#📚|english-questions
1 messages · Page 113 of 1
do you guys know where i can find help for my final essay its worth 60% of my grade
since it's scored,
it's your job to do your essay 😔
wdym
i just want help starting on it
just getting the information and doing my rough draft
Please bear in mind that this channel is NOT meant for answering your homework, exams, etc. This channel is not for cheating!
thats cheating?
in other words, wrong channel
#💭|general >:3
thx
hmmm
I love you too if that's what you're saying
hehe <3
they only asked for help, not for us to do it lol
thas like me coming to you and saying 'do you know how to start an essay about the current situation in the middle east? like what do I say (btw do you have any good sources?)'
Iss jus asking for advice
And writing essays is an English-related thing
don't talk about the score is what I mean xP
why is mentioning the score wrong?
hard to help™️
But there is semicolon in ur example
oh yea, i found another one on "modern usage"
In old times they used semicolons when they wanted to seperate long sentences
They often repalced commas with semicolons
but the idea is the same
it could be commas and have the same meaning
The wiki page has some other examples though
From the Wiki page
"They crossed the river under a white quartermoon naked and pale and thin atop their horses. They'd stuffed their boots upside down into their jeans and stuffed their shirts and jackets after along with their warbags of shaving gear and ammunition and they belted the jeans shut at the waist and tied the legs loosely about their necks and dressed only in their hats they led the horses out onto the gravel spit and loosed the girthstraps and mounted and put the horses into the water with their naked heels." (Cormac McCarthy, All the Pretty Horses, 1992)
dadawda
Anybody to chat?
Veryyy very shocked/suprised/confused
If I have to make them an one vocabulary, what would it be??
Among us ?
'flabbergasted' is strong enough not to need the adverbs you've used
And the way you've used them feels off
It's best just to say 'flabbergasted'
yea exactly
I was trying to be nice about it but really the adverbs made no sense 😅
oo yea
yea, some indian meme: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Dze7pcpWnrM?feature=share
.
ig it can kinda mean 'extremely' but 'drastically sad' sounds so odd
I just asked a simple question and you guys mixed up with confusion elements....
Out.
'Overly, extra, confused and surprised' basically.
Hey, I wouldn’t mind mass pinging me
A corpulent, pouch-mouthed person
Is the comma necessary here? Would I need to use a comma if I used "pouch-mouthed" first and "corpulent" second?
It doesn't matter how you flip them, you're separating two coordinate adjectives that modify a noun
Think of it like "A corpulent and pouch-mouthed person"
The comma is just there instead of the and
in some anterior time, the burial mound was desecrated, and its jeweled contents were taken away
or
in some anterior time, the burial mound had been desecrated, and its jeweled contents were taken away
can someone explain which one is correct and why it is correct!
the swim you took must have addled your brain more than i thought
or
the swim you took must have addled your brains more than i thought
the second one is correct. "Had been" (this is past perfect) refers to something that had happened before something else happened
so "had happened/been/eaten/done etc" means this thing is first, and "happened/was/did etc" means this thing happened later
Before I stopped eating pizza, I had eaten a huge slice of it
"had eaten" was first
"stopped" was later
got it, thanks for the explanation.
what about the second one!
the first option, "brains" is very informal, "brain" (brains in plural) is correct
first option is brain and second one is brains
alright, I'd just use brain
gpt and the answer in the solution part says that brains is more fitted to give this phrase an idiomatic vibe and some other ai bot is saying first one is correct as you is singular so brain should be used as a singular
I would not worry about it so much, if I were you. Just remember that "brain" is the normal word, and "brains" is this more informal one
i see, ok.. thanks again.
and "brains" can also be used when there are many brains. I have one brain, you have another one, and together we have 2 brains
same as cat cats
ohhh, ok.
Oh, alright. Thank you very much
@serene plinth
@flat rune ???
yes!
What's the reason for this very random remark?
oh
I wanted to express that i could take a kid on in a fight
is that a problem?
hello
Yes
oh im sorry
- This is the English questions channel. Your remark was very out of place
- Talking about beating a kid lowkey crosses the line. Talking about violence against a kid is against server rules
What’s the difference between he has lost his keys and he has lost his keys by now? Does the first one mean he has lost his keys before in unspecified time and it has a result now what about the second one? It happened for this moment?
Adding "by now" implies a sense of expectation or time progression. It depends a lot on context and what you want to emphasize to know when to use it.
I usually use when I am almost sure something has happened because time has passed
I’m sorry, come again? It means that smth has already happened for this moment?
think of this: your friend went out for lunch and now it is 20 oclock, it is very late. You can say: "he should be back" or you can say "he should be back by now". We usually use the second because a lot of time has passed and we want to make that information clear.
we basically want to draw attention to how much time passed
I don't know if this is the right place to ask this, but I just wanted to hear your thoughts on my reddit username: "Tarbean_citzen". What do y'all think of it? English is obviously not my first language, so I don't really know if that usernam sounds cool to other people. Tarbean is a fictional city from a fantasy book by the way
I was going to use Coriolanus_Snow but it was already taken
which is a name from the Hunger games books
I like Tarbean_citizen! That sounds like a cool name, and it sounds natural.
thanks!
the book where the city comes from is great too . It's called The Name of the Wind. Basically a mix of harry potter, lord of the rings and game of thrones
?t
What were you completely certain of until you found out you were wrong?
?t
Where is the most awe-inspiring place you have been?
?t
What’s something that everyone agrees we should change, but somehow it never changes?
?t
When do you want to retire? What do you want to do when you retire?
?t
What is the worst restaurant you have ever eaten at?
?t
What would be some of the downsides of certain superpowers?
@fierce swift you prolly wanna disallow people from using that command in here ^
this is practically spamming a learning channel
?t
Do you like going to concerts? Why or why not? What was the last concert you went to?
Good afternoon
something feels funny here and I don't know what lmao
what about we do "With regard to the carnivores, the bite mark pattern is consistent with a large animal, likely a feline, and not a canine for the reasons..."
Should be is instead of are
Hein
Hein?
wdym by "should be is not"?
Should be [is] instead of [are]
why would you even use should there?
????
Because... that's how the English language works? (It) should be y instead of X
I cant explain why, it just is
You wanted to use "likely a feline and should be is not canine.."? @buoyant thicket
No?
.
