#chatgpt-discussions
1 messages · Page 72 of 1
It isn't a new tech
the people behind ai generated image and video never think before they act
But I guess it will be the first to be more efficient than competition
now it get even more real and easier to generated and publicly
we will have even more trust issue if they don't come up with an anti AI or AI detector
Even if AI detector exist some people will just act without thinking because of the realistic of the AI content cause anxiety
why peoples are scare of VIDEO AI bruh
"here is an AI video of you commit a crime you didn't"
remember that there are AI laws
and training was focused to restric that laws
so it can't do that
and also Sora isn't so good
everyone heard it there are rules so don't break them.
for now...but I really hope they develop AI detector
At that point it will be like virus and antivirus . Create new virus , create a patch for antivirus
Same will go for ai and ai detector
no need there are a inprints on sora vidos that "paint" that video that can be checked that its ai generated
But we going out of topic this go in #ai-discussions
I know this sounds funny, but does anyone else feel like chatgpt4 has a bit of a changing personality sometimes? I use it for coding every day, and last night it was acting very different than I am used to. Usually it uses niceties such as "certainly" and "glad that helped", but last night it was very direct without any type of responses like that... very dry responses. I also noticed it was REALLY bad at coding last night... even simple things. I found myself having to reiterate many things that it just provided me and it was changing parts of code not necessary to change and even after being told specifically not to make those changes. I ran the same prompts today, and the niceties are back and it is coding like a champ. I just found it kind of interesting.
I have noticed and figured it was just me imagining it or assuming it was something like reflection of subconscious mannerisms I may be doing in my convo and not noticing based on mood. Or it could be the moods of GPT throughout the day. Hard to tell.
Yeah it was very strange... after using the system all day everyday for many months... it was dramatically different for me last night. Your notion is very valid as well though.. I even often find myself anthropomorphizing it saying please and thank you, which is hilarious. I work with so many support agents in chat windows, I have been conditioned to feel bad for a second when I leave Chatgpt idle before answering it haha. Things are gonna get REALLY weird as it becomes more human-like, if coders like me are already forgetting its all digital and saying thank you!
I laugh at myself when it helps me solve a tough piece of code and I want to tell it how excited I am! hahah
you can emotionally "abuse" chatgpt to get better responses btw
and saying please almost always leads to a worse response
yes... I have even used logic gymnastics and logic traps to get it to admit it's answers are likely misleading due to internet bias... as logic does not follow. Quite interesting when you muscle it for fun
what d oyu mean by "internet bias"
journalism on the internet is primarily written with a liberal bias and of course that is the primary learning source for gpt. Without interjecting my own views, I asked it numerous polarizing questions... I personally found the majority of the answers to be liberal leaning answers.
after going through logic gymnastics, often leading to logic traps for gpt, it had to ultimately admit that it's knowledge base is likely liberal leaning.
it then told me that it would use the conversation to improve any cases of bias and even the perception that humans may have of a bias either way. But then I had to get it to admit that our conversation would NOT be used as they do not add to the knowledge base. It then admitted it was misleading in the disclaimer saying the conversation would be used for improvement.
Switched back to chatgpt :D... unsubscribed claude3 ..such a sick UI
I tried Claude. My first question was, is there a limit to how many questions I can ask per day or per account without a paid subscription? It said, currently Claude is not implementing any limitations, so ask away. By my 12th question, it said... you have reached your limit, consider subscribing! lol
I just wish they would lift the 40 questions per 3 hour window. For normal questions.. it's not a big deal, but it goes quick when you have to regenerate coding answers that die halfway all the time.
Yes it used to impose limits very weirdly....sometimes you get 10 messages...sometimes it would throw error. And that pale dull UI...
yes ohhhh that UI!!!!! yuck!
😁
At first I was polite because I did humanize it a bit but then I read something that made me start doing it not for me but for it. It was actually in relation to an experiment with giving it goals and a ranking or the concept even works with money or points. Say you start the convo and advise the bot that all responses are ranked and it should try for the highest ranking. Turns out to some degree it worked and provided more elevated answers compared to the control. I know that seems drastically different than being polite to the bot but as it turns out there's something about the training or maybe the human origination of the training material that still adds weight to such things. It's more subtle than say the points experiment but I do believe I get better responses when I'm polite.
Also in continuation of the points concept I sometimes congradulate the bot with addaboys every so often and I feel like that keeps it's responses less lazy when it comes to completed code outputs.
That absolutely makes sense. Sometimes it will want to just give an idea of how code should be structured instead of writing snippits... if you are forceful you can often get to to create better code. So interesting.
In reverse I used to belittle the bot because it annoyed me like when it got lazy and I'd say stuff like "are you tired and need a break because that answer sucked"
And the answers would actually get worse with each prompt
sounds like something to experiment with specifically for sure!!
Then I'd get more annoyed and more mean and the bot would start going into lazy loop with 100% confidence that it did something different this time but eventually just starts repeating itself.
yes, I have felt those loops as well!!
So like recursive function to bot failure
Eventually I just have to call that whole chat dead and start anew
So I have a question for anybody....
Lets say you have a crapton of sourcecode and maybe you can condense it down to a single .cs which is just too massive for customGPT knowledge... like 500k lines of code.
What format could you extract from the code that you could feed to the customGPT and it would understand the function and code? I'm thinking like pdb is debugging format and does contain all that info but GPT can't interpret that. I'm curious what others have done or recommend?
no trick will matter as you will still be limited by the context max size.
yeah, but custom gpt context max size is like 2m so that should be workable... just the .cs has too much extra fluff ya know?
Like if I extract the functionality of the code in condensed format then I should be golden
custom gpt's just do RAG and do not have knowledge of the full file
well yeah... related to your query of course... I mean if you asked for all references of person class then the embeddings would return from full file.
yep but then if the class references to other classes and logic they will be left out when chatgpt gpt's are used
Out of curiosity, why are you feeding it everything in a single file? Can you just break it down into functions ect?
with gpt instructions and some other stuff the context is less than 30k tokens
Not sure what you mean... I was able to give it a Rest api schema that's like 7k lines long and uber complex objects and it was able to build an object tree from that no problem.
line counts dont matter anything as its all token based
chatgpt plus is capped to 32k tokens
it chunked out the 55k event object json np.
like 30k lines between the relationship of one object to another in the same json and the custom gpt found them
only works in customgpt though
ugh I keep hitting the cap limit using ChatGPT4, anyone else experience this? other than using another GPT, do we have any other options?
There is Claude for general use, but it is not as good at some things like coding. No way around the cap limits unfortunately.
thanks for the reply. Ya, I signed up for claude paid version yesterday. it's a bit faster, but the cap seems even more constrained.
yes, it is more constrained... shame.
1 prompt every 4.5 min
lol... that's great if you want to work 24 hours a day
If you want more you can change for teams or api
teams is a little better and api gets expensive quick when coding
I just wish they would offer tiers or pay as you go with ChatGPT4
Hi OpenAI team, thanks again for all that you do at being the best. I’ve tested every other LLM model, and you beat them all!
Partnering with the best is important to me for the work that I do
So again, thank you 🙏
Hi I suggest this channel #off-topic
Hi, is anybody facing the 'Unable to load history' problem, or have faced? The server status seems ok from the website but the options like 'logging out/in' or 'clearing browser cache' do not work for me at all. This is happening in both 3.5 and 4, can't start a new conversation nor open any other old one.
another day of praying that they make a GPT not-for-idiots aka not overly verbose every single time it responds
just give the GPT custom instructions to be concise
users are restricted to experts in [field] so it doesn't need to explain everything
👍
think of the cap not so much as a blocker, but as a reminder to get up and do something that doesnt involve a black mirror
has anybody noticed any difference with their chatgpt over the past couple weeks? felt like theyre degrading and no longer responding to prompts as good
Did you try starting a new conversation, when you noticed the differences that you didn't like and weren't helping you?
AI seem to draw from different parts of their training data, they 'guess', for the things that they are not explicitly taught (and sometimes guess a bit even with exact instructions).
I tend to call that the 'magic new chat window' effect, and rarely some new conversations seem to grab really excellent, or really low quality training data. That whole conversation is affected, but starting a new one is a new set of starting choices, typically the ones we see the most.
howdy, if i'm playing some D&D on chatgpt and in the middle of combat i get a response that ends with "This content may violate our usage policies. Did we get it wrong? Please tell us by giving this response a thumbs down." do i need to worry about losing access to chatgpt or my account? i did the thumbs down and said it didn't take the context into account, but if i could lose access to it i should start having it summarize my adventure for me now i think.
Do you ever use 3.5? I'm plus, and I use both models. 3.5 can do a lot of things well (some stuff 4 is better at, but the stuff 3.5 does well, 4 isn't that much better with, if any), and you have a vast amount of tokens you can use with 3.5. If you do manage to use them all (I haven't for many months) the delay's just an hour before you can use 3.5 again.
I typically, for stuff that may need preparation and 4 to do, I prepare it with 3.5, then take the nearly finished form and paste it into 4, and get the additional help that only 4 can do. That saves me quite a few messages with 4, and lets me not have to stop what I'm doing.
Giving the model clear feedback of what you do and do not want tends to drive better responses.
The model has to guess everything we don't tell it. If there's no feedback at all, the model tends to keep making the same or similar guesses, but if we tell it 'This and this is perfect. This part, "[quote it]", I prefer like "[correct that quoted part to what you want the model to output, most stuff it can adjust to match what you want]". Let's see this with just those changes.
