#competitive_discussion
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
nah not really
just bringing and using dengo is hard
that’s honestly the only part I struggle with tbh
Ah Kingambit, love that guy
Yea that’s fine
it’s just it’s hard to set up and get into a good position
Does indeed
Arcanine-Hisui @ Choice Band
Ability: Intimidate
Level: 50
Tera Type: Normal
EVs: 252 HP / 4 Atk / 252 Spe
- Flare Blitz
- Head Smash
- Rock Slide
- Extreme Speed
Thoughts
Immediate 50% boost instead of needing one turn to set up that is usually risky
what is the HP for?
Protect is nice I’m sure, I’d know. I switched to amulet lando lol
Why would it?
I like bulk didn't wanna calc
Probably should but I’m sure the set is decent
its like, you have a multiplicative item, but you dont put the EV investment there
Yeah
Dillon you still got that specs dengo set?
not bad, but i feel more worth from putting into attack
It's less good but a waste is a stretch
yeah ig
The original item was sitrus but was too passive
LO then
But that's less damage then band and does more recoil
What if you just kill them with damage instead of trying to take the hit tho
Why would I use life orb unless I'm using a mon that also wants to protect
Arcanine has 2 quad weaknesses, why would it not want to protect sometimes😭
mine was super catered towards having Maushold support
Anyways yeah no life orb isn't happen
I think you just want enough HP/DEF to live adamant chien-pao sucker
I’m sure Dray’s spread would be fine
and then hit the SPE stat you want under tailwind (usually like 120-130ish)
and then rest in SpA
ah nvm I think it's too much HP/DEF investment to live it
damn
I think testing Dray’s spread w/ tera steel would be a good idea. Or just testing his spread without tera steel
first step when making offensive spreads is always finding the speed stat you want
I think bare minimum you want like 115-116 SPE to outspeed most Heatran/Rilla/Dragonite
i think the next one is around 140ish speed? i forgot what its for tho
oh nvm its for tailwind
What do I wanna calc to live?
First thing is Pao adamant attacks
I’ll try forcing myself into using the np set more, but if it doesn’t work I’ll make the spread
Dillon said living adamant chien sucker is too much hp/sp def
True
Maybe gambit sucker?
Might not be worth bc of dark tera glasses stuff
Probably also too much HP DEF investment
You could do -1 attack calcs and ev for some special hits
Is it tho?
fr I gotta start working on it
I just find it interesting
I hate it
Tedious and annoying
Coming up with a good spread is the best feeling in the world
I’m in love with my wellspring spread
i prefer winning
Good spreads win you games
proper EV spread can get you a lot of benefits, rather than just 252 at stats, or copying other stats.
since most likely the team you have had different idea
I win games 😊😊😊
jk I really gotta get better at making spreads
they’re just so annoying for me to make
that’s what I’m doin rn
yea but making spreads and being sure in what they do is cracked
I needa make dengo work
amoonguss and dengo are crazy together
Also have harc and moon for tw and intim support
Idk why I can’t make it work
cuz ur using amoonguss
im just running Moon-Dengo with Clef
then go FWG with Rilla/HArc/Urshifu
its free
What’s wrong with moonguss?
Clefairy has better horizontal synergy
Gholdengo/Amoonguss looks at Chi Yu and cries
So clef over amoonguss?
well I kinda like amoonguss as it s a good switch into flutter
I have moon and darkshifu
Hi Tofu
Bo3 anyone?
Hi everyone 🙂
I’d absolutely love some helping making a garganacl team.
I love the bulk and ability.
Does anyone have a spare Modest Mint? I can give a mint in return.
BRO IM PLAYING SGAINST THIS FUCKING STALLER
RIMER STALLER WAITS TILL HE HAS 5 SECONDS LEFT AND THEN MOVES
AND ITS BO3
I’m so fucking brain rotted
Been playing pretty shit
I think ima try specs dengo
👀
we talked about hybrid teams
and someone else in another made a tailroom team I want too
Its probably going to be difficult
Old sets was Salt Cure/Protect/Recover/Wide Guard
Youd run Leftovers
Right now I think I can actually recommend Heavy Slam over Wide Guard so you can force Flutter Mane out
You’d probably want some semblance of a defensive typing due to Urshifu Water and Rillaboom being so prevalent
Dragon Teras are alright, id honestly also consider Fire if you have no orher way to deal with Chi-Flutter
I like how you have
Perish Song Specs
knowing full well
You probably wont click it
sjhshs
I won't click power gem
L
I don't like the tailroom team after a few games lmao
bozo
Razzle dazzled
Fuck it
L rizz
I'm actually finna ladder with a team
after i got back from lab, sure 
sure canndo
based
watching wolfey until people show up
@mighty stump
the fast and aggressive starter pack
YOu do not need 4
Dusclops used Night Shade!
