#ark-2
1 messages · Page 121 of 1
Old enough lol
Based
Ever published anything?
I have never made my own product from the ground up of that is what you are asking. But yes I have worked on products from financial websites to nasa simulations
With
Anyone can work with nasa.
Do a project with them lol
Find one they are doing, and work on it
It's just science bro
You don't need one
I'd also like to know.
I did it through the university. You can Google it and find stuff to do just from your phone or whatever
You don't need to go to an ivy league school to work with nasa lol
To be clear, ASA didn’t exist until the community whined about not having ark 1 copied into unreal engine 5
Originally, it appeared that WC was intending to advance the ark series with ark 2 and largely leave ark 1 to slowly fade out. The strategy was then tweaked
Adapting to what your community wants
It’s more to the points of “why didn’t they do asa first and ark 2 later”
... If you are trying to be hired yeah, maybe. If you just work on one of their open projects it's not an issue
I mean that is still what they are doing
They’re doing parallel development
I believe the initial question Xor asked was “why not do just asa then do just ark 2”
I think they appeal to entirely different audiences
it's time for change anyway 
Basically, yeah. Did a lot good but even the Devs admitted there were things they weren't able to do due to engine limitations
Is asa gonna have new map after fjordur or it will be totally abandoned for ark 2
It's going to have a new official DLC. We don't know if we will still get new free community maps.
when will ark2 come?
late 2024 at the earliest.
I don't remember if the island has a new creature which as been voted ?
Rhynio
Ark ascended will be available in august this year?
October at the earliest
Not an exclusive one no.
Nothing is granted regarding dates
Check announcements and google
It’s what WC most recently said, but that’s subject to change. It’ll launch when it’s done
didnt they say ark 2 would be realased like months ago
Late 2024
First announcement it was a 2022 release, then it was postponed to 2023. Now it’s postponed to late 2024.
ark 2 will be after ark 3 lol
I do still call that optimistic I do say around 2025 if it even ever will come out
How original
.
what about the ark survial accended or smth i forgot the name will that be free to people who bought evolved
What ark origins
I don't know of anything that will be free to people who bought ase
accended
idk why i said origins
Asa is not free to people who bought ase
are they still shutting down the servers?
can we still run our own servers
They are only shutting down official servers
Nope, just official
that's a relief
They can't effect unofficial.
my friend just bought ark i was going to be sad for him if it completly shutdown
Tell him to get a refund and just wait for ASA lol
do we know if ark 2 is getting multiplayer?
Literally on the Ark start menu for the past couple years...
Ark II -
MULTIPLAYER
Sandbox survival game
lol no but it can't be worse than this version
will see what we get if it's poop I suppose it's finally time to look for a new game
wait are you talking about ark2 or asa
oh lmao I'm talking about asa
👀
ark2 already f up the moment they say it's a 3rd player game
I use both but 3rd player the mean like other games use it as well and that makes it a poop game
I'm more excited for ASA than ark2
the insane delay +3p complaints means its not unlikely that theyll go back on their word
precedent is there, and theres a lot about survival games that 1p is just superior at
i dont think 3p is the worst tho
95% of gameplay needs 3p
My only concern about 3rd person is how it'll work in tight quarters like caves or short bases. I play like 99% in 3rd person, but go 1st in those instances, so I'm curious to see how it'll work in Ark2. Also wonder if the new Asc camera will be a preview of what to expect in Ark2
Is it legal if someone does a mod in asa with some of the creature of the vote ? Is wildcard gonna be ok if it's done ?
WC is pretty chill with mods, so I wouldn't be suprised if modders try to add in some of the other popular creatures somehow
It would maybe be more dependant on the original submitter allowing permission for the modder to add their content, but even then its not like they can really do anything about it
I'm gonna be honest, I can't play ARK in 3rd person.
I exclusively use 3rd person when riding a dino, and that's because I'm quite vain.
First person only would be way worse…riding a creature in first person should be a crime lol
there he is officer, the masochist that rides dinos in first person
Can someone explain me what are the 6 post for being able to vote please
don't know, but it's most likely bc of bot account spam votes
New accounts are in a temporary "early bird" status that gives them limited access on the forums until they have made 6 posts. Once you have reached 6 posts you get full access on the forum.
Thanks a lot but I still don't understand what a ''post'' is and where to do them on the forum (I don't speak English currently so sorry for my misunderstanding)
A post is a message, like you are doing now here. It can be made anywhere on the forum, just don't spam.
Oh ok thanks I already did one without notices
when ark 1 close ?¿
I'm okay with 3rd player just only the 3rd player like it is in ark survival evolved not like different games like fortnite there poop camera location and stuff (no I don't play that game played it 1 time left because that camera angle is the worst ever)
Question; do you want wild pigeons? City pigeons? Or extinct ones like carrier pigeons?
massive flocks of passenger pigeons could be cool. probably untameable, but cool
Oddly enough, Extinction has birds.
You rarely see them though, since you have to walk into a volume for them to trigger.
Which is kind of depressing.
Hope we get more birds in ASA, possibly even using whatever system the Insect-Swarm uses to have one entity have like 10+ models.
when gen1 first launched the stupid insect swarms were everywhere in the swamp biome
gen1 and 2 should have never been added
I don't know about never, but they were (and gen2 still is) too buggy to be launched
they made the game to easy and gen1 is just poop no good base locations at all
Gen1 has no good base locations?? Are we playing the same Gen1?
Gen1 has some of the best base locations in the game
Gen1 has some GREAT maps
Thye just don’t come together nicely
But individually speaking, that’s some of the best shit I’ve seen in ARK maps
he must be talking about pve officials plus when someone hates gen maps generally means they ruin their monopolizes either on pvp or pve
gen2 is the main problem map
you downloaded the same dlc as me?
that map has some good base location
to be fair, "good" PvE base locations are def NOT the same as "good" PvP locations...
i mean the issue i care more for is the shit that infects the other maps
tames and resources and shit
the map itself is cool imo, space biome can be stupid sometimes tho
Space is great, I just hate that the voidwyrms are only in one or two cycles when they are stated as being defenders of the ship, made by the ship's inhabitants
Why wouldn't they be out there all the time, then? Wth
Gen 2 is the end game map. It didn't hurt that much actually. ASE is already pretty old. Unless you are playing on a new unnoficial server, gen 2 didn't spoil the game for you.
Remember we were supposed to be playing Ark 2 for ~1 year by now. Gen 2 was supposed to close the cycle.
yeah, but now that asa is gonna release and we are getting new dlc for asa, gen2 needs to be reconsidered in scope
unfortunately, the trend is that theyll ignore any potential problems the previous map caused and just powercreep it
maybe the new dlc will have missions or drops that guarantee capped loot
maybe the loot will include capped dinos
Seeing as the new DLC is dropping before the Gen ones, I don't see the issue here
A lot of people tend to forget that
I have faith it'll fill it's own niche
Probably back on Earth, but idk honestly they have all the freedom in the world, it could take place on the Moon for all we know
This is their chance to do something completely wild and unexpected, or go the safe route and just do Arat Prime like everyone is expecting
idk i still think theyll try powercreeping the gens
The ball is in their court
is it actually releasing before the rerelease of the gens or did you mean its story is between ext and gens
Pressing x to doubt
Pretty sure it's stated as releasing after either Ab or Ext, lemme check
I can't seem to find it, but it does state that it was originally slated to release in Q4 of 2023, as was Aberration, so it's at least insinuated that it comes out around Ab release and before Ext (releasing in Q1 of 2024)
These are all I could find on the matter, very sick rn so not really at 100% and there may be more
"We plan to release a new canonical-story expansion pack for ARK: Survival Ascended that will be available in Q4 2023."
"The Island (Released at Launch)
Survival of the Fittest: The Island & Scorched Earth map variants (Released at Launch)
Scorched Earth (Released at Launch)
Aberration (Released by Q4 2023)
Extinction (Released by Q1 2024)
Genesis Part 1 (Released by Q1 2024)
Genesis Part 2 (Released by Q2 2024)
All the community-created maps are also to be released over time in 2024 (Fjordur, Ragnarok, The Center, Lost Island, Valguero, Crystal Isles)"
And then this, in the most recent ASA roadmap update;
"So for now, we’re going to plan that Scorched Earth will be coming to ASA in December this year, Ragnarok and Aberration will follow in Q1 2024, and the rest of the maps beyond then."
