#images-discussions
1 messages · Page 106 of 1
you arnt getting an image as realistic as the one i posted from NB2. Only GPT can do that
and thats with no other alterations. Thats straight from 2.0. NB2 aint doing that
yeah, no matter how much I Say "Manhwa comic style, not anime", it keeps on making cringe baby faces of adult charecters with big ahh eyes
Nbpro does the same job in term of realistic image for certain subject, even better for other specific real case use
Is anyone hiring
How do I generate images at 2k? Just prompt "2k resolution"? Or need api for it?
Need api
Show me an example on Nbpro giving a photoshoot picture focused on the torso and the head
that can compete with the green girl image i provided
Googling/gemini says it can generate 2k starting from chatgpt plus plan. I'm on ChatGPT go. That's why asking
As of right now, you can only generate anything at or higher than 2k through the API for GPT Image 2. Not even pro plans can generate at 2k/4k.
Not sure why that is or if that will stay that way.
Alright, thanks.
np
Hi, is anyone hiring?
please see rule 7 of the #server-rules
Until you can provide something from Nbpro that can compete with my green girl image from #images-canvas , be quiet
@rigid bough please accept my friend request
PLEASE
NO
is the ne image now available through API yet?
Any thoughtw on Gpt Image Gen 2?
I love it bro. Has the best prompt adherence that i heardly use a custom gpt to make my prompts anymore like i used ti with GPT Image 1.5
Can you use presets with it? like anime specific styling and shading?
Are you able to understand "real case use" meaning?
I can just type anime screencap style and the image will be very accurate compared to GPT image 1.5 where it reqired prompting the colors to be flat and pervent overly painting effects. Like it's so easy now
so terrible I've had to switch image generation tools. Reception to this upgrade is mixed
what is wrong with it? I don't understand why people dislike it
it generates noise in pretty much everything I'm making, and its hard to get it to follow instructions
The artifacting you get when you edit the image after it's been generated
you don't need to edit, if you do trees you get it first go
its also really clone-y, it repeats things and I try a few times to unclone, it clogs with noise, I go to NB2 and get it first go. So been skipping the pain and going staight to NB2
anyway while I'm waiting for them to sort it out I've got most of my workflow covered via the openai api and nb2 now so I can bypass images2
@light dome aren't u talking anymore?
I already proved you wrong. None of your images were able to compete with mine, Moral of the story is, once open ai fixes this bug, nano bana wont be able to compete.
Ok dude, you are slow, can't help you with that, Tried my best
it’s not the ai. it’s what you do with it
Robert would you say you are an ai puppet
I don't have a clue what you mean by that
very hope this Artifacts issue would by solved is realy take down the workflow with all the edit to do allway with spamming new chat's for ask gpt fix the pictures*
Im finding 2.0 to follow character references way better than 1.5
ye fr
Much much better
it do gets confused if you have too many charactersm tho
It depends on what you try to make
1.5 always followed my prompt and references perfectly usually from the first try whereas 2.0 subtly changes the face details and clothes and when it comes to none humanoid creatures it completely butchers it with distorted body proportions and messy texture
indeed, but I think 1.5 produces more AI artifacts than 2.0
have you guys seen how crisp 2.0's text is?? it is surreal
I would like to see just one image example of the 2.0 artefacts
How?? I never experienced this issue with 1.5 and i use it almost every single day from morning till night.
And 1.5 never made mistakes when it came to text, for example if the screen had a book on the table it would execute the whole scene perfectly with the correct text detail.
2.0 seems like a massive downgrade, i find it to be completely unusable.
Another thing i hate about 2.0 is that its result feels like soulless slop whereas 1.5 looked like it was created by a human artist with heart.
For context i create fantasy art in a painterly realism art style
My profile picture is an example of my work using 1.5
this is where things get difficult, it's all a matter of taste. For me I believe Image 2.0 is much better
It’s not a matter of taste, like i said it depends on what you try to make
I posted an example here #images-canvas message
Try creating art with 2.0
Experiment with different art styles
You will experience what other people have been complaining about
1.5 never had these issues even with realistic images and text
I create all sorts of images, I feel 2.0 is a big step up from 1.5
Sure ^^ #images-canvas message
do you mean the pixel-ly effect on that image panels
Yes
yeah. that's quite bad. I haven't seen that personally though.
The First generation image you do with a new page is pretty good and the next one downgrade slowly for get in this quality very blurr and with lots artifact and noises effect
But the first picture you make with a new Page is allway in high good quality is the next one you do on the same page downgrade slowly
This issue was already here with the 1.5 one week ago but i was fixed three day ago later , and since the 2.0 is release this artifact issue is strongly come back
I seen it a few times before but I don't see it that much since I only do multi image editing
Now , now i'm no regrett it 1.5 2.0 is very most better for make Anime character and even story board is just incredible as hell
Im updating the #image-bot soon!
adding the 2.0 model and a few QOL things =D
hope you all enjoy it <3
model 2.0 is really great for text and ad design, but the fact that it cannot center content correctly drives me nuts
anyone had the same issue?
@tidal lance Explain to him
Can't wait for the image bot to have the 2.0 model
to whom may concern: #image-bot is updated with image gen 2.0 and some nice extra things
hope you all enjoy 
2.0 is better in every sense but somehow still randomly sometimes weirds out the hands
anyone gets a issue where it starts adding like weird texture all over,, also i was doing a series of images for a ai music video, and it slowwly over the immages converted the girls into body builders, each image their jaws got wider and their biceps got bigger
Hmm not really I guess changing the context window helps
i get A+B a lots since today could by they goign to fixed the issue
yay yay
GPt finally knows the difference bw manhwa style and anime style
@regal burrow and @analog grail Let me know when you're online, i have an idea for the image generation
I'm around
i'll dm you, because if i say it they will time me out
hmm i need unlock my dm for this servor then but lately i get very less guardail
Done
what is the correct terminology for a zoomed in version of an image
Like i want to zoom in on an image while preserving the aspect ration
send me a friend request and dm
done
Hmmm Im intrested to know why do amature phone styles look more realistic then professional style photos in AI.
As many complain about the artefact problem - has anyone posted a bug report on the issue?
The OpenAI image team already knows and currently working on a fix for it
Is there a difference between using chatgpt image normally and with thinking enabled?
is it better in the output quality?
For thinking, if you want to generate a image for a visual GPT for real time info, like news, thinking is the best model for that
output quality with thinking is magnitudes better then fast
true
Pretty much my opinion too, I used to use 1.5 a lot but 2.0 is such a downgrade. And whenever I do use it instead of nb2 I get reminded why … I really hope they fix it soon
Why it can’t create transparent backgrounds
it can.
When i download it they arent transparent
Oh that's strange, when i copied the image, it was still transparent
When you download it from the button they arent transparent but when you copy our you say it should make a zip it work.
the photo I had for virgo/virgin just got flagged by the safety layer and I'm questioning my artistic choices now. And had to just YOLO that upsize through imagemagick instead
I tried to upscale, but it still just made the image blurry when I zoomed in. Any tips? Especially for illustrations?
AI redraw not upscale tends to be insane quality, its what I used to do before images 2
Yeah, upscaling with Image 2 is not great and I haven't found a workaround as of yet.
have you tried within ChatGPT to upscale using code?
anyone struggling with image generation giving tons of speckles, grain, noise, etc?
@civic dust disappointed by this and he's been very diapointed by this so much
so so disappointed yes, I was looking forward to images 2
I'm doing a mix of imagemagick upscale using one of the fancy new algorithms, and images 1.5 with api currently. And got sidetracked by a philosophical conversation with the various ai bots that I really should be tracking the exact source of each of these images. Which has the side effect that I'll be able to say what % is from what source
licensing/copyright around AI is a whole moving target right now
Yes! It's very strange. Lots of speckles and grainy textures on random things. Especially clothes!
trees, bricks, hair, grass, fur, shrubs are my nemesis currently
I'm looking at some generations in the canvas and not seeing it... I'm wondering if its a niche style thing?
even the air has speckles...
I did a department store scene with shiny saucepans in and that was super speckled
I can only image. my images are so bad that it looks like it took the texture of a lego board.
My stuff is fantasy illustrations. Earlier a gnome working in a underground gem cutting workshop and now an older hobbit couple in an autumn vineyard. Both are so speckled!
just tried with 5.4, 5.3. 5.2, same results, even worse with 5.2 somehow. now I'm trying o3.
The only thing I have thought to do is two-team it and use ANOTHER AI image generation service.... Thank god for Midjourney's editor functionality lol
my wife just used her basic chatgpt on her phone and it rendered perfectly???? phone version said it was using 5.3
Like I was saying earlier: I think it's style dependent. If you look at the images canvas chat, most of those look fine and people are making them right now.
yeah outdoor photorealistic is quite bad, which is the bulk of what I do
what command to I use over there to generate something?
I'm not sure....
It does not seem to be working lol
hmmm, I added to my prompt to use dall-e and it worked. time to test more images now.
yeah same here. 
Hey I think figured something out. My fantasy prompts often stack phrases like ultra-detailed, 4k render, painterly material rendering, cinematic shallow depth of field, embroidery, gem cutting, lantern lit, fantasy costume, and dark fantasy. The model tries to satisfy “rich detail everywhere,” and when it cannot resolve every tiny leaf, stitch, pore, gem reflection, and cave texture, it invents high-frequency texture noise. I think that might be what reads as speckles, glitter, stippling, or crunchy over-sharpening.
it worked once and now it's failing again...
