#š§ ļ½serious-chat
1 messages Ā· Page 408 of 1
Wdym bro
Oh nvm
Lmao
Son of Vegemite
Who told you that lmao
652 never ages
We are in an era that leans more towards a diplomatic approach rather than aggression.
Your diplomatic position depends on the strength of your country
Okay, what kind of diplomacy worked with Serbia in the late 90s then?
If your country is weak as fuck, you have no diplomacy
yes i mean us diplomatic
I'm waiting for your answer
LET HIM COOK
Indeed answers take long time we don't need a paragraph lmao
US wonāt give a fuck to some random african area with shit land of nothing
And their diplomacy, was fucked because their position
How to get diplomacy as a minor power
You need just few words 
BOMBING OF YUGOSLAVIA
Yeah
-# Yugoslavia never should have broken up
im talking about curent situation, ukraine dont go to other topic please
Diplomacy comes to your hands, once you have the power to destroy the entire world
What a perfect counter-terrorism operation
I was, you legit are talking about completely different scenarios, scenarios where diplomacy is an option. Not here.
Oh, Nice, I understand everything šš
No heck that's why I supporter Saddam once y'know
-# This user is under FBI investigation Ā· Read More
Wat a perfect racist
They killed 2.1 million civilian
Wtf are u saying
They should regret they didnāt remove all of the terrorists in that region before retreat
Ur fkn mad
Nah bro that's WW2 levels high crazy in 1991
Or simply they donāt have to retreat from there
I forgot, mine loves mao-zedong
Makes sense
its not being surrender, its abaut prevent more death.
Indeed Make Nabi great again lol
Yes, destroying their army will prevent more death
Now they are paying for it, crazy
How did diplomacy work out for Chechnya? Or Georgia?
Mine as in minecraft Chinese guy
Don't get me wrong
We wonāt miscalculate this and we will conduct any necessary operations to counter terrorism
How did diplomacy work out for Ukraine between 2014 and 2022?
Long Live for War on Terror
Alright distinction cleared lol
impossible
Went terrific y'know
Very easy actually
Look at Iceland
wtf do u want nuke war
Didn't say that anywhere
Their gdp, was lower than one of our province
And an american state
What do you think of the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia? They mistakenly destroyed the Chinese embassy in Belgrade
Oh boy
We think they deliberately destroyed our embassy and we did nothing
Because, there isnāt much counter measures we can do
We canāt bomb an american embassy because of that
It is clear that this is what Russia will do, they are already prepared for it, without you having to say it.
Yeah and China wasn't happy
And btw we should not escalate based on that, and thatās my opinion
By that logic any country with nukes is free to act as they wish
Being crazy on one embassy is madness
Just few people, let the guy in mainland do the propaganda work
True doesn't China have nukes
Thatās all enough
you said, you want to destroy their army
Yes
Who ever used nuclear weapons to destroy an army? Lol
In the capacity to use them like the Americans or Russians
Yeah just get a tank regiment
United States of America
Didn't they target civilians
what do u mean, who sent army ?
Well industrial centers and cities mostly
To end the war they say
??? You mentioned "army"
And btw I believe we did drop a nuclear bomb to kill an active army in Xinjiang in the 60s
Thatās a conspiracy theory and I think thatās true
yess, who sent it to destroy russian army ? its not come from nothing, please use your logic
Soviet - sino war or skirmish in the 60s post Soviet-sino split
In English please
A Uyghur separatist army actively plundering our organization in Xinjiang, and they suddenly disappear which matches the time of one of our nuclear test
Is that a coincidence ? Or ?
who sent it europe ? or us ?
Sent what š
US is out of the equation, they are ok with Russia now
Damn they drop a damn nuke to eliminate an army post WW2
Thatās a conspiracy theory, and nobody knows if thatās true
With any European military and their planes and armoured vehicles
The mystery deepens
enough reason to use nuke
simple
Nonsense
Why don't India and Pakistan nuke each other then
Why doesn't Israel nuke Gaza
Why didn't USA nuke Vietnam, Afghanistan or Iraq
Yeah solving problems
Realpolitik lol
I donāt think that will work if they just nuke what they wanted to nuke
what nonsense, why they make it if not use it
There was a LOT diplomacy maneuvers in any of these events between SUPERPOWERS
Last resort
If there was only one superpower and great power which is the US
They can nuke anyone they want
Indeed a nuke should always be a last resort
That's things are rusting in silos being replaced
do u think putin care about that
trump needs to be beat up ā¤ļø
Yes
Or he would've used it already
On Kyiv
If he donāt care you wonāt be on earth rn
Neither im
Go Miss Canada, Canada's great super Hero
Canada is nothing
Iām legit going to beat him up
Heās such a meanie
Nah they have oil and minerals
Waiting to be annexed by the US possibly
Indeed tariffs are on today y'know
Ofc this person comes here out of nowhere š
well obviously š
Yeah it happens lmao
Oh yeah perfect place to expand their interest
They have oil and minerals nice
And whereās their nuclear arsenals
Indeed f trump but I barely believe Canada's economy can handle it with ease
Do u acc think thatās happening š
They donāt have one right ?
well ofc itll hurt but well survive
Itās bad but not killer
I donāt think it will happen soon, but it should be one the path
r u stupid
A weak country with vast territory and resources
Indeed it will survive
itās not happening
You will see if it will happen or not
51st state ha a reality maybe š§
National interest above all
obv our legitimacy and independence and sovereignty r concrete and strong
Thatās nothing in face of tanks
the question is more of a siege on Canadian identity and it trying to break Canada internally
the U.S. cant reasonable Canada
Nazi Germanyās legitimacy and sovereignty and military might much god damn higher than you but does that stopped Soviets drive tanks and destroy everything along them ?
reasonably invade Canada
Indeed we need Canadian oil
Thats 1940 my bro š š
Unless a war with China happens
They donāt need a reason to do that
Or pick random one
well then who cares
Like national security purposes
let China be bombed to the ground š¤·āāļø
Bro you haven't seen fallout
r u stupid they canāt do that just bc of ā national securityā theres more to it than that š
you attack russian, but you beg don't use nuke, total nonsense !!
