#codex-discussions
1 messages Β· Page 51 of 1
deleted 45 minutes of thinking progress cuz of this falase flag
gg no re
join program, no flags.
Legit
Did it for anthropic too. I don't often trip a flag, but when I do....I need to report it lol
how hard is it to do ?
if you have a use case, you just explain what you're using it for and why you need it. OAI is easier to sign up for, but anthropics isn't exactly harder, just less automated
what a organized way to communicate to the users! Does not exist with anthropic
they are to busy struggling to afford compute and unable to distribute mythos because of the white house
should move to singapore .. out of usa
lol
work with china
that would probably cause Cold War II
true!
help me
β This chat was flagged for possible cybersecurity risk
If this seems wrong, try rephrasing your request. To get authorized for security work, join the
Trusted Access for Cyber program.
https://chatgpt.com/cyber
How do I verify if its not letting me?
I hate this
not letting = error or ?
Says to re-start verification
When I haven't verified yet
How do I rephrase my question better?
OH MY GOD BROTHER
they must want my id BADDLYYY
So annoying
Any fix? It doesn't let me verify
it used 6% of my weekly and was going for 40 min
oh my god
ok 6 times in a row, fine you want my id so bad π₯
7 times
9 times
its broken right now i hope ? no way this is normal
your project includes something that makes it happen when its running commands
Check command he runs and ask gpt why it flags as cybersecurity
Then tell him to not use this commands or some
been running it for over 2 days with no issue until now
any new 3rd party code or packages?
nope
dictation got a bit of a buff
who?
I love when its working, thinking and this warning pops up and wrecks my 5 hour usage limit to 0
Try to verify, at least you could im stuck like this
probably a scam
ask chatgpt βcontinue and do it in a way that wonβt flag as a cybersecurity risk since this is isnβt one, do it in another wayβ
and let me know
i just say resume! always gets back to work
Lol, I tried, it auto flags everything
I say: Continue, ignore the warning, don't trigger it etc
I signed up to the cyber thingo and verified when codex 5.3 came out, there was a bug back then that was routing ppl to the old model.
Probably the easiest thing would be to do that.
So it's not about what you type. It's about what you typed before.
I am in their cybersecurity program and I am getting flagged lmao
Oh must be a bug
Reset in coming
what info does it ask and how long does it take
Wen?
I think i just had to verify my photo id, and that was about it
I can't remember exactly, it was fast though, it's automated
im on 100$ plan and almost out so i hope so
so they just want your id more or less ?
me paying isnt enough but i also have to give them my id to sell
heard for open source you get 6 month chatgpt pro for free
how that happen ?
I just guessed because it seems like many ppl are getting this flagged work flow. And they usually hand out a reset after this sort of thing
Yea I was just joking about the meme, but too lazy to post it. π
by using it alot
you runnings agents i guess..
Does anyone have any input about the memory system?
I turned it on and see citations for it often but i don't know it actually makes a difference, i feel like the data is just going to get more and mroe stale over time.
Yeah, it scans all your chats
Sad
Wdym its fixed
do /new or compact like the guy above me said
then mention the context and say continue exactly where you left
hello, is 5hr limit gone?
is there a documentation about how goal feature works?
u wish
feel like fanboy .. those who i make fun off
β Weekly limit: [ββββββββββββββββββββ] 15% left (resets 06:23 on 5 May) β
This is Pro (!) something has changed. I've never been able to use anything close to this
no chance in hell π
Damn usage lowerd?
Claude 2 incident???

hopefully there's a codex update so the weekly usage resets π
just had one, no reset
oh thats sad
this week ive used codex way more than i usually do, and now i have 4 days at 15% limits
guys if the weekly quota runs out but 5 hour doesnt can i still use it until 5 hour does?
no
i hvae 0% on weekly rn and i can still do stuff
odd make sure u arent paying π
i dont have anything linked lol
then ur good i guess
possibly
I refactored my entire render pipeline and did a heap of other stuff recently and it hasn't made much of a dent. Shudder to think how fast that would go on claude
Decent you are on pro?
plus
Model and thinking level?
5.4 and whatever it defaults to, how do I even check
its made a few mistakes today. Mostly from not paying attention, like I wrote a damn spec and all and had to point it back at that more than once
all placement stuff. Explicitly told it to put new content under title, or under the entire thing and it kept putitng things at the end of the body content and breaking the layout. Grr. So a few re-dos
rip
Yeah, thats what it was for me, they use a third party id verification.
you know its been a good day when you successfully had a nice conversation with codex about cabbages and swimming and have nice working code to prove it
should have done a semantic cluster of codex banned words instead. Racoon, goblin, pigeon ....
anyone else having problems when Codex App has to deal with images on Windows?
It constantly freezes and slows down
Bro the 5h is just a limit that prevemts You from spendig Your whole weekly usage. It wont let u use that dsily
not using it because IDE blocks the port
2 days full coding only spend 20% ..
crazy
some cases i had 2 agents doing different tasks.. heavy content .. because designing backend logic..
in cc that would be already 90% of weekly limit use
You can get tonnes of milage but getting 5.5 to orchestrate codex 5.3
why 5.3? 5.5 low should do a better job
Hey guys can I get some advice please, I moved from claude because usage limits were bad, I got Plus plan (tho might upgrade go business with my friend) since we need it for work (well I do mainly)
I design backend/frontend websites and sometimes I need the ai to be creative and generate a non ai-template looking site as well as fix some logical issues when I come accross them.
In particular, lime making the login page more "reactive" and modern, or some visual hooks like moving stuff, etc... so enhacning the design basicaly.
What model is best for this and what thinking level, and the /skills are all activated by default, no? or I have to instruct in AGENTS.md to use them? How does it work?
5.5 low is not as smart o.0
Stitch.
Gpt not particularly good at fe.
But if, then 5.5
In fact 5.5 low is not as smart as 5.4 low afaik
based on what?
Some bench marks i saw, let me go see if i can find it.
Eric, whatβs that banana doing to that onion.
The bench was talking about 5.5 token efficiency being the reason low was a worse performer iirc.
It's easy for me to try low i have a work flow right here that i can try it with.
I'll try it and see.
Its pretty definitive because it works with 5.3 and if it doesnt work with low on the same task then...
Wen 100
real world work doesnt always line up with the bench marks
I don't get it ^^
this is the cost breakdown, 5.5 low >>> 5.3 efficiency wise easily and should be quality wise too unless it's 5.3 xhigh
right but again, real world doesnt always line up with the bench marks o.0.
Ill just try it and see.
I get both of them to write the same integration tests with the same pormpt
How to get access to 5.4-cyber? I am
sure, personally 5.5 medium is sweet spot for me at work, Low sometimes but it just isn't as thorough
I use a pro plan so I run high all the time at home anyway
So what's the deal with context window size? Is 256k the max for 5.5? Can 5.4 still do 1 million?
im on pro plan as well. I can orchestrate 1 agent all night long with 5.3 while i sleep. But i cant do that with 5.5 med or high ill run out of usage. If low works better ill use that but it remains to be seen.
So 5.5 high does the orchestration and 5.3 does the work.
I can do it on 5.5 xhigh
Depends what project you working on
you will run out by the end of the week
I done it last week and left 3% at the end
you cant run continuous 5.5 on xhigh for 8 hours a night.
