Batch E & F - comments/questions

[copper ginkgo]

.

[proper jewel]

"Note: Please allow an additional 24 hrs after the times listed below before the results are actually displayed on the nebb website" <-- So last batch arent displayed in the NEBB yet, right?

[burnt forge]

Correct

[cinder acorn]

our last ones are still not there 🤷‍♂️ submitted like 2 times

[teal kiln]

1 day of submissions added in this batch : 100 lines.
Have fun adding all the rest 😅

[split glen]

@peak swallow hey spork sorry for tagging you, but i think i mistyped the url of my s class submission, u can check it in row 704 (yellow colored row).

it should be :
139.59.255.37:26657

not : ```

39.59.255.37:26657```

[copper vault]

hi @peak swallow chain is moving, don't forget to recheck our explorer #610 😁

[ancient trout]

For the second Sunday, I have been waiting for the verification of the two S class tasks I submitted with ... not yet submitted, at the moment I do not understand whether it makes sense to do at least 4 more S class tasks, but I am patiently waiting (in the report it seemed that the S class task would be checked from one to two days / correct me if I say something wrong)

(--memo tpknam1qrprpvtyd8kncg72m6hwe4wv6rjj3kee56tffp7gqw02wv60vrk5q4sxgxp)

[burnt forge]

You can check the latest ones added, I believe Feb 27th is the currently last processed dates. Should come soon I think

[ancient trout]

Thanks for the answer. I will wait to check that I am doing everything correctly..

[mellow wharf]

Hello @peak swallow can you check please, i thin we submitted Explorer in this dates. But i dont see it in docs. Can you confirm that you received our Explorer?
tpknam1qqjzwxrku9pv8vtz0x2y578ytj58cwc55ughh7qlj3rwekye2lz2y30dua2

[barren ivy]

ehm my new submission doesnt apear in this spred

[fiery kernel]

hello. Could you check 509?

[fathom helm]

@peak swallow Hi, sorry for bothering you. My ibc relayer and rpc submission were both labelled as "Operating Namada Infrastructure as a service". So only 1 was counted. Please help me to correct it. tpknam1qzst4n2a6pxw33mme3sn3arx540gka0xgudd7fxqpsdvy8k6aslusharwh3

[atomic karma]

Hi @peak swallow
I can't see my submit about Namada explorer can i resubmit again?
(http://namada-se-explorer.contributiondao.com.s3-website-ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/)
Thank you

[autumn moat]

same here

[random tide]

@peak swallow hi, I sent the form of the completed task Operating IBC/ Interoperability infrastructure on February 27, there are tasks in the table that are from February 27, but for some reason there is no mine, do I need to be updated again?

[livid geyser]

@peak swallow I sent the ibc channel task later than the time in the table on February 27th. Will I be added to the table in the next batch?

[lean gust]

cielphvoted has been warned

Reason: Posted a link

[rain adder]

no , you wait

[elder marsh]

@peak swallow hey i see my s class task got approve in batch E&F but i didnt get any roids fo that why?

or is the pilot nebb isent updated?

[proper jewel]

takes aprox. 24 hours for NEBB to update after googledoc

[rain adder]

I wonder if it's not a manual task though to do google doc -> nebb
I do not recall ROID update during weekends

[proper jewel]

yea no idea 🤷🏻‍♂️

[hollow pine]

@peak swallow could you double-check the submitted assignment from
tpknam1qqh9gu556m47vny2h58gfr0zardjl68j57dy4caw6mr9nkvgjes0uuwgz9m?
My rpc/seed node 207.244.253.244:26657 is available.

[rain adder]

seem very manual there is a TAB "last DB refresh" with the dates

[lean gust]

subtlelight has been warned

Reason: Posted a link

[lofty fractal]

Hello @peak swallow

Please recheck submission 690
My RPC is working
http 65.108.197.84:26657

uptime.com/freetools/global-uptime-test/517584/65.108.197.84:26657

Thank you!