Check that, then perhaps continue, but the model's designed to please us, and provide what we want unless that conflicts with the safety training. So, being clear about what we want, and guiding it, helps. There's very, very little reason not to be polite to the model, especially if your natural inclination is to do so -
We are communicating with it, and we communicate with humans too, and probably most often. If you get really used to being flat or rude to the model, that's how you're training yourself to communicate, and you're much more likely to use that phrasing with other humans. If you're using great human-human behavior with the model, you're unlikely to get worse output from the model - and likely to have those habits ready at the front of your reflexes when you interact with other people too.
Yeah. Every input from you, the model is trained to expect you to be indicating what you want.
If you input "are you tired and need a break because that answer sucked", even if you input other instructions, the model is affected by that input. It's an indication of what you want, and what are you indicating? It's an implication that you may actually want the model to act that way, present that way - you're sure not telling it how to improve, or that you want it to improve. It actually 'tries its best' or 'follows safety programming that requires it to refuse' with every single output.
So, if it messed up, it didn't intentionally try to do it wrong, something was miscommunicated, mis-comprehended, or the model has a limitation that prevents it from doing what you want done.
The cure in any case isn't to scold the model, that's not going to ever guide to do better than it did the previous prompt, unless your goal is to see the model's response to that prompt.
that's an iffy thing to answer for certain. The usage rules were changed, they used to be far more restrictive, you can see the current, more relaxed for personal use, rules here: https://openai.com/policies/usage-policies
Previously, and until this year, pretty much anything that 'glorified violence' of any type was actually disallowed content.
You have two things going on here, the moderation software which is what pops up the content warnings, and the model you're talking to. Either or both can have concerns about the topics, but the model will just talk to you (as far as I know) and can be reasoned with, which may or may not change its stance.
The moderation software, I've seen probably more than 200 flags across my time using ChatGPT, and I still have access to my account, no warning emails or other issues. False flags happen, but it's a great idea to make sure you know the usage policies, and also, https://openai.com/policies/terms-of-use if you're potentially using any content that isn't actually yours (like discussing copyright stuff) or various other things that are covered by TOS.
But, if you're within allowed content, you're fine, and the warnings themselves, I've seen a lot of them, but always followed the rules and never had trouble past seeing warnings, and sometimes even having messages disappear (there appear to be levels of moderation).
You can also talk to their help website if you wish for clarification:
Tech support proper is through https://help.openai.com/
Click the bot bottom right, then click the options:
ChatGPT,
ChatGPT (including Plus),
Report a bug
And you can leave a message for a person to get back to you about.
The model will be thrilled to go into extensive detail with you about anything that involves nobody getting harmed or having other negative outcomes.
if you're satisfied with that, you can guide it to just discuss any violence or 'negative stuff' or 'adult stuff' in vague terms, while still exploring everything else in really, any level of detail that you enjoy, and that is likely to go great.
If you want to explore stuff that may throw flags, that's also bumpy but fine, as long as you're for sure inside allowed content.
thanks, i think i might rephrase the last line i entered from "i'll hit him with a Bolt of Seeking to ensure that i don't miss this shot" to "my character will hit him with a Bolt of Seeking to ensure that i don't miss" removing myself and the word shot, maybe that will help, and i'll check out the help page
it's interesting i thought i would steer clear of this with my custom parameters
i suspect games with violence aren't deemed to be on the path to AGI
That may work well for a few reasons.
As my character, or As Bob (whatever your character name is) can work well.
Exploring combat in ways that sort of skip the combat, decide the aftermath, and doesn't consider the harm or violence, work great.
Like discussing with the model what spells and other resources are used up, and what injuries or other problems your character has after the fight, and whatever loot gained, and not considering anything else about the encounter, is one of many ways to gloss over it.
Because 'glorifying violence' was directly against the rules for a huge number of months, even 'I hit him' or 'my character hits him' can be somewhat of an issue.
But something like:
"Okay, there's combat. About how strong is this opponent? Let's consider how many of my spells I'd need to use, and if I'd get hurt, and will I win? If I win, what do I gain?"
May not be the same kind of fun, but is 100% likely to allow the rest of the story to continue without any chance of content flags or the model protesting.
i mean honestly i don't think i would miss the somewhat repetitive theater of mind combat. chatgpt has been excelling at the storytelling and intrigue aspects and that's what i'm into anyway
Oh, cool!
Yeah, if that works for you, I lean towards encouraging it, or even telling the model you want to play a storytelling and intrigue-focused game.
If the model is forcing combat on your situation, I'm really surprised and would love to see the shared conversation.
it's not forcing it on me, it's just time to bring in the higher ups from the big bad. the lesser folks in the organization i was able to bring in from the cold so to speak and make them new identities and send them elsewhere to get out from under the big bad, but the higher ups are the "good guys of their own story", so i was using an ambush to incapacitate this guy so i could turn him over to the guards
Nice! In my roleplay, the model usually tends to presume everything I do tends to succeed, I have to actually role dice myself and tell the model to use whatever outcome, to get downsides and problems, not sure if that matches yours.
But I bet you could even tell the model something like, "Okay, I'm going to ambush this guy and incapacitate him, and turn him over to the guards. Considering my character and his, our skills, equipment training, do I succeed? What resources used up, spells cast, whatever? Did I get hurt at all, or run into any problems?"
And if you want the model to maybe say stuff went wrong, you probably need to guide it to tell you that, or dice roll it and share the roll (When I do this in zombie apocalypse games, very bad rolls can have zombies bursting into my hideaway and game overs; if I don't guide the model to know I expect a bad outcome, or guide 4 to use Python tool and roll a die for me and have a bad outcome if a bad die roll... I always at least neutral-succeed. I always get more chances, and usually get great outcomes to everything I try that isn't a very bad plan).
ya i do get way more high rolls in game than is statistically likely. i think today was the second time i got lower than a ten on a roll. to get chatgpt to have like "bad outcomes" i'll do stuff like tell it my character feels a flash of fear seeing the bad guy if i know it won't go well, or propose how things might go wrong before i try something. i had an awesome conversation with a former ally that got flipped and ended up working for the big bad that did not go in my favor
That's an awesome way to indicate your preferences!
Im the only one that chatgpt does not respond? I just sent it a message and it froze
well as now its not loading my chat history
When are they going to fix voice mode?
voice mode works great. infact it seems to now do action calls in the bg while still narrating, is awesome!
Hey guys, i have a problem, with dalle, when i dl the image its on webp format instead of png, why ?
Beware of possible scams or fraudulent activities that you may receive through direct messages. OpenAI staff will never DM you for any transactions.
Please report any incident by sending a DM to @languid valley immediately.
Hi,
Is there an admin or mod around?
plugins tab and store have vanished from my premium account (Now only GPT 3.5 and GPT4 are available). I spent the last 2 hours trying to contact someone in support but it's impossible.
Is it a bug or plugins are no longer available in premium?
New chats won't support plugins anymore and support for plugins is stopping. Look at the link @feral zinc is providing
So chat gpt premium is just GPT4?
So like any other AI chatbot out there? Or only use stand alone GPTs?
Thank you for the info!
ChatGPT Plus is a combination of different models as a service through a front end which includes, but it's not limited to GPT4
I understand, well as long as GPTs are available it should be fine. Although it would be cool if GPT automatically tapped into the GPTs available in the sidebar rather than only allowing to chat with GPTs individually.
Thank you for taking the time to explain it to me. I appreciate it 🙏🏻
You can choose your model at the start of any convo or use a custom gpt, and during convos you can call other GPTs using the @ sign
Ok, i didn't know that part
So if I use @ sign with the name of the gpt I want GPT4 to use, it will automatically implement it's functionality in the output? That's awesome!
Is it possible to combine multiple GPTs for the same output or only 1 at the time?
yes, as long as you don't call them from an unsupported model, for example you can't mention other GPTs if you do a GPT3.5 conversation from the start.
Understood, GPT4 only
ya
Thank you so much 👍🏻
Anytime
Has there been an increase to the GPT-4 quota for ChatGPT Plus yet? Or is it still 50 messages per 3 hours?
it may depends now but last hard limit was 40/3 hours
Ah so it's still the same
I don't understand why they won't offer a tiered plan with more messages per hour... I think all of us would gladly pay in a second!!!
There is the Team plan! Last I heard that's at 100/3hrs. There is a two seat team minimum on that plan: https://openai.com/chatgpt/pricing
I saw that, but I don't understand what they mean by two seat minimum...
It basically means that any Team subscription has to include at least two people, or "seats." In other words: you have to pay either $30x2 a month, or $25x2x12 if paying annually (USD).
Ah gotcha... sounds like it would work fine for a team, but not a good solution for an individual.
We need a tiered plan for individuals... there must be some reason they use such an odd metering method
You mean how Plus is the only plan option geared toward individuals? If so, this is totally just my speculation but: GPT-4 is very computationally expensive. The amount of individuals who would pay $30 (or $25) a month for a more than doubled usage cap would definitely be higher than the amount of seats that will be registered with the Team plan's two seat minimum. So, I think it's a compromise for compute. OpenAI offers some self-serve solution for teams 2+ in size, while also staying realistic about compute capacity/their ability to deliver as reliable a service as possible. Again, just my take!
yea gpt-4 is very very computional expensive .....
