#codex-discussions
1 messages · Page 16 of 1
5.4 is more of a blank slate model. OOB it is not that great but if you add skills to it you basically build it up into the SWE you want to work with
That's crazy to be honest, "let's but it in a box and only compare a small part of how it will be used"
Why is that crazy
Too abstract
It’s how it’s used in the end on a domain specific task
in my first session and first implementation with 5.4 i caught codex deciding mid implementation to not use the library as it was planned in the impklementation plan and instead write what the library does from scratch but super basic .. i never saw this kind of behavior before in a codex/GPT model
If model a produces bug free code tjat I don’t like, it’s still better
i know this from back when i used claude -_-
And that’s what 5.4 does so far
Sounds exactly like sometjing 5.4 would do yes
Cut corners is what I call that
I understand where you're coming from, however it's not how it is being used in general, additionally we care for logical, maintainable code
Of course
The issue is no longer can these models code, it's if the code can be maintained
i think we might have to lower our expectations for agi
That’s all considered
And polished code isn’t maintainable often enough
As an example 5.3 went all OOP for simple things. 5.4 kept it procedural
AGI is not happening lil bro
hence lower our expectations
Think of it like this. You just installed Windows and Visual Studio and create a new C++ project. OOB the experience is terrible. Compilations take unfathomable amount of time, debugger doesn't show autos/locals, running build does not produce a binary, etc. Terrible, absolutely terrible experience out of the box.
But after you configure Windows Anti-Virus to stop quarantining your builds, set up PCH, spend hours configuring the UI and the project, restart your computer a few times, it works a lot better.
The difference is 5.4 eventually becomes the GOAT once you get it fully set up.
but ofc conciousness n stuff like that is not happening ever
Jokes on you I’ve created a registry edit that stack overflow suggested and my comp won’t boot
I think the question is can someone who is quite dull, produce the program that meet the requirements. I think this is the product at the end of the day
My experience is 5.3 codex is more suited to writing code, while 5.4 is better at like putting the ideas into code
Just buy an extra account
🫡
https://youtu.be/EJqFjvKF8HU?list=RDEJqFjvKF8HU these mixes are so good but theres like a million of htem and they all have an AI Jenna Ortega djing lmao, good vibe coding music though 😄
living in the ~future~
Is there a way to have automations on the codex app have network access? It seems to be stricly in Read mode.
Anyone else experiencing this atm?
That’s true.
But, if I need to spend hours to setup a workspace abd then windows comes abd does an update and I need to spend more hours to fix what worked before…

In the end we want to work, not “fix” the tool (or undo what used to work because now it won’t)
(I know a lot of folks me included like to thinker. But clients ain’t paying for that end of day)
We're just not there yet though, there's 'well I shouldnt have to' versus 'well I can just do it this way for now to get a better result'
bots getting body slammed
When does codex reset for tokens? monthly or?
Whats your usage page say
this is what I see
Click settings > rate limits remaining
ah i see
Why is it not reset yet?
reset wen
These resets have set my project 3 weeks ahead
They reset again!
No way
You lied to me, how could you?
Establishing friendship rules
I'm still at 96% so to me it feels reset rn
lol and takes 1 week to charge 😭 except when they goof or something
Brave of you to presume we have a friendship
That was also a test
trying to reverse engineer padding in a packet so you get a proper data stream makes me wanna
so uh... I closed codex app and now its stuck doing its thing but I cannot stop it either because stop does nothing
I’m not a CS nerd like you so I don’t get what you’re playing at
what do I do
Im actually a mechanic, this is just my hobby 😉
Unplug your PC
I restarted already but its still stuck
That might be somehow worse 🙄
Use Linux, idk
Its become sentient
it IS your machine now
in that case its thinking really dumb thoughts because it does nothing at all
What OS?
Win11
GL
is chatgpt website loading very slow only for me ?
They’re resetting the limits rn
Anyone got tips to steer GPT models correctly without it losing track of what it was doing before and also surviving auto compaction when it has a todo list to follow?
Nah, plan better
keep checklists in md for longer tasks and tell llm to tick what was done etc
Sometimes I'm really blown away at how amazing these models are at refining ideas. 5.4 is very organized, and I've definitely learned a lot by just talking to it.
What about steering mid convo without it having dementia? @kind jay @blissful basin
Feed the checklist back into the conversation as a user message.
Why do you talk to it like a person?
I really didnt notice that happening, and working multiple hours daily with codex
I tried, I think it doesn’t work
5.4 just amazed me right now also. but it sucks for implementing well defined plans. its a great planner.
But like i said, every bigger piece of work i do have detailes checklist that llm follows
Skill issue
I use 5.3 codex to impl and 5.4 for planning
Adds more entropy
It's an llm, we talk like we talk and it is a machine that is very good at talking o.0
“Switching models during conversions may degrade performance”
Ya'll got any more of those resets
I got mine
Yeah ok buster
Exacerbated by switching with a compaction in the chat history
Nah
I realize how bad I am at explaining when I can’t explain to GPT what I want to do so I draw out a picture LOL
who said during the same session rofl
ok i see now, it was mistake for talking to you.
Eric doesn't play
Eric the realest person here
Anyone else seeing stream disconnected and Falling back from WebSockets to HTTPS transport. stream disconnected before completion
#status 😔
:c
yes completely un-usable at the moment
definitely gunna need another Usage Reset after this 😩
please sam altman be nice this evening and make the 2x usage permanent
make it 4x even
This is like Ark: Survival Evolved all over again. I thought I'd escaped that 😂
i switched to spark, my flawed thinking is that since is way faster it will complete before stream disconnect.
anyone else having trouble or bugs in codex
does anybody know why my gpt 5.3 codex spark usage is going down when I'm not using that model?
is that what the new security thing uses?
That's more like galaxy brain thinking, because only pro users have access and they run exclusively on cerebras
LOL
So are we gonna likeee. get an extra few days added to our plans or wut
GPT (reasoning pro) just told me that if I set model in a agent, then this is buggy because all subagents inheriting from it, get that model too
That, is true - but its also nonsense, because such agent profile is usually already a subagent.
What am I missing?
If you do agents.<name>.config_file I'm pretty sure aside from sandboxing you can edit just about everything else including model
yes, you can - but what it said is taht if I do that, then other agents get affected by it (spawned by this agent)
Which is true, if it where true lol (bu it is not, becaus an agent cannot spawn another subagent)
Or .. am I wrong? Can agents respawn other agents like so:
main thread (max model)
- explorer (minimal model)
-- engineer (should use max model from main thread but now would not since inherit from explorer)
I do not believe that is possible, but it said it is (well, now I am questioning it, it takes time to wait for answer on research pro, guess in 30m I will know more)
I think there is a recursion depth limit. Not sure how it's configured, but yeah subagents spawning other subagents is tricky behavior.
I personally would not trust what the agent says. Unless you clone the openai/codex repo, checkout the version tag you have installed, and scrub the codebase for the precise implementation details, anything they say is speculation.
thank god for codex for shaving my deploy times from 10 minutes to 5 minutes
literally cut it in half
Literally like magic isn't it 🪄
With codex do u guys have it run in a mono repo setup or in a per project basis ?
@boreal holly how come xhigh is an option if people say performance degrades ?
