#ark-2
1 messages · Page 72 of 1
I'd rather deal with a rex then a pissed brachi.
Cause a rex, while would easily kill a human, you could outsmart.
The fuck are you gonna outsmart from a 2000+ ton behemoth?
true but compare the little girl hastn grown a bit tho? i highly doubt shes from the arks they must have given her an implant or something
Id rather deal with dodos, they are chilled little dudes
but well see about the time skip and stuff
Show it you k ow algebra. It'll be impressed and leave you alone
but i doubt the arks would send kids onto the islands
You aren't 'given' implants.
They're fabricated onto your skeleton.
Actually, we can see this in the second trailer.
We see a skeleton of a survivor, with their implant being fused into their arm.
Because that would raise the games rating lol
yeah but who knows maybe santiago can infuse them cause he is a smart fella after all
Yes they would.
They 100% would
She might have. Anyway, if I were the guy behind those trailers, I would insert Easter eggs
we still dont know if they actually age?
creatures evolved from what we see
so some time passed
The ARK's where made with no moral ground with mind.
The Genesis-ship was the moral place, keeping their people in a simulation to entertain/prepare them for their new planet.
The ARK's just mostly tested for any age/time period people to see what era/age of a human is the best for survival.
I think she will be just an Npc. I don’t believe we will have kids. Atlas tried that, they have given up.
They tried and got a 'looot' of backlash from it.
I'd love NPC companions that're part of your tribe.
But admittedly, it's a bit weird to have children in a video-game.
But personally, I wouldn't be 'opposed' to it. As long as they don't add any animations.
I'd probably just wouldn't participate.
talking about that, will our tribe be set up somewhere? will ee actually have a tribe, can they die. what do you guys think
What you mean?
You mean characters like Santiago/Vin?
yeah , i wonder if we can meet them or maybe we are them
Oh hell no, they've confirmed we're not them.
You know how many people would be pissed if we couldn't make our own characters?
well they could have made a story mode and a free mode
And yeah, it's a bit of a given we'll be able to meet them.
They wouldn't hire voice-actors just then we wouldn't meet them.
that would require 2 save files tho
Yeah, there is a story-mode.
It's called 'following the story'
It'd be idiotic if they had a "story-mode" for an open-world game.
The way they have it in Genesis-2 is just fine. If they actually gave the missions some story.
hell no i want a real story not just " do this so i can get into the ships computer"
Well, I for one don't want a real story lol. I want to make the story
That's what I just fucking said. 
thats fine too i just dont want the "everyone is gone here a some explorer notes "typ of story
Yeah, and it'll happen.
'Within the form of story-based missions' (in theory)
I didn't dislike that
Mission mission, optional cutscene ... mission mission, cool unlocks.. mission mission... regional boss
Is what I forsee
i didnt dislike it but i dont want it again 😂 we have had it for 6 maps damn
Genesis-2 told it's plot through the missions (as poor as it was) and it's expanded universe through the notes.
Which is how it should be, personally
Ark has a real story, it how you begin and get to the end, they only control the ending. What you want is a linear story where you just do what they intend for you to do and nothing more.
i know all about arks story but our character was not part of it
everything already happened
or am i missing something
Your character was apart of it how you got to that point on your own, it wasn't pre-determined.
If you just speed ran the transcendence, then you missed the whole point of the story. anyone who took it slower and casually built up for transcendence and not to just raid other people feel like they connected more than those just trying to PvP which is exactly why I prefer PvE in games like Ark
what does that have to do with anything that i said lol, i take things slow and get every explorer note and only do pve
there are 2 seperste storys, mine and the people that were there before me
Yes
yes
im looking forward to having more npc story but that doesnt mean my story is non existent
Hopefully that will be more prevalent with the fact we'll have AI tribes some of which we will probably be able to interact with quest/story wise and others we have to fight.
That would be a nice addition
It’s the same game only difference is you play it in easy mode
Lol, no difference is the people I play with actually want to build an astatically appealing base not necessarily got to have ultimate defense.
As if pvp is hard lol
Lol compared to pve yes
Oh those vault drops towers must be perfectly aligned and symmetric
We're part of the story, but all of the built-up has already happened.
Cause that's exactly that, the notes where the buildup to 'us.'
Our story starts on The-Island, whoever you are is up to you.
What our motivation to get the the Tek-cave is up to you.
Your reaction to all of these tales are up to you, if you even decided to read them.
The story of ARK is about restoring Earth, and 'we' do that.
Your motivation is for you to decide, but the story of the Titans and Corruption does focus around us.
Is ark 2 gonna be really bad for pvp?
combat will be more skill dependant, player movement/traversal options are upgraded. compared to current Ark 1 pvp i think it's gonna be more variable and interesting to watch. changes that make the PvE aspects like dinos better can also be a positive for pvp. it's also advertised with the tag for online pvp.
Considering those changes and additions i think pvp will be better on Ark 2
Only if you can't adapt to bows, dark souls melee, and 3rd person parkour movement
Nah, that sounds ass
Thats nothing like ark thats a whole new game
Ark 2 is a new game 🤣
Dude thats gonna kill the pvp community
They hopping on the souls bandwagon
Its gonna be a new horizons but with real dinos
Primitive style basically the direction primitive plus was going.
Its a good thing they bringing ark 1 to unreal engine
Cause ark 2 is probably gonna die 💀
Nah man ive heard alot of people say what ive said and just confirmed it 💀
The Wildcard Founders Note sold a lot of us without game play footage required
Wait till u actually play then lmao
hold the door open This is the way out if you don't want it.
Cringe 💀
Yes you are, we're moving forward with a much more fluid movement system, a game that won't be ruin by OP tek, will have AI tribes not just dinos to deal with, and 10x more manipulative building system all of that confirmed by the founders note.
But you don't need to worry about it to soon anyways, it a time exclusive for PC and Xbox
We will watch it die 💀
Thats the only redeeming quality 💀
Nope, every bit and much more is a much needed improvement, prim+ was the best version of Ark 1 it just a shame they decided to hold any updates and put that time into Ark 2
Huge hot take lmaoo
Anyhow the rest of us in this chat are actually hyping the game up, so you're a lone wolf in this channel.
you guys dont think ark2 going to be good?
We do, the PSN user is just a lone wolf. The rest of us today have been hyping it up
And when I say today, I mean I've been chatting with people in like 3 different channels in this discord looking forward to Ark 2 for like 3+ hours. Most time straight chatting in discord I've done in one sitting in a while.
Alot of people do they just dont have platforms
Most people do, it just the few that can't embrace the fact you won't get your tek suit and guns to have a CoD shootout and will actually have to adjust your playstyle.