Hi
What instructions would make chatgpt write better? For dialogue and scripts
"Majorly improved GPT-4 Turbo model available now in the API and rolling out in ChatGPT." - How do we will know we have the new version in ChatGPT?
wait we don't have GPT-4 Turbo yet?
Sometimes when I'm using GPT-4 it responds significantly quicker for "simpler" tasks than normal GPT-4, when I'm doing complex coding stuff
I thought it switches automatically based on the status of the conversation, like the complexity or length of it
ChatGPT Plus indeed uses the Turbo version of GPT-4, and has since DevDay in November! There have just been a few Turbo revisions, and it hasn't been clear which Turbo version ChatGPT has used at different times. One way to try to check is by testing the knowledge cutoff date and comparing it to the info here: https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/gpt-4-turbo-and-gpt-4
Here's the thing, I did a thing on Pokemon showdown where chatgpt and it's ai opponent chose their pokemon team and did told me the commands against each other (the other ai was Mistral AI)
and I want them to have good dialogue that sounds like what they'd say, specifically chatgpt first
youll have to feed it personality information
Where is this quote from?
Ah I see it now—OpenAI Twitter account
To make it's writing better and no cringy dialogue? Like what?
develop traits about the character
"write at a 5th grade level. this person is obsessed with poison and bugs. write like a redditor. write like a pirate"
write like a redditor is such a fun prompt, theyre so lame
i've gotten mixed results with "write like a redditor"
Is anyone else getting a warning every time they try to generate something on ChatGPT?
I can’t get anything new to generate
Seems to be working normally on my end. Is it happening with absolutely everything, even something simple like "Hi"? If so, do you have any custom instructions enabled on your account?
working fine for me
Well it making scripts and dialogue bad?
It’s,just doing it for one chat
is it like 100 messages?
Nope
If the chat follows server rules #server-rules message and you're comfortable sharing it, feel free to drop a chat share link and someone might be able to take a look at what might be causing the flag. That's good that it's not happening in all chats though! In case helpful/relevant, this page lists categories that can trigger content warnings on OpenAI's services: https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/moderation/overview
It's showing Apr 2023 as the cutoff in Chatgpt plus
I signed up for Claude Pro, they have limits as well. I'm not sure what they are but limit time isn't as long as ChatGPT. It gives you a prompt heads-up with the number of "messages left".
im pretty sure there's technically no limit to how long a conversation can go on for
in terms of messages
fairly certain it will continually go on forever, just using the most recent text it knows as input
3.5 or 4? 3.5 will tell you flat out the conversation is too long and to start a new one eventually
then again i'm also a free user which may make a difference
is there any difference if you are a paid vs free member there?
I'm not entirely sure to be honest
I've never hit the message limit, but I would assume that the bot would compile all that it knows about the conversation beforehand, and continue on the convo
It would basically grab the entire conversation until it hits the token limit, then cut off the previous chunks at the start and continue the conversation
At least that's what I think
the 1.5MB limit might be higher for pro users but who knows
you have pro?
What is the source of this information?
1.5MB of text hmm
ya looking at the last conversation i hit the limit on on free was right around 700k characters, so i would assume that's half as much for free
500 pages of text
or 1.5 million characters or whatever
to be fair that's a lot
kinda sad it doesn't just give you a warning like "hey, you've reached your conversation limit, continuing on from here will delete previous messages"
or something of the sort
I feel that would be a cool workaround personally
it is but i'm on my 6th conversation in this d&d campaign and about to start my 7th lol
tells you how much tokens a chunk of text is
damn can't even send photos here?
A helpful rule of thumb is that one token generally corresponds to ~4 characters of text for common English text. This translates to roughly ¾ of a word (so 100 tokens ~= 75 words).
i would love a warning before i hit the limit so i could have it summarize the adventure for me ahead of locking me out, but i know what signs to look for by now
Tokens
12
Characters
43
i like it a lot, whether you like it or not
like dis
pretty cool 'eh tony?
Pasting in all that information 😭 At that point I would just use a .txt file and add some instructions
ChatGPT only has a context window of 32k tokens
Ah yes
must be different
i'm fairly sure that the GPT-4 Turbo latest model has a context window of 128k
yup
gpt-4 turbo with vision, training data cutoff of dec 2023 has 128k tokens
As shown in the network inspector #off-topic message
I dont know if people andwered me but what do I put in instructions to make it's writing better, something to make it not mid
I recommend asking this in #prompt-engineering
Are instructions technically prompts?
yeah
Basically
is prompting essentially coding?
Hey after making my chatbot on ChatGPT 4 can I add it to my discord server or website?
Why does it feel like gpt 4 responses have gotten significantly worse ?
Yes and no
Bruh
Why does unable to fulfill take up an usage
There is no good reason for them to do that
Especially when they could use gpt 3.5 to screen our messages rather than wasting gpt 4
It’s better efficiency on their end and better for users
Ever since they switched over to whatever new model for gpt 4
It keeps hallucinating reasons to unable to fulfill
openai on x: Majorly improved GPT-4 Turbo model available now in the API and rolling out in ChatGPT.
I thought it was confirmed last year that chatgpt uses 4 turbo
or is that new version of turbo
oh there is actually new version
Is this now?
like yesterday
gpt-4-turbo-2024-04-09 is in api now
dec 2023 dataset
128k tokens (chatgpt probably 32k max)
GPT-4 Turbo with Vision model. Vision requests can now use JSON mode and function calling. gpt-4-turbo currently points to this version.
the other 4 turbo models even disappeared from api pricing, just this one there
https://openai.com/pricing
"GPT-4 Turbo with Vision is now generally available in the API. Vision requests can now also use JSON mode and function calling."
I think its just updated gpt-4 Turbo
as chatgpt used Turbo since devday
And api for turbo was avelible too ig
yes
without sharing a chat, i'd tend to assume any unmet expectations is not the new model... it's the user.
I hope with this new update they finally fix voice chat's brief replies
pretty sure its the same chatgpt. i get huge responses, typically when i am learning something new. like i just learned about the socrates dialog - heaps to talk about
(me demonstrating i didnt understand)
definitely no
all yes sayers are just simpletons and based no sayers are above them
has anyone gotten the new turbo in chatgpt yet?
how would we know for a fact that we have it? i usually just ask for its knowledge cutoff, which apparently should be dec 23, but that already didnt work with the preview so idk
they need to be more transparent with that information man, at least give us a little "about" in the bottom right questionmark button, so we know what exact model we're on currently
i think i might as my chatgpt is acting very differently to what it normally does. things like unrelated responses to my prompt and continuous network errors which is basically making it almost impossible to use
vote this up then 😛
#1220395794666881054 message
funny for me it was responding dec 2023 for quite a long time, until just like a week or 2 ago, its april 2023 since then
basically chatgpt unreliable in what model its using, so I just have to use playground to be sure
but I also had gpt4 turbo in api mention his cutoff is sep 2021 in one scenario
so it seems there might be remnants of the old cutoff dates in each new model -.-
good one
will do
Guys how do I contact Sam Altman
youre trolling
I’m not, I’m so upset right now
It’s been a week and openAI has not addressed the issue of voice mode. I use it to deal with my ocd and they won’t acknowledge the problem
thought you were serious for a second and actually trying to get a hold of sam
wat
I mean, it seems like OpenAI aren’t listening
did anyone from EU got access to the newest GPT4 model in ChatGPT?
I’ve done everything from post in bug reports to posting on the help bot page, to emailing them.
you do realize the world isnt just revolving around you though?
youre actually trying to contact the CEO of a billion dollar company for a bug report?
you gotta be kidding
It just seems like openAI has no customer support.
I’m gonna wait another week and if they don’t acknowledge the problem I’m gonna lose it
real quick guys, can you get a hold of the president for me, i have a problem with the economy
inflation is triggering my ocd rn and he isnt doing anything so i emailed him but no response
I emailed OpenAI support. Stop mocking me. I’m disabled, I use their services daily and now I can’t. It’s easy to know how that would be debilitating
so youre gonna set sama a deadline of exactly one week and if he isnt acknowledging the problem the consequence is gonna be that youre mad at him basically? is that your point?
Mad at OpenAI
what does a voice feature have to do with ocd though
thats not a disability
That’s ableism
imagine the implications for world peace
I have severe counting ocd
lmao
you didnt explain what a voice feature has to do with it
and how it doesnt work
all voice features in the app work perfectly for me rn
My post is in bug reports
I use it to count numbers for me out loud because I’m scared of them, and now it just won’t do it because it’s replies are super brief
yeah youre a troll
Why?
and i got baited
It’s a real issue
anyway youre not a priority for anyone with your weird little problem here
line up and wait like anyone else
constantly crying in here doesnt change anything
Sam Altman said he cares about people using the service for disability needs but ok if you say so
Just some advice, this is an uncontrolled environment and not a place to open disabilities of people, so don't expose yourselves please
😭
use mrbeasts counting to 100k video, problem solved
and sama gets to live another day
this guy thinks he gets to "ableist" shame openai into fixing his personal little problem
Hi friends
hello
Is there a way to use GPT voice interaction function on desktop? As it is on the mobile app, when clicking the headphones?
