#📚|english-questions
1 messages · Page 121 of 1
No, however there are people who may be fluent or teachers, or English helpers who help answer questions.
here
Yes, if you cannot live in a country, then the next best thing would be a discord server based in such a region, or with a large number of people from that region. But its really necessary for you to speak, to increase your skills.
Ah ok, I wanna be more active here to answer English questions, so I was just wondering!
If there are questions asked here and they dont look like they have been answered, or there are also different perspectives on the answer, then feel free to post a reply for those people.
Okkkk thank youuu
Oftentimes, this is where natives come to be arrogant and prescribe erroneous rules of English onto learners, leaving learners more confused once someone comes along to correct them. The native will rage while insisting that they are correct because they are the authority on the subject simply for being a native.
How's that for another perspective on this question?
Oh i see, lots of natives don’t really know the rules of grammar I believe. It can be very confusing
Yeah, I've been known to be ||wrong at times (🤫 don't tell anyone)|| but I try my best to accept the ||mistake|| and move on in a respectful way
Just do your best
No one here is perfect
Hi, I have some research questions and I'm looking for help from someone with an MA or PhD—preferably in English
I have an MSc, but I guess I'll never meet the MA requirement. But if I can help, post your question. It's been many years though.
Some others could possibly help also if you ask the question.
(s)
I promise you an MA would be extremely hard to find on Discord, and a PhD even more rare.
?def would
No definitions listed.
I've met two MAs (physics and philology) but no PhDs 😔
I've met 10 PhDs
Discord is the place of idiocy, none of the learned are to be found
Sometimes I meet new ones
So many experts on social media
Bruh
Do you mean on dc or just all over social media in videos
no
Hello, I want to learn about various background knowledge of the world (mainly social science, politics, global issues etc). I also want to learn deeply about liberal arts(mainly, why people choose to study liberal arts, what exactly do you do in liberal arts, why is liberal arts important.
Hello. I am now at A2 level. I have 10 months. Can I score 6.5-7.0 in ielts?
Pls answer 🙏
How much time is needed?
Hello, can someone explain the difference between 2 sentences please
- RMT-like life
- RMT is life
*RMT - Real Money Trading
The former sentence indicates that "life" is filled with RMT, hence the adjective RMT-like conveying an idea that RMT is integral to "life".
The second sentence emphasizes on the fact that "life" is filled with RMT through a simile.
What is metaphor and is there trick to find out if a word is used as metaphor or not?
Metaphor - A figure of speech to describe one thing is like another
Words such as "Like" or "As" will be your friend in trying to use metaphors but are not required to use metaphors.
Ex:
- She was as beautiful as the moon
- She's a shining star
- Life is a rollercoaster
- He is a human GPS
He and I were friends, of a fashion, but I haven’t seen him in years.
I've not been able to find any definitions of 'of a fashion'. My guess would be that the meaning is akin to that of 'Of sorts'/'Of a kind', but I haven't been able to find a definition that matches. Any further insight would be great
You're correct, lol
Fashion can mean like something or an interest in clothing
But why is there no mention of it anywhere
I can't even find a second example of it in use 
I mean yeah, but it can't mean kind/sort, can it?
Yep
I'm not sure. I'm familiar with 'after a fashion', which is an expression that would perfectly fit the above sentence, but not with 'of a fashion'. Googling 'after a fashion' does turn up many results, also
i still don’t know the difference between “advice” and “advise” 
Well,
It's not very
Commonly used
Advice is someone giving some helpful information to follow
"I gave my friend some advice"
Advise is a warning
"We advise you not to run because the floor is wet"
You advise someone (verb)
You give and receive advice (noun)
ohh okay, thanks! ❤️
I gotchu <33
yo
do British people use "about" as a meaning of around?
Yep!
are they interchangeble or about is the most popular?
"It's about a quarter to ten"
"The car is going about the roundabout"
"The earth is about the sun"
And they are in most contexts, but they're about/around the same amount of popularity.
can I use just use about?
not around?
Yeah, I'm pretty sure
If anyone does correct you, you can always come here to ask if they're right
From my own thinking, I feel like you can always replace "around" with "about", but you can't always replace "about" with "around"
For example, "what are you talking about?" sounds fine, but "what are you talking around?" sounds wrong.
I actually didn't think about that, thank you!
A: Do you have _____ yogurt in the refrigerator?
B: Yes, I do. what articles i can use?
-an -some -any
any
For physical location and movement, yes. However, in some cases 'around' means 'avoid by going to the side of [x] and then behind it' or 'orbit [x]', while 'about' wouldn't be interpreted so. It's not that 'about' can't have that meaning; in fact, it can. However, it's that 'around' is more readily interpreted as having that meaning, while 'about' often means 'aimlessly within [x]' or 'randomly within [x]'. 'About' can't mean 'avoid [x] by going to the side of and behind it', while 'around' can. Sometimes 'about' means 'orbit/go in a circle with [x] as the centre', but that is often left to 'around'.
Let me exemplify:
- We drove about the town.
Implies that we walked aimlessly within the town.
- We drove around the town.
Offers to be interpreted as meaning the same thing, but is more readily read as meaning either 'went in a circle outside of the town with it as the centre' or, more likely, 'avoided the town by driving beside it then going behind it'.
1.The clothes were scattered about the room.
And
- The clothes were scattered around the room.
Meaning 'everywhere all within the room', are both acceptable, but the former is British.
- I walked about the hospital.
This can only mean you walked aimlessly within the hospital. With more context, it could mean you orbited the hospital. However, it cannot mean you avoided the hospital.
- I walked around the hospital.
This could mean you walked aimlessly within the hospital, avoided the hospital by going to the side and behind, or, less likely, orbited the hospital.
'About' is British in both its senses.
For the sense of 'orbit [x]', you could say
- The Earth goes about the Sun.
Or
- In Niels' model, electrons go about the nucleus.
This is British. Most would use 'around'.
However, in non-location/motional senses, they are NOT interchangeable:
- I know about that.
Not
- I know around that.
Likewise, in phrasal verbs and proverbs, they are NOT interchangeable:
Phrasal verb:
- How will you go about doing that?
Not
- How will you go around doing that?
Proverb:
- What goes around comes around.
Not
- What goes about comes about.
I really hope this helps!
(formatting might be wacky on phone. I've fixed it as best I can)
tl;dr
only sometimes.
"what are you thinking about" too
this "about" here is not even obvious to many non-native people, because in different languages this just doesn't exist
like german "Woran denkst du?", literally "What-next-to are thinking you?"
one of the most annoying things in languages, the fact that some words are used just because they are used, not because they follow a predictable rule. I think about you, not next to you as in german. I trust you, but I do not trust to you as in polish
...or I can walk down the street, but I can not walk with the street as in polish
We are all doomed 😔
Okay, really oddly specific question, but, how do I say 'self-inflicted cutaneous excision' without the letter 'e'?
You mean, like, "slf-inflictd cutanous xcision?"
nono, more like
replacement words
that don't have e
a rephrasing
without e
like instead of saying 'tell him that', one could say 'talk of that to him' to avoid the 'e' of 'tell'
You mean, rephrasing using words that don't contain the letter e?
That's a strange and interesting question. I don't really have an answer to it.
but I also can't think of any words for 'cutaneous'
'excision' could probably be rephrased to 'cutting out of', though
Ah, alrighty. I shall wait longer
E is the most common letter in english words, so it will be challenging
Cut into his own skin, him did. (Lol)
not really the same meaning though
What parts of speech is "their'
determiner
What is the difference between a profiteer and a racketeer? My understanding of what a profiteer is is that it's someone who unfairly and illegally makes money off of others, and I am unsure how a racketeer differs
I think the difference lies in the legality/illegality of the business being conducted
A racket is an illegal business
A racketeer is someone who is profiting from operating a racket
A profiteer is making money in an unfair way, but is still technically conducting a legal business
ohhh
thank youuu
Do you guys know what does this introduce here mean?
to start something
"used to introduce a comment" means something like "used to make a new comment", start making it
You can introduce yourself to others, you can also introduce a person to someone else. But you can introduce things like comments or stories too, then it means you tell them/write them, you just let someone know about them and it's a new information
So it's not exactly the same as "to introduce yourself" or "to introduce someone to someone"
hopefully it makes at least some sense
Basically, making a new conversation?
it's not really about any conversations, it's just that you can "introduce something" so you can "let someone know about something new". Like a comment or a question, or maybe a story. For example I introduced my comment right now
No need to overthink. Just know that you can say "to introduce a comment/story/question" and it means you let someone know about it, it's a new thing to them
a chunk of an individual's skin cut out by said individual
Ohh wait, with a little modification this would match exactly omg!!
(The) cutting out of a portion/chunk of an individual's skin by said individual
(Since my original phrase was talking about the excision [the cutting out], not necessarily the excised, [the/a chunk of skin])
Not sure how to get around the 'e' of 'the', but it works welll
Thank you so muchhhhh 💜

