#šļ½english-questions
1 messages Ā· Page 132 of 1
Thanks for explanation, it is very useful
Mi pleasure :)
If I am beginner in English, from where should I start???
Can anyone tell me pls...
Hi there! There are quite many of them to be written one-by-one so I suggest you go check this website out: https://www.tolearnenglish.com/guide/
OK thanks...šš
Can I say ( I'm well ) when someone asks me how are you?
: How are you?
; I am doing well.
...is the acceptable one unless you are being asked how are you doing physically or how is your health.
You can say "I'm well" its just very, very formal and no one really says it in the US. Most folks say "good, thanks," "I'm good," or something like that, whether its grammatically correct or not
@zenith ether @pallid veldt ohh thinks ā¤ļø
Hi guys, Iāve got a weird feeling about present tense. Disney has been making Disney plus shows, i feel unnatural if I just say āDisney plus shows impact the moviesā, however, I think āDisney plus shows are impacting the moviesā sounds better, even though logically the present tense should work hereā¦..why is that?
They both work
Thanks for the reply cupcake. How would you say it in this context?
I think if that's the only thing you're saying and its just a general statement, go with the first one. If your going to continue to explain why its being impacted, the second. They are really both ok though
It means he did something that made her embarrassed or shameful, likely in public.
don't put pineapple on pizza
Yeah, what does it mean?
it means that you don't need to put š as topping on the pizza
like the pizza shouldn't have the pineapple on it
because putting pineapple on pizza is a blasphemy
Hahahahahaha
Blasphemy means disrespect?
I'm sure it's similar to horrible and outrageous
bam
What does he mean?
In that context
because putting pineapple on pizza is a blasphemy
because putting pineapple on pizza is a blasphemy(not relevant and appropriate?
@obtuse dragon
it is a blasphemy because you ruin a culture that it's the italian one
yes pizza is italian
Can I just ignore the glottal stops? I've been dealing with english for about 5 years now and I just recently discovered about this
I say 'mountain' with the 't'
it's kinda of a hard phoneme for me too
Hi everyone... can someone tell me how to use the international phonetic Alphabet???
what is the difference between literary decisions and poetic devices?
Wait... chicken isn't vegan?
lmao
Strange question but i have some doubts about it: Can i say (I am full-figured, isn't it?) (He is smart, isn't it?) Just here we deal with To be form (I am) or we can say amn't?
I am smart, isn't it ?
āItā is referring to a non-human most of the time. So it would be āI am full-figured, arenāt I?ā āHe is smart, isnāt he?ā āI am smart, arenāt I?ā
You use he, she, they, we when referring to a person.
Got it, thanks a bunch
No problem.
I have to make sure: They have been to Japan, haven't they? Right?
Question about dashes. Can I use dashes in the following manner?
When he returned home that evening, the butler informed him that the other members of the Thompson family -- Jack, Jane and little Jamie -- had all left the house in the morning.
( omg so based ) what does this mean
As a slang you use "based" when you agree with something.
Well, it depends on who is speaking and who is listening. Personally, it's okay when someone calls me that unless they're creepy and strange.
what's the difference between "critique" and "criticize"?
Does punctuation go outside or inside of quotations?
To critique means to evaluate, to analyze the good and the bad. To criticize is usually just to point out the bad.
Sometimes inside and sometimes outside. If you are quoting someone's question, it is inside.
If you are asking a question with a quote, it is outside.
John shouted: "What the hell?!"
Do I always have a comma after/before a prepositional phrase?
What does it mean, "two heads are better than one"?
It depends on its position to the main clause.
"From the dark, a frightened voice emerged."
So it can't be "A frightened voice emerged, from the dark."
No comma there
why not?
Because it follows main clause
is that rule absolute?
It's a general rule, unless you want to get poetic or unorthodox with your style
Can I always use a semicolon instead of a period when I'm writing
To make my sentences flow more smoothly
No. Semicolon joins independent clauses that are somehow linked by meaning.
Don't overuse semicolons.
Okay. What does -- mean?
the em dash? It acts as a parenthesis.
Blah blah, blah -- something inserted here -- continue the sentence.
Parenthesis are used for short phrases or individual words; the em dash is used for clauses
Sorry, I have to go now....
My questions ran out, thanks dude
Donāt use this with strangers, itās way too familiar and it can come across as patronizing. Only use it with your girlfriend or your mom, or when you write a letter.
( Good too see you brother )
I want an informal response to this phrase
do i have to say (you too bro )
I think you could say good to see you too or simply, you too. Or maybe "same". Sometimes I use likewise but I think is formal. 
It sounds good!
Ohh thxā¤ļø
(But I don't think I'm the one you mean)
Is there a problem with dictation?
Lenses show movement; the projections, hundreds of years ago, are far better than high-definition television. In clarity and colour, they are amazing, but they could not be preserved, except by drawing. They were living projections. There is no doubt that painters saw colour images, optical projections which look like paintings, and they made paintings which look like optical projections. The old masters saw moving colour pictures.
The old masters used lenses to
A copy paintings.
B keep a record of the image.
C see coloured images.
D improve on their abilities
why is the answer D here, guys... ?
What's the difference between argument essay and a persuasive essay? they seem extremely similar
I think they are different
how so?
They are kinda similar. Argumentative essay you have an idea and try to convince the reader that your idea is true. Using facts like in a debate. Persuasive essay you try to convince the reader to agree with your idea. In this type of essay, the writer can use his own ideas, opinions and evoke the emotions in the reader in order to convince them to agree to his opinion
You can read more about it here: https://csecenglishmadeeasy.com/2018/10/the-difference-between-the-argumentative-and-persuasive-essays/
is this the entirety of the passage?
But anyway...
First, by way of elimination, D is the best answer.
A and B are out because there's nothing in the passage to support them.
C, a little bit tricky, because there's a very similar phrase in the text. But lens isn't just for that right. Lens show movement. That part is important too.
and we're left with D
But why is it correct?
From the passage we can get that lenses were used to project moving images (1st sentence) and these images are vivid (2nd).
But they cannot be recorded. Unless, someone draws these images (still 2nd sentence). Think of an experience vs a photograph.
The projected images like experiences will be gone unless someone draws/paints them.
The painters (with the help of lenses) saw these vivid, moving projections that look like painting
And they painted what they saw.
It's like
Lenses: shows something beautiful
Painters: painted what they saw
Result: beautiful painting (because they painted what they saw)
The old masters saw moving colour pictures (last sentence) because of the lenses (previous sentences).
In other words, with the help of the lenses, the painters/masters could come up with something amazing.
So, D. The masters used the lenses to improve their ability.
Does this make sense? :upside_down:
:laughing: lol
Persuasive Essay Format
- Intro
- Body
- Conclusion
Argumentative Essay Format
- Body
- Claim 1
- Claim 2 (Claim of your opponent or the claim that is contrasting your idea.)
- Conclusion
As Moony has said above, a persuasive essay tends to, from the word itself, persuade the readers into doing something based mainly on the author's perspectives. On the other hand, an argumentative essay acknowledges opposing views. It also mainly rely on thorough research, evidence, and facts.
thanks, that rly makes sense
I think you could also use:
Thank you for the information.
I appreciate your letting me know.
I am grateful for the information.
Thanks for informing me.
Thanks for bringing this to my notice.
would anyone be able to help proof read some of my work?
^these are good for the workplace or an email, you might hear thanks for the heads up in a more friendly context
Sure
Sure, if someone hasn't answered yet, I will get right back at you when I get home. ^^
check dms
still looking
hi
i'll look
@flat rune for,during,except for, in addition to, He has arrived at Mumbai ~~to ~~from Hyderabad-bad question, inside of/away from
okay
THanks mate
Unity (what changes did you make, and why? How did you ensure your essay feels like one, flowing document?)
