#elder-scrolls-lore
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Implying they arn't always toying with us. They could even be the so called "Aedra" fooling the mortals since day one.
Akatosh is Omnipresent
Nope, only present within space that have time
As the old world died, **Satakal **began, **and when things realized this pattern so did they realize what their part in it was. **
https://en.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:The_Monomyth
The Cosmos formed from the Aurbis [chaos, or totality] by Anu and Padomay.
Akatosh (Auriel) formed and Time began . The Gods (et'Ada) formed.
https://en.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:Before_the_Ages_of_Man
So that he might know himself this way, too, Anu created Auriel, the soul of his soul. Auriel bled through the Aurbis as a new force, called time. With time, various aspects of the Aurbis began to understand their natures and limitations. They took names
https://en.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:The_Monomyth
They shed their skin and severed their roots and called themselves Atakota, who said "Maybe."
When Atakota said this, the skin it had shed knew itself. It ate the severed roots and even though it was dead, it followed Atakota like a shadow.
Atakota continued to roil, and each of its scales was a world that it devoured. But now Atakota was not in conflict, and things had time to begin and end. The shadow wished it could eat these things, but its belly was full of roots that were growing.
When the shadow could bear it no longer, it swam closer to Atakota and spat out the roots. Now that its belly was empty, the shadow almost ate them again and everything else it saw. But it had come to see the roots as its own after carrying them, so instead it told them secrets and went to sleep.
The roots found others and told them how they had survived in the belly of the shadow and how they were still able to grow there. When they shared this knowledge with the others it changed them, and they took on new forms with new names.
https://en.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:Children_of_the_Root
Akatosh's Time is the only reason anything can even exist, his time stabilizes the entire Aurbis
Everywhere has time. Not everywhere has as much time or in the same manner, but he is still everywhere.
Akatosh is Omnipresent.
The entire basis of all of TES existence post Anu and Padomay is Akatosh existing
He is the Grey Maybe, he is Nir (in a metaphorical sense)
That anything even exists in stable form is courtesy of time, and that anywhere has anywhere to exist is courtesy of space. Akatosh and Lorkhan are everywhere, even if they're not always as thicc in certain places.
This is the only constant in all TES religion
That the great Wyrm forms and allows all to exist by spreading across everything
There are places canonically outside, therefore, not omnipresent. Present everywhere within the Aurbis maybe, but outside no.
The Aurbis is the known universe to begin with
There is nothing outside Aurbis this is a non-statement
It might be a multiverse or whatnot, but time is still time.
TES is a Multiverse, the multiverse is the Aurbis
That time is not Akatosh, though
[citation needed]
Akatosh is time this is redundant.
Akatosh is time within the Aurbis
And the Aurbis is the entire thing, so that's not really a useful statement.
It was confirmed in ESO.
Unbeknownst to all but a few, Nirn has come unmoored from the fabric of the multiverse, as the mortal realm is drawn ever closer to Coldharbour, the twisted Oblivion realm of the Daedric Prince of domination and enslavement, Molag Bal. The Planemeld, a process in which the two worlds slowly become one, is threatening the existence of all races on Tamriel.
https://en.uesp.net/wiki/Online:Introduction_to_the_Lore_of_The_Elder_Scrolls_Online
It's not a Multiverse like the MCU however, all the planes of Oblivion and Realms of Aetherius are considered universes
I wasn't responding to you, I even already said it's a multiverse
My bad
AKHAT is Time. That's his fundamental nature, it's why anything has stable form. Outside of the Aurbis is outside of Anu's dream entirely which isn't really a useful conversation since we don't know what's going on out there, if an "out there" even exists to begin with in any meaningful way.
From all we've been taught atm, there is nothing outside ANU who is everything that is the Aurbis etc
It's just Aurbis. So yeah I'd say there isn't an "out there"
If you cut yourself out of the Aurbis, you are separate, no longer bound by the rules and concepts of this one
If you're referring to Amaranth, we don't know the exact functions of it, but considering Akavir is on Nirn in the c0daverse, I doubt it separates you from Aurbis
I can assure you, I need no introduction to Sermon 37. That's not what it's talking about.
same
Funny thing about cutting yourself out of the Aurbis: you split off and become a separate canon
Omnipresence, Omniscience, Omnipotence, and other such terms only mean something within a context unless it means all possible existences, including ours. Hence, Akatosh can only be Time within the canon of The Elder Scrolls' Aurbis.
The point with Sermon 37 is principally Vivec recognizing he'd been on the wrong path this whole time. He thought the best way forward was I, but in the process he'd become weakened, for to paraphrase what he wrote earlier, "It's easier to kiss the lover than become one". The better path is WE, and that ties into multiple aspects of his personal character arc culminating in c0da.
Sermon 19 for instance shows his failed attempt at Amaranth. He has CHIM squared away, he sets himself up for the leap, and yet he cannot take it. He can't take that final last step.
His personal failings and baggage hold him back.
That's goal-post moving and also nonsensical, we're referring to fiction, within the fictional reality of TES Akatosh is Omnipresent.
Many fictions have Omnipotent or Omniscient or Omnipresent characters
Obviously nobody is arguing Akatosh is Time irl and Omnipresent in IRL and all fiction
Ah, then we agree then, for the most part.
And by c0da he's come to recognize that he will not be the new Amaranth, and that's fine. Beforehand it wasn't fine for him, he wanted to be everyone and everything as Sotha Sil explains, but he can only ever be Vivec.
But by the end, what Vivec is has changed, and he, or rather her, has her child who is the new Amaranth instead, playing her collective part in bringing it about with Jubal and all the others present rather than trying to be it herself.
Technically speaking, fiction exists within our own universe, similar to how dreams and others are like small realities, but not what they appear to be.
Sure but like. I was never arguing Akatosh is real? I was just explaining what he is, in the lore of The Elder Scrolls.
^
The channel's literally #elder-scrolls-lore, that's the context everything's discussed in first and foremost.
Within the context of TES, AKHAT is Time. His nature is not uniformly powerful throughout the Aurbis, but it's always present.
Hmm, trying to figure out the relation between Satakal and Akatosh
Similar superficial appearance, an aspect of Satakal perhaps?
Speaking of "outside" the Aurbis's multiverse is an exercise in futility, because you're not discussing TES anymore. It's not even a matter of different canons, because bear in mind that the canon-related statements c0da makes are MK's own and aren't necessarily reflective of TES's official status; I absolutely will defend MK's works as valid pieces of lore, but I still recognize they're at a secondary level to the "official" works' primary level.
Other than them both being the First Spirit to form from Anu and Padomay, and what allowed all other spirits to form?
In a teaser for Morrowind that pre-released the Yokudan Monomyth, it's explicitly stated that Akatosh is Satakal
(Anu as Satak, Padomay as Akel, Akatosh as Satakal, Lorkhan as Sep.)
https://web.archive.org/web/20010308212518fw_/http://www.m0use.net/~crodo/teaser/myth-yokudan.html
Satakal's more an idea of Anu+Padomay plus some Alduin
Which of course still ties back to Akatosh in the end by that nature
And in the French version of the Lore book The Monomyth, this statement remains
Yokuda," Satakal la Peaudemonde " (Anu en tant que Satak, Padomay en tant que Akel, Akatosh en tant que Satakal, Lorkhan en tant que Sep.)
oof
Think I can post it now, Elven myth. Says same thing. Anu and Padomay = Time which is Akatosh
The first ones were brothers: Anu and Padomay. They came into the Void, and Time began.
They're not 1:1, but certainly referencing the same concepts. See also Tall Papa, who's basically equivalent to Magnus but still has his own dynamics too
Or cases like Orkey where they're worshipping some amalgamation of Arkay/Xarxes and Malacath
Multi-language translations may or may not be part of the whole, though then again, it could be part of the multiple interpretations
Also Satakal is explicitly tied to Sep/Lorkhan
And in every myth Akatosh is tied to Lorkhan
So it persists
Is Namira Space?
French Text frequently holds lore secrets. For example the only reason Jills are canon is because of a French Translation of A Child's Beastiary
Namira is entropy. The slow hunger eroding everything away.
Makes sense, there
Namira is a really twisted aspect of Sithis too iirc
She's said to be essentially borne of the Void, yes. Which makes sense for her nature when you think about it.
Yep, I love that ESO lore. It really fleshed out Namira
The Void doesn't necessarily care for being anything other than the Void, thus does Creation rot.
Hence the Dark Brotherhood, too, if they really are serving Sithis and not just Mephala pulling every string. Sithis is associated with chaos, but chaos doesn't just mean random noise.
I think the Brotherhood are serving Sithis in some capacity
It's disorder, breaking down the orderly macro structures above. Entropic reduction to a base state
Lucien Lachance partway confirms it having witnessed the Void personally
Not just them, the daedra pass through the Void whenever they're killed
Closest thing to sleeping they care to experience, and it's not pleasant for them
That too ye
That base level of misanthropy. The Aurbis itself doesn't necessarily want to exist, possibly even wants to be basically nothing, and one can psychoanalyze Anu just by looking at all the various shenanigans of his dream.
He dreams, but doesn't want to.
I think the best way to analyze Anu's character is too look at Akatosh, since in a broad sense Akatosh is his self insert
Akatosh and Lorkhan both, really. Lorkhan is often left out of the conversation, and that can often be to do with Altmeri bias; the two are inseparable and two sides of the exact same coin
Absolutely true, just got a bit hyper focused on Akatosh ngl.
Could even tie into a certain alchemical process you might be sort-of familiar with if you've ever listened to Tool - Lateralus. Black then white in the beginning for Void to interplay or more directly the black and white of Padomay and Anu, then red and yellow, Lorkhan and Akatosh.
Spacetime, the first proper stabilization of the interplay.
That is a cool and pretty accurate way of looking at it. It works
I also see it as, Lorkhan being exactly as Sithis is to Anui-el, a sort of way for Anu to find out who he is, by bouncing off/reflecting of what he isn't, because Lorkhan is everything Akatosh is not while also being his shadow.
That's the gist of Padomay/Sithis in a sense too, to not exist and exist so Anu, which is everything, can better understand what they are.
It's very wordy and hard to explain tbh
Akatosh's shadow but arguably also a light being cast on him in turn.
Lorkhan is the IS NOT to Akatosh's IS, but where the pessimistic Altmer see that IS NOT as a lack of praxis on Lorkhan's part, Lorkhan was instead just as much looking forward.
I blame Trinimac
"IS NOT, BUT CAN BE". It's a key nuance you wouldn't see from the Altmer.
He spread misinfo about Lorkhan to the Altmer, I bet it's Trinimac's fault they forgot about the Dark heart or Lorkhan's nuances too
After all, he left and saw the I and went forward with that revelation to show other people, and he intentionally gave up the chance to rule the Arena because he wanted to help move things forward to whatever comes next instead.
Yep. Though I do wonder how much of that failure was intentional or his mind being corrupted by the Dark Heart and Namira
I'd say Namira's corruption came later. It was his post-Convention corpse she was puppeteering
Khajiit myth remains vague on it, though Yokudan myth says outright the Hunger ruined his mind
He was so hungry he could not think straight. Sometimes he would just eat the spirits he was supposed to help, but Tall Papa would always reach in and take them back out. Finally, tired of helping Tall Papa, Sep went and gathered the rest of the old skins and balled them up, tricking spirits to help him, promising them this was how you reached the new world, by making one out of the old.
Especially I doubt his failure was at her hands, because if he had've "succeeded", she'd be in even more control of the Mundus.
All the way up to Convention was himself, the Moon Beast is just his corpse revived as a zombie
Or a new corpse reformed
But that the Void Ghost is still trying to move forward goes to show his true colors. He's a multi-faceted individual and may well have his own personal darkness even without Namira, but he's at least trying to move forward whether people like it or not.
He basically taped everyone's eyes open and sat them in front of the screen to show what he saw, or help them to see at least, and be in a position to find what comes after. Not everyone necessarily consented to this project, but again, complex matter.
I think he's managed to move past much of his darkness, as we see in Sovngarde Nords who arrive seem to lose their hate and bigotry, and he has his friend Tsun soundly reject anyone who claims to be of Sithis/Namira/his old Darkness in general.
He and his brother both. Auriel may still beef with him, but Akatosh does not.
Wdym? Neither have beef because they're the same person
Their different religious interpretations yes, but the separate thinking personalities theory is faulty honestly
Not necessarily
MK's spoken directly about them fragmenting, particularly Akatosh is all over the place which is something the Khajiiti mythology even recognizes
It's not supported in the lore is my main reason, MK sometimes agreed with it and sometimes changed his mind and didn't. In the lore they're consistently treated as equatable.
And it's stated outright in the lore that Alessia pulled Akatosh from the Elven pantheon
katosh was an Aldmeri god, and Alessia's subjects were as-yet unwilling to renounce their worship of the Elven pantheon
Again, the Khajiiti mythology does support it, and they've been shown to be right about multiple other things. What's especially interesting is even the dragons will refer to the local name for their father.
They'll call him Alkosh in Elsweyr even if they have no actual reason to
MK never said that Auriel is not akatosh, he said something about Akaspirits in his AMA, but we should note that not only does MK not have complete creative control over the lore, but he also said this in his 2013-2015 period.
MK has said outright that during 2013-2015 he was horribly addicted to alcohol and benzos and was constantly hallucinating, confusing fiction and reality, as well as saying things he, per his own words, does not remember saying or even believes
In all the existing in universe lore, the different interpretations of AKHAT are treated as that, interpretations, not literal separate personalities who co-exist and form from a greater oversoul
I'm well aware of that, but getting into the validity of MK's texts is a whole 'nother can of worms and not a useful conversation right now.
