#Waitlist WINNING
7080 messages · Page 8 of 8 (latest)
they are not going to move agian
pton ppl would only decommit if they got off harv lowk so
i doubt
mane now im thinking i probably couldve used their financial aid offer to negotiate more from stanford
im still on both 💀
isnt stanford hella stingy w it
harvard seems to be on the extended now
i saw like 2-3 people get off since the initial wave of people getting in
yes
what happens if i send a loci in rn
stanford not being more generous is criminal 😭
no grad programs
hell naw gang ur not
they have sooo much money per student because of no grad work
no i mean like. how does the most pretentious ahh stuck up school have the best
i wouldnt decommit from stanford for either of them
i just want the financial aid offers
😛
fade stanford for having this small ahh waitlist and not moving it at all
400 kids bro
i erally should have declined ts waitlist offer who gaf
do i look like i know these numbers 😭
i heard its 90s this year
or high 80
idk actually but
i mean yk how big the waitlist is 😭
jesus fuck
are you legacy
yes triple leg which is why i would have gotten in if i REAd
did they tell u tho how many they waitlisted??
nah i js looked it up on google rq
eh maybe
generally universities dont really gaf about it unless u apply early and if im wl now i figure probably would have been admitted idk
this guy im bff with had tri generation legacy and he got deferred
kid from my school donated hella to stanford and had more legacy than me and he got in rd
which is maybe why they didnt let me in
who cares lowk
waitlists are also used for legacies
bro my bff had 7x legacy at yale and did a generational throw by applying ED amherst
im kind of surprised it didnt move this year
i feel like legacy is becoming less and less important as time goes on
it might be a AI thing though
also i dont have 3 gen legacy i only ahve 2 so
i watched this interesting video about the emergence of legacy and how it doesn’t match institutional priorities anymore
bro icl being at stanford as a non stem major would probably have been so bad because of AI
flying into SFO was torture literally every ad i saw was for AI
potentially but legacy is important cause they want donors
also literally every ad in SF is for AI too
SF is definitely techy
but stanford is figuratively and literally so large you dont have to involve yourself in ai
my grandfather was flabbergasted i didnt get into stanford/ivy because when he applied it was like 25% 30% 💀 said he was going to stop donating (guy hadnt donated since 1980 so idk waht the fuck hes on)
its kind of impossible to avoid ai anywhere though
let me know how many of ur classmates use chat im going to be very intereste
would say donor status is more important than legacy, just that legacy is pretty close relationship to who donates
yes
probably a vast majority
ok wel
i think claude is more popular than chat
now
yeah, but outside of that the premise surrounds legacy as being a way that allowed for holistic applications to develop that heavily favored white people at the time without universities needing to reject someone more “qualified” by entrance exam. i forgot where i watched it but it was interesting to hear that perspective on why legacy was an emerging factor, because legacy wasn’t something rlly considered until the 1920-1930s iirc. i think the video was from some organization that works on exposing the funding of universities, i would have to search again for it
that too
its a remnant of elitism
college admissions barely existed before the 1920s anyway lowkey
like before that most people just didnt go to college
thats honeslty what i was thinking too lmao
like everyone who applied back then wouldve gotten in cause applying is like rich ppl only