#ark-2
1 messages Ā· Page 119 of 1
Because hacks can be countered and beaten lol
I have never met an aimbotter I couldn't beat with heavies lol
I'm just joking/serious
Why would I care about balance of the game when I gotta deal with constant cheats
Because there are still places you can play without hacks.
Why do you think everyone plays unofficial?
Brrrroo
My friend placed a bat heavy in front of an aimbotter
He stood still in fur until it turned on and died....
The only really bad hacks are the ones that can turn off gens, popcorn gear, or make you godmode
The rest can be countered
Yh, sometimes it gets patched and smth new comes out
Aimbotting etc is normal game play š
It's annoying but not enough of a reason to disregard game balance
Cheating is very normalized
Yeah, it's a plague
Ik, I was joking
But like, I would prioritize the cheating over balance
If I had to deal with both and fix just 1 of them
They are handled by different people...
Does it matter?
Someone's in change or decision making and management
Yeah, but there is never a justifiable reason to only focus on one
True, very true
Just saying I'd prioritize the cheating issue
Cause it's just so bad
Games unplayable with cheats vs game unbalanc
i also hope they prevent any kind of ini change. i dont want to be forced to make my game look like trash to have that competitive advantage
I'd hope they optimize their game better then
well they just need to have the video settings be useful. changing stuff barely changes fps
Wait for lumen lol, it'll make things worse
depending on how easy mods are even creature balance can be completely changed in unofficials
a lot already prevent players from building in some places and ban some creatures from being used entirely
Yeah, but a game that depends on mods to balance items is pretty bad
ultimately if the players have fun it wont matter, but yeah official would be cancerous
I mean, maybe it's just me being 100% biased against adding stronger fliers lol
i dislike griffins being yet another creature that needs several hundred hours to bring from wild to combat viable
wildcard just loves the breeding system too much
wonder what portion of official pve would disappear if breeding took under 100 hours to get any desired form
Dunno, I have never seriously played official pve
i mean something similar might happen on pvp but im not sure
breeding takes way too long
Pvp would still exist. Breeding is not what keeps people playing there
yeah
but if breeding didnt take as long, things like trading for lines wouldnt be as big id imagine. And that seems to be somewhat significant
It would still be a thing lkl
being a thing doesnt mean its as big
You would be surprised how many pvpers are just completely incompetent and lazy
ig
This do be true
That's an anecdotal fallacy at best, and his preferred game mode of choice has no bearing on the understanding of what goes on in PvP
Again, that's just simply false to assume
Illegal RMT is rampant
U don't know man
People sell duped items and even cheats etc
No, really?
Idk if you're trying to be sarcastic but yes
Loads of RMT and selling
It was obviously sarcastic
Recently tho maybe not as bad cause dead gane etc
Like personally I wouldn't care about rmt
But when it involves duped items or selling cheat services
Fk all that
Ah, ok, so you're one of those lol
I'd imagine it's not that good tho
I heard prices drop long ago
Cause more dupe loot in economy etc
"Trust me, it's worth it guys!!!11!!"
Hang on, I got a phone call to make
GG promoting illegal practices in the official discord, guy
Also circumventing ban lmao, GG
You're speaking excessively highly of it and said it's worth it????
I mean yh, many people find it worth cheating etc cause devs can't stop any of it..
Good riddance

Cheats and cheaters make me feel icky
Tbh might even be a net positive so the PvE servers arenāt cluttered with breeding setups lol
Imagine mutation caps actually working š
do you guys think a 1650 with 32 gb ram and i5 10500h will be able to run ark 2?
what are your guys' thoughts on the system requirements? i cant find a reliable source for them but the only one that seems semi reliable is system requirements lab, anyone know if its reliable? thanks in advance
heres the system requirements i found according to systemrequirementslab
CPU: Intel Core i5-7600/AMD Ryzen 5 1600 or better.
RAM: 8 GB.
VIDEO CARD: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 /AMD Radeon R9 270 or better.
DEDICATED VIDEO RAM: 2048 MB.
PIXEL SHADER: 5.1.
VERTEX SHADER: 5.1.
OS: Windows 10 (64-bit)
I really donāt think 8gb of ram and a 960 will be able to run Ark 2, but for your 1650, itās hard to say.
yeah i cant afford a new pc im broke and i really want to be able to run it
i dont even know if ill be able to afford it with all the inflation you know
The game has always been wrong with requirements I really wouldnāt say any card is optimized other than a Titan X
You might have a chance but the cards become obsolete.
Titan X? so im f**ked is what youre saying
no way the game will be that good looking / unoptimized, truly tragic for me
so you really think that my pc doesnt have a chance? titan x is $700 bro š
Iād say it has a change tbh, the reason why itās expensive is cuz they donāt make them anymore, again the card is a 2015 card.
I mean you have over a year to put something together for an upgrade if necessary
i cant even work, i have no money, this isnt looking good
i can legally work but nobody wants to hire me
why is that
Young with no prior experience?
yep
Just gotta keep applying
well idk man that 1650 is gonna struggle like it might be unplayable since the game is transferring to UE5
What I did was look for jobs that listed āwill trainā and always had ads out.
These are the typically the worst places to work and have a high turnover rate
i just upgraded from a 1050 ti like not even a month ago and im already running into trouble with my 1650
Good chance of getting hired
Iām gonna be honest, you downgraded
i wish i had daddy's money or smth
naw, everything runs better
yeah but it isnāt as optimized. my 1050ti was the best card I had before moving to a 3060.
I had a 1650 but it was horrible compared to my 1050.
i have my old gaming laptop and this pc maybe i could sell / trade these 2 for an upgrade? idk
damn not for me
I wouldāve tried to saved up for at least a 1660 super.
1650 is heaven for me but its already lacking in terms of running new games
I just wouldāve stuck with the 1050 til at least a 1660 super. It raises your chances by a lot of running ark 2.
ok
Ark 2ās requirements arenāt true, theyāre a copy and paste of arkās original requirements
Can anyone help me on smalls???
when ark 2 coming ou?
it hasnt been announced
end of 2024
Which probably means end of 2026
Tbh best to say āwhen it comes outā
itās confirmed ark 2 will come out in 2033
That stuff was funny the first like... 5 times. Now it's just kinda boring and overused
Nah. Itāll be delayed.
It wasnāt tf, end of 2024 most likely into 2025
@serene onyx it actually just got completely canceled
Not surprised tbh
ong
Wasn't canceled
Dont worry we were only joking
Is survival ascended going to available for pre order for playstation?
No
We have not heard anything regarding pre-orders.
https://survivetheark.com/index.php?/articles.html/community-crunch-368-asa-roadmap-update-asa-comparison-and-more-r2126/
We don't even know if it'll have pre-orders
Are they going to keep the playstation official open so we can at least play something?
I'm aware that you were joking, others may not be.
That makes sense lol
No, all official servers for Ark Survival Evolved will be shut down.
No
You will still have unofficial and sp
So is playstation going to be out of the Ark player base?
What?
Again, only official servers will be shut down. You will have access to singleplayer and unofficial.
I get that. But I just want to know if playstation will have access to the new version of ark when it does go live
Because I remember a while back it was announced that Ark was going xbox exclusive
Playstation 5 will, yes. Ark Survival Ascended will be available for PC, Xbox Series X/S, and PS5.
Only Ark 2 will be PC/Microsoft exclusive.
That was ARK-2
Okay, thank you. Sorry if I seemed difficult
Where could I go to find updates for ark-2?
The pins here are updated whenever they post anything in #766826918803800074 or #announcements.
gotta love ppl making creatures even more for ab map š¤£
Whe
-n Ark2???
