#ark-2
1 messages · Page 104 of 1
I can't do much useful googling right now but I'm very sure that if someone tries, they will find audio recordings of WC/SG talking quarterly finance stuff
this is typically very available to the public
How do we know? I'm sure WC wants the best for both the community and their business, but a large part of the concern is the fact they've massively hurt their credibility by saying, "X will be free", and then backtracking on that. Even if they were forced to do so, what else will they have to back track on?
They changed what X was
2023 financial year is starting this week, so there was probably a big discussion 2-3 weeks ago
X was an UE5 direct port. Asa is NOT just an UE5 port. It’s a balance and performance pass, a bunch of QoL, and a new DLC
"Due to unforeseen circumstances Ark 2 will not have souls like combat"
I don’t love the price tag either, but I’m being fair by admitting ASA is not what was originally mentioned as a free update
If SG/WC are listed as public companies, or someone closely related to them is, then you can go to SEC ( Securities Exchange Commission) and read the published accounts for that public company. They will provide all sorts of details regarding the financial health of the company, things the company is proud of and threats the company recognises
There’s not much mentioned because they’ve announced it with a meme 
That makes it even worse. Being crooked like a genies wish or monkeys paw makes it look waaay worse.
"Ark 2 combat will be a port of Mario64"
"Oh... well... actually... The product was originally a toaster, but now it's a bread crisper. So, it's different."
Idk, I think it’s worse to say a toaster will be 1$ and now it’s 20$
At least this time it’s a toaster being upgraded to an air frier
The thing is: the only information we had was we would get an free UE5 upgrade for Ark. It wasn’t clear what else would come.
I can't find any documents between WC and SG, we need some war thunder players
Ark 1.5 is a ground up recreation of Ark 1 using the UE5 engine. Most assets and mechanics can't simply be copy pasted into the new engine so the developers will have to start from scratch (almost). Ark 1.5 gives the developers an opportunity to fix bugs that were fundamentally impossible to address in UE4. They definitely won't fix all bugs and it's unlikely the game will be perfect but at least the developers stand a fighting chance.
Sure, but if a company told me they were upgrading my toaster to a an air fryer for free, and then said well, we added a few features (not to discredit how much work will be done to ASA) so we need to charge ya for it. I'd probably say, ugh... No thanks... I just wanted a toaster. Problem is, a certain part of the crew is being strong armed into using air fryers, and charging em for it.
I don’t buy they are charging for it because the scope changed.
The worst will be when we do spend 50 bucks on the bundle and come to find out that the bundle only includes access to the beta of ark 2 and not the full game itself.
They are probably charging for it because people are tired to fund Ark 2 for another year.
Jeremy said most part of the work was already done. So why not just release the upgrade and maybe later the remaster?!
I’m saying there was no mention of an air frier. WC promised a free toaster, then said “actually we’re gonna offer you an air frier but it costs ya”
Free upgrade + paid remaster.
Doesn’t make sense to say they changed the scope in two months just because
Right, but that’s not what was initially communicated
There are other reasons they can’t say out loud. Like money.
don't listen to social media
Listen to what then? My mind reading? WC communicates using social media and other forums
And I’m just conjecturing. Because I think their approach now is better than before. Keep things until they can say more.
Well, anyone waiting for the toaster just want the toaster. Saying it’s now called Air Fryer won’t change the sentiment.
Not wrong
I hear ya. I just don't think with the vocabulary they've posted they can legally claim that their intention was to produce a different product.
Not that social media posts are legally binding or anything. You can't just tell someone you're selling them one thing, and giving them another, at least to your investors. Thats what makes snail so scummy at the moment, because thats exactly what theyre trying to do.
google "snail-inc-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2022-earnings-call"
They could have explained it better if that was their intention
There's also a level of common courtesy that goes into it that WC have demonstrated to us. They've not tried to weasel worm their way like that.
My guess is they just made a hard pivot and changed one product to another while we were in the dark
fill out the form with whatever details you see fit, you will get access to a corporate group call discussing a bunch of stuff
if you want to hear what snailgames thinks of their gamers, straight from the snail's mouth
I agree. The lack of follow up kinda reads as fear, even if there's NDA bs, they can still respond in a way the community is familar with.
oh god i'm listening but i have no way to rip it
How do you listen to it?
with great difficulty
Oh haha, I want to be in on the loop 🥺
HOD's vid kinda sums most of that up.
do the google search, find the page asking for basic registration details, give some name and some disposable email address, it will take you to a "webcast" page where you can listen to the call in full
there is some chinese man talking about how impressive it is that the ark community is so dedicated to the game, something something about nintendo switch
"introduce new features to keep the game fresh and noise noise
i can't listen properly right now
"monetised content"
"initiatives for 2023"
god the audio quality is awful
"this new ark game will be powered by UE5" "new addition to ark franchise" "we are excited to reveal a new ark expansion pack coming this year"
Ahaha
"new biomes, new mechanics"
I think it’s funny everyone’s being butthurt over ark2 release
we all knew they was gunna do this
we all knew.
😆
this call is worth getting a proper transcription of....
Pretty much all the chatter and outrage is about ASA
plz.. someone else
"I would like to share the latest progress of Ark 2"
i'll stop spamming my bad paraphrased transcript, i've made my point
"ark sales decreased by 33 million in 2022"
getting spicy
Im back my loyal subjects
I did, I’m your king now
For me 🙂
You missed me, I know you did @wintry cape
take my money!
Only cuz you asked
Makes sense. Also makes sense to shut down the ark 1 servers. Also I understand why they will charge for the UE5 upgrade, it’s just a natural outcome with Ark 2 new postponement.
Imma pay either way.
I want to hear more about it first.
What if it’s not worth it
Cause I love Ark?
But what if it’s not a good ark
I’m concerned about the new direction, that I won’t lie about. But I’m confident it’ll be good.
-great idea
For the people still enjoying Ark 1, it’s a no brainer. But people like me, that already stopped enjoying Ark 1, it’s necessary to have new stuff. I mean really new stuff, not just better graphics.
It sounds like Fortnite mixed with Dark Souls with Ark’s flavor.
I’m a beginner and I already sorta stopped enjoying it
When does beta release?
They didn’t say anything about a beta. I guess august is just the final version release, no early-access.
2024
Is there going to be a beta for that?
People that buy the bundle will get it for a month, before the actual release on the end of the year
Im more interested in buying the bundle because of the early-access
I want to play ark 2 ASAP
Pve, pvp, sp?
I wanna know more about the “souls like” concept and the serious tone.
All of them I guess
Like I feel Ark is serious as it is
I genuinely don’t know what to do in ark rn…
I doubt we will get relevant info about Ark 2 this year
It takes forever for me to raise Dinos so I can’t do boss fights and stuff
Charlie, how long did it take you to get ur first boss Rex on official pve?
This is what everybody does in ark. 90% of the time is breeding and farming
???
Especially once you get a base going.
I don’t understand how someone can turn a lvl 150 rex into a lvl 450 rex on official pve
We could kill the broodmother just trapping it
Hard to explain that to you in here. But it’s possible. Also, x-Rex can get to 500.
Watch YouTube videos. First you think it’s complicated, but it really isn’t.
I’ve never really understood how to mutate Rexes to get them boss Rexes
But this system will hopefully be revamped on Ark 2
It’s easy. But you will need to read or watch a video about it
Takes forever to breed and raise a single Rex on official pve
Basically you need to have 100s of females and get as much fertilized eggs you can.
I was tempted to move to sp just because of it
Actually there other creatures that you can raise faster and do a better job on the bosses. Depending on the bosses.
Shadowmanes, deinos, megatheriums etc
Rexes are just the ones that can beat all the bosses. But they aren’t the most effective.
I want all the above to be different on Ark 2
Same
I can’t unlock all the tek grams because I don’t have the Dino’s to do the bosses
Tame a bunch of high level rexes.
