#UCLA 🐻🐻🐻 (2022-2023)
12760 messages · Page 13 of 13 (latest)
Does rolling basis mean randomly throughout the day
rolling means as space opens up for that college, major, and demographic
Oh
Are there majors that move more than others at ucla or just in general?
PLEASE
Nahh instead
Instate*
I would rather recommend going to cc then
If u look at stats cc is most of transfers and if u do tap and cccp u will have a solid chance at ling + cs since it’s non impacted
W
does anyone know how to submit the immunization form
Anyone got off the WL?
Including me as of now I only know three people that got off
Congrats
PLEASE UCLA
The only status update I am getting is their final rejection of me...:(
Do they do that
So real 😔😔😔😭😭😭
Assuming when it’s finally over we get notified that we r out? Not sure though.
Have any gone out today??
Is the ucla roommate housing thing due today?
Like meaning do we have to submit our roommate preference today?
i believe it was may 2 11:59 pm?
I don’t think so
I think it’s just that you’re guaranteed your roommates if you submit by that deadline
Alright hopefully it’s not today cus I can’t even submit my housing app
roommates locked housing form submitted. Time to wait for orientation
For u guys getting off wl, what are ur majors (both main n alternate)?
Psych and alternate is undeclared
Psych was an impacted major so I’m surprised I got off the wl
Do they even unwaitlist undecided
wow that's great man congrats
i myself have cs as the first and applied math as alternate
dk if that helps anyway since both seem pretty impacted
Manifest. We got this ur getting off the wl
Please!!! Good luck to all
hey i turned down ucla cs so good luck for wl'ed ppl
🙏
PLEASE PLEASE 🙏
no way
that's so sick dude
congrats
thank you. didnt think my acceptance for ucla would be 2% lol
congrats, which major/location?
how easy would it be to switch to math of comp from bus econ?
i forgot to ask, what is your stats?
psych
cool, in-state?
igetc done and lower div, asb (treasurer, vice president, president), mesa treasurer, mun, xc/track and field, couple other clubs, eagle scout, volunteering, in state (socal), 4.54w
yh socal
hi hopefully i'll see some of y'all on campus next year <333
just did the final send off post and i'm feeling so blessed 2 go to ucla n thankful for this chat lol
Has anyone oos gotten off yet?
Still waiting on UCLA. Read on reddit that one person got off the WL in CoE
If you’re talking about the electrical engineering guy he was in state
So far I've only heard about instate people getting off wl
i thought there was one OOS from biomed
You’re gonna have to show a screenshot because I don’t believe you
Sorry. Just checked. that was Cornell for BME
ok np
I hope to see you too!
This chat has been so helpful
Did anyone here anything for engineering?
People are claiming some in state have
Ugh I’ve only heard in state kids get off
UCs prioritize in state kids
As they should
:/
Bruuuuuh same I got off for OOS EE
U got mail?
Congrats
ty bro, I know this is probably meant for the other dude but I'm still taking it
I’m Intl so will probably have to reject because of cost 😦
No no it’s meant for both
ok lmao, thanks again
@ashen sequoia 🐻
🎊
yo anyone else just get off the waitlist??
me
mostly college of letters & sciences or did anyone get in for engineering too?
^ looks like this guy got off for EE
How does hosuing application work for WL acceptances? Do we have extended deadlines?
I would assume so
15 days
From when u got in
I feel like ucla acceptance off the wl is gunna be high this year. A gut feeling that I wish
We have 1 week to accept then a week after to do housing?
Any disadvantage for housing placements?
Also what is the housing deposit?
They said do it early
Just a deposit for ur housing
Where does it say? and thanks!
I meant how much $
I called them
30
bruh thats it?
No, anything important there
Someone similar to u was there
Haha no that was not me
They committed to ucsd but got accepted to ucla in anthropology
which major? city?
Science + Canada
Yo fellow Canadian 👀
cool
welcome little bruins
UCLA u want me sooo bad
What is UCLA known for?
