#Auto Aim Live Test

3550 messages · Page 4 of 4 (latest)

stark void
#

Making gold rounds not gold rounds was oddly controversial at the time i seem to remember. Not comparing but I just remember being surprised as the "other side" even really existing

cold badger
#

Yeah its comical sometimes , one buddy had a whole flock of bots looking like a pack of dogs chasing the owners hand with a treat in it lmfao

stark void
#

No clue, i know very little behind the way bots work

tacit nova
#

For example look at this, a bot was following my every move even if i was never detected, even tried to kill me in the end XD that needs adjustment XD

#

@hybrid fjord Screw you 🤣

stark void
#

I'd argue there is a clear difference between "here is a bunch of changes we want to make, let us know what you think" and "here is a thing we want to test, we have no plans to introduce this but we want to see the outcome".

tacit nova
#

I Genuinely jumped! i was scared for my liiiiife

hybrid fjord
thin shell
left stratus
craggy stag
#

Shrimply a Krill issue 🦐

hybrid fjord
vast onyx
craggy stag
#

That would be nice.

cold badger
left stratus
hybrid fjord
tacit nova
vast onyx
craggy stag
craggy stag
#

Someone at WG flipped the wrong switch-

hybrid fjord
stark void
tacit nova
vast onyx
west hare
#

Not exactly "on topic" but why don't the devs give us a splash screen stating what /when there is a public test going on and what specifically is changing for said test?

I've seen a lot of social media with players absolutely clueless as to why the game play mechanics "aren't working correctly". And you can't rely on Friday twitch streams to reach the masses.

stark void
stark void
cold badger
# stark void I'd argue there is a clear difference between "here is a bunch of changes we wan...

Well I for one think this sucks 😕 if I want to play a war gaming game with an irritating aim ill go play WoW legends , WoT modern armor is already a pain with fore mention outline and colors issues . ( thats why I love those ice camouflage skins from the winter event at least there is one tank on the enemy team ill be able to make out through bushes , shrubs , trees and 72 other cluttered obstructions ) . Sorry if this all sounds like im ranting , I try to sprinkle some lols in with the salt .

#

It probably makes me sound more salty but meh I try to keep the giggles up dang it lol

west hare
stark void
stark void
cold badger
cold badger
hybrid fjord
#

Mr 340heat BFG is a cool dude

craggy stag
#

Heat using 1% of his power.

cold badger
#

Im just saying I am 43yo and have been gaming since 1987 . . . . I just got disarmed like a noob ! No diff !

stark void
# cold badger The equivalent of a judo flip , disarm and total pacification lol

I'm sure some of my rants before i was demoted to staff annoyed some perhaps now colleagues lol. But I always tried to keep it constructive, and somehow ended up working here.

Long as people don't go overboard in terms of being offense/rude/etc. Anything could contain useful stuff, seems counter productive to ignore it coz someone had passion behind what they wanted to say.

cold badger
#

Heat for King of earth 2026 !!!

bold crag
#

Can’t you buy gold rounds with silver now? Weren’t they paid in gold at one time. Anyone can grind silver my gosh cw u can make 70-200k a game easy

stark void
tacit nova
stark void
#

Buttttttt also, let's drop that here and keep it on topic 🙂 can continue in general if needed 😅

tacit nova
cold badger
# stark void Correct, the name gold rounds is because they were once gold only. The complaint...

I want to sincerely thank you , im an old fart and I tend to be a tad too quippy ( yeah gonna go with that for purposes of not being banned lol ) on some subjects but I have never seen someone level the field as masterful like you did . Mad props for that and for the player perspective that completely threw me off like Whaaaaaa 😲 . If the rest of the industry had your mindset i think we would be rather close to Ready Player One at this point . The industry needs more of you . Thank you , gonna go brag about you to the rest of our little pack ... they ain't gonna believe this without screenshot for real .

stark void
#

Glad I could help 🙂

solemn trail
#

fauto faim

left stratus
# stark void If it makes X% change, and then you can make an accurate predictions of the chan...

So you all are planning on doing a test with auto lock with curret equipment and skills(current test). Then revert auto lock to old status when equipment changes. Then nerf auto lock again when enough data is collected on just new equipment and skills with old auto lock to get accurate data across the board?
Im asking this because you can't test 2 variables at once that's now how it works and is indeed how you get irrelevant data.

left stratus
left stratus
tacit nova
left stratus
ocean beacon
ocean beacon
#

Thanks I guess?

cunning ocean
tall bone
#

I like the idea of a +/-1 test. I honestly don't understand the problem that some have with BOT games/lobbies nor do I understand the problem people have with others just wanting to play this game as they have for almost 12 years for fun without worrying about stuff like stats.

