#references♥_1450-1470
1 messages · Page 36 of 1
Doesn’t look right and you could achieve the same effect with a pin mechanism attaching the top plate to the plackart
But historical cuirasses did have a leather strap attaching the placard to the breastplate
The rivet fill pretty much the same function (the rivet can slide to allow movements)
Pretty much was the most widespread way too, even in HRE lands where the riveting was more "popular" you still find strapped cuirasses there too
lol just looks italian and then like western european since french, netherlandish, spanish, english, and german all imported italian armour . . . .
and then germans often kept the insides of their arm guards together using leather straps under the plates and you had to strap them onto your body with the same straps kek
so i dunno bad opinion
Requires less metal and you don’t need the extra leather at the front just on the inside if needed makes more sense
There’s a pin in the middle that holds them together that’s what I mean
Medieval people were SO stupid !!!
did they know anything???!
If I had a time machine I would go back in time and teach them that their way don't make sense to me
How would that require any less metal?
You will have placards and YOU will like them
It’s a small pin compared to an entire belt buckle think about it
it's really not that deep buddy
can the pins be removable?
or are they more permanent
cause if they are permanent then it would make sense to have a belt buckle to be able to remove the placard with ease
biggest nitpick i ever did see
haubergeon will be my only dorsal protection idc 'bout nun
NOOOOOOOO
Why cause yourself the pain
Touche
Has the full version of the game been released?
Willie found a new job
strap can have more flexibility
jarvis send that pietro monte quote about sliding rivets malfunctioning under repeated blows or whatever
#leatherforthewin
idk man the rivets look kinda sexy yo
also are the crescents on some of the ingame cuirasses stop ribs?
brigandiner
they’re all based off surviving pieces
i see
i have no idea about history but all of those pics look sick
Maybe you should…
Nah check this shit doesn’t he look way cooler?
reminds me of for honor
Look how big his muscles are
That’s how you know he’s a real knight
Laugh at me all you want but this guy is “historical” as it gets and he can’t even make it up the stairs
there's several issues in the pic
the "gambeson" being one of them
it doesn't help the silouhette
just shouldnt be there in the first place
That’s why the strongest knight of the group got to wear the greathelm - they were the most powerful of them all
Why has there been so much ragebait and scam links within the past week or so?
lmao
(oops mb)
Did the militia of visby have outdated armor compared to the Danish? (I know this isn't 1450s but just a question)
0/10 bait, I don't like ragebait but if you gonna do it, the least you can do is make good ragebait.
Leave Sir Cumference alone
Trust me theres a lot you don’t see cause of automod. Those particular ones are impossible to automod unfortunately as you cant automod images like that. But we get a few every week of those ones plus dozens you never have to bother with
what
my doctor accidentally said that today during my annual checkup, I was trying not to grin bc he was being super chill and professional
it normally isn’t funny but I guess I was in that silly mood
diddyblud
behind setztartschen apparently
idk where else to put this but i thought yall would find the armour i wore for halloween at school interesting
ever so slightly oversized but i'll grow into it soon enough
Sir this is the reference channel
you couldve put that in #general-catfish-🐱🐟 or #halfsword-chat-⚔ ig
shut up nerd
yes
yall look at armour here
so i thought it'd be fitting aha..
nnnno thats armour
not proper armor
butter galvanised ill-fitted maille,
cheap metal, oversized, bad silhouette sallet
same thing for the arms and gauntlets
this channel is for historical references
refer to this
im tired boss
skull emoji
I can assure you everything in that costume is something not to be referenced
That’s all bastardized unresearched reproductions of various pieces
In fact I believe that arm harness is based on 14th century English plate which doesn’t fit the time frame of this game
(which is fine for costume armor for halloween or collecting whatever you do you with your money)
Exactly
But it doesn’t fit this channel when this channel is for educational purposes
The armors in this channel are meant to fit, down to the year and region, to 1450-1470, 10 year wiggle room. For your specific harness, which is costume, you can go to #general-catfish-🐱🐟 or #art-🎨 , I am pretty sure they will like it.
German word for Burgundians
Burgundische?
Welche too no?
Forgot what welche was referring to
Isn't it french speaking areas
Romance speaking language areas
Or Celtic
:3
What
This wasn't a question but a statement 😭
U sound like the ol ball and chain
Question, are there any surviving pieces of armour from the 1450s-1470s which are FULLY gilded? Not asking for artistic manuscripts cause those sometimes like to dive into fantasy with such stuff. (Some manuscripts simply give an important figure golden armour to make them stand out.)
does anyone have a good reference image that shows how aventails would be fitted to an armet?
trying to doodle.....
not an expert by any means, matterfact im relatively new to delving this deep into armour but i imagine it'd be attached to the brass rivets at the bottom? but not many armets have these, as far as i can tell it's pretty rare
no
there is this, that i found!
thats kinda what im looking for but i was moreso referring to diagrams or a more detailed depiction. trying to figure out how they were fastened to prevent big gaps in the front like that one, ik they had supplemental plate bevors and gorgets but i wanna know if there were alternatives with better neck protection for armets without the bevor and whatnot
good question, not too sure either
of course theres that other plate that could be attached to the lower armet? forget what it's called
heres some solutions i found
I have studied armor, and indeed, it would be there. How exactly? I am not sure, but I imagine it would be somewhat similar to the aventail of a bascinet? (Which I am more familiar than armets)
i imagine so, yeah. it might not cover the lower face like a bascinet's aventail but its quite similar
i will never not enjoy posting early armets
cool to see how they evolved
kind of a shame those armets with hounskull visors don't fit the game's tiemframe cuz they're my fav
there's always mods, unless you're not the type to mix time periods
I meant how it was attached, not the design
oh yeah my bad
i mean it might also be attached similarly?
fair enough
thank you i appreciate it
all good! love armets
i'd send a screaming gif but im 99% sure i dont have embed perms
fair enough
the only one I have on hand because I made it when i was discussing about the Eurocopter Tiger
I dont know the french word
... can you tell me perchance
targe, pavois
manteau (for the larger forms)
most pavises were held by a pavisier though in europe
In 10 years we'll get the 14th century DLC, trust
these helmets are 15th century tho
just earlier that 1450
i think this sallet is in the game isnt it?
Yes
When?
~1410 iirc
yeah around 1410s
1400-1420 DLC
Got this from Francois L'Archeveque's post. He's my favourite sallet helmetsmith.
Bossmode
swag
I WOULD VERY MUCH APPRECIATE A 15TH CENTURY FRENCH CAVALRY SABRE]
somthin like this. very different from what i use in u]olympic style sabre but still baddass
that is not 15thc
and on the image above the sabre isn't french
it says "venetian estradiot" from what I can read
wouldnt be surprised if it was from the 1490s (so outside the game's timeframe)
That says 16th century, does it not?
Yes
sabre fencing was around since atleast the 14th
so what
found the orignal image where you can make out the quality. 6. Sabre says 16th century
also the sabres are arranged time wise, the fourth example on the image is dated 1495.
i would assume Sabre 6. is late 16th century
What do the king labels mean
- Temp. Henry VI
- Temp. Edward IV
- Commencement of reign of Henry VIII
- Engraved by Albert Dürer, 1495
- Temp. Henry VIII
- Sabre of Venetian Estradiot. 16th century
no idea what Temp means
also i misread it, the 4th one is dated 1495, not the second
The earlier ones could fit the game time frame
the early ones pretty much just look like slightly crooked swords.
