#lore
1 messages Ā· Page 6 of 1
Why not 25 when the brain is fully developed
Why not 30 for some people because it depends on body
Weird argument lol
The 1 second between 17 and 18 is where your body gets injected with all the right answers, don't you know?
Of course. And if they're 1 second too young that's jail.
We all know all dating starts at 18. No dating at Hogwarts everyone. Umbridge says so
As this has nothing to do with lore of the game . Let's get back on topic please
The context is should dating be allowed at Hogwarts
There was no need to delete that
<@&755190193367023772>
I know
What happened
Certain topics are best not said
Not really
Two 16 year olds dating is no issue
There's a reason most countries have it at that age
Move on
idk how you watched the Yule Ball scenes then
š
Hermione and Viktor must've sent you out the theater
Nothing Sir
All okš«”
You've been asked to move on.
I'd like if the game or a Portkey future game delved into this potential Merlin written book or potential Merlin owned box
and the potential mark of merlin
Does a wand actually need to be a wand? Like there is obviously wandless casting but with a wand you are just using it to focus & channel magic thru right. Would it be possible wand could be like a bracelet
Probably
U can have a staff, an amulet or other tool probably.
Magic tools just help focus magic better for magic users, so they are used more often than not but they ain't required. The only exception is the Elder wand which explicitly amplifies the power of any spell it casts making it better than any magical tool since none are known to be capable of the same and making it better than any wandless magic spell in terms of power since wandless would not amplify the spell though it may not matter if the Elder wand user's amplified power boosted spell doesn't match up to the power of the wandless spell (the two spell users won't always be at the same default power or skill level afterall).
Basically tools are good for focusing magic better in general but a skill wandless should I think be able to cast just as good a spell without the magical tool
unless its the elder wand they use
You need some kind of thing to channel your magic through be it wand finger or whatever else
Hagrid uses an umbrella (with fragments of wand in it but still⦠you could put fragments of wands in anything. Itās what the wand is made of not how itās shaped)
Mcgonnagall and Dumbledore use only thier hands for some.
Harry too
You don't need any tools to use magic, just the skill. Hence the existence of wandless magic
Also you need to have the magic gene.
Otherwise forget it
the tool being your finger hand
you need something to channel your magic through or it wont work
ya i think they mean a magical tool like wand or something, not your own fingers
like i said here
some magic you don't even need gesturses but its limited to teleportation basicaly from what i recall
Though magic can happen in young magical folk. Often a bit erratic or uncontrollable because they donāt yet know how to focus of control it. Often triggered during states of heightened emotions.
Like Harry vanishing the glass of the Boa Constrictors display at the zoo.
And young Tom Riddle at the Orphanage. He claimed he could make people do what he wanted.
Animagi donāt use gestures to change and that transformation is a form of Transfiguration magic.
Similar case with Metamorphmagi and skilled Legimens (like Goldie who could read thoughts/feelings without needing to gesture or use her wand)
Gestures can help with magic that needs to be guided or aimed.
But some is innate or even more like a reflex action. Not a conscious one, due to high emotional states.
Ur correct on such magic, but I mean more in the case of spell castings, I think hand gestures or minimal such are required for those used with a wand. But then I also imagine the most powerful wizards/witches could do some of them without hand gestures but you'd still have to point ur hand to ur target for some spells.
Like AK and Exspelliarmus
What about the time when harry flickered the lights and made his aunt into a balloon . He wasn't using his hands or wand then
read this
Interesting
he was just hella mad cause she insulted dumbledor and didnt actively cast magic (he was surprised as well) like the time at the zoo
When harry was talking to the boa constrictor , do others hear it as parstletongue or normal words ? The scene was in Harry's pov
parseltongue like the time he talked to the snake in the duel
others just didnt pay attention to him at the zoo
When the snake said "thanks" and he said "anytime". That was parstletongue as well ?
yes
all the times when he talked to a snake it was parseltongue
the time he talked to nagini disguised as the old lady was also in parseltongue
Parseltongue sounds like hissing so they heard hissing without being able to understand, meanwhile harry could make the hissing into words in his brain
hermione did notice that he was talking weird but probably didnt think to much about it or just didnt really hear him i forgot that
its just like any other language you dont undestand it unless you know the language
just a little more special cause its a fantasy language
yeah - others wouldnt even know they were talking because usually snakes dont talk
And how did Ron speak parstletongue to open the chamber of secrets. Did Ron know parstletongue at that time or was it just luck ?
mimicked what harry said in his sleep
It's too much of a coincidence that harry would say the exact words that would unlock the chamber of secrets in his sleep.
only thing it took was to say "open"
i doubt that - harry only spoke when he needed to open something in parseltongue
in the books he mentioned that it took a couple tried to get it right
Yeah , he did it right the first time.
in the movies it was cut for convenience
like so many other things ; . ;
yup
imagine if they re-did it in a couple years as a series instead, where each chapter is an episode
i would love to see that - i would want it to be as faithful to the books as possible
I would totally watch it
Iam getting more and more convinced to read the books because I know nothing even after all these years
How is quidditch mentioned in the books ? Is it like a commentatory in a sports game ?
yes! exactly - also the commentary is soo funny when it brings the different commentators' personalities out :D and i 100% recommend reading the books. they make the magic so much more real. ive read them 4 times now and each time they are still equally as amazing
Iām reading the 3rd book, Iām currently on the last chapter but the commentary for the match Gryffindor vs Slytherin was hilarious lol I enjoyed it. First time reading the books btw
Does the books mention only Gryffindor vs Slytherin or does it show quidditch with other houses as well ?
all teams
I wish they made 6 hours movies but were split into parts.
You just joined and boosted the server
How cool you are!!!
I am so mad I didnāt know it existed before this lmao
I am beyond geeked to play with you all when the game drops!
Technically you can't. It's a single player game
Not with* but you know what I mean, play while y'all play ya feel
I think Iād give it a year max until a multiplayer mod is released
Yeah I get it.
But I would love to play with y'all if they do a multiplayer quidditch
Love to have a quidditch game in VR. Think it would be awesome
Ditto Wizard's Chess āļø
I saw in the interview, they aren't considering putting Wizards Chess unfortunately š¦
they did consider but arent able to same with gobblestone but they want to have it in the world at least
Makes me a tad sad that we wont get them in as mini-games.
I know it's a tad off-topic, but Bannerlord managed to input 6 different table-top games that you can play against AI opponents in the taverns and inns and castles in the game. It's a small thing but it helps make the world feel truly alive.
I personally think the addition of Wizards Chess and Gobstones would have helped immersion that little bit.
Yeah Iām honestly really annoyed that Wizardās Chess and Gobstones wonāt be in the game
Honestly immersion is what Iām worried about the most
The game can look as pretty as it wants but if it doesnāt FEEL right itās gonna ruin the whole thing
Faris Spavin
He is the Minister for Magic in the era in which the game takes place
He became the minister with 109 years of age and was elected 6 consecutive times by the British and Irish people.
Spavin guided the Wizarding community for 38 years. Known for his long-winded and sometimes thoughtless speeches, Spavin infamously survived an assassination attempt by a centaur
Makes you wonder why the centaur tried to assassinate him.
Probably wasn't all that great for the other sentient species of the British Isles then.
And most important, how did the centaur try to kill Spavin?
he could't use avada kedavra due to the wand ban of 1631
i wonder if he used an actual gun, that would be awesome
A gun? Lol no Centaurs are well established as Bow users.
or a spear
Though there's nothing stopping him from having bought a potion and put it in Spavin's food
I wouldāve loved for it to be included, but in a way, I can appreciate that the developers chose to place their focus elsewhere.
When you think about it, thereās a huge amount of potential to create a wizardās chess game that is, itself, deep and immersive and a very unique experience. Rather than shipping something half-baked now, the door is open for Avalanche to put more resources into a potential extension later that delivers on this. (Same thing applies for Quidditch and other mini games within the world š¤)
It took offense to a bar joke
Do we know who had the invisibility cloak during 1890s
A Potter did.
Concealed carry wands 
Oop
There were other invisibility cloaks, but there was only one true invisibility cloaks, the othersā power wore out over time. So I think thereās a chance weāll see invisibility cloaks in game
That's again good with multiplayer
They gotta add multiplayer if they want to see massive success which would last long.
Yeah but story mode might not work as well so they may have to add more aspects to the game
As long as the story mode is interesting and keeps me on the edge of my seat till the end of the game , it would work. They should later add multiplayer and mini games as an expansion
Can cooks in Hogwarts use killing curse on chickens in-order to cook them?
Or any animals that's served to eat there basically
Why did my comment get deleted ?
Straying away from Topic IG š
Oh , fair enough
Since when are roots of a plant food ?
Iam not
You may have heard of Ginseng?
they are mainly used for potions not food
and the cooks in hogwarts are all elves so dunno if they would use such means or just do magic
for other cooks probably also a no cause youd have to be a dark mage to cast ak
Yeah I have. I have heard of carrots extracted from the roots and stuff but I didn't know you would eat actual roots
with regards to potion ingredients they are probably just chopped up no mercy given
No I did see they had roast pork
So can they just use killing curse to kill pigs to cook for their students since it's much less messier & also painless to an extent?
or magic
Are mandrakes born from a baby and raised and then chopped up as an adult ?
i dont think house elves are allowed to cast dark magic so unless they have it from somewhere else (where they would probably just slaughter them without AK) they just let them appear
they are a plant so yes
OMG that's horrible
Why did JKR make them soo detailed like say that they turn to moody Teenagers & have acne & sh't like that?
Why do they scream ?
as the adult ones have the most usefulness
Like why humanize them soo much? š
I'm guessing they hate the sunlight
But they are plants. They need sunlight to live
there may also just be a folklore/myth anything with screaming plants/roots and she just took that like she did for most things
Their 'hair' does not them
The plant bit is their Hair
Too late for that
there are some plants that dont and mandrakes are mostly in the sunlight just covered up with dirt
They have mouths , do they use it ?
probably not as they absorb nutrition and water from the roots (maybe)
but they can use it seen when one bit draco
Technically it didn't bite. They don't have teeth.
It just closed it's mouth for a few seconds.
