#š„Hot Takesš„
5861 messages Ā· Page 6 of 6 (latest)
@fossil barn these are lmcās dust they donāt look like normal galaxies dust rings bc lmc is a irregular galaxy
*stars *
show me a star cluster that looks like lmc if it does Iāll believe you ok
Yea just like every other galaxy and nebula has
They arenāt just stars too thatās dust and nebulas
What the
how does that at all look like lmc besides the fact they both have stars
Is it cuz it has a lot of stars ?
Idk Iām mildly just confused cuz lmc is big so itās easy to see lots of stars in it but I donāt see any resemblance in looks wise sure they both have lots of stars but every galaxy does..
ok if you ignore the tarantula like you said does it still look star cluster like, Iām using a better example as this is well processed and b2 and got I think a filter to make it nicer
When you donāt have a high fl I understand how tarantula makes the image good but look at all these other nebulae that look really cool around tanratula
without tarantula its nothing
Not really a hot take but imagine if we never learnt that taking an exposure will reveal more than just with your eye, which means instead of people competing to have most integration in a target, people compete for the most stupidly fast systems out there (for visual use) (also, ik people do this anyways lmao)
Lmc is way cooler than smc imo
The fact you can image a nebula on this galaxy is just awesome
Maybe, but itās there to stay (in our lifetimes at least) so itās awesome.
Ikr, smc has some nebulosity but nothing compared to lmc
LOL smc is all nebula
smc
@peak drum
Yes?
I know SMC has nebulosity but then it doesn't look like galaxy, lmc is just better
Lmc lame
Says the person who has never seen it irl
SMC is sick narrowband, broadband the nebula is too low contrast to image.
arguably better that LMC but LMC wins for variety of objects
lmc is a star cluster with nebula
Lmc is a Dwarf galaxy
Lmc is a satellite galaxy
Both a dwarf satellite galaxy
My wallet disagrees with this statement
I have pix but I'm complaining anyways
I'm too lazy to stack in pix
And will find any reason not to
One thing pix will never have is simplicity in stacking
With DSS I can load my images and walk away
And it does a good job
That's all you do in pix though!
Out everything in their corresponding slots, hit run
yeah well its not worth the effort to double click the pix icon
i would rather open dss
or siril
even siril is more simple than pix
honestly I'm just making up any excuse NOT to stack with pix 
no i admit pix is better but i refuse to use it
yeah will i dont and i refuse to use it
Same tbh, it takes 12h to run on my pc
But its definitely better
yes its so slow
alternative: dont use a ball head
shushush get tracked kid
jk lol
but do its awesome
im working on it
progress?
should only be a few more weeks
ooooooooo nice
i think ill probably get swsa gti instead of eqm35 because ive changed up the rig i want
will it be half the weight limit?
i plan on getting a redcat 51 instead of a newt and eqm35 would be oversized
abt
easily yeah
ah ok well oversized is fine if you can afford it cause you can always upgrade
yeah but ive been saving for a long time already, ill just upgrade the mount eventually
yeah just keep it nice and you can sell it
and also ive realized how bulky the eqm is, being able to squeeze it on a trip is important to me
ah yeah
i might buy it new, not that expensive and its easy to resell
yep
šÆ
widefield
polar aligning with a polar scope is quickly becoming obsolete with sharpcap/TPPA
no u
????
/asiair
so my friend said two point polar alignment is impossible/ or im just doing three point wrong but thats literally what the asiair does right?
The asiair can do a traditional polar alignment sharpcap style OR tppa
interesting
Not obsolete. Itās still very handy for travel.
Real.
