#š§ ļ½serious-chat
1 messages Ā· Page 269 of 1
Isn't Imperial a race in The Elder Scrolls
you must choose one between Spain or Italy which got capitulated
what would you choose
I would say Italy will not be a huge affect but Spain definitely will
Spain obviously, they contribute a lot less while Italy is close to France
How
We are also Mycenaeans, we built civilization
That's true, it would be overrun
cool image 
Yes, worthy of the builders of civilization
Latvia Soviet Socialist Republics ?
We are
YOU ARE ROME
why u keep changing your country 
If our economy collapses all European economies will collapse
WE ARE
CUZ ROME
Latgalian empire
I should become an Albanian patriot for a while
rome is gone brouu
don't blame rome 
Union of Soviet Socialist Democratic People's Federal Republic of United Latvian States
U.S.S.D.P.F.R.U.L.S
LAME
Latvian Antarctic Multiethnic Empire
sounds like Latvian took over the entire world
Yes, but one day we will return
btw how did you got the gold title
Dhe Kosova ƫshtƫ Shqipƫri
"Marshi I UĆK" - Albanian War Song
DISCLAIMER: PLEASE DO NOT COMMENT ANYTHING PRO-SERBIAN. PLEASE SERBS, SHUT THE FUCK UP. I DO NOT GIVE A SHIT ABOUT YOUR OPINIONS.
ENGLISH:
I
Oi Kosovo o craddle of freedom,
Every house holds one flag
KLA suits you well,
for homeland blood will spill
Boys of Kosovo are fighting from Drenica to the mountains ...
its only one way ticket no return ticket 
š
Leveled up just as you did
Damn, you sure she is your sister?
You both are too different
how ? tell her you are a reactionist š¤£
why there is 652 in your name 
is that your social credit
Now I'm a minority
Minecraft
Yeap
Please, no camps for me
Are you fully integrated and assimilated?
isn't that cool
How did this happen
š¤š¤
you can do re-education without camps
Hell yeah
š¤£
This server is a lottery, one day you can be on top of the world, and the next day you can end up in my state
Mmmh, I have to think about it
You're white too
I'm not yet a minority
why you want to become minority 
No, I want to be part of the majority
being majority boring 
I meant the role, but your hair looks nice
so serious jackie wakie
Morning everyone
Just woke up, had to do write ups on the debate and the fallout
Orange man got cooked
https://www.instagram.com/reel/C_U4gjdt0Cq/
Actually, i wanna answer with a turkish folk song. Nothing is a justification for killing innocents, and nothing is wrong with Hamas about Palestine. It is Lebanese backed. I dont support it
make a lot of sense from turkish prospectives
wdym
I mean you hold such opinion from Turkey, it make sense
and you guys doesn't need a powerful isreal in that region
because we dont want any war
no one wants war if everything can be settled peacefully isn't it
war is the supreme court of civilization of humanity
we dont have problem with them about their religion. We are against to them because of their genocide
Hamas is not at war with Israel. It defends Palestine.
Don't they carry executions on Palestinians?
People have been fighting each other since the beginning of humanity.
Also why doesn't Hamas fight in West Bank where Israel was building settlements?
they doesnt but i have heard that they do this to israelis
They do, there are independent reports
but israel bombs refugee camps, schools, hospitals
Yes Israel is bad, never denied this
They have no right to it
I'm saying that Hamas sucks at protecting people or isn't protecting them much or at all
As a Turk, I say this: The Palestinians have betrayed us much more than the Israelis. But this is human being problem.
https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/09/1126021
As you can see not even the State of Palestine approved of the executions, probably most Palestinians didn't
yes i heard that hamas killed a few israeli hostage
These were Palestinians, two were accused of having ties with Israel but what about the other three? š¤
They also killed elders at times
But this is not a situation for defenseless innocents. At the very least, they are defending themselves by supporting the hammam.
Palestinians are supporting Hamas because no one is taking action for them, they're not to blame
really, thats not my problem. I am angry with denying human rights
But Hamas is not good at whatever they are trying to do unless it's attracting attraction where it isn't needed, like Gaza
Yes, this is also the view in Turkey
If they really wanted to do something they should have destroyed the settlements in West Bank to discourage Israel from building there
Israelis don't live there until they're completed, and the West Bank isn't part of the State of Israel, so destroying the settlements is fair game
Like I said. It's not my problem, and I don't care. I only feel sorry for the innocent Palestinians and Israelis who have died. No innocent person should die. Other than that, I have no idea. I'm not the judge.
all I'm caring is how many progress that Israeli could carry out to achieve their ultimate goal and I'm freaking earning from it
I don't mind what they have done, I care how much profit they can generate
and emotionally speaking, I feel sorry that many people died from this war but if they determined the solution would be implemented by war, then do it.
and win the war.
That's so inhumane

yo South Korea has as many stores or places for otaku as Japan?
(Keep it to English please! We are The English Hub after all!)
Have you invested in any military complexes?
CHKP ESLT
only those two
I didn't invest any stocks listed on Israeli stock exchanges our Tel Viev Stock Exchange lol
He provided the translation afterwards
š
They didn't stop doing it
This company has grown so much, is it American?
They would be Israel's first supplier
Invest in Leonardo too
They made a solid +48,48% in the last year
Italy is investing in armaments, so it could be useful
Invest in Beretta too, stocks should be cheap
The Golan Heights definitely don't belong to Israel, the entire world recognizes those as part of Syria
to genociders
Oh man, no reason can justify the death of innocent babies, there are civilian casualties, but deliberately killing babies, those who are too old to hold a gun, and those who are sick, makes that side wrong, no matter what the reason. I hate every side of this war...
guys i need ideas! I am in an English club in my uni and i am look for ideas about an instagram reel saying that we are back with a freash start for this semester so if anyone have any interesting idea pleas lmk.
Wdym
a video (instagram reel video for our English club in our uni)
So you have to make a video that has something to do with English?
win the war, that's all I want to say
no but more like that we are back ( the club is back)
what do you not understand?
What do you need an idea about
They can move them back to Israel, they did this in Egypt and in Gaza, they removed some settlements in the West Bank too
about that we are back again for a new beggining
?
This is incredibly vague
An idea about⦠being back?
yes the English club is back because we havent been doing anything but now we have a new leader which means a new beginning for this club, so we are looking for ideas
According to the Oslo accords
Okay so your club needs something to do, is the club just a general āgetting better at Englishā club?
Why not
kinda yea it is English and translation bridge (the name of the club)
I don't think the Golan Heights are in the West Bank at all
I have some exam papers (1 hour long) where I can grade people and give advice
what does this has to do with it????????????????//
They are the legitimate territory of the Assad Sultanate
Itās pretty obvious
explain
If youāre learning English and donāt want advice or tips be my guest
chat what is this guy saying??
They belong to Narew, only legitimate son of Assad
People write some things⦠someone else gives advice on their responses⦠itās very simple
I don't think the Golan Heights are part of the Oslo accords, because they weren't even part of Palestine
this is an idea?
A Level 2 Functional English Skills paper
because i am looking for an idea
His resemblance to Assad is uncanny
r u british
Yes
this idea is not helpful
Then donāt do it thatās not my problem
how old r u
16
yoo chat what is this guy bluffing about?
whats ur name
If you donāt want to take advice from graded responses then donāt
It saysā¦
owen?