Sucking
Hey not cool
Yesss
?
okie
yes
Did anyone get off WL for CS
it's a combination of college, major, gender, demographics, location.. not as much merit based
Ofc it will be
They only have a certain amount of space for each major
Although it is very unfortunate
did u get off the waitlist?
anyone know if the engineering majors got off?
nah just wondering hbu
still waiting lol
but many ppl are gonna switch majors after enrollment 😭
thats why many people who game the system (putting a non-competitive major) get through and those who put cs / cse suffer
I should have applied to structural engineering or some shit like that
and switch into CS later
Well they still have to get into Samueli to have an easy switch
if i cancel an ap exam
like i said i was gonna take it
b it decided to cancel and then i fill out the additional info form
i won’t get like
rescinded right
Ask them
Has UCLA released any engineering waitlists yet?
Anyone going to ucla waitlist admitted welcome thing?
Me!
wait
when is it
???
and where can i find more info
is it basically the transfer day?
yes, my friend got in from waitlist
oh bruh wtf i didn’t get smt thing 😭 lemme chdck
Did u get in through wl?
Basically besides we get a own thing in the morning
Thought u didn’t get in through waitlist?
it ain’t a crime 💀
comp sci
Omg that’s literally incredible props to u congrats
it’s out…
At this time? Wow
tyyyy
hella rando i saw email i thought it was rejection
they might have just saw the email/notification rn
Yh probably
Cus I haven’t seen or heard anyone get off today
Maybe ur email was late
i think this was the regents reject round
That’s probably it
yea
it is possible the email is delayed from the portal update
^
idk what happened but all ik is that my ass is stupid
to this day i cant find it
Do we still think wl acceptance hitting 10% this year
tbh i think it’s 1%
It looks higher than last year but not at the rate of 10% as of now I feel
they like to be extra fr
I wanna guess around 6% at most
it looks like many people who got off already are accepting their offers
so probably not too high
any of y’all think there’s a fourth round?
Yh
200 is like 3x as much as last year already i think
219 was last year
whats regents reject round?
First round was like 10 people so we around 220rn from my guess
The 200 coming from guessing cus we got a handful from this server and college confidential which will be around 40 and then the people who didn’t post so 200
hmm
He’s playing around I think
But congrats on getting in!!!!
I want to say more cus it’s so close to may 1
considering they accepted the waitlist position first it should be higher than the general yield rate
And no deposit fee I think. Atleast for me
Maybe around 4% this year then actually thinking of everything
Fuckkk I forgot to apply to the media team 😭
And I’m not going to pull somethin outta me ass rn
wait
is there a way to not loose a deposit
like if u commit to a uc
but go to another uc bc of wl
is there a way to like transfer teh deposit or anything
for ucla?
do you have a deposit waiver?
And I didn’t pay for a deposit for any other uc too
Yh
yea u prob have a waiver
Yh
wtf is this deposit waiver
They think u payed for another uc already that’s y I think
That would only make sense
you said you didnt pay for any other UC too so for you its probably a deposit waiver
cuz other people have to pay deposit for WL i think
thats when they sent u infoo n stuff
how long did it take for the account to activate
after u made teh accnt
Ohhh didn’t know
i might make my accnt like on friday or like the weekend
15min at most
It’s confusing but it’s not that bad
aight
I would do it so u can start housing
mhmm
They said sooner the better
Yh I got off wl on the 28th
Yep
Yh after u submit u choose ur roommate
Psych for me
Any engineering ppl??
Haven’t heard back yet
I got in for bio
Any waitlist updates?
has anyone received a waitlist rejection?
nu
nope
Any updates? I thought today was wave 3
Probably tmrrw, apparently someone admitted on college confidential said they had until today to commit for wave 2
oh fr?
what r ur stats?
pure comp sci?
