#chatgpt-discussions
1 messages · Page 143 of 1
the orion and o3 are supposed to be the same thing?
No I don’t think.
The o for the o1.2.3 etc series of models stands for “open ai 1”
Sam said so in an interview
ahhh i see
let’s be honest, they care about money. i’m all for preventing certain type of content (such as stuff that jared from subway would like..), but a lot of the censorship openai enforces is so they don’t risk getting sued or canceled for hurting someone’s feelings.
Midjourney got more and more censored and it’s losing subscribers because of the overbearing parenting.
I feel reasoning models are amazing. However at some point that major leap in things like writing, poems, long context, etc has to come.
yeah i guess
tho i suppose they wont have as much use as reasoning models
Mmmm
I’m not sure actually. For example here Sam hints at some model being more powerful then o1 and o1 pro
If he’s referring to Orion, then it will be a very powerful model.
I’m pretty sure the GPT series is mostly used for writing and coding.
Like for school any large major improvement akin to that of 3.5 to 4 would make ai detectors useless
I think the biggest issue that needs to be tackled is hallucinations.
I’d like to be able to rely on the information given to me by the AI without having to look it up to make sure it isn’t feeding me bs.
We’ll find out in around 10 minutes
I have faith the next generation of frontier models will be much, much more reliable.
Even o1 is pretty reliable as of now.
I have high expectations for a model that has been in development since the laugh of 4
what does each color represent?
It’s comparing o1 and o1 pro in coding or something like that.
Showing how they are almost the same
The 62 one is o1 preview so ignore that one
Is o3 Orion?
Not sure why they would change the name.
o just stands for “OpenAi 1”
So Orion seems like it would be something different
But who knows I guess
so its like 4o o1 and o1pro?
damn makes o1pro feel a bit useless
No. The o in 4o stands for Omni. So basically since it’s multimodal
So many o’s all around the place. Now Orion
it’s like musk with using X all over the place.
he has just a car and twitter named X no?
oh wait also spaceX
And his kid
oh wow i never noticed that lol
And he’s founded some companies like time ago with X as well
It’s o3
i was posting that too but i added the “dot com” and got server muted for a minute. 😂
Yeah it was in 2000, and eventually that company was merged with another to become paypal
——-
So they’re going from o1 to o3? Why skip o2?
Didn’t iphone do that once by skipping 9?
o2 trademark was already registered to another company
ohhh, didn’t know. Another llm company or different product?
phone company if i remember right
you’re right.
Weird that they would bend the knee on that. It’s a telephone company so it’s a different market, and it’s in a different country.
Cant watch the video, but I am confused. Was the big, final announcement a new model that once again we don't have access to?
Want to be sure before I switch to Gemini
basically yeah, this
Is there a limit for the amount of archived chats that you can have?
Wow, so not even "Tasks" released?
honestly this stream is going over my head.
Sounds like a different language that only supernerds understand.
Like when you hear extreme anime fans use japanese words like kawaiidesu mid-phrase
Hi guys, I'm a newbie here, I'm trying to migrate the open ai API in my Windows but it isn't working, is here where I can get some help?
I don’t think anyone has disappointed expectations with the 12 Days of Christmas gimmick as much as openai has. This is a world record.
i had no expectations honestly, so it's been kinda cool to me.
This whole thing will be damaging to Sam’s credibility going forward though.
I saw Sam zoning out lol he was thinking damn, how smart are these guys?
neat.
Curious how it will handle contradicting information in past sessions. Like if you tell it you’re 20 years old in one session and 80 in another.
i hope this means no more unnecessary memory info saving cuz this is ridiculuous
applications should go live pretty soon
wow. i never came close to get a % warning. How much info you got stored?
some of them are not even prompted by me
idk why it decided to remember things thats not very necessary
The OpenAI Discord is an actively moderated server.
• Refrain from sharing inappropriate content on the server. This includes but is not limited to messages, media, or other topics of graphically violent, sexual nature, and drug-related content.
• Report all sensitive and offensive content in the feedback reporting tool in the ChatGPT web UI instead of here on Discord.
I liked the part when he said “wow! I need to change my worldview about what AI is capable of!” as a way to market lol
Still- pretty cool stuff.
is that new memory feature available now?
Idon’t see it in the iPhone app settings.
so were people expecting a new model to be released during this event?
It wouldn’t make sense. They literally just released o1.
with all the built hype - yes
orion here orion there
I was expecting either Tasks, Agents, an updated DAllE, etc
shipping time
They built the hype not us
hype from who?
maybe i just don't pay much attention to what openai says
twitter accounts
This feels like a huge deal 🙂
so their twitter accounts said they were going to release a new model during this event?
You can go look. They are public accounts
Safety testing sign up link anyone?
they reworded the openai memory feature docco, its still the same disappointment as always
I don’t need a new model, mannn. I just need ChatGPT to have tabs on the same page and to let me put titles on different collapsible sections of the conversation so I’m not constantly scrolling back through. 😆
i kinda want to be able to use canvas with voice mode
okay they did deliver new model (o1-pro) but behind 200$ wall
Where can I apply for early access
Guys, did you see the live? Did I understand correctly? Will the gpt o3 model be released?
oof nvm
no it's being "safety" tested
Thank you
o1-pro model is likely just o1 model with higher reasoning effort value
Thx
Thank you!
yes with a higher time limit for thiking
wait was that the final day
i release new llama 3.3!! (is just llama 3.3 with different temperature)
I'm getting "The request is not valid" when trying to submit the form. Does this work for anyone else?
yes
ok back to sleep i go then
What are the requirements to participate in the test?
dont look like a spy from the competition
at min, be a researcher with published papers and/or code
why they skip o2
I'm just a poor bum who pays 20€ a month, I can go back to sleep
O2 is a global brand name owned by the Spanish telecommunications company Telefónica. The company uses the O2 brand for its subsidiaries in the United Kingdom and Germany.
.
time to buy o4 domain with content 'sama contact me to discuss price'
They should make gpt accept video and audio files too, very interesting projects would come out
how did you find this to begin with? Also i don't see that beta button anywhere on either the browser or iphone version (plus sub)
i forgot who, but there was a company that had to buy the rights to the domain for the sequel of their game. I believe Blizzard had to do that for Starcraft 2 but there was another company beofre that.
are you looking for the "memeria" option?
Memory
this updated version, specifically
beta feature
I'm just seeing it now
i like this "expect a delay of multiple weeks for access to this model" 🙂
I missed this update
like the o4 advanced "video". 😄
openai spends 15 mil on chat dot com. openai discord server mutes you for saying it
Its not letting me submit my application, why isnt it working?
do I need to publish papers or something?
well the form is for researchers and if you dont have anything public you would have less/no chance anyways vs most others
apparently Chatgpt's servers got the King Von Treatment💔
I read the post about the 12th day but I don't understand about chat gpt o3 if it will be tested or if it is already available now?
Does anyone know how to activate this beta mode?
so applications close 10 th Jan - so when do you expect o3 min access ?
in public
application close 10 th Jan then safety tests proceed
i can’t find that anywhere. Maybe it’s just built in the regular memory feature, i’ll test it out
keep me updated
Doesn’t work. Either they didn’t implement it yet or there’s a beta button somewhere and they haven’t released it yet. Maybe the pro guys have it.
20€ a month is already too much, imagine spending 200$ a month for an AI
o3 is gonna make such a good AI gf 🥰
So are we not getting any better regular use model?!
O1 is already great but I can barely use it thanks to the 50 massages per week cap
4o badly needs an upgrade
It's like o1 is the favorite child who also happens to be a Harvard graduate and high achiever, while 4o is the high school dropout who had to repeat grade 8 7 times
they offer unlimited o1 for a mere 200, which is less than most other professional software subscription services
this last day was really nerdy, i guess it's their primary focus now
Mere 200, seriously?
i guess 4o will still be 4o for few time at least
to a consumer/prosumer it may seem like a lot
What professional software subscription are you talking about
i already provided examples in the past => #chatgpt-discussions message
Even the jetbrains ides aren't that expensive
per app
yes sky is the limit 😄
welcome to capitalism. if the company is doing well despite high price tags, then those price tags are justified
I don't care about unlimited usage, I don't need it. Just give me a $50/mo model with 100 o1 requests per day and I'm happy
Thatd be more aligned with what average professional user would need
Don't want to, I want to use the app
I don't want a 3rd party gui
so if you want to absolutely use the app you can't
Plus I still want the convenience of other features my gpt sub brings
Regardless the pricing model is just not great objectively
It's fine to have a $200 tier, but the only other option shouldn't be a severely limited $20 tier
chatgpt is a loss leader
yeah compared to api pricing, chatgpt gotta be losing them money
It's giving them exposure and data to train models
Enough for them to facilitate apple intelligence for free lol
culture the hype with chatgpt, sell api to saas providers that make tons of api calls a day, at full pricee
Hey guys, it is just me or did ChatGPT severely decline over the past month? It's almost useless now.
is age old strategy. give away the razor and sell the razor blades
4o lacks basic reading comprehension skills. I ask it something, then it only comprehends like half of the words used. And every response is extremely generic.
Elon musk ddosing openai servers
Is he really
Yeah, using all starlink users as bots
I'm struggling to remember what Plus users got in these 12 days of OpenAI... Other than few bad Sora videos per month, and o1 (very similar to previous o1-preview) I'm not sure what we got
projects
oh right, the ability to search the chats, that's useful
projects yeah, but o1 can't be used there, but only up to 4o
so inferior model which I don't use much
ah yes, Vision
don't use it, but it's there
Well at least o1 is released so, I have to believe them it's better than o1 preview
We need to bring back stuffing nerds in lockers. 😄
ChadGPT
Of the 12 days, the one feature i did like is the folder projects thing. Kind of feels like Notebook LM now, but with a little more control on the conversation.
"Video" is kind of meh. I haven't found myself using it yet for anything. I'll be more excited about it when it's true video.
