#ark-2
1 messages Ā· Page 110 of 1
Maybe in 2025 for your birthday
As a treat
lol wait till ark 1.5 before, and hope the 1% it releases on the announced date wins
Can we have a separate thread for ASA I want to speculate on meta changes and the upcoming new dlc that's exclusive to ASA
š© please
Like what are people's thoughts on it is it going to be a prequel to ark 2? Like there's so much they can add to the ark lore
Gen two hype was crazy leading up to the release and I'm starting to feel the same way over ASA with the texture overhaul on the tree
that tree pic really getting you hyped up fr
But general is iccccccky
Oml I'm sharing the link where dollie mentioned the channels lmao
Does the link not work? Otter said she couldn't find it either
Oh, it worked, I didn't realize it was linking an actual post
My bad š
@inland shoal you're acting like it's going to be a new story with no lore and not just ark as it is ported to unreal engine
new lore*
Bro there coming out with a new season pass exclusive to ASA??? Yes there's going to be new lore
Singular DLC, not new season pass lol
Official dlc not fan made maps
they haven't even shown an image from the game yet and its 3 months away
the dlc they're talking about, not even a season pass, is going to be released MONTHSSSS after the game is released
It will have new lore, though. Don't see why you'd think it wouldn't
Okay? Doesn't mean that you can't speculate on it now
Devs said its a new canon DLC
it's just a little soy getting excited about a game and dlc that are going to be butchered because of time and skill restraints
And some things basegame are being revamped, it's not "literally the same game" or anything like that
.....right!
thats not true they show a drop and a tree
funniest shit I've ever see
seen
It's more than "soy" to think that the remake is going to not be a step in the right direction imo
but i had to say it š¤£
release is 3 months away and we haven't gotten an in game picture yet
literally a tree and a drop
Ok, and?
dont worrie in 3 months you will get a pic š¤£
I don't understand how people can get excited over it for that fact, and the fact BOTH wildcard and snail games are corrupt and don't care about the player base who had supported it for over 8yrs
youre wasting time whit The fanatic of this channel, dosent matter what you say about anything as long its on defending all wrongs and excuses from wc and snail he will moke you all the way
I don't think he even has anything to say to me about what I saud
the truth hurts, especially when you've been supporting a company whose game is completely addicting and you think they care about their players
they literally have tribes on pvp servers like conquest that will ban you if you kill them in pvp/fob their base
literal insanity
Soooo ... don't play Official š
They type here every day and defend wildcard down to the last hair, no point in even talking to them lol
what is that even suppose to mean
the devs suck and take my money no matter what servers I play on
u rite
comparable to valorant players going batshit insane when riot game drops a tiny bit of lore every 3 months
I'm the most upset about that conquest server where tea tribe is running around banning people who try to raid them / kill them (this is pvp servers btw) and the tribe is linked to snail games. they take down the server whenever they're raided
like wild card can do NOTHING about that? they can't mention it might lower the games literal stocks because people don't want to play when they get banned for playing?
Continue to suck money? Last I checked, Ark was a one time purchase. No Subscription
bro never heard of server hosting
the new game is going to be $60, plus dlc, after I paid over a 100 for this game that only got released full access 5 yrs ago and is already becoming unsupported to make the same game with better graphics
so yes, they are sucking money
ontop of buying ark 2 a year from now
which is even more money
For a remake - which you don't need to buy
there's no point in arguing with you
they are taking support from this game and focusing on ark asa and ark 2
you clearly have a bias for this company
that has no bias towards you and the rest of the people who defend their actions
The ARK Conquest Discord can be found here: https://discord.gg/e25Pc2PysU
Told ya
As they should - Ark1 is a mess and is in dire need of fixing. If Ark Asc was just an engine upgrade then I'd be pissed, but its way more than that with a ton of QoL features
I can't WAAAIT for a few months when I can come back here and @ you when there's maybe 2 new features added and the rest is graphical updates
We already know theres way more features that that š
There's a lot more coming because ASA is meant to thrive alongside ARK 2. People severely underestimate what ASA will be.
it'll just be delayed again
Wild baby dinos, cross platform multiplayer, cross platform modding, new structures, photo mode, better snap points etc. I think thats a few more than two new features
half if not more than half of those could have been added to this game
Not the point he was making, but ok.
those are not game selling features when the game is currently out and they can currently add them without it being a new game
the point being there are enough features to call it a new game, or at least worth 60$? for better snap points?
everything except cross platform multi-player can be achieved through mods
Also, Dynamic navigation mesh and creature pathfinding overhaul (AI pathfinding)
again, could be an update for this game. they should've added things like that before this came out of early access
but now they're selling us a new game for features that should've been added years ago
Guy says I'm not worth arguing with, but dismissed every counterpoint given š
dismissed? you mean rebuttal?
you're acting like a few QOL features is enough to justify people buying a $60 game they already have
Holding you to this, @ ing you like hell when you're wrong lmao
QoL features, optimization improvements, an entire friggin' new engine, true crossplay with mod support, and way more š
you can't account for things they mentioned just now, like wild baby dinos lmfao there's mods that add that, and better snap points
Asa is also a better deal for new players because instead of sixty dollars plus extra for dlcs instead it will be 60 for all of it
you're literally wrapping a nice little bow on a pile of shit
yes, you're right
but they should give the game free to old players who had paid over 100+ of dlc
Keep coping, get ready for the @ s in a few months
you people are the rare few overdosing on copium
also >in a few months
more like next year at this rate seeing how they aren't showing ANYTHING from production other than a tree asset and a loot drop
companies usually have full trailers out by now, we don't even have a full jpg image
Hifi Rush dropped with no trailer, no nothing, and look how successful that game is
You don't always need AAA marketing to make a game lmao
dude told ya dont waste time here, their points are, defending everything wc says even when they go back on their word, ending dino breeding, end official servers, end cap bps and so on, if you dare to scroll back about 1.5 year of this channel you will see them making ark 2 on this channel and everyone that try to talk about a topic their respond would be " that's being address and not more talk about"
about the game being free for old players, if and thats if they make half of what they said and the game aint broken like ark 1 is they have the right to sell it as a remaster but that as yet to be seen
I defend what WC says because I believe a lot of what they have said is beneficial to the game as a whole. Uncapped breeding lines is broken in both PvE and PvP, and you're a fool if you think otherwise
And ending Official Server support for an outdated game is just logical. Why spend time, money, and resources on an outdated game format?
Official ran for 8 years, be grateful we even got that much lmao
But I won't disagree that I got a lot of satisfaction when the Devs said Officials would be wiped š
When ARK 2 drops is ARK 1 just gunna die ?
Your acting like companies never go back on their word. This isnt a new thing. It happens all the time.
And it's all gonna start back up again anyways, not like the players aren't going to reup on ASA, I know for a fact that the mega tribes are planning their whole operations as we speak lol
it's only a minority of the playerbase after all
Define 'die'. Support for Ark1, aside from fixing crashes, will be ending when Ark Asc drops
I believe It is supposed to coexist with ASA
did you just try to twist my words? you damn well know when i said about you guys being in favor of ending official servers was for ark 2 and eve ASA not about the end of officials of ark 1 but yeh go ahead
you're a fool if you take anything wildcard says seriously at face value
I'm not twisting anyone's words, I'm just voicing my personal opinion
But feel free to think otherwise
šæ
š¤”

hot take: introduce microtransactions to ASA and Ark 2
No
My interests are with clarifying WCās intent vs reality. Being realistic means swallowing entitlement and optimism. Iām replying because I want to agree 100-fold that itās a questionable take to support capped stat lines if you care about game balance
Given fox seems to prefer power tripping and seems against PvE balance, Iām not surprised heās labeled the numerous patient and polite discussions had about breeding as some rabid internet troll group
They don't need to cap dino stats entirely, it can be achieved by making things difficult and having filters to get through, much like the old game. Deterrents/tedium maybe, but it's more about not letting things out of hand too quickly.
Think Pre 2018 vs post 2018:
No cryopods, whistle non stop to breed (or else they mess up position), no optimal floating dino designs either due to prior comment, hard to obtain mass females due to element/cloning being much harder, dinos took longer to tame/move around as well, not as many bonus rate events or auto raising mechanics (such as Maewing).