Yes
bro i am looking for ideas! i do not want advice from you
owen wanna be friends?
then find another idea dude thatās all i have to say
sure
yepii
Did you watch Trump's debate?
yeah half of it
Opinions?
ah
Trump is a better candidate
neither candidate has the upper hand
trump repeats visceral lies with a bloated track record and kamala has a poor track record. although funnily enough on immigration, trump told his party to deny a bipartisan bill that would decrease it
Trump was honestly yapping a lot about immigrations
he repeats the same lies to make it seem like heās morally correct, when he is actively preventing the other party from legislating a bipartisan bill
That immigrants eat dogs in Chicagošŗšŗ This is a top argument
They didn't withdraw their troops, and the region is under civilian law for Israelis only. The only thing they fixed was moving settlers off the Sinai and Gaza
I don't know why you specified things that I didn't question or contradict you on
Democrats and Republicans are two sides of the same coin
I would use the virtues of the second amendment to overthrow the government and blow off some heads like Robespierre did
if you looked into their policies youād see this being VERY misinformative
I sent a document about this before by the American journal of international law but I'm too lazy to find it again
Nothing would change for the economy and foreign policy, even social policies would remain unchanged
oh yes the hell it would
republicans advocate for clear tax breaks for the rich, the denial of worker rights, trump takes a more nationalist stance and would be more hostile to allies
De facto is, but isn't recognised as legal occupation just like Crimea or Transnistria
Or Taiwan
This is pure election campaign, all extremist positions are constitutionalized after the elections
Those are all not recognised by many but de facto don't belong to some of the States that claim them
I have no idea that Israeli leader really betrayed his nation and people give Sinai, Gaza to their enemies
no this is a result of polarizing branches of government
a democrat executive branch and a republican congress stunts legislation to be incredibly neutered
they have that capability to hold those territories and they can do a lot of project to annex them
any republican with a not too-smooth frontal lobe can realize the election interference Trump attempted to do on last election is not okay and that guy can never be trusted
Giving Sinai to Egypt in exchange of getting officially recognised? Do you think it's a bad idea for a new country?
trump supporter and smart do not go together
well I won't surprised if they still holding the Sinai they can even took over the canal
They do but you must recognise that it's the more pragmatic choice
however i am no endorser of kamala
I mean, a lot of the things they promise will not be maintained because it would have a devastating impact on the electorate itself
bad idea at all I think that is
i just see her as less of a threat to international security
Why
if you are powerful enough you don't need to seek recognization
everyone's going to recognize you because you are a power
They gave back a small piece of land that may be somewhat strategic but now they're officially recognised by an Arab country
bro really thinks this is age of empires 2, you can't just take lands without any international pushbacks and grievances
It's even more ridiculous how Israel got recognised by Morocco
well that's not really a small piece of land
that's huge for Israelis for sure if you look at the map
there's no any inch of territory is wasted
Yeah but they are better off focusing where they can't be challenged like in Syria or Palestine
territory = money, resources, populations, geopolitical regions, power
yea i understand Harris may not be the most popular one, but if it's between her and a traitor, why not
You know very well that she will continue to support Ukraine as well as Israel, and, in truth, she has no concrete foreign policy, she says things to please everyone like: "What Israel is doing is wrong, but it is our ally...."
wow
is there a reason she shouldnāt support ukraine?
There could be an escalation and everyone to the afterlife as well
Some Americans oppose it for whatever reason, as if many of those weapons aren't being sold
do you support appeasement policy
Most of the Americans that complain do so for the free money handouts
It isn't for nuclear escalation
I'd say there are many reasons
Such as
do they outweigh crumpling european stability and appeasement
for american national interest, they must support Israel wholeheartedly with no hesitition
what happened the last time a major dictator was appeased
In this case, yes
Israel is the only only only american proxy in the middle east
I'm talking about Ukraine there, I think most Americans support Israel no matter what
to not prevent global escalation
they have israel they can project their power, they can control the oil sources, they can control the waters in these region, they can control those nations and enemies
Israel is not a proxy, if you spend 10 seconds reading the definition of a proxy you'd know that, but you'd rather yap
they don't have israel, they have nothing in here
Do you mean like pre-WW2 where they gave free countries to a certain moustache man to prevent escalation? That worked I guess
that's what they should do
you do know that global escalation is if russia attacks NATO soil, something that will bring in every single major western power against russia no matter their previous support
everyone has stated they will not go to war unless NATO is forcefully dragged in
ww3 that would be
It's a shame that Sweden is doing more for Ukraine than our country
If Russia really starts losing in Ukraine, then there will be an escalation, you can't deny that
russia isnāt like america
US is looking for their own interests and if having an ally can help so why not ? same goes for asian countries like South Korea and Japan or western Europe
nukes are not under putins finger
It's better for everyone, they will stop attacking other neighbours for a while
there is no nuclear football
Russia getting Crimea is what allowed it to launch invasions in Georgia
it is an incredibly convoluted hierarchy to launch a nuke in russia
The peninsula was turned into the HQ of evil
How can you compare Ukraine and Russia, despite the fact that Russia has much more troops
No, they probably could use nukes on Kiev, they can't retreat after spending time, money and men there
same thing people said about allowing Ukraine to use western weapons to attack Russian soil, i still don't see putin dropping any nukes as he said dhe would
russia has troops, ukraine has imported resources
They can do that and everyone in the world would lose their shit because it's a completely dogshit decision
the field is equalized
no, i already stated nukes are not up to putin
I don't think Russia would risk trading a free nuke on the capital for a double loss, walking away like a loser and potentially getting nuked in return
which are supplied by Western countries))) And Russia is fighting against everyone alone
thereās a reason nukes werenāt launched in the cold war
Only against Ukraine
cuban missile crisis
a junior officer on a submarine decided not to fire a nuke because he thought his radar was a false threat, it was false and the world didnāt end that day
No, Ukraine is not a country that has any real geopolitical weight outside Europe, probably the West would respond by sanctioning the Russian economy even more, but they will not dare to use the atomic bomb
this one was a real close one, especially since Castro was so eager to start something with the States
They have so much importance worldwide that the price of all goods skyrocketed, especially grains and wheats after the competition died
I have other information about this.. But, ok
ukraine is the worlds biggest exporter in some industries
Provide it then
No one complained when the US used it on the Japanese, except the Japanese themselves
The war in Ukraine impoverished many already poor countries even further
itās a proxy war
oh yea im sure that when one of the largest wheat producers in the world collapses nothing bad would happen
And obviously lowered our living standards and those of Russians too
LLLOOOTTTSSS of people complained. even the INVENTOR of the bomb, oppenheimer, was against it. stop using generalization as a means to prove a point
No, it will not collapse, Russia will manage its affairs
ofc nothing will happen they are just producing some wheat that everyone could do
just look at Africa, Putin had to put a summit there with many leaders to assure them Russia will maintain access to wheat
Insignificant complaints, de facto the United States has suffered no real consequences
it will not collapse for now, since they're still going strong
if there's a notch in the market, will be automatically fixed by the invisible hand of market
you are showing a disturbing lack of knowledge in context
Has anyone sanctioned the United States for nukes?
sourse ? trust me bro i was there
i like how we can make shit out and treat them as facts
we have that too!@
this has nothing to do with your point, you are throwing blank statements and questions
we are expanding our nuclear arsenal
Instead, yes it does, if they have not suffered economic consequences then they have not suffered real consequences
russia using nukes in ukraine would bring the world against them, they would be crushed
soon we will have thousands of nukes as the amount that US possesses
and everyone, everywhere will safe, forever
interesting
We need a NAP, Nordic Atomic Program
you completely diverted from āno, people wonāt careā to āno, because the users from a century ago werenāt affected negatively because they are the worlds only superpowerā
You do realize the US doesnāt ever want to use nukes right?ā¦
In reality there are spheres of influence, and, I assure you, many would be indifferent.