Breed them and combine the best stats. Such as if dad has better health and mom has better melee, you breed them until they pop a baby with both the good health and melee. You may have to do a lot of this and it'll take a stupid amount of time on official rates.
Once you get a rex with all of the desired stats, breed it until you have a bunch of females and one male with those same stats. They should all be the same level. Do not keep any mutated babies at this point.
You should be using an incubator. This way you can tell how many points is in each stat. If you breed two of your best stat rexes together (who MUST have the same stats!) the baby will always come out with those stats unless it mutates. Take note of those numbers.
Now you breed. All those females to that one male. Again, they should ALL have identical stats and they should ALL have the same level.
Once you get a mutated baby, you will know right away because the incubator will tell you so. And since you keep track of the original stats, you can see which stat is higher from the mutation. A mutation will add two points to a stat, thus two levels.
Once you get the desired mutation, if it is a male, it replaces your previous, un-mutated male. Keep your previous male, because - and this works at any point down the mutation line - if a female pops with the mutation you need, you breed it back to the original male until it throws a male baby with her mutated stat.
And then... you keep going on like that. If OG breeding group is level 250, then the first mutated baby will be 252. You breed the 252 to the 250 females. When another mutation happens, the baby will be level 254. And so on and so forth.
Now, at a certain point, you will hit 20 mutations on the paternal side. You can keep mutating after this point, but your chance of a mutation is cut in half. But since all of your females are clean, with no mutations, there will always be a chance of a mutation on the maternal side.
This works because even though if you breed a male that says 20 mutations on the paternal side and 1 mutation on the maternal side, once that male produces offspring, that 1 on the maternal side will be pushed to the paternal side on the mutation count of the babies - so then, the baby will say it has 21 mutations on the father's side, and 0 on the mother's.
To further clarify on keeping the original male with zero mutations,
If you get a female baby with your desired mutation, it's illogical to use her as your breeder because of the cooldown. If you just breed her back to your current mutated male, though, the mutation count will double because both parents will have mutation counts and so both will be passed down to the offspring. So you must keep your original male so that you do not double the mutation counter.
Theoretically you could keep stacking mutations like this forever.
Wow, that is one of the best, most detailed break downs of breeding I've ever read, I think. Good shit, mate 👍
Thank you! It took me a while to get the hang of it and eventually I just had to do it myself to fully understand. Every guide I read left me still confused. So when I talk about it I make sure to be very clear, and explain parts that confused me when I was learning.
Fair enough, I got the gist from that one Syntac video, but there were parts that he left out or didn't touch on that were brought up here (mainly how to flip the muts from one side to the other.)
Thank you so so so much!!!
You're very welcome! If you have any questions feel free to ask (:
You are just missing the neg mutating part
?
Will do!
If you breed a mutated male with a mutated female (that have the same mutation) their counter artificially raises, while the stats stay the same. If you do that, get two babies with the higher counter and repeat the process like 30 times you can overload the counter so it reads a negative number. Since the check for mutation chance only checks thst the counter is greater than 20 having a negative counter means the chances of a mutation are the same as if it had no mutations.
youre missing the lvl1 cheat way to get mutations 🤣
… you lost me after the first sentence…
It's not practically useful to do unless you are trying to cap a dino
Lol, thst comes after you get the neg line and doesn't affect the mutation chance. It only helps you maximize the stat to level cap
I thought I'd pretty much covered "Do not breed two mutated dinos together" :p
I just wanna know how to make boss Rexes to practice on the server I’m on now and when I get ASA and ark 2
Don't, unless you are trying to neg mutate
You did
You’re hurting my tiny brain
There is only so much I can learn about ark before I go clinically insane
I tried watching that video but I have a very hard time learning through video format because I zone out. Which makes looking things up about Ark frustrating, because even things that could be answered in a sentence are just ALL videos...
to be honest having a bunch of lvl1 fem you will get muts like 70% per egg and dosent matter how many mutations the male as
With 100 female fresh tamed rexes and a neg counter male, you can literally cap a line in like a third of the time as doing a clean stack
Level 1 does not increase the chance of a mutation
ho it does
Know what sounds good to me? Coming back here in a few months after j get the hang of normal mutation stacking then learning neg mutations…
It's not worth doing unless you are in pvp or you want to cap a line
I get it. Sounds a little exploit-y
Ty again! @weary kestrel good night!
Np! Good night
It's no different than going past 20 normally. It's just more efficient at it
If you’re on official just ask around for a boss run and skip the single worst time wasting mechanic I’ve ever seen in gaming

if your new just go with the basics neg mutes are where the OG players are at listen to @weary kestrel explanation and see how far you go then look into neg mutes
pretty sure if the male is above 20 then even with fresh lvl1 females the chance is halved
Is it time yet? Nvm they delayed to 24
Or just don’t care about breeding because it should be removed going forward. In ark 1 you can just take form other breeders and in ark 2 I’ll riot if I see the horrendous system repeated
you know theres a way to bypass breeding process and just get stray to boss fights right? its call reapers
Reapers can do alpha master controller?
will the map also get updated?
Yeah
I’m mildly surprised given I don’t hear them being used as armies for that
cant really say im surprised whatsoever with how ark 2 has been coming along
anyone else remember when we all thought we'd get ingame footage at the microsoft panel? good times...
ark 2 is gonna release when chess 2 comes out
yeh
They aren't comparatively great. But if you have people riding them and seperate dps tames they work amazing
i was the one on my group that come up whit a ways of passing alpha mc, use rexs reapers even gizmo myself but theres was a problem from time to time doing mc, when done sometimes some dinos would stay behind, lost about 9 reapers 3 rexs 2 gizmos in total runs i have done if not mistake
PC 2
what? they are even better when ppl dont ride reapers on mc, at least the AI is more smarter than panic ppl and does the tail swing, you just gotta be always giving commands, know if youre only taking one is still very duable as long you have a team to back you even, hell you can even dodge the mc lazer by jumping if youre riding one
Huh, I'll have to try it again. My unridden reapers got smoked last time
lol i remember was able to jump to those bridges on the final ring
were on agressive?
i use them on agressive give commands time to time even more when gigas spawn and i was on foot
in official
Yeah, I have done boss fights before, a lot
I only successfully soloed the alpha gen1 with stegos and theris with one reaper though
solo i never try since i was on a group doing free runs but i always said if i had to do solo i would bring a gizmo for the final run and the rest reapers max out lvl
and gets even better since you have the mutagen from gen2, i used one on a R-reaper and it was a beast
Maybe if I get a desire to try it again I'll do that
used gizmo for the mc beam, when you ride it and you get zap it dosent dismount you
What's a gizmo lol
ferox
So…to my original point. Did you do master controller with only reapers? No other bred tames? The point I’m making was that you need someone to do breeding of some sort to complete everything. But I’m not confident in what 20 mounted players can do
i did whit my group only reapers and was i who supplied them so they dint had bonus ride, wait i think one or two use theirs cause im recalling one was crying of loosing a color reaper
So that’s 20 reapers? And how many riders?
since we trying my way "idea at the time" 20 reapers and about 5 to 6 ppl in total
I see, alright
and if wc havent fix or its suppose to be like that you can use reapers to jump above those "bridges" on the final stage
Does that work for any boss? I suspect it’ll struggle against some of the tanky island bosses and obviously king titan, but I hear you don’t need much breeding for those (for other reasons)
reapers have a natural armor as long dosent have light, if not mistake i use them on rag, mc, all asc bosses those i can confirm, think i use them once maybe twice on valguero but not sure and i think i use on the island too maybe once or twice since i had groups of dinos for those fights than again i cant confirm those
i think i can say now it was a long time 🤣 since i stop playing before transfers open on gen2???
I’m less worried about their hp and more their damage
Since I know for some bosses like island alpha brood afaik you need bred tames to eat through the really high hp pool
35 to 50k hp rest on melee they work fine
yeh brood i recall using megatheriums but i think at some point i did whit reapers, now if was all reapers or not not sure cause brood her healt aint the issue its the poison at least for me
Oh the reapers would torpor out lol?
i dint get that, what you mean?
