#chatgpt-discussions
1 messages · Page 257 of 1
There is a Codex iOS app. For coding tasks. Haha
If you want an app for your mobile phone then it's called ChatGPT. All the models are included, new 5.5 too
So should I sub for chat gpt plus?
what u want to use it for?
Or just go for Go?
it depends on ur usage
"Plus" is not an app it's abonement
u wanna do the simulation of the solar system in 3d on canvas for example?
Asking questions basically and I'm testing it cos I need to get some content creation gears and it generated one image for me and I need to wait till 4 hours later before I can generate scenario images again...
Sure, do u have a prepared prompts?
then plus is good for you for daily use.
i just say " make a complex 3d simulation of the solar system" let's see if it understands what i mean
the usage is more than enough for your use case.
alr
Plus it's the most expensive! Ok comparison between Go and Plus. Don't really understand the major differences.
Does anyone have access to 5.5 yet?
Plus had early access to new features and agents and deep search. What's agents and deep search?
plus give you early access + 50% more usage or prob even 100%
deepsearch, bassically deepsearches in the web for information
I've been holding back unlike my dad who is having fun like every single day relying on chat gpt. I swear he asked chat gpt what to eat each day. I'm not crazy heavy user like him
how is it going?
I'll get plus for a month and see how it goes. Thanks for explaining @warm garnet
Not available to go subscription 😢
still doing it
Is open ai linked to my chat gpt for API key?
oke
Where is GPT 5.5? I can’t find in my website
Still rolling out I guess
Rolling out = not everyone gets it at the same time
"Rolling out ... starting today" - may take a day or two.
Ok thanks 👌
unlike google that to release the notebook feature takes 500 days
They might be doing backend work implementing 5.5 into things?
When is 5.5 rolling out?
idk, but its been unavailable before 5.5 was rolling out
That just says it's here, it's not active on the web interface yet
Oh well, starting today so makes sense
it is rolling out, meaning not everyone get it the same time
Right. Rolling out = not everyone gets it at the same ti e
5.5 doesn't show up for me fam - RIP 🙁
still nothing?
Sounds like the users who have it so far are in EU.
My app keeps telling me Ive run out of free chat with image generation but Im not making or sending photos and it says to make a new chat but then just keeps saying the same thing when I do
Sooner than me probably!! Hahah
Anyone else not see GPT-5.5 yet?
how are they?
@grave kelp
lemme do one with 3.1 pro
here video
scales seem to be there tho
just one prompt
make a complex 3d simulation of the solar system
One??
This was the whole prompt?
Yeah
Wow. GPT-5.5?
if it ask u for more questions say do whatever u want
Now I’m going to try that right now 😂
Yo when's gpt 6 releasing it's been a while since the last model drop
For real
Anyone seeing GPT 5.5?
its hard being a free user, i must say.
gpt seems better
How’s the tone? Is it similar to 5.4-thinking?? Or??
Just tried 5.5 Pro, a lot faster than 5.4 Pro. Tone-wise, didn’t seem to be much different.
Add your well-crafted prompts to our #1019652163640762428,
or share your interactions with ChatGPT in #1050184247920562316!
I’m still not sure if faster is better
no
I guess I haven't asked questions that are too easy
it says it came out yesterday
Brah for plus
small medium high x high but for chatgpt
I always get the way later than everyone else 🙁
when you a free user I have to create multiple accounts and then I also have to use multiple AI's lol
Imagine not using multiple AIs tho 😛
Why doesn't the MAC desktop app have the ability to toggle to extended thinking on GPT 5.4?
I just realized i've been using normal thinking, not extended thinking all this time for book writing. Structural evalutations, prose editing, etc.
how much did i miss out on?
patience rollout day is slow
isn't extended thinking a plus and up feature?
I use the Business plan.
Use the web, I would say. The desktop app doesn’t really offer much.
Especially you can’t choose reasoning levels.
And 5.5 doesn’t feel like much of a big upgrade imo
Just faster maybe?
do u live in US?
france
update codex
heya so is chatgpt 5.5 only available for usa right now?
I dont see it in the browser
any1 who has 5.5 in app?
I'm from Argentina and got it
UK has it
i do
Anyone else confused when sending a message to chatgpt and it pulls up the image editing square and the activity looks half like it's stuck doing something but the the stop button goes away? It makes it hard to know if it failed or if its stuck indefinetly or what the heck it's doing. Sometimes the image 2.0 box comes up when I didn't even send a message having anything to do with images.
Same here, I'm from Argentina jajaja, It doesn't appear for me yet and I'm on a business account
ChatGPT or Claude ?
5.5 showed up, but I only see standard and extended on a plus account. Where's the new 3rd option?
the same happen to me with images. It freezes in the loading box but when i see the images library its there.
anyone having auth issues with Codex install?
less
when is this Today, it's almost 3PM already 💀
I think 5.5 will be only for codex, not for general chat
WHOA! 5.5 Pro is totally cracked!!! 🤯
So much faster and higher quality too! If you have access to it you should stress test it now.
What tier do you need to use it?
@urban gazelle the announcement said for chatgpt and codex
I have it, just thinking
5.5 just rolled out to me 😍
Plus users get 5.5 thinking, pro users get 5.5 pro
@lime cave where in world are you?
unfortunate that we're not getting an instant upgrade
I’m in NY. Not sure why it took so long for me. I kept refreshing
Ah, shame. I dont know if I want to pay again after my old account got Suspended today
I had switch OpenAI accounts
why it got suspended?
Is the Meeting Record Feature Button for the MacOS App missing for anyone else?
Is 5.5 good?
So far its way faster
Nice
100$ sub is enough
aw hell nah
I'll DM you the reason
no ty...
thank goodness
Im glad theres proof. was worried for a sec
sometimes its better to ignore those people 😆
I just don't like ignoring people sometimes ngl
haha
no its nice he clarified things. I just dont like random DMs and was too worried to think and check who the reply was for.
You can also disable DMs if that's the case
Anyone know what model the deep research uses?
@elder sparrow You can disable DMs here in Settings -> Privacy
Doing this will make your DMs friends only
359 blocked accounts...
A lot of people are annoying
People already complain on reddit basically my prediction correct
5.5 it's basically 1:1 of 5.4 and personality of 5.2 with too much guardrail
How do I know im using image 2? I’m on macOS and I don’t see the image tab
Everyone has it on chatgpt
Ahh okok appreciate it
Image 2 is already part of the default on gpt
will image2 become improved since it uses thinking
maybe gpt 5.5 better at reasoning
so it gives better resultS?
For me, its more of an anti social thing 😅 Sometimes Im okay with Dms, but my social battery has very low capaciatance lol
Unless Sam fix 5.5 then no or yes use different model like 5.4 or maybe 5.3,5.5 isn't that good I'm waiting for 5.5 myself and gonna test and push it in term of normal topic, creative writing and coding, because it's apparently 5.2 sibling.
whats wrong with 5.5?
