#🧠|serious-chat
1 messages · Page 155 of 1
okay so what u gonna do now
exactly..cuz its difficult to find someone w a great personality
Forgiving is hard
so try
Like I said
uh huh
Yes she is absolutely damm perfect inside
Take her dude
then what u waitin for
I mean
But she doesn't have the greatest body or face
As long as she's perfect on the inside
why u care about looks sm
What flag is ur name
It's not about that
uh if looks matter more than personality for u...then idk
cuz u may find a girl w the perfect looks but what if she isnt good inside
Yeah
If you want a girl to just sit pretty and treat you like garbage that's up to you but take my advice
That has happened to me too
I've dated a girl with perfect looks and body
But her personality was kinda mid
That made me miserable
That's your core mistake
Take a girl who would support u no matter the circumstances
Yeah exactly
Maybe she doesn't look as good as other girls
You should always realize that aging Is inevitable and at old age those features that attract you won’t be present in both the people
But one thing that will persist is the vibe that u created with that person and their character so choose wisely
Take her or I will(she would probably reject me)
Like she has dreams in life and she does art
It's a limited time offer before she finds the one
And that one might want to be you
So take her
Yeah like the only thing that I don't like is her looks
The rest is just so polished and great
Dude its not about the looks
It's about who will sit by your side when you're on the edge of life
Life is about tough choices
Commitment makes decision-making easier and removes any fear of missing out; knowing that what you already have is good enough
But if you aren't sure enough about her, make it clear to her
Get into relationship and go with the flow
But always make this clear to her that you aren't sure rn and you need time
If she's down for it then it's fine, if she's not ready then move on
Thats what I've been thinking. I need more time
If she thinks you're 100% ready, it might create ginormous problems
Imagine after getting into relationship you find out it's not the best
It'll be catastrophic for her
That's my guy
The question about whether God, as an omnipotent being, can create a stone so heavy that even He cannot lift it is an illogical, self-contradictory as well as paradox.
You have to understand what actually omnipotence means,it actually means the ability to do anything that is logically possible. It doesn't include doing things that are inherently self-contradictory or nonsensical.
The paradox assumes a contradiction by asking if God can create a stone He cannot lift. However, this scenario is logically impossible. If God were to create such a stone, it would imply a limit to His own power, which contradicts the concept of omnipotence like creating a square circle, making 1+1=3 or, grandfather paradox.
Therefore, the answer lies in understanding that God's omnipotence encompasses all things that are logically possible or, not self-contradictory and consistent with His nature. It doesn't extend to performing actions that defy logic or entail self-contradiction.
This is a question that often circulates on the internet, to disprove it only the use of logic would be enough since this is a paradox that implies logic. Whoever formulated this question probably did not take into account some logical mechanisms, in particular, according to logic, it is impossible to deny an axiom; In this case the omnipotence of God is an axiom and cannot be denied and asking such a question only turns out to be a paradox. <--- This would be the logical answer. Another answer could be the fact that God is remotely something human, he is more of an entity, always present and omnipotent. The concept of strength is linked to a human conception, but God is not a human. It's something that can remotely come close to it, so this reasoning does not also apply to its being.
I wonder if there is a correlation between this data and the terrorist attack in Russia
One should first understand whether the attackers can be considered truly religious or not
@formal pilot
r u an ex-muslim?
now thats some interesting 😂 question
The present perfect continuous tense describes actions that started in the past and are still happening now or stopped recently. It highlights how long the action has been going on.
For example, "I have been studying for hours"
"She has been working on that project all week".
To form this tense, use "have" or "has," add "been," and then the verb with "ing" at the end. For instance: "I have been studying." This tense is great for showing that an action has been continuous and can express feelings like frustration or excitement about ongoing situations.
Yeah, i belong to a Muslim family
Wdym?
U r being a racist rn
You belong to a Muslim family but not a Muslim? Your action says that
Indeed
This is a really broken mindset that only religion causes terrorist attacks
Whether a person is Muslim or non-Muslim, there is no such term as ex-Muslim.
Fr
Ignore
Bluff
Be respectful to all religions and don't try to answer Islam related questions as you're not Muslim, otherwise it will lead people to strife.
Yup
Well aren't you a keen-minded fella
Ex-muslim are raised under islam, and they for sure know what they're talking about. Who are you to tell them their journey doesn't matter at all?
Well, we know something
We have the same believes
And even if he is an ex Muslim yet we can understand his beloves
Sounds like a 'you' problem

His ways of perceiving Islam might be different from yours but it doesn't change the fact that you're completely disregarding his perspective.
That ex Muslim is my friend and I'm a Muslim myself
We ain't
Good for you
Poor u
Chill
No

Who said that a person born into Islam is automatically raised under Islam? Being an Ex-Muslim doesn't guarantee that the person will not criticize the religion or go against the religion. Even if someone identifies as Muslim but lacks proper knowledge about Islam, they cannot speak irresponsibly about it, let alone non-Muslims. I am simply defending my religion and aiming to prevent others from falling into misconceptions.
Now I'll explain: many people, Russian and otherwise, complained because they thought that this attack was related to religion or the presence of Islam in Russia; so I wanted to understand if Indeed it was so
Nothing racist
Well, the people's perception is different, they always blame religion, but remember that the Putin is not a Muslim and this attack wasn't because of some religious goals but for their own desires
I understand, but the newspapers said that the attackers were strictly linked to ISIS
Doesn't it mean the ISIS was funded by Russia?
OFC IF ITS TRUE
They also said that ISIS tries to attack a state in conflict with another to destabilize the situation between the two countries
Then why the Russia is trying to defend Tajikistan's borders because they were threatened by ISIS?
These ideas are based on the person's surroundings. If this surroundings inculcate good ideas about Islam, then such problems would not exist
Wth is going on in here
I respect all religion
But what do you mean by don't try to answer islam related questions??
I always discuss about islam
Is it wrong?
Nevermind him fgs
This tbh
Their view of islam and experiences are as validated as those who are currently adhering to the ideals of islam, also just an ex. we can't overlook countless instances where women report suffering oppression because of islam
What did I said wrong?
Nothing
You said you were an ex-muslim lol
That thing apparently doesn't exist
What I meant you didn't understand! I said you can't tell someone about Islamic things without references. As a non-muslim you can't say anything you want like some one wanted to know about if this thing is haram or halal! Or which is right or wrong in Islam.