(The opposing Flutter Mane lost 38% of its health!)
Ursaluna used Hyper Voice!
(The opposing Flutter Mane lost 62% of its health!)
(The opposing Iron Hands lost 12% of its health!)
The opposing Flutter Mane fainted!
The opposing Iron Hands fainted!
redstonejesus won the battle!
redstonejesus's rating: 1152 → 1172
(+20 for winning)
ZPokeProfessor's rating: 1086 → 1067
(-19 for losing)
I razzled his dazzle
So ya about that, I just lost using Chi-Yu and it telepprted me to a center. Is there no way around that?
nope
Dam. So the gring can just end an hour in if you're unlucky?
I don't die because im ev'd for it
Did you run Specs Modest Chi-Yu
Ohhhh I've been putting amulet coin on for more money. Should've done that
But ya I'm evd into max SpA and Modest. Guess I should slap on specs
its not going to work
Why's that
you need amulet coin for the max ammount of money
and you need level 100 and specific evs for the money farm
you can't just slap anything into the tournament and farm money
I'm level 100 and maxed out SpA and Spe evs. I asked earlier what you guys use and I was told Chi-Yu and Pixilate Hyper Voice Slyveon
yes but you can't just max max
you will die to any mon that survives and hit and have to start over
Oh btw have you seen the VGC meme rant that I typed up earlier
Do I have permission to post a text wall
I wanna make sure you're absolutely okay with it
Sylveon @ Amulet Coin
Ability: Pixilate
Tera Type: Fairy
EVs: 76 Def / 252 SpA / 180 Spe
Modest Nature
IVs: 0 Atk
- Hyper Voice
Use this. Only thing that kills it is a lucky freeze from Swalot Ice Punch - very rare.
Sylveon is more stable. Chi-Yu with no defense EVs is gonna die somewhere
Make sure to hypertrain IVs as well
Yea
You actually can slap about anything lvl 100 with a strong move and decent stats, ends up deleting lower lvl Mons by a wide stretch
Nothings going on atm so
you can not I have tried it
Ty in advance 
greencross has given 1 Gen Rep to woodtofu
one or two lives a hit and ohko the mon
Pokémon VGC Rant
• TPC wants more people to get interested into competitive? Great, awesome, makes sense. How are they doing that?
• ABSOLUTELY NOTHING
• Official format is doubles? How about <1% of story battles in doubles format?
• Take the time to build a Pokémon school in almost every generation
• Teach NOTHING about doubles, let alone competitive, great planning
• Lots of other places make you backtrack, why not constantly add new stuff to teach in the school
• Zero reason to go back to the school, when there’s so much you can teach
• Get your casual fanbase interested in your competitive scene
• Nowhere for them to learn about it
• Sure, they can go to YouTube, but why not introduce at least the basics in the game?
• How do they know who’s good to watch? What do they even know what they need to learn about?
• Why are people always talking about Eevees and Eyevees, what does that have to do with my Pokémon?
• How come other people’s Pokémon have better stats than mine, what did I do wrong?
• What are bottle caps even good for?
• ALL of the info databases for them are located outside the game
• Half of these aren’t even good info and have misinformation
• Okay okay, that aside. They go to YouTube, learn a little bit, want to try it out
• NOW THERE’S NO BATTLE TOWER
• Where are people going to test things out in low-stakes battles?
• Not even a consistent way to do double battles in the game regularly, smh
• Go on the in-game ladder? Get bodied by the people who have experience and know what you’re doing
• Incredible, now the new players are discouraged in themselves
• What a great way to build your competitive player-base, round of applause
Lmfao
On the bright side
I was saying early in SV's release
You can tell who went to the academy or not
I mean, the info they give there is negligible
Fairly
this is fantastic bait
If you willfully try with bad Mons yeah I get that, but a starter can wreck them, pseudo legendaries can and so on
Based
alright

Its worse when people just parrot stuff
Without applying their own critical thinking
I'm glad I have the comp channel's approval on this
💯
pokemon legitimately is still awful for beginners imo
Tbh being bodied by better players is like one of the best ways you can learn
I wrote 26 pages of information just so I could compile SOMETHING
I also am 100% okay with you guys meme'ing this in here LOL
it takes alot of time for teams, and there is a lack of resources
Not when you don't have any idea what's going on, cause reviewing games is a skill initself
And again, that's still a knowledge barrier
This. Right here. You learn from losses, but only if you understand why you lost. If you're just new and getting wrecked that doesn't help you
the best way to learn imo is coaching or the more serious poketubers
You're not even reviewing games at this point, you're learning what is bodying you (like strong Mons in the format, maybe you grow your distaste for legendary spamming meta also and discover it ain't for you)
I dont think getting demolished with no feedback is good for anyone
that just makes new players quick because its "bullshit"
You're not looking at it from a complete starters point of view here. Not everyone just wants to hard lose every game to learn
That's why I make it a point to ease anyone in without slapping meta teams in their face if they wanna build with something
me as a player rn getting crapped on by a pro would probably help me because I can review games
One thing I discussed with my coach was to not put too much thoughts into reviewing games and instead focusing on the next one cause you can't win them all even if you did everything perfect in your honest perspective
If my boxing coach just decked me 10x across the face rather than telling me after 1x to keep my hands up I probably would be wondering "why the fuck does anyone find this enjoyable"
Who's your coach?