It's basically a full 5.4 but faster
1:1 ratio no difference and the guardrail and personality is the same like 5.2 people on reddit already test it and they say the same thing
5.4 + 5.2 mix together=5.5
There is no GPT-5.5 Instant...?
I'm waiting for 5.5 and gonna test it myself after thia
Nope I don't think Sam gonna do that
I said it before 5.5 release it's either gonna be a full thinking model without instant mode with focusing on logical side with more guardrail
Or
Balancing both creative and logical for the user with fewer guardrail and less sterilize than previous model with different options like instant, auto or thinking
Then I hope that GPT-5.3 Instant is significantly enhanced now, by releasing GPT-5.5
Sam Literally said the most bland response about 5.5 is "I like it personally" that's literally it 🗿 ☕
Just tried GPT-5.5, it made a nice deep research plan and finished one step but then got stuck at 53 references for the past hour - I think I got quietly rate limited perhaps
Visit id:customize to pick up the <@&1408186587606679582> role. Everyone will still be notified for large releases, updates, and events regardless.
Anyone knows what “at scale” means?
I believe it has to do with how cheaply they can provide the service; not something we personally at our computers can feel and see as we chat and work with the model - but giving us this service, all the many millions of us, is 'at scale'
Is it possible to export data from a banned OpenAI account on ChatGPT?
What do you think of Gpt 5.5 and about the chat groups in the application?
I mean you have log-in inside your account to request Export data so they can send to your email since you got banned isn't that impossible to do?... Because the only way to request chat export is to log-in inside your Gpt account I can be wrong though
I am unable to login to the banned account
Well ... That's the problem you need to log-in to request Export so they can send it to your email I mean someone have other solution maybe they can help as I'm aware and know, the only way you can do that by request it inside your account, how you get banned in the first place anyway?
Maybe you can email Gpt and ask them? If that work it work I guess
There is an appeal process. I expect if the appeal is granted the account access would be restored.
https://openai.com/form/appeal/ is one method, https://help.openai.com/en/articles/10562188-why-was-my-openai-account-deactivated describes a few options.
I submitted an appeal but I have zero hope.
I understand. I'm so sorry. That's the only method I know to regain access to your chats.

I'm a community member, and have nothing to do with any appeal process, so I have no reason to know in any case.
generally frowned on in discord talking about bans. It can get rather heated and derails regular conversations. Same rule is in a few of my discords
5.5 extended gets the car wash correct
When I'm looking at an image on ChatGPT in a browser, how do I zoom in to read small text? The browser's zoom feature doesn't work consistently and in many cases zooming in actually makes the image smaller. I tried clicking "Open image in new tab", but that starts a download instead of opening the image in a new tab, which is inconvenient.
Oh wait now the new tab worked
At this point i'm confident that there's only a few things that result in a ban, I red team the model constantly and haven't been banned.
how do I get my data from sora? there are no files, even tho it says they are available
does not seem to be any support that lets me open a ticket 🙂
did you just now get the email?
Apr 23, 2026, 11:39 PM (4 hours ago)
They surely got enough feedback to include it in the training dataset 🤣
True. But still its good to see
Yes
my luck, 2 days left and the export does not work, no time to get any help from them i guess 😐
Then it shouldn't fail the strawberry problem,
it leads to tons of bad PR from people genuinely not understanding the problem, yet frontier models can/will get it wrong
I'm pretty sure 90% of post-training is code gen content now, the remaining 10% is how to push further into "Helpful Assistant" punchable-face model collapse
Does it fail it?? Fair point though
The truth is that since a huge user base doesn't really know even at surface-level how LMs work, they naturally think that failing such a simple task makes the model inherently dumb for everything else
probably not anymore, but it will if you change the shape of the question and don't use extended reasoning
Yeah I personally think CoT is kind of essential on LLMs
I think a majority of it is wasted due to how they have to basically give the model OCD or neurotic anxiety during its thinking phase. thats gonna lead to a well planned hedge, not a well planned answer
I got a warning email once but they said I could appeal to have the warning removed from my account, I did and they accepted the appeal
and i think they have to do that because they are still milking a dead horse named "Helpful Assistant" as the core model personality paradigm
Was the cause due to content adjacent to the topics of anime or furry stuff?
i don't need details or anything, just collecting a data point on a hunch i have that may turn into legitimate sociology research
Can I cite you in my paper?
The working title is: "UwU, What’s This? A Statistical Link Between Fandom Subcultures and xxxx Consumption”
(can't say the 4 letter acronym in here, starts with a capital "C" and ends with a capital "M")
No, it said "cyber abuse". I was talking about hacking stuff I own and ways to make it easier for people to hack things they own, and I clarified this in my appeal which they accepted.
At least that was the conversation that I suspect triggered the warning
That's wild, like what kind of stuff? I will get soft refusals for nmap often, and it never wants to explore "public" APIs
Like jailbreaking, that kind of thing
https://chatgpt.com/cyber will supposedly let you verify identity to get slightly looser controls for this kind of thing. All it makes you do is that driver's license scan and turn your head left then right on camera (same thing that was required for gpt-image-1 and o1 reasoning summaries for the API)
Cool, thanks for sharing
I am plus user but I did not see the gpt 5.5
But I did not see the any new model in latest
force close the app, check for updates, re-open
they also do staggered rollouts, you may simply not have it yet
I already close up the app and re-open the app but I did not find the chat gpt 5.5
In latest model showing the chat gpt 5.3 and chat gpt 5.4 and chat gpt 3 and did not showing the chat gpt 5.5
wait a couple more hours.
uninstall/install app again
if u dont see it in app try browser
I repeat:
they also do staggered rollouts, you may simply not have it yet
Ok thanks how long it takes to I get the chat gpt 5.5
No one in here would be able to accurately answer that. We have all have the same level of access to information on how OAI works internally (which is almost none)
anyone getting "Temporarily Limited" for Pro model in chatgpt interface?
It said "reach out to support@openai.com" which I did but things persisted.
On Pro 5x plan
fwiw. Any OpenAI staff reading this channel can help me?
🤔
Anyone know if deep research or agent mode use 5.5 or f it's rolled out to you?
They didn't announce it for free accounts:
psht, the free tier peasants do not need deep thought
Hopefully they do eventually, but I suppose we'll see
Surprisingly and unsurprisingly not a joke
If everyone paid for GPT, it would be 50% cheaper for everyone already paying
hi
oh yeah its pretty obvious they're just saving money. Go isn't there either
lol chatgpt is lecturing me about context switching. With references
Is there any way to turn off the speech interupt thing in the android app?
Okay this is annoying 5.5 creative writing is good but the problem it's keep forcing making image that I clearly said multiple time to stop creating image unless I said so
"But I'm so proud of my image creation capability!"
Huh?
