#ark-2
1 messages · Page 47 of 1
dats true
Very true.
I understand your assertions here, but I’m not sure this would be a popular decision. Ark already has/had servers with constant wipes: Arkpocalypse and beginner servers
And those aren’t popular
I think we just need more environmental threats
You know when we, pvp players, used to build boats to store safely out stuff and they brought Leeds to the game?! Things like that, but for the land bases, would help I guess
I mean, I’ve talked about Aratai raiding bases in here
Arkpoc is very popular isn’t it?
It just ebbs and flows as folks leave before a wipe and come in droves right after one
Not that I know of
I think it’s ok to have seasons while on early-access, but after that, I don’t know…
I would say Arkpoc is popular. Go look at the server population
I like the way it is now, but maybe creating environmental threats to the older/larger tribes, if possible, would be awesome
Ok, I stand corrected
If ark 2 comes out is there any guarantee the original good YouTubers will come back? Like kishko and his tribes
Of course not 🤣
People will come if they like it
how would we, some mortals in the ark discord server know?
I hope in this game they fix the bugs that made the pvp just get bad
I’m sure WC is doing their best
Yeah I am aware, they juggle new maps and updates it must be EXTREMELY difficult, I am still not aware how they do it, in the 2 years they develop a new entire game and new maps and updates
it will be a totally different game, nothing gets "fixed", nor do we know if it gets improved. everything will just get a rework
Damm
True, but I’m sure the new mechanics, new engine, new map etc are aimed to avoid old issues. Like mesh holes, map exploits etc.
Don’t waste your time buying ark 2
see the thing is with games, different types of games will face different issues. mesh holes are not common in more focussed rpgs, but are very common in mmo's
why waste time? buying takes at max a minute
Don’t waste your time trying to convince people in the ark 2 channel 🤣
If they couldn’t fix ark 1 what’s to say they would with ark 2 it’s the same everything just a continued story meshing will still be thing duping will as well
That’s a valid risk. I’d recommend buying after seeing some gameplay or seeing how week one goes
True, agreed. My point is, they are developing from the ground up, knowing the issues and looking for solutions. There’s a big chance of improvements.
no logic is following in this. why do you think they make a second game? to recreate glitches? they have been focussing so hard on ark II, focussing on ark I is just a waste of time. + like i said, mesh holes are very rare in rpg focussed
if Ark II is just a few months away, why create fixes for bugs
Exploiting is gonna happen 100% of the time
in what games bugs are not taken advantage of? 
All online games have exploitable features.
That’s a worry of mine, the graphics might be a bit too good for my humble old pc, though I am upgrading it
Correct, so it’s a valid worry for ark 2 to have exploits 😂
The question is WHAT exploits will there be, how bad will they be, and how will they alter gameplay? And when will they be fixed
It’s a non issue as all games have it. The real question is if they will be manageable
invalid to just decide to not buy a game based on some worries
Ark PvP is riddled with cheating and exploiting, so if that pushed you away from ark 1 I can see that pushing you away from ark 2
That’s what pushed my tribe but me away
see, pokemon scarlet released, full of bugs. so thats a valid reason not to buy it/not buy it yet. but we have seen no Ark II reviews from people who played it, so you just cant say: "i wont buy it because it might have bugs"
What is funny to me is, people are dooming ark 2 and praising buggy ark 1🤣
black market of ark scares me how much money those people are talking about
Yea that’s hypocrisy to me lol. But some folks are just concerned ark 1 and ark 2 will have similar issues
it's going in reverse mode for them
Used to play ps4 ark, guy meshed turrets on the entersnces to our rathole, it was probably our fault because it’s the worst rathole it could be (valguero blue ob) they quit after that, now I just go solo in smalls
Hopefully I can drag them back, even if it’s just to PvE ark 2
Sure it’s valid to be concerned, but amazes me there are more people asking for Ark: Remastered version than those willing to see Ark 2 released 🤣
Ark 1 isn’t fixable, IMO
Nah there’s too many maps and bugs to fix
You could rebuild ark 1 from the ground up and remaster it. I wouldn’t do it lol but it’s possible
tell that to the delusional people coping thinking it will ever happen
I know 
oh wait, they won't acknowledge the truth 😂
See I am restarting and hoping it gets minor fixes but I know it won’t, I just wait for ark 2
In that case it wouldn’t be a remaster
i sometimes want to strangle communities by how idiotic they act.
somebody says something that MIGHT happen
everyone else hears that, spreads it
then, the rumour spreads and people start talking about it like its a fact
…that’s definitionally a remaster
*** ahem Loadedcrysis***
It’s the same game being redone and rereleased
If you build from the ground up, it’s a new game…
Yeah it annoys me, I was watching some good YouTube old ones and people are saying “kishko died and his parents didn’t know he had a yt”
no? lmao, a remastered game is the same game, just better coding
^or just newer in some cases where devs are lazy 😂
If you build it from the ground up, it’s new game
Yeah
What’s done under the hood has no impact on a game being a remaster or not
From scratch no code maybe assets but no code
A remaster is entirely dictated by “is this the same game”
Which it 100% is if it’s intellectually identical
By definition, it wouldn’t be a remaster, but it’s their game, they can call it the way they want 🤣
if thats the case, its either a modern thing or i am lost
Most remasters are exactly what I’m describing, because who would buy a game that’s a remaster without major changes to what’s under the hood 😂
Many remasters are games that are rebuilt for new code bases (example being a new console)
ark 1 remasterd, but we decided to add a new credits song performed by big Vin himself
if nintendo would build a game about an italian plumber who collects coins and stumps on enemies to save his crush from turtles, would that be a new game?
see it's different shifter, not a exact 1 to 1
*the same game but for a new platform
Yes, of course lol
Or they would be calling Mario remaster of remaster of the remastered version
It’s just a new Mario game
Remaster: A remaster is a type of port where the original game is updated to work on newer systems and with better performance. The developer uses most of the original code (if they can) and usually just improves the textures and framerates but keeps the game mostly intact otherwise.
aight mb
But if you take old assets, work on them and improve image, sound etc. it’s a remaster
That’s a remaster indeed
So to remaster ark 1 you junk 99.9% of ark 1 code, thus basically rebuilding it
It’s not made from the ground up
Therefore it’s practically from the ground
other resources talk about starting from scratch though 
Golden joystick awards today
I forgot about that
if you think ark 2 will be there you got too much hope
grrr, i am an ark player, but the servers are down so im going to be toxic in the discord >: )
On pcgamer nah won't be on there. Tho it's about consoles. I never have voted. So doubt jt was something to vote on
Seeing folks fresh off official is very amusing
That’s because they’re both right 😂. It can be either
ark 2 ''was'' on pcgamer in a 10 sec reused trailer clip, best bet for this year is the game awards if they attend this year
The super best bet is waiting on the announcements channel 🧠
When is ark 2 coming out
2023
Oh I know I was there
Damn
tomorrow
They could win most wanted today
Geboren shush
General concerns me
the "dark" side
Let's hope gameshwo awards has gameplay
it doesnt, during the times ark servers are online its fun with mods, during offline times though...