Yeah, for ASA, if they really intend to have a long early-access cycle + some years of development of the “new” game, I guess they need to 1 - postpone genesis maps as long as they can or 2 - balance the 2 maps.
well this game also be 300 gb?
Anyone know when next arkpoc wipe is?
It’s supposed to be smaller. But we will see.
You mean lunar?
Id say you are right indeed
i thought lost island had like 2 locations of note but idk for sure
lot of caves have stupidly long thin entrances
Not the biggest fan of the map, but it's shaped like Tamriel so that's cool, the islands in the East remind me of the Center a little bit too
wish we had more of an archipelago map
like crystal isles kinda does it in the southwest
we need an item for the island that allows solo players to raise babies on pve official. Since maewings likely wont be released for a year
on ASA
Also, I hope they balance dino levels so its the same spread and % chance of higher levels
All maps created equal
Definitely the levels all need to be fair and even across maps, I 100% agree there
That's probably what the Gigantoraptor is for.
Personally, creatures like that should be on as much maps as possible that fit the theme. Since they're going to be so useful for all types of players.
Man, I think that’s one of their greatest difficulties when making a map, because I hate archipelago maps. I would love a map with a huge landmass.
valguero does that pretty well
i think the main issue with an archipelago map is that its hard to add features
the most featureful is priobably gen1 ocean
but even that is basically all underwater feature wise
wonder what crystal isles would be like without crystal wyverns, since it has so much explorability but its so easy to traverse
Gen 1 ocean is broken AF though
I know people that crash in there all the time. I myself had some crashs in very important occasions (like at the moeder arena).
Also it lags a lot in there. I’m not sure if it’s because there too many fishes spawning
must be the 15 seagulls crashing people
Just when in the ocean swimming. I think it’s more related to the fishes
But back to the topic, I would prefer an ocean designed to be a biome for the water creatures, for some missions (like gen 1 and 2), special loot crates and water caves. I wouldn’t want them to spend too much time on the water biome.
I would prefer to see them focusing on the land
i havent lagged too much in gen1 ocean personally
the huge amount of stuff in it could cause an issue tho
Yeah gen 1 ocean is weird and laggy. It doesn't even crash the game for me it just disconnects
No where else in the game that happens to our tribe
I never have had issues with it, and my pc is a potato
know what i be mad if they make ark2 a subception
Yeah, it's the overspawns. Previous gen consoles can't handle it, and current gen ones can only do it for so long before a crash
ark 2 gonna be anything like ark 1. farm, build, raid,defend like?
Most likely
i swear if ark 2 gets delayed again im deleting ark and getting my life back.
until ARK 2 releases
Ok

And wenn is that?
Late 2024 (at the earliest)
Hii @worldly garden
Unknown if you’re PlayStation tho
Ocean on gen1 lags asf on PS4 🤣
Ive never lagged out from there since i've got ps5
Hi 🖖🏻
Shifter still alive in #ark-2 ? Dayum
I’ve been around. But I’ve largely stopped responding to anything uninteresting
If it’s juicy game design related content I’ll usually try to come back for it
Nope, only 'when Ark2?'s
I mean…when was the last good conversation I had here
August 6th about the perception of map size mattering more than actual physical size
True, if the map is flat it seems smaller than a map where you need to puzzle your route
When ark 3?
That, but the other major consideration is mount speed. Tons of fast fliers and gliders that ignore the topography and shrink the perceived size of a map can make things feel worse
True
Part of what’s so nice about Ab despite being smaller than other maps is that transport is slowed way down…so the map feels larger
Lots of discussion about that very topic here. Downscaling the role and importance of fliers
FLYERS R GHOOF XDD
@anyone know when ark survival ascended comes out?
october bro
NOVEMVER
October.
October. 🦛
November! 
October. 
It's out when it's out 
Ye well hopefully they fix some shit
Hopefully they don’t allow aimbot and esp
November 2029
Please in ASA or Ark 2, remove the 'do a 360 and the dino will despawn' mechanic
All 3 dinos I wanted to tame today have despawned right in my face, despite being all of 2 meters away from where I originally found them
I’m confused. Is ark 2 and Ark survival ascended not the same thing?
I’ve been told for ages that Ark 2 comes out in late 2024. What’s the difference?
Ark Asc is a remake of Ark 1 with a better engine, cross play, and more new features - currently set to release in October of this year along with a rollout of all available DLCs, free maps, and a brand new paid DLC ober the next year or so
Ark2 is the sequel to Ark1, with more of a primitive focus - set to release in late 2024
Two different products
Asc was already delayed a bit from August to October, as well as some of the planned content being pushed back a bit. But hopefully it's back on track for October release
Agh I hope so
Ay am I still gonna be in it?
Asc? Defo my guy
Ark2? Ehhhh... We'll see
You mean 9202
Still seems to soon
November!
Do they still intend on not releasing the game for ps5?
not at launch, after the pc and Xbox series s/x early access launch period
Okay well at least playstation still gets it
I've only played the game for like a year and I've got over 1k hours I'm excited for the new stuff
That's ... not confirmed yet
forgive me Zen, i must've mixed it up after working 10 hours straight on 4 hours of sleep 
Go rest, I got this shift 👍
so, odds of getting a good look at ASA things today?
Unlikely. Probably not until September for anything more than some concept/comparisons/creature vote stuff
Nah today will probably be ongoing creature vote and EVO. I guess there's always a possiblity of a random ARK 2 concept like they've done before.
they have put Ark 2 stuff out every 4 weeks roughly, last week we didn't so the chance for something Ark 2 is there seeing as we got nothing in july
Still waiting on Yi Ling dossier too
Guessing that will be next week, although the concept was out quicker than normal.
Yeah, concept was out real quick
Well yeah, they've stated before that once they have the top ten they do a preliminary concept art for all of them, just in case
Oh, do they? Must have missed that
I can't remember exactly which vote they said it after, but it was shortly after one of them where they changed the rules, maybe the Rhynio one? Idr
maybe today they will give a redwood tree UE5 for their hardcore fans to be happy about it 🤣
Dont forget no news on the animated series either!
I actually think we'll get something on ASA. Ark 2 ain't gettin squat for a bit with the ASA rush. I feel like they're trying to pull a big surprise about the animated series though. WC likes those kinds of surprises.
Like, Ark 2 has to compete with the news for ASA, then news for each story Ark and their respective non-story Ark as they get promoted and then released, in addition to a whole new DLC and its teasers and news. Good luck getting anything useful about ark 2 besides loose concept art in there with as little as they've been able/wanting to give us.
Idealistically we'd get something, but we were also told that we wouldn't have to wait long into 2023 for the show, that the remaster would be free, the devs cheating on official servers, and the rest of the garbage with the roadmap. Credibility and positive consistency are kinda out the window at the moment.
As the company tries to lift up on their big boy game studio britches, things will probably get more sparse and less exciting.
Amazingly thats coming from a diehard Wildcard fanboy. I want nothing more than awesome cool news. However, corporatization generally kills passion especially with a community like Arks.
While I don't agree with many of his opinions, I think neddythenoodles vid on the subject kinda did a good job encapsulating all of that as well if you havent seen it.
Conquest is an official server type. Employees cheating in a game they work on or for in which they have administrative powers is still just as a scummy, and I simplified it for ease of reading. Even if we want to debate the semantics of what a remaster is, the owner of the company said an upgrade would be free, and has since not even properly acknowledged the mistake in any form.
Like I said, I'm a huge fanboy, but the credibility of Snail Games was already trash and thats going to seep into Wildcard as well.
Doesnt matter anyways, we were both right.
No news on anything.

They literally acknowledged it in the post that announced the paid remake
can't expect a ark players brain to function properly
Apparently, goddamn lmao
Guy has me blocked for some reason too, never even spoke to him before 🤷♂️
As for the seep into WC bit, they're literally leveraging the ability to make Snail money with quitting and letting Snail rot, so that's also wrong (and good on WC peeps for threatening to quit over forcing MTX or NFT shit into the game, proud of y'all for that 😘 )
It was some twatter post, I wouldn't know exactly just heard about it
Stieglitz never acknowledged the blunder. When the owner of the company makes what some would argue is a pretty big mistake, I wouldn't think it's appropriate to send an employee to clean up the aftermath.