Oh please not because of Islam, it is because of society
Right
I never criticized that
Are you going to deny what those victims have to say just because of your worldview as well?
This nerds are now blaming Islam
Yeah
Islam is the only religion which gives most respect to women
He is not. He is mistaken in his assessment. Although his viewpoint may appear logical, it is ultimately unfounded. The affirmation that there is no God but Allah is supported by an entire religion, which presents a broad spectrum of compelling evidence. Conversely, the atheistic assertion that there is no God is merely an assertive claim lacking any substantiating evidence. Since God is not observable, proving a negative is impossible, making this assertion completely baseless.
Honestly, fucking-A. Keep going
That's true
As a Christian I agree with you
Islam never oppressed women. I am a woman and I'm saying this, if Islam oppressed women as educated people I wouldn't say this
As Muslim woman I totally agree
Some people accompany with disbelievers and disrespect their own religion in order to make them happy. They even don't know what Allah(SWT) said in Quran.
Although I believe this is a very bad excuse with all due respect, how about I prove that science is actually incompatible with atheism?
ppl mostly criticizes religious institutions, not their literature
thats the core
Whole lot of ex muslim and Muslim women would disagree but their struggles don't really matter to you tbh
Yes. There is a whole surah in the Quran named "Al-Nisa" which means " the Women"
it's always religion.
--anonymous
I agree with u
But just like how Muslims become sensitive and say there is no god but Alllah
Some people like Vivek disagree
Islam gives respect to Mother 3 times over Father
What struggle?
Strike em
Because they don't study Islam they are only born into a Muslim family, sister.
Okay and? Did I say anywhere that Islam is the core problem of it all
I would love to listen to your perspective, enlighten me
Agreed. It's mostly blaming the car for the mistakes of the driver. I hardly ever find someone is attempting to address the religion itself.
Yeah, I totally agree with this ayah, but not with the interpretation that is done by the patriarchal society, and so-called sigma male.
No way
I would like to identify as a Sigma male
I'm reading some cool stuff atm
Oh really you want to be the one who abuses women and here u are saying women suffer because of Islam?
@thorny steeple I'm glad you're here dude, I've lots of questions+ I'm agnostic atheist
||Just sayin if you ever want me to prove how do I know God exists or not, i can't||
You're so condescending.
Someone has their own problem doesn't mean it because of the religion. You people always take things in religious way. This is the land of God(Allah) and it's His rules that what we have to do or not because He knows better than us that which is good for us or which is not. So, keep your freedom in your pocket in all cases.
that's such a dismissive attitude. Just because someone doesn't study Islam doesn't mean they can't have valid opinions or experiences related to it
@slow storm @silver vault dude there's no point in arguing like that
How can one be both Agnostic and Atheist?
I'm so sorry 😅
agnostic, leaning atheist is possible
But not both at the same time
I am not even trying to blame the religion tho? It's not my fault they're taking it like that. Like how insecure you have to be
you may be both to a degree like I just said 🤔
or soft-atheist
One is a position other one is belief
such terms :3
Yeah, but not both at once
...you have missed my point 💀
How did I? You simply said that you could be an atheist leaning agnostic person. How did I miss it?
If someone doesn't study a particular thing, how can they speak about that thing, man?
and you stated that it's not possible to be both at once.
I said that you can, just not in absolute terms.
Elaborate, bill
but religion itself refers to an institution so its better to separate religion and verses, we may refer to verses as literary material
Yes, and I re-enstated that you can't be them both absolutely
Agnostic atheism or atheistic agnosticism is a philosophical position that encompasses both atheism and agnosticism. Agnostic atheists are atheistic because they do not hold a belief in the existence of any deity and are agnostic because they claim that the existence of a divine entity or entities is either unknowable in principle or currently u...
It's a legit term
you never had the "absolutely" part there :3
now it's better
I fully agree with what you say, no one should ever allow themselves to interfere in your affairs with things that don't concern you, but you should do the same. I will never come to a Muslim country to spread Christianity, but Muslims should do the same with us in our countries, without imposing their values on us.
I worded it in another way which indicated the same thing
Yeah dude some religious folks are volatile
nah -w-
but now I can agree
Totally unrelated but
There's no way he said that 
Truly a pacifist, peaceful person
He did, I was there
Did he touched you?
hello
uh no
@slow storm epic delete
💀
Your honour, what did he say?
Rumours has it, he did some stuffs yk
It was unacceptable
BJP propoganda! Or something
Tell me more
@silver vault he's far far away from South Asia but he knows
That was only for @formal pilot
Well, it's not that far on a global scale
Instead of abusing eachother, try to engage in good discussion, it'll benifit y'all, just saying
Yeah, you are right, but I'm not arguing with anyone. U can see my msgs
He's just that unlikeable
Epic edit 😅
I'd rather chew broken glass than listen to that bloke for five minutes
He's good with history tho
Yeh totally, so good he forgot that ladakh was part of India
Finally deleted 😅 @cedar oar
And needs his handling
Your honour, that's geography
Totally not true
There's some historical stuff related to it
And ik chocolate broccoli personally, she always raice voice against violance against minorities (specially Muslim minorities)
Nothing happened on April 16, 2024!
But it's considered to be part of geography, Your Honour
out of context
Palestine is typing
what u think then hinduism religion does ?
Please 🤣🤣🤣🤣🚶🏻♀️🚶🏻♀️
Women are burn alive with their dead husband, so respectful your religion
Do you guys think WW3 is here ?
How respectful towards other religions these folks are
?def
ad hominem
Definition (adjective): appealing to personal considerations (rather than to fact or reason)
Do u know about "sati"
Entire religion is fake then?
Any religion which claims itself to be the one and only religion is fake
You should try to answer his questions/pov instead of creating new question
There's a process
I do, again. Cite proof
Where does it say anything about sati in Bhagwat geeta
He did not question any thing
It's like avoiding questions
I'm not here claiming my religion to be one and only true religion
But you guys are
Totally not true it was his pov
You should Elaborate him why it's true
Then you can ask questions from him, there's a process
Where does it says in Bhagwat geeta to worship statue, not eating beef and drinking urine!?