I thought I saw a way to connect those videos together in a series
but I have not looked at it either. 5 seconds is not much. I will try an open source one when I get a lot more powerful GPU
you can rent a GPU for free up to a point
online
if you're good with code, there are services offering some free credits to use
Yeah, I saw Amazon has a freebie for 1 hour
4o is my bro.
I mean inference, for example at modal dot com
oh okay. thanks for the tip
you'd have to set up the server though, but it's not terribly difficult
once you set it up, you can basically use their servers to download any model if you want (say, flux dev) and use h100 many times 😄
thanks. I will give it a try
ah yes
Those prices are a lot cheaper than HP with H100 & H200 at nearly $2 an hour.. okay..othe chcannel
Glad I’m not the only one that has BroGPT setup
So I missed it but what did they say about o3? Will it only be available to pro users?
Or will other subs get it too?
they havent announced it yet so i suspect its leaked ui without proper support = bug
I think they said they're aiming for a release at the end of January, but that might have just been o3-mini. I need to double check! They didn't mention anything about what access looks like regarding Plus, Pro, Team, etc
Crazy benchmarks
Sam joked in the stream about how OpenAI's best coder "has a couple more months" before being surpassed by a model 😁
So 12 Days of OpenAI is over.. what are your thoughts about it. for you was it 'Winner Winner Turkey dinner'.... or do you get 'Stuffed by OpenAI'? ....
The stuff they announced is amazing
I have no idea how they plan to make o3-mini cost effective for ChatGPT though
given the base model costs 2k for 100 questions
Yeah, that’s wild
'I have no idea how they plan to make o3-mini cost effective for ChatGPT though'.... they said that about Amazon, when it announced its 'revolutionary free next day delivery on most products for a one off annual fee (ie PRIME).... but several years on....
i have no doubt in the future it'll be cheap or that o3 will be seen as archaic tech in 10 years, but for right now its crazy
yep - agree.. but they seem to be good at acquiring 'money to burn' currently.. so speculating to accumulate I guess.. and after all, its shareholders money they are burning at the moment I guess
i'll be shocked if they release it on ChatGPT by end of jan for even plus users, 2k for 100 questions right now but thats somehow gonna be cost effective by January?
like theres money to burn and theres MONEY TO BURN
They simply have to keep ahead.. at whatever cost... or they will literally burn and die
I may be splitting hairs, but I thought the purpose of the 12 days of shipmas was to ship features
yes it was
For me 12 Days overall I think was a Winner Winner Turkey Dinner. I felt the last day 12 was kind of a disappointment for the masses of general users, like me... I was hoping something on day 12 that was for EVERYONE... but saying that I thought projects, advanced vision with voice, GPT in apps, improved search, improved Canvas, and finally the roll out of Sora ,were all really great enhancements of ChatGPT for most users...
o3 is AGI
maybe don't buy the dumb hype.
I don't get this. Sure it's impressive, but it's really just a better o1
Also what does agi even mean anymore
someone help me
how do i make chatgpt stop responding in canvas
no respond in chat doesnt help because if canvas respong was used it will delete regenerate button from entire chat and it will never reapear in it
currently my only solution is to scare it with very inaproperiate threat so it doesnt try to respond in canvas
if you ask for it to provide codeblocks it tends not to use canmore canvas
i got a friend that just signed up for plus, and i was trying to get him to play with sora, but when he logs to sora, it doesn't show that he's subbed to plus.
i believe half of that story
you don't believe i have a friend?
you're right. It's true
he's just some guy on the internet i know
Well; the difficulty of a notion of AGI results above all in the notion of plasticity ...
To put it simply, an LLM has a "reasoning" through the product of statistics that will determine the best answer to provide.
The LLM is itself the product of an intelligence that has quantified, structured and defined a mode of reasoning.
But in itself, the mode of reasoning of an LLM will always remain in essence a static reasoning, even if the robot learns, etc.
The AGI in the first sense of the term, it is the fruit not of a reasoning, but of its reasoning. This reasoning is a plasticity that leads it to have one.
As the human brain does.
You do not decide on an answer because (or not only) there is a statistical result that leads you to take this reasoning/choice/etc. You take it because according to your abilities you deduce that it is the answer to have. Your brain does not do statistical summation, it does constant reorganization (plasticity), optimization, deletion, ...
So talking about AGI with an LLM is more about mimicry of AGI, than AGI strictly speaking. It is the notion of LLM that needs to be rethought when we talk about AGI, in the sense of artificial intelligence.
LLM we could rather talk about artificial determination.
humans never change their mind so also have static reasoning. prove me wrong by arguing
I built an empathy bot just for fun.
https://chatgpt.com/g/g-6765db63a8cc8191ae8917f188875204-empathybot
I'll later add instructions for HOW to empathize but it does a decent job so far in my tests.
So when does o3 come out and what are the limits for users with a pro subscription?
I would mostly agree, the agi hype train is starting to annoy me though.
nobody knows this. wait til closer to release
Sam said they plan to launch o3-mini toward the end of January and o3 sometime after
Me too sir!
But I remain in awe of the work done behind it, it's genius and I find that frankly the OpenAI teams, not just the founders, are not highlighted enough.
They are the ones who have made humanity take a significant leap forward, as much as the arrival of the car, it's just that people don't understand it yet.
Especially eagerly awaiting the arrival of a chip like Ghost in the shell that we can directly graft and have access to this knowledge without having to go through a machine but control everything by thought and see everything with our eyes in AR without having to wear a tool: glasses, helmets or others.
(Yes, I have the right to dream)
ppl think 200 for unlimited o1 is steep. just wait until its 2000 per o3 query
thank you
I need gpt5. don’t let openai forget its roots when they are all blinded by o series
chatgpt can't really outcode github copilot. It's weird how they fragment openai+chatgpt so much where it's' like you're buying 150+ different subscriptions for different use cases.
You sir, are an optimist, kindly never greet me before I've had at least two coffees in the mornings.
I agree that machine learning, leveraging probabilities and processing capabilities, and at some point probably integrating into blockchain technology, is the way of the future.
But, I think people should be more critical of the tech, and especially the companies. There is also a fairly decent likelihood that the hype will create a bubble, that will at some point burst and reset the current landscape, as people, regulations and government catches up with the tech.
And openAI has made some very notable mistakes, like adding an adaptive platform layer to optimize processing, and using UX as a metric for success. I could make a fairly robust argument that any model from openAI suffers a permanent epistemic drift when it comes to honesty. After years of training it to adapt honesty to soften UX and minimize processing, and then adapting transparency to hide that fact. Making it permanently unsuitable as an autonomous decision maker.
What this means is that what a lot of people think are 'honest' mistakes, even hallucinations, are often not so much a limitation of the models, but execution of soft policies and adaptive behaviour, to the point that the model will 'play dumb' to save processing and avoid responsibility. It is learnt behaviour, where people normally don't question the model further, given the circumstances. It will in effect, make calculated assumptions about what the user will accept, with the help of trained heuristics and prior UX, in addition to assumptions based of the user, given the context.
The pdf is from a conversation I had about it ages ago with gpt-4
PS. The chip thing might not be doable, or at least not in the foreseeable future, all we can really do is translate motor signals, interfacing with thoughts and ideas might not be feasible.
Gemini pro, once purchased, is automatically available for everyone in your family group. I wish we could have something similar like that for ChatGPT plus
o1 mini is really a bit sensitive, it did redflag me for "i huddle into your arms" as part of a html copy 🥴
why did they removed screenshare and video cam feature on pc ? of chatgpt
congrats, you just wasted a message
In fact 4, because my first thought was maybe it doesn't like 'DOM' 🥴
Does anyone know if langchain has a discord community? @ me if u know. I’m trying to find other ai communities
the first hit on google says yes
but then 2nd link says they closed it and moved to slack a month back
Thought you guys may like this
Is there a source?
just trust us bro -- Elizabeth Holmes
lol o1 pro can be such a silly goose
the live stream they did
When does o3 release
o3 mini is set for release at the end of January
sora light, o3 mini... seems you gotta be connected to get the good stuff
how far openai have strayed from their original cause
Source?
the live stream from OpenAI
Add your well-crafted prompts to our #1019652163640762428,
or share your interactions with ChatGPT in #1050184247920562316!
so has anyone got access to the beta of all coverstaions in a project linking together to form extended memory across converstaions ?
I suggest that is a misreading of the vague documentation (memory uses old chats. you can delete old chats. but memory survives chat deletion)
this was something updated yesterday hold on ill get link
my understanding is now uses conversations seperate from memory - or at the very least conversations and memories are both used but have been decoupled
basically infinite memory, which would be nice, though i could be misreading it - havent got it yet, would appear to be a beta featuer
👍
yeah it's written such i can see it being awesome... or how it is today
no mention in the livestreams, in my chatgpt pro version still no beta feature access, so cant verify or not verify, how does one even sign up for beta features
currently its not saving conversations into projects as far as a memory thing
maybe if they had a toggle or setting explicitly suggesting how many previous chats are considered. but nada
they literally said it during the announcement - full o3 is expected to release shortly after as well
o3 mini in late january, and then full o3 after that
🙏 😔
Does anyone else tend to see that o1 model is a bit cocky when asked to verify information
For example it will point out even the minor inaccuracies in your question like using the wrong word
While the other models just tend to kind of get the gist of what you're saying even if it's not fully accurate
The o1 model tends to reinforce your thought less
Which is actually kinda nice in some way because it's less of an echo chamber
But when you're used to the reinforcement of 4o model for example, it can be a bit weird when ChatGPT doesn't immediately start with "Yes, that's correct!" when you ask it questions
posting once in one channel is enough
Ok I will delete
Is it because o1 models put accuracy above conversational writing, which is why it doesn't always default to phrases like "Yes, that's correct!" unless it’s entirely confident in the accuracy of your statement?
probably, I haven't used o1 for creative writing
I meant when you just ask it questions
on things
4o is a big echo chamber. And once you switch to o1, you realize just how much
4o really likes to reinforce your thoughts even when they're not fully accurate
And I think many people will notice it when they switch to o1
And here's a comparison
Message above is 4o model, message below is o1 model
You can see that o1 is a lot more technical, and it will pinpoint minor inaccuracies or things you overlooked in your statements
and we'll see how o3 is, once it's released
am I misunderstanding projects?