I'm not trolling I truly don't get it. I read the comments & they make no logical sense to me why people get so upset with how others want to enjoy their game & free time.

south idol
south idol
queen dove
#

In a game like cod or BF6 (when it launches), these players would be irrelevant

It’s only because this game is so niche, and the community is so small overall, that these guys think they speak for the entire playerbase. It’s a very odd dynamic

cunning ocean
hybrid fjord
queen dove
hybrid fjord
hybrid fjord
left stratus
hybrid fjord
#

Gold spam not relevant to what I commented which is about the auto aim

left stratus
queen dove
cunning ocean
left stratus
hybrid fjord
cunning ocean
left stratus
hybrid fjord
cunning ocean
#

Massive tumors on rogal and soft undercarriage

left stratus
cunning ocean
left stratus
cunning ocean
hybrid fjord
#

Teef takes ages to unload the whole clip 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️. It gets spotted after it fires the first shot and deleted immediately

#

If you’re allowing a teef to fully clip you, that’s your problem

#

Ignis is only op because of ATGM’s

cunning ocean
#

drives in open and gets missiles "MISSILES NEED NERF!"

hybrid fjord
cunning ocean
#

Half the time I don't run the teef cause you have to sweat hard to have a real good match.

hybrid fjord
left stratus
cunning ocean
hybrid fjord
cunning ocean
left stratus
cunning ocean
#

Cause rn that targeting reticle mine as well be the screen atm on the tier 10 xD and it's about to be worse and be covered in dust.

cunning ocean
#

Why Ive been saying no to nerfs and changes but nope everyone says nah it's needed trust me bro.... And then you will see all of the tech tree tanks that will no longer be used.

hybrid fjord
#

I had no trouble 3 marking my t49 when teef was in the game. I used the derp gun too the whole time

cunning ocean
hybrid fjord
#

At least dingus says so

left stratus
west hare
vast onyx
hybrid fjord
steep sable
#

Im definitely liking the original aim better , just overall awareness , its such a hassle always having to re aim / orientate , just not that big an improvement if any for all the hassle

hybrid fjord
left stratus
left stratus
hybrid fjord
vast onyx
left stratus
vast onyx
#

Gotta compare apples to apples. I'll also settle for an era 2 or 3 gold mark

left stratus
hybrid fjord
left stratus
vast onyx
hybrid fjord
vast onyx
left stratus
hybrid fjord
left stratus
vast onyx
vast onyx
left stratus
hybrid fjord
hybrid fjord
vast onyx
hybrid fjord
left stratus
left stratus
vast onyx
hybrid fjord
#

Higher chance of @keen viper gold marking his T249 tbh

deft barn
#

Auto aim doesn't select the closest tank. How does it select the tank if there are 3 or more tanks you are facing?? In my case I had 2 tanks in Ruinberg down the street I was duelling with and one tank came down a nearby cross street and I hit auto aim multiple times and I died before it even selected the closest tank I was pointing my gun to. Someone please explain how that is supposed to work. That didn't seem right to me.

tacit nova
tacit nova
tacit nova
vernal fulcrum
#

Why we need auto aim is due to the reason how some of us see things. I have an issue with one of my eyes due to which my vision is blurred and auto aim helps me playing. I do not want to take advantage of auto aim just for the sake of it and mis use it. People with normal vision who wear glass do not fall into this category. Some comments for persons like us giving up the game entirely and playing offline games is pathetic.

hoary oxide
#

I'm think alot of players may suffer from beer goggles

tacit nova
cunning ocean
#

When you go and look and it's mainly tds at tier 10 with 2 marks.....was going for 3 on leman but I need so much damage.....

oak summit
snow robin
vernal fulcrum
oak summit
vernal fulcrum
tacit nova
oak summit
tacit nova
oak summit
#

A little bit of reflexes I need also in the morning leaving the bed 😂

steep sable
#

Is that tank behind a rock or is it in the open ? No idea , 300 meters and can't lock in direction, silly , no a dan

deft barn
#

It seems to me if I'm looking in the direction of three tanks withing 200m, and autoaim is "supposed to" work and I hit auto aim, it should lock on the closest target first, and then next closest next and then if I hit a third time it should cycle to the last tank. I don't think this has ever worked that way.

Of course it would also be nice if you could target the biggest "threat" first or the highest dps tank first. Maybe an option to select the targeting method would be a constructive suggestion.

But before that I still would like to know how is it SUPOSSED to work NOW?

Is this broken as is or working as intended? If working as intended, I think it is broken and needs work.

steep sable
#

Not worth the hassle , no real improvement to game play , more negative then positive, ya sure its playable , but just a hassle and unnecessary, I dont think modern armor us counting on the spotter looking out to identify targets , so its less realistic, simply add a targeting delay to avoid the snaps , at least allow the target to be located and centered , I always manually aim anyways the lock is used for general orientation

deft barn
#

I also think with the most recent change this issue is more apparent to me because I'm using auto aim more specifically in these types of engagements... up close fast and furious duels with multiple tanks and less and less to snap and zoom in to shoot long range shots.

queen dove
tacit nova
queen dove
#

“So you can’t use your eyes” is a favourite

tacit nova
tacit nova
steep sable
#

The game in general just feed back to the no auto aim feature

#

Again I didn't use it to shoot its predominantly used to identify the threat direction , id be fine with that , u always take over from that point anyway I find , thats all , regardless I still like playing,

queen dove
#

It’s almost as bad as the players who message other players calling them cheaters. You made a mistake, you got shot for it. Suck it up

tacit nova
tacit nova
deft barn
strange hazel
#

Me and my buddies are long time players who exclusively play world war II. We do not like how the auto aim was changed. As a more casual player, it's making it a lot harder to aim your shots well. It takes a lot more time to line up your shot.
My buddies and I are rather upset about it and would like to see it reverted soon.
Not everything needs to be changed. The auto aim system worked fine and is a core mechanic. I don't understand why it's being changed.