Well brood “poison” is just torpor and stam drop isn’t it?
hell no lol, it drop your health like crazy not even sure if does torpor, i rhink its manticore that does the high torpor
Tbh I never paid attention, I just spammed LMB until it died. Not sure if it or the spiders did poison/torpor/etc. all I know is when I finished everyone had torpor
Maybe in ark 2 I’ll actually know what boss attacks do
i think youre confusing whit manticore, that one that can drop even rexs in the middle of the fight
I’ve never been knocked out by brood but I’ve 100% had a lot of torpor on my rex group after the fight
i remember back when i was playing on ps4 the same group of rexs i solo alpha megapethicus 4 times whitout healing lost to alpha broodmother i was piss as hell, aside time spend to lvl up those rexs they use max out saddles
but i dont remember torpor from brood maybe im wrong but torpor only comes to mind is manticore
I think the torpor isn’t enough to be a consideration for brood since I’ve never had anyone knocked because of it…except an unmounted player who decided to try to flex (spoiler: he died instantly)
lol you just remind me a guy doing alpha rockwell 🤣 once we were inside he to try to switch armor by taking each piece of hazard suit to put flak i think but he got tentacle and the body was naked on the floor 🤣 good think for him it was a free alpha rockwell run otherwise that would be like 3k element lost as payment, i think that was the price ppl were charge then
Can confirm reapers are very viable for bosses, especially the R ones. I've run them exclusively on every map, the only one it gets kind of close on is Ab Rockwell, and that's only in singleplayer (they are viable on both single and unofficials, but single Ab gets hairy as you have to use the terminal and that limits you to either a tek suit or rad suit, and seeing as how you can't use shottys on reapers to shoot the balls AND you have to turn your shoulder pet on and off at certain times to kill enemy reapers, it gets a little too close for comfort near the end)
wc turn orbs on again on rockwell ab?
Why are R Reapers different/better than regular? I figured they were just reskins
every variant has some stat changes, like aberrant variants have less hp and more dmg, same goes for X and R variants i think
How does that make them viable for bosses, especially the R versions? 🤔
more dmg output compared to normal version
The difference between Ab and Normal is like ... 1-2%
So unless R Reapers get a big buff somewhere, they'd be about the same
In addition to having totally new color patterns and regions from their normal counterparts, they also have a 5% damage increase and 3% less health when tamed.
trust me it makes a difference when you lvl them up and whit mutagen you get even extra kick on them
either way reapers have natural armor that i personally find it better than max out saddles
i remember my last reaper "big momma" had around 60k hp and 1030 melee
i guess if that was on pvp it would had more melee since that was the talk of difference between pve and pvp
People are posting ark 2 is pve only, did I miss something in the crunch?
no, people being dumb yet again
Cool, that makes sense. Thank you
aint ppl being dumb its just some trolls make rumours and ppl follow then even more if is trolls whit youtube channels
next time you see ppl saying its only pve or pvp tell them to check steam page its all there
ufff that general tab its way too toxic, i start to laugh at the shit ppl saying than after 3min i change from laughing to thinking "this is madness", some ppl actually making campaign not only against ark 2 but even ark 1 to ppl just quit 🤣
All variant dinos have minor (but meaningful, especially at higher levels) stat changes, as Fox said. Variants are almost always better than the standard ones, basically
"In addition to having totally new color patterns and regions from their normal counterparts, they also have a 5% damage increase and 3% less health when tamed"
did you copy/paste my reply??? 🤣
Personally I prefer higher hp reapers, but high melee are kitting machines
Oh I copied the wiki, sorry I didn't see your reply. You beat me to it
Lol
yeh i got it from wiki but i was like "i already reply him that"
"trust me it makes a difference when you lvl them up and whit mutagen you get even extra kick on them"
I always forget to mutagen my reapers, tbh 😅
Sleeper problem with ark 1 is that player levels scale in value based on wild creature stats
The dinos are your weapon.
Sorry, player INPUT levels on tames scale based on wild creature base stats
That's why the wild tame stats matter the the most, yes
That and the roll after tame
you can hit the jackpot on a bad creature, statistically rare, but can happen.
a bad roll can ruin a great wild tame as well
Yep. If ark 2 still uses the basic ark 1 stat system (hopefully not), I REALLY hope they make base stats a flat value separate from any wild level ups
can i sand you a video on what asa my look like
F
Are they really shutting down ark for ark evolved scented
Yes for the candles
look at this video this is what asa may look like
hi
hi
hi am above you lol
Some variation is good, but it should be no more than like 10 or 20%
Not 400%
Lol
As long the whole meta is overhauled, it will be way better. Having souls-like combat opens a lot of possibilities to accomplish the missions, kill bosses etc.
can i sand you a video is a video on what asa my look like
Sure, but I won’t be able to watch it right now. Can you tell me what it is here?
sent ty
is only what asa my look like
The variation in wild tame stats is fine…what I want fixed is how that results in higher stat tames getting more stats per player inputted level up
Yeah, player added stat levels need to be just gone
can i san you a video
Is it official content?
is a video on what asa my look like
Alright, hit me
it is mad by one guy it look good
jut let me no what you think of it
i think it look good if asa did look like that
The motion blur makes me so sad lol, but the content is interesting
I think this UE5 update to ark 1 needs to include major QoL and content changes however to make people want to pay for ark 1 again. Ark 2 is clearly a new product…so it doesn’t have that issue. But it’s so new I think there’s valid concern it’ll lose elements people found attractive in ark 1. For example if ark 2 has the really obtuse souls “attribute” system that would be a major turnoff for me
back at least the video give us sum idea in how asa will look and my feel still we need reil game play of asa
wheres the video at?
i can give you the video it show what asa my look like
I'm ok, but thanks for offering!
is the same video i gave to shifter
Yeah, it's alright, I don't really need to see it
I'm 100% going to buy whatever WC put out anyways, so
so i might need some help with this
do you have to pay money for new ark?
ark 2
or will we able to upgrade to the ark 2 for free for others who do have this game?
Yes, you need to pay for things - why is this such a hard concept for people? 😂
someone tell me that in a call i left saying they will upgrade it
but guess they were not right in the call
i did not no if old one we can still play on it
and invite others on steam to play with us on old one
i do want to try it but i remember i got it for free on old one
so will have 2 arks
old one and ark 2
What we know right now:
Old Ark Official servers will be shutting down in late August (or when Ark Ascended releases) - you should still be able to host/play unofficial servers/singleplayer as normal. This version of Ark will not receive any updates except to fix crashes
Ark Ascended will be a paid release in late August, with 2 DLC packs for additional cost with the maps having a timed release (Scorched, Aberration, Extinction in the first pack, Gen1 and 2 in the second) as well as a brand new expansion coming in late '23
Ark 2 will be available as part of the bundle with Ark Asc from Asc's release until one year after - then Ark 2 will be a separate purchase. If you get Ark Asc in the bundle, you get Ark 2 as well
also someone tell me that if you do play unofficial servers you will have to pay for them for others to join you can someone explain to me on that because i do not understand i might need help on clearing that up i was not sure
unofficial is free to play on
its only the person that runs it that have to pay for it to keep it running
so that means i can just host server then on unofficial server
and i wanted to check because people tell me wrong information
they tell me that you wood have to pay to host unofficial server
after ark 2 comes out
official servers = wildcards run it
unoffical servers = random owner people that pay to keep the servers running for other people to join on.
if you are planning to host a unofficial server of your own, yes you have to pay to keep it running
ok then will have to switch to ark 2 then so we can still play then
ill let them no
so its free to host on ark 2 then
idk
I dont think its known yet at this point for ark 2
seeing as ark 2 got delayed to 2024
o
but in singleplayer as normal
can you still invite players to it if there friends with you on steam?
