#đď˝english-questions
1 messages ¡ Page 84 of 1
It is slang/vernacular for "I am telling the truth"
Do any of you have a link to a site where the user types in a text and gets a voice recording on the output. I remember seeing such sites before?
can someone explain to me what is APA style and give me an example pleaseđ
how do u write in it though i wrote an essay and my professor said its all wrong cuz it isnt APA style i got no idea how to do it
hi yall
can i ask a question
which is the correct sentence
"They didn't work on the project yesterday" or
"They weren't working on the project yesterday"
there's no context
but what do you think the context for each would be
i see
thanks
my test book list past continuous as the definitive answer
it's kinda weird how the books gave out specific requirements for each tense to be use lmao
i always use them interchangably
Hey, how to say that properly in natural American English? đşđ¸ Not sure which words combination to use, I just want to let somebody know in my corporation that I'm about to resign and stop working for them but no idea how to say that properly:
- file a termination notice
- submit a notice of termination
- submit a termination notice
- send a termination of the contract
- something else?
they say both are correct with different emphasis
well, start with https://apastyle.apa.org/ and go from there
Uh okay, but what is that document called? A resignation? Or a termination notice?
Oh, okay, got it, thanks!
no problem, glad to help
The Second sentence emphasises on an ongoing action than the first one.
What is the difference between:
I couldnt come earlier
I couldnt have come earlier.
hello
Wassup, y'all !
So, recently, I realized that every time I read anything, I need to translate it on my head. Like even though I know the words..
If anyone can help me about this I'll be thankful
How can I get rid of the wanting of translation into my main language
in reading or listing
Use main language less and english more in daily life
Surround yourself with people who compel you to use English (vc with foreigners will do)
Spend less time in old enviornment, create an english dominant environment for a couple of months
It'll become natural
@austere turret why thatâs true is correct one?
Why not thatâs a true?
Okay, now I'm starting to think that learning all two hundred words from the irregular verbs table is easier than understanding grammar
No way! Do you like joji too?
hm
okay thanks man

Hallo, any fast way to improve professional english and vocabulary with the use of cool grammar, idioms and phrases? Kindly help.
Reading books such as Stephen King can help improve your English a lot :D
Even reading articles can help improve your range of vocab
Uh, you can also read Shakespear, but it goes a lot in depth concerning different English topics and terms
It means 'I don't know, I'm not sure but I think it means I'm not sure about something - my mind tells me but I'm not sure if I am right'
I would have thought you had known the by now.....@west plover
Could you make it simple?
does "steal upon" means to give, to bestow?
âSteal up onâ means to sneak up on somebody like when you want to give someone a shock or a surprise.
It means the person speaking thinks the listener knew some piece of information and is surprised that do not. It is information the speaker did not think needed to be conveyed to the listener. âI would have thought you had known it is wrong to take someone elseâs lunch from the refrigerator.â
Would you rather say âthe deadline is overdueâ or âthe deadline has already passedâ ? Iâm not quite sure but I believe the former one sounds off, you would use it more for due assignments that were not submitted before a deadline wouldnât you ?
I'd say "the deadline is overdue"
Thank you đ
Hello l have ask what best book for beginners?
Could you guys give me tips for speaking skills? I'm not really good at it at the moment.
If you mean novels, I've read "The notebook" by Agota Kristof when I was a beginner. The book is written in simple English since it's written like as a children's notebook, but the story is seriously for adults.
but it's not a happy story.
Are just and only interchangeable
Hello, I hope you're all doing well. I know this is a basic sentence, but I'm having a very hard time visualizing it and I can't find good images to help me with this. I would appreciate it if someone had a picture or a better way to describe the sentence ''Move your wrist up and down''. In what situation would I see this type of movement? Thanks in advance!
you would see this when maybe doing a doctor's exam, or you're doing excercises
Oh that works, thank you so much!
Hello everyone. Is there anybody who is native in english? I will request you to check my statment of purpose.
I am happy to check it, as long as it isnât very long.
I'm curious to know the difference between at least to me at least for me. Can we use them vice versa?
- If you have everything to hand, at least for me, there is no reason to develop.
- The problem, at least for me, was that after three years I started getting bored.
- Singing along to the radio, my voice sounds decent, even pleasing, at least to me.
- Even if you think your questions are trivial, they may not be, at least to me. đ¤Ż
It's a wild guess, i detect a vague pattern.
At least for me is projecting a noun
At least to me is projecting a verb
Just is more about being enough.
Only more likely about requirement
The speaker is under the impression that the listener(or the person spoken of) knows/understand something already.
Where do I start when it comes to removing my accent? Trying for U.S
Accents are beautiful and natural but still want to change it?
Look for some yt vids how your local language speakers changed there.
And speak in VC regularly.
Is the phrase "from time to time" an adverb?
yes
Hey people đ˝ , I have a question for you guys, though, more than a question, I'm looking for advice from others English learners, how you can increase your knowledge about prepositions ? Because even though I've been increasing my English level, I think I'm an intermediate đ¤ , I realized that, I rely on my Spanish to understand English too much, so during my English journey I learned the ideas behind the prepositions like translations from Spanish words, so now I have some issues while trying to put the prepositions in my sentences (Yeah based on this message I have more issues but I need to focus in one, right? 𤣠)
Mostly, context matters though. In cases where the sentence is talking about something that you have exclusively, then they work. E.G. "Armed with just a sword," and "Armed with only a sword," are identical.
A context where you can't interchange would be, "I just finished my homework," meaning you've finished it very recently, vs. "I only finished my homework," meaning it's the only thing you've completed.
In cases with time, "only" cannot convey what "just" does. For example:
"I just washed the floor" (recently washed the floor)
"I only washed the floor" (exclusively washed the floor)
TLDR; if it's a sentence talking about the only object you have (just a pen vs only a pen) they are interchangeable. If it discusses time or the only thing you have completed, then they are not (only washed a floor vs just washed a floor)
Thank you!
What is the function of "as well as" ?
"The deadline is overdue" wouldn't be correct. A deadline is set so that a task is done before that time, the work would be overdue but not the deadline. I'd say "The deadline has passed"
it's used as a conjungtion or prepositions, that connect two sentneces together, usually adding emphasis to the sentence that comes before the conjungtion
thx đ
@austere turret hows you today
Hey
Can a subject and an object be interchangeable?
For example
Theo is my best friend
My best friend is Theo
Another example
My American friend is a teacher
The teacher is my American friend
Yes, but only when the verb is "to be". With any other verb, switching the subject and object changes the meaning, eg. "The dog bit the boy" (aggressive dog) vs. "The boy bit the dog" (aggressive boy).
The emphasis is subtly different. "Theo is my best friend" answers the question "Who is Theo?" "My best friend is Theo" answers the question "Who is your best friend?"
You could answer "Who is your best friend" with "Theo is my best friend," but when the question names someone or something specific (eg. "Who is Theo?"), it would sound very strange to switch them and say "My best friend is Theo."
Thank you for the detailed explanation!
@swift tusk hello, I'm fine thanks.
Whats the difference between:
Would you open the door
Would you mind open the door
Both sound polite
would you mind opening the door
"Would you open the door?"
This is a direct request, asking someone to open the door.
While it is polite, it doesn't soften the request as much as the second phrase.
"Would you mind opening the door?"
This is a more polite and indirect way of asking.
By using "Would you mind," you're asking whether the person would be bothered or inconvenienced by opening the door. It implies that they have the choice to refuse.
Grammatically, the correct verb form is "opening" instead of "open" because "Would you mind" needs to be followed by a gerund (-ing form).
yes
Id add a "please" in "would you open the door"
for example
would you open the door please
Thanks
First conditional and second conditional what the hell is that?
What are reported questions, orders and requests
Help
Whats the difference between:
He always read this book
He is always reading this book
The former describe his habit of reading book, wwhile the latter aims to complain the action of him reading that book
Cảm ƥn bro
I have questions for natives only. What is the difference between must vs have to.
For example
I must go to the shop
vs
I have to go to the shop
You must go to the shop
You have to go to the shop
Is there significant difference? Or it can be used interchangeably?
im not native but
from what i understand, "have to" is like a obligation imposed by somebody else or for circumstances and "Must" is a obligation personal or moral
sometimes can be interchangeable
Why can I use âAnyâ in âAny questions?â and why I canât use âSomeâ in âSome questions?â
Why You Can Use "Any" in "Any Questions?" but Not "Some":
"Any" is used in questions where Itâs open-ended. In "Any questions?", youâre asking if there are any questions at allâmaybe there are, maybe there arenât.
"Some" suggests that you already believe something exists. So, "Some questions?" doesnât work because it sounds like you expect there to be questions, which doesnât fit with how we usually ask this kind of open-ended question.