I'll admit I haven't looked into whatever twitter posts are mentioned since I dont use the platform unlessit gets sent to this discord, but saying that snail has had and will have no influence on wc's business practices would be incredibly ignorant.
Feel free to insult me or others, but don't wonder why you get blocked as a result.
I'm all for accountability, but are you saying the Snail CEO should have directly responded to this? Rather than the people who made the initial statement (WC), who then walked it back by saying instead of a lazy UE5 port they would rebuild ark 1 from scratch in UE5 with new QoL and DLC?
Nah, I was saying Stiegltiz should've. I feel like normally he would. He's actually been super amazing about that kinda atuff until recently.
Would've really helped his rapport to come and be show his relatablitilty and fan support again.
Like a, "Look guys, I know I said X, but the more we looked into it, the more the team got excited about doing more things with the remake. The scope of the project took a massive positive turn, but now we need more time, and will have to charge for it. Hopefully, you'll like what we wanting to bring to you, and make it worth it."
Not those exact words of course.
that is basically what happened
Thats what the crunch said, not jeremy
although I don't think he made either communication
There's a different level of intent or impact coming from the founder of the company vs a crunch we get every week made by an employee.
yes...but one could argue that a plan being walked back, especially one that nobody could financially invest in, isn't perse something he needs to directly respond to
since I don't think he made the initial promise or statement?
ho man they dint share a redwood tree for their fans uffff go ASA
This kind of comment is why they don't share anything with us according to Dolly. Highly professional stance by the way.
try again
fox isn't great at reading this chat
I believe the idea for the remaster was leaked, but then Stieglitz was the first to openly announce it before the crunch poated more info about it.
And one could argue that he has no obligation to tell us anything, and he probably shouldn't. It just hadn't been in his nature to ignore blunders like that, or not use it as an opportunity to hype the game up.
i read it right he's just going on the wrong way, the simple true is they have nothing to show
there's nothing to hype about a rush remaster/remake early access game
Also should reiterate that you and I were in agreement about the outcome. I promise I wasnt trying to be combative to that point. Just having a discussion. I apologize for my directness.
These kinds of comments are why I can't take a stance on certain events without it being implied that I'm stupid.
pure speculation. I'm sure they have stuff to show, but there is some truth behind what Dolly said, this community will be highly critical of anything put out, so they know it has to be good and as close to final product as they can get.
I don't think Dolly should have said it though
Basically any change/thing revealed will be ripped to shreds if it 'isn't right'
Thats unfortunate, because that didn't use to be the case. I remember when jat posted the super early development stages of the platform saddles, and it was still hype af.
Majority of this community is so painfully toxic these days
Like a snake eating it's own tail.
well it is true posting a damn UE5 tree upgrade its a joke but since they had plans... well to some was this month ASA would be release, i believe if they actually had stuff to show like map areas in UE5 they would have show, but since this "remaster/remake" whatever you guys wanna call it its being so rush they probably breaking more than actually making progress
and all this to get a quick cash to finish ark 2 or maybe its more funds to snails since snails invested in making another fail game
wouldn't the fact that they haven't shown anything suggest that it isn't being rushed?
well can be the other way and its being rush and getting all screw due to that?
Hmm... To peeps that know anything about game development showcasing an asset like a tree would be entertaining as it showcases the difference in power of the two game engines. Its also an opportunity to show that they are doing stuff and that they do have stuff to show.
Instead they get mocked for it, and well... You cant have it bother ways. So, you get nothing.
its not like ASE was a perfect stable game to begin whit
everyone shits all over ASE but it's a damn fine game, people wouldn't have played it as much otherwise.
its a love/hate relation plus there aint any game like ark that you can choose
Here's a hint as to why. Because it's not easy to make.
The Devs seriously did something special with ArkSE, even with the issues it's a damn fun game that keeps dragging me back. If the updates and new features are half as good as they say for Asc, I'd still be totally happy purchasing it again
And I hope Ark2 follows in a similar vein
ah
well if you look at it, only recent years companies (indi ones) doing survival games but more recently games being giving a chance to tame creatures, aint about easy or hard to make it its all about market and what makes ppl spend money
ark 2 the day were all official severs are gonna have tribes with members in the hundreds
I agree. Nothing but shit from the community in debatably the wrong ways. Experienced folks have more developed arguments, but then lesser experienced peeps see that and have to crap on it in less educated ways. It creates this vicious cycle of misplaced frustration as those lesser experienced peeps gain experience.
Its rough with how punishing the game is by itself without the social aspect.
ark is a enjoy the grind but hate the getting raided part
ark grind is fun
getting offlined in 2 minutes is not fun
not to mention the fact that ark has so my ddos users
thx god i use a aes 256 encryption
humm, have you ever fall trought the map from simply log in? have you fall trought the map while farming metal whit a arky? have you ever rubber band against a tree 50 stray times? how long have you being playing ark?
list out all the positive things that you've done in ark.
falling through the map has happened to all of us, but it's not what defines ark. It's a bug, and they have fixed a lot over time as well.
I have 30k hours across 4 accounts with 98% of that time being on official servers. I'm not proud of that, but there is very little I haven't seen in the way of bugs.
I also recognize that many of those issues happened because of something I did, and can prevent. Not always, but most of the time. There are reason why players clip through the mesh, there are reasons you get clipped inside of trees. I haven't personally had any of the examples you listed happen to me in years because I learned what caused them and avoid them.
Should we have to work around bugs? Thats debatable. Dying to the same thing over and over again is not something I'm personally interested in. At any rate, the game having bugs wasn't quite your argument and sounds like a strawman.
I challenge you to find a game that doesnt have bugs. Look at like minecraft. Minecraft has sooo many game breaking bugs. The way community handles them is completely different though.
Hot dang, 30k. Respect 🫡
I hate flexing hours because it's disgusting. However it seems thats what the comminity accepts as credibility.
ufff 30k thats a lot but aint crazy numbers
i can spend 30k hours inside a base and just saying i got 30k on the game btw
Oh, I've made the mistake of wrestling with a pig my bad. Peace out to you.
damn going bad mouth ha
I see gameplay hours as your willingness to stick to a game, despite it's flaws, wayyy longer than any other game or series and still seemingly enjoying it. I'm hovering around 11k
issue is that ark has hour sinks that promote afk
which imo aren't real play hours...because you aren't actually PLAYING the game
True, and fair point
officials sink hours thats at least what i think even more if is pvp, still on pve you always have stuff to do
i have see ppl spending days inside the base rising dinos and collecting eggs and was fine by them, they call that playing ark
Thats why its meaningless to boast hours, but it does show some commitment to the game like what was mentioned I guess. 30k hours sounds like a bunch until 10k of that is afk rendering the base.
Personally, the vast majority of my hours are playing the game. Though most in the community sees anything aside hardcore Official PvP as waste of time
I guess instead of saying I have 30k hours to that kid, I should have just said I've been playing since before spinos were in the game. Not gonna stop him from trolling.
ufff
Ah, early Spinos and their skin-covered yucky teeth
Kinda miss the puppy run though, despite being comically inaccurate
i miss the time that 1 phiomia mean that you could save your dinos from starvation
It's dumb, but I personally miss the sabers having nuts. Something so strange about it. Then they took the time to give both genders their proper anatomy lol. So weird, but so funny.
An example of a bug we all laughed at back in the day, but the community would have a fit about today.
ark has a massive problem of "I've played X hours or been here Y years, so I have perfect knowledge of how game design works"
perhaps to some people's surprise, game design knowledge is independant of how much time you spent playing ark
Well, I could also add that I've actually spent hundreds of hours in the devkit which still has limited credibility, but I think the point of me mentioning my hours is because some guy challenged my ability to refute his comment, and the community just accepts playtime. In some instaces hours played can translate to experience. I've also not mentioned being perfect at the game. I just try to learn from my experiences. A lot of people do not.
What you mean I never touch coding before?
