#The female character are not just oversexualised, they are straight up poorly designed
1 messages · Page 5 of 1
I mean the fact there is witch has been broadly used for any wise woman with herbal knowledge or suspected of magic, the most attention being harmful ones, but many antiquity communities had "white witches" you would consult for helpful magic or cures. Now the idea of witches and Catholicism is definitely interesting because historically the church prosecuted witch accusers (for belief in magic beyond divine miracles) rather than accused witches. Eventually that turned around as witch paranoia swept Europe on the grassroots level and one of the crazy occult popes did the whole hammer of witches, and in Christian parts of the world it came to be seen as from pacts with the devil (much as how in other parts malign witches or black magic are seen as having roots with evil spirits or dark powers). So while the church certainly oversaw a lot of witch hysteria in certain parts of medieval and Renaissance times (though the most famous American examples were by protestant pilgrims), it's a somewhat larger arc of communities often conflating women of particular knowledge or isolated social positions with evil happenings (out of superstition or mere opportunism), and that filtering through whatever prevailing cosmology they had, usually aligning them with evil forces.
“but many antiquity communities had ‘white witches’ you would consult for helpful magic or cures.”
Is that where the term “white mage” comes from?
Kinda just similar terms. A frequent term for benevolent vs. Malevolent magic is white vs. Black magic. You also hear stuff like right vs left handed magic.
Language just really liked white (as in light, day, etc) vs black (as in darkness, night, death)
So like, kura is pulling from a tradition, both Christian and preChristian or nonchristian of communities blaming women as malefactors consorting with dark powers, and in the anglosphere the most ready version of that context is the Christian "consort of the devil" iteration. I think it also true that such a term was applied to other traditions of folk herbalists or practitioners of older religions (like vodou, druidism, or whatever else), or even powerful spirits or gods in their own right (see baba yaga) usually as a means of conflating or misinterpreting such things. So like, while kura might be trying to say Eva is witchy as a female equivalent of warlock dark pact stuff, it's also true we could trace the term witch to those herbalists and folk healers, which is likely part of the inspiration for terming the alchemical and seemingly purely scientific mercury as a witch.
not talking about eva at all
Fair, wasn't sure if that was part of your reasoning for the historical definition is all.
and im pulling from general understanding. if u ask a common ppl they will just say a witch is generally dark magic and more evil aligned. its most common trope. that usually applies to stories too bc those ppl are also common ppl that are making the story and understand that ppl believe witches are evil etc.
i was bringing up witchcraft vs wizardy magic bc i feel like voids kit looks and feels more like a warlock than a wizard. wizards would usually see more common magic spells, void summons a portal with hands that clamp onto ppl to crush them in place etc.
then fenrir is saying witches and wizards are same thing or they dont mean anything
witch i think is a silly take but what can u do in this thread lol
🧙♀️
I think the idea of a witch as evil aligned in the modern connotation is more mixed. The term has been used as the femme equivalent of wizards (Harry Potter) or we see them in a similar academic context (little witch academia) or they get aligned with magical shoujo (something that leaks a bit into mercury) or as a feminist reclamation of vilified feminine powers (down to reclaiming classic fictional evil witches like maleficent or wicked, which often align them with prechristian or academic contexts). Some people might think of Halloween witches first still, but that's certainly not the only association or even the most common one these days.
I mean what's 'common'? (Not looking to debate that fully, just questioning that 'common' magic likely comes from some very narrow narrative or game traditions). Certainly void is themed in his magic and sinister in his aspect, but I don't think that alone eliminates his wizardly aspects, anymore than say, saruman or Voldemort.
elemental spells are prob most common magic spells across fiction. fireball ice storm etc.
it doesnt need to eliminate his wizard aspects, it just means he is way more warlock leaning than wizard leaning.
I don't think him being themed into a single spell overrides that particularly, and I think his other aspects feed that, but I think we just have different reads on factors that speak wizard vs. warlock. Which is ultimately fine. It's not like this is an empirical thing that has an objectively right answer.
its a lot more than a single spell. its the character designs w the hands floating, voicelines, abilities, all of it.
its just easier to explain why that one spell screams warlock more than wizard but that doesnt mean the rest doesnt either and shouldnt be ignored.
I mean thats just not true though
Like that matches maybe older fantasy but in most newer incarnations that I engage with the idea that a witch is an evil dark mage serving some god is outdated
They are just women who do magic
Now some of them could be allied with Gods or something but thats not a consensus. The same with wizards using "normal" spells which i didnt see where u defined btw.
If its just fireball and ice whatever I would argue what a wizard does has changed in more modern incarnations to be much more abstract than like dnd 3e fireball
My take is that what is a wizard or a witch or a warlock fluctuates depending on the universe it is based in and I dont think we should be using outdated tropes to define them
Careful, kura’s probably going to cycle back to the same argument again. 
they arent really outdated if they are the reason those terms exist. they arent made up words that u apply ur own feel to. even universes that use them still have the basic lore of a witch/wizard for those terms. they vary depending on the universe, usually taking stuff in that universe and applying it to those to make it more unique, but they are all pretty similar since those terms imply something.
They r similar in the sense rhat they describe people who use magic yeah
u might think we shouldnt be using "outdated tropes" to define them, but regardless of what u think, they still use these outdated tropes and u are just saying u think they shouldnt. i dont really agree or disagree with ur point since idc if they do or dont, just saying that they do because these words carry weight. u cant really just take a word and say it doesnt really matter and ppl should use whatever they want for it. so samurais now just walk around shield bashing ppl and not using swords lol.
yea the similarity is there. the difference is why there are different terms.
there is a reason why fighters exist. but there is a reason why a boxer and a muay thai fighter exist. they are both fighters, both using different fighting skills. same w magic. magic exists, using it differently, for different reasons, or gaining it from different things makes characters different.
shouldnt just say the terms are outdated and every boxer can be a muay thai expert in games bc they all using fighting. same w magic lol.
A samurai is immutable though we know what they did we have knowedlge of how they worked and how their organization functioned they existed in our reality
A witch a warlock a sorcerer a magus a wizard these are all much closer to fantasy than they are reality
So when you say void is more of a warlock than a wizard you base that off of the fantasy definitions of what is a wizard and a warlock which is not the same as saying brall is a samurai for example because samurai were REAL
hear me out
u say in ur 2nd msg that they are closer to fantasy, then in ur 3rd u say i base something off of a fantasy definition.
should i base it off of reality definition? like what are we saying here.
im taking most accounts of what ppl view witches or wizards as and applying it to someone that fits the theme by using magic.
#1407460293281583124 message
I brought that up because tou were using a false equivalency of samurai and boxers and muay thai
yea but what should we base the terms off of? just make them up?
the terms exist because there is a belief behind them generally.
My option is that those types of terms exist in the context of their own universe and fluctuate depending on that universe. I would say void is a wizard or a warlock hes just a guy who uses magic.
he is or isnt a wizard or warlock?
ur saying hes both just uses magic? or none apply and he just uses magic?
happens lol
I meant to say *wouldn't
None of those really apply until we know more about supervives world
I guess hes a sorcerer
that can be true but since we dont know anyhting abt the stuff we can apply our guesses based on general magic knowledge.
i think sorc/warlock apply to him a lot more than a wizard
A wizard is such a nebulous term though
Gang we know history. We are talking about a fictional setting like DND or any fantasy RPG. We aren't still prosecuting people as witches in the modern day. Seems like a bit of a virtue signal. Not gon hold you
You sound dumb
You wouldn't know what a wizard was if they cast fireball at your face
You sound like you splash in the pond every hour of the day
Hey so heres the problem
There was nothing to really engage with in your last statement because it was stupid
And theres nothing to engage with what you just posted bc I dont get the... reference or something?
Idk what it is
Im trying to watch something here so don't ping me again plox
Putting Jin in a wizard hat does not in any way make him a wizard. It’s more then visual design man it’s also about fire balls @heavy magnet
Ur fuckin with me watching blue eyed samurai rn and u dont appear to have an argument or anything to say rly so bye
What is it about fireball thats inherently a wizard thing
What makes a wizard is the magic they use and the source of their power. You don't see wizards harnessing the power of eldrich beings ever.
Why isnt it a warlock thing
Fireball is in every wizards spell book. Any game with a wizard they have the option for a fireball
@raven frost You are sounding kinda wizard phobic rn I’m ngl
I just ask the real questions the mainstream media wont
I know you work for fox news but i cant prove it
Fireball could be an anyone spell
Reported
This guy doesnt get it
Fireball doesnt make you a wizard but all wizards have fireball
Do you need a venn diagram?
It’s not just about the fire ball you are missing the point, void isn’t a wizard is the point, he’s not even a battle mage, he’s a controller whom uses dark arcane magic, that’s not a wizard that’s more like an evil warlock
Can wizards not use dark arcane arts?
Thats a warlock thing
They can if they study it but not exclusively
Why not
A guy who only bakes cakes isn’t a chef
Why is that
Well he would be a cake baker
What makes a baker not a cook
Or a wizard who only uses fire that’s a pyro mancer
Dont you have a show to watch?
Not a “WIZARD”
I mean I'll keep goin
Why cant a pyromancer be a type of wizard
A pyromancer is a kind of wizard no?
Why the separation
The separation is crucial because wizards draw from a variety of magics, they get to choose what they use, it’s the feelings of mastery over elements and knowledge, void strictly uses dark arcane magic that’s not a feeling of mastery, the guy has to be point blank range to get an ult off, in what world does a wizard stand 2 feet away from the target? Also wizards are men and void im pretty sure is a strong African woman
I gotta respect this kind of trolling
Mods this guy is dog whistling
🤝
Im being fr
First half had me going
No trolling. Your take is dog water at best
Ill stand on it
Im passionate about wizards
We all are my brother
I think its important to have a distinction between different magic users and there is no actual """wizard"""""character in supervive that really feels like a wizard
Yeah, and that's why Void has more than just a wizard hat.
