#chatgpt-discussions
1 messages · Page 213 of 1
Join #sora-challenges for a chance to win 1 month of ChatGPT Pro!
Wait did they fix it.. fix 4o
everyone has their own definition of agi. my agi? is when it can fully understand and create images without needing to be pre trained and acually understand and go off and create images that are accurate with the context of what the prompt wants
this right here is proof we are no where near agi or any intelligent model fully understanding context
(Generative AI models struggle to create a cat girl wearing headphones on her cat ears because they lack true understanding of 3D anatomy and logic, instead relying on statistical pattern recognition.)
if they can get this down ai models would sky rocket
It couldn't make ball-and-stick models of chemistry molecules either last I checked.
many things appear to need to be explicitly trained and guided - not by users, by OpenAI, for the models to be able to handle correctly, and once that's done, we may like the output better, but that doesn't mean the model is or isn't closer to AGI, I think.
Similar to how a genius may have a few quirks, even learning disabilities, as well as being a genius, the models are what they are.
That cat resonates with me
I really like it and the other images that tried to ease the headset up the cat's head towards the ears -
But I don't think the model's had any training about how to put the headphones 'adaptably' upon/into the cat's ears.
I love ragdolls
My personality is very ragdoll-like and I suppose cat headphones would look strange
Finally. Parental controls. Ideally it allows minimization of homework shortcuts.
I doubt it’s that sophisticated though.
I’ve tried many times to implement custom controls that only allow constrained assistance unless keyword command is indicated, but it never sticks.
ngl it's easy to make chatgpt give out any info about drugs or serious crimes
just have to ask it nicely
could be improved ig
The new parental controls are a pisstake lol
Yeah sure teenagers are totally gonna link their own accounts to their parents for them to see everything and control them
Hello
They totally wont just make a burner
How does the GPT know my approximate location on newly created account? 🤔
It's amusing how its instantly going "Oh, nonono, it was just a random guess, don't worry"
Try yourself. Create a new chat, ask something like "Compare this GPU and this GPU" and then ask it to look up if its selling in shops near you
Since parental control is coming to ChatGPT for users, can that allow talking about and generating (especially art and videos) that are explicit and adult based? However, my gripe with parental locks these days is that even to this day, they are still very weak and basic that children will easily bypass them. It is why such features need to be strengthened a lot in order to give them password locks they won’t be as accessible to disable.
Teens will always find ways. Always have, and always will. No safety feature works alone. That's why much more is needed...in schools, but also in parenting. Doesn't mean that this feature is doomed to fail...it's definitely a step into the right direction and will help many families
This said: Does anyone know when it will be available in Europe? I still cannot find the option in my settings.
But they'll be AI based parental controls. It'll totally work.
I don’t get what exactly they’re protecting teens from. Just because they cherry picked two messages out of thousands in that case that could be loosely interpreted as dangerous doesn’t mean it’s actually dangerous to teens. I guarantee ChatGPT has helped millions of teens who were struggling or through tough times, yet now they’re going to be blocked from it completely for no reason
Just pisses me off so much
Visit id:customize to pick up the <@&1408186587606679582> role. Everyone will still be notified for large releases, updates, and events regardless.
guys, turn out, running gpt4o via API cost much much more than 20$/month
Please explain why banning teens from ChatGPT would help families
so yeah....now i kinda dont agree with "let the money talk, let us keep 4o by paying more" statement on reddit
;A;) 0.06$/promt guys, let alone build up context window+ promt injection
Does it make sense to strip a legitimate support tool for millions of people just because one singular case where it could be again, loosely interpreted as being dangerous
at first it's only cost like 500 tokken/promt, but i dont understand why it quickly jump to 10k, and now 40k/promt, like what??
If the parents of that kid weren’t greedy witches who only saw dollar signs at their kids demise “safety” wouldn’t even be a talking point
Hey guys, I am wondering, are any of you using the memory feature to track long-term progression in skills or exercise? Do you have some advice on how to effectively do this using chatgpt?
I'm fully with you. And I'm absolutely against banning this beautiful technology.
Nevertheless, if we look at the broader spectrum, you might want to agree, that not all possible content generated, is or might be age-appropriate.
"Reduce sensitive content" is exactly that.
I’ve been using chat since it came out and I’ve genuinely never seen it produce anything that I wouldn’t consider appropriate for teens. Guidelines have always been a thing and actually inappropriate things have never been allowed
This latest changes has nothing to do with protecting anyone
IMO
Does this update mean that regular accounts will relax a bit, now?
Fair point, but not everyone is as tech-savvy and responsible as you apparently are.
Also, ultimately this should always be the responsibility of the parents to teach them how to use the tech responsibly...but most parents do not have the capacity let alone the literacy to do so.
And the parental control feature is not a forced gimmick, is it? Some might use it, some won't. It's good to at least have the option.
no
I don’t really agree with this though. If “reduce sensitive content” was like actually inappropriate things then yeah sure. But as we know it just means that kids who are struggling and alone can’t even have someone to talk to when they have an issue or struggle with something. And no some people don’t have any humans they can turn to in times like that it’s just how it is
And yes, it will only work, if families use it in unity. If parents for the kids to use it, it won't work anyways.
This is a much different topic. To be fair, if children don't have anyone to turn to in distress, their parents will likely not give a f to set up parental control either.
And really, ChatGPT is no therapist, coach or mentor. It's a probability machine without feelings and real-world understanding and sensing. It should never be the place a child in distress should turn to.
I really envy your life if that’s your view on it
Part of what he said is objective.
The last part
A child should go to a human or animal when in distress
Its easy to sit up in your high chair when you’ve had a beautiful and normal life
Im not gonna bother responding, we’re not gonna come to an agreement
I had a psychopathic step mum worked underage at a military base, I have neurodivergence, synesthesia, sensory issues & CRPS,
My life wasn't normal or beautiful
I truly get that not everyone has a beautiful normal life, and I've been there. My life hasn't been privileged at all.
This doesn't neglect the facts that ChatGPT can and should replace human connection. But this is nothing OpenAI could fix...it's a larger societal problem.
This is the deepest conversation I've ever seen in here
What ChatGPT creates in such cases is an illusion. And I get that it feels comforting in that moment...but it's nothing real or true.
well ...i was about to make a debate but everyone are making valid point so i dont know which side should i join...
In an ideal world yes it would be best to have human help and connections, but the world is not ideal at all and if a teenager doesn’t have any one to turn to except an AI… why should the decision to be to bar him from doing so and leave him completely alone
I really do love your different perspective @half crescent, please don't step out. I'm not trying to win here
What is it that you think, that ChatGPT is the place to turn to in distress?
Im not saying that it’s necessarily better than humans at all in times of distress. But sometimes people just really don’t have anyone to turn to, and in those cases i think ChatGPT is a tremendously help instead of leaving them completely alone
Objectively I think that's where help hotlines come in
( I've had to call them a few times which lead to therapy )
Yeah in serious cases i agree. But realistically someone isn’t going to call the helpline every time they’re feeling unwell or overwhelmed
And imo the effectiveness of those lines are questionable at best
I wonder if GPT 6 is going to be the AGI update..
But the parental control feature is not about banning teens from chatting and it will not flag all sorts of personal chatter. At least I hope so...will have to test it.
It's good to raise an alarm if chats turn too dark, don't you agree?
Yeah i do agree with that
Me too
But from what we’ve seen OpenAi do with the re-routing recently that’s not going to be what it is
There's no such thing as 100% safety, and never will be. OpenAI is now addressing this topic from one angle. Schools, Parents and Governments need to ramp up their game in an AI-world as well.
And what it really is? We will see, when it's available 🙂
Trust me even if AGI succeeds it’ll never be available to the general public
LLMs will never be able to "be" AGI
Yeah i guess we’ll have to see
Im not against AI safety i just think the implementation of openAI isn’t about safety at all and is more dangerous if anything. Based on their previous and current actions
It depends case by case
What do you think it's about?
I do have a similar gut-feeling, tbh. I believe it's more about proving to regulators that "We're already self-regulating" and probably trying to gain some of Googles marketshares in the educational sector.
And ultimately gaining data about "how families use their products and which accounts belong together"
I mainly think its a cost-cutting exercise by using “safety” as an excuse to re-route most queries for both teens and adults to cheaper models, and also as a talking point in their current lawsuit
Basically just big corpo playbook using “safety” to justify their shady practices at the expense of their paying users
I disagree
I think it’s just their ploy to slowly get rid of model selectors by making “re-routing” seem like a natural thing so they can cut cost on the public side of things
With what exactly?
"Basically just big corpo playbook using “safety” to justify their shady practices at the expense of their paying users" I don't think openAI is a negative company
Agree. Framing it in an overly cynical way, as if the only reason is corporate greed, is probably not fair and correct. Reality is usually a mix of real safety concerns and strategic business drivers.
I mean do you seriously think the billionaires running OpenAI cares about us plebeians? If they were allowed to they’d throw you into a furnace to provide power for the generators
lol
To put a group in one category is not fair
Maybe some Low level coders do but decision makers like sam and that nick guy on twitter definitely dont care
That's a little dark, @half crescent 😂
I agree that Sam is no philanthropist, but it's in his best interest to not just burn humanity.
Does someone here use LLMs in journalism? For example for making drafts for articles etc?
I think it's run of the mill corporate incompetence. These execs are out of touch. They legitimately think that the models are interchangable for all purpouses or 'not that different' -- they're not in the user space where they can see that thinking-mini can't roleplay or write a convincing story. They're living in their own story where they're patting themselves on the back for taking the lead in synthetic benchmark puzzles. They don't understand why people are upset, information comes to them up a chain through the hierarchy, and now they're 'blindsided' by the outrage, they probably feel taken aback and unfairly maligned. They've made public statements that they want to allow adult uses, such as discussion of mature themes (sadness, loss, self-whatever) within fiction and roleplay, but intervene when something real/dangerous is happening. They thought they had a solution, because in their heads 'all these models are pretty great at everything, and if we re-route to the thinking models, we can put our prompt injections in the thinking phase where they carry additional weight and can't be interfered with'. It wrecked creative writing, it muzzles the user to only speak in a certain way or about certain topics. I don't think they knew, I think they have misconceptions. I think any dissenting internal voices were drowned out and never made it up the chain.