Small tribes when it came out was a good example of this; enough filters that most dinos after 1 year had been mutated ... at most, 20ish points. Now you can go from 40 points to 254 in 1 month
not once i see any of you talking about take out breeding and rebalance the entire game to work whit only tame dinos but yeh šæ
with the exception of a few bosses and missions, the game IS balanced around only tame (or at most imprinted) levels
that's...the entire problem lol. You just dunk on the game with halfway mutated lines with some very rare exceptions
cleary you play single player or outburst unofficials to said something like that, tame a giga and go do a purple drop on extinction and record that so ppl can see you do it
News for ark 2 date?
I think this unfortunately leads more to gatekeeping/rewarding the most dedicated at the cost of everyone else. Tedium should always be minimized
When ia dropped thia fking game?
found a video in about...3 minutes with some level 300 gigas with 35k hp. Hardly capped
It doesn't have to be tedious in the direct sense, but at least have a degree of difficulty / requirements
Pretty much all games I used to play in the past (online based) are now 50, 100x easier than they used to be. Good for peoples dopamine, bad for balance
and ofc I appreciate the intentional misread of my message Fox šæ
i said tame since you wanna take out breeding, twist all you want
I have 4k hours in official of this shit full of mesh and bugs
balance should be in the stats and gameplay imo...if you can ever one shot 99% of the environment that's too much. Doesn't matter imo how long that takes
you know quite well what I mean and continue to be dense. If you want a fruitful discussion, I'm happy to engage. But in a one way conversation it's hardly my fault if you choose to ignore me š¤·āāļø . You know by breeding I mean mutations and specifically mutation stacking
Dev u need to do a better game this time
Ark 1 was a big shit
From official comunity
Ark 1 is getting a remaster in the near future, and ark 2 is coming in 2024. I'd recommend providing critique at that time
i aint scrolling up to copy/paste your answers
since I think WC and everyone here is aware of ark 1's faults
Remaster???
Really??šš
Removing or nerfing mutation stacking would make the game a less fun for people like me who enjoy doing it ofc i am a single player so i cant speak for pvp players
What they have to remaster?
Remaster the mesh from 5 years?
Dupe method?
you already read and responded to them in the past. Hence my disappointment in your lackluster efforts to paint me as some whimsical troll
I play from day0
if you're SP, I'm sure mods can readd the feature
And from day 0 i have mesh
True
This game lost like 99% of veterans gamers
there is a clear void in end/post game content that would need to be filled if mutations are removed. Of that there is no question
Just kids on boosted now
are you mad about ark official being thinly populated? I suspect folks left recently when they found out it's being shut down in August
U just a random kid like 10 years
should specify that any form of play for unofficial/SP should be supported or enabled. Ideally through simple settings tweaks, but if not that then through mods. Most balance or design conversations I engage in are about the vanilla "default" ark experience, be it official or an unofficial with no changes applied
just use mods
Good thing ill actually be able to do that in ASA
exactly
š¤”
Sounds like you play official, which to quote Ced, is āthe minorityā-
Impossible challenge
There are things that can't be done without decent dinos, this is true. And I think getting rid of breeding entirely would be a bad move for arks future, but on the whole and in nearly 99% of interactions with pve, a single moderately decent Dino makes gameplay trivial. Instead of having 2 or 3 things require a capped Dino line (while everything else can be done with a basic tamed Dino), I do think a rebalance of things needs to be done that both makes normal pve more of a challenge, while still having higher difficulty events like ext purple drops. My argument however is that it's not really capping stats that makes dinos op, it is adding levels after that is too strong. The compounding percentages between mutating and then leveling is what makes dinos really broken, which is why I would much rather see a different system implemented, or at least a nerf of the current one. Something like a perk tree for mutations and a skill tree for levels fits the concept I would ideally like to see.
It shouldn't be imo. Official brings a gameplay that can't be replicated on unofficial. For both pve and pvp. What should happen is some changes to how official works to make it more open and friendly to everyone lol
just a reminder to newcomers that ark is 8 years old so what you call "the minority" used to be the majority
totally agree, just a reminder to take out a function from a game thats being worked to balance difficulty will brake the game make it impossible to achieve certain things so the entire game would need to be rebalance to function properly for that change which is breeding to get stronger dinos not to mention the cap bps for sniper shotguns etc
They did already mention that they are doing a rebalancing. How much actually will get changed is still up in the air though
Capped bps need to get changed for the same reason that capped mutations do. Although capped gear is waaaay more impactful lol.
i can see it having more impact on pvp maybe on pve would be on gen missions
A capped flak armor, just as an example, is like 200x better than primative. Prim flak is usually sufficient to protect for a decent amount of time against most small pve dangers, do the same with capped flak and you are literally untouchable
For pvp, a capped set is normal to have, and while necessary isn't super game breaking, but for pve (excluding certain genesis missions) it is well beyond necessary
Sadly, the official statements and the current numbers are what matter, not what Ark "used to be". Official players do be living in the past, though, so...
But in it's present state, it's quite bad

That soundsā¦annoying? Unless you can ride on any creature without a saddle. Iād certainly hate to be suddenly kicked off my flier because the durability of the saddle hit zero ā ļø
It WOULD be nice if official was pleasant enough to be the standard format where most people play. But I suspect that wonāt happen without some extremely major changes to how the game operates.
Tbh even default flak is pushing it imo. You can face tank a rex for way longer than you should be able to with 100 base armor lol
Fair enough, but yeah as you said it'd have to be far and beyond what I would expect Wildcard to effectively change (and not mess up doing so, lest the masses cry)
Well if we stop beating people over the head about it, the knowledge about minority/majority helps inform us what āthe massesā actually are, instead of who the vocal majority is
I suspect if you looked at hours played for example official players would smoke the rest
Press X to doubt
I dunno, it seems pretty likely given official players probably play longer sessions and dedicate more time over a longer period to the game. The next question of course is āso whatā. Does a ton of extra hours translate to anything?
For exampleā¦in a game like minecraft, more hours played for say a content creator means more exposure and more sales. But for ark, does more hours for an official player = more content? Or is it the same content but itās more hours that get cut out because nobody wants to watch people waiting around for timers and/or low rates?
A no lifer on official is typically still a no lifer on unofficial, the route chosen does next to nothing but speed up or slow down the rate at which they breed their tames and get into the meat and potatoes that is raiding, no more, no less
That is not even remotely true lol
But I guess I could understand your point, if only slightly? More time playing game = more played time to report to whomever, be it Microsoft so they can adjust the Game Pass revenue split or to Snail/investors to give them stuff to look at and pretend to understand
Generally speaking the skill level between 1x official players is higher than you will find on unofficials
Other than say mts
Anywho, without going on a tangent, what do hours mean to your original point? People with more hours should be listened to, about something? Because that's not something I think should dictate the direction of the game in ANY sense whatsoever lmao
Yes, your arguement would be to ignore the people who contribute the most to the direction ark goes
Especially taking into account the fact that people lose jobs, forget to pay rent, and so on, over breeding alone, and given the decision to make that the whole game, I'm sure some would š
Yeah everyone should just play chess or something
Not directly. It depends on what the hours are used for
Ark pvp is not really set up well for youtube, and ark pve youtubers consistently do the exact same things every time.
People forget stuff like that over literally anything. That is not a valid reason to ignore or belittle people who played on official.
