#📚|english-questions
1 messages · Page 43 of 1
Does the sentence „He might think that he has to remedy his (Darwin‘s) theory“ makes sense?
Remedy in the sense of rethink/reconsider?
I could understand tenet to mean think/reconsider. Also to amend and rectify. Remedy usually follows the identification of something being incorrect or not as it should be.
To have a party will usually, inform you if who is having the party but the way it is used. Typically it will be " let's have a party" (let us), meaning those listening and the speaker will have the party together perhaps doing with many more others that are not there also.
I'm having a party, means i bb an organizing the party or a party. Those i speak to may or may not be invited.
You are having/had a party? It's usually a question asked of someone. If you say.. you are (you're) having a party or will either be a surprise at if you just walked by and see they have s party, or you could be telling them that they shall have a VB party (command).
These are all contrived. The most common is "let's have a party" meaning let's get together and we will all be partying, or else it will be "I'm having a party. "
To do a hair cut, will usually be spoken as,
Let me give you a haircut; or let me cut your hair; or i cut hair: I'm a hair dresser; I'm a barber: I'll cut your hair,
For the recipient it will be, i had my hair cut; i had my hair styled; i got a cut; i went to the barber; i went to the hairdresser.
Hi! I hope everybody’s fine! In my english class, we have to say if we do agree with this quote: « we want to end gender inequalities but to do that we need everyone to be involved. Emma watson
I wrote that, is it corect? Idk if i made mistakes
I do agree with this quote because I think each person has to fight against sexism. It has to be a collective effort: men have to educate themselves about sexism (they can ask questions to women around them of course but it’d better if they could look for the information by themselves to lighten the mental load), the parents have to try to raise their children with feminist values (regardless of their gender), and above all, all the women (and other gender minorities who experience sexism daily) should support each other.
But what is the question.
Well, my teacher asked if we agree, and i asked if my text was correct, because i probably made spelling mistakes. Sorry if it wasn’t clear
Nice
Hey everyone, by any chance does anyone have the PDF's for Hoff Erika 2013 language development 5th edition or linguistic analysis 9th edition?
been looking everywhere and don't seem to have any luck
Everything is too expensive and I don't really have the spare money to buy these books for my education that my teacher wants me to get
Try https://archive.org/ sometimes they do have pdf of old text books
Thank you, I will have a search now
unfortunately no luck, any more suggestions?
Contact the author directly https://psy.fau.edu/people/ehoff.php
https://libgen.rs has both
Library Genesis is a scientific community targeting collection of books on natural science disciplines and engineering.
I won't post the direct links, though
in what terms
do you mean
Connect with is like to link but more in a close way, for example it is used for linking a device to a web, so it s kinda of a unique relation
insnae

Mug is native he ll know way better than me. Hey bro 🙂 haha
insane
so if someone wants to connect with u
it means like they wanna keep in touch with u
or have a "connection"
i wanna connect with my best friend
example
Thanks, I didn't know that meaning
but it depends how u use it T-T
and what context its in
Isn't connect used only with people you want to be close with?
Like best friend, crush, or someone similarly close?
Not just a random friend from school, that you liked and want to chill out with every once in awhile
Is it correct was the question
Do close off the question marks. If it's a question, then it should be hard to make a mistake as it should be exactly as originally said. A paraphrase is where you give the same message but in your own words.
Yes it's sounding ok.
"Likes taking over dislikes" is it correct to say in the meaning that there are more like likes than dislikes?
It's most likely referring to that, yes.
It's a little hard to understand
The likes are exceeding the dislikes.
If it already happened, you wouldn't want to use the continuous tense.
There are more likes than dislikes, is good
yeah but connect can also mean like "Sally connects her Lego brick's" but with connect in that tense meaning like "I want to connect with Sally" like in a friend way but it means like I want to know more about Sally or I want to be friends with Sally. In English we do not special words for friends nor family (besides some pronouns and names), I have no idea how to sum it up
hope I tried to explain it
I see
I guess it's kinda personal like
Someone may say I love Sally
Meaning she's my partner, I want to know a lot about her, you know the drill
While someone other may say I love Sophie, meaning she's my friend
That's probably how I felt about this word, so some people would consider it to be something reserved for people you have really close connection
While others will just say it to any friend
I think that's probably the case, but I'd see it in a more romantic manner too. It's pretty big in dating site blurbs and all that.
When to use "I'm older than you" and "I'm your elder"?
Help
Connect is used for people you may not have seen in a while. It's not just lovers, best friends or friends, but can be anyone you may have met in your past, or when suggesting you meet in the future. The term has always been a general term. It's been hijacked by Facebook,linkedin etc, so most people think if it in terms of anyone.
Alright, thanks :3
If heart is in a bad condition is it weak, sick, bad?
Hello,can anyone tell me how to learn english effectively so i dont have doubts?what are the methods you guys use to improve reading comprehension and what apps and wesbite do you suggest me to improve all 4 modules of english?
Talk to people who speak English and listen to shows, podcasts, youtube videos and maybe read english books...this is my best advice for you to learn but you rather set yourself surrounded by the language and or use apps which can help I kinda recommend Duolingo bc obivous reasons 🔥
Where do i find those peoplr who actually interested in talking?
Maybe in vcs here
Duo lingo doesnt provide any translation in my language so this option is not good for me
Do you think a teacher help better than resources on website and apps we have on net?
yeah
because its interactive
and you can learn alot from other ppl
Which one is interactive?
I actually don't know but you can prob sign up
maybe do work sheets
hi guys I'm bad with to english so can someone help me to found a way learn more english class or speak . thank you
Whats gerund
Friends usually say I'm older than you, when trying to impress someone that they are more knowledge (based on being older - friendly conversation). I'm your elder is not used by people that i know of, even those u up in there 60s i don't hear of it. It did get used by old people, those that are over 70ish now, but i don't think it's used much in that context now but the younger generations at they are getting older. In Australia it is used to refer to the senior people in first nations.
@cyan forge
Usual term is bad heart when chatting about personal woes. Weak heart might be used by a kid to their sports teacher if they don't want to play a sport that's going to "kill" them
I just took the english test at my uni
Damn it sure was something
I got to the B2 level, probably didn't pass the C1
Does anyone know any English essay writing practice books
For clarity, It was like a "progressive test", meaning that you had to do all the levels. If you didn't pass a certain level, you couldn't go to the next one
Teachers are very expensive relative to reading and listening to youtube. In the end the teacher provides a grammatical structures and then provides some exercises to give you practice. The only benefit then is a quick feedback to say you pronounced it well or that you have the correct structure/answer.
Doing it yourself, means you can do it when you want and have time. You can spend more time looking at the structure and more time to complete the exercises. The down side is most people don't bother to set aside time to do their study and it never gets done. Vc can supplement your personal study by giving you quick access to people to listen to your work, and for you to hear things you may need immediately.
Funnily enough, I found A1-A2 far more difficult than B1-B2, Just because each audio recording was in bri'ish english or even with the scottish accent
The american ones were only in the C1
Which to me is simply wrong
American english Is generally speaking easier than british english, period
Maybe Americans can't do a1/ A2 
Scots are top
showing verb as subject and object
where do i found those clips?
vc??