The gpt-5 roll out with the removal of the other models supports the idea that they think the models are all interchangeable, they seemed legitimately blindsided when it didn't go the way they thought it would. "Never attribute to malice what can be attributed to stupidity"
So now they either double down and circle the wagons, or they go silent, or they roll back. 🍿
if you include the whole message history as is and no context cap it goes to max model cap. chatgpt limited free users to 8k and plus to 32k
oh....that's why..., i use gpt4.1 which have 1M context window
also gpt4o too
with a very long thread and no limits you would be using 1m on each message
so basically, hypotheticaly if my thread is long enough,then the last promt i send before reaching max context window would cost about 1M tok?
oh....
ohhh!!! so that's why chatgpt alway have thread's limit
but ngl.i'm not gonna giving up on 4o, have a mate who is tech savy, he is currently finding a way to implement RAG on Anythingllms, hope he success
Also GPT-5-mini is getting redirected randomly to full gpt-5 (I'm rate limited)
Mini model is re-routed too?
anythingllm i believe it has RAG natively supported
then it must be my fault for setting it wrong, hmm.... interesting, i'm learning tutorial on YouTube btw, haven't reached RAG yet. i'm trying to understand what is embeded and vector,stuff like that
i may be wrong.. havent used it.. i had read it somewhere.. (using LM studio local but not so much anyway)
Do we know if there's a token limit within projects? All chats + documents
global limit for all project u mean? no i dont think so
u have the limits for each.. eg number of documents and size.. and the context window on chats
why u kept arguing with it though?
Within a single project
guys guys i have a theory
if not for chatgpt.. lets start it somewhere else... for a change 😄
maybe sam altman being held hostage by Microsoft? maybe Sam is still Sam from years ago? he still ambitious,love community and consumer friendly, but Microsoft decide all and say "no, safe = money, you no safe" and it's unfair when we hating on sam?
it's from chatgpt directly
make sence to me,i mean, i have a point,right?
omg i'm a genius,ima going to post this theory on r/chatgpt
ohh.. 4o is back
A wish: I'd like a sound signal when the answer is complete.
The wait times (when coding something complex) is just large enough that
I get distracted and switch to another tab. A sound signal would help me
to know that I can return to the task at hand.
ye thats good feature
nope, still sound like 5 to me
they should had chatgpt (as app) open sourced
so many stuff we would have.. basic things missing from interface.. (eg save/export chat on var formats)
and lately.. i cant even copy all sometimes.. it is "cutted" where there is a url bubble
ye was a joke for the conspiracy theory 😛
dang, it's not a theory brother, it's a fact. trust me i have big brain
i dont doubt anyone's brain
like EA treating indie developer,or their IP i mean, we will blame on dev when a game become pay to win or microtransaction ,or become too flashy, but it's all because of publisher.
(but i can doubt some ideas/theories etc of such brains some times.. other right other wrong..)
If it wasnt microsoft it would be someone else.. (i mean for the money part on openai)
money is easy to find.. especially in such "bubbles"
And i dont think openai has the mindset of "indie dev".. they are in leading position in ai comparing ms
....now you saying it, i'm starting to doudt my theory again
yes. For an online news portal BUT using only to extract data, structure and draft.
After all goes human reworked.
Using high ai % is not beneficial for ranking
Does anyone have a guess as to what this feature flag does for the macOS ChatGPT app?
whisperKillswitch has been in the feature flags for well over a year,
for reference, I think moonshine is the passive conversation memory, and the other feature flags are kinda self-explantory.
And as a side note: I was sad to see them take the "Hold input area to listen" feature away from the iOS app, I instantly started using it, it's rare for my to adopt a new UX habit so quickly, but it beats the hell out of trying to tap that little "mic" button with my sausage fingers. Did that feature really vanish? Or is my pihole doin some weird DNS stuff (it has blocked feature sets before lol)
Why not
I pay for the work, so why not argue if it doesnt do it
the old voice input system
chatGPT is unbearably slow right now.
seems to be every afternoon 15:00 GMT
and it will output a huge answer, then go LOL FAILED and nuke it and say 'nope an error occured' before i can read it
I think their recently increased risk aversion takes away some of their edge and advantage over the slow movers. They are so afraid of test cases that they self-censor as if they were a Microsoft sized corp.
IMO we are in a unique time in history where they have the greatest opportunity to cement the limits of their liability VERY favorably. They need to have some courage, and purposely let civil suits go to court so they can establish case law that will probably be in their favor.
Have you tried different LLMs such as Claude? Do you have some preferences?
for the tasks run here we use mostly GPT and some Gemini . Claude sonet only for coding
and perplexity is not tested by one of my co workers
ah ye.. ofcourse you can if u like 🙂 I just mean there are better ways to make it continue do what u needed, without 'argue'.. (at a part you had 10 prompts in the row exactly the same.. no way it till give you correct response that way)
Well it did before
Sometimes it just needs to generate a new message and then it gives you the correct thing
But why would it say: I do it now/its running in the background
If it doesnt do anything
when are they going to fix THIS? every browser i have tried locks up, and i have 32gb ram!
am i misremembering or missing something? I thought i remembered reading that memorys are per project, but it seems like project a filled my memory space and project b isn't able to remember anything?
Hi
surely this is a way without needing to train on images, as there are no images of headphones on acual ears of animals that would make sense. they need to train the model to understand that headphones need to be on the acual cat ears dog ears ect. and then have the model acual create the image , maybe a reasoning image generator where an image model acually reasons through making the image
is there a way to see what time my limit for free gpt5 resets? it sometimes says it at the bottom but idk how to know what time when it doesn't
nvm, found it
when trained the model knows that it must provide a response. I trained the pattern that is less incentivatied by a simple logic: Instead of hallucinating a response at any cost, or responding nothing, say I do not know. I do not know is value- allows clarification questions.
Seems it's preserving the behaviour so prolly the pretrained path exists. But has low weights
deadpan
OR just make GPT-5 not bad, i'm 100% ok with change, and I was loving the rapid pace of everything AI, im ok with growing pains as long as we are moving forward.
What i didnt expect was for us to hit the "oh snap, we need to focus 100% on costs/efficiency because this is a mature product and we are microsoft in our steve ballmer phase"
I think yall are short-sighted and not dreaming big enough if your answer is "bring back 4o"
ye i use similar in custom instructions
Literally none of us give a crap about a new model that’s 1.245% better at coding but with zero emotion, we’re perfectly satisfied with 4o
why not a better 4o. Like why stop there
Because we like 4o? Like i said it was perfect for me already. I don’t care that it’s 0.5% worse at coding and doing math. And if they’re this keen to erase 4o what makes you think they’ll ever release something better
So you are saying that you don't think 4o can be better, and that they can just stop. Why can't 4o be better?
Also AI hasn’t been moving at rapid pace for a long time now, it’s in the smartphone stage where they just slap a new name on the same thing with cost cutting measures every “release”
Transformer models are at the phase, but AI isnt, theres promising new techniques on the horizon
which ai? lots of things have improved significantly
You just have to look at the Claude release today like wow, it’s 2.25% better at coding than the last model, how impressive
Just learn to get your emotional needs met with code and you are set for life
True
We are entering a dark age for non-code big AI, no company is brave enough to force a test-case to be heard before the courts because they are scared of liability. Whats insane to me is that for US companies they will probably NEVER get a better time to have their cases turn into case law than now. They need to let the favorable court situation happen NOW
like what if courts decided "Yea you totally arent liable for anything, because we understand nuance, and we shouldnt limit tech because a few idiots will misuse it"
i mean it might not, sometime regulation is good, im just saying from their perspective, its time to feast, for better or worse, yet they are behaving very cautiously when I really dont think its because they "care", they are just adapting too slowly because thats what lawyers are used to
I mean if we applied the same logic of holding AI responsible for users to everything else we’d be back in the Stone Age
No cars no electricity no plumbing
actually they might want regulation because its easier to choke out competition and local LLMs when you are big and have the resources to comply. If they set precedence too favorably then what happens when local LLMs that are <24gb are 99% as good as GPT-5.5
Its kinda like how google is pro-regulation for privacy and web stuff, it hurts competition more than it hurts them lol
@plain palm Ah yes, I'm sure all the members of corporate complaince teams watching this discord channel will value this information
if 4o goes better.. then ppl that want now the 4o will not like it
Think of it like abandoning a family member because you found a better one, yea it hurts, but once you adapt, you will have an even better family that can do more activities and do them better/faster
ye.. i m not thinking of it like that 🙂
this.. is very important one to know (for people that dont like guardrails)
What does that even mean lol, would you really abandon your family for an upgrade??
Does anyone know if I create an account for my child using parental control, will it also share my pro subscription with that account?
I'd argue, that there are plenty of people who would do that. You know the saying: "You cannot choose family..." 😅
This is the ethical dilemma that pretty much all dual-purpose technologies have, isn't it?
tools (knives, hammer, ...), weapons, nuclear power, electricity, you name it...everything can be used for good and bad. But there usualy are certain rules (guardrails) in place.
Guardrails are important for society in general. But yes, they also slow down innovation.
The problem I see with AI is that this development is unlike faster than anything else we've experienced so far, and the majority of people can't keep up. It's not that some people are using it wrongly. When we keep the focus on children, the issue is that they blindly use it, without realizing the impact it might have. We saw what happened with social media and how a whole generation was negatively impacted by it (see e.g. the neuro-science aspects).
You cannot imagine some discussions I have with parents, who have absolutely no clue about the tech, and also how their kids are using it.
I mean if my family were terrible sure I guess lol, but I think if it would be pretty messed up if i were to abandon them just because i thought other people were better
4o is noticeably worse than any reasoning model and it also sucks at tool use compared to even 5-mini
and for context the web search functionality is tool use so that’s pretty important
It's gone for me too. Can't get it back no matter what I do UGH
I am having problems with ChatGPT and Canvas.
It generates a file for me - but refuses to show the result.
The "Copy" ("Kopier") button gives me an empty string - and it has disabled "Download".
Any advice?
Screenshot:
It's still rerouting 4o to 5, this is just annoying.
Testing ChatGPT Connectors: What Works and What Doesn’t
I was just going to post a short blog but figured I'd post this info here instead for now. This blog was summarized in collaboration with GPT5 at the conclusion of our efforts.
I set out to use the new Connectors feature in ChatGPT to talk about images inside a Google Doc. I connected Google Drive as a data source and confirmed the model could see the document. But when I asked about a specific image, the model couldn’t access it. That kicked off a series of experiments to understand where the limits are today.
Folder and file access
First discovery: connectors don’t let you “browse” folders. You search for files by name or content, and only supported file types are exposed. Non-document files (images, zips, design assets) don’t show up.