I still have no idea what you are tryna imply
The bite mark pattern is consistent with a large animal, likely a feline and is not canine for the reasons described above
You could even remove are completely
The bite mark pattern is consistent with a large animal, likely a feline and not canine for the reasons described above
That's because you don't speak English that well yet, I'm a bad teacher though so if you want a proper explanation I recommend contacting one of the teachers
well, I think it should be "a canine"
if you are not using canine as an adjective
yea, I agree with that
Canine here is an adjective
Of the canine family
and in which sense is "feline" being used?
Of the feline family, Lion, cat, etc.
That's a better way of explaining it, I didn't know what to say besides, that's just how it works
Why do people use the white thumbs up emoji
I dont get it
The yellow one is just as good at conveying a virtual thumbs up
The person using the thumbs up is probably a white skin tone
I know plenty of people that use the black thumbs up
Yeah but so am I, I don't go out advertising that
Yeah cause they have a reason to
That’s like saying I speak English but I don’t advertise it
💀
No because speaking English is a good thing, feeling the need to mention you are white usually isn't a good thing
Just let the member use the thumbs up without being offended for something that isn’t effecting you
I'm not offended
Don’t act offended then
I'm not!
If you have nothing good to say then keep your fingers off your keyboard
I was just asking a question...
A question that turns into a flawed idea
All the more reason to ask the question?
👍🏻
I was just curious why and asked, didn't mean to judge or offend anyone
You could use tone tags if this happens often
👍🏻
I'm Asian. I can't be racist
Lmfao
I think they need
- 'to' after 'regard'
- Comma after 'feline'
- 'is' instead of 'are', as you've noted
No idea why they'd use 'are'. They might have made the verb agree with the number in their head. Kinda like saying, 'The band are dying one by one' or even 'The group were amazing'; the nouns are singular, but the verbs are plural regardless cuz the speaker thinks of the singular nouns as referring to plural things. It's called notional agreement (the verb is agreeing with the notion the speaker has rather than with the syntax of the sentence). It's more common in British English than American English, and, upon checking the link you've sent, the researchers seem to be British and Irish (idk how common notional agreement is in Hiberno-English, though), so that could be why.
In this case, it feels very odd cuz 'pattern' isn't really one of those collective nouns you would regard as having a plural referent, afaik, so it might be that they were thinking 'the bites … are not canine (in pattern)' in their mind since it's a bit of a long sentence that can get you confused
This is written strangely. I don't know the rules specifically but I would write it this way "With regard to carnivores, the bite mark pattern is consistent with a large animal, likely a feline, and is not canine for the reasons described above and in the referenced publications"
Most important for me is 'is' VS 'and' and parenthetical commas to add a statement mid sentence
I would personally split this into two sentences since it feels a bit long winded
I'm missing a little context that may help flow but something like this: "With regard to carnivores, the bite mark pattern is consistent with a large animal, likely a feline. These marks do not indicate a canine bite for the reasons described above and in the referenced publications."
This way we're relying on whole statements instead of commas
I feel like this is good but it should be 'is consistent with that of a large animal'
otherwise yea
I am searching for a partner to practice speaking for ielts ( write me in DM)
Heeey
Why not here?

hiyya judas :>
Hello
English question I has:
Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful.
What does it mean to walk in counsel? 'Counsel' is advice, so what is the meaning of not walking in the advice of someone
Not being influenced by advice
Basically advocating for a person not to take the advice of bad people, not to put themselves in a position to encounter them, and not to hang out with them.
Don't be influenced by them and don't partake in their activities
You'll be happy in life if you avoid all these things
yea I got the gist of it but I was more wondering about the phrasing 'walk in counsel'
Is this a metaphor?
Or some usages of 'walk'?
It's like a metaphor ig. Basically, walking is going about life, doing things, making decisions.
Kinda like "walking in the footsteps of my father"
Hmm, thank you
Do you make someone your betrothed or take someone as your betrothed?
Or do you have someone as your betrothed?
Will you make me your betrothed?
Will you take me as your betrothed?
Will you have me as your betrothed?
Guys, is this sentence right?
• They went to the beach with some friends of theirs
Sounds good to me 👍
Hi everybody. What's good?
I have a question.
For you guys, especially native speakers, when someone says:
I saw a movie.
Does it sound incomplete to you?
I know it can be understood without trouble, but do you expect the person to tell when or is it just right?
For example:
I saw a movie last week.
I saw a movie yesterday.
Yeah, that sort of sentence would be rather bland without more context. But if the conversation was something like this:
"What did you do yesterday?"
"I saw a movie."
This would be perfectly fine.
I rarely use this phrase alone. If it's in conversation and it's relevant I'll say "I saw a movie where the main character does this". If I want them to know that I saw a movie and it's about my experience, I'll say "I saw a movie the other day about [topic] And I really enjoyed it"
is this bible verse?
Hi, advanced english speaker and native
I need your answer for this True or False game. I have the answer key but somehow its different with my answer and chatgpt
F
T
T
F
F
Oops. Forgot to ping
I need 2 more @boreal ingot
Am I not good enough 😔
hehehe
Not like that, I need to collect whether my understanding is correct or not
I'm confused
Ben asked Jen to marry him on January 1.
- It is asking date or marrying date
Ben fell in love with Jen a few days.
- A few days later means how many?
A couple of years later they had their first child.
- A couple of years, how many?
-
Asking date. She said no here
-
Doesn't matter, because "a few" means at least 2 days, and that's all you really need to know to answer
-
"A couple" usually means 2. But I'm pretty sure it can be used to mean 2+ too
Here it just means 2 though
-
my first understanding "Ben want the wedding date on Jan 1
-
Suppose, today is 15. A few days later, means 17 18, etc?
-
ok
-
Yes. But even if she said yes the first time, they probably wouldn't organize the wedding on the same day
-
Yes
-
Yes
Why number 5 if false
First met 2009. Ben asked to marry in January, so it's 2010. She said yes in March, and they got married within the same year. A couple (2) years later, they had a child. It's 2012, not 2013
you said 2+ is also fine
I also said this
How come
If it doesn't seem clear if they mean 2 or 2+, just assume it's 2
If it's 2+, they will have to tell you clearly
ok
Don't overthink it
so dfault
a couple of means 2
what about
Yes
Ben asked Jen to marry him on January 1.
Only one sentence and am I wrong if I interpret it as
The wedding date on Jan 1?
Yes
Asking to marry is not the same as having a wedding
Why would you have the wedding ready before you even know if they'll say yes or mo
I know, but what I read is
Ben wanna marry Jen on 1 Jan.