I was there. So much calamity
Idk
"The company’s pitch was to drive down costs and bring innovation to space technologies".
Even if I couldn't find any similar meaning on the dictionary, is "pitch" in here translatable as aim? Like, " the company aim was ..."
Or does it have any other meaning
Do David borrow my money?
Got it Moneypenny just helped me on VC thank you)
Yes in this sentence that's basically it. A vision or aim.
Usually pitch is used by staff to a boss to get approval for an idea. It's usually a quick concise statement, because bosses are too busy to waste time listening.
A pitch is also given when a company is trying to sell an idea to a customer for a service or product they can sell. (This sounds like your example)
But a company doesn't follow a pitch. A pitch pushes an idea into the mind of the boss, and that translates to an approved project or shapes a business through the vision, strategies, goals.
Did David....?
Will David...?
Can David...?
Must David...?
Who is David
That s so clear, thank you
right now, it’s just an example name. I don’t think they were referring to someone’s actual name
Probably use it when you can use the word "probably". It's a way of admitting something may not be absolutely true because you do not know for sure, sort of.
"kindof"
like you think you're right but theres something else
"I can sort of speak French" is like saying you can kinda speak french but not too well
like not to a full degree
Hello guys, wanted to ask you
What is the difference between "Down below/ Down under / Down"??
down below - under something
down under - australia or new zealand
down - the direction down, like left or right
Like 'to some extent', right?
i guess so?
Hmm
A bit confused about "down below" and "down under"
down below is describing the location of something as "under another thing"
down under is an informal name for australia and new zealand
down under can also be used the same as down below
Is there any difference between being considerate and being kind?
Being kind means that youve done something good for another person
considerate involves thinking about things and not wanting anyone to feel bad
can i say that being considerate means to prioritize others as well, not only only myself?
considerate is putting other people’s ideas or feelings in consideration, it doesn’t necessarily mean to prioritize others
what about being kind
and being kind is respecting others in anyways, like thanking others for their services
does that mean being considerate also means being kind
Hey guys I wanna know how I can enrich my vocabulary
memorize and practice those words in a conversation constantly
being kind
Duolingo can help with that if it has your native language
being kind is like a broader concept since it can mean being considerate, being generous, etc?
yeah, #💭|general is perfect for slightly normal online conversation, but not for real life communication all the time
Pretty much
Being kind is respecting other services
Being considerate is taking other ideas and feelings in
I think I cannot escape from the influence of my native language
I’m a native Chinese speaker and you know there’re many differences between these two languages
I believe you can, but it takes time and dedication
I think it is still very possible if you surround yourself in english influence and take chances, might be hard but not impossible
Good idea
for what context?
Yes you can, but you have to add “will reach popularity” or “reached popularity”
I don’t know how to explain why that works so you might have to wait for a teacher or someone else to tel you so you dont make mistakes with that
Hi
I have an urgent question for the native speakers
How do I greet a teacher on a zoom call?
Good morning? Hello?
Do you have the exact context where you saw/heard the word?
But I'm not a native English speaker
In my school, we're expected to greet the teacher with a 'good morning'
I'd never ever greet my teacher with 'hello', not even in my wildest dreams
hello will you guys help me in proposal to my english teacher? i mean how
What do you need help with?
just realized it was a nickname
It's fine.
What is the difference between adjust vs tune vs tweak and configure?
could you provide some context
yes you would be able to say it if him refers to a person who was / lived in the city and got oppertunities in / from the city.
This discord channel opens doors for me to practice English. It’s okay?
yes that would be correct, though a bit of a strange way to put it.
haha thats okay, everyone starts somewhere.
What about since and for?
Not sure but since is used when you want to clarify the start of the time period like since morning or since 1960s....and for is used when you want to specify the tenure...like i know him for 6 years
E.g. I'm learning music since 2018.
I'm learning music for 5 years now.
Since and for can also be used as conjunctions in addition to the adverbial use Mojo has told you about
Adjust is usually moving something because it's not in the correct position or is not working optimally. Adjust the position of a chair so you can see something while sitting in it. Adjust the tv so it has a better view angle. You can adjust your camera to take a better picture because it's not presently taking the best picture.
Tweak is a fine adjustment. Something is ok, but could just be a bit better if you tweak it. Focusing the camera. Most is in focus, but if you tweak it a bit, you can see the hairs on the faces of the people in the picture.
Tune usually refers to things that make sound. You will tune a guitar, or violin. You can also tune an engine so that it is running smoothly. Radios and tvs are also tuned into channels.
Configure, is not adjusting. Configuring is when you have a device that has a set of parameters that need to be set, to provide you with personal usage. For instance phone software can be configured with dark or light screens, colors, themes etc. When you buy a car, you may be asked to choose options. That is configuring the car, sedan/wagon, color, wheels, leather seats etc. When you get the car, you may configure the onboard computer, seat positions, temperature, sports mode, etc. Basically configure is changing options, but not related to something that is broken or incorrect.
Proposal? Proposal means you wish to ask your teacher to marry you? Is this what you are asking help for?
Or did you mean you have to prepare a proposal?
Good morning mr/mrs/ms/miss/dr <surname>. Is fine and most polite. Or if they have a title, good morning professor, or good morning professor <surname>
Sorry so late
If they are casual, and if they introduce themself by their first name, then hello <given name>, of good morning <given name>. Would be okay.
Joe reached popularity as a talented athlete is fine. Slightly more common alternative is "Joe shot to fame...". Or even simply "Joe is famous now"
We can also say 'rise to popularity/fame', right? 
someone can have a rise to fame yes
Doesn't just 'rise to fame' work? Like, 'He rose to fame following the release of his first album'
yes
👍
Ty
Does "don't worry about it" sound rude? What other expressions would you suggest?
well, i dont think so, buut u can use "no worries" or "no problem(np)" too
When to using "do" to make a question pls ?
hi, can someone help me with this. When do i need to use "THE"? it seems to me that duolingo puts them random
I see the border between the countries
do you have the toothbrushes?
"The" is nominative, so it change the sentence meaning
I dont know to explain it because im still learning too. But from my understanding questions start with auxiliary verbs like: do, does, did, is, are, was, were, etc
Do you need help?
Do you search something?
Are you looking for something?
i don't understand
Oh i know thankss
When you need to buy bread, you say :" hello can i have bread pls"
But when you ask from your friend the key you say : hi bro, can you give me the key pls ?" ( because you and your friend know and has the keys ) you know ?
"The" you point at unique things, notice that sometimes you also see "the second" but at the end is always pointing out at unique subjects
If you just want bread you ask for bread, but no I want THE bread
Also dates are unique, the 1st of September
Because you don't want particularly this bread but just a bread
You use "Do" similar to "Can" to say "Are you capable of" like:
Do you need help
Are you capable of NEEDING help?
It's usually for yes and no answers
Like ... If you want meet your baker from your friend you will say : its THE baker of my village. But if you just want present him profession you will say : it is baker
thanks, i think i understand
*it is a baker
You need "a" to point at generic things
Yes i forgot sorry
You're welcome, ask here anytime
I understand thanks
I actually might be not 100% correct I just went on intuition 😅
Oh don't worrie i use "do" with my intuition i just wanted to know the rule 🤡
i think you use do only for present simple. (but i may be wrong )
"Do you needed any help in you life ?"