And mentioning the history of witches doesnt really apply to a fantasy setting and it seems like it was just a fun fact you wanted to bring up
Actually for the sake of it
I will actually respond to the top half bc the bottom is obv troll
Even if we took this at face value what is there to say that pyromancers cant do all the other elements and they just really like fire? Even using the chef example every chef has a speciality. Void could very well be capable of fireballs and just dosent want to use them
And what does range have to do with mastery
Is Ryze not a wizard because hes much more close ranged?
Not every single wizard ever has to be 600 meters away calling down lightning
Go splash buddy
@raven frost Well ryze is technically a wizard but only because there isn’t a classification for his magic, mana magic? Where void is clearly using evil arcane magic with an even deeper specialization on strong black dimensional rifts. Wizards can be evil but the moment they specialize or get corrupted by it they are no longer a wizard as they arnt capable of displaying mastery. As far as the archetype anyway, speaking on games, wizards are usually channeling ranged casters with big aoe damage and are very squishy. She also doesn’t look like a wizard at all, she has giant ebony hands not a staff?
I get it tho you feel a little silly seeing how wrong you are but I’ve been studying this sort of stuff since I was an apprentice, I remember the first time I was incredibly wrong about something so I tried to virtue signal my way out of it.
Hold this healing spell for me ik you need it
u can apply this to EVERYTHING IN EVERY MEDIA. it is not a smart take. woah this archer can potentially gut ppl with a dagger why do we call him a pro archer? woah this expert sniper can potentially shoot pistols why dont we just call him a gunslinger? woah this mace wielding champ is strong enough to use a 2 handed sword why are we labeling them as a hammer man?!
do i need to go on any more on this topic or does it make sense why that take is just bad.
yea ofc void could MAYBE use fireballs and we just dont know cuz he doesnt like to, but why even bring that up at all? u are just rambling about shit that is not in the game at all and acting like it matters lol.
Super based take. I don't understand how people can connect the dots
I mean when someone says a character is witchy you have a clear picture of that in your mind the same way something is wizardly.
People constantly lump mages, wizards, and warlocks together like they’re the same thing, when in reality they’re wildly different archetypes, each with their own flavor, philosophy, and brand of power.
Let’s get this straight:
A mage is raw intellect and control. They don’t just cast magic — they understand it. Mages are scholars of the arcane, engineers of reality. Their power comes from study, precision, and willpower. They dissect the laws of magic the way a scientist dissects atoms.
A wizard, on the other hand, is the classic practitioner — steeped in tradition, spellbooks, and ritual. Wizards channel power through learned forms, relying on structure and formula. They’re the architects of magic’s rules, often obsessed with perfecting their craft within a framework of incantations and glyphs.
And then there’s the warlock — chaotic, dangerous, and absolutely intoxicating. Warlocks don’t study or recite; they bargain. They make pacts with beings older than time to wield forbidden magic that mortals were never meant to touch. Their power isn’t learned — it’s granted, and it always comes with a cost.
So yeah, call them all “spellcasters” if you want, but that’s like calling a poet, a lawyer, and a cult leader all “people who use words.” Technically true, but you’re missing the entire point.
Oh, don’t get me started on witches. People keep throwing the word around like it’s interchangeable with mage or wizard, but it’s really not. Witches are a completely different breed of magic user.
They don’t pull power from theory or contracts. They draw it from the world itself. Witches don’t study magic, they live it. Their magic comes from instinct, ritual, and connection. not formulas or bargains. A mage writes equations, a wizard memorizes incantations, but a witch knows which herbs to burn and which words to whisper because the air tells them.
so yeah there is definitely a difference in what kinds of magic users there are
@rotund crystal Ur actualy too based and too true for this chat my fellow Wizard, ur casting high tier magic and there coming back lacking wizard 101. Legitimately concerning how much wizard hate this community has. Let a wizard catch a vibe tf are we talking about? @raven frost ur getting aura siphoned its incredible. Where did ur aura go? Kura stole it… Kura has it all…. Ur legit auraless now, unbelievable blunder. Stand on business, you lack the tomes to discuss such intricacies Murc and that’s ok, get ur gear up, go grind goblins.
Fuck you man I was at thr origin episode
send this guy back to the dungeon. u need to learn more.
this dude a squire
On god brother
doesnt even know how to give a well educated take
or even respond to real criticism
just caling someone dumb
I dont understand why specialization in evil means you arent capable of showing mastery. Like im a chef and i specialize in the meat section does that make me no longer a chef
Someone who bakes cakes isnt a chef they are a baker
"im a fighter."
"oh really what do u train?"
"fighting." ass message
No no by all means that would make you a meat glazer perhaps a meat gazer not a chef
@raven frost completly ignoring all the valid points and just calling someone dumb. Then claiming that they are just being trolled when it's just a straight refusal to acknowledge reality on it's own terms
Beside the point really tho, void isn’t capable of cooking anything else, that’s just the facts ur living in a delusional world
buddy said how do we know void doesnt know how to shoot fireballs and he just doesnt like to 🤣
I mean I'm keeping it a buck with you and I'm giving a real opinions here and you just ignore it because it clashes with your own internal schema
which is fine man some people cant be honest with themselves. Take some time for some self reflection here
I get it dude sometimes it's hard to admit when you're wrong. No one likes to look stupid, but thats just a part of learning
I personally think all of those examples are stupid. We call pro archers pros because they are adept woth a bow and arrow not because they only use bows ans arrows for example. This logic cant be applied to wizards because the term wizard is nebulous. Its not literly person who can use spells so I dont see how any of the examples you broughg up accurately attack the point. What im saying is not that its impossible that void is a warlock and he has to be a wizard and everhone else is wrong and stupid. It's just to say that a definition like the one proposed does not work in this context because we dont actually know the extent of voids magical abilities and the nature of them.
But I see im in the presence of FAKE WIZARDCELLS who dont want to open their minds to new perspectives
if u think those examples are stupid u are calling ur own examples stupid bro.
is that not clear to u lol
those examples are what u are doing.
no dude this person is delulu
So I (Chad Sorcpilled free thinker) am going to exit
Oh you cant read can you
yea i would too after getting owned by real wizards
I cba
i bet you hang around conservative furry discord servers
take ur larping self to ur little dinky archer channel
Im misty stepping out of here
Clearly can not handle any form of criticism. Im sorry your perspective is so small
Well, I see I’ve got some people I need to add to a blocklist.
For anyone interested, here’s how it looks so far.
Soft as baby shit my boi
These guys are wizard phobic and play roblox dress up games
prob paladin enjoyers
@topaz hawk I like that he put you down twice
Bro needs his echo chamber
Yeah dude lmao
why is gnome there tho
Bro Legit can’t handle that a group of young wizards want representation in there game
Thats keemstar
yea i know
We don’t like his tactics but the wizard gnome pact goes way back
Guarantee bro jerks it Zoe from league of legends and says its ok because she is in lore thousands of years old
makes sense ty for clarifying
But yeah no as I was saying before a bunch of Wizardphobes tried to stunt our movement, they should add a wizard to the game. There are a million ways to do it, and we as wizard kind feel underrepresented by void or any other so called “Wizard” in the game. If ur def of a wizard is void? you dead ass lack gamer cred and you need to go back to fundamental nerd lore, I’d recommend checking out Lord of the Rings idk if you’ve ever heard of it but. It’s like even if you were delusional enough to count void as a Wizard why stand so strongly in the way of a force asking for another wizard? Can a game only have one wizard? The only conclusion one could draw is that you must be Wizardphobic and I pray you can put aside ur hateful ways and maybe even see yourself being friends with a wizard someday. Standing as a blockade to a movement simply asking for representation in a game is wildly bigoted and I see now why the game is dead. Maybe if y’all added a wizard instead of worrying about the size of the wizards ass you’d have a player base.
I am asking to be included in this block list
so stoked to be on this
why is this thread not locked yet bro 😭
one of the most popular threads of all time
cause no one cares games dead discords dead subreddit is dead. no hope left may as well let the nutters run the show
what do you get out of typing this btw
Rather have all of it in one thread than there being 20 threads
He has nothing better to do
some people just have no motion fr fr
just remove any topics like this, it brings no actual discussion to the table and both sides take it to the extreme every time to the point of bringing up religion/politics where this community isn't a part of or need to be a part of
I agree with you on how much this topic has been discussed to the point of being spammed and every single time this discussion gets thrown around it goes popular because people thrive off on trolling instead of having an actual discussion about things like these
it's just a toxic conversation overall where there's no middleground
Thats not up to me to decide
fair, but if you could bring it up to the other mods also for a collective decision that'd be great
every time this conversation comes around there's really nothing good that comes out of it
Exhibit A:
nuts is just being a troll here.
wym
OH
LOL
they gonna start drawin triangles on her
Im not even trolling when I say wizards gotta be in the game. I stand by everything I have said here. Void is does not fulfill the fantasy of a wizard and I think a character that plays and feels like a true mage should be in the game
she has boobs on her bro
they are still gonna get mad
u are not understanding the complaint
what's the comparison point?
I just think they look similar
Sure. I'd put her in the main cluster, but with some definition. Very safely unexagerrated, using the big horns, boots, and scythe to project her character recogniton.
I hate the new character design, it doesn't look bad on its own but its just a continuation of the thing I hate the most about this game : objectification of women. HAVING to see their boobs for them to be entered into the roster. This sucks.