also ik someone who got off the ucla waitlist in september last yr when he was already attending berkeley
there hasn't been a wave for awhile, any idea on when the next one is
there’s always a chance that they filled up most of the class with the previous wave already
it may be
It’s been a good run 😔
its a shame
UCLA waitlist acceptance rate was so much higher this year
but still didn't getin
A huge shame there goes my dream school

It’s cool tho bc I wouldn’t be able to afford it anyway
i mean
they waitlist thousands
and accept only a couple hundred
so dont feel bad about yourself that you werent taken off
they waitlisted way more than needed from the start
damn rip
Was it that much higher? I only saw abt 80 kids at the waitlist event and since it was last min I was pike in junk abt only 1/3 came
i think we might be overestimating the amount of people based on how many we've seen get off in a2c and CC
people on the waitlist and get off for ucla are more likely to use and say it on these forums i think
its def higher this year
i know a bunch of people irl, and a bunch of ppl on tiktok, college confidential, a2c all say the same thin
Ohhh I heard like 190 last year
Do they send waitlist rejections?
They’ll do it middle of summer
Gl
Frrr
its time to let go
dont worry im sure you'll do great at harvaleford university of technology
how do you know?
It’s over 😔

not over
They leave that open until like august
but theres still always a chance
It’s been more than 9 days since the last wave which was pretty big
I think they’re going to do very small short admits now, I don’t think they’ll do another wave
i think the only chance we have left now are if someone already enrolled gets off the waitlist at another school and withdraws their enrollment from ucla (hence why they dont want to close the waitlist just yet)
i agree with this in principle
imo at least 90% of uc undergraduates should be californians
nobody with amazing grades should see themselves rejected from every campus
Sucks to not have quotas #NCONTOP
100% agree
the whole impacted vs nonimpacted shouldnt even exist imo atleast to this extreme
I mean they already have a significant advantage in admissions as well as tuition, and rightfully so. I don't think it needs to be at 90%.
texas and georgia have it at 90%
theres no reason for cs majors from CA with 4.0s and great ECs to go to out of state schools like purdue or uiuc because they couldn't pull UCs
Nope, Texas schools are the only ones in the country with that high of a percentage
They could absolutely pull a UC with those sorts of credentials but they are not entitled to a spot at UCLA if they are significantly less qualified than an out of state candidate.
If they pay taxes for the school they’re absolutely more entitled
The primary goal of public universities is to educate those who live in the state and pay to fund it. Believe it or not, not every school is built for the purpose of solely educating already top-tier students
There’s a reason why the UC system, which has been doing well for decades, decided to make Merced not too long ago despite many of you claiming it’s the “worst UC”
Because their goal is to educate their state, and Merced especially hit on an audience that was missing an education
They can pull UCs they just can’t pull the top UCs
Like Cal, UCLA, UCSD, etc.
They can def pull some of the other UCs tho
I feel at least
It’s just Purdue and UIUC are probably better for CS than the UCs they’re getting into
Just Texas, Georgia is normal
Agreed but we’re essentially paying taxes too
Our COA is triple y’all’s
Maybe not triple but more than double
That’s if they guarantee you an education
There are people who end up paying taxes and getting nothing in return
True true
They literally are doing a satisfactory job of educating it’s instate residents. UCLA and UCB both have similar in-state percentages as other top public universities. Also since 2021 all the UC schools have been moving towards accepting more instate students so what that means is that every OOS student that gets accepted this cycle has to be significantly more qualified than the average instate student that gets accepted. There is nothing wrong with the current UCLA admissions system and they have done more than enough to serve the needs of its residents.
More entitled, yes. But not entitled in the absolute sense to the degree where a significantly more qualified OOS student doesn’t get a shot at admissions.
Also accepting more of the best students from OOS and internationally are going to benefit the state in the long run because those top students will most likely get a job in the state that they graduated from.
the issue is that there a lot more less qualified OOS students being prioritized over overqualified in state students.