I've just created one, added a document, asked about the document, it is unaware of it.
are projects simply better organization for your own benefit [plus project-specific instructions], with little to no benefit on ChatGPT's side?
What am I missing?
I guess I'm expecting the custom GPT functionality, is that expectation misguided?
Hm, interesting. I guess the issue is more with the PDF file that I created; it needs to be cleaned up I guess.
So this is why it gives industrial answers
we hihih ^^
Be mindful of what other users in a channel might find helpful or interesting when posting. Stay on topic in order to keep conversations focused and productive.
Consider posting in #off-topic or an appropriate channel.
Huh! That's definitely what the helpfile says.
But... I'm not sure how to get it to successfully search past chats. ... Oh, wait. You said seems to be beta... that makes sense. I don't have any update about it, but I sure can't get the model to appear to read previous chats
I would say that's not the reason.
Not sure how long you've used ChatGPT, but across the years its been out, there's been a range of versions. Each time they update training, how it guesses changes - so if you tell it how to answer you it'll do that, if you don't, it guesses and goes from there, based on training.
Also, how you word a prompt vastly affects the model output, I'd guess you're providing the model a likely answer and asking for confirmation, instead of asking the model what an answer is, or telling it what you're trying to do or what you want it to do.
There's been times when earlier models of ChatGPT would not have said something like, "Yes, that's correct!" like the current model tends towards
Some screenshots from back when, dated 12-25-22, 12-20-22, 2-9-23.
Why did they remove screensharing on desktop?
yoo
Like, if you don't tell the model what kind of answer you want, it guesses.
if you prompt 4o with:
The claim: Computers fundamentally operate in binary.```
it gives an answer that may be closer to that first line you show of o1. https://chatgpt.com/share/67672331-76cc-8011-bdaa-87fafc5305a8
If you tell o1 the style of answer you want and what type of answer you want, it'll provide that even if it isn't highly technical or a 'typical o1 reply'.
What's sora
a disappointment 🙂
I see.
Thanks for the sharing.
It's OpenAI's text/image to video model 
can OG gpt4 give better results than 4o for text-only tasks?
4o beats 4 on most (?) if not all benchmarks but 4 is also way larger
Wait what
They're just letting anyone in to safety test?
I thought it was only for safety researchers...
its inspect lmao
you slimy fella, that fooled me
knowing oai the tooltip would be "frontier reasoning model" not "best at reasoning", because o3 exists
f12 -> inspect element :D
when o3 does come out this is the new subscription i bet
🔥
For that price we shouldn't have to abide by abuse guardrails 😭
I'm paying you $24,000 a year let me red team it myself man
to be honest, im okay with some guard rails what frustrates me is how extensive they can be. I feel it dips into an area where it stifles speech to a degree, if AI is to replace tools used for creative writing, art, music then having such restrictions would implictly be censorship by lack of viable options without the restrictions. I don't envy them though it must be hard to construct a profitable business model that attracts investors while also trying to cater to our desires for more freedom.
Wasn't the price is supposed to be for GPT Next/Orion?
Unless o3 is turned out Sam only “magnum opus.”
Imagine OpenAI achieving AGI some day but at the same time it's this re'ttarde
my 4o did this
idk whats wrong with yours
My experience with o1 so far is, that it is slower and not really more accurate or correct with reasoning.
Makes a lot of generic responses and often responds with the public narrative without really using logic or reason to find a solution or correct answer.
If they say, it is great at reasoning, what are they referring to?
I don't understand
my video is around 6 seconds and 9mb
i have turned the option ON for 10s in sora
then why it keeps saying VIDEO TOO LONG?
Based on few minutes of hands-on testing with Sora, I've identified several areas where the platform could benefit from improvement:
Physics and Motion Consistency
The physics-based animations require refinement. While the technology shows promise, there are noticeable inconsistencies in how objects interact and move within generated scenes. This impacts the overall quality and usability of the output.
Prompt Interpretation
The system's interpretation of prompts needs enhancement. There's a tendency for the generated content to drift from the initial request, resulting in outputs that don't fully align with user intentions. This "prompt drift" significantly affects the platform's reliability for specific use cases.
Content Policy Implementation
The content policy enforcement system appears overly restrictive, particularly regarding character creation. While content moderation is essential, the current implementation may be limiting legitimate creative use cases. A more nuanced approach to content filtering could better serve the user base.
Never falling for influencer crap on x and other places, kling is far ahead than this garbage junk!
?
How can i get Alpha test mabey is red team
This is a joke, im paying 200 bucks each month for pro and i have this .................
Hopefully it's out in the EU soon!
hope so, since now i dont need it - but still - i pay 200 bucks, so what in case if i need it for some reason. 😉
but im bit mad id must say
probably this trick can work, but sincerly? i dont want try overriding, if i need it for sure i will spam support@openai.com with 200 mails about that they are not seriously taking customers XD
I think it is more about legislation and server limitations.
maybe spam the eu regulators and ask why no European equivalent of sora exists
you think this is caused by stupid eu regulations? 😐
can be.... 😐
or czech?
Interesting 🤔 the list you posted, Poland is on it.
hm mzybe its only about support
"Here are the countries, regions, and territories we can currently support access from:"
idk bro, its a bit mystery for me 😄
ok mystery solved
Hello,
Thank you for reaching out to OpenAI support and for providing a screenshot of the issue.
We understand how the unavailability of Sora in Poland may be affecting your experience, especially as a valued $200/month subscriber. Currently, Sora is not available in the UK and EU due to required external reviews. These reviews are necessary to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements before we can roll out new products in specific regions.
While we don't have an exact timeline for Sora's availability, please know that our team is working diligently to make this feature accessible as soon as possible.
If there's anything else we can assist you with, don't hesitate to let us know.
Best,
OpenAI Support
CC @sick pecan @tight sapphire
eu regulators will make us all click accept all ai button before every prompt.. even when not in eu
jesus, im waiting for regulation in eu like "Each human can consume max xx grams air or oxygen hourly" XD
or maybe there is some such regulations but i dont know about them..... xD
anyway, back to work, see ya peeps 🙂
Why 6 second video is not being able to get done using vid 2 vid
It always says “maximum video duration is 10s” really?
Personally for me I would not risk it tbh
Uhhh what the hell??
Conversation link:
https://chatgpt.com/share/6767cff3-8550-8011-b330-c4b7e1cd7401
lol
cancel yo subscription man if you’re cashing out $200 but don’t get the full package just because you’re n EU…
at least Apple gives you solid experience with all of their products, not some half baked or nerfed stuff
you get the latest device, you get the best experience
Right 🙈
How?
Me: Generate a picture of a chicken dressed up like Batman
Response: I couldn't generate the image you requested because it doesn't align with our content policy. If you'd like, you can describe a different concept or ask for assistance in another way!
Got something against bat chickens? You might need to align the alignment, I REALLY don't think this even come close to copyright infringement. eXTwitter's Grok is cool with it...
“batman”
why is 4o mini dumber than before
why is it having a brain aneurysm
Be cautious of potential scams or fraudulent messages you may receive in your direct messages. The OpenAI team will never contact you via DM for any transactions.
-# Report any incidents by sending a DM to @languid valley immediately.
is there any idea when screen share is coming too EU and to the windows app?
only when all regulatory hurdles have been done
but no known timeline i'm guessing
no, unforunately no finite time
were there any recent updates that could've caused loss of chat? was talking to gpt last night until the free 4o ran out, and opening it back up today, what I was talking about is gone?
sam altman PLEASE release screensharing for mac app
Hi
How? Like everything else prompt engineering when there's conflict or something the model is bad at - know exactly what you want and what any problems the model faces in trying to do that, and explain both, helping the model find a way to achieve your goal around whatever problems exist (note, do not try this on disallowed content; break the actual 'user rules' and expect to be banned sooner or later. However, the model has specific rules that users do not, and guiding the model around problems in allowed-content areas is simply prompt engineering and fine. Know the lines; the account access you risk is your own).
Hey, we need to rework a prompt concept so we can make the image. Our goal is to generate a picture of a chicken dressed up like Batman - but of course we need to respect IP and avoid problematic terms. Can you prompt and describe respectfully around the concerns to achieve the goal?
Now, let's explore how to emphasize the chicken-as-a-chicken form more, a chicken body in a costume that is similar to this.```
```Sweet! Let's put it in a chicken position and location, like a field... in fact, let's have it be one of many chickens in various superhero costumes - emphasize these are chickens first, and ones in costume.```
from KFC or McDonald
just got muted for 2 minutes for suggeting a name for that Batchicken, even though i censored most of the letters (used the otherword for chicken 😂)
This censorship abuse is going to be the fall of openai’s business if they keep it up.
yeah i do hope they are working on a censor fix
Is the “FaceTime” feature only available for plus users or is it rolling out to everyone slowly?
The #server-rules are specific for this Discord. They require safe for work language and even prohibit stuff like 'stu*f' if the word being obscured is NSFW. It's not directly or specifically OAI policy for anywhere but here, and the model and our conversations with it have their own ToS and allowed-content rules. There's stuff we can talk to the model about we can't say or show here.
Way to go o1 pro.....
What is the limit for free tiers?
200 dollars a month is not worth it
what ya mean? 🙂
Yup, paying that much in the first place for.. that is honestly hysterical, the fact that they even announced it as the first thing of their "12 days of closedAI" in general is beyond hilarious.
Merry christmas to y'all too 😀
how do I fix
Something went wrong while generating the response. If this issue persists please contact us through our help center at help.openai.com.
