infringements is ok for that
So, I thought Road to Bakhmut by Stolen Liberty was banned?
If so, how is 75th allowed to run that?
Workshop ID: 652CFAA435286661
Defanged BattleMetrics URL w/ Modlist: hxxps[://]www.battlemetrics[.]com/servers/reforger/32444069
@stiff oasis, the mod publisher, for awareness.
since we are on the topic of a mod that was banned here some more
https://reforger.armaplatform.com/workshop/652CFAA435286661-CCRTB and
https://reforger.armaplatform.com/workshop/645A0B4EA9122291 and
https://reforger.armaplatform.com/workshop/64F6F39DEE09C0A7-Warforourhome/scenarios also here you go
https://youtu.be/nCmoaGPpYTc?si=50dMCWSQdBS4e9Ic
Road to Bakhmut but updated for personal conflict scenario. StolenLiberty owns the original map and assets.
Welcome To The Eastern Front. Gear Up and Strap In.
🚨SUPPORT THE GUYS🚨
Toxic - https://youtube.com/@Toxic-arma?si=mekS2m1MD6b4Ojwa
Tommy - https://youtube.com/@dottxm1?si=tm8J-olbt7GJMJGB
- Server : OPR FARGO
PATREON
https://patreon.com/splif?utm_medium=clipboard_copy&utm_source=copyLink&utm_campaign=creatorshare_fan&utm_content=...
Any chance we could just use our old map again? Seems like enforcement isn't really a priority, unless I'm being presumptous and this was just missed before.
(And again, we do not associate with those people anymore)
I've posted these here because I've already reported all of these links to Mario and have been met with silence. I want to ensure that enforcement is being shared across the whole community. When we ran the map, even after making significant changes it still attracted unwanted attention like flies to shit.
If enforcement is no longer actively addressing this map, we need to know. Unfortunately, it's available on a public GitHub link, so anyone can download and republish it. This will be a never-ending cycle.
To be clear, I honestly don't care if we can't run it anymore—we’ve made plenty of other maps since then and are currently building an entirely new Bakhmut map from scratch. But can we please get an official and clear stance on this? Because right now, it looks like enforcement isn’t as strong or consistent as it used to be.
as far as Im aware no bans been lifted. MarieE would need to chime in. Though I think he was out of office for spell there so things are probably slow because of that
Ah, appreciate it. Hope he's doin' ok. No rush, just seeking clarity 🫡
I am guessing from previous experience that bans like that dont get lifted to actually give some gravity to the punishment.
ack
some assets that stolen liberty was using was banned, not the actual map.
The map isn't the problem, it was some of the assets being used at the time.
Using that logic, nobody can use real life locations as maps.
Therefore chernarus would also be banned, which its not.
(yes chernarus is based off of a real place too, or a mixture of real places)
The map was open source! Assets such as the arsenal and others were banned. If the DEVS had an issue with an open source map it would have been removed. If I'm in the wrong for using an Open Source Map then so be it. I'm not sure why you guys are so butt hurt about a map that is free to use is being used?
respectfully I'd just let them discuss it, I don't think these comments will help your case. but the open source nature of it is kind of irrelevant here, one would be able to make the case that people monetized their labor in enfusion, therefor the open source content is still "poisoned".
if I recall right it was all the work as a whole
the them was not the issue, what the banned developers did was.
and Opensourcing it later dont matter.
So in theory, if someone did RTB from scratch thats still a no-go?
if its exact match then probably as it would be hard to prove its done from scratch
the theme of the map was not a problem though
I would recommend gettin some different piece of land nerby and making map out of that
theres plenty of ground to choose from
I get where you're coming from, but I feel like RTB was also a very popular map as well. I don't feel like it does justice to cut losses and try some nearby areas as it wouldn't have the same playstyle as RTB does.
popularity plays no part in it
ban means ban and is there to keep people from breaking rules
I personally don't see anything wrong with RTB. Not picking sides here, but sure maybe the devs did stuff they weren't supposed to. Doesn't mean that we have to shame the map. Reforger was meant to be highly modable with being mods shared etc.