The dark side of the ark community is a pathway to mentalities others would consider unnatural
Maybe we can keep those folks on ark 1
Time to peddle ark 2 rumors to keep the community cleaner
how can i describe them?
0 sleep
0 hours of being nice
10000 spend on the black market
slides into Ark 2
probably better, they seem to love ark 1 more than anything new and complex
and really fluent in chinese from playing official pvp
Tell them ark 2 is SP vin only gameplay with a story focus ASAP
we should edit the fan wiki Ark 2 section lol
typical ark player would learn some dudes native language just to swear towards them
God I hope it's Q1 of 2023 and not Q4
I bet on Q4.
Stop
But in ark you see just squares
That's too far man
My bet is q2
Woman lol and I was dreaming of playing it this christmas, but oh well....
i move my pawn to E4
Yall forgot about the term "remake", if anything ark 1 would be that, not a remaster
it's like the crash bandicoot reboot, it's a completely fresh new game based on the old
That really depends on how faithful the new game is to the old one
Let's hope it won't be like the crash Bandicoot reboot though.
Most rational chatter
we are talking about ark 1 if it got a remake
not ark 2
the destroy all humans remake 💀
I never played the original and I had fun with the remake
Ah,ok. Because I played original crash on PS1 and was not loving the new stuff.
I think an Ark 1 remaster would be converting everything to UE5, but it would be buggy AF
yeah I just used it as an example of what is a remaster and a remake
i only played the original 🤣
Gotcha.
nah if they do it, it should be a remake
Converting old assets to a new engine would be a remaster
ik
im just saying if they decide to make ark 1 again they should make it from scratch (remake)
opinion no one asked for:
the spiderman remake was not needed
remember this is the ark 2 channel btw
Oh sure. Agreed. Theres no point in doing a remake of a buggy game (buggy to the point it can be unplayable).
the general chat scares me
yup
here is shifter, so im staying here
i only talk here ahaha XD
For nostalgia?
or a mod map
Yes 😂
I hope it happens, i wanna see the island on UE5
and aberration
aberration is beautiful dudd
best dlc
would need to wait another 2 years for that to work
HuHHH?
I haven’t chatted anywhere else in years 😂
i like gen1 
the tping didnt make it for me tbh
You're pulling my leg, right?
Gen 1 is beautiful, but it’s littered with oof problems
no, i would rather take your arm
though biomes look very nice specially bog
Arm-a-geddon.
its confirmed, i am canon in Ark II
I mean you can recreate them now since most of the Island assets can be bought in the UE store
Tbh I should be in ark 2 😂
My hot takes are legendary
In which month you think Ark 2 will be realesed?
i'm gonna be a npc trader you unlock after burning Vindiagos village to the ground
any month, then i'm always right for the whole year 
june may is my guess
because of the xbox game pass 12 month guarantee that got announced on june of this year
June is a big month for ark and Microsoft.
yessir
6 times including launch did ark/Microsoft release stuff for ark.
2023, I'm not sure but it is releasing in Early Access
Technically the early access launch is the open beta before the full launch 🧐
Nah beta is when a game is almost done, early acces is like a middle ground between alpha and beta
"'Beta' is a standard term to denote a milestone release during production in which game functionality is included and optimised (but may have bugs), game content is finished (but may have some implementation errors), and which is considered nearly complete."
Not a solid definition, but it's defiantly 'not' near the end.
There's a few differences between Early-Access and Beta.
But by the end of the day, they're more or less the same.
facts
but I'd want a much bigger completely reimagined abby
yeah but i dont think ark 2 game content will be finished, i think they have a lot more ideas to add, imo for me it slides more into the early acces side of things
abb is perfect as is, love that map
they did say arkII would be launching in early access
I want more glowy tbh
more glow? wdym
There's some cut concepts that would've made Aberration better, in my opinion
^
bioluminescense
hell, I'd love to see like flourescent rocks and crystals too
ohhh ik what you mean
maybe even trees with like crystalized bark and gem leaves
yeah there are some zones on the blue zone who lack something fr
i have never seen those concepts
Like the cut lava-region, or the more grossed, worm-like Rockwell.
At least it wasn't as butchered as Extinction was.
lava region🧐 ?
oh yeah didnt they want to make extinction bigger?
because of it being on the earth and all that
We don't know.
But the wasteland was going to be more then just sand
And the cut kaiju that later on became the Stryder
Thank Atlas for that
heckin tencent ruining everything
Tencent?
they wanted to milk ark so much with pixark, ark park, dark and light using ark code, atlas
They had nothing to do with ARK
That's Snail-games
ARK would be much worse if Tencent had their way with it
still I assume tencent wanted to do all these spin offs
agree
Hang on, you mind if I dm you?
yeah np
@thick moat Extinction had even more
While you can see Aberration that we got in those concept arts.
They basically scrapped the whole idea of the original Extinction map, though.
yeah
the fallen obelisk for example
i hate seeing these concept arts that didnt happen because of rushing
It's in the game though
It was reused for the sunken-forest obelisk.
Though, a bit more lackluster in there then it would've been on Aberration
Oh yeah, they're great
Even the Island was gonna have a mountain range
yeah im seeing beach concepts too
This is why I would love a ARK-1 remake.
Either a official one, or a unofficial one made by modders in ARK-2 with Wildcards permission
damn even obelisk ideas
I hope this happens someday
all this would of made ark even better
I hope they take all the time they want with ark 2, as long as it releases, there are so much great ideas
we all got the mad ark 2 news bug we are all ark 2 now lol soon we will see ark 2 next month i hop
and game play
all I know is family

bob you got ark 2 new bug your now ark 2 it self no bob gone to us lol jk
If bob isn't a preset name for ark male character im rioting wildcard

I’m pretty sure it was the standard name in 2015, then they’ve changed to human
It was.
It still kind of is, cause if I recall, there's like a 1/5 chance that the default name will be 'Bob' when you load into the creation-menu
I have never seen it
Yeah, ever since the change, I've not seen it even once, and I make a looooot of characters.
So I'ma call bull on that one, chief
It might be a small percentage, but it's not 20%
I've made like 50 characters over the last few years, literally always human
Yeah, they’ve changed that. I don’t remember when and why. I liked the Bobs more than the Humans.
