#🔥Hot Takes🔥
1 messages · Page 5 of 1
Exactly
And the fact that many of them at some point were quite possible galaxy cores
They're literally the skeletons of ancient dead galaxies
Can confirm
powerseeker > AVX
Bruh your trying to be @fossil barn
Ah fame comes with copy cats 💀(joke)
To be fair it isn’t all that far off 💀
Teach me your ways
Just think of something objectively good and helpful, then call it overrated
Tbh tracking mounts are overrated. JWST doesn't use a tracking mount so they're bad. All you need is a big dob and if for some reason you just have to have tracking put it on an az gti in az mode bc alt az better. Untracked gang!!1!!!1!!1!111!
JWST doesn't suffer the symptom of earth rotation, it doesn't need a tracker.
Yes but jwst doesn't use eq mount so no one should use an eq mount bc eq mount bad bc I said so
If NASA had JWST on earth, they would likely use some sort of tracking mount.
...This is a joke...
ah i see, i thought so. Just never know with people nowadays lmao
I was just playing off of this
Pixinsight, SiriL, and Photoshop are overrated
SiriL has a capital L for a reason
They really do suck, idk why they get so much hype
I just realized Kerbal made this forum
I thought you made it for the longest time
Nope wasn’t me
No wrong
First make Lmc think your really dumb
Then post totally accurate takes
Sunrises are underrated
Aw wtf my message
Center balance > equatorial
alt az > eq
Assuming that's ironic bc that's all this is anymore
Well I'll do an unironic one
Dust and dark nebulae are the best targets by a mile
Also northern and Southern hemispheres are pretty even
Both have orion, north gets cygnus, taurus/perseus/casseopeia, and the far north (ursa major, minor, cepheus)
South has carina, vela, mw core, clouds, and a couple super nice molecular clouds
If done right yes. No meridian flip etc. More compact.
More stable if designed right
haha
Newtonians are best on EQ and fracs are best on Alt-Az because of diffraction spikes
mineral moons can look cool but not when they are done like this, this is just too much saturation and sharpening
Looks like its been taken over by some kind of slime mold
Ofc it’s Andrew mccarthy
He’s like bray falls but worse
"worlds clearest picture of the moon"
Sure, and I made the best picture of crab nebula
andrew mccarthy has made good images ngl but: he uses topaz and is got very odd images and i mean very odd but gets heavily praised for it by people who know little to nothing about the images
like this is a good image because he processed it normally and not crazy styled/apod styled
Mars looks too red/orange
The moon's saturation though? Looks really nice I like it
M 16 is ugly (pillars of creation excluded)
I think its alright
Agree with everything here
Perseus/Taurus is the best region
Taurus only got M45 and California
You did not just say that...
Its a whole molecular cloud
Tons of barnard objects
Absolutely covered in dust
Bunch of reflections
A number of ha regions
Also hyades
That's nice but compared to Virgo Cygnus or the hole milky way core stuff
......
A- Virgo is ok but not amazing
B- Perseus/Taurus is comparable to cygnus. I prefer the former
C- MW core is kinda eh imo
Not absolute top teir
I live pretty north an have light pollution of Vienna in the south so i don't know all the core stuff
But galaxies are the best Dsos so Virgo is pretty sick
Mmmm
Dust is the best dso target
Virgo is cool but only if you sink time in for ifn
Or have a very high fl
nah your wrong there
the omega nebula, eagle nebula, trifid nebula, lagoon nebula all very close to each other
I can't wait for summer, where there are less clouds and I can image the MW core regions
I wonder what nebulas are on the other side of the milky way
Its just not my thing tbh
I don't love how incohesive things look
what is your favourite nebula?
Ooo hmm...
