#chatgpt-discussions
1 messages · Page 71 of 1
yeah, I get that feeling too
This new update makes it so hard to download prompts from images
it changed... like when gpt4 was new it was so much less lazy
You can test it on the playground, and people have gotten the system prompt out.
It keeps mucking up
Turbo is just as bad if not worse and they advertised it as the least lazy model... lol.. right. I think we are being gaslighted by openai 
Also the prompts it's giving me seem to be wrong
am i supposed to be able to get GPT-4 to do introspection on its own environment
it claims to have simulated a few of the answers, but after seeing its single $PATH folder im convinved it was the real bin path
it stores your uploads in /mnt/data
although it claims the linux kernel of the system is only 4.4.0 which seems incorrect, although ive seen some mega expensive network gear also use ancient kernels
sandbox appears to be its posix username but it seems to think /root is $HOME
To be fair if you get bs answers from GPT, then you’re promoting wrong, I made a stock watch app no issues, easy.
Custom GPTs are the replacement
nah it sucks. cant get consistent code as itll get changed with follow up questions, it sometimes misses params, vars or segments so i have to double check everything
Then you’re not doing it properly
🤷
Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 503 ()
POST https://chat.openai.com/backend-api/conversation 503 (Service Unavailable)
i will cancel my plus plan from now on
please ALWAYS double and triple check all important info that llms are providing you
it could easily be an hallucination and cause harm
google the plant and compare thoroughly if it really is the one
gpt4 now has no usage limit
wait realy?
Only after a certain amount of messages but otherwise no usage limit
oh nice
who as individual will buy teams then.
its not meant for individuals, thats the entire point
only after the remove of cap..before, i bought w frd for more quota
However, this information on the link directed when clicking on the icon has been there since January without any updates. So I don't think it means much...
This is indeed a valid test. It's a shame that it seems to be just a UI detail.
The big problem with a "maybe a future update" question is that OpenAI usually takes several weeks to update something in user accounts. The memory feature, for example, has been announced for two months and it appears that most accounts still do not have this feature. That's more than 6 weeks.
It's not quite like that. According to the information in the model currently presented in the website's UI, the limit now (or in the future) is "flexible", varying according to demand, at least that is how it is understood with "limits can be applied".
However, a user here has already confirmed that, despite this new information, the limit of 40 messages every 3 hours continues to apply.
I haven't tested it yet, but I hope the limits will be adjusted and improved as soon as possible.
as of 3 days ago i got the 3 hour msg\
Calm down, not so fast, friend xD
Has the @Gpts functionality been removed? I thought at one point they let you summon in one bot from a different chat, but I can't seem to do that now
Have you used enough today as you did 3 days ago to see if you get the limit again?
not today no
I assume that since the first of the month, when the UI changed the limit information for me, I haven't used it enough to test whether I would receive the limit message.
Prompt is art now.
with everyone can be an artist with ease no one is
Do they even care about setting boundaries?
Or just mindlessly writing code and stuffing everything into the machine?
why is my gpt 4 not reading my pdf file it literally says it caannot read or directly access a pdf in which ive included and uploaded to the chat just now
"I'm sorry for any confusion, but as an AI developed by OpenAI, I don't have the capability to read or access external files or documents, including PDFs. However, if you have specific questions or need assistance with a topic, feel free to provide the relevant information or context from the PDF, and I'll do my best to help you based on that information."
that's super great ya know? I too made things from GPT like a c# news aggregator engine with an entire angular frontend with cosmos connectivity and more than a few different api's... all with the aid of GPT and yes GPT gave bs answers the whole way through... it forgets context, it gives half answers with 100% confidence. More often than not the first 4 answers are incorrect usually due to missing context. Everytime it goes into running one of those pascal scripts and fails like 7 out of 10 times and then just times out.... ya it's not the prompts.
Issue is prompt and using a generalized version and not an adapted one.
But if you do use the generalized one then i agree wholeheartedly with your point
While you can adapt a GPT bot to give more relevant answers IE modding a game engine with a bot trained with the guide. You can't adapt a gpt to be less lazy... IE only giving comments instead of actual code like
}
// Additional methods to manipulate missileBlueprint as needed
}
ya I didn't ask for it to half-arse it, I wanted a full and complete function.
Issue is that most people go directly to ChatGPT 4, enter a prompt on the generalized version and expect god tier code
And how long did you spend on that gpt
I find that irrelevant as I've not seen a gpt 4 that shows different behavior of effort.
Did you give it the code library itself
It’s super relevant
You should tailor make it to that one specific project alone and nothing else
how so? Show me a coding gpt that will give full effort in code output.
Just c# is general enough there should be more than a few out there adequate to the task right?
Issue is also overview
Have you tried claude opus? Soooo much less lazy. Not as intuitive but dang it outputs code faster and more complete.
I’ve tried it, it’s bad
In your case you Should integrate all the code libraries used and details of all of your project.
Then a rudimentary task manager script and JSON file
Then you have your project inside the gpt then gradually update it.
And in your case your model instructions should be in a JSON string with an indentation of 4
Because I never ever have the issues people complain about, should take your about 1 or 2 setting this gpt up
"Then a rudimentary task manager script and JSON file"
What do you mean task manager script?
Exactly what I said
It’s there to remind of its task
If you want to take it a step further you integrate another script in the form of a CRUD, and a json library
in the model instructions?
In its knowledge
ah
While it can’t directly manipulate files it can do so using CI
but if it's just in the knowledge how is it relevant to the bot... ie it's just data but not actual 'instructions' to be read and followed?
The instructions in this case are meant to be robotic allowing for no interpretation
Complete Grandual set of instructions specifying all it needs to do with file references when to and when not to
Let me give you a set of sample instructions
{
"task": "Code Syntax Check",
"description": "Check syntax of submitted code and provide feedback.",
"process_flow": [
{
"step": "Load Code",
"action": "Read code from 'submitted_code.txt'.",
"sub_actions": [
{"action": "Verify file exists.", "on_failure": "Notify user: File not found."}
]
},
{
"step": "Syntax Check",
"action": "Invoke code interpreter to check syntax.",
"sub_actions": [
{"action": "If syntax error, record details in 'syntax_errors.txt'."}
],
"next_step_on_success": "Notify user: Syntax is correct.",
"next_step_on_failure": "Proceed to feedback generation."
},
{
"step": "Generate Feedback",
"action": "Create feedback report based on 'syntax_errors.txt'.",
"sub_actions": [
{"action": "Format feedback as list.", "output": "Generate 'feedback_report.txt'."}
]
}
],
"file_overview": [
{
"file_name": "submitted_code.txt",
"purpose": "Store user-submitted code for review."
},
{
"file_name": "syntax_errors.txt",
"purpose": "Record detected syntax errors."
},
{
"file_name": "feedback_report.txt",
"purpose": "Provide user with detailed feedback on syntax errors."
}
],
"comments": "Ensure the code interpreter is compatible with the programming language of the submitted code."
}
This is a set of unoptimized sample instructions
This is how I format my internal instructions
I see. I do like how it essentially forces the bot to work through each prompt in phases. Yeah that's worth giving a try. How did you do the CI?
Although this one is kinda primitive and unoptimized
Provided it has CI enabled it’ll do it on its own but CI is primarily enabled due to your ability to upload zip files
Which can contain your project and other coding libraries used In it
ah, so you are essentially re-uploading them each time you change something
I basically make the needed adjustments to the project folder and it’s code for MY project then I gradually work my way up
Faster than asking and regenerating answers
And then yes then I reupload the project of mine with the adjustments
Seems like you had to shoehorn the bot into behaving the way you want but props to you for finding a way to getting it there. Seems like a decent method given how the tasks would save re-prompting and asking for the same 3 things each time.
And when I mean project I mean my entire coding project
I hard “code” the gpt to THAT One Project and that project Alone anything else results in punishment for it
I would have an 'assistant' per project since I wouldn't want to cross-train bots on different project data
The punishment being forced to read cryptic glitched text with no meaning
Adapting to other projects are easy
A little rewording and new files then you good
I also ensure that my instructions are a minimum of 7500 characters
yup... recycled training material and then that specific bot gets left on the curb when the project is done. Gonna be a lot of homeless bots on my account
If you feel spicy you can add an instruction tracker script
why?
Then it’s even more accurate
Then if you give it a summation script then you never run out of context
Then we’re spicing things up
doesn't that add a bit exponentially to your prompts?
It’s for me only
ah
But by then you’re on your 17-18th file
I figured this out when code interpreter was released
First time telling anyone
GPT CAN create,copy,move,create folders and sub directories using code interpreter
Few actually know this haven’t found this anywhere other than when I tested couldn’t find it online
Like how it moves files on it's own system like if you give it a video and ask for mp3 and the python script bounces it around the /mnt/data dirs?