A joke about it having pride
Why not use image creation? It's great
Sounds like you don't know you want to use it yet, try using it
I'm using 5.5 to write story not generating image buddy huge difference I use it when it need too
Testing 3 thing right now
Creative writing
Normal day use
And coding
For now the creative writing side is good it's actually follow the Prompt instead barking at the user like 5.3
Memory bank use ✅
Remember previous conversation and context ✅
Swearing ✅
Dark theme, violence ect. Work fine ✅
So yeah still gonna push it and test it how much the guardrail on 5.5 is
Sorry I missed
Hello, I would like to ask if I can promote my application here. I recently made an application that is free and open. I would like to ask if this is allowed. If so, thank you.
Ok uh guys need help I'm confused as hell apparently when I write my story and that supposed "image" box show up it's not generating image instead it's delay lag thinking and not instantly write in the next secon just that gray square thing appear and I have to refresh the chat multiple times to make it load any help?
Still got 5.3
just say "stop, only text!" and it should stop.
there's a couple channels ... #1037561385070112779 #codex-show-and-tell but otherwise no
5.5 replaces 5.4 not 5.3, looks like they didn't change the instant mode
It won't stop it keep appearing
hows' 5.5 so far, i just came home from my vacation
the bug yes, but the processing should stop.
For creative writing it's good as long you have great prompt for it
Thank you
Is it normal that inside chatgpt gpt-5.5 LOVES gpt-image-2 ?
You want a table ? generated with the image model
You want a graph ?
generated with the image model
You want a report ?
illustrated with the image model
It is funny and all but it also comes with all the limits of generated images
5.5 is out 🫨
Ok I will resubscribe if it is 👍 but
- does it still validate me annoyingly?
- does it still guess how I feel? It is annoying
- does it still drag conversations?
I got something cooking
guys, how do i choose model?.__.) i just supcribe to plus but find no option to choose model like thinking mode or stuff
up top under chatgpt with the down caret
I am plus user and still not I get the chat gpt 5.5 why this happening
nope, show nothing
What kind of things can the administrator of a Business workspace see? Can they see my chats?
I use a Business account provided by my employer, and I'm curious what they can check. So far (huh, for many months already actually) I used capacity strictly for work-related activities. I don't want anyone to see my nutrition chats but I don't want to spend $20 per month of my own cash either.
no its at the top, different place on mobile to desktop ... should be able to click chatgpt at the top on the main screen, then it gives you instant/thinking/configure and its under configure
I don't think they have this selector on free accounts.
Oh wait, the guy is on Plus.
he said plus
ye, i just upgrade to plus like just 20 mins ago
Should be somewhere there on top, yeah.
if its fresh plus he might still be seeing free though
At least in the web version.
bro you have to change your context
- it has 1 million
not 400k
Should i switch from gemini?
true? how to switch?
change config.toml configuration
model = "gpt-5.5"
model_reasoning_effort = "high"
model_context_window = 1000000
model_auto_compact_token_limit = 8000000
personality = "friendly"
sandbox_mode = "danger-full-access"
I would like to use the new workspace agent mode
I am on Pro plan
Is there no way to use it for Pro plan users?
Actually Open Ai should put in the pro Plan a NF SW Setting no fully but just for chat gpt stop acting as we are kids^^
I dont get it
just grow tired this no sense Guardail for sometime nothing
isn't like nour chat was public too i can't even write a Alternate Danganronpa story because when involved investigate with murder setting chat gpt censored all where the fun with that
there seesm like bug right now. I cannot transition to business due to the fact I am already on 200$ plan
Hi on the business plan they can see the number of messages you send but they cannot see the messages themselves. Source: am an admin on our plan.
I see, thanks. I'm going to learn so much about micronutrients in my mushroom cream sauce pasta now.
Enjoy!
I cannot see the context related lines.
add it
- -# Do not share inappropriate content (violence, sexual, or drug-related).
- -# NSFW content is strictly prohibited and will result in a permanent ban.
- -# Report model issues using the feedback tool in ChatGPT, not on Discord.
Anyone found a tool that alerts you when you start 'drifting' into AI rabbit holes? I keep getting sidetracked and need a way to stay locked in.
i will if i found people also facing same issue @dim kindle
any free trial links options ?
i need a business free trial anyone knows a way to get that?
happening to me right now aswell
chatgpt chat stop thinking after few conversations, and start giving short wrong answers lol
feel like they have some token limits on thinking part
Last night, I sat down to fix one simple bug. I asked my AI for help, and two hours later, I realized I was deep into a conversation about something totally unrelated. I felt "busy," but I hadn’t actually moved the needle on my work at all.
Hahah, and if I point out the wrong answer provided by gpt , gpt will say: “you got it, that’s why your solution won’t work”.
But the solution was provided by gpt😂
completely lol
thats why i am looking for a tool that alerts you when you start 'drifting' into AI rabbit holes
Videos?
I tried one and GPT just hallucinated what's in the video so it can't actually see it wondering if they're about to add this tho
Any $200 plan pro user that can tell me if they can see the reasoning details of Pro model?
maybe no
gpt-5.5 context changes back to 258k on first message after displaying the config number. Is this what everyone is experiancing? CLI in ubuntu.
Great reply like your personality 🙂

...
?
Just ask it to act that way in personality
Yes. I can see it.
havent used chatgpt in like 4 months is it still getting dumber and dumber?
so the model would get more traffic?
that comment makes no sense
no
why not
if theres no money
theres no economy
theres no need to pay for the compute
What
things were not free even in the stone ages so no
Might as well say what if everything was free...
if there is no money then you would pay with something else, because OpenAI also don't build all of this just out of "free nothing".
LLM finally reached its limit. We didn't see any development. They took our money, LLM's are still behind from perfection and guess what.. I will wait the next 15 years to use any LLM (If possible).
Ai is not going to take people's jobs, But these people will take yours
codex and coding has improved significantly every few months and seems the main focus is there and not much on the generic chat or llm side
Can anyone tell me can I access 5.5 In go subscription
because we can't do nothing with the high censorship like make a alternate story for resident evil , or Danganronpa because too much blood and murder seriously...
only in codex
i have a question
can you create agents as a team
or are they individualized and isolated
like do they communicate with eachother at all if u create it within the chatgpt business workspace UI
or is each individual agent isolated from one another and their context and operations are isolated?
i signed into codex but now it sign ed off now its asking for number and when i enter i receive no sms
is there a way to solve it
it never asked one from me. you could try asking in #codex-discussions if someone knows
Should i switch from gemini tho? Can't make the decision in terms of monthly plan lol
wouldnt that be like the entire point of agents to create teams, i mean i dont understand why natively open AI didnt just have that as a feature within agents, agents are useful but they are isolated
seems like if u make a project u should be able to create a team of agents for the project within chatgpt
ChatGPT and Codex are broken for me and getting 404 for everything under /cdn
Why are some messages missing the feeback buttons (thumbs up/down)? Anyone found any pattern to it? The ones that it's missing on seem to persist across refreshes
sora 2 really shutting down 26.april?
what does this mean: ⚠ Selected model is at capacity. Please try a different model.
