#codex-discussions
74121 messages · Page 75 of 75 (latest)
It’s not that tho, it’s you basically regurgitating the same thing you say in the other server
Tried that, but hitting esc doesn't really fix it. It just completely freezes up
how delusional can you be
Claude servers crashing is a different issue than lacking intelligence
What platform are you on
And if you think claude doesn’t drop in intelligence you have grass to touch or are just new to this
you may wish to try gemini
you’re delusional bro
bro swear he works for codex customer service 🤣
claude is def dumb in its own way too
you should take biggies advice
Yeah but less so
dont be a loyal hoe, just switch each time a model does its thing for you
if you build an agnostic workflow its not a big deal
3 months ago its was all 4.5/4.6 as the implemtation agent for me
🤣
Please look at his messages there bro is just larp
now 4.7 is only allowed to plan and be my hostile reviewer
and that may change again next month
I find codex to be the better reviewer
they both find things the other doesnt
True
codex doesn’t love you bro
really thats the trick to all of this, two models etc, cause you certainly cant trust any of them
They give a lot of perks ngl
Prolly love us more than daddy Dario
ubuntu
Yeah I’m down to one model rn that’s probably my biggest problem
Claude + codex is the absolute peak
If former update if latter clear sessions (this works for me)
f only they could sync up and not both be rtarded at the same time, would be great
You’re not gonna believe this…
in the scheme of things though, still pretty awesome from 6 months ago
yeah + $400 a month gets a little excessive
conspiracy time? 😉
Plus tax
Nah you can sync them if you want
So really like 450
Just use claude code through codex
I'm locked to codex until I finish my project, earn some money and buy a new computer so I've got no basis for comparison here
I do study it so I’d hope so
Using codex only is going to bring me to an early death
oh i do, i ment the models syncing up i.e both being usbale and at full power at once
Nah bro just has all the usage here btw
Tough ask
You should ask the other guy he seems to love it
Do you think they both drop in intelligence or just claude
And yet....
https://marginlab.ai/trackers/codex/
new model = full power for a few weeks, gets hyped up, users subscribe/migrate, gradually reduce compute/quantatise the model over time, then its rinse and repeat between them
I don’t get it, it proves my point
for me the most excitement of a new model is not it can do new X, its i get two weeks of full processing power
There's literally no evidence of this
No the real answer is, whenever their enterprise client like J.P. Morgan or whoever else want to do something they throttle all of us
That’s the real answer
lol the evidence is in using it day in day out over the cycles, its obvious
Don’t tell them what compute is
Or what gpus are
Then you need new eyes
Blind leading the blind here
Yeah same here especially running via oauth for Hermes..3 days now.
You think colossus has only 1 model?
"I have a feeling" isn't evidence
Answer
Idk
Read computer architecture book and comment
but you aren't doing exactly the same thing every day
Have a nice day
what a joke, the page status say 100% operational
close enough, anyways i see with my own eyes, thats my opinion not going to argue over it
Baseless larp
the delusional jester was comical
It's a tired opinion from 2023
k
Yeah..gonna try VPN now lol.
You get amazed by new capabilities, then eventually it becomes the new normal, then it screws up (as it's always done) you think "it's getting dumb!"
@solid lake why didn’t you answer this fact
Twitter post btw
Bro just copy pastes same message in both servers
Have fun
yup I’m an llm that’s how delusional this jester is
same result with vpn, it's completely stalled. i have to wait 5 minutes just for one response
glad you're having a good time with it and its working well for you
you think an llm has the ability to call you a delusional clown
no way he’s using jester in this context
Is bro that brain rotted
Nah I’m a llm
Oh okay
🤣
@robust lintel @winged ore this has been happening for over 3 days now, codex is just completely unusuable for a lot of people just frequently freezing. Why is it taking so long to even acknowledge the problem? Many people here reporting it, in twitter too, I sent a help request with a lot of info too. https://x.com/i/status/2058754716889489872
this chat gave me my laughs for the day I’m not even mad
bro said I’m a llm 😭 I wish
You wish you were a stochastic parrot?
Hope you find peace in life
as long as I only have codex there will never be peace here.
anyone tried /goal here?
Vpn seems to be helping so far lol
Has anyone else having issues with goal?
yeah
used it in production for refactoring a codebase - no feature implementation or bug fixing
i don’t understand how they say its persistent when I can’t even close codex while the goal is active - and secondly, context management is not done well in my opinion
Enough at 5.5 on high/xtra for about one day max. 5.3 would last you the week depending on what you are doing
sadly i do not think despite you can buy a quantity of tokens is there a visible UI showing exact usage
which makes a really crap user experience for those trying to actually budget or optimize what they do
Token usage: total=921,155 input=835,996 (+ 29,337,088 cached) output=85,159 (reasoning 22,031) << is a 5 hour window a million tokens on plus or something?
Promo
yes lol
yeah, the end of a session
where/what might you use for that?
idk, it just tells you that when you leave a session. its default behaviour
How do I access codex in my phone I remember there was a website no pc
App
if you only have a phone you aren't going to get far with codex, I think it needs a desktop one to connect to
or just do everything cloud
So they don't allow phone anymore that's unfortunate
still happening and VPN doesn't completely fix it
you might be thinking cloud via the website, or some other 3rd party site
anyone use cursor? if i get both a cursor and codex sub is it possible to use my codex sub in cursor like in opencode?
pls ping me in replies too
Has anyone successfully connected Codex to GLM5.1? Please share your step.
How do I install on termux
I asked chatgpt and got a few suggestions, and it looks very similar to how one would do it on regular linux.
Nope, what u want in proof.
it's cheaper to buy a $200 sub
Hi, is this channel dead?
If not, what's the difference in quality for medium vs high temp?
Is the play to run medium by default and crank it up to high when medium can't cut it?
Or just run high always? xhigh seems overkill ngl.
how can u know if its overkill or not ?
Im turning always on 5.5 xhigh but i actually have no clue which one to chose
depends what your plan is and how you are using it
Usage limit drain.
xhigh takes longer, sometimes medium does the same in shorter time, reasoning only makes more sense if the problem is complex enough where medium reasoning doesn't get the job done
Coding mainly. You could say 50% new development like API design along with frontend design and the other 50% debugging and fixing filed bugs.
Also, yeah, I use the chrome extension heavily for verifications.
Or automation.
