#ark-2
1 messages · Page 116 of 1
A small indie title in 2015, like the vast majority of games made at that time, did not optimize performance
While not an excuse for WC’s new 2023-2024 products, I think it’s fair to say they did what they could with what they had in their early days. Given the budgets and timelines it’s a miracle they outlined so many systems that worked together to make the blueprint of a huge hit. My expectation is that with budgets, people, and time, ark 2 can be the realization of everything ark 1 worked to be
Hell, even Dying-Light 1 that was slightly more professional then Wildcard was at the time had a bug ridden game on launch
Oh, honest thoughts.
But do you think ASA will be delayed this CC?
Could be. I also don’t expect much in the way of finalized release dates until I see extremely concrete game footage and specific announcements ahead of imminent release
Oh defiantly.
Personally, I'm betting on, at most, end of September without Scorched.
I don't see a huge delay of months, since that'll bottleneck all of the other DLC's.
But I can also see with how much love they're putting into this, that they might wanna put Scorched on the backburner until they get basically 60% of the game done, then put all focus on indivisual DLC's.
I’m curious about how they balance polish and timeliness
Yeah, I really wanna see their work-schedule and how it goes.
We’ll never see that lol, we just see the end product
But I am very happy to see they’re prioritizing soft deadlines and polish. I just hope they keep that up
I believe Dollie stated in general that people at the office where stepping back due to mental stuff going on with the submarine.
So if I remembered that right, they're willing to allow their employees to step back for mental health, when other massive studios like Microsoft wouldn't allow that.
Dollie I believe has also stated they take mental health very seriously, so with that I don't think they crunch heavily.
All studios have crunches. But it’s good WC doesn’t use that to exploit people
However my concern was whiffing a release deadline AND having questionable polish (for example with Gen 2)
Oh defiantly, even the Survival-Stories had crunches.
But there's 'alright' crunches where it makes sense. Then there's ones that should violate some human-rights law.
Some lines of work have more or less of it. Auditing for example is hard 18 hour days for 3 months and breezy 6 hour ones for the off season
Didn't Bungie had 18-hour days for like a year for Halo-2?
However it works in the industry tho…you gotta manage your customer expectations and your ability to meet them
WC is doing way better at it. And I appreciate it
Yeah, Googled it.
Halo-2 had 18-hour workdays for 10-months straight.
That's a 'yikes'
I checked their hiring page, and yeah, it's big bucks.
I believe senior level-designers get paid like 60k a year over there.
Senior animators at Wildcard get around 120,000 - $135,000 a year.
Damn. That’s great money. Makes a man reconsider his career choices
Hehehe, defiantly 
when the wildcard wipe all the official servers guys?
End of August
Question prob repeated many times but i can’t find any pins - which maps we get when asa drops right away? The Island only ?
The island and SE as of now
Current plan is The-Island 'and' Scorched on launch. But with an update to the roadmap coming next week, I'm betting they're removing Scorched from day-one
I’m betting on a full delay into early 2024
Cool
I hope they will give required tools to the modders asap so they can start working on whatever they feel like
They've said something along those lines, forget where though
i hope they add new items in ASA
like upgrades for items like a better cooking pot that can be crafted in the smithy
generally more mid game stuff
What's going to happen to the servers of ark1 when ascended drops? Can we make our bases jnto a single player thing?
official servers will have a chance to download the save I think they've said
it's not touching unofficial servers
when are thry finnaly launch ark 2
Your guess is as good as ours
Official answer is 2024
Of course before that it was 2023 and then 2022 before that.
August 31st, unless the roadmap update this week changes that.
@worldly garden did they say there's an update this week?
A roadmap update in Friday's Community Crunch.
I just spotted it thanks
In CC they'll say they are no longer bringing down the original ASE servers and people who destroyed or abandoned their bases will be even more angry.
I suspect a significant delay in ASA, which will trigger an extension on server life for ASE.
But no ne maps or anything that requires developer time
i see videos said ark 2 is like conan exil gameplay 😮 is really or fake ?
yeah but is same not far
the vin dielsel cinematic videos
i hope is not bad hype
The only reason some people say it will be like Conan is because the way ARK 2 is described supposedly sounds similar to Conan. But we have no gameplay footage of any kind for ARK 2, so people could be completely wrong about it.
i hope you have reason
so gameplay like ark 1 it's finish ? what you mind about that
I suspect gameplay will be like ark 1 in some ways and not in others
It will NOT be a carbon copy of ark 1. That’s ASA. It looks like ark 2 combat revolves way more around melee (ark 1 is almost all ranged)
There is no gameplay of any kind yet. We won't see that for ARK 2 before next year. So no-one can accurately judge what the game will be like. Only based on what is written.
Ark 2 is only third person 
This was unironically the entire chat for almost a year
I know. I was there, reading it in third person. Took a while to get used to.
Wild times. I adjusted pretty quick to reading chat in third person, but I get change can be scary
"You guys get to read chat in third person?"
I had a friend read it to me so I could experience in 4th person
I think thats second personish
So Ark ASA getting delayed? 🧐
Wrong channel
Perhaps but i hope it wont
Update is coming this Friday
Hopefully just September, but find out soon.
I still have faith that it will release at the end of august
I would too if not for the fact they indicated 31st August, therefore not giving themselves any kind of window for a pushback in August. That's why I think the first half of September.
I mean yea. And it doesn’t make sense that they’re shutting down oficial servers just to delay Ark ASA. That’s why I’m thinking it will release on august.
I'm going with at most the end of September, without Scorched.
Well, who's to say they wont delay that also?
I suspect if there's a delay they'd extend the shutdown too, assuming it's not like a day delay or something.
Wildcard has to know that if Official goes offline for too long, then getting new official players will be hell for ASA.
Its already gonna be hell.. right?
I mean as in barely anyone on Official servers day-one.
At least if they shut down official hours before ASA's launch, it'll entice people to move to ASA faster.
But if it's days to weeks apart, people will start to move on.
Thats right
Unless they're going to drop official, and let ARK be a community ran game (I wouldn't mind that) then they have to keep the ball going.
I wouldn’t mind either
Personally, I think ARK would do better if they allowed the community to manage their own servers.
Smaller clusters, better admins.
It would definitely do better
I like the idea, but there are issues. One of the reasons I prefer official is that I know my character and progress will not suddenly go poof because the admin loses interest or does not want to pay server fees anymore
Or suddenly log in to find out someone wants to play with everything-is-a-dodo mod for a month…
Or I’ve been deleted because the admins brother wants my base spot
Etc etc
I hear from guys on official classics what admin soak their turrets and just fly away
I’d be surprised if that actually happened
The admins work for WC and have better things to do with their time
Probably
First, it's the same game but remastered, with Unreal Engine 5
Second, only The Island and Scorched Earth available at launch
I'm genuinely hoping for some fundamental mechanics reworks. Like the inventory. Dear lord the inventory
you guys are hoping too much, better be careful
Oh I have no expectations.
Actually that's a lie
I expect ASA to be worse than ase for a long time.
Ark has always been the game to hype you up then let you down at the worst low possible 🤣
Can't wait for ASA to be delayed only to still be a buggy mess that isn't worth 60 dollara
When Asa is out are they keepig ark up? or they gonna delete it
Only official servers will be taken down. Whether they will continue to sell it on Steam/Xbox/PS I don't know. Probably will though particularly for the old gen players.
Ah gotcha
offical servers my beloved
Unofficials, SP etc will all continue to work. But I’d be surprised if you saw any updates other than critical security flaws
Nah real, thats fine idk if id want to spend money on asa immedately. just needed to knownif my babygirl ark would stay up
Gotta wait till the bugs are mostly out
gonna be a good while then
ark still has tons of bugs, and it took some time before the biggest bugs went away, but some are still there
So your official goes away 8/31. However we are expecting a roadmap update Friday in the community crunch.