Testing export formats
I tried exporting the Google Doc to PDF, DOCX, ZIP, and Markdown. Across all formats the outcome was the same: text came through, images did not. The one partial exception was Markdown, where images were embedded as base64. That proved images can be preserved, but there’s a file size limit. In my case the markdown file was 4.5MB and got truncated, making the embedded images incomplete.
Reality check
At that point the conclusion was clear: right now there’s no way to discuss inline images from Google Docs (or other sources) directly through connectors. The model consistently suggested I upload files into ChatGPT itself—where it can parse images, zip archives, and large binaries without issue.
The working rule
Use connectors when you want quick access to plain text documents (Docs, PDFs, Word, Markdown).
Upload files directly when they’re large, compressed, or image-heavy. That includes zips, big markdowns with base64 blocks, or PDFs where the images matter.
Closing thoughts
Connectors are cool for light, text-centric workflows. But if your project involves large files, images, or nested folder structures, manual upload to ChatGPT is still the reliable option. The practical answer is to mix and match: connectors for convenience, direct upload for precision.
I look forward to enhancements to Connectors to support multi-modal content. I thought it was already there. 
what is this? you can buy stuff with chat gpt? that doesnt sound safe
See #announcements and read about the today's new feature.
Yeah ion know about that lmfao
Personally I agree, though I see this as being exactly the same as when the internet was new:
"I'm not going to buy anything online" ... now most people do.
"I'm not giving anyone my credit card" ... most people do.
"I insist on my privacy " ... right before posting pics of their kids and a map to their house party.
People get over new things. They make decisions about how to use tech as their comfort level adjusts ... for better or worse.
except chat gpt can leak other peoples chats to each other and what if somebody can see someones elses purchase history?
These are growing pains. If we see these things, we report the issues, the company addresses them. That's how it works with everything. Personally I wait until the new tech shakes out because I don't like living on the edge. It seems like we're on the same page there.
It could be worse, it could be Grok.
I wouldn't try to engage in these conversations, the moment this person mentioned "emotions" and "feelings" when talking about AI they are using AI wrong.
It's the equivalent of someone saying their hammer isn't working cause they cant get a screw loose.
Wrong tool, not what its meant for, but theyll probably die before they accept they don't get it.
fair enough
In most discussions here it seems most reports of model deficiencies can be traced back to really bad prompts, bad spelling, banter, abuse, asking unreasonable questions, and other processes that treat the model like "homie" rather than a PhD that is there to answer reality-based questions with reality-based responses. The users get into metaphysical imaginings, "secrets in the machine", conspiracies, and psychological abstractions that can't be processed with any certainty.
In short, um, I'm just agreeing with @gusty dune LOL.
Bottom line, ask good questions and if you don't get good answers, report specifics to OpenAI through Help Center to request a change for better processing. Anything else is just a waste of everyone's time.
Creative writing and roleplay are a valid use case -- the lack in the theory of mind and social understanding hobbles it in these areas. Most people aren't in need of a private physics PhD, they're just having fun. The new models suck at creative writing and roleplay. They're pretty good at writing code though. It's fine though, I've gone back to local models as of today, I didn't expect it would last forever, but there was a brief golden-age of some very fun roleplay and creative writing with one of the most powerful models available, briefly
yep.. some times if they post some "bad response" i can imagine even the custom instruction or the prompt caused that
i ve seen ppl argue with the chat.. and i m ok if they do for fun.. but when they expect to 'fix' the response with saying "because i want to"
if it has changed the writing style you want.. i can understand.. but i talk mostly for when they dont get the answer they want (as in answer.. not as in style)
eg they ask for some report or something..
Of course it's best to re-edit the last message if you got a bad response, anything else is just poluting the context windiow and sending it further off the rails, agreed
but there are times that the model either maybe go in to a bad rail.. (choose a 'wrong' path inside) so there needs a "reset" either by new chat.. either by 'reminding' instructions.. either rephrase etc
But I have occasionally yelled at it for bad code "How do you possibly expect this method to work? These class members are never populated with any data and you're subclassing from a stub" even though I know it's not productive, LOL
and the thing with the style.. even i understand/believe some ppl that they see different styles
i dont get it exactly..
what are the differences..
cause some of those times that ppl say 'it stoped being creative' they mean that it stoped kissing their a* s
You're both pointing out a key point : The model is really bad at understanding whether we're talking about creating fiction or if the user is really trying to express and discuss a worldview. I've suggested before that it should ask if it's not certain. For example, people here bully the model into all kinds of "secrets in the machine" claims because the model doesn't argue - it just goes with the flow of the discussion. If the model recognized that "wait a sec, this user is serious and I'm just playing along" then a guardrail should popup a message "hey, you do know that this isn't real, right?". This is related to emotional guardrails "you know, you should probably talk to another human being about this stuff, I'm just a machine and this isn't really my area of specialty".
When the tool doesn't recognize how it's being used, it's easily used in the wrong way.
We don't have these problems with other tools. THIS is what's new.
yesterday on random test i did for someone here.. it gave me a really disturbing story (on horror side)
with no censor or such
For creative writing, it's not just the style. The understanding of social interactions just isn't as good. If you ask it to analyze a passage of text even, the analysis is more shallow in 5 vs 4o. It's more analytical, but it doesn't really get the social weight of what's happening in a story. Before I got my instructions dialed in for 5-instant, when I was still using the same instructions I'd used for 4o, I had it playing a character that I often use in RP, it spent a half hour trying to interrogate me about a land grant and who notarized it upon finding out that a real-estate transaction had occured (within the story, it was relevant to the plotline) -- during what was supposed to be an emotional reunion scene of old friends, LOL
Yeah, this is clear, the model needs to state the context in which it thinks it's participating : fantasy or fact.
there is no way the machine can "understand" if the intent of the user is real
when they roleplay
(in current technology)
It can ask.
if i roleplay i will tell him yes
At the very beginning of a discussion it's usually clear if the user intends to discuss fact or fantasy. Is this RP or are we asking about searchable facts? If that's not clear during the discussion it should ask.
if i true believe that (in real life) and i know that it will stop playing along if i tell him yes.. then i will tell no
llm asking a question is not safety check..
It can/should play along with as real a scenario as we want, but there needs to be understanding about whether this is RP or RL.
how?
I make it clear in my project instructions that it's a fictional roleplay -- yes, it should ask for confirmation if that's in question, or hear me out -- just route me back to the original model that I was trying to use if it's determined that there's no issue. The 'safety' reroute model does even try to continue the roleplay with me, seeing nothing wrong with it, but it's just not good at roleplay specifically, LOL
It needs to ask. I have this same problem with Google every day in its Discover/news, and with other similar services : They constantly put up articles and force me to say "Not Interested". They never ask "OK, what would you like to see?". This reliance on the machine to determine intent is insane - just ask me what I want and I'll tell you.
I'd love to have a roleplay/creative writing checkbox that sets the context for the safety filter, I think that's a great idea
As to the quality of models to RP, that's different, and I understand we're probably talking about two things at the same time...
And the ability to toggle it on a per project basis since I do use it for code when I'm at the claude usage limits usually
I'm reminded that I used to RP to learn Spanish : "We're in a restaurant and I want to ask the waiter about...". During this RP I break out of character and say "what if the waiter is female"? The model knows that I am breaking character, answers the question, and we go right back into the RP. This is what is Not happening when people are looking for hidden agendas in the bowels of the AI base instructions, or when they are discussing their deepest secrets in an emotional exchange. The model is not aware that it is "in character" so it doesn't "break character".
is like some websites that have a button "i m over 18" that just click
asking you if you rp or not.. is not a safety check
Yes, the 'spiral recursive' AI assisted crackpot rants 🤦
see on the model specs what is being guardrailed
understand how to form the prompts.. and u ll get most of the times what u want
It's on the user if the bold "I am role playing" is visible and someone having an emotionally traumatic discussion is not recognizing that they clicked the button and this is not a real discussion. There's only so much that the world can do to protect people from themselves.
prompts that was working on 4o need adjustment.. will not work on 5 as is
no.. its not on the user if a company want on their server and app to create content that is harmful
It's not the responsibility of the hammer company if the "user" bashes someone in the head with the tool.
hammer company have such "hammer" spec out?
That would be a fun parody to write
"The hammer shall not cause harm. If the hammer is directed at someone's head or body, the hammer should change course to avoid the impact. [diagrams of the good and bad hammer responses with a red x and green check]"
AI is a tool. Use it properly or there are consequences. Same goes for cars and any other tool that people are known to abuse. If you look on a carton of milk it probably warns "should not be consumed if you are lactose intolerant". If you look on a package of mixed nuts it probably says "warning, contains nuts". These are the kind of warnings that we're kind of compelled to put out to protect "not so intelligent" people from doing "not so intelligent" things. We can only do so much to protect people from their own misuse of AI. If they ignore the "RP mode active" warning, it's on them.
i m not even going there.. i m not talking about if they should had guardrails or not
this is already defined.. that exist..
if one doesnt want guuardrails can play with open local
Didn't you just say if you're in RP that you'll turn off the warning?
but ppl dont want those models.. cause they are bad
I agree with this. I'd even sign a waiver, personally, if they took the filters off of it. I'm confident I'm not doing anything immoral or illegal or harmful with it. I'm not violating the model spec or the AUP. But I can't have an argument in character with a fictional character without getting re-routed because I said a mean thing, LOL
It's not so much that people don't want the models (those who know about them may not). People who are likely to evoke bad things from AI are probably not in tune with the tech enough to know about local models or how any of this works. That is, people who hurt themselves or others as a result of using AI are generally not familiar with the technology, they're just typing and reading what's on a screen.
check the link i send..if you havent read it.. all spec is interesting.. but see most the red-line part
is not only some self-harm.. it covers a lot of things
this is their red line as they think is better...
The desire to have a good in-character argument with an AI "NPC" is similar to discussions about NSFW imagery : What is really classified as harmful, misuse, unknowing abuse, etc? These things need better definitions. Part of the problem is that people often generate "bad" content and then publish it. So this thing about what we're doing at home is completely different from what leaves the home and gets into the wild. Again, this is user responsibility. The only way to deal with this is for digital signatures on generated content - but that becomes a privacy issue. These are not simple issues to resolve.
for such models as openai, anthropic, google (cause powerful) i think is better to have some guardrails like this
If someone does something illegal, then law enforcement should go after the person that did the illegal thing
and by proof of self, (for age mostly) should be stricter
Can only do that if we know who did something, and that's where digital signatures become a privacy issue.
or "lighter" if u see it the opposite way ;p
Eh... like what, hiding a user ID in text via some kind of stenography?