hybrid fjord
strange hazel
steep sable
#

Maybe they can find away to use auto aim to identify threats per say to give quicker orientation vs directly aiming at a tank maybe if u want to avoid the cheap 1 shot kills which is what I heard this change was about partly anyway

solemn trail
#

Yeah I don't think this kind of change is gonna come to live game
It's simply too divisive/problematic for implementation
Sure it may be in the right direction for some, but it also takes away/alters a key part of the game that was never really a big issue
Accuracy on the move is what made it as good as it is now, and with the blanket nerfs to accuracy coming I feel like this kind of thing is just redundant

tepid thistle
#

Personally I hate it. Please switch it back!!!!

solemn trail
#

Like personally I'm not really against it
I just think it's really redundant because of all else that's gonna happen with regards to movement and accuracy

#

I do however completely understand people's sentiments with this and how it effects their ability to play

#

That alone makes me not want this to go through because many people essentially need this feature in order to actually play because of disabilities

#

If this were to go through then that would be a lot of people would be at a significant disadvantage even more so playing than they currently are now

#

Tldr ; doesn't affect me much but affects waayy more peoples ability to play at a somewhat competitive level

brittle glade
#

Good change thus far, probably would increase the range to 250m but otherwise solid change

pastel snow
#

Too bad its being reverted.

craggy stag
#

Hope it comes back at some point

formal zenith
#

For me i dont like the auto aim rework thus far... I use auto aim as a quality of live thing. For example if I'm aiming at an enemy I often use auto aim so that my gun stays on the target while I look around to see if I can shoot someone else. And if I decide to shoot on the locked target I switch to sniper mode and beeing still on the target and than take the shot manually without auto aim

distant loom
#

Agree… I use it less for aiming… more for locating (range), tracking and maneuvering. It’s like the DEVs don’t play the game.

#

It’s best to camp 🏕️

snow robin
#

i hope they wont continue to mess with auto aim since the feedback is very divided

ocean ice
#

It sucks. Launch a missile and totally unable to guide it. Also unable to auto aim. Is this another verison 6.0 debacle in making?

solemn trail
#

It's just simply too divided/problematic for implementation

queen dove
hybrid fjord
craggy stag
#

Altho I understand the issues for those with disabilities

tacit nova
craggy stag
#

Yea. I feel bad for that batch. That'll require some ironing out.

tall bone
#

Thanks to everyone who has come into this thread the last couple of days & voiced their opinions about this test. It's nice to read more than the same 5 or 6 people posting for a change here agree or not I'm very glad to see some new names here posting 👍. I like many of you am a casual player. I'm also old & suffer vision issues. I love WoT on console & really hope that this change stays in the trash bin but that's just my opinion. Again thanks to all the new folks for posting the last few days ☑️

craggy stag
#

If WG keep up good tests like this. I feel that the equipment changes may not be disastrous after-all.

tacit nova
# craggy stag Yea. I feel bad for that batch. That'll require some ironing out.

Mostly that is going to be Devs making some options for the handicap, but the problem is that the game is a Multiplayer PVP mainly, so you can't really go nuts to give a super advantage that some normal player might want to exploit, so you have to keep it very very basic, If you look at games like The last of US part 2, i has an amazing amount of handicap settings, but although i heavily applaud the stuff they did, part of it was done because it was a Single player game.

craggy stag
#

Yes. I can see how having disability settings would be troublesome to implement in a multi-player PVP game.

tacit nova
craggy stag
#

I wonder if that means that the update is coming sooner rather than later

tacit nova
tacit nova
craggy stag
#

I see.

tacit nova
#

Now if you excuse me i am going to abuse some elders in my tier 8 for free XP for a bit XD

loud abyss
#

Hate the change. Will leave if implemented. I've got almost 100K games under my belt. Have spent over $50K in the past 11 years. I'm done.

craggy stag
#

... 50K? 💀

south idol
worn pier
#

This new auto lock is crap, as long as light tanks stay just out of your range they pick you apart. Even once spotted it’s sometimes impossible to get a lock while maneuvering and re-positioning

stiff lynx
oak granite
#

Aiming in a shooter is too mich for some people

worn pier
#

It is just giving another advantage to the overpowered light tanks in the game like the weasle. They pop in undetected from a blind side lock on and move out a bit a tear a heavy apart, I call bull on that

tacit nova
tacit nova
craggy wren
#

Final take, after 4 years of playing every day, disabled and old, i am finding the game boring to the point i am loosing interest. Surprisingly, this one change really ruins this game for me, makes play laborious and tediously uninteresting. Even though i am scoring about the same if i survive the first minute or two. I think i would stop playing if this is implemented. Though i use feature to find tanks rather than snap shoot. Oh well

worn pier
hollow gust
#

It’s not a second week of testing, it’s a different test entirely

#

It goes back to normal on Tuesday

worn pier
worn pier
tacit nova
worn pier
hybrid fjord
#

That’s a first. Never seen anyone say they aren’t interested in +1-1. I can’t wait. The game will actually be balanced for a week. Tier 8 gon be lit

craggy stag
#

The few tanks that used to be +3/-2 were...tragic. sometimes. It was fun. AMX-12T able to fight tier 4s was cool. On the other hand. Tier 9 wasn't fun-

hybrid fjord
craggy stag
#

Been here for a long time. Coming up on 10 years

hybrid fjord
#

Didn’t some tier 5 tanks on PC used to be able to fight 10’s?

