#📚|english-questions
1 messages · Page 17 of 1
So comprehension includes listening reading writing? 'v'
Yes, anything skill that tests your understanding to a certain text or extract. Comprehension in general is reading, but things like listening comprehension exists.
I just don’t like the repetition of “listen” in the title
Ahhh I got it >< THANK YOU SO MUCH ❤️
Npp
Do you say "America time " or "American time"?
Hi
What do you think?
No, it’s A
Why
Can u explain
This event is happening in the past
but why was the correct answer added "have"
@mint seal
Because the sentence is written in past tense, therefore you would say “to have crashed”
Although “to crash” sounds like it would fit, it is written in present form which is why it wouldn’t fit into the sentence.
Sure
it should be D
why?
because the part where it says “…to the hospital and will operate on sometime in the next few days” sounds like the CEO is going to perform an operation
Passive voice
the “will operate” still refers to the subject, which is the CEO.
If it’s “…and will be operated on” changes the context to the CEO being operated by surgeons.
I understood. Actually, ceo won't perforn an operation.
yeah
sorry im quite rusty with explanations
doctors will perform an operations
yes
thank you
npnp
“i may have not eaten ice cream this morning”
or is it “i may NOT HAVE eaten ice cream this evening”
is there a difference?
The time is different
Jokes aside, there isn’t much of a difference between the two sentences in the part you’ve capitalised.
could anyone please explain 'rancid day'?
I know what rancid means, but what does it mean in this collocation?
They're the same, essentially.
Is this about timezones? If so, America has multiple timezones, so there's nothing called 'America time'
@mint seal Sorry to bother you again TvT But can you check the grammar of this passage for me:
Everything is immutable, change is an inevitable law of nature. The world develops because of human development and that development is always associated with the development of language. The development trend of the world today is globalization - in other words, turning the world we live in into a "flat world" - where people can remove all boundaries and connect with each other. Putting together is easier than ever. But in order to realize the "flattened world", it is necessary to have a condition that is decisive for the whole process, a boundary where, when this boundary is removed, other boundaries can immediately disappear. is the language boundary. The world will be completely " The World is Flat " when all can find a common language - where people can erase all boundaries and connect with each other becomes easier than ever.
Immutable means unchanging yet you're saying change is inevitable. Is that sentence meant to be a contradiction?
British weather is perhaps at its most variable in the spring.(grammar structure : noun + am/is/are + its + superlative degree of an adjective?)
ok majority of it is grammatically correct. Some of your punctuation marks are inthe wrong places though
||im typing from a screen that makes discord harder to type in so in advance, i apologise for my spelLing mistakes||
your first sentence does not make sense, context wise. As @lyric hornet said already. If you want to place a contradiction, I suggest rewording it to “Everything is immutable but change ** can** be an inevitable law of nature“
if you read your paragrah again, I suggest you to not repeat words like development more than twice.
I'm sure Kiu is correcting your work, but here's a quick nitpick: use a double hyphen to represent an em dash instead of a single hyphen (though using a regular em dash at all is preferable).
“Putting together is easier than ever“ this sentence sounds weird on it‘s own. WHat do you mean here?
also after “ever“ replace the fullstop with acomma
that way it makes your writing flow better instead of having a truncated sentence
“...that s decesive for the whole process**(replace with “and“)a boundary where(remove comma and “when“ “boundary.“)this is removed(full stop)**
“is the language boundary“ is a dependent clause. It does not make sense on its own.
please reword the last bit of the paragraph and send it to #📝|proofreading for it to be checked
*after “other boundaries“
boundary is repeated too many times. Limit that word to either 2 or 3 uses only.
Ahh it'll be "where people can erase all boundaries and connect with each other becomes easier than ever."
@mint seal Let's me read it again, yeah I found a lot is weird in this paragraph
im on my phone(discord website)so I can’t click on which reply you replied too LMAO
I replied your text: " “Putting together is easier than ever“ this sentence sounds weird on it‘s own. WHat do you mean here?"
oh, thank you
is this the meaning of the sentence I said was weird?
I replied "“is the language boundary“ is a dependent clause. It does not make sense on its own."
=> So how about: "...a boundary that when removed, other boundaries can immediately disappear on their own, that's the language boundary. "
Yess, I changed it
can you put your changes into #📝|proofreading so it’ll be easier for me to read without going back and forth
Like put everything together plus the changes you’ve made
Ohhh Okayy ❤️
I would say through the hills, but yes.
hey guys there are the lyrics of a song "some people want in all, but i dont want nothing at all" like wdym "don't" is negative and "nothing" is negative too, like the negative of the negative ???
You're right in saying this is grammatically incorrect, but it's a common slang way of wording it. The speaker is saying they do not want anything at all.
thank you rly much!!
A lot of times, song lyrics contain grammatically incorrect phrases because sometimes it rolls off the tongue better, rhymes, or just sounds good with the song.
No problem!
hello everyone..
Is “so do i” old english for “i do so”
Because it doest look like its grammatical
”so do I” is grammatically correct unless if you’re not talking about that
“get” is in present tense. “Got” is past tense of “get”
both words are used when a noun/subject recieves something, either literally or metaphorically
E.g. “Can you get me the charger?”
“I got this keychain from the store the other day”
Hello every one I want to learn about quantifiers??
It should be subject verb object it is object verb subject ?
Thank u 🖤
Working times that are not 9am-5pm, I assume
Which the difference in walk, hike, stroll, stride?
Actually i have applied for msc digital marketing course in ucd ireland and their requirement is 130.
My score has got stuck at 125.
There's no study materail to improve the score.
I always do bad in speaking due to nervousness that's why i am not getting 125+.
🥺😭
Hi,
I am reading a book and it is written that :
"That evening, as Geezil watched the two boxers rehearse the fix in the hotel room..."
For the context the fight is fixed.
"Rehearse the fix" means the two boxers are reapeating the fight for it to look real, right?
The fix is the fake fight and rehearse means repeat right?
Thanks for your answers!
Hi guys
Do you have advice for learning? I feel some difficulty and I suffer from forgetting vocabulary. How did you learn? I can benefit from your experience
Just write the vocab on notebook on daily basis and make sentence using that vocab
Then definitely u will remember a lot of vocab words for sure
Use merriam dictionary app where u can hear the audios like how to pronounce that particular vocab.
Thanks my pro to advise
try to use ur vocabulary in ur free time and maybe replace them with "basic-words"
What do you mean "basic-words"
say "i was terrifying/appalling" instead of "i was scared" or sth
Oh, synonym
yes
Hey i want to use "smoothly" to create a sentence, and I create - " The computer works smoothly" In my mind it means that computer is working without any problems or issues." My question is - Should I use phrase "The computer (runs) smoothly" instead of it ? <--- For me it means that the computer works smoothly but only while the system is starting. I am begginer so sorry for any gramma mistakes.
Both work, but yes it is more natural to use “run.” However, I don’t think it just means that the computer works smoothly but only while the system is starting. For me it means that the computer runs without issues as well
use the vocabulary you've learned. each time you learn a new word, try to use it as much as possible in conversations
by is better but at also works
oo
💀
i love this sticker now
"to not overlook" means to not ignore something ?
/ fail to notice
"I would strongly advise you to not overlook the power of writing, to not think that writing is unimportant." OK nevermind i think i Understand
no, “overlook” means to overthink
Ok but it doesnt make sense in the sentence then
an author leads podcasts and even Google told me that overlook means / fail to notice something
Ah lmao I thought of something different
I used the wrong word 
I define “overlook” as to underestimate something
Not overthink
It can mean that way
i think you should put rhe “ even though he says he loves the old man, he kills him” in past tense
and he has no empathy at all too
Thank you for the answer.
Hi everyone!
Someone could tell me which sentence is grammatically correct?
- The chances of success would be above average?
- The chances of success would be above THE average?
Thank you!
first one
Thanks!
youre welcome
HELP
a) Society puts ______people, who aren't doing well financially, criticizing them for being irresponsible.
b) Do you take him ______an idiot, just because he is a stand-up comedian?
c) Stop holding _and resisting my help, now tell me what is troubling you.
d) I need to break these new shoes before I go hiking in them.
e) Your wish is tantamount a command.