Is it normal for subagents to show up here even after they are done?
no this channel is just endlessly compacting atm
I didn't realise how hard it nags you to switch to 5.4 mini until I used almost a full 5 hour
first it's not temp, it's reasoning effort.
if you want a simple rule of thumb, think of the higher the effort the more inference passess the model makes
a higher effort has better chance to grasp more depth, spot more edges etc
are you on pro 100?
same. probably will move to 200
Waiting for models to drop
since they decided to keep 200 at 20x , it s economically rational lol
Yeah looks like
since it will be 2x times more cheaper than 100
Right. Reasoning. So what's the sweet spot? Medium or High?
I use Opus 4.7 at xhigh always.
Whatever produces the best code for you
This depends very heavily on your codebase ngl
if you use xhigh always, you already know the answer for codex too
Yea
But Codex seem to be running into rate limits?
Yeah, I don't have the time to run the same task with different reasoning levels to compare the output honestly.
Pro 5x.
I’ve been on Xhigh /fast all month
Do you use subagents like I do?
then pay someone to work for you then lol
how could you anyone on this discord with 0 info of what you actually doing know what effort is best for you
lol if only there was a tool we already pay to work
I'm already paying Anthrophic. I could get Claude to run multiple tests to verify.
Jokes btw
False. I have shared context above #codex-discussions message and folks are more than welcome to ask for further context.
models are very relative to workflow. they re not like videocards having objective framerates in various game resolutions
If you’ve used xhigh opus all this time, xhigh 5.5 should be your choice. Limits are higher if you have equivalent plan
i m speaking on this convo here and now
Well, you should jump into a convo after reading context.
Also milk it till promo ends in the next 5 days
again, xhigh will work best with ambigous or underspecified intent
I'll probably try /fast mode. It does appear to be pretty slow.
Yes
/fast is bearable
This is with High. Not even xhigh.
Yep
yea maybe go do that, if that's already working fine for you
did they lower the limit again?
doesnt end for pro 20x
i hope performance gets better when all the plus and pro-lite plans are reduced
plus is not on promotion anymore since 3 months ago
o rly
only pro 100 currently on 2x promo
? you re on plus?
do it
But instead of that I’ll prolly keep the 200 and one plus
do 2x pro 200
Idk let me first max out the first one
200 plan is decent. I got about 2.1 billion tokens on /fast over 2 days before I ran out. 600m into my second plan with no /fast usage, 14 hours in and at 82% usage
Depends on your usage of course
i dont use fast, prefer to have some things going in parallel instead for same total usage
what did you accomplish with 2 billion tokens
That’s it?
2 billion?
Finished my iOS emulator, debugged problems with a certain binary not properly decoding encoded scalar, built a private dashboard, some MCP servers etc
Yeah that's about what you get when you use /fast
Noice
Interesting
fast is 1,5x speed at 2,5x usage right?
I ran it from the minute it reset to the minute it ran out on /fast. I may have been running 2 chats at one point - lots of long running goals, 2 days of near 24/7 usage and 2b tokens of output. By that metric you can expect ~5b normally, but obviously that is outputting slower so by the time you've used 5 billion tokens you're likely to be at / near the reset
Correct. It's not worth it imo unless you have a deadline which I did
i dream of running /fast with API key and being able to afford it 😄
API pricing is rediculous. I think I've done ~9b in the past 2 weeks, which would have been ~$6.8k iirc?
More
Yea I think you get sth around 10k out of a 200 plan, maybe even more
It's heavily heavily subsidised, especially with the reset schedule Tibo's got us on
but I'm going to get blue balls when they stop
X20 was also given the extra usage
Ig now on a rolling basis
I remember it was super confusing to decipher how much they gave tho
I honestly don't pay attention to it too much. I use what I need to, if I need more and it's worth it, I'll buy more.
I only use Codex for projects where the only important part is the output being correct. If I care about the internals, I need to put a bit more care into it.
That said, I'm pretty happy with how a couple /nuclear-code-reviews turned out, got from 2 15k line scripts to a lovely balanced directory with max 600 lines per file
Thats the skill from cursor i believe?
Yeah I just ripped it and installed it in cursor to try it out
Nice, i have it bookmarked still have to test it
Is this the skill from Twitter
I've got a couple others, like I downloaded the Jira confluence guide and made an agile skill, I have a rust best practices one I use in Plan Mode
Like from yesterday or a couple days ago now idr
I've been testing out codex-lb, and honestly, not amazed. It's buggy and not reliable, and the docs are a mess.
I was thinking about contributing, but there are PR's that are approved and not merged, I don't really want to get involved with a bunch of merge conflicts and versioning issues
is it just me or each tool call takes ages?
i worked on this concept i called chaos review, inspired by netflix chaos monkey, basically pick a random file, then read the high level docs, and review its part in the system, if the tests are good etc
Too late buddy sama is approaching your location
Tibo is already in your room
I asked in here and I was informed 2 accounts is fine
good i can ask him to add some features :))
tibo give me the reset button
Seems fine on my end
i talked to codex about it and it suggest a bunch of options to implement this better
incl hotswapping during active turns
needs a codex fork though
Oh there are infinite ways - I presume the project was started by a non-developer.
Honestly as long as you keep the websocket connection stable & open I don't see a reason why you couldn't direct individual requests to different accounts
The codex client is blisfully unaware of what happends behind the abstraction of that websocket, as long as it replies in the required format
(to my knowledge, I haven't delved deep on these things)
Websocket hasn’t been stable enough for that ngl
well you have to be mindful of the caching still, so dont switch constantly. but codex already has a built-in reload auth function, its just not publicly exposed
Http fallback still better rn
This is true. I presume it'd actually be less effective to do mid-turn swapping. Honestly all I care about is a convenient way to
- Align my reset periods
- Swap from Account X to Account Y when the ratelimit is maxed out
yea and without the manual logout/login, thats the annoying part
Login is and always has been awfully buggy for me on OAI products
To the extent I've considered cancelling my subscription out of frustration many times
works fine for me, just multiple accounts with 2FA etc its annoying
Threatening gpt with this works too btw
I've looked into the auth flows / requests and I still don't understand it. It's that preauth cookie error bug that's been reported 100 times but never gets a clear fix / response
I'm currently still logged out of the ChatGPT app on my Mac. To make matters worse, every time I tried to log in to one place it would force log me out of everything else. I just gave up. I use ChatGPT on the web or mobile, and Codex as the app as it seems to work
Could be worse though. A\ took 3 months to respond to a support ticket I opened about a new hidden limit they applied on everyones plans (200$ included).