My mind is too dirty fam š¤
you dont need teeth to bite
babies can bite and they dont have teeth (not all atleast)
I thought they can't do too much damage as they don't have teeth. It's different if they had teeth
I always thought they were like Groot
So It's sad that they're killed
doing damage doesnt matter on if they can bite
i mean i can hit you and it doesnt have to do much damage but i still hit you. you get what im saying?
Yeah , I do
more like an evil screeching relative from him
There were huge venus flytraps in herbology class in the socerers stone game. Is that part of the lore as well ?
i dont think they have been mentioned anywhere else but its possible for them to exist in the world
Would cursed meat taste foul?
dont think so its more of a "youre a creature so you dont get to" thing like wands and all that
ofc unless instructed to do so by the owner
AK won't hurt as much as slaughtering right
yea
ak is like the most "humane" way of killing
instant painless and in some cases you dont even know how you died
Since Mandrakes have mouth & teeth
Would feeding mandrakes polyjuice potion make them look like the person's DNA it was made out from?
(no teeth) the facial "features" if you can even call it that of the mandrakes might change to the look of the person
Chapter 6, page 94.
"The Mandrakes didn't like coming out of the earth, but didn't seem to want to go back into it, either. They squirmed, kicked, flailed their sharp little fists & gnashed their teeth; Harry spent ten whole minutes trying to squash a particularly fat one into a pot."
Like a wooden statue of them?
If anyone is still interested I am pretty sure the centaur , just simply tried to kick him to his death.
I just want to know, how many hours will Hogwarts Legacy give players?!This in full gameplay
Iam guessing about 70 hours
I hope it's a lot more. 70 hours is almost nothing. It would be very sad.
Also, there are plants that take 24 minutes to be born.
Iam talking about 70 hours of the main story. Excluding Side missions
I see the game being way shorter than that. Maybe 30-ish hours. Nothing has been confirmed as of yet though.
I agree. Short main story with lots of side stuff
God of war Ragnarok is around 40 hours and has 36 trophies which most people took around 50+ hours to complete This game has 46 trophies so Iam guessing it to be about 60+ hours
Trophies say so little about game time though
70 hours is a lot lol, god of war is like 46h and it's an amazing game.
You are probably setting yourself up for disappointment
I said iam "guessing" not expecting. It's open world after all.
What do you think then ?
Realistically 30h at best, hoping for more of course
Not even red dead redemption 2 has 70h
of only campaign
Witcher 3 had 60 hours of campaign
You talking only base game? Though there were more
Guys this is the lore channel
You're not talking about the lore, please go to #š¬hogwarts-legacy-general
Seeing how we do ask people to stay on topic. Yes please listen when told to do so
you deleted my message :(
We get carried away sometimes. Fine , we will stick to the lore.
One game out of 10, just saying, it's not likely that HL is going to be that long only on main story, it's their first game with this scope, cdred had a lot of experience already, hope i'm wrong tho and the game's story is huge
won't say more since this is lore channel
The lore they are going to show us will be done in a 30-ish hour window. Here, fixed it.
Yeah , you have a point. It makes sense that this could be a 30 hour game.
How many hours do you think side missions might be ?
imma respond in #š¬hogwarts-legacy-general
Im sure alot of you already know this story, but I recently stumbled across it on Harry Potter Theory and found it very interesting...
I thought that was about to say Salazar IS Herpo then (immortality via horcrux etc) and therefore still alive now.
But was just a nice āfactualā story š
What more could the possibly do if they make a harry Potter tv series
I mean, there's alot of stories to tell. not just in HP's era but before and after...
if they were to do it again i would say they would need to stay as close as possible to the books and the only way to do that really is to do a tv series
Do s Founders show and get the 4 actors who did them in the portraits to play em
i dont think all of those actors are alive, but while i was looking for it, i was reminded that peeves umbrad the prankster of the school, lived alive and dead at hogwarts sinces its creation in 993
I don't know who each actor is bar Ken Bones (Salazar) who I think is stil alive.
Peeves has never been alive to begin with. He's amortal, not living to start with so cannot die as a result. He's a spirit of Chaos who came with the school. Its possible he manifested into existence from chaotic magic or the chaos that comes from school.
That's what Amortal means. They are not alive or dead to start with
Peeves has never been alive in the any sense of the word and thus never died and never can it seems.
makes sense
no wonder hes so annoying
hey have a question, is thd Black's family rich ?
Yep
of course they were. bellatrix was loaded for example
You are saying a reboot ?
Ye
If they do it I know they are considering due to the reports that are mentioned by the head of the Warner brother
How does magic work in terms of "power" does it take effort to cast a spell? If it's a large spell is it draining?
.
.
If I cast a spell and have something moving when I am not around or like "active magic" does it drain on me when I am not around. If I die does the spell go away because it's attached to me?
(Just in the wizarding world, not specific to Hogwarts Legacy)
There is no indication that its that way or that there is some kind if mana or something similar
From what we have seen you cast the spell and thats it it doesnt drain you and there is no limit to how much you can cast
thank you ^^ i'm doing a small story about my Oc and she Belong to the black's familiy but i was not sure if in 1850 they were already "rich" ^^
Like a virus basically
Highly likely they were
One thing we never really know is how rich Harry is. We know itās loads for an 11 year old. But enough to buy a house etc? No idea
(Me realizing that I have this ugly face picture I did as a joke to a friend ⦠and forgot everyone can see it :ā) )
I see ! Thank you !
Well in the sense they ain't alive per what we consider alive. But viruses can die out and be killed. Peeves apparently cannot be.
Got a question for big brain Harry potter people
What makes deaths invisibility cloak different from all the others? I heard that there were multiple invisibility cloaks but idk if that's true or not, but if it is what makes it any better?
And it's more efficient than the other ones. You're truly invisible with it. Other capes might malfunction sometimes.
thats the lasting longer part
they break after some time and dont work as well or at all after some time
the deathly hallow one is like a fresh one
if i remember correctly, you can't steal it with accio.
Yeah, it's everlasting and immune to certain spells, with Accio being the prime example. It doesn't protect the wearer from spells though if they are hit despite being invisible.
And it still has a lot of "weaknesses", like true sight (e.g. Moody's magical eye), Homenum Revelio - although that could be a case of Dumbledore being his usual ridiculously powerful self as we've seen no one else do it - and of course the Marauder's Map which continues to be a magical enigma and I'm still convinced that no one could ever duplicate it, including the Marauder's themselves.
It would weird to see someone else play harry , Ron or hermoine
Indeed
and animal senses can find you still even with it
Like sure your invisible but they will still smell you and hear you
Its innately better than any other cloak in the invisible department
its other effects may be due to protective enchantments on the cloak
like it can't be summoned
but it won't protect you the wearer from a spell that is targeting you directly
and its not albe to alter size so it can't fit many under it
The Hallows are basically just higher quality magical creations which could be replicated with the right skill and knowledge i think
on the site it says the player character is a pureblood, halfblood, or mudblood. does that mean when creating a character you will choose between the three and it may or may not have a impact on character interactions or are they just skipping blood status
?
Where does it say that?
This is the wiki. They fill in for stuff that isnāt known. Which is a lot when it comes to the MC in HL
We donāt know what the blood status is for the MC or even if itās a choice,there wasnāt anything for Blood status in the CC
ok
Iād say in general, donāt rely on the wiki for knowledge. Instead go to its sources
I mean, the Wiki isn't wrong on this one - the MC will definitely be one of these considering they're all there is to blood status in this case because they're obviously not a Squib. But as Siren said, there wasn't an option in the CC, so the blood status is very likely fixed
Probably story/background related with Half-blood being the most likely imo as it's the safest option.
I donāt think theyāll be a muggle-born, i doubt muggle-borns can even be sorted in to slytherin
Muggle born Slytherins are a thing, theyāre just pretty rare
true, plus merlin was a muggle lover and a famous slytherin
Based
Only because JKR had to come up with someone on the spot. 
Merlin does make sense to be in Slytherin from the fact he was quite ambitious.
and in myth a manipulator and mover of events and people
Did JKR ever address the safety of Hogwarts
given that there is a monster snake living under the girls bathroom i doubt it is very safe
Hogwarts violated so many safety regulations
That snake is a safety feature
not for mudbloods
Vocabulary!
I dont think wizard students would call Hogwarts safe either
Hmm, doesn't seem so bad, aside trolls, three headed dogs, snakes, a forest full of creatures, deadly tournaments, plants that can eat you, and incompetent teachers
Moving Stairs without warning. no exit signs. potato defense, neglectful teachers (some are possibly spies), to young too ride a broom,
The moving stairs are also a safety feature
Same as the trick steps
They train your mind
yea after i end up in a wheelchair
and the other things mentioned
plus quidditch injuries
Why do you need Exit signs? Can't you find your way?
harry nearly died at least twice playing it
evacuation
no elevator so i cant go upstairs when i broke my leg using the moving stairs
Hogwarts and other magical schools would be shut down if Muggles knew of em at large and they were under Muggle jurdistication
Quidditch is something for the more brute students anyway
plus given that i plan on being a bigger baddie than that voldemort loser safety is not a priority
still. muggle safety would be a good example for wizarding world
they have potions for broken limbs
Skelegro yay, you are in for a great night
Also you can just levitate injured students
still atleast warn ppl that stairs are gonna move
And what if not?
Do you want to sue Hogwarts or the stairs themselves?