craggy stag
#

That would be crazy. But hilarious.

hybrid fjord
#

Apparently it used to be like that way back when according to Google. That’s crazy 😂

craggy stag
#

My first kill on a tier 10 was with the AMX-12T. That was when platoon didn't have to play the same tier. Friend would grab his tier 9, boosted me up to tier 10. Killed a FV 215B 183 with a AMX-12T. Felt legendary.

tacit nova
hybrid fjord
tacit nova
craggy wren
#

I am interested in 1+1 but i play a different tank each game and i have most tanks 7 + and modern , so don’t think that will mean much to me. We will see.

misty yew
#

Been playing since the beginning. Not a fan of the reduced aim assist. I’ve used it for years for target acquisition. Once I have a target I switch to manual aim to attack.

keen viper
tacit nova
#

Hot Take, use the mini map and see where the enemy is XD.

keen viper
#

The gap will be increased. Worse players will be farmed easier

tacit nova
#

If you think about it is a hot take XD

misty yew
#

I use the map quite a lot. The aim assist would tell me what of the distant targets were able to be engaged in stead of manually checking each target to see if it was blocked by terrain.

keen viper
hybrid fjord
keen viper
#

Type 5s in the open and you cant tell. Im not the only 1 noticing this

tacit nova
tacit nova
keen viper
hybrid fjord
tacit nova
#

To be honest i never in my life seen players complain as much about the auto aim, as the outlines, those are the real problems, lately WG seems to focus on the things that hurt the game the most instead of the actual problems.

tall bone
hybrid fjord
hybrid fjord
# keen viper Only started in 2019?

Consistently yeah. Prolly fall 2019. About the time they did the 279 year long mission

Been playing since 2017 but it wasn’t often. I was such a bot lmao

hybrid fjord
keen viper
#

I started in 2022 consistently. Started in 2014 on another account tho

tall bone
keen viper
hybrid fjord
tacit nova
quaint anvil
#

If the intent of the auto-aim changes is to encourage more long range fire, then I think it is a failure. We are one person controlling 4 tanker functions. The least we can expect is that the gunner can obtain and acquire a distant target while we are driving the vehicle and scanning for enemy threats. If anything, make the long range auto-aim more accurate.

hybrid fjord
tacit nova
craggy stag
#

Why did we get rid of it? We we at the pinnacle of greatness. And it was cast aside.

worn pier
worn pier
tacit nova
#

@hybrid fjord HA! you weak!! XD

#

Give you Super Uni Card XD

#

No stat shaming

worn pier
#

I very rarely play WW2, I would rather open up the Era’s verse each other than deal with this auto lock crap

cunning ocean
tacit nova
cunning ocean
tacit nova
cunning ocean
tacit nova
cunning ocean
bold crag
vague crescent
#

I like the change, but would have preferred to have auto aim nerfed/removed for close distance encounters as that’s where the RB/RT yolo crowd farm their no skill damage. Call me crazy, but I don’t feel like people should get free damage for being able to drive in circles while holding the trigger down.

mortal pier
left nexus
#

Next move is to remove auto aim entirely

cunning ocean
left nexus
#

Is aiming that hard?

cunning ocean
left nexus
cunning ocean
left nexus
cunning ocean
left nexus
#

Prove it i bring my amx and you bring t92 if you could do 500 damage to me i will delete my account and i wint even auto lock you

cunning ocean
#

I'm good I don't play lights like that

left nexus
#

Than you have to admit you are out of touch with the problem just because you dont have problesm with it doesnt mean the problem is not there

cunning ocean
#

And if your asking for the arty not everyone has the tier 10

left nexus
#

You can bring any light
I can bring xm 800
Wiesel mk1
Anything with auto cannons and the result is the same

Even if we both bring xm 800 for example the person who auto locks firdt will win

ocean beacon
left nexus
#

You can even bring leopard 1a5 amx bronus even chieftain or m60a3

cunning ocean
left nexus
#

That makes no sense

cunning ocean
#

Don't know why your hung up on others opinions anyways I been asking for era 2 tech trees and buffs to tech trees if you read other threads but probolly don't there are obviously underperformers and will increase with the skill and equipment changes but no one listens to me.

tacit nova
cunning ocean
tacit nova
left nexus
tacit nova
left nexus
cunning ocean
left nexus
cunning ocean
left nexus
#