The different interpretations of Akatosh are treated as interpretations by some cultures, and that doesn't mean they're right to do so.
Fair, but his words is largely the basis for the Mirror-aspects look at the Time Dragon. In the lore it does not exist
For like the third time now, it does exist in the lore and you've yet to address what I've brought up about that.
We'd essentially be saying our theorizing trumps the near entirety of mortal understanding, which is arrogant I'd say. From the Snow Elves as old as Gelebor to Imperials, Altmer, everyone, says the same thing
Where does Khajiit mythology contest this
Akha is not Auriel
Mortal understanding is itself severely limited, you have to look at various different aspects of it and cross-reference to get any kind of straight answer, which is of course what the Monomyth is.
https://en.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:The_Wandering_Spirits
Akha. The First Cat, whom we know as the Pathfinder and the One Unmourned. In the earliest days, when Ahnurr and Fadomai were still in love, he explored the heavens and his trails became the Many Paths. He was Ahnurr's Favored Son, and his father told him to find love like Ahnurr found with Fadomai. Akha mated with the Winged Serpent of the East, the Dune Queen of the West, and the Mother Mammoth of the North. He then went to the South and never returned. Instead, Alkosh appeared speaking warnings of the things Akha had made along the Many Paths. Since then, Alkosh and his faithful watch over the many children of Akha, for they are both terrible and kind.
Akha is not Akatosh, Alkosh is, and Alkosh is Auriel who is Akatosh
Akha is likely Anui-El honestly.
Akha. Aka. Dragon/Time (both mean the same thing strictly speaking).
Nahfahlaar calls Alkosh his father, not Akha. Alduin calls Akatosh his father. As does Paarthurnax. Paarthurnax asserts that Alduin is Akatosh's creation.
Everyone asserts Auriel is Akatosh
Yes, but a key point to remember: some conflate Akatosh with AKHAT.
Because Akatosh is AKHAT
AKHAT is just his Ehlnofey name. Just as Auriel is just his Aldmeri name
Yes, as is Auriel and Alkosh and so on and so forth. And they are each other. But that doesn't mean they're entirely each other.
I don't see why not however
It's a easy concept, though. We literally already discussed this in the previous conversation
Lorkhan and Akatosh.
They're two sides of the same coin. By the same concept, Auriel and Akatosh and whatnot are different sides of their same coin.
They can have their own individual personalities, but they're still inextricably bound as extensions of their oversoul.
We know mortal biases effect how they tell tales, the discrepancies in the described personalities of the Time Dragon is just that, bias. An Akatosh priest even mentions this in ESO
"All but the most dogmatic of theologians agree that the Imperial Akatosh and the Elven Auri-El are one and the same, though the Elves' worship of** Auri-El is skewed by their unfortunate racial biases.** But Auri-El is indubitably the God of Time for both the Altmer and Bosmer, and** in their creation myths we easily recognize the acts of our own Father Akatosh.** As to your penultimate question, since both Akatosh and Auri-El are credited with commencing the flow of time, by definition neither could 'precede' the other."
https://en.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:Artorius_Ponticus_Answers_Your_Questions
Technically it's all just Anu once you go up high enough.
The thing is I don't see it. I don't why we should assume they are separate personalities at all
That needlessly complicates what is a simple case of one individual, lots of opinions
I'd like to remind you that the Imperials are well known for their own bias in claiming the acts of dragon gods as just that of Akatosh
Case in point that condemns the argument: Alduin. They thought he was just Akatosh.
Then with TES5 we see they were quite a ways wrong about that.
Yes but I'd counter saying in the Alduin/Akatosh Dichotomy one of the notable reasons he is wrong is that he does not trust Nord word.
In the Alduin/Akatosh Dichotomy, per the Authors words Elves agree Auriel is Akatosh, unlike how Nords disagree
And the Nords end up being right about that, casting doubt on the validity of the Altmeri view and by extension the Imperial view that's influenced by it.
That is why Alduin Ent Akatosh exists as a direct parallel, this is what the people themselves have to say about their theology, this is what a foreigner thinks while diregarding their word
Alduin was retconned, yes his old lore is now retroactively Imperials being snobby, but this does not extend to everything Imperials say, that is a massive leap.
The Elves and Man agree, that is the key difference. The Nords and Imperials disagreed
The Aldmer, Bosmer, Dunmer, Mer mer mer all attest that Akatosh is Auriel
So? They share beliefs because they're culturally related, that doesn't mean they're correct.
And again, we know historically where Akatosh comes from!
Akatosh comes form the Elven Religion to begin with! He entered Human faith only because the Nedes adopted it from their Ayleid masters
Akatosh was an Aldmeri god, and Alessia's subjects were as-yet unwilling to renounce their worship of the Elven pantheon. She found herself in a very sensitive political situation. She needed to keep the Nords as her allies, but they were (at that time) fiercely opposed to any adoration of Elven deities. On the other hand, she could not force her subjects to revert back to the Nordic pantheon, for fear of another revolution. Therefore, concessions were made and Empress Alessia instituted a new religion: the Eight Divines, an elegant, well-researched synthesis of both pantheons, Nordic and Aldmeri.
That is a false dichotomy and you know it
Let's keep real world religion out of this, please.
Back on TES, Akatosh is also literally Elven to his roots.
Aka-Tosh, etymologically is literally just means Time Dragon or Dragon Dragon. Aka is an Elven word. He is stated to be of the Elven Pantheon.
Auriel in Varieties of faith is stated to be Auriel Time Dragon. Considering from where Akatosh comes from, and how in Remanada he is called Auriel and Aka-tosh, I'd attest Auriel Time Dragon is also known to the Ayleids as Auriel Aka-Tosh
It's not a false dichotomy, multiple related religions sharing their beliefs doesn't mean those beliefs are correct, it just means they all agree on something. Agreeance =/= truth.
I love you sweet Aless, sweet wife of Shor and of Auri-el and the Sacred Bull
El-Estia, queen of ancient times, who bore in her left hand the dragonfire of the** aka-tosh** and in her right hand the jewels of the covenant
To assert that a common truth is false you'd have to show its' false and you haven't, no where in the lore is it contested that Auriel is Akatosh
Alduin is an exception that proves the rule
And more importantly, he is a retcon, and not indicative of all the Time deities
It's the same as people thinking the Waking Flame in ESO are right about their narrative of Dagon's creation just because they agree with Mankar. Dagonite beliefs being consistent isn't support for their truthfulness, it just means Dagon believes it or his followers keep believing it.
We don't know he's a retcon, because we don't know that him being Akatosh was ever intended to be the truth in the first place
It was.
According to whom?
It's a retcon, you really have to leap to say it isn't. At the time of Morrowind Alduin was Akatosh, per all the existing lore and how MK talked about him.
Also by definition it is a retcon because retcon means retroactive continuity
Literally from TES2 onwards and especially Redguard onwards they've intentionally run with the unreliable narrative trope, providing lore as opposed to truth. Things aren't put in the games to be the truth, they're put in to be narratives that might or might not be the truth.
This is retroactive continuity by definition
Unreliable Narrator is used to explain the retcon, that does not mean it is not a retcon
Retroactive Continuity, new information that reframes information in a continuity. Akatosh we were told was Alduin, then this was changed, that's a retcon
I'm familiar with nearly every text of MK's, I don't recall him ever describing Alduin as literally Akatosh. On multiple occasions he's made it clear he's a separate individual, albeit still connected to Akatosh or even AKHAT above.
At most a mirror-brother like Auriel.
Almost every time he has spoken on Alduin was post Skyrim
Yes, and has any of that ever indicated he wasn't meant to be another aspect originally?
The few times he hasn't, it was near Skyrims release and he knew everything happening in the writing room
The entire mess of Mirror-Aspects is very arguably MK trying to keep old lore relevant in the face of new lore that overwrites it
Alduin explicitly claims himself the Son of Akatosh, not his mirror brother, or equal in any capacity
I know, and I'll absolutely fight any argument that he's meant to be equal. My point was that that's as far as MK ever described him. Never Akatosh, but akin.
That's the thing MK did describe him prior, not OOG but in the game lore, as we see in variety of fates
And I seriously doubt MK was thinking of the plot of Skyrim in 2003
I mean, they might've been. They had plans for Skyrim all the way back in Redguard
even if just preliminary
A lot of TES5's lore was already established way back in the PGE1 which released with Redguard, let alone whatever Bethesda might've had written down but not utilized in the games yet
Plans for Skyrim is not the same as writing Lore you know will be proven false 8 years later. Soon before Skyrim released they thought the plot would be Uriel bringing Dragons from Akavir
Alduin initially wasn't even the focus
That was one of the ideas they were kicking around, yes
Another involved Auriel sniping Talos right out of Aetherius which then messed up any attempts at depicting the Red Diamond in artwork
and the dragons being more fleshed out as "organic time machines"
Anyways we're arguing semantics, it's a retcon because by definition a retcon is retroactive information that changes continuity. Prior to Skyrim the continuity as written in the franchise was Alduin as the Nordic view of Akatosh, and then this was changed. That is a retcon
That's a DLC and the plan was for the Thalmor to do so iirc not Auriel
The continuity was specifically the Imperials believed Alduin was the Nordic view of Akatosh. That was never an objective statement, and the document it comes from is already known to be filled with Imperial-biased inaccuracy on some things, notably Almalexia; it tries so hard to conflate her worship with that of Akatosh's that it goes to show it's just as likely to press that upon anything else such as Alduin.
They basically are in canon considering they're Time Spirits, and well they're organic
There is serious proof MK thought of them as the same however, prior to Skyrim's release in MK's Nord Religion design Document, he had Alduin as the Time Dragon still not Firstborn, and he had the Nords believe Talos helped Martin not Akatosh because the Nords would never believe Alduin would do such a thing.
Some of the gods are the same (or similar) – significantly these are the three female gods, which are far more important to the Nords than they are in the Imperial Cult. (Kyne is in fact the de facto head of the Nord pantheon.) The Nords are perplexed and disturbed by the Imperial Cult’s focus on the Dragon God – they regard this as a fundamental misunderstanding of the universe, and one likely to cause disaster in the end. (Which fits perfectly with the pessimistic Nord view of the world in general – things are likely to turn out badly, and it will probably be caused by some foreigner.) Lucky for the world that the Nords are so diligent about keeping Alduin asleep, while the southerners are busy trying to get his attention! Any mention of Akatosh in a Nord’s presence is likely to bring a muttered invocation to Alduin to stay asleep in response.
The Nords believe that, During the Oblivion Crisis, it was Talos (Dragonborn, Martin’s forefather) lending his aid, not Alduin.
The First born stuff is all after the change that comes with Skyrim
MK was still pushing for them to be equated with what he presented to Bethesda
I'm aware of that document, but you don't realize that's the Nords making the exact same mistake their southern cousins were making. That text is almost verbatim present in ESO as well.
Because an ESO dev ripped it from MK yes, MK was delighted when he learned this
He had nothing to do with it being added to ESO, it's not some 4d chess move he planned all along since 2003
Not necessarily MK. It was a design doc from Bethesda, they could've just gotten ahold of that.
The Design Doc is by MK, this is confirmed
MK just provided us with a slightly edited version to read beforehand.
By MK or provided by MK? Those are two different things.
By
Where did he say he wrote it himself?
This is a serious reach, are you really going to deny this?
You do realize Bethesda employs multiple writers right
I know he did and I can find the citation, but are we really going to leap this far?
I will actually ping MK on r/Teslore if I have to I am so certain.
Feel free to, I'd love to have that as proof for if someone else ever asks the question
If he himself wrote that text, cool, I have no problem with that concept, what I'm asking for is proof that it was him and not a collaborative effort amongst the various writers. Bare minimum I'd assume Kurt would've helped
I am getting it but yeah Kurt probably helped because MK and Kurt did almost all their lore together
Even the Sermons weren't actually as much MK as is conventionally thought, they were heavily edited by the others.
Vivec in general had like 3 different writers
Which as MK pointed out suits his character well
Ken Vivec best Vivec
While I wait for a straight answer also worth noting MK presented them as internal notes initially on Reddit before ever posting them in a proper organized post on Tumblr
It's rather clear both from it harkening to his older lore and how he presented it is his work
I don't know if he will ever answer me on reddit so I also dm'd someone who knows him.
uesp also, cites the Doc writer as MK.
Nvm there is a straight answer
It might be citing him for publishing it, but that doesn't mean the UESP knows he actually wrote it.
The Imperial library, cites the Author of the doc as MK.
The one who posted this was Lady Nerevar.
Lady Nerevar is his wife
MK wrote it, period.
I'd argue there's still a mild grey area of second-guessing that a direct answer from him would clear up, but pending that response from him it's more likely than not, then.
But going down from that tangent, saying he's the writer, he's still fundamentally writing a piece of lore for the game. It's not necessarily meant to be an objective statement on what is going on, it's just meant to be the Nordic beliefs.
He's the only one who presents it, he created the initial lore the pushed the idea, he tried to make Alduin equal to Akatosh post skyrim, he presents this information whenever prompted about the what if for nord religion in skyrim, his wife cites him as the author
You really have to push it for that Grey area
If his idea got through nord belief on this topic would never have even been questioned and the mirror brother stuff would not exist
Again, Alduin is an outlier
An outlier is still a precedent to question others.
And he is indicative of nothing pertaining to the other time spirit interpretations
Also, his idea did get through, even if it didn't immediately get through in TES5. In general there could've been much more done with the Nordic mythology in TES5, but that's another conversation too.
Alduin creates the precedent that any lore we know can be changed to something completely different later
He does not present the precedent that his situation is applicable to everything, that is a leap
That's not a new precedent, though. We already knew the lore could be changed. But also we knew the lore could be wrong.
