#paleontology
1 messages · Page 228 of 1
They should make a realistic stat server with all the sauropod mods and none official dino mods and see what happens
again, rex would be the best land playable
yeah those died off. lmao
if im correct, rex outruns every 4 and 5 slot? besides like, hatz, sucho, maybe cherius, maybe bars
hatzeg is a 3 slot these days but yeah. almost every herbivore and half the carnivores are abysmally slow irl for the games standards
Rex players would be an even greater cancer than they already are, and sarco players would probably be even more miserable
Yeah no megapackers suck in general, not just rexes in them, I have seen people literally just have multiple apexes to beat other apexes and then just have tons of those small annoying dinos just to counter kents/aeros
Realistic stats hopefully entail a game whose fundamental structures forces players to be “realistic” in their actions which maybe can be fun or be dreadfully boring.
have you heard of my idea that would forcibly and temporaily reduce the iq of players and force them to become dinos in game, like the matrix? Sadly not possible though it would solve alot.
every hunt would just be getting ran down or getting one shot
like, nothing would be able to fight stegosaurus as it would just one shot almost the entire roster
stegos were slow though, you would have to go for its head
werent they quite good at turning in place?
Yes
@hallow spear has there been any studies on how well stego was able to turn in place?
yes
the industrial revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for paleontology.
what?
https://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2021AM/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/367356 this is part of it
Stego I kneo you don't do sauropod much but what do u think of this?
bro is living in 2011
what does that even mean
hmmm, seems a little oversized. even the giraffetitan is
His Saurolophus is pretty odd too
Alot of his pieces are oversized
broken jaw
I’m glad hadrosaurs can’t do that it’s one thing “creosaur” allosaurus can dislocate its jaws
clearly they did it to hoover up large numbers of baby tyrannosaurs
what would've been the fastest group of sauropods? would it be dicreosaurids as their the smallest?
someone explain the joke to me
Allosaurus can dislocate its jaw to swallow diplodocus whole? Real?/jk
Hi, I want to know your opinion on this pachy
maybe the jaw is too long?
also this is perotorum
are elephants the only species beside humans to hold "grudges " ?
There was a instance of a tiger that was shot at by a hunter, and it spent about 2 days tracking him down and waiting for him to return to the area just to ambush him
crows hold grudges on par with if not worse than elephants
Crows and wasps also retain memory of faces and will try to bother you back if you can
i dont know, i think killing someone then going to their funeral to beat up their body is kinda bad
would you say there needs to be a level of intelligence to hold grudges? beucase i view crows and elephants as very smart, but wasps? i dont know , hearing that makes me interested
if you do something to make a crow dislike you, it will teach its entire bloodline and crows around it to also hate you and sometimes attack you on sight for generations depending on how bad you messed up
generational truama....
Likely, plus some insects are pretty intelligent for what they are especially bees & wasps
what makes a animal intelligent? like, how do you define levels of intellegence in animals? lets use bees and wasps, how do you determine if their intelligent or not?
like, i've always wondered how exactly you determine a animals level of intelligence, is it through problem solving?
It’s probably a very intricate and lengthy topic that I unfortunately probably can’t explain
From my understanding, nearly all animals have sentience, but sapience or much more “humanlike” thinking happens far less often as most animals just need brain function enough to survive, mantain some sort of social structure, and mate
But with some, if you have the energy & capacity to get enough nutrients from what you eat/hunt to sustain more brain activity then the brain can allow itself for more specific actions and thought processes
thats quite interesting actually, thank you for informing me of this!
I think this should be good so far
Glad I could help!
im gonna assume that due to this ruleset of determining intellegence, its virtually impossible to tell the intellegence of a extinct animal?
You’d think, but we managed to figure out tyrannosaurus brain capability some time ago
Brain cases can say a lot about an animal (specifically dinosaurs in this situation) and is also considered a good indicator of telling species apart
and what did we learn about it? i know alot of tyrannosaurus is compared to modern birds of prey, like eye sight, is its intellegance also comparable to them?
I read that it was comparable to a Baboon & had the capacity to form “societies”, which is pretty cool
Also “societies” as in social groups and whatnot, not like…civilisations. Confused me when I first read it.
so like, bachelor groups of male rexes would be a very likely possibility? ( i believe those are things baboons get into? thats what i do remember of it , or something like that. )
That would be fun to think about it
alot of things to think about with baboon intellegence rex
is this a reliable chart?
Recent papers have said that we probably shouldn't expect them to be like mammals or even crocs, as in they wouldn't be croc-like or bird-like intelligence, but would just be their own thingie
Putting dogs above parrots and cephalopods is CRAZY
There was a case of a dog attacking his owner's killer after 7+ years, can't find the source since I saw this when I was a kid and never seen it again.