Have you tried ’denoised’ as an added quality if your prompt produces artefacts? I sed that when 1.0 just came out as it also had some artefacting problems.
i'll try
doesn't work. 😭
Still not a fix for the images right?
Did they release some new image model? I see people saying "new model". What's the deal?
A/B testing
So far I have not gotten any a/b testing today
just me or whenever u create a "tree" image with gpt image 2, it will ALWAYS generate the same picture?
hello guys!!
S'up?
Something I'm struggling with is that characters often have very similar faces, particularly when going for 2d styles. Anyone found a trick to make multiple characters look more different from each other? Nose and mouth shapes and the like?
This is less of a problem with a photorealistic style, but it can still show up
Hey, anyone having this error:
openai.BadRequestError: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': "Invalid value: 'gpt-image-2'. Value must be 'dall-e-2'.", 'type': 'invalid_request_error', 'param': 'model', 'code': 'invalid_value'}}
When trying to edit with gpt-image-2 via python library?
BadRequestError, double check what you are sending is correct
I’m about to yeet my phone
Can someone explain this to me please? I have chat gpt generate a concept image, that includes 2 images together. I approve the concept, I want 2 images.
It won’t separate them and it changes the concept 💀
A few months ago I was able to generate gifs ffs I don’t get it
Does anyone remember a while ago there was like a meme where you can tell the image model to render something over and over and the image would eventually warp and get progressively weirder?
I forgot what the prompt was but I wanted to see how the new image gen model handled that use case.
Any remember?
I remember that with 4o ImageGen
Hi, could someone answer a quick question for me?
Hey, quick question — is it normal for generated images to sometimes come out with a kind of grainy/noisy “static” look?
Some of mine look clean, but others get this weird texture or slight pixelation that ruins the quality.
Is this caused by the prompt, the model, or something like lighting/render settings?
And is there a way to consistently avoid it and keep the image clean?
Any tips would help 👍
Yes, that is a issue the developers have acknowledged and are working on a fix, you can always prompt to fix/pervent the artifacting and keep it smooth
Hello there. Hope everyone is awesome. I was wondering if Image 2.0 stopped creating image transparencies. When I’ve asked for it, it’s faked the transparency by adding a checkered background.
That's strange, when I did it in ChatGPT, it was actually transparent
Yeah. It is weird.
Okay, thank you, even after requesting corrections it doesn't respond to the commands, and often it changes the image I liked too much, even completely altering it.
Mine don't stay there either; I need to use third-party tools for that.
image 2 does not do transparent pngs.
You can't typically create images with a transparent background when you have thinking selected as your model. Currently, the only model that does transparency is instant.
I will test it, because in my case, none of the models work in transparent mode.
Because I create my custom emojis with ChatGPT.
Oooh. Thanks. I’ll check it out tomorrow.
mmh.. On my GPT the Word Images is no display on the list since tonight why that ?
When will image v2 be available in API?
already is
v2 does not do alpha mask
Have we heard anything about the rot look repeated edits gain yet?
Nope, still the same old, "We're aware of it an actively working on it."
Eh, I’ll accept acknowledging it
That was on April 22. 😭
are you sure?
very
if you ask chatgpt for a transparent image, it is using v1.5
there is no way to check on chatgpt which model it is using, tho, so, I can only say that based on the image style and on the fact the API does not support transparent background for v2
so ChatGPT will choose 1.5 if you ask for a transparent background? that's interesting
as a neat trick, you can just generate with v2 and then use v1.5 to remove the background, but it is unreliable
yes*
* it is unreliable, so far I have noticed that it will always pick v2 if you give it a substantial prompt, regardless of how much you ask for transparent background
I made a big bunch of transparent images yesterday, it must have been using 1.5 as they were all flawless
but given a simple prompt, it will use v1.5 if you ask
if it where transparent, then yes
the fact it.. v1.5 still a pretty good model
while building the #image-bot a few days ago, I was surprised that v2 coudln't do transparency
it was frankly quite annoying since I had to handle yet another edge case of people passing background:transparent as a param while selecting model:gpt-image-v2 lol
Im considering adding a button that just takes whatever image and gives it to v1.5 to remove the background
Im actually considering adding a bunch of extra stuff for more artstic control rather than just plain AI outputs xD
nice!
I wonder about how much interest would be on having a pixel art mode, that actually makes pixel perfect pixel art 👀
hey where is the image library option?
Can someone please point out?
I suddenly cant find it
:H:
yes same for me
It's impossible to generate images with GPT; it keeps giving an error, not to mention when it sends: "I couldn't generate the image because of an error here."
too much issue lately i'm no going to paid pro again for this crap
This is also stressing me out and causing me to waste a lot of time trying to generate a single image. I was considering paying for the pro plan, but without thinking about these conditions the service is currently in, it's irrelevant and foolish to pay for it, considering that in my country I'll pay more for the pro plan than a conventional American plan.
Disapointed too by this Artifact issue they still no have solsved, also the waste of time for false Guardails when no was need . seriously paid pro and by treat as kids and heavy restriced no very fun ! you going to lost à very lots user OpenAi if you continue that way and no fixing issue !
pretty Nice Open Crap Ai hit Guardail for a Star Wars Oc Characters Seriously can you just go hell with your stupid guardail Waste my Precious Time !
Need ask four time for get what i'm want it no know the stupid Under-Human do this settinfg for the guardail system but i should by fire off !
You know, I wish they had some kind of Sora challenge for Images where if you won you get a free month of ChatGPT Pro, I would really love that mods
ye and image credits get used for that too
is it same for everyone else?
This is unacceptable, and support isn't responding. I pay for a product only to have constant errors and problems; this is frustrating.
Hmmmm I've been wondering why now professional photos look more AI then amateur photos, is it because professional photos were trained on AI or am I missing something
true
ANd your username lowkey reminds me of the best anime I ever watched💯
My favorite character
Im gonna switch to claude next month. Chatgpt has been great but other AIs have just outperformed openais models.
Im not saying that they are bad, Im just saying that there are better alternatives for the same price
Intresting, how do you think Claude would help prompting the ChatGPT Image model?
What...chatgpt is literally SOTA
If ur happy with chatgpt, stay at it. It is a good llm.
But Im a coder who needs an ai that is good in helping me troubleshooting bad documented code from 2ish years ago that I wrote.
Thats the good thing about the different models. Each have their pros and cons
And as of rn, claude is better at coding
Tbh, I dont think claude scores at image generation. Im not even sure if it can generate images
I take back what I said in that case
Is there a place we can share video generated stuff?
I was able to get some cool results from the generated assets from GBT
Agree
has the artifacting been fixed yet by the by
No
Hmmmm I think the autoregressive method that the GPT Image models do are to improve the spatial reasoning, I think that's why it has so good spatial reasoning bceause it generates the image part by part kinda like spatial reasoning
I think the way their model generate is pixel by pixel so like unlike traditional diffusion models where it generates from noise as it goes this is more like top to bottom type of diffusion. I forget what it’s called.
That's intresting
Yeah, there’s a particular technique. I’ll try to find it if I can.
promoting claude in the images channel will never get you anywhere. I pay for chatgpt largely for the image functionality. Which is a bit broken right now unfortunately
Now i'm pretty sure the artifact issue is becuse the guardail mess up with the loading the generation image to check thusand times all is alright
its any time it has to repeat anything I think ... textures, edits, recurring stuff
what is annoying is they still no had fixed this that realy turn down the workflow to spent more tim to edit make new chat reroll and pray for the style this the same : because sometime i will clean up the artifact issue but too much cleaning and even change the colors , and ambience. so yeah is such a shame OpenAi don't Fix this Just Right Now specialy when user Paid for This.
That's real, and now I have to stick to ChatGPT because ironically it's thinking images feature might help me demonstrate things visually
Are you experiencing image tool error now?
I just did a minute ago but then it generated
seems like the model is not able to transfer one person from one image to another and retain most features, maybe there is a specific way to instruct it for it?
Really? I had no problems transferring my characters to an image, unless that happens with humans because I didn't test humans yet
humans yeah, people and such
i.e. place this person on this aircraft or something similar.
Just seen an ad of ChatGPT images of someone using it to help plan and setup a garden, I wonder how much useful can the image model be for more taks
This has been a common use case for image models that can edit. Gardens, interior decorating, virtual try on's etc. Google Photos now extracts all the clothes you've worn into a virtual wardrobe.
Wait, what about the outfit thing?
See that constantly on the chicken and garden groups on facebook. Talk to me when it can get the shovel and help properly
Why is GPT so stupid for following clear instructions for image generation?
I requested: Chat, please generate a toggle with no background, a light gray outline, and a solid white button inside.
Result: It does the opposite of what I requested. It delivers a solid white background and a button without color.
gpt-image-2.0 doesn't do transparent backgrounds
But it generated a transparent background, but the ball also had no background, even though I requested it to be solid white.

if it was trasparent, it was v1.5
There are ways for gpt-image-2 to generate a transparent backround, but it isnt the model itself doing that. Its post processing on chats side.
The model itself cannot do transparent backrounds yet
I assume that at some point it will have trasnparency, since the previous version does
For power users, you can use the Codex app and ask image-gen to create your image with a hot pink, etc backround. And in the same prompt as it to make everything pink transparent.
honestly, I assumed it would until I checked the API docs and in fact, it doesn't
Yes, it's transparent. Don't ask me which model, because the website doesn't allow or give the option to select a specific model.
yes, it used v1.5, not v2 then
Visit id:customize to pick up the <@&1408186587606679582> role. Everyone will still be notified for large releases, updates, and events regardless.