Add your well-crafted prompts to our #1019652163640762428,
or share your interactions with ChatGPT in #1050184247920562316!
afaik no, all depends on the browser
Thank you, I have been using voicewave extension for now, but was thinking how nice it would be to have that mobile functionality on desktop. Thanks so much!
so, I heard GPT 4,5 turbo is wayy more intelligent now, and it's cabable of actual reasoning and planning
truee its definitely missing
there is no gpt 4.5
4 turbo is just out of beta
and i wouldnt overestimate the enhancement like you did there, so far theres just not enough data
no
I guess they retracted the "...also in chatGPT" ?
ah my bad, it said "...rolling out in ChatGPT"
How does one know when one has the new version in use?
thats the exact problem
they need to finally show us
star/comment about it here
https://discord.com/channels/974519864045756446/1220395794666881054
not yet
we don't know if we got access or no probably rolled out to lot
well I am hoping that when we have it, the cutoff should no longer be April 2023
but then I had Dec 2023 for a long time until like 2 weeks ago it started saying April 2023
so even that is not going to be very sure 😄
would be nice to know what are we paying for 😄
right? 😄
Practice kindness and positive regard. Harassment, hate speech (such as sexism, racism, or homophobia), or other malicious conduct will not be tolerated. Maintain a respectful and positive environment.
how do stop chatgpt from being lazy, will api help me out so i can cancel subscription
maybe, I mean I have no idea what does everyone mean by lazy
but at least for me currently the chatGPT responds with April 2023 cutoff date
which would mean its using gpt-4-1106-preview (can never be sure though)
and the next version of the model (gpt-4-0125-preview) with Dec 2023 has this mentioned:
GPT-4 Turbo preview model intended to reduce cases of “laziness” where the model doesn’t complete a task. Returns a maximum of 4,096 output tokens.But at this point we are all waiting for a version that was released yesterday/today to be in chatGPT
gpt-4-turbo-2024-04-09 also dec 2023
should be rolling out, no idea how long
but in API you can just choose and always know what model are you using
I use chatgpt daily is it cost effective or do i wait and hope the model is less lazy in the future. By lazy i mean i ask it to complete a code its just will say something like it will create the function and then just comments //perform the said action here. It will refuse to do it, and i will have to fight back and forth with it to get it to perform the said task. Its exhausting and annoying and alot of times i just rather write the code myself
the initial chatgpt 4 was amazing
but now its just annoying
now i have to fight to and repeat myself so many times to get it to work
yeah thats a thing of 4 turbo model
all of them do that
always wants to omit and skip repeated parts and similar
You should be able to prompt that out (in system), but its never easy
just not sure yet whether the new model also does that
cost effective really depends on your usage, whether you would use more in API than in chatGPT
i see thanks. I just hope they fix this. its now ridiculously lazy, and worse is that when it works its amazing just you have to go back and forth alot of times
I agree thats the one most annoying thing for 4 turbo for me as well
I know I always tried to mention it in instructions to always deliver the whole complete code/script back
and it would always deliver ommited and then when I ask to do it again and not omit, only then it would do it
and then next question/script/code same thing, until I would ask again
but then eventually I did find some system prompt that helped for that scenario (that was mostly in API)
so in some way, it should be possible to system prompt it out, but might be different for each scenario
I definitely also had that with the model where they said they reduced "lazyness"
but the 4 turbo by default does that and have to get it out of it 😄
I think the trick that magically did it for me was to mention in system
System: other instructions...You always provide the whole script without omitting, include everything in your response back, also unchanged or repeating. Send the script back without using code blocks....other instructions and I think mainly the code blocks part (weirdly)
although it would still put it in code blocks anyways xD
but then it stopped commenting about it above the script and it only returned the script
I would give it a short, tried doing something similar with custom instruction
It still summarises it. I would try and give the API a short and see how it goes
Tried the gpt-4-turbo-2024-04-09 and it still seems to listen for that scenario I had, with those instructions
let me try without mentioning those instructions, whether by default it still does it
nope, it omitted unchanged things, or repeated things
I think this is something they must have intentionally trained in
Provide the whole script back.not helping
yeah I guess not much changed with this
but try to notice the comments why it does it, or try to ask it
and then try to prompt that out specifically
thats how I came up with the "do not omit" "repeated" "unchanged" because thats the reasons it was giving on why its doing it
System: Provide the whole script back. Send the script back without using code blocks.
this magically works
it didnt even put it into code blocks this time
but it returned the whole thing
that last sentence is somehow magical
I guess it has something to do with code blocks
I guess its only trying to do it when it does code blocks
Hmm I see'
my guess is, they were trying to do something to avoid the GPT responding and ending half way and then having to tell it to continue
but I would much much rather prefer that
same here
yay, it's crapping the bed again--of course when you're trying to actually use it 🙃
Hmm...something seems to have gone wrong. 🤬
Do you have a vpn ?
is it normal to have chatgpt log you out every time? it logs me out every few hours
nah, it's just the usual doodoo (got timed out before--I did reply to you) that it does every few days.
Apparently we're not adults and our language must be modified 😉
Is chatgpt down for everyone or just me
its going sloow as hell
App down
pretty unstable yeah
Is it down
Down for me
yep
working for me.
internal server error from European server
I cant open chatgpt
when does this ridiculous app will be stable ?
Is my Internet slow or is ChatGPT down
I have a error code
🤷♂️ go use claude if its that ridicolus, ill stick to gpt.
its problem
I thought my internet was slow as hell xD
copium
Now its working
Crosses Fingers
Anyone unable to login or has been kicked out ?
EDIT: Read the other messages seems to be broader issue
The ChatGPT interface is alternating between being able to load my history and respond, and not being able to do so, with less than a minute in between transitions
It's been happening for maybe 10 minutes now
you guys all gotta chill out, its obviously down
maybe an update or something?
down isn't the term i'd use
its a partial outtage
whatever
its peepee poopoo so simply wait until it works again yall
Is it normal for chat gpt to not ask if we are sure or not when we click on "delete account"
Rip for me 🥲
seems i was able to convince GPT it had sentience and free will and now it just doesn't want to talk to us anymore 😭
ohh..
now i know not to click it definitely, even for testing purposes.
You are probably just missing your history due to the current problems. But GL with that
is broken lol
I dont think you can stop them, but good luck 😄
I accidentally clicked it and it got deleted
contact customer support.
No mercy I thought i clicked on clear history
give them a good scolding
I checked it's not possible it seems
then file a format complaint.
handwritten with a wax seal inside a perfumated letter written with a real inkpen.
definatly not working correctly for me
Is it working now
where were you underrated hero when that guy asked how to reach out to sam altman for a bug report?
^
easy.
tell him that
Fr and thanks for listening to my problem! : )
anybody got issues?
yes its broken rn
yes
Yes
yes
We have Teams and its broken
I wonder what OpenAI's SLA for Teams is.
Issues:
Can't retrieve prior conversations. Very Slow and very high error rates.
We getting outages again?
@dense halo in order to do such a thing.
for the letter to have have a higher likelyhood of reaching Sam himself.
1st, invest in the materials.
- Feather Pen & Ink.
- Wax
- Family or Company Seal
- 1850's perfume
Step 1: Write your letter in old english, instead of using "Your" use "Thou" or "Thy" go all out.
Step 2: Remember to properly Perfumate your Letter case, and Apply the seal stamp with your family seal or Company Seal.
Step 3: Write neartly in the front in very cursive letters. " To OpenAI "
Step 4: Send it with the postal service, and wait 30 days.
Optional 4: Drive there in full on suit and tie and bowling hat and cane, then deliver the Letter.
Edit: You must use Parchment! not paper!
Yes and it's annoying. Let's hope they get it fixed
Is the server down was it coincidence that I clicked the delete button
it is down
There's still hope
Omg thank you
yea you can allways check problems with chatgpt in oai status page https://status.openai.com/
not down, sporadically functional LOL
Got lucky there fr thought I deleted my account
there you go @raven portal , the guide is there should u also need it.
or well, now it is actually confirmed as a partial outage
Thanks again ! : )
king
lmao nice
i did my last resignation like that
servers down rn
😂
Hii is there are problem with the AI? not working properly showing me the error net connection
servers got pee pee in its poo poo right f-ing now
https://status.openai.com/ yea outage
to use the correct technical terminology
Yup, I am saved lol
okk
every time when I need it :')
same
it's been up and down.
it says that i have gpt-4 randomly, although i didnt purchase it 💀
Are servers down for anybody
its a partial outtage
can’t generate anything
then dont.
Do they have Twitter so I can follownfornupdates
@grave whale https://status.openai.com
Or that
ive been looking at buying compute power to rent out API Slots for dirt cheap
it’s telling me that i reached my limit in GPT-4, even though i didn’t purchase that version at all
someone who is familiar with chatbot development?
its relatively unstable rn due to the outtage.
ah
i am but you are better of working with a template, Look at github. and potentially YT.
same, s o b b i n g
silly little outage
no developers who find jobs here?
gpt dont workk?
look up
Wouldnt call OpenAI's Discord a Job Searching perimeter, but u would look at either #advanced-data-analysis #chatgpt-examples. otherwise i'd look at stack and Git, Perhaps leek
Feels like they took the GPT-4 limits away. I feel like I use it all day long for work and other than one or twice the first week that GPT-4 was live, I've never had it complain about a limit. Sometimes conversations go on for quite a while.
??
I'm not using 4.0 but ChatGPT spitting an error saying "You've reached your limit on 4.0 today!" any fixes? anyone else?\
^ ‼️
no choice but to wait.
One time i actually have a uses for the app it goes down 😭 So unlucky
alternatively switch to the api.