And again, Alduin akatosh dichotomy notes the difference between trusting Elves and disregarding nords for a reason, because the scholar failed academically there
I've gotta leave for work hnnnng
appropriately, curse you time for running like this
I'll be back in a few hours
I will unfortunately be gone by then oof, talk to ya another time
i found a pretty nifty quote a while back in one of the loremaster archives pertaining to this subject
no wait it wasn't a loremaster archive
https://www.imperial-library.info/content/lawrence-schick-and-phrastus-altmer-culture
Atharaon:
Are the eight planets of the Altmer literally the same eight planets of the other Aedric religions but with different names, or are they actually different planets altogether, i.e. there are more than eight planets up there, but each group is making a selection of their own chosen eight.Phrastus:
The answer, I believe, is mostly the former with a little bit of the latter: mythopoeia is real, or “real,” so the reality-warping force of cultural belief must be accounted for. In other words, they’re all the same planets but not exactly the same divines—and if that doesn’t make sense to you, I scarcely know where to start. Where did you say you studied, again?
MK also has a pretty interesting topic on the subject
On the different time-dragons:
Don't forget that gods can be shaped by the mythopoeic forces of the mantlers-- so Tosh Raka could be an Akaviri avatar of Akatosh with a grudge against his mirror-brother in Cyrodiil.
Just like Akatosh-as-we-usually-know-him could time-scheme against his mirror-brother of the Nords, Alduin, to keep the present kalpa-- perhaps his favorite-- from being eaten.
Notice all the coulds.
i personally tend toward "Auriel and Akatosh and Alduin are all part of the overall concept/plane(t) Time (AKHAT) but can act individually on account of being different personalities of a god"
usually when you have different personalities in the same body, we'd imagine the personalities fighting for who's in control, but because he's a god, those personalities are able to exist more or less simultaneously, hypothetically capable of avatars of two different personalities appearing at once (although it'd have to be the right circumstances: Aedra seem to have a hard time creating avatars, although we see a few in TESIII, one in TESIV, and two in TESV)
but of course, that's just my interpretation
do with it and the information presented as you will
a notable piece of context which is pretty much required to understand this:
What are planets?
The planets are the gods and the planes of the gods, which is the same thing. That they appear as spherical heavenly bodies is a visual phenomena caused by mortal mental stress. Since each plane(t) is an infinite mass of infinite size, as yet surrounded by the Void of Oblivion, the mortal eye registers them as bubbles within a space. Planets are magical and impossible. The eight planets correspond to the Eight Divines. They are all present on the Dwarven Orrery, along with the mortal planet, Nirn.
https://www.imperial-library.info/content/cosmology
I can't agree with that because I feel you have to ignore so much lore and coherency in them all being one individual outside Alduin in order to justify, this decades old theory derived from some quotes from MK during the worst time of his life
Alduin especially because you have to ignore his own words in order to justify him being part of the whole thing
This was quote is also from the tumultuous period of MK's mind, hence my distrust for it.
Regarding Phrastus' quote, that's honestly demonstrably false, if cultural belief had real effect on Deities and such, then the Tribunal would never have lost their godhoood
Mythopeia does exist yes but according to Lady Nerevar, MK's wife, it's not that at all. It's re-enactment of Myth to change myth
And that's essentially what the Aldmer King Auriel may have done when if he had mantled the Time Dragon, and that's a very separate theory to the other one I have distaste for
i'm standing by my interpretation in this case, i was primarily just tossing in sources which might assist in the conversation
my 2 cents were mostly to hopefully help provide an overview of what these might mean when taken together
Ah, fair enough
well, actually, this allows me to bring in another source, which was my primary purpose for pitching in anyways
"The Moot looked to the tribe of Ald son of Ald but he would break no oath of the Pact
- Shor Son of Shor
i don't believe my theory or mirror theory in general contradicts the idea that Alduin is the child of AKHAT (i use the Ehlnofex name here to try and refer to a more neutral view of the Time god without cultural bias). for instance, the Khajiit have three Time gods, Akha, Alkosh, and Alkhan. these are all Time gods, and so would reasonably all be mirrors of AKHAT, yet have relationships with one another and interact quite heavily. to take Alduin as belonging to a separate Planet or to no Planet at all seems, to me, to also imply that either Alkosh or Akha does not belong to a Planet or belongs to a separate Planet. what are your thoughts?
and apologies if i misunderstood your stance
Thing is, despite how much I like it Shor son of Shor is not canon and has yet to be referenced in any existing media. This text is also directly contradicted by Paarthurnaxs' words about Alduin being a *creation *of Akatosh.
And even then, within Shor son of Shor, the new them is not the old them, And Alduin is not Akatosh.
Along side this text MK also released the text Seven fights of Aldudagga where Alduin is a clear inferior to Aka-tusk, and from who he was shed.
Khajiit myth is a different story entirely, Akha was likely Anui-El if anything, and he disappears. He is then replaced by Alkosh who assumws his position. Dragons refer to Alkosh as their father and nobody speaks of Akha in any capacity.
Khajiit myth has Alkhan as firstborn as well, and of Akha, whom is replaced by Alkosh
i only skimmed the conversation before entering the sources, seeing as i wasn't intending on continuing
My stance is essentially exactly what the lore tells
out of curiosity, if you take Akha as Anuiel (which is a stance i can understand), do you believe there's an analogue to Sithis in the Khajiiti pantheon?
What is told on the tin is what it is, no deeper time spirit conspiracy, I don't agree with the fandom theory of separate personalities of a Time spirit oversoul
Namira would be Sithis
Or rather she is of Sithis, from him
i appreciate the clarification
Namiira. The Eldest Spirit. The Great Darkness. The Void. All creatures who feed on rotten flesh are her spies and the prey of Cats. The Lunar Lattice protects us from her hunger, but not our own. Know that to name her aloud is to invite the Dark, so you must never do so, as Namiira is the sound of her true name. She is a spirit of infinite realms, of which only Azurah knows all. Mortals who become ensnared by this spirit are tortured until they forget who they were and know only Namiira. This is eternal suffering for all souls but the ja-Kha'jay, whom Azurah will not abandon to the Dark.
I see Namira as the aspect of Sithis, the great Change, entropy specifically, hidden with Lorkhans' heart, the Spirit of Limitation
This matches pretty well with what we're told of her in Khajiit lore, and with her connection to Sithis
however, that is not quite what i meant. i meant a direct analogue of Sithis, similar to how you say that Akha is essentially Anuiel
after all, we know Namira to be a Daedric Prince, and we know Sithis not to be
Sithis exists in Khajiit belief as the void, but outside arguably Namira I don't believe they personify him
Namira is not a normal Daedric Prince, she is the Ur Dra according to Azura in Khajiit faith
Nocturnal is the Ur Dra according to some sources as well
It's a contested position, but given that the Dark Heart is proven to exist, I believe Namira to be
Her connection to Lorkhan is far more significant and thus makes her more worthy of the position than Nocturnal
It's also possible that Sithis is what the Khajiit texts consistently refer to as "The Dark"
Lorkhaj. The Moon Prince. Fadomai's Favored Son. The White Lion. He was born in the Great Darkness and it followed him as his burden. Loved by many, he was considered a noble leader. Lorkhaj was the first spirit to make his own path with purpose, because he was in conflict with himself as soon as he was born. His courage inspired all those he encountered, so much that he united the spirits to make the World. He gave his life to do this. We honor his sacrifice by walking the Path with purpose and resisting** the call of the Dark**
Namiira. The Eldest Spirit. The Great Darkness. The Void. All creatures who feed on rotten flesh are her spies and the prey of Cats. The Lunar Lattice protects us from her hunger, but not our own. Know that to name her aloud** is to invite the Dark**, so you must never do so, as Namiira is the sound of her true name. She is a spirit of infinite realms, of which only Azurah knows all. Mortals who become ensnared by this spirit are tortured until they forget who they were and know only Namiira. This is eternal suffering for all souls but the ja-Kha'jay, whom Azurah will not abandon** to the Dark.**
Noctra. The Shadow Thief. Daughter of Twilight. Born from the black blood of Lorkhaj at the steps of the Void Gate. In the songs, Boethra battled this spirit until it knew it was not Namiira. When this was done, Noctra was brought before Azurah to be judged. Azurah showed mercy and allowed Noctra to live, so long as she served Azurah and the ja-Kha'jay. But Noctra is rebellious by nature, so she stole one of Azurah's keys and fled back into the Void. It is written that Azurah sent the true spirit of Lorkhaj to find her, and ever since Noctra has aided the Khajiit when called. Tribes may whisper to Noctra for silence, shade, and luck. Do not summon her to perform vile deeds,** for this will bring the Dark with her.**
hm
i quite like that take, i think. i'll have to look into it more. it's closer to what i was going for than the Namiira answer 
i don't really have many more thoughts on the topic, however

apologies for not reciprocating your answers! i feel kind of bad, but i don't think my thoughts are collected enough right now to properly represent myself. if i end up feeling up to the task later, i might end up coming back and joining in again 
All cool! Feel free to come back and discuss whenever you feel like
Hmm, could be that multiple entities could fill the title of "Ur-Dra" due to existing alongside/during the process of time becoming linear, or too early to tell the difference?
well... i've seen an interpretation of the source, which i think holds water, that says the title can basically be stolen
But Fadomai had taught Azurah the names of all of the spirits, so she recognized the Great Darkness for what it was, and she roared in time with the song:
UR DRA NA MII RA UR DRA NA MII RA UR DRA AZU RA
And Azurah tore out the dark heart of Lorkhaj, and all of the darkness in him came with it, and she cast it beyond the sea.
- The Favored Daughter of Fadomai
it goes Namira, Namira, all of a sudden Azura, indicating the one who was holding the title suddenly changed
although, interestingly, i don't think we ever hear Namira called Ur-Dra by something somewhat authoritative, only ever from The Favored Daughter of Fadomai. for instance, both Nocturnal and Sotha Sil call Nocturnal Ur-Dra, which seems a FAIR bit more convincing than an origin story to me
the source which originally mentions the title also credits the royalty of oblivion (Princes and Lords) for the information
Nocturnal is accorded the title Ur-dra by nearly all the Royalty of Oblivion. As the mother of night, she claims to be an aspect of the original Void itself, and it is generally deemed best to fortify this declaration in one’s evening prayers.
- Imperial Census of Daedra Lords
it could be that it's been stolen multiple times, or held by multiple people simultaneously. i personally subscribe to the theory that Nocturnal, as Shadow (including the unknown portion of the consciousness, which of course predates the known portion of the consciousness, thus how Nocturnal would be considered Ur (first)), is definitely Ur-Dra. the title belonging to Nocturnal makes significantly more sense than Namira, although i don't think Namira necessarily... isn't Ur-Dra? Nocturnal definitely is, but Namira might be. all the Spirits are, after all, ultimately each part of a single whole. the line of logic i'm aware of with Namira's claim to Ur-Dra basically points to the relationship with Lorkhan and Sithis, but does rely on taking the Monomyth's suggestion that Lorkhan is a limitation as meaning that Lorkhan is Limitation
Padomay -> Sithis -> Lorkhan -> Lorkhan's death -> Namira
IS NOT -> Void -> Limit -> Death/Ultimate Limit -> Decay (Entropy)
i missed a source. Spirits of Amun-Dro also names Namiira Ur-Dra
Azura seems like a liar to me; but that twilight between truth and lie is still a bit of both.
oh
i forgot that Namira came so late, actually. it could be that Namira took the title of Ur-Dra upon being realized
sorry, but i can't seem to figure out if this is talking about something in particular?
do you think she lied about something that pertains to this specifically, or is it just a general statement that she seems like a liar?
P much any time I read something she says she did (or perhaps someone else says she did; or in actuality that a writer rote that someone wrote that she did, etc) it smacks of b.s., that's all. Much of The Lore is false and misleading in that way.
so general statement
gotcha
Sure. It applies in some ways. To me it seems more likely that Azura didnt rip out lorkajh's heart, and may not have even been there in person so to speak.
well, these are Khajiit myths in particular
The dwemer have some likely false fables too. But yes. Grains of salt e v e r y w h e r e. :p
maaaaan, this server is so hard to talk on
Lol watchyomouf
the Khajiit were blessed by Azurah to have their shapes tied to the moons n stuff, so it makes sense to me for them to credit her for something like that. this also doesn't, in fact, directly contradict with the idea that Auriel, for instance, ripped out his Heart: note that Azura is ripping out Lorkhaj's Dark Hart
that said, yeah, you're right
who knows if it's true
"So what i said was true, in a manner of speaking"
Well Azura is not Mephala, lying isn't exactly her sphere.
The Khajiit are not the only race to attribute the Dark Heart and its' greater significance to Namira, the Reachfolk do as wlell, and they have no such devotion to Azura
Claims of Azura being a liar are frequent, but honestly she rarely is? The entirety of Morrowind history post Red Mountain is claiming she's a liar and well we all played Morrowind didn't we?
ye. regardless of Azura's place in the story, Namira and the Dark Heart are pretty certainly connected imo
Azura I'd argue is the most trustworthy prince, she almost never betrays a loyal follower
The Dark heart I'd argue is far more important than Nocturnal having powers of Shadows, mythically it's a blob of pure and absolute Sithis and Namira is near irrefutable its' authority
"having powers of Shadow"
that's downplaying it a tad...
Also worth noting that Sotha Sil, is not Authoritative, he has been wrong many many times.