Two point doesn't exist because the computer can't triagluate off only 2 points, the asiair, like @hearty cloud said, can do both normal pa with like sharpcap, or TPPA (Three point pa) (I am that friend btw lol)

Itās called triangulate for a reason!
which more accurate

tell me or i wont image markarian chain tonight
Bruh
Two point doesn't work so it isn't more accurate
In fact it's impossibly inaccurate, you can't get any precision
One point polar alignment
Point at Polaris using eyeballs
Ez
Itās cheap, easy, and fast!
fr
ah no mine doesnt triangulate it uses its big brain
it say hmm well it moved this far from the first point that means its 100 degrees from correct
do not image leo triplet
Chicken
You can just⦠go around and find random unnamed hydrogen and name it btw
Find some pillars? Name it the CNB nebula
Some other "Opinions" made send because they were the opposite of some popular opinions, but this why just what...
i lost 92% of my braincells reading that
Bro it es 7 in the morning what are your expectations
Ah i can definitely understand that
i hate mornings
Oh no donāt let Godzilla read this
Nooooo
same
Everything>clipped background
how is that a hot take
Cap
I would prefer a decent image with a clipped background to a over topazed basically AI generated astro image
No
Just don't stretch as far then tbh
It'd look better than both
this is š§ take
ā¤ļøāš„ take is like ''i like seeing pictures with a clipped background because it is like the dark in space if you look out a rockets window''
( I do not think this)
sho palette looks garbage 
that is definitely a hot take
hubble palette is ugly
Nah, I think it can look nice sometimes... like when Hubble does it but I do think it is overused and overdone by amateurs and often it is not done well which gives it a bad reputation
IT DOES
Then yell at zegery he disagrees
Hot take: SHO is the best narrowband palette
HOO imo
that's 2nd place for me
Upside down running man nebula looks like the eagle nebula
Best take
HOO is so cool
Probably because it's the closest to a natural look
i agree
looks like a nurse shark

Astrosurface is better for planetary and lucky imaging deep sky then Autostakkert
And nobody has ever used registax for stacking.
If you use registax for stacking
Watermelon pet about to say "registax > all stackers"
For planetary Iād say theyāre identical, Astrosurface is definitely better at dsos tho.
Watermelon will say registax is best for ds narrowband stacking
YES.
Photoshop best for planetary stacking
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
pencil and paper is better for stacking. go pixel by pixel. you mustnt trust strange photoshop code
' 10 x 2 minute orion nebula '
https://www.elite.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/stacks-of-paper.jpg
Love the detail. The stacking really brings out the layers of orion nebula. And the sharpness is paper sharp
and you dont got to worry about compression
EAA is a little bit wird, just du Astrophotography or Visual, not some wird mixture.
frrrrrrrr
lucky imaging DSOs for the vast majority of people is just copium to make up for poor gear combos/choices
Hot take: The Orion nebula can actually be a pretty difficult target - it is very difficult to get the faint dust around it while also making sure that the core isn't overexposed, I the brightest part is the most difficult to get right...
š
It can be done but most of the images I see look unnatural somehow, idk
in what way
Didn't want to use anyone's in the server so I found this online. To me, somehow the nebula part look weird eventhough the picture as a whole looks fine.
It's over sharpened
Yep
Itās hard to process well, very easy target overall though
I mean anybody good at processing galaxies will do fine
ezzzzzz
Its true
m42 is extremely high in dynamic range
the trapezium is very easy to blow up and clip
you can get it to look like this by adaptive forms of stretching or helpful tools like HDR multiscale transformation in pix
Sometimes a clipped background can look good
I see a clipped background and automatically think "there's data being left on the table"
I do the opposite, I think āwhat are they trying to hideā
show ONE example
bottom one better by alot the colors are better in the tops galaxy
You know the truth, you just say the complete opposite to annoy people
The top one is better
Idk wym I always say the truth
@misty marsh...
Motor drives you put in manual mounts are underrated
There may not be a lot to them but I still never see people say one thing abt them
AYO DELETE
I did have a eq1 with motor drive and could do at least 30s subs at 300mm... Without being able to do exact polar alingment...
the bottom is better, the top one has horribly compressed highlights
plot twist
See thatās what Iām saying, I can keep an object centered for more than 10 minutes. Itās like having a star adventure
To polar align I just point my mount near Polaris no polar scope or apps
Big difference is the price, I paid 40⬠for the mount with the Motor... XD
The motor I got was like 62 dollars and the mount was probably around 200
Astro isn't this expensive
These are Picture with 100⬠equipment, and there all are under an Hour of time.