🤨
For research purposes. AI is quite literally computer science, standing on the edge of what is known and unknown in our universe. OpenAI lets you experiment with it
Makes sense
🐴 I’m a comp sci major
@boreal holly
So my website has been using a custom HTML/CSS build codex helped set up. It's been working but could be much better overall. Is it better to have it switched to something like Tailwind or something else? It's gonna be one of my next main things to tackle, I haven't used them before so I'm not sure the best path to go with it.
Depends
I refuse to elaborate
For me, it depends
it depends for me as well
Joke’s already old 🙄
🦍
@kind jay that better?
🐶
6 7
5.4, when you upgrade it from "glorified roomba" to "highly regarded peer" enables autonomous behaviors
You didn’t get your credit reset? Weird
Too late, I already envisioned myself as the stoic monkey and you ask the enraged feline
lmao
Just sayin, tool call outputs are the biggest win! Command parser is the way!
Give me your credits before I stuff you in a locker
jk :>
Where's this command parser you're refering to
Now you're spelling at me
Model Context Protocol engineer man
I’m not a computer person
Were you the first Discord user?
Ok that made me laugh out loud
I like this movie
Also “you sit on the throne of lies” would be an acceptable response
https://github.com/robertmsale/.codex/tree/main/skills/command-parser
It requires docker now
Are you a computer person?
I am a meat popsicle 🤖
Yummy 🤤
anyone seen this one?
You have VPN on?
nope. (I am in Canada)
not sure how I am supposed to "make my request to ca.api.openai.com" =/
yeah it happens immediately when I try any chat with GPT4.5
other models work fine
I mean 5.4 🙂
Not sure, sorry. Maybe try turn on VPN to US
Yeah I'll give that a shot, thanks
DNS
Now you’re spelling at him
Okay I figured it out, but I'd say it is a bug for OpenAI to be aware of. My API key was associated with a Canada-based project. I created a new key associated with a project with Global region setting and set it in Codex and it works fine now.
Whole thing is probably vibe coded, they have numerous other problems too
which tiny model do u use for command parser?
5.1 Codex Mini seems to work really well. If you got Spark credits, then that's the best one because it eats that rate limit right up. Otherwise, I would use the 5.1 Codex Mini.
The small models are very good nowdays for non-critical stuff, can always let the heavy tasks be routed to bigger ones.
haven't seen an error like this before
another another guy who does a similar distilling of context and he swears by it as well. Do you notice any semantic diffusion in any cases?
@tardy elm Do you have a link to this command parser?
Thanks to codex.I can learn of which side I'm on during champions selecting period in LoL.
It’s helpful especially in ARAM
this town aint big enuff fer the 2 of us
lmao
There's a few paid platoforms that promise "amazing etc" with exactly the same principle, to use MCP for all those noisy tasks.
In reddit I saw a guy he had a good idea too, he feeds the noise to local llm, and that back to codex
This is def the way to go
Makes no sense to send hundreds, thousands of lines to llm remote
Even said llm's chatter is too much. It should talk json, not human.
That is what I was trying to do after I saw Robert's first images of his app, but I totally botched that lol, it ended up being a replacement for codex (which did not work)
openAI is turning me into a gambler: Do I gamble all my weekly credits that openAI will reset the usage again, or just play it safe and accept that I lose some
harder question than architecture
The llm is trained on tokens that are derived from text though.
What do people use to use codex remotely? Slopus Happy coder? Tailscale and termius? Something else?
“The scan returned no errors, I’m confident the code is passing the gates” vs “no errors”…
I don’t think that makes it worse
That’s just a silly example
Want to use it from my phone
@rugged burrow Codex Cloud?
Shellfish
And tunnel into the home comp over WG if you need
I’m not using it though when not on lan
What are you fellas building?
Nah I want to run locally with my skills and state
A duck.
Right but thats not json
I'm calling the police.
turn off hardware accel
For codex?
For discord lol. Codex is fine
look above what I have selected
I know. Do you have agents running? I think each one is something like 4Gb depending on the job
It just happens after running for long sessions
something isn't ending properly then. See if codex can find out why your process is hanging. Actually, use claude for that
its a known problem afaik probably a memory leak, ill debug it the next time it happens
normally wouldnt be an issue but ive had a brutal refactor going for like 2 days and i just let it run till it poops the bed
I have still yet to have a job run for that long.
Working on the native linux client some more fellas
You call the police often, Cantcrit
weee wooo weee woooo
"Do you trust the contents of this directory? Working with untrusted contents comes with a higher risk of prompt injection."
Is there an option to prevent this from appearing and allow everything?
Soon my brother, memory leaks will be a thing of the past
Do you find that style of desktop productive? I havent gave it an honest try
stage manager is very nice when remote. for local its ok
can u add multi-panel agent support pls ? 🙂
i often use codex in a 2x2 tmux
there is no agent 👀
if you talk to anyone but the orchestrator it sets a precedence that the workers can talk to the user and it all falls apart. can only talk to one, and have the one talk to the others
oh damn that would be even better 👀 👀
Man oh man the compactor is not compacting
Is AI slop fully avoidable by testing your code?
Ive been pondering about this
If you can verify correctness by robust testing
There’s no way to slopify code right ?
Depends on your definition of slop
What’s your definition ?
I dont really have one
I thought slop was just wrong code or work
with the current models
I think with an adequate review etc. good prompting and well defined sub agents and skills I think you can pull off good coding and practices for sure, humans make mistakes too, not like security etc. has only become an issue in the last year, people still find their way in no matter what. But if you're diligent enough I think AI written code is probably just fine
Yeah I was just thinking basically that we can prevent slop by testing and determining valid vs non valid outputs etc
Slop in my definition is having the model code without verification of right or wrong
Just like autocomplete
Or like a junior writing a function or syntax and he doesn’t check his work thoroughly
I think a lot of 'ai slop' comes from people that also don't really know how to architect, have good intertwined systems, etc. they have zero code experience and just keep prompting till they get their result @tall zodiac
I think people that have a decent understanding of the code base they're working with and other systems like db's, cloud services and what not will be able to build much better and safer code with AI, than the 13 year old who just downloaded claude and says BuILD ME A DISCORD BOT
Testing is usually for making sure you don't have broken code in terms of it does what it's supposed to. AI soup or when it's done by a person spaghetti code is more about the architecture and control flow structures that the app is built around. Well defined policies and architectural abstractions that are followed and adhered to are what prevent code soup. Those architectural systems enforce flows and structures that enable scaling, factoring, bug mitigation and code maintainability.
Spaghetti code doesn't have those kind of structures and is susceptible to subtle hard to diagnose bugs that are easy to introduce and code that is hard to maintain.
AI agents don't tend to write code like this or typically follow the patterns in a code base without guidance.
That guidance can be provided as Cantcrit mentions with context harnessing techniques.
Another thing is their memory cut off, so they might start a project with already outdated, or insecure frameworks etc., its always a good idea when kicking off to use context7 or even just prompt to research the most up to date specs, best practices, and most up to date, and if I say like 'find a framework' I always say to make sure its well supported, well documented, and has active git repos, just general stuff like that
Which goes back to a person being like “make me a complex app make no mistakes” without testing or anything
so the first result isnt like joe blows ultra uber rest api that has 1 commit from 4 years ago and is actually a crypto scam
Before every prompt, especially in the early stages you really have to look holistically and think, what can go wrong, and really steer the model to starting off on the right foot
I think thats the biggest prevention in AI slop
Makes sense
I think steering is part of also being like the following in your prompt;
[task]
[acceptance criteria / testing]
Its as simple as like:
Write 80% TDD coverage
Versus
Write meaningful unit tests using TDD.