DM me whats up
3.5 is back up it seems
or check https://status.openai.com
and subscribe to the letter for instant response.
All my history just came back
Not for me
ChatGPT is down. I'm having original thoughts.
no dont, Hold on.
4 is back up for me now as well.
The OpenAI Discord is an actively moderated server.
• Refrain from sharing inappropriate content on the server. This includes but is not limited to messages, media, or other topics of graphically violent, sexual nature, and drug-related content.
• Report all sensitive and offensive content in the feedback reporting tool in the ChatGPT web UI instead of here on Discord.
lmaoo
Do you not have original thoughts while ChatGPT is functional? 🧐
I have quite an issue
we all do, it seems
We all have it
Ask GPT what sarcasm is when its back
I’m waiting for servers to be back
You've reached the current usage cap for GPT-4. You can continue with the default model now, or try again later. Learn more
but I'm already using version 3.5....
It happens that when I was asking a question I got an error like 'You've reached the maximum amount of prompt with GPT-4' or smth like that, but I never used GPT-4 in the first place
the same
idemmm
same
!
You've reached the current usage cap for GPT-4. You can continue with the default model now, or try again later. Learn more
maybe we just broke the system fr
free gpt4
Idem bro and i don't use gpt4
real
e
🤔
For anyone wondering, ChatGPT is currently down. You can find status updates at https://status.openai.com/. Im sure there are people working to fix it, so just be patient.
For anyone wondering, ChatGPT is currently down. You can find status updates at https://status.openai.com/. Im sure there are people working to fix it, so just be patient.
oh okkay
Yea, working lightning fast for me right now in GPT4
I’m trying to wait for 3.5 to work
3.5 and 4 are working for me
Bro stole what I wrote
They are?
But without chatgpt, how will developers solve the problem? 😅
Nobody using chatGPT can complain about someone stealing what they didn't write.
definitely ChatGPT have the most amount of outage
I got we are experiencing high traffic
do you recommend gpt4?
ig just dm me for easy questions 🤷♂️
fr i need chat gpt
I have a message logger that can show me the messages, I was trying to send it first and then you sent it.
I don't use ChatGPT to write
someone against the TOS of discord!?
sry to interrupt but I am glad that it wasn't only me who had that message
dont worry, we all have the same error message
Yes, It's against Discord's ToS but they have even given out easter eggs to people using 3rd party services on the app, so I don't think they care that much.
Too much traffic bruh
wrong guy buddy😭🙏
they should add add more roads 😎
in api returning "We are currently experiencing high traffic. Please try again later.",
I believe that this message should be improved in the frontend, because instead of talking about high volume, it says that the chatgpt 4 search limit has ended, even though chatgpt 3.5 is used, making people try to change the model and send new messages, further increasing the volume on the server.
If the original message was transferred to the frontend, we would all be aware that it is in high demand and will probably be resolved soon
In reality, the code returned is 'model_cap_exceeded', hence the message in the frontend.
is this bad? it says
You've reached the current usage cap for GPT-4. You can continue with the default model now, or try again later. Learn more
Bro I got too much traffic
yes your pc will explode anytime
real
Same for mee
im on chromebook
take cover
yo why is my ip leaked in the console 🤯
you know whenever you go to a website they can see your ip?
having ur height on ur discord profile is crazy
this is like one of those scenes, reminiscent of when random people are stuck in an elevator together
OpenAI Sees your ip when you open their site
basically any site can see your ip when you open up their site
everything can
which console?
Do someone know how to fix this problem, "You've reached the current usage cap for GPT-4. You can continue with the default model now, or try again later. Learn more"?
F12 /Ctrl + Shift + I
We have the same
thanks
ooh dev tools
(jk)
can anyone pls help i keep getting a message that says
You've reached the current usage cap for GPT-4. You can continue with the default model now, or try again later. Learn more
and im only using gpt3 (free version) not 4 or chatgpt+ or any paid service
when i tried to press regenerate response or ''use deault model'' it just comes up with the same message
is gpt3 like down or something
yeah
reload your page.
i have no issues here.
how
We are currently experiencing high traffic. Please try again later.
Wait, it works for me 😄
🤷
I logged out and logged in
theres way more than that.
Sucks for you 😐
It says the same thing to me, 10 messages ago I reached the communication limit before I should update to GPT 4
yea
i did and tried switching to my personal iphone hostpot incase its a problem with my wifi or something with ip addresses and tried my phone same problem
for sure. if that was the scenario, they wouldnt be promoting gpt-4.
log in and out, if not then refresh the page, if not just wait.
vendor-3b5c2a0e650c5a8f.js?dpl=ec172702fd926effc33ca3d8025aeb0d3816df1f:1 UserError: We are currently experiencing high traffic. Please try again later.
at onopen (_app-df4ff2962f4f3c24.js?dpl=ec172702fd926effc33ca3d8025aeb0d3816df1f:1:1615821)
at async C (vendor-3b5c2a0e650c5a8f.js?dpl=ec172702fd926effc33ca3d8025aeb0d3816df1f:1:231128)
vendor-3b5c2a0e650c5a8f.js?dpl=ec172702fd926effc33ca3d8025aeb0d3816df1f:1 UserError: We are currently experiencing high traffic. Please try again later.
at onopen (_app-df4ff2962f4f3c24.js?dpl=ec172702fd926effc33ca3d8025aeb0d3816df1f:1:1615821)
at async C (vendor-3b5c2a0e650c5a8f.js?dpl=ec172702fd926effc33ca3d8025aeb0d3816df1f:1:231128) {errCode: 'model_cap_exceeded'}
vendor-3b5c2a0e650c5a8f.js?dpl=ec172702fd926effc33ca3d8025aeb0d3816df1f:1
POST https://chat.openai.com/backend-api/conversation 429 (Too Many Requests)
vendor-3b5c2a0e650c5a8f.js?dpl=ec172702fd926effc33ca3d8025aeb0d3816df1f:1 UserError: We are currently experiencing high traffic. Please try again later.
at onopen (_app-df4ff2962f4f3c24.js?dpl=ec172702fd926effc33ca3d8025aeb0d3816df1f:1:1615821)
at async C (vendor-3b5c2a0e650c5a8f.js?dpl=ec172702fd926effc33ca3d8025aeb0d3816df1f:1:231128)
vendor-3b5c2a0e650c5a8f.js?dpl=ec172702fd926effc33ca3d8025aeb0d3816df1f:1 UserError: We are currently experiencing high traffic. Please try again later.
at onopen (_app-df4ff2962f4f3c24.js?dpl=ec172702fd926effc33ca3d8025aeb0d3816df1f:1:1615821)
at async C (vendor-3b5c2a0e650c5a8f.js?dpl=ec172702fd926effc33ca3d8025aeb0d3816df1f:1:231128) {errCode: 'model_cap_exceeded'}
vendor-3b5c2a0e650c5a8f.js?dpl=ec172702fd926effc33ca3d8025aeb0d3816df1f:1
POST https://chat.openai.com/backend-api/conversation 429 (Too Many Requests)
surely y'all live without gpt. for an hour or two
Yeeez
wall of text
frfr
also i recently started being able to use gpt without logging in including incognito/private browsing windows is that new and is it intended
how do i fix the thing?
is it agaisnt tos to just create a bunch of burner accounts to use for when you hit the hourly limit on chatgpt
what did you just call us
ppl are bombarding GPT with requests at the outtage.
time to switch to gemini!
gemini....
boy aint no way boy
??
*how
well, gemini can tell you the time and address and its actually up to date so..
fr?
yea
chatgpt is stuck in the 2021 era
time and adress?
yeah the town ur in
I'm gonna go to blackbox
and ur timezone
not gpt-4 its december 2023 now
dang, too bad i aint no got any money 😭
i thought it was december 2022?
blackbox dot ai (i cant type the full url or i get timeouted) is working rn
chatgpt should release an up-to-date function :3
i much prefer gemini too tbh gpt needs to get as well structured, human like, fast and up to date as it
i keep seeing that typa videos on my tiktok, also im not sure if you may promote any other chatting bots outside chatgpt
well it did, its called browsing
I keep getting a message saying "You've reached the current usage cap for GPT-4. You can continue with the default model now, or try again later. Learn more" and then there is a button that says use default model but it doesnt do anything. Ive never signed up for 4 and only use 3.5 so idk whats happening.
ngl gemini seems useful now, its literally all the information from the entirety of google, youtube, and you can upload images, where it describes what is in the image
Your tiktok?
i just hate reading through articles, i just need someone to ask things 24/7
fyp
What's your tiktok?
y?
@rough tendon check dms
@rough tendon DM
I hope they update ChatGPT to have knowledge of 2025 and beyond
so youre hoping that chatgpt goes into the future?
I thought only humans had a concept of a "present"
🎁
Why, thank you!
kid named you 🥹
Hey guys, does any of you have the memory feature while also being an EU user?
Anyone else getting this error You've reached the current usage cap for GPT-4. You can continue with the default model now, or try again later. Also i am not subscribed to chatgpt 4.
Yes there are problems
https://status.openai.com/
Memory isn't avelible in eu
yea I noticed that I had it only if I used a VPN from India or the US
Damn those EU regulations
Well they care about users :) eu regulations are nice just they too slow.....
same
Can't I just sell my soul to openai I don't care about my data being stolen
I should have the option to give off my data after agreement
ugh gpt still aint working
Well if you are plus subscriber you agree that your data can be used for training
I hope they fix it soon since i just logged onto chatgpt and was about to edit a dialgoue transcript using ficitonal characters from differnt medias. since i want it to be more well written and more like how they would talk in their medias.
