#ark-2
1 messages Ā· Page 88 of 1
atlas?
Primitive vs tek is an entirely separate conversation from easy to recover progress to hard to recover progress
Id rather see different biomes with different seasons
I think it would be a cool thing, periodically there actually are seasons that happen
š¤«
I am fine with that, iff the map is gigantic
Yeah, thatās a requirement for this
the premise of atlas was cool but the thing was that to look for fights you had to actually search for them on the map. In ark you can just fuck around and find someone randomly
In smaller maps wouldnāt look good
My biggest pet peeve with ark maps is that the regions usually make 0 sense
I doubt there would be different seasons depending on where you are
If there are hemispheres, sure, if not, then the season should be the same everywhere lol
Seasons should def tie into natural disasters
if you want different hemispheres tuen you get the dry season
And since the carno concept shows a savannah biome you get wildfires
Iām fine with some biomes acting as a disincentive for building through natural disasters
I donāt know when you played it, but back in the earlier days, there were so much people playing it that was very common to engage on naval fights all the time. With time itās population went down and things got boring.
Much like the extinction wasteland was āprotectedā from building due to meteors
snowstorms? Like bruh
Itās just a matter of density of players
yeah launch was pretty fun but after it died down it was meh
just building on an island for eternity
Yeah, if Ark 2 is popular, a massive map wouldnāt be an issue
You mean if servers could handle it
Who the hell wouldnt play ark 2
Only .5% of everyone who ever bought ark 1 still plays it
I donāt know. Iām no market analyst š
I donāt even know what exactly to expect from Ark 2
The reality of ark 1 being everyone bought ark 1, realized it wasnt what they got because it was executed poorly, and dropped it
Thereās not much info so far
They have so much money bruh because it is very popular for being one of the best poop games ever made
why they are making a sequel AND a show
That's literally not what I see lol
I think thereās gonna be loss between ark 1 and 2 because of the combat style, third person only, etc. that will be made up for in returning or new players
The sales to player base ratio in ark is pretty similar to any game
TBF, Ark was a huge success. I wouldnāt say people dropped it. I mean, the all time max player count was back in 2022. More than 200k concurrent players.
Only on Steam
That was just steam numbers, ignoring Xbox and ps
And ark1 is hugely popular on both lol
Thatās something most games wonāt have after seven years
hopefully combat will not be as shit as ark 1 combat
And epic
I can't think of any game that has its highest player count after 7 years of a consistent player base lol
This game came out in 2015 it is very old for what it is ur insane if you think it being maxed out in 2022 means anything
Thatās my point
csgo
dota i believe
What it means is that the game isn't being discarded by players š¤Ŗ
There are games that are still popular after a decade, like gta and cs go, but their max concurrent player counts happened closer to their releases, not after several years
It means a lot, thatās the reason they are upgrading their engine
It literally has idk where you get these high numbers steam only peaks at 40k average in a month
Um, steam peaks at 40-50k concurrent players at any given time
Average peak is different from all time peak
The all time concurrent players peak happened around Fjordur release
the game has a great concept which entices a shit ton of ppl but they do it so bad its true potential over the years is lost
No doubt it could have been better, but by no means I would say people dropped Ark
Any studio would want this kind of ādrop in numbersā š¤£
Everyone hates this game i dont think there is a single real person ive talked to that likes this game because its such a lifestyle changer
This game operates at such a massive scale for how shit it is
Itās actually bad for people like me. Iām bored with Ark 1 and eagerly waiting for Ark 2. But thereās still too many people playing ark 1 and WC wonāt drop it.
yes
Man, I think you are very wrong on your assessment. And thatās not my opinion. Thatās what the numbers tell me.
Ark is not and never will be a game that suits everyone. Expecting that is unrealistic and naive.
it is so small now compared to the long and distant
as Bruising would say: ''that's a clown take''
Even Cedric said Ark 2 won't be for everyone, and that it's okay
Duh, im just saying that but on average this game is not good
Its just that this game drew in massive amounts of people throughout its life with most disowning it because of its quality
Name a game that hasn't happened to
More than ark? A lot
Ark1 is continuing to get new players, pretty much on a daily basis if this discord is anything to go off
Most notably skyrim, or i guess fallout 4
Skyrim is maintaining a player count and gaining new players?
Isn't fallout a single player game?
Yes
No shit?
I don't know skyrim tbh
Ark just has a much worse rate of maintaining
Because it requires effort over time, and a huge learning curve, and people don't like that
A good game that captivated a lot of people. A good game is able to make a good amount of people like that type of game, but it can never be done with everybody i agree
I say skyrim because both have a goofy factor to it but arks is more derived from boredom than gameplay
Effort is fine
When a game is basically selling your soul to the devil in terms of āskillā and gameplay its a little too much
we've met your match, should we summon our own ''sane'' person?
I actually looked Steamcharts last month. The numbers are pretty much consistent over the years. I wouldn't say Ark lost its player base. Some people go, some people come.
grinding Is better done when you can do it as your progressing through the game
Rather than needing to grind inorder to progress
Like I've said above, most studios would love this kind of trend
You said learning curve? Pvp is fairly skill based in terms of tactics
Lol, what
Sure, but it's not really very hard to get into if you know the base game
Nah, it's just an everyday weird take lol
Look at steamcharts. They have the average player count each month since the begining. You will see it's pretty consistent over time.
It literally takes not much effort, unless you are trying for alpha status
Whatā¦.. this game is notoriously bad in terms of effort
Yup, and for an old game consistency is literally the best thing you can haelve
I would love Ark 1 was less popular by now, because it would speed up things for Ark 2, but it's not the reality.
Thats like the 2nd biggest thing this game is known for? Other than riding dinosaurs?