Hum idk 🤔
I thinks this sentences its correct
But its not present
Will you need... Is in future form
In that case is "Did you needed..."
Yes
do you need not needed
Yes but i wanted make a past sentence but i write "do" and don't "did"
but i wanted to make a sentence using past and i wrote "do" instead of "did"
kk, back to duolingo. thanks for help and see you around
No
Argh need to study more also please explain
English doesn't allow double negation except for very few special exceptions
So didn't needed is just wrong
It? The Baker is a person. So it should be, 'He/she/they is/are the baker of the village'.
Yes my bad sorry
The is correct there btw
Tomorow because from me its night 🌃
I use "do" all the time to make questions. However thinking about it, you will receive yes/no answers (it's a closed question). Open questions will hopefully get a longer answer.
Do you like to eat? Yes
What do you like to eat? Burgers, Ice cream, vegetables....
The sentence is used in response to someone who feels they have done wrong, perhaps apologizing. It's not rude to say, don't worry in response.
"The" is the definite article. It is used in front of a non, when you are referring to a specific object.
If you are taking about countries if the middle east, and during the conversation you refer to countries again, you would use the countries, to continue making more that those are the countries you are talking about. If you do not use 'the', and just say 'countries' you are referring to any country in the world generally. For example, " i lived in the middle east. The countries are very hot." You can tell that in the second sentence i am saying middle east countries are hot. If i was to leave " the" it if the sentence it would be.... " i lived in the middle east. Countries are very hot". This example, is telling the listener that countries in general are very hot, all countries, but just middle east countries. Fluent English speakers would not use the second example. It is probably understandable, but confusing (perplexing).
"A"/"an" is the indefinite article. It refers to a type of object(noun) but does not suggest you are referring to any particular one. For example, "I lived next to 'a' lake". You know i lived by a lake, but you do not know which one, because i am speaking generally. "There is a big lake in my city. I lived by 'the' lake" is used to indicate a specific lake (the lake in the city. Something that we have been referring to or discussing)
Use the present tense of the verb when adding do/did i make a question.
It is an ok response to use it on occasion. For example, if you ask who is it?, When the fire is being knocked on, a person can respond 'it's the milk man'. Similarly if you ask someone who answered the door, they could respond with it also. Used as a gender neutral term.
I am up for something or I am down for something
both have same meaning ?
can someone explaing to me
Up for something means you probably can do something, but you don’t have to
Down for something means you are very confident and excited for something
@oblique venture
I thought the reaction was a middle finger and felt like I did smthn wrong for a second 😭 💀
I don't think the aforementioned sentence is a cleft one
👀
what does cleft mean?
I'm copy pasting.....
We use cleft sentences, especially in speaking, to connect what is already understood to what is new to the listener. In a cleft sentence, a single message is divided (cleft) into two clauses. This allows us to focus on the new information.
It-clauses are the most common type of cleft clause. The information that comes after it is emphasised for the listener. The clause which follows the it-clause is connected using that and it contains information that is already understood. We often omit that in informal situations when it is the object of the verb:
A:
Sharon’s car got broken into yesterday, did it?
B:
No. It was Nina’s car that got broken into!
thx
Is it correct and natural to say "I'll save your number back."?
like a phone number?
yeah probably
It's how Yoda speaks
hello
welcome Kiu
hello there
welcome Kiu
i was wondering if am talking to two different people
which is correct, "where are u going?" or "where are u going to?"?
Both are correct
could i ask it like that:
— i'm leaving now
— where?
or should it be "where to"?
wiat ig itd be "to where" not "where to" if this is possible
Well neither's exactly correct. If it's a super informal context, just 'where' is enough
No.... what are you trying to imply there exactly?
If you create an object and describe the manner you could say "made out of passion"
If is a gift you could say "I made it just for you"
"Emotion" is use to indicate things in your mind, so an object can "give you emotion" but the thing that will make you do things is "passion, love... etc"
where to
Is also fine to say "Where"
oh
sounds weird though because when you leave somewhere youre going to somewhere else
Whats gerund ?
"Where" can only used as response like "What"
wdym
If I'm using words like Where, Why, How, What... They must be used in response of something else
-I been running all day nonstop
-Why?
-I had to meet a friend on the other end of the city
-Where?
yeah
You also sound really straightforward so don't use it too often 😂
It's a verb in ing form that can be use as noun, example studying
I study...... at the moment (You need to say what you are studying answers "the English language")
I'm studying at the moment
While studying I spend sometime answering here
Those examples aren't gerunds. They're just verbs with the present participle form. To be a gerund, they have to actually be used as nouns. For example: "Reading is relaxing," and "I like studying."
"Reading" is a subject in the first example. "Studying" is a direct object in the second.

Thanks my bad examples will end up teaching me more 
I don't understand the meaning of you include "back". It is ok to say," I'll save your number"
greetings everyone, I'd like to ask a question
if one was to start learning different languages and expanding their experience in each, how would their English be effected? (specifically languages completely foreign like chinese or Hebrew or the likes)
also is there a test I can take here to rate my English language skills?
'Where to?' Is fine. But not just 'where', especially with the statement, I'm leaving now. Generally, 'where' will be responded to with 'where what?' because it doesn't make real sense to ask.
it's like saying "I'll save your number too." Is it incorrect to replace too with back there?
generally, if we really wanna be picky and just harsh, then every second you speak a different language than english, your english deteriorates, but in real world this is not as easy to forget the language you already know as I just kind of threatened it might be, like you'd have to really pay no attention to it and not use it whatsoever to forget it, assuming you already know it well
I see
also do you guys have tips on how to write a scholarship application letter over email?
A an example, I spent about a year in Germany, speaking French and German primarily full time. After only about 3 months, when i was speaking English, i would be unconsciously throwing in the propositions of French or German. It was a little strange.
hm, interesting
when you learnt a 3rd or 4th langauge did you feel your cognitive ability improve?
Use 'too' or 'also' but not back.
Email is the medium. Just write the letter as you would normally and attach it as a .pdf. don't do it as the body of an email. You don't know what it will look like at the other end.
Read the requirements for the scholarship on the website. There is information usually given on what they require, or format or style etc. It may even be a video application for example.
You can start to see patterns between languages, that may help guess vocabulary or structure, or even give a basic understanding of languages from near by countries.
does it extend beyond linguistics
(like mathematics and day-to-day life for example?)
I tried lots of languages, useless now. My mathematics didn't improve. I don't think i noticed any change at all.
💯
man
well I wish you the best of luck
if you or anyone wants any help I could offer do not hesitate to ask.

whenever i go to greece or albania for an extended period of time i tend to replace normal words like yes and no with the greek and albanian words (still saying "yes" in greek to this day)
i'd also usually have a delay in some english convos because im not used to speaking it at that point
english def isn't lost but i just take some delay when not speaking it for a bit
At least you arent a monolingual beta
friendly fire will not be tolerated
Bruh
I also recall a slight delay, when English was required, but i think it was due to the shock of not being the language of the moment.