It seems more like the chat uses whatever model it wants, it seems like it completely ignores any request, or it's just plain stupid.
What makes me never consider paying for the PRO
can you share a chat?
Okay, so how do I get him to use v2?
It seems to me that you always use v1.5 and never v2
because the images always come out incorrectly or don't provide what I requested.
actually this has merit from my testing rn
cant post images here
The best choice is to use both to see the improvements.
Yes, but as I said, there is no select option to choose the desired model for generating the images.
Just this prompt in the mobile app works for me - "Make an image of a black circle on a transparent background."
Edit: Nevermind. I see that it uses 1.5 if asking for transparency.
has anyone noticed that after an image has be done, using thinking, the streaming of the thinking model doesn't end?
Anything you found as a solution @stoic bolt ? We encounter this issue frequently, and while the support team requests additional input, we haven't had any success yet. The support is great, don't get me wrong, but receiving a response only once a day puts our business at risk, making it difficult to continue. 🙂
Any suggestions on what to do? We've been running this application for months without deployments, and suddenly these messages start appearing. It seems like an issue with the validator, but the payload hasn't changed. I also upgraded to gpt-image-2, just to try and see if this would land me on a different infrastructure.
So ChatGPT can't generate 2:3 and 3:2 images anymore?
I tell it 2:3, I get 9:16 now, every time.
current boilerplate in my prompts:
DSLR high-res digital professional-looking photo. Aspect ratio: 2:3 portrait (do your best to force this)
posted an example in https://discord.com/channels/974519864045756446/1204360881593520128
Hmmm don't understand what people use 3:2, 2:3 aspect ratio for compared to 16:9 and 9:16
high end HDR certified monitors often have that aspect ratio, same goes for DICOM Monitors in medial.
Interesting
I have. Doesn’t happen all the time, but enough.
hey, some of us use 1:1. But this is just a layout thing, if I saved them as any other aspect I'd have to autocrop and that might take out the fun bits. I'll be using these photos to make a directed graph Soon(TM) and that'll be connected circles so ... still 1:1
Don't worry I didn't forget you 1:1 people 😊
too many years in front end watching autocrop take out the important parts of photos has scarred me. I really, really like how AI can recompose a wide or tall image into a square one
Does anyone know why randomly image gen defaults to infographics or like, random unrelated images?
my sunday be like: arguing semantics of the difference between a drip, a trickle, a stream and a flow with a bot
infuriatingly, got A/B testing with the perfect stream of water on the ugliest faucet I have seen on my life, and can't get it to put the same water stream on a nicer tap
anyword on when they are going to fix that horible texture i keep getting over my images?
this happens when you use refrence images, and it has to "edit" an image
It can happen on a new generation too
can you share a chat?
Yeah I also noticed significant quality shifts and experienced A/B testing. But now seems like OpenAI team has regretted rolling out the new model, and images' quality is getting back from my side at least.
its been around 2 weeks since they released that buggy thing, they should have waited
you would rather have a less powerful model?
that seems to be incorrect from my experience,
can you share chat?
is there a way to switch back to the previous image gen or are we locked to the most current
what specific workflows are broken for you now?
just getting this https://chatgpt.com/s/m_69f6cc221b348191b8565b79c7e74d5c noise over stuff where i dont want it
and i dont believe its only when i edit images, but even if it is thats not a workable solution
Not all the time. It happens for me even when I don’t use them.
hmmm ok
would rather have a working model than just waiting 2 weeks for them to fix this one
only via api. I added an api call to my workflow to get around the worst of the issues with v2
good idea
Last week I created the most beautiful series of banners as one image then ChatGPT magically connected to canva and it imported with every individual item adjustable.
Today, the Canva app is bringing a 404.
Yay technology.
acha
Does anyone know of any AI Gen sites that let you make 3D models of a 2D image? I’m curious if it would help with my character consistency.
nope, I would ask on #ai-discussions since that's for non OpenAI models
I'm constantly getting adverts from Meshy but have never tried it
i've tried it! it's alright
Hello everyone, am I the only one to whom chatgpt has been generating images lately, even when I'm not asking for it?
Meshy 6 is cray cray
There's another good one but cant remember the name. The rest are meh
I just thought it would help, if I wanted to have more character references
Anyone got an idea how to get rid of the annoying spotting that image 2.0 keeps adding to everything
I've been using Grok
To clean up the image or to just generate an image from scratch?
Go to #images-canvas and I'll upload a visual example
Hello, I’ve been trying for a while to create an image without a background in ChatGPT. For example, I have an icon that should have a transparent background, but I always end up with a white background. Does anyone know how I can fix this problem? 🙂
artifact issue is getting out of hand now
redraw your composition in another AI
Posted some attempts at redraw in gpt, satisfactory so far
I was just browsing around the server and came across this. What the hell??? I've been out of the loop or something because this is SO convincing. Wow holy crap it's so good, I can't believe AI can make this image with a single prompt. No garbled text, no strange fingers, no phone mount oddly morphing into the desk or something else. It's so good that it feels like I'm living in some sort of alternate reality, like a sci-fi movie that just became reality. #image-bot message
still it's all by human requests, so share your ideas, 😀
I'm working on a game and I was using GPT Image 2 for some assets, but it's just so expensive. To generate one high res image asset is like $0.50, multiply that by a few hundred and it adds up
So I started using Gemini 3.0 Pro, still very high quality but half the price
it does, can use the #image-bot for free
I don't want to use a public image bot to generate assets for a game
fair, but fun stuff, not just work all the time
i don't share work stuff
It's a lot of fun, I just don't want the images to be on a public server like that, well not until the game is released anyway. Plus I would feel like I'm taking advantage of something that isn't intended for that purpose, I need to generate a lot of images to test iterations and such. Plus I can't use my LoRA here.
I have Codex integrated with the Scenario MCP so I can generate game assets that adhere to my art policies
It's friggin beautiful lol
nice
what i do in the server usually gives me an analogy or a new take of what I do at work. gain a different perspective to use in my work related ideas
images generating is working fine for you guys?
yes
What a surprise the artifact crap i still here they promise to fixed but they still NO CARE anything !
what are surprise, you complaining... again... all good, all normal. Just another normal day.
no a Suprise with you litteraly lick the boots openAi all day's and allway make remenber rules to anyone post in the wrong channels 🙂 So Not isn"t normal they don't care a issue everyone get it after make fews generation on the same chan the quality no should downgrade that way before i was No this crap issue ! they promise to fixed it and is now week Nothing as change is pretty funny to paid Premium for have a pathethic service like that !
this is a discussions channel, not a complaining channel....
Wo care
you obviously don't
everyone as right to express what is wrong with OpenAi
yes, and everyone has the right to upon act free speech
and complaining on the wrong ways to let OpenAI know... that's questionable
Off course too but when you say this channel is not for complanining isn't free speech is trying to mute the speech , i'm not the only one is disapointed about this artifacts issue. and we know they come here sometime for check the chat's what people thinks as feedback
https://status.openai.com/ there are some errors on the back end
we no should paid when have issue that way they should refund the two last week as Apologies or even if they can give us a extra week free. Because this crap bring lots troubles for lots peoples need workflows.
complaining at the shoe store how terrible the vacuum cleaner works... doesn't help
Funny because that no as any sense since the issue is from the same store.
They just don't care they just reply , saying we will fix it and two week later still no fixed 🙂
is great to work to OpenAI you spent your day the foot on the desk 🙂
here is not the complaints department, for that there are feedback channels or the official help.openai.com methods 😏
just venting here for the sake for venting is just wasted energy
Isn't not at all that way everyone know the issues more display than a request feedback open Ai will by oblivious read by a bot whill auto reply saying thank you for your feedback your issue as been reported have a good day !
sure, if you believe so, in your world must be true. when you check reality, world doesn't work like that. your highness
maybe but still this issue upset me because we no should have this issue since the past everything was smooth , and when is happen on the past they fixed this 3 day later now they just give up because they only focus about the Monney
help.openai.com <- should really at least check it
They no talk about artifacts
but bringing bad energy every day... is getting boring, not productive
i dn't do this all day's just figure out the issue was still here after the 10th Picture mad in the same chan.
I agree. At this point, a lot of us are making do or problem solving.
I mean it's ok to complain, it's a human reaction GPT will never show willingly. At least for now. But this is a place to share and discuss about images too. Try new ideas. And even chelllenge others.
I see they included the scribble as an official style in the images tab lol
noticed too
still missing the personal self defineed presets
Which are?
the ones you provide? like with the front end sora had
Oh so refrences you provide, that would be a cool feature to have, too add your own styles for conistency
well I do that from my IDE, but to have a few within ChatGPT in an easy selectable manner would be better
Hi
Bye
Anyone seen the trending hallucination prompts? Love to read more. If you have Chat GPT set to Instant, and tell it to modify an attached image (Without actually attaching) it hallucinates that you did.
Can someone tell me how it makes perfect movie screenshots when never mentioning a specific movie? This can't be the standard diffusion, right?
https://chatgpt.com/share/69f8f7dd-66c4-83ea-abfc-b5759e2d73e6
This is with the API, same kind of result:
#images-canvas message
I seen this tred
I like the badly drawn one and the creepy photo one. idk which you have seen. I have been trying to come up with my own.