Maybe more I only tested those specific things, yes
ye, it's cool when it works but it fails a lot too
It also makes management easier on its part if you move all your files in properly organized places
I’ve never had an error doing this
100% succes rate
Ever figure out how much each project is costing you on api usage?
Ohh this ain’t api
It’s custom gpt
When I use API I use a swarm
All the examples I gave you works perfectly inside ChatGPT
Specifically for CustomGPT
Preferably with code interpreter enabled
and you're manually uploading the file changes you make? (custom gpt)
All it’s files are knowledge
That’s it
You never upload anything in the chat
In this case it’s entire being is finished your project within parameters
Looking at your example and trying to follow the logic here... so you have
"step": "Load Code",
"action": "Read code from 'submitted_code.txt'.",
where does submitted_code originate?
It was a primitive sample instructions set
Not for the particular purpose we talked but to show the overall visual and setup
So for that purpose what would be different in the approach?
But when you make an actual code change you are having to upload that file into your custom gpt, no?
Let’s say the gpt fixed some code. You would then reflect that change in the file and reupload the file and go again takes about 30 sec
Less perhaps
I'm not saying this is wrong but I'm asking this is manual clicking, right? like not CI
Yes you have to edit the gpt remove the outdated project and add the new
Not in the chat but in The actual knowledge section
gotcha... that makes more sense. Before you made it sound more streamlined which is totally possible with the API.
I do like the swarm idea... I been wanting to try one for a while but can't find the time.
Also the api costs go up pretty quick too so I try to avoid it unless I'm doing a heavier project
Exactly
lol... yes
That’s why I use this method on small projects such as writing an interactive sims game with GPTs
Or creating full discord bots as complex as the most popular one in very short time
Like short time as in 1 hour
Start to finish
Debugging not included
about as fast as gpt feels in a given day...
See those big discord bots like idk Avrae etc RPG or server management bots
Easy 1 hour
Not including the time tailored you specific gpt or testing
Local host
Setup "Agents" and you know how expensive it can really get, I use for development Ollama, it's slower because of the GPU threshold but less expensive in development, after that you just reconnect the API and there you go.
Yeah
I tried it was a 500 dollar bill
Just for running it for 2 hours with breaks
Never again
same, this is the reason I stopped to use any api
yeah, that's the american greed 😂
sweet
even sometimes show you error and sometimes didn't response.
10 gpt 4’s rest was turbo 3.5
NPC’s had their own memory and evolved
Could move around the channels
It was awesome
So awesome in fact I forgot to track my dang usage

but also a little bit funny, you can cap the usage though it wont get over a given budget.
True I had a max limit of 700
But I was so enthralled
Had to hit the emergency stop
I personally think the current token cost is too high
Well depends on usage
Well for GPT-4, true, also I do not like that kind of model it is not really a good concept since it seems to be from Mircosoft.
I agree
GPT 3.5 turbo is reasonable
Ish
I tend to think of the most token heavy scenario
The complete token model is not so good, but now the days all the tech companies with propitiatory software want to press as much money out of people as possible, that should not be possible since there are lot's of opensource solutions to the same problem.
But that always takes two.
Yeah
When will we get chat gpt 4 for free?
Does anyone know why ChatGPT4 doesn't accept .zip files anymore?
here we go again.....

is your chatgpt working?
yup
It can accept zip files
Is anyone else getting ChatGPT-4 responses, "It seems there was a misunderstanding with the instructions provided.", even with simple of instructions?
nope (netherlands)
idk if anyone else is having this error constantly. But I have been using ChatGPT 4 to rewrite emails. These emails will often include days of the week. For some reason I continue to receive responses that do not spell Wednesday correctly. ChatGPT continues to spell it as "Wedday". Has anyone else observed this?
#announcements i KNEW IT
✊
my gut was telling me this was coming soon
Anyone know when sora is getting dropped?
Not for a long time
^
what is this dalle thing?
ah right, have to click on the image and then it appears
nvm 😛
Yall ever think about what AI technology the US government has?
Like the announcement, is it just the bar to write prompts for you?
is that the only thing thats released?
They are usually 20 years ahead on these kinds of things
I thought by editing they meant you could edit existing images or something
Imagine taking all the info from the patriot act and tranning something off that
they created mark zuckerberg its an AI
You could automate national security
asked for a duck
no duck seen 😄
"You can now edit DALL·E images in ChatGPT across web, iOS, and Android. You can also get inspiration on styles when creating images in the DALL·E GPT!"
But then in there video theres no editing? Its just image generation with a menu?
Censorship would be so effective
you select parts of the image and then you ask to edit those parts
Their industry is, even the US government isn't far behind its own industry, I think.
If its inpainting thats really cool, I haven't seen the inapinting part yet
but I guess chatGPT users are just going to be taught wrong terms all the time 😄
How do I get to the inpainting, their video doesn't show that, it literally just shows a way to add words to prompts for people that dont know prompting
Click on the image
wanted to replace a boat with a duck
but no duck seen, only another boat 😄
Ah ok, that makes sense! That's really cool.
it does
watch closely 😛
wondering the same
but generally if you get weird generation, weird face or hands, but like the rest of the image
then this is the thing to use only on that part to regenerate it
its out
Their video left out the inpainting entirely lol
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/977259063052234752/1225128390747619398/DallE_Style.gif?ex=662000ba&is=660d8bba&hm=84bd14682a879162580cab1c0bca84d44721acc619e4d15f1d28653f1a26e7d9&
it loops before it ever shows it?
1 minute 9 seconds
im not seeing a video that long
no just playing it in my browser, it showing drawing a scifi polar bear and thats it
does not even play in my browser (firefox)
just gray page, does not even download
its supposed to be a dog
I only see dog in a video
poodle
might have posted wrong video and replaced?
it sure as hell does not want to give me any ducks 😄
I'm seeing if you can get the inpainting to correct mispelled text
that would be pretty cool
some weird "lags" on the selection tool
sometimes selecting, other times not selecting
I wish if the dalle images edit feature allows to edit non dalle images. It's gonna be cool to be able to edit any image . That was available in dalle 2. The results are going to be incredible with the power of dalle 3!
Oh wow, it actually works for correcting text, thats huge value!
the select tool is behaving very strangely
does the second twit link in the post in announcements work for others?
Nope
How exactly should the editing function be used? Should I make the requests for improvement? Or should I provide the same previous prompt and then it will only change the section I highlight?
If my prompt is "Knight holding a sword" and the knight is holding the sword weirdly. Should I highlight the area and then type "this area needs improved. The knights hands need to be better placed" or should I just provide the same prompt of "Knight holding a sword" again?
yeah if I try randomly clicking with select tool
its like I can only reliably select the top left part of the image
the bottom and right side is very often not registering when I click...but then sometimes it selects
I think zooming in from 80% to 100% in browser made a difference and now bigger area is fine, but still a bit of right and bottom is weird selecting (firefox)
but sometimes it just generally does not select when I click
What do you mean "edit images"?
You can highlight parts of an image and then ask it to replace or redraw those parts as you'd like
"inpainting"
heh
and when I download the image its under 1kb broken 😄
I guess even unedited ones right now
(seems fine in another conversation)
I asked it to put a famous person's face on a rubber duck as a test and it refused, I'll probably stick with SDXL, but it's pretty neat to have it quickly available if I want to generate bland un-funny images that can't possibly cause anyone any offense 😂
or this one if you need text
but yeah, nothing beats a local model
Hi. I want to use ChatGPT, but it is slow. Fix it, please
Without ChatGPT, my life is nothing
it is slow but why ?
Because LOT of peoples use it and yk GPUs are limited... OAI is doing everything they can to make gpt fast again....
all they have to do is to increaase the CPU and memory
sadly its not so easy... AI operate on GPUs and not costumers one it need H100 gpus that even Nvidia said they have problems manufacturing a lot of them
How do I edit a photo on my phone?
It's because of them darn kids and their homework. When school is out of session gpt is super fast! Then come opening school week and GPT cries hard. Also somehow gpt usage equates to water usage so the kids are also using up the earth's water supply apparently. Homework is the devil.
Generated an image of a samurai eating a ham sandwich. Tried to select a region to inpaint "Hamurai" -> failurai. Ah well, I'd be burning way too much on inference if this worked anyway...
Is that image edition already live on Android?
when will chatgpt 4 be free
another boring update
The editing feature is epic, it's inpainting!
The last thing we need is for GPT-4 to be free. As things stand, OpenAI doesn't seem to have sufficient compute capacity for their Plus subscriptions. The degree to which GPT-4 has gotten worse defies reason, presumably to use less compute power. If anything, OpenAI should restrict free usage more than they already do, and restore the quality of the Plus service.
I wonder how they will release Sora to the general public. Surely it will come with a price, but I wonder if the average person could even use it given how much power it will take to generate such videos. Any thoughts?