on old ark?
wait if you do unoffical server offline on your computer
and invite someone on your friends list on steam can you let them in game ?
will it work?
what i mean is allow them in by via invite on steam on your friends list?
what i mean is you do not have to host server to be on list on old ark
you can just invite them on unoffical server that offline but still invite them to your world
will that work?
like on your friends list on steam?
i was not sure so i wanted to ask about all of this i was not sure
also how about the mods on old ark will they move over to new ark?
let me tell how gaming online works, official server=own by the game company can be free or you pay a sub like WOW than you have unofficial server= server host by a player thats paying for that server and HES the one that makes the rules and can decide if other players can play on his server for free or not
so what your saying is that is its free to host ark 2 but on old one i was not sure
its never free to host any game unless you own a "server pc" otherwise you have to rent a server to host a online game dosent matter if is ark 1 or 2 or other game
i have pc
yes you can make your pc as a server to host online unofficial servers but it will consume a lot of resources to host a game and play it on same pc
ok i was unsure i got mix up
so unofficial server on pc hosting is free then is that right?
i got mix up what others were talking about
i was unsure of the information i was getting to understand this stuff
a server itself is a pc, can be a normal pc, a gaming pc but when companies that rent server services its a different hardware configuration, i recommend you google it to understand better how servers work so you have a clear idea
so mods come first for PC in August and then console later in the year? I saw that the overwolf CEO said this yesterday
I don't think we have any confirmed details yet on the timeline for mods, except WC working with modders to get popular mods available on release
Whats the timeline for the non canon maps? Seems like all will be available day one but they didnt list the maps.
Scorched will be available upon initial release (but still need to buy the DLC pack) Q3 '23
Aberation Q4 '23
Extinction Q1 '24
Gen1 Q1 '24 (Pack 2)
Gen2 Q2 '24 (Pack 2)
Oh sorry, misread - I don't think we have a timeline for non-canon maps yet
If I had to harbor a guess, I'd assume a month or so after their compliment/mechanics sharing DLCs are released
Center / Rag Q4 '23
Valguero / CI Q1 '24
Lost Island / Fjordur Q2 '24
But these are just speculation
They said those come out with the main game in the crunch
'The base game will include The Island, SOTF, and all the “Non-Canon” DLC maps (which will be added to ASA over time). '
So they're confirmed but are releasing after a delay
Ah I see. I assumed the bundling meant instant. Good catch
Yeah, I had to read the announcements a couple times myself to make sure I understood everything
yeah they didn't say anything about the timeline of the mods, but the overwolf CEO tweeted that they would first be bringing mods to PC, then console later in the year
Overwolf is the company they are doing the mods through
Makes sense, OW needs to build framework to support mods on console and PC would be a safe and relatively established place to test that framework first
I'm very interested in how the criteria for 'quality and value' for paid mods will be established ...
I’d also be fine if CI didn’t make it
Perhaps one of the friends we lost along the way
Not my favorite map either
Maybe a $10 off for users who won’t download CI, rewarding the sane members of the community 🤣
so ppl are considering the last cc to be all true before this next cc?
Some people still have their doubts, but I believe it's true. There's some things in the Crunch I don't like, but a fair bit I do
humm
bit wierd making such announce and dont have a steam page for ASA when they have a page for ark 2 but still possible
Yeah, still odd to not have any dev tweets about it
plus this all would making dollie looking stupid, i for sure would refuse to post anything else unless was concrete cause yeh "next time you see something from ark 2 will be gameplay"
i hope there will be new tek engrams or tek engrams will be different like the tek suit but that better or new tek engrams because how long have we been playing with the same engrams
you better hope the game actually works instead of more engrams if ASA is real
True
one thing for sure if ASA is real and almost if not all is true from last cc will make a huge 180º on their word and wont go well for them in terms of player base
@tropic forge what stuff went out of the game because I heard through the grapevine that quite a lot is going away like net gun and stuff
none of that is mention on last cc, better read it for yourself
The scope of the project changed. If it was just an engine upgrade then yeah, I'd be pretty pissed about the price. But it's an engine upgrade, new features and QoL updates, full cross platform support PLUS cross platform modding. That's a LOT of new features that take dev time and resources
the engrams will only be unavailable until the dlc itself is out again after being converted to UE5
I'm curious if "new features" includes new engrams and the like...in the last long period of updates we've only seen new engrams (beyond saddles) with new maps
Besides, seeing all the Official players' salt when they saw Officials servers are shutting down was priceless 😂
The fact that we can quote this hurts me. That tweet was the single greatest disappointment for me.
no i wasent refer to that when i mention a huge 180º, i was more mention on their progress on ark 2 and if is true about everything that would mean they are pulling out resources from ark 2 to make ASA ence the delay plus its also confirm what i said when they mention about ark 1 EU5 by copy/paste stuff from ark 1 to ark2 to speed the process
the music is a wonder of the modern world
Yea the salt was delicious
They're releasing a new story dlc with 4 new creatures after the current dlc is made available, and I assume there will be new engrams with it.
went really well on the popcorn I stole from fox
Oh yeah, lack of Ark2 news was painful
sure, but we don't know how long that'll be after ASA's release. There's always the possibility we see something content wise before that point
You were wondering about new engrams. That's the only thing we have confirmed.
i wasn't clear, but i was responding to this
that was about to happen soo or later cause the moment they announce ark 2 officials die for me cause of the time bomb, dont know why other would thing it would last until they quit ark 1 🤣
I figured they'd slowly phase out lesser populated Officials once Ark2 was released, then maybe a final date a year or so later for end of service. But nope, just slash them all at once 😂
YEET
if is true to all i might actually buy ASA and get myself burn just because of 2 things, 1 EU5 aberration dlc and 2 for ark 2 being in the bundle plus the beta
i wonder how much grass touching will happen on server shutdown day
Haha
Prob none, Alphas are already planning to server cap Asc servers at launch
A lot
Thats 100 procent true
good thing im not a pvp fan anymore 🤣 lost that appetite on cod mw3
Official servers bring no value to me personally, so I couldn't care less what happened to them
Get your tribes together people, the rush will be real
Ye
i like officials but yeh it as its issues
Hoping shutdown happens a week or two before ASA is up lol
I play smalls with 4 tribe s
Nah thats not good
WC is gonna mark it as “touch grass” in their road map timeline
wonder if wc will reused same servers or they gonna get new better/worst ones
“We care about our players and want to give them the chance to touch real grass before returning to ark and turning grass off in their foliage settings”
Actual PvP players: How do I turn off all this ground clutter?
I also can’t wait for all the specs complaining when UE5 ark games drop
“What do you mean my half eaten potato can’t run the game on 200 fps”
so wait, why wc took off INI. if their planing for ASA in such short notice? to piss off pvp players?
It’s called a “pivot”
Where one course of action was being followed, and now a new one is
Ye
other words "lets piss them off so they get heat up before we make announcement of something that will even piss them even more so they dont get in state of shock" 🤣
Based if true
Look dm
People being banned for ini is actually such a huge step in the right direction
True but its stupid
because there are still so many aim botters they do nothing about it and then they suddenly remove ini after a few years because it is credited for pvp even though people are still walking around with aimbot
It’s also probably easier to check for ini
I am expecting and hoping the new anticheat deals with aimbot better
Significantly easier
wc says its hard for them to control 3dr partie programs and aimbots its on that class
I hope this means they will really test some of the stuff meant for Ark 2 on ASA. Like larger maps, the new creature manager and improved AI behavior.
I know but still
Apparently they will develop both from now on, so I hope the announced dlc won’t be the last one.
I hope so too, but we'll see
gotta wait for tomorrow to see whats gonna happen
My bet: nothing will be said tomorrow. Quote me on that later. 
what? another "there will be no eve this weekend, end of cc" 🤣
Yes. Why?! Because I believe they’ve already said everything they could last week. And I don’t believe anything has changed in a week.