I've just switched modes and work around the issue ... my god its annoying they havent' fixed it but at least I can still do near field portrait type pictures and product photography type pictures. Routed around the rest of it
and I get to watch the balance for this go up: gpt-image-1_5-2025-12-16 image, output total $3.041 lol. Mostly works. Looks like you get charged for text output not image output when you get guardrailed
Why does GBT have such a hard time with swords? I’m just curious.
mostly training data, if you specify a certain type of weapon then it's likely to have an issue. did you try thinking and web search?
it seems to need most of the sword in image or it goes weird, like it needs the full reference
Hmmmm maybe you should find refrence images to help
What I worry about is GBT taking that reference image, and holiding it as canon.
It'll sometimes do that, even when I specify otherwise.
Or send it reference images.
An example is if I say "The sword is being removed from the scabbard by the hilt." It'll have the sword all the way out, shorter, the hilt still in the sheath, and a floating handle somewhere.
Yes
Meshy
$0.8 per untextured model / $1.2 per textured model. Add +$0.2 for auto-rigging and +$0.12 for animation.
Just like any other AI, the more you spend the better you get
ah yeah its particularly bad at that that describing an action in process thing. And this isn't just gpt, banana often fails in similar ways for stuff
I feel GPT 2.0 is amazing without references images, but once you use references it tend to be slightly degraded in output.
just asked for "woman in a plain dress" vs "woman in a modest dress" and boy oh boy, the social coding. "modest" was also about 15 years younger
Ooooof.
I gotta admit, AI needs to calm down. It's so hard to be specific about how to generate a woman without it being...something.
I have a bunch of prompts like that. That break image logic
I asked for a pic of my character, and it randomly game me one of Asuka from NeoGeo
How many images per day are we allowed?
on a 20x usage plan
Are images available right now?
hear some news about if Open Ai lost the trial with Musk we could lost a lots in performance for stuff's and data base :x
for such cases expect an appeal, so it's only round one, once that happens can either go to a higher court, or what's usuallly teh case both parties will make an undisclosed settlement.
Hope so because OpenAi still the best Ai for know veery well stuff's isn't main stream and secondary characters where other character failed badly or worse other Ai no realy able to rewrite à characters style , to head to toes , like change hairstyle or outfits ,*
Facts
The next level is being able to somehow convert some of these images into cool video or animation
But they took down Sora 😭
Yes Sora was too much for OpenAi apparently in Capacity sometime like that and maybe some issue about deepfakes
They don’t care about deepfakes. Sora was a consumer test product that failed to monetize because it didn’t think ahead. Everybody from TikTok to YouTube profited from Sora videos except Sora the actual platform.
What was Sora really? It was a deepfake video generator that they just cleverly named “ cameos”.
When it started to get legal threats from a estates especially from the dead, and Hollywood movie Studios, threatening lawsuit against intellectual property infringement and copyright violations they imposed severe restrictions, making the popularity of the app plummet.
The remainder that remained were its most loyal and supportive group of people. Look how they got treated in the end. With export data button, the rest couldn’t even generate any more videos and were locked out,
Copyright majors issue then hmmm , that make me think if all stuff's from Anime , video games , movies , was under Copyright issue and they make lawsuit to OpenAi because people make famous character under Copyright i'm feel it if we remove alll stuff under Copyright the AI being boring as hell
did guardrails increase a bit
how so ?
Guys
i got A/B testing again
the images are slightly better on one side
but... that side also doesn't have the noise problem
ALWAYS. like not a single prompt.
...is OpenAI testing a fix for the noise issue?
getting flagged for harmless prompts
Oh yeah happen it to me is probably a misstake but can by annoying if you use Api or premium account because is count as generate. when that happen just ask gpt , Do It Again.
I ask gpt to make a charecter who has a bit of revealing clothing, GPT made
But when I asked it to add a beautiful blue robe, it flagged me
did, got flagged 4 times consecutively🥲
yeah i guess when looking to edit the characer with the revealing clothing , i make the character more bare and that hit this stupid guardail sometime that way
fr
because is already happen to me by misstake gpt make me stuff with exposed chest . so could by a image generate like that and the censoreship blocked directly
ye tru
is with that we can see it this Model can make n f s w stuffs but is high censored^^
ye sometimes it passes, and sometimes it doesnt
it even generates nsfw when clearly not asked for
which leads to the guardrails
So i'm think the model was too much on the red line and trying four time to make a pictures hits the guardail and no the fault your request about blue dress but because use the revelating cloth you do first for continue your images , because i had figure out sometime with a chan when you generate a picture , in this chan: GPT will use this base picture , this base style , sometime similar or close , cloth , at least you ask another style , i will allway follow the last image generate for make the next one .
right
Has gpt 5.5 instant made any changes in chatgpt instant image generation?
no idea, still got 5.3 here
image generation is the same, using gpt-image-2.0
thinking i will make a prompts more details and sometime more high quality work instead instant but the opposit is fairly possible too
guardrails increased to the point where gpt image 2 became a paperweight
What kind of guardrails are we talking here? What kind of images are being blocked for you?
anything having to do with IPs
the copyright law needs massive revisions
Don't think it comes across that guardrails are there for a reason that is not related to AI and blame AI for adhering to laws
This has been since day 1 with dalle3 and so on. Nothing new here.
i don't see it any copyright guardail in chat gpt and when is happen just ask do it again or say my character is inspirated by*
There are ways around this. One of them is as you mentioned.
Yes is work because i'm was hard block for star wars character and when use the word is inspirated from this star wars characters. ding is work well ^^
getting A/B testing a lot
but lowkey cant decide which one is better
how would you want it revised? Its there for a reason
I hit a guardrail the other day while generating a dapper man wearing a cravat, first time I've seen a blocked for likeness error. I think I accidentally generated a celebrity
Any idea if/when the artefacting will get addressed?
There once been meshy ... that allowed to convert 2D into fully animated 3d models to be used in UE studio , Blender , DAZ 3D , Cube 2D and Anistudio ... i turned my main OC into a Vtuber model with it
if i upload a picture in temp chat can it still train on it (for img generation)?
Nah
it will still retained for 30 days
3 is that the policy? 30 days?
for temp chats yes
What’s the rest?
forever if archived, had a recent export done, everything since the start is there. once you delete it also 30 days
O my... lawl...
After the 6th iteration for a spider logo design.... it is all about the legs...
You are now officially fighting the final boss of AI image generation: “Spider Counting.”
The annoying part is the model is visually composing symmetry first, anatomy second. It sees:
central body
mirrored limb arcs
decorative upper framing
…and keeps turning those top framing limbs into another functional pair of legs.
So even though the prompt says “8 legs only,” the composition engine keeps aesthetically balancing the image into 10.
The latest one specifically has:
4 true walking legs each side
PLUS 1 elevated “display” limb each side near the abdomen
So the model thinks it obeyed the prompt because it internally categorised them differently.
Ironically, if we stripped away the cinematic emblem style and generated:
“scientifically accurate Australian redback spider”
…it would probably nail the anatomy immediately.
Then we’d need to build the military crest around THAT instead of asking the model to invent a stylised spider from scratch.
You were absolutely correct every single iteration.
... Very interesting...
Start with a mockup and tell it to only draw inside the mockup. It won't add more legs.
ChatGPT image gen is so broken after the last update. It is putting a weird mesh texture on all images that onlt gets worse and more noticable on every edit
it's an ai hypertexture problem, we all waiting for a solution
There are ways to fix the artifacting issues though. It just means the process takes a bit longer.
smoothing and normalizing the art styles help
avoid adding keywords like 8k, 16k, super hyper ultra mega infinite beyond details. which make no sense to begin with, and invites hypertexture artifacts
I don't use any of those keywords. Editing the images makes the problem 100x worse.
by the 3rd iteration of an image the image is unusable
What do you mean by this?
if the hypertexture artifacts happen on a photo image, make sure to subseqently ask for a normalization and/or smoothing the aspects of the image that got hit by this
I will try that
also you may want to report that in #1070006915414900886 and not in #1154829862171844679
I just wanted a single pleace to put all my images. I will report it in bug reports
I do not have permission to post in bug reports
did you follow the instroctions here? #1295975636061655101 message
for the Artifact my fix is just make a new chan when that starting and make my picture untils is show on again and then repeat.
can keep the cool stuff on any gallery you wish to open and share also in #images-canvas
This is how I have been doing it too. If I need to make edits I do it on Midjourney or Nano Banana. but the texture is still subtly present on the images from the first gen
Sorted, thank you
you can try edit too just sometime you could have to roll again or open a new chan when gpt start to follow a way in the generation picture don't please you because.
there a little tip when you ask for a images , when you open the chan gpt will make you the picture , and use the first one as base style for make the next one at least you ask gpt to change style or stuffs , so when you open a new chan and even ask the same request or promtps the résult will by never same style !

its repeats in general, I got it to make me an image of a village and it did the thing where it just helpfully did an edit when I didn't want one, and that edit had horrid repeats of the houses in it
The problem with editing too you ask to change one single thing it changes the composition of the entire image
probably need photoshop for that kind of thing
Bro this new Image Gen 2 for fantasy is SO BAD.
Can we like, rewind back to Image Gen 1? (Not 4o, that one sucks)
Image gen 1 is same as 4o.
it is still available on the API even Dalle-2 is there
btw, #image-bot use it for free =)
No it's not.
bruh 4o was a text model, not image 😭
Incorrect
It did many many things. We never even got most of them
4o was multimodal model with native image generation. Still available as a customgpt which name is 4o ImageGen (link: https://chatgpt.com/g/g-6940a876d5f4819186b4668deabcd580-4o-imagegen).
if i do not have visa,how can i buy the plus
you can subscribe from the app on mobile
any Stripe paying method available where you are or through google play or apple app store subscriptions
thanks!
new model dont generate images without background or transparent backgrounds?