"Must":
Feels more important or urgent.
The speaker is giving the command or itâs their own decision.
"Have to":
The obligation comes from something outside the speaker, like a rule or situation where they must oblige.
Itâs more neutral and less personal.
Thanks, u are good at English
Whats the difference between:
Do you mind if
Would you mind if
Both of them are used to ask something in a polite way. The second one is more formal than the first one and thus it is used more.
I know that's simple things, but
"An" and "a", when should I use each?
"this" and "that"
In short, a and an are used before general things. For example, when you talk about an apple you use "an apple": An apple grows on a tree
This and that are used to give reference. When you see a car in a street and want to talk about it to your friend you use this or that. This is used for the things nearby, that is for further. For example, can you see this/that car ?
With your question, and with your examples, you don't call the words after the linking verb as objects. You call that a complement. Because objects are for action verbs. You can read more about subject complement. đ
I donât remember asking for this
Hey fellas, I hope you're doing great today. I was just wondering if you could help me figure out the difference between ''look out'', ''search'' and ''look'', as in:
''When you're in the forest, look out / search / look for the treasure hidden among the trees.''
Thanks in advance!
Look out : to warn/beware.
Search : to look thoroughly. Like finding something.
Look : having a glance / quick glance.
Best fit is search for your question
Daym! I just wrote so much to answer and explain in the best possible way but the bot marked it spam and deleted it đ <@&852814479569059840>
I'm lowkey discouraged smh
An/a for singular common nouns and in front of some phrases
I bought a new phone.
I want to spend an hour with you.
When to use an?
When the immediate next word starts with a vowel sound.
An hour (in hour h is silent so it sounds like aar , beginning sound is of a vowel )
An umbrella ( beginning sounds is of 'a')
A ewe (it's pronounced as Yu, since the beginning sound is of a consonant i.e., y hence we used a )
A university ( beginning sound is of consonant Y
So we used a )
This and that can be either demonstrative pronouns or demonstrative adjectives. You need to be specific here
Explanation Done By: @tidal lily
Oh you revived the whole lost post, thanks mate 
But it never happened earlier @flat rune
@barren rivet look up
Hello folks! How are all you doing?
Well I have came ~~with ~~ (from) a discussion with some acquaintances of mine about the use of:
"I'ven't ...". They though it was so queer to use.
I'd like to know about you, do you use the double negative contraction of "I have not"?
I haven't
Ever
*I have come from a discussion......
"The city appeared peaceful from the middle of the river."
I wonder if this sentence is fine to native English speakers?
Thanks!
There's no need for any changes
One more question:
He returned home as a hero. â He returned home a hero.
Is it acceptable to leave out 'as'? Will it sound more natural to native English speakers?
I see. Thank your for the explanations.
Using tools like as a are called simile.
You can look it up for further understanding.
It's to compare something with something else, putting both on same shelf. Equating two different objects but they ain't the same.
Ex:
She's as graceful as a swan.
He's as brave as a lion.
Whats difference between:
She has already woken up
She has woken up already
"He returned home a King" works fine as a metaphor. You absolutely can leave out the "as", if you think it sounds better.
The difference is simply word order changing where the emphasis is placed.
They essentially have the same meaning.
It's an adverb of time, usually comes after a verb.
So I'd choose the later one
Usually, not strictly
Whats the difference between
This stadium is able to hold almost 1.000 people
This stadium is able to hold nearly 1.000 people
hi guys, i would like to ask. When can we use âI like + infinitiveâ and when can we use âi like + gerundâ??
For example: âI like to watchâ and âi like watchingâ. Whatâs the difference?
Same thing
Use of most is more acceptable though
Infinitive and gerund both work identically*.
Both act as a noun, take an object after them and have an impact of a verb.
Sometimes you can use them interchangeably
CHAT GPT explained to me like this, what do you all think?
-
Like + Gerund (verb + -ing):
Usage: Shows general liking or habit. It is usually used for activities that someone enjoys in general.
Example:- "I like swimming." (I like swimmingâthe general activity I enjoy overall.)
- "She likes reading books." (She enjoys reading books.)
-
Like + Infinitive (to + verb):
Usage: Sometimes emphasizes a preference or tendency to do something in a specific situation, or when talking about choices or decisions.
Example:- "I like to swim in the morning." (I like swimming in the morningâreferring to preference in a specific condition.)
- "She likes to read before bed." (She likes reading before bedâreferring to a habit or choice.)
I like swimming - an activity
I like to swim - a habit
I wouldn't rely on chat bots too much, tho. they might guess a right answer or screw it up entirely and you'll never know
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/grammar/british-grammar/hate-like-love-and-prefer there is a more thorough explanation
Excuse me, do people still use formal english in conversation?
at least make an effort to elaborate what you meant by "formal english"
I dont know really know, I just heard that term.
oh, I see. it wasn't related to the previous topic.
to put it simply, formal means official, it's a register for documents and official events. and yes people can use those words in casual speech even if they're considered more formal.
sorry if my reply was a bit harsh, I got you wrong 
Is there anyway to keep my mind sane in reading exercises?
I can only handle about 4 reading exercises before I start to feel the exhaustion.
I appreciate your help đ
pomodoro technique. have you heard about it? it might help
i havent
mind if you share it, please?
ooohh
repeat for... 4 rounds?
I don't quite understand that..
Ah, I see..
But should I do this in an exam?
Alr, ty!
Is mimicking someone's talk the best way to learn how to pronounce?
Thanks, also does "I would say" sound a tad of uncertain?
Heya, is it possible for "to us" in the following sentence to function as an adverbial, instead of being part of the Subject Complement "very obvious to us", as suggested by the answer key of my assignment?
That his theory was flawed soon became very obvious to us.
Which is more common 'seldom' or 'shrill'? Also, how common are the two words in general?
Thank you. I was just going around asking people. Didn't wanna use Ngram cuz it only uses books for the data
but it does answer to whom it became obvious
Either way, thank you
I think it might yeah
I think it's adverbial but modifying 'obvious'? Maybe
AI says: Yes, it is possible for "to us" to function as an adverbial in the sentence "That his theory was flawed soon became very obvious to us" instead of being part of the subject complement (Cs) "very obvious to us".
In this case, "to us" could be interpreted as an adverbial phrase indicating to whom the theory became obvious. This interpretation would change the SPOCA analysis slightly:
S: That his theory was flawed (clause)
P: became
O: -
Cs: very obvious
A: soon, to us
This interpretation emphasizes "to us" as providing additional information about the becoming obvious, rather than being an integral part of what became obvious.
However, the interpretation suggested by the answer key, where "to us" is part of the subject complement, is also valid and perhaps more common. The choice between these interpretations can depend on the broader context and the intended emphasis of the sentence.
so yeah? I guess that answers it then
if AI can be trusted with this
hi! Is any one willing to help me with a film analysis of saving private ryan i obv will include more info then just this, but feel like its better then spamming and clogging a channel
Hello
Can i ask a bit of question abt. English gtammar
Grammar
Sooo can i use linguistics to make my english better?
Like to b1, b2 level at least
I'm checking with my teacher now too as he'll be the one grading my test
forgot to say thanks !
thank you!
Has someone mentioned .e
hello
what is the actual difference between laundry and laundromat?
Is "do the washing" and "do the laundry" mean the same?
yeahm thanks
But what about laundromat
And also, i know what is "hustle and bustle", but can these two words be used separately. For example, "there's a lot of hustle/bustle today"
?
Hello ,
Iâm choosing an English name, and I wonder if âOpal Kimâ is OKAY.
What dose this name sound like to u?
"Opal" isn't a very common first name, and I've never heard it being used by anyone before.
"Kim" is fine for a last name.
Thanks!
I learned from ChatGPT that opal was used in early 19s XD
I do like it though
, gonna keep it as a nick name
"Opal" isn't especially common, but it wouldn't sound weird. It's a fine choice for a name!
so this might be a bit different question
What does Micky gesticulate around 0:29 before pointing to the adult
https://www.reddit.com/r/Disneyland/comments/1g0ps3q/mickey_mouse_scolds_a_parent_at_disneyland_for/
he points at the person then does this sign:
then points at him again
So I've made a list of different kinds of words and idioms over the last few months and im already able to recognize/understand and translate those words through reading and listening but I still find it hard to use them actively in my vocabulary/sentences. How do I improve on that?
Can't help, I've never done that
Your efforts are applaudable though
Well, a good way to star using those different words is creating personal sentences with them.
Whenever is possible, you should try to substitute/change the common words with those if they are synonyms.
example: This is so strange. => So queer.
This is someone I know. => This is an **acquaintance **of mine.