If you need just a mock online test you could try the British Council app, the pool of questions isn't large so do it every now and than
You improve on the field you are studying on, you will never learn how to go to space by reading french grammar books
You will probably learn how to talk about cheese
Ça, c'est pas vrai
Don't worry about it, was a troll account
Dealt with
Disha Florence never thought she would become a web novel writer.The lady from Bangladesh,was trying to find a way to free herself from the restrictions faced by a woman,(1)______wish she has had since she was 8.
Why put "a" instead of "the" in front of "wish", hasn't the wish already been stated in the previous sentence "find a way to free herself from the restrictions faced by a woman"?
Which is correct:
- Did anyone play Starfield?
or - Have anyone played Starfield?
Why do some people use double negation in informal speech? E.g. ain't no way. Does it more emphasize the negation itself?
Has anyone*
Unfortunately, my knowledge in the grammar isn't as deep as I wish it would be, but I believe that the second one is more appropriate as you're asking about others' overall experience
both are fine
apart from it's "has everyone"
i just say it because
it's just what i say really
just an evolution of the speech
its just an evolution of "no way"
the mistake is to play garbage
By using 'a', wish, we are saying that it is over of many wishes she may have had. It is indefinite. If 'the' is used, then we are assuming it is the only wish she had, which is too specific to be sure of. We therefore use the more general assumption that 'the' wish to free herself is just one of many.
Ain't is just poor English that is commonly used in some parts of the world. Then it's made worse by following it with no. It actually works out as 'there is not no' >>> there is, which is opposite to what the speaker is trying to say. 🙅♀️
How can I inform someone of the death of another person in a respectful manner?
no one died btw just asking lol
Both are ok, but are different questions for different situations. The second is the more usual question to ask. You want to know if anyone has ever played the game in their life.
The first question is related to a more recent timeframe and situation. An example would be if a bunch of friends went to a game convention, and you all played different games. Then you may ask, "did anyone play ...?". The difference is that it relates to the event. The friends may have played it at other times, but this question confines the question to the convention.
(2 should say 'had anyone played...?')
That is something that takes a lot of thought, even for professionals. Generally personally, have a direct approach, and is probably the best. "I'm sorry to have to tell/inform you that ...
A. has passed away
B. died
C. been killed in a (reason)"
No lols 
lol
when I pronounce "passed" should I emphasize the d at the end or is it more of a t?
Passed, not past
Pronounced with the 'ed'
It’s a really soft d, but if it’s next to a vowel it should give off a soft mix of ‘d’ or ‘t’ like “passed over” (pas-tou-vur)
This could vary from person to perisn
InTeed
hahaha
Excuse me .... inTeeT
E on both sides
lol
My gratitude, ma'am!
So, you personally advice to avoid using this "word replacer" even in informal speech? But aren't such details create casualness? Or is it beyond the boundaries of what is acceptable?
"poor English" what the hell lol
It's not standard, but that doesn't mean it makes no sense or that people use it because they don't know how to use something else
People use it simply because it's part of their dialect, as it is in many places around the world
It also follows sensible rules like most things in English do, and if you understand them then it isn't strange at all. Multiple negatives happen because of negative concord, i.e. negating a sentence negates all parts of it. Plenty of languages do that, it is not in itself an illogical process (good luck telling Spanish speakers they're speaking poorly). By historical chance, the features of English that became standard don't include that, but that's arbitrary and certainly not the fault of anyone who uses it.
Are these two statements correct in grammar?
-
How long ago did you study English?
-
How long did you study English?
- This makes it sound like someone successfully completed studying English in the past. We don't typically view studying in that way, so it sounds strange. You could ask "How long ago did you start/stop studying English"
- This is fine (though a teacher may expect you to stick "for" at the start or end depending on how pedantic they are)
I believe no language can be fully studied as it tends to change over time, which means it's a life-long process, so most likely the question should be "how long have you been studying English?".
hey everybody , I have a couple of questions first of all what youtube channels would you recommend to practice lisitening and increace active vocab , second , is there any female partner who wants to practice with me
"these machines don't make life easier — they make life more harassed"
what does "harassed" mean in this context?
yes
harassed is used as an adjective here, so life is described as strained or stressful
harassed as an adjective can be different from harass as a verb
got more 2 questions
-
in "it used to be that if a client..." can "if it used to be that" be replaced by "back then"?
-
"you're keeping me from working". is "keeping me from" in the sentence implying that I'm forcing the other person not to work or that I'm just annoying them in a way they can't focus on working?
How to use blood related in a sentence?
- Yes.
- “Keeping me from” implies that someone else is preventing you from working.
for the #2 can i use it in both contexts i exposed?
yea
Sure.
thanks
greetings people I wanna ask
if I want to rate my scholarship application and improve it based on someones judgement who do I send it to
someone here?
Yes. They create casualness, but as i said it is commonly used in parts of the world as normal. Its a sensitive word usage. ( as the following comment from Alc indicated. ). If people use it where you end up speaking English, then feel free to use it. However, so that you don't get in trouble in parts of the world that don't use it, just avoid it. Using it in anything other than casual or local conversation may mean the difference between winning a contract or losing it.
Disclaimer: And there ain't no problem with not using double negative. I use them all the time.

These are both valid questions grammatically, but have different meaning. The first asks how long ago was it when you studied. That could be 5, 10 30 years ago, perhaps when the person was at school.
The second question is asking how long did you spend studying. That could be 1,2 or perhaps 3 years duration.
Example to both. I studied French 20 years ago when i was in school. I did it for 3 years.
Yes, nothing can be fully learned in a set period, but lots of people just stop and move on to other things in their life. Starting a language is not an indication it will be studied to perfection. Many kids are just forced to study, and never look back once they leave school.
also, applying for a scholarship seems a little confusing
like where do you find their requirements for the application? do they have a specific email address for application?
"you're learning english by yourself, I take it?"
is this sentence gramatically correct?
and does "I take it" mean "I assume" here?
yep
would you consider this text below to be sexist? 🤔
The way he looked at her had changed.
He no longer noticed the fine lines beneath her eyes or the slight crookedness of her teeth.
She was like a painting he’d always enjoyed looking at, but whose true beauty had only become apparent once he learned to see past the imperfections.
i think it's fine but i'd need more context to be able to really give you an answer
😅 💀
really?
my reading comprehension is not good rn
but i could feel its somwhat creepy
it's so fucking weird
it's like a pedophile wrote it
It's weird
But I don't find it really bad
The puppy fat is kinda.....
But the rest isn't that bad imo
Yeah, if you want to
Just this part actually was good
Her brown hair was **piled **on her head,
with a few tendrils framing her face and neck.
🤔 does it just mean her hair was well-organized, groomed?
or is it somekind of haircut
👍
Is family reunion adj or noun?
Noun
You could say it was tied in a sort of bun
A -“I spend half my life trying to avoid clichés, but I think I’m turning into one.”
B - “It’s called getting old.”
A - “Hey, I’m still young. Or at least youngish.”
🤔 cliches are like quotes?
is chatgpt right?
(https://ibb.co/r3ckFfy)
Cliches r not quotes...
It's kinda correct
Think of it as life turning repetitive, monotonous and boring
'trying to avoid cliches'- avoid doing the same boring things/ things turning out as what's most expected....
They basically would like to spice things up in life maybe
It's kinda like this

The strands of loose hair is being referred as 'tendrils framing her neck and face'
Adam watched his twins rolling around in a red-faced tangle of limbs.