Are you drunk?😐

cunning ocean
left nexus
#

Well your prediction is... ridiculous 😆
Have you ever checked the stats if fv107 and compared it to typr 62 in era1?
Thid isjust and example i have checked its universally the same

cunning ocean
#

Do you want the game to feel better just for you and have just super unis playing or do you want elderly players to continue playing simple as yes or no

left nexus
#

I only care about balance
Elderly are not forced to play auto cannons there are always ways to play

Now your turn have you checked the stats of those tanks before?

cunning ocean
left nexus
#

If elderly play only 1 type of tank and they will leave because of a balance change i dont have any issues with it
Also world isnt white and black
I doubt they will leave

#

If they were to leave they would have left by now

cunning ocean
#

Seen more bots this week than past weekends.

left nexus
#

Ok but you dont need to be rude to me by making ludicrous predictions
At the end of the day im just another player who suggested something i dont work at wargaming

snow robin
cunning ocean
left nexus
#

That i am there is no shame in it

mortal pier
#

Basically, only 125 people voted here, which will never reflect the total number of players.
So Wargaming will definitely look at the player statistics and their successes and failures.
How many players logged in, did the number increase or decrease?
How did the change affect player performance?
Did players get better or worse? Which players (elite or casuals) got better or worse?
How did the games go? Did people stand still a lot? Did people capture more often?

Which tanks were preferred?
Which tiers?

So we can't really achieve anything here with this two-front war of discussion.
Just my opinion.

left nexus
mortal pier
left nexus
tacit nova
left nexus
#

............................
Need more?

mortal pier
# left nexus Yeah i hope i am giving good feed back as small as it is i only want the best fo...

You did a great job. For such a fundamental change, every bit of feedback is important.
It's just a shame that there are so few of us here to give our feedback, whether for or against the change.
But I think it's clear so far that the majority of the very good to excellent Unicums on the site are in favor of the change, while the poorer players and casual players tend to be against it. (That's my assessment, but I could be wrong.)

tacit nova
#

In general we UNICORNS also got into a Medium balance about 1st we don't care if we are really honest, not speaking for everyone but a lot of us could care less about this test, only a minority claimed the "GIT GUD" statement, but in general if there was no bigger update on the horizon, this could be a bit more important, but what a lot of us really got from this is that there is a section of our players that:

A) have some type of handicap and depend on auto aim (No problem because it has been in the game forever).

B) Super Unis can adapt to most changes unless they are not fun like the Match maker test, (Ignorant players had the idea the we were not happy because we could not do damage to players because we want Potatoes as enemies, no our effectiveness was still on match, the issue was the games being one sided and loosing by force no matter how well we played).

C) This test was interesting not because of the game, but it opened the eyes to problems of the player base, not the game itself and some unbalanced tanks.

D) This test is quite irrelevant for US players given that an update that will nerf accuracy is coming and that is going to be the interesting part to try out and also pay attention to the players that will criticize that system but based on their own bias and not the game in general, in other words... (Good players will test and give feedback, no matter how good or bad they are at the game, Bad players will want changes based on their biases, this are the problem players to look for).

mortal pier
winged thicket
#

One message removed from a suspended account.

#

One message removed from a suspended account.

craggy stag
#

I did plenty to curb snap shot tank destroyers and medium tanks. Who now had to actually aim, coming from someone who just two marked the T-54. It felt genuinely fun and rewarding to earn every little bit of that dmg.

#

Side note. Red Makez it goz fasta

south idol
#

It empowered the yolo light tanks in cold war. More impactful in ww2 with taking longer for players to aim at weak spots than auto aiming with premium rounds. I prefer the way it was though. Need to get rid of bleed damage. That would be the bigger benefit to players. Make those mini gun tanks use HE.

south idol
oak granite
craggy stag
#

Auto-aim needs to be taken away from a select few auto-cannon tanks. If you do that to the BMPs and Bradley's they will become very sad

south idol
#

Ypu must have balance, you take away from some, must take away from all.

craggy stag
#

Yes. But you don't see people complaining about the Bradley's and BMPs do you? There can be exceptions.

cerulean flicker
#

Personally, I think this gave them the data to see how insanely out of balance the tiny CW autofire tanks are in the game. I played almost entirely CW this week and 50% of every team was some combination of light tanks with autocannons. Absolutely bonkers.

vague crescent
hollow hare
#

i have redownload WoT for these live tests. its good to see WG taking steps to reintroduce player skill to the game. the main thing that i dont like about this auto aim test, is nothing i cant get used to. Keep this up. im looking forward to playing daily again!

serene barn
#

Last thoughts
From what I’ve played seen and read the main issue is towards cw mode mainly auto cannons at long distance that what I see

In general for cw near enough all tanks are all the same for speed and game play style so hitting on the move is too accurate for the speed of the tanks at far range
Going back to being familiar and speed and huge view range it’s easy for tanks to manoeuvre whilst locked on especially flanking the enemy behind solid cover