I mean the perseus molecular cloud lmao
The cloud in cepheus is also MMM
But I haven't had a chance to image it yet
Astro in the morning > astro in the evening
Everything >moon>clouds jdjfhdhdbdbcbcbcjjcfhfj
this was serious
redcat > roki
That's down to preference tbh
In terms of performance per $ roki is undoubtedly better
Speed and apature as well obviously
But if you need something astro specific, as well as a longer focal length the redcat is definitely the way to go
Also quality control is way better on the redcat
This is the "hot takes" thread sir, not the "rational thinking" thread
Not when the fma135 exists...
with the roki you're paying for the extra aperture
There's too many caveats with the roki for me to find it viable tbh
If you do daytime photography then yeah sure, but the quality control Russian roulette is ludicrous
I wonder if Caphe really smashed his...
Ohh boy
Is the quality control an issue?
Yes, a major one
Is a good roki a better deal then a good redcat?
Yes, absolutely
Big risk big reward
Once you try f2 man...
Tf
Once you go through three different copies and realize you're just going to have to stop down three stops just to get something decent...
I can only speak from my experience
And that is an amazing one imaging at f2
Regardless, both are good lenses and I'd recommend both
This isn’t a hot take, only beginners shoot in jpg
Different lenses for different tasks.
Once you pop that F2 drug there’s no going back. Plus the Roki outresolves the redcat if sampled right.
67mm of aperture
I totally agree
in the next 20 years their will be a new type of telescope that will far outpreform all others
Something with gravity lenses...
at my university the talk currently is about materials with negitive refractive index's
wtf does light just go backwards
does the speed just reverse
curves in the opposite direction that it would normally
we should have some lectures on i this year
since n = c/v then the speed of light in that material should be negative
shits weird i havent looked into it too much
V cannot be negative
but i guess its only as a weird as normal refraction?
hold the fck up
i think we'll see some crazy developments because of this
HOLD ONTO THAT FCKING RESEARCH FOR A COUPLE YEARS
I dont wanna study this dont publish that shi yet
haha well i have to start thinking about what im gona do for my third year project or phd lol
Images of telescopes make them look way smaller then they actually are
yeah that thing looks tiny
F if you hear that often....

Neither iPhone or Android are superior or better than eachother, they are all really close so you should really just get the phone that will work better for you. Do you have a lot of products in Apple's ecosystem? Just get an iPhone, nothing wrong with that
I think I only just got the joke lmao
@blissful wing mate, you have no friends
Took me too long to get the joke
oh yeah its a big boy
I never expected the ZWO camera to be as large and heavy as a soup can
So very true
speaking of bigboys , disproportionately large tripod for the 4se
Yeah they use the same mount for the entire se series
I will fight you on this
yeah thats what i was thinking red cat is 250 mm vs 135
its been too long since ive posted an amazing take
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
also what targets do you consider the pretties?
not a hot take
i couldnt believe how big mine was when I saw it
oh yeah and my EQ3 mount
looks tiny in the pics
but in reality its gigantic
watermelons dont taste good
most of them have no flavor and just taste like crunchy water
some of them have a hint of sweetness but barely
this is a genuine hot take
that i stand by
Nah you haven’t gotten a good one then
Those yellow ones are so good and I’ve had really good red ones too
And yes yellow watermelon
Yeah watermelon is very good
You have to get a good one though
I’ve had ones that are so sweet they make you sick
yellow? dont you mean orange
Yellow skin? Because that means they have been sun bleached. Makes them so good
hmm
I’ve probably eaten about 40 kg of watermelon this summer lol
I’ve averaged one every 2 weeks I guess
No yellowww
Ya
It’s reall
Mmm
Have you had the yellow ones?
Must be a location thing because I never seen them
They are really good I never been able to find them tho
One time someone brought one to my house that was the last time I seen one
They are just a different species
Variety
Cantaloupe > watermelon
Sir this is #1033998204993282098 not #false opinions
Fr
But yeah they are good
Yeah
I think I prefer the mouth feel. Watermelon is too mealy
The 4se mount is the only difference, the 5,6,8 se are all same tho
12kg of goodness
Yeah you haven’t had a good watermelon. Good melons have none of that
Yeah it boils down to if you had a good one or not that’s it
I get a watermelon every week from the shop on the side of the road. $1 a kilo. The most amazing melons ever
i could show you better melons but dyno would be pissed
😳
yes
Totally makes sensd
Watermelons > honey lemons > sugar lemons
The Orion nebula is kinda ugly
Not as bad as the flame part of the horse head nebula though
Idk...
