#ark-2
1 messages · Page 14 of 1
I mean the bottom of the tree should be not too bad to get all those skills XD
As a breeding connoisseur I’d prefer to see a stand alone breeding skill tree.
It's going to be epic, no more hitscan snipers and flame bobs
Would even be a good way to replace mutations
If breeding involves less sitting around and more gameplay I’d be down
Right now it’s mostly waiting 😭
I think a lot of people fucking hate the idea of souls combat
"third person only"
man fuck that
don't play it then if you don't like it
Ark shouldn’t be comparable to a basic human need 🧐
I could definitely see breeding take a lot more effort to do, and imprints could involve more than just tapping a button
That’s what I’m hoping for. I’d like breeding to offer some powerful benefits but I think the real power should come from a training method. Perhaps with its own branch in the beast master tree.
my point was that I'm worried the devs will take the generic AAA route
heavy bloom, third person only tomb raider clone
I could see training and breeding in its own skill branch of beast master
I’m holding X to doubt the gameplay will be built for SP given the released information made it quite clear ark 2 is meant to be MP
It's not only single player if that is what you are worried about
Look I would love to see them make third person combat and gameplay above all else
but the way they described it doesnt really sound very ambitious/good
"souls-like"
Quit trying to lump all my favorite gameplay into another tree
the developers themselves comparing their combat to Dark Souls as if its a 10/10 game
Souls combat is enjoyable but janky
I mean, the ambition of ark never really was its quality of combat imo
so leave an entire side of the community out of their plans
I’m trying to make the tree more attractive to select by including traits that benefit breeding and tame maintenance/use
I don't think that's the case
People love ark 1 PvP and the combat mechanics are not impressive
Yes people love ark 1 because of how it rewards you for being good (mostly)
ok well
It rewards tons of time spent in game yes
ignore flamies 50% of dino's and tek rifle
Yes
The grind is rewarding
I would love for Ark 2 to be a like, stretched out progression
I have seen some absolute bobs have insane gear lol
so that even with a full tribe it would still take a full week or two to get tek
"Souls-like" is a buzz word for skill based, a CM said so in this channel, even
Souls-like is a buzz word for skill based third person only melee combat
Good thing there's no tek in Ark 2
says who
There won't be tek at the start though
Uhhhh, yeah, I kinda just said that
yea duuh
@lime forge I do like the topic we’re now leaving lol. Remind me to come back to it with you
I added third person only melee combat
Yeah, I would like to talk more about skill trees lol
Well that part is false, it doesn't have to be third only melee
Third person souls like combat has been brutally overdone as a conversation topic lol
And the devs said no tek, by the by
Ark 1 combat is garbage and we all know it lol
Yea idk about the line of thinking that assumes tek comes back at a later DLC
another primarily primitive survival game
You need to chill, bud
Look I want ark 2 to be a good game, it looks amazing graphics wise and they have high ambitions
It all depends on the storyline they decide to pick. I can see a pretty obvious one that seems likely to hapoen
but the way they described the combat again doesn't sound exciting
Same, I highly doubt it comes back in any way. Element assisted items/tames/structures, on the other hand...
I think an ark 3 may seek tek again but that’s not ark 2
The dev tweet said no tek in ark 2. Just going off the dev statement
I think ark2 pvp could be really good. A huge percentage of the pvp community has been complaining for years about returning to primative lol
You've beaten Rockwell, supposedly for the last time, why would there be tek?
Yes but what about tek? I know I'm ranting on about this but I just feel like its a missed opportunity
adding tek with next gen graphics would look PHENOMENAL
it would also add another tier of progression
They just aren't putting it in 2, because thematically and lore-wise it doesn't make sense. Did you beat Gen 2, by chance?
which would add to the depth of the progression
They've said there's no tek. That's all we know.
No but I've played it for hours on end
You should, then
Well, a look in the extinction and gen2 notes kind of hint that element was purposefully sent to earth, and I don't think it is a total coincidence that Rockwell chose arat to land on
I would have thought that lore wise if there are tribes competing in the game I thought maybe competition would lead to there being no choice but to progress to tek
It makes 0 sense to make everything tek
The protagonist and the tribe or whatever wouldn't want tek but other tribes would be desperate to get an edge over the others?
Nope. Not stooping to lore lol. I think wc has chosen to make an ark game that caters to folks who don’t like tek and they want to focus on more deliberate combat/environmental interaction that tek didn’t provide
I'd be fine with industrial being the new top, idgaf honestly, not gonna play PvP on a server I don't own and have rules for lol
I'm not asking for the tek from ark 1 to be added
By Tek I mean like
Futuristic stuff
I’d prefer if it progresses from like primitive to medieval at most
It could come down the line, but I really hope and expect it to not be at the start lol
honestly its a missed opportunity for a ue5 game
There will be element in some capacity, so there's your future stuff, I guess
I’ve had my fun with tek
RTX + Tek? 🤤
At least for 2 dlc
Well I hope ark 2 doesnt have pay2win dlc
Ark1 never really did, so I don't expect ark2 to be that way
You can always just port the models and functions over from Ark 1 as a mod, mods'll be accessible on consoles too so that's one way to do it
honestly I like that move from WC
mods on console + crossplay
Wish more companies would do this
It sure did, imo. But we've beaten that horse to death already
we're beating a rotting corpse atm
When are we not, to be fair
Yeah, let's go back to skill tree discussion
Agreed
I swear man someone always comes in to rant when I get here
our daily form of entertainment
Anyways, besides taming, breeding, imprinting, and basic stat skills, what other type of skills can you guys envision?
world based skills
Such as...
¯_(ツ)_/¯
Skills that reduce stamina usage while parkouring?