Cite the proof of it, where does it say in holy book to burn geeta
So you don't have any proof
Ok gotcha
I don't drink urine
Statue is an idol
You guys do it who doesn't even follow your religious scripture
Hello
Not a god
Show me the proof
Lol
Are you here to talk in air
So you are saying drinking urine is abusive ?
red herring fallacy is an attempt to redirect a conversation away from its original topic
@mental spear drinking urine is in islam
Vise versa
I'm never said that your religious scripture said it and you're telling me to find it in the book
Yeah, avoid reacting on posts tho
Ok irrelevant
It's the you who doesn't know even about your religion
I'm not even talking about my religion
Worshipping idol instead of God!?lol
You started yet you don't have any proof
So you
and?
What is going on with you are you good in the head ?
Are you mocking his religion?
What's happening
Classic ad hominem
I see
What we started, I think you just read two messages
Who gave you permission to mock his religion in what kind of islam do get this morals from @mental spear
This is not the way discussion goes, it's really sad
@thorny steeple are you using chatgpt to type here?
Where I mocked? He even mocked us
He said totally not true
Because you are talking in an abusive way to him
Where did he mock?
No, I didn't mock, I just disagreed with him lmao
Y u disagree with him, just let us know sir
He's not ready to listen
@mental spear you are in no place to discuss or debate about islam if you don’t have information about it
bro I'm not also mocking, I'm just spitting some truth and facts
Wdym
Guy jumped into hinduism, and he doesn't even know that I'm Sikh, and my religion is a bit different. So yeah 👍
Okay man, next time open this chat when you really want to talk/discuss
oww really now you took a U turn. Where was your religion when we were discussing and now suddenly!?
is this the religion that gives free food
Yeah, they supply free food to everyone
I never took any U-turn, you just assumed
Started insulting
All I said is, show me proof
You couldn't
I'm still interested in proof
if you're not hindu then why it hurt you?
Stalin would dislike that religion heavily
Insulting any religion is not ok ig you should know it
What is Happening here
Right
I ve read smt about debate or idk
Wow
So they can do it and we can't say!?
lmao
😭
When did I insult?
google it 💀😂
Who insulted you?
I didn't read but you insulting
I don't know, is there anything I said that need proof , you're creating logical fallacy! turning things to another when you can't answer properly

re__butt__al fr
I just realized it's serious chat
Good thing
That's what you did, he disagreed with your views and instead of clearing his doubts or discussing his pov you straight up started talking about drinking urine n all
no he wanted proof from geeta and what I said that drinking urine, is this thing mentioned in geeta like the burning one?
Classic
Give that dude prooof please
Sat Sri akal paji
Give proof
Proof
He got muted lol
We were talking about islam and he disagreed on a point, who brings the hinduism?
Hmm
Forget about the proof now
I saw it later
💀
There's a word
red herring fallacy
an attempt to redirect a conversation away from its original topic
how u know?
He will give proof in mute room
nah he will be back then give
brb, flare you're taking tooo long. I'll be here In a couple of mins again
In mute time he will do research
Is android for poor people?
Data reveals rich people use Android while pseudo rich uses iPhone
Science is a systematic and methodical approach used to understand and explore the natural world and the phenomena within it. It builds upon 4 fundamental principles for generating knowledge:
- Intuition: preexisting beliefs and axioms, such as our fundamental belief in causality
- Reason: relies on axioms like causality and is employed to draw rational and logical conclusions.
- Experience: observations and encounters that largely rely on the premise that the universe is consistent and governed by fixed laws.
- Sense: which involves more than just perceiving things; it also encompasses the detection of their effects, such as dark energy.
Adopting the materialistic atheistic view leads to the following problems:
- No reliable intuition: in the absence of a wise and all-knowing creator, there's no compelling reason to accept these preexisting beliefs and axioms are inherently true, thus denying principles like causality.
- No reasoning: without reliable intuition, it becomes challenging to draw reasoned conclusions that rely on intuition as a foundational basis, thus, leading to a lack of trust in one's own reasoning.
- Experience: Given that much of what we understand is seen as products of chance in the materialistic worldview, there may be less reason to firmly believe in the consistency and fixed laws governing the universe. For instance, under this perspective, water could theoretically exhibit unpredictable properties, behaving like fire or rock at different times, presenting uncertainty rather than definitive consistency.
- Sense: this is one remaining feature that could potentially be effective. However, without the ability to rely on observable effects—like with dark energy, which is an entirely intangible and elusive substance known only through its effects—it becomes challenging to trust in the existence of phenomena such as dark energy.
Therefore, the atheistic worldview is inherently incompatible with science.
not really it depends what you are buying
Don't spam
pseduo?
?def pseudo
Definition 1 (noun): a person who makes deceitful pretenses
Definition 2 (adjective): (often used in combination) not genuine but having the appearance of
Brb a fight is going on near my house
People who pretend as rich
You live in the UK and still don't know the meaning of it
he dropped fr🥵
Now you've made two bold assertions which require substantiation:
- "There is no God".
- "Any religion which claims itself to be the one and only religion is fake".
Who needs functionality and affordability when you can just flaunt your brand name right?
Nothings wrong in 2nd point
i don't
That's it
i did not
I'm into it ngl
Gimme time to read and digest
Lol. Seems like everybody hates when I type for long periods. I take care to proofread my messages carefully to ensure they're clear, grammatically correct, and contain accurate information.
What drinking camel urine?
is this quran?
Hadith, the source is at the bottom
what's hadith
No idea
thats better
@slow storm
Read the whole
Yeah
As serious as this chat
U took this pic?
? What is there to read, it's saying to drink camel urine as medicine
What prophet did with those
Yep, I do
Those who
I will post it again in some other chat
Are you using chatgpt?
I refuse to believe it's written by a human
Just answer me yes or no
Because then it defeats the purpose of this channel
I can assure its not gpt generated
Based on?
i don't think he uses it, but after a while, the flow of the discussion may pause during a long writing process
Well
Shiiit
Please don't say that, I was brain storming
98% droid score
How embarrassing
HE IS A SYNTH
Gpt 🤖
Covered by >100 media outlets, GPTZero is the most advanced AI detector for ChatGPT, GPT-4, Bard. Check up to 50000 characters for AI plagiarism in seconds.
Vivek caught him
It's true, they are already among us, I can't believe the Institute is so advanced now
- This isn't an argument; it's a complaint. It's honestly frustrating to see that this represents the pinnacle of intellect or engaging in intellectual discussion.