Thats the way I see it at least
nothing wrong with the theme of the map like I said
just the author(s)
and when authors get banned like that, all their work go
and their work cant be given to someone else to avoid the ban
To be fair, do you know how many stolen assets are currently being used in reforger?
no I dont
but you can report such to the email at the top
or their owners so they can DMCA
the rules still stand and people who get caught get their punishments
simple as that
A good portion of these models people are using, whether it be vehicles, structures, boxes or even weapons are more than likely stolen. It's just hard to track down the source of the original content.
Not saying its every mod out there.

If popular maps start being banned, the overal population of reforger will drop significantly. 👀
doubtful
and mod popularity is no factor
you just need to accept this
theres no way around it
I've never said that mod popularity has a factor in whether the map is banned or not
then what are you saying?
is there any point?
Not what you think I'm saying. I think you're trying to push it to something it isn't. I came here with some observations and that's that. There's nothing more to it.
All the custom assets on the map are banned.
he didnt use any dependencies all his own models
Reworded what I said. The map used both vanilla assets and modded assets. modded assets were banned, resulting in the map being banned.
yeah i get that but a majority of what was used was custom assets
anyway
u guys can argue back and forth all you want the Whole map in itself is banned regardless of open source we went thru this all before when SpearHead had the map live on all our server Stolen liberty then broke ToS which cause his account to be banned which includes all mods he made and assets used to be banned
i have fought this battle for awhile and we didn't win regardless of the open source battle everything including the map is banned per BI
that.
Id say the matter has concluded for the night. BI folks need to chime in at the links above
does this also mean Ram has to remove his work from RHS? and the version of shervika also up has to be removed?
I dont think Ram has been fully banned. just the mod in question
but that thing may need some time to be resolved.
Id recommend just waiting for now.
he and his mods are completely banned off the workshop.
all of his mods are gone
yeh whys seriivka still up then
Fantastic question, but doesn't need answers right now or anything. Just has been lingering with us for a while, too.
great question
exquisite question
Magnificent inquiry
Transcendent proposition
No. As long as RHS mods do not reupload the violating content (which they sure won't) there is no reason. We just stopped him individually from publishing anything as he seemingly can not be trusted with control over mods
So, Ram’s friends can reupload banned mods without “violating content”?
no - read above #ip_rights_violations message Mario's comment
No TvT in reforger, understandable 
I don't get it?
Rams banned for “malicious” content in lobby, which used for normal TvT functionality in game without normal session modes
if it was the act of only one person, that this person was moved away from the project, and that the project is now clean, it is a possibility to revert back to a "clean" status for a mod
when a whole team rips things however, it is very hard to not to be suspicious and to believe them when they say the project is clean - and that's a per-case decision whether BI trusts them or not
Wheaton's Law, as usual
Not sure what you meant with TvT? Anyone uplading his or similar maliciuous DRM mechanims into their mods will be banned. That is a simple rule to follow. We do not care about the rest of the contents of the mod in question.
what legal options are there to protect content from unfair use?
I wrote a whole blog post about this: https://reforger.armaplatform.com/news/workshop-licenses-and-ip-faq
The map was made open source with assets that they did not have permission to distribute like that, it is not only banned because of the group actions but because of IP rights issues as well.
@idle knoll Thank you for the reports, they will be dealt with soon.
Running a mod vs making one are 2 different things
Mods are public. And to be used unless stated otherwise. You cannot privatize a mod. If someone does my bet is Mario would knock on your door.
Specific EULAs state individuals cannot use mods or restrict access or use in general but tbh it’s never enforced
Everything is changing and constantly being altered I believe bohemias ToS will change down the road too for reforger just a matter of how things are handled a lot of disconnected points at times