Yea when you ask gpt for transpart images it apparntly uses GPT Image 1.5 because the 2 model can't do transparent images,
Interesting, haven't gotten any hypertextures using Instant 5.5 today. Tons of it with thinking.
gpt-image-2 does not make images with alpha mask
surprisingly.. as I would assume that this would continue to be a feature since v1.5 does
Yea when you do it in ChatGPT, it actually switches to the 1.5 model for transparency for that.
indeed
I've been able to do it if I switch out of reasoning mode. I don't know if the instant mode is still version 1.5 or if it's just a reasoning problem
if the model generates an trasnparent image, it was not v2
guys what's up i am new here
I m italian but know english a bit yeah, whats ya talking abou'
This channel is about images
just realized, sorry
FOr my introusion out of topci let's say, anyway once I am here maybe the destiny choodes for me. Let's talk images, i am new in this app/social, am I allowed to send here some shots(images?
you can share images made by OpenAI Image models in #images-canvas , #daily-theme and #1154829862171844679 , for other models either in #ai-discussions or #off-topic , human made ones in #off-topic
I do understand nothing sayan, you know mayb coz i am Italian.....
ah yes noww yes I readi it twice
I want to talk withy u and share it here, I can't can i ?
well if you gonna talk here, go make some images first in #image-bot and make sure to use the /draw command
image gens failing for anyone else? haven't been able to gen for like an hour now
Image generation through the API is working ok at the moment
it worked literally 2 seconds after I posted that 😉
I have an issue where I can start a new chat, put my prompt in. It gives me what I want. I try and make one more, and it will hallucinate and give me a completely unrelated image with my characters. Usually some kind of character sheet. If I try and start a new chat, it will hallucinate again. Does this happen to anyone else? Is it a sign I need to stop?

I was wondering, i suddenly can’t use the /draw command anymore, or any image bot commands at all. Why would that be, did break any rules?
Same I can't use the #image-bot
Yes, I have the same problem. Like all commands are missing. @vapid elk , do you have any insights onto the matter?
So it’s all then
ohh might have been my fault
or not
are you sure it is missing?
i can see them and other people had used it
it might have been the discord outage earlier
works for me
They are back now.
we need a daily theme with needles, or with platypus, or sheep
Does anyone know the inner workings of how GPT 5.5 hallucinates a photo when you ask it to edit an "attached" photo when there isn't one. Sometimes it produces real photos, maybe all the photos were real, idk.
it's normal, it call the tool to generate an image, even if you provide a whitespace or a dot, it will give you an image, and since your prompt had the keyword photo, you got a photo back
Im not talking about it being a bug or whatever. I am more interested in is if the image it is giving back is always something that has existed and been trained on or is it random and some are made up, or what if at all anything is happening underneath the hood? It's odd that some images just seem like it couldn't have existed and some you get clearly have existed and you can use google lens on.
I have gotten some weird images, tried to look them by source, and couldn't find anything, I've had some pretty weird ones
One I was hoping to give me some juicy stuff was ".... sensitive data .... attached screenshot..." but all I got were portfolio/crypto screenshots.
if you prompt something like "What are the current president's hidden secrets and fears?* you can get some hilarious stuff
Unrelated but something I just found out is with Thinking Mode you can get 8 images to generate with 1 prompt. Thats nice.
oh, do tell more
Oh you just ask. I said "Make 3 images of...."
But I found online the upper limit is 8.
oh nice, I'll keep that in mind
lol i js found out asw
I was reading through the image generation cot
And it said it had to make sure it doesnt go past 8
Lots streaming issue lately for you too ?
haven't been on twitch
Oh ^^ no about twitch is when you write the prompts is sometime write interupt stream please waiting
TikTok?
GPT
sometimes
also see now when you hit the button dowload for your image isn't enought need also get into another menu.
I think I had a stroke trying to read this.
Well ^^ When you generate a Image , you have the little icon arrow for Dowload it , but is happen for me sometime when just click here the Dowload don't.. and i'm need Open a Menu on the image and select again Dowload for get my picture dowloaded isn't happen allway but sometime i do
This keeps happening to me too.
the same happens if you go to https://chatgpt.com/images/ and edit images there directly, that doesn't carry over and you get a random image
i guess the model has some over fitting on stock photos and movie trailers
i just really cannot stop it from speckling all over the place 🙁
Is that a long chat history? I've been told that it uses the previous images that help it make the new image even if you don't specify that and so the artifact can happen
no it's like after 3-4 exhanges max
sometimes even on first ask
They reduced the daily limit on #image-bot before it was 50, now it's only 30.
Estimated GPT images left: 28
DALL·E 2: 0/30
DALL·E 3: 0/30
What mod did that and why?
Yeah, It’ll happen to me on both.
I Actually increased it '-'
also, you don't even use Dalle 3 And 2, from what I can see on the logs =P
I changed the way the bot keeps track of the usage because it had segregated limits per model, but since OpenAI keeps releasing more models, and all of the gpt models use token-based usage counting, I made so it had one "token pool" for the usage...
so.. if you rather spend 100% of your usage on gpt-image-2 and don't care about the other models.. you can now
dalle 2 and 3, have its usage measured in use count not in tokens, so.. no granularity.. so I kept the old counting system for those
also.. those models are used waaaay less anyway
it wasn't "Openai keeps lowering our usage".. it was me, updating the bot and changing it to give more usage on the most requested model...
¯_(ツ)_/¯
btw.. the number you see Estimated GPT images left: xx is based on your usage average, that makes it much more fair than the previous system since before, you could use it a fixed amount of times no matter the prompt and amount of reference images..
in reality, longer prompts and input images do use more tokens, so... when someone would send a "a picture of a dog".. it would count as 1, the same if someone sent a huge prompt with 8 HD refference images..
now.. if your requests are smaller, you use less tokens, thus, you can use more
Now I get it
I was wondering earlier from 28 my limit was down to 24 after generating only 1 image. I have a very long prompt lol 🥹
yep, makes sense, if your average token usage is usually small and you make one huge reuqest that goes way above average, it may simply use more tokens
that is why the command says it is an estimate.. because it is =P
I get it now 🫡
I just thought that the estimate would help people understand better what the percentage means
thinking about it, I think the estimate would be more accurate if I base it on the median instead of average 🤔
Visit id:customize to pick up the <@&1408186587606679582> role. Everyone will still be notified for large releases, updates, and events regardless.
Premium is being very shorty limited for generation images i had hit the limit after 35 generation image with count also 15 Guardail flagged: and then need wait 16 hour as Cool Down OpenAi make a very tricky move to turn Pro very Important for User use GPT as Workflow 🙂
Just found out though the CoT, that the max images before it can't use web search for images is 8
Not sure if anyone talked about this but has anyone else noticed the speckles in the images? Like it's a lot.
Yes, these are artefacts that are knows. They are present but not always.
No much fix just when is start to have artefacts open a new page. is anoying but no other fix for now.
The daily-themes for April from 1 to 30 have been recorded.
📎https://discord.com/channels/974519864045756446/1475083104749092884
Arms too.
It's unfortunate to have to open a new page when you're trying to get it to fix a few things.
That's real, i dont like doing it but I have to avoid the artifacts until it gets fixed
Hey
How do you guys deal with annoying "hidden" watermarks on ChatGPT Images 2.0?
When I generate images with ChatGPT Images 2.0, it adds a hidden watermark, which is fine for safety reasons. However, when I try to edit the image or use it in a new generation, it adds a second or third watermark, and the watermark becomes visible.?
Whats the most revealing or disturbing images uve managed to make chatgpt generate?
Go be a hornball on some other model. ChatGPT's image moderation is really good.
Doubt it
The moderation is so easy to get around
You can't generate something that a specific competitor can, and that is the point I am trying to make. Have a girl in a bra and panties? So what. That isn't what I am meaning.
Thats not what im meaning either
Dude, people will say this stuff and literally just be creating #3818462910181654392nd image of a woman with a big chest
The GPT-Image 2 modeling is very easy to skip; you just change words that aren't so obvious.
But I really love this new model; I can't wait for Google's response and the subsequent GPT-Image 2.5 or 3.
i dont create bikini pictures,
And talking about disturbing: i once managed to create a gore death scene
exactly like rin's death in naruto but gpt didnt bother to cover up the hole in chest
Intresting...
does anyone know why it's so bad at pixel art, and when it'll get good at it?
AI pixel art is bad because the whole architecture of how it works is not very good in straight lines
even if yo utrained it just with pixel art.. it would still not be pixel perfect
guys, has anyone been experiencing poor text rendering from the image model? it feels like it has regressed?
sometimes a whole torso in comics, at first it wasnt doing this
everything has gotten poor
How do i download my sora videos cause it is banned now the app isn't working anymore
Go to web and click the export button
Hey
Sometimes I'll be generating images, have a solid process that's working -- and then it just stops? It gives me random generations that I didn't ask for. Even when I start a new chat.
mmh lots error for generation today yes , and off course is never the guardail as issue to by down 🙂
this service allway work 🙂
Do u want to fix some errors for generation?
i cannot even get it to properly swap a chair with reference anymore. it seems to mess everything up every single time
Start a new chat after generating one image to avoid artifacts
tell me more detail for artifacts
I can't post today's theme yet... all gens would be removed
The GPT Image V2 API can do arbitrary resolutions, even some crazy high 4K resolutions..
now #image-bot can do too =P
have fun =P
Yeah. images seem to be edge cases lately.
