#ark-2
1 messages · Page 32 of 1
Having them as their own instance like Genesis-2's big missions wouldn't make much performance issues.
I have never had this happen honestly
Have you been in the redwood biome?
I have been everywhere on the gen2 map, both in server and in sp
Then you must've got the flower end of the stick.
Or they have better specs
Most of the reason ark has issues with the map is issues in the processing. Other games have much much bigger maps and dont have the issues that ark does.
Specs wouldn't matter when they also start breaking in the dev-kit
Ur game is bugged bruh
My pc doesnt even have the specs to open the dev kit lol
Wasn't saying they did.
My pc is just around as powerful as the nex Xbox
You say this, while I've watched friends also experience this issue.
Then I proceed to have same issues in the dev-kit.
But I’ve been around both edges of the map in pc and old Xbox one and never really had any problems
Edges 'away' from the space biome, right?
Then I have no idea what to tell you.
Oh Xbox one op
L pc's
No fall damage
I wonder how armor is gonna work in ark2
Do they give abilities or just pure armor
I mean, this is 2022. People would throw a fit if armor doesnt give abilities lol
Abilities on everything for no reason is cringe
I am beginning to think that you think everything is cringe, which is just cringe lol
Cringe
You're cringe how bout that

I embrace my cringeness
"I was born in the cringe, molded by it"
"torn by it"
"I didnt see the based till i was nearly a man"
It's your console/general setup, One X I played on Gen 2's release doesn't have this issue and I have good innernets
Again, I've seen a friend livestream this issue to me, and I still have it within the dev-kit.
Y'all's innanets is bad
Simple
It may be good for your area or something, but it's bad most likely
The fuck is a innanets?
It's an actual word, and if I say the definition that'll lead to a one way road to 'fucking banned'
Anyway, no.
I do not in fact have any affiliation with a famous website that starts with the letter 'P'
I don't know what you're talking about, man.
"Jesse, what the fuck are you talking about?"
Huh, limited download servers. Kinda what I was thinking for ark 2 with limited transfers
That would ruin my whole grinding set up for ark2 if that happens
With 99.999999% certainty I can say you will never be able to transfer anything from ark 1 to ark 2
I’d save myself and not grind anything in ark 1 with intent to bring it to ark 2
"Jesse, we need to transfer items to a completely new game on a different engine"
🤣
They should let me transfer the way my implant looks
'
I was saying it earlier, I don't think the World Maps will be the same as on ark 1
I'm not sure we will have transfers like now
you wont be the same character as ARK 1 regardless
We don't know that
Like we've said many, many times. We don't officially know this.
The whole stating-things-we-know-nothing-about-as-if-they're-true thing is getting kinda old, tbh
Like, I'm on the fence that it'll be left open. But that's just 'my' take on it.
We'll only know when it's officially revealed.
Also, shower thought: What if Wildcard pulls a Halo and make it that Element was created by ancient humans?
As with all things, yes, it's just useless to state anything about Ark 2 as fact until proven one way or the other. Not saying we can't speculate, that's kinda the point of this stage in the game's life, just speculating on features and/or suggesting them, not saying "this thing is/isn't happening in this particular way, 100% guaranteed trust me"
Also idk what you mean, Halo isn't like that necessarily, unless you meant ancient humanoids
Or......what if 'element' created humanity? 🤔
In the Bungie trilogy, the Forerunners where humans
That could be a spin, for sure
Nope, they never were supposed to be
Guilty Spark states otherwise
Guilty Spark is an AI that knows next to nothing of the true lore of the game, lol
Man literally states to chief 'You 'are' Forerunner'
Just because he relays some select information about the forerunners to mister chef doesn't mean he's the be all end all, watch Halo Legends if you don't believe me
Forerunners are not humans
I have.
They where pretty humanoid.
Yeah, humanoid, not human ancestors
Mind if I send you a video?
Sure
There's even a cut ending for Halo-2 that showed a human skeleton in a Forerunner casket.
I know they're not humans in lore 'anymore'
But I was more or less stating the general plot-idea.
Just the 'what bungie established' section
We were the descendants of the precursors, which made the forerunners, then made us
Right, and that's 343's lore
The 'original' intention for the Forerunners that Bungie was going for, was that humanity where the Forerunners.
Bungie has a thing of making humanity the hero's of the story.
Also iirr from the books, the Forerunners are our sister-species, and the precursors made us.
Back to ark2, this isn't halo.
I don't know.
The rings on Genesis-2 look sus
Back to ark2.
Sageness
I wonder if ark 2 will be just as hard-core survival pvp?
I like orp setting for pvp personally but im also a solo player. I still feel like ark1 raiding is more balanced for orp settings however, since in ark 1 you can just soak a base and be in pretty quickly
I guess I just wonder if in ark 2 you'll be able to sustain things as just a casual player
they dont... they said in the livestream that they will tone down the survival aspect
PVP will be different since their priority is mostly "primitive"
But I’m sure for the pop that want a grind there’ll be servers either by wildcard or hosted by people
Nice, sounds like it will feel more like a game on normal mode then!😋
no
But for those who want a challenge there is mod support dmso
we dont know how will the "normal" play turns out, they don't mention "no ORP"
or how the dino roster is gonna be
Rex pt sauropod dodo raptor archaeopteryx
We do know it'll be less then ARK-1 on launch.
That’s what we’ve seen
Will people stick to ark one or 2?
No, they didn't. They said there will be the same level of survival in Ark 2 as Ark 1
depends
there are some people will wait for a sale rather than early release
Thank you for covering the chat
One day Mazzy will stop telling people that misinformation
cant help when the stream itself is all noise and barely content
That's no excuse
no excuse for basing on what i understand in the stream itself?
If you're getting just noise from the stream, then maybe state your things as 'what you remember' then 'facts' 
It's fine to state it as you saw it, which was apparently not very clearly. Just stating it as fact when you didn't pay enough attention isn't really all that great, though 😅
Not trying to bomb on you or anything, but what they stated was simply not what you heard, no harm done. I will correct you on it though when it pertains to someone asking for information
TBF i tried to my best of abilities avoid 3rd party ARK news this time around
but that itself is a difficult task
I just avoid Ark youtubers pretty much entirely when it comes to reveals and content being shown, helps loads I promise
Or people like me who can berley run ark 1
Just stick to Wildcard's official channels and it's way easier
they just dont give us the TL:DR, hence the noise
Wildly unknown. We only know the engine
Mmmm
Expect it to be equally performance heavy when when optimized though to ark 1, since it’s going to be coming out 7 years later than ark 1 and will be released with current hardware in mind
Idk, if you want concrete details, you gotta watch the streams like everyone else. It sucks, but they usually give a highlights reel of the good parts when it's a long one, and it sometimes even ends up on the Community Crunch, if we're lucky! Lol
Is the engine hard to run?
I TOLD you what they said lol, that’s the gripe. It’s that you keep saying your take when a quote of what they said renders it false
What was it again unreal engine 5?