I have 1,560 hours in ARK. I totally know how the game works.
when does it come out
End of 2024
it's more a comment about the reason WC has grown weary of communicating with us about anything related to design or specific information...we see what the community universally supports, which are community creature votes, and that's about it
🤡
Next wipe:
ARKpocalypse: September 8th 2023
Beginner: September 29th 2023
That has nothing to do with Ark 2 or ASA
Which company would announce a planned wipe few days before a shutdown of all servers?
Another delay incoming
Lol that is kinda sus.
Jat did mention they're not fussed about the wipe schedule since it'll be going away soon 🤷
Not to mention, if that's when the server would normally wipe... why change it? That'd be even sillier lol
will ark be 3rd person only
yeah
thats dumb
It’ll be fiiiine
i need someone to play ark with:/
Uh yeah
It was one of the first official announcements about Ark 2
Back in like 2020
Oooh. No, there’d be fuckin riots if they did that.
wait ark 2 will not be like the first one but with better graphics?
It’ll be the same genre of game, but the gameplay is going to be significantly different
That's what ASA is for
why dont you guys just play on an unofficial server
and forget ark 2 and asa are coming out
just dont even bother
in caps so then where is the SALVATION☠️☠️
BAZINGA
Wtf are you on about lmao
Let’s see, because they will have new content and stuff to do
Some people are just EXTREMELY salty that a business isn’t giving away their work for free.
ASA and ARK 2 are out of reach, but ASE stands forever
ASE could stand forever…for some people. It won’t for me 😛
Same. We’ve been asking WC for years to fix Ark. They finally do it and people still complain lol
With such a large playerbase, someone is gonna complain about anything. Although with ark, there’s usually a complaint from everyone about anything. Even if it’s perfect, it’s too late, it’s not everything fixed at once, etc etc
Do you remember the April 1st CC?
Can you be more specific? Or are you referring to this last April when they announced both delays
i wish theyd just confirm them fixing some garbage but idek if the devs know all the balance changes they need and snail games just wont support changes that fix cancer cause all that cancer is basically time sink
we should also know if the smalltribe will exit at the beginning of ASA
Hopefully we get some more info on available server types as we get closer to the release window
Are wildcard going bankrupt? Million dollar franchise taking a 3 million dollar loan?
Uh, what? 😂
I kinda skimmed through a video and I heard “ a multi billion dollar franchise taking a 3 million dollar loan to finish their game is worrying”
I mean it’s not like it matters because I’m sure many people are gonna buy the game
It's also an unofficial source video, I don't believe it for a second - plus 3m is probably a pretty small amount for a game the scale of Ark
I was gonna say, since when did they announce they took out a loan? Lol
Def isn't official info
Can they back it up with a source?
They had a bunch of pictures and stuff
Pictures mean shit when there's no source.
Yet again i don’t know if it’s true I just skimmed through a video to avoid click bait
So, no 😂
Pictures of a website with words
Pictures can be fabricated.
Looked like a financial report
I too can make a website and say shit.
I mean ... You clicked. That bait was good enough 😂
But in the fourth quarter of 2022 they made 15.3 million
Fair enough, yeah I would avoid stuff like that entirely in the future bud 😅
I’m sure they wouldn’t need a 3 million dollar loan?
Loadedcrysis used to get me so angry I just blocked his channel
Very good
He’d make a new information video where he repeats the same stuff
LoadedCrysis?
More like LoadedBait. 
Every week
Yeah, he's not also doing too hot in viewership anymore.
You could say his crisis is pretty loaded.....
Laugh. 🔫
Can you DM the video?
SEC filings
Snail Games ≠ Wildcard
Just to be sure
They do have other projects, however destitute they may be 😂
PixArk 😂
Bro pixark
I got it free on epic games and I saw king daddy dmac play it once
And I never played it myself
Yeah it’s snail games mb
But doesn’t snail games like own wildcard
Oh yeah, I reversed Google searched the site.
Is it fake
No, that's an actual government website I believe
So snail games is really in debt 4.0 million dollars
But it's normal if I recall to take loans from parterships like Nitrado, especially with a new game coming out soon.
How are they even in debt after making nearly 100 million a year?
That's normal.
Where’s all the money going 😭
ASA and ARK-2, probably.
businesses re-invest their revenue for growth, on paper it can show a deficit some years
Is ascended just them remaking and remodelling everything
It's normal for companies to be in debt I believe, cause it's investment debt.
In ue5
Basically, I'm spending 4Million to go into debt to release a game and get 8Million.
I’m kinda disappointed they aren’t offering a free upgrade for it or even a discounted upgrade
That, plus new features. True crossplay, mods for console, ect. And a new DLC
They’re gonna make 100 million at least I think
ASA isn't even an upgrade. It's a new game
Right, but you get the viewpoint.
Can't make money without spending money.
Is it not just a pretty reskin with some bug fixes and a few new dinos
Yeah
Nope.
More like the RE2Remake
What’s the point tho?
For those who don’t like ark2?
Yep.
Which is a solid half-of the community right now.
Basically. Community wanted more Ark1, so WC did just that
By reading what gameplay promises they're showcasing.
But the promises look good lmao
To some, others not so much
They look 50/50 to me, and complete shit to half of the community.
I’m just happy that tek is gone and building is improved
And the graphics will obviously be nicer
I like the idea of souls-like combat, but I had the idea of it possibly being all primitive throughout the 8+ years of its lifespan.
Ngl the game had mad potential
But it’s just balancing issues I think
Like primitive plus and all of that is cool
Tek isn't also the issue, it's balancing issues with it. Like you just said.
But u can still like run through everything with a giga pretty much
Tek is too op tbh like u can’t have a shit tek rifle it wouldn’t make sense so it’s either op or it’s not
Tek suits and nets ruined pvp
Again, balance is the issue. Not the item itself.
Yeah I guess so
Tek would've been a great addition if it was actually balanced out.
But I hate how I don’t own genesis
And I bola a guy in a tek suit
And he flies away
While I can’t ever get nets
And them giving up and removing it in ARK-2, instead of rebalancing it is one reason why I king of dislike ARK-2.
Can't you learn nets on Lost Island?
That’s what asa is for ig
Yep
If you can I’d be disappointed
You can
Lmao that’s a bummer
And Fjordur.
Fjordur unlocks all engrams if I recall, like Gen2
Gen 2 is the only map I actually want but I’m done with ark
Wait for Gen2 on ASA
I’m not playing asa
Done with ark 1 forever lmao
I just wanna watch some ark 2 videos and if it’s good I’ll play it
Then you'll be needing to wait for awhile for ARK-2, especially if it gets delayed again.
Gonna be a while for Ark2
Yeah I don’t mind
asa airbus a320
It’s not like I need to play ark in the meantime
I just want them to take their time and actually remove all the bugs
I used to think the game was made buggy on purpose to make you lose your stuff and play more 😭
Hah 😂
lmao
No, that's what the stint of 'fun' creatures was for
Pego, Microraptor, Purlovia, ect
Troodon
'"Gameplay"'
Why are troodons so fast
Never understood
And the worst part is when you’re wearing good armour and a level 20 troodon kncoks you out
and you’re stuck there for a good 20 minutes while it runs around trying to kill you
Missing half its shots but just enough to keep you out
I’m just so excited for the crafting style of ark 2
The more primitive style of gameplay too
- more realism and better graphics
Yeah, I'm excited to learn more about how the modular crafting works
Dinosaurs don’t have an omniscient radar 😭
Im also glad they considered Dino armour
I thought of having dinosaurs vary in size slightly but it wouldn’t make sense for a game with pvp you know
Like, it can.
Could work, as long as the variations weren't outrageous. Smaller scale could move slightly faster and have more stamina than larger scale that have better weight or health or something
Scales would 100% just be cosmetics.
Like the fish scaling.
Could do that too, but imo if there a different (visually) then there should be a difference mechanically
That's probably way too much time and effort that could be put into something more worthwhile, especially changing stuff like movement speed and stamina that'd could easily get out of hand with balancing.
Not just that, but it'd also add yet another grindy mechanics people have to look out for.
It's already an issue that not all 150 creatures have good stats, since it's RNG of where they mostly put their points into in the wild. We don't need another chore.
Also depends on how they do other scaling like levels or some equivalent. If the whole system is built from the ground up with those variables in mind then it isn't as crazy RNG as it seems.