It's a rather conspicuously convenient in between. Not skeletal enough to detract from curves (so not wraithlike or ghostly), nor powerful enough to step away from the snatched waist and slender limbs (so not really imposing for a frontliner swinging a giant weapon at your head). Her knight armor is absent around thighs and torso (and the undersuit has tears to expose her abdomen and chest), her helmet does not block her flowing hair. While the idea of mixing the cyber with the ghostly is very cool, and there are elements of the design that do articulate that convergence well, we do fall into the same old pattern of samey body design that detours from telling us about the character to make sure it's safely attractive in the same way.
This critique (as applied to other designs) isn't new, and the fact it held true here probably isn't surprising, but this is a fairly good example of a design that doesn't feel like it lives up to its potential because it's restricted to a narrow scope of what female character design is allowed to be. That's not to say there wasn't real talent and passion that went into the design frpm the devs, nor that other people can't enjoy it or aren't allowed to enjoy it. But it's the sort of thing that induced an immediate eye roll and groan from my wife, and to me feels a missed opportunity in certain ways.
"How dare women have boobs"
like theyre not even overly big or exposed
unless u think they specifically made her wear something made out of cloth to tone her breasts instead of for the ragged look, but if you wanna assume that, i dont think i wanna talk to you about this tbh
because atp you probs see that shit in everything
You read their paragraph and that's what you took out of it?
i explained what i took out of it wdym
might be quicker to just explain what you personally took out of that statement rather than just attack a person
different people have different perspectives and that kind of aggressive taunting/questioning isn't empowering any sides of the argument
what are you even expecting for someone to answer that question
either way this whole conversation from like 10 threads ago with 1k+ messages each... yeah idk why this is still being discussed when it isn't even about the game, more or less just people's preferences about character designs and now we just have this toxic environment of both sides taking it to the extreme
No i genuienly think its that stupid tbh, i feel like most people that push for this debate that hard are just completely delulu.
everyone is free to draw their own line, but trying to say that the intent in that design or part of the intent is objectifying women is just crazy imo
or sexualizing them
we've got trolls in this thread, we've got people bumping threads from literal months ago including this discussing anything about female hunters,
seriously what's the goal here
If you ask me i feel like people just come here to vent every time a new female character gets released
its like the most schizphrenic debate xD, like where do we draw the line if this character is an issue to you too? Do you just not want them to make things that look like women?
Theres also a few people that ask for the entire bodyshape thing but completely forget that the topdown perspective just makes it hard to convey height basically completely taking out one dimension while going for the other dimensions will just make it hard to make them look female to begin with, larger bodytypes are just alot more commonly used for male, often tank, designs, which we basically arent even getting, because of a ton of other issues.
I seriously dont get why there arent a ton of "make more fantasy stuff" or "make more monster characters" instead
Like think female dwarve in armor, think some lovecraftian horror thirsting for revenge that conveys her feminine identity with voicelines and maybe abilitys hinting towards it
that shit would be cooler than most of the characters we have right now regardless.
But i think they hope to appeal to people more by just staying human since its proven to be easier to identify with a human being as a human being
I personally think that those dont get people interested tho, id rather fight in an arena, even if i want to be the human hero guy, that has a ton of fucked up kinda creative monsters and fantasy creatures that look like they can hurt me
But i bet atp people would complain that they made them female to begin with too. You just cant win with these people.
Not skeletal enough to detract from curves (so not wraithlike or ghostly), nor powerful enough to step away from the snatched waist and slender limbs (so not really imposing for a frontliner swinging a giant weapon at your head)
I don't really care about the topic but just wanted to say that you have to keep in mind some countries (especially in Asia) don't allow for skull/ghostly shapes in media. (which is why some LoL characters Thresh or Hecarim have different character model in said servers).
Wait that was a law thing? I always thought that it was just something socially unacceptable
So... you think what I said constitutes an attack?
I agree that this discussion is pointless. What PWYFF said on it MONTHS ago should have been the end. However, there are two or three people that genuinely want to discuss the issue, a few trolls whose only goal is to attempt to trigger those who are trying to discuss a legitimate and real concern, and many poorly informed individuals loudly stating their views without a modicum of research, introspection, or empathy. As such, the two or three people keep attempting to gently educate and explain to correct ignorance which creates ample opportunity for the trolls to attempt to get the emotional response they want because it's funny to bait people.
Should you stifle the entire conversation just because of ignorance and trolls?
never said it was an attack but it was an aggressive method of questioning wherein the question itself is irrelevant to the discussion where it can only lead to something else outside of the discussion itself
we just can't ignore the toxic environment this discussion creates. I agree that this should've ended months ago after the 10 other threads and over 10k messages at this point
but when politics, religion, and stuff like that comes out, it brings out the worst in people and invites the worst of people at the same time
there is a noble cause in all of this but after checking out this thread and those other threads and just seeing how people react to this
there is in no way this is healthy for anyone to partake in nor is it even helpful to the game nor its community
everything important has been said at this point, no reason to keep kicking a dead horse
This isn't politics or religion or any comparable topic. It is a discussion on the comparative design standards between the characters and how the choices made are perceived and interpreted. There are people coming in to the conversation and rather than engage with the topic, they find it funny to attempt to bait those engaged in it.
Also- understanding what someone brings to the conversation is an ideal way to enter it. If someone has less experience and less exposure than you would want to approach them differently than someone who has had exposure and disagrees.
This whole discussion has been beaten to death and it's definitely leaning to politics/religion #1422985554059985076 message
For some, it might be. But I think if you read the way in which the two to three people who are genuinely attempting to discuss the issue and how it pertains to Supervive are clearly not discussing it with a religious or political slant.
there was a whole political discourse about this topic around September in this very same thread as well, it's quite well spoken from both sides but it definitely leaned into it
#1407460293281583124 message
#1407460293281583124 message
#1407460293281583124 message
I struggle to understand how these messages can be construed as being delivered from a political leaning. This feels like normal art criticism and discussion. Which is slightly off topic, but still pertains to how characters designs are perceived. What about those responses do you find political?
It's a discussion about how art can be viewed as political due to people's perspectives. Which in this case and topic is how Supervive portrays female characters
It's the logic that makes regimes declare halls of art 'degenerate' for being the wrong style or wrong form or wrong politics
what attack bro, i called it out as something stupid because it literally is and explained why already
And if you want a one sided discussion you shouldnt have that on a public discord
But atp why even try having a discussion at all lol
Acknowledging that art can be perceived with a political slant is not the same as making the discussion about politics.
And?
whats the issue with that, people use different means to discuss and argue about things. Everything is something that can be looked at from a political perspective and politics play a huge role in how societal standards are formed?
like what are u even trying to argue? Do you just want everyone to go by ur own rules of discussion?
Neryll, with respect, you might want to actually do some moderating of the discussion to ensure it doesn't become toxic. Rather than encourage those who enter the conversation with the clear and express intent to troll or bait. That would make for a much healthier discussion that doesn't devolve into insult hurling, strawmen arguments, and gotcha attempts.
he made a joke, if thats toxic to you, i think youre the issue tbh.
I agreed with it because i also think just going off of shape is kinda dumb because of the same reasons i stated here earlier
if you read my messages ud know
Understood. Thank you for your candid thoughts and feedback. I clearly understand that further discussion is pointless. I hope you have an excellent day
theres other disruptive behaviour ive taken action against before, but generally, if you cant handle ur points being ridiculed by others, you should just not engage with public discussion
i dont wanna be the guy to judge what kinda joke flys and what doesnt.
What's the joke in the above image you found funny? Can you explain it to me?
You should generally just not engage in discussion just to try and villainize someone you dont like if you want them to agree with u. Like all you did so far is to just pull out random messages you looked up from me, which tbf, is just inherently bad faith to begin with, laid them out like they have to be toxic without even doing any of ur own thinking towards it just for me to tell you afterwards how i meant the messages multiple times for you to just jump to the next message u can attack
this isnt the first time either like
How stupid do you think i am
Look at the first message of this thread.
or the other thread that is about female character design broadly
So the joke is that the poster found the person's argument so poor they decided to mock it?
then read this and you know why i think that the entire shape thing is ridicilous for me
yes, and?
Do you think mockery is part of a healthy discussion?
So you want me to remove everyone from every discussion that ridicules someones points?
I dont think its something anyone is innocent of tbh
and i feel like even if we started moderating it more heavily it wouldnt really change the nature of these kind of discussions being so polarizing
Itd be the same shit without the jokes
I dont think anything can fix that public discussions like these without everyone being on the same page with a few things at least, like basic stuff, nothing will ever go in a productive way, its just something you cant change. People just want to get their own points across without really going into the discussions wanting to change their minds about a topic
i think the only way to solve that is to remove these threads completely personally
they havent been good points of feedback to begin with for ages now.
kinda based
lets take it to dms tho, i think its been in here enough for now
Despite your lack of a direct answer, I can interpret you acknowledge that mockery is not contributing to a healthy discussion.
Your reasons for not moderating it feel pretty poorly thought out and not well reasoned.
The argument for removing threads in which people have a higher likelihood to troll will not reduce the threads that people troll, but rather provide a clear and decisive way for people to end threads they disagree with. By trolling.
Again, it is on the moderators, not the participants in the discussion, to ensure that discussion is healthy. You may think it futile to moderate, but we have confirmation that simply watching (or directly encouraging) those who intend to derail conversations doesn't work. Maybe a different approach is warranted?
Do you think there haven't been good feedback discussions recently because of the propensity with which discussions devolve into insult hurling, strawmen arguments, and gotcha attempts? PWYFF was right that people are far more performative in their discussions due to the expectation they are being read by devs, but this too can easily be quelled with properly setting expectations.
As primarily a spectator, it feels pretty frustrating to see discussions derailed by those who seek not to contribute, but to troll. Rewarding their trolling by closing threads feels not a punishment, but a reward.