Stock price sure has 😂
Time to buy, investors. It’s cheeeeap!
yeh i read on general snail stock price when really down but i dont understand none of that shit
guess if microsoft wanted to buy wc it would be a nice time for it thats all i got from it
All snail games investors are Ark players. They are pulling the prices down just to prove a point.
boycott ark is real???
Of course I’m kidding, but it would be fun. 🤣
What made the stocks tank was probably their profits going down. Apparently Ark sales tanked. And Ark is basically their most profitable product.
well ark 1 steam page was bombard whit negative reviews so... 🤣
Ark is like their only profitable product
well everything else as being abandoned so yeh makes since, if only someone bought dark and light 😢
D&L is a bad game, man. Ark is light years better.
BUT there are two other products that may save snail games
D&L mobile and Ark mobile
Mobile games are totally based on microtransactions
dude D&L is more fantasy compare to ark but the way of taming and other stuff i find it more appealing to me
It could be a huge cashflow if they are successful
The general idea is amazing. I remember when the first news came. But the implementation was so bad. As an example of that: the creatures are ugly AF and the building system is shit.
TBF Atlas has way more potential than D&L
IMO atlas is better than sea of thieves.
That's a ... take
Anyways. End of off-topic on my part 🤣
theres some creatures that are cool but the game itself feels like on alpha stage so yeh no way to know how would be if they work on it like wc did whit ark
I have played both from day one. Ark was more polished than D&L. Maybe it can be savaged on the mobile version.
yeh i only found out D&L way late, actually i think i found it near the time they abandoned it
snail games made it, kinda speaks for itself 😂
Let's be honest cheating sadly happens on every big game
Because we have so many people who are just toooo noob to play legit
Dammm
@charred glen you need to chill 😂
Absolute madlad
@fallow niche might need some help here
ark chatters can't use their brains as obviously stated
What
💀
The spamming link or something
Repeated link posting attempts

Bro they cant even fix the longneck animation. Theyre lying there asses off
Horse React 🐴
All guns are broken in a way in ark
Mods arent even coming on console straight away🤣
@fallow niche 🐴
I hope ark two doesn't cost as much GB as ark one
Please move ASA content to #general or #ark-survival-ascended until the ASA channel suggestion has had feedback. This channel is only for ARK 2.
If the remove the file it won't
Rip
Why we don't have a channel for the new ark1
.
no reacts 😭
Alright back to hiding in the dark
No spamming them, there's a difference 😂
What maps are there in the beginning?
Of Ark 2? Just arat prime that we know of.
Yes ark two
Atleast abbbb
Ab
Ab is not on Ark 2.
We need the abbbb
Hahaha
Oh right

Sleepingpod
Wich maps
Bro no map of ark 1 will be in ark2
Beneath that floating island area would make for a great cave system…maybe even Ab part 2 👀
Unless the lazy and add old map in lmao
Just Arat Prime that we know of. All information is in pins.
I was told the island the center scorht erf ragnarok
That is not ARK 2. As I previously said, please move all Ark Survival Ascended content to #general or #ark-survival-ascended.
Where do I go for ark two info
Then?
Ark 2 is in this channel. Ark Survival Ascended is not Ark 2.
They are two separate games.
Ohw
Well to be honest I think we should call that 2 now and ark2 ark3 
No.
😂
Haha
Alright I ma go hide cya
Ark 3 is Ark survival ascended, seeing as Atlas is kinda Ark 2 😂
Atlas not of ark
I predict that a majority of the player base will stay with ark ascended and request continued expansion to that game. But I hope ark 2 is good enough to prove me wrong.
The official playerbase for sure
Yeah
we shall see next year when they drop gameplay and screenshots
I think ark 2 is aimed at an expanded audience in many ways, but there’s not 1:1 overlap with the ark 1 base
we kinda need new people aswell tho
but there is smalls and official right or?
We do not know, because neither ASA or ARK2 are out yet.
All we know is that there’s official PvP and official PvE for ark 2 when it comes out
Mm
🍿
🍻
Only official??😔
So far yes…only official
Other Gamemodes will be released over time is my understanding of Dollie’s message
no ark 2 as single player confirm
guess by that it should have host mode too like ark 1
Oof
we could also have server hosting at launch/closely after launch
aint sure bet its confirm, its on steam page
Atlas is a ark reskin. So its ark
It's not. Move to #general if you want to complain about atlas. Thanks 
Why are you defending a company that lies and just cares about our money?
Okay but first I need you tell me where it even says singleplayer because I don't see it and I got happy thinking my kids could play 
ark 2 steam page on the tag side
Move it to #general if you want to complain about the recent crunch. We're not doing it in this channel. Thanks.
Do you mean this? It doesn't have a checkmark next to any of those, so it isn't confirmed.
yup
Yeah its not confirmed lol
naa dont think they can put those tags if aint gonna be on the game
Saladmander as promised
Yeah they can. Those are just to let you know if it is or isn't. It'll have checkmarks if it's in.
Steam tags iirc aren’t checked off like they are for console/OS support
i just check a game that i mess up in buying it that dosent have single player and the tags dosent have single player
yeah, none from Ark 1 are checked
Right…because afaik that’s not how they work lol
I think ark 2 is saying SP is on the table. Ofc unlike official PvE and PvP Dollie didn’t say it’s confirmed
Ark 1 has these, I don't know where on earth I got the checkmark thinking from. Probably looking at another game somewhere. Sorry 
Probably languages and the OS/console support stuff? Those have checkmarks
So we do probably have SP, but I'm not going to say absolutely yes because we don't have info yet 
Well we also don’t really know what SP entails. It would be nice if it was a robust mode rather than what I’d argue is a sort of…forced mode in ark rn
Probably, I get confused sometimes with all the random things we keep track of.
Wdym by forced? We don't absolutely have to play SP
If you want a halfway acceptable SP experience you need to tweak a ton of settings
OH you mean
Forced meaning that it’s multiplayer balanced/settings but you’re alone
It would be nice if settings and boss scaling etc were balanced a bit more reasonably for a single person in SP
Yes, without creating an insanely OP option like the "use singleplayer settings".
Singleplayer settings definitely imo is uh not the suite of changes I’d have used
Rates DO need to be higher for SP/non dedicated, but I’m not as sure that the stats need to be wildly jacked up
@fallow niche ar you a mod in ark one rn?
No, i am a volunteer for the discord. This channel is only for ARK2. Please stop using it for unrelated content.
Oh okey
So does ark2 actually have a name or is it serious named ark2 
What’s wrong with ark 2
I mean it’s not creative but I don’t see a problem
They finna call it Arat or smth 💀
Ark2: Survival Evolveder
Lmao
It's like the didn't know what to name it 😂
To be fair, there's nothing wrong with Ark2. Halo: Combat Evolved -> Halo2
Okay fair
I mean would you rather ark survival unevolved
Honestly?
Yes
Okay, but even in that situation it did feel lazy
Halo 5: Guardians is a badass name. (even if the game isn't)
Same goes with Halo: Infinite as the 6th main title
Whatever they decide to name it isn't going to be the selling point for me
It doesn't matter of the selling point. It's the name we're going to have to stick with for the next 8+ years, so I'd rather it some 'zing' to it.
As of right now, it's just a meme name.
How is Ark2 a meme name?
Is any game sequel with just a '2' a meme too?
Doom 2
Half-Life 2
Portal 2
Diablo 2
Left 4 Dead 2
Torchlight 2
Halo 2
Banjo-Tooie (that counts, right?)
It might be unoriginal, but that's ... kinda the point. It's a sequel
I wouldn't count Banjo-Tooie, but yes. I do think those are unoriginal names.
And your point of 'that's the point since it's a sequel' falls fucking flat on its ass, since a sequel 'can' be unique.
Example, DOOM Eternal having a much better name as a sequel, then DOOM (2016)
Ark survival devolved
That should be ark one’s name Ngl
There’s no survival in ark 1
Can't use that because reasons 😂
Only tek suits and nets
Why?