Also pretty sure Orcas and Dolphins would be capable of them, Orcas already attacking ships for apparent no reason (could be easily about them witnessing other orcas being killed or captured and being unable to reconnect it to the ones standing over the ship).
so its not reliable im assuming?
A perfect conclusion to come.
Way too many people, papers included, try to compare dinosaurs to modern day animals, even though there are so many that have existed for so long and are so variable, and I’d argue are even alien to what we have today
Probs not, reptiles are smarter than we give them credit for
I mean have you seen the kinds of stuff some dogs can do?
Also that one dog which speaks through buttons and proceeded to have an existential crisis over its own existence, and reportedly started taking antidepressants.
WHAT?
It was pretty big a while back but it fizzled down over time, you can probably find a video or few explaining the situation
Yeah but it's not parrot or cephalopod level intelligence. Dogs are intelligent because they are social, but parrots and cephalopods use their intelligence outside of social interactions
I will say it is impressive with what birds & octopods can do, and I haven’t seen any dog open a jar up
Heck I’ve seen BEES do it. What’s your excuse canines!!
Just recently we had a cow first show clearly show tool use capabilities and there was alot of "are we underestimating cow intelligence.." etc. Tbh there isn't any simple reliable way to measure it, tool use is something we consider to be a signifier, but that's not something most animals need or even have appendages to use tools. Elephants have a trunk and we have hands, if more animals had such things we might see more tools being used all over. So I don't think its really the best way to measure stuff. We struggle with extant animals this much, extinct ones might as well be impossible
There are so many factors to what can cause sapience, and even if you try to narrow it down to limb flexibility & usage or something, you still get outliers like cetaceans that also end up being on par with sapience but have no usable appendages
I still think it had some part to do with what an animal eats and if it can sustain itself enough for more various brain activities
do you have the paper for this? It would be useful for a project I'm doing
Sadly no, but I’ll look around for it and lyk if I do find it
lol where ants buddy
besides elephant, i notice alot of animals that are considered intellegence primarly eat meat, is there any link between that or no?
nice thank you
Higher nutritional gain, it’s one part of why hominids began becoming so intelligent and notorious hunters
I'd assume meat = more energy = easier to sustain a more powerful brain
It’s called a intelligence chart based off humans, it’s as reliable as the person that ask 200,000 questions a year
I do think with reptiles in particular a lot of it is just that their behaviors don't exactly facilitate intelligence in an easy way to recognize. It also doesn't help that that lower metabolism also seems to make them literally think slower.
i wonder who that could be.....
I mean if it’s true that crocodilians can prefer certain colors over others and are able to mimic certain actions like a person drowning
I’ve got no problem in believing they are more intelligent than we give them credit for
The mimicing drowning thing is a load of nonsense.
it is?
Ah okay. Had a feeling
What about the colors one though? I feel like I’ve seen a study about how crocs preferred pink or something?
Mixed. Unsure on that but it wouldn't be exactly wrong to assume they can prefer colors.
can we assume animals intellegence through close relatives? like, i have no problem believing alot of prehestoric elephants like mammoths, paleoxodon and more were as intellegent as modern day elephants
We can assume such similarities yes.
Jensen 2025 had some interesting things on Cognition, though I haven't read much on dino intel in general
i wonder how many cavemen funerals mammoths were crashing
The paper responding to this one was published alongside this one which was funny : https://tetzoo.com/blog/2026/1/12/the-continuing-debate-on-dinosaur-cognition
Well, herbivores need to either run or fight, a carnivore needs to do a lot more things to get the food, like ambushing, understanding the right moment, set traps, I'd assume it's the mental gymnastic that makes them develop intelligence over time.
This is just my own educated guess tho. I'm not a behaviourist
How big is Siats?
Crocs are super smart
Don't they rember and wait at locations prey has previously visited?
They also have crazy levels of maternity and bb care
Yes, they can also exhibit cooperative hunting
We honestly don't know just estimates, we need more material
Peak Material wdym
Oh man, THATS peak.
Ya know, it saddens me to realize the insurmountable number of animal & plant fossils that we’ll never find cause they could have lived on now gone islands, in ocean rocks & were too small & delicate
Fair
Do you one better, the best material!