With time and a great effort you may use them more naturally.
im so bad at this language
Still thx tho
It's kinda fun to write down new words to learn on the notes app 
Iirc The most I did was writing down new words on back pages of my register with respect to part of speech (verb/noun/adjective/adverb/etc)
But to my surprise it didn't help at all, every time I saw them they were like a fresh piece of info. So I stopped it.
Whatever words constantly appear in front of you, you'll stay familiar with it.
I noticed one more thing I picked up some words after 2-3 natural appearances and me searching its meaning and boom! It stored in memory.
But I always forget meaning of few words
thank you!
I'll try to work with that đ
Oh yea likewise
may i have a question?
lmao
They usually said that if d and t is followed by a consonant then unrelease em. but should i still release em for others easier to hear?
like âi worked really hardâ the sound is followed by a consonant
Nice one
Bri'ish influence ig. If you know what I mean. Some countries follow British English in the school curriculum. And online sources.
Ignore, that's an online troll
dang, i thought hes gonna do something crazy with that sh*t thing man
so? why wouldnt u talk bout it in #đ§ ď˝serious-chat
what is the difference between have a try and give it a try
"Unique among mammals, the pangolin is covered in scales."
Can someone please spell out exactly the structure of such sentence. Looks like it's inversion between two sentences
it feels like they omitted the subject in the first part not to repeat it twice
but I don't know what it is called
"Unique among mammals" is a relative clause, whilst, "the pangolin is covered in scales" is the independent clause.
Guys can someone help me finding the song that plays on this video? I don't understand anything after the initial "Someone..."
what´s the difference between that´s why and for that
can you provide more context?
Hey there, I got a question.
There is a site that is currently banned for 2 months. So what is the correct way to say:
The site is banned for 2 months or the site has been banned for 2 months. Or any different way.
Thanks in advance.
Has been
Action took place somewhere in the past and still connected upto present
Whats the difference between:
Can + verb
Can + be + V-ing
Example:
Can do this
Can be doing this
I mean they both are different tenses.
Could you explain it
Simple present and present continuous.
Or is it something complex ?
Oh I see
Thanks
Can+ verb refers to a general or simple action.
Can + be + V-ing emphasizes that the action is ongoing or in progress.
Example:I can do this.
Meaning: I have the ability to do this (now or at any other time).
Example: I can be doing this.
Meaning: I am capable of being in the middle of this action (now or at some time in the future).
Hello Rocket!
Present Perfect Passive
The site has been banned for 2 months.
Use this if the site is currently banned, and you're talking about how long it has been banned so far. The ban started in the past and is still happening.
Present Simple Passive
The site is banned for 2 months.
Use this if the site is banned now, and you're talking about the total time it will be banned for. This focuses on the length of the ban (2 months).
"Has been banned": Youâre talking about how long the ban has lasted up until now.
"Is banned": Youâre talking about how long the ban will last in total, from the start until the end.
you're a live saver
Homage - mild high club
Thanks! Just a quick noteâit's actually 'lifesaver,' not 'live saver'
Does it count future continuous too
Hey guys im an english major and i need help writing a proposal for my MA seminar course. Can anyone give me a hand?
I love English. I'm not in university but I'm a pre-IB student so if I can help I'd love to! :)
i have a question. In which accent, do they release the t or d sound at the end of a word? If there is, will they read this sentence as âit-tuh wasn-Tuh good-duhâ?
Some accents, like Irish and British dialects, tend to clearly release "t" and "d" sounds at the end of words. This could sound closer to "it-tuh" or "good-duh." However, in most accents, especially American, final "t" and "d" sounds are often reduced or unreleased, but that would be more in casual speech 
i want everyone can hear me when i say the past tense and also can clearly hear the t and d buy it-tuh wasn-tuh good-duh it is so anti initiative. How can i fix these problem?
Welll I would say.....pronounce "t" and "d" clearly without adding an extra "uh" sound, try lightly releasing the consonants at the end of words, but avoid exaggerating the sound by stopping airflow briefly (e.g., "it" with a soft "t" instead of "it-tuh"). One tip I hear alot is to try practicing with recordings and mimicking native speakers will help you sound natural while ensuring the "t" and "d" are heard 
its just a way i describe the t and d sound by using tuh and duh, its actually just d and t. Even that it still sounds strange
**In the context of syntactic ambiguity, how does the garden path sentence âThe old man the boatsâ illustrate the necessity of reanalyzing initial parsing decisions, and what implications does this have for our understanding of incremental sentence processing in psycholinguistics?**𼴠đ¤¨
That's a lot of big words right there, so I gotta dumb it down a bit:
- syntactic ambiguity = situation when a sentence can have multiple meaning due to unclear sentence structure
- garden path sentence = a misleading sentence? It trick the reader into interpret it in a way that turn out to be incorrect (intentional?)
- necessity of reanalyzing initial parsing decision = a "hold up, wait a minute, something ain't right" moment, force the reader to go back and re-interpret the sentence when the initial understanding doesn't seems right
- incremental sentence processing: to process the sentence word by word instead of the usual "read the whole thing" way
- psycholinguistics = the study of how the brain work in processing language
In psycholinguistics, this "The old man the boats" help us understand how we read and process sentences in real time. In "The old man the boats", when we read it for the first time, we thought that "The old man" is the objecive of the sentence, but if that's true, than where's the verb? Why was the sentence consist of only 2 noun, "The old man" and "the boat"? This is where "incremental sentence processing" came to play. After re-analyze the sentence, we realized that "The old" here is the objective/noun of the sentence, the meaning is "older people", usually this kind of wordplay is used in literature books, rarely appeared in normal daily life conversation. While the "man" is a verb, usually means "to operate" or "to control/charge (of) something"; usually this kinda word only appeared in military and nautical language.
In reading, the act of understanding a sentence is a process of constantly guessing the meaning of the sentence. But this act can sometime be wrong, like the very "The old man the boats" case. It is important to keep earlier parts in our mind to constantly fix the interpretations. This methos is even more so important in the field of psycholinguistic, where the sentences we read can be incredibly ambiguous.
Hello everyone
What is the difference between soldier/troop/trooper/stromtrooper
I suppose the last one is related only to star wars but i am not sure
And, guys, who else beside me lost their explorer role?
Soldier is a general term for anyone in the military
Troop is a group of soldiers
Trooper usually about a specific type of soldier or police, for example, state trooper (those guys usually lurking around the highway)
Stormtrooper are from Star Wars
And what explorer role? Never heard of it 
and it would sounds like itt wasn-t goo-d? that sounds pretty shaky and bad?
Thanks a lot
Explorer role is given to those who sent certain amount of message on the whole Server and were quite active
But, still, it's the lowest active level role you can get here, because it's only lvl 5, while the highest active level role is 100 lvl
So that's what it is 
It's the compass symbol, right?
As far as i remember, yes
By the way, your English seems quite good to me. Are you sure you are intermediate?
yeah 
my grammar suck though
got a 5 in ielts 
How old one has to be to take this test?
I have heard about ielts a lot but i dont know much about it
anyone over 16
the test was quite hard, there was a time they gave us a one and a half page essay from a literally philosophy book
it came from Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do? by Michael Sandel iirc
you should try it once 
really test the limit of us non-native
Yeah, i would like to take the test some time
By the way, what part of the grammar do you struggle the most with?
everything I guessed? Never actually learn the grammar seriously
Till now, everything was based on a hunch, "it sounds kinda fitting" typa thing
Got it. Grammar is kinda important, but it seems like no one still cares about it when it comes to casual conversations. Personally, my school doesn't teach us English well, so i try to learn it on my own via watching youtube or simply chatting on Discord
And it helps a lot
True dat, kinda ironic I think?
The stuff on the test don't actually appeared in real life convo, but will come in handy during formal works
Does ielts require only formal English knowledge?
On God, it's ALL about formal English
So formal that even the normal native people couldn't answer the questions appeared on it
While us have to write a whole long ass essay 
Understandable, thanks
there is no formal age limit on when one should take the test
however, their recommended age is indeed 16 years
we have two tests: IELTS Academic & General Training
the former is formal as heck, but the latter aims for a mix of formal, neutral and informal (with the exceptions of the Listening and Speaking modules, which are a mix of both anyway)
@crimson vortex, you might want to know these too :)
Oh yeah, I forgot about that General Training
Easier than Academic but still the same price I supposed?
Too expensive for my third world country ass, it's like half of my monthly salary
Are you from germany?
Your nick is in german, i guess. But i am not sure
I think if you chose a Halloween themed role the other roles got cast off.