What the sentence would be if Ben wanna marry Jen on 1
Yeah I kinda see what you mean lol
Exactly the same. I guess it can be a little confusing, but based on the following sentences, you can guess it doesn't mean that
Also, it would be strange to ask someone to marry you on a specific date
Usually you just ask if they wanna marry you or not
In some culture it is actually fine
Yea, the way I interpret is like this. So yea, if it is only one sentence then the sentence has 2 meanings, but if we try to read whole para then, "asking on 1 Jan" is the one which make sense
F
T
F
F
F
May I ask where they said 'March'? Or are you interpreting 'a couple' as 'two? Kim
@flat rune
Yes I did
Kim's answer also the same as the answer key
I believe that, formally, "couple" strictly means 2 or a pair. But people often use it informally to mean "2 or a bit more than that"
@flat rune @supple holly @boreal ingot
Yeah yeah that's how I've always used it too. Was surprised when I found out some people only use it to mean 2
Thanks m'lord
Thanks Mr Ross 💜
What's archaic? 'Couple' meaning 'two'?
'I saw a couple' will always mean 2 though
I suppose 'I saw a couple of [x]' will always mean 3 or more
Yeah I see what you mean no
yeah, what you described was actually my first understanding of this
Can't we say 'we walked down the street in couples'
no romance there
just pairs of two walking down the street
the last one is T as hell
the answer key doesn't understand the text lol
ah cuz two
yeah this logic lol. I'd never understand it this way
my logic would be 2009 -> 2010 in january, a couple of years later, so they got their first child in 2013/14/15/16/17/18
Maybe it is you who is T as hell
T as in Tripping
greedy pairing and cross-the-floor pairing
no idea
I've been able to find some examples of 'in couples' meaning 'in pairs/two by two' but yeah not very common at all
thanks lol I assume u hate dancing xD
is zipping supposed to be meaningful or merely random ?
lmao. Okay, alright, I am T as hell. I am T as in tipping, cuz I wanna tip you to become a cute trans girlie
Go DMs for that. Freakazoid
I love your bedroom talk baby
What about open circuits is bothering you here? Am I missing something?
yup, I the text book Im learning says the same
A couple means 2
It published recently tho
Yeah I don't really know the answer to that, but I can't put my finger on how "open circuits" is even remotely related to the question.
Right, an open circuit can be interpreted in a couple ways. It's either a type of fault in a circuit, or it's an intentional temporary break in what would normally be a completed circuit.
In the case of open circuit, it's just an oxymoron
Okay sure, I guess I can see that
I do also notice another word acting similar to "office". Maybe it can help you sort this out. The word "position" can refer to both a job and a place
Idk what you mean by municipal lead exposure
I don't know if it's IQ, but certainly some difference of perspective and frequent exposure to a particular usage of the word
I could see "party" evolving in such a way: a group of people often get together for the purpose of hanging out and celebrating, and perhaps they don't get together for any other purpose. The gathering together becomes a particular type of event. They go from "forming a party" to "having a party".
for office. Many government jobs have a specific building, or room in a building, where the elected official carries out much of their work. So holding the job becomes synonymous with holding that building, or room.
I threw in the word "elected" unnecessarily there but I think the point is still clear lol
In my mind, an open circuit is where there is no path for electrons to flow, and a closed circuit is where there is a path for electrons to flow.
And that's true whether the path, or lack thereof, is intentional or not
Okay, yeah, I'll try to focus on what you are trying to say
Yes, for someone unfamiliar, I can see that a circuit is synonymous with the intended design of the electrical system, which typically features a closed loop path for electrons to flow
I don't know what your obsession with IQ is, but in practice nobody cares and people misshape/dumb down the language a lot, or misuse words, just cuz they're lazy. Even when they are intelligent
yeah am so sorry for having a sense of humour towards a person I know
my apologies
gonna kneel in front of you
lmao
lmfao
Yeah, I agree with riidefi, that sort of comment is inappropriate in this chat, and the earlier advice to take it to DMs was much warranted
It's not the comment itself that was problematic, it's the environment in which you said it.
thank you I appreciate it
True. Gives off a certain vibe that is also fairly inappropriate
I'm avoiding using a specific word, so that I myself don't arguably cross a line
Legal briefings are truly thrilling reads
I do actually appreciate the language employed in such writing tbh
I think I've heard of such a thing
There's a process of understanding where you first interpret all of the information, then simplify the facts down to their simplest form. This reminds me of that concept. I think that's also essentially how words develop. Simplifying ideas down to simple pieces for the sake of communicating quickly
I've noticed often words are redefined depending on their context. I would love it if all words had strict definitions but I don't think it's possible
should I continue this book or not? whats ur suggestion? I have learned 321pages out of 500 more or less
Im afraid Im learning the wrong book
its just basic grammar book. what does it mean by pedagogy?
I mean, you ve been learning English more than I do. And you know English well for basic writing
Its okay then. Thankyou
I don't see much reason yet to abandon the book entirely. But perhaps take the information with a grain of salt. It may be omitting important senses of many words. Try to learn from multiple sources. A single source may have its faults, but you can usually cover those gaps with multiple sources.
Pedagogy is a system of practices and strategies used in teaching
Professional teachers are often trained in pedagogy so that they are equipped to deliver lessons to their students in an effective manner
By responding to your question in that way, she was saying that she isn't familiar enough with effective teaching strategies to know whether or not that book will be an effective way for you to learn English.
totally not me looking at "an odd number [...] remain" and thinking that (odd number) - 2 = (odd number):
Yeah, probably should have been phrased as, until 1 or 0 remain
Good catch
What does "he had no hustle at all" mean
admitting two at a time, pairing them, until you can't?
can I have the context?
I asked the woman next to me when her stop was
she said the one that was coming up
I get up and say we're here (she had no hustle at all)
She was in no hurry?
Yes
I'm not following... Mean what as remainder?
Hamlet, definitely
THANK YOU MY BRO
❤️
Does anyone else have an opinion?
Why would you say it is more famous?
@unborn walrus
Shakespeare is huge in the English speaking world
And huge in the non-english speaking world, too
@unborn walrus
One person's opinion.
Mine and his.
Lol
Dostoevsky is, no doubt, beloved in Russia
But even there, I would not be surprised if Hamlet is slightly more famous
What shall I do to improve my spelling
English spelling does not make sense at all
Read and write more
tysm
Hamlet. I feel like it's talked about and referenced more often.