Divide it and give it to the next guy
i mean hey sharing is caring tho give that guy some fossils
A single dingle bone
What is this gremlin even supposed to be
the creature.
wait...this lowkey makes sense
what makes elephants outliers ?
proof that elephants are secretly carnivores...? like edmusthosaurus...?
i mean keep in mind our ancestors were predominantly herbivorous
even though increasing meat consumption (and therefore protein intake) is thought to correlate to our larger brains vs our ancestors, apes are still quite intelligent compared with most other animals including most carnivores
Something something “Judge a fish on its ability to climb a tree and it will go its whole life thinking it’s dumb”
i mean the issue is on intelligence is its not exactly measurable in a genuine way beyond: thing exists in a scale that isn't a blob swimming in circles, which even then we have literal blobs that can solves puzzles lmao
comparing it to human thinking ends up leaving out alot
elephants have amazing memory because they need it to sustain their obscenely large groups on social and nutrients
and having what is functionally a grapple capable arm, does mean you need better grip gauging
proof that mudskippers are the smartest fish...?
heck don't some hominids have bigger brain cases than us for instance
elephant intelligence probably has something to do with their unstable environment but they really did not need such massive brains to survive, they could have been just sauropods with tusks and itd have worked fine
chat am already done with this but I was curious if I should add anything to make it a carcharodontosaurian
What is it?
a shark
Skull belonging to what specifically?
guess what gigantosaurini the skull belongs too, if you fail, you die.
a composite of different allosaurs
So allosaurus? Or early Cretaceous carchs?
@stiff osprey will you ever make a updated version of your Aquarium Mk.II? i think it looks really interesting and would love to see a updated version!
i just realized how massive Parapuzosia is, what the hell.
if im correct, livy , leed and dunk all get smaller
meg gets larger?
Longer, maybe larger, depends on how old this image is.
Lots of the old meg recons blend together because they boil down to making the body a little wider or slimmer
this image was Published: Dec 16, 2016
Then yeah, I'm pretty sure that would've been before the big upsize
how much smaller had leed, livy and dunk gotten since 2016?
Pretty sure most everything there also gets smaller
" Dunkleosteus terreli: 6 meters, ~1 tonne "
" Leedsichthys problematicus: 16.5 meters, ~40 tonnes? "
" Livyatan melvillei: ~15.7 meters, 40-50 tonnes "
Meg went from like 50 tons to >100 tons down to 90 tons while still adding several meters to its maximum length
2016 megalodon was
" Carcharocles megalodon: ~18 meters, ~50 tonnes "
Complex parental care/extended developmental periods is likely a strong driver in the evolution of cognition in multiple groups including elephants
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7293161/
how accurate is this leed size? ( still by random )
Idk I wasn’t there
yes you were
You was there too 😀
yeah, leed started mini-gun firing Ophthalmosaurus at me 🙁
Shirtz is unc confirmed
@stiff osprey Please fact check your chart
lets not be rude
???
pretty good
whats the largest animal that was capable of flying? was it a bird or azdarchid?
Quetzalcoatlus, an azdarchid
how much does Argentavis magnificens weigh compared to quetz and hatz?
Quetzalcoatlus or Hatzegopteryx are fighting
Birds can not get to their size due to the mechanics of how they take off (two limb vs four limb take off, two limbs are less efficient)
What measurement of weight do you use?
pounds and tons
I’d recommend kilograms over pounds cus everything uses the meteic system
Thank you Goanna 💛
kgs just sound nicer
Please keep all conversations in this channel on topic for discussion of past and present paleontological discoveries, scientific news, and depictions of prehistoric creatures in media in relation to palaeontology.
Please also to remain polite and respectful towards each other and do not provoke or antagonize other users. Refer to our #rules.
Questions and concerns regarding other users within our Discord should be directed to @feral crane.
why did i get sniped
i dont know how kilograms work 🙁 im a american.
I am too, but the more you interact with prehistoric animals the more you get used to metric stuff
I now never use the US system of measurement because of dinosaurs, lol.
whats the simplist way to understand kilograms?
🫶🏽
THE DINOSAURS ARE RUINING THE SYSTEM!!! alan walker gif
Thank you 😍
who would've been the better flier, Argentavis magnificens or quetz?
Idk?
Quetz
I don't know which but I'm going to guess in some ways Argentavis and in some other ways Quetzalcoatlus
I think qetzookattle beacuse much larger wing to fly and take control of the air
is it due to just general build and how weight distribution and stuff?
🙁
Idk
I heard both weren’t the best with flight BUT quetz has the advantage of an easy takeoff with how it launches itself into the air
there's amazing animation that does showcase just exactly that
do you have that animation?
why are pterosaur hands backwards? is it to support the giant finger thingy that has the wing membrane?
if this is a dumb question/doesnt make sense i apologise, im curious
@gloomy sundial Please do not ping the team unless there is an emergency. We can help you if you post your issue in #1150510168073850971 or if it is a personal matter, please contact us by dming @feral crane 
@gloomy sundial ? what is that reaction meant to mean?
Thank you ❤️ It was my mistake and apolgy
laughing 🤣
why??
your joke was funny
im confused on what you mean
Why is everyone so passive aggressive today
wait...ammonites survived into the cenozoic??
if ur talking about me then im sorry, i just wanna know why my message got reacted to
was it not joking?
