#paleontology
1 messages · Page 252 of 1
Exactly, that image is one of the only images that shows a comparison of estimates of MMCH-PV 79 with the current Giganotosaurus, so, since we don't know much about MMCH-PV 79, we have to wait or use the most accepted version of the estimate.
We don't even have the Proportions of That Specimen
Idk how that Specimen is even relevant to this Convo

Mf is just this
52% size increase isnt enough to drastically effect skull proportions
It is younger than type, which is cool
And the most accepted version of the estimate is a 127 cm skull for a 126 cm femur. You can read the paper, that is what it says. Giganotosaurus has a 163 cm skull for a 136.5cm femur, and is therefore larger headed both absolutely and proportionately. I can't make this any simpler
Again
Doesn't Dans Meraxes HOLOTYPE have a 141cm skull vs the 127cm that is described with?
If you use that skeletal for this
Its Head will turn out huge
Holotype? Nah
My understanding of the crux of Yukira's argument is: "The bigger specimen must have a proportionally larger head because it's bigger."
The Holotype has a 127cm skull yes
The Skeletal you are using
Which is Dans
Has a about 141cm Skull at about 10.9m along the centra iirc
@scenic flame you should make Styracosaurus appear in a Documentary.
It is very strange that a dinosaur measuring 13.1 meters in length and 4.1-4.2 meters in height would have the same cranial dimensions as a dinosaur measuring 11 meters in length and 3 meters in height.
I mean, we have Rex holotype and 5027 which have different head:body proportions
WE DON'T EVEN KNOW THE PROPORTIONS OF THIS THING
yup. They also the same or similar size too, btw.
Okay, those cranial estimates for the holotype are really exaggerated; I was referring to the estimated specimen.
Why? Do we have a precedence for larger individual Theropods always or near always having proportionally larger skulls to smaller specimens even if both are skeletally mature?
Is it? I thought the type was a bit larger
Size is also rather determined by weight
Doubt a Giga of the same length is lighter than Meraxes
We are referring to carcharodontosaurids, which are known for their broad and tall skulls, especially the Apexes or sub-apexes
problem here would be that most Allosaurs that we know great samples of cranial remains, have shown that despite size differences, they have pretty consistent proportions... ( Unless Epanterias and the " Monster " are just individual variation )
Does skull width determine bite force or pressure generated?
Right, so is this a concretely established trend for Carcharodontosauria then? What is the evidence to suggest that individuals larger by individual variation always have proportionally larger skulls?
What does being an apex predator have to do with skull morphology lmao
Problem here would be something like the Giganotosaurus holotype dentary, and the paratype dentary, those two are, although claimed to be roughly the same size, proportionally different, and therefore imply a certain degree of proportional inconsistency.
We don't need evidence, unless you want to delve deeper into the subject, which isn't really necessary to solve this question; simply comparing the cranial proportions of carcharodontosaurids with dinosaurs from other families, such as megaraptors or megalosaurids, is enough.
You do realize that cranial dimensions vary by individual level
There's not nearly enough of a dataset to make these claims for Carcharodonts as they're allergic to preservation
There's no carch with a sample size large enough to know proportional changes through growth/size, except like a few mapus which are their own headache cuz bonebed
what did I miss
Just look and compare and you'll see that carcharodontosaurids are known for their broad, generic skulls.
also why are you using the term "apex" and more importantly "sub apex" here?
that's not really true. Almost all Carnosaur skulls are shaped like that
And a huge portion of Coelurosaurs tbh, and Ceratosaurs
Apex: the largest dinosaurs in the family. Sub-Apex: medium-to-large-sized dinosaurs in the family.
But Wes, Spinosaurs are Carnosaurs.
That's not what those terms mean
Apex means the top predator in an environment, the highest trophic level. This is almost universally achieved by a tendency to feed on other predators.
The previous statement has literally no bearing on the question I'm asking though, you are stating that Carcharodontosaurs have the unique trait that Individuals who are larger purely from an individual variation standpoint ALWAYS have a proportionally larger skull than a smaller individual of the same species.
This statement is just made up on the spot and not an actual term used by anyone.
eg in a garden a cat is an apex
There is a very big difference between the skull of carnosaurs and the skull of carcharodontosaurids; I can tell them apart from afar.
Carchs are carnosaurs, along with megalos, spinos, metris, allosaurus, piats
Carcharodonts are carnosaurs silly
theropods are theropods ah
Well, aren't Birds Theropods?
Lol
For example
They are distant, but yes. And I've already said that it's easy to differentiate the skull of a carnosaur from that of a carcharodontosaurid.
Ah of course, the ugly f$ck Neovenator.
Neovenator mogs all
No? They are not distant
Carcharodonts are derived Allosauroid carnosaurs. And not by a large margin
No, Carcharodontosaurs ARE Carnosaurs, you cannot evolve out of a clade.
You may be confusing CarnoSAUR with CarnoTAURus.
No theyre sharks lol
Carnosaurs is a large clade that ussually has Megalosauroids(megalosaurids and Spinosaurids) and Allosauroids(Allosaurids, Metriacanthosaurids, Piats and Carchs)
NO THEY'RE ANIMALS
Yes
Biggest Sh#tpost Carcharodontosaur ever.
ANIMALS ARE ANIMALS
Oh yes, I confused carnosaurus with carnotaurus, sorry.
the animal that started it all
Carchs are very different from Carnotaurus, because carnotaurus is extremely Unique and distant
Anyone else see that one new piatnitzkysaurus skeletal and how its head is eeny teeny itsy bitsy
Is this elephant's cousin?
@kind bane you becoming famous.
Majunga mogs
Yeah, its great.
Piatnitzkysaurus only need one popcon
Whether its skull was larger or smaller in proportion, Meraxes will always be my favorite dinosaur for several reasons 
Can only rely on Justice and Beagliam reconstructing Carnosaurs. It's peak material.
This is the real meraxes giganotosaurus proportion head length or whatever you guys have been arguing about
Btw i feel like Piatnitzkysaurids have a very different feeding style and ecology when i look at how tiny this ones skull is
The True Peak
Those Plates Are great
Thotes plates are in fact peaked
@kind bane also, do you plan to go back into Dakotaraptor again, or " Hell naw! " ?
@stiff osprey Let me ask you something: does having a wider skull mean that Giganotosaurus also possesses the strongest proportional bite force within its family?
Here is the figure of the plate used
I will wait on more research that may or may not be done on Dakotaraptor in the future so we can actually tell what is and is not Dakotataptor
Winded way of saying that until more eyes get on the specimen I plan on not touching it
Would you vote to destroy or preserve the Dakotaraptor taxonomic name?
It's possible, although we don't have up to date studies on the bite force of carcharodontosaurs other than Acrocanthosaurus
I have no opinion on whether it stays or is sunk into obscurity.
Dakotaraptor was something before it got fossilized
Only Confirmed fact abt it
It lived before it died
smh imagine not having a stance on such a unimportant matter!!!
k,z
Thank you for your riveting comment on this Matter
I think Dakotaraptor is a perfectly fine name and generally I err on the side of wanting the name preserved, unless the material the name is anchored to is objectively sunken into another name (Example: Becklespinax as a name can die) or is a junior synonym of another animal (Example Creosaurus atrox)
It just depends on what other people looking at the material think and decide to go with.
In fact, skull width and height matter, but not as much as other factors, such as cranial depth, muscle insertion area, mandibular robustness, cervical musculature, biomechanical leverage of the mandible, structural resistance of the skull, etc. That is, just because the Giganotosaurus has a larger skull doesn't automatically mean it will have greater bite force/bite pressure, because bite force doesn't depend solely on dimensions. As an example, we have the jaguar and the lion or tiger, which, although the lion or tiger has larger and wider skulls, the jaguar possesses a proportionally greater bite force.
Like I said, we would need an in depth study of the skulls to be able to tell
No need for that
Just trust
Let's say, WE gave you the rights give a new name to the material, what would you choose?
I believe that the Meraxes has great potential for proportional bite force; I'm continuing to study this to find out more.
I dunno, I haven't thought of what I'd want the material to be named
damn.
sudakotaraptor
Tyrantraptor ofcourse, it stole from the three tyrants it lived with
Maybe name it after one of the underworld rivers in greek mythology, except Phlegethon because that has an awful mouthfeel, I'unno I'll leave it to people who'd actually be looking at the material
Tyrannoraptor? Dynamoraptor? Gigaraptor?
I would name it brontoraptor because I think “thunder thief” is epic and is wasted being a nomen nudum 
You still struggling with that
I’ll never be happy 
You are Paleo's own " Sisyphus "
Truly
Brontoraptor is an objectively great name
Tbh tyrannoraptor is baller too I can’t lie
Also a really nice specimen, great bone quality and roughly like 30-40% complete
I believe it could still be called dakotaraptor
Hyrax moment, the most mammal mammal of all time
Unless the name is anchored on a specific bone and that bone is sunk into another animal, then I agree. I'd need to look at the description again though
The name Dakotaraptor is anchored to the entire specimen, no specific bone
Holtz had a comment on this, I’m trying to find it.
Here is what the Holotype is explained as
ur probably Diogenes
So someone speculated that if the kto never happened megatheropods would just keep getting bigger and keep shrinknig their arms
well thats definetly too big for an obligate biped but I do feel like tyrannosaurids would have just kept getting bigger heads and smaller arms until they become bobbleheads with abelisaur arms
Abelisaurs already got pretty close to it, the universe knew they were getting too close to Perfection and had to Meteor them
I gonan find it but some did do some pretty soild armless theropods
Its funny to me that the legs most closely resemble Spinosaurus
Okay back now and time for the changes and to make sure I understood the responses correctly:
- Giganotosaurus: becomes a forest dwelling ambush predator that utilizes forest edges before bolting out to attack prey
- Meraxes: the smaller sauropod prey specialists that also prey on ground sloths and roam a more generalized range including forests and grasslands.
