#paleontology
1 messages · Page 238 of 1
Anyone here has a little more than a guess to what this tooth (like 1cm in length) may belong to? Found in Germany near the place Archeopteryx, Compsognathus etc were found. I would like to know how to differentiate between a fish, ichthyosaur, plesiosaur or if it could even be from one of the few dinosaurs that lived their
“fake spinosaurus species”
Looks inside
AI slop

spinzo
Was it possible for non-avian dinosaurs that were fully feathered as adults to have sparse or no feathering as hatchlings like most altricial birds?
Very aesthetically pleasing curves from the top
Yes, but most (all?) known feathered dinosaurs had precocial young, and so were likely feathered from birth
It's so sad because the guy who did this seems very passionate about spinosaurus but it's moreso just to have a JP3 and Paleo-accurate spino combo
Thanks!
except for spinosaurus 
spinosaurus can already barely function bro do NOT take precocial young away from it
Okey this lowkey Peak
This is good news, If his Babies have more time to develop he will be more prepared and smart, have you ever seen Albert Einstein being a well developed infant when he was born?
Alioramus
Alberta my beloved

Yes, my source is I was there when it happened
No you didn't, because i was also there, i was the baby Albert Einstein

Bro please let it have SOMETHING
Gonna have to go with either oxalaia (because it’s so unknown) or magnapaulia (I like big hadrosaurs)
both by TPixel
…Alr that’s pretty good
Hold the babies in its mouth like a gator mama 
Prob Gorgosaurus or Suchomimus
Best baby spino I’ve seen
Scipionyx
Is it possible that baby Spinosaurus were quadrupedal like baby psittacosaurus? Perphaps It had a slimer tail that made the balancing harder or something
I know It's unlikely but like, is It at least hypothetically possible?
depends on how you reconstruct a hatchling or infant Spinosaurus, I guess.
theropod arms pretty much preclude them from being quadrupedal
also, baby Spinosaurus would have a much easier time being bipedal than the adults, because as a baby falling on its face wouldn't obliterate its bones
Is there still any kind of chance that Spinosaurus could walk or at least stand on all fours? Cause we don’t exactly have the arms.
possible, sure, but it would need some strong evidence. ''It's poorly balanced with current models'' isn't that
We need them arms, which the new Brazilian spinosaur might have?
Are we really that desperate?
None of it is desperate. It would just be nice to have the stuff.
looking at the rumored thing. it's not looking good at all
Eh
It's true
Dinosaurs are ancestrally bipedal and thats why theropods are too, they inherited the default mode. Quadrupedality developed in sauropods and ornithiscians but it was a multi-step process for each group with lots of intermediate forms. We have nothing like that for spinosaurus or spinosaurids in general.
how does the mojoceratops nmation feel https://x.com/omegafreelancer/status/2036214322674708594
Saying that as if anyone cared about Mojoceratops
and yet still no papers/news abt my goat Agathaumas 
Any ceratopsian without a skull is sent to the shadow realm for all eternity (until a specimen with overlap is described (never))
her thick was your average ceratopsian frill?
Also wait why is mojoceratops no longer a thing again
idk, but the first skull is now a new ceratopsian
Tbf it sort of was for a while, it’s now just not a sister species to chasmosaurus belli

I was tracking we had arms, why do people always say this
nvm apparently it can't be associated to spinosaurus because there isn't any overlapping material of the arms they found
someone can correct me if I'm wrong but I believe only the holotype of Chasmosaurus russelli is a new ceratopsian, while that skull isn't the holotype. It's just one of the specimens (CMNFV 2280 I believe) that was previously referred to C. russelli and will now need reassessment.
correct, only the holotype is reclassified, but given it's the holotype the species now explodes
yeah. maybe some of the referred stuff will find its way back!
ok but what abt Monoclonius???
it...depends
how's Nedoceratops/Diceratus?
ig sm ceratopsians are fated to meet their demise
I'm reading this book from 2016, and I was wondering if there's any new or outdated info in the last 10 years since this was published.
So far I noticed that in the book Nanotyrannus isn't an established genus, and this was before skin impressions of Tyrannosaurus were discovered.
But is there anything other new info?
Just out of curiosity, how large would H. gorgops be there?
slightly bigger than a modern hippo
Bigger, no?
"grizzly bear is faster and smarter"-Aah take
another one
HIPPO MY GOAT
why do people direly wish to watch a hippo get violated
How much faster is a hippo then a sucho though?
it won
Chunky bird?
Slightly yeah
Prob depends the size of the Hippo and Sucho, Hippo may be faster in short Bursts simply due to how much heavier Sucho is at max sizes
Lowkey wished the Holotype had more Material
Last time I put that chunky hatz here I got chewed out 
unless i watched a different one, he did outright say sucho would win more times than not
....which is just underselling sucho still and AvA slop but eh

Because Jurassic world decided to show a hippo having an even fight with a Suchomimus
Not really, the species just moves into the new genus and the rest of the referred material gets put into Chasmosaurus indet. I guess that kinda counts as “exploding” but it happens a lot.
"I believe this matchup is surpisingly close"
https://youtu.be/UQlbvkkieZQ?si=ex0Gv_HmeI-OCFlB
Dinosaurs vs Mammals is always a hot topic. I have covered many myself but an underrated has to be Suchomimus vs Hippopotamus. I mean we saw this battle take place in Jurassic World Chaos Theory, but how do these amazing animals stack up against each other?
Timestamps
0:00 Suchomimus vs Hippopotamus
0:30 Suchomimus Breakdown
4:35 Hippopotamus ...
Well even to an extent yeah
Zuko is NOT that big
Hippo dies horribly
Out of all the animals in prehistoric planet, the best and most consistent cgi and animation HAS to go to Tarbosaurus.
Such an awesome design for the creature as well.
it is
The image shows zuko being almost twice the height of a person
the image is the exact same size as the skeletal
Hello, Zuko here
Yea that’s roughly the same size Eventhough it’s an old look for Sucho
Ur image makes zuko look taller but maybe thats because its heads up
Did you know I drawed a H. gorgops? :trollface:
The person in the comparison is just a different size
Lemme get another one
Use actual Skeletals and not just google images
Hartmans, serenos or Dans. Hartmans and serenos are basically the same anyway
Wait mb ur actually right, zuko really is huge lol
Let's see it
Thats an Old Sucho
What piece of media does this originate from?
That too
Primitive War, I believe
Primitive war has a sucho?
Think that's the only cameo it makes in the entire movie
And another scene where it's squaring up against some soldiers for 4 additional seconds (It doesn't do anything really)
Peak Animal
Yes
And that is its only Cameo
Hi
I did it on Paint, so I unfortunately had some limitations, the body is more based on " Hippopotamus tiberinus ", but that guy seems to have been lumped into H. antiquus, so it's more based on H. antiquus now ( I guess )
Hey that's really good!
you mean Cristatusaurus 
Y'all heard about those Spinosaurid neck vertebrae they found in Australia a while back
Hey it's only neck vertebrae so idk it could be something else
I just saw this and we need it
U lost me at generated with ai
That art is probably not entirely right. It depicts the animal as younger than it actually was
Unfortunately it throws AI generated responses every search
Sad
Yeah boo at the AI I didn't see that until after I posted it
as mentioned before something like Fona would be a GREAT reference for this guy
Hey yall, im going to be writing about the history of the appearance of Spinosaurus for one of my college english essays. Do yall have any recommendations for videos or articles that go in-depth about how its depictions have changed over time?
https://youtu.be/KbbFfFeC_vk
Might help
Spinosaurus is an animal that never ceases to astound with all of the new information we’ve learned over the years of studying them, with recent papers revealing that they were both shorter legged and thicker tailed than we thought, something which of course has huge implications as to their ecology and behaviour. Were they divers, waders, pur...
thoughts? how accurate are tierzoo's video's on paleontology btw?
HELLLL NO, STEGO AT C????
terrible
Don't take anything this guy says seriously + ranking animals will always be terribly biased
This is supposed to be in the context of combat?
survival overall
tier zoo claims cheetahs have horrid klepto handling issues despite having one of the best ratios for a mega fauna on it lmao
Or; how one show ruined animal discourse for a generation
Timestamps :
00:00 - Intro
00:36 - The horrors of Animal Face-off
3:09 - How legit is it like animals fighting?
7:57 - The equally terrible era of humans fighting each other
9:40 - The uncertainty of competitive interactions
11:46 - The depressing legacy of Animal Face-off and the chudi...
half of centrosaurine crying in the corner rn
@mental mural please do not post explicit images of injured or dead animals on this server.
It’s bad, although I get the thought process
i remember hgim saying that tail weaponary is worse then frontal weaponary ( like horns and antlers ) and i feel like thats a lie
I think we have ample proof that both work very well 🥀 he just made stuff up for clicks
The entirety of that channel is AvA for modern day animals
Yuannosaurus
That’s not a dinosaur that’s just a sausage with legs
how accurate is this Megistotherium? https://x.com/Visceral9000/status/2036599767543734726?
do y'all love your Maip feathered or scaled?
Hadrosaurs being hugely succesfull yet still being in D tier like actually what
Why is Coelophysis above Campto bro
Both tbh, depending on the depiction.
Sometimes it just can't be without the horse-like mane, sometimes it's beautiful in its scaly glory.
Being successful doesn't automatically make you good at fighting
Though ig it depends on what they defined as fighting for the tier list
Wait wait wait now i've both heard its a tier list for combat or for survival. Which is it?
I think that tier list what abt combat and survival
Probably cause of its numbers and widespread over the world
Gaw dam I forgot how huge that mf is
Why does everyone forget Campto be a hecking chonker
Where is zhuchengtyrannus’s placement within tyrannosaurini? And is there a decent skeletal for it?
Its usually just outside of rex/tarbo iirc. But there's just two bones described so far
I have question , since kelenken was technically an non avian bird yet still a bird would that make it technically a dinosaur? Even tho it do live in a Cenozoic era would that be considered a modern dinosaur?
Kelenken was an avian, and all birds are dinosaurs, so it would be a dinosaur regardless
Interesting. Is the head shape more akin to Rex or tarbo?