Nah ur good, dinotest is acting weird though
W ass image
i didnt know that ammonites persisted into the cenozoic, thats so cool
no, it was a genuine question
https://x.com/kafun/status/2023283894607618103 heres the og if you want it
I’m not too sure on why, but I suppose it’s some sort of privy biomechanical thing
i use metric for everything, physics, dinos, everyday stuff, but I still find both systems quite interchangeable (but ig i'm more of a numbers person)
thank you!
thanks you Top G, W glaze
Earliest Cenozoic ammonites:
Machalski, M., Olszewska-Nejbert, D., Landman, N.H. et al. Ammonite survival across the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary confirmed by new data from Denmark. Sci Rep 15, 45802 (2025). https://t.co/LyicrMfpo1
seeing how they managed to survive the extinction, i wonder what truly put the nail in their coffin and killed them off
If I remember correctly, they survived but they did not last for that long after the extinction event, and I mean a couple million years
If they could make it, alongside stratodus…
where is any non avian dinosaur
Probably related to their shells and poor ocean parameters
I would honestly say its a near guarantee that non-avians survived to some length into the cenozoic, even lacking fossil evidence.
The real question would be for how long
do you count gastornis? or no
dinos....random...
oh my god, its randomdinos.
do we think we'll find any early paleogene marine reptiles? like mosasaurids , or pterosaurs?
Probably not pterosaurs since, iirc, they were already in a decline leading up to the end cretaceous
Small mosasaurs may have persisted into the paleogene, but just like non-avaians, probably not for very long
@gloomy sundial Hello there. If you'd like to report another user, please reach out to us via @feral crane and we'll review your request. Keep in mind this channel is dedicated exclusively to paleo related discussions and to discuss server moderation and rule enforcement, Modmail would be the way to go.
Well that was…odd.
Anyways here’s stegosaurus plate arrangement from uhhh, I forgot where tbh i just know it exists
I don’t think y’all trolling is funny , report me for what ? Who tf is that
Not a clue, but they started to get angry and accuse me of nothing too
would it be marine species that would have the best chances of surviving for a small time into the paleogene?
Yes
Was I pinged or smth? Tryna take a fat nap 
thats a nautilus
Someone was acting strange and we jokingly assumed they were an alter ego of yours
Turns out they were just strange.
is it actually...
Hmmmm, they woke up from their nap after dinotest left...
Suspicious 🤔
looks like one yeah, it just seems the artist drew it more "ammonite-y" than a nautilus actually looks like
Sorry guys, Mr. Hyde wanted to go for a walk
My secret side I keep..
hid under lock and key...I keep it caged, but I can't control it...
Why is it only my reaction images that ever get removed by mods?
I'm starting to think the parrot has it out for me
Because they’re offtopic to paleo chat
thoughts...?
on a serious note though. https://x.com/CodyFandom_/status/2023268193251307835
Only a few days after we solved the mystery too...
i really hope something is done to prevent this from happening.
Well Texas shot down a moratorium against it, so chances are that data center is being built.
Well- half built, abandoned after AI market collapse, and then turned for a profit as a tax write off
so...its gonna be built but wont steal resources from the enviorment...?
Question, could it be possible for them to have blood vessels to flush their plates with blood?
No, its going to be built over an extraordinarily valuable piece of land, require large scale clearing of flora and fauna, all the materials will be produced and ordered and the BEST CASE is that it doesn't actually go operational thanks to the instability of the market its being built to support
There is no situation where this thing being even partially constructed is good. It is wasteful beyond measure.
And mods this is still in regards to the one being built in Dinosaur Valley so this is on topic.
awe 🙁
How come you frame my boy like that. He'd never do such things
careful, pterosaur fans will jump you for saying that (I'm pterosaur fans)
Why are tech companies so insistent of pushing AI infrastructure and production when it’s already proved people find marketing and usage of it to be distasteful outside of memes or shtposting
Greed, the death of the free market and consumer choice, etcetera
Wow that's just great.
Quite literally destroying (pre) history for something ultimately worthless
At the very least I was able to visit as a Texan.
At a risk of being off topic, its just about as worthless as it can get.
The existing infrastructure is more than capable of supporting AI and the bare minimum applications it has to be called a tool, all these additional data centers are a complete waste
And that's just part of the reason why it's worthless in comparison, but yes, I agree we are steering off topic.
I finish the pachy of the other day 
heeeey is it possible if you can see me your chasmosaurus in this exact quality, DA has is pretty off
Neato
which chasmo?
all of them
I always forget to choose the image size in DA sorry
waiting for the day an ai slop channels has their ai some how confuse shonisaurus for the hindenburg
allosaur fans, give your input
I hate to say it…. But wouldn’t that apply to any carnivore hunting a creature that it lived with and is currently extinct?
i dont know, im just here to ask questions not answer them.