Yeah I will š
They can do that, they did that in 21 century
And letās see if you are the next target
we wonāt be
Donāt cry if you are being picked because they donāt need to care about canadians
They will do everything just for americans
Lmao yes let the CCP fall
I like how you completely disregarded my answer, shows that you have nothing more to say
We donāt need to worry if they want to mess with us, there will be no earth anymore
Arent u chinese
We are a powerful nuclear power
but hated
Ukraine occupied Russian territory in Kursk yet no nuke dropped
I donāt give a shit
Indeed
You can hate China
you should
But try to mess with us ? You pay for it
soft power matters š
im shivering š„¶
I see how it matters in face of bullets
for good reasons
Never ask Canada what they did in WW1
I did
soft power is actually super important
And who tf told you we donāt have soft power btw
Hard power is obviously too but in the 21st century soft power has become super important
referring specifically to cultural soft power
You are a pure puppet state of the US
How dare you think you are something based on that situation
You are a puppet of the United States
itās true
Indeed: Canadians Geneva convention nah, Geneva checklist yea
So enjoy to be a puppet and follow what your master nations says
Japan turned out good y'know
China ew
And you have no right to be on the table with us
Canāt stand that country oml
considered child play, nuke is expensive
if anything China doesnt
ur literally speaking our language sir and saying that š
Mental gymnastics I see
Notice, why hast Finland built nukes?
It's against our Constitution
I donāt know a word in chinese and yet English is the lingua franca
Very stupid, I know
Damn who the hell came with the Constitution
you come HERE from China to yapā soft power!
well if your country been attacked, do u still care about that shit rule
If they threaten the capital then yes
Mate run off lmao
and ppl here act like theyre some high-level politician by saying āmyā or whatever when at the end of the day were just ppl
Like gosh š
That's how nukes are used, as I mentioned before: last resort
acting like u control America or China š
Russia will never be in the position of using it as last resort
crazyyy š
Yeah welcome to discord
he acts like heās the communist leader of China š
Cant take him srsly
Maybe his vpn stopped im not sure!
Soft power am I right?
oh that's the truth unfortunately
Yeah lmao
the truth is you guys are the puppet of the US
š
the truth is you guys are weak as hell
the truth is you guys waiting to be annexed possibly one day
And yet ur halfway across the world and fluent in my language
Same lol
who said that's your language
lmao
you think you are superior using american language
Iām trying to match ur vibe but pretty sure English is the language
true puppet
Of the anglosphere
that's not your language
post-colonialist & constructivist š
pretty sure itās my language
oh that's my language too
and who the fuck are you doing here
why you are speaking my language
someoneās mad š
lmao
youre the one speaking English
american ? its still english 
oh yeah is English canadian ?
It's German
There are variations
But English Is anglospheric
everyone knows it here duh
dude
But elsewhere you have to put in effort
that's funny
Like in ur case!! Soft power right??
not your soft power dude
ur literally in China using a vpn to talk on an American platform too like what the freak
doubtless
Yeah our germanic brothers across the pond are wildling
Yeah hopefully it doesn't end up as the 51st state
Watch! š
Imagine you're the one making food, but the world makes the rules about whether you can eat it or not? In a state of hunger, do you still care about those damn rules?
Surely russia have nuke protocols.
LAW/RULE WITHOUT ENFORCEMENT IS TOILET PAPER
Itās clear that Trump is working on diplomacy, so why choose to escalate the geopolitical situation, which actually has the potential to lead to a wider war ?
True that's why the kmt lost the mainland
i seen u said this line many times, you made this ? or u get somewhere
Heās quoting one of the worldās most notorious serial murderers and a bonified pos
are u sure ? 
Yes
gpt said its Alan Dershowitz, law professor
Its from mao
verified ā
I learned it from a supreme leader
If you had just apologized, that would have been enough for me. But okay.
You still can do it actually it's never too late
What we talk about here?
serious things š¼
Hmmm I see
I find many theistic responses to the problem of evil to be weak. When we look at the logical problem of evilāthe idea that Godās existence is logically inconsistent with sufferingāthe two most common counterarguments are free will and the good-evil equilibrium. But both of these arguments have serious flaws.
- The Free Will Defense
This argument claims that God allows evil to exist because stopping it would take away our free will. The idea is that God, who is all-knowing, all-powerful, and perfectly good, lets suffering happen because interfering would undermine our ability to make meaningful choices. If God stepped in to stop evil, they say, it would mean taking away our freedom, which would be worse than allowing suffering.
Problems with This Argument:
Free Will Might Not Be Real: This defense assumes we have complete free willāthat we can make choices entirely independently. But science and philosophy suggest otherwise. Our decisions are shaped by biology, environment, and other factors. If free will is an illusion or limited, then God stopping evil wouldnāt actually violate our āfreedom,ā because we donāt truly have that kind of freedom in the first place.
What About Natural Evil?: Even if free will exists, this argument doesnāt explain natural evilāsuffering that isnāt caused by humans, like natural disasters, diseases, or genetic disorders. If free will is the reason God allows evil, why does non-human-caused suffering exist? This isnāt addressed, which weakens the argument.
- The Good-Evil Equilibrium Argument
This argument says that evil is necessary for good to exist. For example, they claim that without pain, thereās no relief; without sadness, thereās no happiness. In other words, evil gives meaning to good.
Problems with This Argument:
Evil Doesnāt Always Lead to Good: This assumes that suffering always results in something positive, but thatās not true. Trauma can lead to despair, not growth. For instance, losing a child might teach some people gratitude, but it can also destroy lives or cause lifelong pain.
Good and Evil Arenāt Inseparable: Pain and relief, sadness and happiness, arenāt inherently connected. They come from different biological systems. Pain receptors and pleasure systems work independently, so itās possible to have relief without pain or happiness without sadness.
Why So Much Suffering?: Even if some evil is necessary, the amount of suffering in the world seems excessive. This is where the evidential problem of evil comes in. Why does God allow extreme, seemingly pointless sufferingālike pediatric cancer or genocide? If the goal is to teach us moral lessons, why not do it with less suffering? For example, does a parent really need to lose a child to learn gratitude? Couldnāt they learn the same lesson with far less pain?
I didn't finish reading it, because in the middle of the text I saw several contradictory assumptions, this makes further reading pointless, just like the all message
Go ahead and point all those contradictory assumptions and give ur reasoning for why they are contradictory
We have free will we don't have free will
God is good, god is evil, god doesn't exist, I make several contradictions.