The teacher singled us to put up the project for the exhibition.
g) Could you run_______twenty copies of this worksheet?
h) It is advised to pass _______the unnecessary and impractical 'opportunities' in life.
Hi guys, please help, what is the difference between this examples of using tenses in eng?
-I haven't got any siblings
- I don't have any siblings
- I haven't any siblings
In terms of tenses, they're all the same
Present tense
In terms of aspect, grammatically the 1st sentence has perfect aspect but in terms of meaning it doesn't
Sentences 1 & 2 mean exactly the same thing
(the 1st is much less likely in America though)
The 3rd sentence is just uncommon overall
It's correct but weirdly formal for most circumstances
btw I can't say the same. I had lived in Ireland before arriving to US, and how it seems to me, the first example in the US use more actively
just experience
thanks!
AmE prefers not using the "have got" = "have" construction
That's not to say it doesn't exist there at all
But it's not used nearly as much as it is in the UK
I don't know what the preference is in other Englishes
A related thing that's quite common in AmE but not in BrE is e.g. "I got 2 sisters" to mean "I have 2 sisters"
type "define overlook"
Does anybody know what kind of conditional sentence this is?
"If you've just started а new life in а new country, it's better to just go with the flow for а while and see what people are like."
It doesn't look like 0-4 conditionals or mixed conditionals. Is there some grammar rule to build such sentences?
can someone help me make a yes no question in passive voice for my homework! i dont know how to make it 🙂
send here ill try to help
Make questions and answers using the passive voice each 5
1.Yes no quesiton
oh
whats a yes passive voice sentence 💀
can you give an example
oh question
like this?
ok
this is a bit tricky
what does badonka donk mean?
It's a slang term referring to a woman's buttocks.
It doesn't just refer to a black woman's, but any woman's.
What is the difference between “downturn” and “downfall”? Can you provide me with example sentences when these words are not interchangable?
Both words refer to a decline in something, but I believe the difference between the two is what decline they are describing. A downturn describes a decline in specifically an economy, market, or business. A downfall is a more general term referring to a decline or loss of usually prosperity or a status. Here are some examples using the two words:
"The pandemic caused a significant downturn in the global economy."
"Recently, there has been a sudden downturn in the housing market."
"The company recently experienced an unexpected downturn last year."
"John's downfall was characterized by everyone starting to hate him, him losing his job, a divorce, and nearly going broke."
"The body builder's downfall started when everyone found out he was using performance-enhancing drugs and steroids."
"The downfall of a nice, peaceful neighborhood began when it suddenly skyrocketed in crime rate and turned into a near inhabitable place to live."
"Jealousy gets the best of me" can you explain?
It means that speaker often gets jealous and that their jealousy is overpowering and controlling of their life.
When you say something gets the best of you, it means that thing is overpowering and controlling of you and your life. It gets in the way of things you want to do and is really difficult to manage.
What about "grooming" in relationships?
If you're asking what it means...
Grooming in relationships is behavior or something that one person does to establish a connection or relationship with another person. These actions build up trust with the person, usually so that the other person can exploit, manipulate, or abuse them. Examples of grooming can be gift-giving or being overly kind.
I got it thanks for the help
Wow, it’s clear now. Thanks a lot!
No problem!
Hello, I am struggling with understanding a comment on youtube which in my view is very poorly written. I might be slow, so I ask you to explain simply and coherently to me what exactly the person means in that enigmatic sentence. It goes like this: "Vlad is the guy you find after you've listened to as many opinions you can find and still know that you disagree with them all but not know why so you just keep seeking and here you find what you thought you knew, but explained so that you now know why you knew what you knew". The part at the end is what really bugs me: "you find what you thought you knew, but explained so that you now know why you knew what you knew". Sorry if I overcomplicate things
Do they mean that it is being explained to us why exactly we knew that we disagreed with all the opinions given, or do they mean something else? It's really confusing my brain for some reason
Who is Vlad?
I mean I can answer you're question.
Well, I did answer yours
Vlad's right man, anyone named Vlad is right.
Is there a spelling channel I feel like I need help with that area.
Yeah I apologize man I thought this was general chat, I'm new to the sever.
Yeah I guess, but it would be a cool idea you know?
I would copy and paste your question again so that someone really answers for you.
the new supermarket is different to the old one
is this sentence okay ?
I'd say "from". I honestly never seen anyone use "to" with it
well, unless you're talking about experiences
"The new supermarket is different from the old one" or "the new supermarket is different compared to the old one."
the person above outlined it well
Diffrent about or diffrent to ?
depends on a context I assume
Yes, if the sentence meant that the two supermarkets are alive and that the old one doesn't recognize the new one, then to say "the new supermarket is different to the old one" would be correct. However, no one would ever say this.
Khalid.........Very nice this morning. I think he didn't sleep well last night
(a isn't being
(b isn't
Generally, you should say "the new supermarket is different from the old one."
iam chosing between To - about-for-in
so i think To suits the best
well I am confused now
probably as much as my own question above
ok
what about this one
Khalid.........Very nice this morning. I think he didn't sleep well last night
(a isn't being
(b isn't
He's probably not being very nice.
Usually people are grumpy and not nice when they are tired or deprived of sleep.
so a ?
Yes.
thank you
........of any good restaurants in the area
(a Are you knowing
(b Had you known
(c do you know
(d were you knowing
C.
so "different to" applies to living beings?
aight
Those questions are for you to answer, I assume you're doing some sort of a test. Don't cheat - that's going to haunt you in the future
iam not
iam just preparing for a test
i did like 100 sentences and test is tomorrow so i can't ask the teacher about them really .
Well. Take the sentence "he's different to me." This means that according to me, he is different. But to say "he's different from me" means that compared to me, he is different. So in the context of living beings, "to" and "from" can differ.
and they won't be probably in there its just normal book that has questions
do i say : Your frankness annoys people or is annoying people ?
annoys ?
i think
annoys is generally | annoying is currently, in the moment
yes the sentence is just like that
So what I was saying is just assume the supermarkets are the two subjects in those sentences. Because in that context, yes, "to" and "from" can differ a lot.
annoys
alr ty
I still don't get it
"according to me" as if I am stating that he is different
Sorry, that's okay. I was making a strange hypothetical situation. To answer to question better, to say "from the old one" is just as grammatically correct as saying "to the old one." It's just that you more commonly hear "from the old one" more. So that's the one I'd go with, but again, both are technically correct.
interesting
even though I am terminally online and speak english all the time, somehow I have never encountered that
perhaps my lack of sleep also is affecting me
That's understandable, I was making up some weird situation you would never hear of, in which case the better wording would be "to the old one," but again you'd probably never hear a sentence like that.
yes average book here in egypt
alot of stupid questions
even teachers sometimes struggle to solve
😂
i dm'ed u a photo can u see
oh, did you mean "according to me" as "I perceive it as such" ?
Yes, that's what I was suggesting. In some hypothetical that the old supermarket perceives this new supermarket as different.
I see, makes sense
But that would suggest the supermarkets are alive, which is not very sensical.
Yeah, I suppose you could use these concepts in some sort of poetry or something. It's called anthropomorphization.
Applying human characteristics to inanimate things.
I think it is also useful for general usage
all right, do you think you have enough time to help me a bit more?
Yeah, I suppose it's good to know, but I don't know when you'd ever use such a sentence 😆
Yes, sure, I have time to help.
I'm going to copy-paste the question from earlier
Hello, I am struggling with understanding a comment on youtube which in my view is very poorly written. I might be slow, so I ask you to explain simply and coherently to me what exactly the person means in that enigmatic sentence. It goes like this: "Vlad is the guy you find after you've listened to as many opinions you can find and still know that you disagree with them all but not know why so you just keep seeking and here you find what you thought you knew, but explained so that you now know why you knew what you knew". The part at the end is what really bugs me: "you find what you thought you knew, but explained so that you now know why you knew what you knew". Sorry if I overcomplicate things
I should add "please", shouldn't I?
I'm trying to make sense of this right now, it's even got me stumped.
maybe that settles it
Here's kind of how I interpret the sentence. Vlad is the kind of person who you go to when you've listened to a bunch of opinions that you disagree with, but are not sure why you disagree with. So Vlad helps you understand what you thought you already knew, but explains it in a way that makes you realize why you knew it in the first place.