Like life wasting effort?
Can a join someone tribe
Because people are playing it wrong lol
Man, you are talking about personal tastes. We are talking about consistent player base.
The game isn't out yet, so not really šš
I'm one of the people already tired of Ark 1, but I can see it's still popular.
The majority of ppl play pvp no?
No
no
What
majority play Unno PVE
It's a 60/40 split with more pve than pvp
officials are a small fraction of the player base
hmmm
from what i understand official pvp was more or less the original default gamemode though right?
no
there were day one PVE servers
I remember this because I tried both
For pvp sure, and it still is, for pvp
I had chars on PVE and PVP servers
There were PVE servers day one
Yeah, I am aware
pve is like⦠fine, still boring since this game operates from getting its fun from pvp
That's why I said "for pvp" lol
Idk how anyone plays straight pve
By enjoying the game?
but pvp is takes too much effort.
Again, it's a matter of personal tastes
There isnt enough game
I like PVP more, but the numbers say otherwise
No more than rust, or any other game with a similar setup
ark 1 pvp consists of smallest body size, movement speed build and just throwing bolas
Lol, no
I didnt play rust
Of course there's
People on PVE pretty much do breeding lines and go for events
Is this ark 2 chat or am I bugged
Pve is like half the game without some form of pvp
I believe Ark 2 will have a lot more PVE content
9 or 10 maps, hundreds of di os you can tame, more than a dozen bosses, gen1 and gen2 missions, caves. There is a lot that can be done, even if you don't count building
because Aratai will be an important PVE force
I know Thats what it needs to be
Imo pve content makes pvp better
another benefit from Aratai is that it will feel like there is some ''pvp esc'' action for pve players
as long as i cant pick and choose certain world events itll be good
and like⦠the ai is better
Yeah, that's one of the things Im really excited to know more about
I think the AI will have to be better if they plan on implementing dark souls esc combat
I think aratai should still be in pvp though
This is why I am leaving the pvp scene lol. The feeling of fighting things is fun, but being able to do it casually is better
First trailer could be the devs attacking an Aratai camp. Just saying
the events will happen wether you are there or not, it's not like current Ark 1 missions where you have to be there for it to start
feels way more immersive and engaging if aratai can attack/raid whenever
They probably will be. I have no doubt they will be trivialized thougb
imagine the aratai raiding your base while another tribe is also raiding you
Yeah i agree but i mean like
Natural disasters
Ai raids happen when they want to
Instead of like how missions work now
Aratai are going to be bots, don't expect them to perform amazingly against a well built base lol
like dinosaur stampedes happen whenever instead of it being a mission
That's what I want, but they still need to give us the details. LOL
i doubt thatll happen honestly
Still, it would be great to have this kind of attack
i wouldnt mind it though if the aratai could intercept raiders
if the aratai could interfere with human raiders too then im for it
The ai will be a lot better and not as cheesable
''No omnipresent radar -- animals now track and hunt by sight, sound, and smell! Hide from predators with visual camouflage and environmental obstructions, and learn to mask your scent! Dynamic pathfinding enables creatures to intelligently maneuver around obstacles and player-built structures.''
Hopefully dinosaur kits are better
If every dinosaur is fleshed out like newer ark 1 creatures then itll be good
That's sad, how can I tame my first raptor if it can avoid obstacles?! 
bola
because like 80% of the actual dinosaurs in the game are just stat meatbags
yeah, hopefully there will be bolas day one LOL
and are practically overshadowed by the fantasy creatures or newer dinos
Id imagine every form of primitive ark 1 item will be in the game up until metal tools but no guns
I doubt all creatures from Ark 1 will make it to Ark 2, if it is want you mean
Guns might be heavily end game like tek
Ark 2 revolutionizes survival genre
but theyāll have weapon variety since that concept, feels like monster hunter now
If you have to build your weapons out of parts I can imagine that guns would be harder to make
Tek scrap gun would be satisfactory, a tuned m4a1 that is built with tek parts, and shoots bullets made of tek scrap, but isn't actually tek
Yeah i agree but if they have useful kits im all for it
Im pretty sure the roster will only be base game dinos and aliens
Is there a game that has had component based gun crafting, as advertised by the game?
and likeā¦. Maybe gen 2 creatures but probably not
I think all the fantasy creatures will not make a return
No idea
anything that was on the eden biome from gen 2 can return, not like that ring is crashed on Arat
Id imagine flintlock esc functioning weapons are more likely than actual guns
No I think there will be a few fantasy creatures, especially later in dlcs, I don't see then adding dinosaurs in a dlc, which if I recall they never did in a paid dlc, only in free dlc
I like the dinos and all but I still wanna know the purpose of the flower chameleon
from the first trailer
if its actually that small ill like it
Actually anything can return. Everything. It's up to the devs. THey can just say some creatures were on crios or something like that.
Small dinos in ark are overscaled because the game cant handle it
What do you mean?
They look meganuera sized
what dinos were overscaled?
I dont see why they wouldnt add some dinosaurs if the environment suits it
Any shoulder pet because it would break the game
It's an alien planet
If ark 2 is like ark one that lizard probably wont be that small
They have added new dinos through normal updates or new maps. They can do like that again.
It could be a collectable
Small dinos wouldn't break the game lol
This communities taste is absolute garbage + cc corruption
most shoulder pets are fantasy creatures, but the dimorphodon size seems ok
People like dino votes, I bet they will come back in some form or other
Why not?
What micro creature you mean?
troodons, microraptors etc are small
They vote for the dumbest/most cliche shit imaginable
you want bacterias to be a thing?