They’re just a mod abusing who they are to dunk on everyone else.
But I do think Nyx is a step in the right direction, even if she’s not completely different.
Point of clarity, since there are taboos they'd run into: I don't mean actual bones here, but you can still be alluding to that by just being more skinny. This one seems to avoid that to keep a pleasing female shape.
I love how when any non-mod has an unpopular opinion they just get laughed at, and when it's a mod, they get called out for abusing power even if they don't make any threats to ban people or anything xD
I mean that mod constantly saying they just may use their mod powers to shut things down if one side of a debate keeps being annoying to them doesn't seem like it's good for the tone of a debate.
didn't they literally say they don't want to lock the thread, multiple times?
They keep saying they're mighty tempted to, and the context makes where they are promising to moderate as an outside observer and moderator and where they are an active participant with clear opinions often blurry.
And surely that has an effect on how some people might feel empowered or even encouraged to push the envelope, while others might feel iced out from even talking.
when did i shut something down lol, the only thing i did is closing channels that has this exact same topic made by someone that made a bunch of them for no reason, refering to these 2 threads instead lmao
but surely you see how the constant promise that you just might be convinced that you should shut down this topic, combined with the fact that you are not neutral in the topic, might affect how the topic works?
i literally always said that i dont want to close it, i just understand that people want me to
if we have discussion channels i dont want to be the one to decide which topics go and which dont, unless someone is abusing it obviously.
Keep the rest on topic from now on if you want to talk more about this just take it to dms
noted. Said my piece about how the subject applies to the new hunters so far, may have developing thoughts as we see her in action more.
Remember people
You can just
Silence this and not see it!
If you dont like tomato soup, dont go to the soup store to complain!
Anime: Code Geass
Parody Creator: PurpleEyesWTF
Abridged Series:Codement
Epsiode: 16
I do not own the parody nore the original anime
yeah i personally am not super happy with the kit itself but im hoping for an angry wielder of carnage, might like it.
if we are gonna cry about moderating i think 99% of the ppl who are trying to push this “point” would be banned or locked from this channel. making fun of silly shapes is not comparable to calling ppl sexual freaks who just masturbate to game characters or telling ppl to kill themselves lol.
Where are you getting that as 99% of people kura?
Yea thats a wild number lmao
everyone except u so far feels like lmao
either way i think whining about a mod finding a picture funny is weird. its not like the guy is doing anything bad.
If you cannot understand how mocking someone is disruptive and harmful to thoughtful and inclusive discussions I am not certain that I am going to be able to explain why exactly it's worth pointing out
why do you think this much effort into something people have 0 control over on a game discord thats has more activity in this topic (from a few angry people) than in the rest of the discord or the actual game is worth to keep?
the people angry about it dont even play the game anymore
there was 0 thoughtful and inclusive discussion going on based around shapes. the original post is far from what everyone is pushing in this thread.
the reason why i dislike this thread is because of the original post. i dont fully disagree with having more varying female designs like a big monster etc. but basing it off shapes, and not even accurately, is a really weak point that no one really continued. this post hasnt been about the shape idea for a long time so making a simple joke of it with 1 picture is not a big deal.
no one that starts or joins a conversation about "female designs shapes" is reasonable to begin with
a game is a simple: make something fun that people enjoy and the rest comes
anything that strays from that objective is from people who dont know what they are doing or what they want
not really. ppl have opinions on art design thats fine lol.
its not like focusing on art design means devs shouldnt focus on game balance.
i dont think the convo abt female design (imo should be every character design but apparently 3 big dudes means the male cast is insanely diverse lol) is a bad convo, i just think some of the points are actual garbage points like this original post and some of the ppl are freakazoids w too much passion for no reason lol
people having opinions on art designs that leads to "this checklist needs to be fulfilled or the game is evil" has no interest in the game doing good
either they are trolling, wants the game to fail or has no interest in the game at all
i dont think anyone said needs to be fulfilled or the game is evil lol.
"there is not enough shapes"
"not enough diversity"
"enough diversity of smth, needs more diversity of another"
I do think male designs have some convergence with about half the male cast, but between the more big exaggerated guys, weird shaped ones like void, gremlins like beebo, etc. There is markedly better variety. And it's useful to compare to show that more variety is possible and useful to expressing character.
As for this one setting the wrong tone, that's something my partner was just talking about. Presuming nerryl doesn't trap us in this version, maybe talk of character design for those who enjoy such things would benefit from being under different parameters.
none of these is calling for it to be fulfilled or the game is evil its saying they feel that way.
"i feel the game needs more female shapes representation..."
"what if it doesnt have it?"
cmon bruh
you are smarter than this
?
are u not reading the msgs or something
saying they think the game needs more variety is not calling for a change to be fulfilled or the game is evil, its saying their opinion on it. there is no other convo going on here other than that because that is what u said and that is what i replied to lol.
We are clown reacting now 💀
I often find that when one feels the necessity to ask this question the answer is almost always going to be the one they are not wanting to hear.
This is an example of mockery. Do you understand how it might prevent us from having productive dialogue?
im just gonna say, this topic has more activity than any other in the server, and even more than the game itself.
This topic has hijacked the purpose of supervive basically since its over 4000+ comments and the game barely makes it to 500 players
none of that matters?
lol
im saying what u said is not happening u are just yapping.
this is a thread where ppl are talking about their opinions on character design whatever u are seeing is some other thread or ur imagination
wow
ohhh i just noticed something
kura, you were one of those who were necroing this thread
makes sense now
nope i wasnt lol
u are just a pure yapper u are talking about random stuff
someone giving their opinion against a thread isnt "necroing" a thread just because u disagree.
do u think this means anything? it is someones opinion. u can disagree with it, i do, but that doesnt mean anyone that has an opinion on art style shouldnt be taken serious because u think the game comes first. both can be a talking point.
what would be the purpose of that talking point
the dude does not even play the game
what would anyone accomplish by developing the topic further
which is how this thread started
the purpose is to have their opinion heard by devs its not really a hard concept to grasp lol? if a character is op and ppl are making threads about them being op they are either just venting or trying to have the character nerfed. ppl make these types of threads to vent or to have their opinion heard so they can change the design. there isnt anything really wrong with that.
the main issue i have is when ppl ignore things or make up shapes etc. but having an opinion on art style isnt a wrong thing and i think u shouldnt think the game needs changes to make the game better so no one should focus on their art style opinion. both can coexist lol.
but my main point is ur saying ppl are focusin on this while the game is in a state u dont like. that doesnt matter, both can be talked about. and i dont see anyone saying this game is evil bc of the art etc. thats all im saying lol.
literally the image i sent was from when half were throwing insults and the other half were saying "nobody cares"
and lets say the devs "heard" the opinion, mission accomplished, what now?
dioubt the thread with more activity than the game itself has not been read at all
one of many
which the others got closed/deleted
who cares? ppl are talking about their opinions. thats my point. u are saying the game is in a state where ppl shouldnt even talk abt their opinions? that doesnt impact anything lol.
eh?
idk whatever they wanted to happen might happen who cares let ppl talk
well i am talking too
ur "talking" is telling everyone to not talk about their opinions because the game doesnt need it?
if u scroll up and read the msg of urs that i replied to, im just against that logic.
u saying anyone that joins a convo abt this is unreasonable is some larp
ah so when u said either ppl are trolling or wants the game to fail, u were tlkaing about urself trolling
o7
🤣
literally not mentioned about female character design at all
just the people who engage about it
yea just u are now trolling after having no reasonable response
response to what
maybe ur initial msg was true just not 100%. most ppl are trolling or unreasonable.
ive never done either of those things
I dont really seek that with you, i disagree with most things you have to say. The fact that i told u multiple times to take it to dms atp and you still going when ive been disagreeing with you is just another example why im just not going to engage with it anymore.
I get this sentiment but i think its fine to keep these discussions going because i think this argument isnt even something stupid to be had overall, theres some examples that make sense even for me, but since its a polarizing topic there will be people with extreme opinions on both sides (as in one side acting like that intent doesnt exist at all or thinks that its completely fine to sexualize women and dumb down ur designs for it and the other side acting like the designers are sexstarved dumbasses that have no clue what theyre doing and only try to make everything sexy)
and i think its unavoidable to have polarizing topics in an open discussion on a public discord
take mercury's shoes off the skin
if im gonna pay money for it thats the least they can do
Does this make sense for a supervive discussion tho. Will it benefit the game at all or maybe it does not matter anymore because supervive has no hope and discussing things that wont contribute to the game in any way is the only salvageable way of a positive for this exprrience?
Its about the games characters
ngl no discussion in this discord will ever benefit the game in anyway besides "hey can you guys interact with my content so more people see it"
devs wont (and probly shouldnt) listen to 100% of the people that are here in the disc
and nothing of value is ever really said
this thread is pointless i agree but its just as pointless as 99% of the other posts
like
when wukong was broken
there were 20 threads
we all knew he was broken they were all wastes of energy
shit was going to change eventually whether it got posted or not
and same with this thread
they should keep making hot girls
and they will
even tho this thread exists
There can be a discussion in the Supervive discord about if Shrike would be a good underwear model, and while hilarious at first it has a limited scope and purpose, prolonging that as pair of nuts said it has already been said, is pointless to keep it going, it does not contribute to the game at all, the devs are aware some players feel this way.
This could had been about characters in the game but the discussion is off topic from supervive at this point. Unless it doesnt matter anymore since 99% of the discord does not play thos game anymore
This would get removed almost immediately.
what the fuck is even that comparison
lmfao
One discussion is argueing wether is something is sexualized, the other is blatant sexism
Why is it sexism?