That is a super confusing sentence, it took me about 20 reads to get an idea of what it's saying.
No problem, hope it makes more sense now.
anyone
I was asking about
is there an expression
called " in the best case
or in the best cases
and how can i use it
usually it is used with the word "scenario"
like " It will be broken in the best cases " or "it will be broken in the best case "
in the best-case scenario
I can feel it's not slang
I think best-case also can be used, but in different context
can i get an example
I don't believe so
couldn't find one, perhaps it IS the expression
"best-case scenario"
I personally never seen anyone use best-case without the "scenario" part
Alright
thank you for helping
❤️
well
actually there is at least one
best-case used with algorithms, how well they'd perform in a perfect set of circumstances
I am really sorry, I am mistaken - it is used without the scenario part, I was just looking for the wrong thing. You can say for example: "In the best case, you would get a promotion" or "In the best case, the application takes six to eight months to process". I guess you simply omit the word "scenario". Same applies to the "worst-case".
it's 2am my brain is tired
I am sorry
you have been searching for it like 15 min
Iam the one who should be sorry
and appreciated too
no I wasn't
I knew that it was used
I just needed more proof
because our memory is flawed
(human memory)
I got it
btw you can find examples yourself if you google it
or you could use youglish
also useful
Can you please review my essay for literary analysis essay
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HKKQwhGGS0fmiLzQzXPDCZF-eYDgc5-5uhLY7pqwFdQ/edit?usp=sharing
thank you in advance.
thank you so much appreciate your time
no problem
What things symbolizes you??
Personal profile like name, nationality/ethnicity, hobbies, anything that resembles you.
How do you compare yourself in just one thing?
an adjective: a word that describes something
I understand english but hardly speak it or write in english. And I want to get better at writing formal English and understanding how to structure sentences and words really well . Do you have any advise for me on where can I start ?
Please feel free to DM me when you have an answer
Or @ me
hi
Is this sentence a logical and correct sentence in English?
"She realized she forgot her keys."
“Some reporting verbs can have as their objects nouns that refer to events or facts.” Does this sentence make sense to you? It doesn't to me. Where is the object for "have"?
Yea it makes sense
The object of "have" is "nouns that refer to events or facts"
Some reporting verbs can have (as their objects) nouns that refer to events or facts
This (bracketed) part could also be at the end
Some reporting verbs can have nouns that refer to events or facts as their objects
It is
What does pretentious mean? Can someone explain in an easy way
Can the word "learnt" by any possible way mean "taught"?
Like, for example, can I say:
"I have been learnt" ?
From my translation program, I can explain it by saying :
A man with big hopes, want to achieve big goals
You know when you say that you want to be a doctor when you grow up? When you say you want to be a successful woman? When you say you want to be the best of the best?
That's what I'd call "pretentious"
Someone hoping of achieving big goals.
But not sure btw
That's ambitious, not pretentious. Pretentious is more negative and refers to someone who tries to appear greater than they are. It's more along the lines of claiming to be better than someone else.
Yeah, what I said was the meaning of ambitious, true.
Good thing that I say I'm usually not sure😂
Such like ego?
I've seen this done informally or humorously, but I don't think you can apply it in this manner normally.
Yes, it's like ego.
can i arrange for a private course
Yeah, I guess you are right
I see, thank you! @boreal pewter
“I stayed there talking to them until I saw Sam Ward leave the building” Can we swap "leave" with "left"?
No, you can’t
The sentence is mainly in present continuous. “Left” would not fit unless if you rearrange the sentence a little
It’d make sense if you were to reword it like “blah blah blah until I saw Sam Ward who had left the building”
I don't understand. "I stayed" and "I saw" are both in past simple.
Yes, but those actions were already completed before the present
You mean "Sam Ward leave the building" is the present in the context?
Yes
Ok, it starts to make sense to me now. Thanks.
Another question: “The last time we talked he said he needed another two days." Can we swap "needed" with "need"?
No
no
Thats a form of reported speech
so when you report what another person said inthe present simple with the verbs say and tell you change what they said to past simple
and no, actually. that is an example of a verb pattern. In english when you have a verb immediately followed by another verb, the second verb generally has to be in the infinitive form or the gerund form, and certain verbs (ex. see, hear) can be followed by either the infinitive or gerund
the first verb, hear, being in past simple indicates that this action happened in the past
I just revisited the time references of reported verbs in the grammar, and I found no evidence that "needed" should be replaced with "need" and there are rules exhorting users to use the same tenses as the reporting clause.
Thank you for the detailed explanation.
🙂 no problem ping me if u have other questions
thank you so much!!!
is attends a word? like a word attend but paireed with she or he
attends is a word. Basically because you put a plural there
so we use that when its plural? how about when using a third person? for example: she attends a meeting
yeah that example is fine
it’s used in present tense technically
wouldn’t pair with first or second
okay i see, because i saw a sentence using attend even though it used third person
Hiii @mint seal Sorry to bothering you again and again TvT I wanna ask you the exercise 24... Can you explain it to me
https://html.scribdassets.com/4rdt54kgn47nl706/images/13-a1ce327e45.jpg
it depends how the sentence is rearranged. "Attend" can also be used with third person if you place a verb in between.
e.g. "She can attend the meeting"
each sub-heading has a bunch of sentences listed down. The sub-heading indicates which sentences you should change based on the instruction
try reading the question very carefully, it's straight-foward if you connect the dots
Can you answer A, 1 for me?
That's so hardd
you have never taken me to a restaurant
Just like that?
i think
or I was never taken to a restaurant by you
idk 💀
then must give the tense name in the sentence right?
idk sorry
that's okay
Can someone explain and answer the exercise 24 for meee~
https://html.scribdassets.com/4rdt54kgn47nl706/images/13-a1ce327e45.jpg
Ahh I got it >< But how to realize it...
i understand b and c though
so 13 is i am sitting…
and c19 is he has slept….
hope that helps
https://youtu.be/7De3CNixZwc?t=4238
What is he saying here? “winder” or “window”? To me, it sounds “winder”, but then I'm not sure that that broken hole can be called a winder.
Got it. Thanks!
This also is how "tater" came about for "potato"
Even though there's no r in the original word
Apparently it's an upper southern US/appalachian thing originally
Cool, that's quite a bit of useful insights to understand it. Much appreciated. Thanks.
Which one is correct? And why?
-2 million people
-2 millions people
Can you help me please
2 million people
The reason it's the former is because you are essentially just saying a number. It's no different than saying "eight hundred" because the literal translation is just "2,000,000."
It's not appropriate to say "2,000,000s."
That would imply multiple 2,000,000s, which is just weird in this context.
"millions" in the plural is also correct in some other situations.
“Millions of lives have been lost.”
But than, granted, it is another context.
well people usually say wanna and write want to
you’re welcome
sometimes
Like when someone explain smth to u and u say i got it means u understand it
but when someone send you a mail and u say u got it means u received the mail
Got it.
👍
like i said, there are sub-headings. They‘re written in italics which indicates that you need to change the sentences below to its structure.
"We were lying on the beach sunbathing as they were playing volleyball." Why there are two phrases in past continuous in this sentence? Isn't it supposed to have structure with Past Continuous + Past Simple?
Hello guys, someone can tell me please what is this topic, I saw it in an English guide, is: "Modos de hacer previsiones", translated: "Ways to forecast" but I don't found anything about what is, someone knows a
"common name" for this topic?
Can you explain a bit more? Though from that, I don’t believe there’s a common name for that topic
though
all though hes short he can dunk
a friend say to me take it easy tho
its like a word for extra effect
nvm what i just said bc thats how i would use tit
ot*
it*
this is the correct definition
Hii guys can anyone teach me English?🙃
if someone say something thats maybe offensive but they have a point so they say despite the offensive thing you should tske it easy
it use to for extra effect ?
Check events
“Tho” is a colloquial abbreviation of “though” and it is not proper English
well, i got it
nice
Kk
Where will check these events ?
if you go to the top of the server channels, you’ll see an event tab. They host classes for free
Kk
How to use that event?
You join whenever the event is on
No problem
I like your bio sir 😂@mint seal
His solution was simple if revolutionary.