I think you stumbled into my second message lol
Lack of originality of youtubers does not mean limited content possibilities
Thatās not really the case for YouTube anymore, at least for ark 1. Content is driven by market, not the other way around
There does seem to be a limited set of what ark players want to watch. Ark 2 official COULD cater better to content creation imo by offering more diversity and more ācontent worthy momentsā per session
For example, the random events or cultivating an actual sense of danger while traveling
I mean, better balance really helps that imo. Even without adding anything new to the game
Season based official PvP would also mean content creators for the format could release content once a season and not release anything confidential. Especially if changes happen season to season
Avoiding balance on a shaky foundation has kinda been my mantra for ark 2 designā¦I just think the foundation of ark 1ās gameplay isnāt quite there. Ark 2ās seems closer. Get a good gameplay loop and foundation -> then tweak balance
Honestly I doubt that would have any impact at all. Just look at wipe servers like mts or arkpoc. You get like 3 videos a month, if that, because the game mode literally doenst lend itself well to consistent uploads
YouTube has radically tweaked the algorithm to promote content uploads like that
Personally I have hope that asa has a better gameplay loop tbh
The issue may instead be that itās boring to watch whatās out there because the game and meta are a bit stale
It would be nice! But Iām not expecting that anytime before ark 2
I dont know anything about the youtube algorithm, because I dont particularly care for it really
Itās helpful to understanding content as a marketing tool
But youtubers who have a name already, consistently upload clone videos almost exclusively
š¤·āāļø it takes time to adjust. The change was I think a year ago?
Iāve seen a chunk of content creators that upload more rarely (on my feed anyway) rise quite a bit
For ark thoughā¦not sure whatās left BUT to put up clone videos. Itās been 8 years and the game isnāt flexible enough imo to offer unique content forever
I suppose the 100 days trend last year was a good one?
Dunno about listened to, but the hours should be going towards something for WC
And they do, with Ark 1 on Game Pass, the higher the amount of players and time played (not just for official, but the game as a whole), the more of the revenue that is split between all active developers that are a part of the program goes towards WC, as their game is what's holding people on Game Pass (in Microsoft's eyes, idk how it all works on an intricate level necessarily, but I do know that's pretty much how it goes)
So for console there is strong appeal to encourage official play (long sessions, long overall commitment). I hadnāt considered the gamepass kickback element
I'd argue gamepass is one of the biggest reasons ark1 is as big as it is
Hoping ASA gets added to gamepass later in its life cycle
But then there's also the issue of free game = banning cheaters means nothing
Gamepass isnāt free?
I guess you can get one free trial per email and itās close enough. Is that the argument?
If you set your home console, you can create new accounts and they can use your gamepass/live
That's still only one console/one account at a time playing, so uhhhh... I don't see the argument here
Unless you mean alt accounts? Which will happen regardless
The idea is you get banned -> new account ezpz
Although surely itās easy as hell to ban a console by IP
lemme chill in madagascar
I mean, I dont know how big ark is on xbox, but the numbers on steam are not at all dependant on xbox gamepass, and it still has a ton of players
Pretty sure PC player counts also smoked console counts
Could've sworn it was the other way around, but I don't really know tbh
Yep, it was lol, Jesse even said so in an interview way back when š
Funny enough, the current Xbox player count is also more than Steam
Even mods can only do so much in cushioning poor endgame activities for an 8 year old game - with PC, there's a lot larger game pool to choose from for an Ex-Ark player's next game. Couple that with Ark being free on game pass, it's not too surprising console numbers are beating PC at the moment
Also console being wayyy more accessible than a PC that can run Ark decently
My main point was that, at several points in it's lifetime, especially pre-Game Pass, Ark was more popular on Xbox than on Steam
Some of the metrics were even pre-Win10 version
A lot of steam players is on mods which really helps keeping it fresh
They're still tracked in the battlemetrics and such, pretty much all online (as in, connected to the internet while playing) methods of play are included
They need to fix the windows 10 version

They're fixing every version, that's what ASA is š
Not the Stadia version. š
We don't talk about Bruno Stadia
Isn't Stadia dead?
yup
Can't really fix a version on a platform that no longer exists š
Is there a confirmed Survival evolve release date?
Yeah like 2015
Late August 2023
fairs
31st August is the official date.
When did they state the exact date?
Thought it was just 'August'
I don't think we have an exact date, but
'This also impacted our decision to sunset the ASE Official Network offline on August 31st, shortly before the ASA launch.'
ASE Officials dying on the 31st
Just before my favorite quote my WC ever 
Kbye~
Free upgrade was never officially announced, only hinted at and admittedly too early in a tweet
But I'm too busy today to have this argument again for the 40th time, so...
š» Cheers
I'm going under? Under where?
Oh, pfft, you made me say it š
TIL I own WC š
News to me š
As they said in the roadmap that it will be late August, then in the follow-up roadmap they said "This also impacted our decision to sunset the ASE Official Network offline on August 31st, shortly before the ASA launch." it would only leave 31st August as being the August day it would release.
Fair, if they mean literal hours to minutes before release with the 'shortly after'
Lets face it, it will be September. š¤£
It will release at 11:59PM on August 31st.

12:01am August 32st
This years August doesn't have a 32nd.
Unless that was the joke.
That's the jo-
wait, every August doesn't have a 32st ... unless š
December 32nd, 2020
should gear cap for weapons be scaled back much? 3x base weapon damage seems alright though im not totally considering these changes alongside armor and stat caps
like bred tame stat differences compared to tamed 150 values are something on the order of 7-10x right now, and the same applies to player armor vs base durability and armor wise
saddles and weapons seem less out of the ordinary at 2x and 3x roughly for their effect over primitive gear
i think id probably focus on scaling back the former over the latter
especially since capped saddles are way more accessible to bobs on gen2
and red drops across all servers
somewhat similar situation with weapons
but both the armor and the capped tames seem way harder to obtain comparatively
Overall weapon and armor balance needs to be addressed. But I do think 3x damage for a capped weapon is a bit much. I think it should be more like 1.5 with a nerf on the range of the shotgun. Other than that, I think saddles should get a nerf. The scaling doesn't work great for pve imo
should all items/tames be around that 1.5x capped effectiveness vs prim?
Having not tested that it's hard to say if that'll fix the balance issue, but that would be my first approximation
theres probably some sorta testing on unofficials somewhere with lowered caps
or maybe just wipe servers which dont usually hit the same stat levels for tames and i think armor?
But all things considered, a shotgun should not be as effective against large tames as it currently is
shotgun does seem overly effective atm
you could probably do well to just increase its spread tho
ive seen vids of people using shotguns to down wyverns from like 100 meters
It should deal less damage against things larger than a parasuar, and needs an overall nerf anyway
i think pellet spread increase would be fine?
it should fuck things up up close unless you mean even in those situations its over powered
Shotguns aren't super effective agaisnt elephants and hippos, or bears. So why should they be against rexes?
i think damage of near capped shotgun is something like 10k per mag
Shotguns irl are basically anti small weaponry
ig
They should have a damage reduction similar to when agaisnt a rock golem when being shot against anything large
dont large dinos alr have decent damage reduction outside flyers
iirc its something like 30%
I don't believe so
it might vary with the specific dino but i think this applies to rexes and sauropods
Can't say I have ever noticed it
Bullet size isn't changing, but the target size is. Lot more meat and bone to punch through to actually deal lethal damage. A larger caliber round would be relatively more effective, so damage reduction for shotguns makes sense for larger tames while still keeping them useful
Yep. A sniper rifle should be way more effective against large tames than a shotgun
i think thatd end up being more annoying
at least the shotgun you know where the player is
or can do more since they are closer
It's better than having 0 challenges because you got a sniper shotgun that is good antilarge
The ttk of player vs Dino should be harder to do imo, if not in asa, then definitely in ark2
The range is a bit much, but I don't think it's too out of the question. Maybe start a damage dropoff at 70% of current range
Ttk in Ark2 I hope is very different
The issue is the damage output against large at range.
apparently dododex doesnt show any reduction on stuff lile sauropods and rexes so ill go with you being right
theres some stuff about gun damage reduction but its super old and probably changed
Shotguns get used to hunt birds and squirrels, and as anti personnel, they do not get used to hunt elephants
Accuracy by volume makes sense for smol targets where pellet size relative to target size is still reasonably comparable
Yes, I have no issue with shotguns being good against onyc and spiders, because irl they would be at close range and up to a fairly decent longer range. But agaisnt rexes or wyverns? It doesn't make any sense
tho i dont think any gun really should be good at anti large
Snipers are anti large, depending on the caliber
the dinos are too unable to do much to survivors far away unless survivor mobility gets capped
snipers would become basically hard stop to any large dino tho
and you already have limited counters to that besides your own sniper
They already are effective against unsaddled dinos
Hard part is balancing it. Rof? Bring multiple guns. Cost per shot is mostly irrelevant with gathering rates buffed over the years
I don't thing they need to change, other than maybe adding an armor piercing against saddle armor
maybe just reducing armor so snipers are one shots to other snipers would be fine tho getting aimbotted would be a nightmare
Isn't that what Comp Bows are for?