we signed no first use treaty
yes taking everything out of context and do false comparisons in the most regarded way
itās no doubt russia using nukes would start world war 3
Assuming they can get through any air defense
In reality I have understood them as consequences of foreign policy, not of public opinion
assuming putin can convince his generals to fire the nukes, since the president has no authority himself to launch them, he has to go through other people
indifferent ? the first nuke to ever be dropped in europe, a continent so dense with population
and no one would care ?
even now before dropping any nukes and China is slowly dropping support for Russia
but when they drop nukes and commit actual warcrimes, naah the world would be indifferent
Would African, South East Asian countries care? They are the majority of the population and are influenced by BRICS
India will keep standing for Russia, lovers until the end
� are african countries the frontline world powers
i really need to know if Chad or Gabon would care about this ?hmmm the most irrelevant countries yes
ahh keep buying Russian cheap products and oils....
do african countries lead the world�
if Chad ever sanctioned your country you're fucked
and give our weapons to North Korea for transit to the Russian hand
that's what we have done anyway
china, japan and india are the only international frontline powers outside of europe and america
Irrelevant countries? we Europeans exploit their resources every day, how should they be irrelevant?
and oceania
Japan is not a power š¤£
Indians have resentment towards Europeans, would they care?
they have the fastest increasing military size in the world only behind your country, they have the 4th largest economy in the world. they are important
you have a disturbing trend of generalizations
Yeah lol
the thing is Russia has no real allies, their relations with countries like China are merely due to convenience hence why it's fragile, in fact China has more reasons to dislike Russia than to befriend it
itās like you just say what you think without researching
They have a decaying industry, the army has no power if you can't maintain it
..? and they canāt maintain it how..? indulge me
their military is doing perfectly fine
not every country has ability to maintain a military with organized high-tech industry support
are you unable to process what i said ? you think if all central African countries woke up today and sanctioned a country like Germany, there would be any serious effects ? are you that naive ?
I've been reading Russian news for a very long time and I often see this.There are many chevrons here, including from Canada, the USA, Poland and other countries
yes, he is
They simply don't have the resources, once they've used up their army they won't be able to do much else
actually there's only 2 states in the world have high-tech industry support the new organized military
ā¦ā¦ā¦..???? they are the worlds third largest economy and they canāt afford the resourcesā¦? are you reading before you send
China and the US
third or fourth i canāt recall
A bunch of military insignias don't mean anything, by that logic there are Ukrainians fighting for the country of NAFO wholesome doge
Besides yes there are volunteers in Ukraine from other countries, there are in Russia as well, volunteers have always been a thing, doesn't mean entire foreign armies fight there
China spends big in it's military but it has yet to build a reputation, haven't been used in any serious conflict except for some clashes with India (and it's own people sometimes lel)
itās been proven that there are small scale troops from the UK, other european powers and NATO in ukraine
Have you heard that their economy is in decline, or are you just basing that on statistics of wealth produced???? They wouldn't even have the population to sustain a war lol
their economy grew 2.9% in the last year. decline you say? do some research
ah we signed a treaty with India that guns won't be involved between our clashes
And don't say they are more than 100 million or shit like that, because their population is old
Do you think that Ukrainian soldiers bought American chevrons and worn them?) It's a little funny.
blah blah blah LOOK AT THE STATS! THEY ARE INCREASING!
Did you even read the message? There are volunteers from other countries, there are in Russia too. Doesn't mean entire foreign armies are involved
sorry itās 12% in the year, 3% in the quarter
The average wealth of citizens has dropped, industries are trying to give the last economic impulses
watch Russia trick indian students into joining the military lel
If anything it's Russia that didn't fight on its own, the Belarusian army was directly involved a bunch of times and they're preparing to invade again
But nevertheless, there are enough mercenaries fighting with them
They're few, most combatants are Ukrainians
My uncle is fighting there, most foreigners act as trainers or instructors, there are some involved in the fighting
do you have something against mercenaries ? Russia by itself runs one of the largest private militaries
monthly wages have grown nearly „200k in the last 50 years and have grown roughly „10k in the last 20. that is a slow down, not a decline
Their social situation prevents them from going to war
not very delicious
Too hairy?
suddenly
Yes, it is true, there are many volunteer private companies. and in Ukraine they also exist
some might say very furry
I rather have some chick than kitties
Ok, so that means they're going into stagnation
nothing you can eat lol
they got barely no meat only some skin
Are dogs better than cats?
lel
we don't eat cats lol
Why not
were* they have already left it. this year the japanese 225 index of the largest companies closed higher than the record set in 1989
but we got a lot of dog meat resturant
I've seen a photo of a dish with cat meat in Vietnam
by "we" i don't think you mean China
cuz it's expensive and disgusting ?
Did you try it?
I guess there are no cat farms
Aren't the dogs used for the farms fat and with a dark tongue?
anyways conclude here so i can go play truck simulator š¬
I think they're very popular here, most people don't know the origin of their breed
Japanese industries represent the wealth of a few, not the citizens, what you said literally means nothing, if the citizens start to be poor the whole economy will decline in the long term
no we got a farm for the consumable dogs
someone needs to get introduced to factorio
this is the same for every nation in the world
its not a japanese issue that theres inequality in a capitalist society
Not developing countries, where even the wealth of citizens is slowly growing
generally, the people get poorer due to economic decline, not vice versa
yes in developing countries
the more developed a country is, there more inequality grows between the classes
that is how it works
He says they are not in economic decline
ive looked into it but i just havent bought it.. one day though
So in the end they don't matter anymore, they are an irrelevant country and nations like Russia or China could easily survive without them
idk if it can be called a decline since it's not in a freefall, but they surely are in a bad spot, still haven't recovered from the japanese asset bubble from the 80s
their economy hasn't practically returned to pre-crisis levels
it's pretty fun, give it a try
they are not in decline. their economy has grown 2.9% in the last quarter, the average wage is up, their stock market has reached a new record for the first time in the last 40 years. they are important and if you say otherwise you are negligent of basic and obvious common sense
they were in stagnation and slow growth, not decline. they are now growing faster
i do know they had some positive economic data recently, but these are nothing but short-term indicators and are not going to solve it's long standing problems by any means, their real growth has been stagnant for a long time, and when adjusted to inflation, there has been no significant improvements when it comes to purchasing power which has effected consumer spending badly.
a long time is only 20 years
they also had serious problem with deflation for years, with also affects consumer spending and business investment.