- Some medicine contains components derived from snake venom, I don't hear you complain about such things.
- The Hadith narrates an incident from the time of the Prophet (peace be upon him) where a group of people afflicted with illness came to Medina, where he resided. The Prophet advised them to use camel urine and milk as a treatment, and according to the Hadith, they recovered from their illness. It's important to consider the cultural context of this treatment, as it was known in their society. However, it's noteworthy that after their recovery, these individuals committed a crime by killing the doctor and stealing horses, which adds further context to the incident. That's the story of this Hadith in a nutshell.
With the camel urine?
? I just said that camel urine seems to be mentioned in reigious texts
??? Am I supposed to care, I was just pointing out something since someone else also mentioned urine
I don't care about what he did to some random people, I wasn't debating or arguing
after a while, the flow of the discussion may pause due to long writing process
I didn't even complain about camel urine so please read again instead of making up stuff, thanks
98% AI score again...
💀
I feel like this guy doesn't even read what I say and just passes it through the AI instead
You mentioned that it's a common theme, which is also untrue.
I apologize if I misunderstood your statement and interpreted it as insinuating that Muslims commonly practice drinking camel urine. It came across as insulting, and I'm sorry for any confusion.
Maybe he has Asperger's syndrome that makes him write this way, who knows
Who needs critical thinking skills when you've got a handy AI to do all the heavy lifting Right?!
i mean, it HAS a medical purpose but it was never mandatory.
It's a common theme, someone else mentioned urine in another religion so I thought about searching its cultural significance
It's like bringing a calculator to a math test and claiming you're a genius
Egyptian
I don't know any Muslim that drinks camel urine, it would imply the existence of hidden camels in the Arctic Circle
Who knew debating could be so automated
Humans are such simple creatures
Yeah I just pointed out that it's mentioned
what? 
💯
It's difficult to access camel urine where there are no camels, just like I don't think lingonberries grow in the Sahara
Why do you think that's relevant?
I rely on AI sometimes to detect unintentional errors in my text, and get insights to improve my writing style.
If you believe this is somehow undermining my argumentation, you're mistaken.
explain more watcha wanna say exactly I'm interested
?
I said what I said without any filter, if you didn't understand just read again
Simply put I live in the Arctic Circle so we don't have camels here, people would have a hard time finding camel products of any kind
i mean yeah camel urine comes from camels, lingo berries can't be found in Sahara, what exactly you wanna say 😭
im using grammarly free, its only change things like 'a' to 'an', 'the' to 'these', etc.
according to context
additionally google translate little bit
No, you don't use it for this, you simply copy and paste what it tells you, the texts you write do not reflect anything of your real thoughts
so you don't need to drink that, and actually if I have a camel i would never drink it tbh
i mean if you're a Muslim
if you ain't so still you don't need
I recall Bear Grylls using a dead snake as a sack to carry his own urine to drink it when he would be dehydrated
He said that you can only do so twice before losing any benefit to that practice
Please consider that cherry-picking Hadiths and making irrelevant comments in a middle of an ongoing discussion might cause confusion and assumption that you're intentionally aiming to portray Islam in a negative image.
i remember seeing something like that on national geographic
nah
Some true serious chat action, if you will
I've read previous messages and I did some research on my own to find out about the meaning of urine across religions
You missed a lot
Well it's true that science is built on axioms and pre existing knowledge but we don't follow them blindly, they're continuously tasted, according to your point scientific method requires a belief in creator
But in reality it requires experiments n all
I need time to response to all the point
I was not really actually asking it. It was just a satire question
Lemme cook
🤖 🧠
wait before you cook tell me what's the topic
You're burning this channel down!
It's really frustrating that the focus of the discussion shifted to directing assumptions about my actions and making claims about my writing style, instead of addressing the content of my argument.
This is from the Bible
Content of "your" argument or AI's?
This too, is from The Bible
2)No reasoning, how?
Reasoning is based on logic, evidence experiments not only on intuition
- experience
And it's also really frustrating to say that that writing style is yours and that those thoughts are yours when that's not true
I didn't even rely on AI to write this sentence at all. Anyways, wait in the queue, I'm in a middle of a discussion with @formal pilot . I'll be responding to your false accusations later.
i think I'll read the bible after those, I actually have the bible but i was too busy to start reading it
I'm curious about Christianity
I would like to interject a moment to present forward my sentiment of, "Anyways" not being a word. I believe people commonly mistake it for, "Anyway".
Only one reptile is capable of producing fully liquid waste to my knowledge
your server link ain't working
These are not false accusations, rather yours is all a mockery towards us, if we wanted to ask something to an AI we wouldn't be talking here
I don't know if that is urine or something else though
Yes, it's urine, surprising
Prepare for a long long ride
- reasoning
The consistency and laws of the universe are not assumed to be product of chance in a materialistic worldview. Instead they're observed patterns that held true across countless experients
Let's give you a water example as I can say you kinda like water
Boiling point of water isnt by chance, it's a constant physical property
i mean, urine is urine for any creature who pee
i don't mind, ik that bible is way longer than Quran but they are interesting
damn
4th point is about sence and you gave an example of dark energy
I'm really tempted to go full nerd mode on dark energy
Experiments primarily rely on cause-and-effect (causality) by subjecting variables to test and measuring the outcome.
Your argument would be circular if you rely on cause-and-effect to prove experiments are reliable, in order to use experiments to prove cause-and-effect are reliable.
Bish zip your mouth like capybara
Vivek clearly exposed your reliance on AI yet here you are shamelessly denying it like a fraud. So quit embarrassing yourself
They have slightly different compositions also animals expel wastes differently, mammals use urine and excrements while 99,999% of reptiles (ostrich excluded) use uric acid excrements
you don't need to cry so much about someone using the "calculator" in the math exam, just do the same or cry about it

@thorny steeple stop this AI man
nice
noted
You're defeating the purpose of this channel
Hello beings of the highest light

maybe just Google translate 😭
?
Calculator? I was being sarcastic there
what*
Whenever I don't know what to say I ask the chicken to debate in my place
what what
im now being sarcastic on your sarcasm
my cat do that
mmm, chicken, nam nam
it is already destroyed. There won't be the same chat
Deal with it
does anybody here use owo?
some questions can't be self answered
I'm in debt bruh pls someone help
some of my Friends
200k
I can answer any question
never thought I would fall in debt for owo bruh
God, world, philosophy etc
lmao
I can make it next day, BUT TODAY IS THE DEADLINE
hah
no one can answer anything
np , you may think so
Dude have ever did an experiment??