long range
I don't think one shot kill weapons are good in ark at all
atm dont fab snipers take like 3 or 4 headshots to kill a player with capped armor
capped fab sniper
The variability of that is too much to really answer lol
i mean its basically just dependent on number of shots to break armor since headshot usually one shots naked player no?
ik some people run with like 900 hp tho
900hp is a low estimate honestly
that doesnt sound fun to play against lol
I ran 2k on my sniper char lol
Yeah
There is no point in going high movement speed or weight if all you are doing is sniping lol
yeah thats valid its just that having hp scale to that height, and you can comfortably hold an extra set or 2 of gear plus brews
But tbf, I think snipers are mostly in a balanced position rn. They aren't overpowered, and they aren't underpowered
thats so many shots to kill tho
Shotguns, tek bows and flamethrowers are a bit more of an issue
Ttk in ark should be a lot
Especially at range
It's not cod
I don't believe it takes that many
if its at least possible to do so without needing to reload then fine
without like aimbotter aim
It is if you can hit your shots lol
Which means it's more balanced lol. If it was practical in every scenario there wouldn't be much use for dinos now would there lol
fair ig
In a perfect world the weaponry would have niche uses that complements each other
So like alpha brood mother would two shadowmanes 3 Rexās 3 bread stegos cap saddles and two velos 2k melee each would I be able to complete this boss fight successfully?
alpha brood mother hits like a truck. so you need tanky stuff
idk what u wanna do with velos and stegos
i would just get good rexes with good saddles
Just use megatheriums lmao
ššæ

Why go in with half the max allowed dinos? Bring more Rexes. Stegos are slow, they're not going to do much. Velos are pretty bad unless ridden and even then they're not great in bosses
The real question is why we think the ark 1 broodmother will be in ark 2

I mean we got araneo art so i wouldnt be surprised seeing it in some way
A last remnant of an ancient power
kinda makes it seem like only the araneo is transitioning
it's just brood gone smol
I dunno, that Ark2 spider seems a bit small for a boss creature. Might be a standard tame
Might actually make it worthwhile to use, Ark1's Araneo is basically PvE cave fodder
I didnt say it was the boss but the fact that it is coming back could mean brood is too because they are somewhat linked togetehr
Yeah, mb, misread
I think it is more likely to be a miniboss tbh
I think it's just simply the Araneo.
Don't think there's more to look into it.
More mini bosses would be sweet
I think actual curated boss fights (mini or otherwise) would be pretty sweet. Something beyond āLMBā
We've at least seen some basic mechanics are possible during fights like Gen2 Rockwell or some of the Gen2 missions, so hopefully those can be expanded upon for more unique fights/encounters
The self contained gen2 missions are pretty good. But even fights like the lava golem would be good to have in larger quantity
Yeah, agreed
You know what I'd like to see less of?
And this is to the fault of mod map creators mostly ...
Labyrinth/maze caves with buttons, puzzles, and traps
I don't think there is an issue with those
I really dislike them because everyone is just going to find the solution online and skip as much of it as possible. Plus traps that one shot you with awful hitzones, or spawn like 20 creatures (always the same Scorp, Spider, Snake, Bat combos...) making them very predictable just gets old fast
So the issue then isn't the maze. It's making them original and not googling the solutions
The one hit kill spike pits, let alone in a place on the map where you can't get back to easily was always bullshit imo
ark2 will come 2030 Thank you for your waiting
So I'm of the idea that those could go for sure in exchange for more open air mazes, like the ones seen in BotW or something

For me, the issue is the unnatural feel of it all. Compare Ragnarok's Labyrinth to the Center's Underworld and connecting caverns - both house an Artifact or more so are required in some capacity for map completion. The Center has a sprawling network of tunnels and connecting caverns with unique locations - many of them not being required to explore and even multiple entrances so you can essentially travel a fair amount of the map completely underground. There's no traps perse, but plenty of cave and non-cave spawns in certain spots leading up to a no-tame parkour course leading up to the artifact
The Center was underrated for sure in that regard
Kind of hope ASA will actually give the later on Artifacts proper descriptions then just 'The artifact found on Aberration'
Rag's Lab starts off with a room where you run around pressing buttons to open a door. There's no hint which buttons are right in game as far as I know, so you either randomly press buttons and hope for the right combo, or look it up. I guarantee I know which 99% of players end up doing. Then the fire room with more buttons and invisible trap hitboxes. I still have no idea what sets the trap off, but if it does go off then you better spam med brews or you're toast. The path split is fine, with the water tunnel being neat for ambiance, and the jumping pillars being alright. But the actual maze with more random buttons is awful
Rag is a terrible example for a lab cave. The one on fjordur is way better in design imo
Then the worst part is the sacrifice room. Don't have a throwaway shoulder pet or tribemate? Lol, start over from scratch and lose your inventory! The arena at the end with the spirit creatures is pretty neat though.
I picked the Center and Rag because they were both early community made maps - yeah, later maps are better but most of the overall concepts are still there. Fjordur's is probably the least frustrating because it at least has the decency of being able to find the solution in game reasonably
You picked the worst example by picking rag tbh
Does Valg have a labyrinth? I honestly don't remember except maybe that one cave with the death pits but I remember it being pretty straight forward
Lost Island is just Rag Lab Jr with less rooms and more maze with random buttons
Yeah, but fjordur labyrinth is pretty good. The biggest issue is how op it is as a base location
Eh, good is a stretch, but I know I have bias against labs as a whole
Points for theming though
I mean, it's better than the center parqour and is one of the most interesting cave to run for the first time
Well remember, the Center is one of the first community made maps
Hello
But I agree, the actual parkour course is the weakest part of the overall cavern. But I'd take it over a button maze with no in-game solution
When I press information to see the server, it does not direct me to any other page , mi ark mobile
Well, ark mobile isn't ark2, being as ark2 isn't released yet
I know, but if anyone can help me
Mobile has a seperate discord
Doesn't help that I also don't like Rag
The caves should be like missions - that way a one hit kill trap just ends the mission rather than causes you to lose your items and have to respawn etc etc
is there still gonna be stupid pocket admins or a more restircted team of support
What is the date of the Ark 1 update?
what update?
are you talking of ASA?
By enabling it in the server settings.
anyone wanna start a fresh world im new
are they really gonna charge extra for DLCs even though they are already cooked ?
No
Does anyone know if ark ascended will have tethering
can we please get fixed collisions with ark 2? since when im trying to get past dinosaurs, i get stuck on them, or it looks like im unstuck before it snaps me back, please.
Please remove all collision detection in your game. Also fix my network issues. Thanks.
Itās not magic
Why donāt you also GIVE EVO while youāre at it 
Wait is it true that you have to pay 90⬠for the new ark thing ? šā¹ļø
60
gonna say it again, mounts need to have souls-like moves in Ark2, not just players lol and rexes need a pounce attack like on Land Before Time XD
not that i think the rex pounce attack will make it into game, just would be insane to see/do
but souls-like combos would fill in the medium sized tame combat quite nicely
For split screen?
Or just non dedi
Non dedi
Say it again as much as youād like: itās true
Although I think a pounce makes minimum sense on a rex, each size/creature class should have a unique suite of moves and abilities that are more than just spammed bites or āforward hit conesā like most ark 1 attacks
Iāve advocated for side steps, twists, guards evenā¦all would work to make tame combat more diverse
no doubt, rex pounce for lols only
but the agile dinos def need dodges as a part of their melee: deinons, raptors, terror birds, etc should be quick on their feet as a part of their appeal
would also like to see armor kits for unsaddled tames, mainly kentros but also gigantopithecus and dire wolf...dont need a saddle to gain defense
Rexes and Gigas being able to attack behind their feet just by biting looking down is the dumbest thing š
I hope Ark2 has more realistic and balanced hit zones
let them do dmg by pooping onto creatures under them. let's be honest, those turds would weigh a lot
One thing Iām torn is on rebalancing the weight system. It always bugged me that a fairly basic kit in ark 1 would weigh down a raptor/terror bird. I wonder how you could keep small mounts as viable travel options that obviously would hold less stuff
too soon for that, troll
Bro when ARK 3
2070
when ark 4 
YO we should be worrying about ARK 5
nah, ark 6 will be lit, with unlimited 2048K and real life is the same, as ark.