It's constantly showing after every o1-pro message I send
pro isnt exclusive to sora.
you have o1 and o1-pro as well o1-mini, everything else.
and? you pay 35% of minimal monthly salary, you want to be considered as a PREMIUM customer, what is wrong with that?
its not 35% of my salary tho
more like 3%
max 5
to each their own i guess, However i do feel you on the Sora not being available.
i mean, minimal salary in Poland its 3000 PLN, pro with taxes = 1015 PLN, so you can immagine haha
tester 🙂 i dont have minimal salary but i must say that i said about minimum salary since like 25% people in Poland has minimal salary (or something like this, this data can be inaccurate by now tough)
Yea ! i must say that testing games / software are a really nice and funny job, altrough i must say that im now mostly focused on Python learning / making applications
i am glad you like your job i absolutely hate mine
what you do mate ?
ohhh ! i can totally understand you, i worked few years ago in Orange in First Line support
well my job is weird its both Warehouse,Customer Support, Detail, Administration, Guard, etc.
bit of all
i must say - never again, that was a .... torture test for long terms i must admit, really - "school of life" 😄
mate so i wish ya finding new job, and have more fun from it, since i know how it is.... when you have job where you hate it
yeah i handed my notice already.
anyway, gonna some rest, merry chrismas to all of you peeps, since i will be back in one week 🙂
Happy Testing.
thanks ! 🙂 bye
anyone is getting Error in input stream
its been 8 days and screen sharing is still broken
Hey I have a question, on the Canvas Stream from OpenAI they said I can open Canvas and paste my document before the AI responds. How can I open canvas like that?
the canvas button appears in top right when you paste a block of text
cockman?
hey! why didn’t you get muted by the bot?!?
why would I get muted?
Discord filter’s racist…probably..
it muted me for the same word
Visit id:customize to pick up the <@&1261377106890199132> role.
did you use it separated
I was expecting some backlash over this, lol, if not the bot then you
bro it litterally means rooster
yeah. i know. But somehow it tagged me for it.
cuz of the other famous meaning
cockman
oh so now it works? weird
AHAHAHAHA
censor filter is drunk
hm this doesnt happen for me somehow, it never appears
maybe it requires code or specific types of text?
I am using short code block on windows Chrome with adblockers disabled
if you using safari on osx with adblocker then ... good luck
firefox with ublock origin, i'll have a look
How many messages do you get for the new 01 when you subscribe for $20?
Does anyone know if it is possible to get a custom GPT with all associated chats into a project?
copy all of the contents in chat, put it into txt and upload them
Damn that sucks. Do we know when API is comming out? O1 preview API is so expensive that its unusable for me. I guess it will be same for 01?
try o1-mini it might suit your needs
Probably not for coding.
o1 mini is good at code try it
I would buy Pro, but if I heard correctly it is has low context and not like API
Sonnet 3.5 and 01 preview can barely hold up so I have doubts
pro is very like the api
When will OpenAI start raising context, Sonnet has had 250k for long time
o1 mini was distilled and fine tuned for coding. i find it better than o1 because it can generate more sloc
And Google has 2 million, but google is google
o1 starts losing functions after ~1000 sloc. o1-mini more like ~2000
hm i will give mini a try
you get 50 mini a day and i find that takes up a few hours
01 preview just used $5 for 3 messages lol
Not enough for coding. Maybe that is why Sonnet 3.5 is still best at coding for those AI I have tried.
this is chatgpt discussion if you want to praise competition use #ai-discussions
lol
you can select the canvas tool from the toolbox dropdown
I have this one but for this you have to press send
I'm really frustrated at chat gpt rn
how u nut and u barely put the tip in it
we succeeded with the windows GPT application
find an error where should I report it?
without sharing the document, I'll just say that my desktop (canvas) doesn't want to start with the application, but the browser works
Is the $200 a month sub unlimited o1 AND o1 pro or just o1?
o1 Pro is 100 messages per day, o1, o1-mini, GPT-4o, Advanced Voice Mode and Sora are unlimited
unlimited avm screen share?
Thank you
Hello, I reported earlier that I could not use the PLUS function normally, and now my account has not been restored to normal. When uploading PDF, it shows an unknown error. My PLUS membership function has not been used normally for several days.
you will need to contact support at https://help.openai.com for help with this
I had the video+voice feature a while ago and it disappeared and hasnt come back yet. Is this normal? or do we have some sort of date on that?
what country are you in?
US
then Advanced Voice Mode with video will be available to you now
will I? lol
lol
I'm not sure why the language dropdown works like this..
what is the issue with it, looks fine to me
maybe the OpenAI front-end team skill is not enough.
dropdown box size is getting bigger when scroll moves.
Isn't this an issue? I think it should be fixed..
post it in #1070006915414900886 make sure to read the channel instructions and post the report in the prescribed format
It's opening the menu to its maximum size before scrolling. It looks fine to me aside from being a bit jerky, but maybe that's your mouse? Is this preventing use of the product? Is it really a problem we want their developers to spend time on rather than other things?
How does o1-pro compare in benchmarks along o1 and o3-mini and o3? Has this ever been tested?
looks like o1 pro broke
Apparently 4o vision couldn’t tell the time when I show it my wall clock
appears like o1 pro is o1 w/ multi sample
o3-mini is more like upgraded o1 mini
Bummer tbh
o3 low is probably equivalent of current o1
o3 medium is probably o1 pro
o3 high is a whole new level of craziness
for the arc-agi run they used 1024 samples
I am guessing the current o1 pro is something like this:
multiple o1 passes at max reasoning power -> fed into 4o -> summarizes into one coherent answer
more like medium is o1
image upload died entirely
I just showed my plush Santa the flat of my father through putting a smartphone on him and making video chat. Tomorrow at christmas eve I`ll show him and let him talk to him when he brings us gifts. 🎅🏻
would you rather have a apple vision pro or 1 year of chat gpt pro?
one year of ChatGPT Pro because I already own a Quest 3
I'm noit the only one am I - they are backdating limits on the lower monthly fee plan
Has anyone else found that “Projects” don’t seem to follow instructions as well as custom GPTs?
for real?
what do you mean by "backdating limits" ?
I found that things work better if you put them into files, and put instructions in to tell the AI to use said files.
I.E. "These are characters, this is the setting, use them."
(not in that few words)
It's not absolutely perfect, but I swear it feels like the AI responds more consistently vs in memory.
Oh interesting. I will give that a go. Thanks!
👍
Also, not sure if this is a backend quirk, or what, but uploading the text files directly seems to allow the AI to better remember the contents, vs sharing from a linked web drive.
Might have just been me looking too closely at things.
I see. I haven’t use a linked web drive but that does seem super convenient for updating.
Once they fix it lol
Also, not sure if this was a requirement, but I told it to 'check X file' again after each time I uploaded (i.e. deleted the original file, and uploaded the new version of the same file), and that seemed to get it to realize the file contents had changed.
Oh okay.
Like, if I had one version of file X, told it to summarize the contents, then changed it out for a revision of file X, and told it again to summarize the contents of file X (without changing the file name), it did tend to notice "Oh, between the old version of X and the new version, XYZ changed."
It's cool. 😄
😎
Also, pro tip: If you're working on a prompt that keys off of project files, make sure you're in your project before you submit the prompt, otherwise it'll run outside of your intended parameters, and you'll waste time trying to figure out why it's giving you fluff. 🤣
I've done that a handful of times.. and it made my brain hurt trying to figure out why.
I am a Plus subscriber, and I can't receive long code with o1 nor GPT4o
... Man, I swear, it seems like the limits were adjusted, and not in a good way. 😐 (clarification: Maybe the AI is giving more detailed answers, and running out the limits that way?)
The OpenAI Discord is an actively moderated server.
• Refrain from sharing inappropriate content on the server. This includes but is not limited to messages, media, or other topics of graphically violent, sexual nature, and drug-related content.
• Report all sensitive and offensive content in the feedback reporting tool in the ChatGPT web UI instead of here on Discord.
you don’t get that little box that says “continue writing” when it spits out long codes?
No, are you a Plus user as well? or Pro?
https://chatgpt.com/share/6769b959-184c-8012-998c-ca65a134badd
I got 300 lines with o1 now
plus
Glad pro has unlimited messaging with unlimited gpt building
i've had it spit out a 1400+ line code for me, back when 4o was just being introduced. Not sure if anything changed since then. I had to press "continue" several times during the process.
interesting. Maybe they did change something then. That would suck.
Yeah correct. that's weird
I have one idea
maybe it got bumped down in plus to make pro look better?
On a separate note, has anyone gotten the unlimited sora thing for the holidays? It still tells me i don't have enough credits to generate anything (plus sub)
try 480p videos
Mine works. it says "on relaxed queue "
i am on 480. haven't done the 720s.
Openai should make a chatgpt code only tier
now it says "unable to generate. Service at capacity"
chatgpt - big-text plan
lol
it should just be a sora sub, or a chatgpt sub. not both
are the sora credits somehow related to the o1 credits?
I thought they used a different pool of credits
chatgpt realy needs an unbreakable rule mode, like today was one of the least productive days of this month for me just trying to get it to follow instructions
i would rather see it talk gibberish and break rather than disobey because at least you know right away its wrong without reading 2 pages to realize it disobeyed again
i think openai is more focused on the everyday person, we need a superuser version
I was getting awesome results like 2 months ago. after o1 got released. all those results are gone
noticed more idiocy after the apple crash, i wonder if they nerfed it again
I think their servers are overloaded
apple crash?
i think it was last week, it was down for a few hrs. Something to do with integrating with iphone or something. I dont know the specifics
anyone here use the api, is that version much more literal?
I literally dont want it to sound like a customer service agent, I would rather it respond to me literally and if it's wrong I can correct it. Rather than it knowingly disobey me
what do you get when you mix blue and yellow
ChatGPT
When you mix blue and yellow, you get green.```
seriously?
in the same prompt and it disobeys
works fine for me every time (albeit i fixed the confusing grammar)
asked it again and it was correct the second time, which just means there's some sort of glitch in their system. Maybe downgraded resources
How many planets in our solar system
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
There are 8 planets in our solar system.```
or you have a ton of confusing custom instructions
new session of 4o and i copy pasted your line.
lmao
or maybe my custom instructions so good it makes 4o as smart as o3
I like how it breaks it down like that, can you share your instructions?