I could see them mobbing sauropods to death, it's a similar size ratio as komodo dragons and some of their prey and maybe besides diplodocids with their tails most sauropods don't really have much in the way of defense, even just throwing their weight around would be difficult given they're graviportal
It's very much possible, I see it as a lions and elephants type of situation where allosaurus would, like all predators, most likely target young, old, sick, or injured sauropods but would avoid stronger individuals
A komodo dragon-like feeding ecology seems fairly likely to me given their dentition. Opportunistic and more generalized compared to Ceratosaurus and Torvosaurus. Probably took a wide range of prey, including possibly the largest sauropods with mobbing type behavior. The proportion of different prey sizes may have varied by individual or population or region or all of the above.
So what you're saying is that allosaurus wasn't the lion of the jurassic, but the monitor lizard of the jurassic and had a septic bite to kill all the giant prey it only ever hunted 
was spinosaurus four legged?
so this is possible?
btw there used to be a trend where people used to dress up lizards for dinosaur movies(slurpasaurs) Probably better then modern cgi and totally accurate
is this the place to post cool fossils i’ve seen in person
ok here’s deinonychus, one of my favorite dinosaurs and my main in the game
I don’t think that’s a deinon
trex for scale
that is in fact a Thescelosaurus
i took these photos years ago and lost the photos of the labels so it’s possible i’m wrong, let me check the museum’s website
no offense since I can't expect everyone to know the exact morphology of every extinct animal but that looks nothing like a Deinonychus
ah i was misremembering because there was a deinonychus on display elsewhere in the museum
no offense taken i have very poor eyesight and am new to dinosaurs (is this funny to say) despite patronizing museums occasionally. i appreciate the correction from people who know better
i am much more familiar with prehistoric north american mammals and only recently got the dino bug
Here's an image of a Deinonychus mount, there's a large number of differences since it and Thescelosaurus are not closely related within Dinosauria, but perhaps some of the most immediately obvious differences are that Thescelosaurus has a smaller skull and smaller teeth, smaller forelimbs without the pronounced finger claws, and lacks the large and iconic toe claw that Dromaeosaurids like Deinonychus are best known for
Thescelosaurus was a smaller herbivorous Ornithischian
Deinonychus was a Dromaeosaur, a group within the Maniraptoran Theropods (Maniraptora being the group that also includes birds)
oh wow i have a lot to learn. you’re absolutely right the claw is a very big tell i overlooked
the last museum i went to i was surprised by the amount of mounts on display that pinged “triceratops” in my dinosaur noob brain despite not being one. i must learn more
The teeth are a big one. The clearest way I can describe is that herbivore teeth are typically packed together like how our teeth are. vs predators like that Deinon where the teeth are more obviously spiky.
wow yeah upon zooming in the back of the mouth in particular looks very different to my eye
I'd beat up Molly for that tooth
SHES 9 :(((((
based
I dig through shark waste water to collect their teeth, I'm not above kicking a child in pursuit of that same goal
is it worth going through shark waste water for their teeth
whats the oldest tooth you've found?
I don't know the oldest but today I found the smallest
Considering Meg teeth half as complete as that go for like $400
Yes, I’m throwing hands
i wonder what would go for more, a complete tyrannosaurus tooth or a complete meg tooth?
off the top of my head no clue but megalodon teeth are probably easier to come by
6+ Inches: $3,000 – $15,000+ (rare, exceptional).
Large (3”+) / High-Quality/Rooted Teeth: $10,000 - $50,000+
according to the infallible google ai the tyrannosaurus teeth are worth more
You're a paleontologist 30 years in the future and you have to choose one to excavate:
-
A fully articulated, miraculously preserved megalodon skeleton... only its found beneath the last living coral reef
-
A fully complete oxalaia found in the last few remaining healthy acres of the amazon but excavation would give the Brazilian government cause to further exploit the region
amazon is probably going down anyway sooner or later
Love my Amazon prime
Big
2 for sure
Having galeophobia makes an easy (2)
Oxilia becase the value of that reef is greater then the forest
Never let no paleontologist near a rainforest 🙏
Omg im actually getting into a heated argument about birds being dinosaurs
They are
What’s the other person trying to argue?
That they aren’t because they evolved from them
Clearly mis understanding what a monophyletic group is
They aren’t dinosaurs because they…evolved from dinosaurs?
Guys humans aren’t primates, this is because humans evolved from primates!!!!