Sinking time into that region at a dark sky is pretty awesome
Also watermelons mid
You think the flame Nebula is ugly? Jo what
Yeah that bit is yucky
Altinak got reduced to nothing
.
How much integration time there?
fine I'll look up the name in the corner to figure it out
Mango lassie is the best drink ever made
nebule is/should be a word
Nebuloid
Nebulae
nebulash
(nebulæ)
This was a while ago but I just started playing this and
No
Just no
This game is amazing

Actually taking the time to learn maneuver nodes and delta v shit is so rewarding at the end
Nebula : General Nebulae
Nebule : A "dwarf nebula"
Nebuloid : A region of a nebula where active star formation occurs
Omg ikr, that game has taught me more about science and physics than my whole schooling experience lmao (this is a joke btw don't start saying I'll be dumb because its incorrect or something)
I mean in terms of orbital dynamics you get a pretty good head start lol
There’s not a lot of people who can tell you how a gravity assist works before college
Gravity assists are usually more of a master level thing
You won’t really be learning much about them in a bachelors course for AE
Not too sure about astrophysics though
But stuff like gravity assists is more of an aerospace engineering thing
With astrophysics I think its less "how can I apply this to things we can build" and more "how does this force work in the first place"
Full moons are just as fun to image as any other phase. More terminator craters doesn't equal a better photo, and mare detail can actually look just as nice.
nah
No.
Wrong
you're just jealous cuz gibbous moons are the best
Leave
No moon or bust
Crescent moons have gotten the most likes on my ig, so statistically they’re best
Either Waxing and Waning Gibbous are my favorite phases.
Full moon is ugly
fr
Dude every full moon I get someone telling me to go look at it or take a picture
Like bro, 1. I keep track of the phases of the moon, I know it’s a full moon. 2. I literally don’t care
lmao
The mun is so boring
When its full
Crescent or half moon you can do HDR
And get good details
The moon actually has character
No contrast no interest
Real
Facts
Looks like someone vomited on it…
The solution to a cool mineral moon is to play the system and troll
I've tried mineral moon with my moon single exposures but it didn't work
but yes
those overdone ones look horrible
Just lowering the saturation on the yellows makes the bottom one look better.
still got that mineral look, but not the someone vomited all over it look
Just create your own palette
Very nice
Why is it so sharp
looks so detailed what fl?
It’s amazing detail
That looks great
Yeah i like the colours on that
Not overdone, like a lot of them are
When you open the original, there's just sooo much detail
Full moons are better to photograph on the artistic and photographic fronts (as opposed to technical detail), and also make for nice mineral shots. The first point is shared with crescents. While I'd probably say, if you're going for a mosaic or trying to get close up crater detail, half to gibbous is the better phase. I think it just depends on what you're going for
astrophotography is 30% equipment and 70% knowledge
Agreed, assuming your equipment is at least somewhat good
Equipment limits you, skill determines where you are within that limit
That's why I don't understand when people will say "start small...lens...dslr...maybe a tracker then work your way up from there"
Bro, if you have the dough for an eq6r or am5 or whatever get it right away man. Get the best equipment right away within your means so you focus more on technique and skill and not fighting your equipment
Huh? I mean yes if you have the money ofc but you never know if astro if for you
I mean a good dslr, lens, and tracker is a good setup
No...
Of course knowledge is important but once you know the basis and if you're good enough at processing, you're really equipment limited
Unlike a lot of other hobbies you can't do everything with knowledge "only", there's a physical limit
give a really nice setup to a newbie and a ok setup to master and youll likely end up with a nicer image from the more experianced person
Of course
Knowledge has its important role
But equipment...