We're aware of circular reasoning, that's why we emphasize the peer review and replication of result
In science we don't use casualtiy to support reliability, we use empirical strategy/evidence
God punished his prophet Moses because he was arrogant and thought he knew everything, so who are you?
''all I know is...ManhwaFreak deserves Owo money''—Pluto
Which has shown constantly cause and effect relationship
Anyone interested in genetics and anthropology?
Hell yeah
I found my people!!
for reference:
The scientific method is not the only method of knowledge.
Dude i wrote full book on dark energy then I have to erase
Reasoning relies on innate beliefs and axioms as its foundation, principles like absolute truth and causality are absent in the first place as I previously mentioned. Given that, we cannot rely on it as the starting point.
It's evident when observing arguments that are fundamentally atheistic, such as universe out of nothing, or evolutionary processes that result in a highly complex and interdependent organic systems that are all subject to coincidences and chance-based mechanisms.
scientific experiments are published in scientific journals that are reviewed by other independent scientists.
You know the steppe people, right?
Common i can't argue with gpt
I will do everything possible.
Lmao
where's Gpt?
can't even understand a cat and says;
There was a person who was using it to make an argument 💀
There's no "absolute truth" in the first place. Everything we know about the universe isn't fixed and is constantly changing as we discover new things. Scientists are already questioning the standard model of what happens after the Big Bang when the Webb telescope showed that the universe didn't expand at a similar rate everywhere.
i fuckin agree
Yes, in the scientific sense this is true.
but this is not the only method of knowledge
Nothing fundamentally changes for a long time, knowledge is simply supplemented
Because we don't know exactly what everything is, our knowledge changes
There is an absolute truth, we just can't know it or we barely do
Hell yeah
I laugh at those who claim that “emperism” is all they have, lol
Now you're about to trigger my existential crisis
Therefore claiming to know "absolute truth" is idiotic, proud, overbearing, and selfish. Sorry not sorry.
yes it exists but we humans are so limited to know such things
Emperism isn't even an actual word
lol, “rationalism” then too😂
because they are connected
Idk, I'm perfectly fine with that. We don't know everything and can never claim to be. Beauty is in discovering new things.
Let's start nationalism vs globalism
Globalism 
Statue of?
Internationalism
let's go baby
It's like communism, looks good on paper
I don't like communism
This argument is used by everyone who defends religion. but it work both ways
It works fairly well at least in the EU
Experimenting, while relying on reasoning, is more accurately categorized under experience and sensation, not reasoning.
To prove my point about reasoning, explain to me without relying on axioms why is circular reasoning illogical.
Hypothesis is an assumption about something. We do research according to the scientific method to confirm our hypothesis. But that doesn't meant we're always right forever; it just meant our assumptions are confirmed for this time.
Einstein famously rejected and replaced Newtonian gravity, which is kinda considered "absolute truth" for people at his time.
this is emperism
globalism is a lolipop, powerful countries give to poor countries
Nationalism is best for survival
Reasoning - rationalism
Many European countries would be quite poor if they were too nationalistic to this day
I'm curious as to what you'll get on this test
Countries like Slovenia, Croatia, Estonia would be some of the poorest in Europe
The theory of gravity according to Newton is his hypothesis that he has tested and proved accurate to his assumptions.
But it became obsolete anyway
I also didn't always trust logic.
This should be orbitally manuevered to sling itself to #1218635314000560248. I'm suprised that that channel still exists
What about when war starts on food and water?
Nationalism will give atleast some opportunities to people in terms of getting water and food
Globalism will only benifit rich elites
We don't really have those in a long time, there could be rationing
Nationalism most likely will also serve rich people but gives an illusion of power to the nation as a whole
Idk. Religions are human constructs.
I personally am an agnostic - I don't know whether there's a god or not, and I'm not so proud to claim either position. I'm just a humble man with so few knowledge, so I won't assume something big about this world and force people to accept that my belief is most true.
You better get something close to this
Most Germans didn't become rich during or before WW2, there was just an illusion of a better future
If you're poor in a country your chances of getting water is higher
good man. but your beginning completely destroys your subsequent words.
@formal pilot
I hope you're not getting distracted during our small discussion and are mostly engaged in responding to my points.
the more science knows, the further religion moves away. It's just like that.
Bill, I don't get it. If humanity stops trying to kill itself. What's the harm?
I've to do brain storming to reply on your point, yk human mind is not that productive
@thorny steeple I'll mute you now
Anyway I'll get back to you with my response
Enough gpt
I mean, historically it is. If you want to drag this further then it would be a religious debate. Which I'm not keen to entertain. But to each their own opinion.
Gimme time
Yes... maybe this is why people in developed countries are less religious
No worries. 🤝
Give him a chance, he's really active here and over #💻|programming
He contributes insightful pov most of the time
People in developing countries are dump
My apologies, could you possibly explain the reason for muting me?
I wouldn't think so - as Marx puts it, religion is the opium of the masses. It gives them solace when they need hope. To me that's the main function of religion, as a coping mechanism.
People in developed countries live an easier life. They already have coping mechanism in the form of their wealth.
no, that's not the point.
At the beginning you accept “religion is a human invention ”, then you write that you are an “agnostic” and know almost nothing. What is your maxim based on? You should have refrained from such a loud start.
If you are an agnostic, you cannot neither deny nor accept. You can discuss, but do not present it as the ultimate truth.
politicians use religion to control people, but religion arose by its own, in an attempt human to explain the world around them.
Infact religion played a huge role in human evolution
It might be a good thing
I do not deny nor affirm god. Remember that religion is a human construct, while god, if he exists, would be a being beyond everything that exists. There's religions without god too (advaita hinduism, buddhism, taoism, &c.) and they're definetly human constructs as well.
I claim no knowledge pertaining to that subject. Religion, on the other hand, like all aspect of human society - economy, statehood, wars, &c. - can be studied through history and is definetly man made.
Religion keep people together it's not always bad
Just to get denied 💀
Yes
Lol
oh damn it. Good luck man!