For ww2 it’s a different kettle of fish there are so many play styles and types of tanks on offer
Plus without some tools and equipment from cw to help with manual aim or cover the outline only does so much and not that detailed at range that auto aim is essential to either 3rd person shoot or line up a shot in 1st person
Like I said above for ww2 tanks are a tin of mixed wrapped up chocolate
There is so much variety of choice to choose and mix in the match maker and unlikely to be rushed by the whole team within the first minute compared to cw
If anything what happened in the tog that rng plays a massive factor if a shot hits nevermind pens

hidden marsh
#

As for the this changes you've make the TD more or less unusable. Since they need the help from spotting to be functional for the rest of the team and then remove the warning for the opposite tanks, so they don't know they are spotted or targeted and make them visual 100%. This changes is like undercooked porridge, it's eatable but not good!!

wispy gorge
#

My conclusion is auto aim with snapshot sucks,it miss or bounce 75% of times, but it is good tool for beginners to start playing game, players over one year don’t use it or just for targeting

left nexus
#

For example when i said remove the auto lock i dodnt realize how some of our players really depend on it
I think its fine to have the auto lock after thinking about it more

But i also think there should be a certain amount of balance and care to it ans it shouldnt be toxic

So you might ask when is it toxic or unfair ...
Well from what i experience there is this culture of gameplay in both ww2 and cold war that players try to circle around you and auto lock you

Is it because of auto lock it self?

Are they all handicapped

Like some times people circle around you in heavy tanks while you are a medium tank even is ww2 i have seen this

So here is what i ask
I believe it or not am a super uni
I still can deal with an xm800 runinr around me or a t-72 or even in ww2 actually in ww2 its far easier to deal with it

But why i want this to be changed

Every arguement has 2 sides we say a lot of elderly or handicapped players depend on auto lock
Sure ok i get it

But what are we suppose to do with this toxic unfair and quitefrankly bad way if playing that has developed amongs our players?

On the other side of this arguement are the weaker players sure i know how to keep my armor facing where it is needed and i know how to move my hull and turret that i at least fire back but what about weaker less skilled players?

At first i thought maybe we should just delete auto lock entirely

But then again its not a good suggestion

Then i thought maybe she should remove the ability to auto lock from certain weapon types

Like atgms

But is this a good idea?

stiff lynx
#

Personally I didn't consider auto aim a massive issue as it was almost always inferior to an aimed shot. However I will recognize that I alongside most other players use auto aim very often to find targets and keep the gun on them. I think the first part is problematic, particularly at range where you can just tap right bumper at every icon until you see a red reticle on a target you otherwise would never visually identify. Typically I would argue that gun handling during hull and turret traverse should be targeted but that was before I knew this was even possible. The major issue with the test as it stands for me is the target identification aspect, and I believe this is the issue most people are complaining about whether they recognize it or not. Since we now know target outlines are directly tied to your ability to auto aim a target, this poses the biggest issue.

If WG can separate the outline (and hopefully improve it to PC standards) and instead use a different indicator for auto aim we will be in a perfect spot in my opinion. This way gun handling does not need to be nerfed quite as heavily so as to still allow for somewhat accurate aimed shots while on the move

fast tapir
outer nymph
cunning ocean
#

Man didn't realize elderly were punching bags at this point or people with disabilities.

fast tapir
#

Never said that. Auto aim isn't only used by people with disabilities either.

cunning ocean
fast tapir
cunning ocean
#

Been here since the beginning mine as well keep it

fast tapir
#

Just because something has been around for a long time doesn't automatically make it worth keeping forever

stiff lynx
cunning ocean
fast tapir
#

Nicer outlines that you can actually see are great, and don't risk dumping on my game cause someone dice rolled 400m away and got lucky

stiff lynx
cunning ocean
#

Dang well y'all cold hearted lol wonder how y'all will be treated when your 50+ yrs old...

#

Let alone disabilities

stiff lynx
fast tapir
#

If you THAT desperately need RBRT because you cannot press LT and move the joystick, this is the wrong game for you

Sight issues can be fixed with better outlines

cunning ocean
#

Y'all didn't read the comments from the others in this thread either some have horrible eyesight and only see prob 20% of the screen

fast tapir
#

How many times do we have to say it?

stiff lynx
cunning ocean
stiff lynx
#

Literally since the thread opened even those of us in favor are saying "Hey I cannot see these targets plz help with outlines"

fast tapir
cunning ocean
fast tapir
#

Someone having better outlines really does not negatively impact my gameplay, someone autolocking my tank and hitting me with 0 effort does

cunning ocean
#

Yha I don't care about the outlines I'm talking about the auto aim test in here

fast tapir
#

If you are that reliant on RBRT, that you physically cannot touch LT or the joystick, there exists modified controllers you could potentially look into, otherwise, I'm sorry, this ain't the game for you 🤷‍♂️

cunning ocean
fast tapir
#

Could always keep autolock how it is in Co-Op and change it in MP if possible 🤷‍♂️

stiff lynx
stiff lynx
fast tapir
oak granite
#

I feel sympathy for all those disabled people but we are not World of Tanks Handicaped version we have colourblind mode & aim assist (not auto aim) i bet there are also paralysed ppl who wants to play this game but we cant let autoaim also drive for us.

left nexus
# stiff lynx Personally I didn't consider auto aim a massive issue as it was almost always in...