Ah I see that makes sense. No problem.
I have some things in my bedroom, for instance. One thing is the PS5 over there.
Gemini is saying that this is rhetorically acceptable. I do not think so. Can someone help settle this?
Well, I could say a few things about this, but the biggest one is that "for instance" doesn't seem to be structured correctly. I would rewrite it like this:
I have some things in my bedroom. For instance, one thing is the PS5 over there.
^ this
That's what I think too. But Gemini seems to say that the example I sent was of an unconventional style, and that it is rhetorically valid.
Is that really true?
Your example could work with more context
But also, saying "I have some things in my bedroom" would be an oddly mundane thing to point out to a typical audience. Sounds like the type of thing you'd write for a 6-year-old to read.
I can prove that I am not poor through several examples. I have some things in my room, for instance. One thing is the PS5 over there.
While the whole thing is awkward, that 'for insatnce' is now valid
Since 'I have some things in my room' is serving as an example of something with this change
It depends on the context of your statement
Teams from 32 countries gathered in Brazil in 2014 for the World Cup of men's soccer. The event, which is held every four years, now features teams from all over the world. The World Cup used to be much smaller and more limited geographically, for example. The 1934 event in Italy included only 16 teams, most from Europe and the Americas.
What about this one?
This doesn't seem valid, with all the context provided
It's got to go after the full stop
I would make the same change to this like in your previous question
Teams from 32 countries gathered in Brazil in 2014 for the World Cup of men's soccer. The event, which is held every four years, now features teams from all over the world. The World Cup used to be much smaller and more limited geographically. For example, the 1934 event in Italy included only 16 teams, most from Europe and the Americas.
'for example'/'for instance' introduces the example, not the 'promise'. I don't think the AI is correct here
Yeah, I think the AI is getting this very wrong
AI can often be incorrect. It's good to take its linguistic answers with a good bit of salt
These chat AI's have a bias towards finding any little reason it can find to validate and justify. And it tends to ignore the opposing view, unless you prompt it specifically not to
I can see that. Though, it's weird that it is quite persistent with it being true. I'd expect it to drop it off and concede with it after some exchanges.
For some reason, it always does the opposite with archaic language and archaisms: it very much avoids stating they're correct
Yeah, I'm not sure why that is. Normally when you point out its mistake it corrects itself

I specifically explained how transition works, but then it still insisted on its correctness and resorted to rhetorics.
That's intriguing
I wonder if this is just a common enough mistake that the ai has somehow identified a pattern for why this would happen
Yeah, I'm certain the placement of 'for example' was incorrect, so I wonder that it should attempt to justify it. I see no logic behind this
It's an odd mistake, though. It's so intuitive that 'for example' goes with the example
not post-posed:
I have many hobbies. For example, I like to play video games.
post-posed:
I have many hobbies. I like to play video games, for example.
In either case, the 'for example' goes with the example
This is describing the scenario where you might say "I have some things in my bedroom. One of them is a PS5, for example."
Perhaps show it that
It still insists on the nonsensical 'logical relationship' going on. I'm believing it's hallucinating.
Problem solved at least.
😅
how can i expand my vocabulary easily?
Follow #🌄|word-of-the-day and utilise it by texting in public chats #💭|general or #🫂|beginner-chat
That’s how i’ve been practicing
If you want to memorize vocabulary fast then everyday revision your vocabulary and Will memorize it in the morning.
thanks guys, i'll try this
Hey guys, which sentence would be right? 1. "I can also do it," or 2. "I also can do it". Does it even matter grammatically if I put the "also" before or behind the "can"?
It flows better in number one, but both are used in every day language
/rank
Hi
Hi
I agree the first is better. "I can do it also" is good too.
CAN SOMEONE HELP ME
What do you need?
theres these few questions
could u turn the music … i cant hear you
a up
b down
c on AND ITS DOWN RIGHT AND MY TEACHER SAID IT WAS WRONG
I DONT KNOW WHATS WRONG WITH HER
b is right.
thanks
you are welcome
I dont understand this usage
by means of something; using something
She played a tune on her guitar.
The information is available on the internet.
We spoke on the phone.
What's on TV?
The programme's on Channel 4.
I can not understand, Can you share the details?
I dont know how to use this usage of on
This is correct
Basically, the word 'on' is for the state of being used.
The word 'on' helps with describing one thing in relation to another.
Heyyyyyyy
Hi Everyone! 👋
I'm from Pune, India.
Native: Hindi & Marathi
Learning: English (intermediate level)
Looking for: Speaking practice partners
Feel free to message me for language exchange!
I am from*
hi there. would you guys kindly help me to teach me English? i wanna enhance my English skills into B2 level
Hello!Does anyone have Mr James Green server ?I'm interested in his courses .
Hello,
"Sleep with any consenting adult who'll have you": what's the exact meaning of "have" here?
Could be any of those three (the third one would work if you thought of it a bit metaphorically, maybe. The first two are stronger, though)
Thank you very much 👌
Because it is used with the verb “sleep” and the adjective “consenting” which usually indicates having sex, the first definition @boreal ingot gave would be the most accurate— “engage in sexual intercourse with.” I am using context clues here.
Hello, everyone. A bit confused about gerund. Does "swimming pool" contain gerund? Or there "swimming" is a Noun Adjunct?
Gerund is only noun
If woman are like cats with a dogs mouth, they act smooth and untouchable, but they can bark, bite, and demand attention when they want to.
She's definitely not my pumpkin.
She's peace in chaos, not noise in comfort.
Tf?
Men are like dogs with lion hearts — loyal to what they love, protective when tested, playful until provoked, and dangerous when disrespected.
To anyone feeling offended by this quote — relax. It wasn’t aimed at you… unless, of course, you heard the meow and barked back. 🐾
The truth usually only bites the ones wearing the collar.
Have you found it yet?
On: used to describe an activity or a state
to be on business/holiday/vacation
The book is currently on loan. In :used to show a state or condition
I'm in love!
The house is in good repair.
I must put my affairs in order.
a man in his thirties
The daffodils were in full bloom. what is different?
Could be a poem. Maybe they want the grammar checked
Or like "to accept as a sexual partner", a mix of 15 and 16
It's a gerund functioning as a noun adjunct, yes
Consider the difference between 'A swimming child', which can be rephrased as 'A child that is swimming', and 'A swimming pool', which cannot be said to be 'A pool that is swimming'
Similarly, 'A running machine' can be interpreted two ways
- A machine that is currently running (on)
- A machine for running (like a treadmill)
The former is a participle acting adjectivally, the latter is an adjunct acting adjectivally (as a noun adjunct)
Got it. Thank you!
You can jus use ChatGPT; why are you asking here? 
AI can make many mistakes when teaching English, but it's not always wrong. I'd recommend using a textbook instead
Hi guys! i have a pending english coursework (gcse) and one of the texts is the necklace i doubt anyone has read it but the quote itself is self explanatory “How little is needed to make or break us!” if u can i need a wide range of interpretations u guys can make out of the quote
"How little is needed to make us" would mean how little we need to be motivated or maybe become great people, depends on the context. And breaking us would mean we get depressed, or maybe demotivated, also depends on the context
Maybe you could say this about someone's childhood? This little thing could be love and support from someone's parents. Or maybe they lack this, then this could as well break them
Or maybe it's about money, someone just got richer, and now they act greedy, mean, insincere. But they used to be such a good, compassionate person
I also like to see it here
Tbh I trust ai more than books and humans
Books get outdated and could have typos
I have an old version of grammar in use and it's said there the pp of find is find
Nope
Then it'd be better to delete this channel 😕

It will help no one
Why don't we try and see if ppl r gonna use it or not?
Try asking AI some questions you already know the answers to
you will notice that it hallucinates
Sometimes it even finds logic where there is no logic
It actually gives quite a bit of good answers man
We're talking about specifically English related questions right?
Like ask for a meaning
Or explain a grammar
Only when you know how to ask questions properly
Give me an example then
Are u uninstalling the app?
No?
I just wanna see other ppl use ai here
It's just , when they see an ai channel is as accessible as a regular ones , they're gonna try it out first
Yes, but if you don't fact-check the answers and just ask it, then you will forget what you have learned after a while
And so with the human answers?
Why r u so ai phobic man