and the big elephant in the room the debt
they call it the lost decade
regardless of any stagnation, they are still a world leader and the 3rd/4th most important economy. that is NON NEGOTIABLE
im not saying they are not important, my point is they are facing serious economical challenges
that is very true
i never said they aren't
but its very indicative that they are improving
more so concluding on my point to andosweher so i can go play my game 
maybe when its on sale
it's really hard to tell, the central bank of Japan has been fighting against deflation for years to no avail, it's only that recently it started to change, would it remain this way ? only time will tell
the same thing has happened to the uk (but for only ~4-9 years)
brexit started and we lost a lot of economic growth, but now we're forecasted to outgrow every other G7 nation for the next 6 years (this is yet to be seen but its what the specialists are saying)
i'd be very skeptical to that data considering how they underperformed most G7 countries post-covid
I need someone who can help me #šļ½proofreading
Gross
Why
precisley due to brexit, we are now refining our deals
well divide as 4 tier of different type of militaries based on power, 1-tier would be the US and China which had advance wmds, using high-tech to re-organize the military force to incoporate with digital technologies, 2-tier would be the Russia, also had advance and enormous wmds, despite they have a low level of possibility of utility developing space force but mainly their army still being organized in a old way. 3-tier, general typical powers, Germany, France, Britain, Israel, Japan, South/North Korea they don't got much high-tech practice in military field to re-organize the new army, but most have a nice economy could support a long-term war
not gonna mention 4-tier because that was sucks
yea i know Labour party is approaching EU for better and closer deals, but it's gonna be tough
the brexiteers think we're shit compared to the EU, they have the bargaining power not us. but we can pull through with better deals than what we got in 2021
天äøé¾č, å°äøé©“č
remind me of a single large scale war lead by China in past 30 years ?
dragon meat on the heaven, donkey meat on the ground [the most delicious meat]
USA deserves a tier of its own
naturally, but he won't see that
we don't have much war as US does but we have high-tech, a space program incorporated with military, numerous wmds, nuclear submarines
we didn't lag that much to the US technology and the way of moblizing and organizing the military
Germany isn't impressive right now but they announced their rearming after 2022
yea you've proved my point, chinese military has no experience in real battles or a reputation to mention, as far as i know China has a single military base outside of it which is in Djibouti i believe
but apparently they are equal to the US
watch all the citizens lose their shit when they're trying to pass drafting laws
we gonna have more 
They would do well, they need incentives for a volunteer army instead of large reserves
sure, but if a war breaks out say right now, you'd be unmatched to the US
yeah sure if it's a general war
nuclear war would be the full destruction of the US and China
The Chinese military has issues Iād rather not get into, but its not logistically ready for combat with the US
i think it's pretty hard to do that effectively now a days, even the US which has very attractive offers for people to volunteer, they still rely on drafts a lot
fallout 5
The Tsar Bomba (Russian: ЦаŃŃ-бомба, romanized: Tsar'-bomba, IPA: [tĶ”sarʲ ĖbombÉ], lit.ā'Tsar bomb'; code name: Ivan or Vanya), also known by the alphanumerical designation "AN602", was a thermonuclear aerial bomb, and the most powerful nuclear weapon ever created and tested. The Soviet physicist Andrei Sakharov oversaw the project at Arzamas-16...
never underestimate the Russian technologies lmao
yes because that's what we were saying just now
The problem for China is that itās air weapons and defenses are outclassed
The Taiping Heavenly Kingdom, officially the Heavenly Kingdom of Great Peace (1851ā1864), was a theocratic monarchy which sought to overthrow the Qing dynasty. The Heavenly Kingdom, or Heavenly Dynasty, was led by Hong Xiuquan. Its capital was at Tianjing, present-day Nanjing. The unsuccessful war it waged against the Qing is known as the Taipin...
moving to the more intersting part of Chinese history
we got J-10 which have better performance than F-16 but we gonna improve it anyway
we are lagging behind the US in this field
some random guy claiming to be the brother of Jesus end up causing 70 million casualties in China lel
You realize the F-16 is not our primary aircraft for air combat?
That would be the 22
ah for the most advance one we got J-20
that can match the F-22 but not as many we have
The J20 is reduced visibility the 22 is stealth
well J20 is a stealth
Its reduced visibility not stealth
The Chengdu J-20 (Chinese: ę¼-20; pinyin: JiÄn-ĆrlĆng), also known as Mighty Dragon (Chinese: åØé¾; pinyin: WÄilóng, NATO reporting name: Fagin), is a twinjet all-weather stealth fifth-generation fighter aircraft developed by China's Chengdu Aerospace Corporation for the People's Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF). The J-20 is designed as an air sup...
Unlikely
China has been trying to get the 22specs for years without success
They wouldnāt do that unless there was serious concern that it posed a threat
It looks like a woman from medieval times
thats cool
The J-20 is the world's third fifth-generation stealth fighter to enter mass production and service after the US F-22 and F-35.[21] It is also the world's first fifth-generation stealth fighter with a two-seat configuration.[22]
Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit; nükleer ve konvansiyonel bombalar taÅıma kapasitesine sahip, Ƨok rollü ve radara yakalanmayan (hayalet) bombardıman uƧaÄı. Åu ana dek üretilen en pahalı uƧaktır ve bir tanesinin tahmini fiyatı 1,157 milyar ila 2,2 milyar Amerikan doları arasındadır. Kıyaslama gerekirse, Nimitz sınıfı bir uƧak gemisi 4,5 milyar dolar...
This one is going to be replaced by the B-21 Raider
The Tzar Bombaās cool and all but most of todayās payloads are just better because theyāre self propelled
Watch part of the 2012 United States presidential debate between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney.
Courtesy: CNN
Well Russians used to say their weapons are the best too you know
But the reality showed us ....
US weapons are always tasting all around the world and there is more transparency, soooo
Rev. Al Sharpton, Host of āPolitics Nationā on MSNBC and Tim Miller, former Spokesperson for the RNC joins Nicolle Wallace on Deadline White House with reaction to the debate between Vice President Harris and ex-President Trump, which even Fox News conceded was a Harris victory, with Trump unraveling before the American people.
Ā» Subscribe to ...
yo help me with my eng homework I beg
What part of the US is best for a living according to you guys?
What state of the US, to be exact
as cheap as able
and that doesnt smell as fucking weed
i mean, for a common man who wana lives in peace
im able to buy a car and maybe I will be able to move for 2h in car at maximum
For technology stack
Not the right channel to be a clown
wym
i pray on your downfall
The black machine is dating a piece of paper
There were fire holes, hells with the faker
curtains make a good joker
Fuck haters, sister you a waiter
Alaska
Everyone heard some stuff about South (Texas, Florida, Arizona, Alabama, etc), about California, NYC
Yea
I don't know, the only thing I know about there is that it's cold.
Which is great, isn't it?
hell nah
just imagine going to the beach or a lake, chill vibes
that shounds better
No .
a lake where you will sure you will not got freeze š¤£
So whats your point man
with alaska
Okay, yes..... What more? Hm.. That shounds right
Hummm what about Boston ?
or Wyoming ?
Sent you PM, check if thats not a problem for u.
I donāt consider transparency is a positive factor for oneās military
But for sure US military is 1st in the world
The latest American weaponry isn't known to us at all, for example we know next to nothing about the B-21 Raider, the substitute for the B2-Spirit
In NATO the public only knows in detail about weapons from 1995 like the Millennium Cannon, Skyshield and all of that
Hello! Is there someone here an expert of stylistics?
I'd like to ask... What kind of foregrounding is the usage of figurative speech?
Great to mourn the American people who died in September 11 attacks, and appreciate after all sort of such horrific events comes out, for destroying terrorism with profoundly and utterly declaration of war on terror had been released.
Ah not this one
It just a numbers. We playing with numbers. If it comes to a real clash, neither side has experience using these weapons in such quantities, and the US could be very surprised by what China shows.
War is an operation with so many variables that it is very difficult to calculate. And you can't say China has 1 tank and the US has 4 tanks, then China will lose.
Thatās another thing in real combat but by numbers of strength and resilience US has a lot more powerful stuff than we have
No any nation which participates directly into the war will benefit from a long-term war - Sun tzu (the art of war)
And I donāt think neither China and the US has ability to destroy another nation in a very short time based on general war
the us has never faced an enemy with enough strength. what if being half as strong as the us is enough for their political system to break, we don't know. so it's just a numbers game.