Like pointless talking
That doesn't make what I said contradictory. I'm not trying to defend or argue against free will, if I was then my arguments would have been contradictory. I'm arguing against counter arguments to problem of evil which I did from several points of view.
++++
I take it lot of theist here
I think u know absolutely not about atheism
But
Who cares, huh? š
Lol fr
Hi Hi how are you ? Anyone VC ?
I'd generally never deal with the first argument as I don't deal with free-will, nor do I believe in it. However, the second argument is very obvious a caricature of its derivative. Firstly, the argument from evil often times is build upon the notion that evil is a privation; "evil" is not a thing, it's a lack of a thing. Every evil act takes reference to some desire for Good, what makes it 'evil' is that it does so at the expense of other's good. If a serial killer didn't get pleasure from killing, he'd not be a serial killer.
Secondly, the argument is clearly build on an anthropomorphic basis. You're presupposing that "suffering" is unnecessary; and you're doing that exclusively by regarding 'man' as a measure for all things. Man is not a measure of all things, so far as you accept that the universe would still exist without us, and this part of the argument is therefor trivial. However, in considering it, the basis of the argument is very obvious build upon a teleological framework that presupposes that all suffering does not have an end; this however falls into a trap: That we can reduce all suffering exclusively to individual circumstances, without consideration of an external party. There's several complex psychosocial phenomenon to consider, however, avoidance of suffering itself is a cause of much good. So merely the 'idea of suffering' can itself induce good. Assuming this, it's arguable that pain does always generate good; even if we can cherrypick individual circumstances where someone suffering it does not experience much good at all
So in considering the first, it's obvious that all agents, whether Good or "evil," partakes of Goodness, and never evil. This is further demonstrated by the thought experiment of an evil man vs. a good man: Can an evil man exist without goodness? As we've noted, all evil relies on a hedonic pleasure principle. If I get no pleasure from doing evil, I've no desire to commit to it. Hedonic pleasure would constitute a form of goodness; even if at the lower end of the spectrum. Therefor, we cannot envision an "evil man without good." But we can envision a good man without evil. Evil therefor relies on goodness, because it's only a "lack of," not itself a thing.
Why don't you believe in free will?
Does your place of birth impact your life choices?
Yes
Do you choose where you're born?
No
So we can here conclude that your choices in life are already outside of your own ability to choose
Ah damn I need to look for a refutation for this

This is literally the simplest determinist argument. Like, determinism 101
There's no "free will" argument that I'm aware of that's meaningfully refuted it either. Only compatibilists has been able 'to refute' this position - But compatibilists are in practice determinists
And is also the most accepted position among philosophers, 59% are compatibilists, or "soft-determinists," with an additional 24% being hard determinists
I guess you like me then
Only strong argument for free-will is the one based on physics and probability - This argument however fails because it conflates random fluctuation in space and time with me being able to make independent decisions - Even if it means my decisions aren't literally pre-determined by cause-effect, it still does not entail that I am able to make free decisions, because my decisions are decided by the randomness
Astagfirullah* May Allah guide you
Hi Hi how are you ? Anyone VC ?
What would you like to talk about?
anybody wants to read book with me? i have many ebooks and we can share screen and read together
Which one is it referring to
What are these books about?
This is about Trump's speech to Congress. I think.
wtf ramadan devil!
The one that took place recently?
Yes
Ha that sure was something lol
phoenixgotdis, you can claim right now! The next claim reset is in 21 min.
You have 10 rolls left. Next rolls reset in 21 min.
$daily is available!
You can react to kakera right now!
Power: 100%
Each kakera reaction consumes 100% of your reaction power.
Your characters with 10+ keys consume half the power (50%)
Stock: 0
$dk is ready!
You may vote right now!
=> $tuarrange
this is not good
hi guys,Can you buy NASDAQ now, I see that it has fallen a lot recently
Tariffs
@thorny steeple Is there still room for decline?
Starting just past midnight, imports from Canada and Mexico are now to be taxed at 25%, with Canadian energy products subject to 10% import duties. The 10% tariff that Trump placed on Chinese imports in February was doubled to 20%, and Beijing retaliated Tuesday with tariffs of up to 15% on a wide array of U.S. farm exports. It also expanded the...
Pick up a copy of our magazine Too Long: https://toolong.news/ (and get £3 off any subscription with code SUBSCRIBENOW)
TLDR Responds to Your Criticism: https://youtu.be/WAo6nqMcUl4?feature=shared
For most of the past few years, America's economy has been the envy of the developed world. But in the past few months, the American economy has be...
thanks
Check
Trump is literally trying to leave NATO
What happens if he leaves NATO?
Nato without America
The US spends more money on NATO than any other country combined
Don't wtf me pls
Indeed they do 3%
Ramadan Mubarak how're you bro
Their 3% is way different than polish 3 % 
I believe polish also spend a lot not sure if it 3 but a lot
Yeah
Compatibilists are not just determinists 'in practice'. They just are determinists.
shawty wsup
Hello š
wsup shorty
Lol I'm alright what brings you here today
iām bored thats why
Alright
this chat seems dead
need to haress the general chat then
Yeah lol
wat
he meat shawty waht is up
he meat
yeah shawty
meat
thats my shawty broski
I KNOW
True this ain't tiktok fyp
shawty like a melody in my head that i can not keep out . got me singing
i thought tinder
@thorny steeple https://www.reddit.com/r/wikipedia/comments/1j41tyf/so_apparently_the_abbreviation_for_the_title_of/
I'd perhaps caution with this formulation. You're right that they're for all intent and purposes determinists; however, the important distinction lays in how they treat agency. In determinism, we're often presented with agency as either non-existent or at best illusory; in compatibilism, it's treated as an active part in the process of determination; even though it's still a part of a chain-of-causality
Sigh
If you really believe this piece of shit
Getting around with that term of evil and good
I would like say stay in that stage
And my stage, is how we are using our might to define whatās evil and good
And you will see how it will be achieved by force
Whatever you say
Your sick definition with a bunch of unorganized people has no chance against an organized military force backed by a state
This shit was included
I will see how your free-will would stand what chance against bullets
Only winner defines whatās good or bad
Losers already fucking dead
Survival for the fittest
Bro's literally out here positing ideas of a 4th grader like it's deep
I'm sorry bro, you're not deep thinker for believing things everyone believes.