No
Oh i see
Yes, their closest living relatives are seriemas
it would be closer to something like a falcon than an ostrich or chicken, so it's a pretty derived bird
idk, you'd wanna compare the maxila and dentary to the holotypes to know
Yeah that’s what I mean like technically wouldn’t it be more close of a modern bird
it was very close to modern birds
So it’s like a grandpa to modern birds
part of them in fact
In some way it was more "modern" anatomically than a chicken is
Ok that was a dumb ass anology
more like a cousin a few times removed but still part of the family
Don’t get me wrong but I THINK you might enjoy hadrosaurs like lambeo
Ohhh that makes sense like an older cousin
I have another question this one might be stupid (I’m not the best with my cenozics ) but would inostrancevia be considered a canine or like reptile
It's neither a mammal nor a reptile but it's closer to mammals than to reptiles
What would it be then
Neither. It was a stem mammal, a relabive of mammals that isn't quite a mammal
synapsida is the group that includes mammals, dimetrodon, inostrancevia, and all these other guys
Yes since it was prehistoric
Thanks guys I just need more help with cenozic I’m usually pretty good with my dinosaurs tho
Always plenty more to learn. I love evolutionary relationships so feel free to ask me about them... anyone else here, feel free to correct me if i'm wrong
Maybe sparse filaments among scales
what is your opinion on the giga baboon and lock ness monster
The loch ness monster got debunked a long time ago, it doesn't even have correct plesiosaur anatomy
Observe
Eggs
Lochness reminds me of the Plesiosaurus that was found in Svalbard
My country!! 🇳🇴
Those supposed to be scales on the underside? I thought plesiosaurs didn’t have scales.
Icthyosaurs didn't have scales, Plesiosaurs do last I remember
PK new baby stego
So what’s the consensus for it?
We will prob know more Soon once Suecheng gets described
Specially since Zucheng is more complete than the Holotype
On the ends of the fins I believe. That might be it though, I’m not sure.
A couple more bones complete 
Don't think there is any at the moment
new prehistoric crocodile, the crocodylus lucivenator
OH WHAT THE HELL it's actually complete
Nice
Old countryside uncle croc
Peak
Anything that end in venator is automatically awesome
Hiii, Did one of suchos fingers act more like a thumb or was it more like 3 big fingers cuz google is not helping me 
I’m tryna draw one holding a controller for a meme but the question on everyone’s mind is… how would sucho hold a controller 🤔
It would need to pinch it between two hands, all theropod fingers face inwards
Thank you uwu✨
Seems theres more
Rommel Mentioned they have a Good Idea of its size and even more stuff was been discovered with passing time
So its def more complete
Probably more Complete than what Spinosaurus Mirabilis was lol
is it big?
it says its up to 4.5 meters or 15 feet, its smaller than todays nile crocodile and 1300 lbs
Can't wait for it to be publish in the next 5 years 
oh thats boring i only like big ones or weird looking 😄 maybe it was young tho
it was not young
it was a pvp tierlist
does anyone know what prehestoric animal sceptile is based off of? ( if the "grass type starters are based on prehestoric animals " theory is true ) i heard Sinosaurus but i dont see it
Double crests…. So most likely Dilophosaurus
dilophosaurus
Honestly could be nearly any theropod, 90% of them have crests over their eyes
I’ve got a lil question
Yknow how wolves and cougars and such are so much smaller then their prey
How come so many dinosaurs don’t seem to follow this rule?
which dinosaurs?
Rommel said Paper was meant for this year
Wonder if the new added Material delayed it
mainly in my head im thinkin about how absolutely massive tyrannosaurs are (rex and tarbo specifically)
Many dinosaurs did hunt prey larger than themselves, like allosaurids, carcharodontosaurids, megalosaurids, dromaeosaurids, (probably) metriacanthosaurids
Tyrannosaurs have jaws evolved to kill prey with a quick crushing bite, which is different from 'normal' theropods. It doesn't work as well when your prey is much bigger than you are, because vital areas become harder to reach and tougher to bite through, and unlike cats, tyrannosaurs can't leap on top of prey
how fast could triceratops run?
don't worry I will be the first one hating for no reason
OOH OH don't forget some more "basal" theropods like Dilophosaurus
That said, of all tyrannosaurids, T.rex is really the only one that is larger on average than all its prey items. Tarbo hunted Saurolophus and Nemegtosaurus/Opisthocoelicaudia which were larger than itself, and Zhuchengtyrannus had Zhuchengtitan/Shantungosaurus
Most of those theropods have adaptations for grasping and pinning down prey items that would have to be relatively or very small compared to their overall size and mass. Not to say that: " They can't hunt animals relatively large than them ", but I also feel like that sorta of scenario will only occur in very desperate circunstances.
Hi there, I'm barging in randomly but do we have any paper about the exact preys Giganotosaurus, Tyrannotitan and T. rex hunted respectively? I imagine T. rex has a lot but I suspect those for the first two are rarer.
(I didn't even notice the convo was almost about my question
)
Not about Giganotosaurus specifically but there is an abstract somewhere about how carcharodontosaurids preferred to eat titanosaur sauropods, let me go find it
here it is
They all have ziphodont dentition which is specifically an adaptation for large prey
How so?
and aside from dromaeosaurids, they all have small arms, which is specifically not an adaptation to grasp small prey
grasping much smaller prey requires you to have a lot of downward reach and agility, most easily reached by long arms (or a long thin neck like spinosaurids)
And Spinosaurus has both.
spinosaurids, unenlagiids, noasaurids, dromaeosaurids, troodontids, and (maybe) megaraptorans are well adapted to hunt small prey
Most Theropods with short arms, have claws, meaning that they have not made those traits dormant or mutated to completely or mostly lack them, like Abelisaurs. Meaning that those claws still are important to how those animals function. Also, the short arm argument, is only smart, if you do not consider that having shorter arms means that a lot of those theropods can pin smaller prey against their chest, which tends to be a range where they can bend their necks and reach that prey with their jaws.
they do, and arguably just as often if not way more often
They're for inflicting debilitating wounds and causing massive shock through blood loss, which is a strategy only applicable to large prey. Small prey specialists have more conical teeth for quickly grasping prey and likely swallowing it whole
oh hey Random, you might not care but have you seen a ai spinosaurus skeletal?
i probably have during the early days, although real artists can make similarly bad skeletals
If only we did not had a paper commenting on Allosaurus feeding mechanisms, hinting at Theropod, or if not, mostly Carnosaur feeding tends to be pretty similar to birds of prey like falcons, who eat piece by piece of their prey item. What else they do? Oh idk? Often pin their prey down and eat them alive sometimes? Curious.
I too have various numbers of toe bones depending on which foot i'm looking at
more context
of course it was S.dorsojuvencus
Also, i'm gonna be honest here, most evidence we have for Carnosaurs and Dromaeosaurs hunting large prey item, tends to be evidence that often times can be contested to being damage being done post-mortem, rather than definitive evidence like Ceratopsians and Hadrosaurs surviving Tyrannosaur encounters.
wait you've heard of it before? like am serious what does the species name even mean
All that paper really supports is that the main driver of an allosaur's bite whether attacking or feeding was in the neck, which is the same for komodo dragons that hunt large prey with similar dentition
If we oversight anything else, indeed.
idk, but I was there when Eng first made up the specimens
it's unfortunate because there is probably some interesting Spinosaurus material mixed up in there
Isn't this the guy whose comments called you a bunch of weird stuff cause you downsized Deinosuchus
Is it? I don't think Eng has ever talked about Deinosuchus
No I mean this guy
It's also not ecologically pratical to your only surviving strategy as a carnivore being to kill a idk how many tons animal, with the risk associated with that, and often times being more benificial to feed on the offspring of those animals ( Or older individuals, have to add that, or someone is gonna ask it )
Truly, Carnosaurs and Dromaeosaurs went extinct, due to how much meat they wasted and effectivelly killing off all of the herbivores in their ecosystems, driving them to become non-functional ( being sarcastic btw )
Oh then maybe, I didn't open the link last time the comments were sent and I don't want to
https://youtu.be/MOzPnRnmelE?si=CXv6DJwCYPod9n-r he also made this masterpiece
@MAKATOONY @airoplayz3103 @eondude2675 @TERMINATEDACCOUNT89767 @wasdtrike671-t1i
he also made 11 species of a footprint
Sounds about right to all three messages
like how do you just make 11 speices out of nothing but a print
How is an adult Torvosaurus going to compete with a Marshosaurus as a small prey specialist? It isn't
Those are real I think, ichnotaxa can be cracked
yeah I know just still find it very baffling that bro would do all of this
And why is there a concurrent trend towards gigantism between theropods and their prey consistently throughout the Mesozoic?
truly, I used the word small prey specialist, didn't I? Besides the fact that I didn't, and explicitly said " Relatively or very small ", so never really specifying how small that is, other than it's " Smaller than that animal ". Also, I don't think that doesn't respond to anything that I said in that specific comment, not that there is, the logic is like Lions hunting down adult elephants.
Also, so true... Let me see... Deinonychus- No, that guy is too small compared to most animals there. Allosaurus...? - Damn it! Everything is Sauropods! What about Dilophosaurus... Oh for f*ck's sake! Why are you bigger than everything in your formation?!
It’s true though
A trend towards gigantism, not that they were equal size. In fact your explanation would predict the largest herbivores in a given ecosystem would be only as large or slightly smaller than the largest predator, if that was sufficient to their defense. In fact we see the opposite as demonstrated by deinonychus and allosaurus and others, i.e. ecosystems where the largest herbivores are significantly larger than the largest predator
It's only in tyrannosaur faunas that we see somewhat of what you're predicting, because tyrannosaurs were hunting differently than earlier groups of theropods and their prey was defending itself differently
True. If you don't count ontogeny, truly they were always the largest than their contemporary predators. Also, I get that I also was very selective there when joking about it, but reality is that, is only true if you count those herbivores, and not count any other herbivore or potential prey item ( significant, as not every prey must be a herbivore ) being significant to those carnivores life-cycle or function in that ecosystem. Realistically speaking, Carnosaurs are mostly hypothesized on functioning by hunting sauropods, because that's what is given the most emphasizes, Allosaurus hunting a young Camptosaurus, instead of a Adult dangerous Stegosaurus or Apatosaurus, is very less " Cool ", so the opposite scenario is prioritized over anything else.
It's particularly interesting that even when offered prey their own size or smaller (rebbachisaurids), carcharodontosaurids prefer to eat the larger titanosaurs anyway
I don't think I have to repeat it.
Possibly because large carcasses are just more attractive to scavenging, but could also be because a larger sauropod is less agile and therefore easier to catch, or that the risk of hunting a bigger animal is offset by the larger amount of food given, or that a 10t juvenile titanosaur is less ''experienced'' at defense than a 5t adult rebbachisaur
Random, that is literally the meme of like " Thanks to my agility, i'm sure to win! ", but I agree with the latter part.
Likely all of the above
Also, to explain this, it's like saying that " Hypothetically a 50 ton steel ball would be too slow, and I would be sure to dodge it, thanks to my agility! ", unless you don't emphasize gravity, and forget that by how much strength associated with that object being thrown and relative weight of that object, you would in most scenarios: ||Die||
Really has nothing to do with what's cooler or not. You still haven't sufficiently explained ziphodont teeth repeatedly evolving in large bodied theropod lineages, an adaptation specific to large prey. Or their trends towards gigantism. Or how they'd compete with smaller mesopredators on the same prey base
So true, do you want to explain how unlike Ceratopsians and Hadrosaurs we do not see evidence of Sauropods surviving encounters with Carnosaurs, or to make it more easy, why we don't see evidence of Tenontosaurus surviving encounters with per say, Deinonychus?