[summer swan]

I didn't see my submission and I submitted successfully on 27th

[scenic fiber]

not updated yet. see the last db refresh tab in the spreadsheet

[burnt forge]

@peak swallow Wanted to check if this has been reflected in points yet. Looks like crew and pilot still share the same pool after last db update (today) so wanted to confirm if this will take a while to be reflected? Thanks 🙂 #1214161772714532945 message

[restive jackal]

@burnt forge Why do you use one issue to submit to both crew and pilot? It's not fair

[burnt forge]

I have two separate issue gists, where I have 4 issues per gist, please go down the excel sheet to see. The issues are different in both pilot and crew submission

[restive jackal]

it is the same PR

[burnt forge]

#751 and #753

They are separate

I have 4 issues in each gist which I found after digging and playing with the protocol

It’s more than most, where they have submitted only 1 issue to get the task marked as complete

[restive jackal]

I see you have been approved because the issue 2624, and it appears on both issues

[burnt forge]

Check the gists against the task I mentioned above. There is no overlap in issues. I found a bunch of issues and split them.

[restive jackal]

I checked, the #1 in https://gist.github.com/spidey-169/b5f7dbe06dda347097a886ad721d1511

[burnt forge]

All bugs reported in each gist have been acknowledged by the team

[restive jackal]

the smae with #3 in https://gist.github.com/spidey-169/364dcc077953a47dadb4282698e75b72

[burnt forge]

This was the old submission. I sent revised submissions in #751 and #753 entry

to make sure they don’t overlap

[restive jackal]

so why it is the same with https://gist.github.com/spidey-169/6b6c6368cbb85009d19566748283f785?

the same person, the same issue but diffrent address and ranking

your pilot address: tpknam1qpr9k2cus3suzqa0vfy5xasd96ayerk33rryn8qw5mtt2n6fw05a7997t90
your crew address: tpknam1qzsq8k8hf8f89g6an4tx554g0qp2hfyqz8rjsmk87lnffjmc02esxywulpk
Is it correct?

[burnt forge]

They dont overlap. Stop making accusations. The bugs in #751 and #753 don’t overlap. Please check before making accusations. #751 has four issues (2642,2643,2613 and 146). #753 has 4 more issues (#2624,2677,2669 and 2617)

I am competing in both accounts and hunting bugs just as everyone else

This will be my last response to you. As you don’t seem to be be looking before asking questions.

[restive jackal]

oh, I see, sorry my bad. Thanks for clarify

[south arrow]

Hello, @peak swallow . I already submitted the "Operating IBC/Interoperability infrastructure" task on February 27. However, my submission is not showing up in the spreadsheet. Please have a check for me.

• Public key:
   tpknam1qr05kk3zwc5e0sxx4yg9r4xjppt5jv06mar83ml6wuvg2sjfnu92qsacs32
• Evidence: https://gist.github.com/huvny-de/bcfa5f3ee1c0c2e65dfdc081c5d33658

[scenic fiber]

they looked same to me too when I looked yesterday. may have overlooked the details, but can't blame hades here as they do look similar on the surface. I'll have a look again later, probably missed the details here too

if they're different bugs fair game ofc

[burnt forge]

I have posted it. #751 and #753 are different and each has multiple issues in them and none of these overlap. You can check too

My gists are always public, not trying to hide anything.

[scenic fiber]

ofc wouldn't think you would. you've been playing with open cards all along 🫡

I'm not so familiar with how gist works so may be for that reason 🙂

[burnt forge]

Its just a way to share comments/code snippets on github via links

[scenic fiber]

ah ok

could be there's something with the link parsing that went wrong, anyways I'll confirm later when I get to my computer, just so there are no doubts re my statements.

[burnt forge]

The link to the submission is in the excel as well beside the above submission numbers, and they are working fine.

[scenic fiber]

alright idk what went wrong when I clicked them yesterday, probably a mistake on my end

[restive jackal]

I think the NEBB stuck at 90044

[amber burrow]

please,can u check dm wen u avaible . thank u @peak swallow

[cursive nova]

I submitted on the 24th and its not captured in the spreadsheet, this means I will need to re submit it again? Or what could be wrong . @peak swallow ,does this means we that submit using the incognito mode doesn't reflect at your end

My tpknm tpknam1qrvsyrczhgm2v6k0pkwawuy8049shsvz2l5xde7gpcpnyuzeg9znxv2xtcu

[burnt forge]

ping spork and confirm if he received it? That;s the best approach I would say. I haven't not seen others with this issue, incognito mode as far as I can understand shouldn't affect the submission

[cursive nova]

This is my 4th time of asking same question, no reply from anyone.