There’s almost definitely gonna be skills to cater to the new terrain navigation mechanics
And combat obviously
I am kind of envisioning building skills, like something that increases the chance that enemies won't see your base or tames
Faster harvesting of certain mats, maybe better usage of mats so that the chem bench doesn't have to exist (as in, you get the skill, and you can get more narcotics out of one craft)
I could see that being useful
Better usage of mats would be awesome. Be able to spec yourself into a walking chem bench
Actually what about like caves and stuff
It would be cool to see professionesque skill trees
They teased at like oceon caves or something?
Night vision skills 🙃
If they add night vision skills and not fire balls I’m goin to bed
Hopefully ark2 is designed in such a way that gamma doesn't work
It probably won't work
Thankfully
I mean, ark1 already has fireballs, soo
Im hoping the same. No gamma changes, none of that ini remove everything and give me N64 graphics bs.
I mean I hope they have some super low graphics mode for igpu's
Some people need an ini to run the game at all
As long as it doesn't give unfair advantages to using it lol
Ye
I’m selfishly not interested in catering to 10+ year old PCs if it means cutting gameplay elements that rely on settings a certain way
Yeah, they already did kind of cut out all older Xbox and Playstation
New games shouldn't have to cater to really antiquated systems imo
I think they should
ark 2 coming to ps2 comfirmed? 
I’m against games being like “hope you have the newest hardware that came out six months ago”. But once it’s getting to like 6-10years? I’m down to have them pass
Same. I shouldn’t be at a disadvantage because you can’t afford a decent PC. Poverty2win shouldn’t exist either
Like ark 1 was catered towards a titan X and gtx 1080ti
Ark 1 barely worked for ANYTHING when it first dropped lol
My gpu is 5 years old, and so is my cpu and it runs ark on high settings just fine, I am kind of expecting ark2 to be even better for that with ue5
One of the largest complaints with Sotf was that the framerate on most computers was like 20 lol
Obviously if nobody can play your game that’s not good. But at the same time not everyone game should be weighed down by potato PCs
Assuming a 1070?
Nope, 1650
Although, really, if your pc doesn't have a dedicated graphics card, you should probably think about playing a different game
1650 is from 2019 though?
Not everyone has the money
Most people started on a terrible computer
Their parents laptop or smth
That’s fine, they shouldn’t play ark 2 then
It’s like saying everyone is entitled to an Xbox to play halo…that’s just not how that works
Yeah, hate to say it but that's the way of things.
Luckily ark has made some great strides at becoming more accessible on cheaper systems
Optimization is always good, but when gameplay is compromised because potato PC players feel entitled to cutting edge games I get a bit miffed
Yeah, I don't mean to gatekeep a game, but if you really can't afford a decent pc, you can always get an Xbox or something and make it work
I had to wait like 3 years before I could play ark at all, so I don't have a ton of sympathy 😅😅
Xbox is prob the closest console to a pc
It misses all the features I use pc for though
Same boat. Couldn’t play a lot of great games until I got a pc a couple years back that was more modern. My sympathy is very limited because the games just don’t make sense when gutted to work on potatoes
Get an Xbox THEN get a pc?
For ark 2 a current Gen Xbox will play it just fine. No pc required
You can get a pc with a 1650 for 500
Yes
But I do many things other than play games
I watch YouTube on my second monitor while playing
You’re conflating a comparison choice with your personal choice
I use discord, multi-task
But surely I'm not the only one who uses pc's for this reason?
Consoles are powerful as hell for the price
No, but people prefer Xbox for other reasons you may care less about
I built my pc for work lol, the game capacity got patched on after a couple years lol
I mean I think a lot of people including myself just enjoy having a machine that can do anything
Yeah, and fact of the matter, those machines are more expensive
I mean im prob just weird as I'm a computer nerd but I still just love the freedom of pc
Yes but what about the kb and mouse argument
Vs controller
You can use both on basically any new machine
Console has vsync on my default so it's less responsive
This isn’t a pc vs console argument though. This is “how do you afford to upgrade your gaming setup”
Especially with a souls like combat system I don't thing that argument holds value
Sometimes it’s too expensive for some folks to upgrade their pc for a cutting edge game, and a console makes more sense financially
And like console games sometimes a new game simply will NOT work for an old outdated hardware
But what about people that need the gaming power of a console and the usability of a pc
Keyboard and mouse VS controller only makes sense in a game with ranged combat
Do they get both machines or get one that can do both
But people with bad PCs seem oddly entitled to access all games
They prefer pc?
Get a job and work for it like anyone else? I don't know what you expect me to say lol
If I want the gaming power of a console and the usability of a PC I get me a PC that has that power
Most people who can't afford shit aren't old enough to get a job
That was my point
You end up spending more if you buy both separately
Plus subscription fees and console game prices
A lot yes.. most are still children or teens.
I have no sympathy, as some people here know, I didn't even have a computer until later lol. I never even got to play video games as a kid
That was probably a decade ago
I had to save up for my own gaming PC by working in restaurants, etc. and didn't have it befor I was 20
First time I ever played a video game was in 2019 🫤
At the age of 13 you can get a job already, not as good paying, but still helps a lot if you wanna buy smth
Today some kids allready cry when they "only" get a Xbox or a PS
Even 12
Haha I tried at that age and even my current age and no luck
They hardly respond
And u get payed 4PH
Yes you can do smaller tasks and earn some money and if you safe up you even can afford a PC
Weird, at 12 i deliverd papers and at 14 i started in a groceries store
We should probably move this conversation to general though, it has gone way off topic
as it does usually
I mean this should be a convo about not having poo graphics in ark 2 that ruin immersion being the norm to accommodate ancient potatoes
It might not even be possible to do that even if they wanted to lol
I am worried that on console that the game is gunna chessboard too much
Tbh I have 0 idea how that all works in any detail
Ue5 already isn't compatible with older Gen Xbox. It's not only wildcard not wanting to. They literally cant
I am not familiar with that term
It also makes no sense to develope for the old potao generation when the new gen consoles are out
New consoles have been out for over a year now right?
some time like that yh
You limit yourself and the old consoles slowly run out. Other developers also move on and develope for new gens only and the aviable power they have. Has allways been like that.