BRO ARK 7 CAN'T WAIT BRO
makes me wonder, what ark 8 will be like 
I had a dream about ark 9
You plebs are still on ark 9? That's old news, us true fans are speculating ark 11
I'm still waiting for Ark1 to be good š
cant even walk past a dino without getting snaped back fr ong
Thought I read that right last CC.
Everyone thought though it'll be every 'other' week.
new assets look nice - although the rocks holding down the ASA cooking pot look way too shiny imo...rocks aren't silver ore š
The rest look great though...eager to see what the rest looks like
gotta be wet river rocks 
i want separate berry plant models for crop plots
would be nice to see the berry color growing on the plant
is ark 2 out
no
perchance
does snail games have impact on upcoming ASA and ARK 2 ?
That will be 5 tera bite to download š
I second that. I always forget where TF I planted my narcoberries.
Would be nice for wild bushes too. Maybe generic bushes give the regular random smattering of berries but mostly fiber while dedicated berry bushes give a lot more of specific berry types. I know at one point WC had berry specific plants in their radar a long time ago
Ark 2 needs massive bosses like dark souls that can be solo'd or grouped for
super hard but good loot
Make the pve better
Massive and soloable are usually contradictory - at least outside of power fantasy type games
I think it was dropped because resources can quickly become unavailable based on the structure clear radius, and you because need so damn many of them
Makes sense
I think the genesis solution of plants with variable drop rates works though - stuff with say 80% narco still ensures you can get whatās needed without losing the immersion of variable plant harvesting nodes
This is what bosses should aspire to be. Ideally with restrictions in place (and scaling difficulty based on playercount)
Iād kill to have a really solid boss fight that mandates the use of a small mount like a raptor
This right here is the centerpiece imo of ark 2ās long term success. What IS good loot
Ark 1ās loot system imo is all kinds of borked. Wildly OP gear with stats that absolutely trash the PvE balance and cost heinous (sometimes uncraftable) amounts of resources
But what can ark 2 do to fix it? I donāt know the best answer to this. MHW style loot would be cool, but since ark loot can always be stolen or destroyed, it feels like ark 2 canāt use the same system of ultra rare drops (unless they can be mass produced like capped BPs)
High quality armor and weapons/bps from them
Including high quality dino armor
and weapons that have unique playstyles and/or effects
Bro I over heard news about Ark 95
Exactly the opposite of what I think a good idea would be - see my above message
Unique weapons would be cool, or a unique tameā¦perhaps special engrams. But comically high stats on gear is what ruins ark PvE so profoundly
dw, by then everyone will own an advanced NASA Super Computer.
Will they be shutting down official servers for asa
Ark SE Official servers will be shut down August 31st
Ark Asc Official servers will probably last a few years, then also likely shut down at some point
I wouldn't be shocked if ASA and ark 2 servers stayed online roughly the same duration
Ark 2 ascended when?
Prob before the Animated Series Asc drops
And then we would have ark survival infinity
Oh alright we be oke then
Will be gaming with our mind no controllers anymore
i use a keyboard
steam ftw.
Nasa computers for the most part are worse than normal gaming computers jaja
Are you sure about that 
I worked on a fair few of them
The big super computers are usually in different companies, or at universities
Well yeah they are not meant to run games
But that doesnt make them worse computers
As long as they do the job they were designed for well
NASA supercomputers are impressive - average NASA computers are likely no better than the government standard (ie bad)
Well when most people say nasa computer
They almost always are referring to the super ones
Nasa uses other people's supercomputers usually
like many things, on the ground it's often contractors/contracted things
but I'd presume like so many government contracted things, it's functionally identical
I mean, they aren't nasas computers usually
I love semantics
What is up with ark 1.5
See in ark I just can't use a keyboard
Not used to it
Nothing.
Incorrect, itās the skybox. 
Iām sticking to ARK XP
ArkS DOS
Ark java
I prefer Arkdows Vista, best looking one for sure
The joke become instantly unfunny when you tried to join in
bro went for the jugular
Release date
ark 2 will be "released late 2024" but, they gonna start pulling a scrap mechanic.
yEAH , I used to work on one , we used it for imaging using a big microscope and that PC was a Beast. The graphics card alone was worth more then half the stuff in that lab.
i was always tempted to install a game inside it xD
Realese Date?
Late 2024 is the current one
Don't worry there will be unforeseen events that will delay it more
I sure hope so
what graphics card?
No idea, it was big though. I haven't seen the purchase list since administration is the one who deals with those kind of stuff but we did ask and all they said was what i posted on my first post. I am sure its a good gpu though , otherwise we would not been able to see what we do on the pc.
this was back in 2020 btw
true, but the one we have works like a charm for now
but im guessing it was more of a titan series gpu, not 30 series or 20series
any idea of the price?
we do live cell imaging on it and that needs a big gpu and cpu.
yeah, probably nvidia titan rtx, which is mainly used for grapics designing, researchers, developers, etc
im not a pc tech savy so il have to take your word there. Im more of a microscopes dude.
nice
idk man, im not a pc tech savvy either but i know a lot abt computers and ai. I'm only 14:)
thats nice , the more you know , the doors open in your job options. i learned that the hard way
true.
idk tho, I'm not rly a job kind of a person, more of a making jobs for people type.
you do what you love the most, thats the best kind of job
alr, well we should get back to the ark 2 topic š
when is ASA releasing?
Sometime in August.
daaamn super close
Hopefully it doesnāt get delayed

you mean sometime on september
Haha, very funny and original delay joke.
Going to keep saying August until they do delay it.
aint a joke, just following what they said, official servers ofr ark1 ends on the end of august short follow ASA launch but yet believe what you think
Shortly after can be a week, to literal hours before ASA's release
They could shut down the servers for ASE the day before ASA comes out.
We just don't know, cause a delay hasn't happened yet.
"This also impacted our decision to sunset the ASE Official Network offline on August 31st, shortly before the ASA launch."
if you wanna count hours, minutes or second go ahead
Yeah, I'll count hours.
Not unrealistic to think they'll shut down servers, just to reboot them back up for another game hours between.
well if they gonna keep their word those servers are going to the trash since they gonna use more update servers so dosent matter if they clean those servers or not
Right, but if we think of it as a business standpoint. It'd make more sense to shut down the servers of your product hours before the release of the new product, versus shutting down your servers weeks before the release.
They admitted official being the minority, but it's still a minority to capitalize on.
Shutting down the official networks, then letting nothing happen for a week or two would heavily damage the already minority of that playerbase.
But if they do it hours beforehand, then it wouldn't have as much impact on that playerbase/people moving to other games.
Not saying it 'isn't' going to be delayed, this is Wildcard.
But I think it's more likely that the servers will shut down 'hours' before release, then weeks.
If it were me, Iād release ASA a week before shutting ASE servers down
However, itās not me. September seems pretty reasonable all things considered š
its minority now after 8 years keep that in mind plus when they said "shortly before the ASA launch" i believe gonna be couple days not weeks
I could see like 3-4 days.
I just think a week or more would start to damage that playerbase.
not really
whats gonna damage will be before the launch for those that play official, but whit a pause if you really like the game the "hunger" will return to play the game again either ark 1 or ASA
Itāll likely be at least a week before official is playable for 90% of players š. Flashback to every MMO launch ever where servers get trashed on launch day
True.
well its suppose to be a "remaster" not a brand new idea of a game so they better have a good launch or i can see another battlefield fiasco
As if even half the players that even play official will be jumping on to play the new one, at least, going off the comments typically made by that minor section of the playerbase
I foresee a pretty easy launch tbh
Don't you love the concept of the loud-minorities?