Nocturnal proclaiming herself Ur-Dra is not authoritative as well, for obvious reasons
Meant to TYPE power over the shadows, I'm aware of how far reaching it is
Typos are all I do today
what i meant was that Nocturnal is Shadow
just as Mehrunes Dagon is Destruction, so on and so forth. it's not power over shadows, she is shadow
I know, that's mentioned in Amun-Dro as well, but a Shadow is not the same as THE Dark. She's of the Void yes but that seems less significant than being directly connected to the core of it as Namira is
yes, but it's contesting with Khajiiti myth. out of the two, i would definitely take Nocturnal, Sotha Sil, and according to Imperial Census..., multiple other members of Daedric royalty (presumably Princes and maybe lesser Lords)
Lying is something everyone does; Azura does it well to have deceived so many ;p
The Imperial Census is from prior to ESO, and is also an unofficial teaser written by MK, it's not worthless but it's not right to say all the royalty of Oblivion agree she is Ur-Dra when this is clearly not the case in official lore
The reachfolk say namira removed the heart iirc. Mephala's webs are more cunning and devious than others, this is true--perhaps she is the source of the conflicting tales.
ESO itself calls Nocturnal Ur-Dra 
ESO?
Like the video game?
What?
yes
ESO also has the lore claiming Namira is so
In any case, the words of priests are hardly valid sources for truth outside of the walls of their temples.
I suppose, which is why I say we look to what makes each prince significant
And while Nocturnal is shadow, I see being Prince of Ancient Darkness and directly being tied to the Dark Corruption of Lorkhan as more significant
(pasted the wrong thing at first)
https://en.uesp.net/wiki/Online:Sotha_Sil
https://en.uesp.net/wiki/Online:Nocturnal
https://en.uesp.net/wiki/Online:Aios
There is a threat! The Daedric Prince, Nocturnal!
"Accessing privatized threat-array. Dreaming … knee abrasion. Lullaby.
Threat located. Nocturnal. Ur-dra. Unfathomable Mistress of Shadows. Prospect registered. Risk level: moderate. Thank you for your concern."
- Aios
"You trespass, Ur-dra. The Clockwork City shall bear your weight no longer."
- Sotha Sil
How can I even be sure that you're really Nocturnal?
"Your doubts do you credit, mortal. But in your heart, you know the truth.
Your shadow grows long and dark. The shades of Evergloam dance at the edge of your sight. I am Ur-dra. I am Nocturnal."
- Nocturnal
another notable quote tying into the last one
"Before Oblivion, there was Nocturnal."
- Nocturnal
I see that Sotha recognizes her as such, and yes she claims as such, but I frankly think the visible connection to Sithis who is far older and more encompassing than Prince is more significant
Though there's also the fact that Ur-Dra as a term for beings prior to other beings is a bit nonsensical, what with the lack of Linear time post the beginning of time, you mention this above iirc
yes. the reason i point out that ESO calls Nocturnal Ur-Dra is because you took the "new lore" to be more authoritative when the new lore claims both things instead of just one
Ur-Dra also supposedly means the strongest of the Princes, which is a whole other discussion primarily because of Jyggalag
strongest?! where'd you get that idea?
that's not something i've ever seen someone associate with Ur-Dra
"Only that you keep your intentions hidden and your eyes open. The Night Mistress is Ur-dra - perhaps the eldest and most powerful of the Daedric Princes. And your ally, Divayth Fyr, is no saint.
Nocturnal is impressive, and if she had taken over Crystal tower she would've become strongest, but as of now? No way do I think Nocturnal is the strongest Daedroth
what makes you think it's Namira?
aside from the connection to the Dark Heart, which does not immediately entail being the strongest. besides Nocturnal also has a connection to the Dark Heart, and Sheogorath seems to as well
Mainly her connection to the Dark Heart again. Jyggalag I'm only not considering because he never contests the position in any source.
And between Namira and Nocturnal I think Namira is far more impressive
this seems like an arbitrary distinction to me
Nocturnal's connections afaik extends only to Amun-Dro stating she was born of the blood spilt from it, which would place her beneath Namira.
What's Sheo's conneciton?
The whole thing is arbitrary since again, any spirit being first in a time of non-linear time makes no sense
the way i've come to understand it is that Nocturnal is all Shadow, including the concept of the Jungian Shadow, which is - again, by my understanding - basically the portion of the mind or self which is unknown, undiscovered
this is why i referenced Nocturnal being Shadow earlier
of course, that's rather speculative, but as far as an original Ur-Dra goes (keeping in mind the title seems to be capable of changing hands), Nocturnal makes much more sense to me for that reason
after all, unknown must predate known
this would also tie into her status as Lady Luck:
shadows aren't just the literal absence of light, they're also kind of a point in which things are undecided because they're in multiversal conflict
... chosen to explore this relation of world to shadow, Azra was the first to realize that shadows were not a mere absence of light but a reflection of possible worlds created by forces in conflict. A light strikes a rock, and the shadow is a record of their clash, past, present and future.
Other conflicting forces produced less obvious shadows, fire and water, wind and rock, or nations at war.
With skill and patience, the shadows of all could be read, and patterns teased out, emphasized or eradicated.
Manipulating a shadow could, through contagion, manipulate the object or force which cast it.
- First Scroll of Shadow
Shadow refers to so much more in TES than it does irl
but again, this doesn't even have to contradict with Namira being Ur-Dra!

Time relies on movement and causes entropy, "simultaneously." There isn't a "before". Void, and then everything began.
Decay and shadow only exist secondarily to matter. Stuff rots, light gets blocked.
Simultaneity sounds right. Not Sure namira would fight about it, but nocturnal probably would.
Nocturnal: "I am ur dra!"
Namira: "sure, whatever."
I wonder if Princes beyond the 17 exist, and if so do any of them make claim for Ur-Dra?
I know Deadlight hints at there being more at least
in oldold lore we've been told there definitely were
but i'm pretty sure that predates numerology and all that
Probably. The 17 are just the ones that we know about, principally because they actually interact with the Mundus.
Not to mention the magna ge star orphans. Meridia was one, then got exiled back into oblivion.
Would be neat to see more magna ge cultism.
Like, truly weird eldritch/alien/fey concepts and goals...
Forget black/white/gray morality, lets try on some blue/orange/zappa morality
Sheogorath?
Nah. He's just mad.
If there is a elder scrolls game that takes place after Skyrim then who canonically won the civil war in Skyrim
We don't know
We do not know who won, nor how they would handle it, they could do pretty much anything they want with it if the next entry comes after TESV.
They could make one side win then reveal that was the bad choice and that side fails to stand against the Dominion or they could make both sides lose because some outside event or they could just dodge the entire thing and just not discuss it.
Hell they could do it KOTOR 2 style and let us decide in dialogue.
We don't have a TES game set after TES5 yet.
Ok
I am guessing this but does oblivion take place during the oblivion crisis I havnt played it yet so idk
It's the primary plot of the game, yes.
TES1 was the Imperial Simulacrum, TES2 culminates in the Warp in The West, TES3 the Nerevarine Prophecy and fall of the Tribunal alongside Dagoth Ur, TES4 was the Oblivion Crisis.
I think I only guessed correctly because the name gave it away
And as I’m pretty sure everyone in this server knows Skyrim was the return of alduin
well...
technically TES: Legends (specifically the narrator Kellen and all that) takes place after TES5 seeing as the Clockwork City DLC takes place concurrently to Skyrim, but it doesn't reveal any details, so it ultimately doesn't change that we have no answer currently
based on what BGS has historically done, it would make sense for them to leave it ambiguous so that it's up to the player, but we'll have to wait and see 
Me when I lie
You can check the lore buddy
There is no lore stating the Empire won, since TES 6 isn't out
The Stormcloak missive refers only to the Fort in question if that's what you're extrapolating to say Empire wins lol
tes fandom try not to blatantly lie challenge 
Though by contrast, there is a new set of Skyrim Tarot cards that state something rather interesting
https://www.reddit.com/r/teslore/comments/w94ugk/new_skyrim_tarot_deck_may_confirm_a_stormcloak/
More seriously, they still haven't confirmed anything, and I doubt they even will one way or the other when TES 6 actually releases.
It would make sense that
Stormcloaks won
Dovahkiin becomes emperor
Dovahkiin and Ulfric reunite the Empire, ousting the Thalmor and granting more independent governance in Skyrim
So that both sides are technically victorious
They will never make Dovahkiin Emperor, because they don't like giving canon endings to the characters
There's also the fact that making the LDB Emperor would require giving them a canonical race because then future Dragonborn emperors will exist
Also, there's zero reason for LDB to be Emperor. The Amulet is sadly gone
K. Dovahkiin acts as negotiator then wanders off; an end the Median dynasty abd a new line of emperors is spawned. Not really a big deal tbh
Both civil war outcomes are canon if the new empire negotiates reunification and fairer relations.
It's possible they could have TES 6 happen at the same time as TES 5
So they just dodge the entire question and leave us with another 10 years of arguing
Yeah I found this very odd
We'll have to wait and see what the other card descriptions say, because the Stormcloaks coming out on top seems incredibly unlikely to me.
I think saying one way is more likely than the other is redundant, Bethesda is going to find someway to keep it tied, vague, or let us pick. That's just commonly how they handle these choices.
Just a thought but could it be possible with their kid or grandkids down the line?
That'd also be a confirmation of race so they prob won't. I think we're narratively moving away from the Empire, but that's besides the point. Dragonborn Empires are done
@ErfXploded Just as there are many possible futures in tarot, there are many possible story choices in Skyrim! As a tarot card, that passage simply represents the "upright" fortune that is possible for Ulfric. The civil war is still canonically a player choice within Skyrim.
The Civil War remains unconfirmed.
I see, thank you
It wouldn't be a confirmation, you're the one choosing your race which means you're also choosing the LDB's race yourself like you did in TES5, except not really because even then you could just as well be the race of the other parent.
Especially if you're instead the grandkid which gives a freely-definable generation in the middle to work with regarding how you came to be.
Oh playing as a descendent can work sure I mean Dragonborn heirs from the LDB on the throne would be confirmation
The LDB isn't necessarily the only dragonborn out there.
Just the one that was in prime position to be utilized when Alduin showed up.
Typically, gr8 heroes happen around the same time in several places at once. I wouldnt be surprised if there was an LDB khajiit and an LDB redguard and...
What does ldb mean
Last Dragonborn
Can the elder scrolls themselves be broken down? Their essence seems potent.. and I'm curious what one could do with it's energy
If anyone's ever succeeded, we don't know about it.
And if they could be altered to adhere to whoever wants to change the past/future fate of something already written. Tho I figure that would take something pretty powerful to manipulate time and space like that, say if an elder scroll turned out to be the antagonist itself, fighting fate in a sense and whatever form it takes. Instead of it already being decided in a prophecy of an Elder scroll.
The Scrolls don't see what will happen, but what can happen.
—Zurin Arctus, the Underking```
I read that they see potentially a Flux of time of what could happen
That's explicitly what they do. Time is not set in stone, neither past nor future.
But even then, i'd like to go outside of that like there are more options than those offered by the scrolls. To do something even a scroll failed to see.
They see possibilities, and different readings can give different results, especially across different scrolls entirely
They don't fully agree until the fated hero actually establishes what happens themselves.
Add the various multiple timelines and multiversal shenanigans, and you see why the Moth Priests always have something to do.
Even at the best of times, time is a rope of many strands, not simply a line.
I can't remember was the prophecy about alduin and the dragonborn in a scroll or from elsewhere?
It's unclear. It originated either from an elder scroll, or the Tsaesci. There's claims for both.
See I never really liked the idea it was from a scroll even if it was.
That's kinda what started my idea on this whole discussion
In a way at least to me, the scrolls themselves almost seem of some sort highly-developed machine origin
And idk but maybe that could have something to do with how and why the dwemer were able to transcribe them
They're basically copies of copies. How they were made or how they function is unknown.
Is there a first or original elder scroll before all the others?
Possibly whatever's at the core of the Adamantine Tower.
It's been described as a scroll case in some UOL texts, after all.
Maybe. Or perhaps all the copies came simultaneously as odd as that might sound..
The divine nature of the scrolls makes it difficult if not impossible to really pin them down. They don't even exist in a countable form, they just pop in and out at will.
It's almost like an ai script or code written by something else dictating all the possibilities from beginning to end of its program.
Wonder if I could reverse engineer it to affect it's author instead
I doubt it's under any kind of control, it's just doing what it does
Even the gods themselves are ultimately governed by their natures.
Convention is as Convention does.
I kinda see them on different levels, some gods being higher than others
But surely the scrolls themselves have some master to be able to have the ability to do what they were designed to do
Just as we design things to carry out their functions thru the tools we provide that are needed to carry out whatever duty whether assisted or solo
Well sure, someone made them, but it's not quite clear who or why
They might be basically recordings for Magnus to take a look at during dragon breaks as was suggested in some UOL texts
with Mnemoli transporting them to him
Showing him what's going on in his creation in his absence
Idk, maybe eventually we'll do something that a scroll failed to forsee even as a possibility, and it will cause them to go berserk and overload and start zapping everyone out of existence lol..
I doubt it, the scrolls aren't infallible and never have been
They're just doing what they do as best they can. If something happens they couldn't account for, oh well, just keep recording from here.
Time is a mess even under stable Convention and within a single timeline, let alone all the parallel shenanigans and distortions from various factors.
and dragon breaks render any attempt moot anyway
Idk, my pride would be hit pretty hard if I was the only elder scroll to fail a prophecy check. Basically become the black sheep/scroll of the elder scrolls..
That's every single one of them, though
They all see possibilities. Not all possibilities come to pass.
We hear about the prophecies that came true, you don't hear about the ones that failed.
Especially also when some of those prophecies are self-fulfilling because they involve people who would want to see them fulfilled
Since you bring that up, I kinda like the idea of seeing what could of been as well
i.e. the LDB, of course Akatosh is going to want a dragonborn in place to deal with Alduin, who knows how many other dragonborn might be out there in dormancy since they weren't the ones in the right spot
and the Nerevarine, leave it to the Prince of Prophecy to make a prophecy she would personally ensure gets fulfilled in the first place.