That's not happening. The average gpa of the accepted OOS student is much higher than the average gpa of the accepted instate students. If an instate student loses his spot to an OOS student he or she has nobody to blame except themselves.
at some point it is a skill issue yes
the 25% oos figures for the uc's are high but there's always worse a la umich
I feel like you’re right and wrong here because yes it should be based on merit and merit wise yes OOS are better on average, but also Cali residents DO pay money to fund these colleges
Cali should probably get some quotas like NC has
i think something upwards of 80% in state is reasonable
I agree and that is why I believe they should be prioritized in admissions to some extent. However, they already are prioritized right now so anyone complaining about how the current system isn’t fair to instate students just aren’t being rational.
it used to be very unfair
Instate students were always preferred and now they are just preferred even more.
and i hold the belief that they should be preferred even more than that
but then you run up the issue of educational quality
over here at ucsd we're planning to hit 50k students within the next decade
No, they really shouldn’t because at some point admitting too many unqualified in state hurts the quality of education the university can provide.
i never said they were unqualified
Sorry my bad, less-qualified
by the very nature of being competitive uc has to let go thousands of "qualified" students who would do very well under a uc education
They can be qualified but others could be more qualified
The ones that are more qualified end up doing more with a UCLA degree
well, i hope that they do more for california
They already do, with the community college pathway
UCLA intentionally leaves transfer spots open specifically so they can serve instate community college transfers
i will agree with you that the cc transfer system is great and must stay
So are we though! Our COA is a lot more than that of California residents
Yeah bro but ca residents pay regardless if they’re going or not
You pay tuition they pay taxes
It’s not the same
UCs essentially cost the same amount as elite private schools for oos students
Plus like you chose to go there they didn’t choose to pay those taxes
Yea and again
You chose to go there
True but counterpoint
Usually what state schools do is they vary funding based on the number of in state students attending the state school
i believe that state funding is a larger share of uc revenue than is tuition
Like they do control for that
So it’s not like your taxes are going down the drain
but i think the largest funding source for most campuses is health services
You’re missing the point bruh- they don’t choose to pay for the school regardless of what share of funding it is, you do
Maybe the UCs should consider a system where each person is only accepted to one campus
For example, I was accepted to both UC campuses that I applied to
But I can’t attend both
Maybe just like quotas
And some ppl who apply to a lot are accepted to most/all of the ones
Just denied on the 20th
that's actually how it used to be
I think quotas are fine for some of the UCs
But not all of them
Get over yourself
Wym?
All state schools admit oos students
And enroll them
Maybe it’s because I’m not a California resident
People should possibly end up at a campus they’d be unhappy at because rich people want in to the system?
But I don’t really see the issue
Yeah exactly this is probably why
But other states don’t have this issue
Despite having plenty of oos studebts
Because people don’t prestige whore for other states as much
UMich is considered better than most UCs
Yeah UCs should operate the way I want them to and not from over 100 years innovating on their ideas
That’s a single school
Same with UVA, Florida, UNC, and a bunch of others
Versus an entire system
Not worth arguing though. You won’t be changing your mind, and it’s only clogging up the thread
I don’t think anyone disagrees that California residents should be favored to an extent in admissions
they're not doing a good enough job
It’s just that since there is already a lot of support for instate students by the UC system some of us don’t think that less OOS students should be admitted to make more room for them.
There is 0 evidence behind this claim.
Yes there is, that's the whole point of why we're discussing this
We’re discussing this because someone shared an article about people being butthurt that they couldn’t get into two of the most selective public schools in the country but there is no evidence that they’re not doing a good enough job of serving Californian students.
Lawmakers in California are literally pressuring UC schools to focus more on in-state
It's not being butthurt about students not getting into UCs. It is a literal fact that there are too many, way too qualified in-state students, who are being rejected from UCs which can be attributed to potential causes like UCs wanting more money from out of state students
and uc lowkey is ass bc they give 0 shits
Lmao
It's pretty straightforward, that California residents are paying a crazy amount of taxes to fund these public institutions and it's not fair that these UCs are not doing enough to prioritize them
I feel like for UCLA and Cal as t20s in particular though
If UCs wanted more money from OOS students they can easily make it 100 percent merit based and then you’ll have an instate percentage similar to that of Stanford. However, the reason why UCLA’s instate percentage is higher than Stanford is because they already are serving their instate students.
Emphasizing in state students sort of means you’ll be making concessions in terms of admit quality
The two go hand in hand in a way because not all of the smartest kids in the world are located in California
It's not a concession when there are a ton of over-qualified students in CA being rejected
Nah it is though
Because not all of the best kids are in California
UCs are a public institution that should be focused on serving their state residents first.