I would interpret it as an exclamation of astonishment or wonderment at the fact that even something very little has the power to change the course of a person's life. One may have been made by something very little (that is, what one has become today is a result of that little thing), or one may have been made to lose all motivation and power and will by something very little. For example, if I read a story and am inspired to do more in life like the main character, and then I go on to become a great entrepreneuse, something as little as my reading a story 'made me'. It made who I became. It is the foundation whereupon all that I became stands. On the other hand, if I saw a cat suffering on the street and no one helping it, and I lost all hope in humanity and went on to become depressed and lose all my goals, one may say that very little broke me. Something as small as a cat suffering would have led me to a life of no great attainment and precipitated me into aphotic misery. So something small would have broken me.
That's how I interpret this expression. A reflection upon the grandeur of the consequences of something spuriously inconsequential
Check out this conversation where the asker was using AI: #📚|english-questions message
I'm not saying it can't be useful, but it's not always reliable
Always check after it if you use it
Alright.
Let's say you are reading a book and you come across a sentence that's hard to parse. Then you will go to AI and ask it to explain the sentence.
If you close the tab after that it will not help you, cuz you will forget what you just learnt.
You will have to understand the words and phrases individually.
But most AI users just tell it to explain the sentence and then close the tab
It's useful as someone/something to bounce ideas off of instead of as a guide/pedagogue
Okay? That also happens if you ask a human teacher? I don't understand your point
You need to keep studying to understand a topic so?
Oka
Not sure how I came up with the idea of "AI phobia", but maybe u didn't properly read what I said.
I just said that you need to google the things again after asking the AI
Yeah
Hope u get my point
I see the merit in doing one's own research into a matter. It helps the idea stick. It also helps one gain a deeper understanding of the topic at hand. It's similar to a teacher letting their student puzzle out the answer rather than spoonfeeding them it all (which is what AI does)
It's a good resource, but over-reliance is harmful. But my issue with it is that it's sometimes just wrong, not that it spoon-feeds one with the answers
Are ai grammar and ai book better because you can ask question right away?
Hey, how often do you hear anyone use “in one's heyday” in everyday life?
Never
Sounds like something an older generation would say
Something an old man would say imo
Not as in the Victorian sort of old that you and I so adore, but as in a 40- to 60-year-old dude :p
tysm
Alright, thanks to the three of you
@terse mesa @signal shell @boreal ingot
Ah, well I heard the phrase "in my heyday" in a song. The song is from the 70s tho
It started like this:
“In my heyday
Young girls wrote to me
Everybody seemed to have time to devote to me......”
Agreeing witu SG—Never.
Hello guys...
i have question for native English speaker, do you know what is barrette ? (without searching it on google)
I didn't know what it was
Thank you @latent reef .. I'm learning some merriam webster quiz, so many new vocabulary there... Sometime is really hard, that barrette is one of the example
...
not a native and I know it without looking it up
it's just another name for a hair slide
After looking it up seems like this is a regional difference. Like, barrette seems to be used in the states, while hair slides are a british thing
(the photo is from wikipedia)
seems like it could be regional indeed
Maybe it's not like it's hard, you've just encountered one regional word, maybe more
Gonna say I wouldn't know what a hair slide is either, I would call it a hair clip
Hoooo got it 📝
TIL about "regional word", Previously I'm thinking maybe this is something related to gender...
Example: male tend don't know about that
Just saying the sentence "male tend don't know about that" isnt correct grammatically, firstly i would use men/guys just as male is more of a "scientific" term, also "tend dont know" doesnt make sense, it would be better if it was something like "men usually dont know about that"
Oh. Maybe we are all just men
maybe like "men tend not to know"
probably makes sense too I guess
If you share it to #📝|proofreading I will look at it. If you have to do it over DM you can wait for someone else.
You can still use the word 'tend' (your mistake wasn't in that). I would say this:
Men tend not to know about that
Pixel is right, though. Their proposal is a trifle more casual than mine.
Here is an explanation regarding the 'scientific' connotation of 'male' that Pixel mentioned: #📚|english-questions message
What is means word “tuff”
I saw it many times in insta
are you sure you don't mean "tough"
Hello guys.
Good afternoon. I’m Brasilian girl, and my English is basic
Are there any Brazilians?
Hi does anyone have Mr James channel ?
There is someone english native speaker wanna learn russian or just talk with russian guy?
Tuff is a kind of rock. Look at the attachments below.
However, online, 'tuff' is often used as an informal spelling of 'tough'. 'Tough', normally, means 'very solid and strong; not easily broken, moulded, or weakened'. It also has the meaning of 'able to handle bad situations well' when describing living things.
Informally, however, it's come to mean 'strong, resilient, nonchalant in a cool way'. However, it's almost always used sarcastically.
'Oh yeah, you're so tough for that' (Connotes one is trying too hard to act cool and strong)
To better convey the sarcasm intended, it's often purposefully misspelt as 'tuff'.
Some people aren't aware of the difference between 'tough' and 'tuff', though
They are pronounced the same
Hello !Does anyone know a website from where I can download audio books for free for example IELTS audio books DVD ?
The Libby app. The National Library of Malaysia doesn't require registration. Select "Add Library" and search for The National Library of Malaysia. Select "Sign in with my card" and type any number from "eb001" to "eb999"
you could find some audiobooks on YouTube, for free, but it's only some books and often old ones (because if people were uploading new things yt would probably detect them and take them down)
personally I have found some audiobooks made from Stephen King's books there, or from some very widely known books like 1984 by Orwell
There is so much resources on telegram.
Many thanks guys !❤️
Hi, folks! Do you have any resources to prepare for IELTS especially for the writing section?
Hello
Hello
Hello
How are you
what sort of song?
Hi guys I have a question:
8. It was the CEO __ the controversial statement was attributed to, not the PR manager.
A. which
B. whom
C. that
D. who
B or D?
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but usually we would use "Which" in this context, but 'who' would be the second most commonly used. I think 'That' is also pretty commonly used, though. Whom is almost never used, so most don't remember the word exists.
Here's how you fit the others into this statement:
It was the CEO which the controversial statement was attributed to, not the PR manager.
It was the CEO of whom the controversial statement was attributed to, not the PR manager.
It was the CEO that the controversial statement was attributed to, not the PR manager.
It was the CEO who the controversial statement was attributed to, not the PR manager.
So the answer B is not correct right? A is the best correct answer?
Correct, yes
This is just what I'd usually use though-They can all be correct
I think it's honestly who you ask
I think B or D will be most correctly than A and C😭 but it’s really confusing
I can promise you if it is B, no one nowadays uses it 😭
The class is not always right
Right? I think it so, cause Whom is rarely used nowadays(maybe) but how about D 😭 it’s can be the correct answer.. uhh idk cause my grammar is bad😭
They're all 'technically' correct
So like
Honestly
Shot in the dark
Good luck
Don't choose B
(Unless it is B and your teacher is ancient)
Yeah😭 okayy thank u ❤️ I’ll choose D as my opinion😭❤️
Good luck!! <33
Thank u❤️
Yeah that's a tough one
I ultimately agree with @paper robin . I'll just add my two cents just to provide a different perspective.
To make sense of why "which" is the right choice, you can imagine that this statement is answering the question: "Which staff member was the controversial statement attributed to? Was it the PR manager?"
"Whom" is an option for those that want to sound very formally correct, but I agree that it feels archaic in the modern day. "Who" would be more informally used nowadays.
"That" is not a bad option either. It feels natural enough, to be honest.
In the end, they all work just fine, as was already pointed out. I don't think anyone would really complain no matter which one you choose in everyday conversation.
This is a very trick question 😭 I've asked this question a lot of people have chosen B a lot and I just don't know exactly what is answer😭 so WHICH is the most correct answer? So this question just have only one correct answer because it in the test so idk what is the correct that I can choose😭
Honestly, I could be wrong. But I think A is correct.
Hi guys
Actually I think the answer could also be C cuz "It was the CEO that the statement was attributed to." sounds pretty natural too...But i won't choose it in the exam.
This sentence wants to emphasize this paticular part "the CEO", and you need to find the correct relative pronoun for a human, which narrow the option to B C D cuz "which" is a pronoun for objects.
And since "the CEO" is an accusative case, D is absolutely not the right answer.
Considered all of that, the most formal choice would be B(whom), cause it is a accusative relative pronoun.
I'm not a native English speaker, I'm just a normal student from China.I'm pretty familiar with this kind of question since it's a common type that would appear in the exam in China. And B is the answer I would choose to fill the blank JUST for the exam.
(For reference only, sorry if I'm wrong or used the wrong vocabulay to describe all that, I don't actually know how to say those technical terms about the grammar... 🤧)
"that" is also an accusative relative pronoun, and can be used to describe both human being and object, so it's grammatical right too.It's just not that "formal" to be chosed in an exam...🤧
DM?
@undone pagoda It's rock song
If you wanna help me dm pls
I don't think Sinful's answer is appropriate for a school or test. Formally, you would answer B. Informally, you could answer D, C, and maybe A.
It was the CEO of whom the controversial statement was attributed to
Which Sinful suggested, is entirely incorrect in both formal and informal language. It's equivalent to saying 'whom the controversial statement was attributed to of/of to'. I believe Sinful intended to front the 'to', thus:
It was the CEO to whom the controversial statement was attributed.
This is the most formal and correct option.
It was the CEO whom the controversial statement was attributed to.
This is correct grammatically, but the preposition being stranded at the end of the relative clause is slightly less formal than the use of 'whom'. It's correct and what I would choose on a multiple-choice test, but it's a bit less natural than the previous one, mainly because of the discrepancy in formality.
It was the CEO who/that/which the controversial statement was attributed to.
These are the most informal. 'Who' would be the best option since we're speaking of a person (The CEO). 'That' is very commonly used for both people and objects. 'Which' may be used informally
The language you use on a test may majorly differ from the language you use daily. 'Whom' is one such point where the two are in disagreement
I believe in written formal language 'whom' may yet be encountered, but, otherwise (save for after fronted prepositions, as in 'to whom', 'of whom', and the suchlike), daily language has forsaken it
Do listen to the natives' intuitions if this is a matter of daily conversation, but this strikes me as either an exam question or a sentence to be used in a formal context, in which case, a native's intuition may misguide you
I would like to correct your last sentence.
The past participle (V3) of 'choose' is 'chosen'. The past tense (V2) of it is 'chose' ('choose' is an irregular verb). In passive constructions, V3 is used. Thus, your sentence ought to have been 'It's just not that formal/formal enough to be chosen in an exam'
I do agree with your answer to their question, though :3
Ahhh, thank you! Tbh, I'm probably not great for those types of questions anyway. I learned something! :3
I hope it did not come off as condescension! That was not my intent :3
Nope, ofc not! :3
Is discloser in british english disclosure?
If so, how would you explain "permitted disclosures" in this sentence "Each party acknowledges receipt of inside information by company will make company, and each person (legal or individual) of that company is entitled to disclose confidentiality information to ("permitted disclosures")"?
I think in that context disclosures would mean the person disclosing
Though it's odd since disclosure would mean "the action of making a secret information known."
This whole sentence seems ungrammatical. Maybe you messed it up while replacing names or got it from an unreliable source, but, as it is, the whole sentence is ungrammatical, and so that one odd point regarding 'disclosures' can't be addressed with certainty, as one might be misunderstanding the badly-formed sentence. What I can say is that, in British English, the distinction between 'disclosures' and 'disclosers' is maintained
Thanks for the correction!! I almost forgot this concept.🤧
What does “gurting” mean in slang?
To do something brilliant but dangerous.
Could u please gimme some examples?
Hello, how are you?
is there a teacher or something?
Why the word island have the s in it
the word island has an s because the spelling was changed at some point (Something to do with a mistaken association with the french loan word isle according to Wikipedia)
Aisle and isle also both have a silent s
Www thanks 😊
Can someone pls help me with the lyrics of about 7 seconds of a song of English?
Sure
https://youtu.be/4e9FpE_8lWs?si=kvjZcnWDQpDOUqIs
0:36 what's he say until the second 0:47?
@green seal
It isn't English. I'll DM you it though.
Michelle, ma belle
Sont des mots qui vont très bien ensemble
Très bien ensemble
Or there you go.
Thanks you so much guys
Was written by english people
I know how catchy it sounds, already acknowledged that
Gotta work with what I got though
Also what do you mean by "the distinction between 'disclosures' and 'disclosers' is maintained"?
So it's not the same word?
Additionally shouldn't it be permitted disclosers?
The distinction is maintained means that even in British English they still have different meanings.
Was the text copy and pasted or is it from an image that you transcribed? If it is transcribed, posting the image here would help.
Nope
Copypaste
Also I can't share much since it's a contract
And the information is sensitive
was the word "company" originally the name of a company?
That's not what I mean. I mean did you replace the actual company name with the word company. The portion you posted has no such replacements?
Okay then it was not written by a native speaker and has mistakes. I could guess what it's trying to say but there's no point in forcing it to make sense as is.
True
What about this one?
It would make more sense if it was permitted disclosers right?
That would make it better grammatically but disclosers is not a natural word choice imo
What would you say then?
What would you call a person that discloses confidential info?
I would reword it so I didn't have to call them a single word
Okay this is not helping
"Each party acknowledges receipt of inside information from Company A will make their company, and each person (legal or individual) of that company entitled to disclose confidential information to all other parties permitted to disclose information"
Alright. Doesn't sound like there is much I can do for you in this case then.
Over the counter I'd guess. Looks like Google agrees.
I assume it's paying in person instead of by mail or some other remote means but it could have some special meaning in healthcare or something. Someone else may know better.
That much I know, but does it also imply paying outside the authorities jurisdiction?
That would be under the counter
Wow there's UTC too
Didn't know that
So OTC is legal
I've so much work to do holy shit
"a disclosure" means the fact that something was disclosed, and "a discloser" means the person who disclosed it
no, it can not
disclosures and disclosers are entirely different words already
there is a thing like OTC medicine, it means things that you can purchase without getting a prescription from a doctor
this varies by country of course
as people have pointed out, it's messy, but the weirdest thing to me here is "confidentiality information" instead of just "confidential information"
"(it) will make company... is entitled to..." is very weird, makes no sense, it was probably meant to be "(it) will make company... entitled to..." just like you can "make something possible"
or "it will make me hungry"
but not "it will make me is hungry"