The game is gonna be nothing like og ark it wont have the same feeling
Tell me you play pve without telling me u play pve
It not supposed to have the same feeling, for starters Wildcard themselves even said tek was the worst thing they added to the game and I agree with them.
Cry about it lmao
Lol, you're the one crying because the new game not the same.
Take your lone wolf self back to an Ark 1 chat
😂
I think Ark 2 will be amazing
i am all was her
if they maker eal what they are all promising on the steam page, yes, it will be a banger
Check out the Ark Founders Note, it a long article giving a lot of detail.
yeah I did the day it released lmao
read it whole
That sold me on it, if I didn't have Gamepass Ultimate that would be my pre-order right there, but at most I might have to buy DLC as it'll be gamepass day one
same, between the steam page and what they said on the note, it's very promising
Will ARK 2 come to PlayStation? I looked it up and it said it was an XBox exclusive, but I only have a PS5 and I love ARK.
as far as we know it's just a timed exclusive, so not at launch but probably some time after
ark2 is bad because i cant aimbot with fab rifle in first person 😔
Ark 2 will suck bc my spear isn't hitscan 😔
That's good news as I really want the game when it comes out because who wouldn't?
Ark 2 will be ass because I can't use ini and gain performance😔
3 person only to so yea
yeah i know it's carcha but we were talking about ark 2 xd
though ill respond anyways, they are where gigas spawn
ok ty
sure ty
ty
np

yessirr

got dayum thats a helluva thagomizer on that stego concept
i love that name stego tail has lmfao
carnivores be talking a lot of shit whilst in optimal thagomizer distance
thagomize these bobs
Git thagged
Lol
This game is going to kill ark 1
Are you level 35 or is the iguanodon?
Me
Yea i guess they are pretty usefull for your level
I mean they have alot of stam they are pretty fast and they can collect lots of berrys
It only took 1 tranq arrow
It’s 23
When come ark 2 on console??
But i mean they are basicly much better parasaurs but without the parasaur ability (which is basicly useless in pve)
It will come on xbox on the same release date as pc
I’m playing ark 1
Yo @mint swan wanna play ark1 ???
I cant im omw to school rn
I mean school/college i really dont know its different here in my country
But my ps plus is also gone so i probably still couldnt
I’m stupid
Ye that sucks
I’m on ragnarok
Viking bay prob?
Or ok wait are you next to the blue pillar?
Yeah
Then you are at jungle prob
Guys, you might want to continue this convo unrelate to ark 2 somewhere else before it gets deleted or someone gets annoyed!
Wait go in ark chat
This channel is for Ark 2, maybe go to the #ark-survival-ascended channel?
We are in that channel rn
We were talking in that channel
These messages were like 10 min ago we already swapped cuz someone told us
^
^
Already has compared to pre announcement
👀
i want a dlc where the entire map is underwater and terrestrial lifeforms live in giant underwater cave systems. You would need aquatic dinos to go between cave systems and all the good resources would be very deep where little to no light reaches
Mhm skip water stuff for base game and keep it to a dlc so it gets the proper love it deserves
the initial map needs to have at least some lakes
Lakes yes
Ocean no
If dlc is done they can make the lakes have tunnels or a cave in future to match the new water expansion
im 99% sure there will be DLCs in the future
Mhm hopefully
Fr better for them to focus on land first
this could be cool but the land areas would need to be massive
not really
just some areas with plants and rocks
if they arent then too much of the game revolves around water travel which wouldnt be fun
the water element is cool
but you still have 80% of the game completely locked to land unless you completely change how resources and basebuilding works for this dlc
it would be a dlc though. maybe an expansion of the main map
though, this could be easier to work with if the map was a giant trench
and you had large caves across the walls
thats the idea
changing the entirety of base game is pretty hard
i know
though it could be cool
need to know how ocean works to really say
it wouldnt be barren for such a dlc, and i cant imagine they still add eels and jellyfish after all the 8 years of complaints
they might add better resources
if you could like
build a base sorta like vacuum compartment ones but way more bob level
you could have smaller land areas
probably should be fine too since the main thing about such a map is overall traversal mechanics completely changing
though maybe you also want to change base design idk
Hopefully the ARK ocean becomes playable with UE5
Tho I am not an overall fan of the change
wdym
Remember to move off-topic to #ark-survival-ascended or #general
@crystal smelt
can i play ark 2 allready :(?
May my takes be heard far and wide 
Yes, the game is out did you miss it
I can imagine an ocean DLC with small islands and flats/mangrove swamps for land building (along with pontoon and ship building)
Gen 1 oceam biome
cause you can go all out with like 5 different layers to play with
Plus subnautica also
complains? there was only complains when they release eels cause aside to getting dino pin down they would dismount player but they fix it later so there was no longer problems whit that, jellyfish gives you bio toxin which was the best for tranq darts so dont see a problem there either
eels were a even worse ranged jellyfish at launch 
What about Gen 1 ocean biome? The islands were largely tiny and had none of the shallow waterway environments like mangroves and sea grass flats i mentioned
Also what about subnautica? Yes it’s an ocean map on an alien planet. They obviously can’t cut and paste subnautica…but ark 2 unlike subnautica will have RPG elements and multiplayer. It’ll also involve taming over simply surviving the depths…and involve far less tech/tek
basically every pve stun mechanic sucks
unless dino AI in ark2 advances to the point where fighting stun creatures is fun i dont see it happening
not to mention that yes theres tons of complaints at least from what ive seen on major community spaces
its like the biggest reason i see for people not interacting with the ocean besides it generally being useless
movement reduction is still incredibly annoying even if it technically isnt stun
anything that just stops you from moving for more than 5 seconds is
I’d argue stuns in general suck
i can see limited stun being ok
youd need to chain some combo of low damage atracks first to then activate a stun
high risk high reward thing that is somewhat rng could be fine
A small 0-2 second stun or combo break thing is manageable for sure
yeah it needs to be short
But it’s not great feeling for the recipient in almost any case, and should be minimized unless imo it’s a stationary detectable trap
but like im imagining its point would be to use some high dmg attack
shotgun for example
If YOU stun yourself, the stun duration can be way longer
2 seconds is more than enough to get off a shot
Stun can be fun
Stun is never fun on the receiving end. Which imo means it has to be used extremely sparingly
Debuffs are always good until you are the one receiving them
Shadowmane is the most challenged I have felt in ARK in a while
shadowmane is just double jump up or avoid entirely lol
its like a kapro but not quite as bad
Yes, because in ark 1 the only way to be challenged is to be stunned or dismounted
Yeah basically
Because capped flak or tek makes you functionally immortal unless you sit in place and get endlessly hammered
Kinda does
the challenge is just spatial awareness lol
its not enough of a challenge even
with an average kit you literally never die to pve
No its balanced, you just use capped gigas
Debuffs are obviously bad lol, but some are unfun versus a danger/risk
unless youre pushed off a cliff while afk
Or stun locked and bled
eh ya
Or stun locked and chain stun locked
eurypterid will have its aggro glitch before it can finish you off cause itll do 1 dmg
Stun locked usually means chain stunned yes lol
same with troodon
Well we really need to know what type of invincibility frames we will get if any because if there are none stunlock seems very inevitable
I tap 2 islands and counterspell the stun
Dunno why you’d think that? I frames seem entirely separate from stun locks
Unless you have stun every time you’re hit. But that would be psycho
can a creature just be hard because you have to shoot a weakspot or run
Jellyfish
If those are in ark 2 you’d need about 300 i frames to escape 😂
provided halfway decent hitreg
half of these issues could at least be solvable if hitreg wasnt terrible
hopefully they get better servers
We all know that won't happen
I lost boss fights because of bad hitreg
i mean id be hopeful
coughs blood dinopithicus king
its not like its the first game by wc anymore
Still hard to imagine an ark game without bad hitreg
didn't wildcard kinda fix hitreg on humans with bows at least on one of the TSOTF patches?