Yes, even longer
1.5 years allready
Yeah, it's a fairly common practice that console players are used to
Same with grafic-cards, etc.
It’s just the reality of hardware advancing this fast
the rtx 4000 series is supposedly also coming later this year
just wait until quantum gaming happens lol
Yeah, I feel like vr has a long way to go before it really takes off
Well what I fear is if they get it right. Kids won’t be able to differentiate reality and a game
Easy. If it pokes you and you feel it, then it's real, if not, then it's not 😂
Quantum gaming tho sounds so sick. Hope I live to see games where the ai regularly outsmarts players and doesn’t just cheat lol
Or you have ai that feels insanely organic and you can play ark 7 and watch the raptors play tussling next to a Trex stalking a trike separated from the herd
I mean, it is already possible to do that. Most players are pretty easy to outsmart 😅😅
My dream game is one where I can live in a fantasy/speculative biosphere that feels alive
Soo, ark? But with better ai?
I want to watch my impact on the environment, I want to see animals and plants adapt. Complex behavior I can get lost watching and learning about...I mean ark is moving that way I hope yea
I’d say a hybrid of ark and eco would be more up my alley
Yeah same really
Imagine if on genesis 2 you get one month to beat rockwell prime, and if you can’t (PvP or PvE) rockwell takes over the ship and you lose 🧐
I would like a game, where i can get all the choice i would be able to get
Cuz you know those games where you can pick a dialogue, but it doesnt matter cuz they will give you both the information in 1 sentence
I want a game where i have impact on EVERYTHING
the innards slowly spreads every new in-game day
Arkpoc
Not arkpoc. The map is static over the whole wipe
yea like
maybe feeding wild animals would make them more dependant on you
and interrupt their natural habits
which would lead to you taming them or something
This suggestion is over time rockwell actually hijacks the ship in ways that impact how the world looks. If you fall behind Rockwell’s biome starts creeping into the eden ring for example
So more like an ark campaign type thing?
Ooohhhh wait
What about a game, where if you die from a boss or something, instead resetting to your previous save point, actually have an alternate path, where you will face other bosses and other problems
Yes, like eco has a meteor you have to destroy that requires tech but if you and your group is reckless you run out of resources and lose before the meteor ever hits
Meaning you die on the island and wake up on SE? That’s gonna need explanation for me to get it lol
For example: a villain wants to kill every person in 1 town, and if you fail to defeat it you cant go to that town again
Ye, something like that
I think folks would get pissed in multiplayer…you can’t play with friends if you die is not a easy pill to swallow
That sounds like an excessive amount of work to make happen lol 😂
Doesnt have to be a multiplayer game 😅
Well I am assuming ark will remain a MP game first
I’m talking about ark (the game series) so 2 and beyond 😆
Are there even servers where you begin on the island, you die and need to go to SE?
I would love to see ark2 get some advanced ai
It would be super cool to have a cluster called “campaign” servers that when you beat a final boss you get teleported to the next ark with nothing but your character
Yee
I am sure it could be designed
So everyone on Ab has already beaten the island and SE (for example)
I wouldnt mind if you could "tame" other humans in Ark II, and you would be able to use them in war
It would probably just need an overload of the tp from the boss arena into a transfer
Maybe they do exist, we just dont know 🤭
It just has to hard wipe you from the server you beat and move you over to the next one
I’ve kinda soft done that by agreeing with my server mates to do that on a cluster. But it’s not quite as structured lol
We actually started completely clean. But same energy lol
Slavery 🤑🤑🤑
Idk, i normally play SP, recently a friend asked to play on a pvp, then after i made some progress for them, they kicked me so now i am just going to keep raiding them until they give up XD
Revenge is a big motivator for PvP it seems lmao. Gotta love ark 2 probably promoting the same
Go under the mesh
But then in a more "friendship" way
You have to knockout tame humans
No.
Yeah they should make Ark 2 better
True
no shit
why do you think they are making it if they dont plan on making it better lmao
Also does anyone have an idea of what the black levels will be like
as in like night time and caves
Black levels? You mean how dark it is?
They should make Ark 2 better
That’s just me though
They ARE making it better
yes
Like ark 1 isn't as dark as say rust is at night
I’m not sure. It’s a good question to ask
I think an interesting mechanic would be travelling in night to take cover in the dark
both from dino's and players
Fr?
Is ark 2 third person only
Nah making Ark 2
👏 well done
sadly
Ughhhh like 2% of people play in third person
I’d say 2% people play in only first given mounting is always third by default
Ok on a Dino is different but when your not on one
I think the number of people who use tp is a lot higher than 2% lol
Ark 1 core gameplay is gonna be largely different. Go play Assassins creed, breath of the wild, or dark souls and see if you prefer first or third.
Personally I couldn’t do any of them in first.
Basing it off people play ark 1 is third person isnt a good idea for player view as it was meant to be first person for players
i have never seen someone only use fp
I’m always first person in Ark 1 unless I’m on a mount.
interesting
Yes 
Same here, and even then I spend a lot of time on tames in first, via spyglass or gun. But that's how Ark 1 was intended to be played, where as Ark 2 is intended to be played in third, simple as
Third person detracts from the immersion imo
mentally you feel less attached to your character I guess
you feel like you are controlling your character not playing as them
Operating word, imo
I have no issue with immersion in third person games
Sure, i feel the same.