Yeah lmao
look like they were just fucked up in the blade forging process
maybe the first sabers were indeed fucked up and it gave someone an idea
partially joking
theres another cool curved sword called the Falx. it curves into the other direction and way less gradually.
used by the Dacians against Rome around Year 100, was used to poke the Romans in the face by going over their shields with the curve.
i couldnt realyy find one inbetween so i got one on either side to show it existed in 15
but not as shown
sure, sabres existed in the 15th century, but the ones you think of are 16th century, mostly 17th century
and this one is?
thats a 19th century sabre xd
thats an officer's sabre
its hard to get good pictures of old things
shame they didnt have cameras back in 1460
ya dont say
not sure though, im assuming the pictures from their cameras were just too grainy to add to the history books, considering cameras only became good around 1600.
according to the jagiellonian university museum's 2018 exhibition on the history of sabre fencing, this farthest row is the best you can expect for swords that qualify as sabres in the 15th century (may not even be in the games timeframe or geography). you're better off asking for more messers than sabres
Yeah i think more messers and falchions would satiate the people's need for sabres
The ones currently in game i've seen people see them more as machetes than sabres
and that is fair because I dont think the game is really tuned for (or so far was even intended for) that style of combat at all and it would probably need a stance like the one depicted in Talhoffer / a grip style like the animations in hellish quart to function
Oh that's so freaking gorgeous
give me hungarian scimitar
Traittié de la forme et devis comme on fait les tournois », par « RENE D'ANJOU ». Ca 1460
@terse bronze starting to agree with you on these types of armets (found these deep in the media tab of this channel)
these seem a bit closer to the typical armet than the ones you've shared, but still have that hounskull-esque visor
@usernameinvited
Oh god, the head butt now turns from pure blunt to full on piercing
consider yourself lucky to live in the era where that isnt exactly a common death
While wearing the pointed metal hat armor (Not sure the name) you can at least APPEAR to stab someone with a headbutt
Kettle hat?
headbutting with the middle of your face 
if i had a big metal beak in the middle of my face i would as well
I think so, yes
yes
this is only vaguely related to your question, but just idly trying to find prices of armour in the 15th century, came across this habsburg inventory of burgundian treasure that seems to list a harness (appears to be in the singular) along with presumably gilt tableware (if im interpreting right) worth a total of 12,000 gulden. I figure if it was worth singling out and even if it only makes up a fraction of the price, that must have been one hell of a harness. charles the bold's bejeweled hat taken by the swiss at grandson was worth around 484 artesian pounds. all I know about currency conversion is that the gulden may have been a replacement for the pfund (pound) in the HRE if that says anything.
Thanks, thats a lot of pretty good info.
manifesting this armet shows up in the game. This one is a modern reproduction made by Harywald.
chinlet armet
i like dis one a lot
mouth breather armet
me too honestly
i think the only armet i prefer over it is this tudor one i've found which i've really no grounds to believe it's historically accurate so idk if it counts
very big fan of sharp angled visors on armets
rounded visors just dont scratch da itch..
exactly
this
NO clue if it actually existed but i dig it
i like the y shape form barbute we have in the game but i think a t shape variant would be cool as well
open face shape as well but i think we already have something like this in game
this helmet is considered dubious by robert macpherson
i think this is too early for the game
many such cases
I will not stand for the mouth breathing disrespect
atleast the armorer adapted
he respects such facial features
Respectable man
early close armet from Graham Turner's book "War of The Roses" and some reproductions of the same helm i found. its a bit outside of the time period for the game but still felt inclined to share bc its quite cool i fink!
also i think the fellow on the right in this image is depicted with the same helm
it's a shame they stopped using pointy hounskulls by ~1420
tysm for the book recommendation btw its so good, havent sat down and actually read the damn thing ive just been ogling all of the cool pictures since it arrived yesterday lmao
Ikrrr
Glad you like it
I still gotta read it as well
Made it through the first 6 chapters or so months back but then life happened and yk
Gonna have to restart
The Poleaxe, also known as Warhammer, Luzerner Hammer, Mordaxt etc., spread throughout Europe from the 14th century. It was used until the 17th century and was thus for a long time an effective weapon in the feudal armies of european powers and a popular weapon in knightly duels.
Its based on Joachim Meyers Polearm Basics and P.H. Mairs Manuscr...
dunno if this counts but it helped me
Was that made with pencil
Does anyone have references for the splint-and-rondel arm armour in earlier ranks? They're jackchains, I suppose, but I want to see some examples in art so I can better date them
(this one, I mean)
These sorts of oval shields are so damn cool
i love tabulaccio shields
What's your pfp from? Love the Burgundy bits
doesnt look very accurate but nice to see single leg harness represented
FR 586 folio 100
Top right person tho
wait mb
i didn’t read lower
disregard
lemme find the dates and info on the art i sent
that third image tho
Jupons in mid-late 15th century?
I thought that was a 1350's-1430's thing
However this manuscript is dated to 1450
Jupons over plate my beloved
if you got this from manuscriptminiature.com some are misdated
plenty that are dated from 1450 are actually earlier
Yeah I did
Ahh, I guess that also explains the bascinet
were bascinets not used in the late 15th century?
no
well i mean they obviously were by atleast the lower budgeted soldiers who couldn't afford the latest gear/hand me downs
but like
not in the late century brah
there's instances of bascinets that got MODIFIED to be a bit more sallet like to fit the fashion of the time
but in 99% of the case, a sallet, kettle, skllcap will just be far easier to aquire as a soldier
I was mostly thinking that since in some countries it was mandatory to own a certain amount of armour incase of a war or something, that a hand-me-down bascinet wouldn't be too out of the realm of possibility
or even just a merchant selling them for cheaper to move on to the more popular items of the time
it so rare that I would rather not have any bascinets in the game because it could be used as an excuse by people to open the door wide and request more outdated gear
im not suggesting they be added im just talking about armour in the late medieval periods
i wouldn't want them to be added
i doubt a merchant would keep a bascinet DECADES in his inventory in hopes of selling it
probably just refurbish it, sell it for scrap ect
well yeah, they wouldn't keep it for decades because it got less popular, so they'd sell it for less to try and make up for the fact it wasn't as popular so that they could make way for the more wanted items, leading to less wealthy soldiers acquiring them
and these less wealthy people wouldn't waste money buying something thats more in fashion when they can just upkeep this old gear that they dont plan on using unless they NEED to
if it does the job, it does, its like if I have a m1911 for self defence but another model is more effective, im not planning on going to war so I dont need the peak of technology, just enough to work if I need it
sallet with an underbite
there is an ordinance dated to the middle of the 15th century for the city of Frankfurt explicitly notifying citizens of what armour is considered up to date and what armour is considered out of date and thus presumably obsolete. so even at that measly level - you wouldn't get away wearing out-of-date equipment. and when you did exchange it, as at least one good scholar has pointed out, the material it was made out of was probably worth more than the object itself, which made recycling it more appealing than just keeping it around to re-sell.