255 ping here we go
Hopefully ARK I on UE5 comes soon enough
Dunno. But hitreg being bad in singleplayer in ark 1 has me worried. But in ark 2 I imagine the modernized engine alone will provide some help for that
Is it just a graphics update
yeah seeing them get rid of ini makes me wonder if the UE5 version will have long time problems getting fixed
it's not just a graphics update
I dont think changing engines will help with hitreg that much, its still all unreal engine, its on wildcard to fix hitreg
Standard character sizes will help too
they can work easier with UE5 from what I understand
What is it them
Banning anyone over 200 ping on a server is a good start to fixing reg
an engine upgrade lol
Which does?
Are we talking about bad servers or bad hitreg becuase while both are bad and compound with each other they are different issuess
if the server lags don't count sure XD
let's use kicking from the server, not banning
that would be stupid asf XD
Hit reg being bad = one problem, people being hit by 200 ping players around corners or in weird ways = a second imo similar problem. But yea I should have differentiated
Tranq dart hitreg is great right?
Conclusion: we need to storm wc and fix the game for them
I love using the longneck rifle so fun
Second worst hitreg right behind shotgun
Projectiles reg like crap is the issue. Which is why everyone ever uses hitscan weapons
man the smithy shotgun is so ass because of that
even with hitscan
not as much obv
Tek rifle has good hitreg and the rail gun dosent even hitreg
The pump is also sometimes assbecause of hitreg
y but not as much as smithy one
Most people go straight to fab shotty, so it's not as much an issue
Oh I am not excited in a good way
Just waiting for my mods to break and new bugs to come out
No its because they do no damage, people use the end game bows fine because of the insane armor piercing on metal arrows and tek rifle for its good dps and structure destruction
they are discussing it right now
some mods may be saved
I know Zen said they are discussing it
And believe me that means it’s not gonna happen
bruh
Come on its genuis
I’ve not had nearly as much issue regging on structures personally
Why not
But I agree some weapons seem to suffer way more from bad reg than others
Shotgun reg is the only thing that's personally bothered me
fortnite copy and doesn't make sense
Fortnite copy?
Fortnite copy?
god that would be so good lol
you could probably still ddos the server tho i think
its just that you couldnt join and then have to spend 4 years trying to get out
Man thinks this is Fortnite
This isn't a fortnite exclusive feature
I have only ever played fortnite twice, six years ago
It works already if you can crash the server
yeah
though it probably works better against people who arent from the server region
Or just make size mattes on stats. Like: larger chars: more melee and can carry more weight, but will be slower and have less stamina.
If not possible to do that. Yeah, standard sizes. At least for pvp.
you guys think xbox showcase will give us something for ark 2? maybe they reveal stuff simultaneously
since ark 2 appears on xbox aswell
possible, but if not, then I'd have to guess arkII has been put onto the back end
Don’t give me hope
Don't give me hope
When is the event
started now but ark 2 wasnt listed in the begining
not 1 of the 4 games being shared, but could be in a part for gamepass
Aaron Greenberg confirmed they will talk only about the 4 games
Someone mind DM'ing me the event?
just go to the xbox youtube account spartan
Too lazy

Update so far there’s nothing about Ark
I dont think anything will be shown
nope
its just elder scrolls ending
y'all forget the bone they threw to chew on , just to think there's ppl waiting for more ark2 news so soon
i wanna see stuff tho 😦
ill take anything
show me the walking animation that will be enough
It never was going to be shown. Microsoft already announced the games being shown prior to the show
you know how sometimes there is a suprise at the end and a suprise is not going to be announced before
but it didnt happen so theres no need to discuss this
I think Microsoft are trying to be more open to keep players happy
no, there won't be anything, from what wildcard said in the crunch its going to be longer than a few days until they share gameplay
How much longer
Gonna have to downgrade from tek enhanced for Ark 2 lol
I don't know, bored at the moment and that was just a random thought 😂
from what last weeks crunch said with the concept art they will build up to the gameplay trailer with more concept art and tidbits
And with that said, that most likely shows it'll be a bit till the gameplay.
better to have a rough timeline compared to being left in the dark completely
if i had to guess they will post most of the dino roster that will be on ea before the gameplay and if is 2 creatures at each time per month i would say june maybe.... that would be 12 creature concept arts
yh the image files for those had monthly in them, so in the downtime between concept arts they might show some tidbits like they also said would be shared
i might be wrong whit the number cause i just check ark wiki and its quite a bit of dinos on the island, maybe its more weekly than monthly....
that's all we got to go off until the next teaser
if not mistake when i start to playing ark1 ea on ps4 it had 71 creatures on the island (no bosses), dont know how it was at the very beginning
i think at early access launch in 2015 it was like 20 ish creatures
uff
yeh think this gonna be ruff start again whit no kibble breeding so on unless they are way ahead whit progress (doubt that very much)
More like 30-ish, but close
ARK always had a absurd amount of creatures.