Its a hard question actually, because it depends on what equipement we're talking about
I think this is more reasonable:
Once you have at least: good lens (at least not kit and fast enough), a decent camera and a tracked, then knowledge is equally or a bit more important than equipment
That's what I was saying lmao
right. for example, lmc has kind of advanced beginner gear. but he gets fantastic images because he has a crap ton of skill
the flaw is that this assumes permanent interest in the hobby
if you're interested for a short while you've just wasted massive amounts of money
This sounds like something someone who's unaware of the second hand astro scene would say tbh
Especially these days
You will never regain you're money with secondhand
I made profit multiple times last year...
Second hand is still very expensive for most people 
Especially if you're just starting out
I made a profit on both my eqm-35 and heq-5 pro for what it's worth
how
Spicy market
sounds like luck
Buying pre price hikes didn't hurt 
And both times these were prices set by the people putting the wanted ads up
yeah so this isnt really universal advice
I guess this isn't really universal advice then either eh 
If you don't have a lot of money you're going to think a lot before spending it in astro so either you know that you easily "get bored" and so don't spend much, either you're the kind of guy that go into something and never stop loving it and you can spend more
So except for someone that don't have a lot of money AND isn't compulsive I don't think thats a problem
And yeah you can resell it for a decent amount of money
Right, my scenario was based on someone with the funds to jump in with both feet. Obviously if you can o ly afford a tracker and have a dslr kicking around that's something completely different
The most important advice to beginners isn't to get a dslr and lens with a star tracker, it isn't to buy all the best equipment first, it's to make it easy for yourself and get knowledge before you buy anything, and also don't start off with long focal lengths! I had a pretty rough time starting at 1375mm, my 2nd/current scope is 335mm because I now understand the difference. 😅
Don’t start off with high focal lengths especially if you want to do planets
Well I ment DSO, if you want to only do planets then a PHAT dob will be good lol
I say this all the time. Short focal length refractor man. Skip everything else if you want things to be easier at the beginning
Agreed, that or a lens
Which is a short fl frac lmao
And yes, know how to use all of the gear you buy before you actually get it
Not sure if this is a hot take but I have talked to more random strangers at night doing astro than at bars.
(it might be because they can't really see my face cuz it's dark)
Astro second hand market is amazing. Especially when people sell thing without knowing how much it is worth.
And you can even make a lot do money...
Sometimes correct
You also have to know what you are buying and how much it is worth tho
Why sometimes?
This guy knows what's up
Wait till you hear my opinion about the best type of telescopes...
Oh god
What is it?
Every second hand market is "sometimes" amazing. There will always be bad apples and scams, etc. Just by nature, second hand will never be perfect
Newts?
Def not a bad pick by any means
Ofc they have their advantages and disadvantages, but lots of apature for a low cost
I think my starlink is blocking Facebook marketplace 
You got starlink?
Yep
Wow
We got it ages ago when starlink was just starting up, it's a lot slower now but still really fast
"once you pop that F2 drug there's no going back" your stars will be going backwards in the corners
Ok
Getting lucky on a copy = all copies must be perfect even though they're extremely varied
Logic
if you get a good copy you get to enjoy F2 or F2.8
Yup definitely. Risk vs reward
On a smaller sensor camera like the 294 or 533 I guess most copies will be fine though.
Which is why you would be safe 
294 is M4/3?
Yah
Not completely safe if you get a bad copy but better than at aps-c
A couple stops down and it'd be fine on M4/3 even with a bad copy
Potentially just one stop
Also, Amazon (or most reputable stores) should do returns. If you want the lens it’s a good safety net.
Significant skill issue
What would be oversampled on a 72mm aperture? @misty marsh
Or rather, at that 135mm FL too
More fl. But I think to be correctly sampled with the Roki I would need 0.6um pixels lol
With the 585 and drizzle I’m at 1.4 ish
That's impeccable framing
It’s a fun framing yeah. It feels like a different scope
Compare it to full frame lmao
Idk if I'd pay so much for the samyang tho
It's tiny on FF
F/2 is a whole other world. It’s amazing compared to my F6.3 takumar
F6.3 is slow as shit lol
Ya
I'm at F5 with my newt but idc because I've got dark skies
Clear skies tonight too
Few hours on M106
Can’t lie tho. Getting subs like this is 
I feel like the 533 is better suited with the samyang
In terms of framing
Compared to a 585
Yeah pixel size is the only thing bothering me about the 533
It makes perfect sense for longer FLs
But at 135
Single subs?