What does "simple if revolutionary" mean?
Is there context to this question or nah
Employing the active army alone, he would not have enough divisions both to hold his eastern frontier against a Russian breakthrough and to achieve the superiority in numbers over France which he needed for a quick victory. His solution was simple if revolutionary. He decided to use reserve units in the front line.
The sentence you underlined means that the strategy he came up with made a dramatic change that benefited his army
Hmm... if I replace "if" in the sentence with "and" to make it "simple and revolutionary", will the meaning be just the same? I just don't get the use of the word "if" here
To me, when I read “if revolutionary” it sounds like a suggestion, but I believe saying “simple and revolutionary” wouldn’t much of a difference
Ok thanks
can we use "but" and "though" in the same sentence?
The power supply should be ......... by a qualified electrician
(a connected
(b contacted
(c tied
(d communicated
is it B ?
I think A, maybe?
"Although there [XXX} many advances, the misfortune of the demonstrators continues." XXX: 1) have been 2) are Hi! Which one is better. Also, is the other one categorically wrong ?
Is it levelheaded, level-headed or level headed?
I've seen levelheaded and level-headed on various websites, and google docs' autocorrect says level headed.
Good question. Actually, apparently nobody really knows, seems like we have a choice. There are rules for hyphenation https://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/hyphens.asp , however, those two versions seem to be interchangeable. Merriam Webster says levelheaded, while Cambridge Dictionary contains the spelling "level-headed"
Wiktionary labels levelheaded as an alternative spelling of level-headed
I would say, just be consistent with it in your sentences
Also, it would probably be better to write level-headed in formal text
I see, thank you for the throughout explaination!
Longing to return to her ruined ancestral home, she rallies families, neighbors, lawyers, journalists, scholars to campaign tirelessly in the face of violence. Although many advances are made, the misfortune of the demonstrators continues. (It's my essay, and I wrote "are"... Am I doomed?)
Thanks for the correction. I wrote "are"....... Am I doomed ?
I don't know, that's an honest question 🙂
insert the oh no tik tok audio
What is the name of that fairy tale girl who fly sitting on a stick?
There are many fairy tales with this sort of concept
What does "Formality" mean?
Context: The next French tense that it is important to know is the conditional tense. The conditional can be used in the present, past and future, but let’s not get ahead of ourselves! The most important is of course the conditional present, which is used in a variety of situations. It can be used to add formality and politeness, to give advice or suggestions, for wants and wishes, or for imaginary scenarios. We can compare it to the English “would” and “could”.
formality
[1] (noun)
The state of being formal.
What does "claim ticket" or "claim check" mean? Does it only mean "you have deposited your stuff and have right to take it back"? Or could it also mean you have right to acquire stuff which wasn't previously owned by you?
what does "drenched my fears" mean in the lyrics "(the picture) stuck in my brain, it kept me sane for a couple of years, as it drenched my fears of becoming like the others"
is it "made my fears disappear " or "I'm more scared "?
that’s fine
to “claim” something means to receive it. In this case, claiming a “ticket” or “check” is literally receiving the item from another person or thing
it would be “making my fears disappear slowly” in this context. To “drench” means to make something wet but this is metaphorical. “Drench” in this context would mean drowning fears and gradually washing them away, thus overcoming those problems.
from another people that part I get that but what about the ownership? what’s previously his from another person or what’s not his from another person?
I’m assuming this might be the definition you’re looking for. Sorry for giving you the wrong answer, I’m actually new to half of the info i just found LOL.
https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/claim+check
I wouldn’t be so sure about the ownership part you mentioned above
I actually found that too but I came across this so I was confused https://youtu.be/bKOju3nhz3w
i see
I wasn't able to translate the video but it seemed that the claim check also gives you right to acquire something new what do you think?
I’m assuming that the ticket is an item in the game. I don’t play it myself so I wouldn’t know
by the look of it do you think the claim check have the both meanings?
no, reason being is because “claim check” is different in real life than in a game
wait sike
They should mean the same thing
but the “receipt for deposit” wouldn’t apply in the game(I assume). Only in real life
also to be honest, the title for the video isn’t grammatically correct lol
but thats bc its modern society rlly
but the game is based on reality and the same language as far as I know
I’d recommend someone who plays it, sorry
or at least know how it works
Because I don’t know how this “claim ticket” works in the game
just because its based on reality doesn’t mean it replicates it
wait, then does that mean the expression can have the both meaning?
well, yes
when you hear that expression, does the both meanings come to your mind?
Yeah it does
phew
but majority of the time I think of receiving an item(check or ticket)rather than a receipt of deposit…tho both meanings are applicable
Thank you for your precious time Kiu I finally got it
no problem, glad to hear that
can we use "but" and "though" in the same sentence?
do you have an example?
otherwise if not, you can’t put them together really
or maybe something like “But you can do this, though this might not benefit you”
yeah sike i didn’t think of that. That’s acceptable
no you can, to me it sounds a little bit funny at first
when you asked the question I was thinking of almost every combination and everything sounded weird
lmao
lol ok, anyways thx again
npp
who?
my online friend we havent contacted in years and that question came across my mind today lol
Yeah no it’s definitely acceptable but not commonly used to put “but” and though” together
alr, got it:)
-
What's the name of the person who take care about finances (for example in NGOs)?
Is it Financial Secretary or Treasurer
(I am not sure about the second one, sound like Smigol's friend :D) -
How do you term students' organizations?
*academic circle; students scientific association; students research circle; student research group *
Is that correct: Public Relations Scientific Association?
I am creating my CV. Can any native speaker help me with few words?
So I've been speaking English for a while and I listen to all kinds of English speech every day. However, I still sometimes find myself having to rewind a particular part of a video (whether it is a movie or something else) in order to understand what the person is saying. It is very frustrating and I would like to fix that, but I don't know how. Any suggestions?
I've spoken english for a long time and i still do that- ig it's normal to rewind when you didn't get what they said
but my issues with hearing what people say go beyond the videos I watch and disrupt my conversations. It seems like everyone else can understand them well, while I struggle to even catch individual words
Although it doesn't happen often, it still creates an embarrassing negative experience
What teacher?
everything: from formal addresses to casual chatting
is it the speaking pace that is troubling u?
no
accent?
oh
but not only the accent
I have tried rewatching fragments that I don't understand, sometimes multiple times to recognize the words. If this doesn't work I search for subtitles, unless there are no subtitles available. During conversations I ask another person to repeat what they are saying when I don't understand, occasionally it takes more than 3 times, so I have to ask them to say it slowly, stressing each word. I started paying attention to this problem only 1-2 years ago
“Him leaving hurt me”
“I saw him leaving”
In the first sentence “him leaving” can be considered as a whole can it be in the second one
Any native speaker to answer this ?
”Him leaving” can be considered as a whole
MESSİ OR RONALDO
this is lowkey me with anyone with a thick accent. You’re not alone here, not everyone can understand every accent. Though you addressed it’s not just accent, perhaps you just might need to improve general listening comprehension or something…but im not really the one who should give out tips for these kinds of things lol
or just talk with more people in vc/irl
Hello! I need to make a comparative seminar between two writers in the modernism age, does anyone have any recommendations (someone interesting, a relationship between two writers...)
I wonder if there are any grammatical experts in here.
I consistently run into a specific problem with my own writing.
This problem being that my sentences can trail off into the infinite and I am unsure what the best remedy is and what topic I should look up in order to find out more about this.
Even the sentence above could - and perhaps should - be broken up into multiple separate sentences.
Consider the following text.
"Hold it! Quickly!", shouted Marakunda but it was in vain as the weight of the boulder easily crushed the wooden barricades they had set up.
"Hold it! Quickly!", shouted Marakunda but it was in vain. The weight of the boulder easily crushed the wooden barricades they had set up.
Would the first version even be considered grammatically correct?
I'm certain that I need to look up something in regards to 'clauses' in order to find out more about this specific issue but I do not know what exactly, nor do I know if this is in any way grammatically acceptable.
(See the sentence above this one for another example of a sentence that I could - and perhaps should - splice into multiple separate sentences.)