Justin Tang
Then I disagree with Justin Tang
Wow I disagree with justin tang that is wild
I think you need to mix reviewing gameplay and the mentality of there is always next game
I think both of those mentalities have merit, but just repeating it without understanding the full context of it lacks merit.
Then again they're a young prodigy lol, that's why I was interested in peaking into their mindset
That statement does not infer you should just ignore all past games, and I highly doubt Tang does.
Justin Tang definitely reviews games
Especially during labbing sessions
Especially for flowcharts
You should absolutely treat each match as an individual instance to reduce likelihood of tilting and miring in self-defeating mentality.
Getting in more games vs spending time reviewing the past
Don't get hung up on that you lost to a freeze and go to the next match, but you need to still understand why you losee.
Just getting in games is not the biggest benefit.
I know plenty of players who play way more games than me but they have less success
You're misunderstanding me cause mindlessly spamming games isnt productive either since at most you get pattern recognition
My point is a combination of both, and being able to review your games
Is important
I never said mindlessly spamming games though
Nah, you play a couple of games then you stop, win or lose
Even if its one or two thoughts

???
Keeps the mind sharper and you're less prone to tilting
Even if I have loss streak, it ain't a huge one. If it's a win streak, then I seal it and don't risk blemishing it with a loss
But that's completely subjective and also outwith the scope of reviewing vs playing, as some people can retain mental through hours of VGC
I feel heavily into the trap of caring about a number
its bad enough that if my elo is low I can't accept praise from others
I feel that reviewing games is really useful for specific matchups you want to go over again. but reviewing all games like a robot isn't going to cut it for me.
but if you study the craft you will get better
Theory vs practice
also that isnt what tofu said
there is a middle ground here
you need to mix practice and study
I hear what others say, just sharing my mindset
And how I grew it with two sessions with my coach so far
Makes sense
I do agree with the aspect that at trhe end of the day game experience is the highest bang for your buck to learn
You could teach the theory to someone over and over again, but if they don't use it then it's meaningless. I vastly prefer making the errors and having proactive thoughts on the spot (like I should I've done this over that after the turn plays out).
Instead of going to review the game and realizing the mistake, but that's not a skill everybody has when they play the game. I was ''lucky'' enough to have Singles experience and already knowing a lot of basic info about Pokemon that translates into Doubles.
Yeah, so middle ground
In the same sense that someone getting beat senseless wouldnt gain any valuable experience out of it if the mindset isnt established beforehand
and would instead feel discouraged to even play
And I see this all the time
Mindset is big though
The way I see it is making it so I'm immune to tilt and only seek fun through competing vs myself
Yes, but that mindset cannot apply to everyone
Especially (in my experience as well) a neurodivergent-skewed hobby
ofc, that comes down to knowing yourself which... is harder when you're a child vs a fully grown adult vs a teen
wdym with that, not too sure what you're actually referring to
Basically people who have altered brain functionality
Its an interesting trend I noticed
What does that have to do with the hobby ?
So they have different strengths/challenges
it means alot of people with neurodivergency happen to play pokemon its not a comment on the hobby
Because certain mindsets can be difficult to achieve with neurodivergency
and VGC is a very mental heavy hobby
Just a side comment
Nothing much really
Gotcha, I wasn't sure where you were going with that
It's something I like a lot but it's so vague and unprecise. Covers a lot of ground bundled up together.
Then you start coming with labels and patterns, giving recognition while not ostracizing

sorry im a little dense what is vague and unprecise?
We're only starting to dig into our brain matter. Neurodivergence stands for a whole lot of things that are not that similar. Like how ADHD and autism can fall under that category without being the same thing. If someone says they're neurodivergent, you've got no clues what they actually are trying to tell you they are right.