I've gotten it before, I forgot to take a screenshot though
It definitely still happens but it's probably like 1/100 or 1/1000
Back to Ark 2 please
Not much to discuss about ark 2 though. Don’t know much about it
Then move to another channel, this one is dedicated to ark 2.
We only have 7 dinos confirmed. All current official information is in the pinned messages.
7 actually, that I have counted
Rex, raptor, brachio, dodo, lizzard plant, Archeopteryx, ptera
Fixed

what else?
they are like humans
It still counts as a creature
I wouldn't count as wild beings
They're 100% wild animals
9 then, humans LOL
Well, dino is a general concept as I don't think pteras and dodos are dinos I guess
we better say creature/tames I guess
7 creatures/tames
Creatures is what I've been using
How will building be in the next ark
We kind of don't know, but there's a little bit of information on the steampage
So we'll have blueprints?
For pre-fab structures at least, yeah
I wish they'd give us a little hope by showing some gameplay, I've resorted to going back to WoW for the time being and that is an all time low for me lol.
They did say next time they talked about Ark 2 there would be gameplay
If Ark II has a good character creator I will forgive it up to five cardinal sins
Wasn't said everyone thinks so they only said that there will be more stuff for ark 2 soon so it might be gameplay but who knows
Dollie said gameplay is next
Top pinned post
TBH it all sounds too good to be true. But if they can deliver… Well, than the franchise will have a long and storied legacy.
You forgot le ankylosaurusus
And even more, parasaur, trike, quetzals... all those where on the final part of the ark 2 trailer
Those cave paintings give quite a bit of info
The painting doesn't count
Cause it also shows the mega-mek vs the king-titan
The cave-painting is reflecting on the moto of the game.
"Survive the past, tame the future"
The inner circle refers to ark 2
The outer side is ark 1
The past is outer side, inner future
That’s all just theorycrafting. Those cave paintings don’t mean anything.
will ark 2 have pvp?
probably
Undoubtedly
ark designers: Lets do a high quality trailer but put things in there that dont mean anything! absolutely
Do you honestly think the devs added secret meaning to the cave paintings in their one minute long trailer?
Bro this company is so sucessfull i really think yes my guy
Good that youre not a designer / dev
when ark2?
So tell me. What other hidden meanings were offered in the trailer? Perhaps the head of Santiago’s spear represents the future, while the haft represents the past.
Or since the head is made of tek it must represent the past and the wooden haft represents the future. I wonder if the devs intended for the brown color to signify his shitty mood?
WildCard starved us for information for so long the animated series channel devolved into a cult, and the Ark 2 channel is now grasping for hidden meaning in the trailers like it’s some religious scripture.
If the cave had paintings of dinos its very likely that said dinos are in that planet
I hope that ark 2 sticks to one map because it always bothered me that in survival evolved wildcard were always focusing on the next map rather than updating the ones they already have.
I want big scary flying alien (not wyvern big)
It could have 2 pairs of wings or something
Same
How would you update a map that has already been published?
I think he means like fixes and what not
Wonder when gameplay will come out
I’m also hoping for a single map. Have DLCs just expand on it opening up a larger area.
Spit it out already Flobs
North was changed to snow, central became redwoods and the swamp became the swamp
"Some time ago" exactly my point. They just don't update the game. It's always new maps.
This would be amazing
Its hard to update maps that people have already built on
Expand outwards then
If its in the same planet ok but i wouldnt like to have the map look bigger and when i try to go somewhere it just says "you must purchase x dlc to enter area"
Imagine building a nice little complex on a beautiful open field, and then the next day you log in and you’re in the middle of the redwoods with an active volcano in your back yard.
Exactly
Then expand outwards
They atleast gave you time to move outside the affected area, imagine if it wasn't like that
You on ps5?
The map won’t just look bigger it’ll be bigger. You just gotta buy the dlc to open the new area.
Kinda like EA does
ps4
That’s not just EA that’s how DLCs work
"Pay 10€ to acces this snowy biome"
I wouldn't mind the idea of dlc opening new areas
But ayleast have the main game all free
EA would sell the new biome, the new tames, new building pieces all separately.
If theyre clearly separated by like a large body of water or a desert ok but if theyre immediatly by eachother then its a no for me
So you just don’t want an invisible wall stopping you
Yes
Yeah that would be ugly
Yeah.
In ark 1 it makes sense cause its an ark but not on an alien planet
I’d definitely prefer like a rock slide or something opening up a passage through a previously impassable mountain range or something.
I'm gonna get alot of flak but I hope there's no wyvern or tek either.
So on multiplayer you see ppl just going through a mountain?
Being dead is a big nerf 
The problem with wyvern is that they make the game too easy
Literally nerfed into the ground
I’d rather people without the dlc don’t even play with me
I also hope there's no host tether distance on local
So each cluster has 50 servers with all the possible dlc combos?
That seems highly unnecessary. But I don’t really care how they chose to execute it. There’s more than one way to skin a cat.
Hated having to rent a server for my friends just to nullify that.
Yeah. Tether is the reason I ended starting my own private cluster.
That makes for terrible gameplay
Lmfao
Am I wrong tho?
No definitely not wrong
Yeah and there's no excuse for it now since performance can't really be an issue on a new engine and better platforms.
I mean….with pc yeah no excuse. Idk about consoles.
I mean it's only coming to next gen
I haven’t owned or even looked into consoles in years idk what they’re capable of anymore.
Gonna have to play on my pc since PlayStation isn't getting it :/
Not initially on launch
Invest in that PC and never worry about consoles again man.
Easily one of the best decisions I’ve ever made
The only thing consoles still beat PCs at is local coop, and even then it’s slipping
Lots of games don’t even offer local coop anymore.
My pcs better than my ps4 but I just used my ps4 for more ease of use, but ps4s on the brink of being put behind so i should start using it mainly.
I’m curious if tethering will still be required on local simply because ark 2 is so dang massive that most folks hardware will combust if it’s running the server and client
How dang massive is it?
And how do you know these things?
Get WC to hire me and I’ll tell you 🧠
I mean they have Microsofts budget and literacy no other game has something dumb like that so I doubt it'll be back.
Many other games of the scale of ark 2 don’t offer singleplayer or hosting of servers and client
Unless I missed a step and there are folks who host the entirety of WoW on a home PC? I could have missed that step…
well no shit it's theorycrafting, and those cave paintings definetly mean something, why tf there would be a circle englobing a bunch of primitive dinos while the outer side has the king titan and mega mek, im sure those dinos will appear on the game.
Bro don’t be mad
oh dont start with the "DoNt BE MaD" by the way I typed lmao
I’m sorry I blew up

Still no gameplay :((
Remember The Game Awards MAY have gameplay, we'll for sure know if the last Community Crunch before 8th of December mentions something
You mad bro?