^ does anyone know what unity means in the context of asking about your essay process?
i have no idea what the word means and i searched it up and it doesnt seem to fit this
A statesman or stateswoman is usually a politician who has had a long and respected career at the national or international level
Hi, to ask someoneās work schedule, is this sentence correct?
āWhen does he finish workā
And to ask someone schedule in the future, letās say tomorrow, can I say āwhen does he finish work tomorrowā or āwhen is he finishing work tomorrowā
thanks for the reply @brisk wasp
I have a question regarding present and future tense. Do you think there's any difference between 'when does he finish work tomorrow' and 'when will he finish work tomorrow'?
And something like 'I get my car today' and 'I'll get my car today'
No difference for the first one, Iāll get my car could mean you will go pick it up, I get my car today could indicate that youāll have access to it, maybe it is made available to you that day⦠negligible in conversation
@crisp sinew āwhen do you get off tomorrow?ā is common
Hi! I'm curious, pls help me:
"Same side as" or "Same side with" ?
Ty for your help
Thanks Felon!
@sullen solar I think for 'as', it means you're on the same side like him, 'with' means you're actually with that person
ok ty
same-as
similar-to
In agreement- with
There are really straightforward pairings of verbs and their respective prepositions @sullen solar
I would just memorize these pairings since there are no exceptions to the pairings, I'll go into further detail and provide more examples in the first class session
What does ... mean?
After an exhausting and thrilling swimming, I vanish into a hug and dreams.
Someone please check the grammar (the comma and the use of vanish)
I think that the comma is wrong
But I need a confirmation
I wouldnāt use vanish, that means to disappear
Thatās better but I do have a question about the time
Ok
Is this a general statement about how things always are, like after swimming you fall asleep always or is it something that happened in the past
I know what do you mean. I used present simple because he usually falls asleep immediately after a swim
"Are you seeing any progress" and "Do you see any progress" have the same meaning right?
Ok so after swimming heās exhausted and falls asleep immediately
Is how Iād say it
Yes
But I'll write it in first person
Aight ty
Maybe something like he finds swimming thrilling and exhausting and immediately falls asleep afterward
Thnx
Trust me it will take 1-2 years for the series to be finished. Is this sentence grammatically acceptable
Trust me**,** it will take 1 to 2 years for the series to be finished.
After trust me use a comma
,
What do you mean by series
I have a question about using "who" and "whom" in a sentence.
Look at this: "I am the child's father, so I have the right to decide where he can go and WHO he can go with."
Is this correct? Or should I replace the "WHO" with "WHOM"?
i think yes u should replace it
Ah okay. So "whom" is the correct form?
yes
Thanks for the tip! š
It's called an ellipsis. It's used to indicate a pause or that something is left out, e.g., "Annie thought the mumbling man seemed... strange", or "Steve thought the prank his friends had played on him was just wonderful...", i.e., Steve didn't think the prank was wonderful. In mathematics, it's used to denote iterations of a repeating patter, such as something as simple as counting: "1, 2, 3, ..., n", where n can either indicate the number you've reached at any given moment or maybe the highest number you'll reach before you stop counting, depending on how you choose to define it. The ellipsis is used to denote all the counting that's implied to take place between 3 and n.
After an exhausting and thrilling swimming, I vanish into a hug and dreams.
The use of a comma is correct in this case. The sentence consist of two clauses, one subordinate and one main clause, and since the main clause comes after the subordinate clause, you use a comma to separate the clauses.
If you flip the order of the clauses around, you wouldn't need the comma: "I vanish into a hug and dreams after an exhausting and thrilling swimming."
Thanks
I have a question about tenses.
Context: A woman was thinking about whether she had signed a contract in the past.
So I wrote: After giving the matter more thought, she decided that she must have signed it. If she had not done so, then surely they would not have paid her the money.
Is my sentence grammatically correct?
Yes! Looks great, very mature writing.
ya, looks alright
Yes, your sentence is perfectly right.
Thanks for the feedback! š
Thanks for letting me know! š
Thanks for the feedback! š
Hello guys, this is my very first question here. I know that "yet" is used to describe a contrast or refer to the future.
But this sentence "You may need to study hard yet again to try to pass a re-test"
What does yet mean? Is it the same if i remove yet from its?
hey wassup?
u have a statement you want to turn into a question?
go ahead
just to confirm it's make a question for each statement?
the answer to the question is the given statement
At first glance, the second question kinda stands out. It's asking for a procedure but the statements are about purpose. What is something for?
ah, ok I see what you're getting at
Are these statements given by the teacher?
Oh, is it okay to edit the statements a bit? If you start with To.... it's usually about the purpose/goal
Why did they hire more tellers?
To accommodate more customers and improve customer experience
for example
Since you already have the questions, why not just answer the questions? š
For the first question, it can be
They use automated business rules and decision models to move work more quickly and efficiently throughout the entire processes.
ya I think it'd be easier with Qs then answer.
Also, your current statements just need minor edits so they answer your questions
no prob, you can post the edited statements here later too if you'd like
Yet again = once again
If youāre unsure whether to use who/whom- answer the question with he/him and thatāll indicate if you should be using who/whom respectively:
WHO is coming for dinner? HE is coming for dinner
WHOM are you going with? I am going with HIM.
Acoustic is also a type of music so id avoid that, the noun form acousticsāsounds
yo, does anyone know if psychoanalysis is the same thing as psychoanalytical lens
it is the same meaning if you remove "yet." In this case, "yet again" is an expression. "Yet" is just emphasizing "again." Like maybe you've had a series of exams and you've studied and studied and studied and now you have to study yet again
Hey guys, I have a question. Iāve seen some people say something like āthis photo makes me laugh every timeā, but sometimes, I hear people omit the āevery timeā and just say āthis photo makes me laughā. Which one is more natural ?
Those sentences are both fine and natural. You don't have to say "every time." "This photo makes me laugh" means that it makes you laugh in general, more than just right now in this moment (but not necessarily EVERY time)
also i see someone did get to your other question already, i missed that
Thanks cupcake, youāve been a big help!
Thank @pallid veldt and @modest fern
Hey
Stomp means to walk heavily, one time someone said " naruto would easily stomp on him" does that makes sense ? Is it grammatically acceptable
Another question
"The book hit the floor with a heavy thud" thus in this sentence means heavy sound right? What about this sentence "when you stomp,you thud your feet down heavily as you walk" what does thud mean in this sentence
hey can someone help me with my quiz? itās 3 questions please dm me
yes
same thing, but in verb form
In this context āStompā is meaning he could beat or win easily not literally stomp on someone
Alright ty @zenith ether nd @livid kettle
HI all! Consider these different ways of using 'then':
A: "I won't be able to meet you this week. I'm busy."
B: "Then let's meet next week." - then=in that case
A: "Great! Let's meet then." - then=at that time
B: "I'm looking forward to it. When we meet, first let's discuss the project. Then we can have lunch." - then=after that
'Then' can have different meanings... Does this make sense, or are you all confused? š
It has to be won't
Why though, won't is consider informal, but I have to use it even when I wrote a formal one?
Unless you say "Why will you not come here"
Elaborate
How can we help?
Sounds like a test for school credit... š®
i have to right abt a commercial that involves discriminatory
im done the first page (which is the 5 charts) and im just about to start the second page which is actually constructing the paragraph
Goodluck! :D
We don't do homework here.... I hope you understand.
Any idiomatic expression to say that something came as a result?
That's the way the cookie crumbles. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/that's the way the cookie crumbles
What goes around comes around. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/what goes around comes around
with good results or bad results?