I think micro is like actual small flies or bees
No like, rodents, snakes lizards
And? They have all turned out pretty well so far
Like realistically sized things
bees are there, but they were huge in the past
The cool ones were cc corrupted
The small bees in ark are 2d images
desmodus and monkey are cool
And are only in the game because ccās used their power to get it ik the game because they have a brain
There is nothing in the engine or the game code prohibiting small creatures. They usually aren't small because you have to interact with them. Just look at fjordhawk babies for micro creatures lol
If they aren't tamable, they better save computing power. It's just an animation to the beehive.
It was meant to run on 2015 PCs
ya ik I was just listing micro creatures
It was the sinomocrops and carcha influenced by content creators lol, the monkey was a meme, and the desmo was legit
they wont do that because itll look and function very weird
the monkey was influenced by up from the depths no?
The thing is, most pre-historical creatures were huge (talking about really old ages).
I think sino is fine creature
For having as a tame sure. There is nothing in the game that prohibits having small creatures though. And Ue5 will definitely help that even more
Swap carcharo and monke
Besides bacterias and all, things were huge
ik lol I have nothing against it
Yeah thats what i thought monkey was from upfromthedepths
Monkey is from a meme
It's more because of the monkey nfts than a content creator plugging it
Yeah, and Neddy a lil bit once the goat was behind enough, he always abandons that dang thing at some point š
So because someone makes videos they can't have ideas for a creature vote?
Who told you that? It definitely was NOT popular because of NFTs LMAO
Tbh the meme and big buzz words made the creatures won
CoughSky gigaUncough
Isn't that where the monke meme came from?
Community votes are just dumb and ppl dont know whats best for them sometimes
Not the one in the vote... I mean there's plenty of monke memes out there, maybe you're just confused
The only issue is when you have people who don't play ark voting on it. Imo it should be an ingame vote rather than open on the internet, but thsts just me lol
Carchar and āsky gigaā are toddler choices
I don't know memes. I know that the monke was a meme
Yeah
Minecraft votes are horrendous
Thought i think sino, monkey, and bat were fine for the game though
It engages the community, gets people excited, and wildcard has enough talent to make people's dumb ideas into something good
Charchar is WC's choice tho
Just like the Sino
carchar is whatever, bIg CaRNiVOrE eAtS gigas
And then sky gigaā¦.
Can't wait for the Rhyniognatha
Sky giga. the epitome of prehistoric animals are only for kids
better than the 2 saber reskins that made it to the last top 10 somehow
A giant bug that does everything
They have been pretty clear that the dinos functions and descriptions in the creature vote doesn't mean that that is what will be added
Nah, giant cheetah wouldve been insane
The community winner is the Monkey (with no guns), a glorified onyc (that broke the map), and some bug's head with way too high expectations
I even think saber should replace thyla entirely in ark 2
L take
Thyla way cooler, we need some marsupial rep in Ark 2
Thyla had its moment
Give me an actual smilodon
Not really, it's miniscule IRL
Im not saying delete it, just switch their roles
400 pound wombat < 2000 pound saber cat
Gen2 vibes anyone?
Still wish we got the plantable version š„²
like i literally think ark design chocies are overrated and need to be Changed
IE giga mostlyā¦.
I am hoping that ark2 defenses are more plant based
That is why ARK 2 set in an alien planet is a best set for creative creatures that is not bound to reality like dinos
Look at the concept art, that's literally already happening lol
Ppl dont realize you can have creative designs without being cliche š
Yeah i know
the ones released look good
The fact they have brachi is fixing that creature design issue
brachi is just ultimately better than bronto and titano
And fuses the sauropods into one
Brachi was a good choice
Brachi was already a thing though lol
carno? Perfect
Using IRL is creatively limiting when comes to abilities
Daeodon, Amarga, and Desmo are too fantastical
? Ark additions?
Yeah
And?
Still peak over titano and bronto?
and not the official game?
As much as we want it to?
Just hoping giga isnt stupid
Brachi is official
No confirmation on titano and Bronto ever existing in ARK 2
But back to the point of miniscule dinos, I think that the leaf lizard (if tamable) is a great example, it looks to be no bigger than the baby size of the glowtail, and I like that
The mod is not the official game?
Ark additions brachi in the base game would make everyone in the world rage quit immediately lkl
If it works for the baby glowtail, it should work otherwise imo
The concept art for Brachi saids it's official
We are in ARK 2 chat
You are all deranged
Beat me to it lol
There is no normal here
You dont know what we were talking about then
Time to clean house 
Yes but it is cool
Somehow dinos being cliche because they are popular in ark1?
Clearly we are off topic
I disagree
No just the designs being copy paste in general
and also old game that should renew their dinosaurs and make them into something new
So, yes
Welcome to carnivorous theropoda where nothing looks unique
Mostly giga
They did redo stegos lol
They added a new one
Yeah thats ok
You can be unique
Stenkrosaurus lol
Changing too much in creatures late in the games development cycle isn't a good thing lol
People fail to realize dino games in general have the lack of ability to think outside the box
like, the isle
Lol, whay
Aside from literal reskin?
Yeah
its a fucking video game they can do anything with it either making it better or worse
why its stupid as shit in ark 1
Because games like The Isle are leaning towards scientific accuracy unlike ARK which is science fiction
Bro
No, clearly you havent looked at the isle
nothing is accurate
It's a dino murder sim
i refer to that game because they also continue to make stupid obvious bland decisions
Attention sane ark 2 chatters, I suggest we defuse the situation and retreat to the hideout
I don't get it and we are still off topic

šŖ šāāļø
Its basic creature design that ties into talking about ark 2 creature designs
You are just being deaf
Which is why im hoping that ARK 2 giga isnt dumb like in ark 1
I told you already
ARK 2 being in a different planet gives opportunity for WC to make far more unique creatures instead of same bland dinosaurs
Yeah i agree
i was never arguing with that way of thinking
its just that these games play into tropes too much in their design
Being exclusive to dinos only stunted potential uniqueness and limiting potentially good game gimmicks
i think devs could do better in their design
On recent dinos they definitely have lol
I mean look how people loved the non-dinosaur creatures in Ab, Ext, Gen 1 &2
The ones you mentioned as bad design are like 8 years old
When will ark 2 release?