You can’t run all the Atlas grids on a common home pc
Let me say I think Atlas going UE5 soon will be a nice preview of Ark 2
WAHHH im going psycho mode be careful
Oh yeah
Concur
I wonder if the Aratai will tame Dinos, or just native fauna, and conversely, whether or not we will be able to tame the native life forms on Arat
the steam page description does say that they will attack us with their own tamed creatures, whether that's native life or also dinos is still a mystery atm
The creatures bred through the Arks and assumedly Genesis were genetically engineered to be susceptible to domestication, so I bet the Aratai get both native and foreign critters in some respect
I’m gonna guess lore will not decide what Aratai can ride
It’s gonna boil down to AI design and how it looks and feels for immersion to fight certain mounted Aratai
Alternatively theyll pull a genesis and just have a gang of 400 arati riding parasaurs
You know what really annoyed me the most about boss fights in Ark is that the primary deciding factor in what made a mount viable or not viable was it’s drag-weight/how much effect knock-back had on it rather than core stats
There are a lot of creatures that could kill a boss if knock-back didn’t send them flying every time the boss attacked them
If said creature weighs 1/10 of what the boss does of course its gonna go flying
the core stats determined 99% of what could be brought
This too
which is kinda...lame given you can mutation stack things to have absurd stats
Mut stacking shouldnt make it to ark2 or it should be drasticly reworked
your mechanical skill in ark had 5% or less to do with your chances of clearing a boss, and the remaining 95% was the amount of breeding you sat through...and some icing on the cake of farming capped flak
Dont forget about the saddles
fine game design for a 2015 RPG/MMO/survival game that was prototyping something new, but I'm not really interested in that for a more modern product
That’s not true though. Mantises out DPS basically everything when properly equipped, but cannot fight bosses because of knock back
One example, of which there are many
“It makes sense” is not always the same as “it’s fun and a good mechanic”
Not to mention the DPS race against the Dragon that can kill any creature in 5 fire breaths 🙄
I didn’t see anyone commenting that here, but would you like the possibility to create an Aratai character? Like having classes (more RPG).
Huh, seems unlikely. But on the other hand, also a natural fit for PvP
Aratai playable confirmed
Agreed, should be from upgrades you build for your dinos, saddles, costumes etc
Playable Aratai? Hope not
Pls no
I don’t want to grow attached to them
I just want to overtake there planet and wipe them out
Is that too much to ask for
Yes, cause that sounds like shitty writing.
Are you an average billionaire? 
Lol
You think we're joking. 
You think I’m serious?
Yes
Judging from history its more like average human
Average commander*
Average ark player
Humans are quick to follow orders, even if moral is in play.
So yeah, like you said. An average ARK player
Lol well I’m not serious
Yes you are.
Send me your personal information.
693-354-3654
You are done. Don’t even try. 
I should've clarified that humans are quick at following orders from 'higher' authority. 
Do you know who I am?
“Good soldiers follow orders”
''It will be done my lord''
"And good people, know when to not"
Well, seeing it’s not so popular to have controllable Aratai. I hope, at least, that the new SOTF will have them if it comes. 🤣
The new new I mean, if it comes one day.
All I want is to be able to recruit them. 
Either in a later update, or later DLC. I can be patient.
I think that has a huge chance if NPCs will be a thing. But I was hoping to be myself an Aratai. 🤣
Like having special buffs when mounting Arat creatures
I think it’s the AVATAR 2 vibe
I want to be a blue Aratai
Nah i’d rather do that with real players
Didn't ask you
If good people died for not following orders they often failed to reproduce 😂
The point is, some orders like bombing civilian populations shouldn't be followed through by good people.
“Good” isn’t always easily defined in the moment
It's kind of like the trolley dilemma. If bombing that population to destroy the target will save many more lives then what do you do?
Most of the time though, it doesn't.
I'd be happy to know any moments in history that bombing civilians was morally good for the better of everyone else.
History is told by the winners and is told in hindsight
When Luke Skywalker destroyed the death star
I said 'history' not fiction
One could argue the conclusion of WW2
Japan?
Germany I don't know much about.
But Japans situation was extreme.
Even the people that gave the order to drop the fat-man regretted it afterwards.
You can regret the right choice. Not to speak on the specifics of that one
Most soldiers come back from war with regrets as well.
That wasn't right though.
America had the raw power to do damage to the military of Japan without literally nuking a city.
How could they not? Much like well written Aratai conflict, right and wrong is blurry
Well you know how sometimes you can cook something in the oven but it's just quicker to use the microwave. It was like that.
Are you really comparing cooking to genocide?
I’m not sure I would call that genocide
Fighting a war and inflicting heavy blows on your enemy and genocide are not identical
"the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group"
It was a way to quickly end it without more lives being lost, far more than what was killed. Just for the record I don't think a nuke should ever be used again.
The aim was to win the war, so by definition not genocide. I hope ark 2 being about survival of the fittest and involving some cool grey area alliances/conflicts would also cleanly fall outside genocide
And Japan was the aggressor. Import point to make here.
Aggressors with planes, not nukes.
To say it’s morally clear is imo foolish
So, bombing civilians is fine if it means victory and the "greater good", no?
When Japan attacked they had no idea about Nukes and they weren't ready until near end of war. It was the result of an arms race.
No it's not fine, but war doesn't have easy answers, it's best to avoid war all together.
I'm more asking Shifter, since he was the one that brought this topic up. (not to be an ass.)
To the ones who made that choice, yes. And it was seen as “good” by many. It helps that good and bad are defined by people and not natural laws
There’s no natural law like gravity that applies to morality. It’s human generated and human enforced. We see it change in our culture and history, games like ark 2 acting as snapshots of our current moral system 🤷♂️
So, are the bombing of the Ukrainian civilians morally right?
Or is that different?
You want me to answer a modern, ongoing political crisis wearing the hat of WW2 military leaders?
I was talking about morality in general, not exclusively WW2.
I’m saying that no choice of that nature is cut and dry
I provided a counter example to the one you used to defend that morally good choices are always obvious
In the ARK-2 channel?
Where else? If you want to dive deeper into ethics, my DMs are open
🤷♂️ alright. Ethics are almost always more complex than you think is all. I’m curious if Aratai interactions will make some folks face those questions
Or if we’ll just treat them like we do any other hostile alien creature in a video game
Man I scrolled up really far and still can’t find wtf this has to do with Ark 2.
I think it’s some kind of social commentary on the validity of the human struggle on Arat
Since we’re invaders
Technically
That’s correct
The initial question was “is it right that we force land on a planet occupied by sentient natives and replace their ecology while killing them?”