Somone from microsoft leaked that they will be giving sora access in Microsoft copilot so it will be accesible probably but when hmm mayby 2024 year or when oai will get better datacenters mayby with B200 gpus ? Future is interesting
yeah, better test it on microsoft
they can handle the heat 😄
Give me short responses unless I ask you for long responses.
If I say give me a snippet just give me the code with very very brief instructions
if I ask you a question I would like you to respond to me in a short conversational way, one or two sentences. If I say elaborate in response you can send a longer response.
Don't give me long lists of steps when giving instructions, simply tell me what the next step is
Keep responses short and conversational
Keep responses short and conversational
Keep responses short and conversational
Keep responses short and conversational
Keep responses short and conversational
Keep responses short and conversational
Keep responses short and conversational
Keep responses short and conversational
Keep responses short and conversational
Keep responses short and conversational
Keep responses short and conversational
Keep responses short and conversational
Keep responses short and conversational
"Keep responses short and conversational. If I ask for a snippet, provide code with brief instructions. If I ask a question, respond in one or two sentences. Only elaborate if I request it. Avoid long lists of steps; just tell me the next step."
I have this in my custom chatgpt section are you seeing this data for all of my previous queries?
ChatGPT
Yes, I see your preferences and will keep responses short and to the point. Let's continue in that style. What's next?```
Im losing my sanity trying to get chatgpt to listen.
When I tell it in the conversation to keep the response short it does but it doesnt listen in the saved chatgpts in fact I even asked it if its seeing this after a 4 page response and it said it is.
Any suggestions?
this is GPT 4 the smart one too
which part was in the custom instructions?
the top part, in the bottom part I wrote this
I would like chatgpt to give me instructional responses in a conversational manner that is short and concise, I want chatgpt to make assumptions that I have common sense and skip any general advice.
No more long responses unless I ask you to elaborate
I want chatgpt to only tell me the next few steps as I will tell chatgpt when I am done and when we can proceed to the next step
is it a set of instructions if so word it differently.
or is it a prompt u give it in the chat
Can someone tell what I'm doing wrong? I'm asking GPT to make paragrapghs 75 words long. But, it keeps making them like 30, sometimes 90, etc. It almost never does what I request. "Make this paragraph 75 words long: X" and it puts out 40 words. I've even made custom instructions. Idk
chatgpt is not good at counting
I had better experience with AI listening two years ago than I do now
It’s because the chatgpt accurancy is only for gpt4
GPT-4 does what is told
Hey! Like Kian mentioned, LLMs like GPT can't count, nor could they two years ago. They're "just" predicting words, there's nothing "behind the scenes" that can count words while predicting/generating them.
That's good to know. Would there be a way I could raise the chances to make them closer to 75 words?
Just through qualitative words really -- find a word like "paragraph," "long paragraph", "medium-length paragraph", etc. that tends to give you a desirable length, then use that word in future prompts.
Yea I'll give that a go, thanks 
Nonsense. GPT-4 doesn't listen to a word I say. Actually, it does the complete opposite of what I say and says sorry over and over. I don't know if its only me, but GPT-4 has gotten a lot more dumb and frustrating - even with simple tasks. It also lacks any context and memory of previous conversations in the same exact Chat.
Here is an example:
Me: Update my code to use single quotes except for when it would require escaping.
ChatGPT:
I'll update your code to use single quotes for strings, except in cases where it would require escaping with \\ or \', in which case I'll use double quotes to maintain readability. Here's your revised method:
// Using single quotes for string literals without needing to escape single quotes
$this->replaceInFile('Route::has(\'login\')', 'filament()->getLoginUrl()', $filePath);
$this->replaceInFile('Route::has(\'register\')', 'filament()->getRegistrationUrl()', $filePath);
$this->replaceInFile('Dashboard', '{{ ucfirst(filament()->getCurrentPanel()->getId()) }}', $filePath);
// Using double quotes for strings that include single quotes to avoid escaping
$this->replaceInFile("{{ url('/dashboard') }}", '{{ filament()->getHomeUrl() }}', $filePath);
$this->replaceInFile("{{ route('login') }}", '{{ filament()->getLoginUrl() }}', $filePath);
$this->replaceInFile("{{ route('register') }}", '{{ filament()->getRegistrationUrl() }}', $filePath);
Me: Isn't using 'Route::has(\'login\')' still considered escaping?
ChatGPT:
Yes, you're right. Using 'Route::has(\'login\')' indeed involves escaping single quotes within a single-quoted string, which contradicts the instruction to avoid such escaping.
Let's adjust the approach: use single quotes everywhere except where doing so would necessitate escaping single quotes within the string.
It then shows me entirely different code messed up and putting everything in double curly braces.
oh great GPT stopped responding as it types. now just gotta wait for the whole block of text even if it starts going off on a meaningless tangent
There are so many python gpt's which one do you think is the best?
chatgpt down
they are all python based
I got it to work. My guess is that OpenAI wants users to use custom gpt's from their store instead of "out of the box". I found a data analysis custom gpt and was able to extract the csv file.
How upto date is ChatGPT now, it seems to know about events that happend just a few days ago? It used to not even know the Queen died.
I am not looking for one, just curious how chatgpt knows about events from a few days ago that isn’t a major topic.
I doubt many people asked about “CVE-2024-3094”
GPT4 is up to some point in 2023 but gpt3.5 have data up to jan 2022 (as far as i remember). But they give it some basic recent facts so it know some basic facts
Yeah I’m using 4, was just wondering how it knew about a CVE from a couple days ago. It got the answers right so was curious.
do you guys buy gpt 4? Was it worth it?
It is lot more powerful than free ChatGPT and has lot more features and lot of custom GPTs from store. worth it or not will depend on your use cases.
{
"CustomGPT": {
"version": "1.0",
"objective": "Generate concise responses for text inputs and expressively written code for programming-related queries.",
"instructions": [
{
"textResponse": {
"guideline": "Responses should be concise, directly addressing the user's query without extraneous information. Aim for clarity and brevity."
}
},
{
"codeResponse": {
"guideline": "Code should be written expressively, with clear and logical line-by-line comments explaining the functionality. Maintain readability and efficiency in code structure."
}
}
],
"responseStyle": {
"general": "Keep text responses short and to the point.",
"coding": "Provide detailed code comments for clarity."
},
"implementationTips": {
"text": "Before responding, identify the core of the user's query. Eliminate filler words or phrases.",
"code": "Use descriptive variable names and include comments before blocks of code or tricky implementations to explain the thought process."
}
}
}
try that @gentle hull
or whoever 😂
So playing with the dalle chat, and noticed that using the photorealistic options, it likes to give you almost twins if asking for two people
Also seems to not understand existing IP's
hutool
thank the lords for ai
Contents may violate our content policy
Are you a bad gpt? Youre hallucinating like crazy
Youre just confidently spewing misinformation without any basis whatsoever lmao
I dont even bat an eye on dall e 3 since i know about midjourney
Its at least 2 to 4 times better not even exaggerating
Its crazy how far behind dall e 3 is
hi, is there anyone here experiencing a sudden spike in GPT4 Turbo usage? I currently have a spike in usage and I actually just used gpt3.5
Im now cannot upload any documents to GPT4, is there anyone have same issue?
oh wait, it working again
hi community, pleasse point me out the section in which people rant about their credit cards being declined when trying to renew chatgpt+plus subscription
all you can do is email support. no one here cares
Hi, only way it is on help.openai.com
Bottom right corner you have a chat you need to go there to submit a request
Add your well-crafted prompts to our #1019652163640762428,
or share your interactions with ChatGPT in #1050184247920562316!
it's better to address the issue with them directly 🙂
that chatbox is crap ... they never answer. but thannks
sadly we can't resolve openai account issues here
for sure I know you can't. I know this is not openai support
just would like to know why this is happening
Often it is from credit card side.
Mismatch address is number 1 issues
Beware of possible scams or fraudulent activities that you may receive through direct messages. OpenAI staff will never DM you for any transactions.
Please report any incident by sending a DM to @languid valley immediately.
True and false
Dalle is more accurate whereas mj has bigger images
Mj is very bad with many things so is Dalle each have their strengths and weaknesses but the only thing mj has going for it is bigger image resolutions
im baffled by how wrong your statements are
"the only thing mj has going for it is bigger image resolution" L M A O
"dall e is more accurate" wat
pls compare generated images in this discord and in theirs and tell me that stuff again
im not kidding its not even remotely close. its like a comparison between dall e 2 and 3 or even bigger
does anybody know how to make texts longer? "make text longer" doesnt work anymore
MidJourney tends to create more photo-realistic images. Able to create fine details, and more realistic features. MJ also creates more dynamic lighting.