Insane french listening skills, my brain understood only ma belle somehow 😭
Hey what are good podcasts to listen to?
where r u guys from?
Ireland
Is roof rack a thing?
Idc 'bout OTC medicine
I mentioned OTC payment
From : hmalifxxyz@gmail.com
To: xxyz1234@gmail.com
Sent : 12 Jan, 2025
Subject ; Thanking for a nice birthday gift
Dear xyz,
Take my love at first. Im happy that you are well.Im also well. However i got your email yesterday. I wanted to take a moment to thank you for your beautiful birthday gift. Birthdays are always reminder of the wonderful people we have in our lifes and your gift was the perfect reflection of kindness and warm. The book you gave me in my birthday is really outstanding. Particularly its storytelling aspects attracts you more. Thank you again for making my birthday memorable and full of joy.
No more today. Convey my salam to your parents and love to the _______ (tell me what can i write here)
Yours ever,
HM Alif
fill in the blanks- love to the ____________________________________
Well, who do you want to wish love to? "love to your family"?
Another Question. Is the following sentence grammatically correct? Is this the right way to use the word "wager"?
Sentence: Why don't we use these marbles as our wager? If I lose, I'll buy them and give them to you. If you lose, you do the same.
Yes. It is fine as is but I'd personally say "Whoever loses buys them and gives them to the winner."
Thanks! How about this then?
A passerby says, "Wow, they're going to use all those marbles as their wager? That's gonna cost them."
"Use" is slightly weird for a passerby I think.
"They're going to bet all those marbles?" or something
But grammatically it is fine as is.
"birthdays are always reminder" this doesn't sound right. Birthdays always remind us of... would be better
"lifes" are written as "lives", just like wolf wolves, wolfes is not used
and maybe... a wife, but multiple wives, not wifes
"of kindness and warm" should be and warmth, warm is an adjective
"in my birthday" -> on my birthday, in english you just say on a specific date (on a day, in January/any month, in 2025/any year)
"(these) aspects attracts you more" this is not right, these aspects attract you more. Aspects is plural, so we don't need this +s after the verb
you could also use a comma after "However", like "However, ..."
Which do you think is better, Gemini or ChatGPT, and why?
I think both are equally bad
love to the yourness or something
It's AI, so it's bad.
I wouldn’t recommend ChatGPT or Gemini for language learning however if you want to maybe check small things or create study guides for yourself…USUALLY it’s not too bad. I use it at my job and its pretty decent at creating lesson plans
I like using them as a second opinion, but I never trust them fully. However, if a learner wants a conversation partner in English, so that they can osmose the language, AI is pretty good at that
^
Hi, who wants some English lessons, I'll be home in a bit, TEFL or IELTs.
Lmk. I miss teaching it.
Would you be willing to volunteer as a teacher in this server?
yea
You can contact the staff team about it here #🛂|report-help and select “Apply for teacher” Category
Help me
Radio el bahdja
Hhh
They're different things. What is your question?
hello
Please go to #💭|general or #🫂|beginner-chat if you want to chat
Hi, anybody needs help?
hello can you help me with this
Does this line here have a poetic device? “ I wish maps would be without Borders and that we belonged to no one and into everyone at once.”
Literary device, yes. It's grammatically wrong though. Also probably best not to ping a bunch of people to ask.
Okay.
Also can you tell me what devices are used
It’s from a poem so can’t change grammar
I don't remember what it's called but "maps without borders" refers to not having separated countries so it isn't literal i.e. just drawing a map without borders on its own is not the point
Hmm, I can see this being symbolism
The map symbolises the world
The borderlessness of the map represents unity
Perhaps it's a metaphor as well. Even if it's not explicitly stated, the world is the map in this situation
So that's a metaphor being implied
I called it a imagery
I suppose that works, but 'symbolism' is more appropriate in my opinion
Is it 'Wonderous' or 'Wondrous' ?
I usually use 'wonderous' but now the auto-correct say 'wondrous'.
maps are confusing just as people are
maps? the poem or maps in general
The poem I guess
it is called maps lol
Yes quite
howd u know
Idk
''howd u know''
the universe told me
Hey guys , help me here with a word !!!
"Threshold," Does it mean like Limit or Level?
Yeah, a point or level at which something begins or changes.
It's clear now, I appreciate it
Hi
- Are natives typically aware of the older sense of 'cunnilingus' of 'one who performs oral sex on the vulva and vagina' (as opposed to referring to the act itself, that being the modern meaning)?
- Are natives typically aware of the word 'anilingus' as the anal counterpart to 'cunnilingus'?
- Are natives typically aware of the word 'penilingus' as the analogous term meaning 'fellatio'?
My impression is:
- No. It is less apparent than, say, the dual senses of 'regicide'.
- A definite maybe.
- No, but one could probably infer the meaning.
My many thanks! 💜
It may not be what you want to hear but if it is a role you aren't super passionate about or it is for a big company cover letters don't really matter and I would use AI
If you have one written dm it to me and I can give some pointers
Hi, Scella, nice to meet you, i'd like to chat with you
hey guys, what mean "ahh" i see it daily
it's a diminutive like "idk--> i don't know"??
mainly it's a substitute for ass when insulting something. as in "goofy ahh" = "goofy ass".
hello everynyan
does anyone want to do toefl speaking question number one practice together
What Real Life said above is true when "ahh" is used to insult something. It can also be used to express emotions like understanding ("Ahh, I see, that makes sense") or tiredness/exhaustion ("Ahh I'm so tired, I want to quit my job."). It will depend on the context of the sentence! Note that when using it to express understanding, it's more common to spell it with just one 'h', like "Ah".
It can also just be used to express screaming in general, especially when drawn out like "Ahhhhhhhhhhh"!
Thank you very much
Regarding what?
yeah, i'm looking for a partner to work with me
yeah, i'm looking for a partner to work with me
Uh, what on?
Yeah, I've been learning English for 2 years but my English is still poor
so I want to get help from you
I don't really give one-on-one lessons (or any lessons, for that matter). I just answer the English questions that I can in this channel. My apologies.
Besides, I haven't much to offer you in the way of advice but for 'consume much content in the language in all forms and be inquisitive when you happen upon anything that strikes you as queer'
The 2 years seem to have certainly paid off, as you're conversational, so I assume it's at literary and formal language that you desire to improve. That may only happen through the consumption of which language
scella scelling a lot today
What do you mean 😭 ?
i dont know what u mean
you should keep in mind with Scella
ALGUÉM DO BRASIL?
try here perhaps https://discord.com/channels/801609515391778826/1006565255192776704
Is there any better way to phrase this than to have two 'by' phrases in a row?
the album cover of Rapist of Flesh by Dysmofectomy by Diko Nursyahra
The intent is to say that the album cover is by Diko Nursyahra and the album (Rapist of Flesh) by Dysmofectomy
Something like "The album cover of Dysmofectomy's RoF illustrated by Diko Nursyahra" Even in yours just inserting illustrated makes the double of a little smoother. If it's just the clause (no sentence) then "courtesy of" may also work.
altho u end up with a lot of "of"s that way lol
Yeah, just adding onto the previous response. You'll see this sort of strategy when crediting the illustrator of children's books. I imagine the same could be applied when crediting an album cover
I think that option turns Dsymofectomy into a possessive noun and that would change the original meaning, no?
Hmm, I mean, you can attribute a work to someone either by saying it's by them or by saying it's theirs. Surely you've heard something like 'Wilhelm Kotarbiński's Grave of a Suicide is ...' or 'Xue Jiye's Face Off is ..' when speaking of paintings. The same construction can be used when speaking of albums (such as 'Rapist of Flesh'), to attribute them to particular artists or groups. It has much the same semantic effect as saying 'by [x]', I believe.
This is a replica of Van Gogh's The Starry Night.
This is a replica of The Starry Night by Van Gogh.