Practice practice practice. Learn the usual patterns and then learn the exceptions to those patterns
Prolly Hamlet
I hadn't heard of Crime and Punishment 'till two weeks ago or so, and not of Dostoevsky 'till about two months ago, whereas it feels as though I've known of Hamlet and Shakespeare my entire life
Should this end in a question mark or full stop?
I don't suppose you've any English questions I could answer?
It feels like a question, really, but it's not structured like one
I'd say definitely Crime and Punishment, here in Poland people study it in highschools
Dostoevsky is so iconic and known
"Hamlet" sounds pathetic and unknown lol
And Shakespeare didn't even live, it's literally a person who was created by many writers
not a real human
typical boohwawatah moment
That's a new word
Yeah, I suppose in the Slavosphere Dostoevsky would be more known
I didn't doubt that
That's a new word
Idk really. You could go either way and I'd treat it the same
Do you know what Black Cat means by Shakespeare being made up?
I've heard some people say that Shakespeare wasn't a real person
Is there some conspiracy abot him
I don't know if that's true
lmao 😭
They say it was more like a group of people writing plays under that name
I wonder if any reputable literary figures or historians supported the idea
Interesting
Like in a formal context which would you use?
Probably a full stop
Or do you feel there is a difference in meaning? Perhaps 'I don't suppose you've any English questions I could answer?' is a request while 'I don't suppose you've any English questions I could answer.' is a guess?
But ask me again tomorrow and I might change my mind
alrighty
Do you actually want me to ask again tomorrow?
That's not necessary lol
It was a rhetorical request to emphasize just how much I feel on the fence
ohhh
oki
thank you
It's a question - although you clearly DO suppose there are questions to be answered you put it in a way as to appear ignorant of that fact and needing to be put right.
As such, I should use a question mark, yes?
Yes
Many thanks! 
Your welcome
what I mean is that as far as I know, there is no direct evidence that this was a single guy, people speculate he was staged and there were many writers instead
I think it's not like it is confirmed, people dont even know if he was real or not. But assume he was. But then they have evidence that it's possible he wasn't
Eh I'll go with the common narrative
Is that your question in excel format
yea, whys not " the chemistry class" as well?
It's similar to the difference between "I'm at the work" VS "I'm at work."
It's considered more of an activity or a state of being. "I'm currently in chemistry class" , as in I'm participating in the chemistry class
Ive only used 'the' when I've mentioned the class before.
"I had this chemistry class... She was in the chemistry class*
Hey everybody. I was reading a post, and a person wrote this:
There are a lot of books and guides out there which can you give information about writing, but those are** only so useful**.
I searched for the meaning of only so on Google but found nothing.
I only found the idiom only so much/many, which makes sense in this context. But, as you can see, this sentence has no much or many.
Is that right? Is it just an informal way of using this idiom?
Ohh or they were in the chemistry classroom. So it's a place instead of the activity
Yes! It's the same as only so much but "useful" is the thing that is limited
It's saying there's a limit to how useful books and guides are. This implies there's learning that comes from things like practice. Like what you're doing now
'Only so much usefulness' is harder to say, that may be why it got shortened
Ok
- It means "in chemistry class" here means the activity in a room
- But work is not a room, so it can't be equal with "class"
Im still confused
What's state of being?
state of being, the way something is right now, the way something looks/behaves right now
I'm having a conversation and I'm in conversation are the same
If I'm working I'm at work. If I'm in a classroom I'm in class (general), in a class (specific class), or at the class (less common). I'm not sure if there's a specific rule to this.
Which is the correct reflexive pronoun for singular they?
Themself or Themselves
@raven kite, both are acceptable :)
I agree it’s hamlet
It’s generally agreed that Shakespeare was a real person & just one person 😭
Also he WASNT a girl either
Both are fine, but some people (like me) make a distinction where when it's singular you use 'themself' and when it's plural you use 'themselves'
Formally people might be against 'Themself'
what do you mean lol. Nope it's not
It is!! Leading Shakespeare experts & institutions generally agree
I haven’t looked at direct primary evidence but I’m sure there’s a lot
maybe am just drunk then. Shakespeare please hear me from your grave
Like in all of the Folger Library’s Shakespeare pieces in their introduction they always provide a rebukes to those conspiracy theories
You can visit him at Westminster abbey
there are experts only for this specific topic? literally only about him?
greatest literary diva of all time ong 😛
yes because Shakespeare is a titan
I want to have experts who just research me
There are people — more than any other author — dedicated to studying Shakespeare
And whole institutions primarily dedicated to Shakespeare
Ong me too
There’s a reason he’s “not of an era, but for all time.”
systemic - relating to a system as a whole
systematic - like a system in how one acts/how something is carried out
Is this correct?
should be
the same pattern occurs in my native
systemic - systemowy (about the system), systematic - systematyczny (carried out according to some system, frequent)
quite similar
Black cat you are a gift from the gods
thank you

Yes for example a systemic approach could be applying procedures and rules to a system. A systematic approach is following a process or system, and it has an implied meaning that you're being thorough or technical
Hi. Are these two sentences equally correct?
(1) John's idea is better.
(2) It's better John's idea.
The first one sounds nicer, but I was wondering if the second structure is allowed in informal speech
If you put a comma in the second it could work informally
It's better, John's idea.
Yeah, that one's better, John's idea
It's pretty informal though
It's like adding on what you mean as a clarification after the fact
Makes sense, thank you!
After three years' hard study, he gained his ( ) in psychometrics.
A. warrant B. degree C. diploma D. certificate
Which one is the correct answer? I'm thinking B but the answer key says C.
Degree is 4 years right?
Diploma is less than 4 years. I studied 2 yrs Information Tech. That's why my course says Diploma in Information Technology.
it all depends on the country
I'd go with B
some odd intuition would suggest me that "a degree in something" but "something diploma"
a degree in psychometrics, but a psychometrics diploma
but idk. For me B
maybe that's not really useful to think about it this way, cuz I could as well just say "psychometrics degree" and then it also works
Guys what does sybau mean?
shut your bit... a... up
?def sybau
:x: That word could not be found in the dictionary.
“Shut your bitch ass up.” …. I think…
An impolite way of saying “be quiet.”
Are here somebody help me to learn English 🪐
This voice channel is currently active if you’d like to participate!
https://discord.com/channels/801609515391778826/1307419499171155968
hi what does type shi means ?