Itāsā¦pretty normal
What is?
People will show up - but will WC predict the number well enough to have adequate servers hosted that donāt crash or lag?
This
I have him blocked, so I can't see what you're replying to lmao
But I think they'll overshoot it if anything
It doesnāt jump to the blocked message in question? Thatās amusing
Oh nice, he has me blocked?
Doubtful. Of all the indie MMO launches Iāve seenā¦itās pretty uncommon to have a smooth launch day
Even some of the big AAA MMO launches have a screwy experience
Yeah, it just shows up as I sent in the other server
We'll see how much of Wildcard's issues where with the engine, but I doubt it'll have a 'smooth' launch.
Not clickable either
Weird
Idk, most of the ones I've been into on launch day have been fine
Wait, so did Bruise block me on purpose, and his 'show-message' is just being fucky, or is Discord just being weird for him?
When is ark 2 going to come out and is all of ark 1's server going to go bye bye?
Ark1 servers shutting down August 31st, Ark2 late 2024
i think the majority of official players have already quit because there is no reason in continue playing. Basically everyone who gets raided at this point is stupid to play on
but im seriously concerned whether the new servers are gonna be exploited with admin powers
like they did with conquest servers
also pay2win might become a thing since now snail game can impact the development decisions
They always could.
But Wildcard has multiple times, threaten to strike if they pulled that shit.
I checked yesterday and I saw a bunch of oficial servers empty
Yāall think ark asa will be delayed?
Normally I'd say 'yes'
But this is a new product, with hopefully new coding.
Hard to say if the delays are due to technical stuff, or just internal deadlines.
Do you know of ragnarok will be available at launch of ark Asa?
No, only The-Island and Scorched
Custom-Maps will come I believe after the Story-maps
Okay, not 'after' but overtime throughout 2024.
Just rechecked
Awesome thanks. Is Abb releasing this year!?
Canāt wait to play ark asa š©š©
Yes, Q4 of this year
So near the end of it, is the plan.
Then Q1st of 2024 for Extinction.
Awesome, thanks for the info. Do you know When is the next community crunch?
Every Friday
Canāt wait to see more. Have they said anything about showing gameplay or something on the new engine?
They stated "we're waiting till the game is in a more finished state to show gameplay"
And the engine is on Unreal-Engine 5, if you didn't know that.
Gameplay will likely be early August, unlikely any time before that.
They have been saying they aren't showing gameplay yet for like 3 weeks lol
So Ark ASA wonāt have cryopods at launch right? š
They might do, we don't know yet, but they have hinted at having some QoL content from other DLCs at the start.
I only hope they arenāt
Actually aren't crypods part of the base game now?
Yeah now they are
Then that answers the question I guess.
Ig so, kinda sucks if they are tho
Wait really?
yeah pretty sure they are.
Yeah they are, since around valg launch I believe
When they upped the org poly stacks as well
Is ark 2 just for ps5 and not 4 when it eventually gets released ?
Most likely, Iām not 100% sure though. Most games are moving away from old gen, no reason why to jump through hoops for game performance
Would make sense Iām just trying to work out if@my sister needs to jump to ps5 now or not
it's already confirmed to be next gen only for Xbox, so when it comes to playstation it will likely also be next gen only
Iād assume PS5 is required - although maybe the PS6 will drop before ark 2 does for PlayStation
ARK 2 definitely won't be on PS4, I mean look at ASA.
ark2 isn't going to be on ps5 at launch just PC and xbox as its a timed exclusive. both ASA and ark2 will be next gen only so no PS4/xbox one
I think ASA should have gradual weathers.
Cause currently on The-Island, if you're standing on a beach it's like 60 degrees.
But then you go a little bit closer till you're technically in the artic, and it's suddenly 26 degrees
I'm hoping that's the case too. Might be harder to set up though.
Sure, but ASA is planned to have years of support.
So even as a later on update, would be nice
Who knows lol. I expect ASA to be a 1:1 remake of ASE at launch and steadily developed over time, but I'd be VERY happy to be surprised š
Gameplay-wise, sure.
But visually it's already hella different
Lol yep, that's a given with just nanite and lumen being part of ue5
I don't mean that, I mean the meshes they revealed
Like the supply-drops dropping their original generic sci-fi look, and going with the more biomechanical feel.
anyone got an image of the supply drops, I heard a decent amount about them but can't find an image anywhere
I'll link it
aight
carno saddle?
Scroll down
I know, right?
Imagine the different colors.
I wanna see how it looks with red LEDs instead of purple.
kinda glad they're gonna change the texture from blocks to future design
Yeah.
It's more in line with the ARK's biomechanical-like feeling.
fr
Kind of hope the obelisks also get a revamp.
Would love if they have more of that metal-flesh the supply-drops have now.
especially with all the genesis stuff in evolved, it just makes sense that the next game in line looks more futuristic
Well, the Genesis-maps take a different artstyle for tek since it's a different faction that made those maps.
I wish to see the same honestly, that would look so sick, seeing a more "alive" metal type instead of the carbon fiber look they have now
If you look at the tek on Genesis-2, it's a lot more metalic.
That's due to the Federations style for tek.
The ARK's are made from the URE, which relied more of biomechanical stuff, blending biology and mechanics into one station.
Exactly!
The ARK's are suppose to feel almost alien in nature, like they're alive.
Would be sick if they applied this to environmental story-telling.
Is it even worth getting the dlcs for evolved anymore since ascended is gonna drop soon
Yep, and the game itself.
damn, I got evolved for free like 3 years ago on Ps+ then was gonna buy the dlcs but never got around to it
The only thing that'll be separate is a new planned story DLC that'll be exclusive for ASA
so same maps in the dlcs?
Yeah, all of the maps from Survival-Evolved are part of the base-game for Survival-Ascended.
Any future DLC's exclusive for ASA will be paid though.
oh okay, so if I brought asa on release it comes with everything the dlcs give on evolved? if so then I'' just hold my money
Correct, but anything that's new to the ARK IP like future DLC's will be paid.
ok
Personally, that's a fucking steal.
60$ USD for the base-game, and 'all' of the DLC's from Survival-Evolved?
wait, asa and ark 2 are 2 completely different games?
Correct.
ASA is a remake of Survival-Evolved, which is ARK-1.
I'm in NZ so it'll be like $110
Still, the same price for a AAA game for a base-game and all previous DLC's.
oh okay, so there'll be ark 1, ark 1.2 and ark 2
Correct.
ARK 1 will no longer be content supported, and will only have bug fixes after July.
ARK 1.2 will continue development content wise for years to come, with ARK-2 alongside it.
oh okay
damn, ark evolved will be left in the dust but then they'll be working on improving asa and Ark 2
Yep.
It's to be expected of a nearly decade old game
had good memories on evolved, will still play singleplayer and multiplayer with friends cause I just looked it up and asa is releasing august this year on new gen/pc
so my friend on PS4 can't get it lmao
Yeah, it's a next-gen title
my friend can't afford new gen so I'm just gonna spam invite him to asa every day
cause he loves ark
They are planning multiple dlcs for asa
So far only one is confirmed.
According to snail games shareholder meeting 1-2 planned to be out by the time ark 2 comes out so probably planning at least 2 minimum at this time
Where was this stated?
1939
Hopefully Nitrado will be supported quickly so I can switch my server over from SE so ASA -.-
Nitrado is already supported?
Oh, you meant for ASA
Well, I would figure so since Wildcard runs their servers on Nitrado
Yeah when genesis 2 came out though they made us pay for larger player base servers if we wanted that map.
I wonder if they will do the same for Asa
But regardless canāt wait.
I think that's on Nitrado though, no?
Yea
I sure hope Nitrado isn't all we can get for ASA or Ark 2, fuck Shitrado honestly, they can burn for how they run their business
Understand that, I can only access my server 60% of the time. Sue to a lot of issues and maint on their side and disconnections.