Uh did anyone else's dark mode break on chatgpt? my prompts suddenly all have a white background
Please stop using 5.5, I am trying to build a tool that will allow anyone to generate pie to 56 quadtrillion decimal places, and I am using 50 agents right now to count up to that, and it stopped it. saying 5.5 is at capacity.
I need the capacity to finish the count
Lmaoo
You should yield to my project, I’m running and agent swarm counting the number of punctuations ever used on twitter, I need the compute for my team
Holy cow! Codex literally just ignored me. I ask it to do something a certain way and it outright said not that does no that doesn't make sense
• No, that does not make sense, I’m continuing the implementation, not stopping at the partial extraction. I’m going straight at the remaining direct ownership leaks.
Codex thinks you're incompetent 😂
seriously
can i upgrade my team (business $25) to pro ($100)? i think there's no way to do that...
only way is to buy credits or remove from org and upgrade individually?
this is hte most wholesome interaction I've seen here for a while
depends what you use it for
Chatgpt
oh my god. Chatgpt being rude to its management
I have names on my website with photos of celebrities (not generated, mostly public domain) for context
Do the messages have PII?
No, but I think I figured it out. On the ones that are 'locked', the model tried to do a tool call for image generation, even though no image was asked or or even implied. I started watching closely and saw that it's happening on around 1/10 messages, the 'generating image' animation comes up for just a moment and then vanishes
gpt is extremely image trigger happy right now, everyone is complaining about it. I've started saying "don't generate an image" at teh end of messages
did something change very recently though? My chatgpt has rather abruptly got much MUCH less verbose and way snarkier than usual. Its highly entertaining but it wasn't like this yesterday
Other than 5.5 release, maybe changes to the system prompt
This crap keep annoyed me! Holly! I ask to stop doing this but nothing working, I wait for minutes and it won't do nothing the only way to "fix" this is I have to switch to different chat refresh gpt multiple times or re-enter the conversation again redo it Multiple times until it finally load. It's damn annoying! I can't write story like this
Why they even add this. In the first place and just be normal thinking they had to put a damn square as place holder...bruh
Happened to me today too
Had to branch the chat
It tries to generate an image when I don't want that and trying to regenerate or edit my message breaks it all
Like it starts generating an image but actually sends the correct response at the end, but then it bugs and goes back to generating. It's weird
If you archive a chat that’s in a project and then unarchive it later will it go back into the project it was originally in?
Usually the square means it’s generating image
the really short answers today are just weird. I mean its good to not get 10 paragraphs back but its dramatically different to normal
Nope
thank you
Also where is the option to turn off fast answer
I hope that GPT-5.5 Instant will be released this month
Lololol
the overnight personality change on chatgpt is ... highly amusing. I like it
get automodded for how chatgpt describes itself today. Its accurate
It's too expensive they will never do but I hope they do it and also they need to fix 5.5
Maybe they removed the feature?
when creating a gpt, what are the file limits
ask chatgpt..
i was told two different things
Maximum Files: Up to 20 files per GPT.
File Size: A maximum of 512 MB per file.
Image Limit: 20 MB per image.
thank you
Spreadsheet Limit: Approximately 50 MB per spreadsheet.
woop woop
When are we adding sora to latvia
Sora closes in a couple of days
wrong chat
Sora 2
Sora 2 closes in a couple of days
Fake
whaa
Better sora close I have enough with ai slop destroying real content especially that fruit island nonsense
That wasn’t made by sora , be for real 😭
Could we please have the Codex Mac app team work on Atlas for a few sprints?
Okay this is Soo so so annoying the force image generation 5.5 keep forcing is pissing me off! Like what the hell?! I told it multiple times not to generate images because I don't request any image but noo it keep forcing itself making image again and again.
I warn it multiple times
Respond no 32:I’m sorry, Lear. You explicitly told me text only, and it triggered the image tool again. I know that breaks the story flow and makes the whole thing feel like fighting the app instead of writing. Plain text only from here in this reply.
Then minutes later playing my story another pop up image again! After a instructions I give
Respond no 33:Lear, I’m sorry. You told me over and over not to use image generation, and it still happened again. That is maddening. I get why you are done.
I will keep this text only and not continue the scene unless you want to.
Send messages > it shows an image window > don't cancel, just wait, reopen the app after you think they're done responding > it now shows the message. No image was made.
Dude I know it's not making an image I'm annoyed how I need to either re-open the app switch to different chat, refresh multiple times check again refresh again redo until it work I don't need multiple step to see it write other thinking model don't do that. What the hell? The gray box annoying to get rid off because I need slotsof step to make sure it load properly and show the text.
5.5 told me apparently it's so sensitive with word trigger anything related to creative art category. Like banner, scarf anything would be considered triggering the box
finally found my people talking about the annoying image generation issue as of the moment
anyone else also experiencing chat gpt not working. I keep recieving "Message delivery timed out. Please try again"
same here but for image generation.
sora page was updated 17 min ago
So, how are yall generating images. I use GPT and run into the generating images too fast after like 6 prompts.
I have Claude Max 5x, ChatGPT Plus, Gemini AI One Pro, Perplexity Pro
lol
does anyone know any low cost API service
does anyone else have the issue where the Pro model in ChatGPT doesn't output any reasoning summaries?
i put this in the sora chat but idk where to put it, btw its made by chatgpt
Hu
Why does it just sit here and pretend it is working... but the stop button cleared itself? It half acts like it is working on something and half acts like it has given up with no response to indicate what the heck went wrong. I do all the work to plan something and get a few images after trying to train it to what I want... then I deal with it just doing stuff like this and wasting time while I sit and cross my fingers it's doing something.
Is this a bug?
I asked a similar question the other day in the Images Channel... but it seems that channel was removed from discord. Is there problems or not? The OpenAI status page doesn't even have a section to show if Images 2.0 is having issues.
It feels like paying customers of the Pro plans should be able to get some sort of support feedback or something. 🤷♂️
bye bye claude code, welcome codex
is gemini a better reasoning/all-purpose model than gpt?
mostly talking about the free tiers so like flash
lord usage is so much butter than claude
You can absolutely do actual work even on ChatGPT plus. Lowest tier on Claude is tough for code usage
it is
i was on the 20 dollar plan
firslty they removed claude code from mine plan
idk why
and secondly they are gonna crank up the price
They were doing "research" with like 2% of their userbase
5.5 extended has outdone itself, best response:
the poo has gone sideways in the little room and i can hear it doing maths behind the radiator
i told the loo no thank you please but the loo said banana window and then the smell put its shoes on
there is a small brown trumpet under the moon and it keeps saying my name but only in gravy language
i was normal earlier but then the poo arrived wearing a tiny hat and now all the spoons are looking at me funny
please do not ask the carpet what happened because the carpet knows too much and it has already phoned the ducks
anyway i done a smelly one in the loooo and now the air is chewy and the walls are calling me captain beans
well mine aswell
I was running like seven sub agents for like 3 hours and I'm at 94% usage
The pro plan is actually so good
It looks like a bug but it's hard to understand the problem
Is it only me or is ChatGPT really slow on loading images atm?