It means they have just become citizens
Yea, like immigrants
Yes
repellent
noun
- the substance used to repel something such as insects
adjective
- the feeling of strongĀ disapprovalĀ to the point that you do not want to beĀ involvedĀ with someone or something
I was reading a science fiction book but I don't understand what the word "turnover" means in the sentence:
The Martian turnover was expected to occur in two ways; either through long-term economical gains or by a much shorter but painful armed conflict. For almost two hundred years, the former method seemed to take effect, but this gradual stretch eventually did break in a most destructive way.
It is probably about the number of deals done and the amount of money/resources taken by a corporation (Martian) over a given period of time.
also in this sentence what is the meaning of "sleeping in dreams"
They came in one-way ships; fusion rockets and atmospheric gliders, packed to the brim with colonists, sleeping in dreams of a new beginning.
thanks for answering btw
Basically dreaming of
I was thinking of it having a deeper meaning haha
I canāt think of one if so, appears to be phrased poetically so I wouldnāt dwell on it, or use that in conversation lol
I think the 2n usage is correct.
Alternatively you can use fiance. Which means partner to be
Yeah definitely
Which is correct? When I was you I could play the guitar and When I was you I can play the guitar
What does for the record mean
When I was you, I could play the guitar.
thank you
When someone says something is for the record, it means that they are expressing it so that others are aware of it, but they do not have to necessarily agree with or support it.
If I were you, I would play the guitar
+1
for the record
- just so everyone knows...
- please note that...
Repeal means cancel right?
They're synonyms so yea
Ok ty
What does thud mean in verb form "in short"
For exp what does thud mean in this sentence ( in short) "when u stomp, you thud your feet down heavily as you walk"
Thud meaning
if someone asks what something means "in short" they mean they want you to explain it briefly, concisely. Its not a grammar term.
Hi
hi
It is obvious that tourist's level of interest within Festival has kept the same. What grammarly suggests is
Is my sentence incorrect?
@proud trench The tourist in your sentence is singular so you are missing an article like "a" or "the"
It is obvious that a tourist's level of interest... or ... the tourist's level of interest...
.. the festival .. also "kept the same" is strange
āJust listen to these people. Youād swear they understood each other, though not one of them has any idea what their words actually mean to another. How can you resist such farce?ā
does anyone know what farce means?
is that quote like supposed to be negative? orrrr?
Hey guys, so I wanted to ask something. "For bodybuilders, diet and exercise are like medicine. They must be prescribed by a professional, that is, a certified instructor." I'm unsure about how "that is" should be used here and with what type of punctuation. Is it correct or are commas misplaced here? Or perhaps do you need a semicolon or dash instead?
The text is correct and the "that is" is used for specifying what type of professional the sentence is pertaining about. :)
So the punctuation is correct too?
Yes
Thanks a bunch š
Farce refers to a situation that is very poorly organized or unjust. So yes, the quote is be emanating negative thoughts.
Hey i want to ask how can i use "would" in sentences it sounds like so weird to me because in my language do you or would you is same and i didn't get it
Do you = asking a question
Would you = asking for permission or a conditional; offering something
Take these for an instance:
Do you like coffee?
- This means that you are asking someone if they enjoy drinking coffee.
Would you like a coffee?
- This means that you are inviting/offering someone to have a coffee.
Oh like "Would you like to go cinema with me?" right?
Yep :)
Oh thanks a lot š
"Would you like to not eat "
So is it yea I would like to not eat or no i would like to eat or yes I would not like to wat or no I would not like to eat?
I have a question about the word "repeat."
When you say someone has repeated a word twice, what does it mean exactly? Does it mean he said the word two times or three?
I think the question should be "Wouldn't you like to eat?" = This is just a presumptive question assuming that you would like to eat. You can simply answer this by saying "Yes, I would like to eat." if yes, then "No, I would not like to eat." if no.
Twice = two times
so yea he said the word two times/twice
Exactly as what "Fish" Said, twice is two times but not two more times.
Thanks for the feedback! š
Thanks for the feedback! š
In case you have met the double-negative expression as "would you like to not eat, would you?" which implied the speaker might not want u to eat or have no assumption but ask with more posh way
Is it correct to use "since" in "Since leaving Uni in 1983, he spent 3 years teaching at a local school" or should I use "after" at the beginning?
After is better : )
Which ones is correct and why? plz
Not any rank?
No rank?
I haven't rank?
I haven't any rank?
I haven't got any rank?
I have no rank?
I don't have any rank?
None rank?
None of rank?
What's the context?
Not to have rank XD
EnglishPalette real teacher?
yea
Wow
I havenāt got any rank = colloquial/informal
No rank = subject missing
I have no rank = 
I don't have any rank = 
plus this isnt a good question lol (please be serious and ask actual questions about English)
Thank u ā¤ļø ā¤ļø
This isnāt a natural English sentence, fyi. You can say, "wouldnāt you like to eat?" Or "you wouldnāt eat that, would you?"
Keepinmind just following what Joush-Kenobi have said
How many of the 12 time forms do Americans use in everyday life?
all of them. some less than others obviously, but they all need to be learned
We only teach 6 out of 12._.
Learn from all sources, do not get hung up on the teacher or the things that are taught. The world is very wide even though you feel you have mastered many things but actually there are many more things that you can learn
Is the phrase "screaming silence" an oxymoron?
Wasn't too sure because screaming is not necessarily the opposite of silent
What means a oxymoron?
The phrase "living dead" is an oxymoron
I hope you get the gist of it
Too lazy to explain lol
Probably yes
Like a deafening silence or clear darkness
I think answer you correctly š
Oh deafening silence is the proper one
Oh really?
I searched for this, and in Portugues call a oxymoron too, i never see this word in both language hahahaha
Question: Which one of the following sentences is correct?
#1. You did such a good job in your last commercial!
#2. You performed so well in your last commercial!
both
I was gonna say both but i doubted myself so i didn't even answer
Thanks for the feedback! š
haha relatable
I have another question. This one is about mixing tenses in a single sentence. This man (person who's talking) was trying to persuade a woman to do a commercial for his company some time in the future. Bearing that in mind, which of the following sentences is correct?
#1. Since you did such a good job in your last commercial, I thought this one would be a good fit for you too.
#2. Since you did such a good job in your last commercial, I think this one will be a good fit for you too.
2
Yeah 2nd
Thanks for the answer! š
Thanks for the answer! š
No problem
I might be able to help with a few, if I can't you can always ask others.
Hi! The point is to ask here so that the community can benefit.
Okay
Im asking here thn
Is noun clauses question ?
hes the one (who stole my eraser)
Cuz when you say that to a person he will understand that as a question i didnt really get it or
He came into ( when i was peeing )
Is this question as adverb or not same thing when u say : when i was peeing isnt that a question ?
Can sb help ?
I'm sorry, but I don't quite understand your question. Can you try again?
Yes, it is not that clear to me as well.
Ok.
Or not in this sentwnce
I saw the man who was walking is not an answer to the question who was walking, though.
Noun clause simply replaces a noun when more detail is needed.
"Who" in a question is a question word. In a noun clause it is not a question word at all. It's a relative pronoun.
Is it just pronoun to identify the noun thats before
Yes, exactly.
Yeah, you got it.
Just because words look the same does not mean they have the same function.
"I hear you are the person who can answer my questions." - no question there at all.
Adjective clauses comes after none
But normal adjectives comes before the noun right thats the difference
Don't focus on where they come in a sentence, but focus on their function. I think this way is easier.
For example u said
""Where they come""
Where do they come is question
No.
Where they come isnt question i know but what is it
I said: "Don't focus on X." X="where they come"
Its like a thing i think
it's a noun clause.
Like something of question form ?