Classic is run by snail, not wc
It happens but it’s not common..legacy official Xbox servers a admin/mod gave tribes god rexs and gigas..the current servers on Xbox official a admin/mod spawned in a 296 prim tek rifle for a tribe and those got duped and spread around ..but like I said it’s not common
They probably change the date official ends depending how ASA release is going if on time still or not
I think my point still stands though, no?
Snail does things like that
And official currently isn't like that?
If that's also a worry for you. Just host your own server.
I also don’t want the responsibility of running it. Hence, official
It doesn't take that much to run one lol
took 8 years for officials to go down or at least thats the talk, whats the longest unofficial server timer run so far?
not to mention for each map a new server is need it
Part of this question imo hinges on “does ark 2 want to be an MMO”
For MMOs, a traditional mark of stability is a large official network. But if the MMO is toned down in favor of survival and RPG elements, restarting or playing unofficial would likely be the most common and effective form of play. Part of that will come from the time it takes to be “done” with the content and progression. If it’s endless or near endless like ark 1…officials have a logical niche (similar to the wipe discussion had earlier)
thats the thing whit sandbox games whitout any objectives, the player makes their objectives can be short can be long or can be endless but fall short and barely play
Ark PvE is a survival game first and a sandbox second imo. PvP arguably has remained a sandbox game first by virtue of not having a win condition
However, that’s not really the point being made here…which is that any sandbox can reasonably be wiped or have no officials under certain circumstances. But an MMO is treading on very dangerous turf if it relies exclusively on unofficial
i have to disagree whit this, either pve or pvp its the players decision on what to do whit the game aint nothing about surviving on ark, you can just survive by killing dodos and a fireplace to cook the meat thats it
The intro cutscene and boss kill cutscenes functionally define an objective that you can complete to “win” a story ark in PvE
but nothing tells you to do it
hell on the island if you dont go for those scrolls you dont even know about the tek cave
But there IS something that tells you
That’s my point. There’s a cutscene now when you first spawn on the island that tells you to fight bosses and ascend off the island
This is what imo PvP still has that makes it more of a sandbox. There’s no directive outside the PvE one, and once the PvE one is done, most folks are their own PvP objectives like they did before
ho really, bit way too late but...
Well, it's there now lol, and it will be for asa
God please let Wildcard add a tek-cave to Scorched. 🙏
Why not level up on scorched and just Xfer over for the Island bosses?

That doesn't solve the continuity error.
Scorched does need a tek cave imo
It really does.
I could care less if it's unique, or a copy and paste of The-Islands.
Just need a proper tek-cave ascension then 'kill giant cat and be done'
Though, I always imagined a flier-version of the tek-cave for Scorched.
Wouldn't work in ASE due to how janky the flying is. But if flier-controls are revamped in ASA, it could work.
They have the city thing there already, just need to make a gate in it
There is already a gate, and a canonical entrance to the tek-cave on Scorched.
But it's way to small to be friendly for anything like rex-sized.
The tek cave on Scorched is non-violent by all accounts, so it would just be a boring walk to a terminal that does exactly what the Manticore cutscene does... why would anyone want that lol
Honestly got more than we needed with the switch update already
Does every planetary ark control nexus have to be in a tek cave?
Perhaps different versions have diff forms?
Also the island tek cave is so damned buggy. Walk down on foot and you drop through the mesh
Never had that happen in my multiple runs
Also from what we currently know, yes.
All ARK's have a form have some bridge between the overworld of the ARK, to the control-room. Which is usally some form of cave.
Happened to two groups I was in. Not to me but others. We always rode down to be safe from then on
Yeah I ageee there is a bridge, but it could be up high or something. A tower
Any videos capturing this event from others?
I mean from other players, like Youtube videos.
There's bound to be videos of it if it was common.
In theory, it can be disgused as anything, as long as it's in theme with the ARK. (The-Island's tek-cave entrance was in the volcano, Scorched was in a colosseum, etc.)
That's happened to me as well, but it was quite a while ago as you said, so probably fixed (best to go down and back riding a tame to be safe anyways, though)
I did have another similar issue more recently though, about a year ago a snow owl I was riding got mesh destroyed while I was flying down to heal my gigas... sad times, as I lost my whole kit and the team I was guiding through had never run the cave before and were drunk and died at the Overseer fight lol
No idea if common. I’m just paranoid ow
Weird part was, I wasn't even like hugging the wall or anything, just hit a weird kill volume I guess
That’s a bummer. We now have spare players flying in tek suits and the ground team killing
This was post door and the history tunnel to be clear. On the way down we ride gigas to shred the trash
Wait, so you were in the arena? Or the bridge just beforehand?
Different games
Uhmm
ASA is a remake of Ark 1
Ascended is ark1 on ue 5
You got mesh killed in the tek cave riding a snow owl?
Probably but we don’t know
This coming cc on Friday should have a roadmap update
True, we might get more details on what game modes to expect then perhaps
Yes
All I really want is a release date update. Are you on track? Yes/no?
I imagine we won't get that, but there's always a chance
But knowing WC will probably be “gosh doing things is hard so 3 more months” 🙂
is ark 2 gonna have free private servers? (pls)
No official word, but probably a safe bet to say yes
thank god
Especially since Official is just a small part of the overall playerbase
i just dont like how you have to buy ark and then pay more just to play a private server with ur friends
That is most survival games
With Ark1 you can at least host a dedicated session, but that's pretty cpu intensive
Well, hopefully ASA has an option that fully removes tether for PC sessions.
i tried that but it doesnt work for me it only lets 1 person join the server at a time
sadly ^
Mmhm. Haven't hosted too much but the times that I did the Tether kept getting in the way even with crazy increased range. Cave loading is bleh
wait is there a good way to host in Ark1?
Without paying?
yea, like hosting
Kind of.
On pc you can host a non-dedicated server that can have up to (I believe) 5 players. But it has a tether distance.
You can increase it to a comical amount that it covers the whole map, so anyone can go anywhere. Only issue is, if the host goes into a cave/boss fight, everyone is forcefully teleported.
If it wasn't for that one issue, it'd be perfect.
alr idm everyone getting tp'd cause me and my friends usally just go together lol
Time also doesn't pass while you're not playing, so raising babies can be a pain without boosted rates
ah yeah i understnad that
Well, with the time thing that's why being able to control settings is key for a good single-player experience.
You can increase how fast babies are raised, and the percentage you give to babies when imprinted.
yeah
i just dont know how to make a server while making a non-dedicated server, as in my friends cant join the server its really confusing
Yes, hosting dedicated can be done quite easily, but it requires you to have a spare machine. I've hosted 10 maps, but that took two machines with 32GB RAM each. So long as you know how to port forward (and your isp allows it...) it is pretty easy and works well.
ah alr then, thanks for the info
Np. I learned by just Googling YouTube videos. Good luck!
About it, then i host game for my friend, he wasnt able to touch water like get in the cave. (The center)
😟
are there any set relaese dates?
Wildcard is saying it will be released in 2024 but I'm gessing it will be pushed another year or two.
Well if they have to split their time between ASA and working on that. I’m sure it will be pushed back, but it’s going to keep us busy like ark has over the passed 7-8 years. A shiny new toy while they finish phase 2
that really depends on how much more you have to do whit the same game and different graphics and maybe some changes but still you better be wake up this friday for the good news of ASA thats about to come
I think everyone would be happier if they just continued working on the original game, than adding a sequel and a remake-
Like remove bugs and glitches, add more bosses and events in the world- cause creatures are enough tbh.
asa pvp will be so bad. only 2 maps and so many people want to come back to ARK to play pvp. most people hate scorched earth cuz of annoying sandstorms and heat so everyone is gonna be fighting for ice cave and carno cave.