I would say no without any additional context. But did the people who launched the Genesis Ship have any way of knowing Arat had any sapient inhabitants to begin with?
That is an important question.
And it’s also relevant that relations between the two species do not have to default to hostility. That’s a two-party choice.
I would say no, since the ship was launched with an AI that intended to FIND a suitable planet, but I differ to lore nerds on that
True, I’m not sure who swung the first axe, although the trailer indicates something got hostile pretty dang quick 😂
We will be freedom fighters, ok?!
Also, the fact Arat is full of element and mutagel has nothing do with our interest to finish this tyranny
Wait, it is?
We don't know.
I mean they’ve survived the apocalypse and ended up there. Can’t expect them to just lay down and die
This why I want to be an Aratai. I will diplomatically talk with Vindiago and finish this non sense
We have a common enemy, R******L is coming
Vindiago lmao
Diplomacy 100 inbound 😂
A
Source
I’ve already said I was trolling. I was “justifying” the “invasion”
Trolling is mean and rude and sad and bad dont do it :)
I do it all the time
:(
He does. It’s true.
Coherent and tasteful trolling is A+ tier
I’d love more mounted siege weapons, but I’m not sure what to do to make them more viable
The defenses of bases would have to be significantly more versatile for that to work. Otherwise you cause problems that make bases too easy to offline
I thought about that, it would be really cool actually.
I bet the new defense meta will be largely different from Ark 1
I hope it will be. I hate defense in ark1 lol
is ark 2 mainly pvp?
It has pvp, it also has pve. I don't think it is mainly anything yet
will it be like ark 1 with breeding raising and taming
oh ok
I’m thinking the use of mounted defensive and offensive weapons would be super cool. But again, not entirely sure how to do that. Maybe make the rider invincible while mounted on the siege weapons so they can’t be picked off them?
I feel like a turret wall would be far more immersive and entertaining (using ark 1 framework) if you had actual players manning some form of specialized defensive turret(s) be they catapults etc
I've talked about that in here before, that's a reality on Atlas already and I think they will do the same for Ark. You just have to assign NPCs to mounted weapons like a cannons, ballistas etc.
Also, the NPCs need food and they are paid (gold coins).
What little info we have, at least ...
Hopefully the gameplay reveal will be worth the wait
It wont
Yea except I don’t want NPCs lol
I just want human manned ballistas shooting people off their walls 😂
Their definition of gameplay is a 3 second clip of holding a spear with no hud in the night
so dose anyone know when this game is coming out like what quarter of 2023
Nope, just 2023.
Xbox games showcase hinted at first half of 2023, but not a guarantee
"I understood that reference."
guessing it'll get set for early 2023 and delayed to late
honestly not too far off of what could happen ahahah
I would be inspecting every damn pixel though🗿
The idea of a persistent world in which all of your work is left vulnerable while you are not playing is the fundamental problem of this genre
And why an unstructured PvP isn't very good for the longevity or health of the game
I mean, that's not objectively truw
It's 8 years into the game and pvp is still going fairly strong, even on official
It's just not super accessible to new players because they don't know how to play it the way you have yo
You have to have a tribe unless you are doing smalls or a wipe server. Otherwise you can't get really anywhere
If ark2 doesn't have some form of persistent world in which pvp can take place, as well as bases to raid, then ark2's pvp scene probably won't last super long
Hard disagree
Just look at Rust
has wipes
has bases to raid
is one of the most populated survival PvP games out there, almost double what Ark's entire official player count is, and that's on a bad day
That's including official PvE on the Ark side, btw.
I'd also say it's very accessible compared to Ark, you can just jump in and find a dude with a gun, kill him, and then research his gun and bullets; boom, you've skipped the boring grind to almost the entire second tier of the workbench
There's also no, you know, having to sit there and either beg at the heels of the megas to join them, or breed for years just to even become slightly capable of fending for yourself. Not to mention the greatly reduced reliance on RNG, at least in my experience
I would argue that niche =/= strong
A lot of people seem to think this would be a bad idea, but I believe with 100% of my being that tribes having instanced territories with restricted access is actually the ideal method for cultivating a healthy player-experience that is dynamic for both hardcore players and casuals.
You have your stronghold, and then you have "the world"
The world is where all the risk, the glory, and the valuables are found and fought over
But no matter what, you always have your stronghold to return to
Nobody would fight, they'd turtle up like they already do with shared PvP/PvE clustered servers (according to some, I think it's not a terrible idea but definitely needs work)
Certain times of the month being PvP enabled would be the penultimate way to go imo, of course keeping the tribe war feature for those few who do want to just PvP when they want
People would absolutely fight in that situation. They’re playing PvP because they want to engage with other players.
For some that may be true. But PvP players arent on PvP servers just because it sounds cool. They’ll be looking for fights because that’s the content they enjoy. I do think instanced territories would be a good idea if it was to be implemented properly. It would be huge for dealing with pillar spam and would mean players would be able to build in the location they actually want. But in PvP it would need more. Nobody wants to kit farm in the open world as the only source of PvP. Perhaps some incentive for war that would open up a tribes territory to be raided by those involved.
Splitting Arat’s openly playable area into conquerable territories with direct benefits is one possible method.
I like the idea but I feel it would turn out like amazons new MMO and result in to much control for one player to have over another.
New world I think it’s called
I think I've said before that having a feature akin to the faction war from For Honor would be a cool thing to do, have the Aratai, the tek wanters, and the Santiago tribes all be vying for something
At least, in PvP, no idea how that would have a place elsewhere
I honestly think instanced, match based PvP would be a great thing for the franchise.
Unless they did some galaxybrain branching story shit
Not saying it should only be that way
Match based is the goal imo
At the end of the day it seems to me that what’s really kept Ark PvP going all this time is the sunk cost fallacy. Regardless of whether the devs had good intentions in how they designed the game, that element of the experience is fundamentally malignant and I don’t want to see it repeated. That’s my contention.
But perhaps arenas you que into with one tame of a specific size and the winner keeps the others loot and receives more as a reward.
It would be interesting perhaps to be able to put one stronghold against another in all-out warfare, but have no permanent loss incurred. You get benefits for winning, but no real penalty for losing. That way people can legitimately just cut loose, have fun, wreak chaos and do crazy ridiculous things without sacrificing weeks, months, or even years of work.
Group content could be akin to battlegrounds in WoW even. But without respawn and you could loot your kills.
I don't want the PvP to turn into a facebook game, which is what this kinda sounds like to me, but maybe I just read it weird 😅
Just imagine a ravine with a fortress on either end, 10 people and 10 tames on each side fighting to kill and conquer the opposing side. You could even do a full scale siege.