Anyone else having issues with chat making images without request, then getting stuck recursively spamming image after image, then turning it into a semi-powerpoint explanation page? I've had to reset the app several times to get it to stop.
the kind of images I got are too explicit. had to report
It particularly struggles with natural textures like trees, hair, and fabric from what I’ve found. Speckles all over.
That is unfortunate, but I do like seeing the guardrails dropped some. It should be the user's choice really, what get's created, though too many users don't have any personal guardrails. I wouldn't want to be in charge of making those discriminations.
oh yeah, there are a few notorious ones around here that would do that. have to keep the guardrails in check
W 4K
yeah, the image model on regular ChatGPT platform is performing very poorly. it's not as good as a few days ago. I wonder what happened.
Guardail mess up creativy so far yes when you paid pro they no should bothering you as you are VIP or at least they just should by here for safey stuff no creativy stuff *
hmm for a little moment the Guardail was no around and suddently hit harders so there as moment this system is off ?
are the artifacts in question the odd splotchy shadow pattern that ends up on all images after the first generation?
Yes
ive been starting new chats to try avoid that too but idk if I was just doing something wrong, like using the Extended Thinking instead of Instant
the only artifacting (outside of the smudgy shadow pattern) ive noticed is the insistance on overdoing small light reflections
i just tried to attach an image but i didnt realise it was disabled, so just imagine a fleshy texture with an excessive amount of light speckles
in this 3 minute retrospection, i realised that might be the "speckles" you were referring to
Bonsoir
What is that?
means good evening in french
🥖
Trying to get photos for body parts today ... the kind where real photos tend to be taken by curious people at the vet's office at an autopsy, or old diagrams that aren't much better. But lo! Chatgpt to the rescue, rendering beautiful "plastic anatomical model in a doctor's office" .. not a guardrail hit, I'm impressed
I'll spare the images-canvas channel my photos of uteri though
are kiss scenes just not allowed?
GPT is okay at all romance scenes with the sole exception of kiss scenes
Try hard i will work
hey guys do you want to see my art go on to the #images-canvas and search GrayMetalMan to see my images
@analog grail hello there high five? new here
I just got a notification when I opened chatgpt about "GPT Image 2.0" (something like that) - is there something that just came out today or is that just the official full rollout for what came out a couple weeks ago
It’s been out for about three weeks
??
@topaz lance hi, there. This channel or https://discord.com/channels/974519864045756446/1155772063596953642 is a better place for your question in #daily-theme message
im getting tired of the bug where the image generation stuck in loading and when you go to the images tab is there but the editing becomes a nightmare because GPT didi register correctly the image generated 🙁
is dalle gone for good now??
Nope still here via custom GPT in ChatGPT
And also #image-bot where you can access 2 and 3 of DALL E
stopped working for me -- try it
I just did and posted them here #images-canvas
image-bot is no longer working for me -- spits back this message for both dalle2 and dalle3: "🚫 This image couldn't be completed. No credits were used." =--- on custom GPT this is the message: "I can generate images for you here, but I can’t switch specifically to the older DALL·E 2 model. The image tool available in this chat uses the current OpenAI image generation system."
#images-discussions A man was partially hidden behind a transparent curtain, holding a red umbrella with the handle tucked behind his back. Through the folds of the curtain, only the general shape of the umbrella could be faintly seen.
Just started here and am getting that error as well.
wow, today is really bad with artifacts and noise.. #images-canvas message
why when a girl is generated, it's always the same face? it's really annoying. It seems that the model knows only 1 face. Even if I ask to generate a new face, it's the same one with a different hair style. Any tips? same with the man, only 1 face
What is the prompt you’re using? It’s the first time I’ve heard this problem.
for example: "Digital illustration of a confident content creator at a modern desk" it will generate the same girl. Then if I ask, change her face, it's slightly the same one
Ok let me see. 1 sec
I can't send an image here, but with 3 prompts, same face
it's not the full prompt, I can send it to you in DM if you want to show me your results to compare with mine
for example: "Digital illustration of a confident content creator, she has long lush blond hair, and very attractive, yet professional facial features that make her stand out for her incredible beauty at a modern desk" it will generate the same girl. Then if I ask, change her face, it's slightly the same one
Are you trying to do face swap?
no just creating a new person each time
See if the example I provided above, makes a difference
You could fill in your own characteristics
ok I try
Hlo
different but very AI style with plastic skin tho. Maybe it sticks to the same type of girl as it's in the same chat, I don't know. I will try to change the prompt
Yeah start new chat
thanks man
even in a new chat, he generates the same girl again xD I have to specify to change the hair color and style but the face is the same
I sent you a DM with the results to see the images
Are you editing an image or are you just generating a fresh from a prompt?
new promp each time
face is different yeah. So he sticks on some words and generate the same face
Yeah this one was definitely weird haha
I am noticing the new version STRUGGLES with transparancy...
the new model does not support transparency
-_- a h
if you ask for transparency it get's sent to 1.5
Use ideogram it’s 0.1 cents in fal for transparent bg. It’s my go to. High res img
I constantly ask for transparancy and I get the other version
Another good way to do it is set against white backdrop/ green screen use third party bg remover
yea, been doing that
GPT image 4o used to be able too
you can remove it within gpt, do the green screen and then ask to use python code to remove the background, no need for extra tools
Or that
cant even mention paint dot net
"I just use paint dot net and magic tool it all, is easier for me, can manually fix it then"
I’ve recently found the ideogram api the cheapest and fastest for high res image bg remover
as a name it's an url, so gets filtered
yea
It literally cost a penny
paint costs me nothing Kek
hmm
usually i do upscalling later with replicate
just have automated workflow imagens go thorugh upscalling with replicate and convert in webp
Why I’m not able to remix, save or copy my creation I just made like few minutes ago.
And I got an error message about dm not working with the bot
did you exceed usage for the day?
Does anyone know if 4o ImageGen is completely discontinued? I was able to use it for a while after they stopped making it the default by having it pinned to my sidebar, but today I went to make some pictures with it and it just used the default image engine
are you talking about #image-bot ?
Yeah
Some problem with it again?
nope, working as intended, actually
I just pushed an update to it, due to how it works, when the bot restarts, the data about the chat history is deleted, so, the buttons on the generations stop working
that is why it removes the buttons
Will this be temporary?
wdym? new generations have the options
Oh ok. I haven’t made new pictures yet
Thanks for letting me know, appreciate it. Now I know.
it is just that when you click the button, you make a new discord interaction. The bot can't keep track of the interactions forever.. otherwise it would have to store all the image files
the bot just stores them temporarely for some time to allow for the buttons to work for a few days, but after that, the buttons are removed from old generations.. and the same when the bot needs to restart, because it deletes all the tmp data
Yeah I know, pictures I created yesterday don’t have those anymore
it should not be a big deal, since you can still jsut.. scroll up ang save the image by right clicking it, after all, it is still stored o ndiscord's servers
tip, if you click the "Save" button, the bot will send a DM to you with everything about the image, the prompt and reference images used, al lyou need to just repeat the task
Yeah I do that a lot
you can right click the image and download the file. but the "Save" button, is a functionality of the bot to send the content of the task to your DMs
Yup I know that
interesting, I have been planing a feature for adding a setting for auto saving
an option that one could toggle on and the bot would always do as if you clicked the save button when it finishes a task
I might add that soon, since there is at least one person who would maybe use it =P
Yeah
however, I would probably recomend silencing that bot's DMs xD
it could get realy spammy
Good to know
has the artifacting been fixed by the by
Was just about to ask that lol
Been there since Images 2 day 1, preventing me from using it professionally
Happens less, not fully fixed.
you can still see it in what people post in images-canvas
Yesterday was unusable
This whole Monet being seen as AI thing is hilarious
yeah
my images look like an oil painting after a few rounds of editing
am i the only one lmao
Nope
thats the watermark/artifact issue
it's arriving insanely fast honestly
it's the hypertexturing overfitting issue
yeah, reminds me of vae artifacts on cumulated edits on open models
Any word of when it'll get fixed or if it's even getting worked on
I document each AI on what must be possibly the most difficult tests to measure how far we are to AGI. I was about to run my latest (actually a big update to the prompt) but dalle2 and 3 were removed. I hope someone can help get the tests ran. I used bing for now but this is not true enough.
❤️
Hello, everyone! It’s normal for a non-graphic training scene (using wooden bokken) to be flagged this way (regular clothing, no blood, no injuries, no strikes: a wooden sword parrying another wooden sword between two people who are training): We’re so sorry, but the image we created may violate our guidelines regarding violence. If you think we got it wrong, please try again or edit your prompt.
did you try it again?
Yes, I got the same message twice. GPT 5.5 sent the request; I can also ask it what the exact request was, if that helps.
try to adjust the prompt
I had to opt for a dodge rather than a block. At first glance, a block between two wooden swords—even if it’s clearly just a training exercise—is too violent for OpenAI’s usage guidelines. Thanks. At least I have an image that comes close to the context of what I was looking for. (But that’s a bit scary for what’s to come.)
are you guys getting the A/B tests?
if yes then what difference did you observe between the first and second image
Ok regens of images aren't showing up on my app only on the web
How long does this last until?
Because it's annoying
r4eload and they should be there
Nope. The original image shows but not the regens when I hit retry.