Cyberpunk did it- and it really brought the game back from the brink.
na i disagree. if they kept working on the original it wouldnt bring them further. ARK isnt suited for modern gaming setups. Low FPS even on high end pcs. so UE5 is definetly the right thing to do.
i just think they shouldve given ase owners a discount if thats possible
what you mean by low fps on high end pcs? cause pvp player build a shit ton of structures on purpose to lag so they wont be that much attack or is something else?
Ark1 is pretty poorly optimized, UE5 changed how assets can be rendered so theres hopefully much less strain than UE4
Tbh the single reason Ive had poor fps or lagged a lot is cause of multiple structures, or when Im spam dropping like a thousand entities.
And im playing on a laptop.
yet the poor fps ppl talk aint about the game itself but the ppl that create the lag for measuring 💄 or just really to create lag and sadly both applies to pve and pvp
i can speak for pve sadly kids that follow youtube baiters come to official servers and build castles only to after finish complain that official is very laggy and had to build another base that lags less but refusing to take down their "little" castles cause took to much trouble to make them
hmh na. i remember in ocean biom in gen 1 i had just about 24 fps with my 5700xt. ark is kinda old but the performance never got much better
Gen1 Ocean is a great example of poor optimization killing overall performance
i had 1050ti and had around 60 fps and was only dual core 🤣
only place that really said wc fuck up really bad was on gen 2 boss where i would drop to 50-60 fps whit a 3090 and 12 core cpu
The game is unoptimized, if you argue otherwise you're either hard of sight or some other thing is wrong with you lol
But that's what ASA is for, no need to go back and fix the first game's problems (which can't be fixed, btw) and make the remake, that'd be stupid and unnecessary and costly.
Now, a discount for previous Ark 1 owners I can kinda get behind, if and only if they were shutting down the ability to play Ark 1 online, which they aren't, so I don't really see the need for it in that case (besides, it's only 60 USD for the whole game + all current DLC, if you can't afford that then maybe don't have such an expensive hobby?)
Gotta also remember that ASA was likely in direct response to a ton of people asking for ark 2 to be a repeat of ark 1
Hard to forget when someone reminds us every other day 😂
It'd be sick if they just made them huge, no explanation, and gave them spikes like everything else
at this point be happy to have saladmander for a shoulder pet
That would be cute ngl

I can't stop saying "Huge. Spikey. OTTERS!" but like the one guy in Spongebob who says big meaty claws
(You know the one)
PLANT LIZARD??
SALADMANDER!?
Oh no
LIZARD
SALADMANDER

I'm gonna be pissed if that thing is just an enviromental animal, and not tamable.
ME TOO
Saladmander better get it's fair shake on the orc planet
I'd love saladmander to be the creature id 😂
We've seen worse, like lionfishlion_BP lmao
That is adorable WHAT
That's the id for the Shadowmane lol
3.141592654
I want pie now, for some reason
I'd hope so
Would be neat
I want that one youtube channel to do a big war with different types of Aratai 
Rex_fluffiest_character_bp_c
Cantex?
Possibly, I don't really remember
There's others but cantex is the one I know off the top of my head
Various levels of fluff on the rexes would be a funny sight, probably hell to code for sharing spawn zones though I'd think
Babies need to be the fluffiest
Oh for sure
Fluffy saladmander like some plants
It just has like a head of lettuce around it's neck like a lion's mane 😂
YES
Fluffiest Rex is just that overfloof'd Yuty from back in Ark1 early access 😂

Seems kinda easy tbh. The hard part (and by hard I mean ooof) would be the modeling and artistic work to make so many variants look and move well
It’s probably stupid easy to just say “rex pulls from model A X% and model B Y%”
But making models A and B might be pure pain lol. It takes a lot to make a new compelling set of creature visuals, especially if it goes above and beyond ark 1’s color palette approach
I just moreso meant it would be really similar names for the game to pull from and may cause issues (like half the things in Ark 1 being named mega-something, which is annoying to sift through even from the player end of things for stuff like spawn codes and fridge searches etc.)
i got a idea for a dino for ab in asa i think a dino that we can tame that make Nameless Venom the same venom for the Rock Drake or a dino that make different
kinds of venom
I would make it so it has a better chance to get nameless venom when harvesting the nameless
Oh I assumed they’d have the same name. I suppose you could do the whole “X” thing again, but it wasn’t impossible to manage in ark 1
Being able to whistle a Dino to “pick up player/Dino” something without riding it.
And another whistle to “drop held Dino/player”
is a idea for any one ho wants it
The smart megalo ai comes to mind
Yeah, just irritating in more ways than one I guess
I do think a creature well suited for gathering nameless venom is certainly a niche yet to be filled, so that's got my approval, as does AI tamed dinos picking up with and without player input
It feels a bit too niche to just be helpful for gathering nameless venom, but maybe some sort of material sniffer or something that grabs leech blood, venom and a few other spoilable resources better
Oh of course, no more one trick pony dinos lol
lol
like the idea
the dino can keep the venom for longer then it dos now
Also wouldn't mind your opinion on temporary tames, I think I mentioned it somewhere else but I think we should have 0 in Ark 2 because they are gatekept by the higher up tribes and are usually really bad for the game health imo @blissful perch
Temporary like titans or temporary like liopluridon? Imo two very different questions
Temporary tames, period
Titans and lio spawns both are able to be held by one tribe for the whole limit of the map they're on
As in, you can tame them repeatedly and stay the only tribe holding them if you get to them first
And if you leave them on they map they spawned in, it takes up the slot
Titans aren't gatekept
Imo they’re not the same. One is kind of a “map buff” tame and the other is a story progression (PvE) or massive temporary siege weapon (PvP)
One helps you get better loot with which to raid than other people can feasibly get, the other just straight helps you raid easier by a ridiculous amount, they're effectively the same in PvP
Both are useless tbh
I can’t support this because I despite mutation stacking as a premise
Would be cool, but hard to do
Mutation stacking is probably going to be a thing whether you like it or not lol
Which is the point of the convo here, if PvE were the point, it'd be useless to tame them in the first place for the most part (aside from maybe the lio, but again, there's little to no challenge in most PvE with just the base loot quality anyways if Ark 1 is anything to go off of)
They do fill different niches tho. The lio niche imo is better served by world events that offer changes to get rare resources or rewards for people who search for and take part in them. Similar to stumbling upon this rare creature and making use of it once tamed
For titans? I find them a developmental error. Cool mechanic for sure to keep in missions or other confined areas of gameplay, but they got silly in the open world context of ark 1…if you weren’t fighting people to get a chance to use them
I can't see this happening, as it would be far too much to put into a mechanic that I hope isn't in the game to begin with
Ark is designed as a longterm permanent world multi-player game. Mutation stacking or something similar is going to be a thing
If they can make Dino’s grow from eggs and slowly develop in size until adult,
They can make features slowly develop by % on a mutation. They would just need 10 features for like every Dino that could grow and visually mix together. *wishful cosmetics
That’s…not hilariously wrong, but not really true either Raq
The likelihood of it is extremely high
I thought it was a survival sandbox game... silly me
Are the official servers going to be crossplat form?