I doubt it of the template itself is limiting
Let me ask you this, be in WC's shoes
How can you make a charchar look different to their cousin, the giga without monsterfy it?
8 years
atm just 2023, we might have a more specific date with the development roadmap coming this month
Tnx
-Dont have the charca since they are the same
-extrude other features giga has other than its fake size like its crest. Usable arms
-center it around being anti large rather than being large. IE bleed etc, packs.
There are only really 3 carnivore plans you could have to keep diversity
Rex
Spinosaurus
Giga
Ye but the community voted for it, you have no choice
And giga could still be bigger than rex. It just doesnt need to be like 8 stories tall
For ark 2, i highly doubt charchar is coming
lets be real
So does the giga, your point?
Since when
And it's not in ARK 2... (Yet)
like saying dilo wont be in ark 2
The shield in the concept art stated otherwise
Im not even going to explain
Have you been watching in the #announcements lately?
Literally, all you have to do is look in the community crunch lol
Dilo is confirmed
Just because it's popular in ark 1 dosenr mean it'll be in ark 2

No, you said that
Like bruh
I think it was an example
Saying Giga wonāt be in ARK II is like saying Dilo in ARK II
Average communication gap
Wow aroy coming in clutch for us
Im like going back and forth here
Just assume the iconic dinosaurs/base game dinosaurs are highly likely
I doubt any dlc or charchar will be in the game, atleast not for a while
Rock Drake at launch
I prefer a new roster with few dinos and more unique creatures
Me too. But some old dinos are already confirmed, and I'm fine with that.
The most famous dinos will get their way to Ark 2
Rock Drake in ark 2 or else

But yeah, I don't really care for the take of "all the dinos should be 100% accurate but also unique at the same time", I think that's just outdated and lazy. If anything, what they did with most of the dinos in the first game was exactly that; they were all relatively accurate, with one or two changes for gameplay and/or creativity reasons
"Relatively accurate"
and seemingly they will continue that trend in Ark 2
Not to mention, they literally can't change the design every time a dinosaur has new info found out about it, that'd just kill the game real fast. The Spinosaurus is a great example, that thing's overall historically accepted patterns, diet, tail use, etc. has changed like 30 times since Ark 1 was released, we can't expect them to keep up with things like that
Spino is almost a huge alligator
People wouldn't like the change
Have they said anything about that tweet that said the next ARK 2 news would be gameplay?
I mean, they went the Jurassic Park 3 way, making it a bipedal
Yeah, people were being whiney and impatient so they ditched it and started dropping concept art, if you ask me though, it's a rare whiner W
We have intel now
they only kinda w they will ever have, the only reason it's kinda a w is bc we got more stuff
Which is what I prefer, anyways. Base it on popular media, it'll gain more fans, simple as
TBF, WC is always overpromising and underdelivering
true, how foolish of me to expect them to stick to their word
They shouldn't promisse something they would take months to publish (the gameplay footage).
that tweet was back in Novemeber iirc
hopefully the roadmap will give us some nice info
Like the Reaper, they rode on the fact that it's pretty much the Xenomorph from Alien, and that worked out very well
Yeah, but they've changed it a while ago. The gameplay will be published when it's possible.
did they say something about correcting the tweet or something? or just ignored it, i havent kept up
What should we do if roadmap dosent drop this week
Me too, but Raq will say otherwise. 
wait like normal people? 
roadmap is gonna drop and give us a 2024/5 release date
Dunk you in a vat of radioactive goo, like the secret ending of Fallout 1?
Wait another week
What is it with you and fallout
Hell no
I like the game, what can I say. One of the best franchises out there, easily
Probably drink himself to sleep
Marsupial mutation
My guess, anyways
The only good part of 76
They should just keep spino relatively the same with some new things
Accurate spino as of now is nothing really special
just a stork more or less
I want it stronger, at least a buff in water
š»
I want it to rivalize the Rex
probably more like a glass canon since the sail actually makes it very frail no?
i always thought sail damaged = dead spino irl
what is that supposed to mean
It's an inside joke
I dont think spino should beat rex unless its around water
L take
get ur jp bullshit outta here
Whe
Billboard duck does squat against rex in any way
I like the idea of regional apexes
What the fuck
if anything make spino the rex of the sea
This
Spinos don't go to sea lol
spino wasnt a water monster my dude
more like a river monster
i know but thats the only way its gonna be reasonable
not sea i should add just water in general
maybe there will be no spino at all
Spino is too popular to get scrapped imo
Realistically yes, spino is a bank dweller, new evidence suggests it didnt even swim at all
You apparently have no idea what moves this community
Its dumb and childish
Jurassic park stuff are welcome here
true but as you can tell by this convo it does not have a niche for it to be
i mean did anyone even tame spinos in ark ?