If you need me to answer that to you id rather not engage further in this tbh
its just a waste of time
Alright then
the discord isnt a place for cold hard facts and game changing decisions
its a place for the silver players to hang out
not trying to be a dick, since i hang out here too (im not silver)
but thats what official discords for games are for
its for people to come say oh i like elluna
or shrike is hot put her in underwear
or lol what if kingpin was a vampire
all dumb examples but you get what im saying
they have a focus group and a form to fill out for pbe access
and the people in those groups are the only feedback the company should be listening to tbh
i dont think getting worked up because ppl are talking about champ design is worth it
even if u dont agree with their opinions. at least the thread is active
there are many threads in this discussion even after feedback was removed that actually got addressed and got acted on
this is just objectively false
they actually do listen to a lot of the discussions that happen around here|
TC isn't perfect, they're slow, completely ignoring stuff, but a lot of actual discussions around here does impact balancing of the game even if you only look at the 20%~ of stuff that doesn't ever get addressed like Hudson
Nah
highly disagree when those same groups gave us armory lmao
I don't believe a single playtester or high elo person said "o ye ppl are gonna love this"
As evidence by all the complaints they made on launch
don't take my word for it, TC said it
#1383221735037341759 message
either way only listening to the top 0.5% of the community the "high elo" isn't healthy for the game either
For every one thread with good feedback that gets acted on i bet there are 99 bad ones that should be ignored and thats the point I was making
Never said it was, I think I even said that everyone should sign up with the new form they dropped because they probably do want some low elo but good feedback
the amount of threads here that actually somehow gets implemented is more than you'd think
there is some truth to what you're saying but the voice of the community is more impactful than you're trying to portray
this whole thing as well warranted a personal statement from Pwyff
this conversation I agree shouldn't be here (albeit for a different reason due to toxicity and how far both sides take it) but it's still a discussion worth bringing up because many people want to bring it up one reason or another and something that TC definitely knows
it's already had impact
I bring it up a lot but thats just ironically cause its funny
Cause I can't imagine caring about it as much as other ppl
And u r right ab that
What's the TLDR of this
I made the mistake of clicking on it and it sent me to the latest comment
it's an old thing that was articulating dissatisfaction with female hero variety trying to use predominant shape language. How applicable it is has been of some debate, but most of the chatter is a mixture of the larger conversation about female character design - whether it could use more variety or not (with several variations of both sides of that), and then lots of commentary on how much commentary it gets.
So, chill with the gooner bait
Understandable
I know that's an insanely huge blanket of the discussion
It's just funny to call it that
No, but that's solid as a blithe summation.
they're not "only" listening to high elo
most of the point of the PBE/Vive Council is to give mostly balancing feedback
which I think people with most hours in the game can give best
other than that when it comes to design etc. they do a lot of things on their own
there’s an entirely unnecessary keyhole rip in her outfit just to make sure she has visible cleavage lmao
it’s like they tried to pretend it’s not objectification but still couldn’t help themselves
i still think its so funny when people say shapes are a weak basis for character critique… mf character design IS shapes. that’s the basis for all character design. it’s the basis for most design in general. it’s all shapes. it’s all shape language. look around you; everything is shapes. and those shapes influence how you perceive things
I need to goon tho
Can't if characters get concord'd
However, the mercury outfit was great until the weird underboob window.
Not practical for a lady who goes flying across the land
Probably is a required thing in alchemy
Theyre barely listening to them either, alot of the descisions are literally just made by themselves
Its not that they listen more to one specific groups they just are trying a bunch of stuff to increase numbers mainly
Its so insignificant to me that i genuienly had to check again after reading this to notice it im not even kidding lmao
in other words, you don’t look at characters design with a critical eye, and thus don’t really have much to add to the general topic. which is fine. but for some reason you still want to have a strong opinion on it. kinda odd don’t you think
it’s like hearing a photographer talk about the composition of an image, and going “looks like a dude standing in a field to me, i think youre exaggerating”
like maybe you just aren’t looking at things critically enough to engage with the topic at hand
So if i look at it and think its insignificant enough in that regard to not see an issue with their intent i automatically lack a critical eye
i think if you somehow manage to entirely overlook a shameless example of the problem being discussed then yeah you lack a critical eye
Oh yeah because i dont think its an issue because of how it looks with the entire design im overlooking a shameless example
Maybe i just disagree with u?
you literally verbatim told me you “didnt notice it” so don’t pretend like you saw it and you just didn’t think it was an issue
you stated yourself that you overlooked it
Yes i didnt notice it as something people would have an issue with not that i didnt notice its there
Couldve worded that better
it’s a discussion about sexualisation of female character designs and shameless cleavage where it makes no sense for it to be didn’t register in your head as relevant to the perspective in which you were viewing the design
that signifies you indeed do not have a critical eye in this regard
they gave her a full bodysuit and then put a rip in it specifically to give her cleavage. this is as shameless as it gets
how you could not see this as a clear example of the issue being discussed is beyond me
it’s like people complaining that your restaurant has no healthy menu options, and so you create a salad, but then you put a piece of chocolate on it
My main focus on using that critical eye of mine was wether her overall ragged look matches with thr clothing and bodytype and imo its aight. I think the legs being that bulky will probs add alot to how its gonna look from topdown and im obsiously still waiting for animations and the rest.
The only thing i wouldve even thought about would be mentioned here is that shes supposedly a bruiser but still is rather slim which is unusual but they added alot to the overall model for me to think it could still look bulky enough ingame to fit the general look of that role throughout media
and then your ass looks at it and goes “well it’s just some chocolate, what’s the problem? the rest still is healthy isn’t it?”
if anything the fact that they get so close to creating a character design that finally feels like they’re deviating from their norm and then STILL can’t help themselves to give her shameless cleavage is a perfect example of the problem
Again i just disagree, i dont think its something that is forced into the design for the sole purpose of sexualization
then why is the rip specifically on her fucking cleavage
instead of literally anywhere else
how else do you justify that design decision
aside from sex appeal
Oh we know how it looks in game already
Let me try finding an Image...
Ok I found it
the funniest part is also the entire rest of the chest area is completely rip-free
like come ON
Theres multiple rips on her clothing not just there i think its at least as plausible that they just went through multiple iterations of it and just went with it because it looked the most fitting for the ragged look, id personally still prefer armor but i like this look too
Topdown
it doesn’t even look like a fucking rip it’s perfectly round
Thanks
it just looks like part of the clothing
they didn’t even do a good job at trying to pass it off as a rip
You literally called it a rip urself
Thats why i did
yes because it’s clearly meant to pass as one
i’m just saying they’re so shameless in their execution that it barely even passes as a rip
or i’m too charitable in assuming that it’s even a rip at all and it’s genuinely a keyhole in her clothing
but let’s be charitable and assume they at least tried to play it off
it’s like the equivalent of having a male character with rips in their clothes to give them a rugged appearance, and then having a perfectly round rip in their pants exactly on their crotch with the outline of their dick showing through it
wouldn’t you agree that’d be pretty fucking shameless
Thats actually alot more sick than i thought itd look
really? i assumed i was looking at a beta version
genuinely thought it was unfinished
but that’s besides the point
Man if this id what we get on release we eating gooooood
The perspective kinda makes her shoulderplates boots and horns stick out alot more
Thanks for sharing these
that would be if she had a breast out, not just the middle
I mean thats how it would be like if it was the inverse no
why would it? this only shows the top outline of the penis. same as the breasts
inb4 somebody unironically says "breasts aren't for specifically made for sex, though!"

because there is precedent for showing this part of the body in clothing
I'm not saying it's not a sex appeal based precedent, but it is
Should we just start catering to everyone who's only going to be into the game because of porn?
Because that's not working out for Overwatch, is it?
that’s just an appeal to tradition fallacy no?
uh yes
that's how appropriate and inappropriate things are detemined, no?
also yea ofc there’s a precedent. but the illustration is to show how silly the precedent actually is when you put it into perspective and shift the gender
the problem is exactly that the precedent is there, and the call is for this precedent to be meaningfully questioned and challenged
"Oh, but why would you challenge this precedent that's working so well?"
If it's working that well, then it deserves to get stopped.
But anyways, I still think Nyx is a step in the right direction.
Even with the exposed skin she's got on her design, it's pretty clear she's meant to be a more tanky hero than what we've been getting.
buddy its not shapetheory that is the weak basis, it is YOUR take on it. u literally posted wrong shapes for some of the characters, focused on only one part of the body to sum up the whole characters shape, and ignored every other shape in that characters design. there is a reason this post has near 100 poop emojis, there is a reason why everyone that wants female character change are not focusing on the weak shapes u drew even tho they want change. its because this post is trash. even the ppl that this post would help push their point do not focus on this posts point, they focus on the characters overall design outside of just the shape of their ribcage lmfao.
I think this presents the core disconnect at play in this discussion that makes it such a slog to interact with
It feels like a motte and bailey
It’s plain to see areas where TC uses ‘goonerbait’ to try and sell the game, namely in Mercury, the Devil Shiv skin, Eva, the Swimsuit event, etc
And I completely understand the argument that these things are rooted in a misogynistic foundation in our culture
But some of these comparisons and statements in support of that wider idea are a little fringe. I don’t understand how one could compare a chest keyhole to someone showing off their pubic area? This isn’t considered the same thing. What is acceptable or not acceptable to wear is entirely socially defined. How can that be the appeal to tradition fallacy?