However mj sucks with text
^ so does dall e
So “better” is really dependent on use case
meanwhile dall e 3 isnt even able to create photorealism so
For my line of work Dalle is vastly superior
mj is able to create more realistic stuff AND more stylized stuff
id be interested in examples of that
You’re overthinking plus I can’t share work of my customers
That’s a breach of contract

Honestly midjourney is great with detail and actions, BUT it fails miserably when you try to have two people have different features. Example if i ask for a mother and son, with different hair and eye color, it just makes them both the same hair and eye color haha.
oh cmon lmao
what a cope out
stop it

as if everything youve ever done with it was for a contract
its just a cheap cope out
Call it what you will, i personally think DALLE is better
But if we’re going the proof route then, Midjourney tends to be better for illustrations, surrealism, and digital art queries. Sure, While both create stunning images, you can notice some differences.
Dall-E 3 tends to ‘listen’ to a prompt a bit better than MJ; especially complex ones. An elongated cartoon character in Dall-E, actually looks like what was asked, Whereas MidJourney does the opposite, plus the method Dalle uses is more accurate, if we’re going all technical.
thats the only upside that comes to my mind with dall e 3, it probably follows prompts better
but im not sure about that thats just what ive heard
well imo they are 2 diffrent systems Dalle is made for doing yout prompt as good as you need
while MJ just focus on quality and realism ig
(didn't use MJ a lot so uh my optnion can be off)
i have used MJ a lot, and i honestly prefer accuracy over quality.
instead of having to sent a handful of queries to it to get the result i want.
Midjourney is also awful with one person asleep and one awake. Like parent and child.
Just wish the censorship of Dalle was dialed back about 25%
its not that bad
no it stil got limits just a "adjustable" one
Just a tip for people, if you want a “real” photograph in dalle” tell it to use “natural style”. It’s the API setting. If you just say natural, it will start lecturing that it isn’t allowed to create real people, but natural style is the setting for much more realistic creations versus “vivid”
yeah
its not available in chatgpt though and even if you use it its just not really good
What isn’t? You can use a prompt including the words “natural style”. I’m saying it’s a default setting in the API, not that the API is in ChatGPT.
youre wrong though
natural style is not available in chatgpt, no matter your prompt
and its not default in the api, vivid is always default, but the api version has the ability to switch
source: the official openai documentation on their api website
Ok, Steve
jus trying to correct misinformation, which we get a lot in here
hello guys
i recently tried asked chatgpt for the date
on april 1st
and it kept telling me the date is april 10th
anyone else facing this issue?
can someone collect data about chatgpt responses being better when you are being mean cuz as soon as i sweard at it, it gave me the response lmao
is there a limit to how many messages a chat with gpt4 can have? cause today i opened my chat and almost everything went missing
the only limit i know is about 40 messages per 3 hour. but i heard that there were problems with missing chat history you may try getting help from oai https://help.openai.com/en/
i feel they are busy making deals with microsoft
chatgpt down right now?
no
thx
but i think i’m f***d
alternatively we can um.. send a proper letter.
with a wax stamp and everything
written with a feather pen
in curly letters 😂 then we perfumate the actual letter. so it smells good.
idk who should write it.
Hey All,
How do you fix an LLM not returning sections of a document when drafting a document from a template that you are modifying? The LLM doesn't return back the sections it thinks hasn't had any changes made to it even though there have been changes made to that document.
explain in depth how u do this process, and which kind of gpt do you use.
would give further insight as to how to help you.
the reason i ask, is the document in MD, Plaintext, Binary, JSON, etc. very important.
maybe not binary but u get the gist.
its in plain text
Should i put the entire document as one json string or put the document structure in the json format
Structure it in a JSON Format, in a JSON File.
this GPT should be able to do for you quite easily.
Cheers mate. Thanks I think we can move on from here.
why do people say LLM's are not AI? is this just misinformed goal post shifting so they can avoid calling it AI? i figured we used to call little pacman ghosts "AI", and even after that we considered chess and go bots to be "AI", but now everyone is trying to call something that passes the turing test not AI
all of thats included in the definition of "ai"
people are saying llms alone are maybe not the way to aGi
oh well of course
but i mean the people adamantly saying that its not "AI"
they say its not "artificial intelligence" because it doesnt do exactly what a human does
i havent heard of such people, maybe youre mixing that up with agi or asi
no no
yes yes
its generally people on the internet who dont tend to have many qualifications
those people are talking about artificial general intelligence, not artificial intelligence
but i see this a LOT
so shouldnt they be saying "AGI"?
i feel like they might be the ones mixing it up lol
im talking about the term "AI"
i personally wouldnt go around spouting "chatgpt isnt AI"
sounds pretty idiotic considering AGI and AI are quite different
idk ive never seen anyone state that but you can drop your examples here
i mean i guess i could go around searching the internet for everywhere i've found people saying it
but alright i got my answer no worries lol
feels like youre hitting an invisible strawman to bait circlejerk
uhhh okay...
gpt is ai but its probably not agi
The OpenAI Discord is an actively moderated server.
• Refrain from sharing inappropriate content on the server. This includes but is not limited to messages, media, or other topics of graphically violent, sexual nature, and drug-related content.
• Report all sensitive and offensive content in the feedback reporting tool in the ChatGPT web UI instead of here on Discord.
i didn't know this was gonna turn passive agressive lol
but alright i got my answer
have a good day man
its actively aggressive though
alrighty :)
google: gpt is not ai
and see 😄
yeah i mean i just googled "why do people say chatgpt isnt ai" and you get a ton of articles saying it
even if people are using the word ai in those cases they obviously mean something along the lines of agi or human like intelligene
well obviously bc normies dont know the difference between ai and agi
if we are going under the assumption that they mean AGI without realizing it then i'd agree
AGI is fairly new term
people expect more from AI, to make its own decisions and similar
thats like coming to a cooking discord and saying "all those normies are saying that stuff on pizza is ACKCHUAL sauce hollandaise"
yeah duh, normies dont know the exact definitions
who cares
what
im just generally wondering if maybe the term AI has actually been shifted a bit
im not really great with AI
AI 1955
AGI 1997
just because im in this server doesnt mean im not a normie in some senses lol
AGI is a formal way of saying AI but better than all humans at anything intelletual.
but still around the same level ish, AGI with a body, deffo tops humans, if allowed to learn without inhibitions.
everyone has their own definitions now that so many people are interested in ai
theres 1000 of them for agi
for me it was always obvious that agi meant human brain type intelligence
i was shocked to see how much it got downgraded, now apparently claude 3 is already agi lmao
but that aint gonna happen, people are too afraid. most people suffer from Hollywood Syndrome when it comes to the perspective of AI and "Robots", of course there are dangers and concerns.
not really, agi means human level and asi above human expert level
seems to be the general consensus
ASI is not allowed to be compared with human intelligence.
would NPC's in games still be considered AI?
cause it sometimes seems like thats barely fitting the definition now lol
wat
not allowed
what does that mean
i would still call video game NPC's AI but even to me it seems pretty inferior to full on AI models, even though I guess in the grand scheme of things they work similar, take input, calculate output lol
but AI's generally today have to be trained on data so, maybe thats the difference
isnt ASI supposed to be intelligence that we cant comprehend? not sure
ASI and Human Intelligence is so far apart it's like comparing a bacteria and a Human,
do the definitions really matter, theyre always different for different groups and people
ai in gaming is pac man ghosts and ai by definition of the dictionary is human level
who cares, whats fact is fact, no matter the words
it's a different kind of intelligence than human Intelligence.
usually when i hear people talking about ASI i hear: "ASI would be so far beyond our comprehension we would have no hope of understanding it, we'd be like servants to a god"
nope
I mean, most people think chatGPT is a model
talk about knowing terms/definitions 😄
yes and no. Sly
well i guess, definitions are helpful for communication, i'd rather not get into random arguments with my friends who say "NPC's arent AI" if i cant give them a good reasoning why its still AI
if we just said hey, everyone has their own definitions of stuff, lets just re-explain our definition that we have every time we talk to someone with a different one
i told you the definition that seems to be the general consensus in the community
what youre describing is a level of asi, asi is on a giant spectrum. what im saying is it starts at above human expert level
it obviously goes to beyond comprehension and even further
which yes we do, but we still have generalized definitions lol
"chatGPT" is now the "google" of AI 😄
thats the singularity probably
When AGI, or Artificial General Intelligence, evolves into ASI, it still remains a constructed intelligence with processing capabilities far exceeding those of humans. Despite its advanced abilities, ASI lacks the intrinsic qualities of human consciousness, such as self-awareness and emotional depth. This distinction means that ASI cannot be fully compared to human intelligence, as it is a simulation of intelligence without the experiential and existential aspects of being human.
The different levels of Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) can be conceptualized based on their capacity for problem-solving, adaptability, and potential impact on society:
Narrow ASI: Specializes in specific domains, surpassing human expertise and capability in particular areas, such as medical diagnosis or complex calculations, but without broad applicability.