- Tyannotitan: becomes the other large prey specialist of a similar standing as Giganotosaurus but dwelling in more wetland and riparian areas
seems good
Oh thats the Gourmand from The New Dinosaurs by Dougal Dixon. Heres the original piece and a remake by Mark Witton.
The Gourmand went full scavenger
“Went full scavenger”
Okay gsp
I really love this damn thing man, i need me more of Piatnitzkysaurus instead of that f*ckass yankee chud Marshosaurus
Whats a gsp
A GSP also known as a Gregory S. Paul is a particular type of amateur "paleontologist" and serial taxonomical vandal
Also the one that says full scavenger is the other guy, not GSP
It’s worse because he’s not an “amateur” and has been in the field for decades
He’a degraded as of this decade, not fully sure why
Ah.
I like the Cutlasstooth from it. It was very unique
He's a functional amateur
Number 1 rex hater
That'd be the one reasonable thing about him
Wait isn't the other guy the rex hater?
The book was released in 1988 and had some interesting speculation. Funny enough one of the first to speculate feathers on ornithopods
What the f-
That's funny
Do like the Tree Ammonite
Gsp is
Also also I would be doing a disservice speaking of Dougal Dixon and not showing his most historic piece.
-# Context these are 2 human species evolved into a predator and prey
who's the biggest industry plant dinosaur
I though u were goin to say "obligate scavenger"..i had visions of war in my mind
Question, can we have turtosaur?
The Gourmand is described as effectively just a scavenger it is incredibly massive and bulky and has a snake like jaw. It spends most of its time sleeping using itd back armor to deter predators and only gets up to gorge on carrion
Sorry i was thinking about T-Rex there
Also it did get a manga adaptation so enjoy a turtosaur fighting cutlasstooths and a Gourmand eating one
These type of evo spec books are very apressiated by japan
Yeah Dougal Dixon got 2 Mangas in Japan and a stop motion video
Now…. What would one tase like?
The Kraken was cool. It was a massive man o'war like ammonite
Also funny enough it had a filter feeding pliosaur the Whulk before the idea was popularized
Where is Acrocanthosaurus placed currently along carcharodontosaurids? It always seemed to me like it should probably be closer to allosaurus.
but it's not
Acrocanthosaurus.
Dino
It’s placed where it’s placed
Before the carcharodontosaurus leaning stuff but after the neovenator & lusovenator leaning stuff
Oh I see
D i n o s a u r i
Turtosaur is literally just a more extreme version of ampelosaurus/alamosaurus lol
Saltasaurus true peak
Cotylorhynchus reaction
Wait just realized Ampelosaurus wouldn't be discovered for a year after Turtosaurus
So... Edmarka rex hmm
can't wait for them to find the blue whale sized icythosaur, that actually filterfeeds like a whale
Bring back my boi from extinction. 🥹 ✌️
do you guys think cavemen were telling horror stories about mammoths decaiptating other cavemen like how modern elephants do?
How? No Carcharodontosaurid can be closer to Allosaurus, if this was true it wouldn't be a Carcharodontosaurid at all
I think he just means its more basal when compared to the later, very big ones
very big ones? as if acro isn't also the big one
Would certain dinosaurs / plesiosaurs be able to live in/near saltwater, like saltwater crocodiles?
plesiosaurs were by and large marine reptiles
this new paper indicates spinosaurines had adaptations for dealing with saltwater
I don't think it does moreso just adds to the fact this thing had possible salt grands
animals develop salt glands as a response to inhabiting salty environments, most notably the ocean
seen in various birds and reptiles
Where does the huge indeterminate saltasaurid come from?
Kenya, Lapurr Sandstone
Ah so with titanovenator
What has larger specimens, brachiosaurus or sauroposeidon?
brachiosaurus
:
:
Kinda want to model a non-morrison animal for practise. Which one should it be?
Guys what's the current consensus on the classification of Silesaurids
Basal Dinosaurs IIRC
silesauridae are basal ornithischians iirc and i think a lot of traditional "silesaurids" are a grade of dinosaurs/ornithischians
How sure are we about this?
Did not see that coming
not super. it's still sorta debated
Is it true that Carno couldnt really ram with how skinny hes skull on the top was cus i heard something about it
It can't ram while running at 40 kph, cuz that would break its neck. But slower pushes and shoves like rhinos seem doable
Maybe that’s why it had such a strong caudofemoralis longus muscle
Yeah, though that's some almost all South American abelisaurs have.
I know this seems weird but is there a dinosaur that ate Insects and fish and small animals n stuff
Lots of them did and still do
alverasaurids might be insectivores iirc
Is there any big prehistoric catfish?
Some small theropod like compys or microraptor
Qarmoutus hitanensis from the Late Eocene of Egypt
Thats cool
what do you feel happier when you hear
1 - new discovery about rex
2 - new discovery about spinosaurus
T. rex because anything new about spinosaurus means listening to the fanboys talking about buffs and nerfs for 17 years
Spino.
The only spino discovery that would make be happy is if the genus got invalidated
damn
I would be happy if T. rex turned into a Wastebasket taxa, and was teared apart.
Torn
Spino, there's not gonna be that much new stuff on rex that isn't just "it had more muscles or was older or was biting harder than the older paper calculated, etc", meanwhile for spino we're still learning about its proportions, various adaptations, display sturctures, etc
torned into pieces, sent into synonymous hell, dipped into a tub of sulfuric acid, whatever.
Actually no, the only spino discovery that would make me happy is if somehow the spine specifically was determined to not be part of the animal
That would cause significantly more despair than it being invalidated
tbf, it would be funny, if it's similar to Dilophosaurus' " crest ", where the animal had a crest, but water damage caused it to be stretched further, making it difficult to actually identify the extent of the actual crest.
then there would be multiple giant hell creek theropods which would make it cooler
Spinelesssaurus aegyptiacus
Admittedly, yeah
@coral forge it would be cool if there was actually two Tyrannosaurus species, where they may be limited by range or environment conditions, assumingly similar to how prior Tyrannosaurs functioned. But hey, with Voris and Carr around, we can't get that luxury.
mcraeensis
" Actually, it is within the ' range of variation ' of T. rex "
mcraeensis
Pretty sure anyone sensible agrees mcraeensis is a separate species
" Also, ' Thanatotheristes ' is a completely valid taxa. Not dubious,whatsoever "
Holy crap the rivalry is even worse than I thought
Obviously we already have a whole bunch of Tyrannosaurus
We have T. rex, T. mcraeensis, T. horridus, T. porsus...
See, the joke is I'm being disingenuous
Peleofans long for T. rex, T. regina and T. imperator
Tbf its not unlikely that there can be a second species of Tyrannosaurus from the HC, mainly since we know Triceratops speciated multiple times within the timeframe of the HC, so it happening for taxa like Tyrannosaurus and Edmontosaurus is very probable
T. tanneri, my favorate Late Cretaceous tyrannosaur
Too bad longrich ruined that
GSP*
I got my paleo-hacks mixed up
wdym, Carr already said there are multiple Tyrannosaurus species, like Tyrannosaurus bataar!!!
Wait, which T. rex are we talking about?
T. rex or T. rex?
See, the joke is I'm still being disingenuous
“Eem, trex? Wait that’ the beetle lolz!!”
See the joke here is I’m repeating the same joke over and over for comedic effect
Well, we at least have " T. " degrootorum
See the Joke is that... I don't know how to add to the joke, and I fumbled
I sentence you to being unfunny
Had worst.
Well we have Allosaurud
See the joke is…uh, uhh…20 allosaurus species to be sent via cargo unloading over your house
I'm gonna Michael Crichton. All because he didn't wanna type out tyrannosaurus rex every other page
Tbf, he mispelled the word "animal" in the first chapter
Careful! You might start saying: Climate Change isn't real.
Science denial in MY sci-fi writer?
Its more likely than you think
He's also the reason every video about velociraptor had to dedicate 15 minutes to it being smaller than people think
All because he thought deinonychus wasn't as cool of a name
Yayyyyyy oversized ostriches because the entirety of paleognatha is equally related to one another yahoooioiioo
Tbh, I will never blame Crichton or Spielberg for that, when the root of the problem was Greg. S. Paul
Oh yeah, sure, he found out about Giraffatitan... But also, if he kept his mouth shut and didn't publish his lumping bs, " Velociraptor " antirrhopus wouldn't have happened!
It is but it’s because of weather con
Climate change is real. Car gas and cow fart. Pollute environment. Pay no attention to celebrity private jet. Dont think. Consume more product. Beep boop.
thoughts on this logic?
I mean they died out in like the 13th century. But why chickens also can modern new Zealand still support a population of them especially since their main predator also went extinct.
Jurassic Park is such a funny piece of writing for me
We of course all recognize the ficticious-ness of bringing dinosaurs back using mosquito blood and frog DNA. But, when it comes to the dinosaurs in the otherwise blatant sci-fi novel, suddenly people were taking every word on the page as gospel for actual paleontology. It would be like if someone read a DC comic and thought Martian Manhunter was based off a real martian from Mars.
dont forget T. rex
Wait, you mean…you mean the books and films about bringing back dinosaurs from the dead…using frog dna and blood from mosquitoes…is not fully accurate??? Whaaaaa???