I cancelled my subscription days after reporting it. Told them I switched to Codex 🤣
i use cli only because the app always seems to pull in additional stuff like tool descriptions i dont need, since they share the app server + central config apparently. easiest solution to the auth stuff seems to be using the CODEX_HOME env var
probably also for my cli/app issue
like CODEX_HOME="$HOME/.codex-1" codex
I'm using experimental_bearer_token because managing env vars is a pain for apps on MacOS
pretty sure thats a fake screenshot, for me codex switches to "1d 0h" after "24h".
I've had longer then this without a completion - and a clearly defined goal lol
Nope. At least not in the MacOS app.
hmm ok. longest goal for me was 4d so far
what took 4 days?
it was a big refactoring, there was a bunch of wall time for test running, compiling, etc
May be wrong on this
so not 4 days of inference
I had to optimise one of my programs because each turn was taking 3h+ due to runs being so slow
Made me realise that iteration speed is really important to accomplish things in decent timeframes using LLM's
Please help
Jow
How
It's often better to stop and optimise performance then to have it keep drilling on
Is it some secret prompt engineering
My codex doesn't work for more than 40 mins
It's just a goal that's defined clearly yet difficult enough to achieve. It will always keep going until it resolves the goal
I had this stupid idea for "paired coverage" where each source file needs to have a sibling test file and only coverage from that one counts. That slowed down everything to a crawl haha
I was working on top of Unicorn and writing a lot of features that instrumented at the instruction level with runs that execute over 20 million instructions.
I had to do quite a bit of optimisation to get runs down from 40min+ each to 12 seconds lol
I only realised because I came back to Codex after leaving it on overnight to only see 3 new messages
Waste of 12 hours, but you learn to take these things into consideration
i recently migrated my main project from gitlab to github, incl a lot of CI with auto deploy to prod etc
codex wrote typescript tests for terraform, yaml, cloudformation, you name it
/goal doesn’t work for me codex refuses it says “can’t do goal”
absurd token burn
I've never been a Gitlab fan to be honest. I tend to stay away from hosted version control now though as a lot of my projects are quite sensitive. Just local vc and onsite / offsite backups.
hahahhahhaah
I mean atleast you know your infra wont fail
that's gotta be worth something
Umm super duper 4 digit frontend thisend thatend developers please help
Tests in golang are annoying
yea i removed the obviously stupid ones ofc 😄 but it seems pretty solid now, before i had this handwritten 1k LOC deploy.sh haha
It does take instructions very very literally now though. It's good because it reduces instruction following issues, but it can lead to some really annoying situations
My deploy.sh is normally just a docker build, tag and push. Hook portainer / kameleon up to the registry and have it auto pull and deploy. Saves me writing a bunch of IaC stuff
yea i had sth in my goal about dont break prod, so this probably caused this
Stuck on user approval
meh I had this and 2 other chats I've been using and my usage seems normal
Seems like a growing trend rn
Could’ve been patched but timeline wise doesn’t look like you’re far from the reports
If it's prompting for permissions for silly stuff, you may have to add
approvals_reviewer = "auto_review"
to config.toml
I had that issue yesterday
Nono this is for the /goal burn
and of course it added a smoke test lol
Apparently the permissions are causing infinite loops
I've seen it doing that recently, then I saw that meme on X lol. Seems like a 5.5 thing though, can't remember it ever writing smoke tests before
Both of the times it's written them for me it's been extremely helpful though. One was to ensure a unicorn python oracle output matched that of the rust rewrite, and another was to validate a login flow on an old deprecated microservice I was rewriting
yea i mean smoke testing prod after deploy is reasonable
i have some similar works flows took a few weeks to complete some of them, i ran orchestration and stopped it periodically to check and change lanes etc.
I have yet to reach prod with this lol
we need to validate the validation, and to validate the validation validating the validation and have a typeclass for the validation for the telescope validation and ask forty wrappers if the 30 lines of code has permission to exist
the limiting factor with goal is its 4k chars
I honestly feel that's not a limitation. If your goal is too big, it's likely too big to be a goal
/goal goal.md
you can even edit it while its working
A goal isn't meant to be an entire Epic, it's meant to be more of a Story from what I've inferred (sorry for the Agile PTSD)
Smoke tests being synthetic ? I find codex ignoring test data and go make its own synthetic cases
EW
KANBAN
The create goal tool limits it to 4k afaik
Ill try that though
Those tasks do not need a bigger prompt. They need a persistent objective.
From the Goals doc
Right but if you want the goal to be a work flow?
How many story points to create our own in house version of Codex?
so it has some structure and doesnt just do it how ever it likes?
I just use orchestration usually
guys codex or cursor?
The whole point of a goal is that it will loop until a specific measurable outcome has been reached. They're not meant to run workflows, they're meant to keep Codex locked onto a specific problem without veering off track and being told to "Continue" every 10 minutes
They're two very different products. One is an assistance tool built into an IDE, one is a standalone product meant to write code autonomously. Depends what you're looking for
write code on java
i cant find a solution on this really if i pay for cursor they gonna reset the limit every one month which is soooo muchh
Do you want to watch it be written
You dont have to do that anyway "Continue" every 10 minutes Where do you get this definition from?
It's not very useful if you can't give it structure with in the task. Large code bases need to follow architecture and you need work flows to bring those into line.
Or do you want to spend time chatting with agent
watch it to be written
Ide then
Codex in vscode or cursor
Idk about cursor limits codex definitely more rn
Unless composer
Which is just a kimi
Which you could get cheaper than cursor
I think
Passing files and using skills overcomes the 4k limitation, but i already use orchestration like i said
so u suggest intellij?
Haven’t used actually
I'm not entirely sure what you refer to when you say "definition". If you don't have a goal set, when Codex finishes a turn, it will wait for user input. When you do have a goal set, it will automatically resume itself after a turn ends until it decides to mark the goal as complete.
I cannot really advise you on whats best in your specific situation as I do not have knowledge of the codebase that you are working in, or the "workflow" that you speak of.
What I can tell you is how the Codex team intended for goals to be used, how they've instructed end-users to use them in order to derive the best outcomes from them, and what my personal experience has shown to be the best way to utilise them.
Vscode or vim rn for me
i tell gpt pro to read gpt 5.5 prompt guidance and goals guide from openai docs and then write a goal doc for me, works well
Robust, long standing, heavy startup, menus that go on for kilometers.
If you like old software with 1000 options, it's for you. If you prefer a .json - probably not
Good language support though. They customise editors for each language
I see
Idm the extra customisation
But i also don’t want more than what i get from vs
Or need
For Java - VSCode, Zed, Vim etc are a bit of a pain to use because you have to execute all the build commands yourself, manage the extensive files that java build systems require etc.