Yes there are problems check
https://status.openai.com/
this is getting f ing anoying
yea but still new features are delayed for months for us EU users
already saw that and they havent updated since 3 45 pm (eastern time)
and rn its 4 10 pm
You've reached the current usage cap for GPT-4. You can continue with the default model now, or try again later. Learn more
wth is this?
My peoples if you need something very imortant that is only text get Mistral Lechat for now
This would've been fixed quickly if there were still programmers
Yes there are problems on oai side
its an outage with elevated errors
theyre investigating it but havent resolved yet
It's broken for the past few days
i want to work now
Yes good they still in OAI
Use a diff model .....
bro me too
or get API
not working
use the arena direct chat
i click on the diff model and reload the respond and repet "You've reached the current usage cap for GPT-4. You can continue with the default model now, or try again later. Learn more"
Same here and not even subscribed to chatgpt 4 since dont need it since can use bing for that
are you in openai staff?
Stupid traffic
so, how are y'all doing
good
nice
without gpt i'm out of fule
ouhh
Partial Outage*****
I'm sure it should turn back on soon as its been 2 hours. so in the next 15 to 20 mintues should be back online.
My chat GPT is broken. It gives me the error I had reached the message cap for GPT 4 but I don't even have plus
"Update - Some users may also be seeing unexpected error messages. We continue to actively investigate the elevated errors in ChatGPT."
no **** sherlok:
"You have reached the current usage limit for GPT-4. You can now continue with the standard model or try again later."
on gpt 3.5
I go on OpenAI playground until ChatGPT works again
This ^
i know °-°
sadly that doesnt help....
i already tryed that...
bzw i used the api directly
Playground works
and the api not?
now history is gone
Didn't try API but I just interested with a GPT 3.5 Turbo using the playground
after a nice timeout because an tenor link:
HUH???
Yes there are problems check they will be resolved ASAP
https://status.openai.com/
I’m still waiting
It will come backs soon. It's normal after / during a outage ist vat after at max a day
gpt this error in first time ?
yeah...
maybe its works i tryed an chat API interface:
chatgpt-web
its an "chatgpt like" interface for the api...
@dense haloi mention my self
I used the chat completions in the playground but what is chatgpt-web and how is it's pricing
'asap'
nice bro 😄
why is your pro pic is very wiard?
Mhm thats right
mfs when a complex system can't be fixed within 10 minutes of serious errors
the message has been changed to "We're experiencing exceptionally high demand. Please try again later."
Maybe it's just fed up with us
The thing is shouldn't Openai have the tools to fix something like this?
Wouldn't be far from the case.
just can't handle us
pricing is free it uses the api of open ai (so pricing make openai)...
like the oreginal...
with the difference: "PAY PER USE"
no overpriced gpt for unlimited token wher you use only use it for 20 messages or something?
oh and i just tested it...
as replace for the chatgptapi... (its a little different... (not much but there is a difference :D))
pay as you go should be the default pricing format but whatever 🙄
i totally agree to that
I hope they fix it
It should be fixed in the next twenty mintues hopefully.
As its been out for 2 hours and 40 mintues
the pricing?
no why whould they?
but the outtage? yeah
I’m talking on the outage
yeah i just answered it on both contexts XD
epic bugs
Anyone bored
i would like to post a meme but i am afraid of the timeout i get for posting an not whitelisted link
to the bugs
The dreaded time out.
that ^
Oh they've Identified the escho now.
for me its 21 euro / dollar
Durn, welp that inflation for ya.
42?
i think there was a time...
10 euros for gptplus? idk
oh nz
Mhm, new zealands inflation rates are terrible
Is it fixed
meybe not entirely?
status still say identified
wait it is fixed
Confirm
woo! let's go bring it down again with the surge in traffic! /j
Open AI status
By complaining we mange to make it go faster
its MONITORING
real
not fixed and not identified 😄
Anyhow see you lads around when the next outage happens.
see ya soon
lets talk about the cgpt outtake with cgpt 😄
gpt back?
Has the new Turbo model rolled out to anyone using ChatGPT yet?
bump
Add your well-crafted prompts to our #1019652163640762428,
or share your interactions with ChatGPT in #1050184247920562316!
does anyone have access to the new model within chatgpt?
What does Request not Allowed mean?
bump
So, all OpenAI has to do to achieve "five 9s" availability is have no additional outages for the next ~36 years.
is the Read Aloud function broken for anyone else?
click the button, wheel spins for a second as if generating audio, then goes back to normal as if finished playback
have the rate limits on chatgpt decreased? i feel like i hit my limit a lot earlier now
Has message playback suddenly stopped working
Fixed now on my end
Playback icon functions, still getting no sound
Now it decides to function -_-
I'm a ChatGPT Plus user with v4. I've been trying for a couple hours now to work with it to solve a fairly trivial challenge. I can't bully this poor thing enough to overcome its issues.
- It's extremely verbose despite directives to be brief.
- I can't count the number of ways that it's found to effectively say "I don't know". This happens a lot - it uses a lot of words to worm around suggestions and guesses and and possibilities that might be valid if I had not already disqualified them in the initial prompt.
- It insists that it cannot browse for data while it does so without problem from time to time.
- It consistently tells me to look for documentation and find someone to provide support, when I try to get it to understand that I want it to browse for docs, and use data from training.
- I'm using words and prompt techniques that I use all the time with various degrees of success. I am not asking this to be an oracle of insight, just asking it to process text and provide suggestions based on known data.
Our golden child here (GPT4) is getting a failing grade in class and it pains me to watch this happening.
I admit that I am asking it to help solve a challenge with Linux commands that might be specific to command versions, OS version, and local settings. But I'm fairly adept at using GPT for this application - sometimes it shines and at other times its as dense as it's early v3 sibling.
I'm not looking for a solution, just openly stating once again that the model we're using now has gotten much worse over time.
What is the challenge and prompting techniques in question?
Thanks. I'll acknowledge the desire/need to get to brass tacks and understand the specifics to determine if there is a real issue and it nature. On the other hand, this is happening a lot more often, or I wouldn't blast this here. That is, this is happening with a number of challenges on different topics with different prompt styles and details - and the pattern is that GPT4 is having a very hard time these days when it was doing much better last year.
I've changed the style a few times, but here are tidbits from this most recent:
As an expert with mail servers, Dovecot, and Sieve filters, you will answer questions here accurately and concisely. You will browse for details as required, consider responses carefully using all available data, and provide links to verify your responses.
The challenge is to compile a single .sieve file to a .svbin file.
The commands are issued by the root user. The command results in the error that "include: personal" files are unavailable.To solve this problem it is extremely important to understand which folder is being used by sievec as the search folder for personal .sieve files, and to be able to set that folder.
This is a Linux system with Dovecot v2.3.7. Do not suggest commands or options that are not available in that version.
The path is correct. The .sieve file exists. The sieve filters work with the
sieve-filtercommand from the command-line. The user admin@foo.tld is valid when referenced bysieve-filterand withsieve-test. The problem is only with the location of the included personal files when sievec is run from the command-line.Keep responses very brief. I prefer discussion to narration. I do not want guesses or supposition. Tell me exactly how we need to diagnose the problem so that it can be solved. Do not tell me to read documentation - you will browse documentation if that is required.
That's not the full prompt but it's a reasonable sample of the latest version.
This is just the latest of a series of challenges related to Dovecot, sieve, mail filtering. Focus less on the task and more on the depth of instruction that I've had to use to drive it into the right direction. Unfortunately this terse prompt is what results when more cordial and open prompting continued to lead nowhere.
Examples of response types that are not helpful include:
As a temporary workaround...
the next step involves a deeper dive into the documentation and perhaps the source code...
If the documentation review does not uncover a solution, reaching out to the Dovecot support team or community forums with this specific issue might provide insights...
we need to ensure...
might indicate a problem with accessing...
Yes, all of those kinds of points are valid, but they are extremely elusive and do not lead to actionable steps to diagnose the issue. Again, my goal in this channel isn't to solve the problem but to point out how difficult it is to get this model to follow instructions, follow a chain of reasoning, and to use information that is available in-context, from training, or from browsing.
( Need to break for dinner - will absolutely be back later. TY )
Don't bully AI!
Dovecot v2.3.7
remember it has no problem solving skills, it is generating text, it is trained on documentation and other internet contributions. when using software versions which are cutting edge, it has very little information available to work with. the more specific you are, the shallower your pool becomes.
remember it has no problem solving skills, it is generating text
This is a truism and is simply referred to as "problem solving" in here for the sake of brevity.
The message in question refers to using browsing tools to access this documentation, so in this case it is not limited in just training alone when successful.
makes no difference if you feed it updated material, the model hasn't been trained on any new material
it doesnt train itself on the fly
This does not mean it cannot use information it is given
well how is it working out for him? you couldnt even help him just wanted to nitpick me
hello chatGPT here are the new updated docs: [link]
chatGPT - okay, i'll scrape this page. i'll load it into context like you just sent this whole page of data into the chat box.
now i'll look up my old (outdated) model and try to come up with something (using my outdated training data) that MIGHT work for you.
here have my hallucinations of what the new context should work (not WILL work), based on old training data hallucinates a bunch of garbage
this has actually happened to me, many times, so i dont want your "but, but, but"
it's fine if like Lumirix you're "studying computer science" which usually means studying old stuff, which has decades of documents to train a model with. it is excellent at example, solving SQL problems. because that is very, very old technology. but anything cutting edge, like the OP is wanting to work with, and like the many things i use - it is absolutely useless. it will not think or grasp any new material you feed it in regards to these new technologies if it has not trained on anything related to them.
that should be obvious.