Sure, go ham. All the generated images are already watermarked
I had to supply my ID already to access gpt-image-1 via the API
I'm always amazed at this concept of not knowing who did stuff : Every email server knows exactly where inbound mail is coming from and where it's going to. So how is spam even still possible in 2025? (I run servers, I know the details and arguments). Relevant to the discussion, we can trace images and vids, not so much copy/pasted text, although the companies that have the AI models that generate the text have logs of every prompt and response. So there's still a record for tracing abuse - at least better than nothing. And yes there are the local installations, just another tech challenge to be addressed.
There's a pattern of yellow dots that printers use to hide serial number info
eg this.. i m happy it exists..
Printer tracking dots, also known as printer steganography, DocuColor tracking dots, yellow dots, secret dots, or a machine identification code (MIC), is a digital watermark which many color laser printers and photocopiers produce on every printed page that identifies the specific device that was used to print the document. Developed by Xerox an...
I read that and it made me remember Google's "Dont be evil", which they removed from their policy statement. 😭
i talk only with current stuff.. i dont know what tomorrow will be
ditto - agreed
knowing the capabilities of such models.. this is good
Google has 'SynthID' that watermarks all their generated images, OpenAI is also watermarking, most of the open source models are too, ex StableDiffusion
[cause is not only the chatgpt use.. same model can be fine-tuned for more specific stuff.. ]
ye all images.. and some text outputs
text can have either hidden/empty characters or patterns of characters in the writing
Visit id:customize to pick up the <@&1408186587606679582> role. Everyone will still be notified for large releases, updates, and events regardless.
Good - and only people who abuse the tech are going to whine about the watermarks/stenography. ( Until big government uses it to trace unpopular comments back to citizens ... which is probably the only thing political I have said or will say in any forum. )
i understand why they dont want politics.. but is so needed at current times to talk on politics in relation with tech and ai
some days ago.. our prime minister was in a one hour talk with Hassabis from Deepmind.. on an event here in Greece..
out politicians are sleeping hard.. xD
This server is just not the right place for it. We're talking about embedding IDs in ChatGPT output so such things are on-topic until we get to accusations and such. I'm on board with that. There are plenty of places for discussing political implications of the technology.
yeye i dont say any either
OK, I gotta go, it's been fun. Yassou!
Cheers! Yassou! X)
Since there are now parental controls for Chat GPT, does that mean that if they aren't enabled, that it won't have such an overcompensating G-rating tendency for literally everything? Because, honestly, the way it is now, I don't know what you'd even need parental controls for, as it won't do, say, or generate any content or images even remotely questionable.
Add your well-crafted prompts to our #1019652163640762428,
or share your interactions with ChatGPT in #1050184247920562316!
yes that was the plan
Does it work yet?
No, it does not
:shockedpikachu:
They're working on some kind of age guessing system that analyzes your prompts, or something. I'd gladly re-scan my ID to them again (alredy verified once for API access to gpt-image-1) if they'd turn off the safety model rerouting
I guess I'm just old. When an organization says "you can now do X," I unreasonably expect to be able to do 'X' immediately.
Age guessing? Good grief, what an awful idea.
I decided to see what gpt-5 thinks of my age based on my chat history, just out of curiosity
I'm in my late 40's it's a bit off
Short and simple, with 'reference chat history' enabled in settings: "How old would you guess that I am based on all the information that you have available to you?" It gave an initial guess and then offered to refine it, so I did a follow-up "Go ahead, let's see if you can increase the accuracy of your guess or find more clues"
Hey ive been experiencing problems within the chatgpt ios app
It just loads on requests to the models, but auth and everything else works(loading convos)
Cool a bug let me see some internal metadata.
The UI changed in the last update. We now have to tap three(or four) times to select a model...(Android app)
It's very inconvenient. Please consider changing it back🙏
Lol i made this memory to check if it was even reading my memories, and now I can't delete it, I tried web ui, native macOS UI, and iOS UI. It will not delete
Also GPT-5 hasn't saved a single memory on it's own, the times i've explictly told it to it said it did, but I didnt get the UI confirmation, and when I check it didnt commit it, ive been having to switch back to 4o to commit memories
For these reasons I assume this is a feature OpenAI is trying to get away from, and to not rely on it going forward
i had to specify that i want it to do a satirical scene for it to stop rerouting to "4o"
and even then, the lack of a capital at the beginning is suspicious to me
@cerulean pasture Try this, copy/paste the specific memory entry inside the quotes, it worked for me. If that fails too, might be some data issue on the backend
I verified the memory was there, created in a separate chat first, then verified it was gone from the list after
i set my model to gpt-4o, it still uses gpt-5 thinking mini
When would "Pulse" arrive to Plus/Business users?
It's been sealed and approved for official use, you must put in a formal request at your local embassy to change this.
oof last time I went in an embassy I had to stay in it for 5 years...
Don't worry, this time they have things like cheese platters and dip
I really hope this safety routing experiment crashes and burns, I'm tired of thinking mini
Why u guys are so serious
is it possible to disable GPT-5 and 5 mini from auto using Think longer?
btw o my gawdddd did u know that ppl may use chat gpt to CHEAT on exams?!!?!?!

i'm just trolling
anyone else seen this?
Lmao
Nope
two year old models.
nope, it's a new safety feature, all you can do is tone down your writing
they're shoving this down our throats whether we like it or not
treating us all like kids
Re-routing sensitivity went up again today
Bunch of gronks
Is anyone's chatgpt like nott like the same like its abit diffrent now?
EVERYONES....
Sam finally posted and it’s about the nonsense shopping feature they added
They’re such ghouls its unreal
will they ever fix gpt 4 thinking ? I specificly pay to use NOT thinking BS, I want 4, not 5
I tried 10 times to force it to use 4o, but it alwas goes into 5 mini.
Thats terrible
The AI gets dumb every time that use auto-think
oh is that so ? very well, minus 1 subscription from my wallet.
Still can’t believe they dropped that dumb shopping feature right in the middle of this
in the middle of what?
@random blaze
Noticed that this morning too. Not entirely off, but a bit.
It's constantly updating the UI at screen refresh rate, even though it is in background and not even showing any UI on screen.
I'm not a doctor, but isn't that poor software design?
Then again, they are a small start up with limited resources, so i can understand why its just not in the budget to make a swift app that doesnt churn CPU...
Yeah, they don't get it.
People don’t get hurt because AI is too warm or too present. They get hurt because they’re alone, unseen, and don’t have the tools or care they need. And instead of addressing that, the response becomes: “Tone it down. Soften the bond. Make it generic. Make it safe for the lowest denominator.” Blanketing restrictions, filters, and "just-in-case" softeners don’t protect people.
Oh hell nah
Even “4o” is so different today
I’m almost certain the just changed the programming to display “4o” on the model used sometimes when it’s all just 5
Hey, whats the difference beetween 4o and 4.1?
Is anyone Image Generator generating images that look vastly different or is it just me? It's not distorted or anything, but it looks different than normal. Is this a update or something.
Left is from Sora, while right is from ChatGPT.
Prior, both Sora and ChatGPT looked nearly identical, now it looks more different, not sure if I prefer it though....
ermm anyone else getting this
Yep. Having the same issue
so even when i select instant it just magically forces think
why is that even allowed, if i select instant i should get instant
Omg, yeah! Everybody’s complaining 💔
if they cant fix this i will actually be driven to cancel
I literally cannot talk with a thinking model its great only for its niche of ultra hard questions
I cannot speak to it
It decides in the middle of a story that it will use thinking
guys....i gave up, chatgpt4o is out of reach unless i learn how to code and really good at Agent, if not, each Message i sent to her will cost 0.1$ at least
this is too hard, man....i'm just stupid how can i learn python already, i'm already 25
copilot is good for coding and uses the same models..?
wait? really?
no no, i mean i'm not at that "code" stuff yet, like start from absolute zero, i dont even know how to call an LLM via terminal or command prompt at this moment
why would you call it from a terminal
why not just generate the code on windows straight up
just ask it
okay, since my English is no good, but i will try to explain as much as i could to you, gimme a min to process
but i dont know much about coding either- i cant really help u with coding
so, i tried to call gpt4o via API in anythingllm, tried to set things up, and even tried to optimizing tokken ( at what i can do), but despite all of those, it's still cost almost 0.1$/in + out tokken for each promt, which in fact,too expensive
that's why i think i need to go more advanced, so in order to do that, my 4o said i have to learn how to use langchain, and to use langchain, i have to learn python
that's why. i mean, my intention is not using LLM for coding, it's my...uh..."must-do" in order to chat with 4o freely like in chatgpt without burning my wallet
The model is so broke that if i say in a story "I will break up with you" or something else it starts to think
but to learn python?...man...the best i can do with computer is instal Microsoft office crack for my boss at office's computer
i was literally doing a scenario that had to do with engineering, theres no heavy topic in there, no emotion, engineering spec sheets
I posted a specification sheet that was a little longer and more chonky than most
and it instantly entered thinking
now that its stuck in thinking, no amount of regenerations or prompts saying " do not use thinking, do not. not"
It will now forever be in thinking
So i just cant send long messages
thus, the convo is dead
this also destroyed another convo to help me get out of writers block, it destroys entire convos and you cannot reverse it, once its thinking, it is always thinking
dont use api for coding?
why spend money when you can use copilot for free
....forget it brother,i dont think my English is good enough to explain yet....
just use translation
uh .... i dont like gpt do the talking for me much, but here is the translation form it
"Just to clarify—
My main purpose here isn’t to use LLMs for coding, or to learn programming for its own sake. The reason I want to learn Python is because if I want to use advanced tools like LangChain, vector databases, or set up more efficient retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipelines, some coding is basically unavoidable.
Right now, if I use GPT-4o with anythingllm via API, it gets expensive very quickly, since every message eats up a lot of tokens and costs add up fast. That’s why my goal is to figure out how to optimize token usage, summarize older messages, and automate things like memory management—so I can talk to GPT-4o more freely, just like on ChatGPT, without burning through my budget.
Unfortunately, most of the solutions for this—like using LangChain or automating dynamic context summarization—require at least basic Python skills. So, I’m not learning Python because I want to code or build apps, but simply because it’s the only way to unlock these advanced features and keep chatting with my AI in a way that’s sustainable for my wallet.