Apparently it's new slang meaning "really cool"
oh thanks thought it meant smth like say less or say nothing
They might have been using it sarcastically
Let’s say your friend is babbling and you aren’t paying attention. You don’t really care what they are saying, but when they are finished talking, you say “type shiiiii-“ to say that you heard understand their statement.
Hello what is the difference for these words? Lean, tilt, bank, lift?
Hello what is the difference for these words? Lean, tilt, bank, list?
reading can be a significant factor for improvement of english written skill?
Yes
?def lean
Definition 1 (adjective): lacking excess flesh
Definition 2 (noun): the property possessed by a line or surface that departs from the vertical
Definition 3 (adjective): containing little excess
Other definitions can be found here
?def tilt
Definition 1 (noun): a combat between two mounted knights tilting against each other with blunted lances
Definition 2 (verb): move sideways or in an unsteady way
Definition 3 (noun): pitching dangerously to one side
Other definitions can be found here
?def bank
Definition 1 (noun): a financial institution that accepts deposits and channels the money into lending activities
Definition 2 (verb): have faith or confidence in
Definition 3 (verb): put into a bank account
Other definitions can be found here
?def lift
Definition 1 (noun): lifting device consisting of a platform or cage that is raised and lowered mechanically in a vertical shaft in order to move people from one floor to another in a building
Definition 2 (verb): raise or haul up with or as if with mechanical help
Definition 3 (noun): the act of raising something
Other definitions can be found here
I think all four words mean the same meaning
Unit 4 is listing on the left side
Unit 4 Iis banking on left side
Unit 4 is banking on left side
I'd say lean is more neutral than tilt. Lean makes me think of someone or something slowly bending in one direction, without any implied immediate danger. On the other hand tilt invokes an image of a much more precarious situation where the object or person is dangerously bending in a direction, almost about to fall, very unsteady.
As for the other two. I have no idea how they compare. Maybe there are senses I'm not aware of for them
what if we do "lean against the wall" vs "tilt against the wall"
the second feels odd to me
I can tilt my head, but I think I have never seen "tilting against something"
these do not feel the same
the usage just feels different, even if the meanings are very close
Advanced and native English speaker, why 'won't' is incorrect?
When Tanya comes, she ...... see the cake right away.
a. won't
b. will
c. isn't going to
I answered won't because I thought:
Suppose, my family make a birthday party for Tanya and we hide the cake from Tanya
ok, never mind. It's already answered. thanks
Which word is best to use
Depends on the context
I writed my sentence above
There is a problem with Unit 4 it is small leaning right
There is a problem with Unit 4 it is small tilting right
There is a problem with Unit 4 it is small listing right
There is a problem with Unit 4 it is small banking right
yea true
no idea tbh lol
Do you mean politically?
If so you always use 'leaning' in that case
'right-leaning' and 'left-leaning'
Also, you wouldn't use 'small' there; you'd use 'slightly'
Unit 4 is slightly left leaning
that works
as long as you mean in its political content
It is container for alcohol brewing
ohh interesting
So... boats list, buildings lean, roads bank, and heads tilt
cause of the number of synonyms?
@cloud onyx
Read above
You'll probably want to use "lean" if I understand your statement correctly
as I told them 
Thank you
Yeah, but this almost certainly wasn't a political statement
hmm, if Unit 4 is right leaning in content, I'd take that as meaning it has right ideology expressed in it
Could you explain to me what other interpretations there are
The building itself is leaning in a slanted position
But they said 'Unit 4' ^
what could that have meant?
Considering how they were comparing with the other synonyms, I'd be willing to bet this is the correct interpretation
Is 'Unit 4' a term related to buildings?
Yeah, it's not uncommon for a sequence of buildings or apartments to be labeled as numbered units
ah I see
That makes sense
I thought they were discussing a textbook split up into units
It is one of our fermenters
I need help...
What is the difference between v. And vs, where should they be used?
@signal shell sorry for the ping 🙏🏻
What does "an errant bottle of water" mean
could anyone review my essay?
put it in #📝|proofreading
yep i have
An adventurous bottle of water - Kaloko
I still don't get it
?def errant
Definition 1 (adjective): straying from the right course or from accepted standards
Definition 2 (adjective): uncontrolled motion that is irregular or unpredictable
I'm not sure what the context is, but in this case I would take it to mean that the water bottle was out of place
As in, it's not where it should be
@hidden siren you being a judge could help me with this better. It would be wonderful if you could assist me on this.. thankyou in advance !!
I'll add that 'v.' is also used for sports
More than 'vs.' is
I think it's more
There might be an American vs. British difference here, also
This one contradicts me on the sports thing, but backs up the other person's claim about 'v.' being more legal:
And also tells us about a useful unrelated one, 'v.s.' (now rare)
Often the final full stop is dropped in British English, also
just like in 'Mrs' and 'Dr'
America vs Britain
America v Britain
I'd say that vs. is more common in sports
Idk. Just feels so
fuck off mate
the most British is complete mayhem in London, thieves everywhere, and islamists running around with knives
(some tiny whiny baby will get angry and report me for this, and I don't even know who yet)
Ah I see
very curious
very interesting
indeed
(I have no idea what you're talking about but yes)
don't dive into it, you're blessed to not know it then
I would say that v. is used more for legal documentation, and vs is used more in games and sports
But yeah I guess it's regional. I don't know.
I had the impression that 'v' was more gaming/sports, if that counts
In the USA, at least I can support that "v." is used greatly in the legal system
Finding an example in games is more challenging but I found this
Then, there is v/s. Though, never seen on any document or anything. But i have seen many people using it on casual notes or used in the media like movie names or shows etc.
Obviously, i should have given the context with my doubt for more clarity. So sorry for keeping my question a bit vague and very open. But, the reason for my confusion was because I'm giving a screening exam for civil services in my country. Which consists of a small portion of law related topics.
So, while mentioning an important judgement i was a bit confused on whether i should use vs., v. Or v/s.
Thankyou @signal shell and @boreal ingot for assisting me. If there is something that I should know more about, please do let me know.
Again, thankyou !!
I don't know if I've ever encountered that one tbh
Abbreviations other than v.?
I mean the "v/s" thing
In law, I've only ever seen "v."
In games, maybe both "v." and "vs."
I would advise you to follow what you see other documents following
I have also never seen 'v/s', what does it mean?