well its a open map so only 10 creatures would get very repetitive very fast
if you look at real life we have millions of life forms
No shit
I think millions of creature variations could be possible with a skill tree that alters the model of the creature, but I really doubt more than 50 base creatures will be in the first release
well will see in the next 2 days what will happen
wonder if they gonna make glowing dinos again (personnaly it was my favorite color change they had on dinos)
If there is a cave variation of things I would say it's likely
im saying that cause i was checking dates on release of dino concepts and notice jesse saying this "One of my favorite #ark-survival-ascended2 glow ups"
I don't think that refers to actual glowing color regions though lol
yeh but when i read the "glow" part it just pop in my head dinos whit glowing colors
Well, I would love deep sea and cave varients of common dinos that have new glowing color regions, but I am not holding my breath on that
True
worst part in all of that i believe had to do whit rockwell 😭
Maybe, but it's a new game, so the actual gameplay and visuals of things don't have to match what ark1 had
Even the roster doesn't have to match
naaa it as to have at least the main roste of the island or most of them
unless they go whit 50/50 50% dinos from the ark 50% alien life forms
It actually doesn't lol
There is nothing in the lore or anything saying that the gen2 ship was limited in what it could create to the ark1 roster. And the actual ship didn't land and let things escape. It was pods that landed. There is no telling what was in the pods
Considering how many tek based dinos and the fact you get element free tek suit in Gen2 I highly doubt anything connects to Ark 2
well the second trailer actually shows part of the ship but yeh at first was pods that brought dino species down to the planet
Ir depends on what they are aiming for the early access. If they chose quantity over quality they can just bring most of the creatures from Ark 1, but they will probably be subpar
The point I am making is that they have creative freedom in what to add to the roster. They wrote that in on purpose imo
Id rather have fewer but totally “new” creatures (not new species, but new features, textures etc) over badly ported ones
I would like a mix of old remade dinos, together with a bunch of new aliens
Im more excited to hear about other features than the creatures themselves 🤣
I want to know more about the planet, the Aratais, the world events etc
I don’t care much which creatures will be there day one. I’m more concerned about their features
Like new taming methods.
Yeah, I doubt they will drop dossiers like in ark1, mainly because Helena isn't in the story anymore lol
it will be Santiago doodles as he gets bored
📕
🖊️
📖
Pls don't let this chat devolve into emojis like the animated on 🙏
I don’t know… I think dossiers are an important part of Ark. I think they will be there in some way. Like those paintings in the cave.
I think so too, but I doubt they will be in the same format, and I doubt they want to spoil that yet, especially if collecting info is as big a part of gameplay as I am hoping it is lol
think they only did that whit the last remain dinos on the island right?
Did what?
reveal dino dossier before the release of the dino
Well, I guess. But I am hoping they play a bigger part in gameplay than just if you are interested in reading a bunch of madeup facts lol
It would be cool if you can't tame a creature until you get new dossier for it
At least for pve. Obviously that wouldn't work for pvp at alk
I mean they do to an extent, they tell you aggression level, tendency, rather it a herbivore or carnivore, etc.
It usually doesn't really tell anything that isn't obvious, and doesn't really add anything to the actual gameplay
The only use of notes in ark1 is for exp buffs, which I really hope disappear
Fair I suppose. Wait till you hear that I want that with engrams too lol
I want to have to find a note to unlock the engram lol
I don't want it to be tied to levels
Engrams are not a skill tree lol

In ark1. The steam page suggests that the two will be seperate
Engrams have nothing to do with a skill tree lol
👆
☕
Skill tree defintion doesn't change per game, and hex points only apply to people that can access Genesis 1 & 2.
Imagine not having the dlcs
Crafting recipes /= skills in any game lol
The fact that you might not get every engram without a paid dlc does not mean that it is a skill tree lol
There is hardly any tree to engrams lol
And you can hardly say that crafting a camera in game is a skill
It's an engram
It's a counter example of calling engrams skills
Lol, that's how counter examples work.
That literally makes no sense lol
This is a video game mf
I learn how to make a metal wall through looking at my wrist after killing a baby giga I ain't been taught shit
Factually this isn't even true lol
Tbf you didn't even try to reason. You just said we are ignorant for disagreeing lol
That's like the opposite of reason
Hi
HIIIIH
Hi


crafting is luck based and not skill based - avatar with full crafting skil points can make from 0 to +50% better of plueb print but in average he miserably fail under 20%
and then a lot of things are capped anyway

u cant do 20% better than asc blue print as is capped
This channel is purely Ark 2 related, think you may of meant to post that in another channel?
Just a little random
actually that aint true, i did lots of craft cap bps that when above the stats allow but only stay until server save them it lowers to max cap, but i dont see what brought this conversation all the sudden to a ark 2 chat
My thoughts exactly at the end of your post
we are all curious what wildcard will propose in crafting with new components and based on our past experience
I mean they design for official, so probably only slightly different for Ark 2 I would imagine, even with unofficial server where I have had 20k crafting it still a coin flip to a max craft.
I imagine only real blueprints going to worry about is armor, tools, and melee, if they treat bows similar to now where damage is more your stat
If crossbows are a thing those BPs will be useful
I am hoping bps arent a thing, and that components give extra perks or something
The bp they will add is Battlepass
Is there any news on when ark2 is coming or anything?
i hope i get banend from the ARK 2 servers

*banned
Ffs 😂
👀
is ark 2 coming 2024

2023 is all we know
I think 10 were untamable of those original 30?
Even just an accurate hint about taming methods would be extremely beneficial for a dossier
In the loosest and most basic sense yes. But it’s not really structured all that well. If ark 2 takes a tech tree approach I’d like a more formal looking one
The ark 1 tech tree is unintuitive and kinda irritating to use if you treat it like a tech tree. Techs are hard to search for as a new player, often require weird prerequisites…and ofc it’s all tied to leveling up or hexagons rather than anything else
Ideal ≠ realistic
One shot guns likely won’t be ideal 😅. You’ll probably be net pissed off
A bit from a rex = ☠️
Make guns super hard to get
Unless ark 2 = COD style where dying is nbd
That matters 0% to gameplay
realism not epic
It just wouldn’t be a fun game
its feasible its just a bad design decision
if everyone one shots each other then theres no fighting
You could take the gritty survival route for ark, but in doing so you sacrifice a lot and have to make major changes
just ambushes
It means more death which means death has to be less punishing, which adds new challenges etc etc
youd make the game way too cheap to justify such a teeny amount of effort required to kill
There are whole genres of games with one shot kill mechanics that work. Ark just isn’t that genre
You’d need to make death trivial
yeah but making death trivial means that loot is trivial cause thats what you lose oj death
unless you make it so you never drop loot ig
Correct. Kills would be more about routing people out of places than collecting loot
basically fps arena but the arena is 100 sqkm
Yeeeep
💀
It’s a valid take, but it’s not what I’d prefer or find ideal
not even battle royales would be this bad xd
People do love their battlefield games
ya but even then ttk is some .1 secs
.3 to 1
seems to be average ttk across most shooters
A headshot with a sniper basically is a one shot kill. Or an air strike lol
ya but thats a limited part of the game
even in ark you have contexts where ohk weapons are a thing
Sure, but the suggestion also only said some things would be one hits
fair enough ig
In ark right now very little base game things are one hits
Most of the existing one hits are because of BPs and breeding
its basically just breeding
Capped fabi doesn’t one shot an unarmed survivor?