I had lost it before it got new one
Seems like the explorer role disapperad because of the event
yes, I think that is possible
Nein
yeah, i think it's kinda right place
guys i have a problem and i hope you understand it sometimes or the moste of the time i try to say a sentence with English language i find my self stutter is it a problem although i have heard a lot of podcast
I can speak it but not very fluent in want that level that when you are speaking you canât stutter ever like you are talking with your native language
Do you usually stutter when speak in your native language? Or does it happen only when it comes to English? If so, it seems like usual anxiety because you speak foreign language
Maybe you should pratice speaking more with other native speakers online
You can talk to strangers on this server in the voice channels
no i donât stutter but sometimes i feel myself i can speak it vert well but sometimes i feel myself like i canât speak it very fluent
I donât stutter with my native language
But with English somtimes
What about your pronunciation? Do you pronounce words correctly?
Not perfect i got problem with r pronunciation
But i can say that my pronunciation tends to bad
But as you can see i write very well and i understand very well and i hear and understand very well but still have problem of talking
Perhaps you just need to have more practice in speaking. Listen to how native speakers pronounce words and try to repeat after them. If you struggle with pronouncing particular sounds (like r sound), try to pronounce various tongue twisters. Record your voice and compare to native speakers' pronunciation
These are tips that help me to correct my pronounciation
and there is other thing which I classify it the majore problem
which is whenever I see a sentence in social media I try to reapeat it I find myself stuttering this is the most situation I stutter
But when I put a situation in my mind and try to speak it I can do it perfectly
So the problem occurs when it comes to physically saying words aloud, right?
Yp kinda
As i said before, talking to native speakers or other people who are good at english might help you
If I donât this person wouldnât get me đĽ¸
Do you think that practicing more of speaking is the clue ?
Sorry I didnât get you
It helped me, so i suppose it might help you too. I am not an expert myself, just think it's the simplest solution
can I guys give you my approache of learning English and correct the mistakes iam doing maybe the mistake is in my approach
hearing a podcast I understand the majority of the words but the word I didnât get it I will do it in Google translate and take a picture to it to memorize it later
You can listen to podcasts, but, personally, when I see a word that i dont know, I use an online dictionary like Cambridge Dictionary or Collin's Dictionary, because they provide me with various meaning of the same word with descriptions written in English. So I dont see the translation of the word in my native language, instead i see the description/explanation written in English. Sometimes they attach pictures to the words.
And the practicing is the making a sinarios in my mind and try to speak about it (donât laugh at me đ)
The advantage of dictionaries are that they are more accurate than a translator and provide you with usually more than 1 meaning of a word
So translate it with the same language this is it ?
But the most weird thing is somtimes I feel myself I speak very fluent and sometimes I feel myself I canât say anything
IAM not joking but this is my real problem I couldnât find the clue for it
"This essay will argue for the benefits of studying at home"
Would you guys say that this sentence is good?
I do not know how to explain but I just inherently feel that something is wrong
Thanks for the explanation
In this sentence just using the word "that" Instead of "myself" is better
If you say something before it like, "if you walk on the road naked, would you get arrested for jaywalking?", then yes it is a hypothetical question, but alone it isn't really.
Can you explain it?
A hypothetical question is a question that asks about a situation that is either imaginary or not currently happening. Just asking "would you get arrested for jaywalking? " is a normal question probably in response to someone talking about something they did that might get them arrested for jaywalking. "If you could fly, where would you go?" Is more of a hypothetical question because it asks about something imaginary that isn't happening. "If you could go anywhere, where would you go?" Is still a hypothetical question even though it isn't imaginary.
No it is good don't worry.
"Last but not least, hope we can meet and keep serving you in the days to come!"
Is the usage for "the days to come" okay here? I want to say in the future
What is the context here?
It's anniversary celebration for my server.
Days to come makes it seem like you are planning to work with them on something specifically in the next few days.
I'd say "in the future"
Also if you are making specific points before, last but not least is okay, but if you're just writing a long message, "Finally," would work better.
Oh, alright. Thank you for the explanation
No problem đ
Hello
Is "what would I know" the same as "how would I know"?
How would I know about him
What would I know about him
similar, but different in the core meaning
"what would I know" questions the speaker's knowledge, while "how would I know" questions the speaker's reason to know something
but both are sarcasm though
Hey fellas, I hope you're all having a good day. I wanted to know if you could help me understand the sentence ''Bend your waist forward'' please. In which situations would I see this particular movement? Thanks in advance!
Also, I just found another sentence which is ''Move your hands in and out''. I was hoping you could also help me with this one please.
Oh and If you happen to have a picture as an example I would appreciate it too đ
Whats the difference between:
She would come tomorrow.
She will come tomorrow.
@acoustic geyser
She would come tomorrow" suggests a hypothetical situation where she might come, but it's not a certainty. "She will come tomorrow" implies that she has definitely decided to come, and she will arrive tomorrow for sure.
does anyone have any revision material for English grammar?
Can I use would for imagining something in the future? Like hypothesis?
@acoustic geyser Yes, you can! Using "would" is a great way to talk about hypothetical situations in the future. For example, you can say things like "I would visit Paris if I had more money"
Though he's performed on many respected albums, including DBIII: Live at the Cotton Club Tokyo by Dean Brown, drummer Denhis Chambers may be best known for his time as house drummer for the hip-hop label Sugar Hill Records. He did not play drums on the label's classic song "Rapper's Delight," _ _____joined the label after the song's release.
A) however, he
B) however he
C) however and he
D) however.He
Can someone help me pls
Use âhoweverâ when you see a period (.) at first, then a comma (,) after.For me, you should choose A
Iâm confused. Why not D?
The correct answer is A) however, he because "however" introduces a contrast and should be followed by a comma, with "he" starting the next clause. This makes the sentence grammatically correct.
you can watch this Youtube video to learn more: How to Use Commas in English
Thank u so much
why do people confuse American and British English? even in the case of vocabulary alone
is it difficult or does it happen when there is one at school and the other around them?
I'm not talking about accents because sometimes I confuse them too
but trash and rubbish or chips and crisps aren't that similar
I'm non native too but I've never understood that
yup
for me there are a lot of differences
so I'm asking about it
maybe then I'll understand
I wish I could do that on a mature exams (I can't...)
I have to use only British English and luckily I don't have any problems with pointing out differences between American and British English
but now I can understand it even more, thank you ^^
What is the difference between give me and gimme, lemme and let me?
Will Will will Will will? what does this sentence mean?
As a native this sentence is annoying and makes no sense đ don't worry about it.
as an immigrant teenager who recently moved into Canada, I am mandated to read English literatures for academic purposes. However, it takes me quite a while to understand the content of those books (Sherlock Holmes) . How can I improve my reading speed?
somewhat that
the structure is also a bit too complex?
you just have to keep reading and you'll get faster, practice makes perfect.
Is it possible to discuss this challenge with the teacher who assigned the reading? It may be possible to listen to audio and read along?
Hello
Do the Brits use "shall I" and "shall we" instead of "should I" and "should we" for advice, suggeting and offer?
Is it used for formal context right?
Hello, I have been improving my english a lot that month
About what I noticed was how as slow I was for capting english songs and repeat them, without having to memorise the song, but it is really hard to me, not like in my mother language, where after listening a phrase from a song i can quickly repeat it
I understand these songs but its hard to me to repeat them
And wich pages or content does buddies would share with me If Im trying to pass my C1 Cambridge Exam
Yes, as far as I know, the brits used "shall" more often than "should", it's not really a formal term but sure are more polite
Is this correct:
He should have been sleeping.
whats the difference between "would be" and "will be"
and
"could be" and "can be"
similar meaning, but "will be" and "can be" are more certain, have higher possibility
got it. thanks
lets say
i will be there
i would be there
whats the difference
"I will be there" = definite, certain
"i would be there" = might change depends on the situation
got that thank you
Integrating insights from economics and psychology, researchers in the field of behavioral economics explore a variety of topics. LucĂa Macchia of the University of Oxford studies socioeconomic __________other researchers
investigate areas such as organizational behavior and personal finance.
A) inequality, for instance;
B) inequality;for instance,
C) inequality, for instance,
D) inequality for instance;
Which one
Can someone help me I think itâs A
Yeahm I think it's A too, sounds more right
What does "what would you know" and "how would I know" mean?
I think the correct answer is C) inequality, for instance,
Explanation: The phrase "for instance" is used as a parenthetical phrase, so it should be set off by commas before and after it. Additionally, the word "inequality" needs a comma after it to correctly separate the clauses. Hence, option C is the best choice.
Thatâs very tricky. I donât think most native speakers can answer that question, haha.
My gut feeling is âAâ.
The reason I donât think itâs C, despite it being a parenthetical phrase, is because there are two independent clauses. You need a semicolon before âother researchersâ.