Aww. You guys are finishing each others sentences!
question about ark ascended what graphics card do i need
We don't know, but you'll probably be fine if you can run ARK on medium graphics or higher with stable frames.
š
What's the betting ark 2 is over run with cheaters first week? I'd bet my life savings on it
Thanks for your life savings š
Overrun means a majority i.e. more than 50% of the players are cheaters
While there will be many cheaters, the number of normal people playing will be far greater
It takes a second to get cheats usually. Exploits tho? Expect em
Is every ark 1 story DLC also terrible? Curious
You never know
Cyberpunk was released too early and was terrible but now, Cyberpunk is a really good game
Give time to Ark 2 and Ase, stop being so impatient and when you will see the final product, you will be happy that they succeed
I would like that payable in small unmarked bills please
ark players are basicly as broke as you can find besides microtransaction payers, whenever they can't buy something they will keep asking random people to get it for them sometimes
Amen to that, canāt count the number of times Iāve seen players come online and say ācan someone give me, Xā
its impossible to stop all cheating
when was the last thing that was said about this game? i havent heard much lately
If only there was like a Pinned section or something that had all the updates and info in one spot
Suppose to release late 2024?
X to doubt
Define cheaters
wonder when will they give acces to ps4 players and pc in diff countries
Ark 2 and Ark Ascended will never be on PS4 and Xbox one (i think was the previous Gen) Ark 2 will only be a timed exclusive period, so it will come to PS5 a bit after launch for PC and Xbox series s/x
We don't know the timed exclusive thing for certain, do we?
I was under the impression that, as far as we knew, it was 100% exclusive thus far
Assumed timed exclusive, not confirmed
My guess is that the exclusivity is limitedā¦or itās a continuous payment. Otherwise itās not financially viable to just lose a playerbase
Could it also not be possible for ARK-2 to just be called a 'timed exclusive' due to the fact Sony has a short 1-2 years for an Early-Access game to be on their platform before being taken off. While Xbox has a 4-year plan for their Early-Access titles?
I believe it was December of 2016 that ARK-1 came out on the PlayStation. Which would be less then a year before official launch.
man why some games arent in ps4 like alot of people have it atleast put some good games
...what?
I mean, PS4 is outdated hardware. Why intentionally limit the capability of a game to cater to old tech? - If you mean PS5, then talk to Sony, they hate Early Access games for some reason
Well yeah, PS4 is considered last-gen, and ASA and ARK-2 aren't coming out for last-gen.
But I believe they confirmed ASA will be on PS5, due to the only year long Early-Access I believe.
man i hate ps5 ps4 is always in my heart : )
Gamepass is a continuous payment, so... that checks out tbh
Iām gonna guess gamepass < PS5 playerbase but thatās just a guess
PS is the smallest playerbase of the "normal" or most widely viewed as acceptable version of the game, and the way the Gamepass revenue split works is pretty favorable to most devs from what I've heard (of course, depending on game quality and performance in the way of downloads and daily players, pay is split between all the games on the service). That said, not every xbox owner has gamepass (yet), but even aside from that the Xbox playerbase is and was the largest of the three regardless
I wonder if ASA will eventually come to mobile and nintendo's next console
at the rate its going you should be wondering if ASA comes out this year at all
Old joke is old
Definitely an issue with judgement somewhere in WC HQ
Can someone tell me if ark 2 gonna have official servers?
Yes
Gotta have somewhere for the minority of players to feel justified š
I mean the alternative is hiding here ridiculing people
The only thing I wish they would do is make it so you can move over your builds from ASE to ASA
I mean, the size and shape of a lot of base structures are changing, so that wouldn't be possible
With the building improvements ^
Plus no other data will be transferrable between games, why would they allow builds to be?
Though, I wonder if it would be possible to blueprint a build in Single player or something and import it to a server to share/build - obviously it would require materials and such, but that way you can template out quick builds
I forget if that's an ASA feature, or an Ark2 feature
That is in the works for ark2, they haven't said it for asa
I mean there will be mods maybe someone should make a mod to transfer/change the data to make it compatible. There are tools like that for minecraft actually.
With mods, it might be possible but I wouldn't count on it
Especially with snap point improvements. A lot of technical builds use unintended snap points, so if they're fixed/removed from Asc then the build won't be able to be copied over exactly
I highly doubt that will be possible, especially for builds
Biggest issue is a lot of the structure sizes are being changed. Itāll probably break most ASE builds instantly
Itās a different engine, itās not possible to make it compatible which is why they are going to stop official servers for ASE when ASA goes live
I think they are aiming to make ASA an Ark 2 preview (regarding features). So would make sense to have the new blueprint system coming for ASA. But yeah, thereās no official confirmation of that
Could be a possible feature roll out with upcoming content/DLC
Yeah, thatās possible. But I think it would be wiser (my opinion of course) to keep both games as similar as possible (regarding features, assets, engine etc). If their real intention is to keep both updated and running.
sorry to tell you but that aint what they are doing it, just read ark 2 features on steam page to see how much different they are
asa is just the team justifying practice with ue5 as a remaster
Could be part of it, but don't forget how much the community was asking for more Ark1 after seeing some of the drastic Ark2 changes (3rd person only, no Tek, ect)
But either way, I'm excited to see the changes, new features, and new capabilities with a better engine
ty
o7
The goal I believe is to have parallel products for ASA and ark 2 but to basically have them appeal to separate playstyles and types of player
Yeah, thatās my assessment too. By features I mean things like buildings blueprints or the models of the creatures (the sabertooth should look the same on both, but with some adjustments to the gameplay).
Saber is confirmed to have an updated model in Ark2, looks nothing like Ark1's
Sure, but I expect all the models will be updated for ASA
So, why not making them the same (3D model) for both games? Just changing some parameters to work better for the different gameplays
Probably - I'm expecting the Ark2 creature roster to be slimmed down, at least for real world creatures and have more xenofauna instead. Some of the Earth creatures will likely have roles/abilities combined with similar enough creatures to trim the roster bloat
For example, Ark2 Saber might have Saber and Thyla abilities
Anky could do get Stone or Metal/ Flint on a toggle, and we drop Doed entirely, ect
do we really want the ark 1 ''creature x clone but with y model and different sound'' in Ark 2 again tho? bc i sure don't want 50 creatures doing the exact same thing with the only difference being the model, sound and sometimes a extra third attack if you're lucky 
I tend to agree on that. I would like every Dino to be as unique as the recent ones
the recent ones are over op whit abilities from pay dlcs combine in a single creature almost making every creature before obsolete, guess new is the best next thing
Seeing as almost every DLC has done similar to shake up the meta, that sounds pretty par for the course
Yeh I wish they did more dino/map tlcs or balancing
carch makes giga useless in most cases
when does ark 2 come out
Late 2024 apparently
alr ty
im hyped for ark ascended is coming out in october 2023
how much is ark ascended gonna be?
is it the same price if i have xbox gamepass?
They haven't said it will be on gamepass.
cuz for ark 1 i got all expansions for basically free
wait it will be on xbox tho right?
For what it 40?
40 is for ASA which includes base game and all DLCs.
Oo, thanks
better correct that before that spreads around whit wrong info
Whats wrong with it?
But thatās exactly what wildcard posted on their CC
Can someone explain me how the voting system work please
Its a tier list. Creature you want most at the top, least at the bottom
Thanks you but when is the least creature of the 10 disqualified ?