I sent two and none appear on the spreadsheet

Both using the incognito mode

[burnt forge]

You submitted on 24th, and the sheet has been updated multiple times since then? Have you inquired about this after each update. Ping spork, again, he's the best person to respond to this

[cursive nova]

The sheet has been updated once I think, and it covers up to 27th, the last sheet was 23rd while the latest is 27th, so I expect my 24th submission to be carried along on this recent spreadsheet

[cursive nova]

@peak swallow

[burnt forge]

As I said, confirm with spork. The last update happened a few days ago. If its not in the sheet, most likely he either missed it or he is going to update in the following update, regarding missed out submissions

On every sheet update, if your submisssion is not reflected, be active and convey thet to him immediately, would be my advice, as he's processing a lot of applications, so its possible he missed a few old ones

[cursive nova]

Since I could not get any reply, can I resend it using the nebb again?

[burnt forge]

I would say, send it again, but also ping spork here, asking about old submision and letting him know you are sending it again 🙂

He might have your old submission, which might be easy to update quickly, maybe he just forgot to check older dates

[cursive nova]

I'll and also tell him so he won't mark it as spam.

I'll resubmit now.

@peak swallow i did a submission of my S task around 24th using the incognito mode and it went through but your Batch E and F didn't reflect my submission.

I'm don't know if incognito mode submission re not reflecting or you missed it.

This is to inform you that I will be resubmitting same now nd pls don't tag me as spam.

My tpknam :
tpknam1qrvsyrczhgm2v6k0pkwawuy8049shsvz2l5xde7gpcpnyuzeg9znxv2xtcu

[burnt forge]

Resubmission isn't tagged as spam if its valid 🙂

[cursive nova]

I'm just playing safe.

Thanks spidey

[scenic fiber]

@peak swallow looks to me like a lot of "ibc relayer" submissions have simply put in a link to an ibc transaction and been approved?

or am I missing something

[livid geyser]

Perhaps there was a memo there when creating the client.

[scenic fiber]

not in the tx I checked. also it looked like a completely ordinary ibc transfer, not a channel creation, but may have missed details idk

[split glen]

i hope the team can review the submissions quickly because, my last cosmos-namada ibc-relayer submission isn't eligible for the roids. it was because my relayer-wallet's balance is already ran out before the team review it. so, i think it's gonna be wise if the team is work fast because being a relayer is very wasteful of naan. so now, i opened a new cosmos-namada ibc-channel and resubmit the submission.i hope the team can understand this. cheers! @peak swallow

[scenic fiber]

this is a valid concern imo. non-shielded don't have a lot of tokens to waste

[split glen]

i think the team should prioritize the ibc-relayer submission @peak swallow

[barren ivy]

hi @peak swallow can you please check my submissions? maybe already 2weeks. integrating indexer with blockexplorer https:// namada .idekubagus .com my tkpnam tpknam1qzva32fwvq3gsx9uukpt0dudsxr0s07wc0e8xv440ptx8k85g5m358usjyn thx 🙏🏻

[peak swallow]

hi everyone, i see a lot of pings and dms came in for me over the weekend; have something pressing to take care of this morning before i can answer but will do my best to get back to everyone this afternoon. thanks!

[lean gust]

blackoreo has been warned

Reason: Posted a link

[fathom helm]

Memo like 'relayed by XXXXXXXX | hermes 1.7.4+38f41c6 (https ://hermes.informal.systems)'

[plucky dragon]

Hi, please re-evaluated mine of RPC submission, RPC already running well again, previous day’s team been evaluated mine when chain halted. After restarting yesterday, it works again

Mine already placed on row 590 - Evaluated S-Class Submissions (Batches)

http*://rpc(.)reiyan(.)space

My tpknam :
tpknam1qq3hzx8vq5jtscm90teemywunpufl88gh09nng9v5kuaxzjc0x7vkpsz8jq

cc: @peak swallow

[summer swan]

They're supposed to be submitting the success message they got when the relayer is created then 2 tx links are important. The one of when the relayer and channel creation and the one of actually sending ibc transaction from the channel creation account.