So I could have produced much better pictures with more clear time and experience...
Real.
Your get what u pay for
there isnt a more beautiful piece of the sky than the elephant's trunk
this should be the saying instead of "you dont have to be rich to do astro". sure you can do astro for 0⬠with your phone but guess what youre going to be getting results light years away from what someone with a planewave will get, heck even the differences between dslrs and dedicated acs cameras is massive
Bro like most of the galaxies are way more beautiful
lemme pull up a good elephant's trunk image and a good galaxies image
the bode's is from bray falls and the elephant's trunk is from gazingoutwards
one (bode's) is taken with I think a 14in rc and the other is with a 75mm astrograph refractor
honestly i disagree on both fronts, i like elephant processing more than bodes
tbf i feel like the bright pink ha on bodes is kinda ruining it
wrong, it looks good š
its so much brighter than the rest of the galaxy though
this may or may not be a hot take
@rough prawn
I think it's sexy tho, seeing star forming regions in other galaxies
Wronga
@subtle drift what
Thoughts @rough prawn
the bodes is nice the trunk is dog
too much denoising on that b
and that 14in rig isnt even his.. like its owned by someone else and he just plays with it to promote sierra remote obs
i think
shouldve noted that trunk isnt full res since I couldnt find the original I could only find promotional compressed images on radians site which prob makes it look over denoised
oh god not the radian site
nit the opt site
look for IOTDs from last year or 2 fro good images
in astrobin
not astro hot take but dogs>cats
incorrect
im more of a cat person
HAH 3-1
But other than entertainment, cats are practically useless. Dogs actually can have jobs and be productive
as pets cats are better
as slaves sure dogs can be trained better š¤Øš¤Øš¤Øš¤Øš¤Øš¤Ø
Lol cats will murder you the first chance they get
My cat doesnt even use his claws when playing
that only happens if you try to own your cat
dogs arent slaves, my mothers dog works for my mum literally for fun. Also cats kill over 30 billion animals per year compared to dogs kill only around 30,000 animals per year
So? nature lol that happens
and whos watching every cat and everything they kill
cats were introduced into many countries and are the main pest, take new zealand for example, about 1000 years ago it was completely pest free with no preditors, since the arrival of european people, they introduced rats, which killed birds, so then they brought ferrets to kill said rats, now ferrets are a problem, so they brought in cats to kill ferrets, cats are currently one of the biggest pests of nz
skill issue
...
Yes 100%
Same in au. I hate cats
I'm not alone!
you can earn the trust of dogs easily. But for a cat you have to work hard, only then will it trust you.
Is that a good or bad thing
cats dont have a caring instinct like dogs do
they do
dogs are pack animals, they rely on others much more than cats
Only for their babies tho 
just that they think you are another cat/kitten and need to be taken care of
they are a solo animal
ye
My cat thinks she's the one who needs to be taken care of, won't leave me tf alone and demands petting
but imo, cats are slightly better than dogs
She's 14 years old and has some sort of cat dementia š
dogs have the pack instinct, so they actually care about you.
some cats follow their owners to the bathroom
And cats are generally cleaner animals
like so that they can protect them
They're much lower maintenence
my old cat was horrible
That's a skill issue and a half
large dogs can knock over your rig while cats cant'
Yeah that's very true - he says with three Bernese mountain dogs
cats will sit on your rig. which is worse
more stability 
prob camping on the tracker
tripod tray 
or the dew heater
inside your 12" newt
Lower center of gravity ez
your guiding gets worse when it purrs
Unless you've got a shitty Amazon basics tripod, probably not
thats actually more stability lol
except if they move
I think you overestimate how powerful a cats purring is
still, i have had multiple cats and multiple dogs, the dogs are farrrr nicer to you.
simple solution imo is to suspend the tripod tray on springs to absorb vibration
On rubber pads
they coexist?