Theres only the final result at the end of the voting. No rounds or anything - this is it for the Aberration creature
Oh ok thanks
putting unwanted dinos at the bottom of the list is just as important as putting favorites at the top
exactly
ive seen way too many people on my server say "favorite dinos first, then the rest" lol then gigantoraptor happens
so the new dlc is also incluided on that price???
GP forgor to say all 'legacy' dlcs. 
Oh, right, I forgot about the new dlc.
Yeah I think people voted the giant turkey out of spite or something
no
It was actually the funniest thing lol
How to vote correctly:
- Look at the creatures
- Place them in the order you want based on what they look like as the abilities can and will be changed by Wildcard if they think it's too over the top or powerful
- submit the list
- cry that something you don't want won the vote bc you just put your favorite 1st and least favorite last while not changing the others /j
Sounds accurate, especially that last step
I mean i did cry about giganto being added but I did order everything not just my favorite and least favorite
Where can we see the older winner of the vote please
You mean the Gigantoraptor?
Really hoping for that spotlight owl for ab
Yes please
So far they've only revealed the concept art. https://survivetheark.com/index.php?/articles.html/community-crunch-369-gigantoraptor-concept-creature-submissions-and-more-r2129/
It's definitely a contender for me, but spiders kinda take the cake, I've had and raised arachnids all my life and invertebrates in general are my weakness
Yi looks fun, but I'm a sucker for small raptor-ish creatures
I hope in Ark 2 or ASA they can try to remove some anti-cheat mechanics which heavily affect gameplay:
- Character loss
- Crashing and 5 minute wait to relogin (character stayed logged in for 5 mins) whilst character gets killed/dies
- 3 second delay on Transfer all is really, really user unfriendly
Well, points 1 and 2 aren't actually anti cheat things. Just really bad server file transfers lol
point 2 its funny cause you can kill the character even on pve by drowning dosent matter if log out 5min or 5 days but i think i know what is trying to say
Both are -- at least number 2 is, I think it was genie who said something like 'if the 5 minute login thing didn't exist', something anti-dupe mechanic.
Number 1 in many ways is anti dupe as well, partially why they don't restore characters/engrams. I am confident the new system will help prevent character loss in ASA, it would be the most disappointing thing otherwise
I mean, that is because their file transfer system is really bad
They could make an anti dupe file transfer method very easily, but they way the originally build character files forces them to do it a bad way. So hopefully they fix that for next time
Who wanna bet they're still using C++?
From the little I know, I believe most of the industry has moved to C# by this point.
They been using C++ for Ark1 at least so idk
I know they use a blend of whatever language they use, and blueprints. As a lot of their more simpler stuff like guns are blueprint-based.
I haven't used c# that much, why would they move to that instead of staying with c++
I know unity uses c#, but off the top of my head I can't think of any advantages c# has ocer c++
From what I heard, C# is just a lot more easier and more versatile to use.
Could be false, but a programmer I was watching said they worked for Microsoft, and said 'majority of the things we code with is C# anymore.'
That's like apple saying they code everything in swift. It doesn't mean it's better
As for the versatility of c# over c++ the only thing I can think of is maybe using .net libraries? But ue5 is still written in c++ so they probably don't even need those
Yeah, but I don't know it's scope as of yet
Hopefully it's more powerful then C++. Cause coding-language advancement got me excited.
I always knew that coding-languages where hella important for advancing softwares/hardwares, but now that I'm learning Java, it's exciting.
I doubt it'll be more powerful. Maybe easier
As far as I am aware, to date c++ is still the most powerful and fastest language around. Python comes close but only when it uses c++ libraries lol
It has great versatility, but sometimes languages need more specialization to excel in certain areas
Would binary technically be the most powerful language, if you knew how to use it?
Binary isn't a language though
Coding, I mean
Well, yes and no.
Yes because you could theoretically code something to be the absolute fastest you could want it to be, but no because most systems use different binary and rely on differing versions of assembly to work
Imagine a program not working on your pc just because you have a different hard drive than the coder did
Plus oop is so incredibly important for modular coding like programs and games require, that it really isn't even practical to think about doing it any other way
I see
I remember reading a thread somewhere, where the person had literally homebrewed a fix for character loss and transfer issues for his cluster in a matter of days or weeks just by learning how to code š
That's to say, most of the dupe and character loss issues really aren't all that hard to fix, just hard to implement for WC (a lot of the problems were dupe prevention related, and he undid some things that would mean people could technically dupe easier on his cluster, but just made it a rule to not dupe and actually enforced it like unofficials tend to do)
I mean, it's pretty easy with some basic bash scripts. I have one I did for my own personal cluster I hosted locally
I did spend a lot of time on it, and made it pretty robust. But it wouldn't work on a large scale
Yeah, that sounds about like what I had read
There are ways to do it on a large scale without duping.
See the banking system lol
Imagine if there was duping in banking transactions
Like they can't fix every problem, but they sure have a lot they can do better
Bro ark 2 cost like 700 bucks
Thatās cause itās gonna be really really good
700 rupees? goddam thats expensive 
$700 gets you the deluxe package, where WC tells you directly that they canāt in fact cheat on your behalf
Add an extra $50 for a dedicated agent to review your reports and do nothing about them
thats already a free feature
TRUUUUUUUUE
Certified Gamer Moment right here
When you submit your vote for the creature on aberration its registered but you can change it right ?
No, once you vote, that's it, no take backsies
so you better vote the correct way
Wildcard selling so hard
is there no voting for the creature now ? im confused because all they posted is the individual links for top 10 creatures.
There is voting...
Latest announcement at the end of the lost of dinos named has in blue letters BOLD
sumbjt your vote
There is voting, the link was just left off by mistake, but it is there now. Also it was posted in #announcements on Monday too.
Iām Greg
Is the physique of the game gonna change in asa ( water and dino's feathers) ?
Do you mean the physics?
leave my demonic anky ragdols alone
Yes
Yes, it will be fluid.
Ok thanks
ARK 2, 25 cent pre-order now
Ain't worth the offer
They needa pay me to play Ark
Ark 2 date 2024?
Late 2024 for PC and Xbox, no date for Playstation
why is there no channel for ark ascended?
Teeeeeechnically we should be using General, but I refuse to yield
Plus the Mods don't particularly care that we use Ark2 - for now
I thought we're supposed to be using just #ark-survival-ascended for it, but yeah tbh this channel fits better in terms of content and also #ark-survival-ascended is a bit closer to general and therefore more of a cesspool than here, near the bottom of the channel list š¤£
Come to think of it, #ark-survival-ascended is just general 2 pretty much
Think they do plan on one later
But yh idk why not sooner
I don't think there will be a dedicated Ark Ascended channel. It'll be covered by #ark-survival-ascended once its released anyway
Imagine what people would say in an Asa only chat though
I'd imagine it's a lot like this one.
'When ASA?'
'Why 3rd person?'
'Available on Playstation?'
'Is it single player/story game?'
Itās sad how dull itās become
You forgot to mention the fireballs
what do you mean
Guys , when ASA launches , it will cost 59,99⬠with 2 dlcs included and then later other maps will be launched but the ones who paid the 59,99⬠will have those next dlcs ( like scorched on december) but then later we will have to pay again for Ark 2 ?
Nope
ASA will be 40$ including all Dlcs
Price deals been changed many times
Do i have to buy ark 2 either after buying asa?
If they ever release ark2
Yes, you'd have to buy it
It's a separate game
@eternal wigeon okey
Reduce fog amount in ASA for Island please, just had fog 3x in one ingame day (start of day, midday, and at near end of day again)
talking about weather how about making lightning a real threat and actually hit players that use metal armor while flying, open areas and time to time hit the ocean parts too
i'd be down for that
And with the lighting a storm that make a swirl in the ocean
Could add a Lightning Rod to prevent your base from getting destroyed too
even go further and had energy banks to store power
Will there be crossplay when ASA is out?