"Have we learned nothing from Jurassic Park" is said exclusively by people who did not learn anything from Jurassic Park
I feel like they have way less wiggle room with appearance here than with the “Dire Wolves”, Moa dont have a common pop culture appearance that can overshadow the real science like Dire Wolves do with GoT and Ark
Also the book was released in 1990. Even if Crichton was an actual expert it would still be outdated now
We can blame Jack Horn(y)er for the damage caused by Jurassic Park since he was the advisor
I feel like people don’t realize the message of Jurassic Park isn’t “never ever clone things”
Legit, I think I hate the fact that a lot of people want to suggest that JP was somehow " Accurate " to the time, and for instance they'll mention like Henry Wu's quote of the times being so accurate to their real counterparts, when legit anyone could interpretate this as Henry Wu trying to sell the Park's methods of reviving dinosaurs as " Effective ", rather than mention the actual visible issues with those methods.
Y must you do this?
Speaking of Jurassic Park we really aren't going to use this technology to help currently endangered extent animals are we
I feel like it's more about how you shouldn't play god with nature and that greed has consequences
No its clearly about how rexy sucked at everything and spinosaurus was super ultra awesome
What do you mean Henry Wu, the shady corner-cutting scientist that was said explicitly to have no idea what he was creating, isn't a reliable narrator?
Jack Horner propaganda
The novel spells out the message pretty clearly
KILL ALL ENGINEERS
michael crichton: the greed and overconfidence of billionaires literally kills people
elon musk fans on twitter: woah.... cloned extinct animals WILL escape and eat us all
the film? Certainly. I just think it's funny that Crichton would've never have wroten Jurassic Park, if Gregory S. Paul haven't published any books spreading his ideas. And I do genuinely believe those were Crichton's primary sources, as he never had any interest on paleontology or have said to have read any publications.
Jurassic park is a good example of media iliteracy as a uniquely modern problem being a myth
The message of Jurassic park being boiled down to “wow cloning anything ever will result in hecking evil monsters that wanna kill us” is sad
JP versus JW
The novel was playing around with people's fear of genetic engineering at the time, but obviously the message isn't cloning bad
People miss the part in the novel when Hammond has a big rant about using his bioengineering company to actually help sick people not making enough money while eating ice cream
Instead of leopards eating faces, its velociraptors eating legs
elon musk fans ah that's new
jurassic franchise really went from a story about the consequences of greed and humanity's feeling of superiority to glupsh*tto hybrid number 674000 gets beaten up by T. rex and whatever other megatheropod they decided to throw in there
You have that backwards
A tyrannosaurus hasn't had a clear cut victory against anything since the original film
I think we kinda have to come into terms that Jurassic Park doesn't mean anything, and Crichton was just using the current Hysteria of the time, where everybody was afraid of " Genetically-Modified " products.
In the last two movies it was about locusts for some reason and whatever the drex was supposed yo be (for like 3 minutes of screentime)
which is why it always has to team up with some other things and use the power of friendship to kill the big bad evil thing that sometimes isnt even evil and is just being a normal animal
Well yeah, he was a light-horror/sci-fi author, of course he was going to use modern anxieties to elevate his writing
Jurassic Park means something in so far as any novel written for its time means something
Ember killed a para seemingly which makes it the largest solo killed thing by a rex in the franchise I believe
Hot take: I like that the real dinosaurs always beat up the ugly made up movie monsters
Cold take: Those movies are absolute dogwater and I refuse to watch them
Wrong, the Juvenile rex had victory over Ludlow
and then wrote a book about Giraffe-raptors.
the novel has a chapter where Wu tells Hammond they should make the dinosaurs more tame and stupid to fit the public's expectations and Hammond says ''absolutely not. I want them to be real''
cut to every jurassic world movie making the dinosaurs uglier and more aggressive to fit the public's expectations
As someone who’s seen all of them, just see the first world. Then fanfic they shut the island down from there and nothing ever happened afterwards and don’t watch dominion please.
As one does; that is the perfectly normal next step
what had the better message, jurassic park or primeval war
Hot take: World wasn't that bad a film
Sure it lacks any narrative depth, but in the context of an otherwise modern world with Jurassic Park as part of its history, its a perfectly fine capstone for a franchise entirely out of steam
We could probably complain all day about how the JW movies are bad, ugly, miss the point of both the original film and the novels, and are borderline unacceptable for anyone that has even a small interest in modern paleontology
I didn't read Primeval War, so I know nothing about it.
No yea world was a pretty solid film, and if it was just a standalone movie then there would be no further issues
Its about a war that's primeval
Probably
the message of primitive war is wouldn't it be messed up if there were dinosaurs in a war
Something about vietnam and suchomimus and oh wowwwwww edgy super evil raptors how original
I feel the same way about the first JW film as I do about the first Star wars sequel. I thought it was ok when it first came up, but now I see it as pretty boring and paint by numbers
The trees are speaking suchomimese
they miss the point, because they aren't meant to reflect on that point and are exploring different themes. Then, enters Jurassic World Rebirth, and that's simply a " Jurassic Park " story
First Movie: Creation of a Hybrid that reflects the death of the concept of the park as a educational tool for the public, focusing on entertainment
Second Movie: We need to leave the Islands or we can't expand the lore of this franchise in any significant way, so we do that
Third Movie: Literally analogy to real companies creating problems and then profiting off them, by creating solutions only them can sell
Rebirth: " Hey, guys! Do you remember the themes of ' Man playing as God '?! Do you remember ' Ingen ' ?! Oh! As a precaution... We are going back to ANOTHER stupid island!!! "
At some point the world map of the JP universe is going to just be islands
LMFAO. Like the World Map is just dots everywhere in the Sea
I'm glad you were able to take those messages from those movies. I was only able to see them as pointless corpo cash grabs
Admittedly I'm pretty clinical when it comes to movies though
When are we going to see a T. rex/Mosasaur hybrid called Tylosaurus rampanging around all the fake islands china keeps building?
You know how in Saudi Arabia they have these like, artificial islands? Yeah, Ingen probably had asked to build 1 billion of those everwhere in the world.
All the more to make poor buisness decisions...
" You know what they say, John! Mistakes are only Mistakes! You gotta keep trying!!! "
Yeah, we need a new JP movie where a baryonyx terrorizes a new fake island, call it the British Isles or something. Yeah, something blatantly fake that no one could confuse with a real place.
Jurassic World and One Piece are set in the same universe
They even went to one of ingen's islands in the little garden arc
@ancient crystal Hey what do you think of Spinosaurus? Man, I LOOOVE Spinosaurus.
Hi chat! A reminder that this channel is for discussing palaeontology, rather than films, books or other media related to dinosaurs, thank you for understanding!
You can read our pinned messages for more info 
I think Alderon Wombat could beat one in a fight
remember when rex was the smallest out of the big 3? ( Ie giga, rex and spino )
Could they?
I remember a brief period in the early 2000s when a lot of very stupid people somehow became influential in the field and published a bunch of garbage papers with garbage methodology that have all since been thrown out
Estimating tyrannosaurus to be 3 tons at most is the same as calculating and choosing the blatant joke multiple choice answer on a math test
@ancient crystal would you eat fried chicken?
No, but I'd eat a chicken fried
The glupshittosaurus to end all glupshittosauruses
@ancient crystal by Astrapionte
What a cool fish
World was actually very good... Until the final fight. Then it just became anime
Could Yutyrannus survive in a tropical climate?
Not even a hot take, only really the extremely edgy "there are only two movies" fans disagree on World being bad, but the community agreed World is a good movie.
Fk was decent enough (tho indoraptor makes no sense at all), Dominion actually made me angry, and Re-borth is just "ok time to pretend the last 10 years didn't happen"
BIG BIRDZZ — artwork by Astrapionte on DeviantArt. ⭑ Aepyornis maximus of Madagascar 🇲🇬 (Pleistocene-Holocene). This may be the heaviest bird ever; estimates place the largest females at a maximum of 2,200 lbs. However, they were likely within a normal range of 600-1,000 lbs. They stood nearly 10’ tall. ⭑ Pachystruthio dmanisensis ...
The real question is if a tropical climate could survive yutyrannus
What’s more accurate for spinosaurus/spinosaurid neck posture? Does it curve up, or stick out more?
It collapses in on itself into a non-geometric shape that the human eye can't make sense of
Who’s the community, like collective humanity the community?
I hate jps slopasaurus dinos(indom, "velos", and distortus rex"
Hot take, the hate for JP's "velociraptors" is overdone and derivative
It turns into a blackhole
In his house at R'lyeh, dead Spinosaurus waits dreaming.
I like to think they r utahraptors
The Jw ones at least
Tbh i kinda like indominus and indoraptor in some level
The other ones are just sloppy to say the least
Indoraptor’s sloppy. I like how it builds on the intentions of the indominus in Jurassic world; “imagine that thing, a fraction of the size”; but other than that, it’s kinda meh. Indominus is peak of fictional dinosaurs.
I still like indoraptor even with it's flaws
The indoraptor is the worst thing that could possible have happened to the community
@ancient crystal If you were a Lion, what do you think would be your favorite food?
Were they raised as one or suddenly became one?
open to interpretation.
Ah gotcha 
Probably meat
but what kind?
Well obviously not of any herbivores, as they'll all easily kill me with their musth powers
or something
There's Farm Animals, optionally. But then you might be hunted.
Then i can starve to death
What bout humans?
Probably small penguins that inexplicably know martial arts
Allegedly, Humans might not meet the nutritional values of a lot of carnivores, which would therefore, make them: a unreliable source of nutrition. There are those two Tsavo Lions, but a lot about that story could be probably exaggerated
Plus, hunting people is going to get you killed by a hunter/poacher.
Fair enough
Who'd of thought the animals that consistently suffer dietary issues and fail to meet their own nutritional demands despite having an entire planet's worth of food at their disposal would themselves be unnutritious
See, this is what I’m saying.