They do indeed
nice though
My cat and three dogs coexist nicely
well our old cat used to
My cat was incredibly chill until she got dementia or whatever
ive looked after probs 5 foster dogs and 8 cats. all the cats shat on the carpet. the dogs licked you and slept next to you.
how though
my cat had diabetes
actually no
im mostly neutral but lean more towards cats
Opposite with my cat
because they are smol
My dogs aren't actually allowed in my room either
But they usually push my parents off their bed
see
ive had chill cats too. nice but still not the same love as a dog
you can accomodate cats anywhere
only exception is pocket dogs
where you can literally stuff them into your pocket
woudnt recommend that
I hate small dogs, so yappy
yea
why?
Because they're yappy
oh they yap
And typically more aggressive
well voice changer ig
Chihuahua compared to saint Bernard cuzzy who's eating a child
nah, they are actually cute
Nah
who named chihuahua
Dog owners think their babies are perfect and could never do any wrong
Cat owners accept their overlords
bruh wtf are you talking about
That means you tried to be your cats owner
Rookie mistake
Dogs>>>cats
100%
Both are great but dogs are much better
Plus I'm quite allergic to cats so they make me die whenever I'm near them which isn't fun
I donāt die but I sneeze of cats
how did you discover you die when you go near cats?
Dogs will care more about you, than your cat. Your cat would eat you if it could.
So would dogs, just dog owners refuse to admit it
...I don't actually die
But I went to cousins who have multiple cats and was in pain the whole time
Lots of sneezing and itching
Then I get home only to realize the cats had temporarily murdered my immune system so I immediately got sick
?
First image was just something I found online bottom image is a screenshot from stellarium
lol
āUglyā
More consistent
ok thats an exceptional image
if you look at a more typical one it really isnt that great
i mean i wouldnt say its ugly but other galaxies are way better
It seems like ones with low integration look like a floppy fried egg
seriously
but then with more integration you start to get the glow on the bottom edges of the galaxy which makes its shape look nicer
doesnt change the fact that they look so much better than andromeda
M33?
too faint
Well your right but my point is it can be a absolutely insane image with some dedication
If he put that much time into something else it would be way better lol
Nah
Hello
i got a coma corrector and guiding cam is in customs
major imrpovements coming
W
and if so, did ya get the $$$ you were lookin for
Yep
nniceee
Az GTi
ive heard very nice stuff from it
If you get a good unit, certainly
svbony= L ratio
you get what you pay for.. simple as that
Fr
Svboner
I have a cat and a dog and I can confirm that they do as much as dogs
Fr
I never understood why people loved this nebula so much and I still don't
THIS
Saying that on an astro server where most people are probably introverts is a bad idea
Like barking at everyone for no reason?
oh I full well know
only dogs of people who dont know how to train them properly bark randomly
The problem is most people don't know how to train their pets properly
exactly, humans shouldnt have any pets, its cruel basically
well, I guess some animals are saved by humans
but
yk what I mean
I'm convinced there should be a kind of formation before anyone is allowed to have a pet
Yep
Having a dog (or basically any other animal) you educated well, you respect and you let go in nature enough is fine but those people that have no idea how to raise their pets so they hit them all the time because they aren't "good slaves" and they keep it locked up in their city appartements all day...