But by the end of the day, it's a video-game suppose to be fun, not immersive.
I feel this way because of how often I ride tames, but maybe that’s just me lol
(immersion is also very subjective)
That's a very subjective opinion.
It is definitely subjective, lol. "It varies" is literally another way to say that
there is no companion in ark, there are hardly any nps's
Why do NPCs matter for immersion?
Funny, since ARK-2 is more or less confirmed to have NPC's
ugh
So yeah, if that's the case. It's like God-of-War.
HLN-A was a companion, as well...
True
from a small dev team making an ambitious and unique game to a bigger dev team trying to make their game like other AAA games
despite the success they saw from ark 1 and how the gameplay loop is enjoyable
Ong hope you get hit by a cement truck
@stray elm dm
I'm pinging mods!!!
Wha?
check
Ok
clear your pings
From Shifter?
ye
Oing 😢
oingy
'Oing'
Oing 🗣️🗣️
Oing oing 🐷
@steel sluice You literally came in here and asked whether wildcard will make ark 2 better than ark 1
wait nvm i just realized
Ok
so sorry 😔 😔 😔
You ain’t oingin like us cuh
You oingin???
Damn straight 
Bring out yer oing
Oingin at the O
Walton is too Oing for us.
not for me
On bob?

Nah, you're peak mutt

Oinger 47, reporting for duty
mutts: prayed away
👀
Hounds
"Oinger 47, going dark"
Oinger vs Bob
Maybe that would be best at this point, for Oinger 47 to go dark
Bob is ascendant oinger
vs 
virgin emperor 
Bob 
Will bob be in Ark 2
Erm no
Why
We don't know.
But i shall be the leader of the riot if he isn't one of the presets.
Hopefully the characters wont be absurdly muscular with the worst customization in a game to date
Some folks like how gremlins look
I will personally lead a march to wildcard studios
And human hitboxes are the same so pygmy people dont become meta
hlna is the antiBob
Ark 1 customization is peak
Peak memeable
I agree nothing beats ark customization
i honestly wouldnt care for funny character customization if it didnt change the hitboxes
Hopefully the Characters will be obscenely muscular
i want better muscle toning
i wanna edit every muscle to look like a freak
rather than just a beefy hunk
Don't know man.
Can't imagine ARK players without being deformed beefy hunks
but they arent deformed enough
I want my triceps where my my calves are, is that deformed enough?
What I’m curious about is rag dolls and corpses lol
I’d KILL for a carving system but if ark rag doll where corpses just yeet off the face of the earth is a thing I’m not as sure
I do love 'my my' calves

I want body’s to rag doll in ark 2
Instead of just freezing midair
I want Ark 2 to be first person
They should spawn across the entire sky
Won’t happen. Maybe on unnofficials with a mod.
First person setting 🧐
Didn't they literally say only third person
Not happening for the base game. It’s their design choice.
Be a lot cooler if it did
But they already said it would be possible for modded unnofficial servers
I will wait more info on the mechanics to judge
Yes, this ⬆️
I’m going to do something drastic
Somewhere there was a comment about 1st person being available through mods/unofficials
Only mechanic that wouldn't work in first is the combat
It’s like GTA on first person. It’s 💩
Read what Country posted above
I feel like Ark 2 is gonna look so goofy in third person
I've read the crunch...
There are new mechanics. New combat system. I will wait to judge if I like it or not
It might very well be goofy as hell, but we just won't know until we get gameplay
For honor combat system 💀
That'd be better than a ds one tbh
I'm going to at least try it for a month or so
This. I’m waiting.
Darks souls. Like it or not.
I'll likely buy it regardless of gameplay videos, but my opinions won't be much until after I play it.
To be fair. I would have bought Ark 1 even if it didn’t have 1st person view.
It didn't for like 2-3 years
And then when it did it didn't work on official for like 2 months
I meant 1st person
Oh
I would play Ark 1 on 3rd person without any issues.
Yeah, but it would bother me much
Even more if the new mechanics work well on 3rd person view
I will see
I’d rather wait and see
Uhhh, ok buddy.
Third person only is a controversial point
No one is overjoyed about jt
It's either people won't care or people hate it
I would hate a third person ark game
Third person only*
You don't feel like you ARE the character
You feel like you are controlling them
The character end up meaning less
Bro spittin
I'm just stating my opinion?
Nah but it’s a good one
Yes
Again it's controversial
I LOVE first person
It's unique, you don't feel like you are playing a generic AAA game
Dark souls, GTA, tomb raider, God of War, SOOO many games that are third person
And a game trying to be ambitious and unique is trying to blend in with other AAA games
The reason people play Ark 1 is because it's not like every AAA game
The fact that arks as enjoyable as it is despite being so poorly made really shows how decent the core gameplay is
Imagine the scene where you wake on on the beach in third person
ark is cool because its a properly fleshed out survival
Ark is cool because of its amazing map design, uniqueness and that shit
Third person does nothing to increase immersion
What it does: makes the game easier and objectively less immersive
Looking through the eyes of your character
Again, you feel like you are the character not just controlling them
It's really hard to make good third person gameplay
I guess my point is that wildcard seems to be taking the route of trying to be like the rest
I don't mind souls like being used as a term for being skill based but when you add third person only onto it it's easy to imagine how the game will play out
dinosaurs come first 
Fair enough @lavish sparrow. But there a lot of immersive 3rd person games. GTA, Red dead, assassins creed etc. I feel like I’m part of the game. No issues for me.