That’s a fact
Just like any other state schools
I never said the best kids are only in California
Okay so by limiting oos students UCLA and Cal’s oos campuses
Even more
Not every person with great academics can make it into an elite university and UC schools are already doing things to help out those students get in.
You’re automatically preventing highly qualified oos kids that might otherwise be admitted from being admitted
That’s what you’re essentially doing
Yes, there are gonna be Cali kids to take their spot
But I’d argue, simply with the law of large numbers, that the oos kids would have been slightly more qualified
The whole point of a PUBLIC college is that it is supposed to serve their in-state students first who are paying the taxes to fund those institutions in the first place.
Because they would’ve been admitted if there wasn’t that limit
Right, but then you hurt the brightest kids in California too
Because the perceived drop in student quality caused by limiting oos students to the extent that you want
Will cause a perceived drop in prestige
And in turn an inability to attract the best of the best in terms of faculty
Which just hurts the school and the brightest in cali that would’ve gotten in on their own
Despite the limits
That’s literally what they’re doing and it’s great. However, if you have someone instate who has good grades and is qualified but someone OOS that is far more qualified you can make the argument that once the difference in qualified-ness is big enough the OOS student should be admitted.
Obviously in state ppl should have a significant advantage in the admissions process
But the Texan model is far too extreme
It's pretty evident that's not the case, there are a ton of super qualified in state students in CA who are getting rejected from the UCS.
That's literally why lawmakers are trying to pressure UCs to increase enrollment
Because their spot is being taken by someone more qualified than them oos.
Do you really know that?
Yes, because of data.
Out of state students pay a lot more money for UCs
Yes, that’s great but they don’t get favored
It's a strong contributing factor
At this point with 'qualified', you're really stretching the qualifications of in-state students vs out of state students
Now you’re just projecting stuff with 0 evidence.
In state students are favored
UC explicitly says that
And as a government institution, it can’t lie
send the data that demonstrates oos students are so much more qualified than these instate students
I expect to see a radical difference that justifies your claim
Oos students generally have higher gpas on average and
Before the UCs went test blind I’m pretty sure that their average test scores were higher too
The second claim I can’t back because it’s been so long
But the first is common data
money is literally a contributing factor to admitting students, what do you mean I have 0 evidence??
You can look it up and find it; I have before
https://admission.ucla.edu/apply/freshman/freshman-profile/2019 Here you go buddy.
Have fun
calm down 'buddy' lmao
Exactly!
And it’s the same thing with Berkeley too
I’m calm, I’m just waiting for another excuse from your end
We worked hard as hell for those acceptances too bro
And we’re dropping 70 grand a year to attend
the marginal difference doesn't justify your claim
Because it’s a public school and not a for-profit school so all the workers there aren’t even profiting off of those tuition fees since they are working for the state?
Yeah it’s not like the 25th percentile has a significantly higher SAT score and the 75th percentile has far more honors courses.
if you think UCs are not considering the costs that OOS have to pay that will fund their institution you are delusional and there's really nothing I can do to convince you on that
This also has to do with their higher requirement
The average gpa is going to lower on the in state end when 3.0s are considered acceptable there but not for OOS
The fact that you think money is not a contributing factor to UC consideration for OOS/International is so dishonest lmao
No one with a brain agrees with this statement
Look at the differences in the admitted section
How does that go against my point
I’m explaining why there may be a difference
So therefore instate students are still significantly favored because they have lower application requirements then?
State school = serve the people of its population
Lot of overqualified CA students are getting rejected by TOP UCs. OVERQUALIFIED. just because an out of state student is more overqualified doesn't justify anything, the ca student should be prioritized
They have lower requirements because they’re favored
So what if UCs adopted a 90 percent in state rule while giving “in demand campuses” like UCLA, Cal, and maybe UCSD exemptions?
I think this could be a possibility, but there should still be some factor of favoriting for in state
Alright great, and I have no problem with them being favored. As long as we agree that they are indeed being favored.