That is very interesting, could you perhaps share it?
yeah certainly. it's from Sprechendes Metall by Christopher Retsch (and he seems to have grabbed it from Regula Schmid who I think has originally found them- great scholar who is the one who claims that recycling the material from armour was worth more than the damaged or old armour itself) in the context of a set of ordinances for the city of Frankfurt over time. key phrase at the end of the highlight "und derglichen alt gewerde." however this is qualified by "verspulget sein" which may or may not mean that people were accustomed to these older types of armour, just to give the benefit of the doubt to the claim that old armour was 'in use' - either way, the message is clear that they are regarded as inferior. Retsch then breaks it down on page 121 - pointing out that plate armour is referred to as offering improved protection over the older forms, such as leather armour, and presumably jacks (I can't imagine "schecken" in this context refers to a jacket as clothing - it's in the context of armour so I assume it is referring to it as such), and, by Retsch's interpretation even a type of helmet ("lusterhube") is regarded as old/obsolete.
also the specific wording "wehrhafftiger bruchlichkeit" (I believe something like 'proven' brittleness) is odd and ambiguous - if interpreted literally as brittleness, then it seems to be against poorly made plate armour, but if interpreted in the sense of proofed hardness, then it's probably a positive comment towards plate armour. either way, the document goes on to say that a citizen should understand that "sal durch das wort gantzen harnesch verstanden werden ein isenhut, ein koller, ein gantzer rucke und krebs, armegewandt, isern wapen, hentschuwe und oberroren." or approximately "the words 'full harness' should be understood as an iron helmet, a [mail] collar, a full back and breastplate, arm protection, iron armour [unclear, but wapen also = armour in ENHG, but weirdly vague], gauntlets, and upper [leg?] protection"
it seems weird that they would call a 'full harness' something lacking leg protection but the term for upper arm armour would be oberarmroren and they already specify armegewandt for 'arm armour' so oberroren at the end there might be for leg armour - or else why would it be a ganzen harnesch, but that's my interpretation and it's a bit spotty
also the concept of proving may very well be an anachronism I'm imposing on it and there could be a better interpretation of that weird phrase about brittleness, but yeah the end of the document specifying what a citizen should understand as armour leaves absolutely no doubt that it should be plate armour and what kind of helmet it should include, and that other types of armour are old.
guns are a different can of worms
when you’re a soldier in this time period, the high class gear of yesterday doesnt become the low class gear of tomorrow, it gets broken down to make “modern” designs
lower class soldiers have less armor, not antique armor
a similar ordinance was made in late 14th century portugal
"The king ordered arms to be changed in this fashion: the gambeson should be exchanged for a jack, the hauberk for a haubergeon, and the war hat for a barbuta with aventail. Those who were fully armed should wear a barbuta with aventail and arming cap, haubergeon, jack, cuisses, French greaves, gauntlets, an estoc, dagger and glaive."
if its been so peaceful that they can do it, theres a good chance that theyre just gonna sell it lol
the armor at visby was like 30 years outdated, and this is an extreme example (the gotlanders were not soldiers, newer armor might have been looted), so it would have been possible to see a bascinet on the heads of the arriere ban or something, but maintaining armor is hard and oftentimes they rust so much in the inventories that they are rendered useless (which u can see in many inventories). which is another thing to remember, these things degrade naturally.
thallet
What about decorated armor from anyone with enough money to afford it? Would that also get broken down? Or would they keep it due to the decoration?
nice - interesting and so specific.
I think you have to take these things on a case-by-case basis. for example, Maximilian and Mary of Burgundy pawned off a large amount of Burgundian treasure (possibly even including that harness on that inventory up above because Maximilian was in enormous debt from fighting the Flemish revolt and conflicts in Holland/Frisia rebelliond in Geldres). but some of his expensive Helmschmid harnesses made it down over time. on a sort of related note, Philip II of Spain, his great grandson, melted down Maximilian's crown to pay his own debts.
PHILLIP-II YOU SCOUNDREL- Joking
yeah it sounds crazy until you realize max was doing the same thing to charles the bold's stupid treasure lol
Wait WHAT?!
i.e. pawning it off
Did he get- Ah. I do feel that, pawning off treasure (which may or may not be the crown) is a bit different than straight-up melting down the actual goddamn crown
no idea how much this one has been restored or how much of it is authentic (im having a stroke), guess it's another example of armour deemed worth preserving like those Helmschmid harnesses. thought it would be worth pointing out in case you hadn't seen it before (or these photos of it) cause I thought I remember you saying you like this style?
Oh yeah- I adore this style of harness, anything gothic in general is my jam (crisp flutes, points, not too much saturation, tracery and filework like gothic motifs and hearts/spades, the rare latten details...). The cuirass could use some more fluting, but ah well.
My dream harnesses are, in fact, a decorated harness for a halberdier who got nice money and used it for drip (full harness except legs, and gothic decoration without being as dramatic as the Lorenz Helmschmied harnesses), and a REALLY decorated full gothic harness with lots of ocean motifs
I was curious regarding these styles of very geometric breastplates, are they a particularly early style, or cheaper or are they just different like what’s the context for these much less rounded pieces of armour?
Such an interesting choice to display it seated.
It's an earlier style - the keyword you are looking for is "kastenbrust"
yeah you're right seated is very unusual. I wonder if they didn't have the right mannequin
TheGhostHero posted this on the DadG server
https://zettelfencer.wordpress.com/2024/12/07/an-attempt-at-establishing-a-kastenbrust-typology/
looks like that one is at the very bottom under Contentious types lol. the triangular type
That black finish is BEAUTIFUL, I need to go look who made this armor, and see what they used to blacken it (oil blackening techniques that were available back then, modern cold bluing, modern rust bluing, modern hot bluing...)
Made by Rene Kohlstruck
it’s also worth noting that their armor was buried with them instead of “looted by lower class soldiers”
What does that imply? Were the corpses too decomposed or in such a bad state that they considered it not worth removing? Cultural customs? That the armor was worth so little that they left them to decompose with it?
as cannon fodder said, the armor was outdated and it wasn’t worth the hassle to loot so it all went into a mass grave
which i figure is not exactly an uncommon fate for older armor rather than being looted
I see, I see. That makes sense
These are fascinating drawings
I just watched a Metatron video talking about how Burgundian serjeants and captains wore those as symbol of rank
I remember a miniature from I think 1500 that showed soldiers using bascinets, though obviously they are more like militia
yeah Irish armor was very weird during the late middle ages
Here is an example
this is late 15th-early 16th century btw
yeah
there are 16th century paintings that use bascinets as an artistic device to convey antiquity
why they be doin that to him
he was proselytizing christianity on the wrong block (armenia)
done earlier too
1460
iirc these are archaisms
what’s odd about these though is this kind of visor shows up in a ~1450 talhoffer manuscript too
which he doesn’t have a reason to exaggerate about lol
i feel like the visors may be trying to depict something closer to the “flemish” style of close helm visor, the typical pointy face and breaths look, and the main liberty is the pointy skulls
talhoffer mentioned
conical bascinets herngggggg
John Blasphemous from the hit game, Blasphemous
REAL
Armour with clothes on top is so peak
Also what would the technical name for a pole arm like this be?
pollax/pollaxe
where can i find this figure
It's probably a Little French Armory figurine
Pollaxe
was the gothic style of armour really as popular back then as we make it out to be now
it seems every other set of full plate that i see is gothic with a sallet and massive gauntlets
Not really, a lot of armor was italianate (made in the italian style), and of course the different regional styles had their peculiarities (The Iberian peninsula LOVED their brigandines, and so did the french). The reason you see so many gothic armor reproductions is because the modern market really likes such style (Which, as someone who ADORES gothic armor, I cannot blame them at all).