Nintendo WII
heres the thing autism and adhd have alot of overlap though
a few of these neurodivergent disorders have overlap
Having overlaps doesn't make them 100% similar trust me
Yeah I mean the term neurodivergent directly implies that they are diverged from the normal composition of the average psyche
nobody said they are
That's why that term is used. It's supposed to be general.
I didn't say you implied anything. Just the term itself is supposed to be general and that's why it exists.
no jaySP
Ah
also this not everyone for sure but in my personal expirence neurodivergent just means autism to people
Realistically this probably isn't the right talk for this channel. And I doubt we're any authorities on the matter, either.
We've had worse topics so honestly
if you mean im not a doctor no
Bar is in hell
I speak with expirence though
Not an expert on the matter but I did get my BA as a Nurse and I stopped a masters in psychology during pandemic
I can speak a few things on the topic without feeling out of my league
I am someone with audhd so I also feel like I can comment as well
Commenting is welcomed from everyone right, as long as it's not pure bashing/hatred.
I just meant mine holds atleast a little weight is all
No comment cause Tofu is not neurodivergent
It's hard to get properly diagnosed in the 1st place and we lack enough ressources to support most of them once they're ''found''
Im lucky enough to be very clearly neurodivergent and diagnosed as a child
mental health stuff in general is nightmare
between lack of resources and general stigma
There's a saying in English I fell in love with : There is method to my madness
I could rant on this forever, I so badly want to help the whole world but you just can't
Yeah I agree
I wish I was equipped to help others
the closest I get is the small victories in here
You got dealt your genes at birth, good luck
thanks
you know what feels great
Having people in here ping me with teams they played and saying they climbed with it
Even the smallest improvement is a victory
solo Dozo ? what's the set ?
max max what lol, I've got not clues
HP SpDef
what about the moveset/item
Yawn/Curse/Liquidation/Protect
Rest is actually standard Dozo stuff
Interesting, looks like a good defensive thingy I might want to give a shot to
I've been very curious about TatsuDozo gimmick in itself but I don't feel comfy using it
But solo Dozo looks pretty solid
https://pokepast.es/3ab3a9169ce35f53 loving this team even though im bad at piloting it
working on some notes for it
Lando learns Brick Break
not even considering that tbh
it's ran a surprising amount on the little ghost
ig
ig ?
ye
what is this acronym supposed to stand for ?
i gues
lol
very neutral
Subject to change
rockpon and tealpon sad
I wanted them in S or A
I feel like Amoonguss is not that rare to see and Heatran is clearly meta defining
im not sure it is tbh
Look at Chi-Yu usage vs Heatran
Chi-Yu needs to be babysitted by Mane, Heatran can sit alone
harc is used more then amoongus I dont think harc is meta shaping
it absolutely does not
Harc I can't speak much not using it but it's been winning regionals a whole lot
It's in there, Urshi water is at 24% for october on showdown and dark is 10%
yeah that is less then most of excellent and meta shaping tier lmao
That's quite close to Chi-Yu
dusclops is excellent and has like 1%?
Chi-Yu is 14%
that is my point
alot of the excellent and top tiers mon don't have the usage to match
Urshifu Dark is like the compression for Pao-Urshifu Water basically
its different from pao and rapid
pao is an enabler
urshifu is a water type sweeper, durishfu is a dark type sweeper
Dark doesn't need the enabler since it gets better priority right
You get the sucker from pao and the same base power as urshi water
but rapid doesnt need pao either
Dark shifu doesn't want to sit next to Pao
3% Pao usage with Dark shifu
but usage does teach us some things
its not concrete enough to be the end all be all
realistically content creators could influence usage
if usage is not concrete then what is concrete ?
nothing
meta game is alot of opinions
I think all 4 ogerpons are strong enough to be at worst A tier
others don't agree with me
Isn't metagame the act of using real world information to play the game (like stats or tournament results)
kind of
but also I can't just base a tierlist off usage because then every one is the same
i mean, going of meaning of meta defining is metagame defining right
so what defines the meta would be stuff that wins more
yes shaping stuff around it
and not opinions imo
but that's not objective and ever changing
im not going to put harc in S tier because its winning 4 regionals
How are stats not objective ?
because winning a tournament doesnt equal power theres a million things that go into that
But how can stats not be objective ?
because vgc isnt black and white
yes objectively harcanine is wining more
but harcanine isnt objectively better then hands
I'm not talking specifics here
I'm curious as to what makes stats not objective to you
I think stats just give you a snapshot of what the meta is. Opinion and experience shape it further
Sure, the game being math
Means some things are OBJECTIVELY going to be better options for their niches
But when you get to higher levels of play this whole this better than that doesn't really
Work
brambleghast is another good example
Flutter Mane Iron Hands Lando and all top usage Mons stop working in higher lvl of play or you mean something else ?