Morrison formation game, but it’s only sauropod combat, for territory or food or whatever other reason.
Apatosaurus vs Brontosaurus battle each other over the right for being the King of Sauropods in Pop-culture made by humans
An Argentinosaurus arrives at a creek and starts punting the rebbachisaurids that don't get out of the way in time
It steps on an amargasaurus and explodes
Parasaurolophus VS Horse
My money is on Parasaurolophus cause it survived the Reality Warp that occurred
Average dinosaur "fight". we have, the largest land carnivore to ever live and able to bite through car doors, vs big feesh eater that may or may not walk on 4 legs
who do you like more:
1 - apatosaurus
2 - brontosaurus
bronto wins
@austere viper " meg should hbe the size of tylo or mosa for the game " now thats not even megalodon, also, for the most part, PoT does have accurate sizing
not everything is titan/eo oversized
On an Astigmasaura
Hey I have that in my left eye
Apatosaurus because it was the original dinosaur that was “Brontosaurus” before Brontosaurus became its own species
I think reading that gave me a brain bleed
To make it simple, for a long time due to a misplaced different sauropod skull, it lead to Apatosaurus being called “Brontosaurus” and was the animal that was based on for the public perception of the animal, as it was rather recent within the last decade when Brontosaurus was described as a proper species and not being from the skull mishap of Apatosaurus
@hallow spear
Indeed I’ve seen videos x photos of the rally road mount
Has it been described yet? I had randomdinos make a skeletal I wonder how much this will change how we see stego
Idk if it’s just me but the legs look really long on it just like the apex mount 👀
New Stego specimen?
no
Old stego specimen?
its new i guess
@hallow spear Give us a summarized history of the Rally Road specimen NOW
StegoGPT
It does basically have longer legs , but in different ways. It’s longer proportionately because the tibia is shorter relative to the femur unlike the Stenops holotype.
It also has 5 thagomizers preserved hence the 3 pairs
It’s not described yet, that’s pretty much all that’s pubic about it
StegoGPT, can you generate a comprehensive workflow to make it easier for the scientists to desciribe the specimen?
(Typing this took years off my life)
i think stegogpt went offline bro
Man we must've already used up all the daily memory of the current model
Bronto
U dried out the Thetys sea using it
Skill issue for the Thetys sea
I like Pareiasaurs
brontosaurus my beloved
apato
bronto has a better name tho
How sound is my theory that Plesiosaurs were using their necks to suction feed similar to Mata-mata turtles?
- sneak up on fish
- slurp in water filling the neck with water
- this pulls the fish towards the mouth
- mouth snaps close on the fish
- while holding the fish the Plesiosaur expels the water through it’s partially open mouth
- fish is swallowed
Huh
Interesting theory tho
i thought the first part said speak up at fish😭
"I love dinosaurs" The dinosaur:
The plesiosaur asks politely to the fish to enter it's mouth
The Plesiosaur:
😭 lmaooo
Bit odd comment to share here but hard to find many venn diagrams that share this with dinosaurs and such but...
Mentioning again that D&D dinosaur stuff I was trying to make the deity thag would be effectively Spinosaurus Poseidon (bit of context being skipped for ease of things but long and short). And before getting any artwork made I was trying to make an idea board for the ocean deep sea storm spinosaurus god and wanted to ask if it seems a good idea or something is wrong.
Won't ask this for all the deities I'll go back to utilizing the channel for the ecology questions but just wanted feedback for the first one
I think that's a peak idea and u should stick with it
Thanks
How would cotylorhinchus like
Sleep
Like
Their neck where pretty short and stubby
How would they rest their head?
maybe they crossed their arms and rested their heads on their forearms if they couldn't reach all the way to the ground with their neck
like this
dunno if their shoulder mobility would allow for it though, but it doesn't seem impossible.
They could also potentially lay down on their side maybe? I'm just shooting from the hip, I don't actually know.
Anybody got a tanycolagreus skeletal
Thank thank you lambeo man
Do you think lambeo man dresses up as a lambeosaurus and fights crime under the cover of night in Alberta?
I will once I move for college, trust
How many sects of monks did you train under in your youth?
1.3
Oof, I fear that's not enough.
Hopefully you don't get your back broken by Edmusthosaurus in Lambeoman #497
I would never
Edmusthosaurus has nothing on Lambeosaurus laticaudus
Excuse me kind fish, would you mind getting into my mouth for a wonderful journey of adventure?
Very glad we have a Freiren for scale
Now we just need a Freiren skeletal for more context
Gotta find that artist that uses like, Giovanni Giorno
Spinosaurus had salt glands?
https://youtube.com/shorts/FuiIVWLrn0M?si=HLpL5XQboqZnoUYK
Found them it was Gunnar Bivens
here's one in a 'netural pose'
Yes
Mumei,kiara,and amelia
Thats cute ngl
here's the newer one
...yeah I have no idea who that is
that's Gunnar Bivens
Feeling bonita
Yes
Or did salt glands have spinosaurus?
Using yourself as a scale is lowk peak. I only know like 4 people that do it though
This is because paleontologists are short and weird
Theres to much spinosaurus in my salt glands
the average person is like 5'4
My glands are too salty and my spinosaurus to spiny
They r goblins?
This is why they dig holes, covet bones, and are usually found in camps in the middle of nowhere with low tier loot (a reference to them not making any money)
Cope is lowk a chad though
That was a funny one,shark man
Literally all I think of seeing that genus name
Whats the smallest dino?(birds included)
Bee hummingbird
Omg they r so cute:3
Can't see much beating them out in the fossil record
Hairy hand
Don't worry, we'll find a bone shard (that's totally not a piece of shale or something) that is totally from a smaller non avian
https://youtu.be/BL7hEPguCx0
The things I'd do to see the Tyrantrum fossil in person...
The "Pokémon Fossil Museum" exhibition at Chicago's Field Museum brings together the worlds of Pokémon and paleontology.
The big problem is you have to go to Chicago for it
We gonna find a baby non avian and call it a whole new species
...hmm
Chicago is a midwestern backwater cosplaying as a major port city
Well one of my close friends is driving distance to Chicago so maybe I can ask them to go for me
Yes... as a sacrifice to keep the chicagoans at bay
who do you like better time
1 - utahraptor
2 - achillobator
3 - dakotaraptor
🎵 One of these things is not like the other, one of these things is a turtle 🎵
A turtle, unenlagiid, and a tyrannosaur
which turtle do you like better
1 - therizinosaurus
2 - dakotaraptor
Thalassodromeus obviously
Is dakotaraptor actually more likely unenlagiid?
the maniraptoran parts are generally agreed to be unenlagiidae indet afaik
Hmm ok. It’s not extremely large either, is it?
it a big ass raptor
Like a 6 foot turkey?
230kg
Ok so it’s still a very big dromaeosaurid
The Lori Matrix gets this result based on the listed characters of DePalma (which includes many more elements that don’t belong to a Dromaeosaur) but this is no consensus among a field
Achillobator
I like achillo
I think we should revisited more of those old old fossil we have in storage to see what's up with them
utahraptor
Which one was larger: A. Europaeus or Jimmadseni?
Jimmy
9m?
Id there anything contradicting spinosaurus hunting like this
What do y’all think the odds of ever finding a post Cretaceous non avian dinosaur is? In fossils I mean, ofc it’d be dead lol
I don’t see it as too impossible, especially for small birdlike stuff
well most of the small birdlike stuff got wiped out too, only a handful of Aves lineages survived. Odds seem very low to me
even among mammals, the obligate herbivores and carnivores were pretty much wiped out
Nanocoelophysis
Got a question: are both species of Nanotyrannus close in height to Alioramus?
Both are decently taller than Alio. However Alio is only known from immature animals so perhaps the adult could be as tall as nano
Thanks. I just had a thought about a 4th sub for Alio being inspired by either Nano species and figured I'd ask about the height here.
who had the greater comeback story, bronto or nano?
Nanotyrannus because Bronto jumps between being on death row and saved depending on the person

Me when i lie
Cus I have people completely disagreeing with this
Djadochta tyrannosaur is adult alioramus, trust
Nano, Alio and Qianzhou
Nanotyrannus is taller than alioramus??
There is really no explicit contradictions
Alioramus?!
It's a tooth scaling based off am unpublished skull
Alio type is a much smaller, immature animal
we still got him, trust
Iirc the morphology of the nanxiong tooth is more like Bistahieversor than Alioramus
Here's their points
"It has legs smaller than a theropod thats a quarter of its size i really dont think it would be a wader"
"deep water wouldn't be so clear, which is why every seabird that hunts at sea actually goes underwater to hunt its prey"
CONNOR just can't stop making heat
There is nothing to say Spinosaurus couldn't hunt by wading, but the reduced legs and many lines of evidence of aquatic habits mean that wading was not its only/primary hunting mode
That second point is obliterated by the fact it isn't hunting via sight, it's hunting through touch like crocodiles (pressure sensors on the snout)
Thank you twins 🥹
That first one with a bit of blue would go so hard
Reduced legs= four legged spinosaurus real?
Based on living aquatic dinosaurs, spino being unable to walk and just crawling around is more likely than quadrupedal spino
penguin spino
I think it could walk bipedally, just slowly
That's just spinofaarus lol
mammoth cube son or spinofaarus daughter
Did the neck of spinosaurus/spinosaurids curve upwards like a bird, or stick outwards more like other theropods?
In neutral posture it is strongly S curved, both in Spinosaurus and baryonyx
So how’s the validity for it going?