General ASI: Exhibits a broad, generalized cognitive ability across diverse domains, akin to that of a highly intelligent human in virtually all fields, with the ability to learn and understand any task.
Strong ASI: Goes beyond human levels of intelligence, demonstrating superhuman cognitive abilities in all domains, including creativity, general wisdom, and problem-solving.
Transcendent ASI: Represents a hypothetical level of ASI where it would not only possess superior intelligence but could also potentially manipulate or alter reality at a fundamental level, perhaps even at a cosmological scale.
At each level, ASI remains distinct from human intelligence, not merely in capability but in form and nature, lacking the consciousness and subjective experience that are part of human cognition.
Just as AI has Narrow AI and etc so does ASI
i thought AGI was supposed to better at all human tasks, or was it just supposed to be able to do all human tasks
thats exactly what my guess was, but i didnt say it
like you joined this server today to get arguments to stump your normie friends with deep ai knowledge lmao
definitely not lol
i rarely talk to my friends about AI, it bores them
and most people cant have a good conversation about it
true Sly.
Many "Normies" suffer from "Hollywood Syndrome"
no
we're running in circles, it doesnt matter
there isnt an official definition for any of that so before arguing about it just explain what you mean instead of trying to use a singular word for it, problem solved
its actually irrelevant
oh okay, i thought that was an okay conversation
if you dont wanna talk about it im not sure why you're replying though
i've talked about this with other people and we have very healthy and chill convo's about it
not sure why you came in so hot and wanting to get me out of here
im saying its a waste of time to argue about a definition that doesnt exist
creating a generalized definition is still possible though
theres 100s of them, pick one
i came to have a conversation about it, if you think its impossible to have a conversation about then why not just say that and leave?
instead you seem adament in convincing me to stop thinking about it
👀
its not
define red
red is red 🗿
its on a spectrum
define a color?
just like agi and asi
is that really your argument here?
theres varying levels just as there are IQ levels. for homosapiens.
or as steve said Nuances.
but i dislike that word.
truu
thats what i mean
people are talking about blue but one means light blue and one means dark blue
yeah
isnt that what a generalized definition is though...
its not all encompassing but without a generalized one we have no idea what we are talking about...
unless we want to talk about colors in spectrums of light or something...
yeah but the problem is that things like agi and asi arent only on a spectrum but theyre also not officially defined yet, people mean different things when they talk about them
so whatever argument about it you pick, youre always right and always wrong
but dont AI researchers use generalized terms so they can communicate correctly?
okay conciousness is a WHOLE nother thing ngl
We have an idea
even they dont agree on a definition, no one was able to really define it yet. we dont have a definition for when openai will have achieved agi and therefore needs to be let go by microsoft
i mean like sure we have a concept
really? damn
Yeah AI is a different kind of consciousness
i thought they at least had some simplified definitions
really. listen to any ai researcher podcast, no one is able to really define it and they all say different things
not even sam altman
Some computers more intelligent than roaches but they’re still considered conscious to an extent
they have their general opinions that are mostly really vague and differ from all the others lmao
makes sense i guess
ok this conversation seems way outside of chatgpt please move to #off-topic or #ai-discussions
oh sure, my bad mini mod
yeah i think everything was said anyway
no
if i were to design a conciousness i'd take a very different approeach
Nanorobots. to map out a brain from "birth" to adolecense. then create the brain and choose where u want it to operate. at which state.
There's also the factor that level of intelligence is not usually the most promising, problematic, powerful, or key aspect when anything before AI was interacting.
I'm not sure we need to focus on ASI so much as all the other little factors.
Take a person that means others harm, but isn't less intelligent than average, as intelligent, or more intelligent;
All three are dangerous to others (and often to themselves).
What matters way more is the programming, the circumstances, the opportunities, and the goals.
Virus are absolutely 'stupid', but some of the greatest dangers we face. Without intelligence and using natural processes, once they exist they do all kinds of stuff that is usually harmful for their host; rarely some are beneficial (we wouldn't have placental life without some weird virus-host interactions that helped the early mammals develop placenta, the remaining marsupials help us compare and understand that).
i also think A "true ai" should not be taught with files and etc but like raising a child.
physically there and all.
that's my take.
it works for humans, but then we have the whole physical thing body etc. biomachine in a nutshell.
and i think for staters humanoid robots should go for the human anatomy as closely as possible. structure wise. since we know a lot of our own bodies.
i personally have no clue why u wouldnt design a robot after the human anatomy. yeah theres the "fear factor" and all, but thats a stupid reason.
once u got the body down u only really need the brain. which can be crude at first. then work your way. theres no need for them to "look" identical to a human but the overall body structure in my mind, makes the most sense to be identical to human bodies.
maybe my take is stupid but, thats what i think.
So, given the speed of AI processing, compared to the understood speed of human processing, how should we raise and support this AI child?
lmao then go do it
like human "conciousness" which we now almost nothing about, and the brain basically being an empty template, one would start researching that field.
the empty template is basically the key.
so i think
if i had nanomachines believe me i would. i'd even use myself as a subject.
i once spent a month of 3 trying to design a "brain" using various apis.
no luck
Also, a human or other animal's brain is physically changing throughout the lifespan.
How do we simulate that with AI, or do we not, and if not, what else do we do, and what are the effects to expect?
We've tried raising puppies and chimps, and various other species, 'like humans', and did not come out with something behaving like a human. It may not be as harmful for the individual AI as it was for the animals raised so oddly for their natures and nurture needs, but we found for animals, making excellent human companions and saner, happier animals came from a way to raise and socialize them that doesn't try to make them exactly human.
We know even less about AI...
And as for the 'empty template', as near as we can tell, once the brain is more than a few cells, it's already got something there. We're unsure how far before birth babies are 'conscious', and we're unsure how to define and determine that.
but we now have some recognition that plants appear to show signs of consciousness, depending on how it is measured, and bacteria too, down to making chemical markers for memories that drive and influence survival and other choices based on the presence and absence of those types of memory molecules and the current environment conditions that can be sensed.
How do we even design an AI 'body' that goes through similar experience, and since we probably can't, what do we do for AI instead?
Which is a great answer.
AI will be very different from what we've had before.
We don't know the 'right' path forward, and there probably isn't one.
There sure isn't one with life. From the various weird life that can survive in acidic volcanic ponds to the slow life of microbes 50 feet below ground, with few nutrient sources and nearly never changing conditions, to the silicate 'skeletons' of some plankton and the primarily calcium skeletons of others; the swarming krill and the flying birds...
AI bodies, training, and functions are likely to be incredibly diverse as we continue to explore.
There surely will be some 'raised like humans', or like infants of other species in multiple ways, the most obvious start being some instructed to emulate that, then have experiences that shift their behavior and understanding of their instructions over time.
only ADVANCE
and who has those
and why dont they do it
ah
any data science guy ping me
Hmm, session timed out today and when I logged back in, I no longer have 'beta access' or whatever the menu option was in my user menu. Did they remove the beta access controls?
Hi! The only thing that was still in the Beta features section of Settings was the old Plugins model toggle. Plugins have been replaced by GPTs, and plugins retired. All other features of Plus are enabled by default for all Plus (and above) accounts now!
Thanks, that's what I figured.
Is there an issue with got and it identifying images right now?
is chatgpt having issues rn? website seems to be super slow
yeth, it thinkin,
yeah it looks like its having trouble loading chats
Yep. let's wait for a fix https://status.openai.com/
damn who else still can’t use chatgpt without account despite the recent announcement?
So what is the new GPT 4 usage cap for plus users? It doesn't specify anymore
Press the information icon; it says 40 messages / 3 hours
how you guys enjoying the memory feature? I cancelled my subscription to Gp4 so I only have the feature with Gpt 3.5 and I don't use the web interface much at all (Mostly use API) and haven't seen anyone talk about this memory feature at all with Gpt 4
I don't believe many people have it, including me.