jurassic park is bad now have you not noticed
Itās safe to say this is your opinion
unless when they were a noob
š¤Ø
Yes
Yeah lol, they are meta on ab and in boosted wipe servers
I like accurate Dinos, but most people like Jurassic park stuff
ok idk about pvp
And they will be there in ark 2
Idc if its accurate or a fantasy creature
But atleast make it fun and engaging
I just want a fun character
the only reason id tame a spino is to fight alpha karkinos
I tamed spinos even in pve. Just not for bosses
JP stuff are funny
that makes relative sense and doesnt like negate other characters in a game
Spinos are fast rexes, there is no reason not to have one. Just not good for dry boss arenas
Accurate spino is just an alligator with steroids
JP spino is the king 
There should be regional apexes though, rexes for plains, spino for marsh and river, theri for forest, yuti for snow/mountain etc
Thatās what Iāve said above, I guess
ik
I want it stronger
That would be awesome
Also āseasonal creatureā like bears wonāt show up in winter season
I think yuty should be heavily downsized and jot necessarily be the apex
wowowo š¤ hold it right there, no marsh or anything swamp like thank you
yuty should be relatively the same too
pls for the sake of my character
Yuty should be a lot smaller
Keep the roar buff but favor speed and a smaller size since theres no point for it to be bigger than a rex
and allow it to be dealth with easier in a pvp sense
IE no ones using yutys to kill stuff directly why is it so big xd
Yuti are ridiculously easy to be dealt with, like what
it's also not bigger than a rex
it is
Yuty is dogshit outside its buff
I mean it has same health as rex faster speed but yeah less dps
oh yeah i forgot that the thing ''bigger'' than a rex can go inside small dino gates, while a rex can't
so whats the point of it being so big
big = more awesomer obviously
are you asking why evolution makes things big
Ark has nothing to do with evolution buddy
yeah it really does not
and yuty was fairly small irl
not in the animal term at least
without us evolving noone would have made ark š® , what you say about that huh
nOOOOO
ok im sorry
without any of us evolving we would have way less pointless conversations in this discord channel
wdym we are the only people that do conversations here
it would be like the animated series channel
there are entire discords like this

(The isle)
šæ
Like if there was an actual game no one would be debating
but thats all you can do cause ark 2 is just a concept
Do you think we will see concept art or roadmap this week, it would be disastrous if they did neither
Idk
we just got a concept art
im hoping dlcs are just new regions and not likeā¦. Other planets or some dumb shit
i doubt it
Dosent mean they won't drop new stuff
i think there will be a week of nothing before roadmap drops
so we are hungry and excited for information
That dosent work on us
We will tweak out if they don't drop new stuff
We have been hungry and excited for 3 years
I mean, I had breakfast
Literally do anything
As cool as the concept arts are. I'm not 'excited' for anything until we see gameplay and a definitive release-date.
just over 2 years, but we need to make this more dramatic
what did you eat
Yeah basically
My hopes and dreams
Nah I just ate a sandwich
nice
I'm eating shredded wheat. 
That sounds miserable, condolences
Fuck off, I love shredded wheat
honestly sounds fun
Like the cereal
Nobody of value does
this convo is drifting off
you guys think peanuts will be in ark 2
cause noone likes rockkarots
Who else can't stand cereal?
Corn flakes are the shit, but that's for another convo
I can't stand overly sugared cereal
i only eat super sugery cereal
Disgusting
i have to eat all the sugar to make up for the diabetics not eating enough
burn Bada on a pire right now
Back on topic...
what? thats not how diabetis works
Hurry before the mods come
im single handedly saving the sugar industry
That's not how they work, but ight
it is how it works
Actually, hang on.
Are we talking about Type-A or B?
no
because i said so
''You are getting off topic''
there's like 300 msg to be deleted even then not sure if this ever gets to topic š¤£
they need a mass delete button for you guys haha
you gotta put the lizard plant pic to be on topic
We can purge but no need just go back to ark 2 please XD or use general
ho we definitly want to go back to ark 2 but we cant find the game š¢
I cant Wait for the realese Date

i still cant believe we are still on ark 2 not ark 3 yet lol
i dont like water too much it scares me
š
i would like better sizing unironically tho
The whole point of ark is to redefine survival genre
everythings too fat atm
they are redefining it into sandbox pvp
š
dinosaurs were way fatter irl no?
nah
like they are big choncks no
well, some dinos are proportioned ok
like bronto is probably fine
maybe it had a thicker neck irl
but rex is way too fat i think
also everything is supersized
Actually the new idea of accurate rex should be fatter
Because of āSueā
I think the dinos will have a more realistic Style and hight
ngl, I don't think ARK 2 is gonna be as good as ARK 1, I mean, the designs for the dinos are sick, don't get me wrong is just that it's turning to like, an rpg game, which isn't wrong, it's just that it's a really big jump from the ARK I first person survival experience, then again, could just be me
probably just you
Im excited for the changes
same, it's good to see some refreshing changes to some lacking ones currently in Ark
Even WC knows itās not a game for everybody. But maybe it will embrace more people than the first game. Or not. We will have to wait and see.
Ark 1 isnāt for everybody also.
It's just you
ARK is already an RPG.
Yeah, I know it's just that there's just something about ARK 2 that just doesn't get to me, who knows, might change in the future
Aye, to be fair I have a fear that ARK-2 wont have the technology progression that made ARK what it is, so there's that.
Yeah, Iām with you here.
It's just the stats aspect though no?
That's still an RPG
I know most people donāt like tek and all. But I hope they can bring it back in a more balanced form
It's a mix between sandbox and rpg and that's what wildcard is trying to do with ark 2 too
scrap metal 
Fuck it, give us 'tech'
Tek, but renamed to 'tech'
Then technically they didn't bring back 'tek'
Yeah, Iām curious really š
Lul
I like how they hid the tek metal naming of the material on the sketches of the shields š
2 - 3 years

Yeah, I did notice that after a bit.
There's a little text saying 'tek' on the bottom right of the new weapon showcase
The customization looks so badass
Perhaps the tek can just be remnants of the ship. Stationary tools that you can journey to and use while there.