Also they just said that im wrong as we are multicellular but came from a unicellular organism
Either this person is trolling, or they’re a long lost cousin to david peters of sorts
well preserved remains in a rainforest
Oh its like three people now
thanks I needed a good laugh
I mean if that were the case, it would be stupid to NOT go check out what is happening because it would be so bizarre
I would evict 20 uncontacted tribes to see what is going on
also this is a very cringe doomerist mindset
but a fun hypothetical I guess
it’s a pretty common misconception which makes sense to make. just tell them that ‘multicellular’ and ‘unicellular’ aren’t classifications but descriptions
while ‘dinosaur’ is a classification
Yep same with acellular things like viruses and viroids that border the line of living and non living
I try not to argue these things in class though because I’ll get called a dork and be socially ostracised
Erm actually dinosaurs are evolved from triassic pseudosuchians!!1!!
people actually say this about birds though
I saw someone genuinely say "birds used to be dinosaurs but they evolved so much that they dont have dinosaur dna anymore so are no longer dinosaurs"
you can’t blame “most people” for thinking that though, since to the layman a dinosaur is anything big with sclaes
doesnt help that the definition most dictionaries give is "big mesozoic reptile"
What plesiosaur would Nessie resemble most to?
An elasmosaur
is 12.7 to 13.5 meters long & 8.8 to 10.2 tons in weight is still accurate for Giganotosaurus's most up-to-date length & weight?
Something like that yeah
instead of primates i read pirates and now i so much wish we evolved from shiver me timbers yohoho people
12.4m and 8.2t
How plausible is it atm that the other Meraxes specimen is larger?
Nah grouping is just a weird thing. You could technically call us fish and you wouldn’t be wrong.
I know but apparently thats also apparently thats wrong according to them
Welp 
The abstract mentions that the bones are comparable in size to those of giga, so it wouldn't be surprising for it to have been a similarly sized animal overall, we won't know specifics probably for a good few years
Well good thing its a hypothetical then and not representative of my actual opinions
We'd be so screwed atp anyways I don't think it matters what you choose
Foooor unpublished information!
https://peerj.com/articles/20796/
Behavioral implications of an embedded tyrannosaurid tooth and associated tooth marks on an articulated skull of Edmontosaurus from the Hell Creek Formation, Montana
Because teeth can be taxonomically distinct, particularly for non-mammalian carnivores such as non-avian dinosaurs, teeth that have broken off in the bone of another animal during feeding, predation or antagonism can provide direct information on carnivore behaviour. Here, we report on a semi-complete, articulated adult Edmontosaurus skull (MOR ...
Also, just wanted to say something about this, I can't speak for the amazon, I'm not into terrestrial systems at all but practically all our models show catastrophic die backs of coral reefs by the year 2050 of anywhere between 70-90%
Since mitigation efforts typically have a ten year delay between implementation and results, there isn't much that can realistically be done to significantly alter this course at the moment
There's people playing around with assisted evolution, selective breeding, etc. But realistically, with our current knowledge, politics, and technology a "last remaining coral reef" in the year 2056 is not too far off from a very possible reality, and trying to paint these predictions as "doomerism" amounts to nothing else but sticking your head in the sand.
I'm passionate about doing something to combat this outcome, but feel powerless to actually do anything about it.
WHAT DID I EVEN SAY THAT TIME ALDERON I'M TRYING TO TALK ABOUT CORAL CONSERVATION
It seems we are living in the 8th mass extinction. One that began about 12 thousand years ago
Bro what's with the Cap locks, I'm on your side.
What the alds don't want you to know about
Well I had this whole shpeel about challenges faced by coral reefs outside of climate change, and how there's some interesting stuff we can actually do to maybe aid coral reefs much more assuredly, but Alderon Automod likes to delete my messages for things I couldn't possibly understand
I'm sorry to hear that, I really do want to hear what you have to say about this topic
me when i got one deleted for talking about my image editing software (I was left genuinely wondering if "delete" was a bad word)
Ping me directly about it if they are still blocking you
Corals that reproduce through breeding have species-specific very precisely timed spawning events that historically would occur down to the hour across multiple reefs and thousands of kilometers of ocean (I'm realizing now automod deleted my message for the shorthand of kilometers I used)
This doesn't happen as reliably anymore because shifts in climate patterns means that the ques used to cause these events either never occur, or occur less broadly which stimies cross-fertilization between reefs. Fortunately, there is plenty that can be done through aquaculture to keep corals breeding even in the absence of reliable spawning events. There's plenty to be done through coral aquaculture in general but previously that's really only amounted to growing corals in captivity and hoping planting them in the wild won't just lead to them bleaching as well.
There's also work being done on altering their symbionts to be more heat-resistant since it isn't the polyps but the algae that actually can't handle the higher temperatures. This is a lot less assured however, because corals really don't like hosting symbionts they didn't evolve specifically to host.
That's the very basic rundown of some of the kind of newer developments in coral conservation. I could go a lot more into detail but every paragraph I write is a higher chance that one of the moderators sees this message and deletes it for not being paleo 💀
Well to make it more paleo focused, how did Corals survive in the Paleoocene-Miocene, when temps were higher than today?