If I were to pick a concept of god that makes the most sense to me, this would be it
Para Brahman or Param Brahman (Sanskrit: परब्रह्म, romanized: parabrahma) in Hindu philosophy is the "Supreme Brahman" that which is beyond all descriptions and conceptualisations. It is described as the formlessness (in the sense that it is devoid of Maya) that eternally pervades everything, everywhere in the universe and whatever is beyond.Par...
true
@thorny steeple wanna see sm funny?
true
Some people never learn
That's ok to report me
But he used chatgpt to report me
lmao
Ok
💀
next generation brain rot
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maya_(religion)
For me this is one of the most interesting concepts in religion.
The notion that all we experience is just an illusion compared to the reality of God is mind blowing. It's like we're just dots on a paper or lines on a drawing compared to deity. But somehow we're a part of it
Maya (; Devanagari: माया, IAST: māyā), literally "illusion" or "magic", has multiple meanings in Indian philosophies depending on the context. In later Vedic texts, māyā connotes a "magic show, an illusion where things appear to be present but are not what they seem"; the principle which shows "attributeless Absolute" as having "attributes". Māy...
It's philosophy
Philosophy is lame in my opinion
it's a part of religion too
just like the book of ecclesiastes influenced nearly every western philosopher
the philosophy is, that if you can express your thoughts with beautiful sentence, you have won.
thats poetry lol
philosophy-poetry same
Hell na, philosophy sucks
philosophy is the father of all science. People practice logic using philosophy first
Thanks to philosophy we have maths, flowcharts, calculus, physics, technology
why do you think it is lame?
@thorny steeple you're buddhist?
yes i am, why you asking?
@thorny steeple this is why
because under the guise of philosophy you can promote any nonsense
Just generally
oh okay then
Where are you from
thats secret!
what about you?
Wow
India/Bhaarat
@dapper laurel, you're Christian. Correct? I'd like an explanation for Joshua 1:18 please
What a coincidence, as just when I entered here again, you started typing
可愛いすぎる
Yes, I'm Christian and I'll try to answer this question. This bible verse seems rather harsh when compared to the the purpose of the Bible and the Christian religion, but it is correct to contextualize. The words of this verse are addressed to Joshua, successor of Moses, who will be destined to lead the Israelite people towards the conquest of the promised land. The particularly harsh words in the verse are used to try to "train" the people and make them obedient so that divine will is carried out, but it also teaches us to have faith and to be strong and courageous and have faith in God. Military discipline is also another aspect to consider, since at the time it was very important to have an army ready to defend one's religion from heretics or external threats, because, remember that being a heretic is a sin that will be severely punished by God.
What time is it there?
It's crazy, here it's 19:12
Central european time
@cedar oar Here's my answer, let me know what you think...
Thank you for your answer, however. Why are those words used to, "train" the people? Why not more serene things such as peace, comversion and/or tolerance?
Because there were different needs, unfortunately in that period all peoples were hostile to the Jews, their only chance to survive was war
I'm not sure, but I believe Joshua 1:18 is from the old testament
Christians also believe in the new testament for a reason
God could have just aided them if they followed his word, without all of that unnecessary, "discipline", no?
Then what is the old one for?
It's not that simple, the God of the Jews is different from the Christian God
I believe we're both talking about the Christian one
But this writing refers to the Jews, the Messiah comes later and it is a uniquely Christian thing
I'm confused. Why does it matter who it refers to?
I was not very accurate, I can tell you that the old testament It was very different from the New Testament, first of all it was written in a different era, in which war represented a normal social protocol, but sometimes the Bible also functions as symbols and allegories. Death, for example, can be understood as physical punishment or something like that
The old testament is mostly Jewish, so it doesn't quite conform to the new testament
arent the abrahamic religions are the same in their core
Man, this is confusing
except they say that the old one was corrupted by humans
I know that they're drastically different, however. If God is a being without limit to his power. Why is he not promoting peace and serenity there?
So, look at it this way, in the Bible there is a process of revelation of God, in the old testament the divine laws are highlighted, but while in the new one new teachings arise such as love towards others and forgiveness
So why were these virtues postponed until the New Testament?
We can say that these virtues are also present in the old testament, just think of Osea 2:19
Well, if they were present, then why not teach those too to the Jews? Are they not better lectures than war and destruction? Again, God could protect them, as he is omnipotent.
The concept is simple, in the Bible God is explained 360°, in the old testament the pact between God and the people of Israel is described, and for this reason God is described as punitive, holy and right. In the New Testament, other qualities of God are described, such as love and respect for others
They were present, but the Old Testament favored other teachings. Unfortunately they were different times, there was a very fragmented world and no one was willing to convert to a foreign religion, war was necessary
I shall continue this debate after dinner
Btw, where are you from?
Tag me as soon as you can
@dapper laurel i did not know that you were in funime
Yes, I am aware that I am a sinner
I have returned
okay
I should go out of there
do it then
Isn't there a definitive list of God's teachings? Instead of it being split into 2 places.
I left it rn
The wretched country of Armenia
i see that
There are the ten commandments
Not bad, it's a good country, a Christian country
Yeah, but other than that, the Old Testament seems to be more violent
Eh, it's a bad country. I loathe it utterly
They were different times, war was a common habit, it can be said that the real revolution occurred with the coming of Christ
I hope it can join the EU one day
Yes, it was a common thing, however. Why did God not protect his believers in another way other than preparing them for war?
Oh, me too. I could only wish it did, and that the British were in it.
I'm never gonna stop while I'm hard workin'
I am in a zone where you can't step in

At the time there was a different concept of God
Could God not change those concepts in his favour?
I can't explain everything precisely, I'm religious, but I don't study religion, I'm only 15 years old
Hey, me too! (I'm also 15)
God cannot intervene in human affairs, but he gives us the powers to try to avoid conflict. For example, if God gave me the use of my hands and I hit a person and say that it was God who make me do that, I'll be a liar
So he is not omnipotent?
Furthermore it can be said that in that verse the clash was inevitable, the land of the Jews was occupied and the only solution for the Jews was war
He is omnipotent, but he has no interest in intervening in men's affairs regarding war and conflict
Or, God could intervene with his divine powers some way or another
Why does he not try to stop it? It should after all, be an easy doing for him.