I agree that ppl could definitely choose to go to other comparable universities over some of the other UCs
I’ve never said they weren’t
In fact I don’t think anyone here has
But there really aren’t public universities that compare to UCLA and Berkeley out there
My misunderstanding then, it’s our colleague Oskar who is the outlier then.
I think that’s fair
I never said that either
You’re saying they should be favored even more despite the significant favoritism that they already have.
I’m think 60-70% of the seats at those campuses being reserved for in state students is fair
I just don’t think 90 percent is
I never said significant. You said that.
Lawmakers are literally addressing this issue right now, which is what i was calling for
Bc there are also intls to consider
You're the one saying there's no problem right now with how they are doing the admissions
I know that’s what I said I was only quoting you in the first half of my sentence and then I provided the fact in the second half.
I would say favoritism should go to all in state students even outside of this whole UC argument, but in this specific case, I think schools like Merced and Riverside should hone in on a higher in state rate bc they’re meant to serve those CA kids
There are people who agree with and there are people who agree with you that’s why we’re discussing.
I mean, when you're calling overqualified CA students who are disappointed that they got rejected from top UCs as 'butthurt', pretty ignorant comment eh no?
That seems fair
Because there are other comparable universities for oos students to go to
Especially when it's a legitimate issue as Gov Newsom and CA lawmakers are putting forth legislation to address this
There’s no need for them to choose Merced or riverside esp when there are Californians who need a college to go to
A little insensitive sure I’ll give you that, but they shouldn’t feel entitled about their admission just because they have good grades.
Some of those “top UCs” are t20s and are reaches for everyone
Rejection should be expected, even if you are in state
It's not really an entitled thing when it's happening to a lot of people. It's not just 'good grades' either.
They’re t20s and need to be recognized as such
That’s called populist policy making for approval rating.
mate california citizens are literally paying to fund for these state schools.
Populist policy? lmaoo
this ties in well with the counterargument i wanted to make to the idea that "an out of state student with higher merit will do more with a uc degree"
Yes, that is the popular belief in California but it doesn’t mean it is the right one.
I’m saying just because the governor believes something doesn’t mean it’s correct
That is absolutely the case
A state serves its people. The people are paying high taxes in CA to fund these public institutions. Are you able to wrap your head around this? Does this sound unfair to you? You can tell that to the other dozens of states in America the same thing then, because they prioritize in-state students.
You said you understand why CA students being favored but now it just sounds like ur butthurt.
a wealthy student who is maybe a bit more qualified doesn't benefit from the social mobility offered by a uc degree than an in state student who earns less
a major part of what the uc's want to do is to be an uplifting mechanism for students who study hard
I said they can and should prioritize them to an extent which is completely reasonable.
You keep on misunderstanding my position
No one has brought up wealth.
If you're saying the only OOS students that are able to get in are wealthy then I'll have to disagree with you on that.
I would say wealthier OOS students are more inclined to apply due to the UCs being known for not giving out much OOS aid and being pricey
yeah, but those who are able to attend
supplemental tuition + no need based aid means students of wealthier backgrounds have a leg up
I get your point but I’d nitpick that there is a bit of a difference bc of how the t20s most people think of aren’t state funded
(I am avoiding class by doing this)
Yeah because they're better, this doesn't tell the whole story.
i'm still not a fan of the idea that an oos student just because they have higher stats and more extracurriculars is more productive with a uc education
maybe at extreme lengths
for example if we were to compare top students vs the middle of the pack here
They are better positioned to take advantage of the resources and rigor of education that UCLA requires
rly? 10-20% higher admissions rate better?
every year thousands of super qualified ca students are turned away
Yes dude look at the link I sent you showing how much more qualified the admits are for OOS than the ones who are Instate.
when it comes to be being 'better', there's a certain threshold where students are now overqualified and it doesn't matter how much better you are
Yeah man, every 4.0 student is basically just as qualified as an olympiad winner with a 4.0.
olympiad winner? now thats such a dishonest statement lmao, i really cant debate this anymore with you lmao. its as if you thikn every CA student has no extracirriculars, are you're just looking at GPA. UCs are a holistic application
Also here's the thing, let's say UCLA decided to have 100 percent of it's admits be from instate. There would still be a lot these qualified students that don't get admitted which is pretty much you're entire argument. You can't satisfy everyone.