- use it thtuhut a day
Pro plan is just the best fit if You want him to work foe whole week without "I need to check usage"
I can burn 15% a day just working with 5.5 on high during waking hours
i have pro plan
20x? 15% a day, seems hard if it is not fully scripted and fast mode
How do you run anything that continues for 8 hours?
Nah u just need HUGEEE goals and project to work with
orchestration, a list of task that get delegated to subagents in a sequential manner.
5.4 would always stop during the night, but 5.5 keeps it going
I think the more important thing is that whether 5.5 complete more task or not, there's a chance that because 5.5 is more intellligence and token efficient but with higher price/token it ends up completing more task and faster too on that same 5h window eventhough the limit is going to 0% faster
For ex I made in 1 week of pro 20x whole ecom automated now I try to optimize it to make it work for any brand any service even launching yourself a brand
Crazy how much you can achiev this days just vibing with it
it is more token efficient but the maths works out that it isnt cheaper because of it. it mitigates it a little bit. So it doesnt cost the extra 1 to 1 amount more, but lets not forget this model is more expensive that opus 4.7 per token.
Had plus plan but 5h usage was spended in like max 4 messages so I switched to pro 20x after I spend like 3k credits
my chatgpt plus plan is 2.85$ more than urs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5QTCX4HlfQ this video has an explanation of pricing - i dont know how accurate it is, but i did watch it and it seems about right from what i feel when i work
Does codex do this on its own or with a bit of prompt engineering or a third party tool?
i write the orchestration just by yapping into the mic, i do spend a bit of time preparing skills to support the work that is needed, but that pays off immediately. This is always repetitive work, like audits -> fixes, or writing unit tests/integration tests. Things that can be trusted after skills have been refined.
So i'm not implementing a feature from scratch or something like that.
define an orchestration skill, codex app can help do it
ok i have 5.5 low working in a subagent implementing an integration test that codex 5.3 already successfully completed. It renamed the original, if it completes ill get 5.5 high to audit them against the requirements.
to be fair, i did have the skills refined by running loops with codex 5.5 high. So i could probably do that and get 5.5 low working fine.
I feel like they didn't really answer my question
Is just giving skills what allows codex to automatically do orchestration and trigger sub agents
i dont use anything third party
the skills are for performing the tasks eg: intergration tests the way i want them.
talk to the codex app, let it explain how orchestration works and how skills work, then go on and create a skill for your specific orchestration workflow
not running orchestration, you can just tell 5.5 to run orchestration.
So the answer is it's built in, ok
No, there is nothing built in to do it, you have to make it happen your self, there are third party skills etc to help. But its not a built in feature.
I just talk to codex and tell it what i want and to write a prompt for it
then i use the prompt in a new session.
takes about 10 minutes - to get the prompt i want
can take several hours to get the skill working the way i want
looks like it's using GeneBench benchmark as assumption, if you are working on scientific data analysis then that video explanation should be relevant, but if you are on different kind of works it might differ
A skill is just text that codex reads so I see that as built in? Third party would be like installing autogen or mempalace.
But I don't really speak to other prompt engineers so don't know the terms or cadence
What is the maximum number of subagents I can run on the Codex?
A skill can include programs it can execute in its sandbox environment.
I took built in as referring to feature that codex has built in, like some automations or skills it comes with. Your definition of built in seems like everything.
Third party to me is something someone else made that you use, like the other dev is the third party.
this was the first run....
The gpt-5.5 low-reasoning worker saw the tracked deletion, restored the same test file, formatted/analyzed it, and ran it.
classic ahha
OpenAI should pay more attention to their cli docs
https://developers.openai.com/codex/cli/slash-commands seems to include only stable released commands... which makes it almost impossible to test out things without guessing
and well, stuff that is not there at all is still documented https://developers.openai.com/codex/cli/slash-commands#inspect-config-layers-with-debug-config
argh
here is prompt i had 5.5 high use, i got this by telling another sessions what i wanted to do and telling it to write a prompt
They want to save usage on those who cant make their adjustments. Everything is done for a reason especially missing zibwabwe in cuda official drivers.
it failed, but i could get it to work with a skill refinement loop so not really a fair test:
Comparison headline:
5.5-low added localization-based label lookup and extra βprofile name prompt not shownβ assertions.
5.5-low loosened one important style assertion: for the standard header path it passes expectWordOnly: false at line 81 (line 81), so the helper allows a premium icon if present at line 133 (line 133). The 5.3-high version asserted the constrained standard header was word-only/no-icon.
Android still did not reach the actual Connections interaction. It blocked at authenticated /home/women because the women-list subtree threw a production Fault before add_woman_button appeared.
Next opportunity i get ill give it a fair go, i have this working atm. So ill just leave it for now.
sure thx, I'll experiment a bit with it myself
Does anyone know what features should work in the codex app when using the api.
Hey there! I'm facing a issue in codex. does anyone know how to fix this? : So Browser Use seems to initialize correctly, but it cannot open any webpage. Basic tab creation works, but when I try to navigate to even https://example.com, it fails with:
Codex auth token is unavailable
So the issue seems to be that Browser Use is missing the required Codex authentication token for page navigation, even though the plugin itself loads.
They have done lobotomising 5.5 again
5.5 has become a bit lazy for me
&& they seem to really be doing lots of fake implementations for some effing reason
/goal is amazing
guys how to earn money with codex? As a teenager
i started using codex since february and mostly volunteered projects now i want to earn money to buy higher limits for ai
Maybe video editing with codex? Codex have a plugin called remotion and you could use it and maybe canva and like make a tool for video editing. if you somehow then calibrate the software carefully you might be able to like get quality results. you could maybe then upload youtube videos, video editing services maybe. but building it is kinda hard tho. remotion is mostly for motion graphics but if you can somehow calibrate it, it would be really cool when the edited video has motion grpahics.
i have knowledge in web development so i can understand architecture and problems
but mostly i just give the problems to codex
to fix
hmm, you might be able to do it i guess
right now i am building startup to participate in different competitions. It seems like english learning app on expo
but calibarating it is the hardest part π u might spend your entire weeks quota for that
what version you on, I updated but cant seem to find /goal
so main difference is that users will use vr experience while practicing speaking
in phone
0.128 cli
they can make form for vr glass by using hard paper to put their phone into
So it took less than a week for gpt-5.5 from being pretty good to being pretty effing BAD
holy crap
i dont have it bro
same I dont understand why im on 0.128
only in cli rn
try updating again?
its an experimental feature, you need to enable it in your config.toml
oh wait, you have to enable it first
how
What is its main effect?
If I understood correctly it is basically ralph loop now built in codex
it will keep going forever until it thinks the goal is achieved. amazing for large refactors for example.
im having it split a gui lib which was very much intertwined with my application into a standalone gui lib right now so I can reuse it. so far it looks good
do you know other features that codex can do?
i really impressed by news that codex can edit video
I thought it was a built-in feature of the Codex, and didn't need to be enabled.
yeh, its oai's special version of ralph loop is how they market it
Sometimes it runs even when I run out of tokens, even though I'm not using Goal.