I mean lower usage mons can find play and place highly despite statistics showing otherwise is more indicative that player skill and educated teambuilding is valuable and statistics dont tell the whole story
and vice versa, just because something placed highly/retained results
doesnt make it objectively good
Its why I can disagree with a lot of top players
Cause the key point as well would then be preference
But if something places high frequently and regularly (like many top 8-16-32 in different tournaments) wouldn't it just be a straight better option than most stuff not doing so ?
Again, aforementioned example like Brambleghast
It placed fairly higly at some big tours, and Worlds even
Farigiraf, also got 2nd place and high results consistently
But its 7% in usage
Brambleghast being 3% when it was in its relevant metagame
Iron Bundle, objectively very good pokemon, high placing, consistent results
10% usage
Kommo-o finding its niche and winning a regionals
3.9%
anything sub 15% isnt even metagame anymore at that point
baxcalibur
2.93%
I think dusclops is insanely good on trick room
2.43%
That's just the generally accepted area
That's pretty common no
two teams
But you're actively making the choices for one team
If I have Bundle on my team I see it 100% of the time?
You're still only accounting what you expecting to see.
It doesnt matter if you use it or not
It counts toward usage no ?
But im not playing against myself?
Does it count toward usage ?
When you're looking at stats and what to consider in teambuilding you're considering what matchups youre facing
Why would you consider the usage of your own mons
10% is one in 10
So if usage consider what is on one team, you always have two teams in every game still
and the likelihood you as an individual removed from the measure are to encounter one matchup
What is based on then lol...
If usage is not based on games then what's the calc derivative coming from
Okay
look at tournaments the teams aren't listed in pairs
Tournament usage would be different than ladder usage though
I'm talking about ladder usage since I don't play tournament
Tournament results also shape the metagame?
Lol
It applies to ladder
Teams that win get run on the ladder all the time
ladder usage is based off one team at a time
Yes tournaments results, but usage stats for ladder
Its also the more likely used teams
On rentals
As they will be compiled
So they enter the ladder
Which adds to the usage stats
I don't understand how thats mutually exclusive
Stats can be complex to break down
Like how I dont understand how you deciding what one side of the statistics wouldnt be inflating what you're actually expecting to see
If you're not a third party in the match, you would only be viewing it from the drivers seet
You wouldnt be saying "how likely would I see a red car in traffic" and include your own red car that you drive around in
within that statistic
Cause id just always see a red car: mine
Aren't they usage statistics ?
Isn't the derivate total usage/all games played
I looked at the statistics without ever having played one game, 1st link I saw here was munchstats
It will be a total derived usaged of all games played
But you'd definitely also be counted as a unique individual
and your own piloting wouldnt stack the usage
If me out of 100 people used brambleghast
Me playing more games than everyone else
Wouldnt increase Brambleghast's usage
within that 100 people
If you played 25% of the total games
It doesnt matter
Then that Pokemon would see more total usage %
Its still counted out of 100 teams
In stats
and out of 100 teams
You would see
1 Brambleghast
Your greater use wouldnt stack
But the usage statistics, are they using all games or your perspective ?
they are using teams not games
Teams are playing games still
my guy its teams
They're together
no they aren't
So having a team and not playing any games woudl count in usage stats ?
Again, each individual would be counted as a unique individual stat
That doesn't sound logic to me
Not talking about inflation here
I am
Because its relevant
You're saying the more an individual plays
The more it will increase a usage stat
not an individual, the more a specific Pokemon is played
Would inflate that Pokemon usage but it would make sense
The more a specific pokemon is played, its still going to fall to general group of individuals
and said group can only
be counted
once
you cannot count multiples within that group of people, im not counting each individual more than once
Is there a post on smogon detailing how stats are compiled actually ?
I have 10 teams with ogerpon if you counted every team of mine it inflates that number
I'd be curious to see the maths behind their method
vgc isnt smogon
Ima ask showdown chat to be fair, better odds to get proper answer there about what counts in the mix
usage stats for ladder is smogon/showdown too
smogon would be singles usage specifically
keep me posted
Find out Latest Pokemon Showdown Usage Statistics. Most Pokemon Showdown formats supported!
that's vgc on showdown
I said showdown
They're using showdown data
I see
yeah that is switch ranked
I just said that yeah
So munchstats isn't using Pikalytics
Munchstats uses showdown, Pikalytics uses Home and showdown
ok so if i use fluttermane and it has 50% usage I see it in every game?