Still faster than an ankylosaurus right
Ankylosaurus walked like 6 miles per hour I think, basically jogging speed
Left one is closer to neutral neck pose, however we have no indication of tail dragging so right one is better in that regard (and a better skeletal overall(
Did Lancian ever do the spino skeletal with all the bones filled in? And is the length of the tail spines often exagerated?
yes he did do a prior spinosaurus with all the bones filled in as you do with a composite skeletal
Wonder what happened between these two.
it updated
ah yes the spinosaurus model based on the orginal material of said taxon
Yes 
But nah, I was noting the posture and proportional similarities. Longer torso, thicker neck.
Speaking of Spinosaurus: https://youtu.be/Fz52y5LaQhM?si=xfPN8B1D0V2zXuf5
Just found this guy today and it's like a hidden gem
So Spino became shorter?
i wanna know why spinos legs look so stupidly tiny
Probably for balance.
Was looking at this deadsound thing for Dinocon, and I’m wondering, do some hadrosaurs have neural spine-looking structures running down their backs like this? If not, why are many so often depicted like this?
i would think the opposite like its front body is huge and very long the back legs look like chicken legs lol
those are ornamental scales, although similar to elongated scales, they are different in terms of structure. And yes, there's a Brachylophosaurus specimen who has those preserved.
Oh interesting
imo i think it prob walked on all fours seeing how abnormal its body length is i just dont see those tiny legs keeping its body up
We’ll know more about the arms when that Brazilian spino is described.
i hope so cus rn i think the idea of it being a biped is just wrong, or they have its posture wrong
Evolution
No Spinosaur seems to show any kind of evolution to walk on all 4 and Spinos center of Gravity is for a bipedal animal, and the Arms of the Brazilian Spinosaur simply indicates Robusts arms that are proportionally longer than some of the family but don't seem long enough to be bipedal based on what has been leaked, since the animal is still shown bipedal
i hope one day we get a actually complete and still in tact skeleton of spino
So, realistically, Spino doesn't have short legs. If you remove the sail, you'll notice the legs have a consistent proportions to those of other theropods, even closely related theropods like Megalosaurs, other Spinosaurs, etc
but to explain it, I don't know if any studies have touched on the fact that Spinosaurus is very front-heavy, but that fact is necessary for this. Essentially, having " longer legs " is not beneficial for Spinosaurus, due to the fact most of their weight is concentrated in one region of their body, if that region is more distant to the surface, that means the animal will only fall due to it's own weight, or will cause a significant amount of drag. If it's legs are " Shorter ", making the Animal's Torso closer to the floor, there is less pull caused by the Torso's weight towards the floor
Something related to gravity, maybe it's stupid, but essentially, closer to the floor there are more atoms and molecules in that section of the atmosphere, less closer to the floor, there are less and less atoms and molecules, which often tend to cause heavier objects to fall ( at least in the context of our Atmosphere. )
Spino Legs are small
But they seem to still have evolved to be just strong enough to Support its weight and move around if needed
Just not been fast or anything
Long front body with short legs isn't too unusual, majungasaurus is a decent example and more older theropods
This is an example of why you should view things at multiple angles. Just because they look thin from the side doesnt mean they aren't wide
2.5m hip Height for a 14.7m Animal is pretty short tbf
Wouldn't say so.
if i had to imagine spino i think of it more as moving like a croc, lazy movement on land and far better at moving in water
Even Stuff like Torvo gets over 2.5m at like +11m
Megalo is a similsr case to Torvo
Theres very few who are that close to Spino Leg wise that aren't some possibly other Spinosaurinaes and even those are few tbh
Fun fact : The spinosaurus Neotype(a 11ish meter animal) has the same femur length as the largest Utahraptor(a 5ish meter animal)
The Goat
I think it is just a matter of visual illusion really. Cuz Spinosaurus are big on other dimensional aspects, at least, in height and length, those aspects are prioritized in our observation. Otherwise, if those aspects weren't present, Spinosaurus really has average legs, if anything they do not differ from other theropods.
Also we kinda have an idea how long the Brazilian Spinosaur Arms
Spinosaurus Mirabilis arms are 90% based on that since they even compare its Tibia with it
So they 100% know about the specimen Material, and the Arms Posture and size matches that of the skeletal leaked of the brazilian guy
they arent even really wide imo
I believe its legs are also longer.
Well yeah, the legs would be average if they were on an average theropod. But for its length they're pretty short
Spino still has Proportionally shorter legs than even Megalosaurus and other Close relatives
Thats a Fact
Wouldn't say so. I would say it's consistent really.
theyre wide enough
Ehh
Based on the skeletal leaked which I do have it
Leg Proportions seems similar enough to aegyp
and a 15 meter spinosaurus is shorter at the hip than a 6? meter nanotyrannus
im sticking with my idea of how spino stood and moved i just think biped is sillie and just not possible for a creature with such a long frontal area plus how heavy it would have been,
i do not think it could move on 2 legs without falling lmao
Nano is also disgustingly tall lol
But Megalosaurus is taller at the Hip than Spinosaurus, so is Suchomimus, Baryonyx, Whatever Spinosaurus B is
It is possible? It'd just nead to rear up a bit more. Just because something looks silly, doesn't mean it wasn't real
The thing is
Its very possible and the animal anatomy suggests its Bipedal
We don't have any argument that is quad other than "legs are to small"
the legs are small and its front body is super long and heavy
@fossil ingot btw, you mention the " Brazilian Spinosaur " sometimes, but I gotta ask, is it that one that has like a Tyrannosauroidea claw or something like that?
The Legs are Wide and Strong enough for it to walk
Just not run or be fast,
And Agnes already explained why despite legs been "short" doesn't make it incapable of Walking Bipedal
Again
Nothing suggests its Quad
Like nothing on its Material ir Close relatives
Hell every close relative just keeps showing this guys just stood bipedal despite the short legs
and i do not see a world where its tail is gonna balance out the front heacy body,
only way i see it being a biped is if its stance is changed to be more upwards
I feel like it makes sense that spinosaurus was so large and weirdly aquatic. It had to tackle some of the largest freshwater fish ever.
Diagonal?
Don't think so?
I am talking about the guy we saw on the Mirabilis Supplementary Paper, this Guy also Got a Skeletal Leaked some months ago
Maybe even 1 year ago, so we know what most of the material it has including big parts of its arms
Tho don't sure the leaked skeletal shows how the claws are
Would have to double check
pretty sure that skeletal was just a copy and paste Spinosaurus skeletal, no? But yeah, it's a different specimen then.
Yes, but different arms and Posture
Mirabilis Paper Skeletal uses the same Posture
Its a Sereno's Spino but modified with different arm posture to match the proportions of this guys arms
But yeah Don't think claws are different than normal
Ofc I am.not gonna show thw whole thing
That would be the first or second digit?
Lowkey ehh
Think its a Foot claw?
Like from the middle?
Really hard to tell from the picture we have
But is the only "claw" there
No, it's probably from the hand, I'd say. It looks like a second digit, at least to me. The problem here it's mostly that it definetly does not look like a Spinosaur claw, and something more like what a Coelurosaur of sorts would have, but then again I don't know the conditions of this specimen.
Arm
Probably would fit with what I had planned for Spinosaurus, but the image's quality is ahh.
Yeah
Although, given how it's reconstructed, with what seems to be more close to a Baryonyx or Suchomimus arm, I'm gonna say it's probably related to Irritator and Angaturama, rather than Oxalaia, Spino, and mirabilis.
All we really have is the Screenshot that was shared and then deleted
And I have real no idea if the quality can be increased LOL
don't think that's possible.
The Guy is included here
The Quality of the 1dt Pic decided to explode I see
Anyways all this is from the Mirabilis Supplementary Paper so not hard to find
Still wouldn't say it's related to those guys, but admittedly, I have my own Hypothesis for Spinosaurinis. So, not something that I can use to argue.
Would titanosaurs, and other sauropods, have had their necks sticking out diagonally, or S curved upwards?
Like the right image
Alright
Safe to say any sauropod will have an S curved neck unless it is physically impossible for the vertebrae to do that (ie brachytrachelopan)
tbh, Alamosaurus had thicker ligaments. So maybe, it was for that reason?
he's trying 
So then for brachiosaurs, it would also be more like the right?
Be nice to him
the left isn't brachi, also giraffa is in more for a reference position rather than a natural one
Ik
oh wait I misread that lol mb
it's " Brachiosaurus " brancai, trust
updated brick's brachi
Giraffatitan*
which sauropods used their tails offensively as whips?
most of them, probably
Prolly many of them
Like apato and diplo those bein the most famous ones in that regard
But like due to most sauropods bein huge af i think they used their size as a offensive weapon in general me thinks
Rugocaudia
why thalassomedon so fat
twice the weight of its fellow huge elasmos
even heavier than aristo
anything special about this animal that made it so heavy?
it seems that it's not notably larger
I think we only have one pathological sauropod tail that might indicate its use as a weapon, I think the evidence for the whip tail hypothesis is somewhat lacking compared to how confidently it's stated
Wait, why is it so fat
Thalassomedon is bulkier than ones like styxo but idk how it outweighs aristonectes lol
I think it's funny how Eusauropods developed clubs, and then no other sauropod group tried to do this again.
Makes you question the benefits and non-benefits of that feature.
wait yeah what
oh
nvm
SGO PV 597 was not the largest specimen and likely a subadult
but still
how thalassomedon got twice the weight while having the very similar size to its fellows
What do we know about Plesiosaur ontogeny? Because, if there isn't much changes from Subadult to Adult, then yeah, that is quite the " Overestimation. "
so a better way is just directly enlarge that specimen to 12 metres in length
and only heavier than thalassomedon by like 1 ton
bro wth
why thalassomedon so chunky
whos your favorite morisson sauropod?
1 - apato ( and bronto )
2 - brachi
3 - diplodocus
4 - camarasaurus
Saurophaganax fr
Apato and bronto are very different from one another!!!