But again, I don’t know how Ark 2 mechanics will work. It can be really bad. I will wait and see.
This dude really said GTA is immersive 💀
name a survival game thats third person
Actually can’t
The game where you blow up cops with rocket launchers while driving a motorcycle in LA
Very immersive
Yea because it would suck balls
It would
Like try playing ark in 1st person only then third person only
I've done that, I find first person far more immersive
third person again does nothing but put the camera behind the character
Opinion… you know🦾
I mean there is a point where immersion can be objective
like what if I just called Geometry Dash immersive
what if I called Biomutant immersive
both games are NOT immersive objectively
specifically biomutant
Also a popular opinion is that GTA isn't really that immersive
And I can imagine Ark 2 being a mix of GTA5 and God of War
We still don't know anything about what the gameplay is going to look like
The fact that I can imagine it that easily in a game as unique and as ambitious as Ark 2 is a bit of a problem
Is that a good thing?
wouldn't it be better if the community gave feedback on gameplay before its too late to go back?
At the end of the day, they're going to create it how the feel is best.
Wildcard is trying to hype the game up but at the end of the day if they really want to make a good game they should just get beta testers from multiple sides of the ocmmunity
how do we know that?
Ubisoft doesnt create assassins creed how they feel best
that shits so repetitive now
Ark is special
Because its what they've done with ark already.....? They'll create it how they want.
I dont want Ark 2 to lose whats special about Ark 1
and they released pay2win DLC's
That's entirely opinion based.
Not really. You can get most every dino from the past 2 free dlcs, or even trading. You didn't have to buy the dlcs.
Mate Gen2 is COMPLETELY pay2win on official
My point is, that we don't have any gameplay, so we don't know what 3rd person is going to be like.
Why don't we have any gameplay though?
That's the core of ark we are talking about
Gen2 is the story. They're not going to give away story dlcs for free.
I think it's best the community gives feedback
And it also gives tek suits without engram
Slot cap of wood at the start of the game
Because of the story.
By the time you get to Gen2, you're expected to have that stuff already.
Uh I'm talking about wipe servers
Starting fresh
Good luck progressing on smalls without gen2
No you're not lol you're talking about getting a tek suit at the beginning of the game. Tek gear is endgame, so is gen2.
Either way, thats best debated in #lore-nerdz more than likely.
This isn't lore related?
Any pvp player knows gen2 is completely pay2win
The free tek suit is the reason
Again, not really ark 2.
There's not any gameplay of ark 2 that we can compare anything to.
That's the point
They released gen2 without having much feedback
People complained so much about tek suits
On gen2 launch
Ark2 has no tek, so moot.
Gen2 was disabled for months before unoffi servers could figure out anything
That's not the point. The point is the lack of requesting community feedback
Lack of community involvement in the development
They don't have to request feedback, but in any case, several of the members do come here to look, fairly regularly.
They don't have to speak.
They listen to our suggestions for things to add and their interaction is limited
They had 7 years of community feedback.
Must be ghosts then when Dollie or Jat talk in here
I'm talking about ark
Have they shown gameplay?
Ark has 7 years…
Again we haven't even seen gameplay
Cyberpunk released gameplay 8 years before it came out
Sounds like a lead up to a big let down, they don't have to release gameplay though. They're not required to.
I want to see gameplay too. We are in the same side here.
We all want to see gameplay, there just really isn't any way to say "ark2 is going to flop because it's 3rd person only".
No
But a lot of people might drop it because of it
The average play time of reviewers of God of War is 30hrs
That's third person souls-like
If they do then oh well, Wildcard is going to still do what they want with it though, whether they decide on community suggestions or not.
Most game reviewers are uh. Not the most committed players. The cuphead review comes to mind
Just to be clear, I’m not implying that. I want to see gameplay to better judge.
I didn't say you were.
Easiest Tek rifle farm, ele farm, it has stryders, etc but not pay to win?
Can move on from gen2
Anyone who has played official pvp knows how essential gen2 is
Did that guy get banned tf?
Delete comments?
Oh
@fiery wedge Nah trying silence people
Dont wonder why
I removed the comments because it's not this channels topic
^
If you want to complain about p2w, move to #ark-survival-ascended.
Back to ark2 as the delegated topic states please.
Not reviewers
Steam reviews
Isn’t god of war a largely singleplayer game? Correct me if I’m wrong
Yes but it's third person souls-like
The gameplay works in largely singleplayer games
Singleplayer story games do tend to have lower hours counts
NOT in open world incredibly designed survival games
God of Wars gameplay got super boring super quick for me
I think it can work just fine in ark 2. MHW does it and it works pretty well
Metal gear rising is a good example of good third person only gameplay
That's singleplayer only with 8hrs story time
ark2 comes out on xbox right and dont have much detials on ark2 on psn comeing or not?
I have over 100 hours on it
Ark 2 isn't coming to PS
Sony are annoying to work with and would only delay the release date
thats just fucked ty
It will be PC/XBOX at launch, that's all we know.
It sony's fault lol
Sony is the worst console brand to work with especially with crossplay
its both there faults dont blame one party
No I will blame 1 party
Nono Yhiz is actually right about Sony lol
Wildcard will likely release it in the future
They hate mods, and ark2 will have mods.