In every game on one side
no thats's not true
If you were to watch games as a viewer
I have played games without flutter
Yeah it's not 100%
But as a viewer you wouldnt be considering the matchups?
You're piloting?
Since youre palying in the matchup youre only encountering 1 team at a time
but your team example would make it 100%
Why couldn't I look at games and consider statistics ?
no, if it's not being used 100% it's not 100%
Because the statistics are for prep matchups?
??????????????????????????????????????
and you'd be expected to be
playing in the match
if youre teambuilding
To account for it
?
The stats are usage stats. What you do with them is a different thing.

god.
If Bundle has 10% usage and you expect it to appear 1/5 matches becuase of two teams
So you expect Flutter to appear 100% of the time because theres two teams?
at its 50% usage?
what don't you get ?
your logic
^
if you are a outside spectator jay
there is a 50% you see fluttermane in a game ONCE OR TWICE
on one team or both
I've been told this on showdown, Incin was something like 75-85% at some point. That meant you were highly likely to encounter it on both sides of the field if you viewing any particular game.
What did I walk into lol
there is a 50% chance you see mane in a game
NO ITS NOT
Thats 75%/85% chance per match?
Incineroar is then counted uniquely
?

You dont count two incineroars as a different incineroar
If youre then playing in the matchup
Youre not counting your own incineraor
So how is Bundle's usage 1/5
good question
at 10%
Not different, same entry still
???
right so that game is one game with incin you literally just debunked yourself
this came from someone else
I did not debunk anything, this just proving what I say
they're wrong
how are they wrong

Yes that is if you fix your team
no
Not what I'm sayinfg
The viewer perspective would still be assuming you as an individual are planning to play in matches.
You're not encountering two teams at once
Because the moment you play
No just viewer
Not planning your team here, just watching games
And looking at stats, you count both teams
no you don't
But what value do you as a viewer have to look at stats to not look at it.
To not use it
They exist
The moment you use the data you remove yourself and fix the data
And you're just a viewer
Because you always have to view it from a player's PoV
Even from a third party article
If you're enforcing it but that is bias
I talk about usage stats
Im talking about their use and relevant, if you want to see it purely from a viewer with completely 0 reference to them
Then yes, you would be looking at two unique teams at a time since you have no idea what they are, but it would still be objectively wrong to tell a player participating in matches an inflated stat due to a "viewer" persepctive
The entire point of the bank is to inform players
And from a viewer perspective
The teams individually
Would still be an x% chance
x referring to the current usage stat
I'm talking about usage stats here, not what the player does with them
and you have two teams per game
See, the usage stats here are not viewed as "per game"
Each individual is just that, an individual
You don't pair up teams per match and then include that both as a usage stat
Each team as its separate entity
"per game" usage stats would then be different from your "viewer" perspective
Watching games dont change the treatment of the teams as separate entitites for data compilation
Muchstats was created as a temporary alternative to Pikalytics while people waited for it to be updated too.
its still a per individual, non-per game basis
Yeah they fed the showdown data to a simple website, it's fantastic

isnt showdown open source?
ok ima this simple, bundle is 10%. so it's 10% to see a bundle on a team right ?
no
its 10% to see a bundle in the game
your example doesnt work
because with your logic the usage stat PER TEAM would 20%
yeah no
yes man you don't dictate this
well no if it's 10% it's not 20%
on a single team
what tofu said is what it's about % on team using the mon
and that it doesn't double team usage in single game
tofu is literally saying what i am he agrees
you're not saying the same thing
yes we literally are
???
if you go into a game with bundle both team don't count towards the number
ima ask tofu in DM, this is becoming too confusing
Im
Not interested
In furthering this discussion
I think
I'm just gong
To go our separate ways with our opinions
I just want to clarify 1 thing
What 1 thing
Hai chat
Hey leafy
Red confuses me by answering on your behalf
What did Red say
Bundle is 10% and you're looking at enemy team
What are you guys on about
So Bundle is 10% to appear in any game if you are not counting your team
Right ?
You expect to see Bundle 10% of the time
On the enemy side. Now if you're a viewer and you look at both sides, can you expect to see Bundle in 1/5 of the games you spectate given there are two teams.