Also, I think this is just very bad reasoning, because if it was not the case, and a lot of these theropods did not grow any larger, which some of the theropods of these formations didn't do, then you would make up another point that would have nothing to do with this.
The smaller mesopredators actually only hunted microscopic prey, thus avoiding competition with large predators hunting small prey
Also, just to refresh what I brought earlier, if those theropods are only hunting animals larger than them, and therefore animals that they cannot physically, not even nearly possible, pin down or grasp, why do they still have handclaws for that sorta of function? And did not went to a similar route like Abelisauris or idk, Elaphrosaurines?
Pathologies of any kind are very rare, but especially hunting related. If you're waiting for that as the only evidence you'll accept you'll wait a long time
Reminds me of a trend i've seen with some herbivorous dinosaur fans
healed pathology = the prey escaped, therefore the predator could not hunt that prey
non healed pathology = it must have been scavenging, therefore the predator could not hunt that prey
conclusion: predators can't hunt anything
I would, patiently wait for that, rather than imagining the " Lion hunting Adult Elephants " scenario. Also, unlike every other point, this is the only one that you cannot offer any reasonable explanation, which doesn't mean anything, we don't have answers to every argument, but it just shows you don't have one.
I could also say that bone related predation pathologies are going to be even rarer when it comes to gigantophagy because soft tissue is the primary target, indeed probably the only possible target
you shoulda see gen chat w this earlier today lmao
I just answered it in my previous response
How is an allosaur going to inflict damage to bones with a sauropod also escaping the encounter?
Oh thanks, do you happen to have a link or at least the full title (with datation) of the abstract? And did Carcharodontosaurids only target animals at least as big as them or did they hunt smaller prey too?
True. Also, I'm gonna just point out this, if Carnosaurs were so commonly hunting Sauropods, and per chance, Carcharodontosaurs are hunting Titanosaurs so much, why is it that all odds are against showing pathologies that would confirm prey and predator interaction between those two?
It happens with a reasonable frequency for Tyrannosaurs and their contemporary prey, so, what is the difference here?
Because carnosaurs are attacking soft tissue and not inflicting damage to the bone in their initial attack like tyrannosaurs are
But then we cannot confirm that Gbones, that would just be a hypothetical, where it could or couldn't happen. C'mon buddy!
Fascinating examples chosen
Gape studies support it
arent most healed predator-induced pathologies in ceratopsids/hadrosaurs in the skull regardless
I like the stupid size of Dilophosaurus ( I'm biased )
hypothetically if we were looking for something similar in sauropods thats gonna be at least somewhat impacted by there being relatively way fewer sauropod skulls
Believe so, yeah.
Also Sauropod skulls seem an unlikely target for most Carnosaurs...
Thats a really interesting idea
i'd kinda suspect this might just be the case as well but in that scenario the comparison with pathologies in ceratopsids/hadrosaurs falls apart in any case
It was posted in 2023, not sure which convention but I'll try to find out.
And carchs most certainly hunted smaller prey too, juvenile sauropods primarily, which were slower and less agile than other small animals and less well-defended. They just would be competing with tons of more abundant and faster predators when doing so, while larger subadult and adult sauropods would be something only the carchs could tackle
tbh, I was requesting for pathologies, but hypothetically, if any Carnosaur hunted a Sauropod, they would most likely just bite the tail, or the legs right? Which, at least for Titanosaurs, I don't think there is a lot.
I see. I'm surprised they only hunted sauropods in the vast majority of cases.
Caudofemoralis, the femoral artery, tendons in the legs probably, the belly is right there too. Komodos tend to go low first to bring the animal to its knees or side then they attack the throat or eat it alive. Low browsing and grazing sauropods would have very vulnerable throats as well even when standing
Your first two examples I don’t think disagree with the idea of concurrent trends in gigantism between theropods and their prey, kayenta is probably just an incomplete picture of the megafauna
Could you also find that one small sauropod tail pathology citation.
Okay but like, if you tried to bite the belly, you would only start to sing that song by Frank Sinatra, " I bite off More than I can chew! "
Fast food
" Can I eat some sauropods? "
" Only a spoonful! "
comically large spoon
Carchs are mostly found in environments that are very sauropod dominated; differs from tyrannosaurs which had plenty of other groups of large herbivores to hunt
Allosaurus again showing development of an extreme gape
Interesting. If you can just find more info on the 2023 paper it'd be perfect, but thank you already!
The hadrus bides it’s time until a sea level drop when they too can takeover the southern hemisphere home of the sauropodus
I don't think that sauropod-carch paper has been published yet, its just an abstract atm
it hasn't, I have been trying to find which abstract book it's in, but finding the source of an abstract from a title is hard
Titanosaurs were outcompeted by hadrosaurs during the late cretaceous due to their superior chewing. This is why they were still regularly producing giant taxa and successfully crossed over to hadrosaur-dominated north america
Okay, but like, isn't that just testing how much, hypothetically, the mouth of theropods could spread open? And like, let's say you are a Allosaurus, and you bite at some Apatosaurus belly, you better wish you can spread your jaw even further, because you gonna be stuck!
The extreme gape of allosaurus is an anomaly that calls for explanation. And no they won't be stuck thats precisely what ziphodont teeth are good at, slicing through flesh and not getting stuck
A desperate last-ditch attempt to preserve their presence before the asteroid kills all the dinosaurs, a group that were clearly going into decline in the end Cretaceous
Mammalian cunning would have defeated them all within a few million years regardless, the asteroid was simply a mercy
the mammalian cunning when taxation
To be honest I think it was a viable, if rare, strategy. You can easily kill a sauropod much larger than yourself by suffocation if you catch it with its head low. The difficult part would be finding one, presumably you would have to wait until one laid down to sleep (as even animals that sleep standing up have to lie down once in a while to get proper REM sleep)
how concrete would y'all say the rest of the connections between grass starters and prehestoric animals are?
That's a fair enough point tbh but I can't imagine it would be nearly as common as Tyrannosaurs going for Ceratopsids and Hadrosaur skulls as a killing blow
definitely not, as gbones said your average theropod is going for soft tissue damage when trying to kill things, not bone crushing (or airway crushing i guess would be the term here)
Should I watch this and risk a cortisol spike
WATCH IT!
After watching the videos and browsing over the sheer hubris in the comments section I am gonna huff a Tank of copium and convince myself that this is All satire
it's not
Don't ruin my fantasy kuitaran-san
I see. Is the full title the one in uppercase in the screenshot Random showed earlier?
I’m bored, why was saltasaurus so fat?
probably ate mainly plants that were difficult to digest and so needed very long intestines
R o b u s t
Oh that’s neat, long intestines, do we know why it’s so wide from the ribs or something else?
I don't know if salta has ribs preserved but its hips are ultra wide (also seen in other titanosaurs but not to the same extent)
Dang saltasaurus be thicc
Simply too rotund for predation
Also it seems like many depictions of it are exaggerated, it's not THAT wide
Oh wow, the hips are still super wide
But people do like the mighty Saltapotamus
I like the saltopotamus too
Eotriceratops and Titanceratops? Appreciation Post
Saltasaurus isn’t beating the allegations unfortunately
someone please measure eotrikes postcrania we cant let it be smaller than the average horridus with a 2.7m skull
Why is bro drawn as a Balloon
Adam lite
But its Actually small this time
Because it’s a speculative exaggeration
the fate of the free world hinges upon a single gat skeletal
Ain’t no way titanoceratops used that strong jaw and sharp beak only for plants and roots
Suffer
where did he even get 90% of the postcranial dimensions? who knows
every time i see this photo i remember an ancient day in the PK server where someone said ''it's interesting how eotrike is smaller than trike since its skull looks bigger'' but typed an N instead of a B
ngl if it werent for pot that'd probably be the most cultural relevancy eotrike would ever have after the gat skeletal
erhm the random jw figure
me when the skull reconstruction that I hate.
maybe big john is a late surviving eotriceratops and thats why it has a comically large head
Ngl is Scary how big this Skulls Get LOL
Big John wasn't getting trike ladies so it hide itself as a Torosaurus and get Toro ladies
This is one of my greatest fears
As punishment it got sold off never to be studied for its transgressions
True
so do this means there is an "anti-dinosaur" ? 
Yea, it's called asteroids
" The patient needs mouse-bites to live "
The medicine drug..
How gassy would Saltasaurus get
This is a genuine Paleontologian question
Triceratopsine Titanoceratops truther
this guy gets it
Fadeno's Titanoceratops
Its been a while
I stilll have that old skeletal
what would've moved faster in the water ( assuming the animals are the same size )
ichtyosaurs or plesiosaurs?
I'd say ichthyosaurus just because it's built more like a fish.
What's the deal of the hype over a giant pentaceratops?
Big dino cool
Triceratopsine Titanoceratops is the one truth
beyond the charm of early triceratopsini there is the dual benefit of ending anagensis conversations with one simple step
Yeah, gonna dip it into some bbq sauce and eat it
Also elaborate, you got me curious
I love how it looks
Personally my favorite ceratopsian but larger
the whole agujaceratops->utahceratops->pentaceratops->navajoceratops->terminocavus->coahuilaceratops->arrhinoceratops->triceratops uninterrupted lineage idea kinda falls flat if there's an animal closest to triceratops contemporary with pentaceratops
Torosaurus is and will always be my Favorite
And Adam will just make that go even higher
Tho Fadeno Titanoceratops more specifically its pretty much my 2nd Fav
Actually you can have that, without Titano
i suppose a grade one would expect under that model has never actually been recovered in the first place tmk but in any case titanoceratops is so comically incongruent with the idea regardless its hard to dislike it
Guess who lives with Anchiceratops, chasmosaurinae with the first epiparietals fused and Arrhinoceratops a chasmosaurinae with the first epiparietals not fused
yeah most of the transformations that are supposed to be critical to the anagenesis model just kinda have random reversals apparently going on which is moderately amusing
Tbh, similar thing with Centrosaurinae anagenesis where supposed " More Derived " and " Less Derived " forms are found at random in the same formation
ComeAlongPenta
Tbh making a Stego like this beauty is hard unless you bring Dr Latt Demphy himself like PK Did
But ngl trying to atleast make it similar can't be to hard, can it?