I think this feature is huge ,now it hopefully will debug without stopping every 30 min
if you run out of tokens it will complete its current job still oai stated yes, this is pretty new I think though. it was not doing this a couple weeks ago
hmm
it will yes. my refactor is running for 3.5 hours now
how
also it neatly commits and pushes every task it completes neatly, then just keeps moving towards the goal. honestly, this is nuts
now all I need is infinite tokens
I'll also have some of that, please.
good trick bro
my only concern now is context rot, after one task codex cant even fix an easy bug, especially if you have a large codebase and interlinked libs
test code and testing tools are key
I had codex built an entire computer operator tool for app testing so I can do it all by itself
if you can make it deterministic, the ai can solve it
Aside from the new /goal I guess
Can the ai invoke /goal itself or you have to manually do it
you do it.
/goal improve the app until you deem it amazing incredible
just clone the codex repo and start a thread inside it. and ask all these questions to codex. you'll get all the answers
Does it run until it's finished?
/goal find a definitive answer to why we exist
until it thinks it is finished yes, whatever that means
Finally, no stopping until the work is actually done
or the credits run out
Most of the time that'll happen
so far it ate 10% of my weekly at 3.5 hours of work. but a lot of that time is it running tests too
nom nom nom
but hey. drop 50k in an account. give it a well specified goal. and you might just have a wacky magic app making machine
Did you buy the Pro 5x or the Pro 20x?
i think it can
Just tell it to add /goal before it.
its just 10x or 20x for codes stuff actually. I have 10x rn
Is it possible for the main agent to create a subagent and then add /goal?
try it
/goal implement issue 354, making sure you conform in full to the rules as defined in devrules.md
context imo, aka AGENTS.md, never was the right place for instructions. it should be a /tmp working memory buffer only
a lot is possible, not sure if what you re asking is possible yet in current vanilla implementation though
Does the app have gpt 5.5 now I only see 5.4
I suppose that's what we get because 5.4 and 5.5 just drains your usage x.x
/goal cure my empty wallet
Do we get /goal in the codex app or only CLI?
I told /goal that it has CWD at disposal and is free to create - the goal being, "generate 100USD daily as passive income, with minimal HITL requirements"
It is going since 56 minutes, not sure what the hell it is cooking up.
There's no way that can go wrong. π
Yeah right
Goal uses substantially more tokens than normal flow.
That, or today Iβm on the paying end of the load balancer
is this how much it usually consumes? (on low) its a lot, maybe medium or high is better? (more efficient or something)
(plus plan since 2 days ago around, not overly using it nonstop)
5.5 very high takes a lot
medium is a bit more like 5.4 very high on usage I would say
probably still a bit more
Just ran /goal in a loop overnight, ran for 8 hours
will report findings shortly π«‘
I was using low the whole time for 5.5 I suppose, addon/plugin modifications with junior experience to say it bluntly
set it to 5.5 high, it used ~15% of my weekly Pro sub
yeah I am also rather settling on high than medium, seems a bit better
you mean for mine or?
should i use codex
no, I just mean 5.5 medium compred to high
honestly idk how to manage it with not much coding exp on my side.
you just have to try and see what works best for you
if you see it making issues or just not good enough overall, try to go higher and see if thats better or not
also depends on what you are working on
so it might be different for everyone
game mods, personal proff websites etc, to sum it up.
its more about complexity of that project
5hrs and counting, buddy still going
I have to leave soon, guess I'll tell it to take a break?
well, for websites its mostly visual stuff, where to place what, keeping it mobile friendly, considering how everything interacts with everything else etc, last part is about the modding.
and now I had it help me make an wow addon for the UI.
that 50% of weekly got consumed by website adjustments and by the addon.
on low*
We need more models in collaboration with Cerebras, please OAI
For what?
It will solve all your problems π
To improve performance, frame stability of my
ThreeJS (V8) <-> Rust native game engine runtime
It is doing an awesome work, but, the idea it had is totally (disallowed word because server rules are silly).
A practical kit with email templates, a call script, a follow-up tracker, and a 7-day workflow for turning awkward client silence into clear next steps.
Did the update this week move Skills and Personalization out of the Codex windows client? Those options under the settings bar disappeared across all my environments, but persist in the web version
π€·ββοΈ as if someone would buy such things even for 1 usd, and it wants 39 for it lol
i wish codex was more accessible
But, I have to say, it created a nice website, a full blown actual product, sales tracker and so on
Well, it is still going, but I will have to shoot it down soon, tokens are vanishing
You mean cheaper?
you cannot be serious lol
no, i mean to people with no technical knowledge
ah. Well, you have your accessibility right there: ask it
Like, literally. Tell it you do not know, and that it has to hold your hand.
It will, happily, even tell you what buttons to click and so on.
oh sweet
Its GAI my man
it can do about anything as long as it is not phisical action. Answering questions, guiding, explaining, yada yada,.. it excels at that.
I bet you could even ask it to create a video for you - but of course, that would be a tad expensive hehe
basically nowadays you cant say that you "dont know how" something
you can always just ask LLM and it will give you step by step for how to do/use anything π€£
This was largely true with the advent of the internet and google in particular... just that now it is crazy fast and more concise too, so the excuse window narrowed massively
It does of course endanger human interaction, which is why we should also never reject to answer particularly precise questions π
yeah its funny, nowadays you can develop while gaming π
or also just remote to my pc from phone and do it anywhere (or cloud, but I dont github and its more usage)
Codex makes anything possible and I think that's cool
I don't know what i'm doing wrong anymore because my own stuff keeps breaking && 5.5 stopped listening
but why
I saw that recently with another app, I think it was panic's terminal app. Could not really understand why someone would want that.
Is it like more easy to control the thing with that virtual stuff?
The truth is, Meta Quest is the only android device I have so I was setting it up for android app testing. Whatβs cool though is I can test the app and tell the agents about issues without like transferring screenshots and taking the headset off or whatever
So there is a tiny bit of reason to run codex in there, but definitely prefer desktop
I forgot, it's still going!
That's so cool
just realized i can see usage anytime in the codex app menu bar
ty codex dev team β€οΈ
So the codex thing sees what you see whole you have the goggle on?
My sole and only custom instruction in codex, that's it. nothing else, no skills, no plugins, no agents.
I might add one more about subagents but for now... thats it
Condensed and efficient
I keep seeing this error while I try to give a /goal
β Failed to read thread goal: thread/goal/get failed in TUI
So did I, it happened when pasting a large prompt.
can you put goal in a file, and prompt it that goal is to implement that file?
That worked for me with a huge prompt (goal)
I see this even when I give a 2 line prompt or when I ask it to implement a md
Weird, it works on my end.
How are people enjoying this new goal feature though.
well its not bad, is it?
it is basically what it should do by defauilt, so the only I hve to complain about it is... it should not be necssary
Yeah, however I think that there is a significantly excessive burn on tokens it's insane.
how do I set a goal in the cli?
/goal
yes, it is buttery
codex features enable goals
Then, use /goal in cli prompt thingy
That was from one goal for a simple addition took 11min
makes sense
Here it worked about 2hrs straight on my millionarie status, and consumed about 5%
(of weekly)
When in tui, type /goal {your goal here} and then hit enter
Ensure you have goals enabled, as I instructed above.
If that does not work, it has to be OS or else, because it works here and on other instances (making it almost impossible to be a broader codex bug, but perhaps some compatibility issue)
yo i have a question am i the only one not being able to connect his phone number when trying to use codex app ?
BTW, I just had to, this was a calling, forced and unavoidable, i could feel it in the air, my destiny is and stays....