I'm asking tofu or I'll showdown
Because showdown users know better about usage statistics lmao
Jay you just need to look up probability math you can’t add them
I'm concused I'm going then
showdown knows SOOOO much
jay thinks bundle being at 10% doubles because of two teams on the field have that mon
What bundle
no I'm asking, that's why I wanted to DM tofu and not ask you
this is what you are arguing for
because you don't understand usage stats vs view looking at stats
that isnt how it works
Each team has to be treated as a separate case. You don't combine their probabilities
You can combine probabilities
NO you can't
yes you can
That's not how the math behind the statistics works
What bundle!
You can add 15 to each value. Doesn't mean you should.
iron bundle its just an example leafy
This is going nowhere, thanks for trying guys
we are arguing over how usage is calculated
I was gonna say iron bundle?
I mean they explained it correctly.
They gave you the facts about how the math works and you basically said "nuh uh" and puffed up your chest
iron bundle is expected in 10% of games iirc which means there is a 10% chance to see iron bundle in a game either on one team or both
no you don't get the viewer perspective I'm talking about
let's just not go further it's all good
if we count both it would blow up to 20%
The last person to say nuh uh was monke
jay said 10% somehow is 1/5 games or whatever
You don't just add things that don't apply to it. Viewer perspective is not counted. You don't count replays again. You don't treat both teams as a batch case of 20%, or 1/5
Okay
no that is not what I said, that is why I wanted to ask tofu and not you
I use bundle on my other team
I can reply to your message my guy
do you like it?
I haven't used it much
No ones challenged 😔
"Something with 10% usage means you'll see it every game in 5"
With viewer perspective
And that things weak as fuck if I use it against random people
viewer perspective isnt counted
And the games also don't add up together. So you wouldn't effectively see it 1/5, or even 1/10
Each game is an individual case of 10%, but it doesn't mean you meet a bundle once in every ten games because that's not how probabilities work.
The only thing holding my team is zoroark

tbh I got that second part wrong my bad
im wrong here too
I'm supposed to tera the zoro but I tera the bax
I like the loaded dice
But what I like is leftovers and snow being set up
I wonder if I could make my team to have grassy terrain
Spectator?
10% chance, 2 teams
but this was an argument about usage calculated for showdown
^
why change the argument randomly to make an irrelevant point?
Omg why then
Idk I didn’t read anything until recently so if he changes it I can’t answer. Just answering what’s the chance you see a bundle in a match of 2 teams
all of this stemmed from me saying I dont use usage to do my tierlist fully btw
I said high usage doesnt equate to being better necessarily
And besides, chances of seeing a team as a spectator is a factor that isn't relevant in usage statistics. Usage statistics only track how much an individual mon is clocked on team and the pertinent info therein
then it turned into this
How do you know the usage of iron bundle
pikalytics
100% agree
or this website https://www.munchstats.com/
Find out Latest Pokemon Showdown Usage Statistics. Most Pokemon Showdown formats supported!
I used to think valiant was the strongest
Oh from there

also wouldnt mane get bolstered up to 100% at point?
Mane Is the most used on my opinion
it is
Oh it is
its a little over 50% usage
It's not an opinion - yeah
an opinion is me thinking iron hands the best pokemon in vgc rn
But yeah Mane doesn't get 100% chance to appear in a single match just because there are two teams.
I got rid of mine should I not
You can always get another
Imo iron hands is fantastic glue
decent offensive, crazy bulky, recovery, AND fake out
It’s the same function I posted above. 50% chance on one team is 75% on either
🤔
alr. tbh I dont understand the math you posted
and im fuzzy on probability as a whole
It checks out. You don't just add two percentages together, but rate does go up if you factor two cases together.
Realistically for usage stats, all cases are factored individually
Well I use rillaboom for fake out
thats super goood too
Trying to determine probability of what you'll see as a spectator in fluid matches is totally separate from usage stats
Haha
Thanks
🙄
Well I had to go do cake shit but the usage stats are never considering thay PoV
So its irrelevant either case either way
so is it just bundle is on 10% of teams?
Im never preparing for a match thinking “im gonna see bundle on either side of the field
Yes.
prepping for the game was not the root of my question though
I was really curious about usage stats and their impact on the viewer perspective
Well then 1) there was a profound misunderstanding and 2) highly irrelevant because its tailored to players
you phrased it as an assertion imo
The chance to see an individual thing on a selection of two teams is greater than base usage stats but it does not alter the usage.
It's still 10% in the case of Bundle.
my bad if it was a genuine question I apologize
I did mention viewer perspective a whole bunch
tbf I did try to tell you it doesnt matter to usage
It does matter to me if I'm asking 😉
Viewer perspective is irrelevant when talking about usage statistics on Munchstats/Pikalytics.