i dont think any bp can ohk someone with normal kit
it does but nobody is running naked
Break helmet -> one tap?
then ya
I get the message that it’s rare in practice ofc
but people get like 40 sets of armor so even thats not a guarantee
the fact that you can artificially increase ttk so much tho 💀
Politely ofc: fuck flak
fuck the dura cap
tho its fair only because bps and breeding are fucked
cause breeds still one shot
Amor breaking is annoying, but being immortal is insufferable
theres so many mechanics that only exist because more important mechanics sucked from day 1
its weird
dunno if any other game has this issue
ig power creep is a version of it
It has to do with imo sandbox elements being added without careful consideration of the PvE and PvP power scaling they’d change/screw up
Yes, some problems with ark would require changing of core mechanics which would be quite difficult and could break the game or cause people to lose interest. Ark was/is very popular so the incentive NOT to change these core mechanics was there in fear of losing player base.
they also never really nerf entire mechanics either
at best its for specific creature abilities
They have tried where possible to not alter server saves or people’s progress
The issue of soo much investment in anything ark means it’s that much harder to see it wiped
i dont think itd be impossible to change a lot with some of these core mechanics tho since there are raw numbers involved
Even if the net benefits are immense
yeah thats probably it, hard to nerf breeding when it takes years
If you wanted to change flak I believe you’d need to delete all existing BPs and armor
that isnt the worst imo
It's easier if it's a fresh start
you can get a decent bp in about a week of loot farming with a big tribe i think
You sure? Lotta folks would rage lmao. But yes ark 2 is a great place to make the good changes with less pushback
they would rage but they rage even now
they just think that because they spent a lot of time on something that it should never be in vain
meanwhile, gets wiped for the 80th time
i just hope core mechanics are tunable
hah this is yet another reason to decrease grind, actually allows devs to change things in game cause people arent investing thousands of hours into single parts of the game
Take the aberration rockwell fight for example, you can cheese it really hard, but it's become a mechanic people use when starting characters and a lot of people have used it to get a head start on the game (tek). If you were to remove that, the community would be upset because it's a loss of a convenient way to get tek and it would be "unfair" to the people who started later. Before people say "There are other easy ways", replace that with the cactus broth method above.
yeah theres an issue of cheese becoming its own necessary mechanic to engage with the game in pvp
also pve but mainly pvp
its proof that way too much of the game just isnt fun enough to justify doing though who knows if this is only the case because it was so easy
I wonder if the devs of ark 2 read this channel
flyer nerf is probably the best case of this but i wasnt playing ark when it happened
they most definately do
probably sweating over all the stuff they read lol
scope creep to the extreme
the hypemachine never stops 😎
Flier nerf was contentious but oh so valuable for the game
did player numbers even drop
BUT it didn’t wipe anyone’s progress
i seriously doubt they would, i think people just cried a lot
true this might actually hit numbers
People tend to leave only when progress is wiped from my experience. Like when legacy was shut down
wonder if theres ways to prevent somrthing like that
standard ark community response tbh
you have to reduce how invested people are into specific servers and mechanics
ya lol
this would maybe defeat the point of long form survival like ark
“Long form survival” though is kinda bad in practice imo
At some point you’re at the apex of a survival game and there’s not much left to do but flex projects
i think the biggest issue in ark is that theres too much of a jump between progress levels if played normally
they need to pad in the progression scale
and not purely linearly either because everyone will need to do something after hitting endgame
It’s too fast for sure, but also the two ends of the progression spectrum are so damn far apart that it’s miserably easy at the end of it
a diverse skill tree is probably advantageous here
i think its absurdly easy with cheese
Minecraft has nothing on paper for the “end game” except end cities
without cheese theres a super fast patch, then a super long grind fest, then a fast patch
Keep in mind that a sandbox game’s appeal is meant to be defined by players. No concrete “end game” needs to exist
if you plotted time vs progress itd be a z shaped curve with an insanely long horizontal part
yeah but too much of the game is locked behind raw resource counts and engrams and bps
Yes, imo way too much of the gameplay is locked behind grind gameplay loops
and the options towards getting these are so similar that any real sense of freedom is idk, unreal
its like a supermarket having 20 different kinds of chocolate chip cookie
PvP always imposes player made limits on what tends to be done. Don’t get that confused with the sandbox environment not having a conclusion or game given goal for players
like you can tame whatever you want in pve
You can’t “win” PvP in ark - which is fundamental to the sandbox experience
but ultimately you still are just getting a travel mount capable of moderate forms of combat against ground and air, and is capable of ascending and traversing any map in somewhere around 10 minutes
at some point youll level melee so it can take out alphas quickly, and then youre done facing against pve, youre just breeding for boss maybe or youll cheese that too
You’re kinda assuming again that the meta = the game’s directive
you dont really have many things to do
thats on you, youre the one that make the objetives on ark
It’s like saying “why have glass in minecraft if nobody uses it in the speed run”
the meta is so strong and stable that people naturally fall into it, powercreep is that visible
Meta also ≠ power creep
the powercreep reveals the obvious meta tho
And the meta has 0 true impact on a player. You can always ignore the meta if you feel like it
you dont need to play with anyone to eventually fall into the same meta
If your goal is to f around with a kapro, you can do that and nothing in the game stops you
you arent usually going to actively ignore meta though
like youre plain punished for doing this in the form of time, which is the most boring way to punish
it takes longer to lmb spam, takes longer to hold w
Players will always invent a meta. What makes a game sandbox is the ability for players to choose how to spend their time in the game how they want in pursuit of their own goals
and space jump
Many people want the easiest quickest dopamine hit from progression, but plenty have their own ideas and goals they seek out
in mc at least, the build creativity allows for a lot more than what options we have in ark which basically just change how long something takes
since building isnt based on performance
i have done same bosses whit various types of dinos and ways to kill it
gets boring doing always the same way
But the speed run, the “meta” for minecraft, doesn’t use any of it
Because the speed run itself is a choice players make for how to enjoy a sandbox
but these options are made in the context that theres more to do than hit the end game, thats not really a thing in ark except building
maybe exploration counts
In minecraft there’s no real end game except end cities. Everything else can be done without the ender dragon
yes
In a pure “post game” context, minecraft is extremely lacking
and all those options alternative to the endgame are much more developed than the options we have in ark