Even the Tyranny of The Sun. Would Harkon've attempted to fulfil that prophecy if it hadn't been made in the first place?
The vase scene from The Matrix comes to mind.
I forget that scene will have to look later
The Oracle tells Neo not to worry about the vase. Neo's like "what vase" and turns, accidentally knocking a vase over. He asks how she knew that'd happen, she instead replies "what's really going to bake your noodle is, would you still've broken it if I haven't said anything?".
But thats interesting that prophecies don't always come to be. Heightens my interest in the elder scrolls themselves collectively failing to forsee at least one event or result.
Perhaps. I think it is what one might desire. Even if there wasn't a prophecy, it is possible he would simply have sought out another means to achieving his desires.
The prophecy was simply a convenience
Well sure, but it was only through learning of the prophecy that he even knew how to fulfil it
Well fulfill his desire in that particular method.
Indicating a measure of determinism in the timeframe. Fate, essentially. But then you have the Prisoners who can make their own decisions.
And some like Sotha Sil who recognize the nature of fate and even foresee it ahead of time and know they're just going through the motions, unable to break free. He does what he does because he is what he is, and he is what he is because that's what he will do.
Still one of many set possibilities tho
But how does Sotha Sil recognize it and why not all?
Man was juiced up on divine power and was probably autistic, leave it to someone like him to think outside the box and see the box itself.
He knew he was in Plato's Cave, but could not leave. One might argue it was his fate to learn of his fate.
Makes sense
Hence part of why he's so taken with the Vestige in ESO. As a Prisoner, we're freed of the shackles he struggles with
We get to be a "maybe" when he's stuck with "definitely".
He's going through the motions and he knows he's going through the motions, and knowing he's doing it is itself part of going through them.
He's lost his sense of being in the distraction
On the contrary, I'd he knew himself all too well.
He knew he would do the things he was doing. He chose to do them, knowing he was always going to choose them anyway.
Rather, it's Almalexia and Vivec who had weaker senses of self. Almalexia bought into her own lies effortlessly, and Vivec sought escapism wanting to be everyone and everything but himself.
But Sil, he knew. That was part of the suffering, he knew and was resigned to his fate.
Some doors you can go freely back and forth thru and some you cannot go back thru once you open them and pass thru
Because of course he would still do as he did, even knowing he was going to do them.
The ultimate determinism, stuck forever in the future, just as Almalexia was forever stuck in the past and Vivec stuck in the present.
But then again he potentially could if he stopped being so self-defeating and recognized that as a part of his personality traits
Not necessarily. If you're fated to never rail against your fate even when you know about it, it's kinda hard to extricate yourself there.
It's not even just a TES thing, I can relate it to certain mental illnesses
Such a lack of executive function. You know you're doing it, but you still do it anyway.
To me, it's a state of mind and if he could bring himself to recognize that..
State of mind is easy to say for someone not in his position and state.
We know, what we tell ourselves we know, and then, it is so.
Especially since again, he strongly comes across as autistic in some form, or had otherwise made himself as such essentially through his self-modifications. Fundamentally someone who's neurodivergent is processing things in sometimes wildly different ways. Add on the comorbid shenanigans like ADD and depression and whatnot, and you have yourself a real tenuous situation
Makes for an interesting video game character indeed
He was never going to free himself of his fate. He was fated to be that way. He knew what he was and knew he would never be able to generate that spontaneous spark of free agency.
He would just continue doing what he did, working on his projects, striving for his goals.
That is one reality and unfortunately the one he solely accepts as his own
But perhaps it is what we wanted all along and the whole doomed to fate complex is just of his own manifestation and he is seeing it thru as desired
Ah well, there's always checkers ^_^
Anyway, time for bed. This one needs their beauty sleep
With the numerous amounts of mushrooms and mushroom-picking to do in TES, I'm suprised there isn't already some sort of hidden halleugenic mushroom race or creatures.. I looked, couldn't find anything besides mushroom beetles in TESO, which is a start, but not quite the same.
how do you know they aren't all hallucinogenic
Only if they bite you when you reach down to pick them
Azura making a prediction and then plotting to make it so like a Bene Gesserit witch? Sounds par for the course. Daedra gonna daed.
I’ve got a new question for my Dragon Age: The Lost Scrolls fanfiction:
How would certain Daedric Princes react to the Inquisition? The two I am most interested in are Peryite and Jyggalag, since the Inquisition’s overall goal is to “restore order to a world gone mad”.
Since a world in order does still include disease and sickness, I don't think Peryite would mind all too much.
I thought so. I also got down that none of the Daedric Princes like Corypheus very much due to a “Purge” he masterminded before breaching the Fade.
Yeah, I feel like Corypheus' intent to be the ruler of it all would put most, if not all Princes against him.
I also think that, while Sithis is basically unknowable to mortals, he/she/it has ordered Cicero and what’s left of the Dark Brotherhood to aid the Inquisition, both because of the old saying ‘It takes a thief…’, and partly because he/she/it doesn’t like being conflated with Dumat, the “Old God of Silence”.
lor
Peryite would probably barely care since it's just mortals doing mortal stuff.
As for Jyggalag, it's unknown how we would respond since we've yet to see him doing stuff in the context of mortals
What are you trying to say, “lore” or “lol”?
more
I’m still working on that. If you want to read what I have down already:the link to the Lost Scrolls are here: https://www.fanfiction.net/s/13316258/1/Dragon-Age-The-Lost-Scrolls
time and space?
For now I will say this: Herma Mora has taken more than a passing interest in the Inquisition, not only because of Matthias (MY Dragonborn), but also because Maxwell Trevelyan, with Dorian, had, to quote from the game, “muddied the waters of time where the cliffs are Red, and altered its flow.”, which was normally supposed to be impossible.
The magic of the Anchor (||magic made to storm Heaven itself||) interacting with an Elder Scroll (||something that should not exist, yet has always existed||) is causing a few “conversion errors” between Thedas and Mundus, and it only took one conversion error to destroy the Mars Climate Orbiter.
inquitetiution conjistador
Now what are you trying to say?
The flow of time is convoluted.
Time and space are convoluted in Lordran Tamriel.
Theyre convoluted irl. Time cannot exist without space (movement measured against movement, thus energy transfer and entropy), but the opposite is fine. Neither is more fundamental, however, as space came into being at the moment time did--cant have been before, there is no before. Very peculiar.
Sithis/Tharizdun/The Nowhere King/Nightmare King...not sure there is an analogue in Thedas.
That’s why there are some “conversion errors”. Also, there is Dumat, the Old God of Silence.
OH TRUE. dumat. silence vs the chant, i dig it.
kinda fits with the tonal architects // lyrium folders
Speaking of tonal architects and lyrium, I already have this down in the Lost Scrolls:
Kagrenac and Caridin were collaborators for a prototype for the Anumidium, but they had a falling out when it broke free of their control, with each blaming the other for its failure.
During the planned ‘Shattered Memories’ chapter (where the Inquisitor and Dragonborn visit the past through certain mirrors, not Eluvians, while in the Fade) I have that Tarin (MY Nerevarine) and Aedan (MY Hero of Ferelden) discover that the original plan was to have liquid lyrium as coolant for the Anumidium.
i like where this is going. can't wait to read it. 🙂
Another thing I got down is from the prologue to the story proper:
Dagoth Gares was encountered at the Temple of Sacred Ashes because neither he nor Dagoth Ur knew if the Ashes could cure the effects of Corprus, but Tarin and Aedan interfere, causing Tarin to get Corprus. After healing Arl Eamon, Tarin and Aedan return to the temple, but the urn containing the ashes, which had remained pure, had disappeared.
Weird. After putting in a typo of "Aubris" instead of "Aurbis." I saw that Aubris means "Elf or magical being." o.o
What if dwemer never banish but teleport to Yakoda insted and planing to
come back and retake what is rightfuly theres
Elder scrolls 6: Kings of Nirn
We would know about them as yokuda is still around only in remnants and people still go there
Dwemers are the devine then 🙃
…not quite.
The dwemer are a fancy hat worn by a dead God
I have a question in the lore is yagrum bargarn dead in Skyrim if he is alive in Skyrim then the Dwemer are not extinct
Although based on what happened in morrowind he probably isn’t (is vvardenfell morrowind)
Oh it’s just part of it
We don't know Yagrum's status. There's a good chance he survived, at least one of Divayth's daughters is still alive as of TES5's time, but we got nothing beyond that.
I've thought it possible that the dwemer were displaced--lost in oblivion among the nebula known as Mephala's Web. Speculation is fun, and keeps it interesting. I'm not sure it would be in Bethesda's interest to ever answer the question of what happened, nor to bring the dwemer entirely back. A time-locked survivor, a vampire, just a stubborn ghost? Sure. But not the whole race.
He survived the extinction of his race, that dwarf will survive anything lol
Interesting talk. Personally I'd like to see them come back eventually just so I can play as one, seeing Dwemer NPCs go about their day in the world like the other races, their dialogue, etc.
But yea, nothing is ever really "gone" it's just someplace else.. for the moment. ^_^ Even the dead like to come back and roam about in TES lol
That and I like to think about what their inclusion could add to the game as well if they were to come back. Would be nice to be able to build your own underground Dwemer house and tunnels. I guess it just depends on how one goes about bringing them back and in what way.. per say?
Would be interesting if one of their more advanced machine types started to seek out their master's spirits and possess them, possibly re-create the dwemer race from DNA as the dwemer created them. Or idk, maybe the Snow Elves/Falmer could have some sort of part to play as well
I just thought, as intelligent as the Dwemer were.. I would of thought they would have had some sort of backup plan before going on their quest, knowing what they were dealing with and it's power, as they must of figured something could go wrong.
The best laid plans of mer and men will oft go awry.
Aye, which is why one must have many plans lol
One would think a "wise" Dwemer would have unified the dwemer city-states in some fashion, refused to participate in the war, and so forth. Ah, well. Intelligence ain't all ya need to make good decisions.
I don't know about that, might be pretty unified right now lol ^_^ but I'd argue unifying one's race doesn't necessarily mean it's wise.
But true, they possessed more than just that
Ambition, envy, pride, and apparently short-sightedness. ;)
I meant positive traits lol
OH yeah. Good beards.
They are not a perfect species of course
Much of which you can find in any other species or race, so I wouldn't find it unlikely they didn't have any backup plans
I'm curious now about the dwemer ghosts in vvardenfel. An anomaly? A temporally nonadjacent echo? Hmm
Their effective "opposites" we're the ayeleids, imo. They stuck around only to be genocided.
I always thought Ayeleids were means to an end
Basically. They were terrible. And good at it.
It feels strange wandering around sometimes in some of these villages with hay for roofs and candles and then a dwemer ruin lol
Dwemer horse 😳
Probably horribly bumpy ride
The wisest person can't help someone who won't listen to them. The Dwemer were not unified at all, they were many different states and city-states akin to the Ayleids, and they split up and even warred with one another for any number of different reasons.
You're assuming your conclusion.
Yup
We already have the conclusion. <.<
We have the conclusion we have, I'm talking about yours. You're assuming the Dwemer could ever be unified in the first place.
Nothing says they couldn't have; they didn't, that's all. Which was unwise.
I suspect Mephala's involvement, but I need to flesh that out a bit.
I mean tbf the "wise" Greek City states were barely unified and fighting each other alot.
Just because something is wise doesn't mean they arn't going to be fractious city states.
Ayleids are an odd one because they have the city state stuff going on but they are also called an Empire along with the word "Imperatum Saliache" which is why I tend to paint them as some Holy Roman Empire like thing.
True.
fso saashi ❤️
Ther are two quests or instances relating to the Blades characters. Have you happened to play through them?
Okay a little off topic, I came across Skyrim in real life guy? We made a joke on my server that this is what dinner at Toddbot's house is probably like. Lol. Then we found out some terrible stuff about that guy that ruined how funny it was.
Okay, putting aside the terrible stuff the Skyrim IRL guy did, I did turn it into a teaching moment about "Dramatic Irony".
In it he plays General Tullius who says: "You speak of Dragons as if I don't have an entire hold of solitude to look after. I don't have time for fairytales."
I found this highly amusing and really funny if that was an actual quote a writer put in the game dialogue. Was it?
Further, what other examples of subtle literary devices (easter eggs is the new buzzword for this, I think) in the game did you find cool, did you find amusing or name something subtle a writer did to entertain you or point you to a better understanding of the games lore?
It’s all right. Needs a little more work/polishing up.
Just bought both Elder Scrolls books! Infernal City and Lord of Souls. Thoughts?
Can you give us a summary of each?
They just bought the book. Summaries are available online.
They're okay. I enjoyed reading them, but they're not particularly memorable and I've never had the urge to reread them.
I'd like to see more novels, maybe from different writers, published in the future.
Some of the lore they introduced is certainly interesting, and I've used evidence from them before for things. But I don't think there were any huge lore implications from both novels. Very interesting tidbits though.
Well, I will let you know my thoughts. Isnt this what the game is based on?
This shoddycast lore thing is pretty good as far as elder scrolls and skyrim. Not so great for fallout
Much more satisfied with the skyrim lore shoddy cast
It's not "based on" anything, the novels are just further entries in the TES series. They certainly introduce a bunch of stuff that would then be brought up in TES5.
Red Year, the Penitus Oculatus, etc.
Gotcha
anyone know a good youtuber that has a long playlist of about an hour videos on elder scrolls lore?
One that is not "TheEpicNate315" due to me already watching all of his
Today I give you a summary of Tamriel's History with an overview of the Elder Scrolls Timeline where I explain the different eras. I also go over the basics for people really new to Elder Scrolls Lore.