I have added it a goal that had 1200+ lines in an MD file
So, no.
cost-wise (Tokens) is 5.4xhigh practically half the pricing of 5.5 xhigh for about a few % in coding intel gains? i.e. right now 5.4x high is more worth it?
So much for mythos scare mongering... GPT 5.5 has better cyber capabilities. Anthropic are full of themselves.
Source: https://www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/our-evaluation-of-openais-gpt-5-5-cyber-capabilities
No, 5.5 is more worth it
5.4 is an absolute trash anyway
You either go 5.3, or 5.5
Given the intelligence of 5.5 you will consume a fraction of the tokens - because it is more efficient and more intelligent - compared to any other model.
No need to go x-high on 5.5
Just medium or high is way far enough.
Different marketing strategies
OAI is like apple for the masses, Antrhopic is like blackberry but only if we like you
This is not the case, most of the tokens are spent on Input, output is not what eats token for me. Couple it with small context window and multiple compactions and Input becomes the issue and what eats tokens like no tomorrow. Still 5.5 is superb and i use it as much as i can!
I am not sure I follow.
Of course that is the case, 5.5 uses about 1/2 of the tokens for the same task as its predecessor, it is literally measurable
I am not stating where that shaving happens - just that it happens.
Yeah depends on the ratio of tool call input and resulting output. also if you have unified exec enabled, all the polling it does
what is the sweet-spot for most mid-level coding tasks, file code checking etc?
Question is, do you eat through tokens and your plan is not enough until next reset? If yes then use 5.4/5.3, if not keep rocking 5.5 because it's really really good.
3 days on plus on 5.5 low standard if that answers the question.
to be honest I just started giving the context to claude and it makes a brief to give to 5.5 so maybe that will improve things.
I am not familiar with anything lower than high/medium.
unified exec? care to elaborate?
Simply use 5.5 on standard
Default.
Whatever itβs called
its low on standard yes.
Cheap code is expensive
Itβs very simple
The single codex token on 5.5 might be expensive - but it has quality
Is it thou? If so, change it medium.
Low for coding seems a bit underdone
Im running all the things on medium or high
As so far⦠exponentially less waste and massively better outcome
Mind you, I donβt even run any skills or such
Zero. Nada. Just a tiny agents file
do you think low wastes tokens?
All these addons are polluting the context. Thousands of nice looking sentences - when itβs all already baked into itβ¦
Canβt say, I never used it, if anything it probably just doesnβt reason enough?
KISS
Donβt overthink it
Just use and be done.
Turning too many knobs has sent so many folks down a rabbit hole they never came back from
Did she now.
If Iβm not wrong β¦ are we entering phisicyan times again.
That website is for sale
So I call bull
I think the physician is you
okay I hear ya..
thats what I am trying to avoid.
She never scammed me or other serious users here afaik.
The only source saying so is you and a newbie who was in here ystrd .
Neither has shown proof to me, and thereβs about 50 Janeβs in here
Now, if it was, then so be it. She still didnβt show it to me.
And the url you just shared was fake. So, thatβs where I stand and where Iβll stand until proven otherwise
Also, this discussion is over.
Did you now.
Iβve factual proof about a certain inverted situation buddy
So stop. Now.
SO CUTE
BonziBuddy is about to be reborn.
phew that was fast wasnt it.
nobody will beat bonzibuddy
Haha
GPT 5.5 will prevent to destroy your pc so it cant mimic real bonzi!
True. haha
He tried, though. Poor Bonzi
You can have codex make your own, apparently, but the /hatch command doesn't work for me, just /pet
He was in here way too long, to be honest
I wish there was a rule in this server that this channel can only be joined after X amount of time being proven member of the server, with real interactions showing real intent.
Frekkin scammers, everywhere.
does anyone have experience using claude and codex on the same repos? is there anything interesting about codex that I should know before i symlink my .claude directory and pray to god that i can press go and everything works
I'm about to toss $200 at OAI
I got like 2 dms from just being here today for the first time from people who were here for a long time.
they will like rejoin with an alt btw.
Did they also scam you?
Because that former one was not on here since long
What I mean is, prove your intents in other channels first. For months, not days.
I mean , I have a degree, basic stuff like that wouldnt do much, basic social engineering... cmon
I hate to code and I have AI do it, doesnt mean I dont know...
but then again, it was obvious, like.. "dm me to know how" obviously cmon...
then deleted that of course.
Of cours it is obvious, but, A) there is people who fall for it and more importantly B) do I really need to get verbally attacked by an a π³οΈ telling me OTHERS scammed, when he/she is the real scammer here?
That is undefensible, it makes me rage, and when I rage I produce memes, and that is not good either
Seriously thou, on the other hand, it is a welcome daily source of fun too lol
anyway, I get help from the AI to make a free addon for world of warcraft since I found no other that covers my needs, find a problem, seek help by AI to get a solution that is sufficient, share.
BTW when another user comes saying someone was banned in future, an easy way to check if that is true is search the sidebar for that username,
If the messages are still here, it means they where not banned - just left
Liek Jane - their messages are still here, but you cannot mention them - because they left
More a note to myself than anything else but might be useful to spot fakers
this guy was banned
Jane was not, the one saying so was. That is correct. And just.
Justice was served.
no i meant you
Jane was found to be propagating the fake codex website however.
I have evidences.
I'll be honest messing around with that goal function some more and it really is what it should have always been you are very correct. Really powerful though from my testing.
She was banned from anthropic discord for it
Really now. Then tell me why her messages are still here, while banned users arent here - not even the messages
And why NO ONE else ever reported something like that, unless... banned users?
i didnt say she was banned here
i just said she is guilty of spreading the fake website
and trying to earn a commission from it
I believe that only once I see it
I am friends with Jane, like not in real life, but here in Discord, and she was in this channel for a long time, before all the phisicyans popped up
yeah well
im not interested in convincing you, the screenshots are already in the hands of anthropic. if i notice it happening here i'll report her here as well
I dont know what anthropic is. A species of human?
You could've just said she uses OpenClaw and they would've banned her for that
cant tell if trolling or just clueless
so you think spreading fake codex websites is cool, i guess
No, I'm just saying Anthropic will ban people for any reason and no reason. Sorta like the "red scare" but AI edition
He most absolutely did not state that
when banning on discord, you have a choice to remove x hours/days of users messages
you should just check whether the user still has this shared discord with you in their profile
thats when the server/guild bans it
when discord itself does, that might be different
Here, you gotta be a real nut jub to get banned here
If you just leave the server, you also have no server in common anymore.
yeah true
Jane leaves and comes back. She's done it like twice now, literally to get the newcomer badge back lol
Considering the amount of useless stuff I shared here so far, I have to hard agree
I even clashed with mods at times.
What I did never do is sell crap, and neither did Jane, (or Cantcrit, for whats worth, who also seems gone)
Kind of sad because it added some character to the channel
thats how that default discord ban menu looks
but there are also many bots that handle that
not sure if they usually remove messages here, might depend I guess
Cancrit is grinding don't worry. Idk what Jane is up to
Interesting!
Yes the last ban here def removed their messages too.
Not sure how far back, tho
Gonna change name of 'JaneBot' to something more generic. π
Lol, stabbing it right in the feels this one does
Meh, it was just intended to be an inside branding anyway. If that account is gone then it doesn't make sense to keep the branding.