My point is that the engine won’t tell you how hard it is to run: optimization, graphics quality, and server/client processes will
It'll be hefty, but not kill your PC for no reason like Ark 1 did on release, I'd imagine (or at least hope)
Great point
What you can expect is that on release you’ll see steam release the recommended specs

sees ARK 1 specs
umm
The recommended specs for ark 1 iirc were pretty high. I may be mistaken though
TBF the updates bloat it a lot since then
Size ≠ specs to be clear
Recommended specs for Ark 1 are a lot more accurate than they used to be, that's for sure...
Straight lied to us in the early days
oooooooh that
Yeeeeeah... lol
makes the "spec requirements" unreliable ain't it?
Sure did
Recommend specs for ark 1 say 60 gigabytes, that is not accurate
It sounds right for the base game
Yeah, just the island, none of the DLC files, it probably is 60
But the fact that they have to add the DLC dinos into the base files for the free maps and mod maps causes it to be more than that
I downloaded "base" Ark at first just last week, and it was 125 gigs for the reasons specified
No free DLC maps, no story DLC
But the dinos are there
I can go into singleplayer and spawn a rock drake, wyvern, anything in the whole game, but only on the island
Yep, every file for an item that isn't terrain or map detail is there and included
Well either you cant join official server without all dlc or remove transfers or keep it as it is now
In terms of not having the game without dlc installed be so big
Ehh, I think it's fine as is, no reason to split the playerbase even further (over the DLC content, of all things)
Just get a terabyte external just for Ark, EZ
Like 40 USD where I am
Got an 8 tb for 120 at Costco on sale for both me and my dad, works like a charm
Not counting inflation, this was years ago
I feel the large size of the game is probably the biggest turn off of the game at this point
Especially with how slow download speeds can be in some places
Get better internet, or just wait a day
Also lack of tutorial or help for new people
Really depends on the the of person on whether they will look elsewhere for help or not
I would not count that
I solved most things on my own, through trial and error
If someone can't die to a giga 20 times because they're stubborn and then learn from it, then Ark isn't for them
most survival games are just trial and error.. except for conan
it's basically "fuck around and find out" type of game
i prefer not having a tutorial because people should face consequences
I don't think almost any survival game needs a tutorial, unless there's like extremely deep mechanics that you are expected to learn right away just to be able to play properly
Well most people that play mostly survival games already know about ark so if they want to keep growing the playerbase they may have to make it easier for people who arent as familiar with the genre to get into it
umm
Why do that? Then it's not Ark, it's "babying you: the game"
how does "people who knew ARK" start then?

i start ARK with rage and almost refund it until my friend made his own server
and i didnt start on an official server
If people don't like survival games, Ark is the one game they might try, it's literally gateway survival, it's so simple lol
Kinda proving my point, not everyone is going to have that friend and will just refund it yet you seem to really like the game
But Ark also isn't for everyone, I don't like that mentality of making all the games appeal to all the people, that kills games
Citation: Elite Dangerous
that is me but it's different compared to multiple memes about "quitting ARK yet come back and play again"
They wanted to keep their stupid Pegi 16 or whatever, so they neutered the content, and now had to separate the game's servers into several to accommodate the rating for the DLC being different than the base game 🤮
plus i got ARK as a suggestion from a group of friends... not because "hey it's a dinosaur game"
That's not helping really lol
Multiplayer is different because at least you can ask people on the server stuff or tribe up but singleplayer definitely seems like it can handicap people experience with the game not knowing what to do after making a beach hut. Im guessing 99% of people dont read the survival guide and therefore wont know how to tame and will just be kinda stuck
yet you can cheat on SP
Then that's their bad for not reading the tutorial, and playing singleplayer without a guide
You're stating the most offbeat, niche examples
i admin abuse on SP before i can play properly
You would need to look that up and the whole point is making the game intuitive enough to learn without needing to do that or if it is that hard providing the necessary resources whether in the game or links to the wiki or something
They don't matter though, because they didn't have the drive to keep playing from the start
arent suvival is all about figuring things out with little resources you have?
Trial and error, my man
The items tell you what they're used for most times, too
There's not "no tutorial", just not an uber obvious one
the only thing i would agree on is the Dossiers should be guides on taming and caring them
Because, you know, it's a survival game, figure it out
Some of the later dinos have 0 clues on how to tame them, I'll admit
But by that point, you've heard about how to tame shadowmanes or have the intuition to figure it out yourself
plus we are in the internet age... we are not in the 80's where game guides are a thing

Do not underestimate peoples inabilities to look up how to do stuff
(Even though there are guides in some games)
3rd party tutorials are not out of reach
i remember i looked up how to tame Tropeos within days after CI
Again, those people lack the drive to play the game then, who cares if they quit? Fuck em
Too ignorant to learn how to play, that's not the game's fault
they must be like.... 40 year olds or something... because my tribe leader is like that
he never do taming
Or they're just stubborn jackasses who refuse to ask for directions, like every dad EVER
Don't wanna admit they're lost or can't figure it out themselves and need help
Which is on them entirely
tbf he did well without tames
he be tried to beat Val Brood naked
anyways
speaking of Val brood
i am so want to have dedicated boss arenas that is unbuildable like Ext
I would be down for that as well
But it'd be difficult to do without cutting off a large enough area
Game guide would've been semi helpful, since some never think to look online, but a controller/keyboard guide will work just as well even if its just the basics (lmb is melee, I is inventory ,etc)
Boss arenas (if there are any) should stay non buildable, personally
sadly the wiki is mostly PC focused.. there are some "control guides" dont have the controller version
Ark1 has a controller guide ingame, they could do that for ark2
Ark 1 does that, does it not?
An active game guide ingame? Not really, aside from some tips while loading.
In the settings I'm pretty sure, where you'd look to find, well, the set control scheme
i am still struggling to use the HLNA Exo Mek in Gen 2 boss and the Scout because they dont have guide in the UI
We don't need a clogged UI early game to tell us how to walk, screw that
Maybe how to tame a creature, if it's all that hard to figure out
But not basic controls, just read em, don't be lazy lol
There doesn't need to be a clogged UI anywhere. It could be added to the options menu with the other 2 guides for controllers and keyboards.
this is why i brought up the dossier should be... less ambiguous
Do you know how many people straight up have never even seen a dossier?

dino reveals be like
Same with notes in general, just get rid of em
no lore in ARK 2, got it
NPC that can easily build over by jerk tribes?
Not have to hunt down some hard as shit to find note
They've never looked at them ingame, is what I mean. Not that ark1 dossiers tell you how to tame dinos anyway.
No, but thanks for trying
NPCs will not be able to be built on, that would dumb af
If they even appear in the game world
i rather have environmental storytelling than NPCs that blocked your "alpha build spot"
Might be like in a blocked off cave you can't even enter
We had enough environmental storytelling imo, and they're going to add more regardless so don't worry
The fallen eden ring is enough environmental storytelling, and that's only the trailer lol
If ARK 2's map is not a massive land mass like say Valheim and ATLAS did then yee?
but if it's like ARK 1 then that is too much needless clutter
talking about story NPCs
as a replacement for notes
i mean you can go for Conan route but then again.... it's basically Note + NPCs
We already know they're a thing, and notes are one of the most complained about features in the first game, they'd be stupid not to remove them
And did the NPCs in Conan block any OP build spots?