@hallow spear Explain.
tbf fitting 4 thagomizers and an entire set of plates is a hard feat to accomplish inside an egg, makes sense they'd gradually have everything be built up over the course of the animals life
Oooooooh, that's why
the smallest juveniles we know of have plates iirc
the plates at least are likely not something that the animal was born with, although they did develop quickly after birth (we have a pony-sized juvenile stego with a pretty normal looking plate)
At the size of PK's baby they should definitely be a lot more developed than this but it'd be a reasonable hatchling design
THe long shadow of Land Before Time
I do wonder if they play a bigger role in antipredator defense than we think given that pony-sized juvenile is definitely nowhere near sexual maturity
the question is why does a baby develop display structures slash thermoregulatory structure slash whatever Edit: jinx
where do you guys think dinosaurs lean on the sexual dimorphism graph?
reptile ( not much )
or
birds ( extreme in some species )
Antipredator seems like a likely possibility given they acquire them so early. In a small stegosaur it could disrupt the silhouette at a distance making it a harder target, we don't know how they were patterned there could be a camoflage element as well. In general it would make them harder to tackle and handle as prey items
crocs are the exception to this rule in reptiles, but so are komodo dragons and others
is it just mainly size for them?
pretty extreme size differences and behavior, yeah
behavior?
male crocs disperse over large distances, females less so if at all
ah alright, im gonna assume komodo's are the same?
Komodos have limited their territoriality in their artificially tight environment but general hierachies at kill sites and points of interaction are the same with large males dominating
females actually disperse in komodos I think
I suspect the really large sauropods would select towards larger females because a) larger mom typically means more egg production in reptiles and b) less strain on the female when/if mounted by a male if she's bigger than him
but given the total lack of concrete sexual dimorphism in dinosaurs we can't ever tell
in a thousand years we'll have big enough sample sizes
are pterosaurs the only mezosoic group we have some evidence of sexual dimorphism for?
if she's too big though she can't be mounted, which may select for very narrow differences in size between the sexes. Just a possibility
it's been controversially detected in dinosaurs, this is one of the more recent claims of detection (https://elifesciences.org/articles/89158)
Huh male komodos are bigger than females, why did I think it was the other way around
male-male combat partly selects for larger males in all varanids afaik and they're all highly dimorphic in size
you could suggest ankylosaurs and ceratopsids had larger males given all the intraspecific combat but 100% of individuals have those display features so who's to say the females weren't fighting just as much
they have an incredibly skewed sex ratio at adulthood too 3+ males to every female
Mutual sexual selection seems like a good model for dinosaurs given we don't have a bunch of bald ceratopsids and ankylosaurs
insert barnacle joke here
I think that speaks as well to those structures also being heavily antipredator in their evolution and function
their development doesn't seem to coincide with sexual or skeletal maturity
considering the thing that hunts them gets larger than modern day elephants on average with adaptations specified for crushing everything ever I'd imagine both you and your gf would also be well armed and bulked out
How do you guys feel about this 1979 interpretation of ceratopsians
the triceratops is horrible but this is funny
rare miss for McLoughlin, who was putting feathers on theropods in the 70s
I guess considering the time this book isnt too bad but there's still alot of strange things in it
It's very advanced for the time, dinosaur heresis wouldn't come out until 86 and digging dinosaurs 88 both are considered the seminal popular texts of the dinosaur rennaisance. There are some silly ideas in all of them though for sure
oh and predatory dinosaurs of the world should be included there, also 88
Thats interesting, now im gonna have to look into this more lol
there's a copy on archive.org (https://archive.org/details/archosaurianewlo00mclo) truly one of my favorite dinosaur books ever
tbh isn't it just partially right? Because yeah, the execution here is not correct, but we did find that the neck tissues did attach a lot more onto the frill, no?
It did but only to the base of the frill I'm pretty sure, nothing like he reconstructed, but fair enough I'll give it to him. McLoughlin rules
still crazy that Paleoartists who think out of the box tend to predict something eventually... But to be honest, it's like... Uuuuuuuuh... How do people say?
Suggesting 100 different scenarios, eventually one of those scenarios will be right ( something like that )
monkeys on a typewriter
yup.
Gerhard Heillmann was doing perfect paravians in the 20s
I got the book from a thrift store as a gift aswell as some others
Nice!! You have an underrated classic in your hands friend, what edition is it?
Heillmann's art, look at that hand anatomy
First?
That is incredible
yep that's a first edition, very cool I'm jealous. Been meaning to pick up a copy off of ebay all these years but never pulled the trigger
I wasn't even aware, thats really cool thank you
Read it! Enjoy 🙂
Would you eat Archaeopteryx wings?
only if I was marooned in the Solnhofen archipelago
@little mauve What if we invaded the museum housing the Neotype of Spinosaurus to get exclusive photos of the material? ( Ibrahim only offered atoms of bread in his paper )
I generally view Spinosaurus with detachment and wouldn' risk life and liberty to do so
What if we invaded the museum housing the holotype of Agathaumas sylvestris to get exclusive photos of the material? ( Cope's illustrations and measurements are still fine )
still a hard pass from me
What if we invaded the museum housing the holotype of Giganotosaurus to get exclusive photos of the material?
It wouldn't be exclusive for long, knowledge belongs to all mankind
True... But it doesn't mean that one shouldn't get it first
@little mauve what if we went to hunt Edmontosauruses?
( There's too many of them, so you can't say that I would negatively impact the ecosystem )
What uh, what thoughts could someone have lol
I love how in order to achieve sentience, animals need a human brain and similar anatomy
Literally no other way to achieve it apparently…
True, let's level up the game, and get two brains instead, like Legacy Stegosaurus
how else are they gonna design cars and vroom vroom go fast
dinosaur brain development is like this: smalll brain small brian small brain small body flight dense neurons small brain lots of neurons holy crap look at how many neurons there are. Without miniaturization they're never getting off the ground with respect to brains
What random said is correct, the plates should be more developed at that size thagomizers probably as well
@delicate scroll can I ask why ino got smaller?
iirc it was a miscale at first
" Small Brian "
I laughed way too hard at this lmao
i still maintain that at least 90% of people visiting the wcs have absolutely no clue what the ornatops skull actually is
Never been but based on that photo I can see why, really need some sort of silhouette at the very least
yeah the only thing actually conveying anything is the single rod
hey @sullen cairn what if someone named a dinosaur after you?
is that a Predentary?
mesasaurus butacensis gen et sp nov
premaxilla but that also took me way too long to figure out when i was there
Do not fret, I've solved the mystery!!!! /j
What do you think it is? Phylogenetically?
i dont think the brachylophosaur identity has ever been contested
unless you mean within brachylophosaurini in which case no clue outside whats been published
i think mcfeeter's thesis might've included it as well iirc
yeah, there seemed to have been no new attempts or contest of it's first placement
@sullen cairn What if I did a Ornatops skull reconstruction instead of the Nanuqsaurus one? ( I don't have access to nor permission to use work that includes the undescribed quadratojugal )
you'd have a lot more to work with than nanuq in any case so probably would be preferable
True. But would you be happy?
ornatops deserves more love for being an >80 Ma hadrosaur so i'd say go for it
You see, now I just tell you, what a certain demonic clown from a certainly not popular DnD Campaign has said once...
" Careful what you wish for!!! "
Have we ever considered the dinosaurs we already know show the trajectory of cerebrum expransion would the ones to evolve “sapience”
The bird... develops intelligence? Impossible
Also, the contract includes your soul and it will be stored in this bird cage.
hate it when that happens
you know how many of these things table has?
Yah, because it's like the ending of Chainsawman?
Ornatops goes " Keep Dreaming, Table! ", and the world resets ( The author has definetly not gotten bored and ran out of ideas at the same time )
Is it possible that more derived ceratosaurians like Carnotaurus still had a singular row of feature scales along the back, or do we actually have material of the randomly scattered feature scales on carnos back?
We don't find osteoderms on any abelisaur like Ceratosaurus, except Eoabelisaurus which might have a few on the back of the hip. Other than that we just have carnotaurus skin impressions which show a bunch of feature scales randomely scattered.
Oh and speaking of Carnotaurus, I’m disappointed by the lack of South American maastrichtian stuff in documentaries. Surviving Earth could have gone a new route and done South America for their maastrichtian extinction episode, but they chose Prince Creek cause it’s got a T. rex parallel.
Alrighty then
Fascinating how many familiar groups of dinosaurs evolved so early on.
Makes you realize how “loosely” related something like allosaurus is to say carcharodontosaurids, if that makes any sense.
Yup, Asfaltovenator from Early Jurrassic for example is usually found more closely related to allosaurus from late jurrassic than any of the other late jurrassic Carchs from Europe
And it’s apparently not even “allosaurid”? Crazy.
It is sometimes, sometimes not. Since it shares features with megalosaurs and piatnitzkysaurids. Really cool animal
It really is not to mention it's very complete
Wow you weren’t kidding
I love asfaltovenator. Its paper sorta revived Carnosauria
Its skull looks like neovenator's
how?
Idk where else to put this question so Does anyone know a good list of prehistoric marine reptile species? Like mosasaur species? Google doesn’t give me a definite answer especially with the mosasaurs and I’m not knowledgeable enough to know what’s right, I found lists online for the pterosaurs and dinosaurs so i could get a full list of them but I’m struggling with these
There’s probably a Wikipedia thing listing mosasaurs
Wow, when you sum it up like that I can fully understand why the entire community has lost it!
What anatomical features makes oxalaia a distinct species from spinosaurus?
Nothing. Cause it was a little skull nub that got turned to ash.
are therapods just the smartest out of the dinosaur groups and thats why their always depicted as becoming sapien?
Did you know that fish that can leave the water and survive for weeks without it? His evolutionary path is already complete. If the world doesn't end before then, those fish could become... Anfibians g2
Birds are the smartest dinosaur group
Birds are also theropods….
(Unless that was what you were adding on and I said this for no reason
)
They are indeed theropods, but curiously enough the little timmies doing spec evo never depict their sapient dinosaur as a regular bird, it’s always anything but that.
It just HAS to be hominid knockoff because humanity best evolutionary finale of all time!!!
well, what if you made that change?
Here is my spec evo sapient dinosaur I call it Aves neanderthalensis
what would this thing specalize in with its type of teeth arrangement ? @ancient crystal i know your a marine biologist so do you have a answer? https://x.com/NatSciChannel/status/2037027761026719772
Collect clams 1/35
Yeah I've heard about that recently
Very important
Hopefully this means we can cull off the “more oxygen made stuff larger!!!” argument
Apparently it's more about energy efficiency and simply being less practical
The function of the circulatory system can make a big difference though, which is why arthropods with more closed systems tend to have larger maximum sizes
cant lobsters grow forever and only die because they fail to molt
Yeah, though I'm not sure if that's because of circulatory, metabolism, or both
I also wonder if that's as much of a myth as "Crocodilians can grow forever"
iirc their cells dont age or sum shi like that, so tecnically we can make a behemoth if we help it molt and feed it forever
Also I think it's more about their bodies being more resistant to breaking down over time thanks to specific aspects of their genetics, but I'm not 100%
one the best kaijus fr
never forget in canon, showa ebirah is stronger than current hulk
my goat
I could easily see that
Getting off topic tho (wish there was an actual place to talk about things like this)
anyways on it, does anyone have some biology papers for the flora of later permian upper....earth lmao
funny how this implies there may be other factors into play.