All designs made in any game are informed by a wider societal tradition underlying the way people dress. It’s not fallacious to have art that reflects that. If a member of another society that views breasts less sexually and thighs more sexually drew a person in no shirt and long pants, would you tell them, “might as well draw them with all shirt and no pants, otherwise it’s a shameless appeal to tradition”
This kind of reaction for this character is disproportionate, she has a slight bit of cleavage and her shoulder exposed, this isn’t some “shameful” way to dress that you would only see in a “sex object”
This is just how fully fledged grown adults dress in real life all the time, this is no where near as bad as Mercury.
i mean ngl i feel like if u are viewing someone as not shameful and not a sex object, that implies u are viewing others as shameful or a sex object no? u comparing her to mercury means u view mercury like that lol.
feels like a majority of the ppl that are against the female body or character designs are the ones focused on goonerbait stuff or focused on sexualizing the characters body and design. im sure there are some that actually just are goonerfreaks but i just see a cool character while others are like holy boobs are showing sexual character remove this and that focus is part of the problem that they push onto other ppl. like blaming one "side" for boobs, while perma focusing on the female body of a character is a bit weird to me lol.
man dont bring that guy up lol. he has proven himself to be a weird fella just leave him out of the convo no point interacting.
DNI as they say
Sure, let's go with that.
Because the devs decided to make all these Barbie dolls, they're the ones that decided to make the female cast almost nothing but sex objects.
Nyx is a good step towards stopping that, and the fact that a bunch of burner accounts, bad faith trolls, and Discord nobodies sent some random emote doesn't change anything.
unblocks to reply 😂
if u like nyx and are against the other girl designs u are a lil kooky imo.
This is such a massive nothingburger discussion.
what if mercury feels empowered by her shirt and what if she a real eater
i think thats fine from a lore perspective
Like you go to sleep and someone draws a dick and posts it and thinks its ok
Like the comparison is so fucking dumb
what?!
i cant connect the dick drawing to the conversation i have no clue what that means lmfao
i deleted it lmao
someone thought that something that is publicly worn by women and socially accepted to the point that its worn without any sexual intent by women (because surprise surprise, women dont dress for the sole purpose to be sexy to some boob oogling men) to pants with a dick cutout and had to illustrate it to prove that point
LMFAO
what lore?!?!
I swear this game has no lore, I have to look at dev steams from the narrative designer to get an idea of what the fuck is going on with this game's universe.
some in game apex style character bios would be nice at least.
Signwave is part of the mentally ill crowd that should just be banned tbh. They bring nothing but negatives to a community.
the fact that the penis outline drawing got deleted shows some massive bias from the "mod" here in what is acceptable sexualization and what is unacceptable sexualization.
clearly sexualization of women is normal and expected, and sexualization of men is weird and off-putting
and the fact that trolls are allowed to keep coming back and engaging in here to throw off the conversation
like what are we doing here
Letting the mental illness out
@harsh girder @somber fulcrum is this really acceptable mod behavior
meanwhile this random is personally attacking me out of nowhere?
This isnt an nsfw server
They lucky they dodnt get permad
Dont expect people to facilitate your mental illnes
please do elaborate on that! :))
You know, I never really thought of that.
Also, Mew is definitely just here to try and derail the convo.
Don’t take shots every time they say “mental illness”, you’ll go blind. 
I can see that haha
the picture posted had genitals visible on it lol 💀
#FreeTheBalls
comparing that to a keyhole top is absolutely braindamaged i dont even know how we got here.
Im not even having a bias
if you wore the shit u drew in public itd take minutes in some places before u got arrested and would face charges
it straight up isnt acceptable to be posted here either
The delusions some people go through to make their argument is so insane to me
true mb
next time ping modhelp instead, i wouldve acted on it earlier if i was aware
thanks for reaching out in general tho
this entire thread serves 0 purpose
not to sound like LTG
but I feel like after a literal dev responded in here it should've just been closed ?
also I feel like when it comes to sexualization this game is like the LEAST problematic game comparative to other "mainstream" games out there.
As a point of ongoing discussion that multiple people care about in different ways, thread serves its purpose there. This is a discussion thread after all, not a feedback ticket (even if it is meant to provide feedback and response to an element of the game)
if you just look up how many similar threads there are id rather just keep this one open so that i can close the other ones to refer to this one, I could also close this one and only allow new ones to be made with new character releases, but generally I agree that nothing that will be said in this thread is likely to still even be read by a dev.
esp with most points being made are just genuienly some of the worst ive ever read regarding sexualization within games
and ive been around for a really long time
its a polarizing topic, people will have shit takes
since theres way too many extremes
as for whether this game is the worst offender of sexualization, obviously not the worst.
Nor is this strictly about sexualization - the point here has been the limited variety in female character designs. Now I think a fair read on why those limitations may be is the notion that female characters have been put more consistently towards conventional beauty standards, and that leads to matters of sex sells, sexualization, objectification, etc., but it's ultimately a perceived priority that is triggering the larger critique.
I think part of why this draws consistent chatter is that its not the worst offender. The dev team is creative and passionate, and we can see that they can produce a variety of unique and memorable character designs. Part of the frequent comparisons between male and female sides of the cast (how persuasive you find that will vary of course) is intended to highlight that the team clearly could do more if they so chose. Because the team clearly can be creative, and because the team feels reasonable and reachable rather than some cynical commercial project is I think why some folks get frustrated by the perceived continual return to limited female designs.
I think the sole reason why it draws so much chatter is mainly because of how convinced the bad actors on the pro sides are of their takes tbh its basically ragebait xD
Oh typo
Character design and the thought that the game is sexualizing its characters
Like some takes are just wild
Clearly you are not biased at all as you said above...
At least you took action and decided where the line was crossed and took moderator action. That's progress!
Calling out the extremes of both sides of the argument is bias
Ok
Like i get it youre still upset about me disagreeing with you last time but you dont have to lurk on this channel and try and attack everything I say to get ur gotcha moment 💀
It is embarrassing how badly this thread is being moderated and the impact it has on the direction of the conversation. This is not an isolated experience to the thread.
I'm trying to do you a favor by pointing that out.
As in the people that are very extremely pro character design and think that all designs cant have any issues and the people that heavily think that all female characters follow some sexual formula. I think most takes around people thinking that designs could do better around designs outside of the sexualisation aspect were pretty chill tho, hard to argue against peoples preferences to begin with shouldve worded that better initially probs had a long day sry
If I wanted a gotcha moment it would have been above when you spelled out that mocking people is good and definitely not against the very clear server rules.
✊
I havent said its good, just that people will meme and ridicule points in a discussion constantly in a public open discussion especially on a platform like discord which is heavily within internet culture. I never said its good just that its something that will always be around in varying severitys and i dont wan to be the one to rate humor. If thinks get out of hand and insults get thrown around and people start mocking eachother instead of the points that were made i usually time them out and we have been banning people for that too for ages now
And again just take it to dms atp
Thats the last time i said that
I already took it there last time and you didnt even respond you dont want to help me or discuss this you just wanna get me back for whatever bs upset u initially
Join the movement #FreeTheBalls
I'm not going to DM you feedback about this. I'm going to follow the server rules and give you direct feedback rooted in empathy.
Cool
#📜│rules message
What in the passive aggression
Yes i know the rules
Do you support our movement
Hide the balls and free the pubic area
Good, do you think telling people they have mental illnesses or mocking their arguments is rooted in empathy?
Its not, someone did it today and got timed out, the only reason it didnt happen sooner is because noone pinged modhelp and mods were likely not around that moment
I am glad to hear that.
No paqt
No mod wants to check here because its a cesspool
I think the thread has reached its time
It should be closed and then allow a new character design thread to come out on Nyx's release
Yeah it doesnt really change the fact that the same people will just make the same points
oh that picture was funny imo
it will just turn into the same thread tho
maybe, but the tenor of the base topic does shift what people new to the topic are generally coming through and assuming it's about.
how quickly, aggressively, and consistently it becomes 'the same thread' can be different
it had like the slightest outline of the top of the penis
male equivalent of cleavage
also saying that cleavage keyholes are not sexual is hilarious
Whatever bro i genuienly cba argueing about it more than i already did just never post anything like that again 💀
you can say that about most other cleavage but keyholes are not worn casually
I literally was out with a friend earlier this week that wore one. We were eating at an asian and talked about anime
Women dont dress for the sole purpose of what dudes think about them lmao
Clothing is something people use to express themselves beyond that, i could ask her why she did wear it but knowing her shes just gonna tell me that she thinked it looked cute on something else
I dont even think it skirts around social norms or anything theres way more clothing that exposes alot more in that area i dont think this one is as bad as u think it is and i think asking to strictly use clothing that doesnt expose any skin in that area would just not really represent what women wear as much as you think they do
Comparing that to a cutout that shows a whole ass shaft instead of stuff like muscleshirts is insane to me
Which i wore heavily because i was super proud of my body before i got sick i didnt even care what girls thought about me because i was still not over my ex lol
And also watched way too many jojo videos T.T
yeah duh but that doesn't take away from the societal implications of certain pieces of clothing
you can wear lingerie too without sexual intent but that doesn't take away that it's a piece of clothing that is made to sexualise
I dont think a keyhole is inherently sexual, just as much as i dont think a top with a wide space between the shoulders and the breast is, like camis or other stuff. I dont think showing a bit of cleavage is comparable to something that either only covers the breast or nothing at all
Those kinda tops are also a ton more common in casual wear, keyholes if at all special, are just because they are alot more rare at least in my experience
Its not even a hole between the breast or anything, its above and only hints at what u deem so problematic with that bit of shade. Wether it makes sense for the design is up for everyone but seeing how much her shoulderplates boots and horns stick out in game together with her weapon im kinda glad they didnt pick anything bulky for her top while the keyhhole top adds alot to the overall ragged look imo.