Imo, hopefully the base level of a creature shouldn't really matter that much. The ballooning of wild dino levels made some tames way stronger than they had any right to be, but community want big numbies so everything was inflated over time, and the game was further tweaked to compensate
Then mutations happened 🙄
But I'm no game designologist, these are just the ramblings of someone passionate about a dinosaur punching simulator
Any body on ps4/5 wanna play
It was one of the most important ones regarding Ark II, I just want to discuss it and this is ark 2 chat
Thank you for your suggestion though
Bro when tf is ark 2 coming out
End of 2024.
(Supposedly)
That's if it doesn't get delayed again.
exactly lel
Which personally, I kind of hope it does.
I'd rather them take time to develop ASA and ARK-2 equally.
If they rush the DLC's out to get to ARK-2's deadline, than that would heavily effect the quality of the DLC's.
Could be two separate dev teams 🤔
*is two separate dev teams
That's something we've known for a while, is it not?
Maybe, I can't remember everything 😂
Must've been the ark player "publicly confirmed info dementia" PCID syndrome
Are you ok?
It just reads out like you had a seizure is all, because none of it makes sense 😅
Had me worried
When Ark 2 comes out, I’m hopping I can build cooler boats
I wanna be able to become England
Boat war ark 2 funny moments ps5
Amazing
What system do you play on?
Is it loud, like fan wise?
What
Can I show you my cooling system?
No
Check Dm, it’s very sad how I have to cool it
I own a ps4 pro
Also known as the “Boeing 747”
It’s kinda broke
It can’t draw enough air so I put my personal fan next to it
I removed the dust yesterday
Also let’s not clog this chat lma💬
How
PS4 aren’t exactly easy to take apart
I don’t like computer because it needs a 4000$ graphics card to run a decent game
I’ve yet to find a game that can make my 1080ti sweat
ehum minecraft using a different pack to make blocks really detailed will do it
what an insightful discussion, thank you for your time😁
now i know EVERYTHING.
Knowledge is power.
Knowledge is everything.
ark2 01.01.2030
I wonder if the game will be optimized and not 300+ GB that takes 12 hours to install and ends up cluttering your entire main drive.
(Referring to Steam)
My ARK has never taken 12-hours to install with all DLC's.
Mine does for sone reason. Could be steam and it could be my gaming laptop, I have no clue.
ISP issue more than likely, possibly modem related if you haven't bought your own
The standard modems that most ISPs give out are trash
(On purpose)
ARK Is the 1.5 play video real?
There is no gameplay of ASA right now, so no, I don't believe so
October 31st 2023 is the hard deadline for Asa release
I feel like we need a good dose of saladmander
Feel like we need a good dose of ASA reveals before Salamander.
I miss the salad okay
But also, seems like Raq is correct.
Snail from what it appears is investing into ASA, and making sure ASA doesn't release later than October 31st.
Need to do a bit more research into it, though.
I kind of wonder if they're going to show something for ASA on the 1st of September, since that's ironically a Friday.
I'll send you the link
Oh damn, it's a official Snail-Games document.
Basically any more delays defaults the contract to ase and really makes it rough on everything lol
Yup, read section 6 too lol, it's the pits
Exclusivity?
Yup, basically nitrado is in charge of all hosting for Asa and ark2 and they get to decide pricing and if anyone else can host
PAIN
So if they wanted to, they can force us into playing official
Yeah, pretty much
They won't, but it'll probably cost more than ase hosting
Probably.
Which section has the talk about the release-date being no later than the 31st?
It's the first bit. The loan is for Asa if it releases by oct31st, otherwise it goes for ase
Ah, the funding section
Yeah
So yeah, they're kind of forced to release within October, or else the money for the servers go towards ASE and that'll probably be a bit hectic.
Yeah, they stepped in all the mud on this one
Umm....can you explain that analogy?
Well, not really
Just that this is a big issue imo
Like bigger than over wolf mods, bigger even than the conquest cheating by snail. Because this doesnt affect official players, it screws over everyone who does unofficial
The issue is that it won't be obvious until launch, so people won't talk about it
I looked for YouTube videos on it, but the only ones talk about the release date. It's like no one read the exclusivity bit yet. I think gp is going to do a video on it though
it's releasing on that day whether it's ready or not
I mean, it's releasing in early access for a reason
If they use that fact to their advantage and just say that any issues that do occur are because it's EA, then imo that's fine because I still know it'll be good when it's finished
Couldn't really care less what state it's in when it releases tbh
saved for later
Ok, go ahead lmao idgaf
Ok, sounds good

Eck. Unofficials getting hairy does not please me. Hope nitrado doesn’t abuse the monopoly if they have it for a while
They have it contracted for 7 years
early access or not they really need this launch to be decent at worst
AAA games with subscriptions rarely have decent launches. I highly doubt Ark is going to.
Since when is ASA a subscription based game? I must've missed that
I never said it was. I believe you missed the point. It was a comparison.
Strange comparison
Hopefully Asa is “good when it’s finished “ but we’re talking about ark lmfao…ASE been out for years now and it’s no longer (Game preview), like it was on Xbox …and there’s still broken stuff and stuff they can’t fix ..I don’t have much hope for Asa especially being crossplay but I’m willing to give it a try
I think the whole cross play thing is going to make or break ASA I think that’s bigger then any other thing they plan doing
The stuff they can't fix is due to engine and platform limitations; those won't exist in ASA. Also, just saying "this old as dirt game still has a few bugs in it so the new one will too and be bad" is a bit of a false equivalence
Cool thing about crossplay, if you care about that too, you can turn it off
It'll only let you play on servers that are also non-crossplay, though (which there's none of for ASE official iirc, you have to go find an unofficial to play if you do that)
It’s all just assumptions/opinions I don’t know for fact if it’s going to be horrible or not it could actually turn out pretty good ..same as you,there’s a lot of people who seem to think “new engine no more problems” but it’s all speculation.(I see it as new engine ,more problems because devs don’t have a lot of experience with it yet)We won’t know till we try it…also the thing about crossplay is the way the devs make it sound is as if all officials For ASA will be crossPlat.and that only player dedi servers will have the option to not play crossPlat…which I don’t agree with due to pc hackers .not only that but as we’ve seen with the past few ark patch’s/updates especially with Xbox/win10 is that they don’t always get updates on time..so if that happens in the future,most likely official servers will be shut down alot until all systems have there update because it would be unfair for one system to play and not the other..and if a crazy exploit was to come out such as spoofing for ASA then rip almost the whole official player base compared to if it was just in one system…reason why I think crossplay is going be arks biggest change it could make the game or break it and no1 will want to play it
Trust me, I hate crossplay as much as the next guy, but it's an avoidable issue... you literally can turn it off lol I don't get what the big deal is, do you actually like playing on official somehow? Is that the deal?
And as for the opinions stuff, I don't really see how getting rid of multiple generations of consoles in favor of just one and also ridding themselves of an unintentionally stunted engine (it being the main reason for the old game being "bad") doesn't immediately make the new game better, it factually does 😂
Needless to say, Ark 1 was Wildcard's first game, that's a thing a lot of people seem to not think about. How can they learn from their mistakes when the mistakes have to be made first?
It's kinda like how Larian Studios is going. They made Divinity Original Sin 1 & 2, which had a few issues here and there, but then they made Baldur's Gate 3, most likely game of the year and one of the best games in the past decade, for sure. A near flawless masterpiece, in just a few short steps. Wildcard have yet to take those steps, but do I think they're in the same boat? Hell yeah.
I highly doubt they'll deliver anything less than a masterful and enjoyable game for years to come, as they already did with Ark 1 (which we all have played for years, issues and all, let's be real.)
when is the next asa delay announcement ?
there won't be one they need to do it they can't delay it
Is that similar to the ASE official contract? Or it is clearly all inclusive for unofficials?
Of course they can. I remember when they decided to share the roadmap a few months ago they said they would talk to partners so they could take some decisions. After that they’ve postponed Ark 2 and announced there wouldn’t be a free engine upgrade, and instead we would get ASA.
If they need to postpone again they will seat and talk with their “partners” again
I mean, I few months ago I thought they wouldn’t postpone Ark 2 because it was an early-access title, which means they can release a more unstable build and keep working on it. If they did that with Ark 2, they can also postpone ASA indefinitely. Not saying they will, just saying it’s not impossible
The fact they are openly saying they are struggling with UE5 doesn’t bode well to me. I just hope they can overcome this fast.