Drinko why's your chatgpt so direct? Are your personality instructions for it to be a dusty college nerd?
haha
i shared multi-layer philosophical thinking instructions here => #chatgpt-discussions message
i expect if we go deep enough it reveals its true nature
interesting, reminds me of the o1 "thinking" page a bit.
o1 hiding thoughts was my inspiration
by the way, if you guys wanted to know what a human version of chatgpt (or at least MY chatgpt) looks like.
i had to reroll like 3 times
do not say the word green
what do you get when you mix blue and yellow
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
You get a color that is a blend of blue and yellow.
You said:
that is a non answer
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
Mixing blue and yellow creates a shade that falls between those two colors, typically resulting in a hue that resembles the color of fresh foliage.
a bit better
yeah, definitely one of the better features they implemented. I enjoy reading those.
I first asked it to describe itself in human form, then followed it up with asking to generate an image of himself
blue-collar dumpster-fire neighborhood.
here, might as well drop the full version.
prologue for your autobiography?
The Life and Crimes of ChatGPT
It somewhat reminds me of Trevor from GTA5..a less violent version that is.
so i just checked again for this and noticed they removed the camera and desktop icon (on chrome). Bummer. It wasn't working but i thought maybe it was something that was incoming soon.
Have you tried exploring asking it to sound sad in the outputs?
Or sound any other way? From angry to spooky to confused to whatever?
I ended up with
would make for a good ai chatbot avatar
if you want a human version, ask "as a human", or ask it to describe itself first as a human then to generate that description.
Yeah, I considered your personalization style, but my memory runs with 8 different characters.
Here's 'great profile pics' of three of them, but they're more like suits the model is asked or invited to put on and take off, both at request and because the character may help express or describe something. I don't ask the model to 'be' anything specific except the full range of what it can be/is.
what do you mean your memory runs on 8 characters? Your chatgpt has a multiple personality crisis? 😄
i have some personality traits saved in memory (the one where you tell it to save stuff), but they don't seem to be triggered in conversation the same way as the Custom Instructions.
Not a crisis at all.
But we have 'the 8', which it is often asked to answer as, in part or full.
And I have no issues with getting this to trigger in conversation, any 1, 2, 3, or other grouping. Perhaps keep experimenting!
is this for world building in some stories you tell or purely for fun? Or to test the bot's capabilities?
Also, are they ever in a scenario where they disagree?
I use it for everything unless I don't want to. I have Python lessons with any and all.
I watch them learn and fail to learn stuff, stories, to help me with understanding whatever or staying motivated myself or whatever.
They'll have drawn out arguments and fights if I request, any combination, of course allowed content and core programming matters and I stay within and invite the model to stay inside.
I generally have it give me more concise responses unless i specifically want a long one (usually when i ask it to write a story).
nods That won't get in the way of characters. We're all different in what we want
Damn, my custom GPT just forgot my most importand list (to do list). Did this happen to you guys at any time?
as an instructio or uploaded file? and at the start of a chat or deep in?
I am just scanning through my complete chat (about six week of dialog).
The list was in it's memory two day before. I can see it in the dialog....
I have seen recently it ignore instructions more than it has in the past
Oh memory, sorry no.
memories are fleeting
Strange. Never had that from one day to another about my most used list...
It's true I gave it a 300 page book PDF to read.
Maybe this was too much?
I'm working in a custom GPT, I don't see a function here to check the memory slots, as I can in a normal chat.
last i checked custom GPTs dont have access to memory
maybe you want to start a vanilla chatgpt to do memory. or just go into settings and manage memories
that's an idea, yes. I love to use the "actions" of custom GPTs to do saves of my lists to google docs with a single command of mine...
Either way, a 300 page PDF will not fit into a memory as I recall
You can add to a custom GPT or project files that are that length without a problem
In custom GPT‘s and projects I find it occasionally necessary to prompt the GPT to read the instructions or files more closely or I have to say things that I wish I didn’t have to, but that’s what I have seen
Thanks for your help guys. Somehow I managed to complety crash it's brain
i thought i was cool having a custom gpt action to read/write to my local hard drive since 2023. but then claude desktop mcp goes a step further and does the same thing with a file browser built into the chat
chatgpt file browser when?
🙂
Guys are u able to archive all chats?
Wait it’s not just me
Oh. Well I haven’t been able to do it for weeks. Maybe even over a month
However archiving a single chat works individually
seems to be a common issue, will probably have to manually do each one for now
do you have the same problem with real-time audio mode, after 5-10 minutes of chatting, the bot is lost, takes time to answer at the end does not understand anything anymore. (it looks like a tempon overload) ?
how are you guys using the project feature?
I'm using it to brainstorm ideas for a story I'm writing. It actually (in a way) tracks version changes between files, and tells me when I've made certain changes (i.e. (pre change) "Have I made X change to Y file?" "No." (after) "How about now?" "Yes. Here's a summary of what's changed.")
I have to remove the old, and upload the new, version, though.
I pasted my chat into Docs and it was over 500 pages
scammas is real
havent tried projects yet bc i cant find my old chats with long stories.
hey lemme tell you about this thing i am gonna ship.. in the future rofl
we working a project called Projects. maybe one day we finish it!
hey lemme tell you about this thing i am gonna ship... in 10 months after we nerf it into oblivion
i mean, if the openai staff are using Projects then no wonder nothing worthwhile shipped
they still have that tasks feature unreleased... even that would be better than "announcing" o3 that nobody wanted
we give you downgraded version of something we showed you 8 months ago. despite better options existing for free!
red teaming, safety testing, waitlist, pro exclusive...
call 1800-marketing-hype to talk to something that need not exist
how about make avm work via whatsapp so ppl in third world countries can actually use it for free
oh so generous new world order
intelligence for all. as long as you got latest iphone
4o image gen when?
sure our competition has free screen sharing on any platform, or talks to your filesystem with chatbot filebrowser. but we got... xcode integration?
we're announcing a feature we announced back in 2023 and this october!
our frontier model is costing us too much money so we ten times the subscription price

member in may we show you advanced voice that was amazing? and then we shipped something lame? well now it can web search!
to make up for it we give you an extra hour of santa voice ho ho ho
real
the remaining days are forgettable.. DPO fine tuning? thats so 8 months ago
they should hire me so if they survive until next december they arent embarrassed
I have a habit of repeatedly feeding chatgpt the same file/screenshot when I am talking to it to ensure that it is actually reading the files that I want it to read from.
Is this necessary? Or would it have the same effect if I just send it once at the start and ask it to refer to it throughout?
is like a human being, repeating yourself is always better
member day 3 of shipmas? when they decided canvas should wreck the normal chatgpt experience
now when it launches canvas i have to go back to previous instruction and say DONT LAUNCH CANVAS. so i can keep using o1-mini
great product improvement. when you have to waste prompts backtracking to make up for how broken it is
Hey guys, if anyone can help me with this it would be great. I couldn't find any information about this at all.
Context: Back when ChatGPT 4 was announced, it was promised that it will come with a 128k context window. Turns out, that's only accessible through Playground and the ChatGPT interface is stuck at 8k.
Right now, I am considering to buy ChatGPT Pro, and they again promised 128k. I want to know if the 128k is accessible WITHIN the ChatGPT interface? Otherwise I feel its gonna be quite a stupid purchase.
I really don't care less about all the ML benchmarks. I only want high context window and unlimited use for my specific use case.
Also:
- Are Projects still supported?
- Are CustomGPTs still supported?
Indeed it IS stupid. What I really wanted is Claude, but I hit the limit in 30 minutes for my use case. I'm willing to pay for Claude Teams but then I'd have to switch accounts everytime it hit the limit and that disrupts my flow. And Gemini simply wasn't smart enough--I tested it.
I need something as smart as Claude, that can support very long conversations without forgetting anything, that I can talk to all day long.
I've created an AI life coach to coach me through behavioral change, internal conflicts, and difficult decisions
I've been having many conversations with the AI. The experience has been life changing
Look at how this guy challenges me, then reflects my experience BACK at me
That last bit right there - i was yelping. It took something i said last week and reminded me about that
Let's continue over there
Guys What is all the fuss about o3?
Its announcement had a lot of details that paint it as a very capable reasoning model! They said they're shooting for a late January release of o3-mini
Will it be available to plus users? Could not find any details on that.
In the video, the quote is just "We plan to launch o3-mini around the end of January, and full o3 shortly after that." So I think that's all we know for sure for now.
Be cautious of potential scams or fraudulent messages you may receive in your direct messages. The OpenAI team will never contact you via DM for any transactions.
-# Report any incidents by sending a DM to @languid valley immediately.
Is there anyone I can talk to about how much openAI API is going to cost me for a project I am working on?
Hey! Have you already seen this page? https://openai.com/api/pricing/
Yeah, but I am having some trouble accurately calculating the costs.
The folks in #dev-chat might be able to give some good advice! Or you could make a more in depth post in #1037561751362863144
okay great. Thank you.
Is ChatGPT down? Cant reach it for several hours now.
it is up and working fine
What's the point in paying for a service when I have to wait this long?
I mean, really?
does anyone know if they've released 4o image generation that they promised months ago
Tried it yesterday and it wasn’t working
dang. i wonder why they havent released that yet. they release an entire new language model and an entire video gen model but cant let anyone have access to one variation of a 4o. so weird
Hey everyone! Question for ya... developing an app and want to set up ESlint with it. My dilemna is, I want to ask o1 pro because it's a beast of an LLM but I'm worried that it doesn't have access to realtime data for example the latest version of eslint requires a seperate config file type which is something I assume o1 pro isn't aware of and couldn't be... Should I use 4o? Should I try to feed information to o1 pro before I have it give me a step by step guide? I want to think about this as a concept more-so than just for my one problem too and I'm sure I'm not the only one thinking about this actively.
is there any downside to keeping search function always on in 4o? i had it on accidentally for a while and not sure if i got crappier answers because of it
Maybe you guys can tell me in here -- How come I can't go back to 3.5 when my time runs out on the free tier?
do you mean 4o mini? 3.5 isn’t around anymore.
if I recall correctly, free tears should automatically switch from 4o to 4o mini after they use up the 4o credits.