Yes
yes
Yes
Will it be available on mobile ios?
no
Will ark: survival evolved still be available after ark 2 is released?
Singleplayer and unofficial, yes.
Hiuii
Ark survival evolved has to be still available because that is the best game I played besides the borderline thing
Where you can't go far from the host
ark: craziness evolve, that should be this tab name
That's why they are making Asa...
@untold ingot what?
š¤Æ
Is the game out yet?
ARK 2 isn't coming out until end of 2024 at the earliest.
i hope the AI updates will include pack/herd/flock/swarm mechanics...
pathing aside, i mean like movement patterns and feeding animations or some such
like they promised wild babies, i just wanna see stuff like a herd of trikes making a "horn wall" to defend against a hungry rex...then the rex de-aggro once he feeds. ya know, actual AI updates lol
youre hoping way too much for a remaster/remake early access ASA

so i take it you guys are expecting a 1:1 re-release of ASE lol
i get that on early access the game will be a little bare-bones, i'm just hoping for final product AI to be something worth prefacing so long ago
Thats ... basically what ASA is
why even bring up "better" AI if theres nothing better about it
re-release =/= remaster
just a hope though lol i dont expect anything that goes on here to be added in game
Not even going to entertain that arguement for the 100th time
for better AI?
Re-release vs Remaster vs whatever the hell else people want to call it
ah lol who cares about the definition of remaster of whatever, i just want better AI XD
All we really know that is confirmed to be updated on the AI front is better pathfinding - everything else is just speculation and hopes
I doubt much else will change
agreed, i just hope itll be better...
Ark2 seems to suggest better AI, but we'll see
i feel like theyre close to something more realistic (we all know they dont care about 'realistic', js) with pack bonuses, mate boosts, aggro range, and fight/flight base AI
for us with a million hrs of playtime, sometimes its just the moving world of 'living' dinos acting like dinos that makes the game worth logging in for the billionth time lol
uff that statement true words, shame im the only person alive that never see dinos acting like dinos š¤£
lol thats my point...i hope the new AI will make them act like animals in the wild
like when a procoptodon starts doing the treadmill on a rock (pathing) that is the best way to kill immersion XD
Imo thatās an ark 2 hope - for ASA thereās likely too many creatures and too much ASE clutter to invest into an in-depth exploration of realistic AI (as opposed to improvements to existing behaviors like following or attacking)
ASA would be (to me) a win if it was able to address the big sticking points of ASE while still being basically ASE
sounds fair, considering timeline. i just want it to be implemented at some point lol def not holding my breath on a passing idea...least of all one voiced on discord XD āļø
Iāve been thereā¦Iāve suggested some hard copes here lol
Have you actually ever seen a real Procoptodon. How do you know they didn't do this?
lol they probably did, procoptodon couldnt jump...
I think I"ve seen that movie
They are smart. I've got one too
@regal marten
TBA
Late 2024
yep, "end of 2024", it was delayed many times / for many years already. i call vaporware at this point
I wonder if we donāt chat here so the ārelease whenā question is always at the bottomā¦does that actually help people the fastest š§
No, we've already seen that, true to form, Ark chatters can't even lift their sight a mere comment higher than their own and read the exact detailed obvious answer to the same question that they're asking
It's just impossible for them
What will be released first ark 2 or call of duty 6 š¤£
šššš
Lol
Seeing as theres been like 30 Call of Dutys now, I think 6 was released a while ago š
Right? Someone out here living in 2009 š¤£
Whatās an ark 2?
ASA probably towards the end of this year then they will probably stick with that for atleast 2 yrs then ark2 probably around 2026-2027
Iām gonna offer a new discussion take for the first time in a century - whatāre thoughts on imprinting being done once at hatch and after that only to ADULT tames? Then changing raising to be an extremely minimal process that can take place while youāre fully offline? Iām a bit worried about just making raising super fast, but I want to give players the chance to let afk raising take place while also not missing the chance to get imprint bonuses
If we want numbers, youād hit E to claim -> do ONE imprint to get say 10% -> do the remainder of the imprints with an adult tame
i had a similar idea that involved maintaining an affinity stat in place of imprinting stat and would work the same way but that would be irritating lol
its def a good idea though, imprinting system is irritating too lol
One the difference is that unlike affinity the model proposed is permanent. Agree maintaining affinity is a chore that ultimately reduces tame diversity rather than (the goal) of increasing diversity
Are u saying u can keep imprinting when fully raised?
Cause then it's just op, all raised tames will be 100% imprint buffed
Making things way ezier and noob friendly should be an unofficial setting
The idea is that if you do NOTHING, you can then imprint up to about 90%. If you do the baby imprint and then do the adult imprints, you get 100%
Still busted
With cryopods itās pretty much the standard to have 100% for everyone but bobs is my understanding
truth
Well no
In pvp for example, people can raise mass dinos meant for suicide
Like 100+ un imprinted cause it's to annoying
So ur saying ud make that even more busted
It would still take the same number of imprints (and probably time) to complete
It just wouldnāt be locked once adulthood was reached (except for the 10%)
So an adult tame raised lazy could cap at 90% after someone went through the effort of completing however many imprints on the adult
I like quality of life updates but certain things I'd leave to unofficial servers to choose what they wanna implement
This game is currently unbalanced as is anyways
ASA rebalance would be nice
More tlc on older disks etc yh I guess
Newer dinos always busted and nerfed
The idea is to drop the active time needed to raise a baby soā¦more people can actually play official
If we're talking Offical PVE sure
PvP is different
People have alrdy mentioned PVE and PVP Officals should be slightly different but WC to lazy
They COULD go hard on this
Season Wipe PvP and not PvE for example
Since they already split them (see tuso and flier carry)
They have arkpoc or classic for offical wipes
And some people do like no wipe pvp
Both are popular
āPopularā by what metric? I see lots of dead PvP official servers 3-4 months after every DLC since extinction
And ofc arkpoc falls off hard in 2 weeks iirc
even the populated ones are just ppl who log in just bc they logged in yesterday lol
I don't have stats on me
And yh offical pvp clusters always been dying
I'm just stating ik pvp player who like no wipes
And many like wipes
But offical already has a cluster for wipes like arkpoc and classic etc
I just want to know what actually works for PvP. Is it solved? Iām skeptical is all
I mean the worst part of the pvp is cheating alone
Then, and only then, do u move onto the game pvp balance and exploits
Cause cheating is so bad, it should be a priority
"server generated" events seems like itll put ppl on an even field, since the environment will be targeting everyone
or was that just for Ark2?