Are they going to literally make ark 1 not available when ASA comes out
Like can we still do single player ?
Only official servers are being removed
It's almost like that very question could be answered by looking at the posts where ASA was announced...
must be the PCID syndrome taking effect again
just a reminder ASA will be early access too, most dont see or dont want to see but ark 2 aint coming at the end of 2024 at all most likely 2026 since they have a 1 new dlc at least for ASA plus i believe ASA will be delay again to next year
having ASA out and everything planned for it, no way we'd get just a year before ark 2
cant wait for ark 2 concept art
I can
whats the consensus on Overwolf here?
is this the ASA and ARK 2 channel because i don't see anywhere else that talks about ASA as much as here
Big shit
It's used as an ASA channel until one actually opens up
I like overwolf for league of legends but not much else
I personally hate addware.
thats what im worried about
Well, with the new legal documents Snail-games have on their website. Another thing to be worried about it seems is allowing Nitrado to have legal say in how 'they' want to do server-marketing for ASA and ARK-2.
Which means if they wanted to, they could make it that they're the only server providers for ASA and ARK-2.
i was gonna use it on diablo 4 but they released a big statement that all overlays are bannable and i didnt want to risk it
i have been looking at various 3rd party trust sites and some of them have Overwolf at as high as 75% bad rateing .
Cause it's addware.
for a number of differant things addware being just one of them.
i dont know anything about Nitrado.
Shitty services, shitty customer support, they're the server providers for official servers, etc.
ouch.
There was, a few weeks(/probably months now lol) back, an ex Nitrado employee who said that they can and do straight up blacklist customers for complaining or calling customer support too much for help solving issues with their garbage servers, if this stuff is true then it's a step in the wrong direction. I'd take 0 official servers at launch over only Nitrado on all platforms, official or not, forever
And of course general monopoly bad reasons because no competition means they will probably be even worse
Yay
i love nitrado!
4 million dollars to screw over your customers, i guess we will see how it plays out in the long run for nitrado unfortunately probably will end up being worth it
I know it’s not easy, I’ve been following other devs trying ue5. Everything is new. I’m not saying that implying Wc is being incompetent. But I’m saying that because I’m not so confident they will release things on time.
I know it’s an EA release. But my point is, even being EA, it doesn’t mean they will accomplish to release it on time (by the end of October). At least I’m not so confident about that. We will see.
First rule of the Interwebs: #1 Don’t trust everything you read on the internet.
... He had screenshots of the process, lmao
I always read those statements from former employees or former CEOs with pinch of salt
There were others that colluded with him as well, and were in the same Nitrado group chat
Not to mention the people who were effected by it
Well, I don’t trust those statements. But I’m not too versed on Nitrado servers. I was involved on hosting unnoficials before, but always private servers with private hardware.
If they keep things like they for ASE, that’s fine
We will be able to host our own servers with our own hardware (or third party hardware).
The issue is that it won't be like ASE, they will have exclusivity rights for all of ASA and Ark 2 (if I'm reading these right, and if they're true.)
They kind of do for official, but this new deal allows them to have rights for 'all' servers.
Nope, you can rent servers from any provider for ASE
This is why the legal-document is a deal breaker for some players.
Cause now they're going to be forced to use Nitrado if Nitrado themselves restrict access to other providers for ASA.
Which is likely, since that's called 'monopolizing' the servers.
It’s called “good business” on nitrado’s part. The error was giving them full reign over all multiplayer functionality of a sandbox game
Good business, until people say 'fuck it' and make their own servers.
(Should that be the case, since idk if this contract is identical to the ASE one or not. “All servers” may only mean all snail/WC servers)
The legal-document mentions that SGUSA are allowing Maris (parent company of Nitrado) full reign of all servers, which included private servers.
You basically own console unofficials with a monopoly like that - it’s a safe bet for that alone. For PC you’ll get dedicated machines, but it’s hardly the same as the price competition from other host platforms
Although I suspect if multiplayer is allowed on dedicated machines, other server hosting networks can host unofficials. Perhaps in a janky fashion, but I don’t see how it’s functionally distinct in terms of enforcement
"Subject to the satisfaction of the conditions of Section 6.1(c) below, for the period commencing on the date hereof and ending on the expiration of the seven (7) year anniversary of date hereof ("Exclusivity Period"), SGUSA hereby grants Marbis the exclusive, non-transferable, global, and irrevocable (i) right to (A) provide SGUSA (and its affiliates) with official servers to host and run the Games and (B) rent out private servers and community servers (other than the Expected Servers), (ii) licenses to use the server files, client keys, or any other, or any form of, data (collectively, "Server Files") in connection with (A) the administration and management of official servers, and (B) hosting and running the Games on private/community servers (but specifically excluding the servers which continue to host Ark SE in its current version, which shall be governed by Section 6.2 ), and (iii) licenses to host and run the Games on private/community servers, it being understood that Marbis shall be entitled to provide the aforementioned services through, and sublicense the aforementioned licenses to, its Affiliates and/or third party subcontractors appointed by Marbis ("Games Exclusivity"), Marbis hereby accepts such grant."
I don’t know. I think only consoles will be locked in. Things will probably be the same as we have now.
Sorry for the text wall, but that's the Section talking about it.
AFAIK ase was always exclusive to Nitrado and we were able to host our servers. But officials and consoles… it’s different unfortunately
The issue now is, maybe, cross platform
Im not sure if pc will be locked in because of the cross platform feature
Or if you host a pc exclusive server you will be fine hosting your own server with your own hardware
It looks like A and B are distinct
B says nitrado can always, for 7 years, rent servers…but it doesn’t offer exclusivity that I can see outside A, which speaks to officials
Does the "rent out private servers and community servers" not mean anything?
I have no idea how to read legal-documents, and just read it as one consisive page. So that might've been the issue.
no it states exclusivity before that with A and B being for i which is non tranferable exclusive rights which would apply to both A and B
its in the description of GP's video if you know where that is
I sent him the link
Yea I’m thinking this is nearly identical to ASE
It binds nitrado as the official server hosting service and “default” unofficial provider for 7 years
anyone know a lawyer?
I do, but i can also say most lawyers won’t read one cut out clause and tell you much lol
I can send you the whole document if you want
Yea let me see it
They did not actually. Only for official. But they will have exclusivity rights for ase if Asa isn't released by Oct 31st
sow we will see asa in october
Yeah, for sure
Althooogh, if someone at wc really wanted to flip off snail, they could delay the launch until November 2nd lol, because then the contract for exclusivity doesn't apply
That actually sounds like something Jesse/Jeremy would do.
I don’t think so. If they need another postponement they will have to sit with their partners (snail games, nitrado etc) and negotiate that. Just like they did before the roadmap presentation.
Postponing it breaking the agreements is probably worse for WC than it would be for SG
It certainly would
When is the release?
October according to 'snail games CEO jim'
Though now theres another document to read 78 pages lots of debt, info to go through.
where you ppl get those infos about snails documents???
ASA will be separate again for the Snail Games and Wildcard servers right? I hope at least
We dunno
All servers will be nitrados
and another shit creature about to join ark
They’re public contracts required for investors
Why does it seem like people are mad at nitrado for possibly owning all the servers? At the end of the day wc/snail agreed and accepted the terms that were in there deal it’s not nitrados fault..also there service must be ok if lots of games use them.if they were as horrible as people make them sound I don’t think they would still be in business…as for people saying there quality sucks it’s only true to an extent…wc/snail has/had the option to upgrade there servers for better performance but has not ..and I know this for fact because I played on a big official tribe server that was so fat it crashed literally every 15m and the devs had to UPGRADE the server and after that we were able to play again without as much crashing
A lot of people just don’t like Nitrado. I believe it’s pricing. I’ve used Nitrado for years without issue, but I don’t use their cheapest available servers.
I've never had issues with them myself, but I'm also not going to pretend that they're better than Gportal or most other providers, they have quite a few issues that have been documented here already that I don't have time to regurgitate
Will the asa official servers be crossplay?
Yes
WWW
I need gaming PC….
i need pegomastex
are asa’s graphics about to be vastly better than the original or js like a little tweak and remaster
It's gonna be ue5
Vastly better
i dont really know what that means but im guessing its very good
It’s gonna look better than real life
perfect
Is ASA going to be available for download before the release? Anyone know?