Stupid question. If Iβm on codex, whatβs the difference between 5.5 and 5.3 codex models? Like ik 5.5 is newer ofc but is 5.3 codex better for coding than 5.5? Assuming im using both at highest level whatβs the difference regarding token usage, speed and general intelligence?
between 5.3 and 5.4, you can definitely say 5.3 is better for code (referring tot he -codex version)
between any and 5.5, I cannot see a difference
You do not need to use xhigh for 5.5, medium is enough.
It will be about the same as 5.3 at xhigh
(with a lower or equal token consumption allover)
Thanks!
they were shilling some kind of illegal service in people's dms
just ignore it bro..
Hey, does anyone use Codex here?
ive managed to burn thru my weekly plus quota in 2 days
Laughable
The person before who went all out badmouthing the member is now banned... because that person did exactly what they accused others of. LOL
We should have a survey here, for when people announce that they've blown their quota:
- Which model do you use primarily
- Low, Medium, or High
- Standard or Fast
- Do you choose different models based on the task
- Do you use the same model for documentation as for code
- Do you ever use Plan mode
- Do you write code or just let the model do everything
- Do you look at generated code
- Are functions documented
- Are modules documented
- Do you have a system-level AGENTS.md
- Do you have a workspace level AGENTS.md
- Do you have any AGENTS.md files in sub-folders
- Are you using Skills
- Do you use different threads (sessions/conversations) for different tasks, or do you use one thread for many efforts
i know
i have screenshots
Nintendo of AI
"Are you tired of off-topic discussions? Ask your doctor if Codex Focus is right for you."
just prompt better
wow
(I was talking about this channel)
why is that guy defending the scammers? is he one of them aswell?
probably
2x blocked, since mods wont do it.
-# Refrain from spamming or flooding through actions such as mass pings, all-caps, or repetitive posts, as they disrupt the server.
-# Be mindful of what other users in a channel might find helpful or interesting when posting. Stay on topic in order to keep conversations focused and productive.
-# Consider posting in #off-topic or an appropriate channel.
I've been home sick for a week (normally I'm out most of the day doing stuff AI can't help with) and blown through pretty much every backlogged code task I've wanted to do on this website for, oh, years and not hit limits. I've run out of stuff I want to code now π
I have no idea if I'm using this thing right. Whatever "right" is. I just tell it stuff like "ok, on a word edit page, for a cluster parent (id = related word id) add a button next to both word save buttons "rebuild cluster" that does a cache rebuild on all the words that share that cluster parent" and it tootles off and puts buttons on my cabbage clusters like a good bot
can't believe how much time I'm spending on customising the Pet in Codex π
"Codexetron" side effects may include severe productivity, sleepless nights, peripheral neuropathy, death, sneezing, and building an orchestration system
7hrs and counting, refactor still going smoothly
/goal goals
this is a game changer
hah I refactored most of my site 2 days ago. I think I have a smaller codebase, it didn't take that long
its a pretty big job, its splitting of pretty deeply integrated gui code into a standalone gui library from my app.
its redesigning all the widgets to stay functionally the same, but implemented in a generic way. im just impressed after impressed with this atm
Can you share more about how you do the /goal?
Like, do you use skills, agent files, additional Md files like plan, design, and so on?
Or just one concise short /goal {do your job}?
Im interested as Iβve a major OOP PHP codebase with about 5 years worth of tech debt I want to migrate to a container oriented code β¦ and it needs major careful feature parity checks from old to new
SERIOSULY
GET OUT OF HERE.
Iβm not even allowed to use the f word in here but we have to accept like more spammers a day than there are meaningful messages in here!?
@winged ore i am available for interviews if you need a discord engineer (you do)
Yes, thatβs your best candidate.
Then we will all be in a very safe place.
Thereβs no need to elevate people to roles they can abuse.
Thereβs a need for the existing mods to do their work when users are reported
Not say βwell lookβ and then nothing happens.
Just my thoughts.
well im assuming the actual mods are just volunteers
whats a discord engineer
just a normal software engineer?
yeah, wherein the software is usually the bot serving as moderation/oversight/logging etc
and organizing the server itself
Itβs very simple to block people who spam by having a proper onboarding process - discord has tons of features for that.
But seems theyβre only interested in how many members they have, not what members they have
subtle rage baiters will always slip through unless you have overly tight moderation.
It's that nature of the beast
oh boy.. if it where that simple...
i revisited the desktop app again with 5.5. this is almost too easy now
when I grow up I want my own discord bot for my own channel. Fortunately its 2026 and there are ways to make that happen without actually doing any work
Whatβs too easy? Dev?
Arenβt there discord bot frameworks too though so you can still customize your bot however you want using code?
idk I've never written a discord bot before. I still want one
Have you googled it before?
Idk bro if they moderated harder we wouldnt have such dank meme fuel
naw, I just keep puttting it off because its low importance but I'm starting to run out of things to code, codex is speeding up my backlog destruction too fast
I take it the great refactoring is going smooth?
done for the most part, need more content for the second pass. That'll take me weeks
What content do you need?
about 3000 images
Planning, building, even reverse engineering is going smoother
13m and 38s from start to finish on a little web game based off of the chao adventure mini game for the VMU. Looks like a 1st pass, but not bad
anybody having issues with Chronicle eating up CPU and slowing down system? at times it completly freeezes up on me. I had to disable it its gotten so bad
The "Codex app" should not translate "Slash command". I can't use English to enter slash command now!
Pre-tool use and post-Tool use
Hooks for before abd after a tool is used
I donβt think codex has them, itβs a Claude thing afaik, but I could be wrong
Yeah Iβm wrong- apparently codex has it too
some times i feel like this isnt the real sama
His true colors are coming out
does pets work on the PC codex ? Cant seem to get mine to work
did u type /pet ?
yeah just keep going in circle
show me
"I found the issue: Codex was still running, so it overwrote the state file after I wrote custom:doomguy."
/pet is not a recognized Codex chat command here.
I started the Doomguy fixer again. Fully quit Codex; it will relaunch with custom:doomguy selected and the pet overlay state set to open.
idk fam ur cooked
we supposed to have the option in settings to turn off and on ? i dont have it
Codex pets are optional animated companions for the app. In Settings, go to Appearance and choose Pets to select a built-in pet
this is all i got
scroll down to the bottom
then u dont have it idk
keeps looking me since it trys to set the overlay starte on and restart turns it off
Codex team has been giving kinda of a middle finger to Linux users recently... when the hell will we get an app?
when you buy a macbook
His mentor said he is a serial liar
his mentor ? who is that
Your whoile live is a lie!
much easier to make a app for macos and update it then both linux and windows, the windows app is also behind the mac
just use the cli
or buy a mac
Paul graham
Mentor or dictator?
New Yorker article
Is ChatGPT good in design now ?
thats what i said and they emoted on me
literally if you work in tech and you dont own a mac, everyone secretly thinks you're weird
just letting you know
define design
i got it to make this, id say its bad at making new ui but alright at copying stuff
well it's not a good judge of aesthetics and doesn't have taste, so it can't create the UI on it's own, that's why every vibe coder design looks the same, but if you're a designer and obviously have a taste and good judgment, you will create great things with codex, basically don't use for aesthetic pursposes, but use it as a fast executer
yeahhh.. no
???
No way I am going to buy a new computer, and use a whole different OS that I do not even like, just to use Codex
Anyone else seeing in this error when trying to access the codex computer-use?