🤔 red faced tangle of limbs?
(they are fighting on the rug)
are restraint and self-control interchangeable?
yes, in most cases

"there are no restraints for the project." would be an example of them not being interchangeable.
Red-faced --> flushed face
porch is the outside part of the house with a desk?
it doesn't matter whether if it's the back or front?
"How are you going to make up for the mistakes you've made?"
what does to make up mean?
To remedy
(his son just died in the hospital)
*A storm of conflicting voices battered Adam’s mind.
Is this really happening? Yes, Jacob’s gone. He’s never coming back. How can that be? Half-an-hour ago he was fine. It can be and it is. He’s dead. Dead. Dead...Adam stared at his bloodstained hands. They seemed to be getting smaller, as if they were floating away from him on an outgoing tide.
The noises of his mind and the hospital were receding too, until all that remained was a silence like an ocean.
🤔 does the use of metaphor here sound weird to you?
🤔 how abt "a silence like an ocean)
what is to remedy
To make something good which can replace the bad thing you done
thanks
so in present tense we use "can" when we're absolutely sure it is true and we use "could" when we're not so sure about it. Did I get it right?
I don't think I've ever seen a backyard deck called a porch. Could be fine though.
Nah. Definition of porch explicitly states "front part of a building," so it'd be the front deck.
Joe Biden pitched for a $25bn increase in the World Bank’s lending capacity.
Oh i thought it said tentacles framing head and neck 🙅♀️
Wtf
Could is past.
It's not sexist. It's just a romantic description of a person. It is not referring to gender or portraying gender in a demeaning or less able manner
hey guys i have a question
the pronoun it refers to...
During that decade, scientists in England developed the first computer program. It took 25 minutes to complete one calculation.
a- the first computer program
b- one calculation
which one idk
Sounds v er you sexist.
are you ok?
and no this is not a homework or a test this is just a question everyone in class is arguing over
soooooooo? what
come on
You've been sitting there waiting for someone to respond to this. Congratulations.
not really
and thank you very much
Hehe. 😄 Took me 25 days to find the calculator on my phone.
what
Same. I read up for context and still have none.
Hi guys what's the correct answer here and why
I wish!!!
Has your test ended?
Of course haha i was just curious about this question
It should be the 2nd option then
Atone for your sins, especially the grammatical sins. 
A
what does effort mean here?
What is the difference between to distort an object and to bend an object?
Spell incorrecter change
hectic means a crazy probably unorganized schedule that makes it hard or guves no room for other activities
tight means little to no time and room for other activities
busy means a probably more organized schedule that also has not a lot of time or room for other activities
@candid gyro
He was a tall man, thirty-six, born of English-German
stock,
his featuresundistinguishedexcept for the long, determined mouth and the bright blue of his eyes,
- 🤔 He's of English and German descent?
- 🤔 His features are normal except his mouth and eyes?
The letter combination of 'un' has two ways of reading it, depending on the word itself. The first way is 'oon' and the other way is 'uh-n.' I'm not sure what you mean by translating it as "an" but it's not possible
Correct
Your nickname can be pronounced in a variety of ways
So it's up to you on how you want people to pronounce it
"The crude thing about deception is that it is built on the very emotion that is essential for human relationships... trust. The greater the trust, the greater the betrayal."
What does crude mean there?
i've done it, and I still don't understand. That's why i am here
what is croase
rough?
i can't still understand the whole text
the rough thing about deception,
what does it mean
if it's cruel or evil... i will understand
do you think the word crude isn't fit there?
can you help me to understand it please
like try to rephrase it
primitive means ancient or old, right?
i still don't understand
hmmm... im still confused sry
in this, i understand that it means "rude"
but in the text i've given, it doesn't make sense to me
if it means rude
i also think it has negative meaning but i am not sure negative in what way
i'll wait for a native speaker to answer
thanks for trying to help
what is gross
gross is like disgusting, right
Crude means like raw
Here
Yeah like something which is bad from the origin. Like it is bad without any exception. Crude, raw
but not everything raw is bad right
is it raw things normally associated with bad things
It can happen they re seen as associated with bad things, in this context, that s what the writer mind is doing
okay, but i'm still not sure
Look at this sentence: "time flew". It didn't really flew, it just passed by. Alright ? So if I say "deception is crude", It doesn't mean it is bad to be ate, instead it means it is bad
It s a metaphor. + sometimes the meaning of a world does include their metaphoric meaning, it happens being the word used many times like that
it's figurative
not really
Because crude it is used here not to allude to something else, with a similar meaning. It does mean what it says, because it included that meaning over time being used with that figurative sense
But I am not sure about that. Maybe figurative can be used to describe the meaning of the world itself too
In that sense, you got me right anyway. I tried to help 🙂
yeah, thank you... but to make sure, i'll just wait for a native speaker to answer
Can you explain what figurative is?
Can you mention a few examples of un words pronounced oon?
Oh unsera is one, but that's with a German accent
Crude in this context is basic. Rudimentary.
@forest solar thank you
Similar to your definition of raw. The base product that makes some thing. In this situation the basic foundation of deception. In a similar context example, crude oil, straight from the ground, used to produce all of the petrochemicals. @candid gyro
In Italy it is different you cannot use crude ("crudo") like that, I mean it would sound unfamiliar. So you re giving a nuance I didn't have honestly
As crude as in the sense of "basic foundation of something"
When do you exactly use the phrase "What's the odds?"?
hi everyone
What are the odds are used when things that would not happen, happen.
An extremely ugly guy gets the most beautiful girl in the school.
What are the odds?
Against all odds
How can I say when someone is flirting with someone else, so that they got involved in a close conversation between themselves. Trying to explain that, I started my sentence saying, "they found themselves involved in a good vibe" but it sound so wrong. How would a native spell it out more fluently and in a more correct way. Thanks
They started to hit it off.
Thank youuuuuuuuuuu
Hy guys
does "hit it off" mean the same thing as "get along"?
Yes
I think "I need to listen to the other two parts as well." sounds better.
I'm curious about old beleifs that were completely wrong, this could be any beleif from physics to medicinal knowledge, my goal is to find out why when and how this false knowledge came to be and what caused them to be corrected. My method of doing this will be by data-mapping what I can find and using that to find out what I can research personally, and what the goals I can realistically reach will be. <-- any mistakes in here? uses alot of words i dont normally use and frankly have no idea how I even know them.
Beliefs
What is it instead
Oh I see
Thanks!
Now to type it a million times to get it out of my system xd.
Now put the entire thing I #📝|proofreading
i wasnt sure if it was okay for there since it was such a short writing
Hey I have a question
What's the differences between "Open to work" and "Open for work" ? Can I use both ? I know "Open to work" is more common but "Open for work" is it still correct ?
You cannot use both if you want to say “open to work”. Additionally, “open for work” is an uncommon phrase which could imply willingness to work, however, I would advise sticking to “open to work” if you want to be understood clearly.
Thanks for your explanation 😊
Open for work sounds really odd
I wouldn't use it in a sentence personally
Available for work sounds better
Personally, I would just stick to “open to work”☺️
Yes
It is
What is the diffrent between ' in charge of ' and ' responsible for ' ?
Responsabile is linked to accountability
' in charge of ' isnt the same ?