Iâm not an English learner/teacher, this is just what Iâd put as a native speaker. We donât study grammar to the level that you do.
Checked with another native speaker as I wanted to make sure, and we agree itâs A.
Canât confirm itâs correct but I think it is.
Answer is A), and my opinion is the same Alexei's. To give a little more reference, we should first look at the function of the semicolon:
A semicolon is a punctuation mark (;) used to connect closely two related independent clauses in a single sentence when discussing the same topic or contrasting two similar ideas
The connection between the two independent clauses should always be apparent without a coordinating conjunction like 'and'
Then we look at the sentence with the blank space:
"LucĂa Macchia of the University of Oxford studies socioeconomic other researchers investigate areas such as organizational behavior and personal finance"
=> We see two different subjects which have their own respective verbs (studies; investigate). Note that there are no conjunctions around the blank space, so we're left with an adjective before it and a noun phrase after it. So clearly, there has to be a split with a semicolon here (crossing out answer C).
Now we look at the sentence before it to get more context:
"Integrating insights from economics and psychology, researchers in the field of behavioral economics explore a variety of topics"
=> This sentence is talking about researchers in general, who study "a variety of topics." So, when the next sentence wants to introduce a specific example, that sentence has to use a phrase like "for example, for instance." Which means, "for instance" must stand before the semicolon (crossing out answer B).
Finally, a quick Google search will tell you you need to put a comma before or after an introductory word/phrase, depending on where it is in the sentence. Anyway, we know a comma is definitely needed, so we rule out answer D, and choose A.
It might look easier to understand if we just move "for instance" to the beginning of that sentence:
For instance, LucĂa Macchia of the University of Oxford studies socioeconomic; other researchers investigate areas such as organizational behavior and personal finance
TL;DR: Just imagine the semicolon as a period (but never a comma) and you're good to go
I think itâs A too, because it has more meaning.
"what would you know" - dismissive
"How would I know?" - confusion
As a native I'd say A and D are both correct. A is closer to proper written language, and D is closer to spoken language.
I'd go with A
formally speaking, A is the best option; D is borderline unacceptable but is ultimately understandable đ
What does "that would be me/she/him" mean?
Self-identification/Identifying someone else in an informal tone
"That would be me/she/him" is a casual way of identifying oneself or someone else in response to a question or statement.
Example:
Question: "Who is the project leader?"
Answer: "That would be me!" (Meaning, "I am the project leader.")
"I am" is direct and straightforward.
Both mean the same thing, but "That would be me" feels less formal.
Why is it "declaration" and not "declarance"? Why is it "acceptance" and not "acceptation"? What is the rule?
acceptance - the act of accepting
acceptation - accepted meaning/interpretation of a word
declaration - the act of declaring smt
declarance - kinda same meaning? but "declaration" outplayed it to became a more popular choice (skill issues)
Pretty sure declarance and acceptation aren't actual words, at least in the manner that I am using them in. Even though they should be grammatically correct. It's just confusing when there's no standard or rules to follow.
"acceptation" is a word acknowledged by the official Oxford and Cambridge
"declarance" is just an old word from way back then, no longer used in modern days
and yeah, sometimes those old coots kept appearing in old literature and confused the hell out of the readers
what the first things should i learn abt an English to get a good speaking skills? such as IPA or sth? u guys have any recommend? thank you for your time
Hello, my name is Carla. I want improve my english. I'm living in Portugal and for me improve my english is very important for my future job. Where should I start here at discorde?
@timid mason tysm for your advice it's helps me a lot!
@timid mason I got another question basically, i can talk with people for communicate easily because i got a lots of vocab (due to like to reading / listening) but there are problem that I may using wrong grammar via talking or something not following by the rules (this kinda problem for me), Do you have any recommendation abt it? like go on for learning grammar or sth
what is "persona" use for?
Help
I dont know this, which one is correct first?
Sorry, I dont know how to use "prefect infinite"
Do you know past perfect? It works in almost the same way: to talk about an action that ended before another action, usually in the past. This is also the usage you'll see the most.
Example: He claims to have won a lot of money.
=> He won the money sometime in the past. But only now is he talking about it. There's a clear difference in time between these two actions.
If you said: He claims to win a lot of money.
=> You're saying both these actions are happening at the same time, together. It might work in some other cases, but here it just sounds odd or even wrong.
Thanks
Huamahauaaayaoah woaahyauah yuh
I agree
I got it thanks
In meaning , what is the difference between this two sentences?
"She thought she was going to be rich" and "She thought she was going to become rich"
Same meaning.
Thank you
Whats the difference between:
He claims that he had seen those
He claims to have seen those
Hi! What is the difference between "art and culture" and "arts and culture"?
Isnt Arts plural?
I google the term, some websites use "arts and culture" while some use "art and culture". I'm wondering what is the difference between them?
Linda! The party ___ at 9 AM, make sure to bring snacks though.
a) is hosting
b) will be hosting
My gut feeling says its a), but I can't find what's wrong with b)
a is if the party is hosting at the present
b is if the party will be hosted in the future
or not im not sure either
The correct answer is **b) will be hosting **because it talks about a future event that will be happening at a specific time (9 AM).
Examples:
Present Continuous - Is hosting (present or future arrangement):
"Linda is hosting a party right now."
Future Continuous - Will be hosting (future action in progress):
"Linda will be hosting a party at 9 AM tomorrow."
Both of them sound wrong, Iâve never seen âto hostâ used that way.
We would say:
âThe party is being hosted at 9pm.â
âThe party will be hosted at 9pm.â
Is this grammatically correct?
âItâs indeed worth itâ
In the Western tradition, the three classical branches of visual art are painting, sculpture, and architecture.[7] Theatre, dance, and other performing arts, as well as literature, music, film and other media such as interactive media, are included in a broader definition of "the arts".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_arts
We use "the arts" for anything creative, including dance, drama, etc. "Arts" in "Arts and culture" refers more to this kind of art.
We use just "art" for things mostly relating to traditional painting and drawing (visual arts). "Art and culture" refers more to this kind of art.
Realistically, the two phrases are extremely similar and there's a big crossover, so there is not much difference at all.
Art is a diverse range of human activity and its resulting product that involves creative or imaginative talent, generally expressive of technical proficiency, beauty, emotional power, or conceptual ideas.
There is no generally agreed definition of what constitutes art, and its interpretation has varied greatly throughout history and across cult...
The arts or creative arts are a vast range of human practices of creative expression, storytelling, and cultural participation. The arts encompass diverse and plural modes of thinking, doing, and being in an extensive range of media. Both dynamic and a characteristically constant feature of human life have developed into stylized and intricate f...
"He claims that he had seen" and "He claims to have seen" have the same meaning.
most reliable member in EngHub
Which one should I use in the context?
They mean exactly the same thing, so either can be used.
Whatâs the full sentence? It sounds incomplete.
âHe claims that he had seen those (documents before)â
âHe claims to have seen those (people at the crime scene)â
Thereâs no difference based on any context. Same phrasing.
Your and youâre I get confused when I use these words đ
Even some natives can sometimes incorrectly use youâre/your or there/their/theyâre, because they sound the same.
Your - possessive pronoun.
Your cat.
Youâre - a contraction, short for âyou areâ.
Youâre tall.
Thanks you
So it's interchangable?
Yes. đ
Thanks Alexei!!!
What is sutli
Is the sentence " no one can tell me" a complete sentence? Is the "me" an indirect object?
it's a complete sentence, yes. And since there's only one object, "me" is the direct object
Thanks!
guys what is the difference between for me vs to me?
- To me this apple is delicious
- For me this apple is delicious
? It can be interchangable?
Is there significant difference?
the second sentence is incorrect, you are expressing your opinion so "to me" is the correct option @flat rune
hello people
if you want to express your opinion then use âto meâ. If sth benefits you then use âfor meâ
I'm learning English
so the first one is correct in this circumstance
never thought about it like that. Crazy. Thank you
what are they talking about?
every questions about english
Somebory of the Brazil?
Guys what is sutli
don't think that's a real word
maybe it's a word in his language
I googled and it's a hindi(?) word for "twine"
"twine" like yarn
Yes itâs like yarn the last time I checked
yarn like a fine line đ
i meant wine why did I say yarn
I am ashamed of myself and will dissapear forever now
Got a rare question for the English masters here. Take the following sentence:
"It wasnât the sounds, but the silence afterward that made the hair on the back of her neck stand." [1]
I'm concerned about the "but the silence afterward" part plus the comma before it. In novel writing, can this part grammatically be here or does it have to be moved to the end of the sentence, like so:
"It wasnât the sounds that made the hair on the back of her neck stand, but the silence afterward." [2]
I have a feeling [1] looks better because it shows a clearer reason for why she actually got scared; while in [2], the true subject of the sentence is pushed way behind, away from the action itself. Thanks in advance and please ping me 
i like the first better >.<
just a gut feeling tho
Vocabulary question. What do you say when you are going to run a gambling game, like start taking bets on a sports game?