Hello everyone, I was watching Harry potter and they harry got a cloak which ron says. Thats invisibility cloak. I wonder if there’s difference invisibility cloak and invisible cloak. I see so many patterns like this where two noun together to refer one thing. I don’t know which pattern to use either adj+noun or noun +noun
Yes, that's an important feature of English: attributive adjectives that are basically nouns in front of other nouns. But noun + noun is generally uncomparable; it is more about categorization or identification than mere description. Thus, 'invisible cloak' is a cloak that is invisible, whereas 'invisibility cloak' is a cloak that is associated with the power of invisibility.
Could you make it more simple explanation?
"Invisible" is adjective
"Invisibility" describes the object's function
An invisible cloak is just a cloak that you can't see. If you put it on it won't make you invisible. It would be similar to wearing a clear plastic raincoat.
An invisibility cloak probably makes you invisible but exactly what it does depends on what the author says it does. It might not work for a non-wizard for example.
Another example
Metal object
Metallic object
It highlights the object's nature
I've got a question myself. I'm reading introductions and I'm seeing people mentioning English grades as A1 or B1. What does that mean exactly?
CEFR levels, A1 beginner to C2 proficiency.
Here are more examples
Dangerous zone
Danger zone
Accurate test
Accuracy test
Publicity official
Economical plan
Economic plan
Historical marker
Historic marker
Industry park
Industrial park
A1 and a2 means beginner and ,b1 and b2 intermediate and c1 and c2 is advanced
So it's levels
I see
So C levels is advanced in this server. Thank you so much for answering the question
Hi M, it is called "invisibility cloak" because it grants the wearer the power of invisibility. In this case, invisibility is the "power" or "skill" needed to become invisible.
Like Real Life said, an "invisible cloak" would mean that the cloak itself is not able to be seen. It does not tell us anything about the power it grants the wearer, it just describes the cloak as being invisible (which means being see-through or being transparent. Real Life example of a plastic raincoat is a great example!)
So like "waterproof jacket"
Yes! This means that the jacket itself has waterproof qualities. It is made of a material that is waterproof.
How do I use this usage of at?
used after a verb to show that somebody tries to do something, or partly does something, but does not succeed or complete it
He clutched wildly at the rope as he fell.
She nibbled at a sandwich (= ate only small bits of it).
That's such an interesting idea. I never really considered it. It appears to me that using "at" in this way keeps the verb intransitive (it has no direct object), yet introducing this propositional phrase "at [X]" indicates what the action was being directed towards.
notice how in both of those sentences, the verb and adverb is "targeting" the subject
[verb + adverb] at [subject]
I look at the computer
I **stare **at the clock waiting for my shift to end
Look, Ross! I'm just trying to keep shit simple. We vietnamese only have like 15,000 words in our vocabulary
There's something more interesting happening. Each of these sentences has an equivalent completed variation.
She ate a sandwich.
She nibbled at a sandwich.
He grabbed the rope.
He clutched at the rope.
Bascially it's dependent on what verb you use, right?
Exactly
And that's why I hate the English language sometimes
I guess that's really all it is
Oh you can say it this way, but that way can also mean the same thing.
Me, who learnt both english AND vietnamese
The choice of words forces you into either a transitive form or an intransitive form.
If you want to indicate the target of your action with an intransitive verb, you would normally use "at"
Or maybe "on"
and that's the thing. I teach conversational English. I tend to discourage students from agonising over whether their shit is grammatically correct
Do people use this?
all the time
it is just depend on what verb you use
How do I know it simplified?
like in Vietnamese, if we want to eat noodles, we say
Anh ăn mì
You basically learn it by seeing how people use it. I don't know if there's a better way to know, unless you find the verb in the dictionary and see if it is transitive or intransitive.
but if we want to say like "I nibbled at a sandwich", we'd say
Anh gặm nhấm banh mi
@acoustic geyser
Again, can I express my disdain for the language?
It is quite painful sometimes
You're Vietnamese?
yes, I am
I mean, you came from your country and are living here, yes?
Well, I was born in Australia, still living in Australia, but I've grown up speaking our mother tongue with my parents
Welcome to Vietnam, I guess
Anh chưa đi về Việt Nam
You should remove "đi* to make it less redundant
Ah yeh
(A) had spread (B) would spread
whats the different
In 1995, a group of business and academic leaders met at the home of Juanita Brown and David
Isaacs in Mill Valley, California. None of them had any idea they were about to create a social innovation
that 11 rapidly around the world.
- (A) had spread (B) would spread (C) had been spreading (D) would have spread
"were about to create" means they haven't created it yet.
"had spread" means it already spread.
"would spread" = it will spread in the future (the future from 1995's perspective)
Hello friends, I am new here and I came to learn English, knowing that I use translation because I find it difficult to learn and I want help and advice ❤️✅️
Thanks you very much.
How do I understand compound verbs?
(A) says that you've done it.
(B) says that you're considering
Practice using them in sentences
For example:
Babysitting my niece
Babysitting is a compound verb
While possible in general, this is wrong given the context
But we don't know if she will do it
But we don't know if she will definitely do it
See with would, it implies possibility
It doesn't indicate possibility, it indicates that it had not happened yet at that point but at some point in the future it would
Pause! Let me read that shit again
Fuck you're right
I apologise
Any french here
why do you swear so much, teach? 
My aussie vernacular!