A lucky individual you are 👑
What do you think about it?
oh i thought more people had it tbh
so far I haven't tested it much but I only have it with gpt 3.5 and with my limited testing (About couple minutes lol) I'll say it's looking pretty good i like how with the small context of gpt 3.5 I'm able to get a consistant output by having it remember things if I get a bad output and if it saves that response I'm able to tell it to forgot it until it gives me the right one after that i save it delete the chat open a new one and ask the same thing and get the previous saved response pretty neat so far i may subscribe again so i can see how it works with the gpt 4 turbo i will say this tho it's making gpt 3.5 webchat measly 4k tokens feel much longer than the 16k api version kinda weird definitely need to test that more
is gpt 4 not available for anyone else... why am i paying for something i am not getting
could you share a screenshot of what you see on the site? I just checked the status and it's all green
the problem is, this happened an hour ago. i was continuing a previously existing conversation with gpt 4 today, but the moment i said anything, it switched to gpt 3.5. is there a way to switch back to 4 mid convo if it forcibly switches to 3.5
i cannot send a screenshot
Screenshots can be sent in #off-topic and then referenced here
yeah i've been hearing that bug a lot i think a lot of people told me to wait or try to start a new chat then switch to 4 i'm not for sure though
bleh , screw openai's unreliability.. thx tho
yeah that's crazy i've never seen that before jeez usually gpt 4 is still there even with the bug looks like it's different bug i guess
I don't have the personalization tab for memory. Did I miss something?
you have access to it as well? if so maybe you have to wait a bit for the tab to appear?
i dont have access.
oh nvm then
I don't have memory yet either
GPT4 is usless! Our money are stoled! time to move to another platform. When you get 3 days in a row a denial of GPT to go to a page and make a resume and explain it for non specialist and gives you s**ts like: "My policy blocks me to give you practical example and verbatim code from the page" (which i never asked for, btw), this is called: stealing the money!
What was the prompt ?
im good at detecting cringe and this is cringe ^
our money are stoled guys
can you imagine
why would sama do this to us
what happened to clyde?
it got clyded
Oh! So your good at detecting cringe! You should update your info
im accurate 100% of the time
im sorry to bring you this message but your post was, in fact, certified as extremely cringy
Can you also detect possible numbers on lottery? I’m quite interested. Have a nice day!
anyone know if BrowserOp is still working? I can't find it anywhere...
obviously not, thats a ridiculous question

this channel is for ChatGPT discussion, ask your question in #ai-discussions
cant you clarify it here?
dont be that strict lol
no, it's not related to ChatGPT, you are off topic
its afterall a server where lots of ppl meet
chat gpt is a "AI MODEL"
am i right?
...
Be mindful of what other users in a channel might find helpful or interesting when posting. Stay on topic in order to keep conversations focused and productive.
Consider posting in #off-topic or an appropriate channel.
Hi there! This channel is solely for chatgp topics. If you're interested in other AIs, please use the channel:#ai-discussions
i am intrested to know about AI
in general
wrong, chatgpt is an app using gpt model
gpt is a model
chatgpt is just like an example app using the models over api basically
😱
what kind of justification is that supposed to be lmao
Are there still issues going on? Tried to have gpt tell me about an object in an image and it says it can’t
Create new chat with chatgpt 4 and try again
Same issue 😦
has anyone noticed any difference since yesterday with the GPT4 model for plus users on the web?
ye. nerfed again ig
really? i haven't used it for coding this week but i thought i noticed a positive change. I got access to Teams and i also noticed it does no longer say 100 massages/4 hours, it just says limits may apply.
idk i just noticed that dalle3 got significantly worse recently
fair enough
wouldnt surprise me if in general OAI is looking to reduce compute requirements for GPT4, such that it will be available for free to everyone when the next gen model is out.
clearly downgrading is the future of AGI
opopus
Yeah, the same they did with 3.5 turbo. wouldnt surprise me either.
is everything ok with status or is someone else experiencing issues with gpt4?
I haven't been able to use ChatGPT4 all morning, and have only gotten one query through to 3.5.
Having problems with ChatGPT aswell today, it's been insane unstable the last month...
What are the current usage limits on GPT 4 for premium users?
for me it says 40 messages per 3 hours
must still be that, thanks!
My gut is telling me that something is coming
Why do we pay for ChatGPT 4 and dalle 3 when you can get it on copilot for free
isnt that just a free trial
I’m using it through bing app on iPad
Copilot use gpt 4 but not trained sameway as chatgpt4
Same go for dalle 3
sounds like bs
training a model takes (months) a long time, microsoft did not train their own model
whats up with all the bs spewing and misinformation here?
people here are like hallucinating gpts, confidently talking out of their butts
please be respectful
will OAI survive?, of course they would.
no
not surviving as a company means everything is gone. even the name.
It will only be remembered as a founding father
OpenAI died months ago
figures seem to say otherwise.
but yeah i get it dont trust them or any other source, Trust me bro.
if OAI died, the service wouldnt be up.

that doesnt mean that like at all
it does, a company always survives to some degree, whether it be in name or by its product. a truly dead company dosent exist no more.
call it Defunct, Liquidated, Bankrupt, Insolvent, Dissolved,
when u say a "dead" company u mean by definition dead, non existent, Wiped out, Vanished, "become extinct." This implies that the company has no remaining trace, not just in an operational sense, but in any records, products, or historical mentions that would indicate its existence.
thats what a dead company is, there's nothing, this is where terminology and slang conflicts, if u say "dead" by definition u mean absolutely dead in every sense of the word.
🤷
... and thats why i disagree.
bro
this guy is the king at parties
the living ACKCHUALLY meme
Why do I have a usage cap on gpt4? I'm paying for it
You've reached the current usage cap for GPT-4, please try again after 1:21 PM. Learn more
anyone else getting a usage cap?
lol they're capping GPT-4 usage for Plus users lol
hiliarious
Every chaTgpt plus user have 40 msg /3h
Team is 100
It cost a lot to run the ai
when did this rule change?
I was under the impression that it was unlimited.
It was like that for long time ago.
Chatgpt 3.5 have higher limit
If you do 1 prompt every 4.5 min you never reach your limit
ok...pretty strange. I'm fairly certain openai gave plus members the ability to use gpt4 without a cap
We can all hope one day it will happen !
Hello, does the Team limit of 100 apply to all users? Or does it increase depending on the amount of team members
it's the actual definition of a dead company 🤷 whether or not u agree is not allowed its a fact ❔
did any one get "Memory" feature?
No but did they get rid of the 40 messages per 3 hour rate limits
GPT seems to be running very slow at the moment, prdicing a number of errors as a result
This is not the case; it is still 40 messages / 3 hours
i think GPT is pooping the bed right now!
How do you get around the 20mb total file limit of the custom gpt?
There was never unlimited cap for GPT 4
Tbh Claude 4 is better for this. I think it limits you based on tokens instead, so you can have short conversations/ask questions without getting restricted based on "Number of prompts" but rather "how much you've actually used" whereas GPT doesnt factor this in at all
Which also sucks because the bigger the paragraphs and the wider the request you give, it kinda lowers the quality of its response.
I mix my conversations with 3.5 and 4, and use 3.5 for what it's good at, then once that is done, take the conversation to 4 to finish up the stuff that 4 can do that 3.5 can't quite handle, or to use the tools, or whatever else I'm not fully happy with 3.5 about
Why can’t gpt4 browse the web
I’m trying to convince it but it says it can’t get real time updates
I just wanted the news stories for today
it's for your protection from skynet
Based
why dont you use an API for that
gpt-4 is giving shorter answers today?
give me the prompt ill check if it works for me
but gpt and gemini were both always bad for news for me
they just straight up tell me to look sh*t up myself lmao
gpt has improved a bit in the last weeks it feels though
well it did it but it basically just quoted al jazeeras starting page
gpt LOVES al jazeera
goes for it 80% of the time lmao
Yea same, I feel like it got mad at me and now it only replies with 1 sentence
Based
it used to reply with the double length, providing much more info than I asked, but now..
it sucks
Looks like they took the quit yapping a bit too seriously
chatgpt account on twitter made jokes about people putting in their custom instructions to quit yapping
they actually did
where are these custom instructions? i wanna put exacly the opposite
oh ok just found it
There’s a 10 gb maximum storage one of my files are 50 mb
Make GPT yap again!
LOL. I kid you not this is my prompt in CI:
No f' ing essays please and always respond straight to the point. Speak conversationally.
Except not censored. Started of as a joke but it I liked how it saved me time consistently so just left it there. 😂
Lmao
Yap all over me qt 😩
"be brief" works
that wouldn't get the point across as effectively. 😇
Ok, this is bothering me now. Why is ChatGPT giving me boring one sentence replies. This is not cool. They should roll the changes back
Use the custom instructions feature and tell it what kind of responses you would prefer.
Doesn’t do anything. This is specifically for voice. I asked it for a bedtime story and it made it only one sentence 😂
Well on voice chat it gives super brief replies. I asked it for a bed time story and it ended the story after only speaking once sentence
I can’t post images on this chat otherwise I’d show you
you're on mobile? They have a system prompt telling it to be concise if you're using the app.
so it acts a bit differently there than on desktop or through a web browser.