Coincidentally, after we had a conversation yesterday about the supposed " Trends of Gigantism " in certain groups of theropods.
thoughts?
Yea
It Happens
thoughts on this discussion on twitter about the dinosaurs allos? it is about the dinosaurs allosaurus
I will say it's probably not as unlikely or horrible as people say it is (in this context), if you think about it we make most of our modern dinosaurs very smooth out of habit and conservancy.
thank you very much:D
Aren't they technically scutes? Don't think those count as feature scales
whats the difference between scutes, feature scales and osteoderms...
Also for the record I have no problem with the fact that the LOOP Allo has feature scales, but rather that they look nothing like any known dinosaur feature scales and more like crocodile osteoderms. I also believe they extend into an area we know didn't have feature scales
From my recollections, feature scales are just big scales, scutes are separate structures embedded in the skin, and osteoderms are another thing entirely and made of bone.
Lmao
thoughts on this whole thread? https://x.com/raftingzalmoxes/status/2037216506124399086
its a hot take for a reason given info shifts and you can very easily just say: maybe insert did insert and still show vs: we know insert had insert feature
me when the show about giving info gives misinfo( its ur fault actually)
That’s not at all what they’re saying
The whole thread is “Why should a documentary actually be a documentary when people can just search it up themselves”
Are there any renditions of what baby Tyrannosaurus looked like post nano? I want to draw T.rex families again 💀
...which would be that
giving debatable or outright false info and requiring the audience to verify it when the whole point of a documentary is to be where the info comes from
also hai falcon
Tarbo’s our best reference for now
Definitely a hot take, burnt the food with this one. They should absolutely specify what is made up and what is backed by our current research, or else people will take everything at face value and assume all of it is true, when that won’t be the case.
It’s not even verifying information
It’s “Oh, you found this idea cool? It’s your job to actually learn about it” instead of presenting any information about the initial subject
Hello
ja
True, we shouldn't have speculation in paleo-documentaries at all. Because, certainly, Paleontology is full of definitive answers... And certainly, those answers will not change or correct themselves in the future, so we shouldn't encourage our viewers to research or discuss about those topics. And that's how we fail at basic education.
All-in-all, the thread is a lovely example of why you need to interact with individuals outside your comfort zone to get a well-rounded view of the real world
I don’t think having no speculation at all will be any more beneficial, but at the very least there should be disclaimers and narration about it to not confuse anyone
I was being sarcastic, because it's really the pinnacle of " Not understanding Paleo " and therefore failing at communicating Paleo. Yes, maybe there should be disclaimers, but I think documentaries just fail at explicitly saying that our perspective or impression of how extinct animals look has a margin or is entirely subjective ( Subject to which animal we are talking about ), if you pass your information ( in this case, reconstruction ) as " What these dinosaurs looked like " ( implied " definitiveness " ) , you essentially do not prepare the viewer to how information about that animal will change in the future. As I said " Failing at basic education ".
Sorry, Moderator removed that, let me rephrase that last part, to fit the rules: You are just creating a generation of " People who do not really understand that topic and do not accept the new reality surrounding those topics. "
i ain't reading all that 
Here, I narrated it for you, using Brian, so you don't have to read it
🍺 🍻

I love Microraptor because to me, being a gliding dinosaur in the canopy is the coolest thing ever, and I also love dense forests and arboreal animals and the thought of being arboreal and only living in the canopy or emergent layer your entire life
Cuts to prehistoric planet and the cave diving triceratops herd in the corner
I was hoping for some Voice Acting... 😔
I can do accents, so maybe next time
💎 🔍 🧐
I can’t heal or recover stamina for some reason
Wrong channel
cool pfp btw.
I’ve tried relogging for over an hour even in hopes I could heal or recover stamina but it is still not doing so
oh oops
I think it's kinda impossible to separate speculation from actual proof, because imagine if every two seconds a documentary went "idk tho".
Made the scale bar the wrong size by accident
wait did u hear about the usili formation gorgonopsid, its as big as your miscaled version of ino
I think its as big as your miscaled version
Ironic
yeah if you want Dino knowledge discord is probably the worst place to get it anyway 😁
Unless you're asking me of course. I know everything, and anyone who disagrees with me is wrong.
@brisk quiver Give me a reason to think T rex wouldn't hunt the larger herbivores in its environment.
Hello fellow fossil enjoyers
There is evidence it fed on them, and evidence that it attempted to hunt them. Logically, if it attempted to hunt something often enough for it to appear in fossils, then it must have been able to hunt them. There's nothing preventing it from hunting them either.
Also to grow the sizes it did, it would need to hunt large prey. It would not be able to sustain that size off of small animals
I can't say it didnt, but was clearly going for them in very very rare occasions. It's jaws weren't even made for clamping and holding on big animals. Watch how croc tried to grab the back of Borneo elephant and failed, now imagine rex trying to hold onto a big trike after ambush (impossible head on already) which is literally a ball
https://youtube.com/shorts/3lKqg4mMA_Y?is=zdIoUA4n4tmaplwg
While wildlife filmmakers were capturing a peaceful river crossing, a massive crocodile was secretly waiting beneath the surface.
While I am not Mr.Triceratops maybe the threat of damage could have stopped it from attacking most of the time but at the same time because of the size of the T rex I find it hard to believe that it wouldnt go after the bigger dinosaurs as it wouldnt be able to survive just based off a scavengers diet. But im a dummy so ignore my words
Tbh, I'm leaning to the idea that at least with E. annectens ( and perhaps E. regalis, if you count the campanian record of Tyrannosaurus ) it probably wasn't very good at it.
Honestly more a missed opportunity to depict places we’ve actually found paleokarst landscapes
or even scavenging honestly its just way too damn big for it to be able to do that and reach maturity
Also large size means it ate proportionally large prey, doesn't mean it went for large healthy adults
2-3 ton edmont or trike is already a massive animal
A few things here: the assertion that it "was not made to clamp onto big animals" is outright false and it shows clear adaptations for it. There's no evidence it was particularly uncommon. And, your video is not a suitable allegory. Very different animals with a much larger size difference
Its an example of rex like jaws failimg to hold onto a large round animal
Name me adaptations for holding onto big round things in rex
Of course predators will target easier prey items when they can. But adult T rex show clear adaptations for focusing on prey with a large body size
the croc is unable to hold onto an elephant four or five times its size - evidence that t.rex could not hold onto a triceratops of the same size as itself
2-4 tons is already a large body size. And allosaurids or charcharodonrosaurids clearly were more suitable for hunting large prey.
Clearly? You think the 8ton predator with the strongest bite force of any land animal wasn’t suitable for hunting large prey
What size has to do with ability of jaws to clamp onto a big round animal
Croc can't grab onto smth as round as elephant from above
Hows rex holding onto trike's back after ambush?
These are not "rex like" jaws at all. None of T rex's prey items were that relatively large. T rex shows increased body size, a robust and solidly sutured skull, large jaw and neck muscle attachments, a robust neck, increased agility and decreased speed. These are adaptations for dispatching relatively large prey, i would argue approaching the t rex's own body size
So then more possibly could it have done something like that wolves and lions do where they will chase down a herd and go after the weaker animal? After all they would be the last to run and and the last to be able to react
What exactly do you think the Rex was predating on? What caused it to have those adaptations if not large prey?
Carnivores only tend to get large individuals when they've grown or established themselves in areas where prey density is not only high, but where availability is practical for it. Because beyond that, a lot of Tyrannosaurus specimens don't tend to get pretty large.
Being robust is not adaptation for large game hunting, otherwise giga or allo should be worse at it than rex (they were better at it)
You have no reason to place an arbitrary limit on T rex's prey range like that. Carchs and tyrannosaurids simply evolved different strategies of predation
Tiger is more robust than leopard yet tiger goes for proportionally smaller prey than leopard.
They are adaptations for T rex's method of taking on prey. Allosaurus was a generalist, and carchs had adaptations for attacking vastly larger, fleshy prey. Not similarly sized or slightly larger, often armored prey
Basically this and also keep in mind big healthy adults were the a very small portion of large herbivore populations
Well tigers are more aggressive then leopards and will take down the prey in a more open style then leopards who quite literally jump down from a tree onto the backs of its prey
A lot of sauropods were armored as well as nodosaurids they went after
snow leopards in the corner being the smallest big cat but hunting the largest prey
most predators will do this and it was probably the case for rex as well, there is no reason to believe it would be scared of or unable to hunt adult Triceratops (fossil record clearly shows the contrary), but if the Triceratops stood its ground and fought back instead of running, the rex would most likely give up the hunt
Leopards very rarely jump on a prey from a tree. They are not clouded leopards to do that.
Yup yup realized my mistake when I wrote it my bad
Triceratops rarely ran cuz it wasn't able to run. With those legs and pelvis it fast walked at most and why would it try to fast walk away from rex literally killing itself to it
Nodosaurids that carchs went after were notably smaller. Also, you may be thinking of Acrocanthosaurus, who was perhaps more robustly built tham T rex. Giant carcharodontosaurids were very robust animals, but to a lesser degree than T rex, reflecting their different method of attacking prey
This is what separates hunting from combat or AVA
Hunting is fear tactics intended to force a mistake that leaves a fatal weakness. It is not supposed to be combat, it is supposed to be a mauling where they cannot fight back.
that was my thinking as well as I cant see a reason why a T Rex would think its a good idea to approach a dinosaur that has 3 spears for a head honestly.
Trex had close to none chances vs defending triceratops in direct combat btw
Triceratops is a dangerous prey item. T rex would most likely try to ambush and cripple it before it can react or face it. Otherwise, it's not really doable
ehhh thats a bit of a stretch (the "no chance" thing)
so then are we discussing a hunting situation or a combat situation? Cause even then a more careful rex could potentially take down a Triceratops I feel like in a combat situation
This i agree, theres a reason rex was ambush predator
A lot of prey items within Tyrannosaurus' pre-historical range aren't that big or generally tend to have a pretty poor sample of large individuals preserved
This includes non-triceratopsini chasmosaurines, lambeosaurines, nodosaurids, ankylosaurids, triceratopsinis, ornithomimosaurs, oviraptorsaurs, pachycephalosaurs, etc.