(Not really)
no because
1 it's all flat
2 the jungles are not dense and there are no NPCs in the jungle
3 most NPCs are in the already existing structure areas in the open desert/highlands like camps and settlements
Precisely, places you can't build already
which is the majority
conan is small compared to ARK Island when comes to map hell the server i playing on cant handle more than 70 players
The big city dungeon wasn't because, well, it was a dungeon with enemy spawns
The first map was not tiny lmao
It was insanely vertical too, unlike Ark
i dont feel the verticality tho
I built on this huge pillar thing in the Northwest once, it was crazy high up, almost highest point in the map
Ok? That's a you issue, sorry to say
compared to Island mountains?
I just hope ark 2 figures something out to where it's not about "always having playerbase online in your tribe" in order to keep things. It could be orp, it could be that a base is less needed and you can keep things uploaded or whatever. I want it to be more about gameplay/ risk what you use in pvp.
Yeah, there were much higher points in Conan
i mean losses are too common in ARK anyways
ORP would be a godsend, but nobody wants it because then it "removes the ability to PvP" which I call bullshit on
You either have to get on to feed your dinos/re-up your generators/etc, or your base decays. Can't sit in ORP forever
I just dont like how regular officials are opperate out of ratholes or single square undefended bases or don't log off or it's all gone besides your players level.
this is why i want them to consider ratholes as "meshing" because those are not intended to be lived in anyways
ratholes are not intended when comes to map making
True the rathole playstyle goes too far. Honestly orp is a good way to go. Its all I play on anyways
💯
an optional tutorial that teaches UI and basic mechanics would be great, I 100% agree. A great survival game teaches you the basics and sets you loose, and ark 1 has sort of struggled with that
it tells you "tame and stuff" but it's not super clear with how to actually go about DOING tames (from a mechanics perspective)
I love how Conan just tests you in with nothing not telling you how to do anything
tbh that is how most survival games should work
Conan just remind you to drink
It feels massive till you get obs and even then it’s big enough to house 40 plus a server
Game doesn’t even tell you how to get thralls
Or learn new recipes
But Conan map has depth which makes it feel much bigger than it actually is along with the dungeons
tbf conan is simple
Not if you wanna pvp and farm efficiently
Conan recipe run first thing is ridiculous. It’s basically a three hour endeavor
You die
And it’s 4 hours of grinding to get your legendary 1percent loot back
I hope it ain’t like that in ark2
It’s rough in Conan
Tbh is it just me that sees no problem with the way the game is played other than the amount of people within a tribe? Megas ruin the game more than the places to build
i dislike the breeding system more than anything else, but for official I can see megas being the most problematic
I love breeding. Breeding is my favorite thing to do when I carry my tribe
In my opinion megas are cool because of huge fighting and giga fights instead of tribe vs tribe because there’s no Lot of counter fobs Like megas
I'm gonna RREEEEEEE
Having a community in a mega makes the game infinitely more enjoyable
If they can figure out a way for megatribes to be less immortal from raids via technicalities (such as server capping/ddos etc) would be interesting.
Imagine you could boost a server in Ark so that it could support more players or...
💯
🤡
Tell me you have swamp fever without telling me
You only get dossed if you die and they show gamercard on body or they just decide to doss a random gt that joined server
Not barcodes tho
Barcode op
Only based people have swamp fever

Make ark 2 official servers playable 😛
I hope ark 2 will be for all consoles at launch instead of launch exclusive
Seems it is launch exclusive for Xbox
sadly yeah
Lobby at Sony HQ, it's their fault
They don't like early access games like the other companies do
did they say if ark 2 will be 60 frames on x/s/ps5?
i hope they make the sharks and dolphins able to jump a bit out of water unlike in ark 1 where its like a barrier
Gonna cause so many problems
People jumping onto land like a manta with a shark
Super speed dolphins which have been bred overtime can just fly over land like mantas
this is assuming super breeding and stat changes are the same
Actually, it will be 1 FPM, or Frames Per Month.
UE5 employs a hyper-realistic rendering engine in which a college-educated artist comes to your home, sits inside your TV, and lovingly paints each frame with painstaking detail.
This, of course, is a bit slower, but totes worth.
(You will also need a TV large enough to accommodate the artist, and snacks while they work. But all that's in the ToS.)
I hope they do figures and statures I would love to add them to my collection if they go that route
which I really hope they do
Probably will be but on a smaller scale
Any news about ark 2?
not anything noteable rn, we should get a lot at extra life on november 5th
Gameplay
we're all hoping for gameplay at extra life
🏰
we will ether get game play at extra life or family or both i think both
when is extra life again
ah so far away
Fewer then it was on the 1st
true
God hurry up ark 2 please 🙏
Yeah, because rushing a game in development ALWAYS turns out great, right?
Look at what they did taking there time .Can't get worse
I'm looking....what am I supposed to look at?
Please come out Jan 1 .Probably not till may tho gŕrrrr
Rushed development is why Gen 2 launch has astros out ranging turrets
Let’s not do that again 😂
Pretty sure that’s actually intentional to drive demand for the new stuff. Pretty much everytime something ranged is added it’s range exceeds turret range for awhile then they reduce it
i will love if your caracther can lose a part of his body (like when a rex hit your arms when you try to escape) but whit a passive ability he can re grow whit time
…find me a man who can do that and I’ll bite
But I’m good not being some weird superhuman regenerative monster
yes after what i write i think yes i dont want superhuman regeneration
No worries lol
I do think a tame with regenerative properties could be cool. Maybe a tame that can drop its tail to distract stuff or maybe sacrifice some hp to make a clone
yes but clone how come?
Maybe a tame that can release a shimmering hologram version of itself as a clone to distract
like a robotic tame?
ok
And that ink cloud looks like an octopus
ah ok now i see that will be cool
i cant wait to see how the character customization will look in ark 2
I can’t wait to see what Ark 2 will look like in Ark 2.
Can't wait for 4k gameplay model of Vin Diesel 
Vin be lookin good in the trailers
In 19 days we will probably know better
Tf
Nice
Extra-Life is in 19 days
We may or may not get something on it.
How many folks will treat extra life as entitlement to a reveal
I suspect this chat will be too active at extra life lol
I’m torn between wanting to see gameplay or just a better sense of the experience in some other fashion…
we probably will get something among those lines, atleast a info dump as usual is very likely
Yeah, the chance they show something is pretty high given their track record, I don't think it's out of the realm of possibility
Some info on how the game will play would be nice
So we don’t just have speculation
yeh another 1min trailer of a dodo picking bones, to be honest all of this lack info at all its a sign aint be any real news this year
That trailer might not have revealed much, but we do know a lot more after the steam page was updated. So the first half didn't have as much as we were expecting. I'm glad they announced the delay earlier in the year tho, here's to hope extra life reveals new things/shows gameplay
just dont get too much hope or you might get another surprise
Best possible news outside of gameplay/content reveals would be a delay to late 2023
Then I can actually play ark 2 without my life suffering
In 19 days Wildcard will host their annual Extra Life stream. And it's POSSIBLE that we will get more info about Ark 2.
me over here laughing at all the youtubers making videos with "new information about arkII"
meanwhile me, your resident information dealer- oh really?