But, like ark I’d argue, the need for a post game is an illusion
There just needs to be a series of objectives players can define for themselves to have fun in the game space
i dont think enough of those can exist without you eventually just taking a break or going modded/unoffi
which is generally true of mc too
I’d agree ark 1 is lacking in some respects on that front, but it’s mostly because a lot of it is gatekept by breeding (which is so time intensive you can’t really flexibly choose to dabble in it or explore it)
but id say at least building and exploration are much better in mc than ark
Procedural games have a big leg up in terms of late stage exploration
ye thats something unfortunate with ark
if they could pull off procedural gen for every server thatd be crazy
itd also get exploited like hell but eh
itll never happen tho
It was tried for ark 1 but the community rejected it
You can right now create a procedural ark
oh that
That whole idea, which was a possible direction for ark instead of SE, was scrapped because I believe people just didn’t feel immersed in procedural environments
That and people didn’t have all the resource locations memorized and got cranky 😂
xd
That being said I think ark can give plenty to do without more than one run of exploration
What’s IN the world can be made engaging enough to make the experience fun after you’ve “been everywhere”
ark mobile had a weekly cycle of dungeons with bosses at the end
there was like 10 before i quit
Procedural dungeons would be an excellent addition
idk how they implemented it
but it was something neat to do with friends
especially since it was usually new
It’s also something to test your skills in a slightly different way each time
Most good RPGs have some form of infinite or repeatable challenge mode so you can actually keep playing the game
World events sort of speak to this, but dungeons may be a boon simply because they can be more curated to a limited party/tame structure
ark2 dungeons should force you to solve 1 of some hundred leetcode problems, make some new devs that way
true
its definitelt easier to implement a decent dungeon experience than some open world type of thing
Idk about easier, but you have more control over how it’s experienced
i wonder what making procedural gen aratai structures would be like in ark2
itd be simpler to implement permanent ones
youd need to prevent them from beinf blocked off
but so you would with random spawns too
unless they arent extremely important
I’m gonna guess there’s thoughts about a combination of more fixed Aratai settlements and outposts that get built with premade blueprints as events
i wonder if that coulf work
atm all the objects like trees and rocks are permanently spawning in the same place they were originally put in
though it probably couldnt be too hard to make limited random spawn structures
Well this is an entirely new question
i might just be inadvertently focusing too much on the engine itself
Aratai structures would likely need to be placed like creature structures (for example the ant nests in Myrm’s mod)
im unaware of how those work
But procedural resource spawns are a whole new can of worms
are they completely random or are there a bunch of spawn areas they can pop up in but dont need to at a given time like loot drops
which i think respawn randomly into some set of possible spawn locations
I’m 90% sure they spawn as a static creature
do creatures spawn absolutely randomly
i havent ever really checked, would think so but i cant say
Creatures spawn in ark 1 in spawn containers
You draw a cube on the map, and creatures can spawn inside that cube with a preselected ratio
aight
Spawn containers are smart; they won’t spawn new creatures if the creature count cap is reached or if too many of a single creature is present it won’t spawn new ones
It’s why a lot of PvE folks do meat runs to cleanse out the spawn containers
It’s an ok system for ark 1, but if ark 2 has migration and other similar mechanics spawning will need to be far more complex
it will need a ecosystem were herb ones counts are control by carno ones but whit that there as to be and apex one whit low spawn rate like gigas on ark 1 which now im thinking about thats what it is on ark 1 but needs more improve so dosent get out of hand like ark 1 were theres tons of herb ones and even some that kill the carno ones, guess aint that simple
It will not need to be an ecosystem
In fact, it probably cannot ever be an ecosystem
ecosystems are way too hard to make reliable
They’d have to dramatically decrease the percent of wild creatures slain by players for an ecosystem to work, and I’m skeptical that’ll happen
well if herb ones stop fighting back carno ones maybe that would work???
You can spawn in a perfectly balanced ecosystem, but add players and shit gets very complicated
plus then theres the render, no render dinos gets "pause"
The fact you’d need a server to run an endless biosphere sim in addition to the game is also a performance risk for sure
You COULD do the sim, but it would come at a cost
it would need top notch servers whit the best net connection
If you had a massive game space like NMS, players would be unable to dent the global population. But otherwise it’s just a recipe for performance and gameplay nightmare
unless you were able to reduce player creature kills by an extensive amount
than we gonna have AI arath so thats more pulling resources from server uffff
I’d like to say the reason a functioning biosphere won’t work is MORE to do with players and the game and less to do with performance
i really hope wc test ark 2 on a server whit lots of ppl on it (max if possible) so dosent happen like ark 1 did
You could absolutely make a functioning realistic biosphere, but would it make for a fun ark game? Im sadly thinking the answer is no
really depends, i can see ppl that play in SP enjoying it but online i can see ppl destroying it like some many times ppl did on ark1 whit rare spawns
talking about destroying rare spawns i deeply hope wc dosent bring that trophy crap to do bosses, it was the worst thing for me on ark 1
The game is built for MP tho is the issue
finding all the spinos on the island 
or alpha basilisk on ab
Subnautica has a functioning ecosystem (which is super cool), but in SP you don’t notice unless you play for a long time
And in ark even with low pop servers people are used to clean wiping biomes/maps in search of certain spawns. It could be changed in ark 2, but I doubt it could ever be realistic and remain fun
Remember killing 2% of mammoth BABIES results in extinction
i got lost there 🤣
If you wanted a realistic ecosystem: killing 2 out of every 100 mammoths will result in no more mammoth population
ho yeh
Not to mention the brutally easy trolling involved in rendering a key species extinct, or the gatekeeping that can happen if an alpha tames something and renders the wild versions extinct
when you meantion babies it pop my mind the penguins babies 🤣 and i was like "there wasent wild mammoth babies "
not yet 
we really have to wait for the release to see what path wc took on ark2 doubt we will have anything concrete on gameplay unless that gameplay its a live one than yeh we might get better clues but doubt that
Many very interesting details will be discovered after release to be sure
well im almost certain there will be no kibbe to tame so thats gonna be a pain on start 🤣
thats another thing i wanna see if they gonna change, the timers to tame
Taming taking as long as some of the new tames makes kibble kinda pointless
by default it should be faster than ark 1 default tame times, i don't want to babysit a theri for 1 day with 15k narcoberries
Make taming a challenge rather than a test of patience
And ffs remove taming effectiveness
i can see 7h to tame a max lvl wild rex on release 🤣 whit meat only
so you want kinda like a endurance fight?