-
I am opening the books! Who wants to bet!
-
I am taking bets! Who wants to play?
Feedback and suggestions welcomed.
Subordinate clauses can be left in the middle of a sentence, as long as you remember to have a comma at the end. A comma before as well as after should be fine: "It wasn't the sound, but the silence afterwards, that made the hair stand on the back of her neck."
Either. Although, for 1), "who wants to bet" is a question, rather than an exclamation đ
If you want to be cool, you can use one of these to indicate the tone you might be after: â˝
Good night people
this is cool
meet new people, and improve the my english
how old are you?
yet i´m learing my english
so, if anyone wants to help me
i´m greteful
what does "ain't" mean?
am/is/are + not
"He is not pretty" and "He ain't pretty" has same meaning then?right?
Yes. Same meaning, but they have a different tone.
yeah ain't sounds cool
you have my complete trust
good morning person
does anyone know o goos songs to pratice english?
i'm learning
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yqu6_OVBJ50
here's a goose song
What's the difference between humiliated and humbled?
What's the difference between humble and fumble
Fumble is to handle things carelessly or nervously
Ex. He fumbled the catch(dropped the catch)
Humble is an adjective.
Another meaning of humble is near the ground.
Ex. Thy humble nest built on the ground
I wont go the the ship, I would be seasick.
Is this correct? Hypothesis in the future.
You're close, but the sentence structure needs a slight adjustment to correctly express a future hypothetical situation. The correct version would be:
"I won't go to the ship; I would get seasick."
This implies you're predicting what would happen (getting seasick) if you were to go to the ship in the future.
Thanks
What is shuvia
thanks
I want practice with anyone now
Welcome mate!
whats the difference in "just got home from work", "just arive home from work" and "just return home from work".
They're all same. You can use them interchangeably.
Only formalities are different
"Just got home" is informal
The remaining two are more formal.
okay thanks
https://youtu.be/FGJ7QWpa7XM?si=CVagUVgg3hQFoWTE
In this song
I.dare anyone to even try to guess what he is saying between
<<4:00- 4:25>>
Provided to YouTube by BWSCD, Inc.
Doorstep ¡ Public Memory
Demolition
â 2016 felte
Released on: 2018-11-09
Mixer: Robert Toher
Producer: Robert Toher
Music Publisher: Clocktower
Composer: Robert Toher
Lyricist: Robert Toher
Auto-generated by YouTube.
#đď˝rules Please read them before posting anything here.
" He mumbled half to himself " " He was scared half to death " what does ' half " imply here ?
Depends on the context.
"He mumbled half to himself" could be interpreted as half of his dialogue could be heard by the speaker and half couldn't.
"He was scared half to death" is an idiom that means someone/something had done something to cause fear, shock, or unexpected emotion to another.
I.g. He was scared half to death when we all yelled surprise at his party.
ĐĐ´ŃавŃŃвŃĐšŃĐľ, Ń ŃŃŃ Đ°Đ˝ĐłĐťĐ¸ĐšŃкиК! Đно инŃĐľŃĐľŃнО, в ŃоП ŃаСниŃа ĐźĐľĐśĐ´Ń ÂŤĐľŃŃŃÂť и ÂŤŃвНŃŃŃŃŃÂť, Пно ŃŃŃднО пОнŃŃŃ
what is different is and are?
Excuse me
Are as if/as though the same as like?
And are as if as though interchangable?
In some cases yes
As a conjunction, I would say you can use either
'like' is colloquial
In fancy writing you don't use it
Anyway it's best to look at specific examples. Do you have one in mind? There must be a reason why you asked this question

hello, what is the difference between "to smash" and "to shred"?
"to shred" - is to tear something into long, thin pieces
"to smash" - is to beat the shit out of something into uneven pieces
How to Gaslight someone
Does the verb "to smite" exist? And what does it mean?
Smite: To strike someone sharply or heavily
Example: The samurai smites the enemy with his sword.
Thanks man
Hi, could you explain how to correctly use the word "odds", in terms of probability?
I am slightly confused about it
You can use the word "odds" in the following ways (in the context of probability)
The odds are against you in winning the lottery
This means there are low chances
It is also used in betting
For example: The odds of being thrown up on, is surprisingly high
It held the same meaning of "chance"
replace odds with chance and the sentence will still stay the same
what is "throw up on"? Did you mean "to vomit"?
"throw up" aka "vomit"
more used in casual context, whilte vomit is more used in formal context
Like; I threw up after 6 cans
okay, got it
weak.
Explain the difference between âalongâ and âacrossâ with understandable definitions.

"along" -moving parallel to or following something
For example; Move along, Pranav, or I might just shoot you
"across" - from one side to the other, crossing something
For example: I saw Pranav threw up from across the street
A Dear John letter means a break up letter that a girl writes for their boyfriend?
what does "immoral" use for
like
it feels soo immoral
what does this actually means
like in what situation do we use 'immoral'
Well, you first have to know what morals are
And a dictionary is quicker for that
immoral = not moral
im- is a negative prefix
moral is both a noun and an adjective, so don't get confused
But to understand the adjective, you have to understand the noun
okay 
can i say one-armed in english to tell someone that they are bad at playing videogames?
đť
How to Gaslight someone?
Hello
I dont know about this usage
https://promova.com/english-grammar/perfect-infinitive-with-modals-in-english
like method or smth?
what is "gotta" mean
it stands for have got to
would you give me any example
Heâs gotta be joking. He would never do that.
So this means Heâs got to be joking
or I gotta go now means i got to go now
oh thanks i got it now
np
like i say "i gotta watch that" means "i got to watch that", right?
or " i have got to watch that"
that case means got to
like normally we can understand gotta is got to
no problem 
btw, are you still confused about any abbreviations?
this may help you
oh thanks, this will surely help me.
nice pfp btw
is that alya?
@tepid bough
oh great, it was only 12 ep i think, idr it now
the season 1 ended
they are working to produce s2
but iâm much busier now
how should I react to this now
have already said "oh great" 3 times
lol
just act naturally and comfortably lol
Hello guys. I'm confuse about the use of i.e and e.g.
I know what they mean but in wich kind of situations I could use them?
Can you lern me the time forms
i.e. is Latin for id est which means "that is" and e.g. is Latin for exempli gratia, which means "for example."
so you use it when that english equivalent is appropriate. I.e. can be used when you could also use "that is," which is usually to further explain something. You use e.g. when you could have also said "for example," to give an example
Our future is doomed and doomed is our future. I.e. we're done for!
There are many different kinds of yummy chocolate brands, e.g., Mars, Snickers, and Ferrero Rocher.
How to prononce thought and how to pronounce fought ?
would "(dialogue)!..." be grammatically correct? Same thing for other punctuation like a question mark
I will make it simple for u
Perfect Infinitive with Modals - (1) past event that could happened but didn't & (2) possibility about a past action's happening & (3) certainty about a past action
Structure: Modal verb + have + past participle
For example:
(1) You should have drunk less (But you didn't and got absolute hammered)
(2) Napoleon could have won the battle of Waterloo if he reconstruct his army (but he didn't, the army were at its lowest point)
(3) I must have forgotten about my son's graduation ceremony (I did, and if u don't remember then it wasn't important)
I nearly made it or I almost made it
i think both are correct
but people use almost more
what does "I'd" stand for
âI hadâ or âI wouldâ
Iâd already completed the exam.
(I had)
Iâd rather have cake than a salad.
(I would)
Iâd like to meet up with you some time.
(I would)
gotcha thanks
I would put
â(dialogue)âŚ!â
Example:
âWaitâŚ!â
The other way around doesnât look right to me. We usually put the exclamation/question mark after the ellipsis, not in front.
âAre you sureâŚ?â
And not:
âAre you sure?âŚâ
what is "finna" stand for
it's a slang for "going to"
okay 
gonna and finna have same meaning then
See posts, photos and more on Facebook.
Hopefully the link works, but this is the best explanation.
Itâs exclusive to AAVE (African-American Vernacular English).
okay thank you!
What does it "who/what are you supposed to be" mean?
A way to ask someone to present themselves
I dont understand, could you clarify?
"Who/what are you supposed to be?" is a question people ask when they donât recognize someone's costume, role, or behavior, and want to know what it represents.
Examples:
At a costume party: "Who are you supposed to be?" (asking about someone's character or costume).
If someone is acting in a strange way: "What are you supposed to be?" (asking about their behavior).