It is funny how the new information usually tends to be like 6-8 months old
yeah
Yea I’m tired of the “news” channels just coming up with the same information we already have
The same youtuber that posts clickbait everyday and people still bother clicking on his videos
I mean, it is all of them to be fair
There’s one or two of them that really do it too much and I’d like to see their channels taken down as a fan of ark
When do you get off ark2
ark 2 is gonna be on Xbox game pass for 3 years after release?
as a ark survival evolved fan and someone who owes a playstation I think that's a bad move on wildcards part since a large amount of the fans are on playstation
The numbers do not support that at all, and it's a Sony issue, bug them about it. They don't like early access games for some reason
It's a Sony issue.
Sony only allow two year long Early-Access I believe.
also "large" is a meme since PC smokes consoles in sales to my knowledge
Also, the Xbox community for ARK is much larger then the Playstation community.
last time I looked into it pc was biggest then playstation and then xbox
No shit, wasn't what I said now was it?
you said xbox was much larger than playstation
Oh wait, I'm dumb/tired.
Checking it now, and nope. Xbox is higher then Playstation
what are you checking on?
MMOStats and PS-Timetracker
yeah I saw that and mmostats does not specify xbox only at all as far as im aware says it gets its info from how active people are on social media relating to the game
Ahh
wildcard released statistics(from like 2 years ago but dont have much to work with not every platform has an easily accessible open api for numbers like steam) had playstation 2-3 times bigger than xbox and steam being at least twice as big as both consoles combined, I feel like I have seen more recent stuff but I can't exactly remember where, I am sure the ratio's have changed a decent amount with all platforms having had a way to get the game for free but I doubt that it would be enough for xbox to overtake playstation. I got this info from the crunches where they shared statistics (example: crunch 251) which while old are at least numbers given by wildcard and like I said I doubt the ratio of players would have changed by an insane amount even if the number of players did. I am also guessing that this info is from official servers only although that may be incorrect but still the platforms with more people would have more people playing on those servers anyway. having more up to date info would be nice though especially with all of the free to play deals potentially changing up the numbers

If you look at the polls here in Poglin polls number wise they do support what you’re saying
I'm not reading that.
Either give me a TL:DR, or explain it in hyroglifics.
TLDR PlayStation is a larger part of the Ark community than Xbox
It’s a fuckin paragraph man.
oh shit, yeah they did release new statistics in poglin polls, ok thats nice
I knew I remembered seeing them somewhere but I forgor
Aren't those statics for deaths of a specific creature?
Anyone tryna play im on ps4
Sir this is a Wendy’s
Oh my fault
why is there an ark 2 ps4 edition page on xtralife
Xbox ark and windows ark are the same so it’s hard to say exactly how many peeps are exclusively Xbox
Win10 is included in most of those statistics, last I checked
If more people died on one platform thats going to be because more people were playing and had more chances to die. Also there was a poll for what platform you play on although they may be skewed as maybe certain platforms are less likely to join the discord especially with xbox’s discord integration, that showed xbox and playstation being somewhat equal
Can bring it back on topic of ark2 thanks.
Ark 2: Oceans as far as the eye can see.
That’s what I’m hoping for
Well that and fireballs
Man wants fireballs underwater smh
Nobody ever said I was an easy man to please
Better to not be pleased then
Don’t encourage him
I do want an ocean DLC tho. All the land is tiny islands and shallow sandbars/mangroves
Yesssssss that would be killer
I honestly thought we were getting that in a way with Gen 1, I thought they were all gonna be separate maps
But I want that to come AFTER ark 2 the no oceans base map is finished and polished
Silly me
💯
They basically were seperate maps
You know what I meant lol
Not any one of those biomes is even near full map size
I’m ok with that on paper
The issue I had with the ocean was that it felt too dang crowded. The bog and arctic biomes felt pretty good size wise
Oh yeah, the biomes were fine for what was intended, and I will say the ridiculous overspawn of coel in the ocean wasn't great at all, for server performance or just general gameplay
But that's just it; they were biomes, no more, no less
I’m ok with that for genesis
The first trailer really sold that they were different maps all based on a theme, as did some choice words at one point, but maybe that was hopeless optimism from whoever said it (I don't remember so don't ask lol)
At least to me it did
I thought it was unique maps too
But I’m ok with it tbh. Genesis 1 was in many ways a good pilot for the future, and the quality of the biomes was a huge step up from even the remastered island
Oh for sure
I honestly would even be fine with them doing it again possibly, maybe we get sucked back in to a different part of the simulation in a potential DLC
I keep telling people smaller is better in terms of detail and polish
It felt like you could learn each section of genesis 1, and I kinda love landmark based navigation…something that’s hard when terrain is massive and hastily generated
100% agree
The obelisks to some degree helped with that on most maps, but Ab and genesis 1 imo did the best job, followed by extinction
(Even though I still couldn't find my own ass in the snowstorm biome if you asked me to lmao)
Snowstorm area had some oof zones. But those storms should have been rolling rather than constant. But I think ark 1 never had the infrastructure for events like that
The X-yutys beat me into the ground several times on several playthroughs just because I couldn't see jack squat
Those and the snow golems
Speaking of which, I hope we see variant creatures again, at least if we don't see the basic creatures textured and colored to their environments
I mean, they could have them interbreedable
It's not out of the realm of possibility
That'd be cool as hell too
Idk if we’re gonna get an in depth genetics system
If they keep mutation breeding, that better be a part of it or I'm walking to studio Wildcard's mailbox with a strongly worded letter
Mutation breeding, if it was NOT just a flat stat booster, would be ok in the genetics model I’ve proposed
True
That the one where they can inherit skills, but only so many?
It all gets confused sometimes in here 😅
Profound
I laugh when I hear the word variant
Why is variant funny, I don't get it
Certified Schizo Moment™️
I’d actually be down for a system like that for skills
Every creature is identical in level but their skills vary between what the skills are and what level (delta - alpha) they are
Some skills would just be one level ofc, but others could have that four level variance
Get some RNG that at the very least isn’t purely stat based
Yeah, that could be neat
And the whole thing I was saying earlier would be fine to me if they were considered the same species and just looked different/had a chance at different skills based on their environment, like the snow ones get maybe a blunt weapon resistance skill, while the desert ones get a slashing damage resistance skill (or a chance thereof)
any idea for ark 2 price?
Biome based creatures could have unique skills or maybe a different odds of having certain skills, sure
"Theta Variant Reaper King" and the like would probably get pretty crowded on the screen, though, at least if they keep the floating name UI. You can already hardly see some of the full names and levels of creatures when you scan them with HLN-A lol
Why would it show the variant?