But china way stronger than that
We beat Americans in Korean War, Vietnam war 
And American supported Kuomintang regime
911 was a culture shock to many but in no way justification for what the US would do in retaliation
Thatās what they should do
but when american dropped two nuclear bombs? who beated who there š¤£
after japanese destoryed their most important port
American beat Japanese ?
We have nuclear weapons too, Russia also have that
Well obviously they kick Japanese ass
There is no justification for the shit we pulled in Afganistan
Civilians should never be the target or the cost of a military or government operation
but now if us hits first russia or japan or north cores they cant shit the against
What a shame Biden retreat from Afghanistan
Trump will never do that they gonna transform the afghan country in their influence
Becoming the new puppet state of America
And influence Iran
About civilians I would say they should not be, but if they involved into the war the civilian casualties is inevitable
They sure donāt need a bunch of civilians but they urgently need another puppet with way more less opposition powers in the Middle East
Thatās geopolitical problems not a childish game should decide to kill or not
The only resolution of that is conduct a war called war on terror
Thatās one of the few wars that most global power including Russia, China, US and Europe agreed and cooperated together
Superpowers is the player, regional powers is the chess, and the non-powers losers is the chessboard
and here i am reminded why none of your warhawking and right wing robotic bluecheck twitter geopolitics opinions never merit any serious discussions ever
It was a waste of lives and resources

Thatās a crazy investment for your long time future but Biden screwed it
Imagine thereās a US dominated order in the Middle East
Make everyone depend on the US in everywhere forever
I didnāt see you even arguing with the hard truth articulated by me
Itās not a childish game, itās the freaking life for numerous people in the US
Itās the solution they can get rid of their domestic problems by external war and reshaping their influence and order in any region possible
Thatās our dream if they donāt come to those region we gonna took over all of them and establish our own rule
They already have their backyard South and Latin America, western axis of Europe, Australia, American proxy of Israel, South Korea, Japan
There was never going to be a return. It was a waste of American lives
I donāt really see the unrealistic leftist utopia will be achieved under no force involved 
Do you rather have an Afghanistan living condition with no people died or a global superpower that expand their influence all the time and conduct war against their enemies and gain profit from it so you can afford more stuff ?
Think a second when holding your iPhone and wonder how those cheap products come from
And your USD that dominates the global trade
And your prosperity state that bring numerous opportunities to you guys
Remember your state is the USA, United States of America, not the United States of the World
Iām well and aware, Iām simply against human rights violations
Human rights or something are tools for you guys to expand your influences and project your power to the state who violated them
Not the tool that used for regulating yourself you are in security council who can challenge you ?
Iām painfully aware of Americaās role in the substantiation of suffering in this world. And I work to stop it.
The reason Iām a POLS major is to mitigate the harm we do
If not suspend it emtirely
That would be the destruction of America
Also the end of the democratization and rights
What you are doing is to end the human rights, fr
Do you think if you stop America will we stop ourselves? Or Russia ?
Do you understand what my job is?
Not really idk whatās POLS
But i know you are an American
Political Science
I study governments, their histories their current actions, I predict analyze and study policies
Cool so why did you got such conclusion that you guys need to stop America ?
The Afganistan war was, in all honesty a lie, 9/11 was a genuine failure of homeland security but it was an excuse that Cheyney needed to give his benefactors what they wanted
There were no weapons of mass destruction in Afganistan
Thatās your narrative obviously
Yeah itās true but it doesnāt matter
You guys need to set up a puppet government in Afghanistan to influence Iran
And Biden screwed up that plan
Do you- not understand why Iran is so bad atmā¦.?
Or- which president ordered the pull out-?
Because of america ?
I would say they already want to dominate the Middle East already they even got a war with Iraq
Because we did exactly what you just suggested we do in Afganistan
Yeah so why not continue to do it and screw Iran up
Thatās what you guys need to do
⦠okay Iām going to say this slowly
We.
Already.
Did this.
In.
Iran.
That is why.
It is so bad there.
But you guys retreat from there and you didnāt stop the Iranian revolution
If you use your mighty hand to suppress them what would comes out will only benefit your great America
The culture isnāt ready for democracy they need years of social development and distance from conflict.
If we did that then it wouldnāt ever become a democracy
It needs time and distance from conflict
Does it really matter ? I donāt see Saudiās a democracy, neither the South Korea in Korean War, and South Vietnam, Cuba, those are all authoritarian states
I even doubt Israel is a democracy
But they work and they fight for Americans
And you know Iranās geopolitical location and how much resources they possess
I agree they arenāt but I wish them to be.
You can, after taking over all of them
You canāt just let them go and fight you even
Then that wouldnāt be democracy
To become a state the people have to want it, vote for it
I donāt think they are a democracy or not is a matter but the interest of American nation and people
Our interest is in the development of our democracy and burgeoning democracies on the planet
Whatās the point of let them go and fight against you back ?
I just donāt get it
Thatās such a pretty old slogan from the Cold War era
Cold War is ended You win
I think youāre missing the point. I donāt want the palm of the US crushing down on people. It goes against my values
I donāt see why thatās so difficult to understand
You mean your values above the interest of Americans ?
Or you truly believe that your values can benefit American more
My values donāt stop at my nationās borders
Okay anyway I get it
Maybe itās my bad I use my value as perspective to see this world
āServe the peopleā - Mao Zedong
My values are not conditional on the ethnicity or race of the person. People are people. And while I am loyal to my nation I will not seek to cause harm. If an action must be taken the goal is to mitigate harm in the process.
Itās hard to sayā¦. But itās Marxism
Its not
You should read some book from Karl Marx
Its a modified rendition of Utilitarianism.
I do not seek to cause harm, and I do not partake in joy of it if and when it must be done
You can tell me the difference between Marxism and your utilitarianism
Utilitarianism is about providing the greatest possible happiness to the greatest number of people. I twist that slightly and see it as a harm scale.
Marxism is a theory of social evolution, if not a theory by which you use to explain events within a paradigm. It sees things as a struggle between the common man and the ruling man. That capitalism uses imperialism to delay the inevitable revolt of the common person
Socialism is a cousin to Marxās communist ideas but they are on different sides of the social spectrum
Authoritarian and libertarian are frequencies of control a governing body has on the movements and actions of a given population. Authoritarian regimes usually do not last more than 100 years at the longest without a violent shift in power, or fall apart entirely
Thus the four scales of the political spectrum.
Social progression,
Social conservation,
Authoritarian
Libertarian
Isnāt that pretty close to Marxism ?
According to what you have said your value are unconditional on the ethnicity and race of the person or even nationality thatās definitely what internationalism communist would say
Thatās even part of the ideology of troskey
No that just means I apply my morals consistantly
Trotskyism (Russian: Š¢ŃŠ¾Ńкизм, Trotskizm) is the political ideology and branch of Marxism developed by Russian revolutionary and intellectual Leon Trotsky along with some other members of the Left Opposition and the Fourth International. Trotsky described himself as an orthodox Marxist, a revolutionary Marxist, and a BolshevikāLeninist as well a...
But what you have said are kinda relatable with his ideology
Many ideas are but that doesnāt mean I agree with him.