Maybe it's his habit. Well that's the only reason I can think of
lol

Fine and you?
But you are right. I'll try to tone it down
👍
I don't know, it's just that when I type, I just do it without rethinking
You don't swear a lot while teaching your students in real life, right?
Never
nah it's fair enough. I'm not bothered by it, but I thought someone with the teacher role prolly ought not to swear much
Well....
Then you're fine

Again, you're not wrong
At the higher levels, I tend to be MUCH more casual
That's good ig
Like the rigidity loosens at each level
second that
That way people understand concepts like flow and how native English speakers have this dumb proclivity to shorten everything
ESPECIALLY us Aussies
I hate to admit it but I can't watch any movie in English without the subtitles on 
I mean, English is your second language
Btw, since you are teaching conversational English, it's better to not use "proclivity". Instead, replace it with easier alternatives like "habit" or "tendency"
Saying that will be more of an excuse
to hide the fact that I can't speak English fluently
Not an excuse! It's a fact
Yes, but it's partially true. Otherwise there would be no fluent English speakers from any non-native English-speaking country
Dang yeah, I'm a slacker
Of course, nothing is definite. Polyglot is a thing
English is hard. Take your time
It's the only language where every rule has at least one exception
First time writing in English using time words
Today, I went to the park
But you can also put today at the end and it'll still be the same
this feels made up
The 'only' part lmfao
Okay, the only language that I know of
None of the Asian languages that I've studied have this level of fluidity.
I'm only just learning a tiny bit of Irish and it's already driving me crazy with how terrible it is to find any patterns anywhere. I'm not even sure if Irish has any rules to break.
because it is
english doesn't break too many of its rules
even german, which is related to it, loves to break everything again and again, it even has irregular plurals for every noun (english just adds +s, and has only a few exceptions like a mouse and mice)
Eh, this works in my native language as well. But ig we don't need to punctuate the adverb regardless of where we place it in a sentence
Like Japanese, Chinese, Korean, Tagalog etc.?
What I find crazy about German is that it allows so many modifiers to come together without any hyphens or commas
If there are no definite patterns, then maybe it'll take you a while to learn it