That's the word thus far, yes
Given how often it’s cited that the game’s content is breezed through…I thought it was obvious how much design went into the survival experience rather than the persistent multiplayer MMO experience
Unless you mean like Steam/Xbox/PS, in which case no, it's as it is with Ark 1
In ASA stacking is a certainty. But for ark 2 it would be a grave error to use such a sloppy system for pretty much any reason
(Even if for reasons that elude me and my understanding of ark 2 based on known information about a focus on primitive survival a “persistent MMO” is in fact the secret primary goal for ark 2)
Imo it would be a grave error to remove the system entirely. Altering it is necessary to fix the bugs in it and to make it more enjoyable, but it needs to be a thing
The cool part is that it doesn’t. ASA exists for people who need it to have fun
Pokémon exists for people that don't want it
It’s the single greatest threat to PvE balance, and it’s a really bizarre if not downright lazy way to gain PvP retention
Pokémon breeding is far superior to ark lol
And I agree pokemon and other RPGs should be where breeders should go. Keep people interested in survival in the ark series
The threat to pve balance is a bug in the code
It also exists for the crying people that don't like change
The threat to PvE balance is that the minute you breed out a creature, you can steamroll the AI
Just with imprint
I’m very supportive of ASA, despite me not being a personal big fan
That ain't a bug lol
It’s likely a huge boon to WC, so they can better cut ties to the shackles of ark 1 design without flipping off the entire dedicated base who may not want what ark 2 has to offer
Going above 20/20 IS a bug. However I dislike the entire system intrinsically and…also we’re all talking about stacking way above 20 anyway
Yeah, but refer to my above statement
This one
That’s true, but I’m a little nervous to wack basic breeding and imprinting
Even I have limits 😅
Imprinting needs to be toned down for sure, as does point gain per player invested point, you agreed on this in the past iirc
Little Timmy spent 8 hours glued to his virtual Dino, little Timmy's Dino now has 30% more dmg and dmg resistance than the exact same Dino in the wild
Basic breeding is intrinsic to the game, but not basic breeding leading to steamrolling the AI immediately after
I have already talked about fixes to that
Ah yes that’s true. But I do still think the imprint system at minimum should remain
That’s why I said cosmetic mutations per type instead of actual stat increases. You’d be breeding for looks not steamrolling the game.
I did argue for removing stat leveling on players and tames before so I can’t lie to you and say it’s not on my mind
The fixes are obvious. Don't make bred dinos so much better, reduce saddle armor, and make boss fights more interactive
You mean a 100% pivot from stats to appearances?
#bobs-with-probs or a recruitments channel
On the other end, I also don't like things being nerfed just because you tame them, like the wild giga vs tamed giga stats, probably one of the only creatures I can think of where you can't immediately turn around and kill a creature you just tamed one of
In that case I apologize for the misread. I’m not against it, but I do want to ensure mutations don’t alter the actual model of a creature…since I want model changes to represent real variants of creatures. But color mutations getting crazy imo is the best way to support mutations
It didn't come off via text that way, sounded more correlated and not replacing to me, apologies
It’s alright it was a lot to write, misleading
In that case, 100% for it, but again not something I see them doing as it's a lot of work for very little function
You would be surprised by how much people ignore the obvious
Idk I think it would be funny to max stack hunger mutation and have a fat ass Dino
All true. But getting to those outcomes takes thinking 🤷♂️. Which is what we’re doing
True, it would certainly have appeal in some circles of the playerbase in that regard 😂
Maxed food = -90% speed forever
And have done in the past, when we talked about this very same thing like 4 different times lol
The primary vacuum in design left by breeding is “what do end game ark players do with themselves long term” rather than anything else. The stats are the cherry on top that wound up screwing the entire game’s balance up lol
Yeah last time I buy a 35k loot crate form missions.
I got better from the normal loot drops
I drew the short end of the stick on those points for sure.
But that is a good question, cause do you give the ability for people and Dino’s to become god like?
Do you give people more cosmetics to collect and gather or breed for.
Missions to keep them busy, regardless everyone has a different preference and not everyone’s going to be happy.
Agree that this is a hard question to answer, and many people are split on it
Tamed dinos should be weaker, by far. But it's mainly the per stat level increment thst is the issue
They stated as much too, that some players aren't going to like 2, and that's ok
That and how saddles work
I hate the ability to become god like, as it ruins the survival aspect of the game I’m playing.
I’m always a fan of having endgame loot be about cosmetics or experiences or trophies rather than about raw stats that let you power trip
But some people love power tripping. It’s going to be a divisive issue
I mean…to a degree yes it’s the worst offender for sure. But having 5x higher base stats than the wild counterpart is also extremely dumb. Even 2x is dumb. And that can happen with 0 player levels or imprints
Even if I’m level 100 I want to still jump and run from a rex and not just tank it and not care.
That's why I hope the skill based combat means more than we currently know, and levels/stats are less effective at keeping you alive than pure skill is
Levels should be stuck unlocking engrams and better armor and better buildings and tools
I want the feeling of taking a raptor to a rex and killing it with my dodging like I'm naked running a dark souls boss
But not for stats
The issue there then is that dinos go from level 5 to level 150..., not the mutations
Levels are also an issue, yes
Yesss. Levels and progression should be about unlocking more stuff to explore and try out, and less about our scaling everything. Through there’s always a little of it in a survival game lol
Also an issue I cited. A raptor and a rex shouldn’t be evenly matched because one is 150 and one is 5
Not nearly as much as breeding though, which allows for the stats to be combined as such and get so ridiculous in the first place
A wild raptor should nearly always get smoked by a wild rex. Stat variation should support this
Just looking at the math, it's the level system that is the main issue, not mutations.
Simple as that
For balance in pve
It’s like asking if the root is worse than the tree. Without the mutations, player levels are a mild issue
A max leveled fresh tame is far weaker than a capped tame with no player levels
Maybe remove dinosaur levels as well.
Not against it, but those levels could also be tethered to skills in a skill tree or something that isn’t raw stats
And the difference between a 20 stack and a max level tame?
It's 2x. Not nearly as big an issue as the 10x that comes from player added levels
Let me rephrase. In an exponential relationship, do you blame the X value or the squared term? I’d blame both personally
That “10X” is a product of mutations AND levels. You know that
The effect of levels scaling with mutations means more mutations -> more broken player levels
Mutations for adding perks or visual changes is the direction I think it should go.
I am already against having a level system for dinos in the first okace
A raptor should be a raptor.
Yea have a skill tree for progression as you build a relationship and buy perks, but nothing overpowering and game breaking.
Skills should imo be all about lateral progression
If you want something bigger and stronger get a bigger and stronger Dino
It’s about “more tools” and less about “these tools are better, ditch your old ones”
The perks from mutations shouldn't necessarily be stat buffs, but they should be there
Something like adding climbing as an ability via a perk, which gives the visual model bigger claws/different claws would be nice for sure
Or a perk that changes the tail on the anky to be better at getting different resources perhaps
So there's less redundant tames in the game too
I’m also real suspicious of mutations being the driver for these skill points. I’d KILL for a species level “knowledge” system instead that’s tied to your character
“You’ve leveled up knowledge of certain dino by 5 points” now all Dino’s of that breed will be affected.
Perhaps have some level of variation in what you tame (IE maybe new tames have a unique and random set of starter skills), but ultimately your goal is to get better with “raptors” so that future raptors you tame retain that progress you earned while using your first raptor
Something like that yea
By using taming breeding hunting with traveling with you level up a knowledge base of that dino
So 100% down for that, your character actually learning about the dino and how to handle it
It would pair well with a dossier expansion
How would that work in a tribe scenario. And how does it add persistence?
Have tribe perks that everyone works towards increasing
Instead of just "oh I know the saddle now, I now know exactly what this does and can do all of the things on command"
🤷♂️ could be either way. You could scale the requirement to the number of people in the tribe, or have tribe and personal “proficiencies” that can be additive
Like leveling up your tribe level
There’s a LOT of persistence to add to a global RPG progression mechanic for every species in the game lol
That would keep you going
And having to tame and learn about them all “gotta catch them all”
Omg I’d love it
And just small perks.. “increase taming speed of raptors by 10%” type perk
I still think that idea a while back of us filling out the dossier as we reach certain benchmarks with a species was fucking spectacular
Ideally taming is kinda quick for most creatures
The difficulty lies in the execution rather than waiting around to tame it
I can see this, like you become well known in the raptor community because you're there taming/hunting/raising them all the time lmao I love it
Could have those type of perks be called like "Alpha ___ Tamer" or something
Damnit, now I want a taming skill tree again
A GIANT dino book and skills trees
Scaling by number of people in a tribe would be a bad Idea lol
Have a generic skill tree for survivors.