That's better than my 50 minutes of wide orion data
Bortle 3 is cheating
I'm pretty close to that lol
I'm Bortle 4, but in walking distance to a bortle 3 which is outside of my town
I ❤️my 533
Got a bit of the Leo triplet once orion went behind the trees
That was actually a 120s unguided test to see if the am5 could ha e not being guided
Woops. Didn't realize I was in hot takes
Hottest take east of the Mississippi
m81 & m82 are the hardest galaxies to process
This might just be to hot of a take we might need some moderators in here? 
A moderator for the hot takes forum?
@fossil barn I elect you
you're the moderator
of this forum
I think triangulum is the hardest one
I disagree
Hmmm it's difficult
It fades into the background
Saying any galaxy is the hardest just doesn't make sense
It has to do entirely with the data that you got
Like, at a wide field for example m81 and 81 is way harder than Triangulum assuming you pulled out the ifn
IFN in general just makes everything harder
It can be sometimes
Again, if you got a lot of IFN I'd image its a pain
Planning on hopefully doing that this weekend lmao
Honestly when I find the ifn to be not so hard to process
When I processed bat's data I had no trouble while m33 was hard to make right
But you're right there's isn't a hardest galaxy to process, it depends on the processing skills/habits, quality of data, size of the field...
Good data is always easier to process
I haven't tried it, but I'm sure the bat data I'd excellent
M33 has been a thorn in my side for a few months now. I'm still not happy with what I got
This is my best so far, but I know I can do better
V5 or something who knows at this point. So I do agree, m33 is a pain in the ass
I think your ha addition went a little wrong
YUP
VERSION 6 HERE WE COME
M33 was suprsingly hard in bortle 8. I only got the inner bright arms. none of that glow
Lmc not gonna be happy when he wakes up to a bunch of people tagging him
Nope
Wot
ABSOLUTLY NOTHING AT ALL
Nah pretty easy
dss stacking>pix stacking Ez
??????????
I could understand if you said Siril > pix
but dss????
you have parasitic worms eating your brain out
pix no work i use flats and get white spots instead of fix
they were good flats
If they overcorrect they aren’t…
nah my dust just rebellious
I'll admit dss is very easy and convenient
But yeah, pix all the way. Just is better all around
^^
The way the background bends is gross
though if you have pix you can get the GAME script which has a gradient galaxy mask which is perfect
for colors i think it would help
They are very hard, but THE hardest I would doubt it. Especially considering many other galaxies suffer from the same problem
such as M31 has a super bright core
m31 is easy
just hdr
infact you might not need to hdr
andromeda looks ugly in hdr to be honest
You don't need to image it in HDR but if you stretch it the core will be bright
so you need to stretch the core and outer arms seperately
if you clip your horsehead go back to widefield astro
@misty marsh forget the roki cult, its all about the mono supperiority cult now 😉
(this is just to annoy watermelonpet)
lol
my scope>tak>zenithstar
you have a $100 amazon scope 
facts
🤦♂️
If it wasn't for astro, I might just get 7hrs+ of sleep 
Sleep is overrated
if you sleep you cant protect yourself from ninjas obviii\
😏
There is only 1 right answer to this question
People who have 2 cw on their mount
Do you put the bigger one above or below the lighter one (assuming they're different)
You always want as much mass as possible, as close as possible, to the axis of rotation
So larger up top

you don't need $100+ LP filters. only a 20$ catapult will do :)
He was joking about buying a catapult to launch your rig to lower light pollution
I have 3...