That’s the joy. You don’t know from the name alone
But that's purely an aesthetic gripe anyways
Color cues and perhaps ability cues would tell you
Ehhhh, how else would you tell? Nvm
Or ya know, entering the creature’s inventory has a UI that shows the biome type
Whatever floats your boat. Although if you breed desert and jungle…what biome type would you assign heh
Oooh, so you could knock it/tame it then see the type? And if you don't like it/need it, you just kill it off
The biome type. I’m torn on seeing skills at any stage before it’s fully tamed
Just have them be considered hybrid, maybe take the stripes from one and the colors from the other, at random when bred
Yes but what NAME do you choose?
Hybrid
Ah so the names will be useless lol
All of the ones bred with other biomes are simply hybrid
Because everyone and their mother is running hybrids
Well, not necessarily, you can have them show between what they are hybrids of
Nope. Will have to wait until they give an actual release date more than likely.
But if you get all of them hybridized together, that would be one cluttered UI lol (depending on how many variant, I guess)
Sure,as long as it’s below 50 dollars
Well thats up to wildcard, it's their game.

The breeding ui could easily be a mess
Or I guess they could just not allow hybridizing past a certain threshold, so you can't get all the skills on one dino class
I would honestly be surprised if it was under 60$
I wouldn't, it can't be more than 40 USD as per early access rules
Now, on full release? After all the diehard Ark fans have already bought it so the price doesn't really matter? Sure, 60, easily
Lol I brought ark ultimate version last year , and than steam release it for free ,hope not get Fck up again
Double price double pain
I always either buy games immediately upon release, looooooooooong after they're dead, or get them when they're free (even if I don't like/see myself playing the game)

The few games I get in the middle of their lifetime I've either just learned about the existence of, or saw them on a really good sale that was impossible to pass up, but that rarely happens
Don't you
me boyah
The most upset point that is I did not actually get much time to play it yet
5hours total
And now it get free it let me felt like I am dumb
Rough
If it was 2 hours you could've refunded and got it again but free
But yeah, not much you can do after 2 hours iirc
After 2 hours you have to be convincing because it gets reviewed by an actual person instead of being automated
And is almost always denied, even with good reasoning
Steam gave for free the base game, not the DLCs. But why would you buy the ultimate survivor and play 5 hours?! 😂
6fan
I mean, most of the people who play ark have graphics cards that are way worse than a 3070
i got a 1050, basicly everything on max and mine is still fine after playing ark for hours
1080ti and I rarely shut Ark off
pc build diff it seems
Than i think something is going wrong on my pc?
That's most likely the answer, yes
Because it is heating up a lot? Yeah the cooling isn't working well
Although, if it is running at less than 80c it should be fine for years
Like 60-70c

While running ark? Bruh, don't waste another $800 for a new card lol. That'll run like that for a decade
I thought he had an actual problem lol
Ya
That's baby temps for Ark 1
Serious?
Yeah
The only way to get less than that is to use liquid cooling
Well, optimization doesn't effect the temperature of hardware components all that much
If it runs better, would that not strain the system less?
Not really, you'll just get a better frame rate
Huh, weird
It's mostly the settings that affect how your computer runs
Well I don't need more than 60 fps, so I always cap it if possible
bro i wanted a indoor sauna
😂
saves money if i can get it for just average game price
If I ran Ark on my Series X and PC at the same time, my skin would probably melt off like a ghoul from Fallout
There is no confirmation, but I am hoping it takes like 100 hours or more to max it out
I hope it dosent
Talking 100 hours just to see "new skill learned, rators no longer attack you unless provoked"
Well, you said maxing it out.
Yeah, the endgame stuff better take at least that long to get
No
It better not be possible to completely fill it out at all
Ehhh, miss me with that "can't get all the engrams because it's meant to be played with others" bull
Screw that shit
If I work hard enough, I should be able to do everything, full stop
And not just get extra engram/skill points simply because I'm playing in singleplayer, either
Missing all crafting recipes is a lot different to me than having to specialize in the skill tree
As long as you can reset it
If respecs are free and fast, sure, let me have to pick and choose what to do any given task with
But if it's an item or something, or you can't do them back to back, then nah, let me learn it all
But then i feel either you would get too op or the skills would not be able to be very impactful
One of the most flawed aspects of Ark tbh, the respec requirements and the engram point gain
As long as the skills are unique and not flat stat boosts (which I assumed, because that would be stupid if they were), then I wouldn't have an issue whatsoever
I dont know about no cooldown whatsoever but respeccing without needing an item i am fine with
That’s completely fine. My laptop GPU runs at 90c and it’s fine. 😂
Go play ark 1 until 2 comes out
90 is reaching the limit usually
Yeah, it’s the limit for laptop GPUs
But he is fine. 60-70 for a desktop GPU is totally expected
90 is well above what I’m comfortable with
Its ok but probably preferable if you got better cooling
anyone know how to fix micro stutter when opening inventory
Go to #general or #bobs-with-probs
In that case, never buy a gaming laptop. They are hot. 😂
Yes, but a skill system should by NATURE offer choices like this
Engrams is annoying and frustrating because you can’t make a base, saddles, and gunpowder by yourself. But skills should lock people out of being everything at once, and it’s ok to make respecs a bit tricky
I dunno, I guess respecs in general have really polarized me against them. There's only a handful of games that have them where I actually go "huh, that's reasonable", and they're all singleplayer games save for one, Grounded, where it's not even really respeccing so much as just changing your perks to the needs of the situation (albeit in a rather unique way that's close enough to consider it as such.)
Also, the part about comparing engrams to a skill system is mostly just me trying to have something to compare it to in-franchise, I know that engrams ≠ skill points in the slightest. But it's the closest thing we've got to them in Ark 1 imo
It’s a fine comparison, but the key difference is that skills are optional to gameplay and engrams aren’t
You need a buttload of engram points to build something, ride something, or make basic crafts, which are all basic elements of gameplay
Who says skills won't be necessary? They might be to access new areas, or do new moves
You don’t think tames will serve this role?
And even if they DO have new abilities or moves, I doubt they’ll gatekeep game content or core gameplay
Didn't consider it for a second tbh, but that makes sense
You’ll still be able to build craft and survive with a skill set I would hope. It’s how you do so that is impacted by skills
I sure hope so
Take MHW: you can always finish a hunt with any set of skills or weapons
It’s the method through which you complete the hunt that is changed by your skills and weapon choice
hi all did shifter all ready kill off ark 2 lol jk
If ARK 2 is gonna be just a monster hunter clone, I'll pass
I rather tame and lead my tame army
No matter how you execute those dark soul monster hunter moves, I doubt it is effective against the 10 rex whistle attack unless they make the Rexes the instinct to "not fight until one of them dies" instead of the "nomnom wall" of ARK 1
No matter how much the rider whistled
There is just something about the nomnom wall that just makes my day
DS Bob: does fancy dodges
Me with a giga army: whistle target
I agree with this lol. Ark1 character stats are way less important than the engrams. Hopefully they change it so that leveling is less of a grind for trying to build things, and more about skills and such
Even with the skill system like ATLAS ||(yes I keep bring that shit up)||
I always respec, not for stats but for certain skills for say for example building, taming, or even combat or seigeing
True. I am interested to see how they go with it. I don't want to see general all purpose skill builds because that ruins the game play imo.