And you pick where you go to what you tame and increase
Weapons/taming/crafting.
With limited points by max level.
So to have max in everything you would need friends that are skilled in other trees
That scales great for sp, I don't see how it will scale for multi-player
In theory it could just be linked to each character, like normal exp
Although I’d like to see a tribal component added, it’s not required by any means. There’s plenty of reason in fact to NOT add RPG elements to tribes, since engrams tried that and had to be walked back
I gathered that... What I don't gather is exactly what you are proposing
A fairly standard survival game practice of improving a skill/knowledge type through use
Rather than general “exp” which is often farmed through the most effective means rather than through practice of the specific skill being leveled
How does it relate to dinos, and what does it have to do mutations
It replaces mutations
...
It relates to Dinos because it can be a method for getting “knowledge” about a species through interaction with it
Which can then be invested into skill points or other bonuses for that species
It takes common ground to have a conversation, I literally have no clue what you are proposing, and your explanations are literally the most generic statements in the chat lol
@tropic crag was there severe ambiguity in my proposal?
Alright, I am done with this conversation
It made sense to me - interact with a species -> get some form of specific experience point -> gain “species levels” -> spend on “species specific skills”
It's like gaining mining XP in RuneScape for, well, mining lmao
Not that hard to understand... or so I thought
It made sense to me from other RPGs lol so it was worth checking
That sounds like a vague idea, and I still don't k ow how it relates to mutations or multi-player
To unlock species specific engrams
Saddles/armor/skills
It relates to mutations because it entirely replaces both functions it served: it 1) adds longevity and 2) adds incremental progression metrics that are tied to the creatures in the game (that aren’t just raw stats)
I’d love to see those weaved into the system too for sure
It adds the longevity of leveling. But that's already a thing
I don't see how it replaces mutations. I see how it replaces the leveling and engram system
I’m creating a design hole by removing mutations in my “theorized ark 2”. This new system fills that hole
It links all progress to the character, and ark is notorious for losing characters
I just see it worth it, you have to build a relationship and knowledge of a creature before you can unlock a perk to purchase a saddle for such.
And instead of stats, add the ability to reinforce a saddle or make leg armor or head armor for it.
By that logic linking progress to tames that can be shot through the mesh, lost in transfer, or killed through extremely questionably buggy means is equally stupid
The better acquainted you are with a species the better the perks.
The inherent assumption is that characters work
These sound like incredibly complex mechanics to code and store
I mean…other games already do this
It’s extremely common in RPGs to have this sort of thing
Not going to lie, this sounds like a system I have already talked about before, but it doesn't fill the niche of mutations
I can assure you it’s not been discussed here before. I’m happy to be proven wrong by a quote from an earlier chat, but I only recall your suggestion of moving mutations to unlocking skills instead of stats
It is a replacement of leveling for engrams in exchange for a more interactive leveling approach. It still doesn't replace mutations. It replaces player leveling
The species knowledge would unlock both saddles and the like AND skills for the creatures themselves
It would entirely replace mutations and act to replace the engrams/leveling as they pertained to creatures (which fixes the huge pain in the butt engram sink that saddles act as in ark 1)
And all of this is linked to a character.
Yes
And owning a cave was gatekeeping? Lmao
What in the world...
That seems like a terrible idea for ark not going to lie
Because it's linked to the character, and not the dino itself? Is that correct? Also very strange to bring up gatekeeping in something tied to the character that is intrinsic to the player and their efforts, as opposed to something like a base spot which players have little to no (if any) permanent control over
I’m just not sure I grasp the gatekeeping thing either. You’re gonna need to elaborate
Like we say in DayZ, you don't own that AKM you found, it's just your turn with it, same with Ark base spots imo
People trap others characters. And for a late game fight this would be even worse for a new player than mutation stacking would be
Fights between players would boil down to who spent the most time with their dinos.
I could see it working in pve or sp, but this isn't a pve only game
…uh what?
What do you want me to clarify lol
I get it
How is this different from mutations, which are also people who spent tons of time with dinos
How does this result in the loss of a character linked progression system
Because currently cryos exist and you can steal dinos. Or you can trade lines.
Imo remove everything past riot gear. I don’t think the game needs anything tek related.
...You can't steal a character under the confines of what WC set as the rules of the game, unless you break those rules and hack tho
No tek tier in ark 2 agrees
You can cage them indefinitely though
Or their character gets deleted during a server restart, or any number of things
That happened to me on official servers constantly
it'll come to later end game of ark 2 i bet lol
I pray not. So far so good given the talk of ark 1 style tek not being really meant for player use ever again
Tek gear makes players godlike in game. Being able to just fly away or super punch or use a rail gun.
I enjoyed the game before tek, and wouldn’t miss it if it disappeared.
Having something like that I would see as a great addition to a modified mutation system, not as a replacement
IMHO it’s the super Dino’s that actually make you more powerful
I think an armor branch in a generic skill tree. Letting you level up +5%/10%/15% durability to your armor.
And another little branch adding +5/10/15% armor rating to you armor
Would be enough
Armor YOUR character wears receive this bonus. Not the armor itself.
Ark2 already has different types of armors
Based on a component type crafting that gives perks or something from the components
Nice.
I’m saying like a character tied perks towards a generic survivor tree.
Like we would level up a species skill tree to improve a species.
But that species is human! Hell ye
I don't have an issue with that idea. Only the concept that it replaces mutations lol
Not armor itself but perks tied to your survivor depending how you spend your points to improve armor/weapons/crafting
Basically a redo of the crafting skill mechanic
Yea
Instead of crafting skill and crafting tree where you choose what you are good in crafting
When did he say it replaces mutations? It's armor related, quite obviously...
Oh. I did say it replaced mutations
I would say more like Skyrim , you improve the perks to improve your armor rating or armor when wearing a certain type of armor
I said that species knowledge would lead to creature skill points (in addition to armor and saddles) that could replace mutations
Read the rest of the chat. It was obvious
No, the armor thing Viking just suggested
AH. Yea that’s his thing, I haven’t said anything on it lol
That's not even what I was referring to in any case lol
To many conversations at the same time. Lol
I wouldn’t replace mutation but like I said earlier id remove the stat points and just make it cosmetic, or have a limit to 20 mutations and every 5 mutations in a given category gives you a perk. Like added bleed effect, defense rating, water breathing etc. depending where you mutated.
I think mutations should be perk based, like entirely perk based
I’m very down for the cosmetic only mutations approach. Pretty colors are pretty. Would be cool to even have some colors be more rare than others to add trophy hunting
I agree
Cosmetic only mutations are worthless
Not completely perk based but remove stat and add perks
There is no point in doing them
To you maybe. Ark isn’t always about you though. I’ve had to concede that
Perk/cosmetic
Yeah, something along that line
Please explain to me the value of a cosmetic only mutation?
Do I need to explain the value of a wooden castle?
That literally removes the longevity of breeding
Or people who sell color variations on the market?
Some people just like stuff that looks different. Simple as
I mean let’s say cosmetically your Dino grows spikes over stacking ATK mutations,
At 5 ATK mutations add Bleed to attacks
At 10 ATK mutations add reflect damage from these spikes that are growing cosmetically.
Etc idk just throwing it out there
Yes, so we should remove the gameplay of having mutations in favor of colors. Sounds great
Yeah, I think this is a better approach than the color variation approach
How, if it takes the same amount of time to get a cool purple that it does to get max mutations? Just because it doesn't make your dino hit harder?
You get that most people don't breed for specific colors right?
People breed for god complex
And Ark 2 won't be for everyone, hence ASA
I'm gonna ask a real simple question here. Do you think that ANY longevity concept that replaces mutations is inferior?