You can use the timestamps of this video to skip certain parts if you already know much about the period in question.
Reccomended videos:
Topa...
Thanks.
If I click play all, this gives me plenty of content to listen to while I play muted games or read stuff :D
Kwama Foragers are parasites
Agree or disagree?
Disagree? They're literally foragers.
They're kwama. Kwama come in multiple forms
the TES3-style symbiosis doesn't mean they're separate species, just different morphologies then working together.
I do not think parasitism applies when they're the same species
There’s no evidence of which it is, symbiotic or parasitic. Unless you count ESO not having Foragers 🤷♀️
This isn’t just being born in a different form, this is two living things together like angler fish
Kwama Foragers are also canonically not larva
Scribs are the larva
Yes, but notice even the scribs don't super resemble the other morphologies
Kwama are, fundamentally, Weird Bugs™️. They come in different forms and form symbiotic relationships with each other.
In ESO, yes. I'm talking about the old TES3 design
I know, I showed Michael Kirkbride’s design for original Morrowind
The workers/warriors, scribs and foragers are all markedly different in their original presentation, but they're all kwama.
And even post-ESO we've seen the foragers in a Legends card, and they remain fairly unchanged from their old look.
ESO unified their aesthetic aside from the foragers, but they're still Weird Bugs™️ at their core.
In dunmeri Guar is a blanket name, it’s possible that Kwama is as well
In Legends the Kwama Queen uses the ESO design, there’s no Forager face
Actually that is essentially a forager face, though thickened up a good bit
since look at the forager card
Also that Legends card for the queen specifically isn't the ESO design, it's much more reminiscent of the TES3 design
This is the ESO design
Head's all different, whereas the Legends card has it as a thicc forager reminiscent of the TES3 design
It's possible they're two entirely different evolutions of the kwama. It wouldn't be the first species from TES3 to show up differently in ESO because it's actually not the same species per se.
ESO's cliff striders would then become the cliff racers of TES3, since ESO's cliff racers are markedly a different species.
It is actually so I’ll agree with you on the different species part. There’s an ESO quest explaining the different species
So in ESO's time, potentially the workers and queens and such are their own wholly separate kwama morphologies, whereas by TES3 they've become reliant on the foragers to inhabit the bodies.
Wonder if it was an intentional breeding process to limit their spread
Feels a lot like some Telvanni wizard made some worm so I’ll agree on the breeding. In lore dunmer breed a lot of different looks for animals
Or as the land got more screwed up by the Blight and such, the foragers became more and more necessary over the centuries just naturally, perhaps shifting the balance that way.
Dagoth Ur stole our grass, can't have s'wit in Vvardenfell.
I like that one too
It feels like nobody I know can find a definite answer though. We’re all just speculating on what we’re given in books and games. I love bringing up the debate and seeing everyone’s ideas but I’m always hoping there’s a book or something somewhere
I’m always waiting on someone to be like “Yeah the exact answer is in the book (xyz)”
I’m gunna have to bug Kirkbride
I always found it odd how something as small as the Kwama Foragers could be expected to feed a nest full of the much larger Workers and Warriors.
Ostensibly there's a bunch of foragers out and about lore-wise.
Have firearms or cannons been invented in Nirn yet?
wouldn't mind cannons but I feel like firearms would ruin the aesthetic to the franchise
There's also Dwemer constructs with cannons, mortars, even missiles.
We had firearms and cannons for centuries in the medieval period and obviously especially in the renaissance which is where most "medieval" fantasy actually pulls from
Gunpowder and cannons exist in TES and have been both referenced and directly shown on multiple occasions, but they keep getting swept off to the side even though they're literally a standard-issue component of the latter timeframes TES draws from.
Logically they would've been developed further by now, enhanced by magic like other siege equipment are, even scaled down to develop handcannons and early muskets or even flintlocks.
Imagine enchanted incendiary rounds, or electric buckshot arcing between close targets that were hit by it
I now have the lore-friendly rifles of Skyrim mod and I'm loving it.
Thats cool as heck, if cannons exists, along with all the dwemer weaponry, I dont see why we can't have at least muskets n blunderbuss by the time we get TES6. especially if that stuff is magically enhanc
It'd kind of ruin the classic fantasy trope imo
Plenty of fantasy settings, including those used in Dungeons & Dragons have some forms of firearms
However, with dwemer technology, I feel like stuff like repeating crossbows would be more of their vibe
For example, Ed Greenwood (the creator of the Forgotten Realms setting for Dungeons & Dragons) would have added firearm technology in Forgotten Realms (Baldur's Gate, Icewind Dale, Neverwinter Nights, Drizzt Do'Urden, Elminster, etc.), but the higherups at TSR didn't want it, and thus gunpowder doesn't work in it
But there are firearms in Forgotten Realms that use smokepowder
Dragonlance has firearms as well
I’d like some repeating crossbows for a CC item.
I wasn't aware that anyone could override Ed Greenwood on Forgotten Realms.
It being classic doesn't mean it's always a good idea. Especially when TES explicitly breaks off on its own, and I'd argue it's at its best when it does that.
Guns would definitely not serve the setting well. They'd either be incredibly overpowered or practically useless in a gameplay perspective.
Simple. They'd either be a one-shot kill or be hella inaccurate. Barring that, why would TES have need for it when there is already magic to do the job?
Alternatives
Variety is the spice of life
By your logic, why do we have bows and crossbows?
And lore-wise, not everyone can cast spells, or wants to
Not the same. Crossbows and bows still use the same principle. Crossbows were just more accessible.
The earliest guns were inaccurate as hell, it makes no sense to have individuals use them unless in part of an army. But we already have mages fulfilling that role in armies.
So where is the motivation to spend time and resources developing guns?
Ok, to each their own. Personally, I can see a plethora of ways, rhymes and reasons for guns to be in the next ES
Just because they can doesn't mean they should.
Even the isolated depiction that we have of a cannon features a mage - indicating that even the cannons we have function with magic. Why add a gun when wizards are the ones who would fire it?
What is the benefit of a gun to a fireball?
Reading what @pastel sorrel and @jovial tendon said above may help you find the answers you are looking for.
Neither of them explain the initial reasoning for developing the weapon.
In our world it was to deal with knights in strong armor - but we already have wizards for that in TES.
Why spend time and resources on an inaccurate boomstick when you could instead use said resources on training new wizards who can also fight on their own?
Not everyone is a wizard
Also for example in Forgotten Realms, which is arguably the most well known D&D setting, there was the Spellplague, which basically made magic not work at all
lets look at the stormcloak army, for one. Nords are heavily biased against magic usage, ofc the army still has mages but that is far from what they focus on. From their perspective, you'd want archers n such too, so you can still have range when you dont have mages. Guns would simply be a more powerful extension of the already availiable non-magic ranged weaponry
Also, those kinds of settings have tons of magic immune monsters, and items that make you immune to magic, and so on
If firearms are useless, then bows and crossbows are as well 🤷♂️
exactly lol
but "its not the same"
guns like muskets, flinlocks and bunderbuss would all just be more beefy, militarized versions of the bows n crossbows that are already in circulation
n tbh, theyd barely have to develop anything. Just reverse engineer dwemer tech, as they pretty much already have guns
even saw someone say they have missiles, lol
Ocean combat without cannons in Elder Scrolls though, imagine that
I suppose they could use ballistae
just to clear this up, I do see n understand your point. I just dont fully agree
They had automatons with arquebusses (or however you spell that), but those are not the norm, even among Dwemer spheres. Most of Tamriel's most advanced technology comes from the Dwemer. When even Dwemer didn't commonly make use of that tech, shouldn't that already say a lot?
The only similarity between bows, crossbows, and guns is that they fire a projectile. Early guns were not accurate until rifling became common, which only occured near the end of the 15th century or the start of the 16th.
And, I repeat, the main reason in our world why guns became common was because they could penetrate armor. Such a technological advancement was because of warfare.
As I have stated prior, with nearly every army in Tamriel having wizards of some capacity, the need to research a new way to defeat armored enemies from a distance is practically non existant.
well i aint a gun nut, so i dont know much about the history of rifling n such, but in m mind, if there's even a semblance of "guns" in TES, then i just think "why not". There's cannons? why cant they just shrink the cannons for handheld purposes? it'd be fun
Good full-plate was actually still bulletproof for a good couple centuries, it's where the term bulletproof comes from. Early equivalents to handguns for instance were specifically meant for point-blank range, fired directly into the armor for the best chance of penetration, because at range it was a lot less likely plus you then have the accuracy issues.
That said, the big thing was that not everyone was that heavily armored. Full plate's expensive, and the reason it finally died out was because given the evolving nature of warfare as well as the societies involved, it became far more economical to just lightly armor the whole army than to try and pile on more and more armor on just a few to keep up with the improving capabilities of firearms.
I'm all for realistic settings being realistic, but if it's a fantasy setting, with fantasy creatures, magic and magical monsters, fireballs and lightning bolts, then does it have to have such a realistic reasoning for something to exist
I feel like if rules of realism go out the window with magic and elves and orcs and werewolves and whatnot, then they don't really need to apply to much else either
So if a fantasy setting has guns, it just has guns because it has guns and that's the vibe, and that's pretty much all there is
Basis of the question is flawed. This isn't about it being fantastical, this is about it being internally logical, which is key even to fantasy.
The existence of orcs and dragons doesn't somehow preclude the concept of guns, those aren't even remotely related to one another nor how they function
It's established that most people can't really do much magic, maybe equivalents to D&D cantrips if anything at all. True capability takes time and effort even if you have the talent for it.
But also just the same, why do archers exist if mages exist? It's the same question.
Well, to each their own, plenty of fantasy settings out there that have gunpowder weapons and they're not worse off for it
I'm not saying I need guns in Skyrim but if in Elder Scrolls 6 there were oceanfaring ships with cannons on board, and people with flintlock pistols and muskets, I wouldn't care one bit
The thing with firearms is, they take far less training than bows, which is part of why they became so popular. Warbows can take a long time to train with due to their heavy draw weight, and many archers were training since childhood to get to a good level of competency.
But massed muskets, you just give the gunners a couple of weeks and they're off to war, much like with crossbows.
If guns were developed now in TES, they might have more of an uphill battle, but there's still plenty of people who aren't in the kind of heavy armor that would defeat them. Especially with the fall of the Mages Guild which had such a monopoly across Tamriel for so long, some places might be more inclined to develop their physical technology rather than develop a true replacement institution for the Mages Guild.
They can be found all throughout Vvardenfell and even show up in Frostvault in Eastmarch, I'd hardly call that uncommon. It could be they were developed only after the Rourken and such had left. There's also Centurions with mortars and and the Colossi have missiles, so they were already a good ways into figuring this stuff out.
It's not a matter of "guns and cannons don't fit TES", because objectively they exist in TES in a capacity that logically should make them widespread in the literal millennia they've been studied.
They might not fit the original aesthetic, but the aesthetic doesn't actually gel with the lore provided.
this is not quite true. they had a Dwemer Automaton called an Arquebus, but it interestingly is not actually equipped with one, rather being equipped with some kind of lightning weapon or what essentially seems like a flamethrower, such as in the Brass Arquebus. the other hand has a mini crossbow like a normal sphere
How pissed were the Thalmor with the peace treaty during Season Unending? Being that it forced the Empire and the Stormcloaks into a ceasefire, which is the last thing they want.
On a related note, how long did you think the peace treaty lasted after Alduin was killed? Like, did the two sides immediately return to killing each other as soon as news about Alduin's death reached them?
Maybe we can have a CC item where we get this as a pet.
That's exactly what they did, since the ceasefire was specifically for dealing with Alduin.
I don’t typically do SU if I'm going to play through the actual main quest and I intend to go through with the CW stuff, since SU slightly screws with a couple of those quests.
If the Dragonborn hadn't shown up, would the Thalmor be able to deal with Alduin, Potema, Harkon, and/or Miraak?
No
I mean in a way Ancano would solve a few of those problems by blowing up most of Skyrim,
The Dwemer Arquebus does in fact fire cannon shells out of that arm, along with fire or lightning.
That's why it's called as such. Its normal attack is the elemental blast, but it fires off the cannon as a period AOE ability.
Not even remotely for at least Alduin and Miraak. Miraak wouldn't even get the chance to do anything since Alduin would just eat everything.
Except Miraak would actually probably go ahead and deal with him if he had too, it's made very clear he was out of Alduin's league before millennia if additional training and knowledge, he just saw Alduin as beneath his notice,
Miraak was trapped in Apocrypha and needed the LDB in order to escape (assuming his escape plan was even possible).
He wasn't gonna be getting out in time to stop Alduin unless Mora let him out himself.
Alduin is going to need time Miraak in no way needed us, he was coming back regardless,
in that case, i was struggling to find documentation of it and simply don't have experience with it in-game
i did find a mine that did magic damage on one of the uniques, but that was it
soooo, the Skyrim expansion makes your PC's efforts in the main quest irrelevant, because the big baddie for Dragonborn would have stopped the big baddie for Skyrim on their own?
Hypothetically, if he was able to actually escape Apocrypha, which he needed to absorb the LDB's power for assuming it was possible at all.
well, now I feel all superferlous 😛
Miraak didn't need you, and that was already a problem in the main quest, between the blades and the failures from the past you felt barely more relevant then in oblivion's main quest, which is hilarious given you are an actual honest to Azura chosen one for the first time in the series,
Miraak literally could not leave Apocrypha unless he used you or Mora suddenly decided to release him. So no, he couldn’t have dealt with Alduin.