TBF the server I played there has a skill trees modded for more individual builds like for example
For blacksmithing you either be a Toolsmith, Gunsmith, Boyer (Bow Maker) or Weaponsmith
You can be full on one or two lines of the tree but never all
Same with "Animal Handling"
Not only you choose either Breeder OR Tamer but you also choose between Domesticated, Companion (Shoulder Pets), Beast, OR Exotic
You can be full tamer/breeder or tamer and breeder of a specific species
Hello! Really excited about ark2. Do we have an aprox release date?
sadly no but we might get details on november 5 during the extra life stream
Ark 2 sounds trash
Think I’ll stay on ark 1
Generally who asked for a dark souls combat system (never even played dark souls) sounds like it’s going proper pve
With that name, I don't think anyone should take what you say seriously.
It’s a sequel game they have to change things plus I think a new combat system can be fun but your welcome to do what you want
This exactly.
Sequels are suppose to change stuff, while bringing what made the original one good into the next title.
I can't believe there's people who unironically think that ARK's melee combat is good.
Y'all sittin' here talkin' about PvE and PvP and 1st person and 3rd person when the real issue is this:
Ark 2 needs to have an auto-run key for movement or RIOT.
Nah, I actually hate toggle-running.
Key-holding running is a lot more easier for me, since I wont forget I have sprinting on.
Autoclicker combat is good, for noobs tho 
True
Screw that, I wanna smoke weed while I'm in transit! Conan lets me!
Auto-run or riot! 
I can do this while driving a car, sir, it is not a skill issue.
...in theory.
You know what, I just plead the Fifth here.
I mean there could be a toggle for it
And the Eighth, for good measure.
Just realized that anthems are just the theme-song for countries.
The loading songs as you enter the country
arent XBox does that?
my controller auto run on default
A lot more different for me between Xbox and PC.
I hate using shift to toggle running.
But since I'll always have my fingers on the sticks, then I just need to press it down.
I'd be very surprised if skills weren't necessary
while I'd assume most skill requirements for areas could be bypassed with the proper gear or a bit of building (ark is a sandbox game after all) I imagine having skills (in this case, perks from a skill tree, to be more specific so people dont read this thinking I mean skill from the player) would make your life easier in general though
I believe ArkII should have a dynamic where you cover weaknesses with either perks or gear
say you go heat or cold resist perks so you can wear [insert future meta set here] in the relevant biomes/areas
or you can wear your fur or silk equivalent gear in favor of perks you'd rather have instead relating to damage or mobility
I can see more hazard-zones being locked behind specific skills to make exploring said zone easier.
well, you can always make an armor set for that too though
That's also if skills and engrams are unlocked with each other, akin to Atlas
or, you know... get bitten by an eel, that works too
I dont like that idea tbh
whats the point of unlocking the ability to use fur if I have cold resist perks anyways?
besides looking fashionable as fuck of course
The point is the extra protection and fortitude.
but its counter intuitive design honestly
im sure arkII will have an equivalent of otters and eels, if it doesnt have those creatures directly
Not really, cause while you may get fur out of the skill. But that wont help in a desert, or hot forest.
and with your logic, i'd need to unlock some thermal based fortitude to make arkIIs equivalent of silk for hotter biomes
Tbh I like the item base buffs as well
More realistic than reading a book then suddenly you are immune to overheat without needing clothes and take a mindwipe to forget it
I think perks should be more of a kin to melee skill (like slashing, stabbing, and smack damage) and range skill
Not biological ones like fortitude, hunger, and thirst
Stam, Oxy, Health, and Speed can be retrainable tho
And crafting speed should be just crafting speed, not +to RNG
“I think perks shouldn’t be flat stat boosts like fortitude, but should instead be flat boosts to melee damage”
Mazzy nooooo lol 😂😂
Melee is trainable
Aren't just under Health
Idc about realism here lol
Stam, Oxy, Health, and Speed can be retrainable tho
The gripe is that your raw stats shouldn’t be flagrantly boosted
I know, I was more disproving Mazzy's point.
"Melee is trainable"
-So is everything else in the human body.
Forgot to scroll up bub
I was speaking to Mazzy, my B you snuck in
You can’t train how sharp a sword is
Nah, my middle mouse button got robbed.
But your technique is
Sure you can.
Cutting people will sharpen it.
Jk, but sharpening is training a sword in a way.
That doesn’t increase damage, it almost always increases your likelihood of striking
Also…cutting people dulls the blade, that’s why people rub the blood off 😂
No shit, that's why I said 'jk'
That makes two of us
Three
Can't leave out the man in my head.
Actually, now thinking about it. I think it'd be interesting to have a Monster-Hunter-style durability.
tbh I dont want flat boosts in general, thats pretty boring
sameee
where you just resharpen the weapon or tool whenever it goes dull
I am more interested if they gonna make whistled dinos less effective now they are no longer be just a "running body-blocking wall of nomnom" army
In favor on that silly dark soul fighting mechanic
would be great, and makes much more sense than "hmm yes, my sword is low, let me slap on more wood and metal"
well from what its looking like, damage in general will be a lot more impactful in arkII
so you probably wouldnt want a dino army anyway
especially if dinos get skill trees of their own
would make investing into just one dino and making it super op over time would be way more effective
But are we sure we ever get that "dino skill" at all
I forgor
quality over quantity and all that
no we arent
it hasnt been confirmed or denied
hence why I said "if"
Then for now I'll just still to the ARK 1 wall of constant nomnoming until skills are confirmed
I don't wonna get fooled again
arkIs combat is completely irrelevant to arkIIs tbh
Depends on how "realistic" the AI would be unless it is confirmed so
it would be extremely off pace if they invest so much into the player... skill trees, parkour mechanics. combo and ability based combat... meanwhile dinos, the thing that actually draws to ark is just
"hmm yes" munch
Asking what about what?
besides, even in arkI creatures have gotten more and more complex with each dlc release, paid or not, no reason to doubt that they wouldnt take that knowledge into arkII when making the creatures
That is the thing
It's like that scene in Indiana Jones where the fancy sword guy is the whole new fancy dark souls stuff
While Indy is the ARK dino army
this is what is confirmed about AI so far
"No omnipresent radar -- animals now track and hunt by sight, sound, and smell! Hide from predators with visual camouflage and environmental obstructions, and learn to mask your scent! Dynamic pathfinding enables creatures to intelligently maneuver around obstacles and player-built structures."
much more indepth compared to arkIs
I have no idea what this convo is about
yes
basically how dinos will work in arkII
That is on wild dinos but for tamed 🤷🏼♂️
also you apparently know something about mazzy getting jebaited
no reason to think tamed dinos would be any dumber
I doubt those dark souls mechanics are ever gonna beat the typical dino army tbh
Unless they dumb out the tames for balance or give priority to that mechanic
its likely they are, seeing as its emphasized rather heavily and tamed dino combat isnt really even touched upon
the only thing I could find mentioning tames is as follows:
"For creature-scale combat, suffice it to say for now that when you attack something with your T-Rex in ARK 2, the results are visceral: the animation of the attack actually hard-impacts on the target (not “passing through” it), the victim’s flesh is torn, and the target physically reacts at that location to the hit – all to convey the feeling of the raw power of such a ferocious creature!"