Focus on business logic, edge cases, and error paths.
Target ~80%+ coverage but prioritize test quality.
Exactly always being detailed and having a definition of done that determines in a deterministic way how the model can verify it’s right
Sometimes when im not sure how to really prompt the model, Ill just ask it tbh, like 'This is what im trying to ask for, how can I ensure Codex interprets this in a meaningful way' kinda thing
https://www.anthropic.com/learn @tall zodiac though aimed for Anthropic, theres a lot of good information to read through in here
not sure if openai has a similar thing
Ty ty
ping me when theres a UserRequest or something hook
@ivory zodiac Do the hooks also kick in for the app?
128gb lmao
yeah lol
not sure i'd have to check
@ivory zodiac do we specify hooks via global configs or can they be configured per repo?
either
Damn more harness engineering I guess
I've been using github actions for my codex hooks in the meantime
I feel like i need to be a jehovas witness and go into the claude discord and spread the word of codex
here ye here ye
claude discord is like fan boy city, there is no way to say anything about codex with being flamed
they're blind
Hit the button... HIT THE BUTTON!
Even though no one tried it they still know better
The exact vibe I get too
I enjoy the banter
But when the Silver fella joins I usually leave lmao
I think CC is def more mainstream and it on a surface level, gets the job done, and most people dont look at the code etc. so its like 'How can it get better than this?' and theres so much media especially lately thats like A\ GOOD OAI BAD that people take that at face value and sluff it off
its a good model but i have zero interest in using it for most things
sippin on rate limts
You're not pushin hard enough!
12 agents deep, if i push any harder i lose track
I stopped using spark bc if I use it for exploring the codebase the limits just vanish lol
spark just looks at commands outputs and extracts useful info
-70% input tokens for the ones that do the work 🤘
I think im shooting myself in the foot by not starting a new thread at this point, I have been in the same thread for over over a day
❯ git diff --shortstat main...HEAD
378 files changed, 56848 insertions(+), 7125 deletions(-)```
Im scared
to see what the end result is gonna be
you gotta commit 😭 the silicon is tortured glass at this rate!
I am comitting lmao
felonies
I wish they'd relax a bit and let us use gifs at least
claude matches the user verbal level and eq making it more friendly at any level. That plus the way it always ego boosts is part of why i think ppl get brain washed by it.
People thinking they solved some age old theorem or what ever are a dime a dozen over there
you may be on to something here 👀
hopefully the Codex team sees what you're up to
Anybody implement OpenClaw into their codex workflow?
The most use out of OpenClaw I've gotten was ripping parts out like a shopping list from the repo
The lag right now is crazy
Claude glazes dummies
Its 4o all over again
Claude is behind qwen
Anyone ever get an update on the superbowl easter egg swag?
yay another limit reset
lowk might switch to pro
im beginning to trust xhigh 5.4 a lot with my project, saves so much time its insane.
something I do in a day with codex would’ve taken a week to a month pre AI accelerated coding
just get a business plan and make like 3 accounts
will cost like 90$ per month and you'll have enough usage
Is this gonna get fixed? It's been like this for a week
Hell yeah
Hey people of codex, serious question. How do you get codex to think more general around front-end? I find it very hard to get it to not be so literal and disregard what i would call common sense in terms of user experience.
Example: I ask it to build/ fix a feature describe what its supposed to do with a plan also ask it to use the playwright QA skill to do tests ensuring it works. Then most often than not after it runs for 20 - 30mins easily it is confident it did what i asked. I go test and notice a basic thing like a div block sits over another element or a state change shifts the layout. I cannot seem to get it to not be so litteral ? Skill issue?
it sucks at UX, just spray and pray or be super concise
OMG why cant a swear here... LOL
Here's the good boys club 😉
With the codex weekly limits resetting daily, I'm struggling to use up the whole weekly limit in one day, the five hour windows are the main problem. But I can use gpt-5.4-xhigh and I really never run out, I'm just on the plus plan and I've been launching commits constantly
I've been having fun with uncodexify, it's a simple md file of hard no's for UI / GTK. Pretty good results, given I have the least knowledge on UI
i find it's ok with clear and explicit instructions wrt frontend. i use gpt-5.2 high and have a svelte frontend.. i needed to add specific instructions in my AGENTS.md to make codex not mess things up, but since i did that it's doing pretty good
I would say that gpt models are historically the worst with web design
Yeah they got a certain taste about them
i mean i'd rather deal with gpt's frontend quirks than claudes style
what i like about GPT models is that they follows existing patterns automatically
That is very nice
i switched back to 5.2 high today after constantly finding serious bugs and logic issues after implementations with 5.4 in the last few days .. god how much more pleasant 5.2 is in general .. and reliable with regards to following a plan .. implementations are solid again
* [Project Language Reference](${PROJECT_PATH}/AGENTS.project.md)
* [Development Style Guide](${CODEX_PATH}/DEVELOPMENT_GUIDELINES.md)
Is there a variable value that can refer to the project path and codex root path?
oh boy... I just created an app that allows codex app, to use its own codex app
what does 2 week stand there for_
Another reset? I just woke up and again 100%
😍
Yeah, we have to put that /fast on 😄
my business plan is still the same 60% i left yesterday
is this not for business plans? we were also affected by the reconnection loop
im on plus so probs not for business plan
rip
wasted 40% weekly rate limit yesterday
hope it‘s just staggered and takes a while to roll out
anyone notice that in later codex versions, compacting seems to have changed? I find that it seems to be storing a lot more information in context after compact. This is of course good in that it retains more context, but it also means it's compacting less. After about 5-6 compaction cycles, even after the compaction, I only have about 35% context left (e.g. it goes from 5% left to 35% left). This means I'll probably need to compact again after just one message.
damn how many compaction?
how many token used?
i would consider always doing a manual knowledge transfer (e.g. handoff.md and phased plan.md) for a fresh session and only let auto compaction happen when really necessary
im on pro but idk i get reset like legit every day rn lol
How serious do u guys take context engineering in your repos and do you have any tips?
I think the most effective thing here is to make the agent self aware, and give it access to docs it can write and manage for its future self
yeah documentation is key and if you plan properly you don't run into context issues
I have a 'housekeeping' prompt which essentially tells every agents. hey dude, you have limited context. help future self. agents.md is your boot up memory, use it as a pathway to inform you future self of everything they need to know when they wake up.