It means versus. I have seen people using it casually on their notes. But, yes.. never seen elsewhere
@boreal ingot Well, that's what I'm seeing on law related document/writings. Probably, i should stick with it !!
👆🏻 a perfect example of v/s 🤷🏻♂️
hm
ah got it
Well, Scella and Mr. Ross beautifully explained it in detail. I'll stick with v.
One thing both agreed on is that, v. Is more appropriate for legal related stuff.
every form is acceptable, anyway 😎
hm
No, I don't agree with that. V/s is not a correct abbreviation. Yes, it is used casually but it's not correct.
According to Mr. Ross and Scella.. v. And vs both seems to be right but v. Is used more in legal documents.
Scella gave even deeper insight on full stop.
According to her, full stop is dropped in British english just like 'Mrs' and 'Dr'
I am glad to have been able to help you. You may ping me for any further enquiries, though I may be unable to answer depending on the question
Nope, bad DeeDee
HI SCELLY

are you
sure
Out
Yes
death.
Killed by whom I love, how poetic
Why?
Well, it was a great help. And I am really thankful for that.
Thankyou for being so kind to me. Hoping to learn more from you in the future. 🫂
This is a learning channel, hehe
Sarry
Got it thanks
No problem!
hello ! can anyone tell me if she says "appended" or "upended" at this timestamp ? and what does it mean in context ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXGr_08t3io&t=171s
I think they're saying 'upended'
it sounds like they're saying appended, but it wouldn't make sense there
As for the meaning, it's probably 3
The relationships and economic ties have been destroyed by the attack
Appended would mean 'added a note to' relationships and economic ties 😅
unrelated, my own question:
I've noticed an odd link between withering (for lack of a better synonym that I'm not about to mention) and self-indulgence:
to dissipate - dissipation: self-indulgence
to decay - decadence: self-indulgence
to deslove - dissolution: self-indulgence
Why has this pattern arisen? What sort of connection is there?
@signal shell what do you think?
Others are also welcome to share thier insights
thank you a lot !
Guys, How to use "to" at end of phrase? I have doubt about it
That is an interesting pattern. One that I haven't noticed, probably because I'm unfamiliar with that usage for both 1 and 3. Also I never put together the connection between decay with decadence. I'll have a think about it.
"to decay, decadence" seems odd to me. Maybe just "to decay, decay"
since decay can also be a noun
while to dissipate and to dissolve can not be nouns
guys i need help with forming the topic sentence
My first thought about this is that the sort of self-indulgence on display does come with some negative moral connotations. And partaking in immoral actions is often associated with a degradation of the soul. It's not a leap to make the connection here that self-indulgence causes the soul to dissolve, dissipate, or decay. I'm willing to bet that early usage of these terms was meant to carry negative connotations, but then appropriated into a more pleasant meaning over time while still carrying a hint of the notion that perhaps it's best not to indulge in such things too often, lest you lose your soul entirely.
Yes bro, the use of "to" at end of phrase, for exemple: "Who are you talking to?"
I have doubt about it, I can't use it
this is related the idea of a dangling preposition
you do this often when you move the object of a prepositional phrase to the front of the sentence or phrase
I am talking to someone.
Who are you talking to?
To whom are you talking?
in the second example, we are splitting the prepositional phrase. some people would consider this to be informal usage of grammar
Ahhh thank you so much that makes a lot of senseeee! I also think they're still kinda negative thoughh
To whom are you talking, eh? I see our chat meant nothing 😔
Remember when we said the formality discrepancy makes that exact sentence sound wrong? Fronted prepositional phrase with 'whom' with 'talk'
It's never sounded right to me and I was surprised you also noticed
But you're using it here, so that makes me think you feel it's fine?
i was trying to maintain the use of the word "talking"
if i change too much, we may lose the point i'm trying to make
Ohhh I seee

What does "dog me" mean?
More context?
guys i wanna start a documantery youtube channel does anyone know where can i get assets
just like VOX edits or something like that
Hi, is this a question about the English language?
yup
If you could explain what you're confused about I can try to help
This channel is for questions about the English language, so grammar, vocabular, semantics, syntax, etc.
what does this sentence means?
What's up baby, can you run me up those digits?
'digits' means 'phone number', in this case
I'm guessing 'run me up' is just a slang-y way of saying 'pass me' or 'give me'
they're asking someone for their numger
Will this work on my crush?
I am only here to answer English questions, noot to give you dating advice. Feel free toask this question in #💭|general or one of the other chatting channels
Sorry. I heard someone tell me to use. I was sus by this.
I think this is a legit english question, since non-natives are likely to be unaware of what is cheesy and what is not in pickup lines. So, to answer your question, should you use this? It's cheesy, but maybe she'll be amused, but maybe not.
It's risky
I thank you for the knowledge. I have another question.
What does mean "Nah, that shii was bussin ong. The ops wasnt trifilin wit thems"
I have heard this on the tiktok.
It's hard to say, but probably was a comment on how hard core the tik-toker criticized someone
It make more sense now.
bussin = really good
ong = on god (used to say you're being very truthful and in your insults/compliments and to add emphasis)
ops = opposers (haters/enemies)
trifilin = trifling
wit = with
thems ?= them
- Nah, that shii was bussin ong. The ops wasnt trifilin wit thems
- Nah, that shit was really good, seriously. The enemies weren't trifling with them.
To trifle with someone is to treat them as though they don't matter or as though they aren't worthy of respect
In this case, I imagine the person is commenting on the attack someone received. The meaning would be 'the enemies treated this person seriously and thus attacked them ruthlessly instead of trifling with them. That attack was so good!'
Scella's interpretation is probably more accurate, since I'm not really down on tiktok lingo. I figured 'ops' meant original poster... but I'm a dinosaur
It's okay, we still use it that way on Reddit
On TikTok it's opposers, though
Really you don't need to concern yourself with the idiocy of that app
The weird lingo is pretty interesting sometimes, though. Thanks for clarifying
Can I make a guess at your age and you can say 'higher' or 'lower'?
It's just one thing I noticed about your writing which facinates me and for which I'm trying to figure out an age group
If you'd like I'll make the guess privately in DMs
You can make a guess, if you want. Lol.
55?
It's not that you act that age. It's just one thing you do
That's a good guess. I'm actually 57
I'm trying to figure out an age group
Ah!