And they end up leaving them on the side of the road because they realise a pet is an actual living being that have feelings, needs and requires some investment
yeah I have this huski-lab mix and when we picked her up from her old house, she had been in a closed off room for over 5 hours without airflow or food or water
This is her now, much healthier and happier
orions facing up usually look a lot nicer than the ones facing to the side
unique choose of editing style
Itās called narrowband
its called false color
Both
It's called supremely funky
It obviously has either siii or more likely ha, alongside oiii (I think?) But there's no red nebulae in the galaxy itself
Probably used some wild subtraction method
Or I'm just being dumb
...I'll be honest it isn't the image I'd pick if I were looking for my favorite m31 š
Neat style, just not my thing
Narrowband addition for that target is insanely cool, but also insanely hard to get right
Iyop
Andromeda looks great as long as you get the fainter parts out. And the ha even if just a bit of it
Yeah but if you sink the same effort into something else it would be way cooler
nah a really good andromeda is gonna be way sexier than a much harder target with the same effort
Quite a bit of other targets (especially galaxies) will look like shit at the same focal lenght and exposure time
There is really not that much efford required for a good andromeda shot
And the result is an andromeda shot that looks the same as everybody elseās
It is the same with other target tho....
For example orion nebula
I also think Orion is overrated
But I think you can have a unique image for lots of targets
Especially in narrowband
Not rly overrated. It is just that m31 and m42 are big and bright. Great for beginners
oh yeah the constellation is great but i think m42 is kinda ugly
Absolutely, it has one of the most beautiful nebulas (if not the most) āthe angel nebulaā which rarely gets attention
I mean.... Apparently it is quite hard to image
Could be wrong tho
It requires a fairly high fl
Absolutely beautiful though
Kinda almost reminds me of a tiny rho
Sun>moon imaging
I find sun imaging way more fun as thereās almost something new everyday
Plus h alpha sun images are so stunning
Waaaaaay more expensive tho
Plus could be super dangerous if you donāt know what youāre doing
Moon just needs a widefield scope
You can also get nice earthshine images and mineral moons
You need way more expensive equipment to get good sun images, as good moon images.
But yes the H Alpha stuff is really sick
You can still get good white light stuff and thatās very cheap to get
It's me again, I have another argument to start. Which side to craft a minecraft axe? Do you do the blade to the left, or to the right?
Personally I do left but that is because of muscle memory
I loose seconds doing right side
minecraft.. dead game
better than the 2d variant
was great when it was old but got ruined with too many updates
Terraria>minecraft fight me
you're absolutely right
terraria fans rise up
that's just microsoft
imagine choosing to play the 2d low res remake of the most popular game of all time
It's not even a remake the games aren't comparable
The only similarity is that they're both block games
š¦
I wanted to be hank schrader but apparently the funny spaceship game is banned here
Among us?
Arthur, Don, William and also AJ
That game is dead
Its banned for a reason
Someone called?
I didnt say anything
I said a bad word š¦
How did I not know im
Haven't been here that long lmao
I mean I get why it is
People are...
But also what has society come too
Age of empires II (definitiv Edition) is THE best video game.
Terraria enters the chat
Ksp is currently way better then Ksp2
My personal favorite game is hollow knight
Dark souls 1 and terraria are up there too
Tf2 is superior (pls dont bully me pleaseeeee)
geometry dash is clearly one of the games of all time
although I like satisfactory more I just can't stop playing GD
Mh idkkkk ark>>>>>> just cuz
"hot take"
Rack and Pinion > Crayford focuser
Bro š
Dual speed focuser is way better than single speed
š
šæ
triplespeed focuser is better than dual speed
Nah it's objectively not
Yeah I agree
It went from legendary to simply good imo
But it still has so many possibilities
Some people created a Redstone computer capable of playing Minecraft or raytracing... And I'm currently working on a calculator
calling it dead is just objectively wrong when it still has the most monthly players
for comparison lol
dang
fr
@fossil barn would use a Hyperstar with a Dslr...
Is that a question or a statement?š
I would say statement
Dslr would take up too much space and not work
Who are you, and why do you have his account
Watermelon pet said something that ISN'T an incorrect hot take??