That would be a fun lawsuit.
you dont go to hogwarts for safety you go for magic and mastering the dark arts so you can rule the world
What is the ICW?
thats a muggle group you squib
Even googling it doesn't provide results that make sense
then the ministry and no i aint no squib
its a workers program for unsurance and safety
I can't even find it in Google, seems to be very important
international confederation of wizards
the ministy has supported hogwarts since it;s founding so i doubt they would change it for you
Ah yes if I take the complete name, I can actually find it
they would if they know the benefits
less stops to the clinic right and less potions needed
And I don't think the International Confederation of Wizards would give a standard in safety
how do you know whether or not they make money from it
they should atleast consider it
and hello its magic of course there will be risks, especially since there aren't any universities or colleges after hogwarts so they have to teach you everything during your stay
safety first applies everywhere.
even staff there are questionable
Dumbledore shouldnt have hired Snape
do all ravenclaw's whine as much as you
snape worked for Dumbledore remember
but he was a former death eater and killed Dumbledore later
Because they came from Rowena Ravenclaw herself
dumbledor literally ordered him to you twit
i get it
but snape is not the only one
umbridge forced her way in using that idiot from the ministry who didnt want to admit voldemort returned
if he accepted it from the start and tried working on it maybe BLACK wouldnt have died
not a hogwarts fault it is a political fault
he is a good guy
"If he doesnt, well get to that later" -Hagrid
and a magic zoologist
there are worst people who are actually teachers IRL
hes nice but he may have to look into how hes teaching animal encounters
especially dangerous one's
also
Detentions in a place thats "Forbidden"
also technically he is mainly a gamekeeper rather than a teacher, that said there were no problems with his teaching as he provided ample warnings when dealing with hippogriffs, the only problem was with that fool malfoy
He should have stopped Malfoy
like pull him back
And those Blast Ended Skrewts
i though eagles were supposed to be fierce. from you i think maybe ravenclaw should be a chicken instead
i would prefer if buckbeak ate malfoy in full graphic display
I love that Slytherin personality
does that justify my point here
so just because we are eagles and be fierce doesnt mean going into a forbidden place
same here
Buckbeak should have killed him
My other problem
Restricted areas being vaguely protected
If he killed him, maybe Buckbeak wouldn't have been able to be set free š¦
they had a time travel magic necklace so they could still save him just the same, and besides because of malfoy's corrupt father buckbeak was scheduled for execution regardless
opening restricted area of the library with a spell?
seems like we need more security there
WHy?
If it can be opened with just one spell, its easier to get the knowledge out of it
Also you could, you know, just ask your teacher
restrictions are there for a reason
may aswell not restrict it at all
if they had more security i wouldnt be able to study horcrux and live forever, horcrux and philosopher stone are the only confirmed immortality methods in the wizarding world
It never got confirmed that a Horcrux makes you live forever.
For that you would need unlimited horcruxes
imagine if anyone can do that. i think there will more problems occurring than finding the sorcerer's stone
actually it was it's just that if the horcrux breaks you in big trouble and if you make more than one you'll be a lunatic like voldemort
Well the part of the soul that is trapped can live forever maybe, but the actual you still ages. So you can only refresh yourself as often as you have Horcruxes left
so just get refreshed so long as you dont actually die there is no problem as far as i see it
Hmm, I don't think that works. Even if you reunite yourself with the soul, you will be older at that point, if you would break it again at that point, you would have less time for the next, until there is to little time to redo it
In the american copies, its Sorcerers Stone
technically that is for movie title they still say philosopher in the actual movie
They do not I think
We dunno if Horcuxes even stop you aging
As far as I am aware the british actors did speak both lines
They don't use PS in American version. They say Sorcerer's
at this point i think i will be sacrificing a ravenclaw for my horcrux if it is in game
They did the scenes twice or dubbed the word in. Its almost identical
no they dont
So when Hermione pulls out her "light" lecture, in the british version she says philosophers stone and in the american version she actually spoke sorcerers stone
by the way i saw the magic caster wand is coming out soon, i plan on ordering when it is available
And yes I am aware that the americans called it sorcerers stone, its just to fun to call them out on it
lets not do that
they figured amaericans wouldn't know what a philospher was
and in france its striaight up spoiler
cos Flamal was french
in the actual alchemical lore it is always referred to as the philosopher stone which could be found after completing the magnum opus
i know
In german its also pretty much a spoiler. The "Stein der Weisen" we also know very well
read up on it after learning bout it all from the book.
although the philosopher stone is pretty much always red in various works of media and fiction
aye the last stage
the color notes what it will do
And when you completed it, you would realize you don't need wealth of gold or eternal physical life cos you will have found enlightenment
yay Philosophy
and its referenced in how you get the stone in the book - find but not use it to get it
i hope the philosopher stone and or horcrux method is included in the game, immortality is the ultimate goal for fantasy
won't be
JK has never reveled the method and likely wont
and its likely only flamal has ever made the stone
in lore
Maybe we meet him
he is still alive during the 1800's
we wont
who?
Flamel
Ya'd think Flamal would have several attempts at theft against him by book 1 or be hounded for his method or urged to share immortality with the world
People would call him out on hording the secret for himself and his wife
like you can cure magical diseases with that can't be yet maybe
That doesn't stop us from meeting him.
if it does keep you in perfect physical health minus not stopping ur aging
I mean over centuries he could meet people once in a while
wait whats goin on
Doesn't need to tell anyone about the stone
its well known or rumored he made one
in rl and in lore
so everyone knows
or will try and find out
So he could still meet people and just hide his home via secret keeping
especially since he's alive by book 1 and seen in the magic world
also given how well known the stone is in the alchemical world it is possible that other accomplished alchemists could succeed in it's creation
if he did hide via that, he risked exposure long ago
by allowing people into the house
AD
newt
jacob
etx
thy could succeed but the implication is only he has done it
and its unlikely anyone else has since
He would be a good character to meet. Maybe as someone trying to understand the ancient magic⦠a alchemist could be useful
Voldemort didnt use a horcrux to return, although one of them tried in the second book.
It was his original shade that returned to life, without direct use of his horcruxes.
They only aided him in the sense that without them, he would not be able to survive as a shade.
So as long as his horcruxes remained he would be able to regenerate a new body and rebirth himself forever.
Was a reply to this comment.
Probably not forever
Thereās only so many ābones of the fatherā and only so much āblood of the enemyā he can use in the resurrection ritual
Thats fair. Although I think its fair to say he would find an alternative method in time, being who he is.
But yeah, that spell would only be viable for so long.
No he couldn't. he'd need people to help with that. And long term, people won;'t be around forever. He was doomed to fail no matter what he did
His end fate would be to wander in the void post heat death if he got his way in the end
The more I think of it, the horcrux is very similar to the one ring of sauron.
Yah though its more based on the Lich Phylactery concept
while the Ring is based on the Ring from Wagner and Greek myth prob
The philosophers stone could bring him back, which was the plot of the whole first movie.
I'll grant that no explicit solution is stated, but I cant see voldemort fail in such a lame way.
Just fading into obscurity because he couldn't work a way around his dwindling daddy bone supply.
If Tom Riddles diary returned as full form⦠AND book 4 went ahead⦠would there be two full form voldemorts?
interesting theory. I'd think he would attempt to take over the death eaters from our original voldy. maybe he'd keep og voldy around for some dark purpose or lock him up. but, maybe og voldy might have some power over that part of his soul and can contain it in some way...
Yeah, I think so. They don't even feel it when the other horcruxes die due to being separated and wounded for so long (split soul).
Honestly curious why the horcruxes aren't more active, if they from their perspective are just chilling in some dank cave, not experiencing what the living voldemort is doing
who knows if a soul contained in a horcrux could start making horcruxes themselves lol
I think that if the Tom Riddle memory had fully formed it would have just been a Vessel for the Main Soul of Voldy.
Just a guess, but the pieces are too small to do it.
Only the "main" piece was big enough to keep making them, but at the end of the movies even that one was too stretched thin to make more.
If voldemort had won after neville killed nagini, he would still have failed since all his horcruxes would be gone, and he would be too weak to do it again.
So mortal essentially.
If not he could have made like 7x7, so 49 total, lol.
your 1st point seems very likely, but we dont really know the limit, since voldy managed to make 6, then one accidently but still survived. it was just the killing curse that backfired
Assuming 7 was the limit, and the soul got actually split into 7 equal pieces, then I wouldn't expect them to be able to create more.
However, if it gets split in half every time, then I would imagine the first 2 - 3 could maybe create some of their own.
Its a bit unear what actually killed voldemort the first time.
He unintentionally made another horcrux, which normally requires some complicated ritual.
This hints to his soul being so unstable and fragmented that he just split apart when Harry became a horcrux.
Thus the curse didn't necessarily kill voldemort, the creation of the eight horcrux did.
both good theories. I thought about it recently. maybe the killing curse worked similar to ppl looking at a reflection when they see the basilisk eyes, just in that scenario where Lily used her powerful magic. maybe it weakened when it hit voldy??
Its never stated explicitly, but the way it refers to the soul being fragmented and cracked, and creating a horcrux severs the cracked part makes me thing its a tiny piece each time.
It just sounds more "natural" to me atleast.
so just like when you see the reflection of basilisk eyes and become petrified, same might apply when a killing curse bounces off Lily's magic of love. instead of voldy dying, it split his soul. he should have legit died
I mean, who in history of magic has ever tried deflecting the killing curse and lived to tell the tale lol
Voldemort be breaking ground in magical research, maybe he should have been a ravenclaw. š
slytherclaw lol
I think if its the soul in the diary, he'll definitely try it, but who knows if it succeeds or fails? I also think he'll see og voldy's actions up till then as a failure and try to re-do it all...
slytherins are also academically successful again the famous merlin was one, as were many other succesfull witches and wizards
Snape was pretty smart too. slughorn probably his main rival
I wasn't being super serious. More a joke, downplaying his mad crimes as research typical of ravenclaws. As if his house would be important in the context of things.
when it comes to potions
I missed more characters like Peter pettigrew. You know folks who seemingly didn't fit their house, atleast at first glance.
another theory. reflection of a reflection of basilisk eyes. that might only make u faint for a while. killing curse bouncing off multiple love shields might relegate it to something like crucio š
Given the soul split off on its own from sheer instability when he failed to kil HP first time, he was probably nearing the limit I'd say
slughorn was a slytherin
And snapes teacher I think.
when it comes to potions, I see them as rivals. but what we've seen from snape, he probably has the edge...
Snape modified potions to be better so he has edge i think in potions
slughorn didnt do anything noteworthy, except knowing a little too much about other topics lol
Slughorn was able to hold his own against LV in a 3 - 1 so he has power, abovr average i say
Snape was genius level in 2 fields of magic, and expert in several others.
A bit unfair to use him as the skill bar.
Only broke cos LV screamed and caused an explosion throwing em back
Its hard to guage who is most powerful wizard/witch past the big 3 in modern era
So what if the limit of Horcrux splitting is 13 cos its the unlucky number
I bet the only real limit is how much it takes until you become a living shell in a body lol
they have physical side effects too. the 1st one he created made his hair fall out if I remember
It was a slow process, but yeah, he is described as being less and less human.
Although not so much that he was avoided. He still got jobs and was viewed as handsome and charismatic.
Only his regrow body i think shows the true state of his soul.
Not sure he lost his hair? Wasn't that a fan film?