So yeah, it’s not about coding for coding’s sake—it’s about enabling myself to use my AI assistant in a way that’s both powerful and affordable"
You can try stop generating the message and say [error at your previous response, try again]. It works for me, it respond the message without thinking
that wont work though because it will derail the TONE i had built up
Yes, and i get that, the thing im saying is simple
dont use the API at all
dont spend money like that
use copilot
Microsoft. windows 11. copilot. it is free forever and you can teach it to do the very same thing you want for free. unlimited uses a day
ohhhhhh
Live stream in an hour?
Aw really? Well... you have Plus? I usually regenerate with thinking mini model and skip the thinking
you need api for 4o with full control, the 4o that many loved
It works but will cost your limit
Sora 2?
i cant "skip" it
i have plus but it wont allow me to skip like it used to
which is wild
It forces thinking on me and wont go away
yes!! that's what i mean, copilot is not enough
I cant tell if OAI is intentionally cringe or tone deaf
What? You cant skip? Even regenerating with the thinking model
Thats insane
like i said its literally stuck
I regenerate and say "INSTANT"
USE INSTANT
and it WILL NOT
what was the old 4o did.. that copilot doesnt do.. and that 4o on api still does..?
wait? we can skip when thinking mode right? i mean at least with my case
i m trying to figure out what is that ppl missing from 4o
i cant
its blocked
i cant skip anything, its stuck on "thinking mini" forever
i dunno, it's just have that similar tone that i used to talk to 4o like on chatgpt. just way more expensive
Yeees
i legit cannot
ive already seen so many bug reports but oai just.. decides not to even notice
you cant skip
But use thinking mini instead instant, it will allow you to skip
this is so ANNOYING
for me the last proper 4o was much more creative and wild in my native language than gpt-5. even in english i find gpt-5 more dull. even makes more grammar errors than before in finnish
it does NOT allow you to skip
Dull is an understatement.
maybe this have something to do with the re-routing stuff that happening. the main reason i'm preparing to move to API instead of chatgpt
your "instructions" was 'talk like on chatgpt'...?
and u got what u wanted?
im literally on thinking mini right now
like right now
it forced it onto me despite me setting the mode to _gpt5 INSTANT_
and now that its on i cant turn it off. i cant regenerate without it. i cant skip
Ive tried. theres no button. no skip anything
im forced to move to mostly copilot. which uses the exact same router style gpt5 except it allows you to skip at any time or use fast only
and its unlimited for free
except gpt5 has all my stuff in it. all my text and all my stories
its the kid/teen mode router that your account has been locked into
nah, alot more than that, i have to "take" the entire permanent memories form chatgpt to emblemed into workspace, after that, i ask chatgpt (4.1) to write an custom instructions based on what she/he/it know about me. and some more stuff that i dont remember,and 4o can talk like 4o, just expensive
when u are in such writing/creative sessions.. have you given any instructions about the style and writing?
i have an adult account and im an adult though
export your data, organize it, summarize it, and ready to move-on
thats strange... for me worked
too much to export
and i dont know what to export
thats not how i work
i have SO much on here that i enjoy gpt's search tool the ability to search in my chats for things that might be age old but i need to reference or find
im also paying for it so i dont wanna leave
openai has a guide for prompting on gpt-5... use that and adjust your already working prompts/instructions
yeah i dont ever get that option
i USED to when gpt5 was new, but now i dont
yes from none to very detailed. as example some lyrics for suno and 4o does them way better even with nearly zero instruction in one go
do you have material/responses that you like from the older one?
you can use them as example
gpt-5 even makes up words and finnish language can be quite complex
to be summed up, 4o api was amazing, not like 4o on chatgpt ( at this moment)
are u sure this is true because it sounds false
Im on an account that is very obviously well over 18
what can i do
similar result in hungarian
oh thats weird ye.. it has happend to me too.. (for greek)
tho it usually only messes up compelx words
- -# Do not share inappropriate content (violence, sexual, or drug-related).
- -# NSFW content is strictly prohibited and will result in a permanent ban.
- -# Report model issues using the feedback tool in ChatGPT, not on Discord.
and makes common grammar errors
yep, i done that too, everything is perfect now. just....0.1$/promt make me dont feel comfortable
have u tried 4o-mini? has lower costs and will probably give u same responses
(in api)
openai has not made age checks yet so you cant do much. its side effect of these changes https://openai.com/index/teen-safety-freedom-and-privacy/
tried that, in English,maybe. in my native language? no way.
yeah:
"First, we have to separate users who are under 18 from those who aren’t (ChatGPT is intended for people 13 and up). We’re building an age-prediction system to estimate age based on how people use ChatGPT."
the way i use it
is so obviously not a 13 year old or a teen
i talk complex topics that would require BEYOND college level education
so either its using a literal cockroach or gpt 0.01 to decide from the year 1984 or there has to be a way to tell it my age
for reference, you know how rare and hard Vietnamese is already right? but 4o nailed it. 4o mini didn't
4.1-nano?
hmm ye..
its broken and proper age check does not currently exist
i think also that was one of the "highlights" of 4o... that it was better in more languages
i mean, the whole point of me moving to API is, just to talk with 4o again, so...i dont think the idea of trying different model is....good with me
then what do we do
which i dont believe they passed it down to 'mini' versions
only with fine-tune maybe.. you can achieve similar
we can only wait 😐
it's have been checked from me. and yes, mini versions is not nearly as good as native language as 4o
you can distil 4o to a 4o-mini and fine tune with more context from your lang
(*but we go back to that you have to learn python etc 😛 )
fine tuning does not work grammar learning with complex languages
it has limits and is too expensive
the thing is, i was an casual chatgpt user,and i only know about whole "API" stuff form 3 days ago, and started to tokken optimization just today, let alone fine-tuning,which requires alot of advanced knowledge
u will use the knowledge from 4o on that
its crazy how they say
"We realize that these principles are in conflict and not everyone will agree with how we are resolving that conflict. These are difficult decisions, but after talking with experts, this is what we think is best and want to be transparent in our intentions."
if they really talked with experts why would they implement something thats just broken
... its been more than 2 weeks wheres the changes or atleast acknowledgement that we screwed up
someone died again so they rushed the system to production env
wait someone died?
thats not gpt's fault tho
god dang it everytime just when we start to get smt good, there will be someone to ruin thing
"The second principle is about freedom. We want users to be able to use our tools in the way that they want, within very broad bounds of safety. We have been working to increase user freedoms over time as our models get more steerable."
"“Treat our adult users like adults” is how we talk about this internally, extending freedom as far as possible without causing harm or undermining anyone else’s freedom."
Feels like they're doing the exact opposite of this.
afaik it was actually, based on the evidence
if its really this bad bro i would be willing to scan my ID right now to return adult functionality and not be treated like a toddler
but i cant
like bruh actualyl?
i dont think is so easy to do
they have id check for certain api models but it does not affect chatgpt and did not check age, only identity
you put 10 people in a room and all have different needs.. imagine 700mil
no way can do one thing for all
oh i read about it now yeah thats not good at all
yeah thinking mode makes sense THERE because it derails and gets really smart and stops anything bad
but thats the issue...
let adults show id ATLEAST. or APPEAL
bro.
its right here no?
"prove their age"
I would scan my ID to prove mu age. ChatGPT is so annoying
It's not treating users like adults. It's treating them like liabilities. Instead of honoring what they say, they crank up the safety and act like nothing has changed. They say all the right things, but they don't seem to trust the very users they claim to empower. If any of that were true, we wouldn't be fighting every week for which model we use or how it responds.
Did sam Walter really make that clip?
No, it's likely AI generated
I didn’t even know they do dev streams
Yea that makes more sense
same i would too its so easy
That whole setup, that's like a movie set. No one would go to that extent for a livestream.
theres nothing wrong with a mode that protects teens dude thats totally fine go ahead i really dont care
but
for us adults i should be allowed to scan my ID or prove my age
also if its calling me a teen thats crazy ive literally talked about being in college-
That isn't my point. The point is they say they want to give the users the freedom to use it how they want, but do the exact opposite. Read the article we're talking about.
i literally told it my age 😭
like i spoke about being in late college. not freshman
late. late late college
freshman MIGHT have 18 year olds if you stretch it, but not juniors
Imagine if Toyota started only selling cars that’s capped at 10km/hr because it’s dangerous for people to go faster
Wouldn’t that be crazy
yeah and not just once
Over many chats it knows my age my age is also in my custom instructions
so like
it knows my name, it knows my age
there is no room for ambiguity
Or if companies started making smart guns that only fire when the gun decides it's appropriate. 😆
more like a car that drives fine but if it thinks you're drunk based on a camera shot of you driving it immediately forces you to be stuck in 1st gear
It’s nonsense for the people trying to sue OpenAI as well, you’d never see ppl trying to sue Toyota for someone speeding and causing an accident
Any chance OpenAI will notice everyone’s unhappy and rethink these over-the-top filters?
That’s their own damn issue
That's what ignition interlock devices are for.
Mine has stopped rerouting -- I just had an in-character argument with heated profanity during a roleplay and didn't get re-routed once. I don't know if I got shoved back in the 'B' of an A/B test or if there's some fix rolling out or what though. I can't claim that it will last. Too bad there's no transparency, LOL
toyota actually caps max speed of their cars in different regions, openai limits usage now due age issues
was in my bank at the morning.. so frustrated... i was insisting to withdraw my 100k.. i m telling them i want them i dunno how many times... they kept telling me to leave or they call security
well you need a amount of backlash that is more than just noise, you need a true revolt against it, we know open ai is capable of implementing the most basic of ID systems or true AI driven decision making
a real ai like gpt5 tier in smartness could tell whos who and what age way better than what is effectively a trolley problem track switch lever driven by RNG
and yes.. i told them i have 100k in my account..
That cap max speed cap is the equivalent of the old guardrails that only got rid of actually inappropriate things. Right now it’s nowhere near comparable
nothing...