My whole cluster goes down just about every week ever since they shit the bed a few weeks back, some of my players have lost characters back to back over it to just by joining certain maps
Having it delayed is kinda good for me raising money for ark 2 but itās bullshit to have ark ascended but ngl itās kinda cool
Fr
Yeah, and I have to restart it in the middle of the night a lot cause I start getting messages that no one can retrieve address or just randomly.
Yep, just the average Nitrado experience right there lmao
Not to mention, they can just simply block your support messages if they don't feel like dealing with you
It's fully within their terms, apparently, or something
Hey ark, make some extra $$ and become a server host for your own game. No third parties. Maybe?,.. an idea? Just throwing it out there
At the very least, let us Xbox players use like Gportal or at least some other provider that doesn't have a monopoly via contract and doesn't treat us like shit
I used g portal for Conan Exiles. Never had issues with them. I forgot about them.
They are great as far as I've heard/seen, never hear about a bad time with their servers
Anywho, let's not get too off topic, lest we be smit by the mods themselves (even though this is pretty darn pertinent to Ark 2, imo)
I was going to say as well. Thatās why I stopped. I didnāt want to get shunned if we got to far off topic. But I agree we are in point talking about how or who to host our own sessions of ark 2 on console. As our experiences on Console for SE wasnāt to great.
I bad host can ruin the experience of a great game quickly.
Ark 2 give us more hand to hand combat weapons? Battle axes, knives, swords? Let us customize hilts and blades with gathered materials, trophies, artifacts. Let me add oil to my blades and use flint, spark powder, to ignite it to fight bugs in cave runs. Let my sword act as a torch and weapon. Maybe? XD
good ideas, unfortunately, lystro
You're fine
I do really hope we get like, souls-y weapon coatings that are temporary and change the damage type dramatically, of course fire is one that I think of/comes to mind first as well, but with metal weapons maybe we could have a current run through them for electric damage (maybe does more stun damage than raw damage?), or things like narcotic coatings for blades or even poison for various things (mainly arrows, please let us dip our arrows in poison lol)
I was thinking the same,
Collect venoms for poison DOT arrows,coatings. Fire, arthro acidic weapons for damaging armor in pvp.
Add electronics to weapons for paralysis, stun effect. Etc.
Canāt have the Dinoās be doing ALL the work.
I also like to be on foot Turok man for at least some of the game š¤
I loved that game played it all the time with friends and siblings.
Iād like to camo up and not be riding something. Have some nice tools to pvp with
Wish they'd do a reboot of it, but actually good and not Turok 2008 lol. But yeah, painting ourselves like the environment would be cool
Iād like a better ādrag bodyā and not be so glitchy
Idk give me conan style let me drag you with rope
Or be-able to drag bodies of smaller Dinoās you have unconscious with a rope pulled sleigh? Platform?
Have a small medium large platform that uses tamed dinosaurs to pull it.
Carts, maybe. Like, you knock a dino out, and you can put it on a cart so it isn't completely stationary (and therefore vulnerable)
But I suspect we'll see few knockout tames anyways, idk if they should put that much work into a system such as that
Yeah a lot of work, just dreaming.
I mean a wall of spikes works fine xD in those random hazardous areas, but like being able to drag them out of water cause idk why they love to run and start water wading till they pass out and drown lol
Always thought it was funny that every creature in the game just about, when facing being knocked out, just decides "nah, I'd rather DIE by DROWNING"
If you buy ASA on release it will come with The Island and Scorched Earth. The other DLCs will be releasing over time into 2024.
It was mentioned by Jim Tsai in the Snail Games webcast when they released their financial reports recently. He basically just said there will be 1 or 2 new DLCs before ARK 2 releases.
The price for Ark2 has not been revealed yet
I really hope ark ASA isnāt delayed. But itās it doesnāt make sense that oficial servers are shutting down august 31 and Ark ASA itās releasing at the end of August(??
The 31st is the end of August.
Yeah š
We don't have an official release date for Ark Asc, aside from 'shortly after Officials shut down'
Unless I missed something
I mean like, an official date. The wording of sunsetting Officials on August 31st before Ark Asc's release is a little odd. They're futureproofing for a possible delay
Who says we gonna see a rock next from ASA
I don't see why they can't release ASA later that day, even the same rough time as they take down ASE's servers, seeing as how the servers are not going to be repurposed from what we've been told (UE5 Ark needs better servers to run well or something, I don't remember but it was along those lines)
ARK > RUST
I think they intend to release it later that day. only thing is they don't give themselves any window to prevent it being September. š¤£
I mean, if they're that confident, then good for them
I'd rather have a confident dev than not tbh
Confidence is how WC winds up having to back pedal though š
They also said something to the effect of ādelays happen and yes we may miss some deadlinesā in a recent cc. So Iād expect some form of delay, even if minor, is pretty possible if not likely. Better delayed than miserably unplayable or incomplete, but that does undermine a confident stance on a release date
Delayed again?
Or a different tree!
Or maybe a 5 min gameplay š„ø
šæ
?
hot take: more building options please š
pve strucutres only obviously
i dont wanna trigger any ark "veteran" that has phobia for tek
Always down for more building options
I dislike the tek tier balance wise not aesthetically. Would be nice to have more than one wood/stone/etcā¦we did get confirmation of multiple woods but idk if thatāll mean multiple types of wood structure
and regarding maps, reverse scorched earth wouild be nice
a map full of ice
makes ice wyvern canon
ik ppl r asking for an ocean dlc but this is more promising
besides, ocean is prettty easy
you tame a tuso and u win
The ocean is easy because itās badly designed
Hence the need for a DLC lol
Whereas ice maps are kinda boring and overdone. Every map has a cold biomeā¦what would an ice DLC provide thatās much different?
what would an ocean DLC provide to the other maps
they will remain with easy ocean
i seee a pattern
dont add anything, rework eevrything
For ark 2? There IS no ocean
We have no confirmation of an ark 2 ocean -> so the argument as I made it boils down to ādonāt make a sloppy ocean for ark 2ās base game, instead make a really impressive one as an ocean DLCā
Correct, thatās the chat weāre in lol
thought this was ark 1.5 XDDD
Fair to be irritated then lol. Ocean dlc would be dumb for ASA
but not ice dlc š
nvm its same problem
i would say rework everything then add new dlcs but thjat would be asking too much
lets not bring our hopes up
Iām curious what they do for a final DLC. Do they take a genesis 1 route with lots of normal biomes, or an extinction/Gen 2 route where itās a fantasy biome?
praying its fantasy
the canon dlc they adding for ark 1.5 later on shgould be fantasy
and its probably gfonna be arat prime
It could be a prequel
thats what im saying
Oh wait lol Arat prime is the prequel
They could do other stuff - like the āfirst arkā
you mean the prototype ark?