No. Don't think of questions. It only confuses you. The noun clause is giving more information, not asking for information.
Like these sentences
What did the teacher say ?
Idk ( what the teacher said )
Its refering to question form
Right
Yeah, but (what the teacher said) is just a replacement for a noun.
Yeah sure
I can say: You must do what the teacher said.
Its like
" thing that the teacher said"
It's just an X. A replacement for a noun.
Perhaps it confuses you because it uses what or who. Try that instead.
That is confuses me more š
Look: This is the word that the teacher said.
Providing more information about the word.
Sorry, I have to go now. I am not sure if you got what you wanted, though.
Ight thanks
š
I think what he is trying to explain is that in the sentence, 'what the teacher said', 'what' replaces the noun. So instead of saying 'The thing that the teacher said', you are replacing the noun ('The thing') with the word 'what'
Hope that makes sense
Can someone explain to me the difference between the dark L and the light L? I'm learning Ame
ame?
Light L is when the L is placed at the beginning of a word (love, lose, live, lion) or at the beginning of a syllable (elongate, release, melon) while dark L is when the L is located at the end of the word (dull, doll, shall, ball) or at the end of the syllable (dollhouse, pillow, hilltop)
American english
ooooh makes sense
I know that but today I met a esl teacher who told me that the dark is used even at the beginning of words
I'm so confused now
Yeah I was quite surprised to hear him say that cuz it contradicts most YouTube videos on the subject
He said that the word like is pronounced with the dark L
@zenith ether he also said that I would sound weird if I use the light L as the initial L
Oh
I just look up for dark Ls at the beginning of a word and it's really unusual knowing that you are learning American one
Perhaps there are some uses of dark Ls at the beginning of a word but they are in another dialect
And by these things having said, I think we need Sir @red coral for this. Haha!
I wouldn't really bother with it to be honest. My wish for the student would be to use that energy to get out there and communicate.
What if I already can do that pretty well
Indeed! I think this is also the first time Iāve heard of these words tbh
Guys, i need some ideas real quick on this one, to write an essay
should we focus on preventing predicted problems regarding the environment, or is it too late now and we should think of ways to tackle the already existed problems?
The point of articulation for the L changes depending on your dialect, but for the purposes of communication, most of them work just fine. In other words, unless you are an actor studying a particular accent, forget about it. Just try to be aware of what your mouth is doing and mimic the sounds you hear others making.
Was he smoking something then?
Well I wanna sound american
Oooo Captain
I have been working on my pronounciation for some time
Do you know the guy?
What does that even mean?
Speak with the general american accent
Be more specific.
Wym
yep
uhm, can u please elaborate
I don't know what you mean by someone.
Sound as if I grew up in the states
If you want to sound like Harrison Ford, study his speech. If you want to sound like Johnny Depp, study him. There is no such thing as 'American accent.'
Interesting
Well i need to find points supporting both preventive measures and tackling the current problems
regarding environmental field, or more specific, climate change
There sure is
Explain it to me then.
I think that's beyond my ability
Sure ppl from different regions sound different
Ok, let me help. Here is an example of someone who grew up in the States. https://youtu.be/zGxwbhkDjZM
CLICK HERE -- http://must-click.info/cash -- Start Making Money Right NOW!
Well, I think it would be more sensible if you would discuss more the ways of tackling the existing problems as your essay's main content.
Well I think I said that I am studying the general american accent aka mid west accent the one that they teach journalists
the essay says "discuss both views" so I have no choice but to discuss both of them
It's hard to emulate 100% an abstract concept.
If you say so
Pick someone you would want to emulate and study them.
Oh, is the question you have given the essay's main topic itself?
Yeah but first I gotta learn how to pronounce sounds of the american English
I give up. All the best.
Wym
yes, but i assume discussing the negative points of one side is also acceptable, though i see no negative points here
you know, to highlight the positive points of the other side
Oh, I see. I am assuming that the essay is an argumentative one, no?
She claims to be good at teaching "American." It's a linguistic fallacy, but hey, perhaps you will find it useful. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7SAt9h4sd0
Do you want to study English? Are you working to improve your American English pronunciation? Have you ever wondered what makes American English sound American? I can help you with all of these questions! The method presented here is a powerful way for you to study English. It will help you understand the intricacies of American English pro...
Can you elaborate?
Oh well, first, you need to choose your claim from the two sides given. Have you chosen one yet?
I assume it should be
"Despite preparations for future problems are necessary, in my opinion, current problems should be prioritised"
Do you know a chair when you see one? I know an American English accent when I hear one. Seems pretty concrete to me. Maybe you can elucidate this linguistic fallacy further so that I can understand it more fully.
Yes! Now that you have chosen your claim, you should now start developing your introductory paragraph by starting with a hook as your first sentence. Then, provide a piece of brief background information about general societal problems (both future and current). Then, you should now provide your thesis argument about why you think current problems should be dealt with first. Your thesis typically makes up the last sentence of your intro paragraph. This is where you clearly state your position on the topic and give a reason for your stance.
Take note that in an argumentative essay, you have to highlight both the negative and positive aspects of the two claims given no matter how limited some of them are.
No. You hear a particular speech sample and you categorize it as 'American accent.' This is why I advised him to pick someone he would like to emulate and study them.
I donāt mean to be antagonistic. I just want to understand the linguistic fallacy behind categorizing English speech by accents. Are you saying the distinction is arbitrary?
Or is your point that one can only āshadowā an individualās speech but not an accent, which is a spectrum of similar sounding speech intonation patterns?
Ok. Yeah, I get it. It's a good discussion. It's a debate in linguistics. A notion like 'American accent' is completely arbitrary and abstract. This speaker is interested in "emulating American accent 100%."
You used an example of a chair. I like it. Is this what you were envisioning?
It is not exactly what I was picturing, but it is immediately recognizable as a discernible structure participating in the Form of Chair.
Does that make sense?
The problem is that you cannot emulate it 100% with this:
Thatās right. Platoās theory of Forms is helpful here. There exists an immediately recognizable material structure that participates in the Form of a Chair, but no material chair is the Form of Chair. And the Form cannot be directly emulated in a material sense. I actually think in that sense I agree with what you are saying.
In terms of practical advice to a student, it is best they choose a particular speech they want to emulate and just focus on that. This is when their 'target' becomes more concrete.
Sure, that makes sense.
Do you recommend they pick a particular person, or that they pick several different people to emulate?
Anyway, these are the things I spend my days thinking about. LOL I just don't like when people idolize some of these concepts like a particular accent or the notion of a 'native speaker' sound. I am not saying this person is doing that, but it can easily lead to that when we are dealing with something abstract and yet treat it as if it were an actual thing.
I would recommend one particular person to emulate. This way they can zero in on the sounds they want to achieve.
Okay. Thank you for taking the time to explain your rationale. I can definitely appreciate where you are coming from now. I can see why you take issue with ātrying to learn an American accent.ā In a certain respect I maintain that the more abstruse distinction is real and measurable.
hmm interesting talk lol
It indeed was
I kind of get both points tho
I definitely agree in practicing the language by actually speaking it, having conversations with people, and seeking out opportunities to use the language
(that's why i actually like the class activity here)
the "accent" shouldn't be a big deal. In some ways, it's part of your identity. But what if the learner is at a point where they are comfortable with their vocab and grammar, but not so much with pronunciation and delivery? If the point is communication and getting yourself understood and what's making it difficult for others to understand you is the accent, then it makes sense to want to reduce your accent and make it closer to those considered native.
The thing with English is it sounds different depending on the region. And even within the states, they can sound different. However, I think there are some general characteristics. For example, when we hear British RP we can definitely say, it doesn't sound American.