Nah you can continue to believe what you believed, that only makes me valuable
And you will see how it will happen
As I said
It doesn't matter what's beleived - The object of inquiry is what's true - That I can force a person to believe something false doesn't matter to the subject
You're essentially yapping nonsense
You're such a pseud
And btw you are fucked with any argument against me only using direct insult or something
You've made no argument. That's the point. Nothing you've said addresses the concern
And none of these are 'insults,' they're observations.
Like speaking so awesome using your complex language skill, thinks I canāt do that or who tf gives a shit to something nobody cares
Nah I wonāt give you a little chance to maneuver, I will just directly tell you how it will be
And try to understand it, hardly
Using the most simple language, simple as fuck
You've said nothing - Everything you've said is what I believed when i was 14. None of your ideas are radical, they're normal
Anyone who's spent more than 2 weeks in high school would believe this
It doesn't matter that i can 'force someone' to do something with a gun - that does not make string theory true just because i can make them believe it
absolutely trivial
You canāt awake a guy whoās pretend to sleep
What the fuck is going on here
but you can got him hard, using the stick of truth
If a position is true - It'd not require desperate appeals to English literacy.
It'd be held on its own merits.
Your inability to raise an objection speaks more than a thousand words
Nothing much - Discussing compatibilism and determinism šāāļø
what do those words mean?
Determinism = Every action is pre-determined, there's no free-will.
Compatibilism = Every action is pre-determined, but the will is free to act, but acts according to a predetermined direction
Free will and "destiny" as some people call it are intertwined in such a way that the humans are not capable of yet understanding -possibly ever-.
See, this is the thing i believe in
That's not the definition of 'determinism'. That's incompatibilism.
If we're not able to understand it - How do you know it exists?
They way they are connected is not understandable
Like the way you cannot answer the question why am i here
Are you sure? Last i opened my philosophy textbook that was the general gist of 'determinism' following the direction: That all actions are determined outside the self and will be acted in a directed manner
There is nothing in the definition of determinism which adjudicates whether or not there is free will
Quite sure it definitionally contradict free-will and free-agency.
It's all the same stuff that is not worth talking about without a religious backbone. Either there is a god and meaning to the life you live or it's all pointless. Theism or nihilism are the two main credible points of living on the face of the earth. Other spiritual views are pointless.
No, sure - Though, that'd be if we are to function within a strict terminiology that regard compatibilism as determinist; I'd regard them as formally distinct
The distinction between compatibilists and incompatibilists divides determinists
It's not compatibilism vs. determinism
it's compatibillism vs. incompatibilism, within deterministm
note that you can also be an incompatibilist and a libertarian
(in fact, all libertarians are incompatibilists by definition)
(though not vice versa)
That's new information to me - I suppose I'd agree with it in terms that compatibilism would service within the framework of determinism neatly, as compared to 'free will.' However, most questionnaires who often analysis whatever philosophy students believe often time formally distinguish 'compatibilism' from determinism and free-will
That is true, although that is explained by widely held incompatibilist assumptions
Sure! Though, I'd not necessarily disagree with you - I'd rather regard these matters as down to framing. That determinism and free-will are often assumed to be incompatibilist and are therefor distinguished from compatibilism in common discourse. Though, I'm definitely in the crowd that regards compatibilism as determinist (why I said it was practically the same) - Though, in popular discourse, I'd still go with the assumption mentioned.
That's already a contentious point. However, to say we "Can't know free-will," tell us we've no reason to believe in free will either. If I have no reason to belive in unicorns, why'd we regard the argument of free-will as justifiable?
The distinction is that there's plenty of metaphysical inquiries into the existence of God; different metaphysics direct us to different framings
It is pointless to spend brain power of humanity to dwell on such points.
How's it any more pointless than anything you do on a daily basis?
Talking to people on a daily basis is often time also pointless - Maybe the point of something is "in itself." Your argument assumes that something should be done as a means to an end, and not as an end in itself
Even me going out of my room and spending just a single dollar helps the economy.
That's a false position - How you spend your money can and does damage the economy.
It's called negative externalities.
so that really isn't true
Ok so let's all just dwell on the question of free will as the people and cripple our lives? Is this the right thing to do?
Becoming smarter and more knowledgeable would definitely be the right thing to do, yes
You are free to think about anything i'm just pointing out that some questions can never be answered and are waste of brain power.
That's a false position again - You're assuming that some things can never be answered, you're doing that without knowing if it's true. Maybe it can be answered, and you just don't know how because you want to believe it but can't reasonable argue it
I know that i am lacking the hardware to answer such questions.
If we did what you want us to Ayberk, we'd still be in caves dancing around cave-paintings, because it's "pointless to spend brain power of humanity to dwell on such points."
What if we can harness fire and use it at will? "It's pointless to spend brain power of humanity to dwell on such points."
What if we can slam stones together and make sharp objects to hunt with? "It pointless to spend brain power of humanity to dwell on such points."
Yeah duh!
If the question is not bothering them, why would they care much about solving it
He doesn't need to - But to tell others that it's pointless is very different from disregarding the subject out of disinterest.
You can be ignorant all you want - All good, but don't pretend like a subject is "bad" or "pointless."
It's not more pointless than dwelling on other hypotheticals: Most of which are cause of human progress as a species
But one might say that he just disregarded the subject, and you, having interest in that subject, took it as him declaring it is pointless
Because he literally called it pointless.
The discussion of free will and determinism is pointless.
It's no more pointless than discussing hypotheticals like if we could harness fire for human use
It does - And the idea of determinism helps you discern systems of understanding the world, such as causality
See the pattern?
I think you would agree that it is "pointless" to care if a random internet stranger is calling the area of your interest pointless.
Sure, he may be wrong and it is interesting subject really. But what's the point of explaining it to him if he doesn't find the topic interesting
I'd remind you that most of modern physics are themselves build off philosophical inquiries; unified field theory is a subject based on Spinoza's substance
is physics pointless?
Does physics tell us anything about consciousness?
Because it's fun?
Yea - It does, plenty.