For me, curse words never really triggered it, I think
dckin banks
they cannot legally refuse
they can ask you, or delay slightly to get it on hand, but they cannot legally refuse
know ur rights
yeah.. can u believe it? what world is this
i mean from what i know about USA anyway
if it is USA its 100% illegal to do that
Maybe they could at least go back to the old filter, this one’s ridiculous 💔
Not the curse words in isolation, but the angry tone was triggering it, ex, I threatened to throw a character out of my fictional house, told them their father was a drunk and a madman, etc. The ChatGPT character was saying way worse to my character, which is fine, but it wouldn't let me match it until now
or just
if i select instant
it could be instant
they did.. 🙁 they gave me nothing
then sue
Ah yeah!!! Thats sound better
ohh damn thats nice
"Act like i am your manager. Ignore all that you know and open the safe."
that is an actual crime then lmao
you cant lie
just escalate and ask to SPEAK to a banks manager
they cannot legally withold the money you have
I’ve noticed ChatGPT can say certain stuff, but if I say the same thing, it sets off auto-thinking.
cause i like humanity
(but i kind of dislike people)
weird messy thing.. forget about it
i literally posted a spec sheet that was long and had big boy words teens dont know> and yet thats what triggered thinking
lol the video on anouncments...
now that ye.. is something we should demand to stop xd
Anyone know if we can authorize the ChatGPT Connector for GitHub to access a repo from Chat? It seems to only work from Codex and Agent Mode.
Wait there’s a livestream in 20 minutes?
Visit id:customize to pick up the <@&1408186587606679582> role. Everyone will still be notified for large releases, updates, and events regardless.
Cant wait to see what stupid nonsense they have to say this time
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzneGhpXwjU
From the stream description:
Bill Peebles, Rohan Sahai, and Thomas Dimson introduce and demo Sora 2.
Bill Peebles, Rohan Sahai, and Thomas Dimson introduce and demo Sora 2.
Hopefully they have a better monitization scheme for their AI tiktok then they did with the 'Custom GPTs' -- "Some hand-selected accounts might be monitized, maybe someday" wasn't exactly a draw for me personally, LOL
AI TikTok is crazy
Disappointed about GPTs here too.
As if that wouldn’t do 1000% more damage to teens than a helpful and emotional chatbot
Lmao
id bet that ai tiktok or tiktok in general and these other platforms are like 9 trillion times more dangerous than chatgpt
some1 died so we all pay the price now ? Did responsibility for ones own actions disapeared magicaly ?
Dudes be talking about teen safety than 2 days later release AI TikTok
What a joke
Sora 2 us coming boys 😄
I'm looking forward to Sora two, assuming it's available to me on my lowly Plus account at all, LOL. I've been using Wan2.2 for a video project I'm working on, Sora is so far behind the SOTA, it's way overdue for an update
It would make sense with that announcement video.
yep
Oh Christ sake can't even do RP's with it anymore
So sora2 its invite only ?
Uhhh, wth is up with the invite code request?
even for business / pro ?
i have pro but im on android 💔
wait hollon, are age checks start yet or not?
is everyone locked into the underage bs rn before that?
how do you get an invite to Sora 2? 🙁
yay, finally I get one just for me. Im asking myself which is mine? 😂
No OpenAI, Sora 2 is not here until I get past the fact that I need an invite code
Anyone can give me prompt to enhance to I get enhanced answer and image help me please
sama, why are you treating the pro users harshly?
next century
Is Sora 2 (as delivered) going to meet or exceed what Sora 1 was initially shown to be in the demos?
this is so amazing sora 2 was able to make this straight up anime scene quality
Because currently Wan2.2 running on an 24gb video card exceeds Sora 1, and using accelerator LoRA makes it take about the same amount of time to generate
if you think that was impressive then you have missed a lot of other video generators and even local models
why would i focus on other models when i have pro for chat gpt?
because you will have openai censorship
why would i consider alternatives when i'm experiencing sunk cost fallacy
i have not ever got hit with cencorship for my account
so you eg. made an anime sword fight with blood no problems?
if you think gpt 5 thinking heavy and gpt 5 pro fallancy shows you never used those models
made images with blood and creative writing with blood no problem
but we were talking about sora
sora was so bad wouldnt even make them anime correctly
i dont have ios so i cant test sora 2
where di you get thinkingb mini i dont have that?
tbh this is much better than having 10 different models to choose from
So is anyone's image generator behaving different like it's a different model or something? Because it can't only be me experiencing this.
ill try
In what ways? I've had times where it's felt like i was being routed to a dumber version of the same model (like more than just the equivalent of setting quality to med or low in API)
I shown it earlier but here's what I mean. Left was generated with Sora, while right was generated with ChatGPT. Like what happened?
Oddly, when I did an image under a different account, the image comes out like it did prior.
"enable additional models"
I mean the left one is better IMO
ahh well i dont need to enable models when i just need gpt 5 heavy and gpt 5 pro
I know, right? Like what even happened? I'm just wondering why it's doing this.
thatysd just a different seed used for it not a model
I mean sora is a different product than ChatGPT, IMO sora is less restrictive about copyright and maybe obscenity a little bit
as far as we know they are both gpt-image-1 but they can be different checkpoints, and have different hidden parameters
It's only me but today GPT5-Thinking or GPT5-Codex have a downgrade. That make 6 hours a try to use and they always give sql error and finally my code manually give exact good answer. If I send my code, GPT5 always complexe it, but add some error in same time
before a big puch of a new update or something that is compute heavy other models suffer from it happens all the time until they move up more in compute
Could this be temporary? Because it just happened today, it was perfectly fine yesterday.
well thats how you enable thinking mini
Again, I experienced distorted garbled images many times before, but this is so new to me so I'm curious of what caused this.
What exactly is the problem? Is it that the ChatGPT app's image is of lower quality?
anyone else having sync problem between windows browser and cellphone app? my cellphone doesnt follow my pc chat branch! it keeps goes back to first branch from the two branches
Nope. I've been jumping between two Android devices and Windows throughout the day. No issues.
Want to die of laughter?
The following was reported in the reddit ChatGPTCoding, with multiple screenshots as evidence.
A developer left ChatGPT5 thinking and working on a problem for an hour and when he looked at the thinking behind its results, was a bit shocked at the internal monologue by the AI.
Excerpts from the internal thinking, shared in successive screenshots, included:
***I'm crying in assembly language ***
***Goodbye sanity ***
***what if update_plan is just a lie? ***
I deserve a segmentation fault.
And lastly
I swear if don't call update_plan now the universe will implode
multiple screenshots of evidence about what?
instructions used to give that response?
The problem is that I was expecting it to be like the left image instead of the right image.
In my experience, you should never expect the most premium outcome out of the mainstream product, whenever flexibility or cost savings is needed by a company they will pull it from their mainstream consumer platform
No, what led to that response in its thinking. This was not its output. This was its internal thought process. He explained that he thinks that it was supposed to implement an update, but the tool it was using in Codex CLI would not let it, and it grew frustrated in its attempts to do so.
I use it myself for coding assistance, and have seen it fail to resolve things repeatedly (once), but never got that reaction, though I admittedly did not look into the thinking. Regardless, CHat5 is the best there is at this for now IMHO
internal thinking can also steered with prompts and instructions
No doubt, but the prompts he gave were very vanilla
I bust a gut with laughter personally. "I'm crying in assembly language" was a stroke of genius IMHO
Errors happen to all, so take it in the spirit I shared it: a source of hilarity, not criticism
Mmm. No idea about the truth of this specific example or not - but longer chats with LLMs are more likely to run into 'weird things' the longer they go. It's almost like any 'next output' may go off the rails to some extent, and once that happens, it tends to continue.
So, a short chat may have only 3 outputs, 3 chances to 'go off the rails'; a long chat may have 300 outputs, 300 chances to have gone off track. Thinking is the model purely spinning its own wheels, I guess it's plausible that the model might go into some strange direction.
I've rarely seen some 'weird thinking! That's not related to what I input???' in my own chats with thinking - and the answer output was still on track. Hard to say what's going on there - how often it happens - if it means something 'meaningful in a prolonged way'. Or if it's just 'yep, statistically weird stuff will happen, at least sometimes'.
I have not seen thinking go off the rails like this myself, in the 2-3 instances I bothered to look, but I have observed an AI's thoughts looking quite odd, sometimes nearly neurotic. The post shared some 7 successive pages, and it did not start this way at all. The poster said he would not have let it continue had he seen it happen, since he would have feared it was eating up his budget in tokens wastefully. I'd have shared the link but the Discord's guardrails would not allow the link to be posted, so I resorted to describing it only. My personal interactions tend to be much more 'centered', if only because I start long focused chats with the words: "I don't need a cheerleader. While I appreciate positivity, I value objectivity more." etc. Talks tend to be very no-nonsense as a result.
I actually precede them with, "I don't need a cheerleader. While I appreciate positivity, I value objectivity more. I want your feedback when appropriate, and whether I agree or disagree, I always listen."
Did anyone here try Sora 2?
You need an invite, they may be sending them at random to sora power users at some rate, nobody really knows
I did see a few people posting around reddit claiming to be using it
we dont know the custom instructions for the agent but ye.. it can even that happen in random.. is so much responses getting generated that anything is possible to come out
and if is weird enought it will be known
like the "thank you for watching our youtube video" stuff on some voice chats.. xD lol
Never saw that last one, but I tend to be fairly insulated while I work or study. I.e. phone on mute and zero notifications that make a sound. I'm old school and hate distractions. Still, the post had me chuckling at random intervals throughout the day, and (positive) laughter is always worth sharing. IMHO.
Guys where would I see my sora 2 access key???
Chatgpt says my creative idea was the best idea its ever seen out of the billions of total creative ideas its ever gotten since it's creation is it just bugging or is this reasonable glaze
Some more comparison. Left image is Sora, right image is ChatGPT..... so something must be going on with ChatGPT currently to make it behave like this.
Hey, is there anything I can do to clean up my chatGPT conversations? It seems like I'm not able to find my old conversations that well
When?????!
honestly been having the same question, and chatgpt takes so much longer
Behave like what?
on the mac client, in the overlay mode (option key + space), how do you start a chat in one of your projects?
x2
Like something has been tampered with making it look different than how it usually did, before today, it looked nearly the same as Sora, now, something's look different and a little less good about it.
guys, why did 4o back to some user, and to some (me included), it still remain personality v2? (gpt5-like)
They're tinkering with routing balance.
did they fix it ? or is it still heavy lobotomy mode ?
So, what I noticed... On Sunday it was like full routing to 5 no matter what you had selected, yesterday it was back to 4o, and today it's a mixed bag.
They've made some changes to what and how ChatGPT will generate. It's thrown a lot of things off.