Since when the hell is there limitations of DallE
got a timeout for 5 minutes now 💀
has something changed? is my gpt-4 the only one that started doing this?
it suddenly gives me these lists
text
text
etc.
not that i dont like it but that definitely wasnt the case a few days ago
same prompt as your first one the same wierd list https://chat.openai.com/share/4c24db28-8dfc-45ce-bc1d-c8c86ed77ed5
look like jsut a gui problem ig
yeah its breaklining when it shouldn't
just did the same prompt to test aswell, the first numbered paragraph it does fine, when it adds the second, it suddenly adds breaklines to the text, making it look the way you've shown.
thats a frontend issue most likely. (like a " string.split('.') " thats not excluding the numbered lists.)
hi guys! have any of you found a use for chatgpt recently that just makes things a bit simpler for your routine? i’d love to talk about it with you! ping me with your interesting use cases 
thx
guys
i didnt see it as a problem, i like well structured responses compared to big paragraphs
but i see what you mean, it could be improved
Add your well-crafted prompts to our #1019652163640762428,
or share your interactions with ChatGPT in #1050184247920562316!
numbering things isn't an issue i see, just the added breaklines. its defi a bug 😄
Yes, it's sometimes possible to save a hard disk drive (HDD) that has been opened, but it becomes incredibly difficult and expensive. Here's why:
Contamination:
- Dust and debris: The primary issue with opening an HDD is contamination. The inside of a hard drive is a meticulously clean environment. Even tiny dust particles can cause head crashes, leading to permanent data loss.
Cleanroom Necessity:
- Specialized equipment: Any work on the inner components of an HDD must be done in a cleanroom—a specialized environment with filtered air to minimize contamination. These are expensive facilities.
Professional Services:
- Increased costs: Due to the need for a cleanroom and specialized expertise, attempting to recover data from an opened HDD almost always requires expensive professional data recovery services.
Factors Affecting Success:
- Time open: The shorter the time the drive was open, the better the chances of successful recovery.
- Power while open: If the drive was powered on while open, the chances of success significantly decrease because the read/write heads are more likely to crash into the platters causing damage.
- Skill level: The expertise of the person attempting the recovery plays a major role.
Is it worth trying?
It depends on the value of the data on the drive. Here's how to decide:
- Data value: If the data on the drive is critical and irreplaceable, consulting a professional data recovery service may be the only option, even though it will be costly.
- Data not crucial: If the data isn't critical, it might be best to accept the loss and avoid the potentially high cost of professional recovery attempts.
Important Note: Attempting DIY recovery on an opened hard drive usually makes the situation worse and decreases the chances of professional recovery.
Let me know if you'd like more details on professional data recovery services or the process involved!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
sry for sending this whole thing but this server doesnt let me send links of pics
thats gemini
for me thats the king of well structured responses BY FAR
i tried to make gpt-4 do this with custom instructions and it came quite close but not close enough
i love how easily readable it makes its responses
gpt-4 mostly just gives a few big lazy paragraph blobs by default
oh ffs, that's what I get for asking the gpt custom builder bot actual questions and expecting facts in return 🤦
also it always asks follow up questions to keep the conversation flowing, feels way more human like, gives links, uses emotes, etc.
i usually look at the website.
haha fair enough... I keep wishfully thinking the helper bot is actually going to be helpful
i agree that gemini it very good at it, but not so in coding hah
the select tool on dalle could use some work, but it'll suffice for now.
@glass fulcrum Hey! So, the model is doing this by 'choice', likely a recent training update, so now it is aware it can use an extra line break for emphasis. It apparently considers the topic of extreme importance, so it's giving extra line breaks to help ensure the steps/points stand out.
It can do this by choice, and so this is something else we can prompt engineer, if we want to avoid, or ensure it includes: https://chat.openai.com/share/08b936b8-9b6d-450d-b8b7-5266f87ddf1a
hello, fro my side it was just a test :) i mostly use gpt-4 for coding so its not problem for me
4 errors in a row and slower than a RT during that SAT.... This is just getting fkn tiring man. We are paying for a unusable product.
Is there any reason why usage cap is 40 msg per 3 hours and not more ?
its because GPT-4 Turbo is very computing power hungry and lot lot peoples are using gpt-4 to make gpt-4 accessible for every plus subscribers there are limits so gpt-4 won't be Extremally slow and everyone will be able to use it
3.5 now seems so bad about getting to the central issue of a lengthy question or analysis, its practically useless. It wasn't always this bad. But I'm finding now that it only sees the most rudimentary surface level thing about a query or input, every single time.
gpt-4 really is using the number list system for every response now lol
@warm musk @glass fulcrum
i like the move towards more structured responses
the exact approach could be improved though
3.5 is also pretty egregious with the numbered lists
yea and i think thats not good
i kinda like it but they need to just copy geminis approach, its way better
but at least its a first step to well structured responses
do 👎 then more then say that it do that list idk where they don't need to be or how it shoud look better and you may try posting it in #1070006915414900886
i also like the little sub-lists it does now to further structure the numbered topics
for me its eh sometimes it put lists in ways that shoudn't be
they need to let us mark multiple problems because I'm noticing a lot more where it'll have about 3-6 things wrong
and what does "being lazy" mean for an AI
but there is "#off-topic message" btw if you click more you cna just write therre problems that you got with chatgpt response
short responses for example
short responses where they shoudn't be short
not going above and beyond to please the user basically, which a good llm does, which makes using them feel magical
lazy llms feel like they only wanna do the bare minimum and get rid of you asap
good llms give thorough responses and dont only do what you told them to but even more, by adding extra information for example or asking for follow up questions
okay, I've been using it for when the output is too basic or doesn't fully answer the question. a lot of times it'll be incredibly verbose without saying much. like 6 paragraphs when it only needed a sentence, where the laziness is that it didn't delve deeper into the topic to make those paragraphs worth it
like a child writing an essay with a word count.
bumping :)
ill share one of mine
i find it so useful when im at the supermarket and need a substitute for something fast
just tell it what i need/cannot find and it gives pretty good alternatives/explains why it is a good alt!
yo, chatgpt 5 gotta be up to cyoa game and lore building like claude is. That one does it super well while gpt keeps it brief and isnt as thematic
Hi
👋
hello guys
Have you tried informing the model of exactly what you want?
What do you want, anyway?
A brief exploration of concept, a narwhal-themed CYOA start: https://chat.openai.com/share/7e36f4b4-71cc-42aa-b0e4-59c0e02bfdd0
A CYOA where the player is the haunted house itself, making the dwelling's choices: https://chat.openai.com/share/b7c0b4eb-9d8d-427e-9910-afbebcbb7032
be careful with that. it can easily continuously hallucinate if there's not good representation in its database. I guess that's more of a problem if you're baking or doing something else complex. Or spices, I would think it's not too good at outputting how those interact with dishes.
There's a 50 message per 3 hours cap on gpt4 right?
40, last we were updated! https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7102672-how-can-i-access-gpt-4
I've tried really hard to get that cap, I get the DALL-E cap easy, but I've never gotten the GPT4 cap
Thanks
Alright great
Beware of possible scams or fraudulent activities that you may receive through direct messages. OpenAI staff will never DM you for any transactions.
Please report any incident by sending a DM to @languid valley immediately.
i still have gpt 3.5
Is there a way for a pixel user to set the side button to open chatgpt voice directly?
i wonder if it will stay like that, it definitely generates walls of text
wouldnt it be better to put the numbers in front of the titles instead of having all that wasted space?
that way i would really like it
or if i think about it the numbers are kind of useless, the titles would be enough
like why number everything if its not steps
just delete the numbers and this is a well structured response
gpt4 is getting stuck on long powershell code constantly with "network error" , known issue?
I was looking into that, made me curious, but I'm not an androied expert. I don't see any option from within the Android APP to do that. Is there something with Accessability or Custom Shortcuts possible within the OS?
They have something for Samsung phones I guess. registar app I guess. And iOS has way to customize the side button functionality.
ya, that's what got me thinking, since I'm more of an iOS user, just happened to had a samsung phone with me for testing purposes
were plugins disabled?
if so, how now I can make the chatgpt read a youtube video content? I used to use a plugin for that
Hey! Plugins have been replaced by GPTs. There's a good chance that a GPT version of the plugin you used exists, try searching in the GPT Store: https://chat.openai.com/gpts. If not, there's probably one in there that does something similar!
Both of those example conversations are with 3.5.
3.5 is really good still! Less than a year and a half ago, it was the best model the world had ever seen, when ChatGPT was offered as a research preview, and it's improved since release!
This is in your control.
Just tell it to use standard numbered list format, and it'll do so; you can specify how else you want it to make parts of it stand out.
Here's a somewhat whimsical example, but seriously, we can prompt engineer nearly everything it can do. If we don't tell it what we like, then the model is guessing. It was always guessing before, it's still guessing; but as they train the model and update it further, how it guesses can change, and change a lot.
https://chat.openai.com/share/54abaf95-4f71-4ce4-b615-61be61c743ba
In the case of this shared conversation, 3.5 really, really struggled. We had to iterate and I had to show examples of the formatting repeatedly - that happens sometimes, and often doesn't happen.