And I think it's okay if a learner wants to go for a particular English sound. Maybe it's even good to choose one, so you can be consistent in your pronunciation and you don't have to learn all the possible ways to say a word.
So if you want to try the American accent, go for it. As long as you understand, Americans don't really all sound the same.
But I think when people say they want American English or American accent, they mean they want to speak in a way that would generally be considered American sounding as compared to sounding a bit British or Australian or Canadian.
like saying durable with a du and not dyu/ju
or making the vowels sound a certain way so about doesn't sound aboot, for example
Hi everyone, so I have a question. I was reading a novel called "The Thunderhead" by Neil Shusterman and saw something. Could you please look at the passage below and tell me how and in what sense the structure "who should + verb" is used in the sentence "And as if this werenāt humiliating enough, who should appear at the door at that very moment but Scythe Brahms"? Please note that the sentence itself is not a question. The question mark belongs to the question I'm asking. It doesn't look like a relative clause either which leaves me with even greater confusion.
āIf I had accepted your advances, would you have imagined it was him?ā he asked. āYour weak-minded party boy?ā
āOf course not!ā She was horrified. Not just by the suggestion, but by how much truth there might be to it. āHow could you even think that?ā
And as if this werenāt humiliating enough, who should appear at the door at that very moment but Scythe Brahms.
āWhatās going on?ā Brahms asked. āIs everything all right?ā Goddard sighed. āYes. Everythingās fine.ā He could have leave it at that.
But he didnāt. āIt just so happens that Ayn chose this moment for a grand romantic gesture.ā
The "who/what should (V) but (NP)" structure is basically an idiomatic expression used to denote a surprise. Here are some examples:
"The other day I was flipping through the channels and who should I see on TV but my old high school friend, Kate."
"As I was going through some of my old things in the attic, what should I come across but the long forgotten diary."
How can an accent be a part of your identity?
so if someone speaks English as a second language, it's likely the way they speak is influenced by their first language. And your first language is a part of your culture and your culture is a part of your identity.
For example, an Indian speaker may sound, well, Indian. And that's totally fine. He doesn't need to sound like a New Yorker (unless he wants to).
Well it's gonna be the case if you have no interest in learning English
I learned some English sounds completely passively even tho I'm way pass the critical age
When you have 2 adjectives before a noun, do you use an "and: to separate the adjectives or a comma? For example: "A quick and agile gecko" vs "A quick, agile gecko"
you can use either
sometimes you don't need the comma/and though.
try reversing the adjectives (and put "and" between them if you want) and if it's still appropriate then put a comma/and
otherwise they're not needed
opinion-size-age-shape-colour-origin-material-purpose Noun
A lovely little old rectangular green French silver whittling knife.
will reply in the beginner's chat channel since this is becoming more a convo than question
'Understanding this patient helps me understand the other patient', is this sentence wrong? To understand the other patient is a single event, correct way to say it could be 'understanding this patient would help me understand the other patient', is that correct?
Both are correct, depending on what you want to say.
they both work well I think. "would help me" would mean that you're not currently trying to understand the current patient
like maybe the other patient hasn't come in it yet or something
Ah, what's really the difference then? If it's like 'music helps me relax', it's a repetitive event, I understand that. In this case, understanding the 'other' patient is a single event right...?
āUnderstandingā in āunderstanding this patientā is singular, so itās āhelpsā. I wouldnāt think about it necessarily as a repetitive event.
The difference between the two depends on the context. Youād say āhelpsā when, for example, youāre currently trying to understand this patient, then someone walks in and asks, āhey what are you doing here?ā You will reply, āOh Iām just trying to understand this patient. Understanding this patient helps me understand the other patient(s), so itās a really good exercise for me.ā
Youād use āwould helpā if, for example, your boss at the clinic is asking you, āWhy should we let you examine this patient?ā And you reply, āWell, I have another patient, but I canāt really understand them. Understanding this patient would help me understand the other patient.ā
That makes much more sense now. Would it work if I change 'me' to 'you'? Like, 'Understanding this patient helps you understand the other patient'?
Yes, itās grammatically correct
I have a question for American English speakers. It's regarding the word, "chalet." In the USA, does a "chalet" have to be a house made out of wood? What if it's a brick and mortar house in a holiday resort? Can that still be called a "chalet"?
In the US the term chalet has a broader definition and can be used for homes made out of many different materials. Sometimes resort houses at beaches even are referred to as chalets, but I do typically hear it used to reference vacation homes in the mountains. People often say mountain chalet. However, those mountain chalets neither have to conform to Alpine style, nor do they have to be made out of wood.
Ah, thanks for your answer! š
can someone peer edit my essay?
look for grammatical and spelling errors and see if it just makes sense or not etc
Iāll try even though Iām not on PC right now. Send it here. :D
Just send it here 
ok bet
its like around 1055 words
do u want edit perms? or just like commenting is fine
First paragraph
- award winning
award-winning - real life experiences
real-life experiences - difficult life
tough life (optional)
wait is that good lol
oh ok lol
im dumb, idk what this means lol
oh ur saying what to replace them with
I think theres a way to add comments to the doc
instead of showing it on discord
Yep
just to make it easier for u lol
oh
It's harder if I use docs haha
oh ok lol, is there anything I should do? to make it easier
I could also give u editing permissions as well if thats easier
Second paragraph
- This proves again~~,~~
remove the unecessary comma - disbelonging
isolation - add a comma after 'disbelonging' and disappointment
- based off of
on - lots of negativity
a lot of negativity - authors negative takes to
on - authors negative
author's
yep š
does it make sense? like all the stuff
so far
in terms of the points and stuff
Yes
Haha dw
It's not bad
All u need to do rn is to change these things I'm telling u and ur essay's Gucci to go
yep okay, ty
Fourth paragraph
- Your first sentence is a sentence fragment
make it "The unconscious mind is where all of your feelings of pain, anxiety and conflict reside." - Add a comma here
pain, anxiety**,** and conflict reside. - disbelonging
isolation/alienation - Missing comma
from when he immigrated to Canada**,** - Missing comma
without feeling any emotion towards them**,** - ...without him even realizing.
...without him even realizing it. - Uncapitalized the word "Author"
yep š
Last paragraph
- Remove comma after the word true
..above are actually true~~,~~ because... - Add comma after Alexis
the Author of Fifteen Dogs, Andre Alexis**,** had a difficult life growing up
yeah lol, its a little trippy because you can't tell when the next page is
but yeah its 5 in total
I gotta go to the bathroom so I might not respond for like a couple minutes but thanks for all the help! ill be right back
Oh lol
Third Paragraph
- he was showing how lifes not always bad
how life IS not always bad - Add comma
The world is full of struggles and being**,** for example, a dog**,** or... - Comma splice, replace with a period
The quotes werenāt the only things that proved that his life was somewhat difficult**.** - says
say (The characters' lives and how they ended up really -say- something)
ok so I think thats everything lol
@frosty crane these would be all
thanks so much!
what would u say the grade would be if I changed all the stuff u said?
a rough estimate
When it comes to grammatical aspects, a 90(+) is predictable, but it still depends on your professor's perspective and how would they process the thoughts and points you have given in the essay.
ayy ok bet
tyty
I was supposed to write a literary essay including the psychoanalytic theory providing a argument and 3 points that include two quotes each
so I think I did decent lol
ok well, thanks for the suggestions
aye
Np
ok ima delete the link above so no troll comes in and like deletes the whole thing lol, prob won't happen but just in case
one quick question, do u think I should've included the authors name like I did again? in the conclusion
yes sure, it's a conclusion after all
ok tyty
do you know how to do a work cited page in mla format?