Starless pics look ugly
sometimes
Wrong + bad opinion + wrong again
- ratio
Yeah lmao, I've beat 110 demons in that game, including 4 insane demons
give watermelon their account back
Depends
If it's a bad image, not having stars usually just makes the bad things more noticeable
Otherwise they look pretty sick, though I generally prefer stars
depends on how good your stars are 
That's too lmao
I wouldn't say ugly or at least not always, they are a bit weird and especially unnatural though
It appears that was a successful hot take
Truckers shouldnāt legally be allowed in the left lane of a highway
only in some circumstances they can ... such as avoiding slower vehicles etc..
People in the UK:
In my state theyāre consistently the slowest vehicle
Yeah, I was so confused
Does the speed of vehicles vary between regions
In the US yes
In OK, thereās a cryptid that looks exactly like a lifted pickup truck, and it appears behind you in the left lane no matter how fast youāre going in said lane.
And it rides your butt until you get over
Even if youāre going 20 over
šæ
šæšæ
NASAās processing is bad
huh
u good
@fossil barn since when is this considered bad ?!?!?!?
Sometimes is bad
Wolf rayet star
image...

it's out of collimation, bad coma, out of focus
no
if you cant prove it yourself dont even try
what's wrong with the processing?

@fossil barn its infrared.. do you expect some dust behind it , its pure blackness of space at those focal lenghts .. get a grip
its literally detecting HEAT ...
Nah but itās clipped and if itās clipped itās garbage
Idc what itās detecting
it all depends on the target
Itās garbage if itās clipped
what's clipped
Ur pfp
@fossil barn how about you take a chill pill or a break..
Iām not the one that replied to me šæ
im not the one writing stupid sentences
what
Me either
#1033998204993282098
Yk not all clipped images are bad, especially JWST those images are insane
Watermelon pet thinks my markarians chain isn't clipped but my lagoon is??
Petition to kick watermelon pet
actually they are
those arent clipped
It isnt about that it's about you
does this sentence even make sense LOL
btw it was your Other process that was clipped
#deep_space_pics message this one
it very much does yes
Stop trolling people by acting like a child and purposely saying dumb things for attention
you're not impressing anybody
Hot takes really turning into a very personal discussion
cough cough caphe cough cough
First time in hot takes?
fr fr
Why you hating on my man Watermelon, ist just his Opinion... š§¢
Lol calm down, it's hot takes and it's litterally watermelonpet's trademark to say (extremely) controversial things here
And imho nasa's processing is good but often nothing more
@hearty cloud @narrow summit its fine, I dont even know why I am here I dont even follow this, it only comes up as reccomended by discord itself smh
Tbh it is kinda funny
Given how much of astrophotography is automated (tracking, shutter release, stacking etc.), it's not really you taking the pictures, it's the robots
That's the same as saying, your not driving the car, the engine is...
I actually went to a really neat talk this weekend about just this
The idea that in the future, computers will be doing most of the work
Though he also was very passionate about the idea that autoguiding needs to die so-
Except its a self driving car that doesn't properly turn on half the time and you need the skills to fix it
"you didn't capture this timelapse , the robot did"
thats like saying 3d modelling isnt real art because the computer made the image not you
That's like saying you didn't made a baby, your cells did
It seems people doing understand what I'm saying
It's all so automated these days that all you do is turn it on
Yes.
As someone with
Not full automation but
A lot of automation
You still have to set it up which takes effort and isnt as easy as turn it on
Anyone who has a full rig knows this
It takes effort
If you think astrophotography is "turn it on and leave" then you're wrong
Sure that's all automated but that's not what most people use?
The market share for dwarf is low
modern setups still trend towards that
yeah
Setup is hard man. Hard enough where some people don't even set up on clear nights
Thats like saying daytime shots with AF or auto settings aren't yours because "the camera did all that for you"
except your camera automatically points in the right place and automatically opens the shutter
That doesn't mean it's not your photo
Astrophotography takes way more effort than you think
When I was untracked I thought getting a mount goto and all that would make this hobby easier
While it improves my images dramatically it makes the hobby way more complicated and harder
So many factors going into the setup
On whether or not it will work
So many problems you encounter that you have to fix and any of these problems could ruin the imaging session.