Couple years ago, devs shared Ark 'play as a dino' April Fool's joke was called Ark Survival Devolved
Good
I think they're saying this as a 'it should've been named that instead of evolved'
Ark didn’t do April fools this year because the biggest joke is them
Yeah Exsctly
Ngl I’m actually confused like
How did ark become so successful
Everyone collectively agrees it’s a trash game but people still play it
bc it’s addicting
I think it’s because it’s unique play style of playing a survival game with your friends and raiding other people is just
It has a pretty addicting gameplay loop that checks a lot of boxes for people. Good enough to look past most of the faults
I’m so glad I didn’t waste too much of my life on that game
Saw a guy flexing 20k hours on ark
Genuinely feel bad for him cause he lost 2 years of his life
Because even though people say it's shit, it isn't a shit game itself. It's just ran by a shitty parent-company that has the community of salty teens.
Imagine flexing hours 
wrong, ark is the success that is today due to simple reason of not having another rival
There's a bunch of rivals, wym?
Bro ubisoft cousin have done it better
Imagine ark made by sony interactive
Visual masterpiece
pc maybe, console doesnt seem to get play tested though
what game you have mmo free building "more or less" you can tame dinos breed them have primitive to futuristic weapons tools and have massive maps?
Maps are mid, broken and pay to win
Conan Exiles checks all of those boxes except futuristic weapons
you have dinos on conan? and theres breeding there?
The taming dinos is the only unique factor they have
Literally
You know if rust had dinosaurs it’d be a better ark
They could leave everything else and just randomly add tameable dinosaurs
And it’d literally be better than ark
Taming and breeding animals and monsters, yeah. It's not as indepth as Ark's, but it's there
damn dint know that
not exactly breeding
snatch babies and hope for a greater version
humm, still aint close to ark style then
Eh, close enough. Guess the server I played on had some ... mods 😂
plus i notice ppl when nuts when they had color change on dinos guess that counts too
so in the end ark dosent have a true rival otherwise not sure it ark would last this long dealing the way wc does whit their player base
The way I see it, if it's a survival crafting game then it's a competitor to Ark. Each has their own niche mechanics or whatever makes the unique, but at the end of the day it's still a survival game
theres plenty "survival" games but none so far as to offer what ark does which is way less about survival and more about dinos
That's just Ark's niche. It's still a survival crafting game at the end of the day
theres like 4 i think dino games atm that are survival but you are the dino trying to survive as a baby until fulll grown but thats it
but again ark as almost no survival mechanics and everyone is on ark cause of the dinos
I don't disagree with you there, but point stands that Ark is a survival crafting game. And there are many others like it. Atlas, DayZ, Rust, Conan, probably tons more
Hey.. hey is that you.. hey you yeah. You. Take it. Take this. It’s called trash. I mean there’s other names for it. Like uh.. ark, wildcard, snail games, nitrado servers. There’s some more but uh. Take it. Give me 60 bucks For it too. Shut up and give me. Oh yeah you want some extra parts for it too. 40 bucks.
Heh, Minecraft is a competitor to Ark as a survival crafting game
There’s a very common trend with popular games. Unique features and a complete game loop
Minecraft’s unique feature is block world
ok but lets go back to were this all start it which was why ark was so successful so far and why i said it dosent have a true rival, aint about being a survival game its because it as dinos,breeding,colors and futuristic shit on it plus primitive too
You're wanting Ark's rival to be exactly like Ark, which isn't realistic. Is Coke not a rival to Pepsi, despite having different ingredients and Coke was designed to be drunk warm; Pepsi cold?
just saying is there was another company making same thing as wc whit another story im pretty sure wc would be at easy as they are and even less dropping shit on they player base just because
-Slaps roof of Atlas-
Wait what
dude they are from wc devs where is the diferent company there?
Grapeshot Games
just because they had a different name and saying its a "sister company" dosent mean they aint the same shit
If it ends in games it’s a bad company as In late releases for everything
So wait, now because the game is too similar to Ark, it can't be a competitor? 😂
omg no its the same company same code same ppl no matter what
dark and light ark atlas as all the same damn code same principles same everything and all own by snail games that owns wildcard
not matter how many branches a tree as its all the same tree or you gonna call a different tree if you find a branch whit a different color?
You tell me 😂
I realy was excited about Atlas (bought it), but was so very disappointed
lol youre the one seem to no understand thats why i say that so you tell me 🤣
I've made my point, you're wanting far too specific mechanics matching for a game to be considered a competitor to Ark
well a rival for me as to be similar in term of games youre you gonna say stranded deep is a ark rival?
or green hell
Sure, they're survival crafting games
We could all pack up and play Sea of Thieves 🙂
but yet none as dinos to tame breed so on so how can they rival whit ark not to mention none of those i mention are mmo
Just features, parts of the whole
By your logic, Pepsi isn't a competitor to Coke 🤷♂️
both have sugar caffeine and gas
Different features, makes them totally different 🤷♂️
althought one start whit the same thing as their name until was forbidden
Completely non-comparible!
you just blow my mind, nice talk
Likewise on both accounts
I love this whole conversation, and how it always breaks down into "Oh, so Ark isn't close enough to Rust to be comparable? Ok, let's use Atlas as an example, then." "Nononononono, that's too close, so it doesn't count" "Whe?
" literally every time without fail
so you read all and you fail to notice the part of a ark not having a rival game from a different company?
🤦♂️
Can you tell today was slow at work? 😂
@tropic forge trust when I say @tropic crag is the definition of a wildcard simp
Rust devs are a thousand times better the wildcard devs will be
If anything ark needs to be more like rust when it comes to pvp balance and communication with the playerbase
I've suggested a tool cupboard for Ark 2 multiple times here, and I'm far from WC's biggest fan, lmao. But go off, I guess 🤡
X to doubt. Rust doesn't even have official servers
I have played rust for like 50 hours, and in those 50 hours I was aimbotted 27 times. You literally can't convince me it's any better
Literally the only thing from rust worth taking is the tc and explosives not treating structures like they are paper
B to cancel I ain’t talking about the fact rust don’t got official servers I’m talking about in game wise and in terms of developers rust trumps ark in that category
That’s true
Not trying to rust got it’s faults
I don't think it does at all.
It's a different game entirely
But I’ve seen more active communication with rust devs then I’ll see wildcard do anytime
I mean did you see what their last two posts included

Also said official @untold ingot
Is getting deleted shafted
So either way their won’t be an official except on their ark survival ascended scam
I mean, you can have an opinion. I just disagree with it
That’s fine
You just gotta look at things in both perspectives
Tbf though, if I was a wc dev I wouldnt like talking to the community anyway. I have seen how toxic people are to them about the smallest things
Ark has potential it’s just the devs are not going about it in right way
On that point we disagree
I’d imagine so but part of what makes up ark is the pvp aspect mainly
And?
Yep said smallest things could be fixed but wildcard ignores
That doesn't give people a right to be toxic
They could try to balance the game more
I agree it doesn’t
They are, in asa
That shit is ran by snail games
So is the main ark. What's your point
Ark is the original
Everything is that for snail. Wc has done a good job at keeping the game alive in spite of snail
Snail is gonna kill it especially when the ceo of wildcard said it was going to be free and all
Paying for that shit only helps snail
Because in January that was the plan.
It's not like his tweet was an official announcement though
True but I under why most people are upset more so at snail games but
Because it's obvious that the high price is probably snail
If I was someone who’s played ark for years on official suddenly told official is going down for a new version of ark for $90 dollars I would genuinely be concerned
Paying for that helps snail not wildcard
It helps keep the sales up which keeps their shareholders happy
Keeping snail happy keeps wc around too though lol
Snail is a shady company ngl
Plus they basically added fuel to the fire by technically forcing official players to purchase ark survival remastered
By shutting down official
Once ark served their purpose they will ditch wildcard
And switch to the next one
They have stuck with wc because they have ruined all their other prospects
That’s why they milking tf out of ark until it’s over
Wildcard has to either cut their ties with snail or continue playing fiddle
Wonder how ark 2 will go
I’m honestly not mad about another delay
What’s gonna suck is what snail plans to do with ark 2
Pretty sure Wildcard is basically bankrupt at this point, what with no buyers for the Animated Series having no buyers and Ark 2 being delayed and most certainly over budget.