Most of the time, the gauntlers with huge cuffs you see in armor reproductions, are because at the time, that was the way gauntlets were made, both italianate and german (not huge hands tho, that's probably either a bad reproduction or someone with huge hands)
Also, it definetly helps that many gothic armors we see now were, at the time, thought to be precious enough to be worth preserving, instead of recycling the metal for some other purpose and/or burying it with the soldier that was wearing it. A lot of harnesses from other regions did not have such luck, either because they were not seen as "precious enough" or because whoever had it sold it to pay a debt (the last one is a fate only high end harnesses face, for obvious reasons).
Textile, due to its organic nature, also decomposes and is more difficult to preserve than metal, so brigandines would be much harder to maintain whole, but the separate pieces aren't any more difficult to preserve than any bit of armor.
You can still find some truly delightful harnesses if you know where to look, though
To give you a visual reference, this is how a gothic or german-style gauntlet looks like, this one is of 1480-1490, but gauntlets like this were in use earlier, if perhaps with different decoration (for example, a cuff like this appears in paintings for the Burgundian Wars, which happened in the 1470s): https://www.allenantiques.com/A-98.html
In contrast, this is a typical italianate gauntlet, the cuff length and shape varies somewhat but it looks like this:
Really cool artwork of Charles the Bold
Oh- He DEFINETLY had the drip, at least he does in this picture here
really need to see more of that surcoat
At least one fully gilded from what I read
But several harnesses alltogether
ducal got that shit on
Is that just the flag but on a surcoat actually
wait yeah itbis
thats sick
Absurdly rich but also absurdly in debt and fucked
In piss
Tru
B*rgundian
What you angloids call burgundy is actually bordeaux
It's all about the wine
And Bordeaux wine > Burgundy wine
We about to have another agincourt
Azincourt
Azincourt was such a massive L for the English in the long run
Few realize this
i only like cool armor this is getting out of my territory
I will Now proceed to Post ai Slop and Visored barbutes and ask “where bascinet”
Just saying cuz even after decimating the french nobility they still ended up getting obliterated big time in following battles
Omg kcd reference!! Henry has come to see us or something
I am Very peckish
Alot of people with nice armors seem to get in debt, why and how is that the case?
typical elite ponzi scheme tbh
Please elaborate
you convince people to give you money (or more legitimately, sell off something), which puts you into more debt, to pay the people you're already in debt with
maximilian was doing this all the time but also selling things off
Huh... So it was a constant loop of asking for money to pay off an old debt, then getting a new debt, and asking for more money to pay off this new debt?
I think with people like charles it's squandered wealth. born into extreme wealth, over extend, go into extreme debt
yeah or in some cases accruing debts so large they just followed people over their reign/life
I assume this is what happened to Maximilian I too?
maximilian wasn't born into wealth nor married into much of it when he got to the netherlands. but things did come together for him when he was able to unify austria, which he then proceeded to also mortgage off parts of like his uncle lol
he was in a constant debt cycle
Goddamn- No wonder people lived to the 60s, the stress from those constant debts must've been grueling! (I jest, for the most part)
because he chose the tyrant path like charles
I think Wiesflecker said he had some issue with his gallbladder or stomach and also probably syphilis when he died
Oh wait- fr?
yeah very speculatively lol
but it's what his best modern biographer reckons but yeah I havent scrutinized those suggestions at all lol
Huh... So centralized power, where he basically had an absolute monarchy?
Ah well, if true that's kind of impressive, debt-related stress jokes aside
attempted centralization. ended up creating one of the biggest conflicts in the history of belgium and the netherlands, a debt he carried until he accrued even bigger debts against venice, and ultimately his son making peace and hardly carrying on his politics once he took over
he did successfully centralize austria
...How did he screw up this badly?!
Huh, at least that's something
I think General Jim Mattis cited some Roman who said something like you cant conquer people who dont like you lol
the region would have prospered more with peacetime decentralization but he pursued charles dream and welp people dont like that
Ah, I see... So I assume, he wasn't liked in Burgundy?
Actually no- that's a dumb question
Sorry, my understanding of 15th Century war and politics is, very small, I focus a lot more on the armor, weapons, and other craftsmanship
haha the Duchy of Burgundy just got retaken immediately by Louis XI. but the Flemish hated him. the neighbouring Brabanters however saw an opportunity and, for example, he was on good terms with the Flemish competition in Antwerp. similar things in Holland with the Hook and Cod factions. I think he sided with the Cods. always two groups fighting somewhere looking to take advantage of someone like him
Huh...
similar to the Guelfs and Ghibellines in Italy - factions ya know
Ah, right, right
Reliquary of Charles the Bold
What's up with this gauntlet? Why does it seem to have a gap on the cuff?
How would mid-late 15th century gunners carry their accoutrements? I don't really see the obvious bandolier and pouches associated with early modern gunners like in here and some other references
oh wait
I think I notice that huge pouch by his right leg
Hmm... If you mean the guns, crossbows and the like, you would carry it. In the case of projectiles, yeah you carry it on a pouch or quiver or the like.
If it’s within that time why do the guys on the right look like they’re wearing Bascinets
God that's sexy
could’ve been a 15th century chroniclers recreation of that moment through a drawing. i saw a sallet’s so that’s what i think
possibly
the grete bathrobe
beautiful burgundy
da vinci writes that mounted gunners had sacks to hold cartridges (paper roll containing proper amount of powder and ball)
That is a perfect Sallet & Bevor, if i would make a set of armour, id try to replicate those exact pieces. Absolutely stunning, who made that armour?
Francois L’Archeveque
thank you!
english military victories are of the "nothing ever happens" sort
invade france
loot
kills off the flower of the french nobility
leaves
repeat 5 years later
My favorite part about this section is that there even appears to be a corresponding part of the text under "In what cases imperial law prescribes single combat" (merged into one section on lombard and imperial law in the illustrated version). About a hypothetical case between a Frenchman and an Englishman, just like is illustrated. Pictured is a translation by Sumner Willard of a different copy, but the same section is in the manuscript on 109r. Don't know if it's a good treatise in the grand scheme of things but I'm a sucker for images
I like the english knight’s helmet, looks like early armet or great bascinet to me
yeah it vaguely resembles that Thun one but with a little grated window on the side kind of like italian jousting helmets. maybe just a fantasy mishmash. kind of odd wish the artist had depicted it more clearly lol
"you forgot to add the gigachad image"
basically just this but bars instead of a visor
it’s closest in mechanism to a grand bascinet but it’s a very idiosyncratic example that is probably best left described rather than named
bicoque even (jk)
kempfhawben 
(Morgan Freeman voice) I can smell you
was just looking at the housebook master on rijksmuseum website 👍
ear hole pretty smart
what's the term for the pavise types used in half sword?