It would be posted on announcements if it was
Do you guys think that with the new ARK game being crossplat that it had anything to do with as to why wildcard/snail chose nitrado (other then loan contract) for server hosing? Like maybe other server hosts aren’t strong enough to handle crossplat with the uploading items/chars from all platforms? Or perhaps some systems don’t give other server hosts the same permission (maybe Microsoft is like nope we only like nitrado) .or does that have nothing to do with it? (Keep in mind I have 0 server knowledge so im a bob when comes to that)
I think its entirely a business decision
Agreed. It was probably the best deal
nitrado isn't as good as they say they are it's a sell tactic mate 😂
there over expensive as well and making us pay for slots instead of space
there webside is useless
I think the only reason nitrado got that deal is because Asa went over budget and they needed a loan.
Official being on nitrado is fine, but anyone can host a cross-platform server, there is no reason to lock us all to a crap host other than needing the extra money to make the game
why would they do it for only a couple million tho
just delay again at that point
get a loan from elsewhere
unless nobody else wanna invest in SG anymore ig xd
Do we expect any change to breeding in ASA? Like the whole mutation system from a game design perspective looks broken right now but it’s most fun part for many pve players.
The only thing broken about the mutation system is the cap that’s meant to stop it from getting drastically out of hand.
best chance for that kind of change would be Ark 2, as people that wanted ASA just wanted ''Ark 1 carbon copy in UE5''
I’d argue it “is” broken, rather than looks broken. But it’s also the only post game progression activity in ASE, so that’s not shocking people enjoy it. Ark 2 will need to fill that gap, and I suspect ASA will at most make some tweaks to it rather than fully resolve it
What I’d like to see ASA try is either 1) hard cap at 20/20 or 2) fix the unintuitive method of mutation stacking to be an intended mechanic and include proper UI elements that would guide a new player into understanding how to do it and how to track it
Sony and Microsoft are super restrictive regarding online games. Not everyone can setup servers for the games on those platforms. That’s one of the reasons I’m not sure the crossplatform will be a issue on hosting servers with our own hardware (or other 3rd party providers). Maybe we will still be able to set up pc-only servers.
Nobody wants to invest on WC anymore, not even SG (they are themselves in financial trouble I guess). It’s an one game company (they say atlas isn’t their game LOL), that is struggling to deliver their other titles (Ark 2 and ASA).
I love Ark, but I wouldn’t put my money on WC with their recent history
Well…I’d argue many folks are nervous to keep investing in WC if nothing is produced
By my money I mean if I was a big investor, not as a gamer
If asa comes out this fall as planned, and it’s a hit, I see this as a very positive sign for ark 2 investment and support
Sure, agreed. But right now… weather is cloudy for them… I’d say
I’d agree with that. I think they have a safe path forward, but they can’t stumble around into this fall and remain in optimal shape
Nonsense! I love my 4000% melee Managarmr!
i love your 4k melee mana too
agreed
Speaking of bad UI - the % melee thing has got to go. That should show as a damage number, since that’s what’s actually relevant
“300% base melee” is a useless number to provide someone good information with, at least compared to “230 damage”
Idk, it's stuff like that that created the treasure that is the Ark wiki.
But I like having to look stuff up.
And research.
And discover things as a community.
If you have to read a wiki to understand the game - the game is built poorly
If you need to use a wiki to grasp every little detail that’s fine. But even the most basic ark concepts require outside information sources
I prefer the percentages
you need wiki for the lore☠️⚠️
You just said that if you have to learn organically, the game is bad.
And I disagree very very vehemently.
If you have to learn the game any way BUT organically, it’s bad
If I have to use a wiki to grasp how the game works at a basic level, the game has failed
Organic learning:
"The student develops curiosity about a topic, concept, problem, or idea, then seeks out methods to satisfy this curiosity."
Yes, and that should be done in the game, ideally through gameplay
NOT on an external platform like YouTube or a wiki
Lol imo the whole reason ark is good is because there's so much to explore.
Finding creature base damage is a good example of the multitude of small things ark has to explore.
The system as is today, this can’t be done. Because there are a lot of variables. You probably know as you are well informed that the damage system involves a big equation
That's kind of like "go learn math kid, but don't read a textbook"
fr
That said, I don’t know how they can make the damage status as a damage number
Multiply the base damage by the percentage and output the result instead of the percentage
Just hide the percent and base damage behind code
The actual damage dealt is not clean in ASE. But there’s no reason it can’t be cleaned up in ASA
But it would be just another random number, because it wouldn’t be the real damage in the end
It would be if the target didn't have armor or resistance.
Unless they simplify the system by a Lot, I don’t see how
You want them to simplify then
I don’t like that
Lol I'm the one arguing that they should keep it the way it is
I like the complexity of it actually
To use the analogy, ark right now is kinda like “take the test with the textbook full of answers open so you can just write the answers from the book”
It’s not simplified. It’s just a different way of displaying the same value
At 300% damage, a creature deals (let’s say) 150 damage to a training dummy. I’m simply suggesting that the creature stats show “150” instead of “300%”
Ok then, let me rephrase then, if they take variables from the equation the system would be more simplistic and I don’t know if I would like that
NO variables are removed
My point is “150” would just be another random number just like the 300%
It wouldn’t be though. 150 across all creatures is the same value now
Because the final damage wouldn’t be 150
300% melee means different damage on every creature in the game
150 on a raptor = 150 on a rex with the model I suggest
It wouldn’t because Ark has a lot of variables. Like debuffs, buffs etc
NONE of those things matter to base stats though
The issue right now is that “300%” is a meaningless number to compare a rex and a raptor
Ok then, I think I get what you are saying. Maybe the % isn’t the real issue, but the base damage. Isn’t it?
They could keep the % but just make the base damage as 1, or 100, or a 1000
The issue is that the base stat for damage, which is communicated to players, is not consistent despite showing the same number. This is because it’s multiplied by the invisible base damage stat of each creature
300% on a rex is NOT going to deal the same damage as 300% on a raptor
As I said above, changing the base damage to a fixed number for all the creatures would be fine to me
That'd get weird, seeing a 100% Dodo and a 100000% Giga
That is a bad bad idea lol. That means a level 1 rex and a level 1 dodo deal identical damage (because their base damage is the same)
Base damage = damage at level 0
TBF I don’t think the current system is flawed because of this specific point
But I wouldn’t be against this change LOL
I think there other things I have way more than that
Its just needlessly confusing. At that point, just have the actual damage listed on the stat page. Bonus points for having a modifier for an Imprinted rider showing the buffed damage number
Like the mutations you were talking earlier today
It’s pointlessly confusing and unhelpful
Sure, but people would still need to check wiki to understand the final damage value
And I don’t see this as a problem
Because I like complex games
Not if its just listed right there on the stats page
You can’t list the actual damage because there are external variables
Why not?
The the creature you are trying to kill might be using a saddle (pvp). Or might be buffed or debuffed. Etc
External variable
But the damage the creature is dealing is the same
Specific DR of the target is different, but that doesn't matter
It matters to me actually 😂
Because the stats page should only account for the stats of that creature
Sure, my point is people wanting to understand the system as a whole would still need wiki to understand how much damage their creature are actually dealing on their enemies
Diablo tried to do what you're suggesting, stats would update vs the last creature you hit to account for resistances, defense, elemental resist, miss chance, ect - it was a mess and not useful
You will never know the exact damage you’re gonna deal to anything but a wild creature with no resistance. That’s expected, and people are ok with that…especially because armor values vary in ark
Im not actually suggesting anything. I would be fine with either solution. I’m just saying that simply changing the % for the damage number wouldn’t really make wiki unnecessary
Could have lead with that lol
However all players should be able to know how much damage they’ll deal to a training dummy. Rather than seeing a % value that communicates no practical information a player can readily use (unless they memorized values from a wiki someone else gathered data for)
Ark is so complex that we would need Dododex, arkpedia and all that at a given point
Right, which would be easy.