We have zero information as to their funding, but Microsoft did pay them to put the game on gamepass, so I doubt they're "bankrupt" lmao
I mean we have their earnings statements. Which I keep seeing youtubers misquote
From a business standpoint, it makes sense to sell a remaster if your next product keeps getting delayed and your current products sales aren't enough to cover your expenses. Though losses aren't the end of the world and many successful companies post losses. However accruing business debt in a market with rising rates is dangerous. Even if snail games wasnt public, this would've been the route taken.
100%
no idea what people are complaining about
we pay now for future content is the only risk
An easy way for a company to look for interest is to put a pricetag on things, its not set in stone
I would not mind paying if I knew more about ARK II, atleast gameplay, not just a few buzzwords :/
cant you return games you have less than x amount of playtime tho?
Not in bundles I think
No, it makes ark2 free. Don't confuse the two lol
You get both for 50 euro no?
Yeah, but there is still a chance ark2 cancels. I don't think it's a big chance but it's there.
I think Asa will be worth it but I don't convince myself I am buying ark2 lol
The problem is that people are forced to buy ark 2 with it which is gonna be a completely different game. Its like if i was forced to buy overwatch to get tf2 (yea i know overwatch is free now but u get the point)
I want asa but idk if i want ark 2 yet
man i keep forgetting that snail games has a public balance sheet
300k daily players averaged monthly during 2022 apparently
Doubt itll cancel. Why do you think that?
sold 6 million copies
The thing is. Most new games are what? 60 euro nowadays. 50 for a new gen game is a steal. And then youre getting a remaster ontop of that, so asa is basically free
You’re not buying ark 2 tho
Youre getting early access and ark 2 yes
You’re getting an ark 2 preorder (ie an investment) and buying a remaster for ark 1
The increase was due to the free week promotions on the Steam and Epic platforms and a subscription program on a certain platform that resulted in 36.3 million installs for the year ended December 31, 2022, as compared to 6.6 million installs for the year ended December 31, 2021.
So youre getting ark 2
jesus lol
Should ark 2 never come out, you will never get ark 2
Why wouldnt it
It’s likely a safe investment, but you’re not getting the product when you pay for it
No but you are getting it
If I paid Apple for a new laptop and they promised me the new iPhone next year, which would you say you purchased?
The whole arguement is assuming that you are getting the 2. Guaranteed
Net loss for the fourth quarter of 2022 was $2.3 million compared to a net loss of $9.1 million in the prior year period due to the $16.3 million write down of our Atlas license in the fourth quarter of 2021 offset by an increase in general and administrative costs of $4.2 million that was the result of increased litigation costs and professional fees related to Snail being a public company and a contingent fee related to the $2.5 million state tax refund we received in the fourth quarter of 2022.
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) for the fourth quarter of 2022 was a loss of $5.3 million compared to a loss of $11.8 million in the prior year period. As of December 31, 2022, unrestricted cash was $12.9 million versus $10.2 million as of December 31, 2021.
Why bring in the low % of some extreme case
Because people often forget what a preorder or early access purchase actually is
It’s a RISK you take on to support continued development. If for example 0 people buy ASA, ark 2 may not happen as intended 🤷♂️
But the argument was that he said ark 2 was free
But you know that wont happen
He’s thinking of it that way because you’re not getting a tangible product for ark 2 when you buy the bundle
Yea but you can make any arguement unviable if you throw in extreme cases and numbers
Again, if I buy an apple and am promised an orange next year, I’m gonna say I bought an apple and got a free orange 😂
Not if you paid for the orange?
But I didn’t get an orange when I paid money
No but you paid for it
It boils down to your valuation of the future item
This is so pointless lol
I assign 0$ to the future item, because it doesn’t exist and idk what I’m purchasing
But it does exist and you know what youre purchasing…
Ark 2 is, much as I like the premise, a vague collection of ideas
It’s not a concrete product I’d know enough about to make an informed purchasing choice
I’m saying the price tag of the bundle to me looks like the full price of ASA
Ark 2 has no impact on my valuation of the bundle - it adds no value to it because I don’t really know what’s IN ark 2
Say that youre paying for ark 2 or asa thats up to you. Doesnt matter since youre getting both. You can call either of them free
I suppose if that’s how you value it
Though I’m not sure I’d put such a high value on a twice delayed preorder 😅
50 euro for an early access new gen game isnt alot
Games have been canceled before, so it's not unrealistic to be worried about the value of the purchase
To some people it definitely is
50$ for an 18 month or more delay? I’m not sure I’d ever make a purchase that prospective
Factually speaking. Not talking about peoples financial situation
Id say its unrealistic
Thats still not the arguement…
y'all can buy the game again if ya want to, I personally do not feed this type of poor business model.
It sounds like some folks will buy the bundle entirely as an ark 2 preorder, and have Asa as a side product
Yep
to each their own...
Well, given your two takes, I would say you are unrealistic lol
@untold ingot what do you mean?
Yea what do you mean
I would have thought it was obvious...
No need to ridicule us. Explain instead
I did...
Obv not since 2 of us are asking
$50 is a lot ($90 is more), and you are buying Asa, not ark2...
Not from a factual standpoint 50 euro isnt alot
You must have a different set of facts
I don't really get what's at contention here, theoretically, you are buying Ark 1 (the "remake") at below market price of a standard release price for a current gen game (which is now 70, btw) and are getting Ark 2 free, eventually. Or you could turn it around and say you're buying them the other way around, but whatever. What's there to misunderstand here? Lmao
we already purchased Ark 1 it's a 10 year old game at $50.
That means nothing to the conversation at hand
And as far as I remember, Ark 1 has never been 50 USD. It was 40 USD in early access, and 60 USD in full release
will ark II be better than ark I... not likely
would you like to see my steam receipt?
And you're one of those, so I'm outtieeeee
I respect myself too much to be just another consumer
you can go for it if you want... but I make educated choices
✌️
ark ultimate survivor edition with all dlc is 50, asa is just the base game and it is 50, ark is still a currently online and completely functional game that is consistently one of the most played on steam
that is objectively a bad value
you are paying more for less
Ark 1 losing official may change the valuation
A valid take - I’m curious if the general consumer base agrees
not by a lot, most players play the game on unofficial
Thank you
It’s about 60-40 in favor of unofficial from when I last heard
I’ll also add many folks paid more than ultimate survivor edition prices for ark 1 because they got DLCs as they came out
Someone who got everything day 1 paid about 25 + 20 + 20 + 20 + 30 I believe for the base game and all DLC
it was either 30 or 40 for base game back then
I got it early access for somewhere in the 20s, but idk if it was on sale (2015)
might have been a sale, as i remember buying it for 30 or 40 ish before the game went out of ea
No shot it was 40 tho. Just like the wild take AAA games should be 70 now
🤮 nothing worse than letting someone raise the price then blindly saying “meh guess my money is worth less”
it was 29,99 at ea launch
oh yeah I have spent much more than 50 on it over time
but as it is currently valued you get all of those years of content for 50 which is a good price
It’s also content upwards of 8 years old
you get the first season pass for the price of one (3 DLC for $20), and Genesis pass for like half the price of what it's currently for ark 1
So the value was decreased to be 50 in aggregate
Stuff like season passes came out AFTER many DLC had dropped
Point being, prices fell for ark 1 because ark 1 has aged and it’s worth less
you are still paying $40 more for asa for the same content but with improved QOL which reasonably should not be so much unless it is a crazy good top to bottom remake
It’s $50 total isn’t it? It’s about the price of ark 1 in 2015 + SE in 2016
it's very different than full remakes like resident evil or remasters like halo 2 anniversary
but it's not 2015, it's old content being sold for new prices
They’re trying to sell it as new content for new prices. Idk if that’ll be what actually happens tho
I’m as skeptical as you are they’ll pull it off, but that’s the aim they seem to have
it is not new content though, it's improvements to old content, which will almost certainly not be worth $90 usd
It’s not “new” meaning novel, but perhaps with UE5 they can cook something up as a major enough value add to say it’s a new game worthy of updated prices
Again, I’m not sold it’ll work that cleanly…but that seems to be the approach
I will say I’d pay $30 or so just for UE5 Ab, because that would be gorgeous. Ab was mapping and creative genius
I think as an improvement I would be able to stomach the increased pricetag if it wasn't for the fact that you are paying for it again, you aren't just buying an improvement to your product, you are buying a completely new product that isn't actually completely new
essentially people that already owned the game and have spent over $100 should not have to spend $90
also ab is one of my favourite maps in any game ever, it's based as hell
aberration supremacy
so by your logic every game remaster should be free as long a person bought the original before?