But also I like Apato
Thalassomedon has any complete sister-taxa? Specifically with complete ontogeny
aren't they getting lumped again soon or something
nice
Dyslocosaurus.
Excelsus is, parvus should be fine
Not sure where yahhnapin is headed
I thought B. excelsus had enough material to differentiate from A. ajax, no?
ajax? ajax is its own mess, I was referring to “Apatosaurus” louisae
Plus excelsus’s holotype was described after it had plaster and whatnot mingled in apparently, which may make it undiagnostic.
material being undiagnostic isn't really a argument that allows to lump that material into a different species nor genera. Otherwise the identity of AMNH 5116 would've been settled decades ago.
Ok but it was described after Plaster was used
Otherwise the identity of AMNH 5116 would’ve been settled decades ago.
I like your hopeful thinking
Yes, but then the argument should be IF the material had feats that made it diagnostic to " A. " louisae, not " It's undiagnostic, so we are going to put into a different genera and species, despite knowing it's undiagnostic "
See the reason why AMNH 5116 hasn’t been resolved is because nobody cares. Which is different to the excelsus type because at least people cared to go back and look at it again
excelsus type had plaster on it while being described, and from the looks of it some parts of that plaster were described as diagnostic features, which is troublesome
Not really. AMNH 5116 was described by Leidy, and unlike every Triceratopsini from the Lance Formation for instance, it doesn't have unreliable information. The thing is that quite simply, details about how it looked when it was found, and prior to being plastered, are simply not present anywhere. Yet, again, it's why people are so divided on it being a Torosaurus or Triceratops, and Horner even took the opportunity to add to it's " Torosaurus = Triceratops " hypothesis, despite the fact that it changed nothing about the specimen as a whole.
Supersaurus is underrated
right, but how it would be " A. " louisae? I guess I'm not fully understanding that.
Ion know, guess we’ll figure it out when the material is presumably scanned to understand what is and isn’t plaster
It’s entirely possible it’s still diagnostic as its own thing or even still brontosaurus, but the plaster just needs to be excluded first
Okay, did someone actually confirm that is going to be the case? Like, it IS going to get scanned?
Wouldn’t it be the only way to fully determine between real fossil and plaster? Unless there’s other good methods to do so
No, fishy. Listen, I'm asking you, was that actually confirmed? Because otherwise, I don't see any hope.
Good question. Let me see if there’s any mention of it anywhere on discord
Nope can’t see it anywhere. It’s joever
I did ask the question tho so I’ll wait and see for a response
Nothing ever happens.
Saurophaganax
Old message but we have evidence stegosaurs did eat cycad seeds, so yuh
are you saying that because its actually your favorite or just " haha large therapod was actually a sauropod "
yeah Isaberrysaura
Brachiosaurus prob 
in a realistic scenario where they did somehow co-exist, is the pachy escaping or would the pynco be able to catch up in time?
the depends on the scenario
its the scenario happening in the picture
escaping.
do we have any speed estimates for pachy? i never really though about that actually
Depends
I think if the pycno do a ambush. Pachy might not have a succecifull escape
it surly is possible
It isn’t because abelisaurs are blacklisted from the North American continent
https://youtu.be/DfsPNZlRA_Y?si=tCULU1glzI13zI0w
Okay guys, this is peak (tho the chicken does seem a bit uncomfortable with the tail)
Happy FlexiSpot 10th Brand Day & Memorial Day Sales, up to 80% OFF! You also have chance to win free orders! Use my exclusive code "ALLEN50" to get EXTRA $50 off on the E7 series standing desk and C7 serie ergonomic chair!
Check the E7 Plus Max standing desk: https://go.flexispot.com/o0a6H9 - US
https://go.flexispot.com/s5ox2q - CAN
C7 Morpher...
I stopped trying to watch after the sixth ad oh my god
it's not even a ten minute video 
YouTube moment.
basically, he gives the chicken a tail and has furries help make it
Absolute Youtube
Still holding out hope for some to have made it to like Mexico by the very end
also just get a adblocker, Random.
yo guys I found my old spinosaurus depiction
Although a Abelisaur in places like Ojo Alamo, Javelina and other places would be cool, it would be incredible to find a Hell Creek Abelisaur.
Canadian Abelisaur
Inawentu
I'm gonna throw up if that happens
You know you doomed yourself by typing that, yeah?
No don't tell me that
" Very poor choice of words "
@outer tusk I have an idea for you. More like a Challenge, really.
apato all day
k
I forgor.
peak
oh yeah i saw this peak
I don't like this video that much
Duality
I mean nothing agaisn't the guy but idk i don't like his videos in general
Luckily it’s on the list of things that will never happen
can someone explain to me the origins of apatos neck bumps / spikes?
It's cuz the cervical ribs of Apatosaurs have these stranges bumps on their surface, unlike other Sauropods
and are these accurate repersentations of how it would look?
idk really.
lmao
I personaly like it even tho i preffer it not bein all the way up the head
Also what r those cubby bois at the third image
BoB apato
Very chubby
Very powerfull
I know Bahariasaurus is very unclear to ehat it is classified under, but is there a "more agreed upon" clade it belongs to right now?
Diffused between noasaur wrong and megaraptoran based on discord et al correct
Gotcha. I have an opportunity to 3D print a bahariasaurus that is based on a noasaurid. But I didnt know if say the megaraptoran route was the most "up to date" or not
Either noasaurid or megaraptoran
I recommend coelurosaur leaning, this skeletal is a good representation of it
Personally I lean more towards noasaurid cause I don't think there's an african megaraptoran rn
Fair enough. I love megaraptorans, however a massive noasaur absolutely grabs my attention
It doesn’t help that the second largest “noasaur” deltadromeus may potentially not be one either and end up being a ornithomimosaur, which means the two previous largest noasaurs are both coelurosaurs
Also, rly scrappy material as well
that has to be the worst theropod neck silhouette i've ever seen
the head and neck have just fused into one entity
Baharia is the most unhelpful dinosaur known
- Fragmentary
- Possibly chimeric
- The traits are a hellish mishmash
- Potential closest relative is also a horrific mishmash of uncertain affinity
- Got blown up
lack of cranial material certainly doesnt help either
You can get a diagnostic skeleton without cranial material
yea but it doesnt help
I mean, yes it doesn’t help, but there is no real point on fixating on the lack of a skull when there are plenty of other issues with it as a taxon
i was just tacking it onto an existing list :(
Sorry I may have misunderstood the point of mentioning it.
I’ve often seen folks completely disregard specimens and taxonomy because of a lack of cranial material so I probably jumped to conclusions. My bad
Fishy genuine question, if this is a megaraptor, wouldn't it be weird for animal that would mostly utilize it's arms to have such a short and thin shoulder?
Especially when other large megaraptors ( who at least have their scapula preserved ) show the opposite?
-
we already have very little megaraptoran material to begin with, and even then the ones that do have limb bones show varying proportions
-
this would be a basal ancestor to later Cretaceous relatives, and it’s out of the ordinary for basal relatives to not have as extensive features compared to derived ones
Like how basal tyrannosaurs had longer and larger arms (nano) to things as rex and tarbo
That is barely similar.
Okay, but are you saying that it wouldn't be like a typical megaraptor then? Like, I think that's kinda the point about them, they are pretty derived by default.
That doesnt mean there can never be one. They are known from Albian and Cenomanian Brazil, which was pretty much just a clone of north africa at that time, so it's not exactly unreasonable to assume they cant be in Africa
Only Issue: Most ( confirmed ) megaraptors from South America are geologically younger than the Cenomanian. With most ( confirmed ) older genera being found mostly in Asia.
Of course, we could be broad and mention potential " megaraptors. "
There are confirmed megaraptors from the lower albian of eastern brazil, which is pretty close stratigraphically to the formations where Bahariasaurus is known from. Also your point about them originating in Asia brings up the topic of how they even got to South America. There are no megaraptor fossils in north america and there was no land bridge, so the only reasonable way for them to have even reached South America in the first place was to travel through north Africa.
Confirmed how exactly?
Identified as belonging to megaraptora...?
Yes, but how? What method was used to identify it as such?
How they get all that from 3 good bones 💀
Is it a 2018 paper?
Its been recovered as a megaraptor in pretty much every phylogeny its ever been added to based on the morphplogy of its vertebrae.
iirc it was initially referred to megaraptora in Rolando et al., 2017
It uses two different modified matrixes, a Non-Tyrannosaur Coelurosaur one and a Carnosaur one. In both SMNS 58023 are found to be a megaraptor
I know
I wouldn't exactly bet on fragmentary sacrals and caudals to represent a basal megaraptor. Not judging tho.
bro doesn't know the average megaraptor material
Tbf if someone is deadset on thinking something, there’s little you can do to convince otherwise unless you spend a lot of time picking out every minute detail ever
Vertebrae can also be pretty diagnostic too
I would argue for baharia’s placement more deeper than “look source trust” but I’m more invested in things like Allosaurids and ceratopsians n whatnot, while megaraptorans are a mess and have no staple specimens
Best solution is to go excavating for more bahariasaurus specimens but that’s never going to happen!
Then again I’m not entirely closed against the idea of noasaur baharia, I just have not heard of any convincing argument that doesn’t just result in “look at a single bone that’s superficially similar to deltadromeus while ignoring the rest of the specimen(s)!”