And as a viewer:
- Why would I be watching and gathering information I would never use
That's why people didn't understand what you were going on about
Only to then compile it from your own perspective
Making it irrelevant to actual hobby executioners
You're not gathering information, you're just watching games and trying to get % of what you can see
out of usage stats
Those games are such a small percentage of actual games that your control group is too small to get a real picture
this was about munchstats that isnt how it works
Your results will be wrong
Now im confused
Turns out you can multiply them to some degree
How would watching games not be gathering information
This guy lol
Usage stats, you're viewing the Mons being used but not actively playing
And thats
is your question about how showdown compiles usage?
Welcome to the club
Not gathering information?
what is happening
This I got the discord of someone who does it, I'm gonna ask them personnally
This is trying to fit a square peg into a round hole, my man
if that is how showdown compiles then idk man
that makes no sense
is ally switch a prio move? 
yeah
Someone has to code stuff on showdown, this is who I want to ask my questions. The code will contain the answer.
You're gonna try to bother a dev on Showdown to ask how Pikalytics and Munchstats compiles usage statistics?
Hey drago
https://pokepast.es/2eb1c84fb4496a4f I put a bit of the team together and red fixed it up
Good you?
Shifu can be adamant
jolly scard 252 speed is a bit too much no?
Oh I forgot I haven't changed the mints 💀
btw tofu im gonna not be verbally responsive for a second im going to get food
I haven't changed the mints
Ahagaggagsgayaays
nvm even with jolly max speed scard urshifu its 240ish
You’re learning don’t beat yourself up lol
@mighty stump should I send the Amazon links
No
What?
Is glimmora any good in competitive?
Man
I engaged in a pointless discussion and now I ruined my rep on VGCtwt
Lol
frfr
You didn’t clarify if you were the spectator or not was the problem
who would be the best sticky web user in scarlet?
my booster mane
lives iron head komoo
with 30% chance 
yeah
sp A boosted mane
standard paonite (i think?)
still a sp Atk boosted flutter
https://pokepast.es/d629ec63f6da41a6
mb shouldve just posted the pokepaste
ill go sleep first, thanks for the stream and game
Not that deep
Its funny
im b ased

Happy bday
W
if you still need the answer it's ribombee
rhx
np
Has or will glammora have any impact on competitive play in your guys opinions?
it definitely had impact on VGC and still is useful on some teams
idk what happened but i did not expect dragonite to be so good this gam
like idk why more ppl arent running non paonite teams
it doesnt need pao lol
inner focus AV dragonite is a beast
Thx babe
dollarmonke has given 1 Gen Rep to woodtofu
Good to know you're praying for me
missing AV Dnite
my only regional day 2 so far was with that gorgeous pokémon
maushold + AV dragonite, just super fang tera blast through everything hahaha
@next stump lemme send you something
Also I bodied Nontaro in a bo3 with it so you know
https://pokepast.es/896ab5f1d81aa2b7 Ive changed the Moon set already but same item
Terra blast? Not terra normal Espeed? Lol
I mean its also great for finishing off a prio user but fair loo
I actually run a terra normal extreme speed AV dragonite and it's amazing lol
can someone rate my showdown play
ill sent the link to the replay in dms if u wanna rate it i need to hear others opinions
ill also send my team
I still ran extreme speed but it doesn’t synergize super well with maus
super fang moves after e speed
can you rate my team? ill send it to u
im kinda new to competitive
https://pokepast.es/aae2ce01e5f7e4f3 im running dnite here what do you think of running shifu and clear amulet lando
Can anyone advise a tool to calculate polemons IV?
post it here
type vgc damage calc into google, the nerdofnow website is great
Thx mate
_gnirps has given 1 Gen Rep to mlbd
Keep forgetting ground moves can’t hit flying types but flying moves can hit ground types 😩😩
There is no way Ursaluna can actually take advantage of the speeds here, and you lose your control when you run into something like Farigiraf or a dark type
Arcanine is essentially a dead slot, 0 pressure output from that thing
and you hvae wasted EVs on Murkrow with Brave Bird thats gong to either break sash or just KO yourself
armadd
oh yeah thats actually kinda true
arcanines supposed to be a support, its been pretty helpful when murkrow goes down. i use helpingg hand and population bomb and i kill most things if i hit it
although kingambit also might work
but then i dont want to lose to heat wave
oh wait yeah eq
- Your opponent can freely ignore Arcanine and just focus on deleting Maushold, and with the power creep we've had, that's going to be pretty easy
- In that board position of both Arcanine and Maushold, you just lose to Flutter Mane
true, flutter mane is a problem
Just tera, and you have bulk anyways
ive been trying to find ways around it