I need to play her first ofc
But i think im gonna love the design ingame im all for armor and horns that stick out like that
To add to ur previous comparison, yes it is definetly comparable to a guy with a muscleshirt but if the guy has a massive ego, looks like someone that is obsessed with muscle or has anything else that hints at him just being super confident in himself id totally get it just like i kinds like the vibe with this character since looking at hee horns and big ass scythe kinda makes me feel that shes gonna be hella confident in herself too
Thats also why i really dont get it with mercury on top of it being something youll rarely ever see worn without that kinda intent, it just made 0 sense for her to look like that to begin with imo
are you implying that if a character looks like she'd be confident enough to wear an outfit in public then it's fine it's clearly sexualising them?
Thatd only make sense if i felt like they are being sexualized to begin with. As i said for me keyholes arent more revealing than a cami or any other top revealing as much and those are worn alot more commonly. The reason why i think confidence is making sense is mainly because i think it takes confidence to show any form of how you look that clearly in general alongside probably alot of other reasons that i dont understand on the female side since im just not born one myself, i just hear that often about even camitops but generally anything that isnt super gracefull to ones body. I think that it takes alot less confidence to just wear a hoodie or anything baggy for example since its great at masking alot of how ur body looks
Also obv something that isnt worn the most will always require some amount of confidence to be worn to begin with
hot is 9/10 times better than ugly its that simple jesus chrust
Vuli, can you explain it to me why hot is better? And who is it better for?
Cos human nature
I don't follow, can you expand?
Omg yes i agree i want to know too
guys n girls are tonna give more of a shit about their story n what not if character is appealing, character not completely ugly, fat and having 50 identities helpe with that. Doesnt mean u cant have that in the game but understanding that going about it as if making characters look good is completely irrelevant is retrded
I'm still not sure I follow.
unlucky
i dont get it either
I’m not reading all that, incel.
Nobody said anything about making ugly female Hunters.
can you elaborate
why insult me XD
It would help me to understand it better if you could provide some examples that help illustrate your point.
inb4 theyre gonna bring up concord
ahaha
concord is just an ez example but not the best one
obviously that shit failed vor carious reasons
but saying characters werent apart of it is delusional at he same time
its not that deep
the characters sucked because they had no art direction
it really goes no deeper than that
ye i agree
with this part
Idk does it need that
I'm sort of just struggling to follow your argument. Hot characters are better because people pay more attention to them?
just so were clear im not hating on any group of ppl or domething i have no issues with any1 rlly
Well most or in many cases more ppl are likely to is the point. It doesnt mean that u cant have a game go big with for example only ugly or fantast characters, but it means that it can be a drawing point regardless and is one often utilised wether in numbers or quality. League is one of the best examples of a mixed world. With fantasy, sexualisation etc. (im ngl i low little to nothing regarding league champs identities so i cant judge on that part, but i wouldny care for example to disocver my otp isnlesbian r smthng xd)
Who determines what is hot or not? Is there a helpful guide / strategy to approach this with?
General sense, what are beauty standards for most people thats what hot in the case of this arguement
For example, I just looked at dota 2's most popular characters by pick rate and it looks like the top is pudge. I guess since he is so popular he must be hot
big bobs can be one but can also be excluded and made up for
it doesnt have to check all boxes
cn be as simple as normal body pretty eyes n hair
no ur missing the point
its not mandatory or critical
Just better?
snd pickrate is not rlly accurate way to judge that anyway cos more shit goed into pickrate than a feeling or draw y have to characters no?
Let me put it like this. Do u see the nuanced difference in a hot, sneaky, dark assassin vs a unpopular, clumsy, but highgly talented and lethal assassin? U can picture it in a superhero story maybe. Its similar to considering batman & robin. U have to understand what kinds of people are drawn to various things. And attraction is one that can work for the full 100% or less in many many people. So while at the same time that an ugly or we character can be most popular u can have another character that has more appeal in terms of drawing ppl in or how interesting the character is
even pudge
the character is less of a factor than lux in terms of popularity
and if im wrong there i would be turbo shellehocked
ask every girl playing lux why they love lux so much and ull get similar answers in every direction. Whereas pudge u prob get more nuanced andwers more easily
n both are fine
Also this is untrue but u just couldnt think that far im sorry
i think im allowed that one since he called me incel

At this point, people using the Concord excuse is the biggest reason to not take them seriously.
That, and the “you want fat and/or ugly Hunters!” excuse. It’s pretty clear they just want women to look the exact same.
i dont fall under average ppl that say that bro
Also, Portal should have flopped by this logic because Glados looks the way she does.
pointless n baseless arguement
“but it Valve game!”
And? If you’re not gonna learn from one of the best video game franchises of all time, then you shouldn’t be making video games.
the way u judge is wrong because “theme of game” is why ur not accurate
when considering for specific reason overwatch, league and dota u cannot throw in portal with that
but whatever
Alright, then how about Deadlock?
Yea
It’s doing just fine with a female cast that blows SUPERVIVE’s out of the water.
deadlock is very well done
they likely understand what im trying to say and what ur trying to say
and how their games visiok connects to that
its a good balance
they sre likely to grow and grow over time wether that growth starts sooner or later idk but those devs are talented and well spirited
more like dookielock
my man ❤️
I’m gonna hit you guys with a controversial opinion
I like attractive women
I will now turn off notifications and see how many funny little red numbers I get from this post
Yet the first character he played was Brall.. curious...
Hes fake as fuck
This is smth I honestly have always found dumb with whatever you say. You say they look the same/similar and I literally just do not see that for 99% of the female designs. You can call them bad all you want but calling them all similar just doesn't feel true at all to me. "But they have similar body types" is another thing i find dumb. Like, so what? Wtf is the issue with similar body types?
What do you think could be a potential problem with similar body types Vulture?
Maybe these people are indeed asking for fat women like people have been saying 😃
Idk bro, it genuinely confuses me.
I mean, if we wanna use their logic with that a good ampunt of the male designs have bigger shapes. Must be bad design or smth
tl;dr
We all want to characters to have more meaningful details that express personality diversity
But yeah great points great points the men are too fat agreed
This feels kinda dumb to me. Idk if I could list any hunter who i think is lacking in things that "express personality".
Nothing against you I just find this shit so dumb
Celeste
Hudson
Mercury
I don't even think that Mercury has a personality tbh
I can't tell what she does/like
There is a window with which you can look into her personalities
Merc I can actually agree with but hudson celest is just sumb tbh. It's another case of ignoring anything but body type.
Merc does indeed feel bland tbh
Both kit and character lol
I mean, Celeste is an ice mage that has icy things around her. And a gym outfit
I don't think that express enough personality to me
That's fair. Feels like you call her "bland" when you say that lol, which i just can not agree with.
If they only change the ice spears to a different format that express something from her lore like idk. Her ice spears are like a trident because of her master or anything like that, she would have more personality
Yeah I'm I think most of the 3D visual design of hunters in Supervive are bland
I'm not talking about gameplay kit tho
I hewr that a lot but I just don't see it.
(Anyways calls cya)
No, I'm not one of these people
Sorry to ping but just continuing my argumentation.
I think one of the key things to make something with visual personality is to give atleast one strong personality mark that DIFFERS from other characters from the same Fantasy.
For example:
- Eva is a Succubus that has a pair of glasses (not saying that a pair of glasses is top tier personality mark, but I can't recall seeing a succubus with glasses, Eva is controversial).
- Joule is an eletric mage archetype (wow, how authentic) BUT, she likes rock 🤟. I can't recall seeing an eletric mage that have this type of characteristic.
- Kingpin is well design in overall, very authentic, they mixed a lot of things that just works well.
- Void gives his personalitty mark by his actual visual and standing pose (The void hands from void is arguable but I've seen void characters with void hands already).
- Ghost is a soldier with a machinegun (wow peak design), but he differentiates with his long hair and color palette and mage type skills.
- Saros is arguably well designed imo (but the whatever in his back is, it should be more clear, if it's a SUN don't make it look like a lava lamp)
Then we have like:
- Hudson that is a juggernaut with a Minigun and Beard (These personality marks are not so authentic right, yes I know about the rocket boots but ingame we can't even see that).
- Celeste with generic ice spears and a gym costume.
- Mercury could have a great personality mark with her Gun, but they made underboobs her personality mark (why)
- Shrike is a sniper that has a sniper and a bird. (I swear I've seen this in any other game but can't say where)
- Jin is a assassins that clones himself (wow), but his arm is painted in 144p. Just detail it more and we're good
All these small things leads to some generic feeling towards character design in Supervive
"You want ugly/fat characters" isn't the strawman people are claiming it to be.
Here are all the things that apparently count and do not count for anything in terms of the design of female characters, and their silhouettes, for the people that want more shape diversity:
- Proportion sliders < doesn't count, derivative
- Clothing < doesn't count, no effect on body shape
- Height < doesn't count, no effect on body shape
- Horns/secondary non-human traits < doesn't count, no effect on overall body shape
- Animalistic/Furry < doesn't count, too...marketable???
- Large weapons < doesn't count, no effect on body shape
- Fat < 🦗
- Ugly/Monster < 🦗
It's not a strawman to say some people in this chat want characters who are fat, ugly, or monstrous. It's a process of elimination. Any means of making diverse female characters that isn't fat, ugly, or monstrous, somehow doesn't count.
What else is there tbh?
Am I missing something?
See, it's not a strawman, because I'm saying it's not.