I tried it last time and the teacher said it was wrong lol
Yes, but I cannot remember the format precisely. Hold on, let me get my notebook, haha.
bet
Author's last name, first name (if available). "Title of work within a project or database." Title of site, project, or database. Editor (if available). Electronic publication information (Date of publication or of the latest update, and name of any sponsoring institution or organization). Date of access and <full URL>.
Yawching, D. (2018, April 26). AndrƩ Alexis: the puzzle of "home": Closeup. Caribbean Beat Magazine. https://www.caribbean-beat.com/issue-150/the-puzzle-of-home#axzz71IFii7EZ. Is this good? I saw a work cited generator thing
and it gave me this lol
@drowsy flume
Looks good
ok bet ty
Are these sentence similar like S V O
It is smart to ask teacher
It is smart kid
teacher needs an article (the/a/an)
second sentence doesnt really make sense, are you trying to say the kid is smart? or that it is smart to... the kid?
but yes
that is svo
This is the lyrics of a song
"Calling me a hundred times"
I'm confused because 'a' and time's' are together in the sentence.
Isn't 'a' unnecessary because 'hundred' is plural?
that's because "hundred times" is like, one thing
I'm not sure how to explain it other than
one unit?
hmmš¤
hundred is singular I can tell you that
It's too difficultšµāš«
maybe if I compare these two sentences it will help
Calling me a hundred times
Calling me hundreds of times
Is that a rough estimate, not an exact number?
yes! It's an exact number
one thing technically
so hence it would use a singular article
ahh I understand! Thank you so much!
My pleasure
ooooh, thats true i think, why didn't think of that part
thanks!!
š
It is smart to ask the teacher
Whats the function of " to "
Or " to ask the teacher " is object in this sentence
Hey guys, so I got a question about the phrase "ashamed of". "to feel disappointed and upset by someoneās behaviour" and "to feel embarrassed because you are related to someone or connected with them" are 2 common definitions I'm seeing listed in dictionaries. But what if I'm ashamed because of my own actions and it embarrasses me that someone knows it and disapproves of it. Think about a perfect entity who cannot be judged but can judge everyone else. For example, you can't be ashamed of God in this sense, right? Because how can you be disappointed, upset and embarrassed by the actions of an infinitely perfect being? What am I supposed to say when I'm the cause of my own shame and I'm feeling it towards a superior being or one that stands on a high enough moral ground to judge me?
I mean can you even say "I'm ashamed of God"? (I'm the one with the embarrassing behavior and feeling ashamed because of it, knowing God as the perfect being can judge me)
uhh, I hope I'm understanding this question correctly. But no, you wouldn't say I'm ashamed of God in this context. Maybe you're for something along the lines of "I'm ashamed of myself, God"?
Yes, that's what I mean. Can being ashamed of someone else be used like this when you are ashamed of your own actions?
Because google returns millions of results for "ashamed of God"
oh ok, I'm looking at it now. being ashamed of god/Jesus seems to be an expression that religious people are using for people who are losing their faith/refusing to consider themselves christians anymore
it's not referring to feeling shame for your actions in front of god
What about "I'm ashamed of god because I'm a sinner"? How do I say that?
I feel shame towards God? before God? in the eyes of God?
But I don't want to phrase it to sound like I'm talking to God
Feel shame in the eyes of God seems to me the best option
but being ashamed of God means he's done something wrong and you don't approve of it
which I can see a non-religious person saying to make a point, but if you believe god is infallible, then ofc it doesn't make sense
I only gave this example to be absolutely clear because the definition of God is an infallible being. I only want to know how you say you feel shame because someone will judge you
ok, in that case the last two of these three options seem apt
"to be ashamed/feel shame before/in the eyes of [sb]"
Alright, thanks a lot for the clarification š
yeah np, just to be clear: when you say you're ashamed OF somebody, you're expressing dissapointment AT that person, not in their presence
Good to know š š
Is there any other mesn by emulate except copying?
what do you mean by this? Are you asking if there's anoother means of emulating someone other than just copying them word-for-word?
yes
oh ok, I'm not familiar enough with the practice to give any advice on it, sadly, but copying them does sound like a good place to start. Maybe once you do it enough you'll feel comfortable saying other things in their voice as well
Guys do know any websites like the application Drops? I want to use it on PC!
Guys, do know any websites like Drops, Duolingo, Clozemaster, or Memrise?
What does normie, chad mean?
Normie is a slang word that means someone who does not understand memes
Chad is also a slang word that means an attractive male
As far as i know
There's an APK for PC here. https://pcmac.download/app/939540371/drops-fun-language-learning
How to download and install Drops: Fun Language Learning on your PC and Mac. To install Drops: Fun Language Learning on your Windows PC or Mac computer, you will need to download and install the WINDOWS PC APP for free from this post ... This method of using on PC works for Windows 7/8 / 8.1 / 10 and all Mac OS.
What does (vibes ) mean?
As far as I know vibes is how people present themselves, the way they talk, choice of words, basically personality
Yeah, it's just a synonym for 'feeling' as in one's emotional state or the atmosphere you get from a place. Collocations: cool, good, bad, nasty, nice, pleasant.
I see, so vibes is like a replacement of how someone is feeling towards something or someone @red coral
Yes, or rather, the feeling you get FROM something or someone. "This place is giving me some nasty vibes. Let's get out of here."
got you teacher
So it seems that right now, you can use the app on PC in an emulator such as Bluestacks, but this just came out: Windows 11 will have native support for Android. https://www.makeuseof.com/windows-11-android-apps-must-know/
Guys, do know any websites like Drops, Duolingo, Clozemaster, or Memrise?
Should I practice speaking with non-natives or only with native speakers? Some say it can make you feel more comfortable speaking English, but others say it can reinforce your mistakes and acquire others' mistakes.
Note: For Bluestack users, if you have any virtual machines on your pc. You may have to disable HYPER V when using Bluestacks.
There is also a buggy version of bluestacks that is compatible with HYPER V.
I had an issue with this for awhile so I figured I'd share my resolution
The issue this fixes, is the infinite loading screen when booting bluestacks
both
Well natives like I, are pretty chill about english mistakes, ill correct you but won't judge you for it. So it shouldn't be too anxious of a situation for you
that's just me though
thank you for answering my question!
Donāt think thatās a productive way to help them but ok
well
i don't mean harsh but like
if they mess up i'll quickly call it out then move on
and explain if needed
It depends on the mistake. You should focus on the ones that inhibit comprehension the most first
Highlighting every mistake someone makes is going to be a lot more demotivating than helpful
Have you ever tried to learn a foreign language?
This advice borders on trolling.
we unintentionally sound like an ass due to poor wording š
Should I criticize you harshly for your poor wording?
go ahead if you wish
Not my style.
understandable
I have
old twitter tweets time
yep
thanks
You can also hear "On the house" meaning they give you it for free
Is "endue" of the same meaning and context as "bestow"?
Endue and bestow are similar concepts. I tend to think of bestow as more of an act, and active thing. A right bestowed by the king. Endue, to me at least, tends to be more of a "cause and effect" sort of description. Sharper sight endued by having more receptors in their eyes.
This means there are times when you can use either, at least figuratively. See what other answers you get. Can't say that "endue" is a word that I use often.
Whatās the best phrases to start to explain things?
Well, I recommend the use of beginning transitional phrases such as at first, the first step, first of all, in the beginning, initially, to begin with, and first.
I have a question about the use of past participle in a sentence. Do we need to constantly stick to that tense when we are describing past events in a story that is taking place in the past?
For example, look at the following sentences.
#1. Whenever he had gotten mad at her in the past, he would call her by her full name.
#2. When he had called her name earlier, she could not hear any hint of tenderness in his voice.
Now, for the first sentence, should I have said "... he had always called her by her full name" instead of "he would call her by her full name"?