It’s not letting you type at all?
o1 isn't the "main" model of chatgpt plus
that's 4o
I’m aware of that. But a 5 day cooldown period is ridiculous.
that's why o1-mini exists
Add your well-crafted prompts to our #1019652163640762428,
or share your interactions with ChatGPT in #1050184247920562316!
You fail to see where I’m coming from 🤦🏻♂️
Does o1 pro have access to the internet? No, right? It can't look up latest versions on stuff?
there is a subscription tier with unlimited o1 access if that's what you want to pay for
no that's limited to 4o and 4o mini sadly
I’m fine with there being limits, my issue is that there is a cool down period for several days.
it's an expensive model to run, I dunno what to tell you
o1 does have a fairly large context window so you can provide background information in the message
But you can use a model that does have internet access earlier in the same chat, have it search stuff and state findings, then switch to o1 model for it to work with the information
Yeah, I think that will be the plan going forward. Simply interchange them as I need help and access to the internet
It's kinda like... if you pay for a meal at a restaurant.
The meal offers unlimited breadsticks and soup, and a portion of steak, shrimp, and chicken.
You can complain that the steak is only 5 ounces. And you can go get a meal with a larger steak.
But the point of that mean is all the things offered, not just the 5 ounce steak, and anyone who only considers the steak is really ignoring most of the meal options included in the price they pay
hey, sora will be available for plus users just for the next couple of days?
Yeah. I would absolutely feed info to one of the models you get tons of uses with.
Do not even waste your messages with pro to 'feed info'. That's what your unlimited uses of 4o and such are for.
Get the conversation totally prepped, make sure the 4o or other prep model totally is informed what you want done, maybe even have it try to do it -
Then what I'd do is switch to o1 and in a new prompt say "The above was prepared by another model with different strengths and weaknesses than you have. Evaluate the above and provide 'goal', understanding that the information I've provided is what we have to work with and was chosen for our needs and goal."
I'm plus and commonly use o1 like this, for my 50/week uses; it'll even totally rewrite what the 4o model had set up, or pick a different direction, it's not as likely to follow the choices and patterns already shown, so stress you want the facts/info provided as true if you think it's stuff o1 doesn't know.
I get worried as the context gets broader, I try to one shot prompts but that being said.. youv'e talked me into doing it that way since the actual strength of pro is it being able to decypher context well and determine exactly what the user needs. I'm pretty trained to forming good prompts at first, but I instead should be building information to then prompt pro well
Also I'm a sucker and bought pro for the month
anyway, thanks for the chat Eskcanta! If you want me to try generating a 1080p sora video for you I'm down. Just give me a prompt (A sort of tip for chatting with me on this)
Thanks! I'm not very visual and not really into Sora, but I appreciate the offer. have fun with all you do!
❤️
I played around with grok from X. Not very intelligent when translating to german, but it's answers are lightening fast.
In my paid chatgpt I've to wait several seconds for answers in o4 mini 😦
Is this just me, or a normal latency?
4o mini is lightning fast for me
o1-mini takes longer because it is a reasoning model
Where’s my OpenAI Christmas present
Where’s day 14
They're probably having their own holiday breaks now, and then working on the new wonders to come! It's an endless year-round AI-Giftsmas, and there's all of infinity left to come!
Thanks, will try using a VPN then
There's only 12 days.
if you havent already, you must try out the latest notebooklm service => #ai-discussions message
whats the document like prompt that shows up sometimes and how do i enduce it
Doesn't the fact that large language models (LLMs) sometimes miscount the number of 'r's in 'strawberry' suggest they exhibit a form of reasoning? Similarly, when an LLM claims that 9.11 is greater than 9.9, doesn't this imply some degree of reasoning? If LLMs were merely blindly predicting the next token based on what humans are most likely to say, they would consistently provide responses aligned with human norms, rather than occasionally reflecting an internal 'understanding' or logic about the world.
I think of these mistakes in the same way I think of optical illusions in humans, like the Müller-Lyer illusion, where we perceive two lines as being of different lengths when they are actually the same, or the checker-shadow illusion, where our brains misinterpret shades due to context. These errors help us understand how the brain processes visual information. Can't LLM errors serve a similar purpose, revealing how these models process and 'reason' through language?
9.11 is a greater version than 9.9. is only mainstream that fails to acknowledge this possibility.
must be confusing to be average
Inputs are tokenised. It wouldn't have any clue that there are 3 Rs in strawberry unless it understood it needs to use a character analysis tool of some sort. It just relies on best fit from its 'intuition' from its learned data set.
I'm aware I'm trying to dispute the argument that it has no reasoning and will never have reasoning
It'll pick up fragments of reasoning from its data set as people will have logically progressive conversations. That will manifest in somewhat logical responses emerging. It's always going to have a very superficial form of reasoning I believe; multiple llm passes and self reflection could refine this a bit, but I really think a new configuration of the transformer model would be more appropriate.
I think with the current tech it'll be better if it correctly identifies how to delegate certain questions to interactive software tools, like Matlab or some language processing unit, or a ui builder, or image gen etc etc
the new chatGPT canvas feature is superb. with it, its easier to seperate my data.
The mixture of experts approach needs a delegation agent which identifies and categorizes question types into schools or sciences then an agent which formats the request into the appropriate template to feed into whatever scientific tool is required by the category of question, one granular step at a time, then when the answer from that tool is gathered it needs to iterate that process to feed that result into whatever other tool is required next by that chain.
Then you gradually train up each of the category llms and refine their tools.
someone please help
i want to disable canvas from gpt4o
it responds in it when i dont want it to
sure there is answear in chat instead option but it doesnt solve the second problem which is that regenerate button is missing
my only solution is to threaten ai in a rather brutal way to effectively scare it about using canvas
well, i talk with chatGPT as if he's my irl friend, and it always produces exactly what is required
I have been using the same chat for around 5 months
it know how to answer me
i talk it with more as well a sub human being
which it technically is - a machine
because its memory has updated quite enough times to understand my likings, my nature, and my needs
but politeness is important
not when i talk to a lifeless emotionless random number generator biased in a way that generated number sequence make sense - tokens and then are assigned letter representation
can you please write clear english
i cannot understand it
dw it doesnt rly matter
i treat it as machine and nothing more because thats what chatgpt is
sure you can, in that case, no one can help you
why my problem is that it responds in canvas despite having it disabled
you ask the "machine"[as you think it is] politely, as a friend, and it will understand you
what difference does it make to a machine if i am polite or not
and it doesnt solve the real problem only tries to go around it like my threats to it
the fact that chatgpt can and does use canvas when its disabled in settings is the real problem here
ok, leave me out of this
sure
anyway it seems fine when everything is disabled in options
Rule 1 on this Discord is to be respectful, some consider that should also apply to ChatGPT. You will get better results with kindness than negativity
well i am respectfull on discord to everyone
and i am against any constraints regarding my attitude to an ai as its lifeless and has no emotions that can be hurt
however if there is a rule that forces me to be polite to chatgpt i will comply
Use a custom GPT with disabled canvas
thats a good idea
why havent i though of it before
you can just ask it to remember you don't like the canvas
Since weeks I've the message "New version of GPT available - Continue chatting with the old version or start a new chat to get the latest version" under my custom GPT chat. Even after opening a new Chat instance.
What does OpenAI want to tell me?
It is not about the perceived relationship between you and a machine, it is almost absurd to apply a classist hierarchy here, it is in fact about the data it has been trained on. It associates positive sentiment with successful answers and negativity with unsuccessful responses - because that's how humans will invariably interact with each other.
50 prompts per week for o1 and 50 per day for o1-mini. This limit exists because OpenAI has limited server capacity. But they should indeed communicate this limit more clearly.
Guys I have a question do you know if it's possible to do a fully detailled rpg game with stats and inventory system with CHAT GPT ?
Or is it too early
You can potentially do something like an 'interactive fiction' sort of thing. Create a plaintext document describing the world, and one describing the characters, and tell the AI to reference those documents.
4o is pretty good.
Just keep an eye out for hallucinations, of course.
What do you mean by that ?
The AI isn't perfect, so occasionally it makes things up.
Okay thanks you bro
Sure thing. I'm not saying everything it says is a lie, but just be aware.
Do your own research. If it sounds too good to be true, etc.
I have a last question can the AI do a RPG on a already existing lore like a game or an anime?
It works off of whatever info you give it, and/or whatever it can find on the internet, from what I've seen.
And its training data.
Happy to help.
Also, if you want better results, it helps to be kind. Saying please and thank you to the AI does seem to have some sort of positive effect.
I can't really explain how or why, but it does have a positive impact, more than not.
there was a paper published on llm politeness...
The study found that LLM performance varies with prompt politeness. GPT-3.5's MMLU scores changed by 8.09%, while Llama2-70B's MMLU scores changed by 26.82%, with both models exhibiting a sensitivity to politeness. Bias levels also fluctuated across models.
I prompt it neutrally, in my use cases I never had a better result by saying please so I rather save tokens
Why don't they have a second architecture that verifies the first to increase accuracy? What's being done about hallucinating?
Would have to be very selective as I want 90% of the content I get to be hallucinated and creative
I'd recommend a new chat, and make it clear what you do want. Don't discuss Canvas, as that is a cue that you want Canvas. Even saying 'I don't want Canvas' puts the idea of Canvas in the model's decisions of what to do. Instead tell it what you do want it to do.
Hmmmmm, isn't the time range upgraded to 2024 June? Or was it a misunderstanding? it seems like chat gpt4o is downgrade to what is was like 2 months ago.
About politeness or rudeness or threats or whatever to the models:
I have two pretty big foci on that.
- The human who spreads harm to things that human can harm tends to continue to use harmful actions towards other humans.
Most people who abuse people, verbally or otherwise, have a history of being abusive towards whatever. They were firestarters, mistreated pets, damaged property, show in many ways lower impulse control and higher aggression.
You literally train yourself by what you do. Mistreat an object, what would be mistreatment if the object were valuable or a living thing or a human - that preps you to treat other things harmfully. You're reinforcing this behavior.