All you risk losing are the tames and the kit you brought in with you.
That might be something.
I’m thinking you have your instanced territory, then you have the contested lands, venturing into the contested lands is where you get the majority of your creature variety and mid-high tier resources. You can build freely in the contested lands, but your structures, items, and tames are always vulnerable if left out there. So that’s your bulk-standard run of the mill PvP. But you also have territory warfare that has a handy-dandy matchmaking system that takes into account overall tribe stats, as well as manual declarations of war. In either case, the battle must be agreed on by both parties and a wager can be made between them, tames, resources, tech, whatever. But no matter which way the battle goes, your territory and items and tames contained within are restored to their original state afterwards. Unless you deliberately agree to a scorched earth outcome beforehand.
Something like that.
Options for players of all types and availabilities
The important part is that the time and effort you invest in the game is secure, and you cannot be robbed of it.
Or at least the majority of your time and effort, I could get behind this though 100%
If ark2 pvp turns into that no one will play it. That sounds like sotf with a few extra bells and whistles
The most valuable thing in pvp is character levels, if you have that then you can rebuild everything else
I really don't want to see the entirety of ark2 pvp turn into a Dino included dmz mode.
You must not have read the bulk of it, then. It sounds absolutely nothing like sotf, or that shitty dmz mode in that shitty new CoD, lol
It could be a separate mode from classic pvp
Ark 1 PvP is not good PvP. It needs to turn into something else
The only reason its not good is because of the hacks and graphic ini
And the left click spam outside of some tek and a couple tames, soaking turrets is also not engaging gameplay whatsoever, and anything off mounts without tek is just obnoxious little goblins trying to land a hit.
The ai in that mode is better than a majority of new players 🤣
The only actual positive to Ark 1 PvP is the thrill of scoring top quality loot from a raid or hunt.
Not surprised, these are CoD players we're talking about, after all 😂
Objectively false
"Wait a min, why are there 5 juggernauts in the kitchen?" ai really be out to troll
ini is a big negative to the game to be fair
Ark 2 OT
Yeah, but it's not as bad as cheaters and some of the other glaring and general issues PvP has
Especially since everyone can do it, unfortunately (of course, everyone on PC, that is)
I agree the exploit/cheating issue is their number one weakness. Unfortunately that’s a never ending fight.
anyone one know the exact release date?
It hasn't been announced
L
CDKeys (a well-known platform where you can buy keys for games) lists January 31st as the release date
Not sure how reliable it is, but if it's true...👀
Cdkeys is a gd liar
Tip number 1:
Dont get hyped around leaks. It would be a dissapointment, and People somehow convert a leak like its the truth. At that point, People getting mad at wildcard for no reason
See, you structured this a little poorly. The way it should've been posted is as follows:
CDKeys (a site that is in no way Wildcard or so much as affiliated with Wildcard, reducing their credibility as far as knowing actual information about Ark 2 to near zero, if not absolute zero) lists January 31st as the release date
when we will have news for ark 2? i mean it will be release in months
it could be at the game awards on december 8th if wildcard goes to it, other then that we don't know when wildcard will reveal gameplay (should normally be the next time they announce anything ark 2 related)
Thank you for saying what I’ve always said 👑
thanks flobs!
If they do that all players of pvp just leave the game, that's the beauty to me of PvP, the freedom to do whatever you want anywhere
It's just that raiding bases doesn't have much risk since it's so easy to build explosives and structures are really easy to break, Rust for example does it well (if we don't count that's extremely flawed easy way for anyone to get weapons) explosives are harder to build and structures resist a lot more, even wood
I think with the new combat, huge world and new building systems (along with wipes) would make it such a better mode without these huge changes making it completely different from what made the game popular on pvp
They could do a separate mode with that idea but to me the PvP Concept should stay the same
Defense being strong works better when at the end of the day there’s a wipe
As for the suggestion to rework PvP: I’m for it. Have a small instanced space for each tribe with no resources in it, and have special defense zones out in the world that grant special loot (maybe replace the role of beacons/loot crates)
Your instanced space becomes your tribe vault, and there’s plenty of PvP to be had snagging kits or fighting over defensive loot zones or tames etc
Nah too restricted, that's like an mmo
It wouldnt feel very sandboxy
It would get boring after a while too + where do even solos build, how are the smaller tribes meant to fight vs the bigger ones, how do you make every tribe that comes into the server have that small zone? It would get crowded, i don't think there's a way around it on a open world pvp sandbox, maybe with the atlas flag which makes it so you can own a piece of land that's not "restricted" with pvp hours and pve hours vs bases
Anyone think we'll see it around the game show awards
Yes we all think that, though imo them releasing SOTF makes me wonder if they did it because of a delay..
We'll have to wsit and see for the next community crunch on the 2nd if they announce something
I don't think we'll see it at the gameshow awards. I think it will be next year's xbox showcase.
But let's hope I'm wrong.
It may be the case honestly
I see June being the release month . So whichever way they can advertise it the best for that
I feel like the ankylo concept art was to calm the waters a bit, and they didnt say anything about it being "soon" so yeah what you are saying may be what will happen
Yea
Do you know the term instanced or instancing? That plays a big role in the way this proposed reform of PvP works
The new character models look pretty good. Weapons look good etc. Just need gameplay
Oh I assumed it was random assigned zones for all tribes
Graphically everything looks very good
Yup
This system is actually what makes it possible for smaller tribes to consistently contend with larger ones, because no matter what, the smaller tribes cannot be reduced to zero.
If the core of your operation in the game world is untouchable you have all the ingredients for a perpetual motion machine
At least as far as PvP is concerned
Yeah u can just wipe servers with how pvp is right now and I think it'll be fine
It would be cool as a experimental mode but nothing else
Instanced = off the map
I do think these instances should be devoid of tames and resources. That way you spend the bulk of your time out where PvP can happen
That'd be fine
As long as you can store at least some things, the functionality would still be beneficial to the health of the game
Yea I’m thinking the instances would be a “vault”
It’s used in ark 1 for some of the genesis missions
Yeah and there was a spanish yt series who used it too, but for pvp...
If you know RuneScape, it’s like the houses you can make in that game that are “outside” the normal map
It’s starkly different PvP for sure
It better mirrors an MMO, which ark 1 has some elements of, rather than a flat survival game
Yes that's why Im not quite fond of it
What I dislike about ark is that it tries to juggle MMO RPG and survival elements
The world permanence of a survival game is fine if you don’t have a multi thousand hour RPG progression system and an MMO network where people can come from anywhere to your server to raid you
I think they said there would be stats for ark 2 no?