Itâs a casual way to ask for clarification!
Guyssss
I want to practice English with native speakers please
My ielts exam is in two weeks
Me too
Hi! I want to learn english here with you all.
I want ask, if i can prectes my speking in thes application ?
Camply itâs expensive đđ
Or if one of you now anther application, I can speak on it. Let me now. đ
Hello guys
hope you are doing great
I'm an Upper-intermediate English learner and looking for a speaking partner
If you want to have a conversation direct me
Hi guys
I want to ask a question
It's a stupid one ngl but I don't know what's up with that question
Choose the correct answer
"I have ... to Egypt for 3 weeks"
" Gone, been"
guys, where can i talk english conversation
so i can improve my english speaking
Go there
@waxen cipher could you answer this question please?
@sly pier bro could you answer me, I had this stupid question in my test and I chose gone
I know both of them are correct but idk what brought this question in the test but it's most likely gone according to my teacher since they didn't determine whether they came from the trip or not
Okay? What does that have to do with the question
Oh
But like
Gone means that the person is still in the country
I still don't get how " I have gone to Egypt " is incorrect
For 3 weeks
Like bro
I have been to Egypt for 2 weeks
Means
That that person went to Egypt for 2 weeks
And came back
I was so confused bro
For me gone sounds better
But
I still think both are correct
Since there wasn't an auxiliary word that helped us to know whether he came back or not
I asked it too
But
I don't think so
I think both are correct
And that question was stupid to be put in the test
Last time she put a similar question too
But not
A present perfect question
Not a tense question
It was
Something like the baby was lying on the bed or laid on the bed I don't remember
Like bro these questions
These questions are stupid asf
And these questions themselves are incorrect since there aren't no specifications
With all due respect to my teachers I ask them about that
And
They make up a whole story
To convince me that a specific answer is correct
And these stories are unconvincing ngl
đ i actually think the definition of correct is what the teacher thinks or what we should choose for these questions since we are in Egypt
And that we are not advanced enough at that
Exactly
whats the difference between "either" and "neither"
either he or she is good at sports
It means he and she are good at sports
Neither I or my friend attended the competition
It means Both I and my friends didnt attend the competition
Amm i still dont fully got the concept, would you give me one more example


either - one or the other
neither - NOT one and NOT the other
therefore we're using
either ... or ...
neither ... nor ...
in our sentences
oh thanks got that now
Sorry it was my mistake i put the not in the first example
I fixed
Hello everyoneđ
Perhaps, because with knowledge, you can do many things faster and more efficiently (with a smaller expenditure of energy) than without knowledge. Thus, knowledge partially replaces power. Thus, knowledge is power.
You can read about the origin of this phrase on Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientia_potentia_est
Hi,
would you say that using the phrasal verb âbrush throughâ is akin to saying âglance throughâ ? (in a context where you quickly read through a text)
the difference between men and man is plural things right ?
yes, the word 'men' refers to a group of adult males. Whereas, the word 'man' refers to a singular adult male.
okay i have one thing too, kid means one, children means group of right ?
correct!
thankss
yes!
I see, in order to get the gist of a document at least I suppose. I appreciate your answer ! đđť
child = singular
children= plural
Is it "If I was you" or "If I were you"? I've heard people using both, but which one is more correct? Or which one would be more used?
Remember: "kid/kids" and "child/children" are different words.
kid, child = singular (1)
kids, children = plural (2+)
"If I were you" is correct, according to formal English. Use it when you pass grammar exams or in formal texts. It is about the present or future time, and it means "(right now) I am not you and will not be you in the future".
"If I was you" is still thought to be informal, but is widely used, and some people insist that, since it is used by so many people, it must be accepted as a norm.
There is an old dispute between grammarians about whether people should stick to the formal rules prescribed by professional linguists, or professional linguists should adjust the rules to the way people actually speak.
I'm no professional, but I hear both of those regularly. In my opinion, I would use "if I were you" more.
@visual umbra @deft lily thank you both :)đ
on your paragraph 2, it seems that you don't support their view? đ¤
Question. Can anyone tell me which one of the following is grammatically/syntactically correct?
**1) Just because you're a little smart doesn't mean you can look down on others.
- Just because you're a little smart, it doesn't mean you can look down on others.**
I have never heard the phrase âbrush throughâ in this context. I have heard the phrase âcomb throughâ used but this is a more detailed look at a subject. âIâll comb through the text until I find the perfect quote to support my argument.â
I would like to
I don't have any particular attitude to this. I just point out how things are.
As for myself, I prefer to use formal rules when I know them. Not to show off my knowledge, but to prevent possible misunderstandings.
I do not think I should do something just because "everyone else does this".
The first variant is incorrect.
"Just because you're a little smart" - this is not a subject for "doesn't mean...".
Thus, you have a sentence "doesn't mean..." without a subject.
The second variant is correct.
"Just because you're a little smart," - this is a subordinate clause. "...it doesn't mean you can look down on others." - this is the main clause with "it" as a subject.
both are correct, actually
the first version is correct grammatically, because the latter clause used omission, only thing that missing is the comma behind "doesn't"
the second version is structurally correct, but it looks off because of styling
both are formal
as for this, "If i were you" is the correct one, structurally and grammatically, not because it is "formal" english, it's just grammar, nothing formal nor informal here, not even academic
"If i was you" is simply a usage of AAVE or simply non-standard accent
i would highly recommend you follow the grammatical rules, not because it is posh, making you egotistical or smart or anything, but simply because it will ensure clear and effective communication, communication is a lot smoother, and simpler to understand when there is a singular understood and agreed upon ruleset governing it
also on the "If i were" vs "If i was", you can use this example to compare
"If I were you, I would not have try that" <- meaning that the main subject "I" does not believe that they are "you", and is simply imagining a scenario that is in a different reality and is guessing how things would be different
"If I was you, I didn't mean to" <- meaning that "I" doesn't know if they were "you" or not, and is speaking with uncertainty about the current situation / reality
is the answer that clearcut? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_usage_controversies
In the English language, there are grammatical constructions that many native speakers use unquestioningly yet certain writers call incorrect. Differences of usage or opinion may stem from differences between formal and informal speech and other matters of register, differences among dialects (whether regional, class-based, or other), and so for...
unless you want to change the entire system in a day, it's clear cut enough to follow
lemme quote again "i would highly recommend you follow the grammatical rules, not because it is posh, making you egotistical or smart or anything, but simply because it will ensure clear and effective communication, communication is a lot smoother, and simpler to understand when there is a singular understood and agreed upon ruleset governing it"
kinda like driving a car, no one is stopping you from driving how you want, but if you want to travel safely and properly, it's better to follow the rules
it ends up being a subject of debate, meaning that it is currently contested đ
yeah, but there isn't even an answer as to whether that construct is grammatical or not
im pretty sure i just did?
If i were you = imaginative scenario
if i was you = real scenario, but unsure
and I'm more sure I'm contesting you on grounds of "it's just grammar" being a dubious claim?
that equals sign is a sign of prescriptive language
and even if not, people still use "if I was you" subjunctively without problem
then you're actively following the hyper correction section within that article you just sent
?
I didn't disallow "if I were you"; I'm telling you that you aren't supposed to proscribe "was"
then what should i say?
don't say anything at all
then how should we answer the question that people are asking as to which is the correct one?
Hello
both are correct - deal with it
hello there
then what about "I is"
nonstandard but I can see it being correct someplace
not to mention if it was part of an academic test, then which would be graded as correct?
Whats the difference between:
I was to have worked last week but I changed my mind
I was gonna work last week but I changed my mind
idk, it doesn't actively cause confusion
damn, maybe i should hang up my knowledge of this
wrong context - the original question asks for which one is more often used
academic tests would have no saying :)
yeah, then it would be "If i were"
that's agreeable
ok?
why "ok?"?
you're confusing
to recap, I agree that
- "if I were you" is more formal
- "if I were you" is more often used
but I disagree that - "if I was you" is incorrect
- "if I was you" is unusable formally
i never mention that "If i was you" is unusable formally though
nor have i say that it's incorrect, but instead gave examples of a different meaning that could be understood if it is used
it's a recap and something I repeatedly mentioned
let it stand lel
bruh
yes, the different meaning exists
it didn't stop the "were" meaning from merging tho
yeah, hence why i never said it was incorrect
im confused because you suddenly try to put up a massive debate on styling, usage controversies, etc..
because of this message
it looked like you made sure it's the correct one
yes, because grammatically, it is the correct one
we're not discussing stylistically, nor conversationally
and that is what I disagree with
then good for you on that
lol
but i disagree on that, because it can create misunderstanding
grammar = meaning when
grammar is the general rules as to how a sentence is formally structured
like i said in my anecdote earlier, just like with driving a car
You won't go?