which doesnt mention anything about fighting with tames you arent actively riding
I do have to wonder how many tames one player can even have in arkII
I doubt it wont be anything like the scale of arkI
with so much emphasis on mechanics involving the survivor being on foot, I dont see the devs allowing us to make mega dino armies that quickly make all that work irrelevant
Even if they make some realistic animations that slow down the DPS, the number of tames still "counteract" it
Im getting the vibe that your dino is supposed to be something akin to your best friend in this game
thats assuming we can even have high numbers of tames
Knowing ARK players... Doubt it
I am not sure the PVP people want a pet sim
with damage likely mattering a lot more in arkII, I doubt the realistic animations would slow dps
it would very likely do the opposite, with damage mattering more, that means the damage you do matters more as well
Depends how the cap it because they need breeders along with fighters
assuming arkII even shares a similar breeding system as arkI
which Im really doubting
I personally only want to see breeding for the purpose of colors and maybe an imprint bonus
but not actual stats
with the player having a skill tree, I dont think dinos will have the same method of gaining power either... maybe they wont have a skill tree exactly, but they probably wont have per level flat stat boosts either
if anything, all dinos of similar species will have comparable stats, and you raise your dinos power with the saddle you make for it
Tbh I rather have like all (say a) Rex be same stats, no levels but only gain by imprinting and leveling
I also want to maybe see a wounds system on the Dino’s like if a trikes horn gets bitten off then it has a missing horn on the model or you could see scars on your tames from fights that make them appear more battle damaged and look like they have been with you for a while other than just ohh all that damage your Rex took from a trike just gets heal from it eating some meat
Gives personalities to the Dino’s
More models for already bloated game tbh
Hmm true
I rather have regional scarring or big armor chipping especially on saddles
Like Last Oasis' Walkers or ATLAS' Legacy Ships
That’s kinda the idea I was trying to say but I guess I didn’t say it right
I am wondering if you’re going to be hard capped at X number of “active”tames
I mean there are (supposedly) cap in tribal and server tame limits anyways
You misunderstand
I’m thinking what if you can only have one rex with you at a time?
So specie limit?
Since it’s true that mass tame spam just invalidates mechanics based combat
Maybe it’s a cap of one pack or large tame can “go out” with you at once?
It could be plausible since not all tribes is gonna be proactively out unless raids or bosses
But that limits the breeders tho
I'm wondering if within X distance of your structures the tame limit rises
so you could have your "breeders/industry" tames out and about but could only bring one at a time "out"? Hmm, it's a thought
I do like the idea of having a higher tame limit depending on the size of your base
the idea would likely be "ight bois my base is much bigger, so only 3 dinos aint going to be enough to defend it properly"
since the aratai will likely act similar to purges in conan
and they can ride dinos too
That seems like a lag fest to me lol
eh? at arkI standards, yes
but the steam page does mention that the build system has been redesigned to be much easier to load
the quote is specifically this "Instanced rendering and network-streaming enable much higher client and server performance for large, player-built structures, and a longer draw distance! Survivors can set up and save their own preferred building templates, share them, and place prospective template layouts in the world to then build them out as a team."
I mean, unless the tame limit is dropped significantly, itll be a mess. Rn its like 500, anymore than that will make servers struggle lol
I do think the tame limit will be dropped significantly
with damage mattering more, its less likely you'd want a large army over a small group of highly invested in dinos
I wouldnt complain too much about that
hmm that would make ground combat much more fun and more strategic rather than just ohh we have more dinos than them it becomes a matter of who attacked first and who has the stronger dinos plus much better potential for ambushes if dinos have some sort of stalk mode
i mean with dinos now hunting you in the wild i can imagine that hopefully they will try to sneak up on you if they are like raptors troodons or dilos rather than just gunning for you
plus limiting how many dinos you can have following you of a certain type makes it so that having other normally non useful dinos become useful
Thad be dope
yea but sadly likelihood of that happening is low as they would have to make it so that damage for dinos is localized and the parts on the model can be destroyed plus more models to add into the game but a man can dream
akshully
thats been confirmed 
ahem i have to go celebrate
from the website
"For creature-scale combat, suffice it to say for now that when you attack something with your T-Rex in ARK 2, the results are visceral: the animation of the attack actually hard-impacts on the target (not “passing through” it), the victim’s flesh is torn, and the target physically reacts at that location to the hit – all to convey the feeling of the raw power of such a ferocious creature!"
cant wait to fling a raptor into orbit with a rex
this likely means localized damage itself might be a thing, like you see in monster hunter
but it could also just be a cosmetic thing still and dinos just have one big overall hp bar and hitting it anywhere lowers it
im fine with that
I mean, they announced that they are doing it though
yea but i didn't see that
yea not quite what I meant
I'm thinking tames are "stored" by default and simply can't materialize when not "in base"
similar to genesis 2 missions limiting you to one tame
hmm, I do like that idea too
like you can tame what you want, but can only have so many active at once
I like this idea better tbh, means you can go tame whatever while also restricting dino warfare on a scale that doesnt make ground combat obselete
I feel like the tame manager that was teased in the CEO announcement might be hinting at that sort of system
Im certainly not against it
Because Mazzy made good points: why bother with mechanics focused combat if you can leeroy 10 rex at someone?
john dark souls dodge rolling 10 rexes at once
i would like dino combat also to be more skill based
heavy and light attacks for each dino would be a good start
I mean judging by how they are doing Dino combat from what they said it’s very possible
Or maybe more of an incentive to use alternative attacks on Dino’s rather than just the normal bite
Like maybe the trikes charge inflicts a bleed and a stun effect while the Rex just has a normal bite that does higher damage than other large carnivores
I want an alien rockdrake/bloodstalker hybrid tame in arkII
…. I just want rock drakes
can glide like a rockdrake but also swing around like a bloodstalker, would be epic
I see rockdrakes coming to arkII in some shape or form... they are one of arks most popular creatures of all time after all, but not likely as they are now
I’m fine with that just as long as my bois and girls get to be there in some way
i think the best bet is pebble drakes
smaller gliding/climbing drakes that are lower on the food chain
if rockdrakes do come to arkII, the form would like be an alien tame that shares similar attributes
I want a creature thats entirely focused on mobility with little to no combat potential
hence me suggesting a rockdrake/bloodstalker hybrid tame
in the gameplay sense, not the literal sense
Hmm maybe something more like a bigger sinomacrops
Wtf that's like half it's kit
keep the tame bloodstalker sized
🤣
its a pretty good size for a tame focused entirely on mobility
the climbing gliding cloaking and pouncing is 50%?