Or will it be a skill tree with the stats
Stats are unconfirmed
The only confirmed feature is a skill tree with a knowledge point system…that is in some way linked to missions
I’m guessing stats to some extent aren’t going anywhere
Hmm all I hope is they make speed not upgradable
People going full the flash mode is a pain in the ass
Any type of movement ability is abused in PvP unfortunately
Even in Dark Souls people just constantly roll
Only For Honor had a straight up dual or die system that actually worked
That I can think of
Agree it’s bad design
It makes PvP at ping differences even more goofy
Eh its not abusing an ability, it's just in the game XD
That aint abusing though lol, you can catch rolls
It’s abuse if it’s used in an exploit style fashion I agree. I think the word ember was seeking was “spamming”
Yeah but it's easy to counter if all they do is roll back
That doesn’t make it fun
There’s a distinct different between fun and fair imo
I think dodges would be fun if they’re more like hops and less like assassins creed rolls lol
And maybe rolls for disengaging but u can only do it once and u are vulnerable on it
Yup
There's a lot of ways wildcard could improve on the souls combat, i hope they see the problems this combat has and improves on it
how do yall feel about stealing tames for ark2
like thats the one good thing i think cryos are good for
stealing tames?
that's weird asf
what would the purpose be other than a little bit of tomfoolery
You can do that with maewings
You can steal tamed babies with them
You can also do that with eggs
not needing to start your own end game lines
bypassing the huge time investment breeding will always be basically
i mean adult ones
lol
yeah just delete that type of breeding altogether
Stealing tames is the only way to even out lines, and it makes it easier to build back with good stuff. While I am against cryos, I am for stealing dinos, especially if it is something like the maewing stealing babies etc
the issue is that any breeding at all will at least somewhat mimic that
you will need to go througu the stages of breeding, hatching, raising, repeat
for multiple generations
you cant reduce that in any way except if you remove the hatching and raising stage ig but then its a wonky af game logic and wouldnt feel right
but even then breeding will be some decent level of time commitment or else itd be barely relevant, since the point is to create a superior tame by investing time
They're muted
theyll be unmuted eventually i imagine
Fair
doubt its a week long mute but i ciuld be wrong
Wonder what they did
🤷♂️
should spaying/neutering be a thing then
Yes
if you want to propogate lines the most effective way would be to prevent players from making tames unviable
though i do generally respect the effort involved with line creation
and this would make a lot of that irrelevant
though that its such an insane effort is part of the problem
if that effort was decreased, streamlining breeding and capping how far it can get earlier, then maybe it wouldnt be so bad to make that effort easily available for other players to exploit
When is it coming out
2023
Probably yeah
If breeding is just consolidating stats and imprint, the advantage won’t be so insurmountable that stealing is required as an option to get a foothold
I think a huge percentage of people don't want that though
Any idea when we get more ark2 news
New combat system
Trust me, you wont
First person doesn’t really work with the kind of combat system they’re envisioning
and the new movement system
A huge percentage of people “don’t want” third person only too 🤷♂️. I see that as a flimsy argument, though I’ve seen you present other valid ones so I concede it’s not a no brainer choice
True, but that is driven by the cameras in game play, getting rid of breeding isn't comparable
I think "huge percentage" is the misnomer here, we don't have concrete numbers on either side to support almost any point of discussion imo
I sure don't want third only, or souls style..
Game 2 in a successful model isn't time to upend everything your players love. It's dangerous as hell. If the game feels copycat, it will flop. Literally everyone I play with is 1st person on foot, 3rd on dino. It's about the immersion of truly feelings in your creations, on your dinos, or deep in the forest
3rd person can't match 1st person immersion, by definition
I think before we make any decisions about if we like or don’t like 3rd person we should wait to see the gameplay they are planning to show us
Agreed
3rd person might be necessary for the type of game they are making we just don’t know yet because there is no gameplay
I don’t think 3rd person is a deal breaker…
“Everything your players love” is a bold statement
People who love ark…obviously love ark. But the core of ark, the taming and surviving that defines the series, isn’t going anywhere
Yeaaah, ARK is a pretty versatile game that has many, many mechanics. Hard to round down what people love.
Yea lol ark has pvp which is an obvious statement, but I never play it. I only play single player. So it’s hard to pinpoint what everyone loves lol
That’s what’s nice about a customizable game like ark
I would say the breeding too lol. Most ark players spend more time breeding than they do taming
The breeding is not core to ark as a series. It’s core to the gameplay because of an error, but that’s it
This is a good point. Ark has a number of different play styles that have little in common other than the base game
And ofc the breeding is all roped into the taming and tame management
It's core to the game play for the bosses. The error made it too op and time consuming
But most people don't cap lines anyway
The 20 cap would not have been mandatory
Bosses were made harder after mutation stacking was discovered
I'd say mutations are more at fault then breeding.
Maybe. But you can't say that breeding and raising dinos isn't a key game play aspect
True, though in ark 1 they’re basically the same
Key to gameplay, not to the game design
A lot of people play ARK for the breeding.
I know someone that does.
Well, seeing as most players play for the game play and not the game design, I would say it's the more important thing to pay attention to lol
Makes sense. If the game is out and you know what the gameplay looks like, you may be drawn in by that
Especially if you've played games like Pokemon before hand
Lotta RPG folks like endless stat stacking, it’s attractive to many people to outscale the game. Same for people who like to care for animals
I would say most people don't do the endless stacking though
Most people do, if they have more than a few hundred hours
Hear me out.
Since ARK has so many goddamn mechanics.
What if they turn cooking into its own mini-game within the game. 
You never say anything good
I would be down for this
I’m fine with more things to do. Something has to replace mutation breeding if they remove it
I don't think it entirely has to be removed. Just nerfwd
I might not say anything good. But at least I don't make fuck ups. 
It won’t be removed. I’d be coping so hard if I expected that 😂
Wdym you don't make fuck ups
Don't make me say it.
Say it
🍿 
Hear me out, cloning
If I do, I know I'll get muted.
Ugh say it in conquering the arks
I left the server.
Dm it
If mutations were removed, then tamed dinos would be the peak of power, so it would be an rng race to see who gets the best Rex, and then no one could compete with them. All progression tame wise would be done in the first day lol
'sigh'
Alright.
Precisely why there has to be some form of long term tame upgrading, because people tame everything they need before they go to bed
The first part isn’t even true if you can consolidate parent stats or imprint
Yeah, so mutations or some equivalent thing is kind of fundemental for game duration
Categorically false lmao
You could have equipment loot hunting be a grind, or any variety of other repeatable tasks
So we need some form of long term tame upgrading that dosent involve hundreds of hours
Some long term “thing”. Doesn’t have to be tame upgrades
And?... End result of that if gear continually gets better is that dinos become worthless past a certain point
Saddles are gear are they not?