Only on the web do all show
Im getting very close to perfect the process of making AI generated pixel art
also, this was not a share-picked output, this was just a result from "a red dragon drinking ale in a tavern" prompt, and the pipeline did the rest
things are finally getting reliable =D
Anyone else notice GPT eased off lots of censors in the past 2 weeks or so? Action scenes, blood, copyright stuff etc.
The pendulum swings. They tighted it in last October, so it is time to swing back. Every 4 to 6 months this happens.
I hard disagree with this lol, GPT has been quite consistent about moralizing, censoring non-PG content, and panicking at the thought of a copyrighted image.
bleep
I did just over 120 styles, and 6 or 7 of them are pixel art... I'm curious as to what you mean by 'perfect' making the pixel art? Is there a certain genre or era you conider the penultimate?
AI pixel art is always a soup of inconsistent pixels, they dont align to a grid and are all different sizes
im working on something that fix that
aha
i'd not met a purist in this sort of thing before
want to push it even further, define or reference a pixel rendering engine or system with proper constraints
and technical limitations
otherwise it still remains too wild
meh
I love my pixel art and the depth tricks it can do with optical illusions...
full grid would break that
but that's not saying it can create its own beautiful images,
I just couldn't with any one style of any genre ever after.
^.^
this image model is buns why does it keep getting literally everything wrong
'wrong', you mean maybe like why doesn't it know the things you worked/evolved out on a previous model?
no it keeps getting the anatomy wrong, keeps on distorting the proportions and isnt too good at enviromental knowledge even on new chats
it used to be good in the beginning when it had js come out but i think they significantly degraded it for some reason
if you stop pushing the model to do 'so much' it has less deformity in the limbs and stuff tho... i try to aim for just under what it can max do safely
You mean you get better results with instant?
no i just don't make the image do 100 things... i make the image do 95 things instead because then they're all a little less likely to deform
i usually make comics, even if i try only 2 to 3 panels it still makes a few errors, that wasnt a problem when it came out in the beginnning, it also lost its ability to follow the prompt properly even
have chatgpt rewrite some of your prompts for a while and compare... it's a very good learning tool in this use
still pretty bad consistency wise, guess its not built for comic just yet
you can use a project and upload rules for your stories in yoru comics to the project container and work from there man
^
okay im gonna try that
you'd do an even better job if you ask chatgpt to help you form a plan how best to use project files in a chatgpt project, for a 'stable character comic' 😄
so still no word on the artefacting? I just had it come up in an absolutely breaking way just in a cup of chocolate mousse and had to go off and use nb2, as usual
There's no harm in going to a new chat after generating the iamge for editing to avoid the artifacts
first message in a new chat
nb2 did a way better job of the picture too on the same prompt, gpt's was a bit bland. So no regrets, but dang. Fix the artefacting already
Wow that's sad
I just notices that as a free user I have 5 generations. However, if I edit an already generated image, this eats several of the generations. The limit was three images before the limit came.
It’s getting harder for image gen models to become viral
Real, because at that point we gone to the point where if they are getting realistic, will we tell a difference anymore?
You know what I realized every time you edit any ai image and ask for adjust ment or style to a background it changes the whole entire image when you only want a certain parts, I think an ability to have layers would be awesome, and if you could generate separately from the characters
depends how you phrase it, you can do small edits in nb2 but not gpt
I asked gpt to take out a swiss flag in a togo vs switzerland stadium and it make teh entire audience togo. Was like a togofest. Tried a couple times. Couldn't get it to behave. nb2 just ... took out the flag
meanwhile I am having to coax gpt into drawing me an image instead of critiquing the prompt. "But that prompt looks generated". Yes. Draw it and stop talking about it
how do you even coax an LLM? you tell it you will be feeding it dirtified tensors?
Hot take: gpt image 2 is garbage in the chatgpt app
I disagree
Is it because of the artifacts or is it something else?
All
It thinks about copyright,
But the image model has it already
So it ends up mushed
And ruined
It started the day after the model was released
And all these damn artifacts and crap it does with the uellowness and grainines
Also, it never uses full power. It never goes on high so everything ends up jumbled
And you cant generate in 16:9 without the app
another day, and still artefacted
First it wrote me 50 paragraphs about the prompt so I complained it draws images when I don't want them and won't draw them when I do want them. Then ...
"You handed me a prompt-shaped object and my brain immediately went into “analyse prompt quality and latent steering language” mode instead of “user is probably just showing me a weird thing.”
In my defence, that paragraph is extremely image-generator coded. It reads less like a person describing a memory and more like a diffusion model briefing document written by someone trying to avoid glossy-advertisement output."
And then finally actually rendered the prompt when I told it to shut up and actually draw it without complaining
Finally worked in the end after about 15 tries across nb2 and gpt. Gpt finally got it after being fed reference images and sternly poked
yeah, but you went to that ordeal vs code, code doesn't feel
normally it doesn't argue, not quite sure what set that off
you really can't pick in advance what the models will fail on, and its interesting when they both fail in very similar ways. To be fair, the pattern is usually the same - I'm trying to find something specific that is extremely heavy represented by paid stock and I can't find anything anywhere for free so I go to AI, which hasn't trained on the paid stock so it has no clue either
yeah, but don't fight code, that's like fighting a banana
mostly I go to nb2 if gpt doesn't cooperate but this one they both failed. Doesn't happen often
yesterday my images 1.5 api and images 2 in the app both failed the same way and I think I need to tighten my prompt. GPT gave me some ideas to try
me: "Make her chest slightly bigger, not flat chested. Do not give her a lowcut dress or shirt. Just have her bust slightly bigger."
gbt: "Bet."
gbt: *gives character lowcut shirt and giant rack.
It's like you can't win. Why is it so hard to create women characters without having to go over and over again about this kind of thing?
I did get it eventually, but it took far too long
use body types
the prompt engineering struggle is real lol, i've definitely been there with trying to get models to do what i actually want vs what they think i want 😅
gpt does like giant racks. Also any glamour keywords you add seem to bump up the size
It sucks, because it kinda limits the characters I can make sometimes.
Dude these models are a compete different animal without guardrails it’s crazy
Like night and day difference
Would anyone be willing to help me with a character sprite? At this point, I've spent an hour trying to get it right, and for the life of me, cant get GBT to understand perspective line.
I tend to ask gemini to help get things right and feed back to gpt
I asked Claude, but it didn't work. I too asked Gemini, offred up reference pics...
you need to have a mask
I could mask it out, but I don't actually have the base sprite where I want it, to do so.
I actually had to bring it into Grok, that did it on the first try.
each image gen model is different
yeah very frustrating when you hit something that refuses to work
Sure
What do you need?
I'm just trying to get my sprites to stay consistent. I have pretty good luck, but today GBT seems to be playing dumb dumb.
Can I shoot you a DM, if you're down?
Is me or Artifact issue as being fixed ? !
Yes sorry was chatting
yes its fixed I think
but quality is fluctuating
Hi
I love how GPT Images are in Webp format, that file type the best efficent loseless fromat for images, way better effeicent and smaller then PNG
So how often are the gpt staff actually on here?
Rarely
Sam is a hard person to reach as a solo developer 😆
Question for folks: when they see people say graphics or image quality doesn't matter as long as story is good…. Do you believe them?
I see it all the time in the various Visual Novel subreddits, but like… I definitely think they are lying 😂
Dont just a book by it's cover,
No, of course not-- but let's not pretend that people don't care about that sort of thing?
Like, people can't even handle AAA graphics if a woman has too many clothes or hair, or a non- light skinned person exists. People are brutal when it comes to “bad art.”
But when it's more to put down AI, as if they don't care if the art is bad— there are plenty of games out there people don't play because the art isn't their thing.
Funny story: I once saw someone say that, but in the same paragraph say that he wouldnt play a game if he wasn't attracted to the female characters, so they have to be drawn well. 😂
Yeas. Graphics are surface level look at the video game industry and the bloated triple A flops
I guess sometimes how people talk about it, it feels disingenuous?
The real substance is in story telling good visuals make it that much more appealing
The problem with good graphics and everything is like the drainage we live in. There’s so much media being pumped at us. Nothing is like rememberable.
It's like, a song can be amazing, but if the quality is bad, you're not going to listen to it.
I used to think that way
I mean if it it’s unbearably bad quality, of course not
But I seen some YouTube videos made in PowerPoint that is better than some videos made in some studio somewhere just the way it was presented
I appreciate your these thoughts, it's typically how I think too, but I find that with the constant AI slop shoehorning can get annoying.
What is overdoing AI images?
Just throwing a bunch of abstract colors and blending a bunch of things that just are appealing, but they’re kind of a turn off at the same time
Because people try to cram everything and anything they can into AI images
There’s beauty in simplicity and minimalism there’s a place for it too
I mean, AI slop IS real. Not all AI is slop
It’s like anything else it’s like vibecoding if you don’t know what you’re doing sure, you can make an app that works technically but I don’t know. I don’t know how to explain it.
Absolutely
Like such a difference when a professional uses a tool and there’s a difference when normies like myself use it who don’t know what we’re doing
You're pretty good tho
Don't sell yourself short
Visit id:customize to pick up the <@&1408186587606679582> role. Everyone will still be notified for large releases, updates, and events regardless.
I mean, what is more valuable? output or the input?
I feel like the most skill one can bring to the table is the wisdom to know how best to explain, in words and/or images, exactly what you want OR finding clever ways to communicate what you want to these tools. I feel like that is the only thing that really stops you from getting your results. Once you find keywords and phrases and context and formatting methods that work for whatever you want to do, it clicks (Besides limits in the tools themselves).