Sounds like ARK2, if you mean smth like AI NPC humans fighting you
Yea thatās ark 2. The world events anyway
āļø
Ark 1 does have other kind of events
ASA should appease the current PvP population, but I see ark 2 as a strong place to branch out and try to actually resolve āwhat makes PvP work best in the ark genreā
Step 1 imo is reducing some of the frankly offense timers and time wasting active grinds that are tear jerkingly dull
Don't know if it means much
But I've heard pvp players hate 3rd person only or soul like combat
Not liking changes to a game they've alrdy played and learned
Current ark 1 PvP players -> they have ASA tho
If they hate change, WC listened and granted their wish imo
True, like waiting timers
Have it like 5min instead of 15
How about 30-60 minutes instead of 24hrs for a mating cooldown?
manageable
Or even better have oviraptor tlc boost mating idk
Less controversial but reducing taming time down but increasing the skill needed to tame something is also in this vein
Unknown if oviraptor is in ark 2 sadly so we canāt depend on that
Was talking in general as an idea
They kinds been doing that with recently newer dinos no? Diff unique Taming ways
Yes, which is why I want it to be the standard for ark 2
I ofc also need these methods to not be completely miserable
It's assumed AI and mechanics will have more complexity
ARK 1 unironixally can be complex alrdy
Knowing all the knowledge of game
And (imo reasonably critically) the methods need to incentivize fun rather than lame nonsense. For example, thereās 0 reason to not use a sign trap for an amarga because doing the tame āas intendedā gets you a worse result, because damage = lost tame levels
Why have a tame oriented around combat, but punish players for getting the tame into combat
Imo complexity is only valuable if it adds to the gameplay. Itās not valuable in arkās case most of the time to learn niche interactions and bugs/hidden mechanics that could and should be intuitive without the need for external websites or guides
What, would u recommend u could heal it so its effectiveness stays up I guess
Simply decouple effectiveness from damage. Unless it comes from you the player
If it dies, you lost the tame. If you hurt it, itās your fault. Donāt see a need to punish people for having it fight stuff as the tame intended
Yh I'd agree generally
But I don't think WC or many care when they got bigger issues to care about š
They don't do much game balancing unless it's something obviously broken
Smth small doesn't matter to refine
Luxury for ark game designers to care about small balance things and gameplay
When they struggling alrdy
Wish it wasn't the case ofc
I mean the issue imo is that thereās no wipes to do balance
If you wipe, you can address some silly percent of balance issue because you can shut the servers down, ensure all of item X thatās been balanced is correct, then get people back to the game without worrying about their progress
But it would be stupid if I didnāt mention for the Xth time that itās still trueā¦that fixing cheating is required to start this conversation (although with less progress at stakeā¦it may be attempted less)
oh shifter, you should already know ark players can never be appeased or be made happy with things they asked for themselves
when is offical sever wipe ?
@kind wren thats cause google has conflicted info about it some say aug some say oct some say next year
September 30th is the current date
August was the old set date
Then a delay happened
About 3 hrs is all I could do @split dove Now itās back to dates š
š«” Honorable and respectable effort
There's official servers for Ark 2? How'd you even get ahold of a copy? I thought the game was "vaporware" as many say...
für 3 offizielle Server
given that they are shutting down servers imo they should give people who bought og ark a discount on ark ascended
Theyāre giving everyone a discount on release
A discount for the minority of players? Na- wait there already is a discount š
stealing it?
W-what? No, there literally already is a discount
Have they said when ASA would be released?
October is latest prediction
ark=ded
Pretty sure it's not, but sure
I mean his name literally has kid... š
Or even for free
Few more clowns and we'll have a circus!
Why do people constantly think people should work for free š¤£
The number of people that own ASE is in the millions, that would be millions of copies of ASA given away free and only a small portion of completely new players paying.
Itās discount
For playing a free additional service for a product paidā¦for 8 years, the reward should be getting free products forever
š§
so the game should be free bc the servers used by the minority of the ark playerbase is closing and getting reused for ASA? peak ark user logic as usual i see 
Nothing to do with minorities
Itās the same weird thing that people with ASE want asa free or at a discountā¦doesnāt matter if theyāre active on official (where that number was stated) or not
oh i know, just wanted to use wildcards official statement
This also impacted our decision to sunset the ASE Official Network offline on August 31st, shortly before the ASA launch. Despite ASE Officials representing the minority of players on ARK
that would be funny for those that got for free on epic getting again for free š¤£
slavery never ended it just got word change
peak ark logic to assume minority only count in the end š¤Æ
they still need the money tho
In fairness it IS useful when asking āshould we keep hosting ASE officialsā
Not a certain answer for āshould there be ASA or ark 2 officialsā, though WC also confirmed officials for both so thatās not whatās being asked
you really think snail gonna let that go? get a clue, check the other snail games
thats why i say should
whats gonna happen is ase stays current price for a couple more years
dosent matter if you say it should aint happening
ok?
Why?
cause its unsupported from now on
Beyond the reality that old games sell for less, the game is itself a product without the service of officials. I can see a mark down for that, but I dunno about āheavyā
but there is no more dev input
No support = ādoneā in the world of products. You donāt pay less for a cookie because people stopped refining the recipe
idk i feel like games like ark need some sort of maintenance while playing to justify it
its not polished even now
theres a bunch of bugs and bad mechanics
Ark DOES have a service, which thereās valid argument to cut the price if the āpromisedā service is discontinued. But the service is the official network, not continuous updates
and without official and a large number of unofficial players leaving, the experience is far worse
so why would you have it up for the same price
both are tho
But theyāre not
You donāt pay for the certainty of updates that ensure a high degree of polish
You DO pay for officials, because you get those the instant you click ābuyā
i do personally
like if ark didnt update, unless it was in a really good state, i wouldnt play it, since long term it just isnt a good game yet
its good at first, for a few hundred hours, but it needs updates to keep me going beyond that. And a few hundred hours is a lot for most games, but for ark like games thats not terribly long imo
and those first few hundred hours are good because im essentially engaging with new content
-Slaps roof of mods-
Look at all this free content
but the issue is that most modders are leaving for asa
Not all - and the devs kit is open for you to make your own
there might be some left, but that means new mods will be slow to come and will only keep slowing down as time passes by
and this isnt to mention that a huge part of ark, at least for me, is the players, and thats gonna be leaving too
I'm sure some will stay too
But the promise isnāt there in the price tag is my point
its fair that it isnt explicitly mentioned
You pay for ark āas isā at this stage in development. In early access, you pay for what you see and for the loose promise of more to come. Itās not the same
You've already paid, gotten your money's worth - why does the price of the older version even matter to you anymore? Keep playing or drop it
Players think many things, and consumers consider quite a few things when valuing a game. However, thatās not always what the product itself IS
idk i feel like if ark released as it is now back a few years, like 2018, and without officials and with the corresponding playerbase that itll have after asa releases, i wouldnt buy it since itd be mostly dead
I think the question here boils down to āis ark valued substantially less (or free) once officials are shutdown and updated stopā
both development and playerbase wise
i think ark does explicitly advertise its playerbase too
every trailer involves playing with and against people
Official Servers bring zero value to me personally
It advertises multiplayer - but not MMO gameplay really
Thing is, you still can though
if thats mostly gone, it does make the game significantly worse
i mean technically sure
Not technically - absolutely
If they showed full marketplaces and 100 person tribe wars as the āstandardā thereās some argument that the marketing is no longer accurate. But thatās not really whatās being shown
not really, except for a few unofficials itd become pretty hard to find other people
thats what i envision ase will end up as, mostly a wasteland
Tons of older games with 'dead' communities still have a good number of active servers and players - Original Team Fortress, Doom95, ect
Itāll probably condense to groups of dedicated fans/cheap gamers or private servers for friends. The product however is unchanged
Itās not like extinction erodes into dust at the end of the year
dedis will probably be fine for a while ye
But that's the same as any game with any kind of multiplayer component - if you want the best online experience then you'll need to play the most updated and available version
i dont see why unofficials will be much fun after a while tho
its already hard enough to find one that isnt boosted to garbage. But thats a personal issue
For the same reason any old gameās unofficials would work
Highly common
Why? With the proper settings, Unofficial can perfectly mimic Official - why would being an Unofficial be any less 'fun' than an Official server?
because the people running unofficial have specific preferences
So run your own
Thereās always groups who are 1) poor 2) low spec 3) nostalgic 4) change adverse
renting an unofficial isnt practical for 90% of players, especially since its only fun witj a significant number of people
playing a cluster with 5 people spread across 12 maps isnt fun
For some people. And the folks who want an MMO will be on ASA
yeah
which games tho
especially in multiplayer
halo series is all i can imagine but that seems exceptional
Ark isnāt exclusively MMO. In fact itās very clearly split
I'm not sure I understand the question - are you asking for examples of older games getting a recent sequel with multiplayer?