I also think since he created his new body in the 4th book, that one didnt possess any of the physical side effects from his 1st body
I think its the other way around. His regriwn body was made of dark magic, and his soul was mega splintered at that point.
No cos he made it as a teen and kept his hair
Memory TR is the one from after he killed his dad and grandparents and made his diary his first.
Oh you meant his first horcrux, nvm my comment about the hair.
Agreed⦠seems impossible it could be 7 equal pieces as they balanced over so many years
I think the best info we had was from his meeting with dumbledore when voldy returned for the dada position. his face looked really weird and he had red eyes. different from last time dumbledore saw him...
he looked burned and blurred in the face
exactly
Also i don't the books ever says he lost his hair until after movies came out
Movie influenced the books to some degree i think as they went
Yeah, fair. But it couldn't have been as bad as his regrown body. He could still be viewed in public at that point.
In the 4th book he is a walking masquerade breach for muggles, lol
I dont think he had any physical ailments though. I remember that being some type of magic he created himself to regrow a body. his soul would still be fragmented but I feel like that is the perfect body for his purposes...
Anyways, its clear his looks deteriorated as his horcruxes and deeds in dark magic grew
I also read somewhere about nagini's blood being used too. maybe thats why he looked that way
Yeah at that point his looks didn't matter. He was powerful to the point were being covert and charismatic were no longer necessary. Hence his brute force strategy from thereon out
could be her venom though not sure?
Her venom and unicorn blood was for the temporary body, not his regrow one
- unicorn blood was to extend quirrels life as he possessed him.
Anyway, hope we get plenty of spells from dark arts to play with.
Fiendfyre would be lit
He would still look that way before he died though, so the body he created in the cemetary just looked that way for no particular reason.
LV got way he was cos Horcruxes and AD thinks some other magical transformations he did to himself
He's the only known guy to make so many so its all guesswork but likely the correct answer
I cant see why horcruxes would make him look like a snake specifically. it would just make him like he did pre-killing curse backfiring...
I guess snakes in JK verse are a mark of evil
though in many eastern cultures they are not just that
probably so. its always associated with dark arts
He didn't actually look snakelike it seems until his rebirth so maybe its partially due to Nagini venom at least
Still had his nose i think or it was flattening by his meeting with AD
He doesn't really look like a snake minus the slit nose, just a walking emancipated corpse
the ritual in the cemetary was a form of dark arts too. that was probably the reason. I didnt hear anything about limitations with that body vs pre killing curse backfire
well his new body took in protection of HP which screwed him over. otherwise no seems to be fine
minus his apperance which to most is decidedly not fine
to be fair though, horcruxes are kinda linked to his ancestry, who created the 1st basilisk, spoke parseltongue, and created the 1st horcrux. so it was always linked to snakes in some form. just a wild guess though
similar to patronus and animagus I suppose. just not something he can really choose. it chooses it for u. so if he were an animagus it would probably be a snake...
Nah, but dude had a fetishis for power and being associated with power.
He despised his half blood status, and liked to imagine himself as slytherins heir. He probably became a bit obsessed with snakes, not for the animal itself, but for the symbolic power/heritage it would represent.
there's 3 things that indicate he's related to herpo that I listed above. nobody is gonna outright tell us though. just like nobody outright told tom he was related to slytherin. Also, translated into different languages, Herpo can mean, "he who is slithering". but i will have to search where I found that tidbit and go over it again here...
I mean all his horcruxes are artifacts owned by famous and powerful wizards. Even if the horcruxes didn't get more powerful from it, he had to be powerful in symbolic terms too, to feed his ego.
no one in verse can actually know.
no one knew he was
I found it in Harry Potter Theory's video on it, in the comment section. I dont know Greek well so I can verify it myself: "but all you non-Greek people who have the same idea miss the most important detail, which is really hidden in plain sight.
The name Herpo, is a direct transfer in English from Greek of the word Herpon-ĪĻĻĻν (most -Ļν male names lose their -n in Latin/English, thus why Herpo). Herpon-ĪĻĻĻν is the participle of the verb herpo-ĪĻĻĻ which means slither. The participle is analyzed as "ĪæĻĻĪæĻ ĪæĻ ĪĻĻει"/"ootos os herpee". That in English is translated as "he who is slithering". You english speakers dont pronounce the -g at the end when you speak and the y makes the name sound better than with an i, not to mention that it makes the word sly appear in his name. Thus JK Rowling gave us Hepro's name directly as Salazar's surname: [he who is] Slytherin'.
Lorewise probably Herpo or his descendants took the english version of that name as a surname when they moved to the british isles."
Exceptions are nagini and his diary and Harry. Although nagini was a wizard before the curse transformed her, so she kinda fits the uniqueness he wanted in his horcruxes
no one even knew his surname if he even had one or if he had any kids or relatives
That sounds a bit too concrete to not be intended ill admit.
It says, they took the english version of his name and used it as a surname when they moved to the british isles. but hey, im not greek so I cant verify it
I found this video on the subject. and JK wrote about it a bit too
not particularly the part i mentioned about the surname, but it might have been a likely culprit...
also, there aint many parselmouths we know of. only the Gaunt's and Slytherins bloodline. its a hereditary trait...
read through the wiki a bit. there's some mention of African parselmouths in fantastic beasts
yea, likely candidate would be Herpo or his relatives
closest know ancient parselmouths to the british isles too
well I'm not going to assume any relation and i'd rather their isn't cos it makes the world smaller
and i dunno why theory is putting herpo in same era as razcidian. That guy seemed to be a middle ages wizard based on his artwork and herpo a B.C. Wizard based on his artwork
kinda made it more mysterious imo, since there's still parselmouths roaming around in Africa this day and Slytherin's bloodline can be traced back to Greece and not just british isles...
well im assuming no relation between him and LV cos its just not needed and makes the world smaller imo
yea that's kind of a stretch i'll admit. since Salazar himself lived 1000 years ago, way before razcidian lol
fair enough. I respect that opinion
Oh wow. Folks just respecting opinions and not fighting tirelessly to be ārightā?
Must be a Christmas miracle
hallelujah praise the lord
Given the discussion in #š¬hogwarts-legacy-general I wondered about the following question: The stairs to the girls dorm are enchanted, so no boys could enter, would they be able to detect an actual trans character? So a biological boy that walks them freely or a biological girl that gets denied?
Any thought on that please without getting political.
#š§ theories might be a better place for a discussion like that. We basically know nothing about how the charm works aside from its execution when triggered and the reason why it's even there.
Bryden's probably correct about asking in the other channel, and I'd assume that's up to the head prof...
You can visually look like a boy, but still pick the witch dormitory. Thus be blocked from the males dormitory, while being let in to the witches.
So a transman (wizard dorm) would be denied into the witch dorm despite biologically being female.
Im Guessing based on the character editor, btw.
In terms of the game, your choice of 'Witch / Wizard' will determine the dormitory you belong in. In terms of the in-universe lore, I would assume it wouldn't really be something that JKR put that much thought into.
Obviously she didn't, but I still wonder about the nature of that enchantment
Would it trigger on someone who has used polyjuice potion and turned into someone of the opposite gender?
No idea actually, I think that never got mentioned
But I would assume it would trigger, as that person isn't really trans at that point then, but mimicing someone else
Iām pretty sure the sentient castle can see through Polyjuice potion
I'd honestly not be surprised if it failed. I mean if the enchantments could be so surefire, why not just enchant the common rooms to only allow the respective house members to enter.
No password needed.
I mean the enchantment failing, not the potion.
But how, and if this stairwell detecting enchantment on the boys/girls dormitories can tell, why not have the same spell guarding Hogwarts. Could have avoided almost the entirety or book 4 if that was the case š
I don't think it's necessarily against the rules to enter another house's common room though. As long as you know how to get in you are allowed to get in
I mean, 5hey did have spells that kept them out for a while. But they didn't hold for too long. Atleast in the movie voldemort breaks down dome sort of shield around hogwarts and the death eters storm the castle.
Its not magically forbidden for sure
As Harry and Luna enter Ravenclaws Common Room, so does McGonagall
And the Carrows
Even Black enters the Gryffindor common room when he's a supposed mass-murderer
Yeah but he would be Gryffindor
Yeah I know,
He did have to threaten or scare the painting guarding gryffindor dorms though
Thats true. But I think that was a "decision" of the painting itself
Not really an intended safety feature
Luna is a ravenclaw iirc and its only against school rules to enter other houses common rooms
Yes, but Harry isn't, but he enters together with her.
I think it's ultimately up to head of the house.
Good question. Let me think about it in another 20 years.
I keep forgetting this was a channel, since I'm always usually in HL general.
The sentient castle certainly didnāt stop a potential mass murderer from getting into the third-yearās bedroom
Maybe the sentient castle was 5 steps ahead though
And knew no one innocent would get injured
It didnāt stop moaning myrtle from dying either
it comes back full circle. he got locked up in said sentient castle at the end anyway (more human intervention than castle intervention but still) š
I mean Myrtle...tragic but well
No one liked her anyway
Maybe the castle thought it was for the better
It didn't calculate her staying though
Maybe Hogwarts went like "I mean, I know I should intervene... but that girl's a real piece of work. Eh, let's wing it." Joke's on Hogwarts though
Worst decision ever
Two werewolves mated while transformed, and they birthed wolves with near human intelligence. They were said to be given sanctuary in the dark forest by dumbledore.
So I guess clever kittens?
They completely nullified a room of perfectly good toilets
Oof
Werewolves and Animagi are completely different
Just for the girls...the castle wanted to make sure, even there is still a line in front of Womens Toilets
Different, but the closest example i can think of.
One is a disease and the other is conscious magic/advanced transfiguration
You are not wrong. But they are both transformed people.
The cases aren't that different.
A completly different case would be something like a person on polyjuice, vs a transformed animage
Imo
Slightly off-topic but I've always loved that part of Werewolf lore, especially so since it's an extremely rare event.
Why are ppl even scared of her?
I'd get my homie NH Nicks to whoop her Azz
I'll put a boggart in the toilet & give her a taste of her own medicine if she tries to ruin my peace while peeing
Sanctuary for wolves ?
What else is Dumbledore hiding ?