I have to go for a while so if anyone here has an answer and responds then I would greatly appreciate it if they'd @ me.
is the phrase "by no means" grammatically correct? i can't understand why the phrase is structured this way
I think either of these is grammatically fine if you slip a comma before "but". Long sentences aren't inherently an issue, unless they're really long. The problem is when you have an excessive proportion of long sentences without shorter and differently structured ones to vary the texture
It's grammatical yep. "Means" here is not from the verb to mean, it's a separate noun meaning method/way
As in the collocation "a means to an end"
Also used more generally like "valves are a means of controlling water" for example
Since it means method/way, you can read "by no means" with the same structure as "in no way"
thanks, I figured it out after mentally removing the adverb "no" from the sentence. for some reason i was confused by the negation before the noun...
That's what I initially had**,** but I wasn't sure that it felt alright. (See, right here the comma makes the sentence feel disconnected.)
Hm, I will have to ponder about things and find the correct balance between splicing things up and, on the other hand, connecting them with a comma.
Thanks by the way 👍 Completely forgot to say that.
What is the difference between these two sentences:
1- My neighbor doesn't agree to water my plants when we are away on holiday.
2- My neighbor agrees not to water my plants when we are away on holiday.
I have a question about literature.. do you think that the morals/ ideas of old literature is still among the minds of society? And why?
”not agree” means that the neighbour is against the statement of “watering my plants.” Here when you use “not agree” it means that the neighbour and your statement are completely opposite. Your opinion is “I should water my plants” but the neighbour’s opinion is “you should not water your plants”
“Agree” means that you and your neighbour have the same opinion. Both of you think that you should not water your plants, rather than going against each other with your statements.
yes…mainly on human experiences because some of the ideas/morals from past literature still influence us today
I have a question for British English speakers. It's about the use of punctuation and quotation marks. Is it true that, in British English, full stops and commas go outside quotation marks (sometimes)?
For example, is the following correct?
Example: They call themselves the 'Twenty-niners'.
if that’s true then thats pretty interesting. Not BrE myself tho
I use commonwealth english
I use punctuation after quotes
He said, "I'm hungry".
"they spoke of worlds they could not be in, but forever wondering even in the faces of danger, for they truely were eternal" - what's going on in the para
Hm, we would probably need a lot more context to understand it.
You can either say "it has affected" or "it affects"
It sounds a little poetic, but the grammar makes sense.
i don't think you should worry about grammer when talking about something serious
do you best ❤️
Can anyone say some liens on online newspaper
Just read any newspaper wdym
What does "Ileal" mean?
Context: he covers a great ileal of territory in a haphazard way
”ileal” is a typo I believe. The word itself refers to human anatomy(small intestines or something). The word should be “ideal” or something else
did he even finished the book or did he just read the sad part and then assumed it had a sad ending
can anyone fix my grammar plz 🥲
Everything is fine but “finished” should be “finish”
Actually maybe finished is fine in here idk
I just don’t see it in past tense often
finished, assumed = finish, assume
can u help me? ever or even? tysm
even
Hi do you want to check essays ?
Whatchu mean by an essay, dawg?
Essay Proofreading ?
Thanks, DM you later.
Grindr
Please help me understand this joke.
What date is also a command?
March 4th
it's a pun. If you know the definition of the word "march" you know that it also means:
to walk with stiff regular steps like a soldier. The 4th is pronounced as "forth", meaning "towards a place; forward". march 4th = march forward, which is a command, an order.
Ok, thanks
if you found this in a book online or some sort of digital scan, it's 100% a copying error
the original version probably says a great deal of and the d was misinterpreted as il
If I'm warning someone about something so is it okay to say,''be ready to get traumatized"
yes
Hii
How to use the word 'anomaly' correctly?
Please help me 😭
Schlieffen’s was a pigeonholed plan par excellence.
What does par mean here?
'anomaly' is something different, abnormal, peculiar, or not easily classified. So basically, you can use it as their synonym. For example- your Dog gave birth to four pups, three of them were black and the other one was pink, which is different/not like others. So we can just say that -
- the pink pup is an "anomaly"
hi
Instead of saying the pink pup is different
ohhh so anomaly is a noun
thank youuu i understand it now
It is, yes.. sometimes, adj as well
Glad to be of your help eight ^^
Here 'par excellence' has one meaning which is 'by excellence'.
It is said in order to emphasize that it is a very good example of that kind of thing.
thanks
Hi everyone 👋 Does anyone use the self talking method? How effective is it? I haven't tried it yet. Please share your experience about this method:)
Hi guys, would someone like to grammatically verify two phrases I wrote ?
I can give it a try @primal ibex ... Which two phrases are you talking about?
- Therefore, the lands were registered in the farmer’s name, although the government refuses to issue proper title certificates.
- Gradually, most of the unwanted tenants were evicted from the second house, except for a family, hired as goons by the city, which reinstates in turn the informally relinquished partial ownership of one relative of our protagonist, in order to pressure him to sell it to the goons.
I have been told that the mistake these 2 sentences have in common is the inconsistent verb tense.
-
Here, the first part is in past tense, so I believe it'd be better to use 'refused' (the past form) in the second part.
-
Which 'reinstated' (again past form)
Also, I'm not really sure if I understood what you were trying to say in this sentence. Are you perhaps trying to imply that the family restored the ownership?
- Right. Does my phrase look bad though? My essay is graded.... 2. The city restored the ownership. [by the way, thank you]
'which reinstated the informally relinquished partial ownership' would be the right sentence if the city is restoring the ownership here. The 'in turn' isn't necessary here to imply that meaning.
I'd say your phrases look just fine to me.
He's always had a burning ambition to start his own business
He is or he has?
Hello,
Nice to meet you.
He has.
me too
I knew it every second went by - Can I say this? (Is it correct to say?)
vasyorneym
It does not sound correct, but provide me the context in which you would say this. Possibly it is correct in a certain context.
I can tell ur age
Why "Slow and Steady Wins the race" is correct? Why not Slow and Steady?
win the race.
Hello! “He’s had that car since he was in high school.” In this sentence what is the "He's had" abbreviation stands for?
Is it he is had?
no, it’s just “He has had” i believe
”he is had” doesnt make sense
thank you
Polish my shoes.
Chnage into assertive sentence
Because there isn't actually a known subject in that idiom. It's implied, rather. "slow and steady" isn't a noun (they're simply two adjectives), and so the phrase can't serve as a subject. "slow and steady" are describing an implied something not explicitly stated in the sentence, and in this case, this something is singular. We could say "the one who is slow and steady wins the race" to form a more complete sentence.
“You should polish my shoes”
🙂
"Why did you do that" vs "Why you did that" which is more correct?
the first one
People (might have lived-might live) on the moon by 2050
Which choice is correct?
Might live
Why not might have lived?
||I know why but I just need supporting proof||
Idk why , I'm just more used to "might live"
Well, thanks for the help
"people might live on the moon by 2050" is meaning people have opportunity/chance to live in the moon. if you say" might have lived" it means they maybe already lived there.
Doesn't "might have lived" here means that they lived, and won't be living anymore by the time 2050 arrives?
Already lived and don't live anymore by that time
the time 2050 can't be arrived because this sentence is talking about past not the future.
maybe you should ask a fluent speaker i don't want to give you wrong information. I might be wrong.
"Might have" will mean the probability of people who have lived in the moon
Maybe they lived maybe they didn't
Not really because we aren't sure
At least that's what I've been taught
Foosball... Also known as table soccer
thanks
is it a correct way to say that "maybe it's just how i take it to be" when u interpret something differently than others
@olive parrot
Hi everyone, im sorry to bother you, i was listening to a song and then the singer said " I'm afraid of being what i should have never become", i don't understand why they used the perfect continuous at the end, thank you!
Yes, We can say that. But this isn't the only way.
she ate dinner. / she has eaten dinner. : what is the difference these two sentences?
Does the word 'stubborn' sound more 'negative' than 'determined'?
and is usually being used to say that someone is very unwilling to change their mind?
The first is simple past the second is present perfect tense
Yes. There is a greater negative connotation on "stubborn" than there is on "determined." It is typically used in a context when someone is unwilling to change their mind, yes.
thank you! Bo..jack?
Haha, just a custom image, but close enough.