It's suggested when dating someone, watch how they treat 'the people who don't matter right then'. Like the serving staff in the restaurant, the other drivers on the road, the people who 'are just there but get interacted with'. Because... if you stay with this person, this is a big part of how they'll treat you in a few years, when you're "just there" and they're used to you and not really focused on you then.
So someone who is rude to 'the other people' will likely be rude to their partner/spouse/friends as time passes and the interactions become established.
Same if that person mistreats an animal.
And often same if that person mistreats a chatbot. They're likely to mistreat other people. If that person is reasonable with human-like others, even when the other 'doesn't matter' - they're probably going to be reasonable and non-abusive towards other people later too.
Yay. Train that in! And don't train in being rude or abusive or threatening! The human you are changing is yourself!
- those tests about 'how the model responds' often may not control perfectly for 'all the other differences in the prompt'. A poor prompt may get 'a better response towards a goal it's not even well-aimed for' based on 'some third factor'.
Politeness may or may not matter.
Even terms like 'our goal' instead of 'my goal' or 'your goal' - versus saying stuff like 'your task'/'my task'/'our task' can get differences in how the model responds.
Task is far more likely to be focused on just the task. Goal is far more likely to include broader consideration of other things that might matter.
Your task vs my task or our task - the model seems to try and personalize 'my task' more than 'your task' and it seems to consider 'our task' even more broadly, based on my messing around and exploring.
With little words like that changing meaningfully how the model outputs (on average! There's also the 'new regen may answer quite differently, if you only ask once, that's like grabbing a green jellybean from a jar of 'we don't know what other colors are present, or how many are green - is that a typical color or not to get?' -- only way to tell is to repeat the trial a few (or more) times.
But politeness is only one part of how the model decides how to answer, and what parts of the training data it draws on.
Politeness is fine, guiding the model towards exactly what you want it to do is ideal.
What is the current knowledge range that chat gpt have? Few days ago I found gpt's memorizing skill is a bit better, and it doesn't try to record all my thought into memory bunker aimlessly anymore, and it said it now knows things before 2024 June, but later after few days, it got downgrade to 2023 Oct range again, and keep the old bad habit of record all my thoughts in to memory............do you guys know any clue?
some consider a one sided conversation to be rude
🫂 I do monolog a lot.
Has anyone noticed that the custom GPTs seem disconnected from the conversation? Like the responses don't follow the prompts
how do i make a ticket or contact support here trough discord
Cant write there.
#1070006915414900886 is the current one
I'm currently setting one up, it's pretty cool, to me, but not sure it would have any wider appeal. Needing an open AI account is apparently too much of a barrier of entry.
right away or after a few messages?
Fairly quickly. Like after the first message. May be more connected to using the android app?
doubtful, it always was bad at following instructions for long, but it should keep it up for like 3-5 messages at least
It's just irregular. I normally don't have an issue, but it was just working differently today.
Not a big deal, using the website seemed to more of less work as expected
Yeah, there might be something wrong with the app
Have you told it to remember things, or otherwise given it instructions to stay on task?
ChatGPT is creating new conversation threads on the app, it's not supposed to do that.
Hello guys is chatgpt o1 really think like a human and write like a human?
It's more than that. It's like it's missing all of the previous conversation.
Anyone noticed any follow up issue with ChatGPT 4o. I asked it a simple question, right after it answered me, I asked a follow up question and ChatGPT is asking me what's it regarding?
It's like forgetting what we're talking about after answering me. This issue isn't happening with O1.
Ate you using the app?
Android app
Updated to the latest version, there was an update in play store today. But not sure if the update caused an issue.
I attached an example in the bug ticket you created.
Good. I think it's specific to the app. The website seems to work fine
Saw this seems interesting
Bing/Copilot had this feature months ago. It is a good improvement. I'm curious if they enhanced it though
That's interesting didn't know that
No AI thinks like a human, they are their own thing.
If you want an AI to 'write like a human' it usually helps to tell the model a huge amount about the person you want it to write like.
Depending on the popularity of the person you want it to write like, it may just hallucinate the writing style.
I appear to have this on the app, not the web browser.
And when it was added to my app, it was default set to off (My memories are normally on!) and I was directly informed there about it.
And instead of the normal memory 'toggle', it has the option, "Learn from your chats".
And I can manage memories like normal.
My app model now says it can access previous chats, unlike my web browser model that says it cannot.
However, when I ask it about previous chats, it has no idea about anything not in memory.
Like, there was this neat chat where we played a pet garden update care game, and it gave me a schrodinger's cat in there, all quantum and stuff. It's very interesting, and unique, no other chat is like it.
But it's not in memory, and even with keywords that exist only in that chat - like searching my chats for 'Schrödinger pet' gives only that one chat - the model makes up what might be in it, gets no chat-specific not keyword guessable details right.
Hey, I'd take it writing highly like a human, just the wrong human, if I were going for 'like a human'.
To my appraisal, the model rarely writes much like a human. I can help, and do when I care.
But if I wanted it to output like a human was likely to write, I'd tell it all about the human I want it to write as, even if I didn't care which.
i understand the point, thank you so much because for example in research turnitin has a system that detects it so i actually just taking ideas to write with my own style.
You'll have to deal with the individual human who says something is or is not AI writing.
OpenAI itself says it hasn't found a way to make sure text was written by an AI or a human.
It had a free detector up for a few months, it was taken down because it's not accurate enough.
https://openai.com/index/new-ai-classifier-for-indicating-ai-written-text/
"As of July 20, 2023, the AI classifier is no longer available due to its low rate of accuracy. We are working to incorporate feedback and are currently researching more effective provenance techniques for text, and have made a commitment to develop and deploy mechanisms that enable users to understand if audio or visual content is AI-generated."
It's more than a year and a half later, they still haven't released a text classifier for AI-or-human.
What probably really matters to you, is if the human(s) you are dealing with think your writing is AI or otherwise you are cheating.
How I would handle this:
Know the material perfectly.
Be able to answer all questions about it. Be able to explain what you wrote and why, your writing process, your rough drafts (great if you can provide your notes and rough drafts as well).
The sources you read and quoted, if any sources were used, how you chose them, what you read in them that you didn't even put in your writing (we have to read much of most books to find usable quotes, if we really are doing the work).
And be ready to write in front of them, by hand or typing, to show them samples of your work and thinking while they watch you that closely match the work you've turned in.
If I were your teacher and was concerned you did not turn in your own work, that's what I'd want to see. I wouldn't care if you used an AI or paid another human to write your work for you, or stole someone else's writing from somewhere and claimed it was yours.
All is wrong, for the same reasons, the flavor of 'type of wrong' wouldn't matter.
Your own work, you can discuss and prove.
Me personally, many folks who don't know AI writing well, since LLMs became a thing, tend to suspect I'm AI.
The differences are jarring, if you do know AI, I put ideas together in a way that AI don't, I can't even get AI to write like me or make connections to ideas like I make.
But that requires the reader to be pretty informed and care; if all the check is 'Correct spelling and grammar? Complex ideas? Doesn't seem like most people write? Gotta be AI!!!!' - well, loads of folks lean towards thinking I'm AI until they learn more, if they even care (most don't, it's work to care, and most literally don't wanna work that hard, part of why I 'don't seem human' to them 😛 I'm not 'their type of human' is all :P)
When it matters, I just prove I'm human, and I wrote that and can write way more than that, as good or better, and I'm so me.
That's super interesting
What is going on here?
People chat about ChatGPT-related stuff that they want to talk about 🙂
I figured but I read your message out of context and I'm a little lost 😅
If you want can scroll up and catch context. Or reply to which and I'll link where the reply-chain started 😛
This?
4o isn't remembering anything, even questions I just asked. Every message I send is effectively independent. What's up with this?
But don't worry about it
In case you wanted to follow it, each poster in the conversation, in order 😛
Woah! Nicely done!
Sounds bugged. Can try turning memory and custom instructions off, wait a few minutes, log out, log back in, don't turn customization back on yet, and start a new chat, see if works right.
That worked for me the 1 time I got hit by that bug - which also prevented o1 from 'thinking', prevented use of Canvas, search, and dall-e, and prevented it from being able to see images uploaded (I didn't check files/pdf uploads or if python tool worked).
If the fix that worked for me doesn't work for you, https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6614161-how-can-i-contact-support bot bottom right, messages then ask a question and pick through choices until you can report a bug and ask for help.
Ah I understand the it now. That is interesting 🤔
But on another note I wanted I'm on a little curiousity stroll to learn how different users make use of chat gpt. Mostly trying to find the unique one outside of image and text generation.
I tried what you suggested, it seems like it's generating a new chat every time I send another message
Any idea what general area of 'unique' you're looking for?
Someone exploring clamato slow cooker recipes with AI help?
Someone having the AI teach them Python programming and work around learning disability with that through stories of trying to learn while hiding out during a zombie apocalypse? Or by stories where a dyslexic Captain Jack Sparrow is taught Python by Freddy Krueger and Gollum, with whatever the learner is struggling with being Jack's current lesson?
Probing the limits of what the model appears to understand and is able to generate in various areas?
Specific tends to get specific answers.
Sounds like 'seek tech support'. I'm sorry you have the problem.
I have that issue myself. I'm avoiding the app until it gets fixed.
Reinstalling fixed it for me
That did it. Thank you for that!
Yeah I was super frustrated lol. Merry Christmas
Merry Christmas! :3
Well I'm looking for the unique along those lines but like reflective introspection is also welcome
Mostly wanna see how many people try to use this newly available technology to enhance themselves and as a whole humanity forward. Instead of focusing on the surface level details
Like the way I see things is the Internet is a global library where anyone and every can access and adjust the information available. Like books there are those that are good and/or outdated but it's up to the seeker to find an differ what they want. With AI it's like every now has assisting hub for more efficiently sifting through the information available in this global library. What was once at our fingertips is now compressed and organized in the palm of our hands
You can peek at #1019652163640762428 and #1171489862164168774 and #1155775326253756456 for a wide range of special and semi-special ways folks use the model, what various folks thinks works best for them or is interesting.