I would say head-on, T rex most likely loses. But it has a good chance of pulling off a kill if it can get in behind the triceratops. It could cripple its hind limbs or bite into its spine outright
Tyrannosaurus could almost certainly still overpower a Triceratops in actual combat often.
Only the absolute largest specimens would have a good chance at fending it off, but the internet seems to ignore that not every animal is the record largest specimen
It is possible for T rex to overpower a triceratops from the front, depending on the size/strength of both individuals, but it is still risky
that was my thinking as well. A predator is a predator for a reason and depending on what it preys on more it has very specific tactics for it even if the prey also has tactics to defend it from being eaten.
Even in herbivores that can easily kill their predators in outright combat their first instinct is often to run, especially if they live in herds where it is safer to run away and hope the predator eats the guy next to you
It is risky but its not like horns are the end-all, be-all of natural defense
Look at animals today, if that was the case, EVERYONE would have horns
Is it weird I was thinking a tail swipe horizontally from a t rex to a charging triceratops would knock it on its side?
If I had to wager, I'd say that Triceratops is the most dangerous prey item a T rex could target (in its northern range. Alamosaurus is a different story)
Internet also seems to ignore frill+3 horns and literally no armor on rex's front
I think, to be fair it does not make a lot of sense to insinuate a scenario where T. rex goes head on with a Triceratops, only if so the individual is inexperienced, because it is ignoring principles of how carnivores will always prefer to approach prey with less risk associated with them.
Thank god Rhinos are immune to predation attempts by lions because of their giant horn and armored leather
This is true, anky is not even close with how small it actually was
Seems to be the case with any Ceratopsid.
I think they'd be better off leading with a bite. I imagine tail swipes coming into play more in combat between t rex individuals
In this case I believe the discussion is what would happen if a fully grown T Rex and triceratops were forced into an open confrontation like say a Triceratops defending its offspring
Yeah it's a little overrated. Would probably not be easy to kill as an adult, but probably less outright risk
Rex would do best to leave. Getting gored is the last thing it wants
Yeah ppl genuinly thinking rex had 50/50 head on fight with trike baffles me
Depends really on the size of the specimens IMO. An 11 ton Rex is probably able to handle a 7 ton trike
Yeah that's a little silly. Even with T rex's agility it would be hard to get around the head
but wouldnt that leave its neck open to potentially being speared by one of the triceratops horns?
Also there is the matter of attacking angle since the T Rex would would (im assuming) be coming at it from a higher angle
7 tons is already too much to easily push away
If your pelvis or femur is shattered before you know what hit you, you're not gonna turn around to fight back
What does pushing away have to do with this?
I dont know thats still a really big dino for a TRex to safely attack
Although it's possible, I personally tend to lean to the idea that Lions hunting of larger and realistically more risky prey is more so influenced by our intervention. Density of herbivores has been largely affected, and extant evidence seems to suggest that lions attempt to hunt animals that although possibility was on the table, the risks associated with it should make those options only available in cases of desperation ( Not really a " Walk in the Park " scenario )
How is 11 ton rex killing 7 ton triceratops for you?
Rex's safe approach would be an ambush from behind. The front is simply not doable, and the side risks it seeing or turning in time more.
True true
By being 50% larger and simply manhandling the prey animal like how the majority of predation happens in the real world
Don't think so honestly.
but its not its 40%?
Not saying it's impossible, but there's no situation where attacking an adult Triceratops headon is a good idea
And honestly for predators even 50% larger then the prey can still be kinda risky depending on the prey
The frill makes it nearly impossible to get a killing bite. The head is on a ball joint, it can turn the horns to you really quickly. The only real chance is to try to use the horns as a lever to turn its head but that's pretty risky too
I think it's kinda funny that we are suggesting that Triceratops could be less risky on dependence of the specimen, as if a 7 ton trike would be any different than a 13 tons ( Exaggeration for effect ) Trike. It's like saying you can beat a 1.53 m tall person with a knife than a 1.90 m tall person with a knife, my brother! The problem is not the person, it's the knife! And in Triceratops case it's the horns!
Y'all have made a boring day at the office entertaining lol
Good to hear xd
I wouldve completely missed this if I hadnt called in sick so im happy lmao
I will even add to this, but the general lack of more widespread samples that conclude a overall presence of " Gigantic " Triceratops and Torosaurus individuals should tell that they are doing pretty fine.
Lol my job just doesn't have me very busy. I get free time at my cubicle
trike's biggest flaw was not evolving the musth that made edmontosaurus immune to all predation
Horns exactly where rex's chest and neck are
The front is the absolute last angle it should try to attack a Triceratops from, lol
The rex can bite basically anywhere from the neck to the hips and the trike is going down, you're not fighting anything with a crushed spine or hips
Yeah, hence the importance of pulling off an ambush AND bite placement
True, as such there's abundant evidence of that scenario happening so easily.
I'm just pointing out that Triceratops is not nearly as large compared to Tyrannosaurus as people tend think it is. It's not like a single horn stab is instant death
Instant death is not the only bad outcome here
Its fatal wound at the slightest with rex retreating and dying after
Do me a favor, replace that with AMNH 5027 or BHI 3033
Just like we have abundant evidence of Triceratops successfully defending itself from attack
We only have a few dozen triceratops specimens total lol
Good luck surviving spear to your organs
See? Lol
If the horns go all the way in, it's game over. A shallow stab would still suck and could get infected, etc
We at least have 3 triceratops/torosaurus individuals with healed bite marks on their front
Triceratops is short, still big tho
So, we do know T rex attempted to hunt them and that T rex ate them. That's plenty of evidence right there
They're the most common large animal in the environment of course it hunted them
Realistically, we would be expecting a grapple type of combat
oop you changed sentence lmao
Rex is also very common for a large macrocarnivore
I believe their primary prey as adults would have been edmontosaurus
Primary prey was anything up to 2-4 tons, like young trikes, edmontos, toros etc
We also have many Edmontosaurus with healed bitemarks from Tyrannosaurus clearly indicating that they were able to successfully defend themselves from this "tyrant lizard"
Source for that number?
True, more like successful at escaping.
Wishful thinking
Its not exact number, up to 4-5-6 tons
Escape =/= defeat in combat
No I chose that wording on purpose to comment on the fact that a healed bitemark doesn't necessarily mean they fought them off into submission or anything like that
Healed bite mark on the face surely means that.
Thats why I said "on the front"
Healed bite mark on the face could plenty well mean that the Tyrannosaurus aimed for the neck and got intercepted by the shield.
We can say that, based on modern predators, it would probably prefer easier prey items
Shocking.
And easier prey item is anything smaller than rex itself and slow enough to not escape it.
Ambush predator's prey range is anything that gets close basically. They are extremely well documented to be capable of taking on much larger prey than is reasonable when surprise is involved
Doubt 3 ton trike will run fast enough to avoid adult rex
To an extent, sure. Too small would be more difficult to catch and not provide as much food
Yeah, I believe even the really large edmontosaurus could have been targeted by T rex. It had the equipment to kill them and ambush could put it in a position to do so without getting bulldozed
Ambush hunting is not only the ambush itself but also about killing prey fast enough.
that is also assuming that carnivores will always have a full meal, which often they do not. You get pretty heavy when you are full, surprisingly.
T rex, luckily, had a biological instant kill button for whatever it'd fit its jaws around
Great time to go lay in a sunny patch and take a nap. I'm sure it would target relatively small prey at times
Nothing wrong with that, mind you, but it's pretty documented that carnivores who often engage on eating more than necessary, tend to often develop a pretty unhealthy habit, and develop obesity from it, oftenly disabling a lot of their capabilities in the process. It also happens in Extant Dinosaurs, some bald eagles have to go through rehabilitation to often loose the habit of eating constantly.
Not like that, thats why there are healed rex bite marks. It's all about how it bit and where it bit
Yep, very true. Bite placement is key for Rex's equipment. Too shallow of a bite or biting an area that won't cripple or kill could ruin a hunt
That's funny. Sign of a successful predator though, yeah?
I guess.
Yeah all those obese wild lions and tigers, very much a thing
Don't try telling Sue to go on a diet
What do you mean? They have a perfect diet. They literally just had a Juvenile Edmontosaurus on their mouth the other day ( What you should expect )
On the flip side of that, predators tend to have a pretty low success rate when hunting, so it makes sense for them to eat as much as possible when food is available, because they aren't guaranteed a next successful hunt, or the next five after.
Yeah I hear they're low in fat. We should be proud of her
Gorging is pretty much a universal predator behavior for that reason, it doesnt cause obesity
is this the biggest Triceratops?
Not disagreeing with that, I'm just saying that, realistically a lot of carnivores don't tend to eat to the point of becoming full, that is observable in African Carnivores, they often do not eat to the point of getting full, even though it's completely within their possibilities.
and tbh one stab from the horns is enough to make T.rex back down
I've seen them eat an insane amount at once too. I think it would be more common when they're targeting relatively large prey, since there wull be fewer opportunities for those kills
yup, also can happen.
i am curious if ornithopods would react to predation differently than mammals.
I've noticed on a lot of kreuger park cams buffalo just sort of forget they can body the predators and sit there and get eaten
Mammals are allegedly smarter
I'm trying to find a video, of a youtube channel of a guy who worked at a place meant to rehabilitate birds of prey, in America, but I can't find those ( that and the AI Slop flooding the results also doesn't help )
Tag me when you do
Mammals always fear of getting wounds, even elephants occasionally just avoid confrontations
No, predators typically eat as much as they can as quickly as they can in a sitting due to low success rates of hunts and high rates of kleptoparasitism. The latter is the main reason why a predator would abandon a carcass. Don't know why youre being contrarian on this
Also in buffalo' case, they get tired after 3 lions basically sit on their back and can't really fight back after they are tired
I think what they mean is that predators will also sometimes just grab a much smaller animal and eat it, like a snack
I remember a video following some African hunter gatherers. While they were on the way searching for big game, they also shot small birds and stuff and ate them.
@steep atlas So, I was wrong with the species only when I was trying to remember the video:
https://youtu.be/jOx6JmhH3-0
Please Slow Down for Eagles
Downloads: https://www.gowildlife.org/slow/
🔹Though outstanding hunters, Eagles have a very high failure rate
🔹Combined with shrinking habitats, they often feast on roadkill.
🔹A large meal increases the weight of Eagle
🔹Extra weight creates added difficulty to resume flight and return to cover
🔹Please ...
But the specific video I don't think I'll find.
Thanks anyway! Need a cool video
@steep atlas I did find this too:
https://youtu.be/Dhlg07NeuwE
‘Too fat to fly’ bald eagle found near battlefield in Missouri has been rehabilitated
That's hilarious lmao
No, a larger Triceratops specimens alongside a large Tyrannosaurus specimen
( said crocodile is literally 4x smaller vs being outright bigger than the elephant)
raccoon roadkill... how appetizing.