Or the first functional one
Could even do earth but after tek war and before extinction/the arks
mega sequel
i still think arat prime is the better choice
extinction is nice so im hoping its similar
Agreed - but WC makes the lore, so they can write up lore to explain anything they want
That could include a pretty awesome map we didnāt expect
hope so
when gen2 trailer came out i thouught there would be alot of unique areas
like where the missions take place
Gen 2 was weird. Had some awesome under the hood concepts. But in practice it felt so dang boring
no caves, 3 biomes only
does ocean even count
theres no reason to go there XD and its ez to miss
The asteroid belt mechanic and improved missions were amazing conceptually. But then flaws started to show up lol
The SUMP was an awesome idea to get an ocean on an otherwise dry map, but it was kindaā¦not wrapped into any other part of the map
eden and rockwell are very bland if you compare them to aberration biomes gameplay wise
since u basically fly around there's no reason to tame anything
on abb you lose your sanity trying to get a rock drake egg
if they made gen2 super super hard that will justify the free tek suits
even rockwell prime is easy
unironically the hardest part in gen2 is not getting knocked out by the euptyrid when spawning
Yeah
Correct but thatās cause the lack of flyers so it balanced
flier free maps imo are instantly better
would be nice to find a way to force fliers away from the role of "oops the game can be avoided because I'm above it"
lvl 35 or 37 pte taming go brr
I still think there needed to be missions you could only do in the SUMP, big missed opportunity there imo
SUMP did need SOME reason to exist baked into the map rather than "it's there"
I mean, you can get karkinos and biotoxin? /hs
Yeah, it do be pretty useless... hope they revamp it a lil bit in ASA
Yeah
I love krabs
Don't get me wrong, karkinos are great (and need to be made breedable please dear god), but they're pretty useless on Gen 2 honestly
Everything is useless on Gen 2 except stryders manes and maewings š š
Sorry, and the tek fed suit
I thought they where
Nope. unbreedable
And they could be so much better by just letting them breed so I can at least make them look cool so I have something to do with them lol
They have genders btw, just not breedable
Karkinos are instantly outclassed by a flier
A whole class of creatures become viable when fliers are booted out of the picture
True and real
Here's hoping flier balance is attainable š¤
(I have no idea how though LMAO)
There are solutionsā¦but who knows if theyāll happen
You canāt have fliers compete with grounded tames, which is the crux of the issue. You need to remove flier - ground interactions that favor the flier
True, I could see there being a thing where fliers maybe have like... a poise system? If that makes sense? As in, you take X amount of damage in Y amount of time, and you become grounded or something (kinda like giga rage, now that I think about it š . ) But I have no idea how they'd be able to implement it without fliers becoming useless since damage is so fluctuant with BPs and crafting skill and mutations
Mutations š”
Yeah š
Iād far prefer fliers just do near 0 damage to anything on the ground
And take extra damage/have less health
I hope they just cap mutations at the very least, then it'd be far less of an issue
Let them occupy a scout/support role, but not a damage role
Now THAT would make fliers useless lmao
Some fliers whole thing is damage, like what
Yep. So undo that
Lemme just un-breath my wyvern real quick
If you want a damaging flier, itās so you can dogfight and pick off other fliers
You could easily make breath attacks do near 0 damage and just impart a debuff (if wyverns even arrive in ark 2, which I hope they donāt)
No lmao. Ark 2
just give ground dinos tools to fend off fliers
ASA wonāt see any major fixes to fliers. Itās a dead topic
No, pretty sure we're talking about ASA
Have been since the karkinos thing, maybe even before then
This was the āstartā with no mention of ASA
Unless you thought the SUMP revamp meant we were only chatting ASA? I assumed you meant ark 2 when you pivoted to talk of fliers - since thatās what I did
Fliers in ark 1 and ASA are a sailed ship
Hardly, the whole game is being revamped for a reason
If we voice the issues, there's a chance they get fixed
How do you know?
Hence my mutation cap comment
Too many fliers are intrinsically meant for flier - ground combat. Same with their stats
You got secret access or somethin?
ASA is meant to cater to ark 1 players, while ark 2 is meant to progress the series. So why would they redesign fliers from the ground up? Makes no sense
Not redesign, just rebalance
Since that would be required to āfixā them in ASA. I canāt imagine theyād ruin the skiff or wyverns to do the needed rebalance
Skiff could go unchanged for all I care, if you get the skiff, you earned it
The skiff broke Ab for good - I resent it for that
But the poise system I mentioned could be implemented easily I'd think, probably in ASE even lol
Yea but it would suck lol
Bet there's a mod that does just that
Hence my statement on the matter of fluctuant damage and the issues it brings to the enrage-esque mechanics in the game
It also has no impact on PvE, unless you want a PvE dogfight to end in two grounded fliers poking each other lol
I very much disagree, it would make flyer combat much more interesting and involved. You'd have to take into account that, if you attack this creature, you could be grounded and forced to fight whatever is on the ground as well, so it poses a risk reward thing
But obviously there'd be reduced ground buildup from other fliers
Iām not sure how to help you if you donāt see that as really bizarre. āIām gonna fight a flierā becomes two grounded flying animals attacking each other? Count me out
Thereās NOTHING obvious about that lmao
I mean, it's obvious to me, like how the thing where flyers doing zero damage to ground dinos is the "obvious" route in your opinion
When in reality, it'd make the game unfun
Itās not āobviousā so much as a solution available
Alternatives that donāt reduce the strength of flier - ground interactions to account for fliers having the ability to engage whenever they want -> lost cause
My suggestion is just one of many that achieves that outcome
Poise does reduce flier to ground viability, though?
As they then are less inclined to attack ground units, lest they be grounded
Through the severe limitation of player agency (since I assume you lose freedom of movement when grounded)
As much as landing normally limits you, sure
A dogfight would basically be a test of āwho gets grounded firstā before anything interesting happens between two equal footed airborne creatures
It just sounds like a big risk to come for player agency. Nobody likes to watch while their flier spirals helplessly to the ground to get steamrolled
And it's not like every PvPer (the ones who will actually use this mechanic tbh) isn't running a suit and can't just abandon ship lol
Maybe terrain becomes relevant in flyer vs ground. If dinos cant see you behind a boulder it implies a directional attack wont hit you either.
weren't they planning on doing that? but iirc they didn't do it and just added that lvl cap bc players would lose stuff and cry. now with ASA it's the perfect moment to do it
Almost as big a risk as leaving fliers as they are, I'd say š
Leaving fliers as they are is safer across the board than a bad solution
If youāre gonna eat bad PR for a major rebalance (especially a nerf) it needs to be a strong solution
And, again, fliers would deal reduced (or even zero, if it really comes down to it) grounding damage to eachother
You seem to be ignoring that point
0 and reduced arenāt the same. My statement stands if itās reduced
If itās 0, thereās thin room for discussionā¦but Iām really not sure how getting 2-3 shots with a fabi off would play. I presume youāll say that itāll be insufficient to ground? To which Iāll ask how you intend to ground a flier
A velo would do it nearly instantly I supposeā¦or a turret. But Iām not sure what else is really anti air on the ground that can do a ton of sustained damage to knock a flier out of the sky. Assuming a capped fabi doesnāt work like a rhino charge and one shot the mechanic like rhinos instant rage gigas
I wouldn't have the slightest idea how to gauge whether or not a fabi shot should ground any given flier, because like I said the damage in the game is very wacky and I don't know how to account for it if it's not going to be reasonably capped
So the discussion kinda grinds to a halt right there if we have little to no input on the other factors, I think
I think thereās a better shot for BP and mutation changes than flier changes in ASA
The most I can hope for in regards to fliers is that Ab and Gen 1 get tighter restrictions to keep out gliders or other things that break the map balance
Keep out gliders? Uhhhh, the rock drake is a glider, sir
But I get it, I think it'd be more efficient to just reclassify the maewing, managarmr, and bloodstalker as flyers tbh
Since they can start their crazy as fuck OP movement from literally wherever they want, and the rock drake has to get up high first (and is a true glider)
I don't know how I feel about the skiff being disallowed, though. I mean, Gen 1 is where you get it, for god's sake. But maybe disallowing it's construction on Aberration would be ok? Idk how I feel about it as I don't use skiffs for anything other than taming noglins on Gen 2
Skiff would have to exist on Gen 1
Just hard banned on Ab. Same with manas, maewings, etc
As would the rock drake's access to the map, imo
Drakes are kinda worse stalkers, but itās not unreasonable to mutually ban them from each otherās maps
Drakes are nowhere near bloodstalkers lmao
#BUFF DOCK RRAKE
They're breedable, so I'm good, but I wouldn't say no to it
make them apply radiation on bite š
Thank god WC ignores us for balance most of the time
Now that is something I'd like to see from a creature in the future, holy shit I literally was thinking this the other day no joke
I mean, there's been nothing to balance, ASE is dying so why try to balance anything lol
But the new stuff, they just may take hints for
Even the new community creatures thankfully do not get their full community suite
8 years of ark, and I can count on two hands the number of major balance changes
Well yeah, that's a given
Iām fine with consistency. Rocking the boat makes people mad. Butā¦there are some oof things Iād like to see changed going forward that I suspect are for ark 2
its not a super special ability like what wyverns have but if the radiation damage is based on percent health max dmg it'll be a great soaker killer
oh yeah, mobile soaker killer than can glide, equip tek saddle and is tanky
Hasn't really been all that much asked for that hasn't already been done, besides like making certain things breedable
Percent based damage š¤®
Cave meta disagreed
I was like, i know copied the link right