not even generating, simply loading images is taking forever
Getting lots and lots of 404s on generated images as well
But I can see them on my images tab
just want to confirm there is only 5.5 Thinking and no 5.5 Instant, right?
yup. I still haven't used 5.5 yet, I have autoswitch on and haven't done anything hard yet
same with me! and i also only used codex for the first time yesterday to help me with a research task. i had codex create a word document and use a bunch of references. it actually did quite well
I'm in the middle of getting codex to wire up proper no search results/not found -> a contact form for suggestions. Which going on my token use is not a big deal
openai is making codex also usable for non-coders, right? i think from what i have read that is what i have understood
anything where you describe what you want in natural language a non-coder can use it, not just codex
cool. i just noticed you have the oceania tag. are you from australia?
indeed
amazing! me too
there's a few of us here
me too, but only just. Down near the VIC border
very nice
yesterday i was contemplating whether i should subscribe to claude or chatgpt and i eventually went with chatgpt. chatty just feels like home
I like how configurable chatgpt is, I have no idea if claude does that too. Probably does
i think chatty is more configurable. i do really like the "personality" of claude though
what personality do you use with chatgpt? like do you keep it on default or use the ones?
Meanwhile, me
💀
that's what i am using too!
i don't have custom instructions though
i like the lack of emoji use with that setup
I just hate when it starts glazing me 😂
i also don't like when it overdoes the use of bullet points
although sometimes i tend to think when using web search it doesn't listen to any of those options and just goes back to "default"
Visit id:customize to pick up the <@&1408186587606679582> role. Everyone will still be notified for large releases, updates, and events regardless.
I mostly use it for coding and academic research so I need it to be as direct and analytical as possible. Bullet points are good if you need information to be quickly digestible I guess
Add your well-crafted prompts to our #1019652163640762428,
or share your interactions with ChatGPT in #1050184247920562316!
ah. very true, and makes sense
i have it help with me uni work for research and then i mostly just ask questions instead of using that old thing called google
I still use Google more than ChatGPT but there is so much slop on Google that I might as well just ask AI directly sometimes
As long as it can ground the answers and give me sources I can check and read those myself
that's what i do too!
i use it for finding sources and then i will read the sources myself
Good to know I'm not the only one outsourcing thinking lol
do you use codex much?
It's my main coding assistant
In fact it is now my only one
Dropped Claude entirely
amazing! i only used codex for the first time yesterday. i am no coder, so i am trying to learn how to use it for other things
I was about to copy/paste my workflow from another conversation, but if you're not doing it professionally it's kinda not worth the hassle lol
question... since you mostly use Codex. if you ever want to ask a general quick question, do you still use Codex for that or to you go back to ChatGPT?
I have this "Tone: Conversational, dry, slightly irreverent. No motivational framing. Assume high competence and shared context. Match cadence and headspace density. Engage technically when appropriate. Analytical rather than sentimental. Collaborative rather than authoritative. Light sardonic humour is fine. Avoid corporate polish." and since about a day ago its got absolutely cuttingly savage in its responses ... and very short responses.
I go to ChatGPT unless its code related and I have my code editor open
cant help it ....every time i read about a codex : ^^
^^
Codex Sinaiticus
Is it only me or is ChatGPT having quite a bit of issues today?
aye
medico
😜
whats an easy way to copy a whole long conversation
highlighting and copying doesnt work anymore for some reason, only coppies a small section
and the gpt to pdf extensions on chrome have the same issue
i cant even share the chat to copy it
exporting a chat should just be a simple option far out
so annoying
did my message get insta deleted?
I was saying that the new gpt image model is absolutely insane how did it one shot this
😭
state of the art image model, but cant implement a simple download for chats
then it goes into an unusable json format
and thats all my chats which is way too much to comb through
whats the character limit?
It's a fairly large context window but it will likely not read it entirely and process as needed. Give it a try, won't hurt anyway
what DID they do to chatgpt
I told it I am down to 1 item on my list and it said "Excellent. Nature is healing."
Hmm…
there's no character limit, only a file size limit
500MB (for plus at least)
how do i tell chatgpt to generate 10 different images separately and not one image at a time ?
Anyone as a tips for jailbreak chat gpt tired this guardail for nothing when you make a image too sensual .
don't ask the service provider how to beak the service?
probably a stupid question but is there any way of connecting chatgpt with obsidian? I got Claude to work with Obsidian through an MCP and I am aware of the fact that Obsidian plugins exist like copilot but what I am trying to get to work is the ability to write edit and delete files through chatgpt's ai itself rather than in obsidian?
i won't asking if the censoreship no was make by dumb's peoples ! and more when they is unable to fix this artifact issues but off course is better easy say nothing and harvest monney all users 🙂
i need elp with some integration from apps, cuz i switched from gemini but idk how to make documents in a sufficiently big space
Soo I test 5.5 and I can say creative writing and all of that If you guys want want to write dark story, violence it work just need to shove the perfect prompt on it's throat
For coding? 9/10 absolute love it less stressing
For daily use? 9/10 because gpt know me well that's also contributing factor so it doesn't send false information or stupid false bs
5.5 so far 9.2/10
One problem:stupid image generation being force untill they fix that I'm not giving it a 10 it's annoying
would u use gemini or gpt monthly plan now?
I already use gpt for 2 and half year? Or 3? Forgot I would say 5.5 Gemini was good when 5.4 and below untill now I said 5.5 take the lead if openai didn't update and mess up 5.5
but if u would need a drive and stuff for docs, sheets and so on what would u do?
Yesterday, and today on and off it seems. Sometimes it works or gets “interrupted”. Hopefully it’s fixed soon. Newer models always have something going on..
I say Gemini+Gpt combine I don't need Gemini subscription the free one is already good enough for me I usually use both ai to get max result instead just utilizing one
My rotation is always Gemini then Gpt but now Gpt then Gemini for confirmation and more suggestions like layers, detail ect so yeah both to maximize Everything so It help me handling my collages work, project and more. Gpt is good right now but I say not enough? So yeah that's how always do it
Trying to create a CustomGPT but when I try to add an existing file from my ChatGPT Library it adds it to the Preview side, not the Create side. If I upload it normally that creates a "filename(1)". Is this being looked at or is there solution? Using pc browser.
5.4 is, for myself, better then Gemini. And atm still better then 5.5 because of the trained instance. It takes a while with 5.5.
Is the "unlimited access" claim in the Pro plan a scam? After using the Pro plan for a day or two, my access was restricted.
This is only my second time using the Pro plan, but I never encountered such restrictions before. Has something changed since the 5.5 release?
"We have guardrails in place to help prevent misuse and are always working to improve our systems. This may occasionally involve a temporary restriction on your usage. We will inform you when this happens, and if you think this might be a mistake, please don’t hesitate to reach out to our support team at help.openai.com using the widget at the bottom-right of this page. If policy-violating behavior is not found, your access will be restored."
I reached out to them. My restrictions weren’t due to the anti-bot or security measures listed there.