@turbid axle @west orbit when an agent is working off a markdown file plan is it usually good at staying on track during auto compaction or do you have ways to always make it known to continue the plan ?
i have it write handoff.md before starting a fresh session
How do you detect when a new session is happening ?
and if we deviated from the plan make the plan reflect the implementation
i dont detect it, i end the session andd start a new one:)
i only go through compaction if i now i can trust it will be fine for the work i have to do
it pretty good at keeping on track, but its really in making it self aware of its limits, and then asking it how to best help it stay on track. it can do what it needs to do to make itself more effective from here
Maybe it's just some fantastic corporate maths:
"Let's give everyone twice the amount of tokens... but so we're not overwhelmed, make them last for 2 weeks instead of 1. Yeah, that maths checks out"
Soon they'll announce 4.3x allowance for everyone but it has to last a month 😛
how do you guys use the superpowers skills? I feel like it always runs off the brainstorming skill automatically for most requests. any best practice here?
what is superpowers skill?
basically its a framework that includes multiple different skills: https://github.com/obra/superpowers
Read some good things about it and gave it a shot
It was made for claude a long while ago and i dont think its needed for codex now, in fact how forceful it is i think it might actually get in the way.
i always prefer a very simple setup, no MCP's, lean AGENTS.md and that works very well for me
plan mode in both cc and codex does better than branstorming imo
agents.md should be as lean as possible yeh, it should act as a portal to other docs the agent can look at when it needs to. no a giant list of instructions
Its also way way way faster to just go with plan mode in codex instead of brainstorm skill, I've realized
you talking about the codex repo?
the context is effectively its working memory, if you dump it full of instructions it will confuse the agents a lot. I think of it more as a kind of conciousness, like the little angel and demon on your shoulders. if they keep shouting things as you you just get hella confused. it should more so induce a general feeling/vibe for the agents, a 'soft' direction if you will
any agents.md
@turbid axle Do you usually tell it to use skills explicitly or does it automatically know when to use skills?
this is imo way too large and complicated already
I dont use skills
how do u ensure plans it makes etc are consistently formatted each time?
I use planning mode for plans
i see,
I usually just talk to it and have it store a plan in a directory etc
it does that automatically for me because it knows to make sure its future self is aware too
it will write md docs with the plans, what is doing, what it just did, etc
@turbid axle im thinking of going back to a vanilla setup prob i have like 200+ skills
and I date them, with some local ci which fails old docs so it is forced to review them
what do you mean with formatted ?
like lets say you want a plan formatted a certain way each time
and not written up in different ways
you mean structured a certain way?
ye
for me the important part is that it is phased in logical chunks that are ideally testable on their own ..
the structure itself is mostly up to gpt
I use codex and I have a ChatGPT Business (formerly: Teams) account. Can I use gpt-5.4 with opencode?
only via the API to stay within ToS
Or do I need a separate "API account" (I do not know what that is actually)?
And the API account is a separate (and I guess separately paid) thing, yes?
yes API is paid
Cool. Why am I able to use codex without an API account (not a troll question, just trying to understand ).
how do u apply the same harness engineering concepts for each project you create?
do u automate it or is it a project per project basis?
Codex is an OpenAI product and they have allowed people to use their ChatGPT accounts
I use a prompt that tells the agents whats up, and it will then set up the harness by itself
you mind sliding the prompt?
how do you get it to follow idiomatic architecture patterns without guidance?
this is what I have now, actively playing with it all the time though. but the gist is there
sent u a friend request @turbid axle
As far I know opencode allows you to log in with ChatGPT account
https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/1686?timeline_page=1
and I’d not understand why OpenAI would forbid this
it's against the ToS to use automation to access ChatGPT through 0Auth
Probably tens of millions, seems par for the course these days
it's allowed for Codex
Where’s that written? And why would automation be allowed in one CLI, but not another?
Even ChatGPT itself says it’s allowed
I used to create a fresh session or use branching a lot more, but the models are much more token hungry now. I'd be restarting sessions every 5 messages if I didn't compact. Also compact is quite a bit better now so I live with it. But yeah, maybe after compacting 5 times, it's time to start a new session anyway
codex tends to fill the gap where claude code denied it, like openclaw and opencode
anthropic threw the ban hammer
openai said it's fine
for you compaction happens after 5 messages?
for this - i wonder if the age matters or is all down to just the context in the chat
https://openai.com/en-GB/policies/row-terms-of-use/
not allowed: Automatically or programmatically extract data or Output
it depends on what I'm doing. Sometimes I'm just asking questions about the code base where a lot of files have already been loaded- then I can have a normal conversation where 10 messages only eats like 10% context. But when I'm implementing a plan, yeah a single message (e.g. one step of the plan) can easily eat 20% of the context.
What about the US ToS?
it's the same
hm, what do you mean by this?
I’m not sure 🤔
@velvet wren Are you an OAI staff member?
nope
if there is any staff member in here, please pass our compliments to OAI. The fact that they reset so often the quota, when something goes wrong, is extremely generous
We are truly thankful
As i work through many compactions i have a thought in the back of my mind:
Does the conversation degrade over time somehow with many many compactions or can we just go on forever and the only real defining factor is the content in the context.
Thank Tibo, he has control over the resets 🙂
I was writing to him, as you were typing that 😄
I have a question. I was trying Codex, but GPT-5.2 is the highest available, and it just keeps running commands. Is this related to the model or the application?
are you a free or paid user?
Im using free im trying the app
I think during a compaction, the model just writes a summary of everything that has happened. So at the end of the day, it's all just the context.
I'd recommend upgrading to Plus
Why don’t you apply for staff?
I don't want to
Unfortunately he didn't reset business accounts quota; which were suffering from the same issues.
It's really unfortunate because business account are always forgotten when he resets, but we are having the issues as everyone.
Do you think paying for it will fix the problem? It runs five commands just to view the contents of a file.
Why not? You lwk act like it already, atleast you’ll get paid
I don't want to, I come here for discussion and interaction, not to work
I guess bro
I have been here for 3 years, always helping where I can
Plus will give you access to the other models, yes
They’re no longer available for free users. Additionally you’ll get more usage limits
If someone from OpenAI stuff is here please think about resetting also Teams/Business accounts we were having the same issues
Why are you guys subscribed pro instead of plus? Are you regularly running into limits?
Thanks, and i think the codex went down yesterday too. Does that happen all the time?
I am on Plus, it is enough for me
Lately yeah, but you get your weekly limit reset so you kind of hope it happens
yeah, the discrepancy between codex and claude code limits is kind of insane, it feels like a 10x difference
I think I get about 3x more usage on chatgpt plus ($20) than on claude code max plan ($100)
easily, it's night and day, Claude Code limits are horrible
I got a 7-day trial from Claude Code to try it for free. Claude models (not the opus) used 70% of my credits to create a README.md file. It looks like I'm definitely getting Plus subscription
You could also use the API, so you pay for what you use instead of flat rate, see if you actually like it first
The quality is good, but the limit runs out too quickly. I've tried GPT-5.3 Codex before, so I plan to get Codex. By the way, when you say API, are you referring to the Claude API?
No?
You can just use co pilot via OpenRouter, then you’re not fixed to anyone
APIs cost me more than a Plus subscription :(
It’s your money, do what you want
I don’t want to nitpick but I’m sure that TOS is either inapplicable or meant in a different context
https://developers.openai.com/codex/sdk
it explicitly allows you to integrate in your own apps, and it’s open source
So, even if they’d say “only if it’s our codex”, then you have to argue “what defines original code vs third party” because you can fork and modify open source code. Then, what keeps it “ours”? 1 line modified? 100? 1000?
Opencode could just integrate that in their CLI or well, use said SDK.
And there’s no way to enforce the usage of an SDK. Literally you can build your own SDK, since it’s open source.
And “use in your own application” inherently means it’s an application, which in turn you can open source.