Otherwise all the wars that exist even now could be stopped with the intervention of God, but he somehow has to understand who is truly religious and who is not
Please elaborate upon that last part
This is the final judgement, God does not want to intervene in earthly reality, but will give eternal punishment to those who have been sinners
Seems kind of cruel
It is stupid to invoke God in useless human matters, rather one can ask for his help in spiritual problems
This happens in all religions, even the Jews believe in God, but this did not prevent the Holocaust from happening
Why is it useless? Billions suffer because of it
But the other religions don't matter here
On the other hand, those who are really religious in this world, many pretend to be religious, or they are casual. Today's generation is little close to God
But it is also true that these dynamics happen in all religions, so why treat Christianity as an exception?
I'm not treating it as an exception, this just seems like whataboutism to me. We were judging the Christian God's actions, not the other ones
Who are we to judge the actions of our God?
We are humans and can judge him. After all, we are suffering because of it
No, we do not suffer because of God, but because of what we do
And one of the main messages of the Bible is not to judge others
He could intervene and stop the suffering
Yes, I know you said that he doesn't concern himself with human affairs that much. But c'mon, man. He could stop the suffering of billions of innocent people
Also, @formal pilot, don't think I didn't see you
Goddammmmit
This is where free will comes into play, God gave men the opportunity to choose for themselves, we are the cause of our own evil
Sure, but according to Genesis, they were persuaded by satan, I think. Why must the entirity of humans suffer because of it?
Oh, God damn it
I don't want the arguments of a chatbot
You should've read what he said in that now-deleted courtroom, also his previous messages
What did he say?
He used it to improve his English, in short (missing details)
We have the possibility to choose between good and evil, if humans choose evil it is only their fault
This is false, he copies and pastes what chatGPT says
He's active here before the launch of gpt
He did mistake by copy pasting
But in general he's a good guy
I hope so
Yeah, but why do the innocent suffer because of it? God could do the right thing intervene in the suffering of billions
Aren't Good and evil subjective
The innocent suffer now to go to heaven
Well, according to Christianity, I don't think so
There is no need for their suffering at all. They could just go to heaven straight without suffering.
God is not subjective, evil can be subjective, but a normal person realizes what good and evil can be through conscience
Unfortunately this is earthly life, God cannot be stereotyped or idealized
Brb
God could still protect the innocent, but alright. I'd like another debate, this time about natural disasters. Why do they happen? Volcano eruptions, that stuff
maybe we shouldnt personify God
We are judging him by what is usually considered good and evil
if its real, judging wouldnt help
We were simply having a debate
tru, btw ur vocabulary is tremendous as what i see from chat
Why criticize his vocabulary???? If anything you should debate the concepts it expresses, not the words with which it expresses it. You're just offensive by talking in this way
or we can reevaluate the good and evil from a solipsist perspective d:
what
I remind you that the purpose of this server is to learn English
Was I not clear about something?
isnt tremendous mean big
it wasnt sarcasm
nvm
oh fürchterlich means horrific, thats why then, idk german much, i directly translated, u also did i guess
Maybe I just misunderstood
Unfortunately I get confused between languages sometimes
i didnt wanted to interrupt the debate, go on i just did wanted to make an addition
However, I don't think I have time to continue, I have some things to do
chill bros
He isn't, quite the contrary actually
Yes
I'm not sure why we would need to do that for the debate though
arent israelite's god just theirs, so arent they some kind of solipsist as far as i know
I'm not sure what you're implying here
I interpreted the adjective "tremendous" with a negative connotation due to tiredness 😅
The fatigue part is quite relatable
isnt judaism innate
Wait, please elaborate further
one cant convert to judaism as far as i know
so its innate i guess
from mother to child?
I believe there was a name for religions like that
This may make them solipsistic because their environment seems to be separated by a very definite line
No, I believe those are simply closed-practice religions
oh idk really much so i cant go further lol
I mean, you could technically consider them solopsists, depending on the definition you choose
it would be a very stretched definition :d
Kind of would be
But anyway, tell me more about yourself. What are thy reasons for joining here, thy religion, political stance. I can only wait to know more, as there is not much else going on at the current time.
im irreligous, maybe a naturalist(not sure about the definition) and politically opportunist i guess :Dhaha
Oppertunist?
I meant to inquire about if you're centre-left, leftist, centrist, that stuff
i don't think like a state, I think more like an individual because there are so many factors that will affect the state's decisions, i think my word is completely proportional to my personal power so i have no ideals to guide humanity from above
i say water flows and finds its way, we wont extinct
By, "a state" did you mean governments? If yes, they you may be an anarchist, which is leaning on the left. I'd suggest you try out this political test for fun.
yeah i meant the government, it feels the same 😄
You could consider yourself an anarchist then, also a leftist
Here are my results for the test by the way
🎭
Also, you should've said, "I don't like states/governments" as that is I highly believe, grammatically correct
i've done this test many times in the past and each time i got a different result, i guess my opportunism was expressed here haha
Perhaps you should try it for another time?
ok let me try d:
i may be against governments, but im not pro-chaos either
I am collaborative
My guy
We are an opp except for the first one
Flare has been typing for very long
Man must be cooking
flare just improvise, it gets better and better
equal opportunity is at the center of my answers
Hello guys! 👋
I've been unmuted, Alhamdulillah. Just dropping in to clarify the issue, as I see many people misunderstood the situation.
I do use AI every now and then to improve my sentences' clarity, accuracy, and conciseness. Using ChatGPT or any other AI models or services is likely to result in flawed argumentation, as AI models are trained on very limited datasets. I've never depended on any AI service to formulate any of my arguments; rather, only to make small adjustments to my wordings aiming for the gaols I've previously mentioned. Opinions are all mine, there is nothing that I copy-paste from any AI model. I don't believe this either undermines my arguments or is something to be ashamed of. If that was the case I wouldn't easily acknowledge that I do use it as I did in #🧠|serious-chat message .
I'll be attaching screenshots of how exactly I use ChatGPT or any other service to achieve this.
The reason for this clarification is that I anticipate some individuals who would spam "Chat Bot" or "You're using AI" any time I step in or chat with anyone, which would be very annoying given that it's completely false.
Just an additional note, I don't write word by word what any AI model provides except in times when I'm convinced this is the best wording for the idea I want to express. You can easily notice how I made multiple attempts in the screenshot I attached to find the wording that best suits the idea I want to convey. Hopefully you understand. By the way, I didn't use AI to even fix any grammatical error here. This is my regular writing style (My formal writing style).