But adding ps5 into the launch platforms would delay it by months
Yea, because mods XD
This is why I hate Sony, overpriced games lacking on features lack of consumer freedom
Xbox is better

Not by much though
I hate Microsoft with a passion
It’s true. This chat is for third vs first person wars only
well personally 3rd person would be a nice but i feel ark 2 wouldnt be ark 2 without first and third
I'm tempted to post a discord moderator meme but I can't 😭
Ark isn't ark with third person only
Unofficials will have access to mods for first person
facts
Considering ark2 isn't ark1, it'll be fine
Ark the series is objectively not defined by perspective
Smh, scaring the bot like that
true i just hope the ark2 doesnt become ark all over again
If the game is a survival game with taming and building -> it’s a valid ark series game
I’d argue you could largely or entirely scrap the building and it could be ark, but that’s WAY more contentious than something as mild as perspective
i mean with the meshing cheaters drama
A ton of that has to do with shit coding.
And questionable CoC enforcement speed/pipelines
UE5 isn't going to be the best thing ever, but I'm hopeful it will help
If the actual ingame enforcement was as efficient as this discord server I imagine cheaters would be far reduced
ark 2 hopefully will be different from ark i just hope if they add tek its a limited ammount of tek like maybe tek trouf tek gen non pvp shit
They said primitive
If it's that + third person it's fortnite survival mode
So assuming no tek.
well im okay with 2016 ark
I’ll eat my own shirt if tek comes out in an ark 2 dlc
Why don't they use a different engine
Where is the tweet though I can never find it
There are other good engines
…what? Does fortnite have taming?
I dont know im not wildcard
id die laughing and watch the chaos unfold
It would be a pretty substantial bait and switch from the original intent of primitive lol
sorta you jump onto animals to tame them only 2 though
Shifter do you know which part they said no tek in
It has third person and building
Uhhhhhh. A tweet somewhere around the first ark 2 video?
I’m 99% sure the quote is “what’s next for ark? Not tek, that’s for sure”
My worry is the bugs on launch
lol atleast thats a straigh awnser
I'd they don't even have gameplay to show then what's to know about how the launch will be
Tek dinos?
maybe weve already seen game play and havent noticed yet
No
by that statment i mean the trailers being the game play highly unl;ikely but would be a funny ass jibate
I’m gonna assume no tek dinos
ngl though i dont have "high" expecxtions for ark2 other than the senery
The only way I see tek being part of ark 2 is broken down or derelict tek stuff
maybe an event
No?
It really adds to the sci-fi feel
wasnt that how tek dinos starte was a tek dino event?
Tek Dino’s on other maps was to garner hype for extinction…it wasn’t a random event
ah well maybe if we where to get tek dinos i think youd be right
I’d bet one of the earliest mods will be ones that add tek Dino’s
I'm either blind or not looking right, I can't find it
It was sent to me like a dozen times but that was a long time ago XD
with ark2 will there be moding on like windos 10/ xbox server?
Yep. Console mods will be a thing
well atleast there doing something right
Did we pin Dollie’s message about no pay to win?
Hmm
ngl would love to see a no p2w game
I dont think it's really one that needs to be pinned but not sure
i'm happy they protested to have no NFT's in the games
Can just search from:dollie
i think that should be deff pin cause yes
I'd have to ask admins lol
In fairness ark 1 worked exceedingly hard to avoid any P2W moments despite having paid DLC
I think the only better option would have been to lock dlc content to itself. (IE Ab stuff is Ab only, Gen 2 only usable on Gen 2) But I’m not sure if folks would have hated that more
i mean if they said yes i would cause to me thats a general question will there be p2w type shit in the game
Its more like pay2progress with gen2
If you have ingame trading, I don't see dlcs as p2w, but that seems to be just my opinion
Some maps being easier to get mats on to some folks looks like p2w. I heavily doubt that’s a fair comparison
Ye
ye but i think thats like server lockdown shit tbh like with fj rn how no transfers feel like id be like that
Regardless, it will probably be some time before Ark 2 releases DLCs
Also will wildcard do something to prevent account selling in ark 2?
If I were doing it I’d hard lock story maps to ban all foreign DLC items and tames. Have the community maps be places you can bring everything together
There are accounts being sold with all dlc for 1 dollar
you mean spoofing?
That's really not just on wildcard themselves....
It's wildcards responsibility to shut down these shops
It’s absolutely not their job to be police?
Legal action and shit maybe
It's against ToS on most platforms.
It's their game that's riddled with cheaters
^its on the platform
for offical i feel thatd be a good idea when they started but i dont think players would of liked it prob non stop complaining lik i cant have a shadowmane on gen1 but i can on gen2 kinda shit
Steam ToS especially.
....
Yea so you ask WC to stop the cheaters once they cheat on their game. You asked that the shops that sell cheap accounts get blocked. NOT the same
That's really not ark2 lol that's ranting on ark1.
Cheaters cheat because they have accounts to go back to
.
Ark 2 though? What if it happens there too
Cheaters cheat when the anti cheat is abusable and CoC enforcement is known to be weak. I expect this to change in ark 2 lest the same experience play out for official folks
Ark has no anticheat
Again, still on the platform more than anything in regards to spoofing.
with ark2 there will be problems no doubt there will always be cheaters lets just hope for the best never know maybe will have a anti cheat on ark2 that works
There's only so much you can fix before it's time to just move on.
Great connection back to ark 2 😂
ye at this point ark2 is needed more than ever ark has just died litterly
visible confusion didn’t it have the highest CCU count like a month ago?
Yep
I wish I could invent things so easily 😞
i mean in general its dieing like with the new fj hawks and shit pvp has died pve will always be a thing i feel for ark
PvP to many folks has been dead since extinction
Might be having words if we don't get more cosmetics though 😂😂
(since tek)
or achievements
Less people dropped tek than you think
Nah, i know.
But tek had a lot of outrage in general
Gen1 is the 1 dlc past ext that didn't ruin pvp
YES.
facts only tek skins for some dinos was kinda sad
I hope we actually get future DLC achievements.
My biggest gripe with ARK is how non of the DLC's have achievements.