For example the state level of analysis has much in common with other system levels of analysis but that doesnāt make them the same
Okay but at least you are on the spectrum of socialism
Iām a right shithole promotes absolute capitalism with limited social Darwinism and nationalism to achieve so-called socialism in one state
Oh Iām definitely a socialist just not in the same way as others are
Economic Democracy
Not surprised you would support Harris now
But I donāt think she will win
Have you vote yet ?
Mail in ballots arenāt out yet
Harris will likely win given recent events. Trumpās sentencing is soon anyways, heāll be spending time in prison reguardless
no more impeachment š
btw my trump baby will handle this he already dealt such thing 4 times
He hasnāt been sentenced yet
Only one of the 4 trials has concluded with him guilty on all charges
His punishment is being decided
I meant the inner transparency within the system.
Who spent how much under which administration
- there is a well-known tension between the navy and the army which also pushes the need to prove the real need and efficiently
The US got it first and could bomb you easily, but they didn't
Btw Douglas MacArthur was wishing to drop some to communist but u see, you guys are still alive
Imagine in this particular time there were as evil and malicious people as Bush, would you justify it as you justify war on terror ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_StatesāTaliban_deal
It was his idea
The Agreement for Bringing Peace to Afghanistan, commonly known as the United StatesāTaliban deal or the Doha Accord, was a peace agreement signed by the United States and the Taliban on 29 February 2020 in Doha, Qatar, to bring an end to the 2001ā2021 war in Afghanistan. Negotiated for the US by Zalmay Khalilzad for the Trump administration, th...
I'm curious why you think America lost the Korean war
There are South Korea
No

What do you mean no?
Dude got cooked and looked like a literal moron on stage
He is
He is always repeating himself even in one sentence, saying something again in again
I thought it sounded okay for English speaking you know (I mean, when i translated that to my mother tongue in my head it's just absurd) but it seems you know it's sound stupid even in English
You mean we need to appreciate that they didnāt drop the bomb on us lmaooo
At that time we are allies with the Soviet Union
Soviets achieved nuclear weapons in 1949
And we fought American back to the 38th parallel line, saved North Korea
Well you (not only you but Soviets) didn't conquer the South part
So why do you think you won
Seems like I'm more of an American patriot than Nale (American)
They didnāt directly participate the war they want our ports or Busan ports controlled by North Korea
All we want is let North Korea survive
We didnāt interfere the war when North Korea is invading the South
Well look at the map during the war
So that means you won ? Lol
Dude I looked that map canāt even count how many times
Look the timeline of the war and the time of Chinese intervention
All we want to let North Korea survive and they survived
Then German delegation also won in 45
They just wished the survivor of the German somehow
No idea on what you are talking about
Those dude on western part of Germany too, they wished the West would conquer them, not the Soviets
Thatās our strategic consideration which we based on implementing our own decisions to participate the war or not
Idk why you are focusing that we didnāt achieve what we wanted
It's clearly a draw at least
Uniting Korea ? Thatās not our idea
We just got a civil war why would we need another one so soon
Without considering that u with Soviets are neighbours, while there are Pacific Ocean between Korea and US
hello beings of the highest light
You should be really proud yeah
That doesn't mean to win the US, especially in the proxy war
They got ass kicked as you can see
Yeah but uniting Korea ? No way
Thereās no way you can invade North Korea and threatening us
Well you should be really proud you country is supporting people like Kim and supporting keep north Koreans as animals
You ?
Why wouldnāt we like a natural neutral or not neutral buffer state ?
US
I'm not from the US lol
Idc what North Korea do, but be exist and fight Americans back
Thatās what we need them to be functioning
Our buffer state
And u see why many people prefer the US as world hegemon, coz they (at least ritorically) don't support things like let's keep those people in barbaric conditions coz it's for "our national interests"
marxism condemns that the socioeconomic prosperity of a nation is nurtured by the widespread practices of labor and wealth extractions of lower, much more underdeveloped and vulnerable class society. "ethical" utilitarians simply acknowledge this reality and sometimes try to morally reconcile with it, hence why nale's stance hinges on finding more diplomatic ways to soothe America's interest to better their democracy without coming off as too apparent in bludgeoning other democracies
this is also why, harrowingly, a sizable chunk of kamala voters, however their rationalizations, consider the Palestinian genocide as a "single voter issue"
You mean thatās not Marxism but a standoff between Marxism-Tyrotskey communist and democratic socialism
Itās neither the reactionarism or revisionism
Anyway I canāt find a better word to describe this type of ideology
Ah cuz they got more economy power yes
i was answering on nale's behalf that what he believed in isnt marxism, yes, and it literally doesn't have any marxist characteristics whatsoever because he refuses to ideologically confront the existence of the state apparatus as an agent of economic imperialism š he was just saying, word for word, the centrist moralization of the war economy, while advocating for more diplomatic approaches
I would say we are also managing every inch of Chinese territory even in far-west regions like Xinjiang Tibet you can even see thereās a megacity
But how does that make sense to socialism without communism ?
It doesnāt make any sense according to Karl Marx
i brought none of those up i was talking about nale's argument
I mean I understand heās condemning about imperialism and expansion of national interest on power by force and he want to be reconciled with those bloody conflicts
Well it's central Marx' idea
That all make sense but one thing it doesnāt make sense is how is that socialism without communist ideology?
World communist
Even it was a typical Trotsky-internationalism
It was the Soviets who invented "communism in a particular county" in 30th
That's why those guys didn't value Russia
Well if you know what Soviet really means I would say thatās literally democracy
But ruined by Stalin
Stalin transformed all of those into a real red empire
They themselves called it proletarian's dictatorship