And for the second sentence, should I have said "she had not been able to hear any tenderness in his voice" instead of "she could not hear..."?
Nope. Your sentences are fine. You don't need to say "he had......." or "she had......."
Also, for your second sentence, you don't need the word "had" "When he called her name earlier, she could not hear any hint of tenderness in his voice."
Thanks for the feedback! š
which one is correct?
If I am to be a doctor, I would help him physically. or Were I being a doctor, I would have been helping him physically.
what are you trying to say?
like is there a person who needs help and if you were a doctor you'd help him?
or that if you'd become a doctor later on you'd find a way to help him?
exactly :3
the first then
or rather "If I'm going to be a doctor, I'll help him"
"were I being a doctor" doesn't work. it would be "Were I doctor"
What is the difference between will and would in the sense of future tense?
but that's a really fancy way of putting it, most people would say "If I was a doctor..."
Yeah like saying it without emphasis
would in the future is used to express conditionality I believe
'Will' in future tense refersĀ toĀ aĀ futureĀ occurrenceĀ thatĀ youĀ haveĀ justĀ chosenĀ toĀ do,Ā asĀ wellĀ asĀ predictionsĀ andĀ promises.
I will go there tomorrow.
Yes, I promise. I will be with you next week.
'Would,' on the other hand and as Wowow Boi has said, refers to a conditional
If you come to our event, we would let you be on stage.
It is also being used in condescension moods.
I know that making an excuse letter is lame but it would make me very happy if you would do it.
Yeah... I used to think would refers to in past which can happen but did not happen
I have a question about what tense to use when describing an ongoing on-and-off situation. This man and woman keeps breaking up and getting back together, see? Then during their "downtime," the man was having an inner dialogue with himself. I've written it as such:
This woman never gets sad whenever we break up. She just eats more and get prettier. But whenever we spend time together, she just wilts away like a dying weed.
Am I using the present tense correctly? Considering that AT THE MOMENT when he was thinking that dialogue, he wasn't spending time with that woman. They had just broken up again. So should I have written "whenever we SPENT time together"?
You're correct to use the present tense in this situation. It's a habitual action, so the present is the correct tense to use
but tbh the past tense wouldn't be too incorrect: it would just refer to the time they spent together in the past, leaving the door open to the possibility that things have changed between them since
also make sure to correct that one sentence to "She just eats more and gets prettier." "She" is still the subject of the sentence, so the third person singular conjugation still applies
Thanks for the feedback! š
np!
Is this sentence correct "putting ice would make it 10 times more tasty"
AND this 1 "just made this"
Is "just did this" more grammatically acceptable?
I feel like there might be a few dialects where there is fine, but in my mine, it would be more correct to say "putting in ice"/"putting ice in"
they're both fine grammar-wise, but which one to use might depend on context
ok
So @shy mulch, both understand and grasp mean the same thing, but understand is just literal meaning of understanding, whereas grasp is idiomatic, or figurative because to grasp something means to firmly grab and hold it.
i think it also depends on what you are making? i think there are some exotic dessert with ice shaving on 'em. So on or in depends on what you are making? I guess?
but don't take my word for it. i am not a native English speaker.
So I have a good understanding of particle physics means the same as having a good grasp of the concepts.
You can use them both as nouns and verbs.
gotcha, ty ā¤ļø
Cool beans! All the best.
Hey, i want to ask what is different between maybe and may be about pronunciation?
In terms of pronunciation? I honestly pronounce them the same but I got this from Cambridge lol
š»
may be = /meÉŖ bi:/Ā
maybe = /ĖmeÉŖ.bi/
Hi guys quick question
I was at a grocery store
asking if what isle the colas, root beers are
How do natives ask questions such as these?
"Hi! I'm looking for some pop."
"Where is the soft drink aisle?"
"Where are your beverages?"
Does that help?
pop
Yeah, thank you so much! I was like "hey, do you know where the soft drinks are" she didn't respond immediately she might not understood what I have said
noted!
what region are you in
I am currently in US
Which state
Cali
I'd say soda
"Where's your soda at?" or to be a bit more polite "Where would your soda happen to be?"
Gotcha man
thanks!
š
are you native by any chance?
Yes
though the US is massive and has many different dialextsn
Dialects
Personally if I were to walk in a store and want to know where the soda was I'd say "Hey uh, could you perhaps show me where the Cokes are?"
I usually say maybe instead of perhaps btw
but if I think perhaps is more prevalent then I should practice saying it
I have more questions in the future! Feel free to educate me anytime!
:D
it's slightly fancier and more polite to say perhaps than maybe
If the answer to any of these questions is NO, you need WPME. Now thoroughly revised to eliminate outmoded references and to reflect current idioms, It remains the best and quickest means to better vocabulary in the English language.
what does (references,to reflect,means) mean here?
imo it's kind of unclear what references means in this case. It could references to films/books, as in allusions that are now super outdated. it could also mean references they make to outdated idioms
in this case reflect would taken the meaning of "embody or represent (something) in a faithful or appropriate way"
I don't think you need to know the exact meaning of reference in this context to get a very good idea of what the ad is saying though.
Yes, and a large difference too. They have similiar roots but they mean very different things. I'd suggest consulting a dictionary to understand them both
Bout clauses
what about them
That clause
which clause?
Subordinate
'Dependent'
I wanna know what tge function of the word that is in this sentence
I believe that you dont care
oh I just never saw the question til just now which I was reading articles my bad
A Dependent clause and Subordinate clause are the same thing
Please kindly be patient when waiting for answers. Thank you! :DD
it's essentially extra information tacked onto a sentence that cannot be a sentence by itself
Here is a Google Dictionary definition
a clause, typically introduced by a conjunction, that forms part of and is dependent on a main clause (e.g., āwhen it rangā in āshe answered the phone when it rangā).
I wanna know the function of the word that
Bro that was the sentence im asking for Lmao
My question is
" i believe that you dont care "
What is the function of the word "that "
Oh, lmao. Pardon. Perhaps using a quotation mark next time would be better! : D
So can someone answer my question plz
some people may be busy, just give them a moment
i would help you, and i am native, but im dumb
idiot!!!!
I am kidding
Internet sucks
I have read that all
So that is showing the statement like š
?
Right?
Like that cat šš
what's your mother tongue?
Turkish
ok I see
English uses "that" to connect clauses in a sentence as well as to point things out, like you said
so it has two definitions. in the sentence "I believe that you don't care", "that" is used to connect "I believe" and "you don't care."
In this case, "that" is being used as a determiner since it is referring to a noun which is the cat.
But in your earlier statement, it is being used as a conjunction wherein it connects two clauses which are the "I believe" and "You don't care."
I think its always š
it's not always š It has two definitions. Many languages have different words for these two meanings, but English does not
Maybe you could ask someone who speaks turkish but is also fluent in english to explain it to you
I asked sb whos native
He said always š
Not šš
Its pointing statement
I csnt explain it
I'm lost too to be honest
Buf i got it i guess
ThatĀ can be used in the following ways:
as aĀ determinerĀ (followed by a noun):Ā Give me that hammer.
as aĀ demonstrative pronounĀ (without a following noun):Ā Who gave you that?
as aĀ conjunctionĀ (connecting two clauses):Ā I didnāt know that she was married.
as aĀ relative pronounĀ (forming the subject, object, or complement of a relative clause):Ā Itās a song that my mother taught me.
as anĀ adverbĀ (before an adjective or adverb):Ā Three years? I canāt wait that long.
Ā©
Lmfao
Thats wrong i think
I don't think we can help then lmao
ask someone who's Turkish but speaks English well to help you
Yea but thx a lot anyways
You wouldn't learn if you cannot accept that something is right.