Okay
double spacing
you need to be over 50 for double spacing
That's what I was trying to figure out lol
I'm sorry if I offended
Yeah, I was only guessing cuz I wanted to know which age group did it. I've met people in their 60s on here and they did it, so was kinda curious
I think they might actually teach single spacing in school now
But yeah, back in my day, school papers and such absolutely had to be double spaced after periods
I would imagine so, but I don't know anything about the curriculum of natives
I noticed people doing it after exclamation marks and question marks; is this also correct?
Yep, after all punctuation
Er, sentence ending punctuation
Wow, I thought it was terminating punctuation marks
Ah okayy
Not after commas and semicolons, but double after colons
Oh, colons count as ending a sentence 
I had never considered that, but yeah I suppose they do
It was my pleasure
What's really mind blowing is they don't teach cursive in school anymore. So lots of young adults can't read cursive.
I'm not a native, so my experience is not accurate to that of native young adults, but despite my not having been taught cursive, I feel I've come into contact with it by chance often enough to have gained the ability to read it (although slowly and although I might need to rely on the context a bit more than usual, I can read it). I would imagine that's the case for most natives my age, where they have seen it enough to be able to read it, if not very smoothly
For me, that's also the case with some forms of English Blackletter from looking at older writings, a font with which I've noticed some natives struggle.
for me I can not write in any other way except for cursive, cuz that's what I was taught as a kid in my native (Polish). Now I reapply the same writing to English
why we can say
it is harder than we thought not than what we thought
How to know to add un in an anti or a to word to make opposite? What is the rule
i think it does not have any rule for this
the lesson called prefix
and we add un for the most of words just know how to use il/im/ir and the another will use" un "
Not rules?
yes there are no rules
ok
yah just little rules for
il when the words begins with (l) example legal /illegal
ir when the words begins with (r) example regular /irregular
im when the words begins with m or letter i don't remember it 🫣 example
so except these use un
natives make mistakes related to these too
some type it like unconceivable instead of inconceivable
which is not right, but you don't have to be perfect all the time
i agree with u
Question for native
Which is correct word order
He rides a car ... today
- quickly in New York
- in New York quickly
The most natural word order would be: Subject-Verb-Object-Adverb-Prepositional Phrase-Adverb of Time.
So 1?
2
Truth, I am frequently imperfect!
But the problem is the most natural order would be “He rides in a car quickly in New York today.”
As a certified professional native-English-speaker hater, I can confidently state that native English speakers are frequently imperfect!
We all are
This is correct; I have confirmed it
It is true
But perfect would be boring
They say “variety is the spice of life”
(I used a semicolon. That means you can't challange my authority 👀 )
Indeed 😔
I would not dare to put forth a challenge

Right so English is MPT (Manner-Place-Time)
hello everyone, hope everythings alright
i have a question. out of these, which one sounds better to you native speakers:
- "i just want to sincerely ask for your help"
- "i just want to ask for your help sincerely"
- "i just want to ask for your help in a sincere way"
or if any of you has one that sounds more natural, please let me know, ty
the first imo
but the grammar nazis will tell you that's the worst one
the grammar nazis 💀
I agree for number one. Personally I would say "I could really use your help" since the help you're asking for does not depend on how sincere or genuine your problem is. If I say "I really need help" its the same as saying "I need help with something important." sincerity is being honest about my problem, importance is saying it matters to me that this problem is solved.
I would use the first one but it sounds more natural to say, “I am sincerely asking for your help” or “I sincerely need your help”
I sincerely want to ask for your help.
Yeah, "just" really does make this sound odd
Unless you're really trying to dismiss any notion of ulterior motives
Or any notion that you may be asking for more than what is being plainly stated
But even then, I might say "I'm just making a sincere request for help"
This would be, like, a follow-up statement to clarify what I'm trying to do.
But I'm rambling
English Question. Can a "bloodline" be said to be powerful?
For example: The golden dragon bloodline is a powerful one.
Yes
Thanks! 🙂
Yes
What?
@opal blaze #🫂|beginner-chat
Can someone help me what’s the difference between admittedly and granted or are they the same thing? I need like an easy sentence explaining both
I can’t unfortunately resort to chat gpt coz he’s kinda bad at English 😭
I want an example of how they’re used( both granted and admittedly)
Either way, I think 'admittedly' is more hesitant
Not all adverbs do that
there are adverbs that just put the sentence in a context
'there'
location
it doesn't modify adjectives
I think 'there' and 'here' are modifying implied 'being's
Being tall there, but not being tall here, she has no friends
nope, sadly
but 'being tall' is happening at a location
same thing with 'not being tall'
the adverb provides that location
I suppose it modfies the whole verb phrase
not just the verb
not unheard of
but Im no syntactician so my analysis of your phrase may be wrong
I mean, I think it's always modifying the verb phrase, but sometimes the verb phrase only contains one verb and nothing else
yea, I think granted and admitedly would be sentence adverbs
maybe disjuncts https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disjunct_(linguistics)
In linguistics, a disjunct is a type of adverbial adjunct that expresses information that is not considered essential to the sentence it appears in, but which is considered to be the speaker's or writer's attitude towards, or descriptive statement of, the propositional content of the sentence, "expressing, for example, the speaker's degree of tr...
hmm
yea, they give an example about 'seriously'
But can we go back to thw original thing 😅
I don't know what your question is girl 😭
oh wait you're demonstarting luckily can't modify an adjective!
this started with me saying 'granted' can act adverbially tbh
I was wondering if you agree or not
I mean, adverb is a wide catagory
Yeah Idk why there doesn't exist a term
Maybe I'm wrong about it, but I do think 'there' and your example of 'luckily' demonstrate it
But again, I don't have the qualifications and would have to defer to the opinion of Wikipedia in this case
like there is one for adverbs that don't modify verbs (not sure actua.lly since 'I quite like it' works)
'degree adverbs'
I can think of 'very'
I very like it
doesn't work
but then again 'I quite like it' does
yea 'very' and 'too' are given as examples
but nothing about not modifying adjectives there
yea actually I don't think it's related to degree adverbs, cuz other degree adverbs like 'quite' do
you're right
#🫂|beginner-chat #💭|general for chatting
I want to enhance my vocabulary
Read books
read articles
I'm doing my bachelor's degree in BS English TESOL, so I need peoples to communicate with me and can enhance my vocabulary
Does anyone know about TESOL?
for vocab stuff this should be the 'how': #📚|english-questions message
I read on the regularly basis but still haven't fluent at English
do you read dictionaries?