Guyss can someone help me with this
EXERCISES
A. Study and determine whether the form of the pronoun it in each number is PERSONAL
or IMPERSONAL. Write your answer on the line.
_____________1. It is difficult to start over.
_____________2. Murakami's new book is good and it really inspires.
_____________3. It's okay to say you're not fine.
_____________4. I like your bag. It's cute!
_____________5. I'm sure it's going to be a fun night!
_____________6. I bought you a book. I know you'll like it.
_____________7. Liza is not yet home. It's getting late.
_____________8. I saw your performance yesterday. It was good.
_____________9. What's wrong with my phone? It's not working anymore.
_____________10. I told you it feels good to exercise regularly.
hey peeps
what is functions and conflicts
we got an activity at school about issue stuff and it says write the functions and conflicts of the issue bluh bluh
Hi, "listening to music" can be a noun phrase, a verb phrase and a gerund phrase depending on the context, is that right? Thanks
I've never come across that word before.
Yes, that phrase can be any of the three in different circumstances.
Aaa I need help for my hw plss
When can we use the word "always" in present simple and present continuous?
Thank you for your response and help 👍
Q : .... Saturday morning I usually wake up late
The correct preposition is? On/in?
I believe you would use "always" when you want to emphasise the degree that the verb happens... I read, yes. I always read, no, I don't. I use Discord, but I wouldn't say that I always use Discord. I believe "always" is acting as an adverb here.
The correct preposition is "on" since we are referring to a specific time at which something is done.
Tysmm
Hi there, may I ask you guys what "the things under the valley were not the less beautiful to me" means. I am not so sure about the "not the less beautiful" part. Could something pls explain?
Hello. Which contraction is correct for following sentence: You are not in room 3? You aren't in room 3. or You're not in room 3.
The sentence is negating "the less beautiful" and implying that the things under the valley are equally as beautiful, if not more. "the less beautiful" could be considered a noun phrase here, as indicated by the article "the," but we're using it as an adjective phrase (noun adjunct?) to describe "things." To the speaker, the things are not equivalent to "the less beautiful."
Thank you so much, I get it. I was a little bit confused when I saw this sentence because I felt like I needed more context. So if the whole context is "I thought the valley was beautiful, and the things under the valley were not the less beautiful to me." , does this mean "I thought the valley was as beautiful as the things under the valley" ?
It could be implying that within context, yes. The phrase "the less beautiful' isn't making a direct comparison to the valley, though, and is simply stating that the things under the valley are not "the less beautiful" part of the valley. Other things in the valley could be considered "the less beautiful" things.
So there can be multiple meanings, right?
Ah, thank you!!
Perhaps, but I think the main takeaway is that the things under the valley are not ugly in any way.
Yeah, that's exactly what I think.
Actually, yeah, the article here just confused me
I think it's far less awkward, actually. The article turns it into some strange adjectival noun phrase whereas a comparative would be much better.
Oh, sorry. It seems you're saying it's awkward with the article. Yes, I agree.
"The things under the valley were not less beautiful to me" makes more sense to me at least
If they mean the same
It's hard to say if they do, frankly. "less beautiful" implies that the valley is beautiful, and whilst this can certainly be true, it may not be the intended meaning. Given that the article is used and we end up with a vague noun phrase, there may be something else in the valley which would be considered "the less beautiful." It's similar to saying "the people living there aren't the rich." Who are the people living there that are considered "the rich" then?
"The things IN the valley were nonetheless beautiful to me"?
Oh yeah, I agree
The underlying meaning is so ambiguous
Indeed. I'm quite curious what a teacher would have to say about this usage-- particularly, using a noun phrase as an adjectival phrase there.
I've never heard anyone say something like "not the less beautiful" before. I just felt like it might come from a book or something. Just maybe some writers would write it in that way
I've not quite seen anything like it either, and so it seems quite unconventional. Dissecting the meaning is one thing, but understanding the grammatical components is another.
Yeah, but at least "the things" were definitely beautiful. Haha
Thanks a lot, I really appreciate your help!! @bright pulsar @flat rune
EXERCISES
A. Study and determine whether the form of the pronoun it in each number is PERSONAL
or IMPERSONAL. Write your answer on the line.
_____________1. It is difficult to start over.
_____________2. Murakami's new book is good and it really inspires.
_____________3. It's okay to say you're not fine.
_____________4. I like your bag. It's cute!
_____________5. I'm sure it's going to be a fun night!
_____________6. I bought you a book. I know you'll like it.
_____________7. Liza is not yet home. It's getting late.
_____________8. I saw your performance yesterday. It was good.
_____________9. What's wrong with my phone? It's not working anymore.
_____________10. I told you it feels good to exercise regularly.
Guyss can someone help me with this? Tysm!
Hi
The sentence:
They are in the shop.
I understand that "in the shop" is the "complement" of the sentence and is a prepositional phrase.
But what part of speech is it? Is it behaving as an adjective (modifying "They") or as an adverb (modifying "are")?
Thanks
I have a hard time pronouncing the word "theory". I've seen a phonetic transcription that describes it as "ˈTHirē", but I have the impression that most of the time, when someone says it slowly, the "o" isn't silent.
So it actually sounds like TheOry
Can I just pronounce it without the o?
For me, I would say yes...?
With my accent, you don't really hear the 'o' unless I say the word slowly.
not 100% sure but i think adverb
Thanks @merry pumice for your input!
Guys can someone help me with this?
hi guys my question is that if can we use the past perfect in order to indicate a continuous action in the past
ongoing action but in the past
Thanks!
Thanks!
Any answer please
all of the three make sense
its correct they are exchangeable
@flat rune thanks
If I've understood correctly, I would say no...
I think the tense that would be used for this would be the "past continuous"...
How does “its cries drowned out every other sound” - (referring to the crow - the crow is also angry and frustrated) refer to the theme of power?
As well as “they filled the valley with the roar of thunder” (referring ti the crows cries)
Power is often associated with the ability to silence those weaker than you, so that could be one inference here with the crow silencing the voices of others with their own. It could just be taken more literally, and the crow's louder voice overshadowing the other voices shows its power over the weaker voices.
A parallel could be tyranny. In anger and frustration, tyrants will drown out the voices of the masses to assert their position and dominance.
The roar of thunder is probably just a metaphor for the anger and the resonance of the crow's cries. Thunder is loud, overbearing, and crackles with malicious content, and as thunder does, the crow's cries may be analogous.
Many things fear and cower in the presence of thunder. Some may do the same in the presence of a tyrant's voice.
🤯 👍
@bright pulsar ( Wow. It seems that you were able to provide such a thoughtful, solid response so effortlessly... I'd love to be able to do this... haha )
I think I've seen such a parallel at some point before, so it's mostly thanks to my prior knowledge. You'll be able to do so as well with enough time and experience, I'm certain. Still, thanks.
@merry pumice Amazing, right? Haha
I appreciate the encouragement @bright pulsar; I'm making a conscious effort at the moment in trying to improve my verbal/writing skills. I'm not the most articulate, or able to process things as quickly as others I would say...
Thanks for using your "power" to help others.
To me, good communication / critical-thinking / analytical skills is kind of like a superpower...and a good one to have
is nontheless and nevertheless same? if yes, may i know the meaning?
What is best way to write a Character Analysis
What is a word for a statement spoken as though it were a truism, but is clearly wrong?
Misconception, falsity, fallacy, untruth.
I've never seen the two used much differently. They are both used to say "in spite of."
"When he spoke she was well aware of the hollow ring to his words"
so it's like she could feel/sense that he was not being honest and sincere? hollow ring
Yeah
what is 'frog enjoyer'?
I googled it and they showed me some memes about gigachad....
is it NSFW?
depending on the context it could mean anything. But if I were told that someone is a "frog enjoyer", I would know that they like frogs.
The gigachad memes show up because it is very common meme format
you are french

yo like rosbif land or frogy land and so on
What's the difference between "these kinds of weapons" and "these kinds of weapon", if there is any?
“Weapons” would just refer to a variety of them. Knives, guns, spears etc
“Weapon” in this context would refer to different variations of the same weapon. However the example you gave sounds quite unnatural
Father: Is there enough for Uncle Tommy?
Daughter: Well, there would've been.