Yes it depends on the context
Then how to know when to use this and when to use this ?
Responsabile does probably just add a nuance to it
I am responsible for your something it is not possible to be translated with in charge
But I am in charge you can also use responsible
So i can use what i want ?
No, it s same thing just if you don't want to add the accountability sense to it, if you want to then you can only use responsible for
But I use in charge of everytime I can in the place of responsabile to
Just give a look at internet
guys! begging you! what’s the difference between “pay attention on” and “pay attention to”?
S.O.S
To pay attention to sounds better I guess
why is english so hard- like e when its at the end of a word or sentence makes ONE SINGULAR letter "say its name" what does that even mean??
why is english really hard to pronounce too
like-
because-??
WHAT
okay ;-;
what's the difference between graveyard and cemetery?
I think it s exactly the same. Sometimes more than a world express the same exact meaning
"As the population of Europe started to grow, the capacity of graveyards was no longer sufficient (the population of modern Europe is almost 40 times higher than it was in the 7th century). By the end of the 18th century, the unsustainability of church burials became apparent, and completely new places for burying people, independent of graveyards, appeared—and these were called cemeteries"
So cemeteries is kinda more profane of the religious meaning generally implied in graveyard
To buy into
2 (Austral. and N.Z.)
informal to get involved in (an argument, fight, etc.)
Is it even a thing to use it outside of those mentioned country
I think its bc english got a bunch of influences, like it took influence from both latin and germanic languages
Not familiar with the 'mom has' tense 
It was perfect apart from that one word.
You may be responsible for performing a task, but that doesn't mean you are in charge. On a production line you may be one of 50 in people that have to put a screw into a machine, but one person would be in charge of those 50 people. The person in charge is responsible for ensuring the 50 people do their job.
every language has one of these very stupid things for others to learn, English’s is pronounciations and spellings being so inconsistent and weird
also also because we don’t use those accented letters (when we really should)
same thing
no difference
google is telling me "errr graveyard can ekshklusively aktually used when referring to graveyards in churches" but ive never heard of that
That sounds about right. Also with public health laws typically forcing the prohibition of burying people in church grounds close to residential areas, the use of grave yard is slowly becoming antiquated, with cemeteries being zoned to keep the public safe from their ghostly fears and reduced property prices.
i grew up in generic american suburb #87362178321 so i never saw a church with a graveyard
Yes. Suburb #87362178321 is rather void of church grave yards.
oh my, whaat... in my country it is absolutely logical that if you see a church, you will have a graveyard right next to it, like there are almost no exceptions
European?
poland
what is the idea of english hub?
To connect english learners and help people become more knowledgeable on english
well in america a lot of rural towns have these kinds of churches
probably something to do with religion
What's the difference between these and which is commonly used?
- I yearn for companionship.
- I long for companionship.
- I am dying for companionship.
1 shows you want companionship and have a strong desire for it
2 shows you have been wanting companionship and are wishing you’ll have it
3 shows more desperation and is dramatic way of saying you need company
Of all three, “I yearn for companionship” would be most common, but another conversation-friendly way to say this is “I want some company” or “I want some friends” or so.
A quote from Puss-in-Boots “Fear me, if you dare.” doesn’t make sense to me.
“ fear = be afraid of ” right?
Shouldn’t it be “frighten me” instead?
any explanation?
is he saying
he wants to be frightened
or he wants the other guy to be scared of him
"Frighten me" would mean Puss is asking his enemy to make him scared. Which makes sense but it doesn't fit his character
The sentence he uses is a little strange, but it shows his personality perfectly. He's arrogant, and he thinks that even the bravest people will be afraid of him (the rest will run away or something else). So that's why he says "fear me / be afraid of me"
Don't think about it too much. Puss is just smack talking his enemies
What’s the meaning of the sentence: The world is my oyster
it means you have the entire world to discover
Puss is telling the other person to be scared of Puss. Basically, 'you are permitted to be scared of me, if you have the courage to even do that', meaning Puss is scarier than fear itself.
It means that you can do whatever you want or go wherever you want to go
Swotting up on everything before a month of exams is not effective. (does this sound okay? and is it grammatically correct? it's an example sentence for the new phrasal verb that I've learned so I'm wondering if it's correct
I always just scrape through midterms because they're not very important. (another one yes)
should it be "scrape through during midterms or just" scrape through midterms"
You seem to be busy with something important on your phone.
You seem busy with something important on your phone.
Which one is correct?
No 1
what's the difference between those two?
Both are correct
is there any difference between those two?
They're two different grammatical structures
Yes
But they more or less mean the same
More
more?
is there any difference in terms of formality
I couldn't tell but the second one is more common imo
In spoken English I'd more likely say, 'you seem busy'.
okay
Both are, (to be) is optional, though in some other sentences I would probably include it bc it would sound better to me
Late
what are the examples of sentences that you would use the stucture "seem to be"?
I seem to be the only person who hasn't heard the news.
There seems to be a mistake. -> I think here 'to be' is necessary.
I see. These sentences sound natural to me too. Thank you.
👍
👍
What is the name of the chicken pieces?
How do I describe the pieces of chicken I will eat?
@flat rune
Skin, breast, wing, thigh
skin... 
ok thanks
Chicken nugget?
1 is preferred. The two are both grammatically correct. The first has the nuance that you are busy and it's with something on the phone.
The second gives a slightly more broad interpretation that could be seen as you are busy and it includes the stuff on your phone (generally busy as well).
Both of the scrape statements are used interchangeably and commonly.
For the first statement, did you actually mean swotting up on everything a month before exams is not effective?
Early.
Also in addition to those luk4 said: drumstick, 1/4 chicken, 1/2 chicken, rear 1/4, front 1/4. "What you got for lunch." "I've got a 1/4 chicken. Front 1/4 to be exact. Nom noms. "
what does interchangeably mean? 😭 and yes I meant that
It means you can use either just as well as the other. They both work for the same situations.
When we use in, at or on?
Ooh that all?
@flat rune
Thank uuu

Thank uu tooo

What do you know about rolling down in the deep?
idk but when your brain goes hard you can call that mental freeze
Do you recommend any app for learning new words?
i dont know if they have it for english but memrise is really good for cramming
like cramming vocab
Thank you
like, learning, not cramming? then Anki, but it is rather intimidating for a new user so yeah, the major feature is that it can distribute huge amount of data among periods so that you can study less per day
“can i have the marker for a minute ?”
Is this ok to say?
yeah
all good
Yes, it is correct.
Either watch YouTube about a particular subject you like or try Duolingo I guess, I mostly saw a lot of videos.
Definition (verb): be earlier in time; go back further
Definition 1 (noun): a loud harsh or strident noise
Definition 2 (noun): loud confusing disagreeable sounds
My local choir🙉
Which one is correct?
- I fell out of my bed last night.
- I fell off my bed last night.