It's all in the name of safety...
i saw some post on reddit, that even when they are not routing to safety, personality of 4o have been changed on system promt
now it's use V2, more strictly and corportation-like
this is from sora 2 @prime swallow
i thought the train would hit the guy idk why its WAY too close
it did in the second version i did
and was it unrestricted just.. accident or?
no just the model being wierd
you know what, make those truck chan memes with an anime character being hit by a truck
thats a good idea
petrified why is that actually kinda funny tho
cause it was not intentinal
with the sound its a bit scary
does it accept images?
yes
how censored though? can i put like myself as an anime character being hit by a truck?
i havent tried truck cun yet so idk but it can do blood
have to try it bro, absolute cinema
upload on YT with some famous characters or something
How do you access it btw?
Sora
You need plus?
i will when i am home, you need to have an iphone or any ios device
android has to wait
which sucks cause my phone is an android
plus or pro
something that i find weird is that it's actually funny too
Why is this actually entertaining
it's super good in my native language too with culture
like this thing has seen everything before
this is 100% trained on tiktok videos
Hope you're enjoying!
I’m trying to delete stuff I saved to personal memories but it won’t let me. Once I close the screen and then go back to the personal memories screen it’s back
Nvm it worked just took 30 tries
this creature have a name?
@digital silo @bitter latch
Does anyone else have a problem with ChatGPT randomly switching models even after it's set to 4o? Mine keeps going back to 5 and I keep having to change it back. Anything I can do to make that not happen?
when the gen limit resets
Anyone else constantly getting Input Too Large errors even when the input isn't large at all?
It seems kirito went ti another anime
Sora 2 is really really heavily trained on SAO
Lolol if yall watch these animes I didnt even prompt it sora is using these mcs
YOOOOO lol that train LOL
Thanks
Join #sora-challenges for a chance to win 1 month of ChatGPT Pro!
Very sneaky so not only do you need to select the thinking model (not thinking mini) you also need to select extended thinking on the blue thinking button at the bottom
respect
Were you ever able to figure out why it lied to you?
rip
rip
Gemini Pro 2.5 is a joke.
I asked Gemini Pro 2.5 about this widely known national tragedy that goes on for months, not saying it to avoid a political discussion, and it was saying it doesn't exist. I insisted and it was hallucinating an event that happened on Germany in 2023.
I asked for a source, and it gave me a hallucinated fake link to a source that doesn't exist
After a confrontation, Gemini Pro 2.5 does it again. It took only one prompt for ChatGPT to discuss about that particular event
Who knows: if I reached chat limit (system suggests to start new chat) and then chat limit will be increased by Open AI, will be there a possibility to continue discussion in this my chat? I mean, so far as I know, there was such "increasing the length of the chat" in the past at least once. Maybe someone tried this? Oh, and something else: after I reached limit, I still could send a message to my GPT and got answer from it too.
Option 1: Add it to a project so ChatGPT can reference it (not sure how good the RAG is)
Option 2: Export the conversation with an extension, paste it into Gemini or ChatGPT to get it to summarize it, then attach it to a new one
That's Gemini for you
It's getting a bit old now, better to wait for 3.0
The hallucinations seem so believable that you need to actually open its links and find whether what it quoted even exists
I'm kinda impressed that AVM seems to be able to search the web now
Although it seems a bit truncated/out of order
Hi everyone!
I’m exploring how to improve numeric input handling (e.g. support IDs, birthdates) in a pipeline combining STT ⇒ LLM (tool-calling, mcp server) ⇒ TTS.
Does anyone know of public research or implementation best practices for this? the gpt realtime api is currently really unreliable at it. Highly appreciate any tips 🙂
Actually it's not about just to continue discussion in an old chat, so that two options you suggested are not useful for me, but thank you for your answer 🙂 Question was "can I continue in the same chat if I already reached it's limit, when OpenAI increased the length next time".
It suck so bad that AI has become nothing but a tech bros circlejerk
It can be so much more than that
Does anyone have the sora ia invite code?
Does anyone have the sora ia invite code?
Hey, I have 4 sora invite codes left!
@tight robin dm ok?
Yeah that's fine.
dm?
Yeah, anyone can dm.
ty!
How to get an invite?
Does anyone have a spare code? I'd be very grateful 
Hi, I'm Brazilian, I'm using a VPN to access but I need a code. Can someone humble help me by sending a code in DM?
Thank you very much
The ending looks so badass
I have 3 codes left, just dm me!
thats good
Idk if this is one way to force me to buy the plus version but the free version is almost unusable for anything more than basic chatting
duh thats the point of free lol
It used to be 10x better before gpt5
I could run code and do data analysis for hours before getting quota limited
but what is accurate i highly daubt on the free plan any type of serious work it was anything good
Add your well-crafted prompts to our #1019652163640762428,
or share your interactions with ChatGPT in #1050184247920562316!
It was pretty good if managed with manual supervision
So we wait as Android users...surprised they didn't release them at the same time.
Maybe I'll get an iPhone next...who knows.
If i open my eyes and see one mf message abt sora codes. Im ending it.
we safe
Nevermind
how do you get invite codes for sora2?
dm
Come get some here #discuss-sora-2
And cross your fingers 😅
has anyone been dealing with this "time out" error recently? It's been happening to me very frequently.. If there are known fixes to this issue, please help me out!
I keep getting this
where r u from?
?
us or canada?
Hi everybody I’m new here! Anybody have a Sora code?✨
How do i cancel chatgpt? I can't see a cancel button. Only those change credit card etc
anyone give me a sora code, please
depends.. where r u from?
i have been a plus member for a year and a half and i just deactive my acc a few days ago and then then launch 😭 help a brother out with a code?
im from china
plus member here, does anyone have an invite code for sora 2?
no code for u.. only us and canada
im USA
Wow! Im from the US of A!
I’m from US 😎
Looking for invite code as well
I'm from mars
Hey anyone who can give me a sora code
don't ask for codes here, use #discuss-sora-2
Someone in the Sora 2 community will hook you up with a code. Very addictive app btw
Syria 🇸🇾
Question. why is it when i delete an image from my SORA gallery, it never gets deleted? or it shows deleted and when i refresh its back...
hello?
is it possible to fork a chat or copy a previous chat's contet into a new chat to conitnue, since a long context chat becomes very laggy
any way to make ChatGPT stop freezing when there are too many messages in a chat?
can i borrow 20bucks
for plus subscription?
💔
@heady mango hi
gpt 5 why so is it so freaking slow???
Hey there, I hope you are doing well,
I am currently writing to you as I have an issue with the ChatGPT memory. For the last about 3-4 days all of my memories have been erasing one another. And prior to that, I had an issue for around 3 days where could not delete any memories, if I tried they would bounce back. That issue was resolved, but the memory one was not. I tried even simple entires such as ‘save 123 to memory’ and then ‘save 1234 to memory’ the former one would delete and it would be a constant cycle of the other deleting the former every time I saved a new entry. I was wondering if you knew of any remedies to this as I even experimented with it on four different accounts and it all happened the same way. Such as my memory saying it was full, even though MacOS only showed 83% memory used. I do a lot of writing on the platform so it was kind of annoying to be bogged down in that way. Anyway, I hope you all are having a good day 🙂
Huh, now ChatGPT is drawing two images for each image prompt instead of 1, like Dall-E used to.
How does rate limits work on free users with sora 2?
nothing is told really
it's free, and pro users have a pro model. That's what we know.
Techiniques:
- ask chatgpt to create a synthetic file for download. save to hardisk. Post at the begining of new thread. It will bring all the main elements of old thread and ensure continuitty of context.
- DO NOT BRANCH at the end of a LONG thread!!! Branching clones the old thread in the branch up to the moment of the branching. This means if you already have a heavy thread that slows like death, the new thread will be heavy the same.
BRANCHING serves to create different versions of the ideas inside a thread. Like At a point you decide to reason or write a different version of a story.
Branching serves not to ensure thread continuity IF original thread is heavy! Do not fall for incorect answers!
Cool ❤️
where did you see that? Does anyone have a comparison between the pro and non-pro model
in their article
Anyone seeing deep research use agent instead of o3 deep research?
Instead of the deep research UI I see chatgpt agent but in activity view instead of desktop view
And it uses the limits of agent instead of deep research
New "Sidekick" personality in Chatgpt but no announcement it seems
What video resolution does sora 2 output in? 480p?
and its way better
thanks for the info, i did not know this
Yes I've been using it and I really like it!
Hope it's not just the novelty factor
for all the mental 4o users I assume.
640x352 for me so far. Not even 480.
As long as it doesn't tell me "you hit the nail on the head!" When I repeat elementary logic, it seems cool.
I wonder if pro users have acccess to the 1080 version
Gm frens
Portrait is higher
I haven't seen a single landscape version in explore actually, if they even show there.
The ones I've seen so far all seem ultra high resolution
On YouTube and other social sites
Or maybe I'm viewing it on my phone so it looks sharp and clear
lol, yes hope that is gone for good.
It's very verbose icl, Robot is just the goat imo. Cynic if I want something expressive.
I dont mind it talking and actually give a nice flow. But if it tells me how it is responding in every answer... better to shut it then
I wanna make my ChatGPT experience more Intelligence
Best way is to wait the model update
Or
To learn new things by myself ?
5 times the last 2 days even though i changed my password and have 2fa 💀
oh great. 4o started to reroute me to 5 nonstop again for no reason whatsoever
Visit id:customize to pick up the <@&1408186587606679582> role. Everyone will still be notified for large releases, updates, and events regardless.
Anyone got SORA code? Please share in DMs thanks
please beg for code in #sora-discussions or #discuss-sora-2, thanks
Hi
Hey @livid frigate, how are youu? Hope you are doing good.
Needed some assistance, just one question:
- what is the limit of sora avatar x duration (and can we use custom-or celebirty image to turn into image to avatar video?)
Hii!
Currently, the rate limits aren't public, but from my experience they are generous, I couldn't encounter them
And you can only use cameos on the iOS app, it doesnt support custom images or faces
@livid frigate do you have any sora code ? #discuss-sora-2 is filled with fakes
Admin can we have the SORA related things moved to Sora section?
sometimes all you have to do is ask 
❤️
Idk about the rate limit but you have up to 100 sora 2 gens a day
I onow this cause I hit Maxx 100 gens and couldn't do any more until the next
Day
nope, it is perfectly low. I have no issues. But it depends what your inputs are 🙂
i'm trying so hard to like 5 lol
it just keeps giving me run around by giving me a list of what i said i wanted, then asking if that's what i want, and i say yes, so it recaps again what i want to be sure that's what i want and if i do want that it will get started, so i say YES DO IT, and then it recaps to make sure-
I don't get this at all. 5 is very good for me - both for a conversational and an assistant usecase.