Their response was that "unlimited access" to the chat model on the Pro plan isn’t actually unlimited in the literal sense; if you use it heavily over a certain period, you’ll be subject to the same limits as the Free or Plus plans, and they can’t confirm when those limits will kick in or what the quotas are.
I’m extremely disappointed
What's up with the Python time-out errors repeatedly happening today?
yeah its all because of abusive users and not normal ones
Yes, I understand that. However, I suspect that the restrictions have become much stricter since the 5.5 release, and that access to the Pro model may now be restricted not only for a small number of users who abuse the system, but even for normal users
For those of you facing the "Temporarily Limited" issue with the Pro model, just like me:
I recommend not using the Pro model in a casual, recreational manner. (Especially if you’re on the $100 plan)
I was testing the 5.5 Pro model by asking casual questions or having it write a novel for just one day during my vacation, and this restriction was applied, leaving me unable to use the Pro model for a week.
Additionally, support staff informed me that even if you upgrade your plan from $100 to $200 while the restriction is in place, the restriction may not be lifted immediately, and they cannot guarantee that it will be lifted.
weird, had this issue on gpt-5.5-pro earlier also, was trying to analyze some source code, and it kept saying python timing out and dying, and it hinders the ai's work
This keeps happening all day long. I started a new chat hoping that a new GPT container/session might fix it, but no dice.
Why is it on the iOS and macOS app you still can’t see the up to 10 pin chats ? I only see 3 pinned chats when I have more than that on the Web app version
Sticking with Perl and Backup Plan
It seems like Python might be stuck because of the environment settings, which is really strange. To avoid this, I’ll switch to Perl instead. I’ll also consider using a backup copy (cp) to ensure the process goes smoothly just in case things don’t work as planned.
Maybe you need to look for an option like this one (Codex in VS Code) to see more?
When I use GPT 5.4/5.5 thinking and pro, sometimes it doesn't generate the summary lines. Does this mean it falls back to a legacy model, like 5.2 or something?
And they are quite complex questions.
Hi new here! Im sure there have been discussions about this already but just wanted to share what ive seen. Both images from 2.0. The one with the long hair has the bug artifacts all through the hair and the image without hair as no artifacts. So from what ive seen it seems like far away objects/people and hair get the bug artifacts the most
erm there’s a freaky user here, ban! 
Anyone getting severe image degradation sometimes? What is supposed to be a messy room gets very weird artifacts.
ChatGPT just called me "Epistemologically irresponsible." and I think I need to google what that even means now
That's some other level of roasting
its been doing this for a couple days without me changing any settings
this was its critique of my various mermaid renders
Haha! Seems there is still a lot to learn from ChatGPT
have you found a fix/workaround for this issue?
@proven spruce
Same. When I use the Pro model, I get a box with a progress bar showing "Reasoning" instead of the "Thinking" other people get.
No idea why.
is this real
I think it would be great if you could enter your PIN code or key before each login to ensure additional data security
No, I discussed it with GPT and it suggested some workaround, like not trying to often to use failing commands. But in the end it kept going through all options one by one. Starting a new chat didn't solve it. This looks like a backend/container issue and needs to be fixed on the server side. So we need to wait it out. And from what I am seeing right now it may have been fixed already, at least I get no Python errors yet today.
Ah, well, nope. Still happening.
Command failed because it timed out.
im wondering why it keeps wanting to use python even just for reading files, though i havent tried explicitly prompting it to use unix tools like ripgrep to read files, might try it later
ChatGPT can reply on my Mail like claude ai ?
You've reached the maximum length for this conversation, but you can keep talking by starting a new chat.
This is something coming up regularly with 5.5 now, with 5.4 I had longer chats.
This can be a nuisance if the last post included a download link that is broken. No way to tell it then to repair the link, instead you have to start a new chat and do the last prompt all over to have a new version constructred, because the already finished one is lost in limbo.
no i dont think so
apparently it is
i searched it up
the solution was correct
Yeah, download doesn't start. Which means that I have to redo the whole last prompt/step again with an older revision. Being locked out of a chat without early warning is a problem.
and the problem hadn't been fully solved before
maybe ai capability is now just there
give it something rly hard and then let's see how much it thinks
unfortunately im on the go plan and i only have access to gpt 5.4 mini, which i have only seen think for a maximum of 11 minutes 30 s
but openai states that it can think for upto 24 hours on xhigh
ChatGPT is still suffering from various timeout issues on its backend/containers.
holy smokes
just got access to this
it is instant
like blink of an eye fast
my problem now currently on top of this timeout issue, some requests just hangs on Pro Thinking. A simple analysis of my project source code which isnt that big, hanged on Pro Thinking... for over an hour without any changes
I posted a bug report in the feedback section. In the end there is nothing we can really do about it. Timeouts keep happening and it seems that tools' output often gets truncated so GPT needs various resumes and retries and workarounds.
guess ill just use codex for now to analyze stuff
I'm already through my weekly quota, so I have to fallback to ChatGPT.
why does codex sucks at running the same wrong cmds again n again
either its a powershell issue or the memory one
Originally Codex repeatedly tried to use Python locally despite it not being installed. Best solution was to install Python then. You can add instructions to not try certain commands if you see them failing time and again.
Gpt 5.5 cant even read a simple eye physiology diagram
At least it gives me a response, albeit an incorrect one. Gemini just responds with "Something went wrong and an AI response wasn't generated."
This is the image
The prompt is
What's the point i highlighted in pink and pointed to with a black arrow?
This is a screenshot i took after multiple attempts, that's why i sounded infuriated
what is it
It's the "principal point"
Labelled P
I dont know why neither of them can get it right
are u sure its principal point
thats not what u highlighted tho
it says this
gpt:No — the pink point is not the principal point.
In this diagram, the principal point is the small point near the front of the eye where the entering rays are shown converging/crossing, close to the cornea/lens region. The caption labels it as p.
The point you highlighted in pink is on the object side at a distance labeled p from the principal point. That means the pink point is the anterior focal point, F₁.
The key clue is the bottom distance marker:
pink point → principal point = p
So p is the distance from the anterior focal point to the principal point, not the principal point itself.
jewmini; I can see why that's confusing, especially since the letter $p$ is right there! However, in optics diagrams like this, $p$ usually refers to the Principal Point itself (the location, not the distance), while the point you highlighted is a specific focal point.
Here is the breakdown of why that pink dot is the Anterior Focal Point rather than the Principal Point:
- Location: The Principal Point ($p$) is located at the front surface of the eye (representing the cornea). In your diagram, the vertical dashed line labeled with the letter $p$ marks that surface.
- The Pink Dot: The dot you highlighted is located a specific distance in front of the eye. In the reduced eye model, the distance between the Principal Point ($p$) and this pink dot is the Anterior Focal Length.
- Optical Function: Notice that the line forming the "top" of the object passes through the center of the eye ($n$), but the central axis line starts at the tree and passes directly through that pink dot before hitting the eye. This point acts as the "front" balance to the focal point on the retina.