I hope that you will find your answer. Have a great day ahead.
.
U guys from usa ?
no
After I ( reached - had reached ) home, I ( discovered - had discovered ) that i ( forgot - had forgotten ) my wallet in the office.
Yes
hi, I'm not from the US so I ignored the question initially (when I saw it in another server)
what Twinkle said about that is correct. Maybe what the native speaker you spoke to meant when he said "that" is always :point_right:
and not :point_right: :cat2:
is you'll never use that if the cat is close to you.
Or maybe, when you asked, he forgot the other ways he uses the word "that".
As for you question, that is used here as a conjunction to connect "believe" to what it is you believe
I believe
What? That you don't care
Twinkle gave another example of this above.
I didn't know
What? That she was married
I believe that(š) you are good
You are pointing not with your hand but like showing the idea ?Āæ
you can think of it that way if it helps you
That car is funny
That you dont care is funny
But technically that is not always a pointer
Because again that is not always a pointer
I am not that excited.
Thats differemt
Here, I'm not using that as a pointer
But my second is kind of pointing the idea
I dont know the right word for that but
Here's how I'd look at it. That can be used as
- a pointer ( demonstrative pronoun)
- a connector ( conjunction )
- a modifier (adjective/adverb)
In I believe that you don't care, it functions as a connector. It was connecting I believe and you don't care
it's not a pointer there
Can you give an example of that starting a sentence?
'That you dont like' is funny
That is not a sentence
You don't like that is a sentence
but not
that you don't like
how so? so I can understand where it's confusing you
In this sentence that is pointing the idea i think like
I cant believe that Car
I cant believe that You dont like
But you cant point it with your hand thats why you cunfused i think
Or im cunfused
It says that it marks the clause
go M
Bro cmon are you writing novel
I was in a call
Have you noticed that
That you don't care is funny
and
I believe that you don't care
are different in structure?
If u give me a min, I'll try to explain
All of those sentences on the picture can be rewritten this way
It is clear to everyone that we need more people in math and science.
"that" connects the first part to the second part
another way to say that (which is what the picture is saying) is to say "that" marks the subordinated content we need more people in math and science
It introduces a new part of the sentence.
But what if you want that new part of the sentence to be the subject of the sentence?
Why would you want to do that? For emphasis.
Because you wouldn't really speak like that in everyday conversations.
But again what if you want to do that?
Just flip the order of the sentence
and that's how we come up with
That we need more people in math and science is clear to everyone.
"That" is not the subject
the entire That we need more people in math and science is the subject
and it's also not a sentence by itself
it marks is like it tells you that..., it shows you, it let's you know
For example, let's look at markers in games. Let's say a picture of a flag marks a save point or the end of a level. So if you see a flag then you know "oh this is a save point" or "oh this is the end of the level". It's your visual cue.
The last sentence on the photo
...that does not carry meaning but serves as the marker of the subordinated content
It's like saying if you see "that" then you know the next part is the subordinated content. It's your cue of what to expect next.
have to go get some lunch. if u have questions, i'll reply when I get back
Also, if I may suggest to everyone wanting to speak English (or any foreign language)...
if you're still at the early stages of your learning journey, a beginner, don't be too caught up in the intricacies of grammar. Personally, I think it's best to study grammar when you're at the intermediate level. like at least a B1 if using the CEFR levels
But it's you who can tell if you're ready or if you need a bit of grammar-related explanation
Why is it not opening?
Or
Why it is not opening?
The first one
we who are familiar with grammar rules can understand how a language works internally
Is this sentence totally correct and makes sense?
Actually I am very very bad in pronoun referencing if anyone has a cheat sheet for pronoun referencing plz send me off
Yes, can also
Those of us who ...
Like, those of us who........?
Continue your sentence, I meant
"Those of us who are familiar with grammar rules can understand how a language works internally"
what do you call smelly people in a formal way
Hey, i will ask what is different between "frog" and "toad"? In my language its called with one word and its "kurbaga" but you have 2 different word for this.
Frogs are commonly associated with being smooth slimey skinned and long-legged (jumpy and nimble bodied), while Toads are referred as to having warts, dry bumpy skin and short-legged (bigger and slow) 
Oh i see. Thank you š
that's more of a biology question, haha. personally i would have had no idea what the distinctions were
I don't think there's a commonly used noun to refer to people who stink, but in terms of formal/literary adjectives you could say pungent/foul-smelling
but tbh in formal settings we'd often use euphimisms for that, just like anything that would be insulting in the same way
Shall we paint the kitchen next weekend instead
of this weekend ?
Shall we postpone .................. until next weekend ?
Can somebody give me the appropriate answer...
pungent?
Shall we postpone painting the kitchen until next weekend?
More context needed
You could say something like "He is a historian who studies our country"
A, because itās referring to a nonspecific historian
If it was the, it would mean he is the head historian of your country, or the only one
If you have no idea what to put in the future and donāt have time to figure out which one, just use the
We will get below like pattern.
~~~~|||~~|~~|~~~|~~|||~|~||~~|
Is the sentence correct?
I donāt mean to be rude but I have absolutely zero clue what that message is trying to convey
Maybe you meant, we will get a pattern like below?
I think it is "we will get pattern like below.''
Yep that's the right one thanks
English is pretty complicated language
it's a little bit, but you'll definitely manage to understand it better 
It is super easy to make a message distortes for a non native like me in english. I find that pronoun and participle referencing is quite hard atleast for me to understand a message by others
I understand you! Even tho it will get better with time. Instead of translating the words and phrases to your native language, try to understand it as a native.
Hm, that is the most crucial advice. Thank you. And that is why I am here. In past I was using an app called buddytalk which was the best for my improvement but now it is out of services which is a set back for me
Anytime! I think you'll find awesome people here to help with your improvement as buddy talk did 
If I do a role about language that a person speaks English
Is it correct to do
@Speaking English
Since for habits, truths we use Present Simple and not continuous
What about using "English speaking" (which is an adjective) instead?
Or a noun @English Speaker
"We will get a pattern like the one below" is the best way to phrase it
I don't know if this is the right place to ask about this but if it's okay would anyone like to have a discussion about what it means to be fluent?
technically speaking from its definition, a person that's able to express oneself easily should be considered fluent, but generally people doesn't learn english from the dictionary, that's why most people, at least that i know of, have the ability to express themself generally, but not in specific fields
well, most bilingual people cannot express themselves in an academic manner because it just takes so much longer to learn that
but i would consider fluent to be able to express themselves generally
i wouldn't expect someone who is fluent but not native in english to be able to write a bomb-ass english paper, but i would expect them to be able to talk like you-able to express themselves with minimal mistakes
not that being not fluent is bad, or that not striving to be fluent is bad, but that fluent should be able to either read/write effectively, or speak/understand effectively
I have spoken English my whole life and I still don't fully understand capitalization rules
thats the least important thing
Those both sound fine to me, not sure what the technically correct answer is.
Is stubblety-cook a weird name
Hey guys
Can someone pls teach me this with simple words
It says
Introducing clause
What does that mean ?
Afaik, clauses are segments of a sentence. A main clause is a part of the language which itself can be meaningful but a subordinate clause can be meaningless or awkwardly meaningful without a main clause.
Relative pronouns are used as a conjunction which binds two segments.
In example, I met the girl who was burnt.
Here, "I met the girl" part of the sentence can be meaningful without "who was burnt"
Hence, "I met the girl" is main clause and "who was burnt " is subordinate clause.
Main + main =compound sentence
Main+subordinate = complex
Main alone is simple sentence
Among 3 types of sentence complex sentence is literally complex
One thing to note down, that there can be many subordinates in complex sentence
And many main clause in compound sentence