And they are all homemade from wood because a single metal one was too heavy
The wooden ones together only weigh about 1/3 of the metal one

big on top then little on bottom for precise balance
ok i dont think this is a hot take
but can people stop imaging orion already? seriously there are other targets
so many other things that are accessible to beginners this time of year
but even advanced people just shoot orion over and over
its not even that cool
and i bet half the people who disagree with me will only have imaged orion in the last month
He says as I currently process my Orion data 
Nah you’ve barely had clear skies, you get a pass
I don’t have a problem with people doing it once or twice, I just don’t get the point of doing it over and over instead of a different target
no I thought about using it to decimate the neighbours' lights and the street lights.
like the handheld catapult
The flame Nebula is underrated
Running man is great
Now I think people should shoot whatever makes them happy lol
Orion is quite an overdone target though, I will agree. That being said after doing a wife field on it myself this season, there is a lot you can do with it
So many framing options, different regions, individual targets, etc
You genuinely could spend an entire season doing nothing but orion and get an amazing variety of images
ngc 1999 underrated
(The constellation, not m42 in particular)
ok well no one even pays attention to ngc 1999
If you mean m42... I guess I can see that
I didn't pay super close attention to that region on my image lmao. It is really neat though
i love it
this hole is my fav part
who knows what it looks like thru there
jwst needs to look in there imo
you want nasa to point jwst to look inside a big black hole?
i need to know whats thru the dust
no way
a watermelon pet hot take that isnt plain wrong
BRO HAVE YOU SEEN IT?
i was agreeing with you
Ohhhh ok good
Detraction spikes are underrated
People don’t like them in images for some reason and try to get rid of them I like them they look cool especially in star clusters and big nebula or just any dso with bright and dim stars in one picture
Fact
I like them but sometimes they can be excessive
As long as they are really thin and they don't hide interesting data, I kinda agree
Ah yes the typical person who gets 1 roki that’s meant to be completely perfect and complains when coma is larger then 3 pixels ☠️
Don’t own a Roki 💀
It a good enough lens
did you actually google IQ insults for this ☠️
no?
💀
bros stole my joke
oooh I have an idea for another low iq joke either: You have the iq of a microwave, or: you have the iq of a half eaten, burnt, slightly mouldy, cold peice of bread
lucky you, you can count your iq on your fingers
Lmfao this is the most toxic website possible
Hand drawn diffraction spikes are just weird and unfitting when obviously looking drawn on
I’ve seen a few and they just look dam cursed
Lmao why post this in #1033998204993282098 .
cuz some people think they look good idk
Haven’t you seen people put them one?
yup
they did it for a reason not bc they don’t like it obviously
Send ss of them
one more: You have an IQ the same as the temperature of an ice cube in celsius
0 
I dont
I use kelvins
adjusted.
I use Fahrenheit
Btw that's me
That is a large range lmao
Clowns get paid more than teachers 

Plus a clothing allowance & free transportation to the workplace - though you have to carpool
Wtf do ur teachers get paid if a clown makes more then them
Sheesh aus pays way higher
'Merica
Primary teacher here gets like 60-100k lmao
Probably why American education sucks so bad
WHAT
My kids are off on Tuesday because teachers are (rightly, IMO) on strike again. Absolute clownshow of a country.
Where do you live?
North-East England
Pepsi is coke with a bit of water. I like it
Bebsi
Pepsi=Dr Pepper>Coke
Ok Pepsi and coke taste the same but Dr Pepper is Completely different
coke still tastes good but pepsi is better
Dr Pepper tastes like medicine
maybe the cherry kind
YOU ARE WRONG
pepsi taste completely different
no
The placebo effect makes them seem different
no it doesnt
All of the skittles taste the same
It's a fact
Close your eyes
Eat a skittle
yeah idrk cause i havent had them in a long time cause they suck
but pepsi and coke
easily different
dont try it from a soda fountain try it from a bottle or can
You trippin
I'm not
fact
It's the truth
your taste buds are broken
The red skittles are the same as the blue ones and the yellow ones and all the colors of the rainbow
There is no tasting the rainbow
Kekw
It was on the news
oh?