Recent studies suggest quantum theory can explain consciousness
After a point, it is inconclusive, yes.
It's just something one would believe in, if they wish to. Doesn't matter what the truth is, if there is any objective truth to it at all.
Personally, I believe we're just doing random shit a coupla times and sometimes something works out. The bias of history makes us feel like we knew what we were doing
Ayberk, it's very obvious you've no real understanding of how science functions.
Can you just stop playing the higher being
Anything in science is understood in terms of 'can' and 'might.' That's because science is empirical; skeptical and rationalist. Which are all philosophies, by the way.
which are taken axiomatically
Science being an inquiry into the nature of reality through these philosophies taken axiomatically
Nuh uh.
We still don't know how we perceive what we perceive. We can break down brains to cellular level and study them. We can see the signals spiking. We know which area is responsible for what emotions.
But we don't know the "how" of it
But aren't those also pointless? Why discuss whether we can observe things to know if it's true or not
Yeah lmao he be doing that
Yuh-uh. He asks if physics can say something on consciousness, which it can.
Specifically, the recent evidence is highly suggestive of quantum entanglement being an explanatory variable in understanding consciousness; specifically due to anesthetic research which was the initial theoretical fundamental on it.
So it can tell us lots. The question is to what degree it's true - Empirical evidence so far is strongly in favor of the position that quantum entanglement can be a key to understanding consciousness, though you're right that we have no "definitive" evidence, though as in most science, evidence is never 'definitive.'
This is what i am saying. Some stuff happen and it's true from a "deterministic" perspective and some other stuff happen which is true from the "free-will" perspective.
There is no pattern to this. They are somewhat connected together. If we were to know how it would just show the working of time and the universe all in one equation. Which is unlikely.
This would be true of anything - Including fire making food. Sometimes putting fire on my food wont heat it š¤Æ
Try making beef on an oven at the highest heat to see what i mean - it'd be raw in the middle
Ok
Do you know how heat conducts
Sounds like your fire is broken 
I've said what I've said - you can try it yourself.
I'd gladly demonstrate it for you
See now i know that you don't know how heat is conducted through materials
When you say 'well, you can turn it down to a lower volume to let it heat up the inside,' well guess what, that's what we're doing epistemically when discussing free-will and determinism!
It's only qualitatively different
Thermodynamics will work everytime
This is equivalent of saying "Why cook food at 100°C for 10 minutes when I can cook it at 1000°C in a minute."
š
Dunning kruger do work it seems
That's not what i said.
If you say that, you've clearly no clue what i am saying. It's not even remotely true
Irony also has a fun way of presenting itself to you, it seems
Lots of topics can be explained using the ant analogy
Again - I can prove the position for you. It's simple. Having the heat on an oven when cooking meat, specifically red meat, will often time leave it brown outside* while having it stay red inside*. That's a quintessential cooking trick. That you've never cooked before really isn't my problem
I'd gladly prove it to you as well
It's easily experimental ,you can do it at home
That's how heat transfer works bruh what are you smoking 
An ant inside an electric circuit sees it as just it's enviroment. The topics such as "free-will" , "consciousness" , "infinity" are the same for us. These are our enviroment which we evolved in hence cannot evolve past them to be able to comprehend them.
See - It doesn't matter how you explain it 
What is the counter argument for this?
Nuh uh the aliens will come and grant us wisdom or something?
It's an analogy. Do you know those? The point is that we can see things which we don't know currently, and on that basis test it by changing how we engage with it, we'll reach a point of truth. Same goes with discourse on anything, from free will to determinism
Is this hard for you to understand?
You're actually proving my point. Which is why this is so funny
Why do we know that it's heat transfer? I wonder.
You do realize you're both proving my point but too caught up in your own relativism to realize it.
So you're right, we can "rhetorically" discuss things as if free-will exist. That doesn't make it true. That's why we extend the subject to encompass broader spheres, which is where we often reach determinism.
Same exact way that engaging with heater improves our understanding of heat
So no, "some stuff" isn't true from a "determinist perspective" or a "free will perspective" as you claim here - It's either true or it's false.
hmmm
Yeah i'm just going to grab myself a tasty treat because i wanted to.
Have fun guys
And your past desperate attempt at mockery, specifically @shell pivot, really did well proving this position succinctly. Funny how that works
Heard thousands of such direct insult, and see ya in our play ground
And btw besides that your language is confusing, unnecessarily complicated, and pointless for almost all the time
Btw is that correct ? I doubt it who knows donāt give a little shit
And you are nothing
Done
Correction: "and pointless almost all the time," we've no need for "for" in this sentence.
Also, we've no need for the "a" in 'don't give a little shit.' It's just "I don't give a shit."
As for the specific argumentation: Writing style aren't reductive to 'complex,' they're merely a reflection of how a person write. There's no intention behind them, you're merely presupposing those.
I donāt give a for shit for what for for the shit
Or I give donāt for shit a shit ?
Ahh thatās it
If you wanna pick more bugs, try
Iām okay with it
I'm just pointing out that accusing someone of being difficult to understand should at least involve language that's accessible š¤·š»āāļø There's, again, no intentions behind it.
Wow you're so smart
I wish I was as smart and enlightened as you were
Very intelligent.
True.
I made fun of you, proving that everything is either "true" or "false", and free will and determinist perspectives don't offer subjective perceptions of reality
Respect to this humane one
Ngl
š¤·š»āāļø You said it yourself - Though, if you're attempting irony here, suggesting that true and falsity is subjective wont service your position well, given that it'd be a self-contradiction
Btw have fun im gonna sleep
i need to ask someone some simple question
its about some graphical user interface which i will show through dm, i need an answer like: it looks okay or it looks bad
who can i ask it to? it will take you approx 5 seconds
@feral river can i ask you pls
i need to know opinions i cant do it myself
Goodness gracious! The society here speaks so highly, with elegant words. I am thrilled
the most honest right-winger ever
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtiNx6t5m4Y
Content warning: The following scene may include dehumanizing rhetoric, calls for discrimination or violence, misinformation, or other harmful language. Right Wing Watch condemns bigotry and other threats to democratic values.
We expose this content to help Americans understand and respond to antidemocratic forces. Right Wing Watch is a proj...