I'd imagine the larger ones are just pavises simply, the smaller ones can also be called that as well but if you wanted to differentiate a little you could call them hand pavises, I've seen that term sometimes
Could be wrong but that's just what I know
holy carp...... it mite actually be
The one in the back, on the left also remind me a lot of the other "Venetian" gb
Why are they wearing full maille pants
so that they can protect their legs
I've never seen those before, do they have a name
Cus i know there are chausses but those on the image also cover the crotch
im pretty sure they’d still be called chausses
nah lol
sexy
agree
anybody know some guard techniques for longswords
half sword or real life
real life
do you know where your profile picture is from
take a squizz at that
Fiore Furlano de’i Liberi de Cividale d’Austria (Fiore delli Liberi, Fiore Furlano, Fiore de Cividale d’Austria; fl. 1381 - 1409) was a late 14th century knight, diplomat, and fencing master. He was born in Cividale del Friuli, a town in the Patriarchal State of Aquileia (in the Friuli region of modern-day Italy), the son of Benedetto and ...
Bascinet with orle on the right?
I think it's just a particularly open barbute
Or just a normal sallet
Did people wear orles on their barbutes?
Yeah that makes sense
What’s that image from?
Two samples of butted maille I've been tinkering with next to a piece of standard reenactment riveted maille.
For all I know butted maille has little to no validity historically but I'm choosing this type of maille for my suit of armour for a number of reasons.
As far as I'm aware you can actually get historical riveted versions of thick rings like this but they're not easy to source at all, in fact even the standard flat riveted rings and the associated riveting tools are annoying to get.
These samples are just made from very specific sizes of spring washer.
Despite being butted (which is generally physically inferior to riveted maille), these samples are far stronger being that they're significantly thicker and more densely packed than the normal reenactment maille. They're also made of stainless steel which is a far stronger kind of steel than what you get with available riveted rings.
Being that they're stainless steel also means that they are far more corrosion resistant, which means I can cheat out on having to oil them, which I find quite disgusting actually.
My plan is to continue with the more historical maille for early medieval reenactments. But for late medieval, when maille coverage is quite scarce and mostly hidden, I'll use these butted rings.
As for protection, the two samples on the left are far more resistant to bending or breaking than the riveted sample is.
In terms of how pointy something needs to be to slip through the gaps, I'd say the middle sample is no worse than the riveted, both would allow something like a standard Philips screwdriver through.
The left sample on the other hand... Well, that doesn't even let certain needles through. 😂
Anything thicker than a relatively small needle is too big to fit through any of the gaps.
You can get the tools for riveting in Ironskin for the most part, as well as rings from there (though you can make your own rings with a jig, somewhere to heat the rings up, an anvil, and a round piece of metal.)
True but I'm specifically playing around with thick rings, like the rings shown here on this standard. Also when buying rings you gotta consider the prices, historical riveted rings are not cheap in large numbers, 60 euro on ironskin for 1750 rings which isn't many rings.
Hmmm... In that case, you could try make your own after buying the tools and making the jig for making coils?
Well I'll be honest with you, making anything out of butted maile is already a massive time sink, riveted maile is tenfold, and making the rings yourself is, as far as I'm concerned, absurd.
Mainly because maille for me is if anything, an after thought when compared to the plate armour I'm making, I just don't have that kind of time.
The main thing is that these samples of maille, while being less accurate, are much cheaper, easier to make, and superior in strength. Nobody will be looking close enough at my armpits below pauldrons to see that the relatively tiny rings don't have rivets on them. 😊
In fact I have considered just not bothering with maille at all, since normally it's really greasy, but since I can work on this butted maille while I have nothing to do at work I chose to do so.
Wait you actually trying to make a harness?
Any style of harness in particular? I myself want to get into armouring!
Yes I'm making multiple, I've even been talking to a guy who's done work for royal armouries about tuition.
The first one I'm doing (which is the most simple), is a suit of armour for the year 1403, I'm currently making a bascinet for it.
Ooo- Are you raising it from one piece? Or welding it together?
This is impressive too!
Welding, making armour from one piece usually requires lots of heat, and a bascinet visor in particular is an absolute nightmare to do without a welder
In fact I'm not entirely sure the nose cone would even be possible to make out of one piece without like, a brazing torch or something.
Hmm, I see... I did read in Brian's "Techniques of Armor Reproduction" that bascinets could've possibly been made, in at least a few cases, from a cone forge-welded and raised from there.
Perhaps the nose cone could be made a similar way? Historical metal seems to be easier to forge weld than the modern stuff, or at least wrought iron is.
With enough heat you absolutely can do it, but by cold working sheet metal it's likely impossible.
Here's some different photos of it BTW, still needs a shit tonne of work.
And to be fair, this is my first welding project.
Lots wrong with it right now, all part of the process though.
OOO- IMPRESSIVE WORK! Keep up the good work
And yeah, obviously, as no heat no weld
I am currently busy figuring out how to assemble a forge, both for armouring and general blacksmithing, which without doubt speed armouring dramatically with heat
(And also means I could save up some money from making tools instead of buying them)
Fair enough, I'm personally leaving the more heat and forge kind of things for later when I'm experienced with other things because of how complex that sort of thing can be
Especially heat treatment, like nah, that can come later.
It's like with the maille, I wanna know how to properly fit the patterns and stuff before I start riveting rings together.
Thanks!
That makes sense
As for heat treating, that isn't something you really do while making the armor, but as a finishing step to make it more resistant. If you are working with thicker material and/or for costume/display purposes, you don't really need to do this, but you do if you're working with thinner material
The owner of the now defunct website borealissteel.ca mentioned how they heat treated a gadling for a gauntlet, 0.8mm in thickness, put it on an anvil and slammed it with a hammer: The anvil got damaged, and the gadling was untouched!
For now, yeah focus on making pieces first with the techniques, reserve heat treating for later on when you feel comfortable doing it (and remember to pick heat treatable steel! Mild iron sheet can't be HTd unless you case harden the piece first)
Idk about that, mild steel can't be heat treated at all. High carbon steels on the other hand need to be annealed so that they're soft enough to work with, then you have to heat treat them afterwards to regain the strength of the alloy. The problem is heat treating is complex and can easily ruin the entire thing if done wrong.
Oh yeah- use transmission fluid to quench, and look for guides on how to do it (as well as doing test pieces first for seeing how heat treating goes), there's one in the armour archive
I've been looking into case hardening because It seems like a better idea than just using hardened steel.
As for carbon steels, working it hot already takes care of the annealing-
It isn't, really: Work the hardenable steel hot, or buy it already annealed, it shouldn't be too difficult.
Right but heating steel up takes the strength out of it, and even moreso it provides the piece with uneven hardening, which is another reason it has to be equalised and treated afterwards etc
I mean, it It kinda is, because it's a similar principle to how blades are done where the edge is hard but the inside is soft, which allows the structure to absorb alot more force than a purely hardened steel thing would.
Oh yeah- I forgot about the pre-HT normalizing. Do about 3 or 4 normalization cycles before HT and you should be good to go for heat treat. Carbon steels ARE less forgiving than mild steel/iron, so good idea to work first on mild-
Hard materials don't absorb impacts very well
Well yeah I'm doing mild, which is why I'm using a welder because unless you want to be all authentic about the process there's really no benefit to forging mild steel.