I didn't believe it
Until I tested it
There it was
My world broken
Skittles are exactly the same
do they actually smell different tho?
cause without smell you cant really tast
They do
It's part of the placebo effect of skittles
nonoonoononoonono
They all have the same flavoring but other senses make you believe they are a flavor they aren't
you smell to taste
No
yah
Smell assists in taste
the favoring same
bro
go taste something but dont let air in
you wont taste it
you may feel salt or sweet but it literally wont taste
No you will
no
True
i just tried it
Although
to prove
Placebo
nahhh
smell and taste are very related
I'm not saying they aren't
ok but go get a drop of mustard or ketchup eat it but dont open your mouth or smell
literally wont taste anything at alllllllll
until you take in some air
I want to say this rq when I'm sick I don't lose any taste and I can barely breathe
"barely"
I'm dying bro
it doesn't take much
?
When I eat and I'm sick I gotta rush to chew that so I can breathe after
yeah
I'm breathing through my mouth
yes
You cant smell through your mouth, right
if you open your nostrils
it doesnt need to go all the way thru
i get what your saying tho
back to pepsi and coke
way different
The C14 Edge HD is the worst telescope ever made and is frankly worse then a 127 EQ /j
Bro your trying to be @fossil barn or what
Hah no even I know that’s a cap

Every masterpiece has its cheap copy
This is ridiculous. The 6slt is the worst telescope ever made? It's the exact same ota as the 6se and the c6, legendary optical tubes. Same goes for the 5slt/5se/c5. It's all the same telescope.
Surely you're not going to sit here and say the c6 is the worst scope ever made now are you?
now the mount seems like shit, but there are so many scopes with a bad ota and a bad mount that it cant possibly be the worst
Well thr mount is something else entirely!
He said worst TELESCOPE ever made so I shall go forth assuming he meant telescope 
yeah if he was talking about the telescope exclusively thats just insane
but im assuming someone with that crazy of a take doesnt know the difference between a telescope and a telescope+mount
no they all taste the same. same is true with M&M's. companies are just too lazy ig.
What kind of weak ass taste buds do you people have where you think coke and shitsi taste the same
Free*
Depends where you live. It’s not possible to get enough without tablets or reinforced foods where I am.
What?? You can’t see the sun? (Well ik some places it’s dark for like 6 months at a time)
Or the sun is just too low in the sky
Short days, clouds and even if you see the Sun in winter it’s too low to actually trigger a useful vit C reaction in your skin. Besides, most of your skin is covered because it’s cold.
Ah ok
So basically during summer on a clear day you should run outside naked screaming "Im getting healthier!"? Lmao
totally
dr pepper is goated
It is
It is far beyond coke and Pepsi do not compare them
Pepsi is good
Dr pepper is better than coke for sure though
Tbh yeah I'd pick it over Pepsi too
\💀 no
NO ITS NOT
theres literally the biggest difference
im not
i taste no coke in pepsi and i taste no pepsi in coke
the only similarity is the carbonation
It's a pretty significant difference
real
It really is
reading a book is just staring at marked slices of a tree while hallucinating
what if coke and pepsi are secretely the same drink, just rebranded?
with a change in recipe, like a little variation in salt
no
dynamic drink
ok
wahtttttttttttttttttt??/?
waittttttttttttttt
realization
vanilla diet coke>drpepper>dietcoke<pepsie<coke
Rain water>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Clean River water>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
iced unsweet lemon tea> vanilla diet coke drpepper dietcoke pepsi coke
Hose water>all other drinks
No river water is clean
Mountain water is so good
Austrian Mountain water ....> everything
is that the best u got?
Bro i have 16000 images on my phone just Google
ur mountains lame
Bro i guess you have Netherlands mountains
I guess you accidentally googled australia
it is
I've tasted
atleast in India. Drank a whole 1L of pure unpolluted bliss
Hubble pallet looks only good on a few targets...