Never understood why anyone would be scared of a whimpy ghost in a school full of ghosts & talking portraits
How you gonna have peace while peeing if you have a bogart in your toilet
If you start with Polyjuice...can you get pregnant while under its effect? And what happens to the child if you transform back, especially, if you are male?
No that is if she tried me
If she went out of her way to mess with me
I'll do whatever Dark arts stuff that is available to torture her
Weird question but still interesting
Polyjuice is only for an hour tho?
I'd probably just ramp it up to, no, you can't.
Polyjuicing into voldemort wouldn't make you a parselmouth (i guess), f.eks. so I think the changes are mostly superficial.
You can have large stock of them to be transformed indefinitely
What if you drank like a bucket full of it . You can stay in that form for a long period of time
You'll puke
Oh I get it
So you mean like if Ron turned to a female & got preggo & turned back to ron what will happen to the baby?
Yes
God that is quite the scary predicament
That probably happened sometime in the past š¤£
Will it die? Will the magic protect it and stop the transformation back, or something completely different
I swear even JK Rowling don't hav an answer to that
Only wattpad writers who write stuff involving Harry, Ron & Malfoy will have an answer to that š
I don't think the predicament itself is that scary, I am fearing the possible outcome more.
The predicament itself would have so many possibilities
I can imagine some crazy parties involving polyjuice. magi folk have it good
Why would anyone even want a girlfriend?
All the boys & girls can polyjuice themselves & their friends to whoever they liked for whenever they wanted
Glad it wasn't explored
Its one of those terrible whatifs where the answer is "just don't do it"
Pretty sure polyjuice is just an external alteration. It gives you the external appearance of someone, it doesnāt actually turn you into them.
It doesnāt alter your genetics or anything
If it did you could make it even more whack.
Drink polyjuice of a werewolf right before full moon.
@idle salmon I am a little sad it wasn't. I need answers to those questions.
Just to double dare the universe
And if I have to research it personally. I would try it, if I could
plus harry used polyjuice and still had the scar so it shows there are limits
I dont think he actually did? Or maybe thats an exception, since dark art wounds are typically notoriously hard to remove
He hadn't. It was just the first to reappear
And that's even a film-exclusive scene iirc
But yeah, JKR didn't really go into detail regarding most things, so there's a lot of guesswork involved. Polyjuice in particular can lead to... interesting discussions.
So lets dive into them. I might find my answer
I'll write something up when I'm home in a couple hours
Yay
Technically , if Ron turns back then the baby should disappear
wait what the heck are you guys talking about?
NSFW (not safe for wizards)
society.
lmaoooo
Let's not
Why did my comment get deleted
Keep the topics appropriate please everyone
They brought up the topic. I was just curious
None the less what was said isn't appropriate
Isn't this the same year that the Ministry started to use trains to get to Hogwarts from Kings Cross Station?
Pretty sure the train has been around for a while before HL
Platform 9 3/4 was added to King's Cross Station right around the time it was opened to the (muggle) public - so around 1852/53
I wonder if Vampires are natural beings in HP verse or if they were first born from a curse and if full vampires can even be born to vampires or dhampnirs to humans and vampires.
JK doesn't say much in her archives about vampires, and nothing about dhampnirs: https://www.wizardingworld.com/writing-by-jk-rowling/vampires
Does anyone know of any other sources of vampire lore in the Wizarding World?
Not much more really. They suck blood and are nocturnal
She didn't really do anything with em cos she felt she couldn't
Do you mean they actually die in the sun and don't just sparkle?
š¤£
So we have no idea if they have their traditional powers or not or weaknesses etc.
How was Cedric alive then?
Like they prob ain't immortal or raised from the grave for one.
We know that theyāre vulnerable to garlic
And most have an ability to beguile their prey
well i doubt they have biological immortality
In the lego harry potter wii games, there is a mission where you use a spell or potion to turn harry into a girl so you can enter the girls restroom and save hermione from the troll
So if the lego games have any influence or involvement with cannon then the castle cannot detect that
I think that's just a contrived 'puzzle' rather than a meaningful deep-dive into the lore, especially given that Harry and Ron enter the girls toilets multiple times in the books
The Lego games have zero influence on canon
^^
Where is that in canon other than in connection with "p-p-p-poor st-stuttering p-prof-fessor Q-quirrel"? Because I'd take anything coming from someone possessed by Tom with a grain of salt š
(Besides that, I think it was guessing on the part of Harry and his classmates that linked Quirrel's garlic with vampires)
Someone has been thinking hard about this issue š¤£
Myrtle's bathroom is only protected by an "out of order" sign
Well I am still thinking about the ability of the girls dorm enchantment to detect trans people
As far as I know there's nothing about trans people at all in canon. Closest I'm aware of is the fact that metamorphmagi can take the shape of someone of either sex
I know there are a few fanfics that address the issue, but I'm not aware of Rowling ever addressing it
Uh would you expect her to?
If she did, she would just make things even worse Iām sure
I think if a hat can know which house someone should be in⦠letās assume any enchantment works well too
I actually expect she'd deliberately avoid addressing it at all
Well my personal hope would be, that the enchantment does detect that and would let a trans girl, maybe before she even knows for sure herself into the dorm.
And the other way around would deny a trans boy to enter
The fanfic New Blood (IIRC thats the one I read that had it), dealt specifically with trans students and the dorm protections - in that case it was a trans boy
And the kid had no idea why the dorm wouldn't let them in - meanwhile the boys in their year didn't think about the fact that their room had an extra bed
That's the only specific example I recall from the stories I've read, other than in TheSinisterMan's Prince of Slytherin - in there it's just a metamorphmagus disguising themselves, so it doesn't really count
Hmm.
I guess its fun to speculate and all, but this story canonically has no trans characters and the writer is a transphobe. So we are really to assume that if trans people were ever incorporated into Rowlingās cannon, they would not be allowed into their preferred dorms. Any other conclusion will not align with cannon, and is totally valid to play around with! I myself could headcannon, but with the cannonās contex, it just isnāt so
I will propably think about that for days. Thats what I sometimes do. I get a thought, I take it in and take ages to let it go
But maybe it should let them when they are ready. Like Harry choosing his house.
Imagine not being āoutā (or even truly knowing yourself) and not being able to get into a dorm
@stone matrix That would be pretty shocking, but at least what I know from personal experience the person in question could get to the conclusion pretty fast, if its so openly smashed into their face. Its not something that comes out of nothing.
It could actually be a relieve too
The earlier you know, the better you can act on it. 11 is a great age
Also it would kinda prove to everyone that its not just an idea or a phase, but something real
if you want to see how New Blood handled it - it's the one where Hermione gets sorted into Slytherin and pulls a long con on the entire wizarding world to convince them she's not actually muggleborn despite having muggle parents
How did she manage to end up in Slytherin in the first place...
nope, not gonna spoil š
only reason I said as much as I did is because there are hundreds of fics titled 'New Blood' on ff.net
(most of them aren't even Harry Potter related, though)
So yeah. If it would be me in question I think I would prefer the brutal way of suddenly entering the girls dorm with no problem. Instead of being lied to by the castle.
It sounds a bit wierd to have the castle make such a decision for you, instead of deciding h it yourself.
Why would the person making that enchantment be better at deciding for you, than you?
Lack of autonomy is not a good thing.
Security often comes at the risk of lack of autonomy
Is this really a security issue though? It sounded more like an issue on who chooses the identity.
Like if a new student expects to go into the witch dormitory, but then the castle decides no, sounds horrifying to me, talk about a rude awakening, surrounded by people you don't know, afraid to be judged.
Its not impossible with in game lore though, with the sorting hat and all. But, for me that should be a personal decision, not something the castle just enforces without explanation.
At the very least have the hat ask and clarify what you want instead of just having you blocked out of your sleeping quarters the first day of school.
@ruby thistle technically its not a decision at all. To know when you are ready can be. But being trans is not.
So I came more from a point, where you yourself deep in your heart and soul already know.
Alright, fair enough.
Yes the Outing via Castle enchantment could be harsh, but honestly any outing is. The earlier the better for your future.
To me it would propably be assuring to know that magic agrees with me. You feel less alone. And thats propably the worst thing that can happen. Being left alone after an outing, not able to do anything because those who make the decision (parents for example) do not stand with you and try to talk you out of it. While you know what you want and have to helplessy watch puperty destroying your very being.
With the castle on your side, no one can really stop you to go your way.
And now I am crying and leave it at that.
Well according to the books, the enchantment exists due to the founders found 'boys' less trustworthy, so I guess you could argue if someone identifies as a witch it wouldn't actually be a problem. I just don't know how the spell would know. But that could probably be said for many spells š
A little bit later than promised and I think the most important things have already been said, but anyway...
Polyjuice: I think that one comes down to how exactly the physiology of wizards differs from muggles and whether or not Polyjuice affects internal organs in the first place. Both of these questions are impossible to answer with certainty and the closest point of reference we do have, which isn't close at all, is that things like eyesight are part of the deal. Personally I like to believe that Polyjuice is 100% external because anything else sounds like a fanfiction nightmare come alive.
The charm on the girls' staircase: I believe that the charm is linked to Hogwarts' sentience and thus fully adaptable to the scenario you proposed. There are no arguments to make a case one way or another because we simply have no idea how the charm even works but "well... magic just... knows!" is a valid point when you have no real facts* to go by.
*if I may theorise a bit though: The charm still being in place - and apparently unchanged at that - does at least suggest that even the current headmaster/headmistress doesn't have the power to alter it, which can definitely be interpreted as slight proof that the charm has basically become part of Hogwarts itself. It's a more romantic view on the situation as a whole but I think it fits.
can you have a pet other than the standard owl,cat,frog? i remember ron had a rat and that other gid had a iguana so is there a chance to have a pet snake at hogwarts?
The whole "owls, cats and frogs" thing seems more like a guideline than a rule that is set in stone. We do have several examples of other pets, Lee Jordan even had a Tarantula.
regarding snakes specifically, I'd say it depends on the exact species.
ok i would hope for legacy to have more than three options for pets
Not sure about pets, but we get to build an animal shelter basically. So should be plenty of animals
Why does this makes sense ?
Hermione pretty much breaks all of her self-imposed rules when it comes to Harry.
it doesnt Hermione found the basilisk in hogwartz library also at the time he knew none of the details about the basilisk
and in a life or death situation regarding the whole of hogwarts (or at least all the mudbloods) vandalism can be excused
Yeah pretty sure it was just Draco being a little jerk. He was probably only interested in what was on that i and didnāt want to go through the effort of buying the whole book
i thought it was because he didn't like the book's author who was making a scene with harry
Plus it was only in the film.