That’s neat, I never knew obesity could happen naturally in the wild
it's a little weird how it's all just in the crop
Im actually so happy rn
i am immediately buying this when it comes out
AMNH 5027 is a Pretty small Rex, not even close to what can argue is the average
How many large Tyrannosaurus specimens are there?
Atleast 1
Depends what you wanna count as Large, AMNH is maybe 7.9t based on Demphy's, which gets smaller than Stan, The Holotype, Sue, Scotty, The Rex I forgot from the Growth Paper, and Probably few others I am forgetting
Trike is a "small" Rex for what seems to be average, Trike is smaller than Rex on Average
But like, its still a Massive Animal lol
It been short is helpful
1 that is nicely preserved, yeah. The rest is either a partial skeleton, or just 1 isolated or fragmented bone.
All this Trike and Rex Convo only for Toro to Mog Them
toro is trike lite
so by whatever metric, how many Tyrannosaurus specimens are around AMNH 5027's size? Approximately?
My parents are getting it for me 🤭
Kinda better than most large Trikes tbh
Which are Mostly just Skulls/partial skulls
Unless you wanna add the undescribed willard
actually, it's 1 skull from T. prorsus and " Triceratops maximus " doing the " Potential Man " meme.
Do yall think the articulation is gonna be comparable to the first T. Rex or have they improved the articulation since? Cus that one was basically a brick from what I've heard
Can't wait for Adam to be out Publically so ppl stop calling Toro "Trike lite"
@queen oar would had to check the list but most are closer to the Holotype or even Stan size than AMNH 5027, and "Maximus" can be Considered Horridus tbf
All Mogged by Adam
also, I get this, but I don't think either Trike or Toro are doing pretty well by the time they were around. Don't get me wrong, I hate Triceratops, and love Torosaurus, but it's pretty clear that, Torosaurus at least and other Triceratopsinis, have a much denser population by the south, than the Hell Creek or any formation around the north.
Toro is pretty rare yeah
like, the north is essentially just Edmontosaurus land.
as it turns out, they discriminated heavily against other dinosaur species. they had a lot of slurs too
Edmonto decided to Dominate Hell Creek
I have my own suspicions of what " Triceratops maximus " is, but I'd rather not share them, or I'll likely get crucified. But, given that what Adam's discovery would imply, it's that Triceratopsini postcrania can be a lot more variable, and a lot more indicative of what sorta of animal it can be, and maximus does have part of the vertebrae preserved, but probably not enough to identify with 100% certainty. Realistically, I'm of the opinion that we need more studies on Triceratopsini postcrania, rather than Triceratopsini cranial material.
The Triceratopsini Post Crania is...
hit or miss?
Hit take?
We need more of it
Sure Skull are cool and all
But knowing what the body actually was is cooler lol
not only that, but we do definetly need more Triceratopsini researchers. Triceratopsini reseach is taking long, mainly from what I heard, there not being enough people or enough motivation to really go in-depth about Triceratopsinis.
Edmontosaurus doesn't dominate the Hell Creek, it's an equal or smaller percentage of the faunal composition than Triceratops in most studies
Hopefully with Adam more ppl get motivated
Don't think I see a lot of Ceratopsid researchers discuss about this guy:
Agathaumas the Forgotten
the only one from Lance Formation that has a good description.
Lol
Yoooooooo I am GETTING that
maybe he got them later in the neck or wherelse? we dont have all bones :p
common torosaurus L
That's gruesome af
Mark Witton is known for rex glazing so its not something thats really gonna happen :/
Mark Witton has a literal post about ceratopsian horns being bad at combat vs predators cuz "deer don't use antlers to fight wolves" yet ppl still use his art as example in 2026🥀
Perhaps the person named Mr. Triceratops is biased towards the ceratopsids
At least im not saying triceratops decapitated live tyrannosaurs
its what your not saying
We ignore the paleontologist's art because he drew my favorite dinosaur losing a fight
You give rex fans the idea and they are gonna twist it 100 times so it looks like rex is even more dominating alpha king animal of the world
so is the trike guy butthurt about animal that isn't even triceratops being hunted?
theres a difference between being a dinosaur fan and being a paleo-fan
Mark Witton drawing rex killing smth in a most rex fan'ish way possible is as accurate as I'll draw triceratops decapitating live tyrannosaurus
do you mean the art where rex decapitates an already dead trike which we have fossil evidence actually occurred
or the art where it rips a chunk off the thigh of a torosaurus which is a common strategy for many predators
Mark Wytton is a tyrannosaur fan.
It's rex's fault for having such a huge head to bite big things, was clearly just trying to get more fans
are ypu saying hes not a paleotologist fan?
He's literally a published paleontologist. What is this fan stuff, get outside of that world for your own sake
Rex fans say rex decapitated live trike
There is no common strategy involving ripping a leg off a live same sized animal with defenses which Mark Witton literally said are bad cuz "deer antlers are not used to fight off predators"
facts
We'll either have Rex mauling the absolute life out the herbivores it lived with or Triceratops bull in musth goring the animal evolved to take down the animals it lived with
And I'm ngl
The whole % chance thing getting real old because there is practically no real way to tell how often each side could have either killed or defended themselves against their opponent
It can go either way
The predator gets the meal or the prey gets to live another day
It all comes down to the situation they're in
How healthy they are, where they are and etc.
Shout-out to the Tyrannosaurus tooth lodged in the Triceratops vert
Well Mark Witton only draws rex dominating the hell out of smth so ig it's very paleo accurate and cool cuz rex glazer is also shockers a paleontologist
It just seems like you didn't read the post then
Witton says "A caveat to all this, and a particularly necessary one in case we get swept along by the T. rex hype train, is that we shouldn’t imagine major dismantling of Triceratops carcasses taking place with freshly killed or otherwise untouched bodies. Neat as it is to imagine Tyrannosaurus ripping the head from a freshly-vanquished Triceratops, waving it aloft and roaring triumphantly like some kind of 8-tonne Predator, modern animals generally follow reliable carcass consumption patterns where easily accessed and nutritious tissues are eaten before difficult-to-access or less-nutritional parts (Blumenschine 1986). "
He’s a big fan of dinosaurs, that’s why he spent all this time getting the phd, so he can fan-out
Btw Jack Horner is also paleontologist
Randomdinos makes a very good point and citation
T. rex posters in his locker....
why are ytou bringing up[ jack horner and comparing him to someone no where near as bad as him tahts mad disrespectful
Who says it’s something that can’t happen? Tyrannosaurus was a pretty huge and powerful animal, and usually larger on average to most of its prey items
Both Jack Horner and Mark Witton are phd paleontologists, nothing wrong here.
jack horner is alot worse
Lmao this is absurd
You brought him up for another reason though, to discredit what was being said as saying “well THIS guy is a paleontologist so what does THAT mean??”
Witton also said triceratops horns were bad at inter species combat cuz deer dont fight
I’m not sure Witton ever said that but if you’re claiming he did you should at least give the actual quote
This is also false, he says horns evolve primarily to fight other members of the same species (true) and can be secondarily used to fight predators
Triceratops horns being bad at defense is based on the idea that the adult horns had backwards curved tips, which is supported by fossil evidence, but not confirmed
Which is bs cuz he based it off antelope and deer
If you read the post you'd know there was a wider basis than that
An animal with prominent head ornamentation, which differs from the triceratops which also has prominent head ornamentation
Surely if smth has horns or antlers they are all same, at least dear Witton thinks like that
@brisk quiver you keep trying to cry “rex glazer” but based on context clues it seems you’re incredibly biased towards a certain other animal, primarily one that was hunted by rex. 🤪
"So, in sum, the take-home here isn’t that anti-predator roles for ceratopsid horns are a non-starter, but that the behaviours of living animals complicate this seemingly simple hypothesis"
Don't mess with us herbivore fans...
While he does have quite a few pieces of Rex hunting or tearing something apart, it ain't always one sided in his art
(Additionally there's that piece where Quetz pair bullies a Rex off of a carcass)
Im biased towards triceratops, which, indeed, got hit hard by rex glazing
Also quoting the post: The message from the modern day is that horn-like structures can and might be used against predators, but that this behaviour is by no means ubiquitous. It may not even be that common, according to some researchers. It seems that intraspecific selection is more than sufficient to explain most horn-like structures among living species and that predatory influences, if present at all, are relatively minor for most species. We can’t know how much of this insight can be transferred over to dinosaurs, but if ceratopsid facial anatomy was being shaped by intraspecific factors (and we think it was; see above), then we have to entertain all that this brings. This means, in addition to the traditional view of horned dinosaurs being effective foils of predatory theropods, we have to consider some other possibilities suggested by their modern analogues. These could include, for instance, that only some horned dinosaurs actively fought predators; that their retaliations against attacks may have been ineffectual; and that some species may have rarely, and maybe never, turned their horns against other species.
He’s right, in the real world, the herbivores are underglazed! They are so strong, often killing their predators, who are rarely successful in the hunts!
So you admit to arguing & discrediting arguments against tyrannosaurus because of bias towards it….?
See the difference, rex tearing everything and triceratops looking angrily at trex at most
Only rex has the right to gore
" Only rex has the right to gore "
omfg
The triceratops will have to unionise for the right to gore
Going to break character here and say if Witton glazes anything it's azhdarchids
Two quetzalcoatlus scaring off a rex in PhP was absolutely his idea lol
I'll say Witton should def see more cape buffalo defensive behavior, then say "horns are used for inside species combat"
Is it wrong that I can see this happening
So cool, rex actually ate triceratops, wow
wowwww
Can we just not engage with this guy anymore
"It’s absolutely true that some species, like muskox, African buffalo, various rhinos and red deer use their cranial ornament aggressively against predators (Geist 1966, 1999; Schaller 1972; Kruuk 1972) and it is assumed that predator deterrence may explain the presence of horns in a great number of bovids (e.g. Packer 1983; Bro-Jørgensen 2007; Stankowich and Caro 2009; Metz et al. 2018)" read the damn post
I was gonna say basically that yeah
OMG RANDOM, DID YOU JUST BREAK CHARACTER (big paleo scandal)
Out of all dangerous herbivores of Hell Creek which clearly were able to kill rex, they chose the 250 kg pterosaur to actually fight it. And triceratops was killed off screen leaving a scratch on rex
Adds to global rex glazing issue
"rex is a scavenger, it didn't kill it, just found a dead one"
Breaking news dinosaurus
Rex is not scavenger but there are no certain cases where it actually killed smth above 2ish tons
‘global’ yes I’m sure the world outside North America cares about triceratops
Anyway if we want to talk about antipredator adaptations in triceratops I think the frill is a pretty solid one. Triceratops is the only ceratopsian to not have two giant structural weaknesses in the middle of its frill
Most based dinosaur media btw
Of only they weren't trying to hype on Walking with Dinosaurs name
I mean
It certainly did try and hunt big animals
We can't forget about the healed tooth marks found on lot of the animals it ate
Is this image tuff or should I do a different pose
This and predator with density this high will less likely go for smth big btw
Otherwise it would eat herbivores to extinction lol
Exactly
Is clearly inaccurate, the pachus should have cheeks!