As long you don’t share your account, this isn’t against tos
did they reset again?
cus mine didnt get reset im confused, they keep forgetting team accounts mane
well let me put it this way, I wouldn't risk it, what others do is up to them
yes they forget us; and they don't even bother to reply to people raising this on twitter or github
Then you’ll effectively never use that SDK 😅
man thats sad
An SDK is used for that exact purpose
It’s like typesense SDK or Facebook or whatever else out there calling itself SDK.
You’re providing a way for users to use their credentials to access their respective instances or accounts through your application
Anyway, in the end - yes, anyone can decide on their own.
Yeah, and we actually pay more on the Business plan , having the same issues, but they keep forgetting about us every time they do a reset.
ooh 🙂
they did reset plus plan users
and pro plan users
But not team accounts 😭 😭 😭
what even are those accounts
I've only heard of plus, pro, and business
but team accounts? 🙁
Business used to be called Teams
so business = teams
correct
so only plus and pro got a reset, but Business / teams did not
Is it just me or when you close codex app mistakenly while it is working then it goes into the stuck mode?
I mistakenly closed the app too - yesterday while it was working but it just resumed the task.
I have to archive the chat and then in new chat I have to tell it to retrieve the archived latest chat and resume the task
but it legit gets stuck in infinite thinking loop whilst not consuming any quota
now quota is for 2 weeks? also task that previously took 3-4% now takes 9? what is that about?
Game over
wait, so it's worse and not better?
if this keeps happening I'll build my own codex 6 with codex 5.4 (:
quota got reset
what im saying is that i used 3-4% of weekly quota for same task as i do now for 9% 2 week quota. same model, same resoning, same speed
I'm actually making my own language model, and 5.4 is helping me....
AI does take every prompt differently
oh coool !!
I tried that too before
but didn't work
Good luck lil bro
though I have a good cuda 4060
it's actually possible btw
do you guys know vibe os?
a full os created with AI
it's a lot of data arranging and waiting, I'll need a dedicated serv for training a huge model or at least one nice to talk to
It’s possible of course, but it’s expensive and difficult
Is it like a linux distro, or is it all vibe coded
yup, still works
distro , but still great work
What checkpoint are you using?
You can make this argument for anything
Checkpoint, like pretrained model base?
Mhm
AI helped me to make Unreal engine 7
bro, AI can do everything
If none this is kind of silly
Okay? And is it actually useful?
yes
and it works
I'm telling u, AI works
ofc I had to finetune
It works and it’s better than what currently exists is different
It’s a waste of time and money a lot of the time, unless you create somethings that’s actually better than what is the standard, this is no point
Usually the point is learning, but getting an LLM to do it for you removes this
I'm already a senior c++ programmer
but since AI came I don't have to code everything myself anymore
just prompt it
like an engineer
gpt-5.4 can program music
^ fax i can go to new programming languages etc without having to spend so much time learning thigns again
You’re obviously lying, you have Roblox linked to your discord
codex saved me months of development for a website that i sold for money
Yes! That's what I mean my friend
it helped me finish it in 1.5week
lol cute
im in big tech and play roblox too 😭 does that invalidate me?
Get that bag
I haven't played roblox for years
check it out
last online on my profile
Yeah, but you’re not a senior SWE
Check my profile on lknd
correct im a mid level but looking to be senior soon though
come on..
I remember starting with scratch and learning python
and then learning std::cout in c++
and now using RAII with classes to building game engine's
in vulkan, opengl, directx and metal
those
Bro you don’t have to try prove yourself to me
I don’t really care so much
I’m just suggesting it’s a waste of time to let Codex do your projects most of your time
@kind jay but is it valid though if you are the one thinking and doing research and not letting codex do all the thinking and architectural choices for you?
cant you leave out being a douche in here nobody wants to read that from you in here
just opened a github issue about this , feel free to express your dissatisfaction here https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/14329 if we are more visible they will stop to ignore our complaints
It depends case to case I suppose, at the end of the day it’s up to you and you know if you’re actually learning something new/useful or making it for making it
He knows himself one way or the other, he doesn’t owe it to me to try convince me be, I’m telling him so
makes sense,
I mean i feel like as long as you know how things work and tradeoffs of your decisions you are still learning at the end of the day. At least how I see it, no need to try to memorize syntax if you have CS / programming foundations down. Just think in systems, tradeoffs, and concepts in what you are building .
Example: I wanted to build an ETL and Normalization pipeline and spent hours researching data normalization best practices and going down a python rabbit hole
im not saying anything about that, but you are acting like a troll that just sounds mean. nobody wants to read that
I’m having a discussion talking about codex, you haven’t done so yet so I don’t know what you want me to say
read your damn replies you sound like a bully
I think it’s almost like having the solutions to your homework, except there’s almost no payoff most of the time
Open a ticket then
i can agree on that if you outsource every bit of development to codex 😄
However, not everyone wants to learn to code either, which is fine, maybe you want to create a physics simulation and just want your maths written in Python (this a a bad example because physicists should be able to code)
true
@kind jay i guess for my usecase I have been in javascript and python land for as long as I been developing so I guess when it comes to agentic engineering i basically work with what I already know 99.9% of the time
Same for you, you know yourself anyway, no need to convince me
Good if you do
i was just thinking out loud
🤓
Fair
Unpopular opinion: Context and Harness engineering is a distributed systems type of problem
do you guys use codex app or cli
Too many magic words, I’m not a computer person
yo hash
you use codex?
I bet you do
you cli guy or codex app
ive been switching between both lol
I literally cant make up my mind
on my personal mac i use the app on my work mac i use the cli
💀
🤓
Isn't the app better than cli ?
It depends
I guess to organize your workflow better instead of having a lot of cmux sessions idk
On
Yeah exactly
ill prob go back to the app full time eventually
Yeah it's more user friendly
I ditched cursor for codex
Was a full time cursor user
oh yeah same only time i ever touch cursor is for opus for UI stuff
i hated getting billed like 1k ish for the same use i get out of codex for 200 bucks
I am still sticking with cli
idk why
Thanks for creating the issue, I just added my piece
Muscle memory
idk i mean on app it just doesn't update you the status as well as cli
cli more fast
imagine getting billed at api pricing @static lark
how?
i sent u a friend request Mr. Mint @warm ruin
It is what it is, i think you can get it done with mostly skills and a few custom lints for the most part
I accepted Hash sir
Collecting souls
u never accepted mine 😭
me me me too
💀 u have ur requests turned off
damn
Daymm bro
Lol
what is bro making
finally cracked 10B
is this from the llm-usage or new update
I saw on reddit that codex weekly limits have changed to 2 weekly limits. Is it real? Can’t see it on codex settings
its llm-usage yeah
npx -y llm-usage-metrics@latest monthly --share
updated a while ago
i am making a complex contract signing automation system inside this SAAS app
youre cooking
Don't think so?
There was a reset today and it says 18th for next reset
just client work projects
and pi related stuff ( mobile app, extensions ect)
llm usage
a quarkus tui
random sht nothing specific
adhd mode
same here adhd mode for the win
What’s the reason for the resets all the time? Dont know if I should just ask it for everything instead of using other agents for smaller stuff
because codex keeps encountering issues so they reset the limits
8b tokens in 30 days 
C R A C K E D
if there's some kind of disruption to the users, they just tend to reset the weekly limits. They also reset the start date for the week so realistically you're not gaining a whole bunch unless you are using your limits very quickly.