It was a hypothetical to disprove your statement.
the thing i do agree with is that we don't wanna accept anyone who will flunk out
Wow! Okay since we can't satisfy everyone, let's just keep it where it is right now and not even try anymore to make it more fair for CA residents
So should it be 100 percent?
Because even at 99% then there would still be qualified instate student losing their spots to other OOS students.
No, you know what, you're correct. CA lawmakers are trippin and we shouldn't focus on increasing enrollment for CA residents
👍
after all, they're being favored enough already
Should it be 100% though because that seems like the only reasonable thing to do based on your line of reasoning, we can't leave out any qualified instate students for OOS ones right?
im sry but thats the most dumass strawman arguement ive ever read. i cant continue this with you. have a nice day
It’s not a straw man your argument was - “current system bad because qualified instate students are being left out for OOS ones”. Therefore if it isn’t 100 percent then there will still be instate students being left out for OOS ones.
If your argument is that every qualified instate student should be given preference over every OOS student no matter how much more qualified the OOS student is then the only way you can achieve that is by making UCLA 100% instate.
wow just saw this thread
what an argument
honestly, imo we just let the lawmakers do their thing. California lawmakers almost always get their way since the state is politically one-sided so whatever they want to do with the UC is what it will be
imo they will most likely increase enrollment/chances for low income in state students even more
i think a lot of changes are coming to UC in the next couple of years
but it’s hard to say whether or not the changes may affect how people view the school
They have loads of state schools to apply to why did they only apply to Berkeley and LA?
Those changes have already begun.
i have a feeling that with the changes lawmakers are pushing for many people, particularly out of state, will view the UC system as less prestigious or just want to stay away from it
like how many california people would prefer to stay away from texas and florida
in state tuition is a major factor in attending a UC
are you saying you want other states to lower OOS tuition?
It is not an issue if those spots never belonged to them to begin with.
that is basically the current goal of the changes
to UC
they don’t want to make it all abt test scores
and GPA
Yeah which helped out instate kids because the SAT scores of OOS kids were completely destroying the instate ones.
if you mean lying on apps, then yes that needs to be fixed
and having other write essays
that is indeed a problem
but that happens everywhere
i think the issue with sat scores is that many people simply got tutors to boost their scores, and low income students don’t have access to such expensive resources
particularly in the bay area and LA area
as an asian in the la area myself, i know that almost all of my friends have outside tutors for not just SAT but also AP exams
and they do well when the teacher doesn’t teach at all
it’s not a good reflection on the schools and students actual abilities tbh
That’s a valid point and I’m sure the UC schools took that into consideration when they removed the SAT.
but i think EC need to be vetted more
i’m not saying all students have tutors, but many do
particularly asians
in california
but it’s because of parents so it’s not really in my control
They shouldn’t expect to get into UCLA and Berkeley though
Like that’s not a guarantee
They’re tough schools for anyone to get into
It doesn’t matter if they’re a state school
They’re the best two state schools and by far
california’s population is simply too large
many other state schools that are viewed as prestigious have exponentially higher acceptance rates for instate
but those states also have exponentially smaller populations
Ong
they need to open more campuses but based on how people view uc merced i have doubts that it will bring any benefits for those seeking ucla and berkeley
Lol yeah
The thing with UCLA and Berkeley is though
In addition to being located in the state with the largest population
They’re the most prestigious state schools out there
So that drives their acceptance rate even lower
Like ucla and Berkeley are the only oos publics I bothered applying to
Bc atp I would’ve settled for my state school
From CC: "We were just told that the School of Engineering has hit their target numbers and don’t anticipate extending offers to those on the waitlist. Wish they’d officially let the students know."