The way armor is heat treated gives it the balance to resist impacts without bending, nor too hard to shatter, as after Heat Treat you temper the piece
Right, right. Best of luck!
There's nuance to it, it's like springsteel, spring steel is very hard and you can bend it, but it doesn't mean spring steel can't shatter, it very much can, mild steel on the other hand basically can't shatter.
My concern was the amount of carbon in the piece would be unpredictable, which makes HT harder to accomplish (more carbon = more hard after HT, which means more brittle)
Yeah but you don't case harden the entire thing, you case harden it like a gradient so it has a hard shell and then becomes mild on either the middle or the other side.
Like it smoothly transitions from hard to mild.
Same reason why katanas are two pieces of metal forge welded together, one of those pieces is very hard and the other is soft to absorb the impacts down the spine
There is a sweet spot in tempering (about purple, I think), from what I have seen, that the piece of armor is both hard (does not bend or dent), and tough (does not shatter), and if you do find it you can do some crazy stuff... The problem is, of course, finding this sweet spot, assuming the piece doesn't warp.
I see... Hmm...
Afaik it's better to take advantage of two different types of steels than it is to find the sweet spot between the two.
Same reason you get old composite bows that have a different type of wood on the front than on the back, because they have different properties
I didn't mean between steels, I meant in the tempering temperature-
Huh...
I know I mean like tempering the whole thing to the same temperature
Oh- right, sorry
I can provide you with an archived version of "borealissteel.ca", if you wish: it has some really nice info about armoring, specially gauntlets
Afaik you can't really get the best of both worlds by tempering the whole thing to the same temperature. If you have a really hard outside that blends into a mild steel inside then you possibly truly get the best of both, because the hard shell cannot dent and the soft back prevents it from shattering and absorbs blows better
I'm thinking of making a pair of gauntlets actually.
If you are making gothic armor, specially, it comes in very handy
Well I just want to make a simple pair of mitten gauntlets, cus it looks easy and I could make them for the rest of my group members
Hmm... I did read some truly impressive things from armor heat treated this way-
Then, while not from the website, I have something for you
Also my mitten gauntlets are a bit stiff and perhaps small
Marine biology and armouring? Are you like, a clone of me or something?
PFF- HAHAHA!
Coelacanth, my beloved
My main marine biology fix is mantis shrimps and pistol shrimps.
I want to, eventually, when I get the tools to do it, make my own harness in the gothic style-
Oh! Interesting crustaceans, with how they have weaponized (apparently) cavitation bubbles, the same thing that causes tuna problems and injuries
Except the so called "spearing mantis shrimp", which fascinate me for different reasons
The animals that fascinate me the most are coral reefs, the deep sea, and the coelacanth- anyways, back to armor
I am currently stuck with getting the bare essential tools. How do you use stakes? Do you put them in a vise or in a hole on a table?
Not a clue mate, when it comes to hammering I use a piece of steel girder as an anvil and alot of patience
Huh, for everything from dishing to flaring and raising?
Hmm... I see... I currently have a railroad track I was trying to shape with an angle grinder before the speed dial of it died, a leather sandbag I made myself, and a hex bar anvil I have to case harden before using it (it is mild steel, but really the only thing the scrapyard sold that resembled what I was looking for)
Railroad track is likely far better than girder
Yep, but the railroad track is also inferior to the hex bar: The hex bar has all its mass on a bar you can turn upside down, which apparently is better for hammering (from what I read, anyways, I don't remember where I read it)
holy fucking yap
^^^ Why do so many people like this exist? ^^^
Interesting
Ill be taking this thank you
What the dog doin'
You made this whole thing?
Were Franco-Burgundian sallets typically paired with bevors?
i want maxmillian armor in the game
Wrong period
15 century
No it's not 15 century
1515–1525
Read it bro 
ohhhhh

game is 15 century no?
14 century (1300) and 15 century (1400)
1500s is not 15th century
😅 im so dumb
That's 16th century love
Oh they already explained it
@snow nova if 1500 was 15th century that would make 100 the first century, what does that make the preceeding 100 years?
Actually tbf I wish they did what they did with the laws of thermodynamics and have the first one be the "zeroth", then the second one be the first 😂
Because if I'm honest, it does trip me up in conversation sometimes, at least sometimes when I'm talking about a century I'm not so familiar with.
Big Battles. just about 30 vs 30 people, on a regular field, or for example a castle siege, as there are factions in the game, I would like to see it but HS is about fighting in a small arena, one of the Half Sword artworks depicted such a battle, and a knight with a Georgian flag on his shield
georgian flag ?
pretty sure they aren't
and georgia isn't in western europe (where the game takes place)
if you see a St. George cross (the red cross that georgia uses nowadays) it has been used in western europe by a lot of "countries" from england to italy, some parts of france, iberian penninsula ect
and their site
thats not st george cross bro
For some reason i thought they were czech lol
its kcd developers
warhorse:)
modern day georgia uses st george cross on its flag, like england & genoa
yeah ik about them i just thought they were too
that's what i'm saying
st george cross (red cross) was used a lot in western europe during the game's timeframe without being related to the "country" of georgia
a bit like how greece and quebec (via france) uses Saint Michael cross
And crossbows, i think thats cool idea
big map
and optomization
tbh i think this is about as likely as getting online multiplayer in the forseeable future. as in it we likely wont get it ever lol. the optimization of that many willies at once . . . just look at dragons dogma 2 optimization with the complexity of their NPCs. not a 1:1 comparison but probably reflects how spawning that many halfsword NPCs at once would go down
better off waiting for della arte della guerra for that stuff
it will probably come out one day 
Only Frank is georgian 
his name is like not georgian, i didnt know about that
I watched about this mod, and write this post
The physics alone would be immense
Hand cannons, for big battles, it's funny to blow someone's head off with that baby!)
Chainmail bevor with ocular kettle helm
Absolutely no chance the physics engine will manage 60 clankers at once.
i was thinking exactly that
My pc fries at the buhurt game
I believe most pcs do lol
and that's 1/10 of that
It might not even be a pc thing like the engine literally might not be capable of it straight up.
Flail's (Bottom middle of the first image) and Macil's (very left of the second image) would be cool to have in the game though I COULD see flail's causing performance issues unless they're handled or swing in a certain way.
freaking love depictions of medieval handguns
especially when shields like that or pavises are involved
the boomstick shape looks so much cooler than the more modern lookin arquebus thing
OMG
@vocal vale 
where did you get this from
when devs make optimization
when unreal engine 5 will be good
epic games twitter post
damn I'm glad it's real
French army 15th. Miniatures from the Overseas Compaigns by S. Marmo Burges 1470.
Mine is more lik 5-10 fps
I love everything about miniatures
I wonder if there's a whole online library of them so I can look through miniatures of sieges, common life, etc
Uniforms?
for (mostly) french:
https://jessehurlbut.net/wp/mssart/?page_id=610
for swiss [click on the large blue 'description' button for any illustrated chronicle and it will have a full list of the illustrations - also easy to just use thumbnail view]:
https://www.e-codices.unifr.ch/en/search/all?sQueryString=Chronik&sSearchField=fullText&sSortField=score&iResultsPerPage=20&aSelectedFacets=
that Jesse Hurlbut website is a fun browse
Pourpoints would be a good addition
But the game may be a bit late for pourpoints
There is also https://manuscriptminiatures.com/ (others in this chat put me on to it - being able to search by tags is useful)
yes
Not French, they're using bows
Trvke
Then, which soldiers are these?
it was a joke
they have bows so they can’t be french, everyone knows only the english use bows
Oooo- Haha!
can anyone explain why placart was used? it doesn't protect upper body at all or placart comes with additional armor in upper part?