Well it is intresting

I bet most people dont see it as an issue
I certainly didn't but a few weeks Go my friend returned to the game after like 3 years
We started with the metal fest event then we played some ww2 tier 8 and 9

And mainly after that we settled for cold war he wanted to play sheridan and other atgm vehicles

He first made the issue clear to me auto aim for many players have replaced real aiming many players dont know how to aim for weak spots they simply auto aim and circle around their target

From ehat i remember from before 6.0 right? The auto aim was a tool too keep your reticle where you wanted it but you had to manually aim in the end

Now ofc its entirely different

Also what we discovered is this and you can also go and check stats of tanks in the game

Auto cannons soft stat be it accuracy on the move or turret rotation is almost always worse than single shot cannons
Best example is fv107 vs the type 62 i the top era 1 chinese light

Fv 107 has worse stats but it almost never misses

But type 62 decpite having better stats misses quite often especially when auto locking

We also discovered another issue at range when you aimed your shot missed some times but if you would auto lock it wouldnt happen

I dont know what is going on
But i think auto lock needs to be revert to what it was

Its a tool to help you keep on target but in the end you must aim yourself

As for elderdly and disabled people i dont want to hurt their experience and ability to enjoy the game
But something must be done to this mechanich that works for everyone

blazing hinge
#

Is auto-aim more of a problem in CW? I only play ww2 so i dont know. It seems there are 2 kind of opinions. Players that can not play without using it and players who can not play when other players using it 😁

cunning ocean
#

My guess is them also being salty of era 2 and there trying to play wafer thin tanks that need buffs and more heavies in that era.

tacit nova
#

Auto aim has been on the game forever, the mechanic is not the issue, the buffed accuracy is, and that is going to be fixed soon, so i don't see what is with the banter anymore.

#

What it goes to show is that 6.0 Is still damaging the game in certain ways even to this day.

blazing hinge
#

I undersand that snap shot and mario cart game play is a problem. But is it worse in CW?

cunning ocean
tacit nova
#

And yes if a tank is alone in the open GG your fault to be fair.

cunning ocean
tacit nova
solemn trail
#

"there's a map??"

fallow nacelle
#

I didn't realise the auto aim mechanic was a big issue for the majority of the player base. I think the bigger issue is the auto cannon guns especially in cold war..

left nexus
weary forum
#

I suppose I always thought of auto aim as just simply another member of the tank team taking care of that particular job. Obviously, there's only one person operating everything so he needs help. Auto aim was part of that help...

#

Definitely not a top-tier player and without it, I am religated to playing era 1 stuff just to survive...

tacit nova
# cunning ocean My guess is them also being salty of era 2 and there trying to play wafer thin t...

The main problem is the massive damage they can constantly deal with very little issue given how high their pen is, so no tank is really "Heavy" given that some can be also penned frontally, and that is all due to the autocannons being heavily and artificially high pen.
If we are talking back shots of side shots is fine, but also they tend to pen even on angles and frontally, doing massive damage.

tacit nova
distant loom
#

That was my thinking.

#

Let the commander open the hatch to have a better look… that would be cool!

#

🤣

#

… just a thought

#

In other words… precise aims

cerulean flicker
#

I need little guys inside my WaffentragerE100 for sure...

ocean beacon
# fallow nacelle I didn't realise the auto aim mechanic was a big issue for the majority of the p...

WG has asked this Discord to not include Auto Cannons in this Auto Aim test. From what I have read here WG considers Auto Cannons as a separate item. Personally I don't know why. HKPROTUS is correct in his observation that Auto Aim has been in the game since day 1 on Console. Constant tanks reforged combined with an endless release of OP Premium tanks (in both modes, CW probably more) has lead to power creep and minimal tactics. I even saw an in-game tip encouraging Wolfpacks. Before Build 6.0 players have complained about long range snap shots but this again was more of a vision system mechanic with invisible tanks smashing players from unknown places. And in WWII mode it is still annoying to this day. We have dozens of items about to be changed. Leave Auto Aim unchanged until the dust has settled from all the new changes. Revisit it then if data indicates there is an issue. WG I would prefer your staff concentrate on the new items and not get distracted by low priority game aspects.

stark void
# ocean beacon WG has asked this Discord to not include Auto Cannons in this Auto Aim test. Fro...

WG has asked this discord to not include Auto Cannons in this Auto Aim Test
What was said in direct response to "this change doesn't fix our problem with autocannons" was that it isn't the aim so please don't judge it off thst.

Basically we asked you to tell us what you think of a new flavour of ice cream and your response was "this won't make the neon sign outside magically light up!". To say we said you can't talk about/take into account autocannons is disingenuous. The point was to base the feedback solely on "did it fix a thing it never said or set out to fix" is not very productive... very "judging a fish by it's ability to climb a tree".

tacit nova
#

Because with this test it was kind of like:

#

But what will be interested will be:

ocean beacon
earnest otter
#

Having played the game for 10 years, I don't like changing a major part of the game, like auto aim. Put it back! If you think there's a prob with CW or TD's in general, experiment on THOSE tanks, not all. MAJOR change like this would NEED to be announced on login screen, not sneaked in!

scenic zephyr
#

⚠️ DISCLAIMER ⚠️ if you don't like my comment, just pass it up, don't reply.