What exactly does there would've been mean? It's a bit confusing.
They're having breakfast, by the way.
The “would’ve been” means that in the past, there was enough breakfast for Uncle Tommy until the people in the family(I’m assuming) ate it all
Cause: People(family members)eating breakfast
Effect: Not leaving enough food for the next person, aka Uncle Tommy
The outcome was supposed to be enough food for him, but because of the cause there’s not enough
“which authorized US$280 billion to be doled out for domestic manufacturing” How do you correctly pronounce “US$280 billion”?
Two-hundred and eighty billion US dollars
Sorry
Wait
Lmao I just edited it because I forgot the 80
It's one of the many same type of example sentences from a grammar book.
It’s most likely correct but it’s not a common thing to say
Most grammar textbooks wouldn’t have sentences that natives say nowadays
Idk it’s just odd
Why? Natives are too busy creating new language rules? Lol.
Thank you.
Textbooks are usually outdated because we form a new generation every time haha
So our language becomes different I guess
E.g. I’m learning Japanese and a lot of the sentences, grammar, dialogue etc. Is not what native Japanese people say nowadays. It’s a lot shorter or simpler than it used to be(Also according to my teacher as well)
Not saying you shouldn’t learn from textbooks though, they place basic and important foundation
I gather it must be for that.
Yeah but idk, maybe the sentence to other natives might think it sounds normal
Not gonna go into depth haha
the second one means somthing like leopard2 the first one mean tanks in that context
It means "though", its meaning is similar to "but"
"China's Xi calls for 'more quickly elevating' armed forces."
more quickly elevating?
https://imgur.com/a/LZYouv0
Can someone help?
are enminem's lyrics worth analyzing as an english leaner?
Yes.
They can help you get a grasp on wordplay and how words can often be used in different and clever ways.
To a native, this kind of thing is intuitive. To someone learning English, wordplay, irony, and other figures of speech are not easily picked up on. Eminem is a fine example to learn from.
"I make elevating music, you make elevator music"
Hi, I am German and in Germany we say "I make a 'assbomb (arschbombe)" when you jump with your butt first into the water. I saw, that DeepL say, its in English "cannonball", does that mean, when I write "I make a assbomb" a native english speaker would not understand it?
(pls answer with ping, so I see it^_^)
Yeah its cannonball not assbomb in english so an english speaker wouldnt understand it and i am learning german btw lol
However you'd probably not say "i make a cannonball"
Okay it would be "I do a cannonball into the water". Right? 😉
Yeah
In german, you see a kid jumping into the water and shouting/yelling (still unsure about this) "ASSBOMB" 😄
Shouting and yelling mean the same thing tbh
is "the strong prey on the weak" the only correct way? Could you say "the strong preys on the weak". I am aware of a difference in the meaning if it is correct
ah well 🙂
"The strong" is an adjective being used as a collective. It counts as a plural subject.
Another example is "the rich" in "the rich eat the poor."
okay, what about the phrase "it's what weak people says" ?
"the strong" is plural, you can read it like "the strong (ones) prey on the weak (ones)". If there was a single strong thing in a group that preyed on all the weaker ones, you'd say "the strongest". If you were talking about exactly 2 things, one strong and one weak, you'd say "the stronger"
"people" is plural, it needs to be "say"
This doesn't agree in my head at all. I've never heard this.
never heard of this?
Even without the 's', a word can be plural, as "people" is.
well, I learnt nothing new, but that was very helpful for my confidence. Thank you
Perhaps you should clarify what you're looking for. The example provided doesn't seem correct at all, but there are certain circumstances where agreement can be slightly trickier. I recommend looking into notional agreement. @late topaz
I am sorry, but I don't know what I am looking for. I saw some person say "That's what weak people says but I make my weakness my strength" and something in my brain recognized the thing that I've seen before - the phrase "that's what weak people says". Despite me knowing that it's not really grammatically correct, that moment of recognition made me doubt myself. This is sort of a deja-vu, and that's why I decided to ask here.
tl;dr me no confident, me dumb
@bright pulsar although the "notional agreement" is useful, thanks. It's this thing, right?
Yes, that's essentially it. You'll probably be able to find additional examples online as it more often refers to a less strict form of agreement based on what the statement is focused on.
I'm sure a few natives argued about the correctness of some statements before without considering notional agreement, so it can be a useful thing to have in your toolbox.
Both "the strong prey on the weak" and "the strong preys on the weak" can be correct depending on the context and the subject-verb agreement.
"The strong prey on the weak" is in the plural form, with "strong" and "weak" referring to groups of individuals rather than a singular entity. In this case, "prey" is in the third person plural form, which matches the subject.
On the other hand, "the strong preys on the weak" is in the singular form, with "strong" and "weak" referring to a singular entity or individual. In this case, "preys" is in the third person singular form, which matches the subject.
So, both forms are grammatically correct, but they convey slightly different meanings depending on the context and subject-verb agreement.
helloo, is it correct? or should it be "no one/nobody" instead of "anyone"?
"i hope anyone will steal my phone"
The correct one is nobody/no one^^
After courting the Japanese, Roosevelt decided to support the tsar’s refusal to pay indemnities, a move that policymakers in Tokyo interpreted as signifying that the US had more than a passing interest in Asian affairs.
what does 'pay indemnities' mean? like, basically, to financially compensate?
indemnity
[1] (noun)
Security from damage, loss, or penalty.
Is there any grammar book that'll help me review all english grammar from a1 level to c2 level ?
How many months of studying would you recommend before passing c2 level exams
Still don't understand
Hello there! Try /define taco to get started :taco:
Need someone to spell it out for me
To pay for the damage you caused.
"He realized that his son is quater black and assumed that Desiree belongs to a black family".
I was writing summary of a story and I'm a bit confused that whether it's "belongs" or "belonged".
Depends where you start and how often and well you study.
Thanks mister
Belonged
May I ask why!?
In this context, "pay indemnities" refers to the demand that Russia pay compensation to Japan for damages and losses incurred during the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-1905. Indemnities are typically financial compensation paid by a defeated country or party to the victor of a conflict or war. By supporting the Tsar's refusal to pay indemnities, Roosevelt was taking a stance on the matter and becoming involved in Asian affairs, which signaled to policymakers in Tokyo that the US had a more significant interest in the region than previously thought.
Thanks for the detailed explanation
To match the tense which the sentence began in: the past tense; “He realized…”
But she is still alive.
Which means she still belongs to a black family.
But yes I understood! Thank you sir
it would be more appropriate to use "belonged" as the sentence is referring to a past event. So the correct sentence would be: "He realized that his son is quarter black and assumed that Desiree belonged to a black family."
I see. In that case, you can use "belongs" because she is still alive and her belonging to a black family is still true in the present. So the correct sentence would be: "He realized that his son is quarter black and assumed that Desiree belongs to a black family."
He just assumed that she is black but she wasn't!
Thank you so much for your help.
the sentence would be: "He assumed that Desiree belonged to a black family, but she wasn't."
Because: The original sentence implies that the assumption about Desiree belonging to a black family was made in the past when the son's racial identity was discovered. However, if it is later revealed that Desiree is not actually black, then the correct tense to use would be past tense. Therefore, the revised sentence uses "belonged" in the past tense to reflect the incorrect assumption made at the time, and "wasn't" in the past tense to indicate that the assumption was incorrect.
You're welcome, it was my pleasure to help
...but she wasn't didn't
Whatever, doesn't matter. What matters is to help each other.
Damn, I hate jealous people. 😄
It doesn't matter as long as the AI gives correct answers
Which is clearly not the case quite a lot of the time
I don't know how answering that is going to make a difference in your life, but it seems like your jealousy and personal problems are causing you to write foolish things like this.
Get some help.
If you're interested in the topic of AI and language I posted some articles about it in #1029075039741562880.
Yes of course, you've seen me to the core. I'm so jealous of your ability to copy partly incorrect answers into discord without doing any thinking yourself... Wish I could do that
As I said before, your personal problems are causing you to interfere in matters that do not involve you. That you claim things that you don't have prove for.