Just a nice little visual cue that Draco is still a jerk
Such a scene wasnāt in the book and Hermione still had the torn page in the book so yeah, she absolutely would damage a book if it was for something important
Donāt think it was a Lockhart book. It didnāt have a picture of him on the front. Which seemed to be a thing he did going by the Magical Me front over and his general inflated ego and narcissism
exactly how "EVIL" will we be able to be in game, personally i want to go full massacre dark mage?
No idea, but all the unforgiveable curses are there.
ok i hope to be a murderous dark lord
However I suspect the main story will be mostly linear, aside from how exactly you get at the endings.
Like you may throw avada kedavra around, but im uncertain how much characters around you will respond to it.
And you seem to be trying to save the wizard world from some threat, so you might at worst be some sort of anti hero
Gameplay-wise that shouldn't be a problem, but I highly doubt you'll be murdering others (especially humans) as part of the story and cutscenes. You can likely be the cold and calculating type but there won't be any Voldemort temper tantrums where you murder an entire room full of people
Something like that. Maybe a comment will be thrown about how you use such spells, and you might be able to respond with some arrogant or cynical, or end justify means type of answer. But in the end it sort of goes the same direction.
darn it i was hoping on killing students and making a horcrux
Mods I guess.
i heard WB games typically avoid mods so that may not be an option
The game is rated Teen lol
And generally most game devs donāt allow murdering children characters as that makes ratings boards slap them with AO or equivalent ratings which utterly kills sales
d*** it
Let's try and avoid the topics about killing children please
some hogwartz students are teens
Be that as it may WB has asked us in the past to shut that sort of thing down. Also Teens are still minors this still children
@boreal shuttle Well I think Polyjuice is more complete than that. As you said Eyesight gets restored too, so I guess there will be all organs affected.
About the Enchantment on the staircase, it would be the best indicator and the best back up for you. There is other facts scientific and psychological too though, and usually if you are trans, you know it deep inside. Other people might have trouble to understand that and in those cases I think the enchantment would be an insanely good proof of what you do feel and know. It would be the master argument.
i know there is a McKinnon clan of wizards, is that the same mckinnon clan of the muggles?
What is a McKinnon clan?
https://harrypotter.fandom.com/wiki/McKinnon_family this is the version from the story but there is a real scottish heritage of McKinnon that i am descended from
i am asking if the wizarding mckinnon family is the same as or connected to the muggle mckinnon family
Maybe, as their blood status is unclear
ok i just found it curious as my ancestors were the mckinnon
you do realize wizards are fiction
Yes
But who knows
Maybe there is magic of some kind in your family
There is many types of it
There is a girl in my town who owns a crystal shop, calls herself a witch and sells love potions.
š§āāļø
my mother just said that there is truth to your statement
about magic in my heritage
Amazing
When people describe magic, its always so vague, it might as well not exist.
Like when Harry pretended to give Ron the luck potion, and that made Ron confident enough in his abilities, leading to them winning the game, is probably a good description of "magic" as it is described by wicca today.
I dont disagree, simply believing you can do something sometimes enables you to do that very thing, but its not like you can cure cancer or foretell the future with self-confidence as some would have it.
And if magic is just wanting something, and focusing on what one wants, and believing you can do it, then bloody everything alive is magic.
Which to me sounds like playing with words and definitions rather than describing something real.
Isn't that the whole point of "magic" though, the whimsical and fictious aspect to it?
The moment it loses the vagueness, it's more of a science, no? As in, you can research it and properly harness it.
This is honestly one of my favorite parts of fantasy magic! The science :trollchad: I like thinking about its limitations and such, even if the characters in the world are unaware of the actual workings
Same here
Well ya got to have some limits defined to some extent or you should just be able to use it to easily solve the plot
Like if Gandalf could use his full power in LOTR/Hobbit he'd resolve the plot in 30 mins
are there going to be giants as well, i remember hagrid's mom was a giantess yet in all films and books i know of there is no appearance of a female giant
Madame Maxine was half giant too
half not full
Do you think voldemort could see thestrals?
I mean he killed tons of people, even died himself, multiple times.
But not sure he experienced a personal loss, unless he himself counts.
it doesnt say you have to have a personal death just that you have to have seen death so yes he would be able to. though now that you mention it there is a thestral mount in legacy so would that mean the player character has witnessed death
You need to have seen death and accepted it.
Voldy saw plenty of death. And itās meant nothing to him, only his own death was something that he refused to accept
Harry saw death as a baby but he could not see thestrals before cedric diggory died in book 4. And it still took months before he could see them.
He also saw death when quarrel died in book 1 i think, and when voldemorts horcrux died in book 2 (although he was not aware it was a horcrux he was aware the book was living)
The basilisk does not count maybe, as an animal.
Accepted it, and it must have meant something to you i think. Hence why seeing someone you don't know die may not make you able to see them.
O guess atleast
Harry was a baby. He didnāt even remember seeing them die, never mind accepting death.
In the books Harry was unconscious before Quirrell died. So he didnāt see it. The film had him awake a bit longer so that was an goof on the films part.
The book wasnāt alive per se. It was just a memory fuelled by a tiny soul fragment. The soul fragment wouldnāt be enough to consider it living either.
And yeah, deaths of animals donāt count. It has to be the death of a human.
Voldemort got angry when his horcruxes died. He clearly accepted their loss, he wasn't delusional thinking they were all still around. He just didn't accept defeat while some still existed.
He could go both ways imo.
It doesnāt have to be someone close to you necessarily. Just witnessing, processing and accepting a death you witnessed is enough.
Harry and Cedric werenāt exactly best buds. They were acquaintances at best, and primarily through circumstance.
We never really saw them interacting outside of the odd hint for a challenge and in the challenges themselves. They werenāt close.
I agree they weren't best of friends. But they were rivals, and had communed together several times. There was a sense of respect at the end also.
They totally would have been friends if the port key hadn't been hexed
Ignoring that an unhexed port key would make bo sense considering why Harry was there in the first place.
Itās just that most folks first experience of death and who can see Thestrals,witnessed the death of a family member, which I think is where this misconception of it needing to be someone you were close to came from.
You have to comprehend what you saw and accept death as a concept. There's nothing that suggests that you need to see someone dying who is close to you or that you even have to care at all.
You may be right.
But it seems wierd symbolically, and voldemort never mastered the elder wand, which included a thestral hair.
The fandom wiki states you have to witness death. But it also mentions how it took several months before harry could see them as he hadn't processed the death.
If you dont need to care, what is there to process.
He never mastered it cause he never was the master it got nothing to do with the therastral hair
It was dumbledor<draco<harry
Thats like the main things why harry won
The entire deal about the deathly hallows were to be the master of death.
I mean voldemort fricking "killed" Harry for a few minutes without the elder wand changing allegiance.
Before harry could simply disarm malfoy to become the owner, but voldemort knocking him unconscious in a semi death state didn't make the wand change.
He was in limbo, but was able to go back, presumably because voldemorts soul died in hos place.
He killed the part of his soul yeah
Harry was just along for the ride. He had the choice to go back
Besides, disarming is enough to make the elder wand change allegiance. Surely knocking Harry unconscious would count too
That wasnāt really the limbo its a thing between life and death
And the limbo is something else
Not how dueling works
It was limbo, dumbledore said so himself. An in-between world where you were neither.
Voldy got stuck there.
The EW canāt be used to kill itās true master.
So the EW refused and killed the parasitic bit of Voldyās soul in Harry. Harry just got dragged to limbo with it
Well yes but no
Itās why Harry had the choice. He could get on the train and move on to the afterlife, or go back and save his friends.
The harry death is a separate matter as you donāt escape from the limbo and normally dont even get there in the first place
You get there if you distort your soul (making a horcrux)
Atleast from what i understood
Folks who come back as ghosts must though.
Because they actively have to choose to return
Ok, my point is.
Ew changes allegiance when owner is beaten.
Draco was owner, but got disarmed by Harry.
Harry is owner, but got knocked out, and I dare say lost his wand in the process. I mean you don't hold things when you lose consciousness.
Therefore, he got disarmed, and should have lost ownership of the wand.
Unless the wand does not solely care about who defeats who.
I suspect Harry kept ownership, because he had ownership of all the hallows at that point, and had accepted death. He willingly went to die for his friends, meaning he was the true master of death, therefore also the thestral wand.
Doesnāt their soul just linger as they refuse to leave and then dont get the opportunity to leave once they refused?
Him being the true master of death may be right yes (if its even a thing)
Think they have to choose to go back. I suppose you could say that refusing to move on, is essentially choosing to go back. A bit semantic though
But Voldy tried to kill him with the EW. Not some other wand.
So the EW was still Harryās. And so it refused to kill him.
It doesn't matter in terms in being beaten. He got knocked out, even lost his wand. Ew changes ownership, as far as we know when that happens.
Since it didn't, I argue the ew is more complicated than that.
But Harry didn't get 'defeated' as such, he went there willingly without the intention to fight. And I'm pretty sure that matters.
Harry didn't kill draco either, ew still changed ownership, so murder is clery not necessary.
Aye, thats part of what I'm arguing above, with being the master of death, accepting it and all that.
Which leads back to the ew being a core of thestral hair, and whether voldydoldy can see thestrals or not.
It's definitely more complicated though. as is repeated a million times. The wand chooses the wizard. I'm sure the wand can choose itself whether something is 'enough' to change its owner
I understood it this way: you a normal magical human die. The you go straight to the afterlive no stops in between but if you just stay/ refuse to go you become a ghost and only distorted souls go to the limbo with it being a separate thing from death
If you die go to the limbo the the afterlive/become a ghost youd be correct with harry being in the limbo
Yeah. The choice is whether you move on or not.
Unless you ruined your soul, in which case the choice is made for you.
Did not get that
I mean that you decide on earth and and go to the afterlive or stay
Not that you go to the limbo after death and then come back/move on
and it was possible in the rarest of cases for wizards to visit the borderlands between death and life, in a state called Limbo, and return to the world of the living
So i was wrong (sauce the harry potter wiki so dunno how credible it is)
It almost definitely matters, yeah. After all Dumbledore's original plan was to have Snape kill him and die undefeated - that at least confirms that Dumbledore firmly believed that the situation and intent matter when it comes to being "defeated".