Alduin would have destroyed Nirn unless Mora could be bothered to let Miraak leave Apocrypha.
thinking about how i cant complete the vampire lord questline made me wonder... is there any significance to one being having THREE elder scrolls at any given time. (im aware their literally just mcguffins) but this seems super unheard of as far as my own knowledge of the series goes
in oblivion you see a tower full of them
i mean yeah but you dont actively have them and even that one gets taken away from you if memory serves
you get it back
moth priests have all the uncovered ones basically
individual moth priests can read many of them
they also tend to go blind
i suppose i more meant someone as... unique as the dragonborn? or i mean the player character
Not really?
not exactly common for someone to have that many in their possession, but that's it
i mean for them to have them be in the foretold visions of the scroll while maintaining their sight and sanity
it feels like the dragonborn rolled nat 20s at surviving the readings and whats funnier is you can try to read them again and get nothing from them which in of that is odd
i mean yeaaah but surely it would be recorded in the dawngarurd or even the vampires depending on waht side if not both due dragon breaks
they dont use dragon breaks like that
the end of dawnguard is likely inconsequential to the overall thing
I mean in the grand scheme of things the empire doesn't bat an eye at the revolution truly in skyrim and thats a whole country in tamriel. I doubt moth priests will care about a few dragon scrolls. And doubt they are truly that powerful. My question is what's more wild. 3 elder scrolls? Or 15 DAEDRIC artifacts? (Massively underpowered in game according to lore)
daedric artifacts go where they want to
them all going to an individual isnt unheard of
Worded that poorly I think the elder scrolls are overhyped.
Well true but only the player character as far as lore concerns
they can teach you anything
knowledge is power to an extreme in the tes universe its safer then the oghma infinium for your mine
The elder scrolls like was said before were all in a tower that the moth priests have. The daedric artifacts I only have ever seen all in one place with player characters
the oghma can be used to know how to properly use artifacts
That's why I think the elder scrolls are overhyped. Yes knowledge is power but also they tend to mess up the readers.
how does the player use mehrunes razor or skeleton key
The game tells you?
so does the oghma its possible to find ways to safely read elderscrolls
Yes im not saying that
but the oghma nearly always makes people go mad
I've beaten the games I understand that
using the mysteriums xarxes which is transcribed from the infinium mankar eas able to use mehrunes razor to turn himself into a dragonborn to wear the amulet of kings
Just saying the elder scrolls I think are overhyped in comparison to daedric artifacts that are just heavily nerfed in the games. Off of lore all are incredibly powerful and important.
an elderscroll in oblivion was used to turn back an event in time and change the present without anyone knowing
Yea so in varying games elder scrolls vary just like the daedric artifacts
But the scrolls aren't always that important
theyve also only appeared in 2 games
I understand
but theyre the reason the emperor chose you in morrowind
So they are mentioned in more than 2
i said they appeared in 2
I know they exist fully in the lore between all games but aren't necessarily in them.
they had brief mentions at best beforehand
They appear in skyrim and oblivion
And have been mentioned in more than 2
I understand you said they appeared in 2 idk why you felt the need to Reiterate
I think they are set in games to do exactly what the lore says. But daedric artifacts don't even come close to lore.
IMO I think they are just underpowered for balancing purposes. But man would it be cool to use lore accurate artifacts
Correction: Wabbajack is 100% lore accurate
daedric artefacts in lore are op
Pretty sure four
Oblivion tg, skyrim mq and dg, eso pvp, and blades
you're a Prisoner. tbh i think that's significant enough to justify the potential of ridiculously unlikely things happening to them in general. fate is a real, if plastic, thing in TES, and the Prisoner is tied into it by his very nature
"Each event is preceded by Prophecy.
But without the hero,
there is no Event."
-Zurin Arctus | the Underking
- Morrowind's intro
it's very possible it simply amounts to: your Event happened to require those three Elder Scrolls, so your Hero managed to obtain them
our usual tendency of reading the Scrolls, yet getting no information from it seems to line up with the description of "naifs" given by Effects of the Elder Scrolls
For one who has received no training in the history or nature of the Elder Scrolls, the scroll itself is, effectively, inert. No prophecy can be scried nor knowledge obtained. While the scroll will not impart learning to the uninformed, nor will it afflict them in any adverse fashion. Visually, the scroll will appear to be awash in odd lettering and symbols. Those who know their astronomy often claim to recognize constellations in the patterns and connections, but such conjecture is impossible to further investigate since the very nature of this study necessitates unlearned subjects.
however, this doesn't quite map perfectly with our ability to glean information from the Scrolls in the situations we do. the one at the Throat of the World is easily enough waved away by the fact there's a Time Wound there. it seems quite different from usual readings of the Scroll, perhaps an interaction between the Wound and the Scroll which we just happened to witness.
however, this still leaves the question of the situation in the Ancestor Glade. it seems to most closely match the fourth group described in Effects of the Elder Scrolls, or perhaps the third, but doesn't quite seem to perfectly match any of them. i'll link the book so you may more easily read it, as i don't feel like pasting 3 or 4 more paragraphs of text that's already easily accessible into this already long message. in either case, the moths are very likely involved in at least some other moth priests' readings of the scrolls, based on Dexion's dialogue. anyways, Dexion suggests that we won't go blind thanks to fate, which is (perhaps frustratingly) close to the reason we seem to get so many Elder Scroll in the first place, and (perhaps even more frustratingly) close to the "because plot" answer that justifies it irl
You've come this far, and you've found several Elder Scrolls. Whether you believe it or not, the scrolls have a mind of their own. If they didn't want you to find them, they wouldn't allow it. Because of this, I strongly believe you were meant to hear the ancestral chorus. Only one way to find out."
- Dexion Evicus
however, Dexion also does tell us that the moths are a very important part in their proper readings:
Moths barely make a sound, let alone speak. "Oh, the moths don't literally read the scrolls... but they maintain a connection to ancient magic that allows the Moth Priests to decipher them. If you listen closely when you find the glade, you should be able to hear their song... a soft, harmonious trilling. It's through this ancestral chorus that the moths tap into a form of primal augur and become a conduit of deciphering the scrolls."
How does that help the Moth Priest? "By having the Ancestor Moth close to the Moth Priest, they can utilize the conduit and share the moth's augury. Only the most resilient of priests can do it this way... it takes years of practice to interpret the harmony."
ultimately, this just provides context and potential answers, not an actual answer
hopefully it satisfies your curiosity or helps you come to your own conclusion
that's literally fate in TES tbh
or at least, the way the Elder Scrolls show it
"The only certainty regarding Elder Scrolls I have ever heard is that they hold great power and are often used for prophecy. Yet I cannot help but wonder... have there ever been any events that have contradicted an Elder Scroll without having been foretold in another Elder Scroll? If so, how did such a phenomenon occur? Was it brought on by mortal intervention? Divine intervention? If such an event has never happened, do you believe there is any such thing as true freedom? Or are we all slaves to fate?" - Drafo
Sister Terran Arminus says, "This is a good question with which to start, for answering it enables me to address some misconceptions about the Elder Scrolls that are common among the … er … commoners. The Scrolls are often described as tools of prophecy—indeed, 'the Aedric Prophecies' is another name for them in some quarters—but the fact that the Scrolls speak of future events is merely a side-effect of their intrinsic nature. The Scrolls tell of our future because they are woven into that future—as well the present, and the past, and every other aspect of this reality we call the Mundus. It is a mistake to think that events prophesized in the Scrolls are fixed and unchangeable; again and again we in the Order of the Ancestor Moth have seen the prophecies alter as the future changes in response to the acts of mortals. Future events foretold in the Scrolls may be deemed likely to occur, so likely as to seem almost certain—but no event is fixed in the Scrolls until it actually happens."
- Moth Sister Terran Arminus Answers Your Questions
until the Scrolls observe it, it is uncertain
Urag offers a very, very similar, but not quite identical bit of insight:
The simplest way to put it is "knowledge," but there's nothing simple about an Elder Scroll. It's a reflection of all possible futures and all possible pasts. Each reader sees different reflections through different lenses, and may come away with a very different reading. But at the same time, all of it is true. Even the falsehoods. Especially the falsehoods.
this rabbit hole goes way deeper, but it's a very interesting topic
Elder Scrolls are indestructible, right?
Can the Dragonborn use it to bludgeon someone to death?
Well, the scroll cases definitely look like they've made out of some kind of metal, so that should work
Makes me wonder why you would do this...unless you're devoted to Uncle Sheogorath.
Well, maybe that's the only thing the person has and they get attacked
Maybe they're a librarian at the Elder Scrolls Library
I can definitely see some enterprising Nords try to do this, particularly when they've had too much mead.
Wearing nothing but robes, no weapons on hand, and get accosted by a khajiit thief...there's an Elder Scroll with it's hefty scroll case that they can reach and bam, kitty gets knocked out
A Nord, like everyone's favorite Dragonborn.
inb4 your Dragonborn is a Breton.
Was there a character in Elder Scrolls insert title who attempted to use something to try and become a Dragonborn?
Yes, ESO has two such events. Varen Aquillarios tried to become Dragonborn to legitimize his rule as Emperor. He was tricked by Mannimarco, causing the Soulburst.
IIRC, there is also a dungeon which features someone who drank dragon blood to attempt to become a Dragonborn.
I'm devoted
Small question... Both Alduin and Dragonborns are fragments of Akatosh's soul, right ? As such... Technically, are you just fighting yourself ?
Name the mod Elder Scrolls Thumping
Don’t try to rationalize divinity. They can break and remake rules as they want.
I believe Kirkbride mentioned that can happen - two different versions of a divine being can potentially battle each other. The Cause also mentions that Alduin and TLD are aspects of Akatosh battling each other.
It's not impossible to have a new interpretation of an entity - or someone seeking to become the new interpretation - end up battling the old one for the position.
Thank you !
You’re welcome. 🙂
So how much power is generally required to destroy a Daedric artifact permanently?
Because on one hand you have Fearstruck, which was destroyed back in the First Era.
But on the other hand you have Umbra, which was destroyed at the end of Umbriel in the 4th Era, but resurfaced years later in Skyrim.
As I understand it, you can't destroy a Daedric artefact permanently unless the owner (i.e. the Daedric prince) decides not to recreate it.
Gotcha.
Guess Boethiah doesn't care for his/her shield. XD
...although I question why Clavicus Vile would recreate Umbra after what happened.
Other princes may have done it, Mephala Molag Boethia and Dragon all fit with Umbras deal, and may have thought it was to much fun to cease to exist,
Maybe. lol
Umbra... is a bit special. It might be a semi-independent Daedric entity of its own now.
I really need to read the books.
Are there Aedra that aren't the Nine/Eight Divines?
Lorkhan/Shor/Shezzarine?
Magnus
Y'ffre
If you refering to nine divines from imperial cult.
Sorry, I meant to ask Aedra that aren't the top dogs, like how there are Daedric dukes that are a step below the Princes.
well there's demigod like morihaus
i don't think there's kinda hierarchy of aedra.
Demigods count, thanks.
*Shezarr
The Shezarrine is an individual, not a god.
Random question. Are size-changing spells a thing in Elder Scrolls lore?
Well magic can turn people into other creature, should be more easy with size change magic
Maybe, but then again nothing is ever easy about magic in Elder Scrolls.
I don't know. Killing the guard stood next to your target seems really easy...
Yes, somewhat. Sotha Sil's Clockwork City required the people who lived there (or visited there) to be shrunk to a very small size. The Clockwork City itself is actually very small, despite how it may look like on the inside.
Oh didn't know that, i thought clockwork city is somewhere in pocket dimension of oblivion
Ed, from Ed, Edd, ‘n’ Eddy: Quack.
It's not clear if it is actually small or if that physical model is just some kind of external projection or representation.
🤔
the clockwock city is inside nirn
We do shrink down when we enter it during the events of Clockwork City though
The true canon race of TLDB
Duckinborn
"Shrink", could just as well be some spatial shenanigans and we're the same relative size. We distort when entering portals too.
Sure, but the main quest does quite literally feature us shrinking. Or the introductory quest.
We see something similar at play at the event place near Windhelm, with that snow globe.
Is this ESO?
Yes
Neat.
Lore Master M'aiq
M'aiq wishes you well.
Maiq is tired now. Go bother somebody else.
Hmm what if psijic thrown eye of magnus to the past and destroy winterhold became like present day skyrim.
why would they do that
Any thoughts about the modern day Worm Cult? Might they have the same hierarchy as in Oblivion (like each cell being a Worm Nest)?
They’re lizards
too much hist sap perhaps.
🤓
They don’t lay eggs, since they’re a humanoid creature, they possess human-like things
No actually they do lay eggs
Oh?
They can give birth to live young, but they can also lay eggs. Argonians come in various forms and can change over time.
Well nords like boobs so there ya go 💀
There’s the lore
Their morphology's even more wack than the Khajiit.
Changing sex, changing reproduction methods.
Plus the various different subspecies that make them up.
Hey it’s fiction and imo, they handled it well. Subspecies are cool
Fundamentally they're lizards in origin, but the Hist have modified them quite a bit and continue to do so.
They're uplifted quite a ways beyond their ancestors.
They are whatever the Hist needs them to be.
Evolution is a hell of a drug, but the hist also let them reverse deadra portals so not a long shot.
Argonian boobs is likely because of the other mortal races, it helps make them seem that bit more relatable.
Easier to integrate when you look somewhat like the other group, after all.
Also, the lusty argonian maid wouldn’t exist without argonian boobs
The finest work of fiction of all.
Fiction upon fiction
The Worm Cult is defunct during the events of Skyrim
That's what they want you to think
We can overhear necromancers call out to the God of Worms at Hob's Fall Cave. The ones who say, “We offer this soul to The Revenant: he who watches over the opponents of Arkay and his power over life and death. Fie upon Arkay and his followers! Fie!”