oh. yeah. It takes some time to get used to it lol
but my native polish behaves the same so to me it doesn't matter
Lol but still it's crazy how y'all manage to pronounce the long words in one go
English also has some long words but they are mostly useless in everyday life
Japanese and Vietnamese
Okay put it this way! There is no cl concrete way to write sentences
There are many ways of greeting people. A lot of them informal, sure. But it's still counts as saying hello
i don't speak vietnamese but I have tried learning japanese before
and one thing that struck me was definitely the way the language is spelled
it's almost entirely inconsistent and unpredictable
I have learned many kanji too, not only kana, and I have learned many things before, but it all showed me that oh no, some things just do not make sense. Like taberu right, you know the kanji character that goes with it, and the same one appears in other words suddenly as shoku
japanese spelling is a nightmare
Ah yes! Ooyomi and Kuyomi
Yeah, I was N2 before I stopped
I agree
If you understand pattern, then it's not too hard.
yes yes but still the fact that one character can take like even 5 different readings is just nightmarish, english spelling is often unpredictable but english is still heaven compared to this
I will agree with you. But you have the native role. So of course English is the easiest
If it was something with a C or B grade proficiency, then there might be merit
Anyways, to work I go
okay okay. Good luck
I have the fluent role, so no, I'm not a native speaker. My English is around C1, and my native is polish. So no, not really the easiest haha. I would certainly have it easier to learn russian or czech or slovak than to learn english
I mean, most languages have many ways of greeting someone. For example, Finnish has Moikka, Moi, Moikkeli, Hei, Terve, Tere, Tervehdys, Tervetuloa, Moro, Moron, Heippa, Heipis, Päivää, and Tsau (among others). English isn't very special in that regard.
Ah
Hello everyone. I'm an online English teacher with a bachelor's degree in English language and literature. I love helping learners get improved, build confidence, and express themselves freely without the fear of making mistakes. Feel free to reach out.
Or to ask any questions
how can I pronounce "the" front of "university and user and Europe", please help me
thuh
thee before vowel sounds
thuh before consonant sounds
all of those may start with vowels, but thopse vowels are pronounced as Y is
(as consonant sounds)
so you use 'thuh', not 'thee'
thank u
you have the native English role 
Here is how I'd pronounce them (sorry I sound like shit I'm tired lol):
Yeah, Real Life is correct. You should probably change your 'native' role if you're not one
how can I change
Scroll up and click on Channels & Roles
Then choose one of these four, depending on your English level
Hey,
Would you like to volunteer as a teacher in this server?
Hello, I am Iza. A Bachelor's Degree student & looking for 1 speaker for each of these dialect- British Isles/North America/Australia & the Pacific/The Caribbean for help with my global englishes assignment as we need to compare the pronunciation 😔 I have to conduct an interview (will be done via GoogleMeet) and I'll share the end result on Padlet. I have example from my seniors if you need more proof of the assignment. I'm in Asia and I don't know anyone from these places. May dm me if you're willing to help, as this work weigh 20% of my grade and i want to do my best for it. Tqsm 🙏🏻
can i dm you?
I'm an Aussie!
Feel free to reach out to me at anytime and I'll try to get back to you
Ohh thank you so much!
I sent you a friend req and you may ask/i can share if you need more details for my assignment
I'm willing to help too if you still need someone from North America
Thank you so much for willing to help
but I've got a North American already. As of rn, only British Isles & The Caribbean slots are vacant.
Hello everyone сan I ask you a question about English, what is the difference between Modern RP and Upper RP, and how many different RP are there?
Hi there, I am Maxim. I am looking for English friends. I am 15 and I am from Russia. dm me
Тебе бы сюда пацан
Окей, спасибо
Yes, feel free to reach out. I'd be glad to help.
💀
people looking for English friends and then NOT speaking the English language
booh-hwa-hwa-tah?
a bottle of water mate
that's Englishing enough 😭
I'm more talking this
boohwahwahwahwatah. It's like when an engine of an old car is just starting
Normally, I believe people consider there to be three RPs. Old/older RP, conservative/traditional RP, and modern RP. Read the section on historical differences here to learn about specific consonant and vowel differences. You won't find any Old RP speakers nowadays. Anyone speaking traditional RP would be styled 'Posh'.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Received_Pronunciation#Historical_variation
“She drinks the milk every day” Is it grammatically correct
Yes, it is
This would be regarding a specific kind of milk. If you wanted to say she drinks milk in general, you would say 'She drinks milk every day'
Yes, the sentence you've written is absolutely correct. 'she drinks the milk every day ' is a grammatically accurate statment that clearly express a daily habit.
Is it worth learning U-RP at all?
If you like how it sounds, sure, why not?
There is nothing that makes standard English dialects 'not worth it'
Learning a low-class or very regional dialect might affect you if you go to work in England, but, when it comes to standard ones, go with whatever you find easiest or like most
I'm just afraid that it won't be taken as a serious conversation witch this accent
Oh yeah, Brits don't actually comment on it. Some Americans might tell you 'Oh, you sound British' (some will think it's a bit fancy). You'll meet the annoying person now and then that will tell you 'Bo'l o' wo'uh' (in imitation of a low-class Londonian accent), but that's a curse of British accents' and not veryyy common 
As long as you're not goingg for Old RP, you'll be fine
if you're going for a hyper-British 1920s TV sort of very affected accent, you will face some comments
This clip you've sent sounds a bit put on, to be fair, but yes, that's Upper RP. It's not very common anymore, but you won't be bothered too much for it, especially considering that most learners go for that accent or a General American sort of accent.
It's really important that the way you do it sounds natural, though. So long as it doesn't sound like a veryyyy affected imitation but like a posh person speaking, you'll be fine
I still only use the official Oxford dictionary
That's why I want to understand the literary version that officially exists in English without those words that don't exist in English, so that everyone can understand me
which official Oxford dictionary?
OALD, most likely
because I would have dared the dude to use the Oxford English Dictionary (OED)
Would you have picked him a tombstone font?
nope
Hi! I’m new here. Please help me with grammar.
Is this sentence correct: I goes to school yesterday?
"I went to school yesterday"
"Went", not "goes".
"Goes" is a conjugated verb, for he/she/it pronouns. "Went" is past tense, used for all pronouns
I wonder how every other sentence was correct-
I have a quandary at hand, dear Anglophones, native and not alike, which greatly bemuses me, and, though I am not well acquainted with the manner wherewith I ought to act in such a place as this and though the social rules and hierarchical complexity of this manor are unknown to me—both facts being due to my not having long ago hence made my arrival here, and, ipso facto, my not having had much time to acclimatise to this place—I find that I simply cannot but urge you with most desperate a plee, kind people, to, through your doubtless greatly esteemed experties upon the subject (which experties are to be expected, as I understand this to be a place of great learning), inform me, perhaps to educate me, as to whether the expression in none but the most spoken of Anglo-Saxon's modern progeniture, which is stated hereunder, is of complete and incontrovertible propriety: 'Can I has a coffee?'
you are banned from our store.
I simply wish to better understand the English tongue :( It was my belief that this was the home of learning, but, alack, oh, ALACK THE DASTARDLY ADVERTISING THAT LIES AS IT EVER HAS, WANTON AS THE DEVIL, it seems I am much mistaken 
You can has coffee (no ‘a’). But it will always be cheeseburger flavoured.
Lmfaoo 😭 😭
Why is ‘went’ correct instead of ‘goes’? Please explain.
Can you explain the difference between ‘goes’ and ‘went’?
Regarding what happened "yesterday", the action is in the past. Verbs change not only for person or number, but time (tense) as well. 'Went' is the past tense of 'go' (any subject). 'Goes' is the present tense for he/she/it (third-person singular subjects). One can say: "I went to school yesterday because I go to school every day."
Thank you! Now I understand.
Can you give me one more example?
For example: I ate dinner yesterday, but I eat dinner every day.
“What is the longest that you've gone without doing laundry?“ I dont understand this question
The word 'but' creates contrast, so it's a little out of place in your example because there is no real contradiction between the two clauses. You can say: "I ate dinner yesterday, but then I eat dinner every day (so it's not surprising, etc.)." Without context for that sentence, you're better off with a conjunction like 'because' or 'as'. One more example: "We don't usually buy souvenirs, but this time we bought some on our way home."
Picture this: The last time you did the laundry was seven days ago. You say to yourself, "Wow, I've just gone a full week without doing the laundry!" So, one week is how long you've gone without doing the laundry. But is it the longest you've ever gone? What about eight days? Nine days? What is the longest? That length of time is what the question is asking.
Yes you can have coffee. If you were german I'd even say "You can become coffee" because that's the proper way of expressing it there
You can also become a cup of coffee
Or "You can plead coffee", as it is the case in polish
Interestingly enough it could mean both that you plead coffee because it is a person and you beg them for something, and it could also mean that you're just asking for some coffee
Hello
Hello, I have a question too. When should I say there is and there are ?
As a b1+ i want to know how to improve my reading get faster, when i try to read faster i'm usually missing the plot and returning back, i can read a page in only 1 and half min
You use there is and there are to say that something exists or is present.
Use there is with singular nouns or uncountable nouns:
There is a cat on the roof.
There is a book on the table.
There is milk in the fridge. (milk = uncountable)
Use there are with plural nouns:
There are two cats on the roof.
There are many books on the table.
There are some people outside.
Ohhh ok tysm I understand it now !
"Goes" is for he/she/it pronouns. For example:
He goes to school
The dog goes inside
And "went" is for past tense. Examples:
I went to the store yesterday
We went to the beach last week
Listen to an audiobook maybe?
It's good to note that this rule is very often broken by native and fluent speakers in informal spoken and written contexts
There is three men at the door.
Is something you may well hear spoken by a native
Ohh ok ty !
hi, someone can explain what is "sup" ? It's like a hi?
It's short for 'what's up'
I believe one is expected to say 'sup' in response
or 'hey' or 'hi' etc
instead of actually saying what's up lol
Yes, it's a greeting short for "What's up". Some common responses are:
- "Sup" in return to simply acknowledge and greet them back
- "Nothing much" if you aren't busy
- "I'm working/I'm studying/I'm at home", to actually answer what you're up to (what you're doing). I usually see the simple progressive -ing form used, so for example: "Sup?" "Studying. You?"
ohh, thank you guys 😄
The Son of God renders praises to his Father for the manifestation of his gracious purpose toward man; but God again declares, that grace cannot be extended toward man without the satisfaction of Divine justice; man hath offended the majesty of God by aspiring to Godhead, and therefore with all his progeny devoted to death must die, unless some one can be found sufficient to answer for his offence, and undergo his punishment.
- Can 'praise' mean 'entreaties' or something of the sort? He gives his father praise instead of begging?
- What does 'purpose' mean here? I understand the meaning of this paragraph generally. I just want to understand the exact meaning of 'purpose' in this sentence and see other examples of this usage.
I would interpret it as follows:
- "Praise" is a synonym for "prayer". There are instances in the Bible where Jesus prays to God to ask him (or plead with him) to show mercy/forgiveness, and this is one of those instances.
- The "purpose" is a reference to the Christian belief that Jesus appeared on earth for the purpose of dying for the sins of mankind, that his death would be a symbolic punishment for all sinning people. The second half of the passage restates that "purpose"! The reader is assumed to know this purpose that Jesus speaks of.
Ah, my many thanks to you! 💜
What is this ?
What are you asking me exactly?
It's an English question
I mean what do u understand from this?
I'm not sure why you're asking me that lol. This isn't an English class. I was just confused about 2 words so I asked a question
The question has been answered, so I think the matter is over
U from UK?
No? Why do you ask?
It's an English question XD
In this context, English questions are questions about the English language and learning it, dear. You've misunderstood (or, more likely, willfully misinterpreted) the purpose of this channel 
Dear? yoo 
Toodles, I won't further entertain you 
Lol
im just messing with u
maybe u wont answer me but for real it was fun me who have a few words messin with u, i wish i were a native speaker XD 
What is toodles 
It means 'goodbye'! It is short for 'toodeloo', which means the same thing but is uncommon nowadays.
It's a very silly sort of word, one used lightheartedly
ohh I see, is that word a C1 level or smth? in which country it is often used?
I am not sure what makes a word a C1 word, so I sadly can't properly answer you on that. The dictionaries I've checked haven't indicated a level either. I would, however, expect all fluent speakers to know it (not to use it, just to know it exists).
It's an old-fashioned word. You might hear it spoken by a silly character from the '20s or so. I personally associate it more with British English than American English (particularly in its full form, 'toodeloo'; that is certainly British). You'd need an American to tell you whether they hear 'toodles' or not.
Perhaps @signal shell could comment on its standing in American English when he awakes, or any other Americans who are available theretofore could
.
Oh okay, thank you so much! You have such an ability to break things down clearly. I'm sorry If I'm wrong but you are a British native speaker, isn't? It is because recently I'm active on discord and trying to use every resource you have here
I'm glad I could help! And, no, I'm not a native speaker; I'm just a British English learner! 💜
Toodles is a cutesy way of saying goodbye. It's too awkward for me to say in real life even as a joke. I can't remember the last time I heard it either.
“Toodles” is not common in American English, but is known and understood to mean goodbye. I only hear it used in movies or on TV shows, as a cheeky or chipper “bye!”
it is usually used differentially, yes
For example, it is used by the character Sharpay in the Disney Channel movie “High School Musical”. Sharpay is a character who performs in theater and musicals, and being exaggerated and dramatic is part of her character
Has anyone here read Cormac McCarthy?
If so, do you like the way he writes dialogue without any punctuation marks? I feel like it helps the writing flow better.
Ohh wow I see, thank you, u are amazing!
Oh that makes sense, thanks
can i ask questions what is the difference bteween miss ms mrs ?
I think it'd be good to mention that you can not really distinguish between an "A1/whatever level word" and a "C1 word" in reality, because when you speak the language you mix all kinds of words into one speech, so common words and rare words are mixed together. you can talk to a nurse and hear "veggies are good for you, and if you don't eat enough you'll feel as if you were malnourished", malnourished may seem advanced to some, but this doesn't matter, it is still used. Or "fatigue" for example, it's used to describe the state of being very tired, and it's used instead of something like "being tired"
just like in books or in any longer speech, especially about more complex topics than maybe making breakfast, rare words and common words are mixed with each other
Miss (used on its own or with a last or first name): Young girl/woman. Or unmarried young girl/woman.
Mrs (used with last name or full name): a married woman.
Ms (used with last name or full name): any woman at all. It's by far the best choice, since it doesn't mark a woman by her martial status
They're pronounced
Mis
Misiz
Miz
For older ladies you can go with 'ma,am' in America and either 'ma'am' or 'madam' in Britain
Don't use 'madam' in America
Some regions of America you shouldn't use 'ma'am' at all
It's often best to simply ask for her preference of honorific (or if she wants you to use one, since they can feel stiff and formal), though it depends on context a lot
say it: lock - luck - look - lack
can anybody help me with this?
Hi
more
lock luck look lack lek lick leak lurk lark like lake