Tracked doesnt mean effortless. It takes work
Can relate
It takes me like 2 hours because there is always some bugs. It's different every night too
And now, when it gets dark at 10, there isn't much point unless you plan to image until dawn
Plus, I literally have no automation
Tell me you dont do serious astrophotography without telling me you aren't doing serious astrophotography
you do realise where this is
But that aint a hot take. That is just you not knowing shit about astrophotography š
idk man you seem pretty riled up about it
ye it is automated
uh oh! somebody doesnt know the difference between a hot take and a dumb take!
...I mean they aren't exactly "wrong"
Yes, it is automated. Yes, for some people (remote people especially) it is a matter of selecting a target and pushing a button, but that doesn't account for the work they put in assembling the setup, troubleshooting, etc. Also processing is easly at least 50% of ap, if not more. Automation isn't bad, it's good if done properly. There's a reason that just about every serious research observatory built now is automated
Now I don't love these commercial robotic telescopes like dwarf and stelina for a variety of reasons. I also think that, for now, there is a ton of value in starting with a more manual setup when it comes to learning how things work, the sky, etc. But honestly if they made it work with Eq rather than alt az they could be pretty awesome.
I think you can get a wedge for the dwarf
Nahh. I am sure he hand tracks with his scope and shoots on film , without a shutter release
Becouse u know... Digital is automated. If you shoot digital you should at least debayer the images yourself. We dont want stuff to be automated
God forbid. Otherwise it is all just automated and a robot took the picture
Also don't stack or use any Computer Calculate everything yourself.
They do near the upper end. Once my flats panel arrives, all I do is polar align and click the start button on my sequence.
If I ever get a dome/go remote, then itās literally just click start
Ok. But the upper end is basically the top 1% in astrophotography world
well it still took a lot of effort to make that rig so the images are yours
Not realllly. Just need a minipc, eaf, fw, and flats panel
Give us the take
If you want it to work well without problems than you also need a very good mount
Eq6r is probably the minimum if you want problem free experience
And now the cost is up to around 2.5k and we haven't even talked about cameras or scopes
alright
editing the pics and like changing the colours makes the images not real and therefore bad
Troll moment
oh no
you have no idea what you're talking about
What so even increasing saturation or doing color calibrating also makes pics bad?
not even a hot take its a wrong take
š
lmao
Croissant>croissant
Piss>shit
Old version was better nglgonnalie
Yeah. But i dont wanna be banned from this server . Idk what mods consider offensive so i will stay safe
Lol fair enough
depends on the dogs and cats
some dogs are cats and some cats are dogs
but 90% dogs are dogs and 90% cats are cats
as we say over here
INCORRECT ā
You should see MY uncalibrated pictures
It would definitely change your mind
Last person I heard saying this was a flat earther/space denier/nasa is lying to you/open your mind
Just sayin...
Flat Earth < Veliciraptor shaped Earth
Shin Godzilla or 2014 Godzilla
What?
dw guys im working hard to come up with more shit-takes
not to be confused with shiitakes
please stop trying to copy watermelon pet
you'll never be him
I'm not trying to be him
I am merely going mildly insane
anyway, spending more than like 30 min on 1 target is a waste of time, why spend hours on 1 thing when you can get like 20 different things in 1 night
wrong take
99% of objects arent going to be bright enough for 30 mins of integration
nuh uh
This one
Itās very hard to do my awesome job
That is called EAA
ngl this is actually a smart idea, then you can see which stuff you want more data on and then do another 30min another night along with 19 new targets
Imagine just disappearing off the internet for 8 months and then you suddenly appear with 20 new images all finished last week
Shin Godzilla is horrible
While 2014 wasn't the greatest it did zet up the Legendary monsterverse with fantastic sequels like King of the Monsters and especially Godzilla vs Kong
I can only think about Godzilla-Eminem whenever the movie is mentioned. Good movie though
Kong Skull Island is the best Monsterverse Movie
Kong was great but man...Kong vs Godzilla is epic
Yes but also the 2014 one was such a scary and interesting movie for 7 year old me...
i realized today that may 4th was may 4th and what may the 4th be with you meant
it is in fact not a smart idea
if you want to get a usable image of anything that is not a good idea
nuh uh
Why?? If you are not sure which objects you want to image, you can always search for photos on astrobin...