Both are correct
which one is more commonly used?
if i use the phrase fell out of my bed and fell off my bed... they're frequently the same
when I asked chatgpt, it says "i fell off my bed"
It sounds good
Ludwig spoke in favour of 'fell out of bed'
I think it would be more of an individual visualisation of the two phrases
what do you mean by an individual visualisation
How one pictures the word in their mind
Like for example when you think of an apple, you picture a red fruit
how do you visualize the phrases of i fell out of my bed and i fell off my bed
They're pretty much the same
Also fall out of bed has another meaning
what is the other meaning
You'll find it in American English, books like Percy Jackson
Collins dictionary says that it means to get out of bed quickly
And I think that's exactly how it's used in Percy Jackson
i am more convinced to use "i fell off my bed last night"
Use whichever you feel like
hello, i have a question, are both of these correct?
"in case something happens"
"in case something happened"
whats the difference?
ifaik the word "in case" here is the same as if, so it shouyld be the second one right?
you are right when you say that "in case" is close to "if", but no, there is nothing wrong in the sentences you provided, both are actually correct
so the usage also the same? first one is for first conditional and second for second conditional?
the difference is that "in case something happens" would mean that something can happen any moment now and also in the future, but "in case something happened" means that something could happen only in the past, not now or in the future from now
ah i see, thanks for the explanation!
they can be used in conditionals, of course, and the first one is actually the so-called "zero conditional" (because it uses present simple, happens, after the condition so after in case), the second one is second conditional indeed
also
if i think about this
then the first one could also be used in first conditional, yes
in case something happens, she calls me = zero conditional
in case something happens, she will call me = first conditional
in case something happened, she would call me = second conditional
in case something had happened, she would have called me = third conditional
as you probably have noticed by now, "in case something happens" can be the beginning of both zero and first conditional, since they both begin with a condition and the present simple tense
although, like, if we wanna be very picky, then you can actually start the zero conditional with even another present tense, not only the simple one, "in case something is happening, she is calling me", for example, is also valid, but the most common occurence is that it is just present simple, nothing overcomplicated
whats the proper sentence when you phone a person and their voice is broken? is it "your voice is breaking up"?
@dense oasis r u actually talking in the vc?
"You voice is cracking " use of "up" is no use
yes i am
Works. You could also say, 'you're breaking up'.
This works too
okay, thanks!
btw why did u ask
like specifically me
lol
Cuz you usually don't do so?
Is "smorgasbord" recognized as an English word?
It's listed in Cambridge Dictionary so yes
You re lagging
It s always nice to see all those synonyms
You re just adding your voice to the sentence
i know
im just asking if native use "you're breaking up" or "your voice is breaking up"
what do you usually use
They re exactly the same thing
i see, i read somewhere before i dont know exactly where, but some guy said that "it's not you that is breaking up, but it's your voice."
so ever since, i kept using your voice is breaking up
There s not such a comparison between what s used the most since you re making the sentence longer by adding a different subject to it, as you would like to emphasise the fact that it is your voice that s breaking up. Natives naturally get it by the context
i get what you mean
but i think there's something like which is preferred the most by native speakers
Yup it is
why does my arm hurt now? or why is my arm hurting right now? what is better to say? correct way to say?
the first one, which is kinda weird if you think about this, since the continuous tense theoritically should be the best, but it is not here
the explanation some people give when it comes to this context is "when talking about emotions or feelings, present simple is prefered over continuous"
so
I love you is correct
am loving you is weird
I like it is correct
am liking it is also kinda, weird? like something is off
It's a bit more nuanaced than that, I think. Our subject is a body part, so it's not that weird to use the continuous here. "My hands are moving on their own" for example.
Yes. I don't think the latter is too strange. I can see your point, but I'm not sure it applies so much here.
okay
It's a bit in the middle, I think. I wouldn't find it strange to hear either
they're both correct and I've heard both
Can someone please give me some example that explains what is the difference between
You and i....
You and me...
You typically can tell the difference by removing the "You"
so like
"You and I will be leaving soon"
"You and I will be leaving soon"
which is why "You and me will be leaving soon" is incorrect
because you wouldn't say "Me will be leaving soon"
"You and me" you would most often just say by itself
like
"Who all is going on the trip?"
"You and me"
I hope that's what you meant
"me" is an object pronoun. "I" is a subject pronoun. You need to use one or the other depending on which type it's being used as. The "you and..." doesn't really matter.
"The cake is for you and me." vs "You and I are going to share the cake."
^definitely a way that makes more sense
Hi guys, I need help with some business idiom. I used to be a client of consulting agencies, and now I'm working at a consulting agency. So I'm looking for an expression to say that I switched from a side to another of this business relation. Does anybody knows some expression that helps me to say that?
In my language I'd say "sitting on the other side of the table" but I', not sure if this is a real expression in english. Haha
I don't really think I've heard of an expression used for that kind of situation before.
The only thing I'd say is changed sides or changed teams but the latter is much less formal.
Maybe something like "now I am on the business side" or "I've transferred over to the other side"
Any difficult questions today
It wasn’t raining when we went out. The sun was shining. But it had been raining, so the ground was wet.
Guys why "had been raining" why I cannot use "was raining" like at the start
Hello , I have the question what's the difference both will, going to, simple present (future) , present continuous (future). Someone know about it?
Some examples? I ain't certain but I can try to explain if you want
have teachers in my country who talk that the difference both will and going to is the certain , but present continuous in future is really confuse for me. How much I search , more and more I become confused
For me those two are the exact same thing except they're two different tenses. "It was raining" is past simple and "It had been raining" is past perfect. The past simple and past perfect tenses are very similar to each other anyway, so I don't see why it's the biggest deal? Most of the time people who would correct that are nitpicking, although I'd say the perfect tenses are usually used more formally anyway.
Are you asking what the difference between the present progressive tense and the future tense are?
For me, for instance: If you say "I'll be flying this morning" - it is already relate to the future plans in this case and underline some "plan" because you was going to fly before and you will be in the middle of flying
No, the different uses in future, maily the relation both going to and present continuous( future use)
yeaaap, but it makes me confuse... a bit
Like I cannot get what does it mean in that case if I use "past perfect" what does it emphasize
but the sentence isn't going to? Because have more certain and this action cannot is a instantly plan
It could be
The only real difference between using past perfect and past simple I can think of is like this:
"It had started raining when I left for work."
vs.
"It started raining when I left for work."
The first sentence implies it was already raining by the time that you left, but the second sentence implies that it started raining the moment you left.
I'm going to move to Canada - just your decision
I'll be moving to Canada - (You decided it before and you will be in the middle of "moving" process")
If you want to say it "instantly" use "will"
I will move to Canada - (you might be decided it "right now")
Interesting
man , my school explain this in oposite
It is hard, but native speakers do not follow rules, same goes with me
sad bro
I might be wrong, I ain't a native, it is jsut how I feel
Well, for me "I am going to" and "I will" are used almost completely interchangeably in regular conversation.
It depends on context mostly
I can think of a few differences though
"I am going to" is usually used for more immediate things like "I am going to go to the store"
"I will" is typically used for things more further out in the future like "I will go to Paris."
Does native say present continuous in future? Or the schools talk about it for preucation
Those are two different things
Present continuous or present progressive (same thing) is different than future
in my school people say that present continuous can be used in verbs of movement and plans
@flat rune Damn, I got it, "It had been raining" before they went out 'cuz the ground was wet, but in that moment when they were out it wasn't raining :D I hope you get, anyway I got it, thx!
I don't know that people really talk in this form
Present continuous sentences would be "I am going to the store" or "I am going to find out later."