Taming effectiveness punished using crap taming food so the “challenge” was bringing the right food. But if taming takes skill of some sort let’s junk that irritating effectiveness system that encourages no risk taking and traps over intended taming techniques
to be honest i cant see anyway of taming something that aint dropping whit drugs like ark 1 even passive taming on ark 1 was dreadful on pve you only need 1 jackass to ruin everything
I can: it’s called most of the most recent creature releases
In ark 1 there’s clear issues that are systematic that ruin these new tame methods that I pray aren’t in ark 2
were they implemented the best? not really
was it a sign of more interesting taming to come? kinda
ufff i stop play on gen2 3 weeks before transfers open so no clue about those
I’d say the methods are way more creative than KO
i'd take a risky situation over shoot and afk wait till done
In practice tho it’s almost always trap -> repetitive task tho, which kinda defeats the purpose
well i sough that last dino "new giga" taming and i was like damn thats a crappy way of taming
Anything that requires sacrificing tames is bad because it’s poorly built in ark 1
Troodon is also pure misery…aggro and how exp is awarded is too janky to use for ark 1 taming imo
hienas aint cool to tame either same way as those cats (cant remember the name) from gen 2
I like those methods when they feel like they work
It’s when weird janky nonsense happens that things get frustrating
well 1 the approximate of player to creature fails really bad online at least 2 someone might show up and ruins all progress (either curious or just to ruin your progress on purpose)
Why would that be the case? Given that KO tames take so long right now?
i wish for ark 2 a different kind of pvp that isnt so tryhard that you lose everything and go against no-lifers nonstop
That likely won't change for official servers
There's always going to be people with more time to spend on a game
i already said couple times, ark aint for pvp unless they change it drastically, needs to be fast pace not like pve that you have time
Ark PvP should be via game modes rather than flat sandbox but that ship has sailed
Yea I mean a unique tame taking longer than 10-30 minutes is probably too long
there could be times where pvp is active for example only on weekends and at the rest of the week structures cant be destroyed maybe?
yeh if they want pvp sanbox the rates gotta being a lot way more that as on ark 1, a tribe getting wipe after at least 1 month of work aint easy to start all over again
I think griefing is part of what you sign up for in PvP
Obviously 1-4 hours of active taming isn’t wise, but 10-30 minutes is hardly a loss compared to what PvP players already lose in a kit most of the time
See, I disagree. I say lower rates. Higher rates make it too easy to grow, where being wiped doesn’t really hurt much because you can rebuild it so quickly
pls dont mix pve whit pvp, pve has already enought toxicite from the beat down pvp's that join the server you mix both there aint chatting on global its constantly measure 🥒 and cursing all the time
I’ve never liked being raided, but it does help me knowing where my weak spots were and makes me stronger in the long run
Thankfully you’re wrong. Slow rates mean entrenched alphas that never get raided and dead servers
I think Ark was better when it was 1x tbh
I don’t remember seeing dead servers when Ark was 1x, but sure
Agree to disagree
I can agree on tames
They added things to make entrenched alphas non viable before things died imo
When metal structures couldn’t be broken by almost anything ☠️
your way its a speeder way, you only need to be the first to get everything as much as possible and destroy all the others so you dont have to worry about alter like after 1 month you own the server cause no one can face you
I can agree on tames and even breeding to an extent. But in terms of gathering, I think that makes it way too easy
They were, just different Dino’s
Plant x had infinite ammo too back then 😅. Not much to soak
Of course it was way different metas and balanced differently.
I’m driving now so peace lol
On legacy? We were using Dino’s to soak
early days of ark often were like you help each other and if you said " dont raid me pls " they often would retreat to spare you. modern ark is like noone gives a shit, only tryhards that raid everything they see
I remember explicitly using dinos(especially brontos) to soak bases
That’s a late stage lifecycle game for you though
Most casual folks move on and only the most dedicated are left
yea and thats bad i think
It’s normal and unavoidable
u know i played like non stop for a while and i couldnt keep up with other tribes and had to stop. and im definetly no casual.
everyone will get pushed out except the highest
I’m speaking of a general movement away from ark 1 as a result of people being bored or moving to other games because ark 1 is old (happens in every game ever)
I think Berserker is more saying people who aren’t committing to ark PvP tend to just leave, which has always been true (and is more specific to ark)
well i wasnt solo. i was 6 slot in small tribes, played from the start non stop and still couldnt keep up with other no-lifers that likely teamed as well.
na my tribe wasnt all nonstop players
and anyway. the point is that i think the way pvp is designed in ARK is very bad for the player base
its one of the greatest games and yet i decline to play it because pve is boring and no challenge and pvp is impossible to stand a chance.
Correct that ark PvP is designed to encourage toxic behavior and cheating
yea thats also a problem
Arkpoc is better about it. But PvP is filled with issues
thats one thing. the other is that once alphas have been established ( after a sever opened people will raid each other until a few are left ). and from this point on you will have a very hard time finding a good spot and even get build because others will raid you for their own savety.
PvP in any game with little to no actual rule policing will always devolve into exploits and cheating whenever possible
Even worse when PvP has no end condition except running people off the server
Monkey brain wanna win, don't matter how
Minecraft PvP was like ark PvP and it was horrendous. Then people realized curated minecraft PvP worked super well and it exploded in popularity. Ark should have done the same imo
in minecraft you can at least go so far away from the spawn that people will likely not find you so you can build up savely. in ARK every good spot is constantly being contested. Ive even seen Discords where people sold caves for real money. I think it was like 1000$ for island ice cave. ridiculous
RMTs like that imo are caused by deficiency in game design
even ratholes everyone knows about cuz of youtube videos
RMT often happens when there is a monopoly
If there’s only a few good places to make a highly defensible base, you’re more inclined to cough up for it
If you can’t start in PvP without a line? You’re more likely to cough up for someone who has one
Or pve
Yes, if the value of your time is greater than the money of the RMT. True
Any kind of MMO element will lead to RMT
However, one could argue making things take prohibitively long means people value it at higher monetary values
I don’t believe I’ve heard much of anything about rampant PvE RMT
Or, said thing can be grinded for RMT but is a one and done, like boss fighta
Oh, it for sure exists
I play official pve, it is real
Yes. IE making things easier to do makes RMT less likely. Same is true if it’s harder to monopolize a resource
Unbuildable caves for example would likely gut a sizable chunk of ark 1 RMTs
Boss fights are the main RMT of pve, sometimes dinos but mostly bosses
its kinda stupid that they thought its a good "balance" if caves get applied with 6x structure damage and thats it. Until you do the damage you have to soak for the most part anyway. And Titans were also such a flaw as well because they make any overworld location to a deathtrap because they are op.
you know what would stop RMT? ppl stopping being stupid enough to pay
Do said kits have capped flak?