No.
that's grammatically a correct way to agree that they will not go
nevertheless, even some native speakers look at this and raise their eyebrows
yeah, but same deal with "Be going to" and "will" since a lot of people tend to use them interchangably
point is, grammar doesn't ensure meaning is disambiguated
but it does guarantee an agreed-upon understanding
hence why grammar and meaning do go hand-in-hand, but both are not mutually exclusive
which can always be vague
language is vague in general, hence why we have grammatical rules in the first place
unless we're using iconography, obviously
the grammar of English doesn't help đ
then why are we learning it?
because of historical events đ
that's...
actually it
be descriptive
grammar rules change over time - follow them
alright, why should we change this
language doesn't wait
that's it?
that's...
also actually it
considering the vocabulary being morphed to use slangs, that's pretty normal
if you don't follow, language shall outpace you and you die
damn, i can die?
we can die
that's deep
(please, linguists, laugh)
so why do teachers exist to teach this when they're actively perpetuating the problem?
blame suspicious, politically fueled curricula
why haven't we thrown everything to the wind yet, considering the billions of minds changing every centuries
language is a big business fr
then what have you done to change it?
beside throwing a wikipedia page and debating randomly
idk, try to understand ppl?
i won't lie, your tone at the very beginning of the debate was very pokey
despite the fact that it was a simple question, now exploded into hundreds of lines of replies
I'll continue to challenge some ideas with my "hey, this is an established Wikipedia article that disagrees with you lol"
yeah, but the thing is
gives some starting evidence :P
we have now both made the questions irrelevant, and have both taken this off-road for quite a while
simple question doesn't always have simple answer, sometimes
we did have an answer at the end đ¤
the question itself now has lost it's original intention
therefore, a simple question, have been bloated
kinda like if you want to eat egg or not, but now it's an entire debate on which came first, the egg, or the chicken
it's bloated
conclusion: eat chicken
but is that a clear cut answer tho đ
jokes aside, good talk
but i dont think we should debate it too heavily on new learners
there's a time, and place
and this time, this place, we've both bloated this question way out of proportion
conclusion 2: let it stand
yeah we're taking that nihilistic approach
for now tho, I rest
same, this is not healthy after 5 classes and also sick
see you some other times bud @rapid bison
damn, that some interesting convos those 2 had 
Hello
If an adj word has a "-ly" at the end of its word, is it become an adverb?
Quick = quickly?
usually, yes
And the adj with -ness at the end will be a noun too?
yeah, usually
There are some adjectives already ending on that suffix (-ly), friendly, for instance. These are, to my best knowledge, not simply adjusted in the way described so a workaround is needed. In that manner, you would need to use "in a friendly way" instead of "friendlily" which is not considered an actual word. Another exception that comes to mind is the fact that some words solely exisist as adverbs, let's take "seldom" for example. While, theoretically, you could use it interchangeably with "seldomly", that is not a common practice which is the reason I, at least, would stick to "seldom". I'm not 100% sure on that last bit, though, pretty sure "seldomly" is at least used by some people as far as I know, but mayhaps wrongly so.
Generally speaking, though, I don't think these exceptions are that important since they apply to merely a very small amount of words
Excuse me, are as and since interchangeable because we often use as and since when we want to focus more on the result than the reason?
I mean this.
Because is informal
Cambridge is a reliable organisation but that article is very generalised
It's clearly aimed at beginners
Are those interchangeable
what does "dope" use for
Does the word injunction have two kinda contracting meanings?
I see this word used in legal context and it is used to mean 'stop someone from doing something/prohibiting'.
But sometimes I see the phrase in my study material "religious injunction" where it seems closer in meaning to command
There are generally 2 definitions.
It can mean âto drugâ (doping), which is to enhance performance.
âShould we allow athletes to dope (take performance-enhancing drugs) in professional sports?â
The second definition of âdopeâ is a way of informally saying âcoolâ.
âI got a new Playstation this weekend!â
âThatâs dope!â
Itâs very informal/slang, and it isnât really used anymore. I canât remember the last time Iâve heard it used.
Dope can also refer to someone who is not very smart, âI am such a dope, I canât believe I locked my keys in the car.â It is not often used in this context either
I always had that question:
Why when we usw singular "they", we don't use "is" instead of "are" to denote that it is singular?
Wouldn't be more logical to say "they is going to the mall"?
it's because it is considered to be a general noun, iirc
kinda like you being treated as a general noun, despite the fact that it might depict a singular entity or multiple
same with The + Adj
The + adjective is a kind of generalized nouns to indicate a group of people
For example: The rich, the poor, the great
Can you tell me exactly what parts of this sentence is wrong and why it is grammatically wrong: The bigger the drops are or the more heavily the rain is falling, the more strongly the stress is.
it's because your superlative comparison is faulty, it should be:
The bigger the drops are or the heavier the rain fall is, the stronger the stress is (become)
note : i changed the "the rain is falling" -> "the rain fall is" because before and after a connector such as And, Or, you should keep the same word forms and tense
@orchid nebula
Thanks.How about the expression "the more strongly the stress is?".Is there anything wrong with that part of the sentence grammatically?
more and strongly is one, changing it to stronger is more grammatically correct
So it is right grammatically?
however, there are cases where more strongly can work, but it's usually more of a stylistic choice
if it is "The stronger the stress is" then yes
Specifically,"the more strongly the stress is"
for example, Adam feels more strongly about this topic than James, meaning that his feeling is stronger upon this topic is shown more strongly than Adam's
then no
you can actually change it in a way that makes the confusion dissapear by simply changing the verbs
Thanks,as an English speaker I know it's wrong in spoken English,but I can't give a reason why it's wrong as per grammar rules.
like "The more stress can be felt" "The stronger the stress will be" "The stress will grow stronger" "The more the feeling of stress becomes"
no worries, we're all here to learn, you can practice paraphrasing your sentences for it to become clearer though
it's a great way to practice
got it thanks
What's the difference btw
i'll do and i'll be doing
I use them randomly so idk what's the real difference
Okayy Thanks
One more thing, "Thanks dope!" now what's dope meanig here
You don't mind me correcting you ?
nope
What's dope mean is wrong the correct form would be what does dope mean or what's dope meaning
oh right
i phrase that wrong
gotta correct
stylistically, there's no major differences, grammatically, Will do refers to your next action immediate action, such as I will go home
Will be -ing refers to an action in the future in general
ex : I will go home after school = after school, i'm heading home = immediate action, queued up after school
I will be going home after school = action in the future, could be after school tomorrow, the day after, etc...
both are usually used interchangably though, so don't worry too much
Hmmm it is a little ambiguous and sort of depends on tone/context. If the person seemed like they were being sarcastic then they were using dope to mean an individual lacking intelligence. It they sounded happy when the said it. Then I would say dope is being used like the word âcoolâ.
What is the context/where is this from?
someone said that to me long ago
Thanks you so much so does it count for '' i can't be doing '' and '' i can't do '' ?
i have to be doing etc ?
i have to do
that's a whole different can of worm, actually
can't be doing basically means that you should not do something
like "I can't be doing this, don't force me please"
as for I can't do, it just mean you lack the ability to, or don't want to
as for I have to be doing, that's usually means a forced situation, that you have to be doing an action, otherwise something will happen
I have to do means you have an obligation to do something
oh ok
thanks you
and what's the difference btw i have seen and i saw i've been struggling with these tenses
so i'd say i have seen my teacher ( rencently ) and i saw my teacher last week ( in the past )
Sorry to bother you but what's the difference btw i have to go i need to go i got to go and i must go and i've got to go
I have to go = something require you to go, obligation
I need to go = you have a need to deal with something, or to deflect something, or to state a need to travel
I got to go = grammatically problematic if alone, usually its âi got to go to disney landâ because you finally get a chance to go
I must go = similar to have to go, but with more urgency
Iâve got to go = same urgency system, but between have to and must
Im not too sure on the last one, since its usually used in conversational english, so do keep that in mind
that = refer to item away from you
this = refer to items near you, in your reach
it = refer to an item / object/ animal
those are similar to that, but plural
these are similar to this, but plural
what about in an online conversation* ?
For example
we say we have already had this conversation
or we have already had that conversation ?
so '' it '' is for an item* neither near nor far from us
it refers to an item, in general
when its online, those and that refers to something outside of the scope of the conversation itself
this is refering to a topic that has been brought up again
this refers to a topic that has been discussed before, but not now
oh ok are they interchangeables ?
sorta, but not really?
lemme give an example, let's just say that We talked about cats yesterday, and now we're bringing it up again
"We have already talked about this(the cat topic)"
okay