IntelliJ, Eclipse etc manage Maven / other build systems for you, so you just have to hit run. It's a lot easier to work with
Yeah i mostly use go and cpp
Some python
Vs is okay with these (although the language server takes a while to refresh sometimes annoying)
I'm a massive Go fan if I'm manually writing code, but I find agents write really good rust, and rust is quite a robust language - the compiler is very strict and can prevent a lot of footguns
Umm super duper developers
also strict clippy rules etc
You definition is this: The whole point of a goal is that it will loop until a specific measurable outcome has been reached. They're not meant to run workflows, they're meant to keep Codex locked onto a specific problem without veering off track and being told to "Continue" every 10 minutes
Where do you get this from? You don't need to use goal to keep a loop going. You can just use orchestration and have been able to for a long while.
In orchestration i use structured prompts for worker sub-agents and debug sub-agents. Then there is the actual orchestration instructions for the main agent. This can easily be 4k chars.
You're not actually explaining anything to me i don't understand.
I just think orchestration already solves the problem in a better way.
Yeah i have a rust rewrite for one of my project in a roadmap but wont do it just yet
Subagents and goals are a risky mix from what i hear
Not stable enough
Ok so you people weren't able to make gpt run more than 3 hours before the launch of /goal
who says that?
I mean I don't want to be pedantic, but that's a statement, not a definition.
Orchestration is meant to solve a different problem then goals are. I've been saying from the beginning that goals are not built for large problems. They're not built to run workflows.
If orchestration solves the problem in a better way, why are you so persistent on trying to use goals for it?
I haven’t even used it 💀
I should
I used omo and its horrific subagents. I'm glad I ditched it, but it was nice when not much else existed
the problem with vs is he is only talking english
In codex you cannot spawn more than 10 subagents right
And the subagents aren't like gpt 5.5 pro level
you can spawn unlimited, just change the config value, you can even nest them
Or 5 I think
Where
It says multi agent true
In config
err not sure. I had 20 odd going in OC a while back when I was trying to emulate a company structure. I had an agent per employee lol. Was a cool experiment
[agents]
max_threads = 10
max_depth = 1
In cc you're able to run 70+
Can you give some other stuff from your config
That I can add in mine
God i want to read a codebase that was made using this
model = "gpt-5.5"
model_reasoning_effort = "xhigh"
web_search = "live"
personality = "none"
tool_output_token_limit = 25000
# Leave room for native compaction near the 272–273k context window.
# Formula: 273000 - (tool_output_token_limit + 15000)
# With tool_output_token_limit=25000 ⇒ 273000 - (25000 + 15000) = 233000
model_auto_compact_token_limit = 233000
hide_agent_reasoning = false
show_raw_agent_reasoning = true
model_reasoning_summary = "detailed"
#suppress_unstable_features_warning = true
[agents]
max_threads = 10
max_depth = 1
[features]
goals = true
fast_mode = false # fast mode consume usage at 2x rate
apps = false # buggy, burns tokens
default_mode_request_user_input = false # interrupts /goal runs that are supposed to be autonomous
[notice]
hide_full_access_warning = true
fast_default_opt_out = true # opt out of the default fast mode added in 0.124.0
No js repl?
whats that?
I'll send you a project I worked on. I gave up on it but I had 20 subagents running for a good couple of days. It's a funny repo to look at. You had agents making PR's and other agents reviewing them
i tried 20 or so and it crashed
Ram
like it was still running, but it didnt render anything anymore
64gb ram
Try as much as ram allows
I’m on same use a bit less
maybe when M4 Pro macbooks get cheap at some point, scoring one for 1.5k here in EU would be neat
20 subagents running rust compiles in parallel kinda blows up any cpu/ram you have
y'could tax your whole machine just running cargo tests alone
i did froze my machine twice doing that
offload builds to a load balancer with remote compile farm
then you can run all the agents you want
something is so wrng w/ Cargo build/test on workspaces
[features]
unified_exec = true
shell_snapshot = true
ghost_commit = true
apply_patch_freeform = true
skills = true
undo = true
memories = true
image_detail_original = true
responses_websockets_v2 = true
runtime_metrics = true
js_repl = true
js_repl_tools_only = true
codex_git_commit = true
i switched from subagents to one codex in its own remote dev vps
and just spin those up as i need
not a clue what you're building / testing to warrant this lol
compiler
not really a compielr but a whole thing
tools, lsp, vm, etc
lol this was a forseeable issue
it's like 120K of absolute 🍑 ery that I haven't touched in a week
it has a lot of reductions due
Right so we agree about the limitation then?
It's not a limitation
I'd also like to know what you base your statement on
anybody knows how to prevent this on windows, going mental
buy a mac
You dont have to have a goal set for this, you can simply have completion criteria. You don't need to create_goal for it at all.
and the link calls out constraints, boundaries, and an iteration policy which is a workflow
Yes, I'm aware that workflows exist
well your link contradicts your statement
Either way, it limits chars at 4k.
which is a limitation
You were asking why you couldn't use over 4000 characters for a goal. I told you goals weren't meant to be big. You continue to talk about workflows for some reason. I tell you I don't have enough knowledge of your set-up to tell you exactly what you should be doing. You proceed to tell me that a goal isn't the only way to keep a thread going, and that orchestration solves your problem better then goals can. I ask you why you are so persistent on trying to use goals for something you claim orchestration does better. You don't answer the question
It's not a limitation because goals aren't meant to be big!!!
the limiting factor with goal is its 4k chars
A goal isn't meant to be an entire Epic, it's meant to be more of a Story from what I've inferred (sorry for the Agile PTSD)
Right but if you want the goal to be a work flow?
goals with big detailed goal files work fine for me
Right i called it a limitation i didnt ask WHY?
It's not a limitation
It's purposeful. The feature is not meant to be used how you want to use it
back up a second, you said i asked why its limited. I didnt.
the premise of your argument is wrong
It is literally limited to 4k
the create_goal tool limits it to 4k chars
which you probably didn't even know until i said it
what are you even fighting over
I actually went out of my way to inspect the source code
Youre right im off
Yes because goals aren't meant to be long. You are not meant to use goals in place of workflows. You asked why you couldn't run goals as workflows.
You can't because there is a 4000 line limitation. To prevent you from trying to use the goal tool in a way it wasn't intended. Read the document I linked you about the architecture of goals, who owns a goal, what state a goal carries.