Stalkers aren't tooooo OP, only the skiff is
bought console skins 💀
I did too when they first released
you know the fuck i did it was 99cents only bough trike though kek
It is really annoying. The only achievements are from the island and the center.
shadowmanes tek suit maewings and more
Can complain about ark1 in #ark-survival-ascended though
gen2 was made during ark 2 development though
...it's not ark2
i feel that stament is true but noot at the same time because smaller tibe are able to get a start after being wiped by some mega tribe or something its just ingeneral a nice thing to have for smaller tribes/ solos and shit
who's to know the same decision making wont influence ark 2
Yeah, wished we got a achievements called "Earth's New Tomorrow" or something like that for defeating the Alpha King-Titan.
gen2 is not ark2.
Not what they said
Would've been awesome, I looked forward to a lot
gen2 is a dlc for ark 1 released after ark 2 was announced
the people who work at wild card are human 2 dont forget we all make mistakes just hopefully they learn from them and make ark2 better for everyone
Made a grilled cheese sandwich btw.
Yes they are human too
but they are a small group of developers
not tens of thousands of active players
It being released at the same time is just about the only thing it has to do with ark2, aside from lore, if you want to rant about how shitty it was to you , move to #ark-survival-ascended.
Damn, the outside bread is nice and crunchy.
But the cheese ain't melted fully yet.
Sadge.
yeah with the players comes a community base who knows if the devs actually pay attention to any of the youtube content/community and shit we dont really know all we cn do is assume
it was being made while ark 2 was being made
So...?
decision making might be similar
gen2 ruined the meta, its unbalanced
how do we know ark 2 wont be unbalanced?
It's mostly the same team. So it'll probably be similar no matter what.
because ark2 is a new start
ARK-2 is literally a new game. It has no balance other then what it'll release with to compare it to.
its a new sequel game
Comparing two games balancing issues is like comparing Fallout 1's shitty RNG based system to Fallout 3.
but both of those games are released
so we can accurately compare
we havent seen any ark 2 gameplay and its under a year away from release (supposedly)
And yet, they're two completely separate games in gameplay.
You can't really compare the two.
so leave everything that was loved about ark 1 in the trash
You can't compare the balance of a top-down turn-based RPG to a first-person action RPG.
maybe the plan is to hype ark2 up because of no game play they want to make it to where the player is able to imagine what ark2 will be
oh I'm very able to imagine what the gameplay will be like
and we have trailers so we have a base idea
assassins creed melee + GTA5 gunplay
Sure, doesn't matter anyway.
New game, new community.
Plenty of games have strayed away from their original source, and still are popular within their own communities.
Yep.
And comparing that gameplay to ARK-1's generic 'hit until dead' is (in no offence) idiotic, since they will be two totally different games.
imagine arks cutscenes in third person
boss cutscenes
Sounds fun, then i can see my character finally in third-person.
you can see your character in third person in ark 1
but the game is built around first person
which only does good for the immersion
I can finally see 'Big-d#%@ Larry 69420' that looks like Popeye kill off whatever threat is at the end of ARK-2 in STYLE!
I'm not talking about the pvp
the ascension cutscenes in ark 1 are perfection
literally perfection
Aberration? Top tier
The first person adds so much, you see your players implant on their wrist begin to do funky shit
'ARK-1' is built around first-person.
You have to let go of this concept of 'bad game cause no immersion'
Sure, immersion helps a game be better. But it's a added flavor then the main course.
im not saying its going to be bad cuz no immersion
Yep.
And that's cause ARK-1 was built around first-person.
I'm just saying its a missed opportunity
now imagine that in third
With nice cinematic shots that seem like the cutscene is from a movie?
Sign me up!
Obviously, cutscenes wont be literally a camera behind your back in cutscenes.
That'd be idiotic.
If they're doing cutscenes still, they'll be cinematic.
That's subjective.
in order to see whats happening to your characters implant you have to face the character
therefore cutting out everything ahead of your character
They're good to me, cause they got some of the best shots in the game.
Hire the right camera director, and that beauty can still be applied to a cinematic movie shot.
.
I just don't understand the benefits of third person
besides it being easier to control your character
Again, this is for ARK-1.
ARK-2 is on a alien planet with low technology. I doubt we'll see ascension cutscenes in the vain we say on Aberration.
I doubt I'll be able to look at the scenery without my character in the way
I'd imagine the cutscenes to be more like Genesis 1-2.
More informative then just 'pretty shot'
Look the argument is split
half the people dont mind it the other half hate the idea of third person
I hate the idea of third person because I dont want it to have fortnite + dark souls + ark
Why not?
Extinction's cutscene can could work with cinematic shots.
And Genesis 1-2 are more or less already cinematic, so just get some good camera shots and it's already a third-person cutscene.
Where did Fortnite come into play?
Ok I do agree extinctions one wouldnt look bad in third person
building, third person shooting
dark souls - immunity frames + melee combat
Ark 1 - dinosaurs
"Target-lock"
"combos, staggers, special attacks"
And i agree that The Island-Aberration's cutscene wouldn't look good in third-person.
But you also have to remember, ascension cutscenes are for lore-purposes.
Lore wise, the beautiful shots that we got on Aberration wont happen again (in theory) cause that was the ARK's was of launching survivors to a new ARK/Planet.
We are no longer on ARK's, and if you've noticed, we've never gotten a portal cutscene like The-Island's-Aberration's since.
Then why is the game called Ark 2
surely arks relate in some way besides the past?
Bruh, there's a major difference.
Building takes a long time in ARK, and i doubt that'll change in ARK-2.