You understand that I'd imagine
Here is to hoping it is for me then, and not for you lol
If it is not Dino related then probably yes
Well that's the rub, who is it going to be for? The signs thus far point to not Ark 1 fans lol
If it's not BREEDING related? or not dino related?
With the changes stated as being the combat and camera. Not the breeding
If it’s non of those what we mutating
I've suggested numerous ways that dinos and players can experience variation and longevity over the years. But none of them involve repeated breeding. All seem to be "inferioir" to the existing system
Is that understanding correct?
The most recent one didn't replace it. It replaced leveling
In your head alone it didn't replace it
Your other source of opinion on the matter was bruising....
your source was...your previous statements. I can rely on my own for a similar level of support. Regardless, I outlined the systematic progression of creatures through this system, and how that would replace mutation's design niche (which is a systematic progression system for creatures)
And now he's going to resort to insults, very good
I seriously don't understand why you are so dead set against breeding being useful lol
I'm out, gonna eat dindin
I've only stated my reasoning for what? 3 years now?
And yet every idea I have presented that fixes your concerns you toss aside, because you just don't like breeding lol
I enjoy breeding my Dino’s, as it’s a cool aspect, and breeding should have some sort of perk. Just not a game breaking one.
if they addressed or even began to acknolwedge my concerns, I wouldn't be tossing them. But they all boil down to 1) the afk sim 2) the power creep or 3) the mechanically empty gameplay being front and center again
And yet everyone else seems to like the idea.
Throw bruising in with his clown emojis and "you're an absurdist" statements and that about sums it up.
I think it's time we take a break and go breed irl
And what perks do we get from that? Not like gestation period is a couple days and the kid will be an adult and out the house in a couple more. Jkjkjk
Kid may get a stat mutation, get enough of those and you break society.
And they can take care of me when I’m old
That's if you aren't wiped before then.
Agreed.
I think a perk based breeding system is a great concept, and it's one I hope to see in ark2
I think a species based progression system that encourages interaction with different creatures in the world is a great concept to replace mutations, and it's one I hope to see in ark 2
Even if it’s another damn skill tree…
Under Breeding
+5% melee damage to bred Dino’s. Etc
With like 50 available perks but only like 25 stat points available to use in the tree so you pick how you breed “all Dino’s” in general.
And have species specific perks through knowledge system +5% dmg to bred raptors. Etc.
Idk there could be 100 ideas
the actual perks or skills have a myriad of possibilities
And it’s gives 100% customization to your play style and Dino’s you like
Works better in tribes I would assume, tribes would want to have different survivors increased in perks in different categories for boss fights or pvp or building.
there's a lot of options that can very quickly get lost in the weeds
I'd argue most skills should be abilities or castable rather than passive stats tho
Sure, but it's not a replacement
A good mixture of skills/perks/passives would be perfect. I just didn’t want to think to hard
agree. Imo we don't know enough about ark 2 to get in the weeds
They have a long time before launch, anything is possible
Who knows what will be added or changed, or scrapped
well I'm sure for every 1 thing we see a dozen or more are being tried, added, and scrapped
I would imagine they have a pretty fleshed out idea of what they want, and not much time to change a lot
at the zoomed out level yes
Yeah they probably have a goal or stream lined idea of what the y want for an end result
I suspect most of the micro is in heavy flux
What we are discussing is the zoomed out level for the most part
And this is just what we would like to see
We might actually like whatever they end result at
And if I don’t like ark 2 I’m sure I’ll still be happy with ASA
Ark2 gonna have official servers?
Its a secret
wym? I cant know?
you specifically? no
Will the game be free for atleast a week after its released?
No?
Why would you think this?
Very likely, but no official confirmation yet
a game being free during launch week is a good way to make next to no money on said game
Though perhaps It'll be on Gamepass during launch?
it was said to be a day 1 gamepass launch
''ARK 2 will launch in 2023, simultaneously on Steam Early Access and as a console launch exclusive for Xbox Series X|S and with Xbox and PC Game Pass on Game Preview.''
Last I checked, gamepass is a subscription service
Do you think they'll make ceratopsians not ass in Ark 2
they said something about the trike being much better in Ark 2 on twitter
but KBD at least made it mid-late tier
it should be much bigger and be able to stand to rexes
KBD increases its size and stats by 50%
Needs a better model too
i think the model is fine
i dont like how they keep making ceratopsians elephants with trike skulls
the feet are not supposed to look like that lol
they look pretty much like most modern mockups that I see
the big difference is the ark trike has more of a styracosaurus-like frill, with the added spikes
Feet, uh ... aren't usually the things I look at when it comes to creatures - but the world takes all kinds I guess
Whatever floats your Shinehorn
No one was thinking this except you
There's a reason they allow you to go prone on your stomach in ark
Im talking about paleoaccuracy, which i dont really expect in ARK tbf, but you're just being vile
me thinks you protest too much.
what
You're the one who brought it up 😂
I'm talking about the creature design, you put it in a disgusting direction man
we're not the one who stares at dino feet all day
this is why people don't like discord
well, it's said in the notes and such that the animals we see in Ark aren't actually the exact species we're familiar with
the Arks took some liberties with each species
Yeah thats why I don't expect it to be accurate
But I do think that if they use that as an excuse to make creatures look different, the designs should be inspired and not boring
atleast give them a pedicure right?
most of the designs look good to me
I hope this brings you more joy than the lord provides to your sorry life
Whew boy, someone took things way too seriously 😂
Personally, with the exception of some low quality models in some of the earlier creatures, I don't really have an issue with any specific design choices
Those are some that could really use tlc
and the megalosaurus could have used a few more revisions. the muttonchops kinda look silly
You're saying foot fetish jokes provide more joy then the almighty?
I think trikes fit that category, and pachys too
apparently so you wont give over about it
The lord speaks through me
Might wanna get those voices checked out 👍
I'm just asking you to be respectful bro
accusing people of that is jsut weird
every ark player is a schizo
Some people call it schizophrenia. Others call it a divine gift.
others call it mental ilness
Trike is passable for me, only issue I have is its cracked out shifty eyes. Poor guys always look super on edge
This is what I get for seeking a civil discussion about dinosaurs designs
Hopefully the shift to UE5 gives us better models all round
They have a chance to update models. But that might be a fair bit of work for them in the short amount of time they've given themselves
yeah i don't see much wrong with trike design
the frill is exaggerated but it looks nice still
I think the giga model needs a lot of work. It looks like a giant potato.
i just wish it was bigger. they're supposed to be near elephant size
Reasonably believable is good enough for me for the most part. I can look at it and say, 'Yep. That there's a Trike'
suffers from the same design choices as the JP/JW trike imo
i like the giga's walk cycle
maybe if its not your favourite dino..
it's very bird-like in the head bob
That thing is awful, might need visual tlc the most out of any creature
Plesiosaur, Mosasaur, and Phiomia say hello
Phiomia is cute
phio has been nothing more but a source for meat and hide for me
but the devs never expected anyone to actually go that deep in the water to see those awful models
mosa isn't terrible
Definitely true for the Island 😂
plesi is bad
Mosa is so bland and chonky
plesi looks like they had a first draft and never bothered going farther
Also has like no color zone variation
Mosas are all either all white, or all black - there's no inbetween
ark devs forgot the plesi existed lol
basil and mosa both got dlc variants later
plesi never got touched
they should have made it so the best stuff was deep under the water and rare. Would actually give a reason to go down there.
black pearls
And yes, the island under water is terrible. They didn't bother finishing it and it shows
It used to be - only place for black pearls and oil
at least on the island they're much easier to find down deep
But updates and feature creep happened
oil you could get from beetles
was the oil rocks in the arctic biome a thing at launch on island?