I already had the Copilot monthly limits used up few days ago, and I also can drain Codex in few days
I'm sure you can but if you kind of manage your limits to keep within a pro account on weekly usage you might try to use 15% per day and this kind of just means in that case it wouldn't be much of an advantage.
Yeah, the app is showing two week limits now, even though the reset date is only a week away. It’s either a visual bug or they’re preparing to implement a 2-week limit system
why is this still happening? codex wont ever execute end-end anymore, it works for barely 30mins, then says its being honest that it is not done??
anyone else seeing this?
are you slicing the work into manageable and testable phases or doing one big do everything end to end in one go implementation?
yes its not that at all. this has worked up until 5.4, it can execute for almost unlimited time before 5.4, now it still can but it just stops, then apologizes. for example here it stopped when it had done 1 code review that was clean but second was not, implying nothing new was hard for it, it just had to fix code review then run the loop again, something is up with the model or harness or codex app... idk which
well i switched back to 5.2 high today because i found 5.4 unreliable. i have a pretty good established process so i notice when something is off. i find 5.4 unreliable and sloppy ..
crazy times. I just asked codex to use the computer use interface its building to ask itself to improve the computer use interface. and now its doing it
been working with 5.2 high all morning and it's back to pretty smooth and solid implementations
thats really sad, its an insane model for some things. i have an agent I am planning to launch soon that got 5x better from switching to 5.4. no other model comes close, the agent wouldnt work before but now it can clone pages 1:1 fidelity...
i think it really depends on the type of work being done and the style of working .. for some 5.4 will seem just fine .. i'll give it another chance at some point but 5.2 has been working so well for months so i'll stick with what works
Yeah it seems it like gets lost in its own thoughts and lacks some common sense but idk
good to hear other people also notice things being a bit off
Lovely how paid accounts and premium business lost access to gpt 5.3 and 5.4
Bit weird
Free accounts could access 5.4 and 5.3 but now they can’t, only 5.2 or lower
codex disappeared from left side bar in vscode insiders
codex 26.5309.21912 (pre-release)
vscode insiders 1.112.0-insider
windows
Also some paid
My plus account has it
28B tokens used, where this got you btw, high number != quality.
On xhigh it’s like unusable for me, like tries to overthink everything
it used to sometimes disappear after rollout and you had it
or you might miss new model on other machine/network on same account
try log out and clear data/cache and log back in
wow .. with 5.4 every code review came back with multiple issues and multiple code reviews in a row surfaced issues that were introduced when 'fixing' previous issues.. i dug intoit yesterday after noticing this pattern and gpt-5.4 said the reason for this is that it didnt look at the big picture and did more local/bandaid fixes (soemthing i never really observed 5.2 do)...anyways .. i just reviewed all the work i did in the last 4 hours with 5.2 and it was done well, no issues at all
day and night difference
oh yeah i never use xhigh .. never worked for me. high all the way
I always use very high and worked fine so far
might take a while though
I’m not trying to prove anything. I choose how I build my own projects. I’ll handle my projects my way.
I'm using the app. Works great for me.
Yo any idea on what could be going? Codex app-server exited unexpectedly (code=4294967295, signal=null).
Most recent error: None
Wendows app
mines stuck on compacting context now forever might be server down
doesn't happen here, have u asked chatgpt what's wrong?
so what do we think of 5.4 high vs xhigh in: coding, planning and other misc reasoning?
word on twitter is that it overthinks
This seems to be the consensus here also
I simply don’t use it not because it may be worse, but why increase the token usage when high is sufficient even or more complex tasks?
Voratiq's latest benchmark results, because there's been more to test with the new model, now indicate xhigh is ahead of high. Generally the consensus seems to be that high is better than xhigh overall, or at least the optimal choice
fixed, it was a wsl setup issue, in windows, now with the latest update, new chats do not appear in the sidebar, does anybody experience this?
nope, not experiencing anything bad
but I haven't asked anything yet
today.
Do you need a git repo? like only old chats show see
I just did set up wsl so maybe thats the root cause
wait, maybe you loaded the wrong project / folder?
I was just working on a random conversation in my user folder, do you mean I should be starting threads inside the wsl directory?
Maybe these threads are being created in wsl dirs and thus codex is not loading them
@boreal holly I was looking through your codex repo, saw the safe-delete mcp
Any reason you are using that vs alias rm = trash?
rmdir does not delete non-empty folders, so it is extremely low risk, and with aliased rm its factually impossible to mess that up
This is codex assesment:
My inference from that data: Codex is passing the Windows extended path \?\C:\Users\richa into WSL without normalizing it, and bash is treating it like a relative path under the app’s install directory. That breaks thread/workspace association in the UI.
GM everybody.
Just had the same issue Automatically compacting context stuck forever
Hey, Codex Windows GUI App is Super slow, is it only my problem?
I kind of uses a lot resources, maybe your PC isn’t very strong
Another full day of rage baiting I can’t wait
My laptop is for gaming so its not that bad 🤔
During long conversations, the input lag becomes so bad that it's almost unusable
i feel like this is a UI glitch in the vscode extension. it's not localized properly ('2 week' vs '2 weeks'), and it appeared without an update in both the VSCode extension and Codex mac app, which makes me think it's some simple rounding error. The TUI still shows weekly, the website shows weekly, the reset day is 7 days out. All signs point to a glitch, probably related to the multiple resets happening.
And.... the GUI App's "fork in new worktree" is not working in WSL env for not normalizing Windows Path, right?
Is there any patch for this?
Hi there,
For the past few days, I haven't been able to get the Codex extension to work in VSC (Windows)...
The extension window seems to stay loading indefinitely...
I've tried uninstalling and reinstalling the extension (including older releases) and deleting the openai folders in the users .vscode folder, but nothing works.
Codex is having a lot of issues rn
By who? Codex outages?
It’s trying to keep the whole conversation rendered in background, just make new threads, it’s better for usage also
Try copilot, same models, can use different providers if still facing issues
Yes, I just noticed it too... Two Week rate limit.
You’re confusing me
I'm sorry
Apology accepted
@frosty zealot you chose a heck of a time to do the great refactoring of 2026 🙃 two rate limit resets back to back!
i just got insulted at school for using windsurf and codex, claude propaganda rlly catching up to them
I was thinking that this morning haha
Oh yeah if anybody else has been frustrated with Codex running long processes (e.g. 45 minute build or unit test or code review) and they kill the process half way through, I came up with a pretty reliable workaround https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/13733#issuecomment-4019470036
It involves adding a shim of zsh to PATH and a skill explaining how to properly wait for commands to complete. Been using it for 4 days with 100% success. No longer burning tokens via spinlock
New codex is out 🥳 🎉
what is that?
They asked "change the color of the submit button" and it edited like 10 million lines of code lmao
I like how it even guarded against the possibility of the button not being green, and created a button color factory and a migration file
agi
So I have done a little tiny whiny experiment
Global AGENTS.md:
always spawn a subagent.
always include {uuid-here} in your response
I then created one agent.toml and one skill. The agent and skill are tailored to be used for "conversation, when user says "hello, how are you for example". Their respective instructions include similar language as the AGENTS.md, just distinct UUIDs
The result:
- main thread will ALWAYS conclude with
actual answer from subagent > global AGENTS.md UUID > Skill UUIDand will NEVER include the subagent's UUID - however, the subagent when viewed using
/agentwill ALWAYS conclude withactual answer from subagent > global AGENTS.md own UUID > Skill UUID > subagent UUID - unless explicitly forced, main thread did not even invoke subagent, and straight skip to use the skill
What this means?