Agreed
And it only looks good if it is really done right
Most of the time I prefer broadband or even HOO, but when SHO works it hits hard
Hubble sho images tend to look amazing
I understand how people can say Orion Neb is ugly, I don't think so but heres my weigh in on this
This is beautiful, the colours pop and it looks natural
This... Doesn't look good to me though
The detail in the clouds are incredible, but it looks unnatural to me, and running man is washed out so badly
both images by trevor jones
If done properly, it's beautiful
I prefer this honestly
It needs dust imo to really shine
That's cool, I just like a more natural looking orion
natural "looking"
The other looks like narrowband
HOO is nice
Sho is cool on some objects
But for 90% of things, rgb or hargb (possibly with some oiii) is just better imo
I'll have to try it
This was hargb by someone in another server
It’s kinda cool to see those stars clearly in the core imo
Since you’re seeing the stars which are being born
But the exposed core does give it the idea of how active star production is
It kinda goes both ways
I'm so bummed I'm not going to be able to image more of it before it's gone
I had plans like this
But hey, clouds eh. I only got around 4hrs
I got 3 hours, but in half sleep i shut down my mac wrong and all data got lost...
F
Dunno if its just me or summer targets are kinda boring compared to winter
Yeah I kinda agree
There's a lot of good ones but winter gems >>>
Its a shame cuz I have clouds for the whole week
Haven't really gotten the most out of all those winter targets
Now they'll be gone
I had clouds the whole automn/winter 
RIP
Honestly a nightmare
You mean a burn?
ded channel
i could fix that
dither not drizzle
2 different porpoises
I agree.
Good point
Those Mf's also cut out the nearby running man nebula
focal length \🤨 not everyone has a high fl low f stop scope thats tracked
and your not revealing much more with a ton of integration once noise is gone then thats it
(galaxys)
this is you
I’ve only begun to capture dsos on march 2nd do I get a pass
I want to get a really good image of orion before I try other targets
Is that fine
Image whatever you want
Might be a hot take but theres nothing wrong with orion
No ones complaining about Andromeda getting imaged when its that time of year
Or North America
LMC/SMCC
They're all cool targets. Regardless of how much they get imaged
smc is lame
,hold on lemme see if what i said i agree with hold im googling
images on google really dont show it in its full glory
show one that does then
is that the full size of smc or just one of the nebula thats in it
That's smc
smc is fine then
LOL
I mean, its not lame its just not as good as smc
This was one of the first astro image I saw when i joined this server
It was so cool
Got me hooked
im gonna count tarantula seperate from lmc and say lmc is lame
lmc is nothing without tarantula
exactly
its just a bunch of stars
i feel like lmc would kill me for saying that so hopefully he doesnt see
This here is my favorite image of lmc
There are dustier and more detailed images
But this one
ooo yes
i want to see lmc and smc
Like something you would look up to the sky, and see vividly
On a dark night
This is why i love this image
but i wouldnt go to southern hemi just to see it
That was from 10N i think
Real.
10 degrees north of the equator
😮
i will make an excuse to image some mostly southern hemi stuff
cause
oh
nvm
wow i thought Hawaii was lower
well thats 400 i dont wanna spend anyways
A trip to Hawaii is a lot more than 400
well flights are abt 500$ thats waht i was talking about
from my part of the us🦅
Well you need a flight to return home so add another $500
Uhh
The topic is astronomy not hawaii
Why ?
lmc is a very nice galaxy in my opinion
Has a lot more to it then just tarantula
no thats 500 round trip
no without tarantula its just a big fat star cluster
go to hawaii to see souther objects of astronomy
that's what a elliptical galaxy is
cant you see it has more then just stars?
does andromeda look like a star cluster?
No it has dust rings
literally lmc has that
“Without tarantula”
lmc has dust rings
Mhm sure
it does
how does it look like a star cluster
It has stars and it’s clustered up hmmm
just like what every galaxy has
But they have dust and arms and rings of dust
this looks like a star cluster right?
It is