Thatās just totalitarianism with state capitalism
No
Bullshit with proletarian say that to Ukraine farmers
That's how Lenin described the future
He despised parliamentarian democracy and democracy in general
РеволŃŃŠøŠø ā Š»Š¾ŠŗŠ¾Š¼Š¾ŃŠøŠ²Ń ŠøŃŃŠ¾ŃŠøŠø, Š³Š¾Š²Š¾ŃŠøŠ» ŠŠ°ŃŠŗŃ. РеволŃŃŠøŠø бŃŃŃŃŠ¾ ŃŃŠ°Ń. Š Š°Š±Š¾ŃŠøŠµ Š³Š¾ŃŠ¾Š“ов, баŃŃŠ°ŠŗŠø Š“ŠµŃŠµŠ²ŠµŠ½Ń ŠŠµŃмании Šø ŠŠ²ŃŃŃŠøŠø бŃŃŃŃŠ¾ поймŃŃ ŠøŠ·Š¼ŠµŠ½Ń Š“ŠµŠ»Ń ŃŠ¾Ńиализма ŃŠ¾ ŃŃŠ¾ŃŠ¾Š½Ń ŠØŠµŠ¹Š“ŠµŠ¼Š°Š½Š¾Š² Šø ŠŠ°ŃŃŃŠŗŠøŃ , ŠŃŃŃŠµŃŠ»ŠøŃŠµŠ² Šø Š ŠµŠ½Š½ŠµŃŠ¾Š². ŠŃŠ¾Š»ŠµŃŠ°ŃŠøŠ°Ń Š¾ŃŠ±ŃŠ¾ŃŠøŃ ŠæŃŠ¾ŃŃ ŃŃŠøŃ āŃŠ¾Ńиал-ŠæŃŠµŠ“Š°ŃŠµŠ»ŠµŠ¹ā, ŃŠ¾ŃиалиŃŃŠ¾Š² на ŃŠ»Š¾Š²Š°Ń , ŠæŃŠµŠ“Š°ŃŠµŠ»ŠµŠ¹ ŃŠ¾Ńиализма на Геле, как Š¾ŃŠ±ŃŠ¾ŃŠøŠ» он в РоŃŃŠøŠøŃŠ°ŠŗŠøŃ Š¶Šµ Š¼ŠµŠ»ŠŗŠøŃ Š±ŃŃŠ¶Ńа Šø ŃŠøŠ»ŠøŃŃŠµŃов, менŃŃŠµŠ²ŠøŠŗŠ¾Š² Šø āŃŠ¾ŃиалиŃŃŠ¾Š²-ŃŠµŠ²Š¾Š»ŃŃŠøŠ¾Š½ŠµŃовā. ŠŃŠ¾Š»ŠµŃŠ°ŃŠøŠ°Ń ŃŠ²ŠøŠ“ŠøŃ,ā ŃŠµŠ¼ ŃŠŗŠ¾Ńее, ŃŠµŠ¼ полнее Š±ŃŠ“ŠµŃ Š³Š¾ŃŠæŠ¾Š“ŃŃŠ²Š¾ названнŃŃ āŠ²Š¾Š¶Š“ŠµŠ¹ā, ā ŃŃŠ¾ ŃŠ¾Š»Ńко замена бŃŃŠ¶Ńазного гоŃŃŠ“аŃŃŃŠ²Š°, Š±ŃŠ“Ń ŃŠ¾ ŃŠ°Š¼Š°Ń Š“ŠµŠ¼Š¾ŠŗŃŠ°ŃŠøŃŠµŃŠŗŠ°Ń Š±ŃŃŠ¶ŃŠ°Š·Š½Š°Ń ŃŠµŃŠæŃŠ±Š»ŠøŠŗŠ°, гоŃŃŠ“аŃŃŃŠ²Š¾Š¼ ŃŠøŠæŠ° ŠŠ°ŃŠøŠ¶ŃŠŗŠ¾Š¹ ŠŠ¾Š¼Š¼ŃŠ½Ń (о ŠŗŠ¾ŃоŃом ŃŠ°Šŗ много Š³Š¾Š²Š¾ŃŠøŠ» ŠŠ°ŃŠŗŃ, ŠøŃŠŗŠ°Š¶ŠµŠ½Š½Ńй Šø ŠæŃŠµŠ“Š°Š½Š½ŃŠ¹ ШейГеманами Šø ŠŠ°ŃŃŃŠŗŠøŠ¼Šø) или гоŃŃŠ“аŃŃŃŠ²Š¾Š¼ ŃŠøŠæŠ° Š”Š¾Š²ŠµŃŠ¾Š² в ŃŠ¾ŃŃŠ¾Ńнии Š¾ŃŠŗŃŃŃŃ Š“Š¾ŃŠ¾Š³Ń Šŗ ŃŠ¾ŃиализмŃ. ŠŠøŠŗŃаŃŃŃŠ° ŠæŃŠ¾Š»ŠµŃŠ°ŃŠøŠ°Ńа ŠøŠ·Š±Š°Š²ŠøŃ ŃŠµŠ»Š¾Š²ŠµŃеŃŃŠ²Š¾ Š¾Ń ŠøŠ³Š° ŠŗŠ°ŠæŠøŃŠ°Š»Š° Šø Š¾Ń Š²Š¾Š¹Š½.
This dude is just fucking moron
That was all started by Leninās obsession on centralized power
No
Actually it's not the case
It was Stalin who was obsessed with centralised power
what is
i mentioned nothing about socialism without communism DOTP SIOC lower phase none of those things omg š what does explaining marxist view of international relations have to do with any of those
In russian about it https://elib.bsu.by/bitstream/123456789/295228/1/18-23.pdf
Mostly we associate permanent revolution with Bronshtein (real Trotsky's surname) but it's Marx https://www.jstor.org/stable/23557709
I read too much about all these bullshit in several languages. And, as Eastern European mate, I proudly renounce it as moron stupidly and shit. American dudes, don't be stupid and don't be socialist
As a term within Marxist theory, it was first coined by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels as early as 1850, but since then different theorists - most notably Leon Trotsky (1879ā1940) - have used the phrase to refer to different concepts.
In a nutshell
i said nothing about the perm revolution where are you guys getting these š
Here
Well if I misunderstood that or misinterpreted I'm sorry
After Netanyahu
Why humans need to come up with all these complex systems instead of just copying parrot societies
Do you have a twitter account?
No I don't like seeing insane people voicing their opinions
I don't have one either, but I would subscribe to you if I did
o?
It means why
I share this opinion with the SƔmi
They're basically human parrots, or were before colonialism bulldozed them
Now I believe swedes should pay reparations and kneel.
how is that not relating to marxism if it's using a marxist way to explain the international relations š
actually she's part of views are pretty close to marxism and it is socialism
about perm revolution that's another thing
They kind of do that like most countries with their indigenous people but it's always a blank commitment
jesus christ this guy has an incorrigible one track mind
Especially since they, Norway, Finland and Russia would likely never let an international SƔmi State exist
Well I have read some stuff about commissions of justice or something like that
BUT
EXPLAIN THE ENTIRE SHIT PLEASE
I mean why do I even say "likely" there is just no chance
what are we literally talking about
I think Hanaaru is using Marxist philosophy, Marxists don't necessarily need to involve economy in their discussions
I mean whether they involve economy or not, they has possess some marxist characteristics on the other thing like international relations
There should be.
HOW HARD IS IT TO UNDERSTAND THIS š
Literally the future
THAT IS LITERALLY MY POINT
Because their approach is different than that of non-Marxists, it puts emphasis on the exploiter and the exploited
MY FUCKING POINT IS IT IS NOT RELATED DOESN"T MEAN IT"S NOT PART OF THE MARXISM
YOU CAN"T SAY YOU DON"T SAY THE ECONOMY SO IT"S NOT MARXIST WAY TO PERSPECT THE SHIT RELATIONSHIPS
You can have Marxists that are against socialism/communism like Slavoj Zizek (I'm sorry I'm too lazy to switch to the Slovenian keyboard)
Weeeeell there are different Marxism philosophy tbf
Like Frankfurt school
Clarify which you means
i fucking give up you win whatever
no heck don't give up explain this
why socialism is only about economy
what the heck dude
I have read his book about COVID, it looks to me pretty socialist tbh
š”
?
@static pivot
Shield š”ļø
@manic juniper what Sami ppl would say ?
Sami ?
I don't think she or I said that, just that there are different approaches some of which reject the proposed solutions or aren't necessarily about finding one
I'm lost
I always guessing what you guys are talking about
I don't know, they probably think that there aren't differences between men and women besides how they dress, there used to be centuries ago
same can be said for us to you
It's just Marxist philosophy
till the socialism without communism, marxist views, economy
I don't freaking even know what's the problem with economy
Aren't there different roles ?
Like men are fishing women are cooking
I don't think there ever were, they were hunter gatherers
I'm talking about ideological marxism
Both do both things because they were hunting and gathering
Damn
Welcome netizens
my point is always freaking you possess some characteristics that you can't say you get all rid of this
There used to be more male shamans but the most powerful SƔmi shaman recorded was a woman
Why are you still using modern technology and living in the village? Join them
that was definitely a fucking bullshit
They have a camp not far from where I live, also I live next to a village but not in it
for instance the socialism, communism, views based on marxism, or philosophy and other stuff
I'm 1-2 km away so I'm even more isolated than they are, since I have no neighbours
ideologically you possess those factors, you can be identified as a marxist in some circumstances
that's what my freaking point is
Loool
You are some occultist girl
Forest fan
I just don't get it how is that non-marxism with socialism ?
how the fuck that could be
The thing is you can use Marxism philosophy alone to analyse the progress of history and even prehistory (although I don't agree with this part because it's only assumptions about those humans) and the power structures
@manic juniper u https://youtube.com/@user-gk8tm6kj3i?si=1Nx9hPDJnj5XZiF7
Š ŠøŃŠŗŃŃ ŠæŠ¾Š½ŃŃŃ Šø ŃŠ¾Š²ŠµŃŃŠ°Ń ŃŃŠøŠ»ŠøŠµ.