They locked in
Also Lunae, it's not the human moderators deleting your message, it's auto-mod registering a word as evil...I think 
So those warming events occurred over much longer time periods, and are actually more beneficial to the coral skeleton itself since the form of Calcium Carbonate corals use called Aragonite actually is more stable in warmer conditions, but in today's oceans, a combination of too-fast warming leading to abandonment by the coral's symbionts and higher pH breaking down the aragonite in spite of the benefit of warmer temperatures leads to the mass die offs we see today
I think what people don't realize when they say "Well erm, it was warmer than today thousands/millions of years ago and animals were fine!" is that most of the warming/cooling happened over a period of thousands of years
The current climate change is happening over the span of a few decades (Not saying anyone here, just in general)
Yeah, algae can shrug off a global change in a few degrees if it happens over multiple millennia, not decades
It's like jumping into a frozen lake vs slowly walking in
Gotcha
great find, great paper
I found a decent chunk of it to be redundant, but I suppose its all in the interest of being thorough when describing something as strangely contentious as Tyrannosaurus trophic ecology
It's great to have because while there are three previous examples of rex predation on edmontosaurs in literature, one of them is now considered a potential mating injury and the other two are published by DePalma
I appreciate the thoroughness, agreed that it's a somewhat mystifyingly contentious topic, and the wide examples while comparing with contemporary predators. They even mention limbless lizards.
This, for example, strikes me as an unnecessary point in their discussion, but again they seem to have thoroughness - especially concerning previous literature - at heart so I guess its not too bad.
"Although some recent literature conceptualizes tyrannosaurids as both predators and scavengers (e.g., Holtz Jr, 2008; Horner, Goodwin & Myhrvold, 2011; Kane et al., 2016), some publications still describe adult tyrannosaurids as “apex predators” (e.g., Therrien et al., 2023)."
Ok yeah that is a bit silly
yeah agreed
I have seen people dispute the use of "apex predator" as a term for large carnivores but honestly "top order carnivore" means the exact same thing so idk how that improves anything
Perhaps like the carnosaur, we should call them apex scavengers
I think it might be an issue with their wording, because Horner et al 2011 literally does describe T. rex as a predator during one stage of its ontogeny and a scavenger later in its ontogeny. So a predator then a scavenger
Is it really scavenging if the corpse is fresh enough?
Vultures are literally specialized to be immune to poisonous and highly toxic bacteria
I guess we can’t have spoiled images of animals eating carcasses
Just use a image of a trex eating a burger since burgers are technically corpses and definitely not fresh
How heavy was giga holotype 7,84t or 8,5t?
Yes
Giganotosaurus can destroy trexes tbh. This is because giganotosaurus lives in packs and trex does not
Giga has Family!!!
Giganotosaurus(or mapusaurus) destroys lone arg with the power of friendship
In the Dresden files, a resurrected body is more powerful the older it is. So Giganotosaurus being 30 million years older would easily beat rex
What
Random's been reading a book series, I fear
Herrerasaurus clears both then
I even chose the least gorey images I could find
Tbh carcharodontids look better then trexes, they are alot more refined
pot paleo has it out for venator today fr
I think the parrot doesn't like me
Sentenced to playing solo in pvp no rules server
did anyone see that edmontosaurus trex paper im probably late
a wee smidge yea
What was the biggest carch? Mapu or the second Meraxes? Gomez is excluded
wild that it was found, trex bite straight to the head even puncturing the eye
what would be more unsafe to swim with in real life, sarco or tylo?
8.2t
I like Random's answer more
Actually
Its 1kgs
sarco would see you as food more than tylo would i reckon, but you're just dead anyway
the tooth is embedded in the nasal, it's not puncturing the eye. https://peerj.com/articles/20796/ see figure 2
Because teeth can be taxonomically distinct, particularly for non-mammalian carnivores such as non-avian dinosaurs, teeth that have broken off in the bone of another animal during feeding, predation or antagonism can provide direct information on carnivore behaviour. Here, we report on a semi-complete, articulated adult Edmontosaurus skull (MOR ...
and im gonna assume out of the other aquatics, leed would be the safest to swim with?
There's a 50/50 chance they're mixing in DePalma's Edmontosaurus which had a large portion of its eyebrow torn off in an attack
well there's not much to choose from otherwise so yeah
i mean, you can either swim with eurinho, kai or leed without dying, im gambling it all on leed
sorry i misread the part where it talks about the 8th mark tooth, it’s below the orbit. i think i just misread as being in the eye itself
I found this image on a group, how accurate it is?