I would only argue that it's weird to use a specimen who shares more traits with derived megaraptors, nothing with other basal megaraptors, has similarities to Neovenator ( somehow ) and who only relatives that are as " Equal " in terms of traits are other potential " megaraptors "
Well if you read that blog I kept yapping on about it also talks about things like aoniraptor & indeterminate megaraptora applicable specimens & matrix’s, otherwise this just feels like a cycles argument where nobody gets anywhere cause no reading is done
Though if you really want to talk with mr. baharia himself just talk with ThePaleoFreak I think they’re in this server
I wonder where my drive has gone
I wonder what the bahariasaurus thinks of people arguing about whatever its remains had it look like
Fishy, to no offense, but I am still dumbfounded that I asked you how that blogpost showed any potential of Baharia being a megaraptor, and you couldn't cite anything from memory. While understandably this is demanding too much, you're expecting me to be convinced as much as you, which is why I've opted to ask your perspective on that blogpost, to effectively understand what convinced you.
I would explain but in full seriousness maybe I just don’t care enough about this topic as I thought I did. I mean sure I provided my reasonings why but like…this isn’t a hill I’m very bothered to die on.
I don't think you really think it's a megaraptor. That's my opinion.
I was convinced because there was effort put into the matrix and looking into the material that wasn’t half baked like cau’s weird description paper, and comparing the vertebrae to something like gualicho (which is currently noasaur) and both baharia and other megaraptors dont sit next to it and yadda yadda
No I’m convinced it is megaraptoran. I just don’t want to debate over an animal that has capability of good research but no person in the science field bothers to genuinely look at it aside from kids on discord.
What a weird science field this is. I feel like a partial amount of notable discussions just come from random small discords instead of genuine peer reviewed papers. (Course most does come from people who are genuinely experts in the field but I find it funny how a random teen can come up with a better mockup osteology than actual official paleontologists)
Frankly I don’t blame you for being convinced it is noasaur. Majority of papers around it only assign it as noasaur because it’s convenient and the status quo, and to any casual reader or researcher the descriptions provided are “good enough” for an animal that’s been blown to smithereens, like tameryraptor and holotype spino
That's 90% of extinct taxa. Not really something unique to it, i'd say. You kinda will notice every taxa have " gaps " in terms of research. Except... You know? T. rex
Sadly you are mostly right (I’m certain some non dinosaur taxa get trex amounts of love out there by more smaller subfields and whatnot) and even then there’s more to be argued for rex but it’s not happened because there haven’t been any sort of true deeper re-evaluations that isn’t just gsp making stuff up for the fun of it.
More as a Berthasaur, honestly. I did originally suggest a Deinocheiridae identity for it, but Berthasaur seems to be better in my opinion.
I do wonder how well it would compare to basal deinocheirids. Now that is a paper, forget the “ermmm abelisaur premax 246% larger than trex totally guys” papers it’s time for history!!!!
praying for more bahariasaurus material with iguidensis description
I kinda shared the opinion, basically similar to: Kill Tyrannosaurus. But I genuinely think that people need to let go of their grasp on Tyrannosaurus, more so: Giving less attention to it.
Not to say " There are more important taxa" or " Our priorities should be focused somewhere else ", cuz reality is that sorta of mindset kinda created the issue. Cuz Tyrannosaurus is always important, and it always should have priority
And this is justified, not to offend anyone who've used this kinda of reasoning, by stating how well-preserved it is, how much of a expanded range of samples we have, when these reasons are kinda, only " Selfish " ?
This is kinda implying that Tyrannosaurus is only important and given such priority because it has good material, in any other reality, where it was poorly sampled and fragmentary, it would've been the " Spinosaurus-Equivalent " of that world
This also just is kinda rude to anyone who ultimately decided to study other mesozoic taxa, cuz really " Why would you research something that is seen as a literal ' non-priority ' ? "
Of course, this doesn't stop anyone from being dedicated on Abelisaurs, for instance. But I don't think that person would feel very motivated, when their topic will always be " Not as important. "
i think tyrannosaurus deserves attention because it is the best theropod
More than it already gets?
Totally
So with the whole multi time period ecosystem I was making was gonna ask if the role of Carnotaurus makes sense.
Current idea is a cheetah analog that preys on Macrauchenia, and wild horses
They were definitely a all-time Animal group
Are there ANY huge barosaurus specimens left, or is it all just supersaurus?
Unknown, baro and super material looks very similar in isolation
😤
Is it possible they could be the same genus? Or at least just very similar?
I think they have been placed as sister taxa before but common opinion is that super is more basal afaik
Oh interesting
Tschopp et al 2015 suggested a close affinity with Australodocus and Dinheirosaurus with possible synonymization with the latter
baurusuchus?
yes
I would like to know how abelisaurid legs work instead of having some non-paleontologist moron get funded to say T-Rex had a baboon big brain and could craft tools
I think it’s another carch. 
I just want the edmontosaurus type to get described fully and properly 😭 as well as other complete and well preserved specimens
It’s completely do-able but nobody wants to do anything with edmonto and it’s why we can’t figure out what is and isn’t an annectens
https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ar.25532 here's a paper reconstructing the pelvic and hindlimb musculature of Skorpiovenator
Sweet
There’s also the Kelsey horridus specimen, which is irritating because it’s been scanned, mounted, and thoroughly researched yet no information on further public research has been stated otherwise. Amazing specimen, and it would fully kill the “erm no anatomical differences between horridus and prorsus aside from skulls!!!” argument but lo and behold, nothing
I’m confident I could be wrong and there is an apparent ongoing description of this specimen, though I have not heard of anything from anywhere
If paleontologists somehow dug up an Indominus rex skeleton what do you think they'd be classify as?
(Assuming the prognated wrists would be fixed as the only change)
As in within the clade? I mean it would be a very oddly giant armed Giganotosaurus
Or just a really fat carch/megaraptor. On another note, you could solve the invasive python problem in the Florida everglades with a sarcosuchus/anteosaurus
...wouldn't they start eating the alligators?
Maybe a Megaraptorian?
I mean they would also eat the pythons but pythons are longer then crocs
Abelisaur
Well no, it’s got too many basal features so likely basal ceratosaur somewhete
probably
OH YEAH I keep forgetting its not only made up of many abelisaur but Hesti made a abelisaur one (mostly something akin to eoabelisaurus)
...I'm assuming that is satire
It does look abelisaur though? Obviously not 1:1 cus it’s got a Rex jaw but it doesn’t really look like anything else
I call saddling it and riding it as a horse
Honestly I really like the design for the indominus, looks like an animal in ways the other hybrids just haven’t
I mean i don't see it
Have you tried eyedrops?
again its not just 2 but other abelisaurs like spectrovenator,eoabelisuarus and adjscent animals like eoabelisaurus
It’s like if an Abelisaur made eye contact with a tyrannosaur for a few minutes before laying eggs
That is the weirdest crap I’ve ever said
The lower jaw is really similar to carno’s but just not bent
Suppose i can see it on Eoabel
And now for the extreme end: classification for Anjanath
"tyrannosaur"
I'm voting Raisuchian
Youngosuchus is kind of close
I'd argue its certainly belonging to archosaur since its got a similar hip structure and seems to have a protofeather filament but its also got the collapsible thermal windows and closest i can think of are anoles dewlaps
...nose weirdly seems believable ngl since hooded seals do weirder and it makes sense biologically for internal cooling and probably display
Probably a Bird Wyvern, I'd say. Convergent to Brute Wyverns, due to the lack of them in that insular ecosystem
Oh I meant irl taxonomy.
Anjanath's already classed as a brute wyvern.
Basal Ceratosauria due to fingers
Not abelisauria, cause long arms, different skull shape overall
Not Allosauria, cause lack of extra fingers
etc etc
The most likely option is it being a new family but closely related to ceratosauria, or at least within Averostra
If i had to say, obv
Idk, indominus is extremely messed up xd
beyond T. rex specifically, I feel an excessive proportion of attention is given to understanding macropredators relative to their importance in a given ecosystem
I understand that they're cool, but that should affect science communication more than science itself, but it often affects both
I still totally believe that Henry Wu put his dna in that dino
It has spikes coming from between its vertebrae it likely was in pain 24/7
I think he tried with skorpiovenator but afterwards decided that would be a bad idea
Skorpiovenator looks kinda weird compared to other abelisaurs
It has like a weirdly small head and a Big round body
But ive heard that its not described properly so idk
It’s cus the paper skeletal is bad (surprise) but if you shift the skeletal/material to align with the usual abelisaur bodyplan then it just ends up as a tiny abelisaur
Also iirc it’s immature which may lend to the small size
small used realtively
Wait I mistook it for spectrovenator @true juniper lol nvm
btw you meant scorpius rex
Eh, skorpio's paper skeletal is also bad so it works
Kelsey CT post cranial scans exist but it's Embargo
Dunno why there’s little talked about it publicly
how much prorsus postcrania even is there to compare with beyond brevicornis
and ig willard as well but yknow
Could ichthyosaurus survive the modern seas or cenozoic seas
factoring or not factoring humans
Theres LACM, the one with the split frill, trik?
Perhaps
oh right trik
would hatz be able to survive in the modern world? for this im gonna just say humans arent real XD
i think it for sure could survive then. there is plenty of prey in the same size and niches as hatz prey alive today, and the primary threats to large flighted animals today are man-made pollutants and habitat loss
On a tangent note, would i be wrong to interpret these koolasuchus teeth as conical in paleoart?
Just making sure it is what I think it is before i make it.
I've done brevi dorsal but surprisingly I've seen trik in person only the skull
Haven’t been on path of Titans for quite some time, any new updates for Spino? Heard that he has salt glands
Temnospondyl teeth are, for the most part conical, with a slight recurve towards the throat
They are also lightly bladed, with a carina usually. I can grab refs if you want
that would be helpful. working on a koolasuchus model and haven't figured out the dentition yet
I'm gonna be honest man. Temnospondyl dentition is going to cause you inconceivable amounts of pain. If you choose to commit to this, I will gather the right references for you, but be warned; Priono's teeth are the hardest modeling challenge I have ever faced
bruh I found the paper but download isn't workinh
not going for hyper detailed maws. not that kind of art. I just want to get roughly the right amount in roughly the right shape, number, and positions.