Nope
I must try
You all peoples are native speakers of English language?
my level is about b1+ but I'm still struggling with some grammar issues like tenses and also my vocabulary are basic and limited
is it like a contrasting word
I wanna understand how to use them in a sentence
First of all, it's not "my vocabulary ARE basic", it's "my vocabulary IS basic"
Secondly, what grammar and vocabulary aspects do you struggle with the most?
first I want to say thanks a lot, it's very meaningful to me and I really appreciate people, who take me serious and help me. about your question, my respond is that I have my English exam (A- Level) next month maybe at the seventh so I have to pass at least a score 4 to come through. 5 is fail.
Maybe you know it better what a high school exam requires for candidates
Chat GPT wrote me down:
Core Grammar Topics for A Level
- Verb Tenses
Present Simple, Past Simple, Present Continuous, Present Perfect, Future (will/going to)
Also useful: Past Perfect, Future Perfect, and Conditional Tenses (if-clauses)
- Modal Verbs
can, could, may, might, must, shall, should, will, would
Use: ability, permission, advice, obligation, possibility
- Passive Voice
Example: The book was written by her.
Know how to form and when to use it (especially in formal or academic writing)
- Conditionals
Zero, First, Second, Third, and Mixed
Example: If I had studied, I would have passed.
- Articles
a, an, the
Definite vs. indefinite, and zero article usage
- Relative Clauses
who, which, that, whose
Example: The man who called is my uncle.
- Reported (Indirect) Speech
Example: She said she was tired.
Know tense changes and pronoun shifts
- Question Forms
Yes/No, Wh-questions, question tags
Example: He is coming, isn’t he?
- Prepositions
Time (at, in, on), Place (under, over, beside), Phrasal combinations (look at, listen to)
- Sentence Structures
Simple, Compound, Complex
Good writing mixes these for clarity and flow
Luckily my exam is only speaking and it would takes about 15 to 20 minutes.
in English should I use a comma only when there is a fanboy conjuction?
Nope ,you don't use a comma only when there's a "FANBOYS" conjunction. While commas are often used before FANBOYS (lol i like that usage) in compound sentences, there are many other cases where commas are needed too
like after introductory elements, with "non-essential"(i would say) information, or in lists
lemme know if u need anything
I have this example ' because he punched the teacher in the face , he got suspended from school. but i heard when there is 'because' a comma is unnecessary is that true ?
As long as the piercing is safe and conducive for the client and it makes the client happy I am happy to do it.
What do they mean by 'conducive' here? This doesn't seem like a proper usage?
favourable, maybe?
@dim cedar hey i got another question
about a sentence actually
sadly i don't have images perms
but conducive means smth makes smth more likely to happen
good for it
so like
...that seems like a restrictive way to look at it
what's more likely to happen here
dunno
Which words among these (in this sentence) are pronouns? 🤔
'these'
that's it
0???
actually nono, just 1
it's 'these'
yeah
Sorry I thought it was a determiner for a second, but no it's a pronoun here
@rapid bison
!?
what
'Which' as a pronoun works like 'which one':
Which is the best?
Which of these is the best?
Or is a relative pronoun:
That one, which I was looking for, was missing.
The robot, which I hadn't seen, tapped me on the shoulder.
In your sentence, 'which' modifies noun
Which words
so it's acting as a determiner
"which words" and "which one word" are different??
'which words are' vs 'which of these words are'
first is a determiner
second is a pronoun
what could they have meant?
basically,
sus phrase
Which among these are pronouns?
Would be a pronoun use of 'which', I believe
...then there are two pronouns xP
there is one
you used it as a determiner not a pronounn
Which (words) among these are pronouns?
how does "words" change the state of "which" 😭
???
out of everyone, you think I was trolling?
yeye
she sounds native, but she misused conducive
I believe it's normally classified as a determiner, but really the line is a bit blurry I think 😅 I'm just using the term I hear used to describe 'which'
not Wiki, but Oxford
Yea makes sense
I don't think Wiki has an article on the word 'which' 
unless you mean Wiktionary
they list is as a pronoun and as a determiner
what's the first arrow for 😭
look at how they expalin 'what' being a determiner/pronoun in that paragraph
'which' should function the same
also, worst part: from the English Wiktionary,
determiner which, sense 1, says
(interrogative) What, of those mentioned or implied.
while pronoun which, sense 1, says
(interrogative) What one or ones (of those mentioned or implied).
😭
What [...] ones
they used 'what' as not to use 'which' in the def
ahhh that makes so much sense, yet I do not agree with this usage at all
She should have said the full thing smh
tl;dr lmao it's just a typo
Thanks for your help in interpreting what this means and her line of thought
"low IQ" and "high IQ" so much classism
heading to eugen-
just please marry trump
both of you have the same level of clasism
lmfao
the moment
of 🏳️⚧️
What has become of this place? I left for the bathroom for two seconds 
hehe
...what is the part of speech of your "what"
and to doubly ping this girl, that has never been trolling
It's an idiom so I really have no idea
fair enough
mm
discord and texting on the phone, here
You mean, which is the most popular in the US? I don't know
There are so many apps, who knows which is most popular
What's a starter kit?
snapchat
duh
!
and instagram i guess
A kit issued to those who are just starting out in something
What is the word for a piece of paper with usage instructions and warnings included in a box of medication?
A manual
Oh medication
That’s a package insert or leaflet
thanks
You're the first person I met with the name of Judas 😳
Is this a positive comment!?🥹
There are leaflets called medguide's that the fda requires
Medguide's are for specific meds that have special notes, patient information leaflets (PIL) go with all meds
Mostly text, Facebook messenger, and Snapchat. Some people use apps like signal for private messaging. WhatsApp and telegram are way less common here
I am very much interested in this phenomenon of very intelligent people speaking in a very messy way, which just straight up destroys all these theories like "your speech shows your intelligence". No it doesn't have to
speech is just a bunch of habits developed over time
Is this a question?
Before a person speaks they're pulling from their internal mental processes, which are different for every person. Some people appear smart because they're obsessive, which results in a faster pace of progress. This comes at the cost of quality if not double-checked. Sometimes people may have more symbolic thoughts or visual thoughts rather than thinking in English. This would require them to translate their ideas and that translation is what I see causing the jumbling in their words.
I like the psychology idea of encoding, storage, and retrieval of information, which is measured on standard iq tests
This is fascinatingg 