you're tripping again my man
if this theoretical stalker/drake hybrid did have any damage potential, it would likely work similar to a rhino charge
it does damage depending on how fast its going
The jump is Theo nky reason the gliding and pouncing are viable
And tell me the last time cloak was useful
No no
I wouldnt say the jump is 50%, but it is what makes it viable on all maps even without a largely vertical spacd to work with
though I wouldnt mind seeing the jump yeeted in favor for a vertical pounce it can do
after all, the rockdrake can pounce towards terrain even when flat on the ground if it has something to pounce too, no reason why it couldnt just freely pounce up
That'd be the only situation I'd be fine with a removal of the jump, being able to pounce from standing
so in that context, the jump makes a lot of sense
sry, I didn't say it explicitly, but that hybrid is OP and thus uninteresting to me
agreed it would just feel too terrible otherwise
I'm fine with a severely limited pounce range for those cases
💯
yeah but your advocating for the removal of a big part of my rockdrakes mobility, especially on flatter terrain
so therefore your lack of interest is inconsequential to me since you obviously dont know the concept of fun
I want drakes to be limited so other mobility options for other tames can be considered
I'm rather sick of "kitchen sink" fantasy tames
I'd be fine with the jump and climb if the glide was severely nerfed, but I can't imagine you'd prefer that
the kitchen sink fantasy tames are interesting, especially in a game where most movement is "hold forward and sprint" simulator that can be efficiently done even with your monitor off
What’s “kitchen sink”
throwing random stuff together
my that you mean the ones with just every ability possible smushed into one creature?
"everything and the kitchen sink". It refers to stuff with everything someone could think of slapped onto it
but nothing about the rockdrake really feels random tbh
all the creatures abilites work quite well together
Jack of all do make the game less enjoyable, like if the Dino’s were more unique it would heavily improve the game
Add more risk
ohhh so thats why shadowmanes have a glide and a bleed, and dont forget their secret web attack thats done by pressing ALT+F4
It should probably do less damage or invisibility drains more stamina
rockdrakes already dont do that much damage
shadowmanes are one of the worst offenders of kitchen sink creatures, you won't see me saying otherwise
the only thing that feels slightly random is the invisibility
I think drakes dropping the jump but having less loss of stam when cloaked is a fine trade
not really
you can't jump glide out of every situation, but you can simply cloak and climb out
and if you're caught in the open on a drake that's your L
because then you're immobile in a game where a majority of terrain is flat
i think you're joking
no Im not
there's been verticality to use with a drake in every map after SE
I've spent most of my ark time on the back of a rockdrake
Im very familiar with how the creature works and interacts with terrain
i think pebble drakes could be fine as a more niche transport tame for caves and cliffs
extinction has tons of elevation to work with, as does genesis 1
genesis 2 you have the entire sides of the ship, as well as the numerous plateaus and mountains...
there's an awful lot of viable terrain to use with a climber/glider
L take
^agree that this is a skill issue
rockdrakes dont need their jump removed
hell outside of their mobility they really dont have all that much going on for them
my grandma can swing her walker faster than a rockdrake can bite
on ab they are one of the highest damage attackers
they are noisey as hell when gliding
grandma meta tame
they're behind reapers (which should be removed in ark 2), basilisk, and spinos
and their invisibility is as obvious as a fat guy hiding behind a lamp pole
that could very easily be improved if WC wanted to
wait, is shift sugesting the removal of jumping in an ark 1 rock drake or a rock-drake-like creature in ark 2
well not necessarily
reapers are on the genesis ship after all
I'm speaking purely about gameplay
the drake in arkI
if i gave a dung about lore I'd be in the praise bob chat
I think the rock drakes are fine in ark 1
same
if the ark 1 rock drake was put in ark 2, I'd want the changes I outlined
well there ya go eve?
ark 1 drake is largely fine for ark 1
I want an alien tame thats a hybrid between the rockdrakes gliding and a bloodstalkers web swinging
it would be so fun to mess around and travel with
Blood stalkers already can glide
i'd like a gecko-like tame, can't jump but cimbs fast, used for stealth. would be cool
parachute*
But I’ve noted to never let Eve balance a game
I've noted to never let shifter balance a game either
This is more the role I see drakes in ark 2 taking
damn things getting heated. need to go get my popcorn hang on
Where in my statements did I say I wanted no movement?
in every statement you've made nerfing concepts of fun and interactive movement
🍿
You opened with “let’s slap all movement types onto one creature”, I replied with “bad idea because you’ll kill the number of viable movement tames” and somehow that’s the same as “no movement”
got it, carry on
I’m sensing clown energy 😂
literally not true
I suggested a creature that can glide and use webs
There needs to be different movement types, speed to weight ratios and such
You’re right, you didn’t include mana jumps or enforcer blinks, my B
I didnt suggest any other movement types for that creature, literally just 2
The two fastest and strongest in the game, yes
or shadowmane teleports
or reaper jumps
Drakes and reapers have similar jump heights
And shadowmanes are just too broken lol, those need fat nerfs or removal for ark 2
Flyers need a heavy nerf
^i like this guy
Make the game way to easy
its a mobility focused creature with little to no combat capability
of course the movement would be strong otherwise there is no point in getting it
I agree, fliers should be crippled temporarily if their wings are damaged
and whatever version of wyverns makes it to arkII, the breath needs to act more like poison, no fire or lightning stuff
Or the fire needs to be less powerful
As much as I love my lightning bois they are too stronk
Cryopods might need to be removed too, it adds more risk and challenge to manually move your dinosaurs around, personally it feels too over powered that I can transport my whole collection in one trip with no risk on my argent
I think the cryo fridge is ok, but the pokeball mechanic isn’t. Does that sound fair?
Yes
Yea but cryopods are tek based and there is supposed to be no tek so that’s good
there's a fundamental reason why I say no fire or lightning
both damage types come out in a continuous stream, which would make dodge rolling irrelevant, it would completely break the balance of the game and combats core design
True
I would suggest using them like artifacts, only one full pod per being(human for balancing)
Think a little outside the box…you could easily have some primitive themed way to do a similar thing
aw man no more heat. now i have to toss this popcorn. thanks a lot guys
I’m saying that cryopods as they are now can’t be used I’m not saying there is no possibility of another similar feature being added
Dodging neeeds to be an aspect of ark 2, it always felt off that my Dino beat another Dino by sitting still and eating it, the ice titan fight was so entertaining to me because I went in solo with a mek and had to dodge all his moves while balancing heat
and before people say "no wyverns too strong" (which I agree wyverns are too strong and will need to be reworked for arkII) wyverns are like rockdrakes, one of arks most popular creatures of all time
no way they dont make it to arkII, at least indirectly
its confirmed
True and also dodging will be a thing and probably will be a vital aspect to pvp and pve
Barrel rolls to the sides would be sick for fliers if we’re stuck with them
as is combo based combat in general
Double tap A or D and just scoot on over for actual dogfighting
certain dinos should also be able to dodge. i could see raptors having a dash jump
In the Rockwell ring... The same ring got destroyed
I'll fight you if you speak ill of my children again
Hmm maybe fliers get reserved to a more scouting role or air combat based role rather than transport
Reapers are dumb
well no, it was the lifeboat that blew up
I hope spinos are good in 2 I love my croco bois
With the Rockwell ring in it
no, because the rings arent in the lifeboat-
Wyverns need a speed nerf, it feels weird that the biggest and most powerful flyer is also the fastest, why can’t my tiny dinosaur with no weight can’t put speed the wyvern in flight