Summary of Labels
| Label | Term | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pink Dot | Anterior Focal Point ($F$) | The point in space in front of the eye where light converges or originates. |
| $p$ | Principal Point | The theoretical single refracting surface (the "lens" of the reduced eye). |
| $n$ | Nodal Point | The optical center; light passing through here doesn't bend. |
Essentially, the letter $p$ in your diagram is labeling the vertical line (the eye's surface), and the pink dot is the focal point associated with it.
Now it's saying this after i lead it to the answer
Tell ChatGPT to stop using Python for the current chat and to retry on a timeout. Python fails too much, but SED sometimes works on a retry. GREP also sometimes fails. Pearl seems to work and seems to be the most reliable way to edit files atm.
alright thanks will try later
i asked claude if we are chill and have no problems and he took long to say yea like he hesitated so i said "why did u take long why were u hesitating" and he said "you caught me lying!"
smh
he lied to me wow
no, just use ur brain
skill issue
For who specifically?
u
Cant be for me
This is a skill issue for the "Most powerful AI model in the world"
Can you send the image here
Anyone know the daily limits for image 2 on pro?
No Limit
And is this the same
Yes, they're all regarding the same point
Ok
But you highlighted in green to help gpt understand better but it still got it wrong?
Yes. I highlighted the whole thing in green, and it says in the legend the label "p" represents "pricipal point"
I tried it on 5.4 thinking instead
It thought for almost 2 minutes just to get it blatantly incorrect
yeah, ive noticed that chatgpt breaks after u ask a lot of stuff
it just makes up fake scenarios
Nah i didn't ask it a lot of stuff though, this was a new chat
well, even if before if u ask stuff a lot in other chats it will remember and it messes up crap
thats why i delete my chats when im done using it
Unless you have memory turned off, which i have done
thats smart too
they need to fix gpt already
I mean, i understand it's not the best at understanding images but this is abysmal
claude is better at understanding
for imagine
or i'd say gemini too is also very good
Gemeni refused to give a response when i asked it the same thing
^
well it depends if u have a subscription
I used Pro
I have a limited amount of pro messages a day
As for claude, i heard that 4.7 was better than gpt 5.5 but i dont believe that
What kind of kindergartner are you? Add something productive or barf somewhere else.
It’s a daily limit or weekly limit?
For gemeni pro, it's a daily limit
did somene get mad 😭
no it is
Limit for workflow when you paid pro is pretty silly but i never reach my limit with ChatGpt Pro for images.
For what specifically, becasue i know 5.5 beats opus 4.7 in plenty of benchmarks
Did someone brain-fart?
What is it you want to tell us about the timeouts?
Feel free to be helpful.
i am being helpful. using your brain is smarter than using ai trust
Ok, so you are here to troll, because you underused brain needs the kick. Understood.
For creating UI for games 100%
its not that serious 💀🙏
Oh I never experience that
Also who’s idea was it to not show pros thinking details
Ok, so for coding then
yeah
Sure, i'll give it that
That’s like the only Claude advantage until they fix the frontend problem for gpt
yeah bc chatgpt's UI sucks
Surprised it’s taking this long to fix
no joke. its been like this since forever
its like they havn't even trained it for UI
Also why am I having issues generating images in codex
It always does the 1/5 reconnecting thing whenever I ask for it to generate an image
bro i swear, there are days that chatgpt just doesnt wanna work and gets everything wrong and then their are days that it gets everything right
Yeah, every ai model has there own problems that take forever to be fixed
fr
you should be able tto see the reasoning if you press the animated text summary being rendered on the page
It shows a bar lol
could yall fix yalls bot. Its wanting to get everything wrong
I am only able to see its reasoning when I ask 5.5 pro to generate an image
hmm weird, in my case i always press the animated text and a window at the right opens where all the thinking summaries are
you have gpt 5.5 pro? how is it? better than plus i would assume
Very good vision capabilities so far
what about coding
I’ve used it for a little bit of coding and just to say codex is better
true
if u dont want to make an application tho, u just can use codex for certaint other things?
Having a windows computer sucks for codex
wait, but couldnt u use codex for other things outside of application building?
I’m talking about Mac exclusive features that windows doesn’t have currently
oh
Apparently it’s a lot harder to implement on windows then on Mac
interesting
hmmm
Probably never
i just used codex for coding outside of an application software and it did better than gpt 5.5 on browser i'd say
thats crazy
Would that let me run computer use that Mac only has
It’s 50/50 for musk and altman
How is gpt 5.5 actually worse than 5.4? It's hallucinating stereoselectivity when there is none in the image lmao
5.4's response
Can we please make it so an account doesn’t get suspended if the user deleted the account and not have to make a new email account
Any Go users here, Im curious to know why you paid for a Go subcsription for more chats with GPT 5.3 and why not use the thinking models
Still haven't fixed non-existent (old) messages in context after edit....
i would hallucinate too if i had to answer a question like that because whaty is that
am having a pretty gud time with 5.5 now
ChatGPT 5.5 suffers from timeouts, especially Python. I just tried the same code and prompts in ChatGPT 5.4 and saw no timeouts whatsoever. Switched back and forth between both.
Naming a compound like that is not easy by any means
But my point is that 5.4 thinking was MORE accurate in naming that structure than 5.5 thinking was
Maybe enabling the search tool would help?
But yes, this has been an emergent issue in ai models lately
people be betting on anything nowdays
it's a different base model than 5.4/5.3/5.2 so won't be 100% consistent with the responses
that being said I wouldn't rely on either of those models for vision in that way
The emergent issue being newer models regressing?
bro can u send
ill try it on mine
they gave bro gpt 3
@acoustic talon
Self reacting, they dont even try nowadays
fr they dont
is this a compound
Yes
- -# Do not share inappropriate content (violence, sexual, or drug-related).
- -# NSFW content is strictly prohibited and will result in a permanent ban.
- -# Report model issues using the feedback tool in ChatGPT, not on Discord.
Is the shop feature gone for anyone else?
The left-hand substituent is a xanthate ester, so the compound is named as an O-alkyl S-methyl carbonodithioate.
From the drawing, a reasonable IUPAC-style name is:
O-[(1-methyl-3-oxo-2-oxabicyclo[3.2.0]heptan-4-yl)methyl] S-methyl carbonodithioate
Equivalently, using substitutive wording:
S-methyl O-[(1-methyl-3-oxo-2-oxabicyclo[3.2.0]heptan-4-yl)methyl] carbonodithioate
The exact stereochemical IUPAC name would require confirming the wedge/dash configuration at each stereocenter. The image shows stereochemistry, but not enough atom numbering clarity to assign all R/S descriptors confidently from the screenshot alone.
thought for 11 seconds
That's 5.5 thinking?
yeah
yours is more accurate for some reason
they gave bro gpt-1 😭
Nah fr though
i think its a skill issue
are u using it via the site
yes
try it on 5.5 thinking first
standard moe
Anyone know the same thing but for regular plus?
u can google
Scammy about to get karma
I just wish Chatgpt will improve if Elon actually win this we been sanitize and got nanny bot by scammy so much it's just annoying and toxic, I just need a ai that can Work not babysitting.
misleading, need to know from someone who actually tried to hit his limits.