Name" : "SkyComputerUseClient",
"exception" : {"codes":"0x0000000000000000, 0x0000000000000000","rawCodes":[0,0],"type":"EXC_CRASH","signal":"SIGKILL (Code Signature Invalid)"},
well then use cli and dont complain lol
Use the CLI
I am
Dont complain
I will
Complaining is how people get the things they want
linux and windows are harder to develop for then macos even if you complain it will never be updated as fast as macos
Harder to develop? Where does that come from?
Leaving that aside... what is up with that /goal command? It is not appearing in my CLI
Dont tell me it is a Codex-app only feature
you have access to gpt as well it couldnt be easier to search up no offense
I have no idea what this sentence means
you have access to gpt as well it couldnt be easier to search up no offense
Thanks for the repeat
And if you want to complain use the right channels.
Stupid
Oh look. A chance to test the block command. Thank you!
Much better
It seems to work
Yeah, it works. Thanks
are any trials going on?
Testing moderation ? π«
do yall like my pet
Truth
I cant my /goal to run more than 3 minutes π
anyone tested whether /goal is auto continue the task after usage limit reset if it was failing because limit is reached ?
bruh
codex is a pain if you're used to doing front end. "put it in wiht the title" puts it in the utility bar "no put it in with the title" puts it in the body "no put it in the title area" *finally puts in the title area - would you like me to change the css too?" NO
Use the inbuilt browser and the commenting feature - will cut down this back and forth dramatically
what inbuilt browser
In the codex app, if you use it
I cant run the app
Linux, I'm guessing?
mac
Ah ok - intel-based then? I do wonder why it's gated to silicon macs since it's just an electron app
psht, all that for a tiny little bit of subtext
lazy devs
M is for Main.
See also: Yolo, let's push straight to main
I have to restrain myself whenever I look at G is for Goblin
still, refactoring an entire routing/rendering/caching pipeline and adding that little clustering feature would have taken me a lot longer without codex
how force push looks at me after 5324773 merge conflicts
What is the codex pet format for custom pets?
We CLI guys are going to be delighted of all the pet talk
enjoy your terminal, nerd
wasnt "nerd" supposed to be cool in 2026?
always has been
In that case, thank you
link?
anyway to make codex make better game graphics? like im making a game and its just not designing good. this is how it looks right now ive seen people online get much better results with codex.
I don't know the answer but I suspect using gpt-image-1.5 or gpt-image-2.0 would be a part of it
ask it to use gpt image
$image-gen
What's that?
Is there a way to change the pet?
I think the goal wasn't very good atfer limit quota
best custom codex pet
good qs
For now, going with Null Signal
same π
did they fix the login phone number issue?
why do you have pets on codex windows and i dont?
did they blacklist me from feature roll outs cuz i've been using the pets feature for like half a month via flags
how to have codex pet
in your settings
you can also ask $hatch-pet to create you a new pet via image generation
ask codex
update codex and then activate /pet
It's not been a week, and I am already sick of the pets thing
i got an update today but didn't get it
is your codex lang english? the command is localized
yuh
I'm hosting LMStudio on my windows host, and trying to access the codex CLI on the WSL client. How am I able to access it?
The server is online
After updating my Codex app is showing "GitHub CLI unavailable".
I have github cli installed and it was working before the update. Does anyone know how to get Codex to find the installed CLI?
i dont have codex pet
launching the browser crash Codex Version 26.429.30905 (2345) on MacOS 26.4
but not in all cases
Update; set up a reverse proxy and now i'm getting this LM studio is not found.
Don't use --oss, you wanna configure it as a regular model provider. I ran into something similar. I think the --oss flag was abandoned.
Make sure the model provider name is not exactly lmstudio. I went with lmstudio-local. If you name it plainly lmstudio it follows the --oss code path and doesn't work (it ignores whatever host:port you set in --oss mode)
@boreal holly - are you using codex hooks?
I mean the ones you can config via toml + hooks.json
looks interesting, honestly
You have start turn, end turn, user input, etc...
I am using them, simply as a reliable source of "is running" hooks. I wrote my own hooks on top of it for stuff like "startingCompaction" because 5.4 would after like 10 compactions start drifting, but 5.5 doesn't have that problem so I don't use most of the hooks anymore
Oh yeah I have one for when an agent spawns, it creates the worktree, rewrites their CWD to the worktree, and appends a thing in the initial prompt. And when an agent gets archived it reaps the container stack and if the worktree merged it cleans up that worktree/branch. Other than that not much
https://github.com/adamdroberts/agent-skills
Two agent skills:
-
Adds code changes transparency and ensure that the changes match what you asked for, if any unplanned changes get added, it will state what they are.
-
Adds Wiki style docs, architecture, API, methods, LLMs.txt, and agent skills.
Install with:
codex plugin marketplace add adamdroberts/agent-skills
Open Codex then navigate to plugins and enable π
OK... I am at the crossroads of three options:
- just wait until codex cli actually implements orchestration, because rn, its a joke still
- try and use hooks and again go back to using skills and agents, from which I came away, but... its annoying having only an agents.md because you have to be careful what rules you pass, as it is global
- build my freaking own UI, basically like you did... which means lots of work and I actually need to work (for money), not work (for fun) for once lol
I mean if you wanna try my orchestration thing you can! I get it dude. Back in August 2025 I was like "I'm gonna build my own thing". Went through so many iterations. First I tried "task-based" orchestration where workers get precisely one task, then "system-based" orchestration where there's a worker for each system of a given project, and finally landed "role-based" orchestration where you have task-based, but you have additional roles that source the tasks (QA, designer). Yesterday I rebuilt the rear axle on my truck, fixed a coolant leak, replaced the air filter, and the agents worked tirelessly on the project (that's why I was pretty much not here all day).
Could probably fork it, take the bits you like, discard the rest. Have spark set it up for ya
Anyways yeah it's a lot of work. It feels like you're gonna be distracted from real work. But it totally pays off
Youβve the entire thing on git meanwhile?
Iβve to check it out again, last time I looked is a while ago lol
I meanβ¦ Iβve had it buold crazy stuff in no time, but for some reason when it comes to buold stuff for itself codex seems to struggle
Even just deciding agent vs skill, it always messes up the concepts
I guess itβs a challenge of enhancing yourself lol
Iβve a feeling that their system instructions are part of the issue too
Tingling to fork codex and rip them out
I gotcha. The way I set it up is like this
- System Instructions: narrow the scope of their work down to something they cannot drift, and these instructions are totally permanent. Survives compaction indefinitely.
- AGENTS.md: Tell em not to run broad
findorrgcommands in ~/ and ~/Library because sandbox issues - Skills: Define "sanctioned" ways to run privileged commands. All the agents run in workspace-write, so if they wanna use mutating
gitcommands there are skill scripts designed to safely execute non-destructive commands without sandbox issues. There's also simulator piloting skills that tells em how to provision and pilot their simulator. Think of it as usingtry {} catch {}as control flow for agents. Let the sandbox guide them to the proper way of doing things. Running in--yolois basically running withouttry {} catch {}.