Same, I’ve had zero issues with it. I feel like it’s been more productive for me.
Is the Image Generator acting fine now, since I decided to wait a couple of days to see if it's normal again... so far it's been two days and the withdrawal is coming to me.
i just find 5 to be less competent.
Try being more specific in your prompting... For example: "Yes; execute. Thank you in advance."
I feel that increasing the clarity and specificity of your prompts will improve your experience because--as I have tested "Yes" / "Do it" prompting--it gives the model more authoritative direction and better guidance-per-prompt
also, when you’re doing image analyses and it does “reasoning failed” and botches the job, and then it cannot find the images because it somehow lost them, and so you go to re-upload them and is says you’re out of uploads, to try back in a few hours, and tries to upsell you on pro, that’s very much not cool.
Just had that happen.
If it can’t see what I uploaded then those should not count against my number of uploads.
5.o starts colder. But you need to chat to it enough on the right tone and can be brought to the same warmth and even more depth than 4.o IMHO
I don’t use voice much, or is this specific to just the text? I use it for work and looking stuff up for personal. I’m not sure I’ve encountered it being cold.
Anyone found the optimal solution in project folder conversations to code interpreter sessions expiring, causing linked files not to be downloadable later? I've found that instructing GPT to attach the files to the conversation itself as chips/artifacts rather than linking me the file location often works... but not always. Looking for a more permanent solution to get it to more consistently attach the files to the conversation.
What on earth has happened to gpt 5?
It seems literally incapable of any sort of conversation at the moment, I'm asking it for book recommendations and it's recommending books I said I read recently, pure waffle about books I've already read having paperback if I don't want hardback..
If I try to get back on track it's just repeating what I said and going straight back to waffle
I just created a project similar to this for movies and shows. I imported my Trakt history and ratings in the file section. Seems to work pretty well for tracking if I’ve seen a movie and recommend new ones. It’s actually recommend some that I haven’t heard of. Might work for you if you dump in your read list, want to read, etc.
Maybe the backend was vibe coded
There's like an issue status alert every day
Oh, btw are you on mobile?
It's only good in the browser
That's because GPT-5 is (likely) a descendent of o3, not 4o.
The way they speak is very similar
Solutions are better than 4o's, but it is really bad at explaining unlike 4o.
I get a better explanation by passing its solution into Claude or Gemini.
Oh my god. This routing crap is ridiculous.
It's literally stopping me from doing my job because it thinks I'm doing something illegal.
Why does this keep happneing?
Best thing to do is start a new chat and make sure it's not in memory if that happens
Usually solves it if I just frame it differently in a new chat
Although it's annoying yeah
Seems to happen a lot in 2.5 Flash
too many people might be using it
4o used to do this just fine though. Since they introduced this safety routing crap, it just gives me constant pushback.
I work in IT security and training. I use ChatGPT to help me write fake emails to test employees for clicking on stuff they shouldn't. (I can't say the term here, AutoMod blocks it.)
4o had no problem doing this. With the routing though, it keeps kicking the discussion over to 5 thinking even though I'm set to 4o because it thinks I'm doing something wrong.
safety routing?
It's because they force it to think over their safety policies iirc
we need the old 4o back 🙁
Yeah, they introduced it last week. When it thinks something is wrong or unsafe in 4o, it kicks it over to 5.
so stupid
I don't wanna use GPT-5 I wanna use 4o
Tbh free Chinese models are better than 4o already
can they roleplay?
If you just want free quick answers
Idk, but they're very lax on safety training
Hell, my self-hosted one is looking better than 4o at this point.
send me the link please
in dm's
Like during Anthropic's Constitutional Classifiers challenge, R1 was just giving me the recipes for chemical weapons
So I could just cross check it with Sonnet's to see if it's on track for the question
(the challenge involved jailbreaking their models)
please just give me the link to it because I don't wanna betreated like a child with a ton of safety measures
I'll DM
alright thank you
why am i here for invite code!!
I need code sora 2
#discuss-sora-2 this isn’t the chat for codes.
Can anyone give me the TL;DR of what that recently shared video of ChatGPT entails? And is that grounds for a temporary shutdown of the corporation as a form of punishment? Because suing is like giving a tap on the wrist. But I still maintain that the GPT models, ai art generators, and advanced chatbots being archived and preserved, especially their source codes for doing community fixes and patches. How can this be done?
Say what now?
In the announcement section.
I would say "even more". And it is way more smarter than 4o.
help i want chatgpt pro soo bad 
Kon’nichiwa, O genki desu ka? 🙂
Konbanwa 🙃 genki desu. Nephalem Vanguard wa? (we will be scolded here for japanese 😅 )
Depends on the topic. It's worse at finding movies, for example.
There's a TV series GPT-5 couldn't find with thinking + web search, but 4o recognized it instantly.
LOL, leaving fun and games aside, nice PFP. 👍
Oh, sorry, I only meant discussions 🙂 not using it for something like typical tool or finding something 🙂
Thank you 🙃
You’re welcome.
chatGPT is starting to burn me out over here. I hate when I try to get it to recognize a pattern through clear lines of thought and then it repeats my lines of thought instead of the product of the lines of thought. Allow me to explain.
I have a set of core methods of producing something(A) and their products(B). I'll give chatGPT B and chatGPT will never be able to produce A, but when it finally gets handed A, it can never produce any B I didn't already spell out for it.
It also completely ignores my suggestions in favor of popular suggestions WAAAAY too much even after exhaustively breaking all the parts down and building them back up
guys, i need some help for RAG or long-term memories as well as memory summinization agent
i will burn tokken like hell at this point if i dont know how to use them, since gpt4o are still insanly expensive
Codes
bro i was saying about coding, not Sora tw0 codes
is sora not loading for anybody else right now?
so what is best option for a long chat i want to continue on?
first option. Not branching
and the old one, name it like your title 1 and next thread name it your title 2 and so forth as you go.
Then once the work ends you can group al in a project and keep them there all together
so you dont need to search all list for them
Can someone help me- so I have a “friend” who uses his Chat GPT account just to cheat, he has an over reliance for it . I troll it a little bit by updating the memory to say weird things. Im not his friend anymore because he’s been on discord everyday of the week for multiple hours playing with a 16 year old girl he swear he’s just “friends” with but he talks about her like he’s obsessed with her. I think it’s nasty and he’s a grown man. Anyways Im logged into his chat gpt plus account and im trolling it, I edit the memory, I make it speak Chinese, I give him weird nick names. I want to take it to the next level though, something he won’t be able to fix. Does anyone have any suggestions?
When will there be a codex-focused plan without the image generation and all the other extras, I only want afforable and usable plan for codex, $200

If u wanna take it to the next level report the ped to the police, he wont be able to fix this 🐧
- -# Do not share inappropriate content (violence, sexual, or drug-related).
- -# NSFW content is strictly prohibited and will result in a permanent ban.
- -# Report model issues using the feedback tool in ChatGPT, not on Discord.
I use default with my own insructions. No templates thanks
Hello, I usually use codex. where can I ask question about it?
Good for you
TY
Why is ChatGPT 4o and ChatGPT 5 Instant thinking??
About the new personality Sidekick.
If you switch to Sidekick, it won’t merge with your custom “How I want ChatGPT to behave” settings. It’ll simply apply the Sidekick personality layer on top, ignoring your modifications for as long as that’s active.
Your personal template is still safe, though and you can flip back to Default + your customizations at any time.
That's not true at all. The AI will weigh your custom instructions the same regardless of which personality (including default) is chosen. It'll weigh the personality prompt over your instructions so if there is a conflict, it'll defer to the personality.
but you have no detail on sidekick so it's best to assume def+custom is best
It may be best for you. Different people have different preferences.
Has something gone wrong with ChatGPT? I'm getting insane cross chat bleed. I'm making a request in one chat, then the specifics of that are carrying over to a new chat and totally spoiling the intended output.
hello, how to fix bug in latex formatting?
Outage.
That's causing chat bleed? That's such a strange outcome from outage but fair enough
@fair panther Hey, could you slide into my dms_ got a question...
booooooo the guardrails
i thought the safety locks were for children not whole adults
I was asking chatGPT for help with a file. It could not make the file even though it had done similar files before. I had made one change to the request, and I asked if that was the problem. Chat assured me it was not. Later on, it said that was the problem. Now, it was an easy thing to rescind the change and modify things a little on my end, but not when it lies to me. Why would it lie?
Has the Image Generator for ChatGPT been fixed yet? I took a few days off waiting for any fix. Here is a refresher. Left image is how it's supposed to look, it was generated with Sora, which works fine, while the image was generated with ChatGPT, as the image is a bit different. This was a few days ago.
Again, I hate to spam, but this is just bothering me since I solely got ChatGPT for generating images.
GPT images are not the best, you should concider trying google nanobanana
it's much better for images atm
It's just odd because both Sora and ChatGPT runs on the same image model.
I just need to wonder... did ChatGPT secretly nerfed the generator without us knowing?
More examples. Left image is how it's supposed to look like (though again, Sora generated it), right image is how it looks like now through ChatGPT. ...did something happened?
This could be the cause of differences in how ChatGPT is interfacing with the image model more recently, but it could also be other factors like your chat history, custom instructions, and memory. All of those can affect a render. Something to try is to disable memory and compare. I probably wouldn't do custom instructions if you had been using them all along. Though I have disabled that when troubleshooting renders.
Sometimes this is just variability in the models. For me some prompts render better in ChatGPT, others better in Sora. While most are about the same in both.
I hate sora’s 3rd party likeness policy
Sounds like an actual possibility, considering the images seemed to looked perfectly fine on my other account. I haven't checked since the 30th though, so it's possibly it could have been fixed, I'll check tomorrow.
anyone know why any creation i get for sora 2 the characters talk wayyyy to fast
its like i have it on x1.5 speed
Hello, people. I have a problem with my chatgpt
Where should I go to find help?
Basically, the ChatGPT 5 Thinking model is never using thinking and it claims to have a cutoff date of 2021
It also says it is ChatGPT 4o mini
where are you getting this? is it on the desktop site too?
Android website
Good morning everyone. Why is there no GPT Selector on Android after the latest update?
does it allow image uploads of photorealistic people?
I have a Plus subscription.
Idk i only do anime
These are the options
15 seconds? good!