Yah most don't get a choice to go back from Limbo alive it seems. It may be how ghosts come to be though, they die go to Limbo and choose to go back as ghosts. Muggles don't get a choice it seems. They just go straight on to the afterlife it seems. And souls split so badly don't go back or on but remain stuck in Limbo forever.
Yah the EW wouldn't kill or willingly betray HP, its master, regardless of whether his choice to die mattered in the EW staying with him or not. Even if it would since HP chose to die, he could not be defeated since being defeated implies intent to fight and defend yourself before self beforehand in which case LV could have defeated him and won the EW but likely only if he used another wand to do it.
The intent to fight thing cant be true. Dumbledore died on purpose too, meaning he had no intent to fight either.
Wand still changed owner.
This was because Draco actually beat Dumbledore. It has to be a real win, not just practice or pretend
And the specification of āwinā is pretty broad
Basically, the plot required it
Thats bull man.
Harry got knocked unconscious, if that's not equivalent to winning i don't know what is.
Later Harry "won" by disarming, draco, thus, Harry being knocked unconscious should 100% mean that voldemort became the master.
But he didn't.
Why? Because he willingly went to die? No dumbledore did the same, but died and lost the ownership.
Because the wand didn't want to hurt him? Maybe, but he still went to limbo, and had to choose to go back. Clearly the wand did hurt him enough to knock him unconscious, again this should make him lose ownership like draco did when he was disarmed.
I am assuming here that Harry isn't some exception to the rule. Therefore whatever reason is made to allow Harry remain the owner must apply to dumbledore and draco aswell.
Did Dumbledore get disarmed by Draco willingly? Or did Draco surprise him?
Dumbledore had chosen to die that night.
I dont think he knew specifically that draco would be chosen for the job.
Like I said, the win condition is strange, and the plot required it
Man thats capitulation
Basically like hermione being in griffindor
But draco didn't kill him, he just disarmed him. The wuestion would the be if Dumbledore decided to get disarmed
She fits in gryffindor though
She would be in ravenclaw
I think she fits both, but she herself values gryffindor traits more. She says so herself
She valued gryffindor values more than ravenclaw. No potholes there.
The girl in first year willingly fought flesh eating plants, three headed dogs, and snuck around after curfew despite risk og being expelled.
She is 100%a gryffindor, even though she clearly has a head for learning.
Apparently āshe had a different type of smartsā which is the reason sheās in gryffindor and anyway, that was because she became a gryffindor which is why she said that which is a biased view
And risk of being expelled is a big deal. She was muggle born. Imagine being allowed to learn magic exists, then risking losing access to it cus your friends need help doing random stuff.
I have to go bye
lmao. In the Epilogue of DH, Harry tells his son that the Sorting hat will listen to his request. So, idk - the whole Hermione part is way overblown to be honest. In the Sorcerer's Stone, she even tells Ron and Harry that she hopes she'll be put in Gryffindor.
That's where JKR's excellent world-building shines through once again. 
Dumbledore asked Harry to step aside, so he could stun Draco, and couldn't see him, because of the cloak, so he didn't know he wasn't fast enough until it was too late. He hit invis Harry instead of Draco and Draco used that to disarm Dumbledore.
That's when the shift in ownership happened.
In the book, at least.
I don't think it was an accident that Harry got stunned. Dumbledore was shown multiple times, that he can see through Harrys cloak.
Yes. Excellent in those few parts where she actually used more than 5 seconds of brain power: The Characters. She has well thought out characters. World Building, as soon as it doesn't include specific characters anymore, it stops making sense. Right then and there.
So he had to know exactly where he was
He had asked Snape weeks before to kill him.
He couldn't risk Draco killing him before Snape could take that job.
I mean, its quite consistent that the house you are placed in represent the values you value the most. Not necessarily the values you have the most of.
Peter pettigrew, the most cowardly gryffindor ever is an example of that.
He was apparently in-between gryffimdor and slytherin, but got gryffindor in the end.
He didn't really get to achieve the virtues of gryffindor, but I think that is who he wanted to be.
He was to much of a coward to do it though.
Examples, crab and Vincent goyle.
Neither were were cunning, both were simple thugs.
But they clearly had ambition, and wanted to be leaders on top.
Both were poor slytherins in terms of cunning and what they achieved but they did calue the slythrrin virtues the most.
JKR should have just left the line out. But she didn't. And since she did not, it's canon and thus established as fact.
You can chose your house - the hat takes suggestions like he did for Harry when he told him he'd be great in Slytherin. Harry said no because as children are, being influenced by the first person who showed him any kind of love, influenced his decision making greatly - Hagrid, telling him that all the 'evil wizards' come from Slytherin didn't help much. Furthermore, when Hagrid, or Ron - not sure who did exactly, told him that his parents were killed by an evil wizard who was - also from that evil house, doesn't make for a great unbiased decision making.
While I love to theorize, this ain't it.
Mcgonnagal was super brainy too, but became a gryffindor.
And Lockheart was not exactly much of a researcher or philosopher, nor very skilled (except in obliviate) But he was extremely ambitious, in a negative, willing to lie way.
Able to choose because they were hatstalls.
Most of the students got decided in seconds.
But when the hat was unsure, it let the student tip the scales in one direction.
Harry, was clearly fit for both slytherin and gryffindor.
He showed great cunning, leadership, courage and loyalty. He just valued some of those traits more than others.
And yes, being able to say which house you want is not contradictory to which traits you value more.
If you value ravenclaw traits more than slytherin, clearly you then ask for that house.
The hat still chooses a house according to the traits that suit your values.
If this is not true, then explain how does ravenclaw get students who fail in tests, how does slytherin get daft and uninspired leaders, and how does gryffindor get occasional cowards in its ranks?
The answer has to be you get a house based on values, not necessarily what you have the most of.
Did any Ravenclaw ever fail a test?
Source pls.
But if it matter to you, you'll be able to choose Gryffindor over Slytherin.
The Sorting Hat takes your choice into account."
"Really?"
"It did for me," said Harry.
DH - Epilogue
That's what Harry tells his son.
Yeah, because the choice you make there is the same as your values lol
Taking a choice into account doesn't mean you can choose your house how you please though
If you say "please make me go gryffindor", its because that house, and its values are more correct for you.
True, we've only seen it when it was a hatstall between 2 houses.
Which i guess means that the hat is working for the most part.
All Harry tells us in Chapter 7 of Sorcerer's Stone is that some were chosen faster than others, and the only example where we get any sense of speed is when Draco had been chosen without the hat even being properly placed on his head.
If anything, it proves my point. Draco had been influenced strongly by his parents and their blood-purity and overall superiority over other wizards and/or other magicals in general.
Dumbledore even mentions to Snape that he thinks that the Sorting hat sorts too soon, of course that discussion goes nowhere but it shows. Values can shift, this was in direct contrast to Snape's earlier ambition and how he no longer fit into Slytherin. If even Dumbledore says so, I mean, I wouldn't put too much thought into the whole sorting ceremony.
Nooooo
My comment was partly deleted.
I'm too stupid for my keyboard. 
Yerah, I wrote half an essay, I won't write all that up again.

Thats for example why you are not in Ravenclaw
The shade. lmao
But true.
Source for ravenclaws not acing every test, and slytherins not being amazing leaders always, and gryffindors being ocasional cowards?
Peter pettigrew - gryffindor, clearly not brave enough to stand by his friends.
Gilderoy lockheart - ravenclaw, was clearly subpar in several spells, except memory charms.
Crab & Vincent goyle- clearly the epitome of cunning and resourcefulness in the story.
Cedric diggory, showing great bravery and dignity. But was hufflepuff nonetheless.
I dont know what kind of source you want man. Examples are j the characters themselves.
Yes, draco was influenced by his parents. Meaning his values was closest aligned to slytherin.
We agree i guess?
Meh, I don't see how that contradicts anything I've said earlier.
If we were to go by your explanation, the hat choosing based on the values one weighs most importantly at that particular point in time - outlines the problem with the hat and the whole sorting ceremony.
We've seen throughout the books that values can shift and change. So, idk - going back to well, they didn't live up to the expectations the house represented because reasons, is a fairly easy way out of the whole discussion. Because, you know - people change and, value certain aspects differently or not at all.
The very problem with the hat and its sorting is that you can't define someone by four/five attributes alone, especially not a child of 11 years old.
Children are gullible, throwing some special circumstances into the mix, maybe even pressuring them somewhat, can tip the scale considerably. So, idk.
If you were told by your peers that a particular house is extremely evil or useless or whatnot, you would be more inclined to not choose that particular house - as in pressuring the hat to not place you in that house, or wavering with your decision and thus, again, the hat either convincing you of his choice and or insisting on your own - to not go to that house, only not to be ousted by the peers or the people you've just become friends with on the train. Or the stories you've read in your books about all the great wizards and their houses. I think people give the hat way too much credit, when it all boils down to circumstances and maybe some original intent.
Yeah. That I agree on.
I think ultimately the sorting hat and how it makes its choices is a little more complicated than many people think. It does absolutely consider what an individual student values, but it also looks for what's inside and if said values can realistically transition into traits. It also makes some of its choiced based on which house would be the most advantageous for the personal development of specific students.
Then there's the oversimplification of some characters when it comes to their traits and the house they were placed in. Pettigrew is a good example of that as I can and have argued repeatedly that he definitely possessed some of Gryffindor's traits and had shown bravery in his life - we aren't 100% brave or 100% cowardly, that's not how it works - and just because he wasn't brave enough to stand up to Voldemort, that doesn't mean that he wasn't brave at all.
It's also important to note that some people just don't fit any of the others really well, which makes certain choices/placings of the hat seem weird at first glance but they mostly make sense when you really think about them. Let's use Pettigrew as an example again: it's a common argument that he should have been placed into Slytherin but why exactly? He did have some cunning but only when it comes to his self-preservation and that's really where his Slytherin traits and values end. He wasn't ambitious or proud and he certainly didn't have any leadership qualities.
So there really wasn't a great or even good fit for Pettigrew when it comes to the Hogwarts houses, meaning the hat basically had to pick the one that at least somewhat fits, could help lessen his load and potentially make him the best person he could be - even if that didn't work out.