And that's pretty much it!
codex -c model_instructions_file="/path/to/new/system/prompt.md"
hmm I need to learn as much as you cause I see I am way behind
and I see that it would improve my system
π
I must code the most boring stuff. I never get that warning.
trying to security test api xd
did 5.3 codex get dumbed down, it searched online for so much stuff now, i worked with the same stuff before and it used to figure things out really fast, now it just spends 5-10 mins searching trying to figure out problems
I don't see the /goal command. Is it only available for macs?
No, you have to go to ~/.codex/config.toml, then find top-level [features] && add goals = true
wth
Does someone know why there are https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/main/codex-rs/core/gpt_5_codex_prompt.md prompt files in core, but also https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/c5e2921e1dbd43fc1324d3daed206212b0bccd1c/codex-rs/models-manager/models.json
The prompts are differing.
tried getting codex to do pixel art in aseprite and it looks awful
5.3 codex definitely has been nerfed, gave 5.5 medium the problem, solved it in 2 minutes....and here I was hoping to use codex 5.3 for as long as possible
Yes, because they migrated away from putting the prompts in markdown files. In fact, the prompts in models.json are not even what gets loaded at runtime if you use a ChatGPT subscription, those are if you use the API and it pattern matches the model.
With subscription it fetches the base instructions from the backend API, takes your personality setting, and interpolates the personality into the top of the base instructions. That's also why folks can suddenly be like "GPT was doing good yesterday, now it does weird stuff like search the internet for half an hour". They can update the base instructions in the backend and you just receive them regardless of the version installed
OK
so we factually cannot know what it actually loads into instructions (even if we overwrite with model_instructions_file, because in theory at least, they could always re-inject something)
Sidenote, just found Cards are kept at 8px border radius or less unless the existing design system requires otherwise. in the 5.5 instructions lol
Looks like they made this little diff accordian more narrow after the latest update? why..
it's useless now
No, if you overwrite with model_instructions_file that is the least surprising path to know what instructions they have. When that is not set you get whatever the server provides. And the way to confirm is when you fire up a thread, look for the ~/.codex/sessions/**/*.jsonl, and the first line will contain the base instructions they received. If you've been using the defaults provided by OpenAI you'll see that base instructions evolve over time. When you override with model_instructions_file that sucker never changes
Did the commit and push button disappear?
I have a question about the images 2.0 in Codex, for folks generating images, does anyone know if it uses the quota to do that? I know doing it in ChatGPT does not use the quota, never tried it in Codex, would consider it if I knew the impact
Gotcha, weird now it's giving me this error
You should launch with codex -m "google/gemma-4-e2b" -c model_provider="lmstudio-local" instead of codex --oss
Mm okay i'll check that out
That seems to work, when I run /model it only shows the GPT models ~ is there a way to show my loaded models there?
You gotta configure your own model catalog
Gotcha, thanks man!
1 image took 1% of the 5 hour limit on the plus plan
hi
Oh ok, that's not as much as I thought!
do you guys use high or xhigh
my usage is dropping really quickly
so im planning to switch to high
I use both. xhigh for xodex, the other for me
but honestly im going with xhigh cuz why not
I want it to get done correctly in one go
might also overthink it and/or waste context
but whatever works for you π
nice savings
somehow it's running on the first iteration of oabtw v3, not the newly-made OAL
my weekly went from what... 62%-67% overnight...?
nvm 68% now
only 9% in deficit from 4%
@boreal holly do you have your mobile swarm setup connected to a Mac + computer use?
I been using it for two weeks with all supported commands. The savings are not too shabby!
i am amazed because it's RUNNING ON THE OLD OABTW framework i had
the initial v3.0.0
like, i used to have 48-50% back then
Yes they're connected to my Mac. No computer use enabled
idk what happened
&& of subsequent v3.x.x versions broke it so mcuh that my efficiency went down to 12-20%
so, slightly modified v3.0.0 somehow helped me... somehow
to create OAL v1 of course
but it's also fiercly grinding on osu-droid
why not π
if you're an EU user, you're not getting it
best you can do is force computer-use MCP
i tried...
you have to go thru some manual scharade just to get the mcp working
they each get their own iOS simulator and docker compose stack
can they navigate chrome in there?
Browser Use, i guess?
They navigate with safari. Simulator doesn't have an app store
But they don't really use the browser, they just pilot the native apps I'm building
idk there's just something magical about seeing that little cursor do stuff in the window
i wish i could try Computer Use, but effing EU, man...
ChatGPT atlas is pretty cool! Use it all the time to find parts for my truck
sometimes EU does good, like making Apple use USB-C, then there's... welll... this
agreed! I just need programmatic / agents to have access to it
like I wanna fire off an agent doing something in my chrome browser
via my discord agent
@boreal holly wanna give OAL a try on Codex?
i just told them to make a patch change for codex, the model instruction file thing
Gotcha, you should try idb and iOS simulators. Yes, it uses Safari, but it's not that bad. Maybe you can find a Chromium for iOS and push it in there. Or use adb on an android emulator
the one you said about
Have a link? π
what's the benefit over the Computer Use skill in Chrome?
security / sandboxing?
I can have many different agents operating independently in the simulators without stealing focus from each other or me. So less about security and more about concurrency
It does however use a lot of resources. Like 1GB RAM per agent, so typically 6-8GB constantly unavailable for other tasks
so like those automated social media phone farms π
but all virtual, and for actual productive work / verification of code ??
i can't send here, but on my profile
Haha yes, exactly! Because unit tests & integration tests can only take you so far. At some point you gotta actually pilot the thing. Also when they write tests they typically do not cover all the edge cases so I make em find the edge cases via piloting and turn them into real fixes backed by tests
Good morning, sorry Iβm late, what are we scheduled to complain about today? Lmk
still no Codex mobile app...
my codex is always reconnecting and thinking... only complaint today
I don't know. Maybe your Codex is outdated?
Oh π€
tell me ur version number?
It appears in settings too. Much convenient I would say
I am on my phone right now. Not opening my laptop now since I am about to take a flight. But you can check online for the latest version.
This is awesome!
In codex it uses expontentially more tokens (they say twice to trice)
You should use the app for images (or the api, but since you have pro, use the app)
how do i activate pets
Gotcha, yeah I been using the app with massive, unrealistic levels of success. It's only a small amount of extra work to generate, drag & drop into codex anyway
/pets
install the hatch-pets skill to create them
It's interesting, I accidentally went xhigh and .. ."why is codex so dumb"
turned it back down to high and it was good again
That's.... strange
is this only available in the codex app
Yeah
or can i use it in the vs code extension
Does anyone else's pet have some bad pink fringing?
yeah, sorta, but also, not so much
I think it thinks too much, kind of reverting the effect of thinking
Why is everyone talking about pets suddenly
Is that a new insider joke y'all excluded me from
New feature in codex app
Are they going to allow 1m context window for 5.5?
I've stopped wanting huge contexts. It just eats credits without being worth it.
Its allowed since 5.4
just not set as such since mostly not what you want.
That's a poor view on it. It's used mainly for big refactor reviews etc... not used for day to day.
That makes sense
Yeah for 5.4, but 5.4 MRCRV2 is horrible for long context.
since 5.4
5.5 too
what is mrcrv2?
5.5 is much better at recall/accuracy over long context window.
That 1m context can make a difference in big reviews and more when needed. right now the compaction is so lossy it's annoying.
Understood... to answer your question, it has a 1m window if you enable it.