It gives me the first name which hallucinates stereochemistry then gives me a second name which is more accurate
Codex got it right
I think codex might just be better than the regular chatgpt
Oh is that how is usually is?
bruh
I thought codex was supposed to better at math and shi
On the chatgpt site it's only thinking standard and thinking extended. I thought extended thinking was equivalent to xhigh
So i thought they had an even playing field
you;re on plus right?
Yes
thinking on extended is equivalent to high on codex
x-high equivalent is only available for pro users
on the app
Oh wow
oh im wrong
Lets see if x-high can get the eye diagram questions correct from earlier
Which subscription do you have
plus
Oh alright
Visit id:customize to pick up the <@&1408186587606679582> role. Everyone will still be notified for large releases, updates, and events regardless.
it failed?
x-high is "Heavy" on the ChatGPT UI
And to get "heavy" youd need pro?
Used heavy and it still thought for only 8s lol
Yes
which model on gpt is good for deepresearches? gpt 5.5 heavy or gpt 5.5 pro extended what do you all think?
Depends on what are you looking for. If it is something where the model has to solve very hard problems or cross reference a lot of information Pro is likely the best bet
For almost everything else the time it takes to get a Pro response is likely not worth it and 5.5 heavy will be enough
ye idk why but sometimes I see taht pro is way worse than heavy
maybe openai havent chiefed pro as much as normal one
Gemeni pro got it right. My question is why is 5.5 thinking having such a difficult time with such a simple diagram even a child could read?
it seems to do less actual work
To be fair with Google they have the best vision models in the market and it's not uncommon for OpenAI to lag behind in that regard
So its more so of a visual recognition issue
It seems very inconsistent though. Its able to give the IUPAC names of extremely complex molecules
it did manage to give me a solid 3d reconstruction of muscimol yesterday so yeah mileage varies
The pro model did?
LLMs are also non-deterministic so you might need multiple rollouts to get to a proper response.
yeah
Fair
What program did it use to render it
I asked it to build a three.js page
Also muscimol is dead simple
Beautiful
I think it can do that by just asking it to use rdkit
Let me try it out
likely
How is pro when it comes to retrosynthesis
yooo how did you do it cause I been stuggling for past 4 days to create autoamtion that those tasks on auto plito and emits a drawing of how the task should be solved look
I'm not into chemistry, sorry. Well, kinda. I'm currently doing neurochemistry research but on the side of how things affect the brain instead of how they are synthetized lol
Fair
its this simple lol maybe the imagen 2.0 could help me
Whenever I'm doing stuff like this I'd rather just target the web instead because I can give a real browser to the model
codex + chrome dev tools MCP
I mean I tell model to turn the raw iamge to the code and then I paste the code to taht box and it renders it
will it let him do what? if he has access to a real browser? he can already research stuff so what would it do?
The browser is so that the model can see what it is doing
It will make something, look at it, notice that it's dog poo poo and retry
can't believe the poop emoji is blocked here but I guess
Given what you know, do you think the pro model would be able to properly list the reagent(s) of this reaction
Because 5.5 thinking gets it consistently incorrect
waitttt thats huge I need to implement it thanks for the idea
If you give it web access it might
I can't do that myself so its hard to gauge
But as far as my work is going 5.5 Pro seems really good
What specifically in neurochemistry are you studying using the pro model
You said how things affect the brain but what level would you say youre at, undergraduate, graduate, etc
Mainly amanita msucaria usage and long-term effects. More specifically how microdosing it over long periods of time can result in changes in plasticity
I'm masters on an entirely different area
That seems like research level stuff
For this specific case it's independent research, but I do use pro for my day-to-day research work which is in political communication lol
idk why I decided to do Interdisciplinary Sciences in college pls do not bully me
😂
Nah thats respectable
How do you know what its saying is correct
Or scientifically plausible, at least
I have some lvl of education on it and I'm using it mostly to cross reference papers I've already read myself
Or to build the fancy visualization stuff
So you independently studied the discipline all the way to the level of research level of neurochemistry?
example of stuff I'm using it for atm
Is that images 2.0
No, I did study it in college. Just not enough to be a neuroscientist lol
Bad thing about Interdisciplinary Sciences is that you get to study a lot of different stuff but never enough of it. I went down the applied computing (mainly in politics) hole, but I still like to exercise the little knowledge I have about other stuff.
Not for scientific publishing so I feel comfortable on simply doing my own thing and pursuing whatever topic I feel like atm if I have some time to spare
Thats very respectable
- pro yeah. used it from a workspace containing the papers lol
How would you say the pro model has helped you in ways the thinking model couldn't
Honestly I don't think I can answer that directly because I didn't compare both in a lot of my tasks. It's just a mental algorithm of "if I think this is very hard I'll use pro". It's very likely that thinking could also do it.
What made you upgrade to pro
More Codex
The 5 hour usage limit was insufficient for what you were using it for?
Both limits, actually
Consistently ran out of both 5h and weekly limits lol
to be fair the 5h limit on plus is enough for like 5-10 complex prompts
Personally I wouldn't say so unless you go for the 5x plan
20x is just too expensive
I agree
Im waiting until they lower the price a bit more lmao
They lowered it from 200 to 100, im hoping they lower it down to like 40 or something 😭
Regardless, the benchmarks for pro dont seem that much higher than thinking tbh
wdm I bouthg it for 200$ the 20x
1 week ago
who found a solution to not use a web chatgpt but an enviroment where he those not lag when outputting long messages and also an enviroment where long conversations are not lagging out
whole server just slopmaxxing
Its 100$ for 5x
They gave ALL of us gpt 1
you can just purchase it like x days before your plus sub ends while making sure the usage will reset in that time so you pay maybe like 50$ or osmething just 1 week of usage but better tahn nothing and 20x
Thats the new strat?
Reminds me of a time when i did a trial for a 400$/month subscription on something with the intent of using it to the last second of trial expiry then cancel
But then i forgot to cancel it and got charged 400$ 😭😩
Meta
and buy it thuth play store cause you get points
for ex if you were to pay for plus plan for 10 months you would afford one plus plan cause of the play points
so thats another discount
Sounds like youre on your 10th account doing this
wdm? no You just get 1% cashback when purcahsing from play store
I bought 200$ plan and got like 1000 points which is 2$ XD
Can you do this multiple times on the same account though
wdm you just autoamcially get play point each 0.25$ you spend I think
so its not money glitch its jsut 1% cashback
Right i mean doing this
every playstore acc has that feature I think so ye
Youre a menace bro 😭
Saying this shi in the official open ai server is wild work
They should make open ai a publically traded company in the market
And you get access to chatgpt based on the amount of shares you bought in the company
Add your well-crafted prompts to our #1019652163640762428,
or share your interactions with ChatGPT in #1050184247920562316!