Take this for example
The proof is just to observe that "she didn't belong to a black family" works, while "she wasn't belong" doesn't
Question tags need to make sense with the verb in the clause they're tagging
ok

That doesn't necessarily mean that I am using AI. Even if I were, how would it change anything in your life? By the way, I didn't say whether I am using it or not. Try to stick to your business, will you?
Just to make everything clear: Just because I made a mistake doesn't mean that I am using an AI. It should actually mean the opposite.
am not going to reply to anything you say anymore because I am not a clown. People watch me to have fun.
A. Read the situations below and the generalizations made. Put a cross mark (*) on the line the if the generalization made is illogical
-
A Chinese boy vandalized a pyramid in Egypt. The Chinese have no
respect for the culture of other nations. -
You didn't say anything to prove that you didn't steal the car. This means that you are guilty.
-
Electricity can kill a person. A home appliance with an open wiring is
dangerous. -
I called you three times on the phone already and you never answered.
You are intentionally ignoring me. -
The majority of people die in hospitals. So stay out of hospitals.
-
Men are statistically more aggressive than women. Therefore, I, a male,
must be more aggressive than you, a female. -
Ron is stubborn. He doesn't listen to anyone who says that he needs to
lose some weight. Ron will never lose weight. -
Cats are quicker than dogs. Therefore, they can always outrun dogs.
-
The leather used in Shop A is more durable than the leather used in Shop
B. Therefore, Shop A produces more durable products than Shop B. -
I wore this feathery hat yesterday outside and I started to sneeze. I wore
this feathery hat again this morning and the sneezing continued. When
I took it off, I felt better. I am allergic to this feathery hat.
Guys can someone help me with this?
It's about logical fallacies: sweeping generalization and hasty generalization
🫢
sounds like, you want that someone does your homework? xD
detainee = Häftling
inmate = Häftling
prisoner = Häftling
(EN -> GER)
(source DeepL)
so... which is used for what? Prisoner would be clear, someone who is IN a prison... 😄
I also know inmate, but also for jail/prison (whats there the difference? Just how to say it? formal/informal?)
detainee was new for me.
No this is not a home work or anything this is a review because my exam is near and my teacher did not give this so I don't really understand the topic that's why I needed
It's a exercise in the book
But my teacher didn't give one
That's why I'm asking 😓😭
A. Read the situations below and the generalizations made. Put a cross mark (❌) on the line the if the generalization made is illogical and check (✅) if logical
❌1. A Chinese boy vandalized a pyramid in Egypt. The Chinese have no
respect for the culture of other nations.
❌2. You didn't say anything to prove that you didn't steal the car. This means that you are guilty.
✅3. Electricity can kill a person. A home appliance with an open wiring is
dangerous.
❌4. I called you three times on the phone already and you never answered.
You are intentionally ignoring me.
❌5. The majority of people die in hospitals. So stay out of hospitals.
❌6. Men are statistically more aggressive than women. Therefore, I, a male,
must be more aggressive than you, a female.
❌7. Ron is stubborn. He doesn't listen to anyone who says that he needs to
lose some weight. Ron will never lose weight.
❌8. Cats are quicker than dogs. Therefore, they can always outrun dogs.
❌9. The leather used in Shop A is more durable than the leather used in Shop
B. Therefore, Shop A produces more durable products than Shop B.
✅10. I wore this feathery hat yesterday outside and I started to sneeze. I wore
this feathery hat again this morning and the sneezing continued. When
I took it off, I felt better. I am allergic to this feathery hat.
Guyss does someone help me with this?
Looks good.
Okay okay thank you so much
detainee = Häftling
inmate = Häftling
prisoner = Häftling
(EN -> GER)
(source DeepL)
Is there a difference between the english names? (pls answer with ping)
detainees are being held temporarily.
inmates can include prisoners convicted of crimes or the mentally insane held against their will in a psychiatric hospital.
prisoners have been convicted of a crime.
About the pronunciation of the diphtongs like in the word "boy", u say ói with the sound of " see" the vowel or its more like the vowel of "bit", i am talking about the final vowel sound of the diphtong to be clear
Hiii, i want to ask about the answer for this exercise.
There was ....... much work that i got hardly any rest.
the answer is "so" but i think the answer is "too" can anyone explain why the answer is "so" cause i think it is too much work that he got hardly any rest.
“So” also works in here and I’d think it’ll fit more, more than “too”
They’re both very similar but “so” is used for emphasis
but i think that the work is too much or maybe it is an excessive work that make him hardly got any rest. is it?
Yes, “too” is more excessive and used more negatively
No, the final sound of the dipthong in boy is /i/ as in bean.
There’s not really an explanation as to why you use “so.” To me, it sounds more natural but that really isn’t a good answer
You cannot use "too" here.
but isnt it negative or perhaps excessive
If you use "too" you must say "There was too much work so I got hardly any rest."
Let me think about the reason.
It's true that so is used for positive cases like;
There was so much food at the party.
And too is used for negative cases like;
There was too much food at the party.
However this does not account for the difference in how it combines with the conjunction "that".
I'm still thinking.
We use so + that as a conjunction to introduce clauses of reason and explanation: They both went on a diet so that they could play more football with their friends.
...
thank youu. im kind of get it. maybe i should revise back so + that rules
No, I have not been able to find the rule. I'm looking.
"So that" introduces adverbial purpose clauses and adverbial resultative clauses.
Source: Cambridge Grammar of English pp.314
If that helps.
thank youu
🫡
"The wind** blew across** her body, chilling her wet skin."
can you use "sweep" here to replace "blow"?
what are other possible verbs here?
Yes, you can use “sweep” but change it to past tense
🫡
btw, is that YOU in your profile? you are beauiful bro
No unfortunately it’s not me, but it’s someone I admire
is he japanese?
Yes
@mint seal He was amazing at Chopin Warsaw competition
Have you watched his performance?
ofc i did, hes so good
i wanna be like him someday
im a young classical(training)pianist myself
Wow you're an aspiring champion
What is your favorite choice of piece?
Agreed, his intepretation moved a crowd already in awe by other participants performances
Right now I like Chopin’s waltz in E minor
A piece focused on techiniques ! Good choice
I’m learning it but it’s very hard cuz my hands are small but uh, if u still wanna talk I think we should move somewhere else HAHA
Great idea , let's add as friends and talk on voice chat or direct messages soon how about that
Ok 👍
@mint seal
"The anger in his face **chilled **her."
is this usage of 'chill' as 'frighten' common?
Because we usually use chill like 'relax, calm down'
"can we just stop fighting and chill for a bit?"
"I spent my afternoon chilling in front of the TV"
Yes, it's common.
Haven’t seen it myself LOL
Hmm, I've certainly seen it used and may have used it myself at some point. I can at least state that the adjective form is more common.
It's a more flowery way to say the same thing, perhaps, but writers love that stuff.
"chil‧ling /ˈtʃɪlɪŋ/ adjective
something that is chilling makes you feel frightened"
yeah, i didn't know the word until now 😂
thank you horse person, not Bojack 😂
Yep, no problem.
yeah, the dictionary i'm using tagged "literary" in this definition
========
"He **jerked **his head round and saw something that chilled his blood."
**jerk **here is like 'turn' right? he turned his head around suddenly
Yes. A quick motion.
a lot of times i think i DO know the answers to the questions im asking but just not 100% sure 😂
just need some validations from natives
Going good so far dw
TY Kiu
Thank you, I hope I can remember this knowledge for longer time in my life for future story writing 😄
Yo what up guy
Look if you have one shot or one opportunity to seize everything you ever want in one moment would you capture it or just let it slip
Yo
I have a question about Past participle clauses. Are these clauses used only with passive past forms (v3) or can they also be used with passive continuous form (being+v3)?
Haha, that's Lose Yourself!
No, we can use them in active voice as well.
I don't get it( So can being+v3 be used with Past participle clauses or not?
Just to be more clear, we have two sentences: "The car being ridden by the youngest child was the fastest." and "The car ridden by the youngest child was the fastest." Which one of them is correct?
Both are correct
hey guys can you please analyze my chat with bing chat
https://i.postimg.cc/157NLRzX/Screenshot-2023-03-12-230448.png
is the chat bot making fun of me or I just don't understand something?
checking
English is a second language for me, but my inputs were correct
nah, I it was making fun of me
I don't think so