It'd have to be a safezone, and we already know the takes on those
i hope there is no safe zone tbh
most likely it will be something that you could get late into the game, depends on how dangerous the ship is, maybe it has some defense units
Would be nice to have extremely difficult areas like on extinction with the corrupt mountain thing where basically no matter how much you prepare, it is always massively risky going there
I hope there is a safezone, maybe even village with the questgiver NPCs and the like and that it's done well
Personally, I like how Rust does it
yeeeah Rust is well done, it fits into the world and it isn't just you can't hit any one because MAGIC!
Small tek tools like smithy in safe zones. But smelters and such in hard to reach/ survive areas.
And there's repercussions for your actions, which I like
You get flagged for long periods of time and are shot on sight if you PvP in the safezones
That's too reaching imo
it's better for it to maybe learn basics, practice combat and somewhere to start out
Maybe on the servers you play on, on the ones I was on, you could farm in the safezones if you wished and the time added up the more penalties you incurred
Perhaps, last I played was about the same time, maybe a bit less if anything
I do think that but tweaked could work wonders for Ark 2 though, if safezones are going to be a thing
Arent beaches like āsafezonesā or were supposed to be
Idk how youd stop that other than finding a way to somehow turn off player damage and building on beaches/safezones
Seems very hard to do unless its like a spawn point with a immune to damage radius
Do u mean like
As a spawn point or somewhere you can get to that is a safezone
I guess so
Idk about a town though
Maybe natural structures scattered across the map that fit like 1 group of ppl at a time
like small safe caves or something
grottos even
A town seems like it can be exploited
Yes
Personally I am not a fan of safezones
I think of there isn't an op ranged meta then it shouldn't be too much of an issue anyway
Unless auto turrets are a thing
I doubt it idk
Auto turrets are i think is arks most mind numbing pvp feature
other than uhā¦.. idk tek itself
Yeah, I am hoping for a better way
Not being able to move around a highly populated map because every Bob and their uncle has a turret trap in random spots
depends
idk i think i only remember raiding the dumb ratholes and meta spots
and that too turret traps ruining entire early-mid game playthroughs
Yeah, which is why I think some heavy duty plant/npc defenses should be a thing. But things like battery heavies to camp everywhere is just dumb
idk i feel like bases should be unraidable when X amount of tribe members out of the total are on
And a way to be able to tell if a base is raidable without like being cheesy?
Or just simply not allow ppl to build in places that give them an absurd/insane advantage in a crevace
It takes the skill out of open world combat, at least in a surprise fight
No base should be unraidable , regardless of the playercount.
mmm idk
If it isnt life wasting time to replace the stuff then yes
in a default game
and if its a pretty primitive tech, tames might be more valuable then most resources
If a base can be made unraidable there is no point in playing the game
depends on when you can raid it
Lol what.
Idk i think theres ways to do it but to me its too complex in my brain
im fine with bases being raidable whenever, as long as im not spending days getting basic stuff back
Not tames though
Are we talking 1 or 2
2
Because in 1 it takes literally hours to get stuff back lol
Yeah hours
Obviously end game levels should take a long time to gain back but if i can somewhat recuperate fully from getting a basic level base destroyed itd be fine
for ark 2
Mostly against players
You don't lose levels, and any moderately skilled player can come back within hours
In ark1,
I see no reason why that should be different in ark2
because it doesnt seem as like technology advanced in ark 1 due to its world building
If you are playing pvp in a persistent world survival game, you will get wiped, and you will have to rebuild. Having it be easy to rebuild completely makes it pointless
The player base will be mostly the same, the game style will be mostly the same. Just because it will be primative themed does not mean that it will be more forgivinf
i dont think it will be the same gameplay loop
orā¦. Not function the same as now
Same premise approached in a different way
How do you anticipate it to be different lol?
from how ive read itās page
If it's a persistent world pvp where bases can be raided, you better believe that they will be lol
Nuance in gameplay does not change the fact that pvp will be unforgiving if you aren't either good enough or smart enough to deal with other players
it feels different though im not saying it wont have that loop but it sounds like it doesnt function like ark 1
depends on what youre rebuilding
A standard pvp base and an arsenal of gear and tames
it should be easy to get into the pvp, it should be hard to get to some advanced point that for some reason is important
yeah
becoming alpha could be that reference ig
Having a relatively safe base should take work to get
sure
if everyone has the same playing field and cant take advantage of landscapes in cartoonish ways then yeah
At no point should it be unraidable just because it would take a lot to replace
Hate to break it to you, but the playing field will never be even. Some people just are more skilled and/or have more time to sink
No shit
though id like certain things whos comparative cost goes way down in large tribes like mass breeding soakers + explosives to not be as much of a thing
i think no cryos goes a long way to solve this alr
im just saying ark 1ās freedom of building is bad and so is its building system
but there could be more, depends on how automated defenses work
Arks freedom of building is one of the main reasons that it is so good lol
What aspect
pve? Go wild then i like it
Everything
what things are the worst tho
cause you generally have a decent amount of freedom to build wherever however, plus or minus some cheese
Bruh, I literally have thousands of hours in pvp, and the only thinf I would change at all is a cave meta, and that gets changed by nerfing platform saddles.