You're not meant to use a goal as a workflow. I said this from the beginning
You didn't directly ask me why you couldn't use over 4000 characters for a goal, but I'm trying to explain to you why that limitation exists, and you can't seem to grasp the concept
A good Goal is more than a larger prompt. It is a compact contract for how Codex should work, what counts as success, and what should happen if success is not yet reachable.
Goals are implemented as persisted thread state, not as global memory and not as project-level instructions. That design choice is important: the objective belongs to the thread where the relevant context lives
At the architecture layer, a Goal is a durable, thread-scoped state. It records the objective, lifecycle, budget, and progress accounting that Codex needs to evaluate the thread over time.
Codex treats that state as a contract between the user, the model, and the thread.
This is the architecture to keep in mind: a Goal is a thread-scoped completion contract. It combines durable objective state, lifecycle controls, continuation policy, budget accounting, and evidence-based completion. The point is not to make Codex loop forever; it is to let the objective persist until the evidence says the work is done.
Do not use a Goal when the finish line is vague. Make this better gives Codex no reliable completion condition. Refactor this code is also weak unless you define the expected end state, tests, and constraints.
Goals are strongest when the task has three properties: a durable objective, an evidence-based finish line, and a path that may require several turns of investigation.
you dont need to inspect the code, it tells you right in the UI
like i said this works fine for me, i havent seen a difference really. i use it with well-scoped instructions though
how do you get this?
is that in the cli?
So we agree on the limitation.
when you type /goal and then paste something >4000 chars in the cli
A car not being able to fly is not a limitation. What you want to do is outside the bounds of what goal is meant to do.
We do not have to continue further with this discussion. I have tried to relay everything in as clear a manner as I can, citing the official docs, but you don't seem to want to listen. Good luck with your goalflows
Oh i see its if you give it too much, never actually got that far haha. After i inspected the source i was like ahh ok ill stick to the orchestration because of the 4k limitation. I have used it a few times for some smaller stuff though
Your analogy is just silly, the create goal tool actively limits to 4k. unlike a flying car. If the car could fly and they limited it so it couldnt that might the same. But i think the idea is missed on you. It was my mistake for trying to talk to you.
I wont make that mistake again
It wasn't the best analogy, no. You want to use a tool that was designed for purpose X to do purpose Y. The developers knew that this tool would not perform purpose Y well, and therefore tried to stop people from doing purpose Y, so they would not complain about its poor performance.
You seem to be upset that I am telling you that Goals are architected specifically for well defined tasks with a visible end. A workflow is not a goal.
Not being able to use a goal to run a workflow, is not a limitation of the goal tool.
I dont want to do that, i never said that. You just make stuff up as you go. You want to use a tool that was designed for purpose X to do purpose Y
I just simply said it's limited to 4k so i perfer orchestration.
You can call it a limitation if you'd like to, but that is not the point I'm trying to make. The point I have emphasised in every single message to you is that the "limitation" is the point. It's on purpose. It's to prevent you from doing exactly what you're trying to do.
pls reset
Youre clearly taking it out of context, i am implying that orchestration is the answer.
like i said several times
You say:
I just think orchestration already solves the problem in a better way.
I say:
If orchestration solves the problem in a better way, why are you so persistent on trying to use goals for it?
You avoid my question entirely, and say
Right so we agree about the limitation then?
If orchestration solves the problem in a better way, why are you so persistent on trying to use goals for it?
This is a loaded question
i dont do this!
i said many times i dont but your are just like talking to a wall
so cursor or codex? which one should i pay for
You just make it up as you go, you misunderstand everything and make it a truth in your mind.
just stack codex pro 200 plans
the limiting factor with goal is its 4k chars
I honestly feel that's not a limitation. If your goal is too big, it's likely too big to be a goal
Right but if you want the goal to be a work flow?
I have stated many times
You're not meant to use a goal as a workflow.
Stack?! How many can you need?
what do u mean stack
again the implication is that orchestration is the answer
Okay, then we agree on the architectural answer: workflow-style behavior belongs in orchestration, not in Goals.
My point was specifically about the 4k cap being framed as the limiting factor. If the thing you want to express needs workflow-sized instructions, then it has probably exceeded the shape of a Goal. At that point, the answer is not “make Goals larger,” it is “use the orchestration layer.”
So yes, orchestration is the answer. That is also why I do not think the Goal character limit is the core problem here.
just add more once the first runs out after a day or so
No i think a small workflow can work in a goal.
it just needs a completion criteria.
It is a limitation by the very implementation limited to 4k chars
I never actually met that limitation
i only ever used it for smaller tasks
Yeah, a small workflow can work inside a Goal for sure, as long as it still meets the criteria for being a Goal.
The issue is that Goals and workflows are architected very differently. The Goals page describes Goals as thread-scoped completion contracts with evidence-based finish lines. The subagents/workflow page describes orchestration as spawning agents, routing work, waiting for results, and consolidating outputs.
Those are inherently different abstractions. Something can overlap both categories in simple cases, but that does not make them interchangeable in the general case.
That is the point I was trying to re-emphasize: a Goal can contain workflow-like steps, but a Goal is not a replacement for a workflow.
So if you take a workflow and try to put it into a Goal without adapting it to the Goal shape (compact objective, clear completion criteria, verification surface, constraints, and blocked stop condition) then the 4k cap is not really the core problem. The problem is that the thing has not been shaped into a Goal.
Goals are meant to be compact. Workflows are usually procedural, reusable, and potentially open-ended. So while a small workflow can fit inside a Goal, that does not mean it should. It only belongs there if it has been reduced into a bounded, compact, evidence-checkable objective.
so we have 5 days untill they remove 2x on pro damn
You're just yapping like you have some magical information to teach.
on pro 200 its permanent
sweetheart u mean to put more money in there?
Really?
yes feed the slot machine while its subsidized
Then am happy haha
i think 1x pro 200 / day is a reasonable beginner goal
How do I start
By asking chatgpt
just tell codex to make you more monies
im out of limit ask him for me please
I did what it said but I keep getting error
codex != chatgpt
ask the web gpt
codex limits don't apply there afaik
What does that have to do with how to install
Ask it how to get better at using it for tasks like this.
I mean I keep getting error installing it
Ask it how to get better at using it for tasks like this.