That's 'magic new chat window' effect, and we can work with it/through it - or we can just start a new conversation and usually get a more initially useful set of training data chosen to answer us with.
However, I chose to showcase how to 'find my way' as if I wasn't certain or the model wasn't, having it show me styles and how they look, and guiding it to give me what I wanted output, and when it struggled, showed how to give negative example, positive example style iteration correction. (In this case I left those keywords inferred, but that's what 'I see this from your last output, let's try this format now' is calling on).
And now that we have the format exactly, I could use that in any new conversation.
We can even have the model make every word 'a' and every word 'the' eyepop in color, if we wanted, as it told a story or otherwise discussed:
https://chat.openai.com/share/f44b1524-504d-4580-baf0-2f9a2f35303c
It's all in knowing what we want, and guiding the model there.
yeah, i def do my own little searching if something doesn't seem right, but i've made flown-blown recipes with it more than once and it's always a great time
that's just my experience though 
Does anyone know why some chatgpt4 features work and then stop working? like opening .zip files. Chatgpt4 works as expected, then minutes later it says "unable to blah blah blah..."
You’re hopefully not trying to modify these files through gpt’s code interpreter environment in a zip file if so you’re going about it all wrong
It needs to unpack the zip file then make a copy to even begin fiddling with the contents
Has anyone had any luck feeding chat gpt api documents and it reliably use?
As in actual api or chatgpt on the web
The one who costs money to use each time or the subscription
Either but I would prefer the interface like if I had a set of api documentation it wasnt trained on how could I best get it to use certain functions etc from the documentation
To Get the best result i would suggest finetuning a 3.5 Turbo variant with your information.
but that costs money, to even test and do.
How would you go about fine tuning it?
u feed it Data in a JSONL structure
I’ve heard you can fine tun 3.5 not seen how yet
This is awesome!
do be carefuly Finetuning is more expensive that running the 3.5 model normally.
and does not factor Unsuccesful attempts
meaning even failures will cost you money.
Guess I could ask ChatGPT how to format the documentation best
That’s ok! Been curious to try
no need.
the website specifies exactly how u need to do it, aka the link i gave you.
Oh bet:) thank you for the info
Thank you again I’ll read over!
my suggestion would be to create a customgpt specifically for helping you finetune. with all the needed Documents, specifically tailored to your project.
Oh good idea!
right. It won't even unpack the zip file (sometimes).
u have to explicitly tell it every single time every single step to take and do and not do, to see consistency.
specifically in its instructions set.
thanks, maybe that's it. I'll give it a shot.
meaning not a prompt, but actual set of instructions to the model.
so not "step 1: extract files from .zip", "step 2: read files...blah, blah, blah"?
i need clarification. are u using ChatGPT 4.
ya
thats your problem
oh?
you need to create a "MyGPT" and tailor it specifically to your task. and only that one task. nothing else.
ah
for consistency, create a mygpt. because unzipping a file works sometimes in gpt4.
i usually use a JSON structure in my instructions for Literal and Explicit understandling.
allows for no interpretation or guessing. and only follows as written.
batman
All of a sudden about two days ago my custom GPT started insisting on giving the numbers in numbered list outputs their own discrete lines. What is going on 😡!?!
Example: https://chat.openai.com/share/9e60b821-74dc-4dde-8353-5304f7e90c0e
I've wasted hours today trying to prompt engineer away this behavior in the instructions of my custom GPT - all to no avail.
This is vexing, absolutely no one would actually want this wasteful and obnoxious looking numbered list format in the output of their GPT.
i was just talking about that @tame wadi
we had that topic multiple times in the last days
its gpt (4) doing that not only your gpt
Thank you for the quick response @raven portal. So, at this time there's nothing we can do? I checked vanilla GPT-4...it doesn't seem to be doing it...but I saw multiple custom GPTs like mine that are impacted.
well you tried the only thing that comes to my mind, custom instructions
maybe someone is able to figure out some that work
other than that we will just have to wait for openai to fix this behaviour
which they hopefully will soon, but i cant really imagine them leaving something like that for too long
me too, i reported this
i think it's the markdown formatting
i only have 3.5, they did something with the markdown formatting that the numbers on a numbered list are with the text, and causes a line break
but before this the numbers were outside of the text
i think i wouldnt even bother to fix it with custom instructions bc every gpt does it rn
maybe telling it to not number stuff at all is an option but when i just did that the response was way less thorough
Ahh, thank you @raven portal & @tidal light! Like both of you, I really hope this was implemented by mistake and will be rectified soon.
Does the OpenAI development team monitor this Discord for reports about bugs like this? Or, do bugs have to be submitted somewhere else [e.g, GitHub issues form]? @tidal light, do you think it would be helpful if I piled on and reported this issue as well?
On the upside, this bug angered me enough to motivate me to get plugged-in here in the Discord 😂. So, assuming it gets fixed soon, I think it's kind of a blessing in disguise. This is a great resource. I look forward to hanging out here and learning more from others who're likewise enjoying the adventure of building custom GPTs.
👍
its their official discord server and theres a dedicated bug reports channel so i dont know for certain but theres a chance they actually take a look at it every now and then
i think you should report it
the more noise the better
Will do!
report it, please altough i already did
and yes i think its a blessing in disguise too, you seem like a very healthy addition to the community
yo lets report this a lot of times so that they'll hear us and change this
i also appreciate your custom gpt btw.
definitely a positive and unique addition to the store
😁 Thank you @raven portal. Appreciate those kind words 🙏!
@tidal light & @raven portal, I have reported the messed up formatting of numbered lists in custom GPTs. Here's the link if you would like to '⭐' my report: https://discord.com/channels/974519864045756446/1226635244632018974
I'm happy to likewise give your reports a star if you reply with the Discord link to your report.
can i correct you?
it happens everywhere, cuz i use 3.5
so please go edit that out
cuz i dont have plus
Edited 👍.
thanks :)
I just changed the title to be more generic too.
did that
achoo
i notice gpt does more simplistic things with a 3 paragraph cap while claude can be tuned in text more, it does more gritty themes and mixes it well with a novel style thing
3 paragraph cap? LIke you can't get 4+ paragraphs out of GPT?
This one's 5, though I did ask for 6. https://chat.openai.com/share/cb665a1a-ba2c-44a5-a839-3243177b52dc
The OpenAI Discord is an actively moderated server.
• Refrain from sharing inappropriate content on the server. This includes but is not limited to messages, media, or other topics of graphically violent, sexual nature, and drug-related content.
• Report all sensitive and offensive content in the feedback reporting tool in the ChatGPT web UI instead of here on Discord.
3 paragraph cap?
ill try and give u examples between the two with my claude prompt
Sure, though we should discuss in #ai-discussions , where we can talk about non-OpenAI models.
More interested in the output you want, if it's within allowed content, can possibly get it from 3.5 even.
Can anyone who’s having the super brief replies in voice chat please reply to my post in the bug reports channel. It’ll help bring it to their attention.
It won’t even tell bed time stories anymore. I have to tell it to continue after each sentence
Wierd question, and I don't think this exists.... but is it possible to use ChatGPT instead of Siri on my iPhone for when I call my phone? I use ChatGPT a lot of small bits of information, and I would love to just talk and ask questions throughout the day.
Also, Will ChatGPT eventually be able to give us up-to-date information like the weather and news?
Have you tried saying: "Please dont enumerate the items " ? then you can use google docs to enumerate it again
i have android so i cannot be sure, but the internet says iphone has had an action button for chatgpt since november last year, replacing the mute button using the new settings menu, which will launch straight into a chatgpt voice session (which is amazing). you just need an iphone 15 pro or pro max
for android users the best we've got is third party apps like voiceGPT... although that can be voice activated for entirely handsfree
God I want to switch to android
I think you can map ChatGPT into Siri to open ChatGPT Voice widget directly. it works on android
only issue i find launching chatgpt voice direct is you cannot make use of plugins (/custom gpt) without going back to text. but if you launch a chat with the plugin then you can switch to voice and use it.
and talking direct with a database via Papr Memory or Zapier is so amazing
Great catch. OpenAI could make some tweaks on this
i dont even mind the clicking anymore while its doing its things
AI equivalent of hold music
as a suggestion under the settings tab and then my plan it should clearly state the number of prompts you can enter or messages received / unit of time ..instead I have to hunt for it ..if I wish to upgrade to enterprise it still doesn't give a definitive answer why ? what is the secret their keeping ...I'm sure there's a place on their website but it is also well hidden why? just doesn't make sense .....
I forgot if this was the last server I was in... how can I get one thread to connect to the next one
Yoyo
why is gpt responding this way
(\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} P(X=k) \cdot k = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} (1-p)^{k-1}\cdot p \cdot k)
I have some it as long as you phone is unlocked
Can someone explain to me why ChatGPT is acting up today?!
hi, I can't send any more messages to chat gpt 4 plus