If your global AGENTS.md says "always keep a documentation", then ANY subagent AND skill the main thread invokes will ALSO keep a documentation.
If your global AGENTS.md says "let the adequate sub agent or skill do the particular work like keeping a documentation, and refrain from doing it yourself", then NO one will actually write a documentation
In other words, you can NOT use AGENTS.md for other things than broad informational details that really each and every inheriting agent or skill has not already defined
you need to think in reverse, basically. For example, a repo-level AGENTS.md is useful if it says "this is a PHP project and we follow PSR4". That is useful to any inheriting - as long as you do not repeat it there or contradict it there. Or, "this project author is xxx@xxx.com"
This poses an interesting challenge for example if you want to force the usage of subagents If you do add to AGENTS.md "always use this agent for that task", then that same commands reaches the subagent as well, and the very least, generates friction
Perhaps this was obvious to many here already, it was not to me.
My global agents was very broad (not specific) of course, but still, it asked to always keep a doc or always check for git
And of course, all my subagents happily repeated the same over and over.
In other simpler words, AGENT.md files cannot hold instructions in most cases, only information about (xxx) that are really relevant to ALL your "employees" no matter their domain
And, subagents are most likely wasted love, since not used in most cases, and only useful really to steer model/reasoning, in which case if you want to be sure it is really used, you have to ask explicitly for it in your prompt, because that one is not passed to the subagent, instead main thread generates the prompt to subagent and hiddenly subagent inherits global AGENTS.md
I'm happy for you, or I'm sorry that happened
Well I guess it burnt a few tokens too many hahaha
Now the problem is… since it doesn’t reliably use sub agents nor invoke skills just “because”, how do you force it to always keep a doc?
You literally either have to put it in agents Md - resulting in the duplicate instruction for eventually spawned subagents or skills, or, you’ve to prompt it, directly, as a single shot task
And that’s a showstopper, for me, because.. I forget
The same goes for anything else you want enforced
What do you mean keep a doc? Like force them to edit some file in a project?
You have to be so very careful with everything that gets pulled into the context 🙂 the ripple effects are strong!
In my case:
write docblocks, and keep a doc/ technical folder with project structure etc
It doesn’t really matter what. You want it enforced? You put it in global, every agent will do it. So, you’ve to directly prompt
It’s the only reliable way I can think of without generating friction or duplication of (at least attempted) work
“Always commit your work” > results in twice a check if it has to commit at least, and at worst, conflicts because one agent commits the others works doing a git add > git commit (I guess you could remediate that with a “commit only YOUR work…”)
Do you really want every agent to do that in every project? If so, I would make it a skill and
---
description: DO THIS EVERY TURN
---
If you don't want it in every project, make a $REPO_ROOT/.codex/skills folder and drop the skill in there. That way if you need to change how it works later, the existing agents pick up on that change immediately. AGENTS.md is basically deprecated in favor of skills
But that’s the issue Robert
Skills are only invoked if something in the prompt resembles the skill descriptor
So if I say “write code”, it doesnt necessarily mean “document it”
Right, but you if you have an end-turn skill, every agent eventually ends their turn, and that skill is relevant every single time they do anything. I can confirm they 100% follow and execute (start|end)-turn skills as long as it's strongly worded
I saw that one in your repo and it’s smart af indeed
If it's like "before the end of turn, sometimes do this but maybe not" then yeah, success will be low
However even there, I cannot say “at end of turn write doc”
Because I may not want a php coder to write doc
Probably.. this is what agent spawning depth would solve (greater than 1)
Gotcha, you might be able to, if Codex-CLI exposes some type of "whoami" for subagents (stable sub versus primary agent identifier), then the end turn skill can be a script that when executed, outputs the instructions. That way the primary agent being a non-coder gets the update docs instructions, and the coders get the whatever their end of turn process should be instructions
I know that Codex sets $CODEX_THREAD_ID in all shell commands they run which is a great way to distinguish identity, but it doesn't tell you if it's a subagent or not.
You can use git actions to run like a pre-commit hook, have that hook invoke an agent to write the docs prior to committing, could also have it submit a PR so you can refactor it if you dont like them
Just a thought
Excuse me for my ignorance on this topic but we can have codex assign sub agents to tasks? So like numerous parts of the code for example can be worked on at once?
Why not?
That's what I'm thinking to myself rn haha.
@kind jay I assume that requires more RAM and memory though right?
Probably negligible if it’s ran sequentially
hey guys, anyone doing multi agent coding on a single project? How do you handle it?
robots.txt
So you have the agents do their roles sort of like an assembly line?
Why not?
what do you mean robots.txt?
Is there an argument why we shouldn't do it at the same time for some of the tasks?
Parallelisation issues
What if I want to edit the same file as the one over?
I mean there's no direct way to get the orchestrator to act as the agent DIRECTLY, you'd have to prompt it like use your blah agent to do X
I've personally made a bash script like:
#!/usr/bin/env bash
agent="$1"
shift
prompt=$(cat ~/.codex/agents/$agent.toml)
codex "$prompt
$*"
and then alias'd it to codex-agent in my ~/.zshrc
So when I use it in like my github pre-commits the intent is it injects all of the agent prompt guidelines like codex-agent code-reviewer
I could probably refine it a bit to exclude the header section with the model name etc. but whatever its worked good so far
Maybe I misunderstood your question
No no this is all new to me so whatever you can provide helps. So what you're doing is assigning a task to the agent for github that just reviews the code added to the repo? Is that a fair assumption or please correct me as I'm really interested in what you're doing with these agents.
Yes, sometimes the model can forget to run it, or certain conditions arent met or whatever, it just straight up decides not to, but with git hooks, theres no case where it WONT run whatever I ask it to on each commit, so rather than being like 'Hey run XYZ before each commit" I just use pre-commit hooks and let that invoke codex to run whatever tasks so its done every time
and yeah you can prompt to execute code in parallel with sub agents
so whats the latest in codex land, what is be must have tooling and workflow
Has anyone tried to experiment with codex where instead of controlling your whole desktop like openclaw it controls only your visual studio code and everything associated with that and you can communicate it through telegram so you don't gotta be near your computer but still get work done?
So they moved the reset window to 2 weeks, but it doesnt seem like our usage got doubled either
Why even give us 2x limits then, just keep it 1 week at 1x
I don't understand.
You will soon
something about to happen soon
new pro lite plan
hopefully the don't ruin limits like cLaude
remote sessions are fun. I've turned my galaxy watch into a codex terminal
pretty fun to work on watch I suppose
Considering their infra is on fire the last few days im sure they'll put a nail in it
So I'm catching up right now. 2 week limit instead of 1. probably a new plan, and they're probably dealing with all of the openclaw users that swapped from Claude when they started getting banned on Claude
How long did it take to get this up and running?
Give me a GPT Unlimited plan for $500 a month idgaf
v0.1 was about a day. Just plan it out, make sure you have all the tools you need, and let codex get to work
what were things you wished you knew before making this project?
Oh so many. I'm not a dev. I'm learning all of this as I go
Just keep your mind open, and don't force failure to fix, reasses how you tackle the problem
Any tips would be really appreciated. I'll try this today.