Say something like "I end up needing to ask humans for help on things like this. How do I get better at using you to get to the bottom of problems like the one I am having now?"
i just invented "decision-sourced specification", wonder how that will play out haha
It still don't help me
you need to have agency yourself to make the most out of AI
What do you mean I don't really understand English
"In psychology and philosophy, agency is a person's capacity to act independently, make their own choices, and take control of their life. It is the psychological feeling of being the active author of your own actions rather than just a passive victim of circumstances."
is codex still broken or do I have to still use a VPN to use what i"m playing $200 a month for
i think still semi-broken, usage seems to go down fast
but i dont have connection problems
I mean the freezing
I shouldn't ask for help?
I have a problem where usage isn't going down 😂
you need to learn how to figure things out yourself, even with a free chatgpt account you have the most powerful tools in existence to do that at your fingertips
doesnt mean dont ever ask for help
but dont ask for things that gpt can answer for you in a few seconds
I would say don't ask for things that needs multiple steps back and forth when gpt can help you step by step in a better way than humans can.
give me some
lol Codex being able to reflect on images generated through the code it made is a really awesome feature
so much fun seeing it figure out what is going wrong based on the generated output XD
hello, anyone know when gpt pro reset? im ont $100 plan
thank you !
but its all about codex, not gpt pro on chatgpt.com no ? or i missed something ?
if you're talking about plain ChatGPT then the plan resets each month
you re out of gptpro messages?
curious how much it takes to get there. i never managed that lol
yeah, just received a message saying i hit the limit try again later
yea doesn t seem to be documented clearly
the pricing and usage limits are all such a mess
it says now limited until 29
maybe it's on weekly basis then
@solid lake Fast mode no good.
when planning frontend with chatgpt extended pro does it make codex give better results? or is it still bs regardless? did anyone try this?
you can have gpt pro create an image of the UI and use that as reference for codex implementation
ill give it a try
6 minutes to answer "you're right"
sup bros, i know its only been a day since i asked last, but just wanna check, not expecting a "yes" anyway, but, has the token eatage thing been sorted in codex?
rename the model to gpt-snail-mode
It was verifying and double checking to give you a proper answer.
Appreciate the thoroughness or get out.
is codex really helpful in building something big?
Are you using Medium or High reasoning when coding with 5.5?
I am using Medium with excellent results
yes it is
extra high
well what have you built so far , asking because i love to hear what ppl have made with ai
Do you have Plus or Pro?
I have built a royalty free music streaming platform with an API and coded an iOS app to use that API. I have also built a desktop macOS app for creating images and videos using the larger image and video models which allows drag and drop of content to and from the app. Right now I am working on a game.
😂
Go
what kind of game and are u using more ais because i heard codex is not really good at building the frontend
for best results shud i use high or medium?
a card game. I am only using Codex models
so which language and also u building it fully using codex or also coding urself
because i actually make things fully using codex
as i have no knowledge about coding
Swift is my main language
oh alr
Is chatgpt like dying or something...
I regularly am using chatgpt while codex is working but I keep getting messages like this:
and codex keeps timing out here and there
i think they still have a lot of infra problems over at openai
yeah, Codex is very slow right now
do they not announce anything
there's been posts by Tibo and others on X
it started 3 days ago and it's just slowly be getting worse and worse
it's really atrocious right now
like this?
yep and all the comment replies screaming about ratelimits and slowness
he didnt acknowledge the slowness though
or I dont see it
probably busy building more pets into the app or other stupid features
nobody from OpenAI has acknowledged the slowness
codex seems fine to me
dear gods above in openai heaven, let the 30th come sooner for reset 🙏
pets is really useful for me with multiple workspaces on my Mac, I can keep an eye on what Codex is doing even if I am outside it's workspace
this is insane
where are you located so I can VPN to a place that isn't completely degraded
california
Maldon, Victoria, Australia
damn I already tried LAX server
northern cali
it was working fine yesterday and today it's just super slow
probably still just connecting to LAX
you can run this to check (colo=)
curl.exe -s https://chatgpt.com/cdn-cgi/trace
pretty weird that they take on every smaller issue and reset after, but now there is tons of people mentioning this slowness for few days now and they are just not reacting
i use codex 5.3 mostly, haven't used 5.5 in months
an acknowledgement would go a long way, I guess they're playing games with competition and want to wait to release gpt 5.6 or whatveer
well nobody has used 5.5 for months given it released last month
it's not slow for me currently, connected to ORD
not even sure where ORD is; I live in northern california but my ISP's routing is completely f'd
chicago 😛
oh you mean colo=
eu works reasonably ok for me, at least no timeouts
is ORD chicago? that would make sense since my f'd routing actually routes everything through chicago
like half a decade ago there was this huge wildfire here that burned up all their network infrastructure and when they got it back up and running everything was routing through chicago even though it's like 2000 miles away
they never fixed it no matter how much I complained
I ended up just buying a subscription to exitlag because they have some servers I route correctly to
i mean maybe its your isp to cloudflare routing. try cloudflare warp maybe
me right now
it's my ISP's routing to almost everything, the packets stay in their internal network until chicago
most VPN services are laggy as hell for me too because the packets still go through chicago before they get to the VPN endpoint
what's really messed up is it's gigabit internet and when I use exitlag I ping like 10 to everything
moderate downside to exitlag is that their client only allows specific whitelisted programs (mostly games) so people can't use it for bittorrent etc and tank service quality for other users
...but when my ping only actually matters to me in a browser and in games, it's fine 😄
this is new 👀
How'd you get this, I wanna have a side chick in codex doing my cleaning
side panel too
it's not that bad really
i'm not made of money
It depends on the plan. I mean the credits drain at the same rate on all plans, but the amount of quota per dollar on Plus and Pro 5x is roughly equivalent to credits. For Pro 20x, it legitimately is less value to use credits
credits = API pricing
Proven mathematically, credits == API Pricing
But in terms of value, API Pricing is slightly more valuable because you get access to more models, more modalities, no expiration on API wallet, etc.
you also get better routing with API
if you can afford it, just fast mode 5.5 xhigh API yolo it
well is it normal to build things fully with codex?
cuz am a vibe coder
you can build everything with codex
you can build a lot with Codex, it helps to know the language you are coding in because Codex can make mistakes
the more you understand, the better your results will be
its just that vibe coders are hated idk why
who cares about what future unemployed people think
vibe coding means you dont care about the output at all
thats what i mean. let codex do the work but also understand what its doing
but honestly codex is really good at fixing stuff if it makes any mistakes it fixes itself
it can teach you stuff while it does it
like my dad? 🙂
well i do try to understand and find errors and give it to codex to fix it
and i do care about the output
its just i have decided to build stuff w ai because i cant seem to get the concept of certain languages in my head
Drop
## Sensei mode
Explain what you're doing and why so the user can learn SWE
In ~/.codex/AGENTS.md and your agent will teach you stuff
Software Engineering
All good! Saves a few tokens, and codex understands what it means 😅
all good man, you're all for the vibes
how do i put this into codex ?