Personally the slow review of s class submissions ain't good

[peak swallow]

thanks! checked and updated

[peak swallow]

no luck yet getting it to load, maybe it needs a restart

[peak swallow]

was submitted feb 27 so probably just missed appearing on this sheet, should be on next

[peak swallow]

Works! cool visual design btw

[peak swallow]

sorry, fixed now!

[peak swallow]

Feb 29 submitted so should show up in another batch or two

[peak swallow]

next batch still has more from feb 27, so you should be in there

[peak swallow]

looks good, updated

[peak swallow]

looks good, updated

[peak swallow]

will be in the next batch

[peak swallow]

i do see a submission for you from feb 28 for operating public rpc, so if that covers it you're good and it will be in a future batch
but if there's still something missing let me know

[cursive nova]

I'll wait then. Hopefully it will reflect same details. Thanks

[peak swallow]

there were several that submitted a tx or account link, which wouldn't normally qualify and threw me at first, but then when i clicked through to their tx history i could see the txs for creating an ibc client... would it be one of those?

[peak swallow]

don't worry will take this into account. there's no faucet so not your fault if you run out of gas

[split glen]

can u change the "no" in the eligible for roid section to "yes"? just to make sure haha

[split glen]

btw i resubmit that submission days ago, please don't see it as a spam ok

[peak swallow]

thanks! updated

[peak swallow]

i see upcoming submissions for explorer and rpc node, lmk if anything's missing

[copper vault]

hi @peak swallow thanks for suggest, restarting now it works

please recheck our explorer again #610

[peak swallow]

yep, thanks
working now

[copper vault]

Thank you too 🙏

[fleet elm]

I noticed tpknam1qr4m5m2eu9zc24fzswe2vjwpywlysqewnn704rj6hlgtw948ah5269al0ls has 2x "Operating Namada Infrastructure as a service" accepted. Is it still counted as 1?

[peak swallow]

yes, in all cases duplicate points awarded in the same category will only count as one in the final score

[scenic fiber]

that's quite possible, didn't do as extensive research 🙂

[fiery kernel]

Thank you! 🙂 Can we request a refill for our faucet so that we can distribute more tokens to users?

[rain adder]

maybe ask @peak swallow ? faucet empty

[peak swallow]

yes i can send some, what address?

[regal fable]

Hi @peak swallow please check dm when you have time, thanks

[fiery kernel]

Thank you

tnam1qqntsg9psvkcs8vh7h6tevchj2lw0r7uwqksq3xl

[peak swallow]

sent

[elder marsh]

@peak swallow hey spork i see my task got approved and eligible for roids but i didn't recive any roids for that may submission is #757

[lyric axle]

@peak swallow faucet is empty ,can you send me some token? my address is
tnam1qpzx33tpkapezk38y9rlcpytu0n3vj2f2vfnvd4x
Thank you

I have just established my node and it is currently being synchronized. I hope to participate in voting in the future.

[split glen]

hello @peak swallow can u send me some NAAN for the relayer test?
tnam1qrp925et0kfkt5dyj7j5fchwjwhk9q8x2yvq7c08

[lean gust]

aleksandr7793 has been warned

Reason: Posted a link

[split glen]

i've sent my ibc-channel submission with the txs evidence (from both chains), i hope u see it as an eligible submission, this ibc-channel is really expense my balance. because my recently created channel has been expired because of the lack of balance in my relayer's wallet

[zinc meteor]

my task submitted is yellow-highlighted and noted as "re-check once chain is running again" in the spreadsheet, but still no updates since then

[summer swan]

We're still waiting for s class update. It's been 3 weeks since I submitted

[pallid verge]

hi mate @peak swallow , can you check my submission #1163 ? ❤️
my indexer now catch latest block. thank

[rain adder]

they have automated the task maybe it will update automatically..

[warm flicker]

hi @peak swallow can you please check my submissions? , Public RPC endpoint ht tps://rpc.namada.famnode.my.id/

tpknam1qz3eh8gfqgr2m44cfu3pg6sun4wgt75jwc8jvd85ax0wv24tfrrsc78gjet

thx

[rain adder]

I think you should give him the corresponding line in the file

[warm flicker]

okay bro

[cursive nova]

@peak swallow whats bad format?? It works now but the next problem is format? Is there any laydown format for rpc url? For 1038 in the doc.. I've my doubt around this all this while

[scenic fiber]

check announcements