Amateur astrophotography is pointless since NASA has way better telescopes and have already taken pics of all these things
Thats what my dad said about doing this
god we thought watermelon pet was bad
Watermelon pet should be kicked
Anyone spending time only here and in general needs a psychologist/psychiatrist
he has only 6 astro photographs in this server and he joined basically almost 10months ago
now that is definitely a hot take
i call it medically correct
I call you wrong
So let me get this straight: there has to be a shitpost every day here otherwise some people don't get enough drama in their day?
once you spend all ur day playing games on singleplayer mode like watermelon pet.. anything dramatic with social agenda is a highlight of ur day
I mean, I exclusively play single player cause I don't wanna deal with my weird schedule and other people being involved in it
yeah im talking single player because anything social wise becomes a drama.. hence this forum
the man probably spent more hours here than shooting images his whole life
Images of only m33 core are ugly
you may be quiet now no one said you have to be in hot takes
i exclusively play mp otherwise im bored out of my mind

when am i quiet
idk why r u asking me
read what you wrote
Iām jk
Okay tbf. This is the first good image of m33 core i have seen š . Every image i have seen of it looked soft even tho it wasn't really. The ha regions just look like smudges
well good, cuz thats hubble
that simply proves my point that amateur astrophotography is pointless as NASA has already done it much better
Poop
no.. nasa doesnt have time to do half of the shit amateurs do
maybe if they took 1% of the military's budget they could
how many amateurs are studying near-earth asteroids and comets vs dso's already studies by space telescopes
Im not studying them I apart of the best crew for them..
Close enough
here at least 1 person here
Near Earth Objects..
All the Messier aren't that far away

Toast everytime i see ur name i loose some
you're welcome
you too
M1 is only 3.7035340 (x 10 to the power of 16 - no one cares about the brackets) miles away
I ain't readin allat
Actually don't read it
it's kind of agreeing with you
Didn't read all of ot
oops
lmao
Deleted it
Why didn;t the Hubble discover that moon
huh?
they have probes for that
Well why didn't NASA's probes find the moon then
budget, take just 1% of the us military's budget and give it to nasa
and again, maybe amateurs do make discoveries of jupiter's moons, but then why are they all taking pics of the same 5 dso's instead of jupiter's tiny little rocks
Cause they look better
And are probably easier to find compared to a tiny speck
but an amateur still did it.
but NASA has way better pics already
Why don't you go work for NASA then instead of using your minuscule scope(compared to the Hubble-probs not actually small in real life)
im 15, british, and do visual
wow im surprised
surprised by what?
Why do anything then if somebody has done it better?
I mean why are you breathing, some one can probably breath better than you
Not saying you shouldn't breath
Sound a bit threatening tbh
Most hobbies are intrinsically pointless, but people enjoy them which is the point
Like telling people playing music is pointless because professional musicians do it better, itās not the point to be the best
@shell quartz dont tell me you are about to stop posting here (anywhere on server) because there are better people than you here so its pointless to compete...
on anything
Bro wtf everyone chill-
There's value to anything that makes you happy. You don't need any more justification than that
And there really are places where amateurs can and are doing important science in collaboration with nasa and other organizations
It also is just helping to inspire the next generation of astronomers and engineers
Also I'm fairly certain you are trolling. If I am right... honestly you're doing a good job
Bro I know he's talking Bs but don't say anything against visual.
I felt like he was sarcastically saying he was surprised at TTās age