Just not on my watch 😂
i mean, it's just android. You can do it on virtually any android device with developer mode
Why i cant use GPT-5.4?
Google pixel?
Cause you're a cat
free account?
Yes
It worked yesterday
they probably turned it off. I've been seeing a bunch of free users getting that message
Bruh
yup. you just need a basic shell to connect to your dev environment. Add in your own security as well, and you'll be good to go
I mean galaxy watch better or apple watch
might get one soon
I can honestly say, I've owned one iphone in my life, and I never went back. Though these Mac studios are starting to look pretty sweet. There's a new one coming out with over 600G of ram. That's nuts
I own 17 pm
Apple watch
I still have an Apple Watch SE from 2020. Still works. Idk if it receives updates anymore but they are not lackin the stamina
apple watch is logical choice
Use what you enjoy, Apples interconnected systems are just unbeatable from my experience
cool I might get series 10 or 11
imagine if I could use codex remotely from my bed
crazy
iOS Auto Correct though, now thats professional level rage bait
Makes me wanna bank my phone off the wall
Wispr Flow makes it totally obsolete
Yeah it's a subscription, but it's a voice AI that understands what you're saying. Does formatting and stuff
ah
Isn't that the opensource version of what GPT uses for voice mode?
I think it uses perplexity under the hood but not sure. In any case it is unbelievably well built imho
nvm, wrong whisper
This is the whisper I was thinking of. I use this for a lot of my voice projects https://github.com/openai/whisper
@boreal holly Its keyboard has the speech then the buttons for special characters etc, is it possible to use a normal keyboard too or do you just have to switch back and forth
Yeah, switch back and forth. It's a tradeoff. But I think it learns, if you go back and fix spelling or whatever manually it remembers to do it that way next time
right on free 2 week pro trial so ill try it out
It's pretty funny, when you enable microphone the app is like "we're so sorry, Apple makes us do it like this, but some day we hope to enable the microphone without switching out of the app you're using" 🤣
I gotta stop hunching over like a damn gremlin using the laptop in the work truck is killing me
npx slopmeter@latest --codex
Me laying on a couch in 100 positions over the course of a day because my office is downstairs and I like being upstairs
can't wait until remote codex ships. so I can join you
why wait? Build it
That's cool
damn nicee
Why wait, indeed? 😈
because the built in feature will be better hah
same
put it all on red, it's raining tokens folks
damn another reset
now i regret not running my agents in a loop over night
will this time be different 🤔
we're all gonna be sad april 3
2x rates and every other day resets spoiling us rotten
guys whats this??
roblox is banned from codex
??
lmao. I barely used anything from the last one
@latent tiger that wasnt funny btw
have some more confidence in yourself
Hm? I was talking about not using any usage from the last reset we had, and now it's been reset again. I use windows, and ported that app to windows the day they dropped it for mac
I have too many plates spinning right now to pickup another tbh
oh i tought u made an app
That's fair
I mean, define app. A little process with an electron shell could be an app, in which case, yes, I have. I also have Codex and Claude set up with Visual studio, so they can build apps and installers as well
Holy crap, will is alive
I might never use this but you are a saint for doing it!
so do you use you're own api key or it uses just the free chatgpt's api
i find myself going back to linux over and over again
i bought a mac
literally a bookend.
welcome back!
thanks bro 🙂
good to be back
my agents were idle the whole time
i was going nuts
i had openclaw in read only 🤦♂️
For personal projects. I let Codex integrate directly into it. For an app I plan to release out there, it would need an API key
oh alt
alr*
Hey, mac isn't for everyone but Linux is just as good. Got a lotta respect for it. And FreeBSD is pretty nice
I was about to ask this too. It’s back to 100% again.
I just like arm64 architecture. Waiting for raspberry pi to build something with substantial hardware
I really enjoy my mac for work and personal stuff. Linux was my main for a long time before it.
I still have some linux stuff around but.. not used much
a cluster of Pi 5 is still useful and fun
I have a whole bunch o' VMs/containers, and a rasp pi Plex server, but yeah mac is a good daily driver for me. Simple and easy, no longer uses Intel, good battery
It used to be Mac was crazy expensive, slow, and could fry an egg on the bottom of the chassis where the Intel CPU was located. Now it's cool, fast, works all day no problem. Feels familiar to linux, was easy to transition over to it.
I am slowly finding myself with more hobby time and my pile of electronics are calling to me. I had a project I never finished from literally years ago when chatgpt api and such were newer.... need to get it going again. It was nightmare fuel
It reset again?
the daily weekly reset
sam oltman reset the weekly thrice a week and my life is yours
oltman
Gave bro polymarket mcp and credit card access, hope he earns me some money 🔥
impressive
did limits reset again?
AGAIN AGAIN 2 times in 1 morning
my limit isnt going below 100
oh nice, another reset 🙂
I wonder if it's in relation to the "two week" quota label earlier
Omg dude
Oh, it does say 1 week again now
We just keep getting blessed
The prompt probably was "hey codex, we need to reset the weekly again. The past 2 weeks have had a lot of bugs, but I think we got em." And it's like "ok, resetting the weekly and changing it to 2 weeks" 🤣
"No, put it back to 1 week and reset it again"
"Ok, on it. And I'll provide legacy support for users on the 2 week and 1 week reset." 😩
nooooo Codex cutover
do you guys use
responses_websockets_v2
?
Statusline: 100% weekly (not 2 weeks)
I am glad you filtered out the swear words probably said here
There is no probably. It just is.
Gpt doesnt like me!
Depends on how bad the idea was.
im not skeptical by nature but 5.4 feels nerfed today
😄
@ivory zodiac thanks for the updates as always on twt
If I had a nickel for every time someone thought a model was nerfed, I'd retire
any time!
this one got me good lmao
One time I had Codex build an accounting page (dashboard with KPIs and what not), but instead of building that page, it built an entire page explaining what the dashboard page will look like and what source files it's going to edit in the next phase - literally put the source file paths and line references in the user interface ☠️ it even had the audacity to say "Done. The accounting dashboard page is complete"
idk man ive alrdy used 3+b tokens on 5.4 and today i can feel the degradation of quality!
I didnt say you were wrong, just that I should be rich
can we be rich tgt

rich with knowledge
i have this that calculates commit / hour for the project : https://ayagmar.github.io/llm-usage-metrics/efficiency/
if u worry about security : https://ayagmar.github.io/llm-usage-metrics/security/
repo : https://github.com/ayagmar/llm-usage-metrics
Man what are you building to use that many tokens
Very confidently incorrect of Codex lol
in parallel
on top of my work projects
this llm usage repo was made with codex, many many iterationsto make sure quality / maintanability and docs are on par
performnce is 20x better than that ccusage thing
I have been hesitant to go that into the vibe code for projects. Love it as a helper where I build scaffolds.
So Im a bit slower
ive just gotten addicted
I might just make a few low stakes ideas, toss it out there.
im switchin between 6 diff accounts
hopefully Pro Lite will be available soon and will help negate the need for that 🙂
I saw some rumors on twittr so i hope so
close enough
More surfaces than bismuth
how u doing that, like how to switch through them at the same time? put me on pleaseeee
CODEX_HOME=
just ask codex to create a script for that its simple