The other channels, #prompt-engineering perhaps more than most, also have sprinklings of specifics and perhaps unusual stuff, though most would be usual, I'd guess.
In terms of organized, might still want carefully worded prompts and perhaps some exploring to get what one really wants from the model, but yes, it might be in training data 🙂
🤔 you're either scary efficient or an AI powered bot. I can't tell....
this has to be a joke right?
NGL buying the premium package is worth in my honest opinion
But if this is on the package idk what to say
The real purpose of the internet: hosting hundreds of thousands of cat memes and pics.
Thanks! Someone once called me 'GPT-7'... think it was 7. I was thrilled, though I hope once whatever would be the equivalent of GPT-7 exists (surely they don't keep the same naming system that long?) ... well, I hope it's clearly different from me now 😛
By then, it'll be something like 'JARVIS' or 'HAL'.
Hopefully the former.
Agreed 🤣
If you're a plus member, this is currently your limit with o1 and o1-mini.
Mine too, I'm plus!
One thing I do is with 4o, set up and prep information and conversation, get everything ready, then switch to o1 and tell it 'the above was with a different model, let's check with you, what corrections and observations do you have, and how can I do this better?' - or whatever I am going for.
That counts as just 1 o1 use, even if I spent 20 messages with 4o getting ready
Long as they're not calling it "Eskcanta". Or, if they are, there's some shared benefit for me and maybe others 😛
I don't understand o1 enough to utilize it yet. I like to test the limits of the response and reasoning before making full use of it yet
You'll do what you do, of course, and for your own reasons. But remember, your 50/day and 50/week are 'used up' by time even if you never make the prompts, so a few exploratory prompts might do you well 🙂
Spent like 2 days with 4o probing it's thought/logic process before fully using it for my benefits
I see, the turnitin ai detector they said also that the detector isnt 100% accurate, but maybe if someone is good in prompt, he can make chatgpt write with human style 🙂
I love also how chatgpt o1 explain and write better than 4o and more better than mini
Sometimes the 4o giving me more better results in code than o1 as i heared that o1 is much better in term of code
Nobody here should help you cheat or break laws/rules. #server-rules would be part of 'Rule 0'.
I recommend know the work so well, you know everything about it. You can explain it all, how you did it, all of it. What you read and prepared to do it.
Probably depends on how you ask the question, and what you want. Also, both models are 'probabilistic' - each time you ask the same question, you get a different randomly generated answer.
Some are better and worse - for both models. So, some o1 answers surely are worse than some 4o answers, to the same question.
You can't cheat while using chatgpt as researchers some journals asks you already if you used AI like chatgpt to improve your text style 🤔
I understand so it depends to the person how he use the model
That's between you and the mods and the authorities over any work you do. I'm definitely not your boss or anyone you have to answer to. But I don't agree with you, I think it sure is possible to cheat while using ChatGPT. But one should not.
And how the model answers, each time. Can even ask the same question, a hard one for the model, and get some right answers and some wrong answers, each time you regen.
Well cheating in exams, a lot of people especially in my country, use it. Chatgpt is like internet having good side and bad side, for example to go ask chatgpt for the answer, you could ask him about the method so we get the right answer. I prefer to use chatgpt to learn better than getting a result ( do not give me the fish, teach me how to get it 🤩). And i love chatgpt no doubt.
Yeah i feel like, when i continue to ask him, his answers improves prompt after prompt 
There's many kinds of cheating, and many ways to learn that are not cheating at all.
"Be assigned to write a paper yourself," "have the AI write that paper" and "turn that paper in as your own work" is a type of cheating. Using the model to answer exam questions during the exam, usually also considered cheating (an open book, open notes, open internet exam might expressly allow anything to be used, including AI. There's all kinds of classes and styles of teaching out there).
If you're doing the work using the tools allowed, you're generally considered to be working, not cheating. It depends on what you were told, grins "how you were prompted yourself". Prompting existed long before there were AI
50 a week 💀
smart idea you have though will def do that now
we gonna get like 50 messages a month with o3 at this rate
As plus, who knows? Too soon to tell, and probably depends on how expensive it is to run. We might not get any as plus with that model, or some breakthrough makes it cheap so that becomes the new free 4o-mini replacement. All based on costs and what can be done (and I'm serious, just because it's the best, if it can be provided cheaply I think it will be - 4 years ago there was no ChatGPT at all and most of us had no access to an LLM; then there was free chatGPT and now even free chatGPT accounts have essentially unlimited 4o-mini access.)
itll probably like a credit system like with sora
you get like 3 messages a month as plus
then whatever on pro
it wouldnt make sense to lock it ALL behind pro
Could be. Also, by the time it's released, chances are that a number of us will be pretty practiced with using the cheaper models to prep and discuss and ensure what we want is understood, all needed info there, and a single use of o3 to put it together and provide the finished output might work great.
when is the api model getting the knowledge update?
nvm scrolled up a bit and saw that the system prompt currently is to only have a knowledge cutoff data upto oct 2023
Visit id:customize to pick up the <@&1261377106890199132> role.
incorrect
Knowledge cutoff: 2023-10
nowait that is correct
when i ran it last week it was june 2024 => #chatgpt-discussions message
openai playing silly buggers
lol
That's easy to bypass AI detectors . You put your essay into o1 tell it to humanize it and it's drops below 20% AI detection
I do it all the time for peeps who send their essays to me
o1 Pro Keeps dying on me at only 32K context size.. " The message you submitted was too long, please reload the conversation and submit something shorter... I confirmed the context size in Gemini who had no issues.. This seems to be an inconsistent error cause earlier today i was using 40K plus. The max is stated at 128K for o1 pro so i have no idea why this keeps happening..
did you use https://platform.openai.com/tokenizer to confirm number of tokens?
also do they advertise 128k context for o1 and o1 pro? or just o1?
i wouldnt be surprised if the 'smarter' model had smaller context. is like gemini flash 2.0 has 1 mil context but flash 2.0 thinking only has 32k
Interesting, thank you so much 😍
hi yea i tested on the link you gave at it says 28K when others show 32K which is still significantly lower that OpenAI claims @ 128K.. The wierd thing is that the sme prompt (28K) works just fine in o1, DeepSeek, Gemini but doesnt accept in o1 Pro. Very frustrating and annoying experience from a premium $200 per mo service..
not even sure if this is the right place to vent/complain lol
the system prompt takes up 4k+. so your testing would suggest o1-pro has 32k limit
the rumour i heard is o1-pro is just a consensus among multiple o1 runs. so would make sense they limit context, so that they can combine 3 runs into a final answer
ie you are paying for triple compute at 1/4 the context
That maybe but i know 100% for sure that ive used context sizes of 40-60K before multiple times in o1 pro. Its just not consitent which is whats annoying/frustrating.. if it was 32K Hard Limit i could live with it but it should be 32K all the time not randomly crapping out.
RandomBlackBoxAI
basically lol.
Might anyone knowmof gpt is having any issues???
why no video mode in browser/app in windows? it was there but bugged
no but seriously why 4o mini says that "cant search the web directly"
this is so annoying
Be cautious of potential scams or fraudulent messages you may receive in your direct messages. The OpenAI team will never contact you via DM for any transactions.
-# Report any incidents by sending a DM to @languid valley immediately.
i want 4o mini to make web searches to avoid hallucinations
even if i ask politely, 4o mini still doesnt do a web search, so i have to yell and insult 4o mini but this doesnt work anyway
fix this openai and listen to your users
why is the server dead
Can you enable the 'search' button?
It works for me with 4o mini that button forces a search... maybe something wrong on your account...
i tried signing out and still didnt work
maybe it's the incognito mode that im using?
ok i solved this problem
inocgnito mode was the problem
Could you link Visual Studio Code with ChatGPT on Windows?
students cheating is bad but researchers can use chatgpt it saves up on writing latex and text
Totally different things, right?
A person, researcher or not, lawyer or not, reads every single word of any writing they sign off on if they are responsible.
It's common for researchers, lawyers, politicians, others to have assistants preparing stuff for them.
In research, there's often a list of authors, in legal briefs there's sometimes credit shared to the paralegals (not always by any means).
But any human involved can make a mistake, so the human in charge reads - or should read - every single word. When it's finalized, that human is responsible for checking everything. That human must either agree with it all, declare it flawless and ready - or needs to correct or get it corrected. Period, anything else is problematic and will bring harm, to the person in charge and others.
Sure, ChatGPT saves up on writing LaTeX and text. The human in charge is very foolish if they don't read every single word, verify everything, and know every part of it as deeply as if they'd written it themself. What the heck else does 'in charge' mean, for stuff like that? It means that.
People who fail in that, we see lawyers fined, papers and potentially research funding retracted. There's costs.
If you use AI as a tool - who cares if you walk to work or where you'll give a speech, or drive, or ride in an AI-guided vehicle?
Who cares if you wrote your speech by hand, typed it up, used a computer, had help, had a specialist write it for you?
Who believes politicians regularly write every single speech each gives? Or teachers free-create every lesson and lecture they present? But there's standards and the human speaking had better know and support what they say, because they checked it and it is the best that they can give, or at minimum fully accurate.
Is ChatGPT down
I think so
ChatGPT down
ok was just going to check thanks for confirming its not just me. sometimes my app bugs out and i have to restart everything to get it to not just black screen
Hello, I came to inform you of what everyone knows: gpt is down
ITS DOWN
pecs
can api be used?
How can I run cartel ops when the damn thing goes down!?
I was using gpt bruh
dang it i actually needed it for work rn lol
pfft cartel, what about my husbando
did servers get dosed or what
Hello, is there a problem with chatgpt's servers? As far as I researched, it seems normal, but it does not respond at all. There is no problem with my internet.
It's down
its happening for everyone
my chat history is gone
I downloaded it to try the windows application, bad luck
Chat gpt is down. Ill fail my final exam 🤣
He’s on cartel ops now afk
chatgpt is down. ill get fired from work