We actually have a lot of examples that fit into this category, like the aforementioned Lockhart or obviously individuals like Crabbe and Goyle.
Too long, didn't read.
RedWing has a short attention span, so they're excused. You on the other hand though... some of your posts are just as long, so you're being rude for the sake of it! Not that this is unusual, considering your house 
I don't have a short attention span. I'm just not in the mood to read essays.
Late answer but: He definitely didn't get disarmed willingly and was legitimately caught off guard. It was his plan after all to die undefeated, so that the Elder Wand would "die" with him.
Not so much caught off guard as the time he would have spent defending himself, he spent freezing Harry instead
Dumbledore was basically just an old man with very little magical and physical reserves in that moment - I think he originally planned to freeze Harry and then block Draco's curse, so he could try reasoning with him, but he didn't take his own fatigue into account
Or he did take it into account and still felt that ensuring Harry's safety was the most important thing, both scenarios are possible.
Same result though, but sure.
I donāt think he was expecting Draco to disarm him, definitely caught off guard and weak after having to drink the potion
He 100% knew that someone was coming and could have defended himself - the question is whether he planned to do so after freezing Harry and failed or gave up his plan so that Harry's safety could be assured.
They say it pretty literally in the book
I still think that he easily could have done both, under normal circumstances; which is why this scenario is especially interesting.
Of course, the fact that he was weak did not help
I just don't think he did it willingly or was caught by surprise. He just prioritized both of his students safety
with caugh off guard I meant it more like he was intending to do both but underestimated his own fatigue, which fits Dumbledore's character imo
Maybe, I didn't interpret it that way personally. Dumbledore seemed to be in control of much of the confrontation, so I don't think he minded losing his wand.
I'd say he definitely did mind being disarmed by Draco, because it went against his original plan and potentially put Draco in more danger. But it's absolutely possible that he knew he'd be unable to both secure Harry and defend himself, given his state, and Harry was obviously the bigger priority.
But it's impossible to say for sure, Dumbledore isn't exactly the most transparent character.
Well I think he figured that if he had no wand, then there was likely less of a chance where Draco could be in danger. Since Draco's whole mission was to take down Dumbledore, and the threat was that if Draco failed they would hurt him and his family. If Dumbledore could make it seem like Draco had succeeded, he would be much safer. At least that seemed to be why Dumbledore never confronted him directly about the situation before.
Dumbledore didn't know that Draco was coming though, he just knew someone was coming. And he could have just tossed the wand aside if he wanted to have a heart to heart with Draco, or waited to see how the situation would develop.
He did put a potential mark on Draco's back because Voldemort could have figured out that Draco disarmed Dumbledore on the Astronomy Tower; so even if you disregard his original plan of wanting to die undefeated, that still leaves us with an undesirable situation.
Draco immediately disarmed him after bursting through the door, and even by Dumbledore's standards it'd be a stretch to assume that he could make a calculated decision like this so fast.
I just think Dumbledore saw that it was Draco, and reacted accordingly.
I don't think he would have frozen Harry if it was someone else
He definitely would have imo. He knew he'd die there, ensuring Harry's safety was an absolute necessity - and Dumbledore knew that Harry is a hot-head better than almost anyone else.
But thinking back on the situation does make me lean towards him giving up the wand in favour of protecting Harry. I don't think he intended to defend himself after he saw who came through the door; even under normal circumstances that would have required excellent reflexes.
Or rather excellent reaction time
Draco also would have to react to who was there and where they were before casting his spell, so I think Dumbledore would have had the time to do the same, given his reflexes are usually, way faster. I'd say his weakened self was on par with Draco's. Personally I always thought he froze Harry not to do something to Draco specifically. Since Harry could have easily jinxed him from under the cloak. However, if death eaters or anyone else came up and saw Draco incapacitated it would have been bad news for the same reason I mentioned above.
On top of that I don't think Dumbledore thought Draco would actually kill him. So Draco vs Him, it was better he had no wand. If it was a death eater that was not Snape though, I think he might have preferred the wand, so he didn't die/get disarmed prematurely according to his plan.
Though honestly, with the information we have, either scenario is just as likely
but that was always how I viewed the scene
That's basically what I mean though and why I disregarded the first scenario I mentioned - Dumbledore waited to see if it was friend or foe but the decision to freeze Harry if an enemy came through the door was made right then. I don't think he would have risked Harry in any way and he likely knew that he was in no state to fight anyone really and definitely not a Death Eater. So he basically decided to give up the wand in advance, which would explain why he'd be willing to put a target on Draco's back, because at this point he had no real choice.
It's sloppy either way but I made the error of treating Dumbledore like his usual self in my earlier argumentation - he was basically mind tortured and mentally, physically and magically fatigued.
And because of this your interpretation is definitely possible as well.
This wasn't the Dumbledore we had known up until this point.
He also knew of Draco's mission and Snape's unbreakable vow, which could have affected his decision as well.
That could also be used as an argument for your interpretation - if an overzealous Death Eater arrived, he might have tried fighting them together with Harry, because dying to them would probably have meant losing Snape.
Exactly, if a death eater came instead of Draco he would want to fight rather than protect, due to his entire plan
Man, second-guessing Dumbledore's decision making is a pain 
lmao. As if I would shy away from a good debate. 
Okay, where to dissect this.
A lot of your evidence hinges on one particular individual, Peter Pettigrew, which to me is just too easy. The problem is, we don't know how the hat considers certain traits - as in which ones he deems more valuable and thus weigh more heavily when pondering his decision making.
Again, I'd wager that very few children - at that age, know what they aspire to be. If anything, I could see some aspects instilled in them from an early age - which is well, pretty much what we all have had at that age. But to me, even if the hat had all the knowledge of your past and how you've interacted so far, pushing you towards a certain house, purely based on traits - which are very much open for interpretation to begin with, is well that, I guess.
You've said that people are multifaceted, 'no one is 100% brave, 100% loyal' etc. But the hat basically cherry-picks whichever traits the child exhibited or aspired to be at that particular age. Since you don't have to be the epitome of a certain trait, or multiple for that matter, to fit - there ought to be some that, well, do.
Looking at it in retrospect and going, well - this didn't work out, or well it did work out because these three events I've chosen to reveal to the audience just happen to fit into whatever choice the hat had made years, decades back is - too easy. in my opinion at least.
One of the major themes of her book, and one as old as time itself, good and evil. Harry Potter's, the book-series, foundation is built on that stark contrast between overcoming the big bad and finding a place to belong.
I think dobby is secretly voldemort
Snape: Your evidence?...
As for AD Draco thing, ya he was just legit too late to defend himself and too tired to do so by the point the spell was cast against his wand. Did Draco do the spell at the same time he immoblised HP or after? If it was the former he then he'd have no chance since he can't cast 2 spells at once since he has to say both in his head (I think) if he's doing non-verbal.
Ultimately it works out for him even if its not ideal as Draco has no clue he just won the wand from him, nor did anyone bar GG know he had the wand as far we know (I assume FB won't have people sus he won the EW from GG or that GG had it). So plan A - die with wand and wand loses its power or just becomes a normal wand presumably. Unintended plan B - Draco dies naturally or if the wand is won from him in the futue, hopefully no one knows by who and so and so on making it more likely as time goes, its owner will die naturally thus ending the wands power per plan A.
It just takes longer in the Draco got the wand instance but he wasn't planning that. At that point, he'd just have to hope no one learns who the true owner is or the true owner dies naturally at some point.
Ofc everyone would know who the true owner is after DH given HP told everyone in the grand hall.
Whether CC changed the ownership later is unknown.
But HP may aswell have put a neon sign over his head saying "Disarm or kill me to master the Elder Wand, most powerful wand ever."
me too
I got the yew wand lol
I agree with everything here except the last bit about not fitting into any other houses- I thought it was canon that students that didnāt really fit any of the four houses were sorted into hufflepuff?
Hufflepuff takes those who the hat decides don't fit better into other houses
As hufflepuff said, she'll teach everyone and treat them all the same
I think so too
bro sammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmme
Sort of. Hufflepuff didn't have the strictest criteria on who should study magic. She generally thought that education should be for all.
But her personal virtues were hard work, discipline, fair play, loyalty and such.
My interpretation is hufflepuff is the more practical and down to earth house of the lot.
I have a question. After using expelliarmus on enemy wand it always belongs to me?
No, it doesn't
That worked for the Elder Wand, but not for every other wand
Especially Unicorn Hair wands are very loyal
I think its up to the wand to decide if he wants to switch the owner
This. Itās up to the wand and depends on the core and wood how well it might work for someone who isnāt itās original owner.
Some woods are very finicky and will just refuse to work for anyone that isnāt their original owner.
It's up to JKRs storytelling and if the plot demands it. I'll see myself out.

wasnt that what we saw with voldemort and the elder wand
the wand was like "lol you didnt win me"
The EW wouldnāt actually kill Harry. Because it canāt kill itās true master, which is why the killing curse kills Voldy in the final fight.
who or what is CC again
all i can think is collin the caterpillar
collin creevey maybe lmao
ah ok thanks
That Hufflepuff "takes the rest" has been over-intellectualised imo. From everything we know to be true it simply means that in Hufflepuff your traits (whether present or future) don't really matter all that much if you're willing to embrace the virtues of Hufflepuff. Otherwise I'm pretty sure students like Gregory Goyle would have landed there, Crabbe at least had the excuse of hiding or being unaware of his ambitions.
It's definitely not the house of the misfits or left-overs, as many people claim to be the case, and simply more inclusive than the other houses.
Hi, do you know if a map of game have leaks ? or just thƩories ?
Hello. Whatās this thread for exactly? Confirmed stuff?
Lore about the WW.
"Discuss the lore of the Wizarding World from the 1890s and the decades prior (maybe a bit later, too)."
Ok⦠How much late Victorianism do you all think weāre going to see?
Itās an interesting thought, considering how much of the WW of 1990 was still residing in it.
What are you asking here?
Some person did create a map of hogwarts using the minimap shown in gameplay. Other than that we don't have a map
Map of world are in Lore ? or not ?
i was gonna try and figure out but i couldnt tell lmao
If a Squib and a Muggle have a magical child, is that a Halfblood or a Muggleborn?
A Squib has magical blood, so its a half blood