ŠŠ°Š½Š°Š» Š ŃŃŃŠŗŠ¾Š³Š¾ Š„Š¾Š±Š±ŠøŃŠ° ŠŃŃŠµŠ»Ńника. Человека, ŠŗŠ¾ŃŠ¾ŃŃŠ¹ Š¶ŠøŠ²ŠµŃ Š² Гикой ŠæŃŠøŃоГе в Š·ŠµŠ¼Š»Ńнке Ń ŠŗŃŃŠ³Š»Š¾Š¹ ГвеŃŃŃ. ŠŠøŠ²ŠµŃ Ń ŠŗŃŠ¾Š»ŠøŠŗŠ¾Š¼ ŠŠµŃŃŃŃŠŗŠ¾Š¹. Š§ŠøŃŠ°ŠµŃ книги Šø ŃŠŗŠ°Š·ŠŗŠø Š“Š»Ń Š“ŠµŃŠµŠ¹ Šø Š²Š·ŃŠ¾ŃŠ»ŃŃ
. ŠŃŃ Š³Š¾ŃŠ¾Ń
, маŃŃŠµŃŠøŃ Š²ŠµŃŠµŠ»Ńе лайŃŃ
аки... Šø ŃŃŠ°ŃŃŠ²ŃŠµŃ Š² Š¾Š±ŃŠµŃŃŠ²ŠµŠ½Š½Š¾Š¹ жизни ŃŠ²Š¾ŠµŠ¹ ŃŃŃŠ°Š½Ń, как Š¾ŃвеŃŃŃŠ²ŠµŠ½Š½Ńй Š³ŃажГанин.
Дказки Ń ŠŠµŃŃŃŃŠŗŠ¾Š¹. Š...
yeah I can use that and I don't say I'm not using it to analysis the progress of history, or social development or something
Why is there a rabbit
the point is why the fuck they are using it while saying they are using another stuff rather than marxism ?
like I have a pro-authoritarian mind I call it democratic
No I don't think she denied it, she just said that she didn't involve any of those DOP or similar tropes, which she didn't
They are also wrong and Eurocentric about modern history and social formations but let's argue about that next time
I think it could be dangerous to cut down a log with the rabbit near, what if he jumps there
He is his only friend
dude š
It's usually about social formations ideas
They are well used all across sociology discussions without even mentioning Marxism
sigh
Where
You tacitly also actually used those ideas (they are wrong)
I don't think there is a discussion right now
I was left on unread
ok i think i understand the huge flaw in his mindset, im not looking to spontaneously engage in petty debates and to that end, im going to block the guy for a while. but throughout the entire argument i've only seen him push this pretense on me that what i tried to complement nale's reasoning with, particularly the contempt towards the state as a participant in economic imperialism, meant that i was orienting towards suggesting that America should've been a socialist state, in order to rework their political and socioeconomic sustenance from capitalism, or establishing an socialist international climate.
i brought none of those up, because i was, in all brevity, ONLY trying to explain that nale's views aren't marxist plain and simple. i wasnt even trying to argue with him, either š

Who native speaker(english) on here?
Hanaaru
im not
She is even better
english is my third language
That's why u are even better
We're same
how does that make me any better
uhuh
I'd like to talk & enhance my english with native speaker because they're helpful
That does . Just does.
Yes I didn't read it all but I get her view in contrast with yours
Are you Sundanese
Pure luck, not joking
how eery
I spoke to two Sundanese people yesterday and I felt lucky that you were one too
anyways yeah i speak sundanese on a second language basis.
You're indonesian?
Nope
Ig it's her first language then
How could you speak sundanese? Sundanese is part of region language in indonesia
Do you know that your myths could be the oldest historical events recorded in humanity? They reference lake Bandung and that thing stopped existing 20k years ago
We were all speaking English
I see
Maybe I would learn it but I don't have enough time to learn another language (at the moment)
It's a regional language in Indonesia.
As Finish actually.
Yeah Indonesian should be a variant of Malay or something
They are all part of great Singaporean Empire
the only different betweet you and me is on whether the nale's point is marxism or not, in my opinion it was and you think it's not
no matter you admit it or not, it contains marxist ideas
now, that's the thing....they weren't trying to pose any opposing view, there was no anti-commie argument starters sown in the discussion as far as im concerned. they simply had a one-track understanding infused by his affinity for global warfare that they kept pushing the angle that i was engaging with the topic from a geopolitical vein
when i only made a surface-level observation š
no it doesnt
Wasn't it basically "It's still supporting imperialism but in a less aggressive way"
yeah i was describing nale's attitude and thats just it
socialism, but not socialism, communism, but not communism, that's the conclusion I observed from their statements
I would simply consider they do know that was a marxist idea but they don't want to recognize it because some specific reason
I once said that USA isn't a good ally because years ago they exposed spying of European politicians (that's confirmed, not a conspiracy).
And she basically said "Deal with it" I mean ok I guess
Weelll
I am not completely against USA because it would go against my and our interests but I believe that we should suspend all relations once they're not needed anymore unless they change the way they operate
Nale is such a nice guy
he's a socialist
Classical Marxism = french utopism+ Anglo-Saxon economic sciences + Hegel's philosophy
this sounds very backhanded
So she can use only two first for example but for you it looks like Marxism
IT IS
I don't know why someone wouldn't criticise their own government for practicing what's basically illegal surveillance and spying of your closest allies, if it was my own I'd be ashamed of it
im hopping off then this has been soul-sucking, kinda. remind me not talk here often
IT FUCKING IS
i got class
No way
š you can't say you use an marxist example without marxist
I'm already ashamed of the fact that we are not helping Ukraine as much as Sweden despite having experiences with the same kind of imperialism
why you guys obsessed with socialist ideas while trying at best to get rid of marxism ?
what the fuck dude
Or she used some Frankford school approaches and it might seems to you like neo-marxism
its literally just
Tbf it's the first time in my life someone admiring he/she is social Darwinist
me ?
there are knives pointed at me for being very fundamental and straightforward
Or simply using words that aren't in their internal dictionary
Are you talking about this event ? https://www.reuters.com/article/world/us-spy-agency-tapped-german-chancellery-for-decades-wikileaks-idUSKCN0PI2AD/
Who
Yes
such a crap
Yes, what a shame
oh yeah š
what the heck ur talking about ?
i need to work on that fr
you mean there's another socialism without marxism
||She was targeted before for using "advanced" words I guess||
no I'm not saying about advanced words
I mean the freaking socialism how is that socialism could get rid of marxism
I'm actually also pretty pro-european without atlantism and stuff (and without federalisation)
how the fuck that can ever happen
Why not the federalisation
I am only against the inexistence of NATO as it is because without it many countries would be doomed, I would like to see it gone in the future
Evropa best continent ever
what about me š š š š
But as it is I wouldn't accept going back to 1939
Yes? What about you
reverse it