Paired with a breastplate it causes a doubling of plates in the areas that both of them cover
i've been thinking about poor willies who use placart with no chestplate, prob tech demo nuance, thanks
There are a couple miniatures and such that depict plackarts without breastplates, though I don’t know about textual evidence for it
Some show a doublet being worn under one, and others (prob what the game based it off) shows a jupon underneath. Specifically there’s a Flemish depiction in the chronicles of hainaut which is possibly what inspired the game loadout
yea for some reason the plackart with no breastplate never made sense to me, even with the historical basis for it. one would think if you cant afford a full cuirass and you had to choose between the plackart and breastplate then the breastplate would be the better option. but what do i know im sure they had their reasons for doing it that way.
i will say wearing the plackart over a jupon is a good look doe
Easier to make two smaller pieces of steel than it is to make one very large one. Also the main reason is likely mobility (in the case of a full ciurass), the plackart moves independently of the breastplate somewhat.
In the case of more Italian style ciurasses the only thing really connecting the breastplate and plackart is generally a strap on the front and back. For other ciurasses you can have a rivet in the middle and one on each side holding the two together, but the side rivets are sliding rivets.
Either way it allows the two pieces to move independently.
In fact the middle rivet may have been sliding too, can't remember
Oh also armour can absorb shock better when there's some give, like with riveted segments.
In some configurations it allows for additional mobility
Oh he said it
This ain't 15th century
Woops nvm
You guys said it already
you say this as if you're about to scratch your head
oh
Good one tbh
we need to prevent this crap especially in #references♥_1450-1470
these dang faces are so hilarious
does anyone remember a similarly styled art piece depicting soldiers on a hill throwing rocks down on an incoming force?
It looked roughly like this:
There's a picture from Frossairt's chronicles of the battle of Brignais (1362) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Brignais#/media/File%3ABrigniais.jpg It's dramatic showing the rock throwing, but out of this game's time period.
Thanks
close enough, welcome back Froissart
It's not out of the time period, it depics a battle that happened in 1362 but the gear shown is front 15thc
also hi another sun in splendour fan
best symbol ever
I saw this @terse bronze
and there is a big battle)
huh interesting detail lol
Could be in one of the Schilling chronicles. There is a similiarly looking depiction of a snow avalanche...
It was the froissart one. If you look he actually fairly accurately depicted it
true good memory 💪
how come fat tony is still allowed to post here
we need a banned from references role
🤢
We need a specific role just for those who help send references.

Downloading level 1 restriction update for sending things on this channel, 48% complete.
ask people to name this polearm, if they say "voulge" don't give them the role, if they say "halberd" give them the role
should filter a bit
Thats a pokey swingy thing obviously
that's a halberd
bro said "no i dont think I'll take it as a joke"
i have never heard or seen anyone call a halberd a voulge
don't go on this game's subreddit then
i have only seen people call a voulge a voulge
I dont use reddit
And it's also a common mistake every now and then that people ARE SURE they're right about (calling the thing above "voulge")
Wth? I thought he left long ago
happened here a bit aswell
i see
since you guys are talking about big cutting polearms, what exactly is a Bardiche?
wepon
Another appreciator of sun in splendor
planning to get one as a tattoo in the future
Is he banned or did he left?
And I agree: Sometimes banning is, to my eyes, too steep of a punishment, but if an individual has shown to repeatedly post material that doesn't fit the channel...
Not sure. He was already out of the server when he posted the first picture the other day, so I thought he was banned by then.
Seems to have, their profile is inactive
There was also some guy who posted a gif of some Marvel-looking fellow with a spinning ball mace in the now defunct "list of weapons to add to the game", and said some very nasty things when I said that the whole kit (I did say armor, but generally the armor fits with the weapons) wasn't even accurate to the 14th to 16th Centuries. No clue what was his problem.
new yorkers watching a hobo beat up someone on the subway
funni face strikes again
LOL
"Can I beat Half Sword as beggar" be like
I have a picture of me in half armour should I post that here?
Good point on the armour in the miniature being later than the battle it depicts! And thank you, I spent a while picking the grumpiest looking sun in splendour
Is this that one Greek guy beating the fuck out of the Macedonian
And then the Greek guy kills himself after
Another Pinterest-bro...
In what world is this not a halberd
If they say spear, ban them
what if they say sword instead
Citizen's arrest
Polehammer
pole cleaver
pole falchion with crows beak
this actually brings up a very funny thought
depicting battle scenes out of the 15th century in 15th century gear
like D-Day
Gettysburg where everyone retains their usual national, regimental, and company colours, but the gear is 15th century
It's more convenient retoactively but I find both ways equally fun
Stone age: The Ooga Boogas vs Unga Wunga tribe, but with 15th century gear
Patay with cave stickman art
Link to "The Book: The Ultimate Guide to Rebuilding Civilization"
https://mdsh.io/dequitem
promo code: DEQUITEM10
published by @HungryMindsArt
#thebook #hungrymindsbooks #howtorebuildcivilization #hungryminds #christmasgift
For the armor and weapon test of the war mace we used a 1,3 kg gothic flanged mace for the strikes to my visor. For t...
how accurate of a test is this, do you think?
not accurate didnt annihilate his cranium 😔
didnt crumple his armor like a soda can and he didnt implode on impact so its completely inaccurate
i got my phd from Reddit University so yeaaa im pretty much an expert on this stuff.
Actually made me go into a fit of rage thats how convincing you were
Theres a reason maces (semi) went out of use
I think his conclusion at the end is kinda jank
He basically said swords are better than maces against full plate armour
And he said you want to hope your 'sharp, pointy weapon' will break through the armour???
He mightve meant find the gaps/break the mail
But still strange phrasing
Also this isnt full power
Obviously theyre not actually trying to kill him
That’s what he means, he’s German so his English is really rough
His english isnt rough
i mean that’s kind of the consensus
you just have to know how to use it
"Though even though we strike him with a club or axe... this inflicts little to no harm... for against similar we can never apply great blows... which he who is entirely in white armor cares nothing for"
-Pietro Monte
This is the opinion of anyone who's been hit in full armour by a mace.
Swords being able to stab through eyeslits immediately makes them far more dangerous than maces against plate armour.
Most effective weapon against guys in plate armour was almost definitely daggers.
this foot is about to be up your ass is what it is
No
Blunt force impact weapons were very popular amongst western European men at arms ~1350-1420 (and then they fall off completely)
I've repeated similar statements but honestly swords seem to have been used just cuz
These (axes, falcon beaks, and lead mauls) were 2.5+ feet long though, Dane axe length
So not the 1.5-2 foot long tiny maces
But those were short because they wanted them to be short
Absolutely, with a dagger you can go through the eye slit, possibly under the helmet, into the groin, inner thigh, or maybe the armpits. Same with swords but to a lesser extent. Certain daggers were also made to & much better at penetrating maile.