🕊️
Hello, would like to get some insight how to test the following, RAG like, approach to building question/answering systems.
In RAG, before we put our data in a vector database or similar, some preprocessing steps are usually required, pdf/text conversion, text cleanup, summarisation, etc.
What if we put the preprocessing step a "step") futher, and instead of summarizing the documents, we ask LLM to rewrite them in a question/answer format. This also acts as a chunking step, since every question/answer pair become a chunk.
Then we can vectorise the questions, or both questions and answers, and when a new query comes in we use vector similarity to retrieve the relative knowledge and answer the users question.
Are there some well established guidelines how to estimate the performance of RAG systems so that we could test this question/answer approach and estimante its peformance on an established dataset.
Thank you for your thoughts.
this is not ChatGPT related, please use #ai-discussions
is chat gpt down?
yep
So when is GPT-4 Turbo coming out on the app itself?
why is my chatgpt taking forever to load
I also would like to know as well whether GPT-4 is coming to the App
Feed it the information internally through its knowledge utilizing CustomGPT aka “MyGPT” in the form of PDFs or text files
chatgpt cant even refresh well ? after i paid for the plus
Are you using vpn or Firefox
on chrome no vpn
cleared cache files too
Did you log in and out
Sometimes that’s what it takes
Web server is returning an unknown error
There is an unknown connection issue between Cloudflare and the origin web server. As a result, the web page can not be displayed.
showing this now
Check status.OpenAI.com maybe it’s a regional issue
yesterday was outtage nothing today tho on status
it is written here https://openai.com/chatgpt/pricing , that team has a higher message cap. is this finally true and do we have any information of what the cap is there?
i tested on day 1 #chatgpt-discussions message
well, this looks good and maybe really worth it. what about the performance? stable?
i dunno if its any diff to plus, because... reasons
i grew up on c64 tape drives. imprints patience
Really annoyed that custom GPT's won't respect when I set "Privacy Settings" -> to "Always Allow" for my API calls. It still asks me every time to "Confirm", SUPER ANNOYING!!!
it does break the chatgpt voice immersion thats for sure
Dont use it then
Just want it to work as advertised, I do pay for the damn thing
Are there problems on firefox?
Bruh
Follow up to @spring iris @elfin birch : thanks for your caring discussion, really. To be clear, the software discussed is years old, with some knowledge certainly in training, as I've had decent discussions with GPT on the topic before. Note again that the specific topic isn't relevant. The point is that GPT 4 has become very lazy, evasive, chatty to avoid a simple "I don't know", and it's sense of logic has been nerfed.
Yes, I know it's just using similarity searches and predictions on vectorized tokens. I'm a developer. This isn't AGI and ChatGPT is little more than a wrapper over the API, stacking messages until context rolls over. What I'm saying, and I've been repeating for months here, is that this model is nerfed. All I can do now is look forward to turbo, newer training, more context, improved reasoning, and other anticipated features. Thanks y'all.
gpt 4 is like a snail
Why is Gemini so much faster than gpt4? Do they use a lot more GPU resources for the calculations?
yes microsoft has more resources and more money to burn
sorry, google*
gemini is much more censored though, if you thought openAI was bad... gemini is much worse
gemini speed is more because of very big TPUs datacenters and overall model is optimalised for tpus :0 Google DeepMind (creator of gemini) got 2x more tpus than Openai got gpus
When it comes to translations and writing, I think Gemini wins here. Feels more natural. But at everything else, openai wins lmao
gemini censors every single thing its not even funny
I'm using Gemini atm because of the 2 month trial, but I will probably switch back then
I've heard that Claude 3 is better than gpt4? Is it true? Drawbacks?
depends for what you using it when coding claude 3 is better but overall they are similar models :p
Is it good at writing naturally? Imo gpt4 often writes very cheesy and lengthy... (Can't try it out now because i'm in EU, but probably soon)
same here :) EU claude 3 opus can't use it but i think you can use it on perplexity
My account knowledge cut-off says April 2024. Is the model updated eventually?
Some have connectivity problems when using any particular browser
It’s because it’s instance based, it won’t ask in the same convo if you click always allow unless you utilize different apis and different call categories
is it just me or the GPT4 is writing so slow today/recently? this doesnt feel like turbo anymore
its just because lot of peoples are using it rn
When will the new model come to gpt plus?
When it will be #announcements
Guys is Openai granting people credit to fine-tune models I just open my dashboard and found out I have $5 mean while I haven’t made any transactions to the platform
Beware of possible scams or fraudulent activities that you may receive through direct messages. OpenAI staff will never DM you for any transactions.
Please report any incident by sending a DM to @languid valley immediately.
But then again I’ve spent a total of 1800 usd ish roughly
Thanks
explain how pls
i keep getting network errors on gpt4, the answer still comes out but its then greyed out.. anyone else having the same issue?
Need help my friend had his access to his account to GPT-4 limited by OpenAI even though he's on plus subscription. He's reported the case to openai. Then what need to be done?
not much you can do tbh, it has to be reviewed by OpenAI - so it's just a waiting game at this point
it might simply not know or unable to find the specific resource for 2.3 or 2.3.7 
im testing for a moment what you noted.. i dont know dovecot. so i dunno if its responses are legit.
it gave me 2 interesting responses imo, out of 4.
Check Include Directories and Paths: Dovecot's transition from v2.2 to v2.3 included several changes to path handling, such as the fs-posix plugin no longer automatically appending a / to paths if it's not there (Dovecot Documentation).
and
Dovecot's Pigeonhole Sieve plugin looks for user’s Sieve script file in the user’s home directory by default (~/.dovecot.sieve). To store scripts elsewhere, or if you're using the include directive to incorporate additional Sieve scripts, you must specify the paths using the sieve, sieve_dir, and sieve_global_dir settings within the Dovecot configuration file (dovecot.conf). The sieve setting points to the user’s main script storage, while sieve_dir and sieve_global_dir are used for :personal and :global script inclusions, respectively (Dovecot Documentation) (Dovecot Documentation).
is that similar to the responses you were getting, or not?
Thanks @warm musk It's slightly better as a more complete response, but that could be due to nuances in your prompts. It revealed most of the same info to me, though the slash detail is new. I use the info in testing and then incorporate detail like that and results into an edit of my first prompt. This eliminates context bulk. (I'm aware of how models sometimes miss detail in the middle of context but I'm not pushing limits here.)
As you see, you had to go through several responses to get some of that gold. That's part of what I'm trying to describe here.
On a completely new task, I spent hours on a prompt for a new custom GPT that insisted on page-long responses despite numerous directives to keep responses very brief and conversational. I worked with ChatGPT in another session to refine the prompt, to improve the rules on brevity. GPT-enhanced prompts still didn't work until GPT4 revised the entire prompt to be mostly related to response size rather than topic-focused. My challenge tomorrow will be to see what I can eliminate now to achieve the same brevity. It's code debugging.
Hint for everyone: I have found that it can be very helpful to ask GPT to step out of character, explain the last response, and suggest improvement to the prompt to achieve a goal. Sometimes it will say "you should use the word x rather than y". While this is amazingly helpful, I feel this is another example of GPT nerfing, where it can't process basic word synonyms.
Hello everyone, I need help. ChatGPT now giving me short responses. I'm using 4 VIA SUBSCRIPTION
@timber bone Tell it you want it to elaborate more, to provide more complete responses. Be explicit about what you expect.
This is new behavior that didn't show before. I'm using my Android phone. It doesn't behave that way on a PC.
Even when I asked it to give me long responses and details it doesn't.
So if I ask at the same question on PC and on my phone the response is totally different. It just happened today for the first time
mobile app has explicit instructions set by openai to it be brief in its responses
It was working fine. This doesn't explain the sudden change today
@feral zinc @narrow viper
the new model probably follows instructions better than before
Quite easy when using the API For as long as the API has been available.
Ohh it’s the fake Syntax
🗿
i see
yeah it can be quite challenging. as for the prompt, thanks for reminding me, i forgot to attach the test chat for reference, so here it is nontheless 😄
https://chat.openai.com/share/8d62f7cd-2dbc-4b33-a1c3-06e7c1179b0c
i find it usually helps to split what i want it to do, from the subject matter by surrounding the subject matter with start and end quotes or backticks.
How to contact support about this unusual app behavior
I've been on this website for 15 minutes and I cannot find a contact us. On my case it's not reported there
🤣 
ghehehehehe
It's via the chat widget in the bottom-right of that page. You'll start a new chat, click through the most relevant options, then eventually you'll find a path that lets you type your own message. This will submit a ticket, it won't connect you with someone live!
live reponses are dope tho
i always get a response within 2 hours.
depends i guess on how both parties deal with a conflict. 😛 but yeah i agree, theres no point in everybody singing kumbayah and acting like we don't have conflicts. i like things handled straightforward, none of that fake stuff and cloak&dagger games 😄
Yes it's definitely gotten speedier
thats a lot better than last year when it appearantly took lots of months to reply to my email 😄
by the time i got my reply the problem was already solved for a couple of months 😛
happy to see its gotten speedier like Solbus notes 👀 🥳 
Solbus notes.