The service (the mmo) is in fact shutting down this year lol. So anyone who wanted the mmo will obviously not be sticking around or will buy it later
im asking for mmos that survive after a sequel is announced
OSRS
Usually the sequel never runs at the same time as the original. OSRS is the only exception I can think of (although that was a very exceptional case)
WOW Classic
True
runescape is probably a decent example yeah
Guild Wars? I think
But again I state my above - this isnāt really relevant to the price tag perse
Folks who value the mmo willā¦never buy ASE once the mmo shuts down. So the price is irrelevant to them
a reduced price tag would help ase population stay above a couple hundred to a few thousand
The question then becomes āwill people seeking SP/unofficial/private servers pay the price for the productā
But to the Devs, there's no point to continue to spend money for servers for a less populated and no longer supported game
Andā¦since people did exactly that since ASEās release thereās 0 reason to drop the price
Separate question here Zen
Ok, I'm getting distracted by work š
You donāt need players to make income for a game thatās no longer the MMO
This premise imo is flawed
for the reason that the people who play ark for reasons other than it being an mmo are already buying it at current price?
Correct
cause sure ye, but i think itd be cool if some aspect of that mmo experience stayed
It would be cool, but itās a dead premise. You need official support to run an official service for something like an MMO
i mean via unofficial
cause even the unofficial experience can often get you whatever mmo experience you want
Thatās always possible if you get a dedicated enough group and some source code, but I suspect that wonāt happen in the short term. Maybe 10 years from now wc will fork it over š
i dont think youd need much dev help
just make the game worth getting by reducing price a bit
But without source code I suppose you can always try to market and bring forth a community. Nothing stops that from happening sans officials
But thereās 0 reason to drop the price to promote that
The market for ASE as an mmo collapses when asa comes out. Itāll never be a primary monetary driver again unless unofficials have already built their numbers into a ānewā mmo experience that attracts players
idk i think asa would just make ase even worse then since theres literally no reason to get ase after asa
thats what im getting at, but those unofficials will never succeed if all new players are forwarded to asa
unless its just too niche, and the people in that niche are already willing to pay 40 for ase
Many reasons - cheaper, lower spec requirements, more mods, Iām SURE some folks will argue with balance changes, and ofc nostalgia
i mean basically every mod you see now will likely be in asa
most large unofficials are making the transition to asa
This whole argument is about cheapening ASE because of the mmo going away. But thereās no argument that defends ASE being high price as it ages
The price will steadily fall as new games come out and ASE ages and declines in value to consumers
why not just accelerate that price reduction now tho
Because you make less money?
youll lose some money
ye, but i think the player count is gonna eventually even it out
if theres enough players in the first place
I doubt it. If you jump the gun, you get more players, but itās not 1-1. 80% of those players who dropped $10 may have dropped $30 and youād never know
ig
Thereās also value in trying to push people to asa
Pay $30 for ASEā¦or pay $45 for the far more updated and newer asa. Pay for asa and you get a newer product and wc gets more $
i think asa being a large population is already a given tho
This conversation as I understood it is about money
Not really about playercounts
idk how much value is lost here if you dont go all out to get people from ase to asa
im guessing the majority of ase players will own asa
followed by people who cant run asa
Current official players for sure. They have the most pressure to move to asa
offi is already some type of minority
idk how small tho
maybe 10%?
ik a lot of offi also plays a significant amount of unofficial
Well as I said above - the minority at ASE at this stage in development is not indicative of their status at launch
I think a lot of last Gen console folks and folks with low specs who canāt readily get a rig for asa or ark 2 will keep with ASE
ASE will also likely see a price drop when asa comes out, and a general price decline with age, which will keep the cash flow for a bit longer
This and your above statement are extremely contradictory
What is the contradiction?
That unofficial isn't practical for 90% of players, and then turning around and saying that official players are the minority of players at "probably" 10%. Which is it? Impractical for most players, or played as the preferred method of Ark by most players? But I know you didn't actually need me to spell it out for you... right?
I don't see a contradiction , just misunderstanding on your part
...Suuuure
Renting an unofficial is impractical for most people. Fact
Official has less players. Fact
Finding an unofficial that isn't boosted and broken is hard. Fact
Those aren't opinions, they are facts.
The contradiction is because you like to be contrary
There isn't actually one
people wanna play on unofficials, but they cant rent them basically
*Don't want to rent them
that could be true too
but the monthly payments probably add up so i doubt itd be worth it, especially since its possible nobody plays on them since nobody knows about it or nobody wants to play
To be fair, server-providers have been getting expensive.
I believe GPortal and Nitrado upped their pricing a few months ago?
how much
I don't know. I just heard from a friend that goes through GPortal that they upped their prices.
Could be literal cents worth, but I don't see a company upping price-tags by cents.
fair
But even so, providers like GPortal have sales of their servers.
a lot of unofficials ive seen have mtx too, so that likely helps cover it
but they also tend to be p2w
regardless of eula stuff
Like, I don't think technically Wildcard can do anything about it other then ban them from official servers.
Which isn't going to do much, if they're only on unofficial. š¦
Could get a cease and desist? Kind of an odd area. Like modders asking for donations/doing commissions
People have been doing it for the 8 years ARK have existed, and I don't think they've ever done so.
So they either don't care/mind. Or legally can't.
Fair point. If it was a problem, then WC would take action to try and stop it. I guess if it doesn't affect Official servers, then they really don't have a way to police it
Also, I believe Nitrado has a 'direct donation' system, which if you do that then admins give you a in-game reward for doing so. It technically isn't against the EULA.
It's the same process I believe of people donating to a YouTuber's Patreon, so they don't make 'direct' money off of another product.
Might be a per-server basis for Nitrando, I've been on a few that didn't have anything like that to my knowledge
I've mostly seen the donation system on Xbox.
It's on almost every pvp unofficial
Damn, fucking PvP?
I can understand on PvE, cause the balance is kind of on you. But on PvP, that must be fucking chaos.
Who?
It's why a lot of official players don't want to do unofficial
Fair enough, if that's all what the official PvP community sees.
I will say, finding a good Unofficial community is tough. Especially if you're picky about settings
Very
I expect it'll be a bit easier with some official players not wanting to move to ASA, so hosting their own clusters.
There will likely be a new type of unofficials that mirror officialsā¦since thereās now a real market for that
One thing Iāll say is unique to ark unofficial being so miserable to host is that you need to pay for multiple servers to make your cluster work. So you are much more likely to need donations or other paying players to keep things afloat
People say that will happen, I don't see it happening
Mm. Or be stuck on one map and changing maps is a pain if you want to keep progress
High risk of a lot of issues, especially if you have a lotta players lol. As youāre seeing me and Flobs having lol
Idk what the success rate will be, but itāll be tried for nearly certain
Zero reason to host an official clone while unofficial until the official network is down. Once official is dropped, folks who want ASE official and not asa are now a new audience for unofficials
There probably will be perma save unofficials that see a bit more popularity, but unofficials just can't keep the volume of servers required for an official clone
Not a perfect clone for sure. Especially on server counts. But for everything else it seems pretty within reason
All the serious official players will be moving to Asa anyway
Depends an awful lot on what asa actually delivers. And what you mean by āseriousā. And how many official players arenāt currently playing ASE for reasons that prevent them from swapping (willingly or not)
'No INI cheats improvements? No point!' -Serious PvPers
See reasons for why folks may not swap
Vocal anyway
Idk if by serious it only includes the no lifers or if it means folks who are generally invested
To play on Official rates seriously, is there a difference? š¤
Hard to say. I hear some folks can play a few hours a day/week on official and have fun. Donāt ask me how, especially on PvP, but I canāt discredit their comments
But are those folks called casuals? š§
Have you ever played on official rates?