Already gave myself a headache with troodon's teeth.
Protoceratops i decided to save topology and not go that detailed on their grinders.
I sent an image dump in DMs but you're looking at well over 100 teeth, before the denticles lining the roof of the mouth
I'm aware that it is going to be troodon all over again but worse
g-damn comb teeth
Denticles my beloathed. The entire roof of the mouth is teeth basically.
Didn't had much problem drawing em.
But this is a cakewalk for me.
Gotta rearitculate the nasal and lacrimal just a bit for this even if this is a somewhat distorted skull
little more of a headache placing hundreds of teeth in 3d space and trying to get the sizes and positions accurate. Even if I save half on the mirror
Yup, plus the teeth shape is a complex, for 3d model you want it to make it right than just feels tiled and copy and pasted
I think the toughest for 3d models is to get the mouth articulation right?
There's a reason the big silly goose has the lowest tri count at under 8k
koola is the last tetrapod on my list at least
protoceratops was the biggest pain.
It's the only non-feathered one, so no liberties with "feather bulk." They have extra toes in the back and have REALLY weird feet in the front, teeth AND beak, and really specific skull shapes while also having very non-standardized skulls thanks to changes with age and sex?
mouth too yeah, spent a lot of time trying to make sure they line up when they open and close. The beaks did not make that easy because hard keratin does not deform much.
Omg the lizard's face
you think they noticed the 2nd big boi
"Dinosaurs are not reptiles they r archosaurs"
Yo guys I dont understand it now so in jurassic world the velociraptors were big and in real life They are small and people say that the Raptors from jw are deinonynchus but he is also small
oversized to be cooler and scarier
The velociraptor took a lot of inspiration from deinonychus and Michael Crichton decided to make it as large as utahraptor.
Huh
Utahraptor was discovered 3 years after the book was written and the same year the movie released. Its pure coincidence that they look the same size
The velociraptor from Jurassic park was mostly based on deinonychus but scaled larger to utahraptor. Michael crichton knew that velociraptors were not as large as utahraptor and gave the jp velociraptor the name “velociraptor” because he thought it would look cooler
Ohhhhhh understand it now
the jp raptors are smaller than utahraptor
their size and inspiration was based on deinonychus even GSP initially thought Deinonychus was a velociraptor species though ofc that was inpendent from either Jurassic Park canon
Btw i saw some bts and scrapped stuff and i saw that the raptors would have lizard tongues in the movie and they also would be animated in stop-motion
And thats interesting
We almost got lizard raptors
Also does anyone knows if sauropods in general would have horizontal or round pupils?
now basically most fossil lack a eye ring
From what I remember anyway most sauropods were also recovered as cathemeral?
based on what
Anddd yess ladiess anddd gentleeemeeeennnnnn, WE HAVE FOUND TYRANNOSAURUS REX ALIVE
What if we had an egyptian plover like Animal in the cretaceous?
Possible
wdym by that
would make lips obsolete or even devolve especially from rex
No
Egyptians plovers only do that to crocodiles
Which again,don't have lips becuz they spend most of their time in water
I know you're rage baiting but perhaps you may just not be educated about Egyptian plover: the legend that they pick food between crocodile teeth is fake. It was only mentioned by Herodotus and Aristotle some thousand of years ago and yet it has never been observed since by researchers. Either they made it up, the behavior was lost or another species that did that went extinct.
I have seen some smaller birds doin the same to crocodiles before
But even then the lip thing doesn't matter to this "argument"
Which species? Where? Did you actually see such behaviors? As for now, it's never been reported. So, as I take it right now, you're either lying, or did not correctly see the behaviors you observed, or you've seen AI TikTok videos.
No
I've seen those in documentaries
On tv
Hold on lemme show u
Probably fake. I know some documentaries did it for the thrill of it but there are a lot of fake stuffs that were done back then.
But for what reason, and what’s stopping the Crocodile from eating it you might ask. Well, that’s exactly what we’re gonna be talking about.
Subscribe To TrTube ► https://goo.gl/oKg2iV
For copyright matters please contact us at: tubequestmedia@gmail.com
That's weird
Why would they do that anyway
Sensationalism. Make nature more wonderful because it is never enough.
Bruh,nature is already so awesome
Anyway
The lip thing on trex
U see
Their teeth r very alined and in the right place
Unlike crocodile's terth with r all spread out and interlock
If u see a komodo dragon's teeth they r pretty much the same thing
And they r also covered in gums to protect them even more
Why would a terrestrial predator had their teeth all exposed to the evirioment at the first place?
That would make his teeth dry and break all the time
That’s true
He is not wrong if you keep thinking about it right now 🤔
If non-avian dinosaurs were in this society, Nobody would refer them as reptiles, nor birds as birds but dinosaurs, avemetatarsalians or archosaurs if we feel generous for crocodillians.
They would be classified as reptiles, since non avian dinosaurs are also closely related to avian dinosaurs, you can categorize both birds and dinosaurs in reptiles
And he is still partially wrong if you think like this. Person calls dinosaur not reptiles but calls them birds. Dinosaurs are reptiles and so are birds, only avian dinosaurs are birds
https://www.nationalgeographic.it/scoperto-t-rex-dei-mari-predatore-gigante-80-milioni-anni-fa
So National Geographic Italy wrote about the new Tylosaurus Rex and used an image from the game in the article ✨
Yeah i think every article about the new species used the model in the paper
Becuz they made a collab ans stuff
its because the people who wrote the paper advised alderon while making Tylosaurus so it's currently the most accurate model of one
So I was right to say pot’s tylo was accurate when it came out 🥹 I hope they get the same from apex when making the stego remodel
If there ever were such a bird to do this behaviour there are many crocodylians around the world during this time period, I doubt one single bird and its feeding behaviour would spur the major change of oral integument.
This!
Would an allosaur actually have been able to latch onto a sauropod as is sometimes depicted? Or is that completely out of the realm of possibility?
One of the smaller side, maybe. How small idk.
idr anything for arm stress holding on but at bare smaller-normal sized allos could jump
Could they jump at all?
the known weight limit for jumping is like 4-4.5 tons and iirc nothing stating stress for hops on theropods so
Huh..curious
Maybe allo could jump a lil bit
Whats yalls favorite t rex?
Mines the beetle
Yeah we're fish too
Also referred what currently right now cuz you know non avian dinosaurs are all ☠️
Could A TRex Live in a Zoo? Let's Find Out #dinosaur #evolution #extinctanimals #animals #extinctcreatures
Are we serious? The answer is yes, haven’t y’all seen Jurassic Park?
How’d that turn out again lol?
Last I checked the T-Rex still lived
true, but the park was left in ruins
T.rex can be kept in any zoo that understands how natural barriers and enrichment works
Then again, Hurricane and Company sabotage and poor employee management
Doesn't matter how mad your T.rex is, if it's in a 30ft deep hole it'll never have a hope of hurting anyone
Also true
Wait until it uses the skills it learned from the goats
How smart was T. Rex thought to have been again? Last I remember is something like a baboon.
It’ll escape like the Orangutans, cause we all know the Orangutans are just gingers that went to the jungle to avoid human taxes
Baboon intelligence rex was based on a misinterpretation of the braincase that made its brain way too big, in reality most dinosaurs have proportional brain sizes between crocodilians and ostriches
I'd say crocodilian proportions are the mid-upper range for dinosaurs, many fall below that. Sauropods, ceratopsids, thyreophorans
saying x animal is as smart as y is fraught as it is too especially when they don’t even have the same brain anatomy
Ah gotcha
Cuttles favorite
what is considered culture in animals?
The water one
from wikipedia
"Animal culture can be defined as the ability of non-human animals to learn and transmit behaviors through processes of social or cultural learning.[1][2][3][4] Culture is increasingly seen as a process, involving the social transmittance of behavior among peers and between generations. It can involve the transmission of novel behaviors[5] or regional variations that are independent of genetic or ecological factors.[6]"
do anyone have any examples of reptiles or birds having culture?
Would like cats in istanbul and some other places being extremely friendly with humans count?
Mammals are primed to develop culture because most mammalian behavior is taught from parent to offspring. Culture is novel applications of this teaching, so orcas or dolphins using a particular technique to forage thats unique to a given population is an example. Reptiles don't work this way, they're born with most of their behaviors hard wired. Birds are somewhere in between, with cognitively advanced species showing elements of cultural development
Are you trying to state that avian dinosaurs themselves are non avian and that birds cannot be classified as a reptile?
What if dinosaurs
Nah, Suminia
I like this lil fella
It's basically a non mammalian primate, also imagine if they renamed Tyrannosaurs, to pseudodinocephalians, anteosaurus came before trex and was a dinocephalian
What if Triassic dinosaurs?
Hmmm yes yes
Trex stole his head shape smh
What if
Monospondylus Gigas?
Salamanders are peak
Chat a new study was just published, apparently new dating techniques has revealed that the KT-mass extinction event that killed the dinosaurs occurred 67 million years ago
My source is i made it up
@balmy oyster got confirmation on the Bronto type being scanned?
@tough parcel are you a Alectrosaurus?
My phylogenetic relations are uncertain at this time, more studies required
He didn't get it... 😔
Poor Falcon...
Nothing ever happens.
My hypothesis is that you’re a mutated strain of Hay bacillus but that’s just a hunch
So I heard about the salt glands in Spinosaurus being found, so like- how exactly did they discover that there were salt glands in the skull?