Nah dw bro
I don't understand most of the words that are used here and always use such tools to translate for me
Many people actually do that
We are here to learn and using such tools to improve is actually a really good step 👍
I have some tools built into my keyboard
This new Samsung ai update is really helping me out
improvising is at the center of this server so gotta keep the flow of the debate fast
I took the test on the eight political values
Now this is something really weird coming from Muslim leaders 
Yeah, but to the point of direct or indirectly helping the Zionist regime? 
This topic hasn't Ended I see
Now it ends.
Thank god
no way bro is too good that he is gpt now
Is using chat gpt bring mute
Well
That's gd
Omg why did i laugh at that
it was funny
Just like CCP and KMT they hate each other but they are more hated the foreign powers
.
Not about religion and ideology but interest exchanges they have to corporate against extremism and terrorists
I'm a bit confused with your argument. It's literally define what practice is. Practice indeed has a beginning and is characterized by being repeated. What define "practice" even more is that it's the consistent repetition of an activity with a conscious decision to pursue improvement in a specific area.
The phrase "everything is practice" can have a lot of meanings. The saying implies that:
-
all our action are opportunities to improve our skills meaning we can practice good things and even bad things to be even better at those things.
-
Every task, no matter how small, is a chance to refine our craft, learn from our mistakes, and progress towards mastery.
-
It also mean that life itself is a form of practice. It's the journey of self-discovery itself.
but both can cooperate for a common enemy, over all even if they don't agree in some points they still share the same religion, the same god and the same prophet
the point is, we don't need more evidence to see how Arab leaders suck for Israel and usa, Jordan literally paid like 5m to defend Israel from Iran's drones and they said we were just defending our airspace
people being so fucked up those days

Hello beings of the highest light
L communism
Do comrade = communist ? 🤔
I just attack communists
I thought comrade “同志” = the people who has same ideal, ideology or religion with me
Um
Please don't start it again
No
It was a warfare last night
I'm sick of it
Ahh I missed it
We fought for flare now he's Unmuted
Now please zip your mouth, you're triggering our PTSD
There was Polls & courtroom it was like a legit court 
I'm getting disappointed
Why I missed it 
Ngl you're lucky
Welp

Now you'll get to experience it
Rip bozo 
@vapid hare I was reading about Iran and it's allies
Dude china is about to invest $400B in iran
They have a lot of proxies, the houthis, hezbollah and hamas (and maybe more idk)
Yeah it's like 400B in 25 years
Private army
16 billion every year damnn
Brb
They're a regional player after all, they wanna expand their influence and assert themselves more
Back
O:
China is investing in other countries like crazy
$2.4 trillion overseas investment from 2005 to 2023
@formal pilot wht made u an ex? its very rare to see a Muslim leaving his faith
Well I don't think it's that rare
It has something to do with science n all
😂ok say no more i got it
Aka the belt and road initiative
They wanna foster trade and economic growth worldwide while also furthering their own interests
They want to overtake America by investing and putting Africa in debt
serious chat remains serious after all😬
Whats worse: imf loans or chinese loans
Most of the money goes to countries with hella natural resources
So they can exploit natural resources
They're calling dips on them natural resources
"The only way to do great work is to love what you do. If you haven't found it yet, keep looking. Don't settle." - Steve Jobs
China buys more than 70% of global seaborne iron ore
Iron mines in china on a pause
First they'll eat all the iron from market then they'll sell it
For higher price
@formal pilot so now ur an atheist?
I guess they're investing hella money on countries with iron ore then (infrastructure projects)
Yeah agnostic atheist
Come back to islam and start your redemption arc
Agree 💯
I don't agree
Well, The Big Bang theory does not really attempt to explain the Big Bang as "origin of the universe". It rather describes the early development of our universe

Ofc its his choice, i aint forcing him lmao. Your life your choices, you do you 
Where's your role
Good job
What a nice Muslim
U robbed it IG 😂😂😂😂😂
Gates Bill
Cook tim
=
Money
Brb
Tyt
Back
They'll be dominating the world
@vapid hare do you consider Iran as a Muslim country?

Ofc they're muslim but just a different sect
Who tf is THAT sectarian to consider shias as not muslim 
Some do
Lemme show you something
@slow storm do you consider shia as Muslims?
Goddammmmit
The ummah is not that divided lmao
Saudi arabia and iran have set aside their differences for now ig
Retaliation to retaliation is escalation
What do think about recent Iran's retaliation?
Thanks to Hamas for uniting them!
Israel attacked their embassy first so I get the missile attacks are in retaliation but it may have been a bit excessive
Ah, yes, I propose we strike the common people of a country because their government launched a few missles on our embassy
It was a message, it wasn't deadly attack, countries do that to send a message
Shias are multiple sects.
Some sects are indeed Muslims, although their belief is mistaken.
Whoever proposed such an idea should get a promotion
All the world leaders will be promoted along with their loyal military personnel
Were there no civilian casualties
Hell yeah they're branch
@formal pilot
What is laughable?
The sects that are considered Muslims are minorities.
Their belief is mistaken
That's what everyone says about others
Every monotheistic religion:
What do you think about the ahmadiyya and other minor sects
Vale, what kind of Mulsim are you? Better not be the heretic kind, or else
Im the correct kind ofc 
Is your argument: every religion claims to be right, therefore all religions are wrong and laughable?
@vapid hare Iran's defence ministry said next attack will be deadly
Hell na
Let's hope they don't launch some secret nuke, because that could potentially spell the end of us all
100 idf soldiers dead less goooo
Eastern propoganda!
Im pretty sure they wouldn't reveal all of their nuclear facilities to the general public would they?
I don't know about those. However, I'm certain anyone who is not following the religion revealed to the prophet Muhammad peace be upon him is heretic.
Lmao
What is so laughable then?
Well Israeli intelligence is top notch, they'll find it
They believe that prophethood will continue on with another figure
Hi, another asking for a favor, do you have any sepolia eth in your meta wallet? All the faucet platforms require eth balance in my account, and just started getting familiar with blockchain, and the procedure is a little complicated for me to buy a real ether with fiat...
Jewish superiority, lads!
Are they gonna drone strike the facilities?? That would be catastrophic bruh
It was just a reaction, there's nothing laughable
Get the juice! 
Most important nuclear facility is literally under mountains it's safe
And other got really dense defence