This is assuming the enemy is either on the floor or their mobility is compromised some other way, otherwise likely no weapon is particularly effective.
Two handed weapons maybe to an extent but a fully armoured guy isn't going to care if you have a dinky little one handed mace.
Maces are massively effective against maille (even at just reenactments this year I've known people who have received broken elbows or hands through maille at the hands of maces).
That shit aint happening through plate though.
Also those people who had broken bones were very possibly not wearing any padding at all under the maille. This does not excuse the mace user though, you shouldn't be hitting hard enough to break bones full stop.
Yes and when it comes to the fencing part of harness fencing, the dagger is disadvantaged
Idrk about fencing but I'm talking about trying to kill people
What do you think fencing means
Fighting with swords to a set of rules for fun, should I have any reason to know that this is what the conversation was about?
🤦♂️
That's not what fencing means. And the obsession with daggers in pop history is ahistorical and not represented in the sources. Even grappling is seldom done except when you have already positioned yourself in an advantageous position (not by shuffling, but by fencing), and it is further often done with the weapon in your hands, not necessarily with them empty.
All points attack the gaps. The thrust of the sword has more momentum than that of the dagger, and the arming sword (the sword of the man at arms) was not a flimsy 800 gram noodle like all swords are made today, but stiff and heavy. The point of a spear or axe even more.
No sword is "stiff and heavy"
Literally all estocs are
Even like a 2kilo arming sword is more bendy than a proper rondel dagger, certain daggers are purpose made to be driven though maile, the blades specifically designed to bust rings apart.
Cross section determines this thing. Daggers will naturally be stiffer because they are proportionally thicker (not literally so) for their length, but they lack mass.
I know this is why daggers are good for that exact purpose
Sorry but unless you halfsword a sword its just nowhere even close to as good as daggers are at punching through things, it's not really about the mass of a weapon in this case. You can make far more use of your own strength when driving a dagger through.
This kind of shape is just far better at penetrating maille than basically any medieval sword is going to be, you can also hammer on the back of it lol.
Mr has not seen the stiffness of historical swords
Arming swords are very stiff, they're just not as stiff as daggers
Yes and they weigh a lot more (= momentum) and are longer (= the tip moves faster)
Modern tests do not display daggers just piercing through everything
Didn't say they could, I've made maille that you could certainly never put a dagger through, you just have even less of a chance of putting a sword through it.
And this is irrelevant since we have historical accounts of points of swords going through maille gorgets (which are the hardest to pierce), and the gussets, and the maille braies
Try this in practice 😂
Are u the German fucker with the heavy ass spear who can't fence for shit lmao
I'm English but that sounds like a misinterpretation of me
Not misinterpretations
Go read Lalaing, Olivier de la Marche, Bayard's biography, etc.
Not even to mention the famous accounts of Benevento
Sounds like it, people in this server don't understand how weight distribution works, and like to confuse knowing what weapons were effective at with being bad at using them. Sorry but different weapons just have clear benefits over others in different situations
You can use far more explosive and precise movements when thrusting with a dagger than you can with a sword, like that's just the biology of it.
Duhhhh lol. The benefit of the dagger is not that it pierces maille especially well (it doesn't), it's that it's short
It pierces maille basically better than anything else if you use it right.
That's not to say you can easily pierce maile with it
In fact depending on the maille it's basically useless to even try with a dagger
Anyway I'd love to continue arguing over how people hundreds of years ago slaughtered each other but I've got a medieval market to go to and I want to have a parking space so cya nerd.
Yeah go to your ren fair
It's not a renfair 😘
This is THE market for medieval stuff, all custom made highest quality, this the main place people go to get measured out for super nice jousting armour.
(well I'm going to two and the second one has some more renfair stuff but the first one is the best)
Why are u still here I thought u had to leave
Still a bit of time, just easily embroiled in arguments 💅
Defending the honor of the renfair maidens
Speaking of knives Todd cutler makes pretty nice knives, very pricey though.
Huh?
Did people of the medieval times argue about names for stuff like we do or did they not care as much
they just called things the accurate terms
Fair
golly these arguments get pretty heated in this damn server.....
say no to meanies
They pretty much didn't care.
LMAO, ts so real (I know I'm late but still)
omg schrodinger hiiii
Those red Barbutes are so cool
textile covered helmets are neat
Yes they did
Quite stupidly in those days lol
Dont real voulges look kinda like glaives?
Which is great cus glaives are baller
Is this the same artist as that guy who keeps drawing Burgundian dudes
Pretty neat work
Also the center guy has no helmet but retains a bevor just like that one Half Sword boss
LOL
Synced
Great minds think alike
all these are miniature's box art btw
will idk if it was MADE for thoses boxes but they're on it
the italian knight one is weird, there's too many visored sallets
And theres a bunch of sallets with long articulated tails
whats wrong with that
italian knights/MAA just didn't wear them much?
Oh my peak
how neat i had no idea
i have never seen those western european visored sallet in italian sources
this is me actually
What region would have gauntlets like this?
Also do you know who made them?
also germany
Hey if you guys like knights and armor and stuff you should check out this show called, "Game of Thrones" , it is set in the medieval ages and has knights in some cool armor:
I don't know why they don't hire reenactors for movies and series
GoT armour is ugly
They dont care
Oh god i just noticed the huge ass dents in the Hound's pauldrons
The same motherfucker that commanded the kingsguard btw
The only thing that looked somewhat like armor was in House of the Dragon and even then it was floppy and horrible
Yeah
That joust was such a mess
The most fantasy thing about the show is that that joust didnt spark a huge ass battle
What do you mean knights of noble families are just going around murdering each other
Yeah, it's stupid
I still can't get over the double gorget that still somehow leaves his neck exposed
tbf that's like the worst one from the tourney segment, he's supposed to have shittier armour than everyone else
His shittier armor is ironically closer to real armor than the rest
I think this guy's kit is decent, not sure what helmet he wore though
a shame that none of the armour from the tourney appeared anywhere else in the show though, the rest looked like ass
It's not shitty in a realistic way tho
Let's all just be thankful they didn't give him the For Honor helmet
He has 2 gorgets?
Yeah, there's one directly on the helmet and one on his shoulders
The bottom one is somewhat similar to a great bascinet neckpiece
Looking at real beautiful armour is so refreshing lol
That gap in the neck is atrocious
And the one on the helmet is like a bevor plate
Sword magnet
It's beyond atrocious
Armor is always so stupid when it comes to media
And it’s so absurd
If your armor wasn’t good you were going to die, it’s quite literally life and death
So when it sucks in movies and tv shows it’s glaring
The crazy thing is that realistic armour just objectively looks better
Like it's not even aesthetics atp
Unless looking like ass is the aesthetic they're going for
People just don’t notice
And it matters less when it comes to the actual piece of media
But when you point it out people get so hostile
For example, Kenneth Brannagh’s Henry V is a really good movie but the armor in it is like recycled Monty python stuff. Meanwhile the King with timothee chalamet is a terrible movie but the armor is on a way higher level than the Kenneth Brannagh one
The King doesnt have good armour
Lmao
That original Laurence Olivier one can’t be beat though
Do you guys have examples of full neck protection that still allowed head movement? In the time frame ofc
Honestly I can't think of articulated full neck protection before 1490-1500