Not any reasonable amount
I didn't play right at launch
Snow was first I believe. Volcano was there, but it was just a dormant crater full of metal and obsidian. No lava or cave
that sounds like early access build
Real OGs remember Bronto Valley 👍
anyways, point still stands, there is very little reason to go under water, and I saw a poll, can't seem to find it, but most players never go into the water on their play through.
the island ocean needs both more and less
more features, and much, much, much less huge rock spikes sticking out that just get in the way
Just for the Island, yeah there not much point besides Artifact caves - both of which can be done pretty easily without a dedicated tame
But bigger ocean maps like the Center, Rag, Crystal Isles, and Gen1 it's worth getting your feet wet with places to explore
especially on the center, i love just how deep down it gets
What is the word with Center and ASA?
should come out at some point
None yet. I hope it gets a tune up or a creature to call its own, but the devs skipped right to Rag
center is still favorite map
Underrated for sure
We should campaign for a water creature on center
it would fit the deep oceans it has
some more fish diversity would be nice
or something more between ichthy and megs
would be interesting to see ichthys of various sizes. there were some species that got bigger than mosas
Beeg fish
there's also the now extinct whales. The leviathan. Carnivorous whales.
With water tames, there's already a lot of overlap and not much room for filling a niche.
Ichys and Mantas fill the quick travel mount role
Megalodon, Baryonyx, Sarco, Plesio fill the mid size brawler
Beaver, Dunky, and Angler fill the harvester role (but underwater resources are bleh. If you're seriously harvesting metal with a Dunk then you're doing several things very wrong)
Basilos, Mosa, and Tusos make the apex
We even have 'pretty cool when wild, but loses all relevance when tamed for whatever reason' Electrophorus!
how about one that can burrow under the surface so we can create a stash in the water that can't be found by a parasaur?
you can build a small base on a plesi or mosa
ya but hidden, like a reaper
Risky. They wiggle so much, players just phase through any walls you have
burrow under the ground
ya
Plus agro radius of wild creatures in water is 5 miles, so you need a dedicated pen/base anyway to keep them safe
Giant Moray could be cool, and fit the bill for burrowing stash
I also just really want a rideable Eel
Could double as organic defense. Maybe lash out and cause a bleed, and retreat into its burrow if hurt so they won't die from a Piranha that got lost
This man will have fert while all we have is raw meat and hide
Huge brain plays
Keratin, Chitin, and Pelt too - but no match for the Fert gang
damn no love for the poor sarco
Sarco is included 🤔
server is now marked as nsfw
everyone abandon hope... it will only get worse from here
How so?
it came to me in a dream
Okay, so bullshit.
the subconcious is the most valued source of information
Some would argue YouTube is
the brain is infinitely times better once you unlock its full potential
Why unlock your own when you can pull from millions of others?
Much more efficient.
because you cannot fully dictate their thoughts
Million of brain > just one brain
Every how-to YT video is an engram, change my mind
Can you?
after rigorous training my brain has evolved to imagine endless scenarios, what can happen, what will happen, and the outcomes of it all. I know everything. I know how it all plays out. I can never lose if I always know how to lose, meaning I know how to win. no living creature can fathom the complexity of my brain
And I can tell it not to think about Elephants - but what do you imagine in that almighty brain of yours?
Elephants
xD
I am beyond elephants
you baseless tricks don't work on me
I even developed a vaccine for the grimace pandemic
He said elephants.
He processed the word.
We got him boys.
Doesn't matter, still Elephant'd
It was @minor frigate 's fault. Started talking about feet.
Tf outta my mentions
when this comin out
Ark2 end of 2024

Lol, the subconscious is what makes you dream, and most dreams are nonsense. I would say the subconscious has little information of value.
Unless you are a neuroscientist
Yeah, but as a source of information it's not worth anything
Unless you are studying it
Your subconscious is literally where everything you hear, smell, see, touch, taste is stored, most of which isn't important in your day to day. It's full of information and is retrieved by your conscious mind. That's why under hypnosis stuff can be retrieved that you have had difficulty remembering.
And.... we don't fully understand the brain so to say such a broad statement as "it's not worth anything" is well... stupid.
Only the dream of it being released one day
only crushed ones
is that a casteroides
I hope this game releases before Star Citizen
Star Citizen is never releasing as it's a scam, so I think that's a pretty safe bet to call
there are many of this non sense but it is greatest scam i know in gaming industry
When is ark 2 coming out
End of 2024
maybe
Ark2 is so incomplete at this point, that the correct answer is always this year + 1
Star Citizen is the new no mans sky hypetrain
New? Star Citizen was announced (and monetized excessively predatorily) long before No Man's Sky was even in development
Not really, just the yearly new round of suckers they always get that hype up the game to others, it happens every year around this same time
It's just an endless cycle of players hyping up others to buy the game so they don't feel like they wasted their money to make the game feel more alive
But this is way off topic and Ark 2 won't be anything like SC, so...
Yeah, I am pretty sure ark2 will release at some point
Star Citizen is a new religion. 2000 years from now people will be talking about the coming of Star Citizen as the prophecy foretold!
Nah, it's all about the Far God and Raxxla my guy
Amboutablow
nope it will change the order, ark 2 comes first than ASA
We HOPE there ll be early access 🙂
I’m gonna be a little disappointed if a rework has EA…..
You already made the game once.
Early Access is just paying to be a beta tester for a bug ridden game
I expect nothing, so I'm less disappointed
It’s a 50/50 thing I thought the same way but someone made a point to me.with EA you get the chance to fix some bugs and test more things .but the bad players also do too sadly..it’s some people that they will use that to there advantage and look for exploits and keep them to themselves till release .or game hackers who can get a early look at the files to make cheats ect
That’s the advantage of open EA…the game is “out” earlier, and it’s not like the issues you described can be prevented
Devs should realize pvp community will try everything in PVP.
Anyone else get bamboozled by the announcement post? Be honest 😂
There was an @ for ArkNews
You dont have the ark news role from id:customize
I'm soaking in the tub sipping on some fine wine that my great uncle hector brought back from Naples. Thinking about @worldly garden 's latest video and the potential for more visually appealing dinosaur models. When all of a sudden my mobile device notifies me of a discord notification. See previously I have had the wherewithal to create a custom notification sound for just such an event. I flung myself up from the tub, and ran to the device. However, in my haste water splashed everywhere and I slipped out of the tub the moment my foot hit the floor. My momentum caused me to slip across the floor, out the bathroom door, and down the stairs. With my leg broken I crawled my way to the phone to only discover, that it is not a CC announcement, but a vile Nintendo Switch notification that is not worthy of existence. Thank you Wildcard.
Bit harsh.
Switch Bros are Ark Bros too
Switch Ark is good fun, even if I don't have it and possibly never will unless it becomes free (I already know everything that is essential to know from the exclusive mode, hence not needing to play it myself)
switch users are mobile users without the trial by fire
Switch users are mobile users but not cringe and riddled with Microtransactions lol
A community crunch is coming today ?
A community crunch is coming today
They do every Friday
Yeah the bigger one yet
They will anounce Asa oficial release date and the changes that will come with Asa, maybe a trailer aswell if we are lucky
yeh maybe if youre lucky a delay too 🤣
if were lucky it will only be a few weeks of delay 😀
Wild card has been the most inconsistent gaming company I have ever seen so I am banking on a delay because they cant for the life of them give an accurate release window lol although I will give them credit if they do delay because at least its a little more than a month before the release window which is improvement from their history lol
I guess they are just trying to live true to their name haha
A delay would be more consistent than an on-time release 😂
I’ve actually been extremely impressed with the shift in PR and a lot of other issues in response to feedback
I want to say so again lol to highlight that in the older days WC would give a specific day, whiff it, then…sometimes whiff it again without a whole lot more than a “whoops sorry”, and now there’s far better balancing of expectations and honest communication about uncertainty
The sooner a delay is called the better imo
That's why I still think the Ark2 announcement was wild. Went from 'next revealed content will be gameplay' to 'no gameplay until 2024'
Assss expected a delay haha
October, called it 🍻
Is it related to Ark2?