If I remember correctly, Mannimarco succeeded in becoming a god as a result of the Warp in the West, and the one we face in Oblivion may or may not be the real one, or just an avatar.
There is speculation the Warp in the West may have left behind the versions who didn’t achieve apotheosis. The one we encounter is very de-powered so I get why some think he may not be the genuine article.
The virgin mortal Mannimarco, the chad divine Moonimarco.
Dragonborn, on the idea of a resurrected Worm Cult: Oh, boy. Here I go killin’ again.
🙃 I was thinking of the Necromantic Grimoire items and Gallows Hall. A necromancer DB. 💀
I say, a little bit of Column A and a little bit of Column B.
You have to wipe out the competition. You can’t be the new King of Worms if another necromancer wields power in your domain.
… nah. Don’t like necromancy. I’ll just wipe them out.
Yes, and you can also hear them plead to Mannimarco to restore the Worm Cult.
It's even from the same conversation that you quoted:
*''Fie! We beseech you. Darken this gem so that we may use its powers to **restore The Order of the Black Worm.*The Order shall rise. Grant us this power so that in your name we may vanquish our enemies."
black soul gem is no longer that rare in 4E ? 😮
🤷
If you say you want to restore something, that doesn’t mean that it’s gone; it means that it’s dilapidated or not in the same state it originally used to be. Like, “I want to restore this table.”
I think that’s ludonarrative dissonance.
Imo, I don't think that fits in this context, though I can see how you could interpret it as such.
Speaking of Mannimarco, we all know he became the Revenant but it's not really known what his end goal is supposed to be. Someone as ambitious as him wouldn't become a literal celestial body just to orbit his greatest enemy, in fact it's not even known if he's actually orbiting anything.
Arkay the Enemy states that his end goal is to strike the name Arkay from the records and become the new god that holds sway over life and death. I believe that the Necromancer's Moon is no moon at all, and similar to Baar Dau, it's actually an asteroid heading straight towards the planet Arkay.
Mannimarco might be planning on using his celestial body to collide with the planet Arkay while using the power of his Mantella to erase Arkay from existence. Mannimarco then replaces Arkay's position as the Aedra of life and death through mantling, achieving what he promised in Arkay the Enemy.
We do know that there is something going on in the universe to cause the Necromancer's Moon. Of course, there is a question: are the Planets the Aedra themselves, or are they just named after the Aedra?
I think Shivering Isles gave us the answer to that. At the end of the Shivering Isles main quest, the Hero of Kvatch replaces Jyggalag as the prince of madness, and it's heavily implied that Sheogorath in Skyrim was the HoK. It's also demonstrated that after the HoK becomes the prince of madness, they gained new powers that only functioned in the Shivering Isles. It seems that the composition of the Aedra/Daedra is a planet and an avatar, but the former appears to be the source of their power.
Gong back to Mannimarco, there's an implication in Skyrim that the Necromancer's Moon has gotten stronger as a god. Previously in Oblivion, Black Soul Gems could only be created through special altars that harnesses the light of the Revenant when it's blocking planet Arkay. In Skyrim, it's just a prayer to the Revenant and a sacrifice, no altar required.
I know we explore on land alot in Tamriel, even caves. But do we ever really get to explore what's under the continent itself? Deep waters or beyond that even?
And what's the core made out of
There was a big fissure in Chorrol during the Alliance War which showed a lot of lava, so... probably somewhat similar to our core? Idk.
There are still altars - indeed in the Necromancer House creation, there's a 4 slot altar there for the creation of black soul gems, and I think another mod adds one to a couple of caves you have to go through for some questlines.
Does that altar require the Revenant to be in a specific position for it to function, or is it functional 24/7? If it's the latter, then it further demonstrates that the Revenant has grown in power and influence, to the point where even altars dedicated to it no longer need to follow a specific celestial alignment from the Revenant.
Seems to be functional whenever you turn up with the relevant gems.
Here's an interesting passage that may be of some relevance:
Auriel-that-is-Akatosh returned to Mundex Arena from his dominion planet, signaling all Aedra to convene at a static meeting that would last outside of aurbic time.
-Nu-Mantia Intercept, Letter 4 https://www.imperial-library.info/content/nu-mantia-intercept-letter-4
The Intercept also claims that the Daedra Princes created their planes using creatia.
What do you think was discussed at the meeting?
probably how to stabilized mundus 🙂 daedra princes not invited tho
Theory: Rorik of Rorikstead is actually a very old and well-disguised vampire, and has founded and re-founded his town several times over the centuries, as a "farm" for himself (and he is very responsible with it, not killing anyone or turning any people into vampires, a bit like House Ravenwatch of the Second Era.)
The current incarnation of the town, founded within the living memory of Skyrim in the Fourth Age after the Great War against the Aldmeri Dominion, is only the most recent of many (even the mention of "Old Rorikstead" in "Ragnar the Red" suggests this): various versions of the town are known to have existed back as early as the First Age in which it was definitively "Rorik's Steading", so both its first incarnation and its most current incarnation were founded by a Rorik... Hence my theory that it is, in fact, the same Rorik.
Every so often, he gets exposed as a vampire, and bumped off by some well-meaning "hero". And without his protection, something happens to the town, it fails or gets razed or abandoned.... And then, possibly years or decades later, somebody spills blood in the wrong place (or possibly, learning of Rorik's secret and realising the importance of his connection with this part of the land, the right place, on purpose), and Rorik is back, and works his way into the graces of the newest Jarl of Whiterun, earns a grant of land, and re-founds his village. He is, after all, its protector, and keeps his side of the unspoken contract with his town, which flourishes while he is there, and fails in his absence.
(And the fact that the site was occupied, during the Imperial Simulacrum, by a village named "Lainalten", can be explained by the possibility that this village was not founded by Rorik, during some time when he was spending some time dead, but by some well-meaning other person who thought there was room for a town there. And it didn't last, being either razed or abandoned at some point after the events of the Simulacrum...)
Ooh I like the theory
I wonder if House Ravenwatch is going in 4E. If by any chance ESVI was in High Rock (it likely won’t be) it would be cool to see them and Verandis if he is still alive.
Given the fate of Verandis after "Markarth" in ESO - now tied to the Dark Heart under Greymoor - I doubt he will play any further part in Elder Scrolls lore as a hero, though he may give in to the Dark Heart's power and become the villain of a future storyline.
Yeah that is true. It’s possible he could turn villain. I hope not though as the chat with the PC at the end of the story was really nice
lainalten
Coincidentally has a meaning in Finnish. "On loan" (at least according to google translate).
"The loan amount" in one of the Norwegian dialects.
I wonder if those are relevant?
I doubt the Ravenwatch survived past the Second Era. They are too well known as Vampires after the events of ESO.
Yeah I sadly think they probably didn’t either. Given Verandis is bound to the dark heart and all, they probably just didn’t survive over time.
To be honest there were never that many of them in the first place. With Verandis gone... there's Gwendis, Adusa, Fennorian, and who else? (Incidentally, when Verandis first "dies" - in Rivenspire at the Lightless Shard - it seems that he is leaving Adusa as the most senior vampire left in House Ravenwatch, but later on, in Markarth and indeed in the Castle Thorn dungeon, it looks like Gwendis is the one who's actually matured and stepped up to be de-facto "in charge". With no complaints from Adusa, so evidently it's by agreement.
I had a question about Light of Day. That artifact looks Ayleid in design. But it's powers are very much Falmer in nature. Does someone knows where it came from ?
Hey everyone, I have a Xbox one S and Im trying to login in to creation club and mods but it keeps giving me an error
You should ask your question in the elder-scrolls-support room. It's in the community support.
thanks
NP ! 
Sun damage is just anti-undead it doesn't really have ties to the Snow Elves.
They are not the only known users of it but were the most notorious. It's an immensely rare type of magic outside of their culture. And their mastery of it remains unmatched. That weapon might be a collaboration between Ayleid and Falmer techniques. Would be a pretty cool background for it, truth be told.
Eh still not really. The Ayleid City states of the Ayleid Empire worshipped different gods per city and one of them includes Meridia who is anti-Undead so it would be easy for the Ayleids to have weapons with sun damage to simulate the anti-Undead effect
Right, forgot about that ! Even though it's a pretty big deal... Yeah, think it's safe to assume it's " just " an Ayleid weapon based on it's design and the lore. Which is still really cool though !
She is even nickmaned " The Sunfire "... And the Sunburst is her symbol. Yeah...
I mean if I was a Snow Elf, I'd really want sun magic too to warm my frozen elf ears.
Well coincidentally i just finish dawnguard quest line, and i never think of this before, could be that the reason dwemer blinding falmer because of their contempt toward falmer devout as race, falmer one the most devout race to divines worship especially auriel, and dwemer blind them so they can't see their divine grace to sever them from auri-el, just like vyrthur want to sever auri-el from nirn by blocking the sun.
also interesting in falmer pantheon auri-el depicted as a sun god ? where also known as the old Smaug himself a.ka akatosh is depicted as time god and divine dragon
also in altmer religion auri-el closely associated with eagle (like zeus)
Tbh, the Ayleids are pretty damn cool
Did you know that they were the creators of Alteration magic? And knew how to use magic to alter local climates?
Light of Day originated from a vampire hunter in TES III who is the target of an Aundae Clan quest.
Even his shrine is shaped that way. And his arc draws it's energy from it and can make the Sun rain when shoot at with Sunhallowed arrows. The Dwemer hating the Aedra as much as they do, your theory really makes sense. The Falmer were extremely pious from what we know of them. I wonder how much of that played into the massacre of Saarthal.
Light of day was just a regular iron mace in morrowind, and iron weapons and armor were western (imperial and bretonish) in design
Honestly someone tell me the Midwood Isle mod for Skyrim would NOT fit into the Elder Scrolls lore. Cause I think the idea of the Sonmer (Sun Elf) elven race makes sense. 🤔 Do we really know all of the elven races out there?
I mean, within Tamriel, sure. But outside?
We know of all the elven races in all the known lands so far. There's no indication of any more and I strongly doubt they're going to introduce more nowadays.
There even are Sea Elves (btw always violent to the player in ESO) so I feel Sun Elves might somewhat fit the lore.
ADDS 259 MORE lore books!!!
Probably not, but that mod's interpretation of an original elven race independent from Tamriel is sure a thinker. Especially when you read all the books about them. The lore sure could benefit imo. The Sun Elves even have their own Aetherius realm when they die, which seems silly, but they have it. And their own Aedric & Daedric entities overseeing their land. 🙂
do we know about mer races on akavir ? we know sinistral elf was on yokuda, but i never heard mer race from akavir
The only problem I can see with the possibility of Sun Elves is that the mod's interpretation welcomes Nord culture. And Nords are known for their hatred against elven races like Altmer (for good reason) & Dunmer. The fact the Sonmer are so peaceful and understanding to disregard the Nord's distaste seems unrealistic to me.
There could be Akaviri elves. No idea what they'd be like though.
The Sun Elves having different Aedra and Daedra seems unlikely though - although they might know the same ones by different names and symbols.
@solid path Yet the first Sheogorath was the opposite part of Jygallag. Maybe all main TES games show the different lives of some higher being led to the world of mortals.
The thing there was that one entity changed between the two forms. Sheogorath didn't wander off and become a mortal, he reverted to his pre-cursed form and personality.
Why would then he decide for the Champion to become new Sheogorath, the worst part of his self? Unless there is more to it.
Well, that's a complicated one, but he was trying to break the curse, and for that he needed his "replacement" to win the battle. In previous cases either there hadn't been a champion to take his place and become Sheogorath, or the champions had lost to Jygalag, who then takes over and falls victim to the curse that was placed on him.
The point I was making though is that for the Champion to become the Dragonborn, he'd have to vacate the throne of Sheogorath.
We don't have any indication that's the case, and Sheo is very much doing Sheo type things in Skyrim.
But after assuming the position of Sheogorath, the game doesn't lead us to believe that our character is going mad.
Except that you've just mantled the deific representation of insanity.
There are references to you going insane if you've done things in the right (?) order and you end up praying to Sheogorath after mantling him.
Just because you're mad doesn't mean you're not lucid.
I doubt that they have their own higher entities too, but if the Sun Elves are neutral about Nord culture, then yeah probably they know all the Divines and Daedra the rest of Tamriel knows. Whether they know them by different names like Auri-El is Akatosh to the Snow Elves, I have no idea.
Even weirder is that the land of the Sun Elves in the mod houses 3 Ayleid ruins, (while we're on topic of the Ayleids) which shouldn't be possible, unless they travelled north beyond the Sea Of Ghosts where new islands and/or continents might've existed. But there's nothing noteworthy beyond the Sea Of Ghosts that we know of. 🤔
Auriel's still Auriel to the Falmer.
Akatosh is a specifically Imperial view.
Atmora is beyond the Sea of Ghosts isn't it?
Technically he is Auri-el.
Oh that's true, I forgot where Atmora was. 😅
Oh, I thought Auriel (or Auri-El) was the elven version of Akatosh. I know Akatosh is Imperial view, but when I mean the Sun Elves welcome Nord culture, I meant Talos and the Dragonborn bloodline. Which have commonly been Imperial and Nord individuals. Including the Last Dragonborn. 🤔
I misunderstood, what you said can be interpreted that you're saying the Falmer view him as Akatosh.
I got a dumb question. So I have I couple of D&D OCs I'd like to incorporate into Elder Scrolls, but idk how lore breaking it would be. Because like one is a Changeling, one is half Tiefling/Drow/Drider, and one is Half Duergar/Deep Gnome. So. 😅😅 idk how to make that work out.
The one that's Tiefling/Drow/Drider has 5 spider like eyes