With a tribe?
Yes there is a difference between no lifers, cheaters, and other serious players
Only briefly. I don't trust randos enough to tribe, and the people I do trust don't have time for Official rates. Also, I don't have time for Official rates š
But that's just me
Yeah, official rates have always sucked ass, that much everyone knows š
Well official is designed to tribe. And believe me, if you have 40 people in a tribe, or 70, or 150 and you farm, it makes the rates act more like 25x than 1x
i think arkpoc is about fine outside shit like taming
It's only on smalls or wipe servers where you are required to no life to survive
Because having 150 people makes the dinos tame and raise faster... riiiiiight
it does help with the exponential growth
Can get more done in the downtime at least
like you can parallel grind a bunch of stuff with more people
and you can be more secure
Imma take this as being obtuse
Sure, but you're still waiting a week or whatever per giga/whatever else breeding cycle
And what is the issue with that?
It factually doesn't make them breed or tame faster, since you're all about facts now...
The difference is you don't have to do it all...
Itās the diametric split in experience
- achieving things yourself or 2) achieving them as a collective
breeding takes a while regardless, its a mostly broken mechanic, but you will be able to hit stat cap since you wont get completely wiped and lose all progress
If you are raising gigas, with cryos and maewing, you literally can choose your on time to raise gigas. Or whatever else you are doing.
plus you can take a larger base and mass breed too
like, literally everyone can set up a breeding sky quetz, but you cant mass breed
And this is the main difference between official 1x and other servers. And it's not replicable on unofficial
so you might increase how many generations worth of time by many multiples
I mean yes, if youāre referring to ark as an mmo see the above conversation Bada and I had
You can totally achieve things as a collective in unofficial, wat
more people basically bring your practical time towards grinding things to their theoretical minimum
I mean call it as you want, 1x is not designed to be solo.
Name one unofficial where tribes larger than 10 are allowed?
That isn't pve
Mine? A few others out there are as well, I can assure you
Yours is a pvp server?
What is the pop, and what's the biggest tribe?
And if it's that good, why isn't it big?
It's only a few hundred, and everyone in there knows at least 1-2 of the others, it's a word of mouth friend group, we don't take in randos
It's got PvP and PvE
So obviously it can't mirror official, and is irrelevant to the conversation
And the biggest tribe right now (in light of recent events, the majority of us are moving to ASA when it comes out) is about 30-40 deep, I think
Now that is obtuse
No one server on official can hold more than 100 players, correct?
Got that covered
And regardless, it is relevant to the original question asked, I have a tribe limit higher than 10, period, question answered
As far as other servers out there, idk, the burden of proof isn't on me lmao
In a closed community server
I guarantee that if you opened it to randoms and an actual tribe came on that was coordinated and good at pvp you would be wiped in a week
Ok, and? That has no bearing on the conversation at hand, you're just being obtuse again
...
What part of there isn't an unofficial that can replicate 1x is being obtuse. Closed community pvpve is not relevant to that conversation
That isn't even the point of contention here
Then you have been reading a different chat than me obviously
Because that was literally my point of contention

And has been for years lol
You are just misrepresenting the original point entirely, which I already answered, so
I know these things are hard to understand, especially for someone who thinks it's hard to run/rent unofficial servers š¤·āāļø
"(of an object or course of action) not adapted for use or action; not sensible or realistic."
"impossible to do; impracticable."
What part of renting a server is not sensible or realistic? Or even impossible, for that matter?
I know what word was used, and what it means.
I'm not even going to bother answering to that
As always I am talking from a pvp perspective. That should make it perfectly clear. And if not, idgaf
So you're not going to give me the facts or a lecture on the matter? Darn.
No. You are the king of not answering a claim, or backing things up. I don't owe an explanation to you lol
Also already stated that there is PvP included, but I guess you decided to omit that from "your chat"

Ah yes, because you always back up your claims with reason and facts, lmao. I'm done, you got me rolling over here š¤£
I'm done, as stated
Hope I can eat the Aratai's in ARK-2.
But not Asa š
Bruh, you are weird šš
Arathai food
It's fine, they're not humans.
Pro-Humanity, fuck the alien environment. Am I right Santiago?
I mean. What is human?
I'm just saying, a settlement-like system would be dope for ARK-2 if the map is large enough.
Truths
That's a question that people have been trying to answer since ancient times
Meat
I thought those were confirmed for ark2. It would be cool if they had npcs that could do it
I think so but we didnāt get much info past it haha
Humans, also known as Homo-Sapiens are a species/dominant species on Earth.
I don't care for philosophical shit when it comes to 'what are humans?'
Humans are a species, not an idea. 
I will happily view sapient races as on-par to humanity, but they aren't humans. They're whatever-the-fuck aliens they are.
Hmm, but at what point does the line blur? Species aren't static
That's the science of it
Maybe the aratai are people that went there and it's like a billion years later.
That would explain their humanoid structure
Nb4 Santiago sends us to another settlement that needs our help š
Okay, so it depends what situation we're talking about.
If we're going on a All-Tomorrows situation, where there's 6+ species that evolved from Homo-Sapians, then sure they're human.
But an Aratai, that has no connection (that we know of) to humanity, then they're not human. They're Aratai's.
I mean
I don't get the reference, but yeah
There is also nothing not connecting them to humans
So my new pet theory is that the aratai are previous survivors from a different Genesis ship
That's ... a stretch
In All-Tomorrows, (a theoretical future book) humanity got fucked by a alien-species, and got mutated into like 6+ separate species.
They all deprived from humanity, but they all evolve separately on their own planets.
That's kind of a stretch without any evidence.
Another Genesis-ship would be pretty impractical with the timeline, with humanity being nearly extinct by the time it launched.
Stretching is good pre workout
Huh
It is!
And I advice everyone to do so, even if you're not working out right now.
Well, I am stretching the limits of the lore, because it is funny
Fair enough.
Can u trade Dinoās
Unofficially yes. Thereās no word about an āingame marketā in any of the new ark games
It would be nice to have 200-400 players on an ark 2 server so you could actually run an MMO experience that isnāt handicapped byā¦itself. Get some actual markets going and some real functional PvP that doesnāt involve server slot capping and having a fraction of the tribe actually present
With pvp
They have small tribes to cap limit, 6 man, but big alphas all have alliances, discord of 100+ people breaking the TOS
Enforcement doesn't stop tribes from allying and steam rolling others
Just a game of numbers then
And the little guy stands no chance
I mean Iām not even talking about tribe size
Iām talking about slot capping a normal official server so two big tribes canāt even be fully present
There already is slot capping?
ā¦canāt even DO the large PvP thatās promised because the server slot caps are smaller than the tribe size limits on official š
U realize, by expanding the slot cap from 70
It will be an even bigger game of numbers?