Likely in some capacity, but probably not for players to use - at least directly or long term. More of a focus on primitive technology
So far the consensus is that ark 2 won’t have the “tek tier” ark 1 has
English please
It has been a noticeable improvement compared to like last year and before that
As a cheap ass gamer, no complaints here. Delay was expected and price cut is a bonus
The cast from my broken leg should be off by October. So that's a bonus!
Hopefully it stays with one delay and it will release in October
at this rate, I don't think so
With no gameplay footage revealed anytime soon, I'd say you won't be playing this game this october, probably november or december
Its gonna end up like ark 2 delay after delay
Every ark DLC*
Im pretty sure there was one dlc that wasn’t delayed right?
Wild card us easily the worst gaming company to ever exist(not a joke lmao), ever DLC they've made they delay
Gen 1 gen 2 and ext were all delayed
And every map they've made has broken the pvp side of the game, the devs cant patch simple spots on maps that you can literally walk into the mesh
Which are all over YT
Only DLC on time was Scorched Earth because it was a suprise
Saying they're the worst gaming studio is pretty childish if you know what other studios have done.
Blizzard flat out broke basic human-rights.
Yeah, WC is far from the worst
I'd say Wildcard are more 'idiots' are 'overambitious' then 'bad'
Broke human rights on a video game LMFAO, Stay the victim of your life buddy
Some devs straight up sold scam products lol
Blizzard has confimred harrasment cases towards their female staffs.
Don’t forget studios that sold games that were either 1) viruses or 2) flat out not the promised product
Have you seen what the publishers are doing with ark XD
I can’t call anything WC does a scam knowing some devs released games that intentionally trap you until you can’t refund on steam anymore XD
A few select d-bags at a gaming company doesnt mean the entire company is full of horrible people
Its like the whole nickmercs situation lmfao
Bro they literally spawn stuff in on their servers and sell it to people posing as players for $
And so this automatically applies to Wildcard caaaause....why?
Just cause of the higher-managments poor time management means the whole studio is bad?
Your logic also applies to Wildcard.
That's SnailGames
Im well aware lmfao
As far as creating and managing video games they are by far the worst
That’s admin abuse on officials. Not good, but it’s also not a scam
Also, those where SnailGames admins. Not Wildcard admins.
They could shut officials down overnight and still not scam anyone, because the ark product isn’t sold as official
Wildcard owns the game and is associated with them lol
Actually, they don't.
You dont think in the slightest they have a hand in it ???
SnailGames owns the legal rights to both Wildcard and ARK
It’s true that snail needs to behave to not leave a bad image on WC
So snail games is WC...
Thats literally what you just said
When?
...
Just cause Microsoft bought Bethesda, doesn't make them the same studio.
They "own wildcard and the rights"
Correct.
So they are associated with WC...
Literally directly XD
taking you awhile to find a come back from that huh?
They own Wildcard, but leaked text-messages have shown that Jeremy has stepped up a few times and told SnailGames to 'fuck off'
No, its called an anology...
A poor one
Eh
Not abnormal for someone unfamiliar with corporate structure. It’s not exactly intuitive
"Our plan is to show gameplay close to the launch of ASA, as that’ll be when it’s completely ready and best represent the final product" "ARK: Survival Ascended will leave Early Access in late 2024 once all the content has finished its next-generation remastering."
It’s also true that snail speaks for WC and vice versa tho. If snail is admin abusing on servers, it’s gonna make WC’s credibility look bad
Quick Google search solves a lot of confusion
what a complet noobs those guys are, what a fuck fest on that cc
Not many
Seems like more people in general would rather have it shut down still in August. Cause now it feels wasted.
can ppl start begging for wc not to share news instead, cause they have no clue what they are typing
I'd like to keep up to date with the development stuff. But I agree that release-dates need to be purely a last-step thing
I’ve asked for broad dates for years, and it’s finally happening. It’s a good time
its gonna be delay again, ASA aiont coming this year
Who cares tho?
thats early access end
It comes out when it’s ready
its still releasing as a game you can buy this october
oh ya mean that
yeah idk i hope this is the last delay
Yeah, with it coming out in early-access. There might be hope for the October release date, but I'm not betting on it.
btw is ASA the first in videogame history to be EA as Remaster?
If you purchase a game and they keep kicking the release date back it becomes a bit scammy. But that’s not what happened here. If you can’t buy it yet in any capacity there’s no obligation to do anything
They're also really shit at making announcement blows like this lighter.
Like as cool as it is, having the reveal of the stone-tools is kind of lackluster compared to the delay.
im guessing they got a loan
since they decreased initial launch price
they didnt need to do that after all
They’re making a bet. Which is that lower prices will lead to higher sales counts
Oh, and a discount for a game that's been delayed by two months.
It’s basic economics…
i doubt itll matter much
like why do that now instead of before
people would have still bought the game regardless
the only audience for asa is current ark players, i seriously doubt theyll make a ton of new sales
They removed SE from the initial launch package -> less product = less sales at a given price point. So they lower price to get more sales
i dont think ark players operate like that
Sooooo, as cool as both of those are.
The only thing that was worth while in that CC was the stone-tools, since the discount isn't even gonna matter until 4 more months.
i think theyll take what they can get regardless
Oh yeah, and then there was that ontop of that.
but sure i see that being possible
man ppl that quit officials if they read this cc or learn about it they gonna be really piss 🤣
You gotta remember ASA is appealing beyond current ark 1 players…because current ark 1 players are a fraction of the historic base and are a fraction of the customer base that’s being marketed to
So we get a delay and no Scorched on day-one.
And for compensation we get stone-tools and a discount that isn't valid until 4 months.....
Like, I'm not trying to sound like a little shit. But that seems more of a 'dick' move then cool reveals with a delay.
idk how much of that will be the case
but ig remasters are pretty popular rn
maybe people will come back to the game seeing its not as buggy as it used to be
and not as shitty of a ui
since those are the two things i see the people who used to play this game in 2015 then quit say
and if you plan to play on official no transfers, so you only have to have a bit of lucky to choose the wrong server
I still don't know why they're not pulling a Dead-Space remake, and showcasing the in-game development of the new mechanics.
most devs dont wanna show it off
cause that would make ppl go away 🤣
im guessing they wanna ride the hype train for sales
hype train 🤣
How?
It attracted more people to the Dead-Space remake due to their transparently.
What hype train
deadspace is alr one of the most well liked horror games so they dont need to do that
What hype train?
i was talking about wc not ppl from dead space
Theres no hype for this anymore
the hype train they think will happen after dropping a trailer
You say that, but it was dead for a whole decade before the release of a new one.
i had no clue about that
The trailer has to be the best thing ever for hype to come back
all the youtubers talk about it like its amazing
probably yeah, idk how theyll make it work
Dead space 3, back in 2013, was the last Dead-Space game. And that was cause it was so shit that it made the whole franchise flop.
Like better then anything they ever made
but they still planing doing the same, realese a suppose "gameplay" few days before ASA being available
FNAF became leagues more popular then Dead-Space did at that time.
ya
if it looks good enough, people might overestimate the game and buy it again
And the Dead-Space remake was to mostly attract new players, while keeping veterans happy.
So their marketing wasn't for the older players, it was to draw in newer players.
it might not need to cater to current ark players if somehow the marketing works, but idk i feel like people will mistake this for ark2
Already made up my mind im not gonna buy ark 2 im on the edge for asa tho
ik ark2 was definitely known during that 2020 event, lotta people mentioned it tho it wasnt constantly talked about after the event
But at the same time, they can showcase the in-engine demonstrations of their new mechanics.
What will that do, other then boost trust and possible sales due to how open they would be?
asa is atm only known through crunches tho, at least informally