Correct
Easy, and a massive QoL improvement for people who want to figure things out ingame
Just to be clear. I would be fine with this change. But someone said above that we shouldn’t need wiki to play the game. But the only way to accomplish that would be simplifying the system, and I wouldn’t like that
And tbh, everyone else who doesn’t memorize base damage values; myself included. It’s really silly that I have to alt tab to the wiki to see what damage I should be dealing by multiplying the base stat with the % value I’m being shown
You do NOT need to understand every system in high detail to accomplish the goal of “not needing the wiki to play the game”
All the games I like the most need external info to be “really played”. No man’s sky, the Witcher, Elder Scrolls etc
If a player can figure out how to perform the basic gameplay loop and understand the UI/features, that’s a success. If they want to see all the little details and tricks, that’s where a wiki or YouTube comes in.
I mean you can kill the bosses without knowing base damage.
But you can’t tame a creature or mutation stack anything without the wiki
But I think it is already possible. But just the basics. There’s no final solution to make external info unnecessary, unless you make it less complex
Incubator
And taming? We did that before the wiki existed, come on
The incubator does NOT explain anything about how mutation stacking works or how the mutation cap works
The incubator doesn’t have a tutorial
You just see the stats
And the mutations in which stats
Only because the Devs explained how, or info passed word of mouth style on the Ark Reddit
Yeah, but a beginner has no idea what this means. That’s what he’s saying
Idk about you but the game has a manual that shows you how to tame a dodo, no?
It didn't use to
All beginners need to read wiki, or watch a video to understand the system
The number of people who force fed material to tames or had no idea they were supposed to force feed ONLY narcotics (and never hit the creature to keep them knocked out) during ark’s lifetime was insane
And THIS indicates a failure. It’s fine for ASE given the early access and overall jank. But for a proper polished Asa or ark 2? Not so much
The onboarding experience for a new player in Ark is actually pretty awful. Look in General, daily theres 10+ new players asking for someone to explain the most basic of gameplay to them
I disagree, unless all complex games are a failure 😂
I think he's arguing that complexity unexplained is failure
I mean, even series and movies have wikis to explain the details and fill in the gaps 😂
Any game can have ingame tutorials on complex features
There’s no way to put every bit of info in game
Skyrim at least has a competent tutorial. All normally-used controls and systems are explained one at a time in the first 30 minutes of the game
Almost all good complex games have an “easy to learn, hard to master” approach, where anyone can figure out how to handle the basic gameplay…but people can invest more time into the most niche mechanics etc should they want to be the best or most knowledgeable
Ark is just ... nothing 😂
This is correct yes, although ideally there’s no formal tutorial, but rather gameplay mechanics that are intuitive and something you can learn while playing (although sometimes you just need text lol)
The tutorial doesn’t explain 1% of the game, that’s my point
But yeah, maybe Ark should have a tutorial
Because it doesn't need to - all the basics are covered, and it lets you figure the rest out as extensions of those basics. You don't need to lookup guides or whatever to do much of anything in Skyrim
That's what I like about it
Well, at least I did. I needed external info to play it 100%
Go experience a new world
And I’m fine with this
Complex games always needed external info
It’s part of the learning curve
Now the other side of that coin is Pikmin4. That fucking game doesn't let you experience anything new or interesting without literally having a cutscene spoil everything about it
The best players will try everything and teach the average players (me).
That’s bad design to use that as a crutch for learning the basics of gameplay
I disagree. It’s impossible to have every bit of info in game. Every complex game I’ve played needed some kind of external documentation/info
If you want to guide people at the highest edges of complexity or gameplay, that’s to be expected - since devs are very rarely the best players. But the basic gameplay mechanics should never require a confused player to hunt around for someone else who explained it better than the devs did (either in a tutorial or via the actual gameplay)
On that I agree with you
Ark should have a tutorial for the basics
I mean if you're stupid you're stupid amirite?
But yeah you can beat the bosses without muts
So I'd call mutation stacking an advanced mechanic meant for pvp and advanced players.
It’s not just about intelligence. It’s more about how many hours you’re willing to dedicate to the game
Most info I got back in 2015 was from Ark testers or the hardcore players
Lol uh
If you don't have like 8 hours a day of free time, ark is the last game you should play.
Most was actually from the Devs answering questions from players
They used to be super active and chatting all the time
Sure, but the less hardcore people have wiki and YouTubers to help them and that’s fine
Some people are dumb and need to be handheld through everything. But if it’s the vast majority of players, the burden lies on the developers
I mean, Wc should have made a tutorial indeed, but more complex stuff wouldn’t be covered
Sure, but 90% of relevant info can be covered in a few basic tutorials.
How to Survive
How to KO tame
How to Build a base
How to Farm (crops)
How to Breed
How to Progress
Outside of gimmick tames, thats all a player really needs to know
Like I’ve said above, it’s not about IQ, it’s more about dedication. I know people that like Ark, but don’t have more than 2 hours a day to play. The “local hosters” deserve respect 😂
Heh, almost forgot, How to calculate base damage of a creature 😂
Sure, agreed
Attack a parasaur, divide damage result based on percentage.
The average player isn't really going to go outside those basic tutorials
Joke based on previous conversation
🤘
Some of this doesn’t even need a tutorial. The new cinematics actually explain why to play ark (for PvE), and that’s HUGE
New cinematics?
The Helena ones
Helena
But if at any point they want to, there will be wiki and YouTube to help
Man hasn't played ark for 3 years
People playing 20 hours a day don’t learn this stuff either unless they read the wiki or talk to people who did. That’s the complaint. A very tiny percentage dedicate themselves to trial and error testing everything, and those few people build the wiki…that’s an extremely abnormal expectation for the playerbase at large
(kidding ofc)
No, I have, do you mean the Helena-Deus ones? I thought they just cover story stuff
I don't remember anything tutorialy about them
They suggest what to do
Oh
Gotcha
I’ve already said above, hardcore players will teach people. They are feeding YouTube and wiki with info. Some are coding apps like dododex. And I think this amazing
That will always happen if the game is big and there’s stuff to do
Depending on them to teach players, and expecting players to rely on them for your game to function? It’s a failure in design. It’s like needing a guide to play 1-1 in mario
That’s my point
Ark doesn't rely on the wiki to teach people how to play though
Yeah, I’ve also agreed with that. Ark needs a tutorial for the basics
How did you know back in 2015 you needed a dodo kibble to tame a ptera with 100% efficiency?
Funny you should say that. I'm sure back when it came out, people actually did.
Because this info is basic IMO
Imagine not comprehending the concept of "press A to jump"
Looking at general and bobs with probs, the wiki (loosely referring to “the community teaching itself how to play the game”) is extremely standard practice for ark, if not the default of you want to figure basics out
Now try jumping.
…a little controller icon describing what the buttons on a controller do is what was used
It is and has always been the case
Ingame?
The player was then chucked into the game. This worked for simple arcade games and platformers, and it failed horribly for many many other games
Oftentimes yes. Or it was included in in the game’s (or console’s) manual
Ok because nes mario didn't have ingame tutorials lol
You're speaking generally, got it
Yea
Although I will never argue older games did this better lol
It’s a difficult task for any developer that scales with complexity
I'd argue that game devs don't have to anymore, what with the internet and all
Games like Ark actually create tighter and more involved communities when they leave it up to the players to discover, as a collective, how to advance through the game.
A lot of my long-lasting internet friends are from ark.
I personally believe everything relevant to play/do well in a game should be learnable in-game. Ark does an ok job with this with the Rockwell recipe notes and most of the Helena creature dossiers
Sadly some are wrong, and more complex taming methords aren't covered
They don’t though. They do create a small and tight community of wiki builders and dodo dex folks. But the massive bulk of players simply use the wiki as a support tool, such that basic intuitive gameplay would have no impact on them or the community value ark provides
And the folks guiding the wiki will still have plenty to do - since again, the complexity isn’t going anywhere
The massive bulk of players search ark tips, watch youtubers, leave comments, ask questions, and are shown how to play.
All but the first one are actual community involvement that wouldn't happen unless the game was built as inaccessibly as it is xD
The bulk of who remains for the long haul, yes. Because they quickly discover the game fails to teach them
I’d far rather the community teach other advanced mechanics than the basics
Then we have different opinions! Woo!
Indeed. I like learning while playing, and find ark’s curve frustrating or downright useless without external materials. There’s much room to improve this for ASA