I've never seen or heard of people buying starter kits
Paying bills with ark lol
People supply what’s demanded. People want to pay for this stuff and others supply it…it’s how a market works
Wonder if they were scammed. Gonna guess prim flak wouldn’t have warranted the RMT
Which is itself a grind to find good (even non capped) flak
So... what was the goal here?
Kill the demand for RMT
You can’t
find a better form of pvp for ark 2 xD
It’s a part of survival games
Nobody would RMT in multiplayer subnautica 😂
Indeed. Because there’s no demand for such a thing
Boss fight RMT will always exist, base RMT will always exist
i think it would be better if all caves are unbuildable so everyone is kinda even when it comes to base def
I suspect in SotF almost nobody would drop $1k on a single tame to maybe win one round either
Yeah to fast to expendable
Because I is a known temporary, and is easy to acquire
Yes. Now you see my argument
However if there was out of game progression, it would for sure happen
Meh from what I can tell ark2 will have Conan levels of RMT
If you can’t trade game progression and what can be traded is of low value -> RMT falls apart
Not too much but still there
Then... what would the point of bosses be?
Which tbh is about what you can expect if you want things to exist of value
i think most people RMT for boss fights
People would RMT the loot lol. No winning
What is the direct definition of RMT
It's usually in game currency like dust, but RMT is common
Real money trade = someone exchanges real money to another for something ingame
Ahh ok, I knew it’s trading money for game stuff but I like to have the actual definition
Only possible in an mmo game
RMT can be to devs or between players
Bribe devs 
People will RMT to have people do the one time bosses, I see the appeal especially on the genesis maps that require really well breed lines and annoying missions
But... no engrams or loot?
The telegrams give a huge advantage as well
Then wats the point of the boss
Lol. I got lucky ig
Cus that is a hell of a grind to get that alpha difficulty
I said rmt is common, but not an always
Not an always but it is sometimes easier for some to do so
the real reason why people RMT kinda rotates back to my statement that PVP is poorly designed in ARK. you cant stand a chance so u wanna build asap with the strongest stuff. RMT would be fixed for the most part if PVP wasnt designed in a way where you could lose everything in an instant.
Again, it’ll exist if there’s a demand and the good or service can be traded
Exactly, eliminates RMT but also a vital part of progressing
It would matter less if you could build as fast as you could be wiped
But that’s simply never been the case. And has its own problems
Then make bases harder to wipe
if you build up 2 fast and there is nothing to work towards than you lose interest in the game cuz there is nothing meaningful to do
ORP
That was tried and maps became saturated with minimal raiding
So there is no balance ig
Cave builds have to be banned and open world bases need to be viable
There is a balance, but it comes at a cost to someone
Easy up easy down is costly to people who want to invest in their material resources
Make open bases immune to titans
Easy up hard down means people who show up first get ahead but anyone late to the party is screwed
Hard up hard down
People who show up first get ahead and nobody else but other first people can contest them
Very stable, but only fun for established people
Removing cryopods would nerf caves adequately imo
So there is no winning
We've been over this
Not for everyone, but that’s kinda ok. Established players probably could do with more competition for their status
banning caves makes sense cuz you also want to be able to explore caves ( and get artifacts which you cant do on some maps )
Banning caves with any progression in them seems like the most brain dead logical move of all time 😅
It’s a viable thing to do if caves are too small for an alpha’s needs
Caves are there since 2015, but they became op when tek tier started: crios, tps and transmitters make them op.
Caves without those will be just ok
Back in 2015-2016 people only used bears or things like them on the caves
They won’t be if people can’t tp from and to them. Or bring huge Dino’s into them in cryos.
Believe me, they weren’t an issue before tek
Not true. People invaded servers and griffers used to hide in caves, BUT they were limited to what they could hide in the caves
Not getting every dino inside and inability to tp anywhere you want are major factors
You know people used to invade anyway, right? Alphas from other servers would just start from the ground up, hidden, and raid everything
Easy one, we just closed the caves entrances with turrets and all. The guys inside would do nothing.
With tek tier, they can tp and move Dinos in and out
It wasn’t an issue before tek
Same
Because what I’m saying is, you wouldn’t need to get in fast. Just siege and wait
It happened several times in the servers I played
It wasn’t an issue
Ok
cave mechanic that transmits explosive Shockwave further would be cool
basically just boosted AOE
would need to travel through a cave too
Im not sure about any kind of shockwave, but the 6x damage is already a good thing
It wasn’t an issue before the tek stuff. The problem today is you can play without any limitations inside a cave. You can tp to farm everything. You can move in and out everything.
When I start playing Valheim again that I realized
Building in restricted 3rd person view SUCKS
Yeah, I'm a little concerned how builds will be with forced 3rd person
I can see ways of making it work, and also ways of it being awful ... Hopefully gameplay reveal shows a bit of building
tbh I'd like monster hunter style bosses
have bosses in arkII further your progression by dropping advanced crafting materials rather than unlocking stuff... besides, the steam page already insinuates that we will gain knowledge more from world events anyway
endgame weapon components being dropped from bosses or hard world events would also feel rewarding
mhmm
its kinda dumb, in concept, that you've killed a boss and just "oh hey I can suddenly craft [fancy tek item here]"
I guess it works in ArkI because the arks themselves probably upload the knowledge into your implant after passing their tests, but arkII doesn't have this system
Lore comes after gameplay (almost always)
well even in gameplay it wouldn't make much sense
People seem to forget this 🤣
it's not like a weapon component part can turn your spear into a boom stick
please don't let this happen
Monster hunter unlocks materials and blueprints to a degree
Since you can’t make a weapon without fighting the monster first in most cases
yes, but that can be justified by the more advanced materials allowing for more advanced crafting methods
actually, you dont unlock blueprints unless you specifically get a part from that monster, even if you do kill it... and of course, further blueprints are also locked behind checkpoints in the story
and you arent even the one making the weapons
You unlock the rath set when beating a rath even if you don’t get the gem
You can’t MAKE the thing until you have the part, but you can see it as a blueprint after you hunt one
well the gem is usually only needed for one part, but you've most likely gotten at least a scale
you misread what I said
you dont actually unlock blueprints in general until you get a drop from the monster... raths gem isnt the only crafting part it has, and you are guaranteed drops after killing a monster because you can carve up its corpse
speaking of
corpse carving would be awesome in arkII
You get guaranteed bonus rewards carve or no carve simply by hunting a monster in any form
well that typically depends on how well you did when hunting it
But I suppose on paper MHW has two blueprint systems…one locked behind the assigned quests and another unlocked when you hunt a specific monster
yes
The amount and type? Yes. But you always get something
its not always a monster drop though
it could easily be an ore or something you gathered as well
Just restarted World over the weekend, unlocked Diablos set on first visit to Wastelands thanks to turf war with Barroth 😂