Of course torosaurus with holes in its frill was still able to survive rex attacks, but it only needs to survive often enough, and that doesn't mean trike's solid frill wasn't an advantage
Trike horns were literally pointing upwards
I think frills are kinda useless against rec
The pachyrhino should be eating the rex alive because the trikerasock was the ultimate predator, aside from edmusthosaurus annectens of course
Cameron is such a good rex, he looks pretty well with my "alamosaurus" (apatosaurus)
"Rex is so cool and im so original to glaze it"
your doing to much rn
Son
PNSO alamosaurus is pure bs
“I only care about dinosaurs to powerscale them and argue against people that disagree with my worldview without providing ample argumentation points, despite doing nothing but said powerscaling to real animals that provide and showcase so much more about prehistoric ecosystems that came before us”
I mean they can't stand up to a full power bite but anything that gets in the way of a bite to the neck is good
Rex missing the first strike due to the frill gives the ceratopsian a chance to stab it
I guess
@stiff osprey sorry to tag but PNSO Cameron is offically my first PNSO figure
If they’re getting upwards of ten tonnes they must be eating a whole lotta fish or something
Im sitting quiet until some guy decides to taunt me with rex glazing art
how heavy would the average adult trike horn be?
Are you dense
Idk what's the real issue with a macropredator preying on large herbivores
The thing is adapted to prey on the animals it lived with
Big, agile, bone crushing bite, forward facing eyes, what else am I missing
And if it can get the jump on them, it certainly can hunt and kill them given what it has against large, slow moving, armored herbivores
Baller, the unarticulated one is my favorite mass produced rex figure
There is actually a weight limit for predators going after smth their size or bigger (active macropredators) which is 1600ish kg iirc
If you get triggered by a artwork of animal predation even when not directed towards angering you, then that’s a you issue
Trike and Anky's defence against rex was basically this, can't bite if you can't grip
as of right now what are your recommendations for PNSO when it comes to accuracy (as of current 2026)
Im triggered by rex overhype
my favorites are the Stego, Tsintao, Cameron, Aymen spinosaurus, Yangchuanosaurus, "Saurophaganax", Tylosaurus and Camarasaurus
all of which I own except the tsintao which was too expensive
well you've been doing to much
If anything you’re overhyping ceratopsids. You’ve been doing this since like 11am lmao
PNSO edmonto is the best thing happened to humanity
Thats relative to the size of the predator not an absolute number. Predators preferentially take prey between half and twice their size.
Saying rex didnt go for large adult healthy triceratops is overhyping alright
PNSO articulated giga is next id assume. They wouldn’t risk a species any more obscure for their new line of figures.
Ceratopsians are a bit overhyped tbh, the Real Horned Stars were always the Abelisaurs!!!
1600kg what. What does that mean
The nanotyrannus became victim to the tyrannomusthosaur
Weight limit for active land macropredator
Not at all. Just blatantly wrong. It most likely didn’t make a large part of its diet, but it did hunt them. Rex is our most studied dinosaur, and the consensus is that they would target a triceratops as part of its diet
Lion pack hunting a elderly elephant: “don’t mind me”
Name me at least one case where lions actually attacked adult elder elephant
trying to send it again
when their dying
A few weeks ago there was an big edmonto skull published with a rex tooth in it iirc, probably a teenage rex taking it down
Predators will never go for the hardest to kill prey possible.
Another overestimation by carnivore bias
ok maybe/maybe not elderly but you gotta admit this is impressive
Or a teenage rex that was just eating it
mr trike you talk with such arrogance why is that?
That’s not necessarily true. We can look at jaguars going after cayman. There was a documented hunt of a jaguar killing a large cayman, weighing more than itself
Predators routinely hunt animals twice their weight
Lions don't usually hunt Elephants, but desperate times require desperate measures. Under the cover of darkness we get to witness incredible footage of a Pride of Lions 30 strong take down a young Elephant. Subscribe: http://bit.ly/BBCEarthSub
Taken From Planet Earth
WATCH MORE:
New on Earth: https://bit.ly/2M3La96
Oceanscapes: https://bit.l...
any predator you can see with the naked eye is a macropredator.
This is a sub adult female bush elephant
@little mauve mammalian predators*
Oh mb let me grab my time machine to go record a rex V trike fight
Eating the skull? Yum
This is a sub adult female bush elephant x2
Oh yeah I've seen this. The lions were very clever to attack in the darkness and isolate her.
Also the point still stands that elephant is HUGE compared to the lions!! And they aren’t 10 tons with a gigantic jaw to crush bones!
Cannot be ruled out, but the authors consider it less likely.
Because teeth can be taxonomically distinct, particularly for non-mammalian carnivores such as non-avian dinosaurs, teeth that have broken off in the bone of another animal during feeding, predation or antagonism can provide direct information on carnivore behaviour. Here, we report on a semi-complete, articulated adult Edmontosaurus skull (MOR ...
A komodo dragon can kill a buffalo several times its own size, crocs can take equivalent sized bovids and equids. Look up any survey of prey preference of wild predators. 1/2 to 2x their size is the preferred prey size
Cayman or other reptiles are actually the easiest prey for jaguars. Reptiles with slow reaction which still take 1 bite to the skull to kill them are easier to obtain than capybaras running to the water the moment they sense danger or tapirs which literally tank jaguar's claws and still escape in the water
So you proved my point. Those are examples of an animal going for the hardest thing in its ecosystem
Are the rex fans in the room with us?
We are talking about " weight limits", wdym "it's a female so it doesn't count", that elephant is still huge and has tusks.
Aren’t capybaras notorious for doing nothing even in the face of certain doom
I wonder if we'll ever get discussion that never brings up jaguars hunting caimans
Snow Leopards are very cool(and fluffy)
https://vxtwitter.com/wildlifewire/status/1959326479877071325?s=20
↪️ Replying to @wildlifewire
It’s been previously known that snow leopards on average hunt proportionately the largest prey relative to body size of any pantherine, but these results show something new: snow leopards preferentially hunting the demographic of prey with the largest body size!
I'll say, try to not loose your footing when 5 200 kg cats jump on your back, and you weigh 2 tons
I'm pretty sure this was thought to be after death only
Also caiman do not have slow reactions at all. They can whip and turn fast, especially in water.
Great point actually! and to go even further it must be impossible to keep a steady footing when a 8-10 animal gets a firm hold of you when you weigh 6 tons!
It's less about reaction and more so about striking fast and powerfully, and being very good at it.
This is inexperienced sub adult elephant. I'll say there are cases where lion failed even at that
https://youtu.be/MbV7WuNWHe4?is=fPJWnGulh3L8CbVf
Young elephant survives attack by 14 Lions
Young elephant survives attack by 14 Lions
Read the full story here: https://nypost.com/2014/11/11/feisty-baby-elephant-fends-off-attack-by-14-lions/
Who says elephants don’t have thick skin?
After straying from his mother, a 1-year-old elephant survived a vicious attack by 14 lions at the Norman ...
Bigger prey were less agile in such terrain, so they were preffered, also more meat
I mean i haven’t seen anyone bring this up surprisingly but tigers have been known to take down guar and indian rhinos solo despite being normally smaller than these prey items, let alone get close for a proper mauling
Almost like a predatory animal is efficient with how it dispatches prey instead of charging headfirst towards the prey, almost like these are real animals with real stakes and life or death….
It's important to note that the circumstances in the last video differ greatly from that
Reptiles are overall easier to catch than mammals
Try to catch lizard vs try to catch a mouse with bare hands
how did we get to this point in the arguement / debate
what
nuance is dead and this chat killed it
We didn’t take the red flags seriously
I absolutely can catch a mouse faster with my bare hands. Have you not seen countless videos of lizards in the desert escaping with quick reactions?
Nobody is saying both couldn't kill the other so uh I'm confused
Tyrannosaurus more like Fraudsaurus.
There is a case where tiger killed baby elephant and fatally injured a female protecting it
Doesn't mean this is something ordinary
Is the nuance in the room with us?
in a casket probably
Yes it is in Mr. Triceratops belly
@undone rapids hey Glaive, let's go make some Tyrannosaurus jerky!
Well it was the Elephant in the room, but a lion pride killed it.
When a lizards body temperature drops of course its reaction time is delayed so it’s easier to catch than a mouse
And im actually agreeing on that, now imagine if you weigh 10 tons and 8-10 ton animal gets a hold on you
You turn your horned face to it and smth bad happens.
well, the elephant was sick or a juvenile, so that explains it lmao
It was also due to the time of day and strategy employed by the lions
The Lions had Rocket Launchers, you see.
now imagine if you weigh 5 tons and 8-10 ton animal gets a hold on you
It was due to 5+ lions' combined weight is more than elephant can bear.
They chose the best possible moment to strike and it definitely rewarded them, specifically attacking at night and away from the other elephants.
Well that is the difference, if it gets a good hold on your leg you don't get to turn. But if it fails then yeah you do turn to face it and it probably prefers to back off. Just depends on how you make the scenario play out
https://youtu.be/2lU8HcxIAw8?is=9fgu9XAXMaWrBVcc theres a literal vid of 10+ lions going head on into young elephant cuz they know it cant do sht lol
I think that it's kinda funny how we are imagining the Triceratops with all of the potential disadvantages ever, and then Tyrannosaurus with all of the perfect conditions ever
Like, not to say it ain't possible it's just literally: Coughing Baby vs Hydrogen Bomb
If you payed attention to chat this is the complete opposite of what is happening but go on
Are the people imagining this in the room with us?
Cuz rex has to dominate
What if rex had the flu!!
Are you in the room with us?
No, he's in substance painter
answering a question with another question
Have we considered the tyrannosaurus may have been obligate scavenger? Or due to its cursorial nature, perhaps pursuer of small prey like the Sphaerotholus and Meniscoessus
answering the question that answered another question with a non-answer
Gonna answer a question with another question to the question:
do you like waffles? Do you like pancakes? Do you like french toast?
The Nanotyrannus was the real apex predator of Hell Creek
Im surprised poor elephant even fought for some time after a literal avalanche of lions casually went for it
But ppl will still say how impressive it is for lions to kill smth "this big"
It’s hard to imagine such an organism being a hunter of the large megafauna in its biota.
Hello Jack. Not nice to see you.