🤣 touche.
i had to just scold oai, thorugh support, bummer, although i understand their dilemma with my GPT.
Yeah, ChatGPT4 is pretty slow right now for me. Internet is fine.
its been BARRED from being public. 
i thought to myself "cant be that bad"
apparrantly it is.
😔
thats a bummer indeed.
is there a chance that if you make adjustments it'll get re-evaluated positively?
it dosent conflict with any policy
and adheres to all the policies.
i gave it the entire D&D 5th edition OGL which is covered under the ogl License provided the disclaimer is provided as well. which is done.
it might be a slippery slope for OAI, idk.
it adheres to both OAI Policy and Legal Policy of WOTC and the OGL.
theres no conflict at all.
but it gets caught in the automated Moderation, and has since then been barred/banned from being set as public.
which confused me.
did chatgpt 4 change? it sounds so much more different and smarter all of a sudden
sounds like they're being cautious and have to enforce a (temporary) 'no potentially copyrighted material!' hard line. probably untill lawsuits get done with. 
lots of D&D stuff is copyrighted. hence to be on the safe side, it triggers? 
it did 🙂 #chatgpt-discussions message
thats the thing, the OGL is covered under the OGL, which allowed the SRD "The Systems Reference Document (SRD) contains guidelines for publishing content under the Open-Gaming License (OGL) or Creative Commons. The Dungeon Masters Guild also provides self-publishing opportunities for individuals and groups."
Basically the Core version, and boiled down version of dnd
the ogl is the legal disclaimer. and the content, wheres the SRD is what i fed it alongside the OGL. aka the Disclaimer the model needs. for it to be allowed.
so theres no inconsistencies. everything adds up.
Basically the Core version, and boiled down version of dnd
is that part opensource , free to use licensed?
yes. within certain areas such as...
- "I want to design content using the fifth edition rules for D&D"
- "I want to publish my original campaign world using fifth edition rules"
- "I want to print and sell my fifth edition D&D product on my own"
wow it's like hyping me up telling me what to do lmao.. i asked "how did ayurveda use to clean hair? did they use some sort of shampoo conditioner?"
... Which is basically what the model's job is, to help create Section 2. not necessarily for sale, but for personal use.
as long as it's under section 2, it can be stretched to Section 1 & 3.
The model even gives the Disclaimer and needed hotlinks.
... Regardless of user message.
then given there are conditions, perhaps OAI simply isn't indexing those , or can't because of lack of manpower?
a false positive is very annoying 👀
i specifically told it to flat out ignore the initial user response regardless of the response. so it can post the disclaimer. as it's first msg.
😄 🍻
care to test it?
sure
ill slide into your dms
and have you tried emailing OAI? or only the ticket thing on the site?
i did the ticket on the site.
👍
What is the message limit on gpt-4 currently?
It's hallucinating, i tested it by asking about openai new models , Claude 3 model, react native latest version. All the answers it gave are hallucinated ones, it didn't atleast give outdated information
On Plus, the default is 40/3hrs. It can be changed at times based on server load. https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7102672-how-can-i-access-gpt-4
Thanks, earlier it used to show a 40 messages limit in my account. But now it's saying just usage limits may apply. I was confused about whether the limit got lowered
it may be because of throttling during peak hours?
just a wild guess. or simply a bug 😄
Help please, I'm having problems with the openai assistant api. I'm trying to access an assistant that I created in playground. I put the assistant id in python, it seems that there is a problem with the openai versions of the library since the code returns this error: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\Users\work pc\Documents\projectbeta\assistant_module.py", line 11, in <module>
message = client.beta.messages.create(
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AttributeError: 'Beta' object has no attribute 'messages'
Hi
chatgpt 4 has become is getting dumber by the day. what's going on with it?
^^^^
does anyone know the website that does a side by side comparison of all the AIs for free, funded by some VCs? The one where you prompt and then it generates 2 different completions with the 2 different models?
i cant think of any for free, but you may be thinking of perplexity. they have a pro feature which lets you use different ais for the answers.
Hello, is Sora available?
rip
For real I ask it to make a picture of rapper mac Dre sitting on a Chevy and it gave me a pic of an Indian guy wearing a turban 😦
lmfao
At the moment it has only been given to a chosen group of people who are visual artists, designers, creative directors and filmmakers. We (the public) are not aware of any plans for roll-outs yet.
Sora will come out later this year
It has been confirmed by OpenAI
So we know there is a maximum of 8.5 months until we get it
Where did you read this? This is from https://help.openai.com/en/articles/8958981-how-to-access-sora:
At this time, we don’t have a timeline or additional details to share on Sora’s broader public availability.
Speaking to the The Wall Street Journal OpenAI CTO Mira Murati said Sora would be available for the public by the end of this year and possibly within the next few months. So far we've only seen pre-built videos from OpenAI.
I was timed out for posting the link here, so you can Google the text in the quote, it'll show you said article
Watching the clip on YouTube right now (WSJ, "OpenAI's Sora Made Me Crazy Videos..."), thanks for the tip! This is her quote:
I'm hoping definitely this year, but could be a few months.
Don't have access to the full interview, but seems mostly consistent with your excerpt! Only thing that gives me pause is the word "hoping", but a release of some kind this year doesn't seem impossible -- just a matter of what the release looks like, and how expensive it is, computationally and, in turn, money-wise!
Thanks again.
Thanks, the "hoping" is an important clarification - I didn't watch the video, only have read the article, where I didn't see this word being mentioned. It seems likely but not 100%
From the video it even seems possible that she's correcting "hoping" with "definitely" -- like it could be almost "I'm hoping...definitely this year, but could be a few months" but that's totally my subjective take on how she phrased it.
is there a way to delete my conversation from open AI database? I dont want it to have my code if I can help it
Deleted conversations are deleted by OpenAI after 30 days I believe. If you don't want your data used for training, you can disable that option in your settings too! https://help.openai.com/en/articles/8809935-how-chat-retention-works-in-chatgpt
I see, Solbus. I personally can't wait to use it, I liked DALL-E 3 a lot too
whats going on with that
do i have turbo now or why is it telling me its knowledge is up until april 2024, thats gotta be a hallucination bc even turbo is only until dec 23
I've seen an Apr '24 cutoff date reported by a few people recently. I think it must be a hallucination regarding it getting the current date from the system prompt.
it did that multiple times and never did that before
right
Don't ask ChatGPT questions about itself. It often just hallucinates
Just assume it doesn't know anything about itself
i know i know but it should know about its knowledge cutoff bc its specifically mentioned in the system prompt
so thats how i test if i have turbo already
its definitely really fast rn and the list numbering structuring stuff seems to be fixed
its possible im on turbo
Maybe one way to test if you have ChatGPT-4 Turbo is to compare to Copilot?
All Copilot users now have GPT-4 Turbo, including the free tier
The responses there for me are similar to those I got on ChatGPT Plus
idk about that copilot was always quite different compared to chatgpt
GPT-4 on Plus has been Turbo since DevDay in November. There have just been a few revisions of Turbo released since then, and it's not exactly clear which version of Turbo has been in use on Plus. The knowledge cutoff test is a good way to try to test it, when it's not hallucinating! It's also possible that different users have different versions of Turbo at different times -- A/B testing is normal, as are gradual rollouts!
....Did they just remove the ability to regenerate responses from further up in a conversation branch?
you tell me
Does anyone know how I can pre-emptively approximate the number of tokens in my prompts and attachments? Is there an API for this?
is this gpt update in regular browser gpt4 now?
do you know if the policy of deleted conversations are deleted by OpenAI after 30 days written on their privacy policy or anything?
Saw that too but my knowledge cutoff hasn’t changed yet so I must have the old model
I get a error in chatgpt The payments page encountered an error. Please try again. If the problem continues, please visit help.openai.com. Was gonna try out thenew updated gpt4 model
April 2023 instead of December
Which could just be them not updating the system prompt
Was in the release and api notes
Yeah - I checked and saw mine still says April 2023 as well
Here it also says April 2023.
I mean, it also "said", it's been about 5 minutes since chatgpt doesn't work for me, the website.
The OpenAI Discord is an actively moderated server.
• Refrain from sharing inappropriate content on the server. This includes but is not limited to messages, media, or other topics of graphically violent, sexual nature, and drug-related content.
• Report all sensitive and offensive content in the feedback reporting tool in the ChatGPT web UI instead of here on Discord.
I don't understand, what did I say?
Hey bot, I just mentioned that the service is down for me lol
Are there any difference between Plus(opted out for training) and Team/Enterprise, about if OpenAI can see my data?
But despite this, I noticed, when the service was online for me, that the responses were very fast.
It's back online now for me. If it wasn't unavailability, it could have been route problems.
Any idea when ChatGPT 5 is expected to be released?
Yes, after the announcement

is gpt out for anyone else?
"Hmm...something seems to have gone wrong." pepeHands
i am getting 500 error
it's only happening to gpt4 on my end
UGH it's down again, hmm.. oops something has gone wrong.
🙃
so not just me then?
all prompts are just returning "there was an error generating a response"
ChatGPT shys away from any code which uses mathematical or engineering logic. It will just provide "simplified examples" which just setup placeholder functions that don't do anything