like where exactly
I guess at the top of whatever you're doing
if you truely want to save tokens you can write your prompts as formal logic hehe
If you're on macOS or Linux, run
cat << EOF
## Sensei mode
Explain what you're doing and why so the user can learn SWE
EOF >> ~/.codex/AGENTS.md
If you're on Windows, try configuring a MCP server, which will open config.toml, and in the same folder as that file create a file called AGENTS.md and put the directive in there
finally!
okay
if you're using the codex desktop app, you can put it in settings
in your AGENTS.md file in ur Codex directory
done
oof
that is just insane 🙃
i love goal lol
is /goal the new yolo mode
Now when you fire up a new thread, ask it to do "Sensei mode" 🙂 and if it knows exactly what you're talking about then the instructions loaded successfully
sandbox o.o and yolo
oof xD dang
yeah sandboxed for sure
okay then thank you
have you cured herpes now
it's not that unusual with cached tokens and many turns
100 turns of a 180K context and you reach 18M tokens
that count actually doesn't include cache
anyone car to share how you have codex sessions be able to use your apikeys? without it being mad about having printed it in chat and that you need to rotate your keys? tried 1 password cli but it asks for my fingerprint in every action.
looking into fixing that but anyone that found a perfect solution?
Codex is frozen for me right now
can i be considered a vibe coder if i actually do care how the code looks, or where i want optimisations paths/profiling, structure && whatnot?
you mean use the api key to connect codex with openai, or api keys in general?
For the latter, you should use .env and add that to gitignores which generally is respected by codex (but no guarantee), for the first, I think you can add it to config.toml?
not just "never look, never check output"
direnv
imo that's the difference between "vibe coding" and agentic engineering
vibe coders never care how the code looks, because they don't know what any of it means anyway
i can't understand majority of the complex code i have on first or two glances (i used to!)
As if anyone is actually reading the ultimately thousands of LoC's codex produces in any given project 😉
You would be spending more time reading than there are hours in a day
but i still can dig out any regressions that AI may have missed on testing, though
i care that my stuff works as it should
&& that the codebase isn't a mental overload for others (but may be for some anyway)
lints, analyzers, all that stuff
i need to ensure my stuff is actually coherent
not sure if that fits into vibecoding
i honestly don't really know what vibecoding even means anymore
real vibe coders are like that guy at the jiffy lube who takes the impact wrench and goes dugga dugga to your oil pan's drain plug
agentic engineering, said no one ever
because according to a ragebait tweet of human art claimed as "AI art" showed how people jump to judgement && cold input the moment something is labelled AI/vibe
so why would anyone make up a term for other things?
At least these times are over despite vibe coders
// remember why
$this?->get()?->loader()?->contract?->handler()?->get()?->the_thing(
a()?->b()->c(fn($x) => $x->d()?->e()),
new Factory(new Manager(new Provider())),
[...$stuff, ...$moreStuff],
fn(&$e) => tap($e)->mutate()->persist(),
&$e,
)?->finally()?->unless(false)?->dispatch();
they put all in one broad category anyway
what the hekc is this?
basically what produces mental overload lol
Seen often in so called senior developer projects. Specially the // remember why part
My eyes!!! Damn you should have put a warning on it.
the latter. thanks! but thats what I have been doing but dont like it due to security and agents sometimes printing or reading it then they get not very smart because they get context polluted by thinking about it so much...
doing my first project i really need to think about security so trying to up it . :/
tnx! same with that though
yeah, but "you have to understand your code" right?
and then //remember why
My take is, even a vibecoder produces often better results than all the so called studied señor developers who are often very afraid of AI
(heck, not saying a senior dev cant code, just that it is often not that far away from hallucinated ai slop)
more like "copied it from stack overflow and now //cannot remember why)
ai was trained on human slop, after all
but humans have a fragile ego
so of course they'd attack whatever they "feel"
stupid
you could do a .env outside CWD but you have NO guarantee it wont be read
i'll give this a go probably, tnx!
i think the age of Agentic coding really starts to show egotistic/narcissistic people out the zoo
separates people who just want to do stuff from actual lunatics/delulus
generally, I suggest just use a temp dev api key for what you consider "compromisable" that you rotate often'
me likes delulu, that word has meaning.
yes!
what if you consumed the .env file through a setuid binary owned by an additional unprivileged user and restricted the permissions on the .env so only that user could read it
then codex could run that binary and that binary could read the .env but codex itself couldn't read it
maybe
mac and permissions...
my codex has root access through aws cli with all production secrets and has never read any of them, it always builds this weird shell scripts to avoid it, so idk what you are doing 🙂
this might work on linux tho
how do you know it never read any of them?
Its not that it would tell you lol
hooks
pre tool use specifically
it might work on a mac too, the filesystem has to at least support the setuid flag for stuff like sudo to work
"hey sorry I just accidentally read your xyz file"
hooks wont really help that do they?
Even if your hook registers every move it does
You still dont know exactly where it went?
Or you have hooks impeding read?
for me it overfocuses on that it has read and "printed it in chat", just making the model stupid
yes blocks reads etc
oh
you mean specific file reads, I assume
such as said env
otherwise you would cripple codex to the level of absolute incapacity
isnt it that they accidently print it in cli through weird commands? or can you block that too?
i have a .envrc that loads the necessary secrets from aws secrets manager and exports them as env vars. codex doesnt need to do anything
well it still needs to read files lol
otherwise how is it going to make changes for you or answer a question you have about x in n file
by blocking only access to .env files for example
but i moved on from that, i just have everything in aws secrets manager now, different accounts for prod/dev
i could make it safer by removing the prod profile for aws cli i guess but so far it hasnt deleted my prod db so..
yolo
Been a gpt #1 on most things lately, but today I found a usecase Claude hands down did 10x better. Configuring my hermes every now and then, (alot last days) and Claudes insight into the system, ideas, how to, what not to, and everything vs GPT 5.5 xhigh is a mile between. First in several weeks I found gpt to be the lesser. But oh well, had to be something one of htese days lol. anyone with same exp?
wait until you see the ultimate guantanamo radio station chart winner:
((((($this->get->loader->contract->handler ??= new HandlerFactory())
->get($type ?? throw new Exception()))
->the_thing(
a(b(c(d(e(f(g(h()))))))),
match(true){default=>fn()=>yield from []},
static fn &(&$e)=>$e,
...$args
))?->maybe()?->idk()))
(admittedly tho I think only gpt can come up with this type of nightmare when specifically asked to exxagarate lol)
But yeah, if you daddle a bit in PHP you will see lots of very similar looking code, logic and ... many persons implementing humans extending animals finally throwing babies or similar lol
I do love that language, but its messy nature invites for abuse.