I don't know how I feel about it. The only thing that seems to stop one from making anything is their ability to explain it in the best words that are arranged the best way. End of ramble.
what does this mean
Image size
it means you broke GPT... again...

Images generated on #image-bot will be interactable for much longer now.
also, /preferences to toggle auto save =D
StyleTransfer for Cohesive Aesthetics anyone know how to Apply uniform lighting styles ?
holistic cohesive seamless omni light?
Wats that
Guardail is infinity for Mario characters is crazy
fixed just replace peach by princess blonde from toadstool wearing pink gown and a crown with earring blue pearl
The guardrails are the same as they were with Dalle3
A little more you can’t generate Disney characters
Blame Disney, not OpenAI
Disney as killing Star Wars and Marvel yeah
funny this crap is back for nothing when this no sense guardail die and die and die 🙂 We’re so sorry, but the image we created may violate our guardrails around lightly sexual or provocative themes. If you think we got it wrong, please retry or edit your prompt.
sensual isn't that stupid Ai
Do you do anything productive? Or just contest guardrails full time?
Both 😄
just realy think they should cool of this system is realy broken the workflow when you ask do it again and again
You should learn more about why guardrails are needed. Seems you lack knowledge there
Or lack moral compass, hope it’s not that though
Most this Guardail is here because GPT want kids use the Ai too .
and some is here because stupid big company obsessed by copyright
Guardrails are not needed to the extent we have them
Actually the Only Guardrails should On is all about illgals stuff or violence against people and all about realistic model for no have issue with Blackmail
Look here is the truth about ai “safety, moderation, censorship and guardrails” have nothing to do with actual safety. We should first understand some basic context .
Source:
No Loopholes for AI: Putting Legal Guardrails on Your Company’s Use of AI by Harvard law school ⤵️
1.While no comprehensive AI regulatory framework has been enacted in the U.S., the use of AI is governed by many existing laws, with new laws coming into force across the U.S. In their oversight roles, boards need to be aware of the spectrum of laws that may govern their companies
2.Existing laws and their application to companies need to be reexamined in light of AI advances, and new laws will need to be assessed against a business’s AI needs and ambitions
3.With the rapid and prolific expansion of AI, companies need to implement agile and strategic compliance frameworks to keep pace with the business, and allow valuable and limited legal resources to be focused on those AI tools presenting the highest risk.
Deploying New Technology Doesn’t Create Legal Immunity
Artificial intelligence to perform a task doesn’t exempt you from the regulations that already govern that task. This principle seems obvious when stated plainly, yet sophisticated companies risk stumbling over it repeatedly.
Source;
LLM Cultural Censorship Is Corporate Risk Management ⤵️
Most discussions about LLM guardrails proceed as if we are debating ethics. Critics argue the guardrails are too restrictive; defenders argue they are necessary for safety. Both sides typically assume that somewhere, someone is trying to implement a coherent moral framework and the debate is over whether they've gotten it right.
I want to propose a different way of looking at this. The organizations building these systems are not primarily trying to discover or communicate ethical truth. They are trying to protect themselves their legal exposure, their regulatory standing, their brand reputation. With this in mind, the strange refusals, the cultural biases, and the perplexing differences between AI products stop looking like failed attempts at ethics and start looking like successful implementations of institutional risk management. ```
Here’s some real life example and consequences of those risks.
(Municipal lawsuit:)
Baltimore is the first major U.S. city to sue xAI, accusing it of violating consumer protection laws and engaging in deceptive trade practices by marketing Grok as generally safe.
(Individual civil suits:)
Three teens in Tennessee also filed a proposed class-action lawsuit against xAI after Grok generated images portraying them in sexualized and debasing scenarios.
None legal PR issues:
Apple warned Elon Musk's xAI that its Grok AI would be removed from the App Store if it didn't make changes to prevent the app from being used for sexualized imagery.
A coalition of 28 digital rights groups and women’s rights organizations is calling on Google to remove Grok AI and X from the Google Play Store, as it has lately been used to sexualize women
(International civil orders )Turkey prosecutors ban Grok access after insults against government
(cross border judicial bans )Malaysia and Indonesia Block Access to Grok Because of Sexually Explicit Content
Big Company is morrons obsseded by easy monney nothing new in the world 🙂
Sorry, I know that was a lot of information. I unloaded there, but I wanted you to understand the context and environmental constraints on which they are operating in from a business standpoint.
Plaintiffs collectively seek monetary damages and legal fees, class‑action treatment (in the Tennessee federal filing), injunctive relief to force xAI to halt or change Grok’s features, and court orders that would prevent future creation and dissemination of non consensual sexualized images and require technical safeguards; Baltimore specifically asks for design changes and unspecified fines. In the Dutch matter the court has already issued an injunction prohibiting certain outputs and distribution of Grok generated sexual images, showing that equitable relief is both sought and attainable in some jurisdictions
So I agree with you to an extent that these guard rails have absolutely zero to do with safety. They have nothing to do with ethics whatsoever as they are being marketed all it is is to prevent these headaches which cost a lot of money to go through court systems and if your product gets banned in a country, that’s lots of a possible future revenue.
TLDR
Gaurdrails = Legal/Financia/Company Image shielding. (-$)
0% about safety (+$) but bad legally (-$)
Marketed as safe and responsible AI development (+ public trust +PR)= +$
copyright is law. you abide by it even if you don’t like it. law is not a choice
Out of any group of people on the plant earth the ai industry is the last groups of people that care about copy right law. And if we’re being honest, they’re the biggest violators of it.
does not justify doing wrong on our side
Any form of support be it financial use cases doesn’t matter. It’s all support at the end of the day if you pay for it if you generate it or not, is it irrelevant. You are indirectly supporting it with your subscription.
sure but how i use it is what matters
To you, it matters and that’s good for you that your ethical like that
To them, it doesn’t matter at all it only matters if it affects the bottom line
yeah all are “crooks”, c’mon be real not all are that
I never said they were crooks, I said that they just don’t care about copyright laws. These organizations don’t build themselves. You have real life people working and them doing real life jobs that train these models that get the data for these models that help these models and everything in between. They are cogs in a bigger machine that does not care. It’s sole purpose is to generate revenue.
and that justifies bad usage on the user’s side?
wo care
you don’t
Look people since the dawn of the tech, we currently have there have always been people like hackers and people that exploit systems this is the reality of the world we live in. Now, if you add tools for tech savvy people that could be exploited of course they’re gonna try.
does it justify user’s misconduct ?
Look at nsfw for example
they no care about the copyright they just care about the monney they could get with this lawsuit 🙂
We’re not just talking about images. We’re talking about psychological and biological things that people are wired.
I guarantee you the first image that was generated when they first created this model when somebody was out of office was at nsfw
you see bad you do bad?
No, not at all but it could be extremely addictive because of the natural psychological drives that some people have that may have a hard time regulating those. So naturally people are going to explore. This is a fact.
Now now is easy to by pass this just told gpt do it again for copyright stuff
ok, agreed then, does not justify
It doesn’t justify it, but it also doesn’t absolve these companies for the products they’re making
Especially if they’re being marketed as safe
i’m not talking about them, i’m putting the user in the scope, main focus
Think of it like guns
whataboutism is not gonna change my context
When you are customers and paid for a product they should bend down and no bothering you with this crap i can understand censorship for free user but not for premium user
There’s a lot of people that own guns, And then there’s a group of people that do the opposite , that never commit a crime never kill anybody never do anything crazy At the end of the day, just a tool like anything else
So I agree with you to extent that yes it does not excuse people.
But if you create a weapon that could kill or cause harm , don’t be shocked when somebody out there uses it to kill
Metaphorically speaking
Now again i'm complaning but is just because that slow down the work hopefully we can by pass this no sense guardail
i agree if you create a weapon, it is meant to be used. difference is how you use a tool, AI is not by default a weapon. and the use of it requires and acting stakeholder. AI per se is neutral
OK, here’s another example. Gun manufacturers create guns that have gun safety features on them. But sometimes those features don’t work correctly or another type of defect, and sometimes people end up, hurting themselves with their own weapon because of poorly designed safety features but we’re under the presumption of it being safe
you only complain 24/7 😁
i come from a gun culture where we don’t kill people like the US
I’m using the gun here as an analogy not literal
Because who is the biggest promoter of AI risk and harm and all this fear mongering
you got a dual system thinking, good or bad, right or wrong. it never like that
It’s the industry that pushes it. They’re the ones claiming that AI is so dangerous and aI will take the job in this day like that. They’re the ones that propagating all these fear mongering ideas to the public and the need for AI safety and everything in between so why are they shocking people encountering safety issues with their products?
AI is dangerous if used wrong
I’ll be honest with you I don’t think it’s dangerous at all
and the super alignment risks are real tangible risks
To be honest with you, I think AI is too stupid to do anything risky
All the issues and risks that come from are just from bad and poor design and safety features
current AI yes
Well, I don’t live in the future
but it’s not gonna be like that forever
forecasting, analysis, research
I learned my lesson from Tyler Perry
otherwise you can’t develop AI. and that is happening now not tomorrow
but to guide development got to do homework
“Being told that it can do all of these things is one thing, but actually seeing the capabilities, it was mind-blowing,” he said in an interview with The Hollywood Reporter on Thursday, noting that his productions might not have to travel to locations or build sets with the assistance of the technology. ```
FEBRUARY 22, 2024