Fortnite's building is literally instant, which is why people use them.
look either the gunplay will be GTA5 or Fortnite
I don't know any third person gunplay thats satisfying
Same reason why Halo-4 is called 'Halo' even though it has none.
Cause it's the second title of the series.
but halo is the 4th
ark is the 2nd, how come the 2nd game already takes away the main point of ark 1
Cause the ARK's job was done in Extinction.
Remember?
Their whole point was to reseed Earth.
Well, their job is done. And we're not on Earth.
Done like pvp was 😂
jkjkjk
Look I just dont feel confident with their description of the combat
the things that get me are special attacks and target lock
I would love love love LOVE LOVE parrying to become a big thing
Also, we've seen only spears as weapons......
Sooooo, i doubt we're getting guns.
And if we do, they'd be more endgame based flintlocks.
Doubtful.
pre-2017 ark
ARK-2 is a 'primarily' primitive game.
That means like 70% or 90% will be mostly Unga-Bunga.
If anything, we'd go up to Smithy based stuff.
And again, that'd be flintlock firearms.
I mean they said no tek
they didnt say no fabricator tier
Look the game will either end up as third person rust with dinosaurs or Sci-Fi Dark Souls with dinosaurs
They also did state 'primarily' primitive
And like i said, that'd be 60% to 90% Unga Bunga.
If it's 60% i can see Fabricated stuff returning.
But if it's more like 90%, then i would think we'd be barely scratching the Smithy age.
The skill based combat being much better to work with in third? The movement mechanics? Unless you want to stare at a wall while you climb it...
Primitive is also a subjective term.
Hard to know what they mean when ARK literally goes to a sci-fi tier.
Have you seen a game with first person parrying?
'i don't think rock-climbers stare at the mountain when they climb'
Who says there'll be guns?
They are trying to "redefine the survival genre"
Good for them
it wouldnt make sense for there not to be some form of gun
Ever heard of Gears of War? Or Red Dead 1&2? Or Mass Effect? I could go on
redefining would be maybe first person skill based melee combat?
It would if the game is Unga-Bunga based.
A lot of people have complained about ARK not 'being about dinosaurs and primitive survival'
So, they might've taken those complaints to a extreme.
The survivors have knowledge
They just dont want tek because its too deadly or something right?
Yeah, and it's usually bad lol
You are grasping bro
they would redefine the survival genre like they want?
Absolutely reaching
Tek itself isn't harmful, if within the right hands.
'Vindiago' doesn't want tek.
I'm not trying to start an argument lol
Its called suggesting
"what if"
Using my imagination for what it could be like in first person
Also, sure, they have the knowledge.
But it's the devs choice to decide if the materials to make guns and such are even existing in their region of the planet.
its so easy to imagine third person skill based combat
gunpowder?
You need a form of sulfur.
And I can see Sulfur existing
bout to get smoked by some form of Thingymabob in ark 2 pvp
I can also.
But i can also see it just not existing on the planet. Cause it's Wildcards planet.
Its an alien planet though right? If it has life it is likely to be not too far from earth in terms of materials
planet formation, biomes
An alien planet isn't guaranteed to have anything, hell, it might not even have rare earth metals for all we know
Or noble gases
Life has to be 'similar' to Earth. Doesn't mean it has to have all of the resources.
But it not having sulfur is weirdly specific
alien, non~carbon~based life doesn't necessarily have to live in an environment anything like what we know on Earth
you can make gunpowder sure, but a firearm requires advanced metal smelting and shaping beyond finding the raw materials
Also, this is just what we know with our current understanding of life in our universe.
Non-carbon based life can have different rules.
you seen the eoka in rust?
the tiny handmade shotgun or whatever its called
its manually set off
correct
We can speculate but there arent many probably's yet
Yep
I mean if they cut guns out the melee better be very complex
diverse weapons
different factors and stuff
Not just a couple of weapons
Kinda the reason we're saying to chill, and wait for gameplay like the rest of us 😅
Dude I'm not attacking anyone
That's where the souls-like combat would come into play.
I'm not trying to anyways, sorry if it seems like I am
but immunity frames?
Souls combat isn't complex, it's quite basic.
He.....he didn't say you're attacking anyone?
"Kinda the reason we're saying to chill"
True, but it's a lot more complex then 'wack until it's dead.'
He worded it like I'm pissed and angry and loud or something
I'm not saying you are, you're just very intense in your manner of speaking, that's all 😄
Chill doesn't = to attacking.
Well I apologise, I am an intense person I guess
Only dino that really does that is giga tbh
And every melee weapon.
Compared to current Ark combat? You must be joking...
Its less complex
Dark souls - dodge and hit
Imagine using melee weapons 🤦♂️
Ark - Net/bola shoot break armour defend
It's not quite that simple, though
Souls combat is like, the most basic it can get.
the only complex part is the weapons
Yes which is why its a comparison point for so many games
"souls-like"
Yep. And they feel lackluster.
Why i'm looking forward to a better melee system that you can hopefully rely on.
Hard disagree on that one, lol
I've played souls games a fair bit I know what the combat is like lol
Elden ring is about as complex as it gets I'm pretty sure
Almost all the weapons are practically the same thing besides unique abilities
And the pvp in every game with souls combat is aids af
Oh yea souls pvp is fucking awful
Only good for pve
It'd be a lot better if there wasn't shit like bloodhound step and all that
Which is why I dont get why wildcard are going with singleplayer mechanics for an open world multiplayer game
Then why do the Souls games have such a dedicated PvP presence? Lol
But the combat is still ass with the dodge cancels out of recovery
You seen steam player counts?
Why does ark have such a heavy pvp presence if it's "so bad"?
For which one? Elden Ring? That's because it's boring after you beat it, and they keep nerfing everything into the ground and not fixing the problem spells