no, because normally a game remaster comes out after a game is very old and is mostly non functional, as I said Ark is currently completely entirely functional by all means and is normally one of the most played games on steam with hundreds of thousands of players
it's a very different case
resident evil 4 is working perfectly yet they release a remaster/remake, should i send a email complaing to capcom about the new one being paid?
ark 1 is 8 years old so..
no because resident evil 4 is extremely old
Ark 1 is mostly functional is a take I suppose
We have been around long enough to forget, but a new player is exposed to a ton of borderline insane amounts of poorly functioning and thinly acceptable mechanics
also resident evil 4's remake is a completely new product, it reuses nothing from the old one
asa is not going to be like that
We don’t really KNOW what precisely will be different. We have a general idea but that’s not a lot to go off imo
that would be worse, that means you payed for a functional product, and instead of fixing the actual product they try to sell you a reskinned one that actually works
I understand they can't fix the original as is
but you shouldn't have to PAY for your product to be functional
that's just straight up scummy
imagine if No Man's Sky required that you buy a whole new version of the game for the price of the original for an update that brings the game closer to a fully polished product
Shouldnt the people working there have salaries?
nope
Obv
well theres still couple long hours to wait until next cc so meanwhile im gonna 🍿
not at the expense of paying for what you should have already got??? not if it actively requires such an immoral decision
by buying a product you are meant to receive a fully functioning version of that product
so ark 1 is broken in many ways, and you have to fork over another sum of money to have it fixed???
how can you even try to justify that with "shouldn't the people working there have salaries"
Ark Asa isn't just about the fixes, there's a lot of new mechanic updates as well as a whole new engine, QoL updates and new features. True cross platform support and cross platform modding is huge
But if you really don't like it that much, don't buy it. Nobody is forcing you
can you really say that those new features are really going to be a whole new game pricetag
ark 2 doesn't exist yet
you are gambling
and besides
that's even worse still
cause you can't get it without ark 2
You can if you wait, but then if you decide to get Ark2 it'll probably cost more overall
so that's bad
Iff ark2 doesn't get canceled, which is a possibility
and an actively anti consumer and immoral business decision
Provided they didn't do a lot of changes
I don't disagree there, but value-wise it's worth it in my opinion
And again, no one is forcing you to buy it if you don't want to
I don't disagree with your evaluation. I'll probably still wait for a sake
well sure, but if I want a fully functional version of a product that I already own, then I need to fork out more money for the game
we all agree that is BAD right? like that's not the argument
It has problems, but it is fully functional. Vast majority of players don't have nearly as much of an issue with that as you do apparently
But working takes time. Should they work for free you mean?
If it is identical to ark1 and is only a port, I won't buy it and I would agree with this. If they did significant changes than my opinion is the opposite
Its not immoral to charge for something that ends up changing overtime
Its like p2p games that end up f2p
Should they refund everyone?
It is functioning. It just has bugs
Some exploits too, but nothing absolutely game breaking. Have exploiters? Host your own server and deal with exploiters yourselves
Yea like what game has had no problems
Theyre recoding an entire game + dlcs. New tech and it takes years and you think its immoral to charge for that? Lol
Fix bugs and rewrite all code in ue4 on ark 1? Which they stated theyd have to do. Or rewrite it in ue5 for a massive upgrade
You can get it on game-pass where it will cost nothing at all. Also having it optional is fine, but actually getting Ark2 forced down your throat when you wanna play ASA in August is a no go cause people can't even get ASA sepperatetd.
the game crashes and many of the systems require fenagling to work, the optimization is poor and the game is not a fully polished version of itself, all of that should be free
so what you are paying for is new mechanics, are those mechanics really worth the price tag of a whole new game
I don’t think you can sell a product then just not deliver it, that’s illegal I believe
Isn't game pass a paid subscription? If you stop paying, do you keep the games after? Or if the games are taken off game pass, do you still own them? I don't really know much about it
Yeah, that is absolutely lawsuit territory
I think you can't play them anymore, when you opt out, but as long as you have it, it is an extremly good deal, especially cause it gives you the option to check out games without having to buy them. Also it fells super fishy that Ar2 is "only" $10 if you take the PS deal without Ark2 as comparisson.
Usually a bundle is cheaper than the individual sum of its parts
Like I said, it would be fine as optional package, but they also should offer ASA sepperated for people that have no interesst in Ark2 or are still sceptical about it, cause there is actually nothing really to show of Ark2 by now.
Remember that they aren't selling ark2
OwO?
🍿
So much popcorn is not good for health
true
Slightly false premise…in the US anyway all that’s protected by fraud is someone deceiving you about the product being sold. There’s no reason you can’t knowingly buy a non functional product
Really the issue as said above is that you can’t deceive. If you’re promised ark 2, you must plausibly deliver that product. But there’s NO protection against a flop title, a wildly unfinished one, or a late title
So you’ll get “nothing” if your personal expectations weren’t met and feel cheated…but it’s legal
it's not just what's legal, I don't think they have done anything illegal, I just think it is an anti consumer and straight up nasty decision, to have to pay so much for something that you already have if you want it to be properly refined and include things that it already should have
And that's what mods are for 😂
TBF it’s illegal in some countries to sell bundles and not provide the possibility of buying the standalone products.
I mean, if they go out of business they aren't really going to care what your consumers think. And enough people are calling for them to go out of business, 🤣
“Already should have” is defined by the consumer’s expectations rather than reality
People purchased ark 1 in its current state, so that’s the value it has. If ASA can demonstrate it’s adding value, enough so that people purchase it…ASA will have what it should have. Obviously some people have wildly false expectations, or overvalue future possibilities, but the bulk of purchases represent people buying the product as is
I hope my grandkids think of me when they finally get to play the release of ark 2.
Unironically I wonder what amazing stuff my grandkids will have access to for gaming
idk man, this still doesn't change the fact that I think that Asa is way too much for people that already own the game
you shouldn't have to pay for something you already own again for it to function properly
It’s a response to demand - people have been asking like crazy for ark 2 to be ark 1 UE5 remastered. Now it’s being provided
It’s not a 1:1 upgrade either…since it would be a financial deadend instantly if it was
that still doesn't change anything 💀 you are just paying for something you already own for it to function fully
that's not right
The ONLY correct answer they have is that you can still play the original ARK, you just cant play it on their official servers
“Function fully” implies you bought ark 1 assuming it will have a bunch of new functions and development. That’s not a great assumption
That’s what they’re doing
official's gonna be even more of a minority with crossplay and cross-platform mods
Its like me saying I have Diablo 2 so i should get Diablo 2 Ressurected for free
no
what it means
is that you should not have to pay again, for a product you already own, to function properly
any changes that are not strictly a new feature should be free