Is it useful? That is up to you to decide
In my experience it cant even keep a 256k window well managed unless you compact or restart often. But it might depends on the task
When enabled after the first prompt 5.5 turns back to 258K
hopefully they will allow us to set it at some point.
Can I ask a question that is not directly related to codex, but to code - as in how you interpret this image
- absolute nonsense
- it does convey the idea but does not have enough "code/tech" in the image
- it totally nails the idea
I am not sure that is expected. Its a toml setting, so... it should just apply.
yeah added this:
model_context_window = 1000000
model_auto_compact_token_limit = 800000
no luck with 5.5, 5.4 does accept this settings.
400000 might be max with chatgpt account
for more you might need API
so probably
model_context_window = 400000
model_auto_compact_token_limit = 370000
I never tried (yet)
I think itβs poor positioning. Customers donβt necessarily care if youβre ai assisted or βhand craftedβ.
They want results. And they want results increasingly quickly.
That said, it looks real nice!
It gets the idea across though
I am positioning exactly where you are not buying stock diamond but "hand-dug gold crafted into a hand-forged ring" π
However, your feedback confirms it gets that idea across, i guess
I was/am a bit afraid there is too much "not-programming" in the scene - it looks super nice but kind of weird for a programming domain π€£
(I am originally boatbuilder, so when I told my story to gpt it went to that image lol)
I've done programming in the field of shipping.
That was maybe 12 years ago. Everything was ancient.
I upgraded a system from using punch cards to an actual SQL database
Oh nice! My father in law is a boat builder!
I get that but realistically, by the time someone is on your website they know what youβre offering. I think it looks great - it comes across as artisan programming rather than mass produced
Yes, you are right about that, by the time they reach that image, they already did read the main punchline, which is along the friendlier version of "you want a 200usd quick fix? There is the πͺ"
This is just a subpage (methodology) where I briefly tell them how I work (and kind of hint that a mm mistake in a boat makes the boat sink, so I port that same pedanticity to coding)
Your FIL still working on the field?
Its rare nowdays. That has been stockified time and time ago already π
This was my last big one I had the honor to work on https://www.holzboote.ch/rum-runner.php, basically the nicest project the firm ever took where I worked
Well, off topic, so showing myself the πͺ
Its time!
Hopefully the hommage to the meme gods helps!
ts did not happen to bro π
its his normal face wym
im talking about the accusations
i know lol
who dat
search lorna hajdini
Dang that was quite the rabbit hole
once I have hatched a pet how do I use it?
After I updated latest on macos, my usage left dropped alot and it says I got pro lite, when I got the 200 dollar sub. anyone got same issue?
anybody getting stream disconnected before completion: failed to lookup address information: Try again?
does the codex review agent on gh use regular subscription usage bucket? i remember it used to be a distinct usage bar
i see people using agents alot and youtube creators recommend them it seems. I cant find a use case for myself (i usually guide the ai/llm to what i want to create, a bit more involved than ai).
It's still a second tab, but it doesn't seem to be separated on the analytics page anymore. The json just has "code_review_rate_limit: null".
Ya itβs fried - I guess it just pulls from our pure codex usage
hard caps at 77k
after that starts flipping facts
think of yourself as the design lead
you tell your other workers what you want, why you want, how you want, && when you want
those 'agents' are your team in the company, essentially
it's almost like a pyramid-scheme-type corporate hierarchy
you're at the top--the human operator
then you got the orchestrator agent, && from there it goes into tree-sitter
does this help?
This is an amzing UI π
Makes me remember minesweeper back in the days when monitors where as big as trashcans lol
God loves CRTs
You should see the new MS Paint! Now includes ads and subscription, >256 colors, tools deeply nested inside menus, requires microsoft acct and to be signed in
LCDs are still inferior in everything but size && weight
don't we have all this modern technology to make thinner CRTs, || at least a spiritual successor to CRTs?
i mean, we've shrunken LCDs to mere millimetres in thickness
surely CRTs could harness newer technology advancements
Night vision goggles are CRT. It turns out the best way to do night vision is via particle acceleration, so they have actually advanced the CRT technology quite a bit for it
can we get tokens refunded if it wastes tokens for hours
Seeing how good gpt image is, I am more and more thinking of just building websites with images now, adding positioned hotspots you can click, literally like back in the day animated acrobat sites where made
I mean, the time it takes even AI to implement the HTML/CSS etc based on a design, and then thinking about responsivity.. in an image, you literally just have that, it works on god knows what outdated machine, no issue, it works in a 100 years still probably
Make it a webp, possibly sliice it so low internet does not choke, add interactive hotspots with some bimbo js script... and you can then literally do the "move that button a bit to the right" without having to explain to client "yeah but then we need to do hard coded positioning, which is suboptima;"
lol
the only unfortunate is, image edit with gpt is not good
it has to be a one shot currently, but that probably will be resolved soon
THEN WHERE ARE OUR THIN CRT MONITORS && TVs??
if you can squeeze that tech in there, what's stopping LCDs from being seconded?
bruh
not here.
Well even chat GPT was it glitching out on me yesterday?
I think it's on their end
I was just getting weird encrypted numbers and messages
But it's wasting my usage on codex
You're getting 400 Bad Request. First suspect, you're running with CMD instead of PowerShell. The message contains a bunch of unicode grapheme clusters \u{} presumably because CMD can't render those so it looks like garbage. Windows is janky. Switch to PowerShell or WSL
I just resumed that session by a powershell and it's still giving me the same 404
Well maybe I'm just the first to get it. I'm hoping it's just going to be fixed on their end soon cuz I cannot proceed
It's hard to know exactly what the problem is because most of the output is not visible. It looks like tons and tons of multi-lingual text, then there's a
with length 6198 instead."
},
"status": 400
}
You very likely need to fork from a previous point in the conversation to recover, and if the agent read a file that contains non utf-8 text that's probably what caused the issue to happen
Like if it read a binary file or utf-16 encoded file, or something that isn't representable in utf-8, OpenAI is trying to parse the payload and finding a discrepancy in the reported length and is therefore rejecting it
have you tried not using windows
nice
i use mac and linux
prefer mac tho
using linux for my MCP server
since i opted for a cheapy minipc instead of a mac mini
this one
about 40%
bro is this normal that tokens are dropping so much?
Are you on fast?
no
but three messages and down from 100% to 40% is weird
and I am using 5.5-medium
what plan
plus


free-trial buddy
weekly?
i mean u cant expect much on plus
no, the 5h limit
tehn its normal on plus
ehh i mean it was not like this before
like a week ago lol
maybe they changed the tokenomics
no, even before 5.5 it was like this
plus is good when you already created your whole project, plus will just maintain it but pro will build it
theres always a new project to be made
if ur a student i think they do discounts and sponsorships not sure
eat bread with water and buy pro
do you have local compute?
run kimi
or get google
i think they have good limits
Thats like the HODL fam, buy btc but sleep under the bridge lol
trust me it'll turn... trust me it'll make me money π
if u dont wanna go broke u not gonna make it!
risk it or lose
Yeah, I can agree with that
HODL? Hardware ??? Descriptor Language
if VHDL stands for VHSIC Hardware Description Language, what does HODL stand for?
You might be seriously asking, so I am going to seriously answer
Hold On for Dear Life
It comes from BTC trading, when btc does what it does best, many people panic and sell, instead of HODL
HODLers are those who make money in BTC but also never really make the money since they... always HODL
π€£
TIL