And fliers like pts
-spamming
-cartoonish exploiting of caves
-clunky snapping
-looks stupid
-functions in a stupid way
Granted the game already looks stupid most of the time in pvp
that last part will improve with better graphics
Sure
cave meta is ass
caves shouldve been super thin
and really hard to build in otherwise
But you cannot convince me that pvp build strats are fun in any capacity
On top of looking dumb because functionality is better obviously
The only reason the cave meta is a thing is cryos, platform saddles and pts. Without those, a base in the open world is practically just as good
yes
Before the cave meta was the Plat meta, and that had people just as mad
I want that
Building structures in reasonable areas than in points of interest or where you cant block off shit
Pts are broken everywhere, but worse in 6x spots yeah
they shouldve just pumped cave damage if they couldn't rework some of the other mechanics
Like wedging yourself in dumb places to be good is the worst shit in any pvp game ive ever played
It is PVP you can blow up their stuff lol
Duh but its dumb
only issue is that caves are the only somewhat stable base location so thisd make base turnover immense
Ark is dumb, and not in a fun way
as much as i love deleting 80 billion spam and skyscraper high turret towers
but i dont play that anymore
I mean, that is mainly due to the mutation stacking
breeding is so shit too
0 logic
Takes forever on pvp
Its cool on pve though cause i can incest everything
Yeah, we have clarified you don't like it lol, now give us something productive to discuss lol
breeding is one of those mechanics i think everyone wants reworked but everyones scared of everyone elses backlash
Bruh this entire sequel is just a concept theres NOTHING ELSE TO DO
i wonder if it actually wouldnt be too bad to just properly cap breeding and wipe all lines
but eh, ark2 is dropping soon ish
"ark1 is bad" is literally the least useful topic to discuss because literally everyone agrees about the major issues lol
I use ark 1 is bad because i want THIS GAME to improve upon its mistake but people argue anyways so i continue
A 20 melee mutated giga shreds still lol, thats nearly halfway capped
maybe reduce that too
As long as ark 2 in breeding you cant incest to win itll be better
just scale back everything related to breeding
wild animals would be stronger in a sense usually
10 - 15 max.
I dont think genes should play into stats necessarily
Having a tamed Dino be as strong or stronger than a bred one would be not a very good game design
Yeah
wouldn't be a point in breeding if it were the case
But if its incest then no
Bred ones should always be better than a fresh tamed one
atm breed cap makes every tamed dino die in literally <5 seconds
like i get its convenient but it makes no sense at all
And just adding good genes by taming a desired wild one would be easier in the long run than waiting to get the perfect child everytime to improve the line
with most pvp mounts
This is true
no bueno imo
This is what people do?
the breed took 20x as long, but its also inpossible to play the game against
as we would say over here ''super klote man''
Because mutation stacking requires that
I know, but it shouldnt if you want it to be more dynamic
Instead of saying ark1 breeding bad, give some ideas on how to make it better lol š
i did
if it took actual years to hit 255 stat cap then i could maybe get breeding atm
make incest not work xd
but it happens in like a couple months
Until a certain degree
because tracking genes to a certain point in the ancestral tree would be near impossible to code
Making something not work isn't an idea on how to make something better
Yes it is
you could probably track incest down 2 or 3 gens
in turn you rely on finding wild desirable animals to introduce into each level of the tree
that shouldnt be too much of an issue
the game alr stores every tamed dino on every server
Because wild animal genes are typically always stronger than captive bred animals over time, duh
If tames are stored in a database, you could reasonably track way further than that
yeah
but im guessing they dont actually store all that info
idk if thatd actually be too hard tho
Currently they have tags saved on each Dino in a per instance basis. But that doesn't really work for tracing a line
how many dinos you reckon are on all of a given gamemode
It would be really bad for official servers if they had to keep track of every Dino in existence
And i dont think dmg or health should be changed by breeding
It can be leveled still but i think genetics should only influence stamina, speed and weight. And color
There should also be skin mutations and genetics that influence the ability power of a dino
Maybe more
average breeding rate Ć tribes
Soo, a skill tree type thing?
Yes
making soakers available to bobs would be cool
my take on dino skill trees
well, less so for other bobs since it means infinite offlining
Read up the past lol, that literally is one of the most frequently discussed topics here and is kind of a pet idea of mine lol
So if the game is more dynamic in taming
Basically breeding should take care of the hassle of having to bond with an animal everytime you want one
But you still have to maintain their genetic health by reintroducing untouched genes
Although basically everyone here has their own takes on it
So like i think breeding for stats shouldnt be like the primary focus unless you want some stats that wont utterly destroy the balance
unless theres a cap i guess but thats a cheap way of doing it
So remove imprinting? Typically the general consensus is to make imprinting more involved, at least among pve players
Yeah no imprinting still
Imo imprinting should still be a thing
stat increases in breeding should be less of a focus
It should hurt to lose a Dino
i think thats fine
I just think if you want a steady supply of healthy tames you need to tame specimens still but not as often as likeā¦. Being low leveled and having to tame a new one every try time one dies
You could still have imprinting but i think having some of the most broken aspects of a dinosaur get stronger and stronger over time should take more genetic effort
Yeah, that has also been brought up. There are pros and cons to it depending on map design and how defenses work
and i think colors need to be better
i think ark 2ās style doesnt match the (get any color by breeding) mechanic
regardless of it being neon red
Who has the stupid breeding take
look up
What the? No hp or damage mutations but yes break the balance silly in all the other stats
Sure by acquiring extra perks on a skill tree and breeding them in. There will not be a database of dino family trees though because that would be ridiculously bad on server performance
Also no you canāt have fun, you must introduce and sit through consolidating fresh tames into lines because letās suffer?
Am I psycho or am I reading all that right
You are a psycho, but you are reading it right
If you see me as sane Iām doing it wrong. Fair enough
I think a good breeding system would basically be beast of bermudas then
A good breeding system should be extremely minimal stat/meta benefit but extremely high cosmetic or ābecause I feel like itā benefit
Never played thst, so you'll have to expounf
I mean, this is probably the one point we disagree on lol. I think breeding should make an impact, but no more than 25 to 50% better
Its a skill tree. It basically you put points into things
Raw stats like dmg and hp scale significantly less then other things
Basically breeding adds extra points like ark
And when the population becomes too genetically similar you get negative points into a stat, but you can negate the negative by leveling up but that stat will never be max
But genetics are easy to manage in that game
Is beasts of Bermuda an RPG?