and lawk :p
and what does this means?
exclamation of surprise/other emotion
like saying 'Lord!'
oh nice, thank u!
@boreal ingot Eye me here
giv'us us some hellows
Can anyone tell me if the following sentence is structually sound?
Sentence: **I only heard you shout, "Answer me!" at the end. **
Note: This sentence is supposed to go into a speech bubble in a comic panel.
Thank you! I am a beginner, so your explanation is very helpful.
My name is Ali, and my problem in life is the English language, whether for life or for studying.
I need advice to start my learning journey.
This sentence is correct, but it does feel a little bit awkward without context. At the end of what? Perhaps add that context into the speech: "I only heard you shout, "Answer me!" at the end of the soccer match." or "I only heard you shout, "Answer me!" after I had already started the car.". I think "after" is a good preposition to use here when adding in context!
Thanks, Emily!
Hi guys I'm rajesh english learning beginner person could you teach me
Rajesh,
You should capitalise your name, and the word English, and end a sentence with a full stop or a question mark.
"Hi guys, I'm Rajesh, an English learning beginner person, could you teach me?"
It would be much more naatural to say 'correcting' here, not 'reporting'
I can see why you used 'reporting',b ut 'correcting' is a far better option
The second result is the introduction of a vast number of new words, which the rapid advance in every department of human investigation has rendered necessary. Many of these, to be sure, are nothing but revivals of terms which had previously been brought in during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, but had fallen into disuse; but much the larger proportion of them are entirely new coinages. Especially is this true in the manifold departments of modern science, in which every advance gives birth to a number of hitherto unknown words
- Are natives typically aware of this usage of 'to be sure' as a phrase meaning 'certainly' or 'doubtless'?
- Is this usage old-fashioned, formal, or casual (such that I may hear a native employ it in natural conversation)?
Aware of the phrase in that usage, mostly yes, but not necessarily able to pin it down to its exact meaning.
It would be rare but not unheard of in casual or formal conversation. Probably more likely to come up in a speech or similar.
I felt like a movie quote was affecting my impression of it so I googled it and, yep "A surprise to be sure but a welcome one"
Yes! That is common enough, though it has a somewhat casual tone and is more common in speech. Older folks are more likely to use it than younger folks. Young people would instead say "for sure". Example: "These soda bottles are for sure the same ones that were in the kitchen yesterday!"
It can be used like "surely", but it can also be used to add emphasis, the way "totally" or "definitely" are.
@green seal @waxen cradle, my many thanks to both of you!
Your insights are invaluable
Np. For the record, I'm American.
Hi guys, I wonder is this app a legit?
I just got 424 in the British Council's free Core Skills English test.
I have been using this for a year and I don't know if my English score actually that high. Because I don't even know how to talk properly in English
I want to know where is my skill at now. In exact grade point which is also free
Hello everyone,
I’m looking for a focus group to review my English grammar workbook. If you’re interested in practicing grammar, please DM me — I’ll send you some worksheets and a few questions to get your feedback. It will help me understand how effective the materials are.
Thank you!
I am not in any group but I want to learn. Please send
take everything, then come back
I'm a native so my impression might be skewed but it seemed too easy to truly test up to the levels it claims to. Anyway, there is no speech section so it's incomparable to IELTS and (purely speculating) even a perfect score, while good, would not necessarily indicate a near perfect score on the TOEIC.
So I'm marking my student's work before class. I was thinking about this multiple choice
Choose the word that correctly fills in the blank
I can paint __, but I want to be better than my sister"
a) Nice
b) Good
3. Well.
Student chosen a). But that's wrong. Why is that?
I explained that "Well" is better suited as nice is adjective
yeah it's not an adverb for one. but even in adverb form it's an awkward word to describe skill in painting.
there are cases where it does work like "nicely done" and "nicely handled" though
Man, I hate these gotchas when it comes to getting the students to complete the coursework
because we all know to turn any adjective into an adverb, just suffix that shit wtih "-ly"

unfortunately the reason something doesn't work is often nothing more than people don't say it that way so it sounds weird if you do
I mean, I keep seeing people writing "that" after the subject being a person.
like
I know people that will love to know you
I do not know why they do that
It should be
I know poeple who will love to know you
Ah but it's said enough by natives that it's more or less correct, at least conversationally
because repetition is the essence of vernacular
fucking apparently
they got irregardless in the dictionary so what can you do
Legally smack my C level students across the face with their B-level grammar textbooks
lol. if you have to grade on prescriptive grammar I feel bad for you but I suppose it is what it is.
Obligatory fuck my education system
Like this question:
Could you please turn (blank) the volume? I'd like to listen to the news
the choices were
a) up
b) out
c) on
Now the curriculum says it's A, but there's fuck all context to indicate whether the volume was muted

So I'm sitting here agonising over whether to complain to my boss to please ease up on the rigid adherence to the curriculum
up is the correct answer. But if the volume was muted, then c) is also correct
... I hate by-the-book English teaching
Oh got it, that definitely makes sense, it also happens with every language I thinks so, thank you for explaining me! 
quick question are those audios made by you? or do you get them from another source?
she spoke them. I know her.
deedee is not lying, I trust all vietnamese
lmao
meow meow
nya
you're assigned the role of teacher here
you're supposed to know this
at level C2, would one be able to perfect a TOEIC (L&R) sitting anyway :'D
Look, I'm not going to come on here and claim that I'm the master of the language's grammar. I'm conversational English
I teach mainly conversational English
grammar ain't the point
the point is that you didn't understand how language worked
conversational English will change with the time
"repetition is the essence of vernacular" is correct; that's the point
"fucking apparently" isn't the best response to a fundamental language fact

I guess sarcasm and facetiousness is hard to see in text
Yes, it's often implied than stated
if that was sarcasm, your core facts were very off
if that wasn't sarcasm, you learnt late - too late
:)
I like how you tacked on "very" like you trying to antagonise me
How about you don't
Are you this insufferable with your teachers at school
Or do you keep your mouth shut like you're supposed to because you know that your ass would get thrown out @rapid bison
no, because they are more decent than you will ever be 😭
I am overqualified for, making me exempt from, those classes; thank you
Not sure if I'm supposed to tell a teacher to calm down
No i should
Im just exhausted from work today
Please do not insult anyone here
Then please head to #💭|general or #🫂|beginner-chat
and help the beginners there
I apologise Dee
just to contextualize, I had to be here to make sure a teacher of current English remembers how a human language evolves
this is #📚|english-questions, anyway; it's fascinating, and it helps with learning
dw, Chris; I apologize too for basically launching an all-out attack
I'll strive to be better
same - hopefully
please do study a little (more) linguistics though; it will help you in understanding how words came to be
I swear that it helps
meow
nyaaaa~
Is there anyone want to be an English teacher to teach Chinese children on the internet?
I recorded them. Why do you ask?
💔 not 'irregardless', it pains me
I was just curious 
Don't just throw semicolons around
A full stop would have worked there!!!
two commas 😭
I take pride on being able to use semicolons ;)
(I do not care if I worded any message awkwardly; the point is that I will keep on using semicolons nyeheheh)
I mean, one oughtn't to overuse them :3 But I understand taking pride in being able to use them at all lol
I do like the comma-offset 'making me ...' phrase there, though. It's a very nice touch. Perhaps it would do woth having some sort of linking conjunctive adverb or something of the sort before it.
I am overqualified for, and, therefore, am exempt from, those classes. Thank you.
That flows a bit better and clearly marks the logical connection
it's easier to use than commas, mind you ☕
Indeed lol. Commas are a mess
I like the phrase in general; offseting the entire thing might be better than overusing commas here xP
Meowwwww :3
three cats.
True, while each comma I used has a reason for its being there, it does feel a bit heavy to use that many
A good balance must be struck with commas
the first comma in this message I'm replying to should have been a semicolon/full stop 😭
(see: I'm obsessed w/ them for all the wrong reasons)
Rawrr :ɔ̯
<3
I don't believe so? 'True' there is the sort of parenthetical comment that one would offset with commas, no? I should love to know the reason for using a semicolon there. 'True' isn't an independent clause. I suppose one could view it as an elliptical form of 'that is true'; in which case, I would agree to a full stop or semicolon. However, I don't think most conceptualise that usage of 'true' in such a manner.
nope; I really think it can even validly stand as, and should stand as, a separate sentence ☕
...so I just realized that it (= mine) would strike down "no, it's not acceptable"; I am forced to concede this point
ignore suggestion, thank you!
Hmm, they almost seem like interjections. Would you put a semicolon after 'hello'?
yes.
I'm curious whether you're going by any authority's dictum or by intuition
I believe I intuited that 😭

I simply was curious if there was a prescription regarding the use of semicolons of which I wasn't aware
At the end of the day, punctuation exists to improve flow
Use it in such a manner as you find attains that goal
nya
Nyaaa
meow
What does offseting mean 
It can mean to counteract a force by using an opposite force. For example:
The increase in hourly wages may offset the decrease in hours of labour.
Here, the increase acts against the decrease, resulting in a balance
kinda unrealistic example lmfao
in this capitalism it would be more like
the decrease in hourly wages may offset the decrease in hours of labour
The way DeeDee and I were using it means basically to make something be out of line. If everything is in a particular order and you offset something, that means you 'shift' that something by some amount so that you break this order
Generally used to describe a positive thing making what would otherwise be a negative thing neutral