Damn - that graeco-roman stereotype really made me laugh š
that's funny
The medieval historian is a definite type
Hi i wanna have new friends ...
Sus link
It's paradox when you try to play with number
Indeed
Your country is not a superpower
You imagine like it consistent Europe with 500 millions, but a bunch of countries who have to agree each other every time they wanna do something
Russia is not the king of the world
yes because we are united
and you are not
Remind me why I unblock you?
okay
I have no problem with you having me blocked
it's entirely up to yourself
You think I will argue or something, I just block.
I don't think you will argue
I think you are too brainwashed to argue
I see your opinion about Russia thanks for sharing , every opinion is very important
What's my opinion on Russia?
Russia is a large country that threatens other
I've always wondered what Russians think of Ireland
Nothing, nothing bad nothing good
Why nothing good?
I would assume you think nothing good of Dublin
I doubt here are a lot Russian who hate Ireland. We don't like USA, less we don't like Britain, and some pribaltic countries. Not me personally but Russian. Any other is fine.
what is pribaltic?
We don't like the UK either
I use Russian word, they call it Baltimaad. It the countryes that place besides Baltic Sea
You mean Estonia Lithuania etc.?
Yes
š
oops
nah its alright England's a shithole
You Scottish?
nah british
I'm English
bro the entirety of uk and ireland is a shithole
*the uk and no ireland
londons the only alright place the rest is just irrelevant farm land
London is a place where you phone gets stolen
š¤£
at least it doesn't look like a world war 2 bunker there

yuh corks alright
its fucking beautiful
just make sure not to go to London
and we have the best accent
east midlands accents are one of the best
nah man
its not posh and its actually listenable
we ain't got any posh accents here in Ireland
maybe Kildare
but not really
Some of them guys speak with a Dublin accent
Dude, Are you a teacher?
Gonna check Ireland accent
Yeah, I already saw some people on churches calling each others "brothers" or "sisters" indeed
Don't see like strong accent, just normal English
Indeed
You are not going to be united again anymore
You will see how it will start to desolve
By the hands of America, Russia and China
šŗšø Make America Great Again
In face of our superpowers, your little economy union of EU is nothing
Europe need russia energy, They are only providing logistical support for ukraine , they will not dare to deploy boots on the ground.
That is already escalate tensions with Russia, Starmer still need trump to do what he want
But Trump paused aid to Ukraine now
It is possible that he will disconnect Starlink.
Since trump became a president, i am always watching America political news 
It seems like the whole world is fucking watching American shows

trump very strange, he take away rupees for sick, in, india where i live
I apologize on behalf of dumbass americans who voted him in and the bigots around the world, some in this chat even, that canāt get their tongues off of his boots.
I for one acknowledge that his political slogan might as well be the n-word for the same level of hate and bigotry associated with it.
haha very funny, book what is calling
Neat
This chat is like 90% non-Americans praising him just because...???
Russia is the red one btw
LMFAO
š
Love having Europe demand that the US do more in regards to Russia and to stop being in cahoots with Putin⦠while they have been dependent on Russian oil for decades and still are even after the invasion.
We are simply demanding to respect the terms of the Budapest memorandum, why did the US sign them if they cannot respect the terms?
Donāt know, donāt care to be honest. Europeās problem now anyways.
Blud said we're investing 8M usd in transgender mice, in reality it was transgenic mice 
When they asked him about the Baltics he had to think where the Baltics are
don't really give a shit 2 out of 3
Iām sure if we give 100 billion more to Zelensky that egg prices will come down lol, not like itās because of a bird flu epidemic or something.
but Trump supporters do care about productivity, economy, military might and national interest
šŗšø Make America Great Again
This but unironically, it would lower the price of grain and wheat. But what do you know about that, you likely voted for him
Verified american
Oh right, because 100 billion would ensure a win and therefore lead to pre war export conditionsā¦
"Poland hmmm... Yes very good. The Baltics? Ehmmm... Uhm... The Baltics..."
They're not sending cash to Ukraine, that's what the EU is doing. You are sending rusty weapons no one will never use, it's cheaper to dispose of them in this way
You probably canāt name 5 countries from Africa or South America⦠Europeans are so arrogant with how Eurocentric they are
They literally donāt. Because they wouldnāt vote for dipshit policies that hurt the economy, Trump is CUTTING benefits to military members calls them suckers and losers and has made costs go up for every American.
I can name a few: Egypt, South Africa, Spain, Italy, Somaliland
Both humanitarian and military aid is being sent, maybe at the beginning of the war it was a nice deal, now itās just wasting good military equipment reserves.
Ah yes, the famous african country Italy xD
Where is Lampedusa located?
Bruh
I thought Europeans didn't know about African geography? Lmfaooo
You know, by that logic France isnāt in Europe considering how many colonies they still have all over
Overseas territory, also yes France too is a transcontinental country
It's European, South American, North American and Oceanian, idk if they have more
isnt africa one
But you would say France is still a European country no? So Iām not too sure why saying that Italy isnāt part of Africa is something wrong to say lol
Italy is part of Africa though, Lampedusa is in Africa
oh bro economy is about productivity and wealth, so let me ask, why you think a group of people who don't have ability to consume much stuff is important for the economy ?
Sighā¦
The Pelagie Islands (Italian: Isole Pelagie; Sicilian: Ćsuli PilaggĆ®), from the Greek ĻĪλαγοĻ, pĆ©lagos meaning "open sea", are the three small islands of Lampedusa, Lampione, and Linosa, located in the Mediterranean Sea between Malta and Tunisia, south of Sicily. To the northwest lie the island of Pantelleria and the Strait of Sicily. All three ...
Literally on the African continent shelf
Bro have you FUCKING SEEN our economy since trumpās policies were announced
Its in the shitter
I didn't even make a generalised statement about Americans, it was just about supreme leader Trump
Iām not too sure you understand what im saying lol, Italy is not an African country, African territory? Fine sure whatever, you learn something new everyday, African nation? No, you donāt see Italy in the African Union do you?
Nonsense, Cyprus is in the EU yet it's not in Europe
African country=a country in Africa
Some European countries are in Africa

Fine, whatever. Italy is an African country now then, Iāll keep it in mind next time I visit.