Dinosaur survival
the isle but more rpg
like the isle and ark had a baby
And you get skin mutations too
i think the dinosaur colors should just be more dulled down for most creatures except for certain ones that would probably be very colorful
the bright fake colors sort of work with ark 1ās style but i think itd look ugly on ark 2
Given ark 1 is 500-600% better base stats when you cap a lineā¦and thatās before player levels 25-50% doesnāt seem so bad š
It looks so dumb
Im sorry but dinosaur games do certain things that just, are so cartoony its insane. When the game isnt really cartoony at all
well just keep in mind theres no way for us to know what dinos look like... unless you have a time travel machine š¤£
ark one is cartoony but i still think it looked dumb
Bruh pvp dont care about how š³ļøāš your dino is xd
Id choose my colors too
I mean from the discussion we have had so far, I am not convinced you really play pvp lol
I dont mind the blues, greens, reds, and purples but like plz no neon
Not anymore
The other guy
i hope for the light colors from ab x dinos
I did play official 3-4 years ago but then i realized it was the worst shit you could ever do with your life
And then come back to it from time to time
but i dont sink into it because i have a life now
And i would get fucking excommunicated from every pvp tribe if i bred for just colors xd, just common sense
I played pvp for a significant amount of time and there are plenty of pvp players who like colors on their dinos lol
I dont hate it
Probably depends on the specific sweaty tribe admin
I do it too but i usually dont go for bright neon primary colors
i hope for better color patterns/regions
My tribes never bred for colors
just stats and then most dinosaurs ended up being confetti vomit
i for one loved the shadowmane and noglin colour regions, i hope that quality of regions and colour use is carried over to ark 2
i remember one easter event i bred up a boss team of ugly pastel colored rexes lol
just the bright basic colors always look horrible on most dinosaurs
just the most obnoxious shades of pink yellow and blue
i have sinomas with brown bodies and dark blue accents
One thing that is a bit irksome is that you get all these mutations and most folks just kinda sit on whatever the end result is (color wise)
looks fucking wild
As long as it eats the other thing faster
for some reason ppl go nuts whit cotton candy , its the worst color combination as far i have seen
Because thats what they get
Because getting wanted color schemes very hard to do if you go in expecting x colors
no you dont get it, when i was trading eggs and dinos the first thing they would ask was if they were cotton candy color
damn forgot the name of one color but the other is neon pink
Thats just cause everybody works with what they have
neon cyan
Getting a desired palate is time consuming even on boosted stats xd
no i only play pve so colors there is a demand
Like if those neon colors were more dull theyd be fine
im a fan of black whit vermillion
i dont think anyone would complain except insane ppl
white generally always pops though
Its just that the game is so
S a t u r a t e d
so a lot of colors look poopy
white pops my eyes 𤣠the light reflecting on the screen actually hurts my eyes
Ye
Ark being an eye blinding hollywood mexico filter forever
Good thing ark 2 concepts look way more realistic (not accurate)
And hopefully the game actually looks like that
pretty sure colors will be on ark 2 thats one of the main selling of ark 1
It seems the new planet is more hostile and exotic so I'm guessing we'll see more commonly odd colors
well on the 1st trailer you already get a glimpse of color pattern on ptero
yet the lizard plant was bit of bright green
all im saying just dont get your hopes too high and wait for the gameplay (i hope) and not a render trailer like ark 1 had when i bought it
Plant?
what will you do if that lizard cant be tame?
Thats works though
forcetame
Personally speaking I love the insane colors we get in Ark 1, I wouldn't mind them in Ark 2
Its fine in ark 1 i agree
i love those light colors since they show up from ab
I think it would ruin the aesthetic of the 2nd game if any dino could get any color
Id much rather breeding gain new patterns, or genetic mutations like albinism anyways
With colors too, but less diverse than the first game depending on what ur breeding
Ark 2 on paper is a pretty genre defining game when you read the page, but can they do itā¦
still
depends on how gritty of a game it is compared to ark 1
I hope we see colors based off the area they're in like tanner in the open fields like the Carno Concept or darker in the redwoods
I wouldnāt mind color regions being used to differentiate biomesā¦itās similar to the R and X creatures and I found that to be helpful
You are really on a mission to destroy the game's popularity... š
Colors is one of the things players like the most on Ark 1 and it will probably one of the things they like on the second game
Iād say Iām one of the most anti mutation folks in the chat and I still think color breeding is pretty legit and not a problem
And it is pretty popular among all players, even among people I played o pvp official
all rexes in a shit brown color... not so cool
people need to understand IF they intend to create a game that it will be here for another 7-8 years, it needs to have a lot of content
constant flow of new creatures, items etc. Also events people want to join (new colors for the dinos? new items? new skins?).
If look at steam charts and steam database you will notice the players peaks are always around new major updates, new maps or special events.
first peak of players I remember (player count went over 100k) was when they introduced tek tier, for example
if in 2-3 after released there's not much interesting content being released, people will just leave
bruh i wouldnt kill anything because thats one of the few things u could actually cull entirely if the rest of the game was still there
im not saying get rid of colors just dont make it dumb like it is now
as much as i love crayola baby vomit colored dinosaurs
What do you mean? How should it be?
or it needs to be replayable
People like it, it would be a wrong move
but not for every dinosaur
just not like stuff that it looks dumb on
like big stuff
like what?