You will see 200 players vs 30
Even worse then current problem
they gonna have a queue system, not that itll change any of this directly, but itd be interesting if they added cooldowns to prevent people capping a server in seconds
I think they will be managing character files differently
idk how to make that work tho
Like account based rather than server based
If it is account based, just have the server check the tribe count, and limit it to some proper number or something
Like 20 people from a tribe can be on at the same time or something
i think the issue is if people leave tribe when transfering to another server to work there mostly, and then join tribe back after a while during war
you might need to have a tribe recruitment cooldown
on top of tribe transfer cooldown
maybe apply to allies too idk
it should take a while for people to set up and start a war imo
That would be easy to add in too
you might need to make it also apply to accounts that are tribed together but separate server or are coming from the same server
Instead of having a piece of code that runs on hundreds of servers, it would just have to run on the one that manages the character files
Imo tribes should be crossark
Or just have a hard cap of 2-4 tribes and allow solos
the issue is people in separate tribes working together
the same way they team on smalltribes
this wouldnt be possible to moderate i think
Right, so hard capped 2-4 tribes in the game means that canāt happen
people could then tribe cap a server tho
And if it does, itās pretty clear third parting
idk if theres a way to be confident with that
Cap number of slots per tribe to no more than 40% or somethin
i think you could still circumvent the issue with a good number of players
like 80 players on server in 4 different tribes all working together
cpuld easily bring 32 online without getting caught no?
That won't work
Man u have no idea do u?
Enforcement is shit that it will still lead to major issues
I've played officials, whatever they try to enforce, doesn't work to stop it
Separate
Tribes
Will
Ally
And
3rd
Party
Just like on small tribes
And Enforcement is so shit, you could get away with it
Iv seen small tribes 6man vs fully capped server of multiple tribes fobbing at once
the main issue is on an active server youll have 4 tribes online that might look identical to 3p
at least at first
esp if they all sync up on activity
Having a tribe cap on a server will never work
End of the day, Enforcement is shit, no amount of anti cheat will help them 2 š
i mean i think a hard cooldown with enough parameters would still work
Iv seen ark devs spawn dinos illegally on officials
Iv seen Snail games corruption on conquest
it slows down how quickly someone can engage in war
Small tribe has a 24hr cool down for switching in new players
Does nothin
When u account share or ally
im referring to server cap tho
itd prevent someone capping a server in seconds
i also mean server log in cooldown so people dont all log on at once
What happens if it caps slowly and it's 50 vs 10?
youre supposed to be fucked then lol
i dont think itd be fair to people who want to play in a big tribe to completely handicap their ability to play on a server
plus i dont think thatd be possible entirely
and if they log in slowly you have a chance to prepare vs if they all log in when of those 10 people 8 are asleep and wont get on in 4 hours
Wwll that's just a bad game design to have 200 players in a discord capping a sever
Game of numbers very fun
i dont really think server cap should be that high
not unless map size is massive and they change so many other parts of the game like mobility and cryos
im just working with current 70 cap
The reality ofc is that standard ark officials will never have fair PvP š¤·āāļø. ASE aināt built for it
Why do we even got this tab? The game aināt even gonna come out till 2025š
More like 2030+
Sorry about being unclear. Clear third party means nothing, because itās not a crime on standard official
For PlayStation youāll have the advantage of knowing in advance whatās in ark 2
So , it will cost be 40$ to buy ark ASA and all the dlcs included. But how much will it be to pay for ASA, all the dlcs and ARK 2 preorders?
We don't know how much ARK-2 will be.
40$ first week for early access ASA whit old dlc's that will be release in different times not incluided the new one/s and ark 2 is better to consider TBA so no price for it
Okey
Ark 2 and 1.5 are not gonna survive snail games messed it up and so many players left and will not be back
1.5 definitely will survive. People overestimate how many people are affected by the Snail drama.
Ark 2 can't really comment on until we see it.
If ASE did fine with snail and all its problemsā¦
will have ark 2 official pve/pvp servers ?
Likely yes, but not confirmed
Is it possible for wildcard to refuse a voted creature ?
Sure, they make the rules
I can assure you >90% of players doesnāt even know about it. Also a lot of people that are aware wonāt care about it.
I canāt comment on ASA either. The fact we donāt have an screenshot so far doesnāt bode well to me.
I was really hyped for Ark 2, but since the second postponement I donāt even care that much anymore
Maybe when it releases my excitement will be back
Wildcard never release gameplay or ingame screenshots this early.
It's no different to how they handled ARK 1.
Extinction got screenshots pretty early, and all DLCs got teasers in the form of Mysterious Mysteries but I don't remember when those usually started showing up. Gen1 virtual experience was pretty awesome. Gameplay was never until the official trailer/shortly before release
the fact of almost no info about ark 2 than ASA whit delays already its pretty much confirm wc asent change and learn at all, more they openly admit its hard to learn UE 5 despite the makers saying they made it better and by far more simple to use it, then you have a snail own game coming up whit a demo that i play( dint notice it was own by snail) and after 15min i delete and never though about it again until today i recognize the game and show it was from snails (it explain a lot why delete the demo after 15min) and i ear that was a really big issue whit a big streamer recently on ark and seems that snail was involved so yeh aint looking good at all where this is going
Gonna need a Neddy vid to decipher that note š
sure fanboy š
Of?
Publisher =/= Developer
I have faith in WC as Devs because Ark1 is good. It certainly has flaws, but no game I have played keeps me coming back like Ark does
Not true. First Ark gameplay came like 1-2 months before the early-access was opened.
About dlcs, yeah, they donāt need to release a lot of videos screenshots prior to launch because itās the same game
But a new game made from the ground up, with no videos or screenshots at this point? I donāt know⦠doesnāt feel right
Nope, the first ever gameplay, which was the announcement trailer was on 11 May 2015, 3 weeks prior to June 2nd EA release.
A month then LOL
But I thought it was because it would be an early-access release from a tiny company
When they decided to release Atlas, they've announced it some months prior with a gameplay trailer
Anyways, It doesn't feel right to release it with little to no info at this point
We have a lot of info for ASA, but not much as to what it'll look like aside from a few assets. No clue what new UIs might look like, how the lighting will look on a natural environment, ect
But overall, the gameplay will be mostly the same as Ark1. Mechanics ... mostly the same as Ark1. Maps ... mostly the same as Ark1, but with new lighting and assets
Nope, they released the Atlas reveal trailer at The Game Awards on 7 December 2018, 2 weeks prior to EA release.
You keep saying Ark and Atlas was showcased 1 to 2 months early, but it was literally 2-3 weeks early. And if they do the same for ASA then it could very well be 2-3 weeks prior to release. Because they have always said it will be shortly before release.
True, they kinda keep changing offical posts so you never know until you see it
I think you're forgetting that ASA is still going to contain the same base gameplay experience that Ark1 has. Same progression of Thatch to Wood to Stone to Metal and Tek, same map progression of Maps (caves to bosses to Tek Cave and Ascensions, with a new one thrown in)
There will still be creatures and taming. Resource gathering and farming. None of that is going to change in any dramatic way
Think everyone is aware of this, that's not the pressing issue
It's remake/remaster of a previous game
So we are all looking forward on what plan there is to improve and change or add on existing stuff
We will have to keep waiting and see
'In Theory we have no info for ASA, just what they PLAN to put into the game, not what IS in the game, or will be, on launch.'
Evidently not
I just assumed that's what he meant if he elaborated more š¤·āāļø
Now, for the new stuff, sure. We don't know how that'll all look - and I've already mentioned that
Sorry, assumed you weren't since new stuff not being actually shown was already discussed and the quote was for the known Ark1 stuff being ported over
You do know how long a month is... right?