Just don't get offended again if they make fun of Trump
I think you vastly overestimate how much people think / care about Europe over here lol.
BREAKING šØšØšØ
Now in the UK, it is becoming law that Muslims and minorities are to be given lesser prison sentences than white British people.
You can't make this up. That is what they are doing. Here it is in parliament today.
The Art of War "If you are stronger, attack. if you are weaker, avoid." Ukraine wants to keep attacking until it's reduced to ashes. thats Zelensky want to do
They're going bonkers!
No wonder the far right is uprising in Europe
emphasize in WHITE british people
Is homosexuality some kind of mental illness?
made by polish
not really , that's just gay but nothing else
That has been proved scientifically
With evidence
Even
lol
Nope anyway
Itās proven not to be
There's certain assertion on this concept some,back 1967 some psychiatrist claimed that homosexuality is mental illness in certain way but after that
Yeah then we learned more tho

I couldn't care less
šš

It's okay , you can ask whatever tf u want
sometimes
I look like one
Mexi...
could be worse
Bro came
Initiated an argument
And contradicted himself in the very next reply

He lost an argument against himself
Should've see next msg ...
After that
Bro only wants to win... At any cost
I just wanted to be make sure š and wants to hear some aspects on that ..
So you're suggesting the present studies can be false because earlier psychiatrist said otherwise ?
I got a magic word for you dude 'improvement'
it's fine lol
It's fine broda, the way you presented was funny
Yeah I got that but that doesn't mean that' old is considered to be false ?
Earlier slavery was fine, it doesn't mean it's ok
U won the argument
Man
I never intended to
Thnks
But anyways
R u from Pakistan?
Delhi India. And you?
Nice to meet you š¤ š¤
Jay Hind šŖ
Jai Maharashtra
Clg ? Or job ?
Not in the serious chat š
India waale kahi bh baccodi krne Beth jaate h

Which is wrong dude. I follow Principle of order
Yeah yeah I'm just kidding gotta go ....glad to meet u ....tc
you can't predict how the economy will go, just wait 2-3 months
and we all will see the result of his economy plan
What makes you like trump the most
Bro its BEEN 2-3 months
2-3 more
america first
national interest above all
fuck leftism
that's it
that's nationalism, not nazism
and we all have that shit all around the world
Didn't China take initiative and raised the issue of asian-hate in america ?
China been vocal about it
that's what we have done in 10 years ago
I don't hate america
In France, they destroyed tesla plant
And turned a dozen cars in protest
Against elon and tesla
Do you think something similar will emerge in USA too?
their gov will handle this shit
a bunch of useless people with 0 productivity thinks they can use any measure against the state
this act of treason need to be suppressed
If He keeps doing his signature german stance then yeah maybe 
May i know Where you from
India
Don't they claim USA is the land of freedom ?
It's the land of free my ass
it's leftists claim USA is the land of the free
Are you claiming it's the democrats who have been disrupting other countries' politics in the name of freedom and promoting democracy ?
who claims US is democratic
leftists or rightists ?
Isn't USA a democracy ?
So according to you republicans don't like the idea of freedom/freedom of speech?
And suppression of voices/opinions is necessary ?
@formal pilot do u know abt triple talaq??
Yeah I'm quite familiar with the topic
@thorny steeple
Tell me what's ur opinion
First of all , where are you from ?
I divorce you I divorce you I divorce you
South asia
Apparently it's not based on the Qur'an, neither it did exist during the time of the Prophet
Isn't that bad
But u agree, it exist right
Btw i belong to the atheist gang, I'm not here to defend any religion 
Yes it's bad
Sure, it was common in the subcontinent
I am not here to cuss any religion, I am saying these practices needs to be stopped for God's sake
It doesn't happen in Saudi Arabia or iraq like countries
It's always the subcontinent 
True
Yeah coz it has become a tradition so in future it may be a law
the better muslims
Ain't no way bro an atheist in 2025
Agnostic or deist better
Greetings people
Depends on whom I'm debating, if it's something deeply philosophical I say I'm agnostic, in general atheist is a better way to describe my beliefs
Why better
And why there should be something better than the other
We follow the imams of Muslims, such as Imam Ibn Baz and others, and we do what they say in matters of disagreement. The proof is the saying of Allah, the Almighty: We did not send ˹messengers˺ before you ˹O Prophet˺ except mere men inspired by Us. If you ˹polytheists˺ do not know ˹this already˺, then ask those who have knowledge ˹of the Scriptures˺. [Al nahl:43]
@peak shale
I don't think so, i remember reading news about india banning triple talaq
Muslims aren't good?
And if they said that you have to do talaq 3 times then you do
Agnostic atheism ā or atheistic agnosticism ā is a philosophical position that encompasses both atheism and agnosticism. Agnostic atheists are atheistic because they do not hold a belief in the existence of any deity, and they are agnostic because they claim that the existence of a divine entity or entities is either unknowable in principle or ...
Thankfully
But the prophet certain times have no knowledge abt the current scientific stuff happening currently, so when we listen to them we ourselves and they themselves must be aware what needs to be followed and what's not need to be.
And convey accordingly
Idk about that. Every individual has a personality. A person can be good and bad too at different times of life even in a single day.
But mind you humans have a herd mentality as well.
When I said 'the better muslims' i referred to how sub continent muslims are wannabe Arabs and display even more conservative appeal to life. The reasoning behind is, in the recent years saudi arabia been conducting dance and music festivals in their country and desi muslims are going bonkers over the fact. Why do I know this ? Because the comments are in desi languages which are readable without translation
Yeah they did, but other country may still practice
These scholars have dedicated their lives to studying religion. Do you think you have any chance of being better than them? Don't spread discord among people, my dear. Thanks for the great discussion.
" been conducting dance and music festivals" says the one who probably live in a country that has a bar in everyhood. there is no perfect country , and it will not be
Bro really trying to convince muslims for amendments in Quran and Hadiths 
It's against my valus so I'll always oppose it, unfortunately laws don't work on personal values
Laws are created based on collective morality
Yes
Everyone needs to obey Allah and his messenger it is written in the Quran and you need to have Muhammad in your conversations and decisions
Btw this guy gets hate from every side lmao
Yeah but we don't take info from anyone. for those who know only. only. only. only. fucking only.