Codex going super slow for anyone else?
well, that is a complex question
I questioned, due to it was "working" for 6+ minutes and seemed to be doing absolutely nothing lol
you cannot expect a straight forward answer
It might be seeking for what really is going on
Conspiracies and fact checks and all with that what comes
Seems for the last hour Codex is having some issues
Guessing we will get a status change?
there are some users in here claiming the same issues since several days so you are apparently not alone, and no, there is no estimate nor confirmation of any actual bug or fix
I see some here saying with VPN it is solved
Good news, since you're using the TUI, downgrade to a previous version
Any recommended version?
I would just do codex --version and install the version right before that 🙂 idk what features you use. If you mostly do vanilla codex with minimal features enabled you can do 0.125.0 which is the first one containing /goal. I use that version and have no problems.
how many of you guys think that codex has been nerfed?
i have to wait 5 days to reset, so idk anything about nerfing
bro we are on API and it can't even handle normal FSDP training with vLLMs
0.129.0 seems to be stable
A few folks really like that version! I have not tried it yet, but I hear that's the last version that supported hooks in a good way
Have seen reports that hooks require approval or something
Yeah, I believe it's the stable version for using Codex Mobile. I upgraded to the latest version last night, and today noticed a few bugs, then the issue with constant "thinking...", where it almost felt frozen
Yeah, I kept getting denied permissions as well under the latest version, editing a file, viewing a file, etc all were failing permissions a bit ago
yeah, they go in the config file with a hash listed for the trusted version
for my project I just made the installer update the config file
Gotcha, I don't use hooks, just remember folks saying on startup it's like "these hooks must be reviewed before enabled" or something. But that installer thing sounds like the de facto solution!
where the hell are all projects gone on platform.openai.com?
There used to be a selector for projects, to add api keys, and so on
How slow are you talking? I often wonder why some people get slow and others dont. Makes me think this isn't exactly region specific but more account based, maybe internal throttling
hard to give you a measure. just seems every task takes 2-3x as long now. wish I had a good way to measure it
you mean it depends on how slow somenone talks?
they onboarded a load of new users the last couple weeks
so maybe they are throttling
also the gui app is so laggy on my m1 max mac that it might be skewing my perception too
like 3-5 second lag on typing, switching sessions. insane
I cant remember if it was claude code or codex but I read somewhere someone deleted a state file locally or some cache and it increased their speed by reportably 100x, so it could be something like that?
interesting
if anyone is in highschool and in the bay area, and wants to join a hackathon dm, or if u wanna sponsor the hackathon also dm me
california
insert [that-post-is-too-american-for-me-to-understand] meme
thizzzz
San Francisco, Silicon Valley, the bay area 🙂 but the bay area is more than san fran. I think it includes oakland and surrounding cities
So USA? 😛
start by making sure you are not using memories
and if using the app, I never was able to use it for more than maybe 6 total chats, after that it goes brr and you need to start deleting chats otherwise it just becomes unusable, so test cli first to exclude app issues
Yo if anyone need a website that gives 3k free credits for all claude models/gpt models/gemini models , if u use my link because i bought pro on it , dm me
IT ONLY HAS 3 REFFERALS BTW , ILL GIVE FOR FREE
Why does it say 'app unavailable' when I try to install the Stripe plugin on my Codex desktop app ?
Uh
I just installed the codex desktop app on my windows laptop and signed in and everything and i see no support for mobile anywhere
I tried opening it on the app to get it to prompt, tried restarting both. Checking for updates and everything.
I cant figure it out
Yo if anyone need a website that gives 3k free credits for all claude models/gpt models/gemini models , if u use my link because i bought pro on it , dm me
IT ONLY HAS 3 REFFERALS BTW , ILL GIVE FOR FREE
Yup
Wowoweewa very nice deal
Robert do you use codex on mobile?
I seen you talkin a bit. Im getting frustrated lol
I use Temu Codex for mobile
What's going on with yours?
Oh yeah @lean lark posted the workaround a while back. Something about downgrading and running codex remote-something in a WSL terminal, and it lets you connect with Windows
Unless they updated it and added official support, but I hear the current solution is a workaround
Ah okay so they dont officially support windows then?
That's no longer working.
Dang
So Mobile > Windows is not supported yet and the workaround no longer works. We just need to be patient..
Oki
Should be trivial to write your own bridge, right?
Its stuff like this which really makes me think if I made my platform it could be useful for others too
Why bother when they might publish the official version today?
For fun only
( Having said that ... I have a bridge in front of me that I wrote over the weekend. HAHA )
Bridge is what I did, but you can also just do codex app-server --listen ws://0.0.0.0:4200, then write a frontend that connects directly to the app-server over websockets
Thx I’m not using them
Oh no I have hundreds lol
This isn't so much a bridge as a poor-man's OpenClaw, where I can use Codex from anywhere. It' does mobile too but that's just one client UI from my perspective.
It's like app-server but I'm using the SDK.
I think @torpid trout was doing something like this too.
I like the bridge method because you can customize how Codex works without changing the original code. I have a "onCompact" hook that tracks when an agent compacts, and after like 10 compactions it tells the agent "Time to execute a warm handoff", they write up a handoff initial prompt, archive themselves, and spawn a replacement worker to carry on. The bridge sequences that operation, and prevents agents from spoofing their identity and stuff
"Time to execute a warm handoff"
Sweeeeet
As always, I think I'm about 6 months behind you in my evolution here... 🙂
can they pls train 5.6 for better frontend capability 😭 how can claude deliver better frontend in just 30s that codex couldnt do in 8h
Have you tried giving it reference design images and ability to screenshot the real app?
Some people/bots just have no sense UI aesthetic. 
I did yes, yet it still always manages to make it look template and slop
I find it pretty easy to get it to do good UI. All I have to do is let my artist set it up first. 😉
See if you can use Claude (Sonnet) as an agent and tell Codex to ask for aesthetic guidance. 😉
if i unistall codex and reinstall, will all my projects be gone?
on what platform?