So does that mean they admit by school and not by major?
it depends, by major. For example, if you're aerospace or any kind of engineering, GT, a public school is #1 or #2, and lot better than UCLA.. similarly if you wanna study CS, both UIUC and GT are better state schools than UCLA.
no idea
Lmao we're talking to eachother in the Northwestern thread as well
eh I mean for cs I think they all have similar industry weight
Sure, but I’m just talking about what’s generally up
nah i think GT and UIUC carry more weight than UCLA, and less than berkeley
I’m sure GT CS beats Harvard CS, but Harvard is considered generally more prestigious
Well if you look at the performance of the graduates they're all similar.
haha sure harvard is top ivy. we are talking public universities here 🙂
in what sense? are we talking UCLA as an overall school or UCLA as an Engineering/CS school?
The analogy stands
I'm talking career pay.
UCLA does just as well as the others you listed
lol would you say berkeley med school is better than UCLA?
Nah but Cal and UCLA are equally prestigious…
I don’t get your argument…
Obviously GT, UIUC, and Cal have better CS programs than UCLA
Career pay for Engineering/CS UCLA is up their with the ones you listed.
That doesn’t change the fact that, in terms of general prestige, UCLA beats GT and UIUC, and is level with Cal
Better for research but not necessarily industry.
True
I think he’s considering everything though
UCLA provides just as much opportunities to succeed at software engineering as UIUC and Georgia Tech
I don’t know enough about CS to comment
disagree
Reasoning?
sure
So…?
1- GT, UIUC, and Cal are magnets for tech companies 2- GT, UIUC and Cal provide strong CS research experience, for those interested in grad schools
You're just throwing the "magnets" term out there as a buzzword even though there is no evidence to back your claim.
For example see above report for GT - how can UCLA provide same experience for an engineering student as GT?
I chose UCLA over Cal but it was for Poli Sci so I can’t really comment
Also the reason they produce more research is because all those school are focused on CS and have larger CS programs than UCLA so the research opportunities isn't even necesarily that much better.
Yeah man, let's just base the program quality on the US News rankings instead of judging the graduates' perfomances.
lol how do you judge the graduates' performances? please provide stats
https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/ You can use this site if you want or if you have some extra time you can do some research on your own to find out how these school's alumni perform.
exactly my point.. college rankings and opportunities vary by major.. cal is better than ucla in cs/engineering but ucla may be better than cal in poli sci.
I fully agree with Cal being better than UCLA at those areas, I'm saying that GT and UIUC are in the same bracket especially if we're talking industry.
yeah GT and UIUC could be in same bracket as Cal in CS/Engineering but not UCLA. come on!
There is no evidence to back that up besides US News data
Actually I think they’re pretty = poli sci wise
I just vibe with UCLA’s location, campus, and feel more
But yeah I don’t disagree with you
Diff colleges def have different strengths
I was just talking about the general prestige of the institutions
makes sense.. vibe is very important
its okay, you chose UCLA .. any decision already made is a good decision.
Pls don't talk condescendingly to me like that.
UCLA is the best overall school and best cs/engineering school, happy?
Dude you really lack social decency.
Dude, what do you wanna hear?
I don't mind you disagreeing with me, just don't start sarcastically saying how great UCLA is because that is disrespectful.
Like saying UIUC or GT is better was never the issue for me.
He's a brick wall to debate with, you cannot change this guys mind lol
well i'm just saying that each college has their own strengths. UCLA must have its own strengths e.g. location, med school, etc but if someone wants to do CS/Engineering, sure it's a fantastic school, but Cal/GT/UIUC are in a different league altogether
we're probably all opinionated in our own unique ways
I can respect that, have a good time at Cal.
a lot of my friends chose ucla over cal for stem majors actually
international ppl around me all go to cal if they get into both
Cross admit data, which is pretty reliable for colleges that have a lot of overlapping admits (like cal and ucla), suggests that ucla is marginally the more popular choice
But cross admit data doesn’t differentiate between the diff majors
Like I chose ucla over cal, but for poli sci, so irrelevant to what you guys are discussing
can someone invite me to the UCLA discord?
In dms