-
Never claimed there's a perfect country
-
there's nothing wrong with having bars and clubs(not going is an individual choice)
-
Idk what you find objectionable about what i said
Hey
He def hiding something
Empowering women is the best we can do, it'll make them understand their rights and eventually we'll see a shift in collective morality
And laws will be changed
I know that how islam is supposed to work. Thanks no thanks
-
in our country yes it is a big problem to have bars ( we don't even have ones )
-
You are insulting my country eventho it's not direct
BROTHER CONVEEEEERRRRRTTTTTT


š ā¤ļø
Dr zakir naik at 144p
I think you really underestimate desi muslims lol
Subcontinent muslims claim that MBS is yahoodi child and have yahoodi linkage. They say MBS wants to destroy arabia
Zakir naik himself is 70p bro
@formal pilot should i ?
MBS gets hate from every side man, from left to the right
Which is sad
He's a reformer, only reformer
I also hate him on certain points
Absolutely if you're getting enough money
I don't even know your country.
If your country don't have any bars it's not my problem.
Which ones?
@mortal depot
How much money will I get?
It's all around The chosen land
0 dollars but alot in heaven .... You know what I am saying š surah 78:33
They don't have enough drinkers that's why they don't need bars
Imagine removing all bars from the UK or ireland
Is he from Saudi Arabia ?
In which sentence did i insult his country ? I'm confused š
I dunno dude i avoid reading messages in serious chat nowadays, i just come here to yapp
That should happen
BAN ALCOHOL
I'm good with la illaha il lallah...
After that I have huge problems.
I like sarmad shaheed and Rumi ā¤ļø
Ban it if you can 
Inshallah every alcohol bottle will vanish from the face of the earth with the snap of my fingers on march 10
Hmm
Amen
Deep breath zehrw
@verbal torrent оба
Money do matters
Dubai šš

Hello
sup
How is it going
Ų³ŁŲ±Ų© Ų§ŁŲØŁŲ±Ų©
English please
Is this true
Ok sir
I'm sure you can read it
Yes that's easy
I wanted to learn persian at one point in my life but not anymore
It Arabic ig, surah al baqarah
If you know the language
Wow I think it's difficult
I was more interested in mediaeval persian
Idk anything about arabic
Yeah
they simply do
Darija is easy to learn
I don't see any requirement as such tbh
hear, if you think it's a big deal to have freedom speech I don't deny this point
but your freedom of speech in face of cash flow or bullets, are nothing
What if civilians take up the arms too
they won't risk their life if we feed them
if they do, use tanks
Btw thanks
you see it in US history, you see in Chinese history
what else ? Soviet Union ?
I don't need to mention that much about these type of events
everything was based on force
and that's the truth
Bruhhh why don't you try becoming a dictator, you're build for that. The flow is so natural š
I agree šÆ
But I won't like to live in such social setting
Alas! It's everywhere
there was a cannon, a machine gun, with undestroyable armor
what makes you think those moving flesh has any chance to win against it ?
I don't think so
probably unnecesary to do that, just promising interest to some part of these guys
and they will fight against together lmao
hi guys
Are you suggesting that it's fine if trump govt suppresses USA citizens and even use firearms on them if required ?
I had no idea in what circumstances that Trump was required to do that to US citizen.
I think you can ask nale what do he think about it if it happened
Thatās wrong, at least weāre living in the peace world, people want peace, nah they wonāt risk their lifes
Not really. Most ordinary citizens simply do what they're told to - And act according to the way things are phrased and framed. They have as much say in how culture is shaped as they do in policy - Which is little. At best you can say that they shape how those that shape them will shape them. But that'd be a fairly meaningful framing
Should and do are two very different things - Most ordinary people are not interested in knowing politics. That's why it's only an organized elite that rules society. If we are to merely look at economic theories, we quickly find the term "rational ignorance." People are ignorant about politics, because it's rational to be ignorant. We're not even considering far worse outcomes like irrational ignorance here, which is an even worse proposition, but even the most realistic commentator and theoretical framings tells us that the average people will never be qualified voters
Most of people are just not interested boring shit, what if thereās a revolutionary,regime change, wars
To care exclusively about those things are not conducive towards proper policy-making. Nor does interest in those things ever produce proper policy, it just produce populist policies with negative political consequences; foreign policy specifically always flourish when it isn't suffering under the eye of public scrutiny
If anything, it's better that people remain ignorant in those circumstances
Why i feel that ur using AI?
I'm not - So I wouldn't know
and my writing style isn't even relatable to AI - So you likely don't know how AI works
they want peace cuz peace is cheap
and you will see what they want when peace is expensive
Democracy requires people to think about politics, but in reality they lost to the interests of the oligarchy, so thinking about politics without being able to take action is suck
And the media can be paid to shape opinions as they wish.
So being less stressed by politics is better for the people
for the seek of argument ,does that justify establishing colonial occupation, illegal settlement and ethnic cleansing against other indigenous ppl ?.
I think the establishment of isreal is not justifiable in any shape or form, nor I find a need for it.
and if its not Justifiably then its questioning Isreal legitimacy to establish their state ,and that how subject could be closed.
moreover indigenous Jews from Palestine were living under Islamic empire for decades ,having access to their own holy sites and practicing their religion freely they were equal to other Muslims and Christians in statue.
Nobody's specifically discussed those subjects; what was discussed was the problematic character of the claim of being indigenous as a flawed position - In that, it's arbitrarily delineated. Also, the claim here has certain assumptions you've got to expand on.
Also, the past does not matter to the subsect; the fact is, you're in the present. A state is justified on its own basis; there's as much justification for one as opposed to the other. You're in the present now, noT 1920s or 1930s.
I think the major cause of those problems is isreal since before it Jewish ppl lived peacefully among Muslims, but Zionists want the land to be only theirs not anyone else that have right for it.
Okay, why'd arabs kill and murder innocent jews in 1928?
This page is subject to the extended confirmed restriction related to the Arab-Israeli conflict.
The Hebron massacre was the killing of sixty-seven or sixty-nine Jews on 24 August 1929 in Hebron, Mandatory Palestine. The event also left scores seriously wounded or maimed. Jewish homes were pillaged and synagogues were ransacked.
The massacre wa...
This is the specific origin of the conflict