For example: Michael is meeting his dad in 20 minutes x michais is going to meet his dad in 20 minutes
Same for me
The first one is the present tense and the second is the present progressive tense
basically the present continuous tense is like the bridge between the present and future tenses
It's usually used for the more immediate future
For me, second one underline kind of "plan" but it is the same for me, but @flat rune is native, so he can clarify it better
Then the difference was being the timeline? maybe
(time)going to is longer than (time)present continuous?
"Going to" is present continuous
"Will" is future
"Michael is going to" typically means it is in a shorter amount of time than "Michael will"
If someone says "I am going to" then they already have the plans for it and they are doing the thing soon
If someone says "I will" then they are either coming up with the plans for it or the event will happen much further into the future
That's right but there's more to it than that it's just I can't think of how to explain it at the moment.
it is okay
Because you can say "It had been raining for over 8 hours." when referring to a recent event where it rained for 8 hours but usually when it happened further in the past you would say "It rained for over 8 hours."
damn :D
I don't know if I need to explain this but I can just kind of explain the different tenses
"It is raining"
"It rained."
"It will rain."
Those are all simple tenses and are very uncertain and don't imply any sort of recent occurance or anything
"It has been raining"
"It had been raining"
"It is going to rain."
Those are all the perfect tenses of present, past, and future, and all imply that something is happening, will happen, or has happened recently
Hm.. okie
So saying to someone "It will rain." is typically very uncertain in terms of time frame but can usually be interpretted as soon
But when someone says "It is going to rain." it is almost always interpretted as "It will rain soon"
I think that makes sense right? lol
okay okay okay good. I don't know if you already knew that but I finally figured out like the way to say it lol
But I don't know how "Had been raining" can be used for recent action, because it happened before something
"It had been raining for 8 hours." -- It was raining but stopped recently
"It rained for 8 hours." -- At some point in the past it rained for 8 hours
But it should be "It has been raining for 8 hours"??
"It has been raining for 8 hours" means it rained for 8 hours AND is still going
Oh, damn
The difference between "It has been" and "It had been" is that "It has been" means the event is still occurring and "It had been" means it has recently stopped
same if I say "it was raining for 8 hours"
Well
Present perfect and past perfect
This is usually like referring to a past event in a story. So like you would say "It was raining for 8 hours, but then it stopped."
So I cannot use it individually?
People don't really use it by itself
hm...
"it was raining for 8 hours..." sounds incomplete cause you are telling about that time that it had rained.
It's hard to describe but "It was raining" would usually mean that you're placing yourself in the past and going through something chronologically which usually would not go by itself.
This too. The past progressive tense is usually used when telling a story to someone.
like "I was doing great, but then I fell down."
So individually I can use "past perfect" or "past simple"
yes
the only time youd say something like
“it was raining for 8 hours” on its own is like
if someone was asking you how long it rained for 
ignore what i said
no
I cannot unsee it :D
what have i done 😭
yeah i guess
lmao

meet is correct what
meet is correct
You incorrected yourself 😎
Okie, it is enough for me, gonna sleep on it, thx all
lmfao it is always the best part
gotta love when you don't know a language fully and don't know if you're right or not
So basically if you want to use "it was..." You are talking about the past that is not an event that happened few moments ago.
You also have to keep in mind that it need further context so you have to add something after or use it as response
^ Yep that's pretty accurate
what do you even mean by knowing the language fully, you do not do this yourself despite being native
I'm having a mind blow about the perfect tense cause my native language doesn't have anything similar
Italian 🍕
thats only got imperfect right
italiano 🤌
I have been pizzing margeritas
i have been eagling around walmarts
@flat rune thanks man
riding a freedom eagle
That's really rude I guess...
Io_ho
If you have any other questions just @ me
Io_ho fatto, isnt that perfect?
Yes but we use the particle while in English you use Have/has
@flat rune you are pretty good with grammar, I'm not sure when I'm going to need help but probably I will coming here every now and than.
Thanks
I like to think I'm at least decent at english since it is my only language I'm fluent in lol
I'm living in the UK and most of the people are not even good at that lol
Not even the British
Well most americans I know don't know what an adjective is so I think I'm doing pretty good for myself
its crazy sometimes
For real
I guarantee you @amber junco you are better than like 95% of the people I've met in the states lol
Awh thanks
Wouldn't say it if it wasn't true 😎
I think I also care more about my english because I am also a creative writer from time to time
You can flex on 99.99% of native english speakers when you ask them what a gerrund is and they don't know
gerund??? isnt that the thing that happens when two objects move against eachother
GANG!?
gang
speaking of other languages and their tenses
german's future tense
big yikes
for me anyway
wow
rest in peace my entire paragraph
Shouldn't be similar to English since they came from the same branch?
i corrected myself
i meant progressive tense not future tense
they have a future tense but they don't have a progressive tense
Natives use both. Both are understood in context. If someone says "you are breaking up" is bad, they are just joking around.
This is a good example of why the two tenses are used. The use of 'had rain' imports a message that prior to you going out when it wasn't raining, there was rain.
If you used 'it was raining' you would be immediately contradicting what you just said in the first sentence.
You can see this clearer if you strip t down to the basic messages.
It wasn't raining.... But it was raining. (Contradiction)
It wasn't raining, when i went out. But it has been raining. (Not happening at past moment, but had happened before that past moment.)
The tense allows you to speak of earlier events relative to something that happened in the past.
@flat rune for your reference also
These can be used the same way. They will both give you a future tense. In conversation, many people would probably say 'I'm going to.... ' and "I'll be...." so you may not hear will so much, but it is being used.
Yes. That's a good way of comparing the two. Will is a little further off into the future whereas 'going to' conveys a sense of doing it soon.
Yes.
Is the word con commonly used to mean a disadvantage?
like "This is the con of using this strategy."
I also know that this word means a bluff which is like a trick or smth similar ( correct me if I'm wrong ).
It's an attempt to deceive someone into believing that one can or is going to do something
Yep.
Thanks for reminding me the exact meaning.
Any time mate
Why is "Where are u going to school?" used here?
Isn't "Where do you school?" more fit?
B: Everything's been good with you?
A: I haven't been better. How about yourself?
B: I started school recently.
A: Where are you going to school?
B: I'm going to PCC.
A: How do you like it so far?
B: I like it so far. My classes are pretty good right now.
What is the difference between "satisfactionally" and "satisfactorily?"
satisfactionally is not a standard English word.
without Googling could you be able to guess what "resonance cascade" means? 🤔
Freeman's experiment takes place and results in a "resonance cascade",
causing massive damage to the facility and teleporting alien creatures into the base.
The adverb form of "satisfaction" is "satisfactorily." not "satisfactionally"
Oh? It sounds grammatically correct though, but I guess not.
I accept the challenge, and guess from the passage that is sci fi, so possible it's not real, but if i was to guess what it means,... I'm going to say that aligning the wave harmonics to the resonant frequency of the energy field being generated will cause a cascade effect similar to dominos falling, with each successive collapse triggering a larger release of energy thus allowing for the teleportation to take effect.
wowww
I rarely hear it just stated. Most often it will be a word such as 'problem', 'issue' or 'disadvantage' used. However if the question "what are the pros and cons of ... " Then i know people will use the word as you have in your example.