Strawman fallacy is only a fallacy when when the extreme argument isn't valid
it's funny you put ugly and monster as the same. also half of these points you're saying people are making have just never been made. nobody said animalistic/furry characters is bad for example. many people here are literally calling for more animalistic characters and saying elluna is EXACTLY what they want more of. also, its called body SHAPE for a reason. just make them a different SHAPE. elluna is again a good example of this. you don't have to make a character fat for them to not have an hourglass shape. you're also forgetting muscles
also yes large weapons and clothing doesn't affect body shape cause they're not part of the body. ain't that hard to understand surely
You haven't been around for the entire conversation if you think NO ONE complained about Elluna. Mister Sixty Four complained about Elluna, calling her 'plushie bait', and claiming she doesn't count somehow
This was ages ago in this thread to be fair
i've been around for the entire conversation i literally started the thread
If that were true oath is just a lil sphere.. checkmate
You must have missed the part where Mr. 64 was arguing that making a thin woman who's super muscular doesn't count because it's just 'proportion sliders'
Still the same hourglass shape so it doesn't count
it's about nuance
Yeah, vuli was right, nuance
what i think he's trying to say is that just adding some muscle tone to a character that is otherwise still the same hourglass shape as everyone else is not enough
like with tetra for example
actually muscular women tend to have a much more defined core
more like Zarya from overwatch for example
Like, maybe I missed someone, but generally people are saying elluna is actually the exception to the extreme concentration of character designs (and tarring a side with things outliers said is a form of strawmanning)
Then weapons, clothing, minor inhumanities like horns, and small proportion are good things to distinguish, but conspicuously exaggeration and body type can never go so far as to disrupt being an idealized, conventionally attractive body for female characters
Like, nyx. You could lean into her deathly aspect by her being super gaunt and lanky, a void style reaper. You could lean into her being physically powerful and imposing with heavy muscles to being this dangerous scythe wielding warrior. You could give her heavy protective armor to be a knight with futuristic cyber and or gothic deathly equipment. Instead we have a version that maintains a slim feminine ideal body type in a torn leotard. That's a conspicuous choice, and one they seem to constantly make with their female characters that they don't with the male cast.
Elluna IS the exception. Which is why I was scratching my head when M64 tried to discount her
And why Nyx is apparantly a step in the right direction
Literally makes no sense
Pete, you're at least being consistent
M64 is not
i think you're probably just ignoring any nuance to his argument
which ill admit he is also usually kinda bad at conveying
but i'm willing to bet he was probably arguing that JUST having elluna isn't enough for character diversity
and that the fact they ONLY have elluna as an exception to their rule makes her just plushie bait, like they needed a marketable mascot rather than actually wanting to have a unique female cast
The reason for Elluna being different doesn't matter though
It only matters that she is
well yeah, but the point is that only having a single character be different isn't really enough
People are people. Definitely gets confusing when someone's idiosyncrasies or opinions make their stance hard to follow. Generally try to keep things anchored to debating the basic ideas and how discussion related to that helps, so we're at least working on a common frame of reference.
it's a step in the right direction but it doesn't solve the problem
Truly, the most problem of all time 
I think if all the body type were the same but the characters felt cool enough people wouldnt bother
well, they wouldn't, so long as this also was the case for the male cast
the fact that the male cast IS diverse in shape but the female one isn't is the main problem
I need ghost oiled up twerking in a banana hamock
I see
Indeed
it's called a discussion thread buddy people discuss things
the game has 3000 fundamental problems
you're allowed to discuss any of them, you don't have to discuss only the one you care about personally

I've yet to see a single suggestion of the kind of character the 'more body diversity' camp has for what would be an improvement that wasn't some kind of monster
bro you literally made this account to post here, presumably cause you got banned
idk why youre trying to get banned again by derailing
just give it a rest little guy
True for some, not for me. My team won 5th at VIVECAMP
some of you
account made yesterday, joined the server on the same day, name is mocking someone else's name in this thread, half of your messages in the server are all in this thread
Thanks. Sorry that came off as a brag. It was just supposed to say I'm an active player
least conspicuous alt account
is paqt
Bro i really typed "calls" 😭 I meant class. Anyways it ended
@flat grove can you do your thing now please
It's been explained why it's still open
Per the mods that's literally why it's being spammed
Idk if this is about anything I said but I said mine as a joke
Devs don't track threads by whether or not they're at the top of discussion, they use the 'star' emote system
i mean i'd play supervive if it had more players.. kinda boring to just farm the paqts of arena queue every game ya feel?
I don't think they do anymore tbh, can't tell, too much doomers
hopefully they can get more!
the star emote system 
That's why there's the 'starred for devs' channel
they definitely still look at that 
They probably don't look that either true
But if they looked at anything that's what they'd look at
They look at the vive council's messages
if
I didnt know you could be that based
Dont zeph and jin fall under that ho
Isn't Hwei heterosexual
<@&1169318934902739024> Can you deal with this definitely not real account?
Taric panth

Sett???
bro is typing
Now trhats a man
Ty for pointing it out please always ping smth like that
i literally pinged you earlier
Oh singwave actually did i was just about to go for the firsr ping i got
yessir i got into the channel first, my discord is buggy somtimes and doesnt jump directly to the message when i click on mentions
so i was scrolling throuhg messages c:
Hah xD
bro must REALLY love supervive
add a 0
i guess every game's community has its own Valien huh
maybe even another one ngl
i stopped counting
but hes been creating around 5-10 per day for months
We do have a South American paqt tho, so I can relate to Nerryl
someone needs to call in a wellness check
Dayum
The lack of self awareness with him specifically is something that makes me doubt that he wants to improve
He thinks that when people joke, they joke with him and not about him
which is hilarious atp, noone here thinks ure sane or takes u seriously paqt i know ure reading this
I don’t think they realized that by trying to disprove a “strawman”, they only strengthened the argument. 
Tbh his consistency of creating accounts and joining here is a little impressive. By "impressive" I mean literally the meaning of the word. It's kinda unbelivible
Hes a hero for that
never understimate where mental illness and unemployment can take you
Because they put all those examples without realizing that exaggerating all of them would make more unique designs.
It's a reductio ad absurdum. It doesn't actually matter if you are not arguing fat/ugly/monstrous female characters is what supervive needs, because you discount everything else
nothing impressive about that, its simply sad.
that guy is literally taking hours out of his day daily to do this
he likely has no social life, nothing that actually gets him going in terms of hobbys and we know hes likely never leaving his house
I know you guys think its funny and all but mental illness is super serious these people wake up one day when forced to reflect on themselves and have to fight against all the time theyve lost
if they wake up at all
I bet that
Can't really do much about that if we don't know that's the case. Some people just hyperfixate
yeah fs
its crazy to me that those are seen as strawmen to begin with, all of these things would look fucking sick if they are just built upon well, horns specifically we got with nyx now and lets be real man, if youve seen the ingame model, it just sticks out and looks badass
Hey, maybe it’s because all of the tiny differences you bring up aren’t exaggerated enough to matter.
Nyx is what they should have done with Bishop from the start, and it seems like we’re on the right track now.
those arent even crazy "strawmen" btw, all of these arent hella risky and have been done before with huge popularity by others
Nerryl is there any way to stop this thread from being bumped to the top with each post without locking it? I feel like we'd get fewer trolls and complainers that way
Nah i like bishop the kinda lean armored design with emphasis on her weapons makes sense with her military background
there's always going to be trolls and complainers on a controversial topic
and female diversity in gaming is unfortunately very controversial
people used to dig out older topics to argue points made months ago until we closed them
im not kidding
Bishop's design is great. The massive gauntlet and rocketlauncher may not be original, but it's well done. 0 reason if you ask me to focus on her figure
I like nyx as her own thing alot more, i wouldnt want too many characters like her in the game tho, she has very very distinct things that make her stick out and if there was too many characters like that itd probs just be overstimulating at some point, i like the "lean" approach league and deadlock have with it
I cannot fathom how, with everything you've argued, that Nyx is somehow a step in the right direction. I generally support making diverse characters for reasons of visual clarity, but distinct silhouettes are enough to achieve that. Nyx's silhouette fits completely, barring the horns, into the silhouette diagram you posted a while back
TO BE CLEAR. I like Nyx
I don't understand why you do
Well, Nyx has the cybernetics built into her design instead of being slapped on like Bishop's.
And her animations feel way more heavy and brutal than most of the female Hunters.
I only saw the teaser I can't comment on that yet
Oh yeah, and she's called a Cybernetic Death Knight.
I mean yeah but then again for a military design that makes total sense no, they hit the nail on its head with her, the only thing i kinda miss is headgear with bishop
Burnout skin adds that and that skin is peak
agentmo posted ingame model yesterday on some screens that arent super great but get the idea across she looks amazing ingame
yesssirr
generally the skins redeem the base designs alot imo
I think that the peak design is having one to at max 3 things that is very notable and DIFFERENT from other charaters from the same fantasy (and it makes sense in the background lore)
oh yeah definetly, i couldnt call her amazing without aknowledging it
But how does this actually matter to her design? I mean no offense when I say this, but it really seems like you're not being rational here. You're entirely within your right to like Nyx for any reason, but I struggle to put together a coherent picture of what your argument is in terms of what SV needs, besides vibes
Less skin, I guess
i think the technology they both use are super different from eachother to begin with, maybe hes confusing that
It makes her stand out more, along with the horns and helmet.
It's not much, but it's a step in the right direction.
Let me guess, this is where you move the goalposts again.
Something that bothers me in Nyx is that I can't tell if she's a human or if she's like a zombie
My complaint is that there were no goalposts to begin with
i mean she likely has some kinda vamp mechanic or at least wants to engage with it, which kinda would make sense with an undead vampire ish design, i like the colours they used
I see
Nyx being undead would be pretty cool ngl
Agreed
shes a frontliner from what i understand, looking at the vid and her design kinda makes me think shes aatroxish, draintank/bruiser
How much of that will actually transfer into the current meta is a different question xD
we still have the 100% antiheal mechanic so unlikely shes gonna play around selfheal too much
These type of characters are usually strong and low elo problematic