People will get the best bps day 2
It's not enough to keep the game going just to get gear lol
It's not even endless lol
Thousands of hours with almost 100 creatures is functionally endless
It shouldn't be, but something like 20 mutations is definitely within the realm of reason
Sure, although I’d prefer some other way to get those stats
A game like ark I think it will always exist in some way
It didn’t before mutations (and the subsequent error that was made to enable capping)
Player retention would crumble
Official servers would barren
Take monster hunter: fantastic popular and long lasting game, and there’s no infinite scaling
Infinite grind to endure, and stuff to do, but not infinite scaling
MMOs bore me
MH is by no means an MMO. It’s an RPG for sure
And RPGs, too, if it's pure RPG
So you’re on board with severely reducing mutations? Since that’s an extremely RPG element
Uhm, yeah?
Just clarifying
I thought I already said thay
You may have and I didn’t remember 😂
It needs to be severely reduced, but shouldn't be removed
It won’t be removed, so that’s the outcome I hope for
They could do a system simular to mutagen in order to accomplish the same goal mutations try to accomplish
I have beef with the stat boosts and the process 😂
I would prefer the stat boosts get replaced for perks, which could include but aren't limited to stat boosts
Perks and skill trees 🤮
Perk farming could easily be a thousands of hours sink that doesn’t result in horribly breaking the game’s balance for PvE
less knockout tames?
I think a perk system would be flawed
If it's a 1k+ hour time sink like shifter said, and those perks don't make stat crazy, your tame can easily die and you'd have to spend another 1k hours grinding another tame, as opposed to just hatching an egg and raising a baby in significantly less time to replace your tame
A mild tangent from our conversation, but I think most ark 2 tames if not all will mirror the new creatures and their taming methods
You’ll notice almost none of the tames added since genesis 1 are knock out
i haven't noticed
You’d probably farm the perk in the parent so you’d be able to breed them into babies
but thanks
It would HAVE to be like that, getting all the perks immediately from an egg
I’m down for jumping topics btw, no sass intended
I hope it isn't somthing ridiculous or hoping the game dosent fuck you over
Cough stryder
should items in the inventory effect smell?
It depends
Do you mean like being tracked by creatures?
yes
Hmm, like meat in the inventory attracts carnivores? I’m not sold
7 days to die did something similar with it and it did cause you to be attacked more often
For equipment I’d be ok with it though
I also don't want to have to mass grind (as an example) bug repellant for a 24/7 effect just so I don't get swarmed
But I think scent would work better with armor + special items + environmental stuff like mud etc
Anything your character itself is holding
So if it's a spear made of aratai shit, it'll only work if you have it equipped
well water helps cover stench so something simple as water will help hide it
You’d get the effect ghillie armor already gives you if adding mud etc
For scent, yes
yeah
But unlike ghillie, which grants total stealth, scent is but one sense
It’s a nice thought, but I doubt they’d be able to implement it
If you make a bunch of noise or are in sight, oops the scent masking ain’t enough
We were promised the AI would use multiple senses 🤷♂️
I fear that the scent based tracking system could become too OP causing nothing to track you, who knows what they could add later down the line
Most new tames on dlc maps since ab haven't been knockout tbh
probably
*extinction
mana
They could add a dead silence potion, or an invisible to dinos potion
velo
They could go way too crazy
The key word is most...
Gasbags
Your supposed to be on our side fucker
most
Not all, but most new tames
most yes
Who's?
I suppose we can mark it down as a wanted feature
Mana velo gasbags and snow owl are KO. Gacha and enforcer aren’t. More are KO than not 😂
kinda like passive tames
Don't forget the titans
Shifter and me
I’m not sure how else they’d make multiple senses work for wild dino AI…
Titans and meks are extinction too...
I am. 
And scouts
True, but I kinda consider those bosses more than tames, especially cause they’re temporary
They are as much tames as titanosuar are
So is the lyperodon, or however you spell it
True, but even in that case it’s roughly 50-50
but knockout could make more sense such as titano
I barely call that a tame
Genesis 1 is where they really went away from KO tames
It's more of a boss
Yeah, that's true
Then the maewing happened
yeah
It’s a special tame because you need a net gun 😂😂
I don’t really have a problem with any of the tames except for the megachel. It was just a buggy mess
They have always been leaning away from knockout
Have a strong enough tek-bow, and you don't.
So damn true. So janky
Said who? I knock it out without a trap nor a net guns, it's called skill
I tamed 2 bad ones, just to get a pair, and then never again. Imagine capping hp on a level 30 tame lol
Lmao
I’m glad the joke was well received lads 😂
What joke?
I liked the concept, but it didn't work for ark1
Deez
Walls
With a better AI it would’ve been fun
megachelon taming is annoying
Yeah for sure, also without 200 million sharks
To this point, what did you think multiple senses would look like if NOT the method I described? They said they were dropping the old circular detection radius in the Pax interview @jaunty nexus
Also known as the megachelong
This is like the most exciting news so far imo
I should point out you wanna pronounce this with a 'sh' instead of a 'ch'
People talk immersion and say first person, I talk immersion and it is ai quality
I didn’t pay attention to the pax interview
Was one of the things I missed
It's on the steam page too, just not in a ton of detail
did the ark 2 gameplay come yet?
I’m banking on mod makers to have first person made fairly quickly 
Not yet
We'd be talking about it if it did
Not yet, they stingy
Well we do know next time anything is said about ARK II it’ll be gameplay thankfully
I could take it or leave it. I am not a fan of ark1 fp to begin with
This chat would be poppin something fierce if it came out lol
I like FP more than third
I think there would be riots if they say something and it's not the game play lol
Brewing somthing villainous and sinister
👨
Fair enough
You’ll have the chance to see early gameplay before you have to make a decision
Do you have a PC/Xbox?
especially because wont be available for me for a bit
At least you’ll be able to see the gameplay and judge it before you play
yep
Only 4 people could resist the force, lotus, the weed smoker, shifter, the expert life analyzer, raq, the tech geek, and lastly, flobs, the chef
Play ark1 like crazy, and watch all the ark2 bugs get fixed before you have to deal with them lol
i get things on disc so hopefully there will be a disc version
Wait, I am the tech geek?
I love this head canon LMFAO
just to prevent something happening and the game poofs
I would have thought science nerd
Ah yea ark 2 will be good
I can only imagine day 1 bugs
You said you deal with computers a lot in you job right?
Yeah, looking forward to them lol
ready for a long delay for us?
Well technically I don't have a job rn unfortunately
If it feels like day 1 atlas 
Git gud
Yeah lol 🐸