In CW co-op I'm noticing from this test more of my team doing the lemming train, and capping enemy base more often than it used to happen.

It seems as if: "I can't auto-lock? Fine, I'll run with 10 other players on one flank and take the enemy base".

So now I'm seeing an issue with this test. It's attracting trains and cappers.

If anyone else has noticed this (any mode), feel free to add to this.

ocean beacon
#

I have a bit.

tacit nova
earnest otter
#

Eliminating basic 10 yr old game mechanic? Guess what? I hate it!

tacit nova
tacit nova
hybrid fjord
keen viper
#

Probably gonna be buns tho. Seems like a worse thunder chief 😂

hybrid fjord
#

Looks fkin sh*t tbh

hybrid fjord
#

Nearly 100 less alpha than bz-75, worse alpha, armour is sus

keen viper
hybrid fjord
#

1 less rocket booster

keen viper
hybrid fjord
tacit nova
keen viper
tacit nova
#

Unlike you guys i am not Mr Negative

keen viper
#

Yea i did see that. It goes 30kph. But i guess it has rocket boosters

tacit nova
hybrid fjord
tacit nova
#

QL and Chief

hybrid fjord
#

Console BZ75 has 8

hybrid fjord
#

Basically no difference really tho

hybrid fjord
#

This tank looks buns

keen viper
#

Actually its probably balanced. QL is op😂

hybrid fjord
#

320 heat is 💩

keen viper
hybrid fjord
#

Most tanks are better than that thing

keen viper
hybrid fjord
tall bone
hybrid fjord
#

Hopefully all the whales move to the new Chinese tank and then I can finish BZ-75 JustKekU

keen viper
#

It got that second turret and is pretty good now

tall bone
keen viper
#

Tier 4?

tall bone
#

Yes

keen viper
#

I wanna try thw grant again. They like the same thing

keen viper
tall bone
keen viper
#

I love the hetzer. So much fun

#

The tier 4 swede td is another 1 I love aswell

bold crag
# left nexus Is aiming that hard?

Sorry but no one could aim a light and drive. A gun wouldn’t be needed because you’d never be able to do anything. You do know there are crews of several
People on these tanks right?

tacit nova
bold crag
keen viper
#

😂

south idol
tacit nova
#

I am just abusing my T-32A and some 10X Free XP booster to see if i can get it for cheap XD

south idol
#

Nice

stark void
#

Keep the thread on topic please

spark glacier
#

I'm a lowly CW co-op player with my buddies (For us greybeards it hits the right 'Tanks n Chill' gameplay that allows for banter n beers while decompressing after work). So take this feedback for what it's worth:

Overall I think this change needs to be refined and done in a slightly less (seemingly) arbitrary manner. I'm not sure if that 200m has discrete gameplay relevance to other systems, but the binary on/off nature of it suddenly working - or not - while still being able to see our targets outlined in the distance, feels jarring and clunky during normal gameplay.

I don't need the long range snapshot accuracy. I almost always aim my shots anyway. I really just use auto-aim to alleviate one bit of finnicky tank & camera & movement control while moving or adjusting my positions in chaotic combat.

Basically for me, if my tank crew can 'see' a distant target enough to create that targeting outline on my screen, I would like the option (while panning my camera around) to maintain orientation of my turret toward's the target's general direction. It just feels more intuitive, smoother and more ergonomic in a console with console controllers, driving vehicles to have this one manual bit of tank control automated somewhat.

Like I say, me personally I do not need the long-range accuracy. And I appreciate the problems PvP players face with the current auto-aim / accuracy model.

But I think (especially for co-op because the Bots don't have feelings about this one way or another), a more nuanced system where accuracy drops precipitously with range while in auto-aim mode would yield similar benefits. While still allowing the basic ergonomic and Quality of Life assistance appreciated by a large number of people of varying abilities, preferences and so on.

oak granite
#

@stark void in regards to feedback i would let people give one Statement what they like and dislike they can edit their post but cant write another they can discuss stuff in a different channel. (If that is possible on discord)
I think that would make gathering feedback easier for you

stark void
nimble pebble
#

Fortunately, we'll be locking this thread today so I can do full analysis on the feedback

But never fear! There will be a follow up survey/feedback form - so keep your eyes peeled for that :D

tacit nova
charred stag
#

Whelp I'll be taking a break from WoT now until the changes come through again. If they don't, at least I ended on it with some good memories finally lol

ocean beacon
nimble pebble
worldly blaze
#

Love the test, hope this becomes a part of the game in the future

queen wagon
#

New Auto Aim - is the Best rebalance at this year.

oak granite
#

Test was great with a bit of tweaks regarding 3rd person outline and maybe outlines behaving like on PC it would be perfect

pastel snow
#

The test is a succes. You get time to react once spotted, rng is less of a factor. Playing with your brain actually pays off as you can not rely on RBRT.
I hope auto aim is removed to limit the yoloing and to bring the pace of WW2 down. Matches will last longer, another huge plus.