I’ve had a long history with Giganotosaurus , ever since my first skeletal diagram in 2021/2022. Overall, I’ve revised Giganotosaurus around 6 times (what can I say, I’m a perfectionist), and as I get more data on the holotype specimen, the more I want to update my skeletal diagram to be as close
does anyone own any skeletons/fossils? even if it’s casts it’s fine. i wanna buy a skull but idk where to rlly find one
this is dizzy rose. never ever ever trust anything dizzy rose posts
they're a powerscaler ava youtuber who has no grounds in anything paleontology related
They need to make a law or sign that tells people about whether a youtuber is a paleontologist or powerscaler, plus they are super toxic about lizards fighting
law is crazy
They lie and distort the truth and should face the consequences
Would hooves work on bipeds?
Don't use Dizzy rose, Dan has the skeletal on his website, Thecodontia. Even has weight estimate
Depends the time of month n day lol
Really great work, and important to recognize that the authors are also clear that only some of the data finds a paraphyletic "sharks." Ultimately really cool stuff that is probably pushing up against the limits of what we can currently find with genetics, and hopefully we will find some good paleozoic/early mesozoic fossils to help us resolve the issue.
"Sharks might be going the way of prosauropods and fish"
I hope that person sees the redundancy in that statement
"Oxalaia Is my favorite Dinosaur" https://i.pinimg.com/originals/3c/7f/20/3c7f203e38f21554d5c7097df102bd9c.png
Dan has his Giga at 8000-8500kgs on the website
With a GDI he did at 8150kgs
Wait is the news that some sharks may be closer to rays than to other sharks?
I thought this was already the case
I'm further not too keen on their use of "Tyrannosaurid" which appears to stem soley off of GSP's work. Even in being thorough in your recognition of previous studies, doesn't mean you have to give all conclusions equal weight.
Just bite the bullet and say Tyrannosaurus better yet just say T. rex we all know that's where the tooth is from, so there's no point in wording your paper as if its unclear.
Don't Rays COUNT as Sharks? as In they're like VERY closely related?
No. They're all elasmobranchs, but sharks are thought of as distinct from batoids (Rays and Skates)
Ohhh that makes sense
The humble nanotyrannus gigas
I'm ngl it makes sense that Nanotyrannus was In fact the last Non-Avian Dinosaur instead of yk Good Ol T-Rex
Wdym
They existed alongside one another
Don't we have somewhat plausible evidence that T-Rex KIND OF already started to die out before the Asteroid even came? If so I think it's clear that Nanotyrannus likely was the last Tyrannosaurid and Non-Avian Dinosaur
No
Also there are loads of non-avian dinosaurs. And that's just talking about North america too
Whole ass planet of dinos
Yeah idk where you are getting that from
Idk It might just be me misremembering some things
"The last non-avian dinosaur" would still ingnore the many hundreds of species that would have lived alongside it otherwise
i think its plausible. the appalachian migrant nanotyrannus likely supressed tyrannosaurus populations via mass infanticide, driving the latter near extinction
Non-avian dinosaurs were doing fine before the K-T extinction, even though some lineages and populations changed or died out through natural means.
Same goes for pterosaurs btw
Aren't all confirmed nanos from lower hell creek?
Here's something chat's not ready for: it's not improbable to think that other non-avian dinos survived K-T and died out
I'm saying "Last non-avian Dinosaur" Since well, All Large Herbivores died, However I believe a small Number of Nanotyrannus survived the Impact for a while feeding off what was left before finally "dying out"
That's what I meant
It's just poor preservation on the fossil record. A lot of pterosaurs were probably still around, even though we don't have any evidence
Some dinosaurs probably did hold on for a while afterwards until finally dying out, in fact it's probably more likely than not
Yeah also that
There's no reason to believe that. Nanotyrannus existing at all was up in the air until a few months ago, let alone living beyond the impact
something like acheroraptor or troodon would have survived way longer than nanotyrannus based on food availability
Alverasaurids survived the longest cuz bugs, I was there and saw em
Alverasaurs and troodontids, perhaps some caegnathids
There was also a sauropodomorph that looked at me and said "No One Will Believe You"
A significantly smaller size likely did give it a better chance, just probably didn't hold on as long as the other Bird-like dinosaurs did
Smaller than t rex yes, but nanotyrannus wasn't a small animal all things considered
The largest and most specialized always go first because they need superb conditions
There's still a possibility in my eyes
Not saying it was guaranteed but It's still very much possible
The only reason birds made it out is because most were small and incredibly generalized ground feeders at the time
Birds were hiding out in a secret base in Antarctica, which penguins guard the secret of to this day
Well even if you could say it did survive the extinction event for a bit, last non-avian is a lot more farfetched to say
Feels weird seeing bro like this
The last non avian dino was a very avian looking non avian dino
So in the end one could say Tyrannosaurus was starting to "suffer" quote on quote the same fate that awaited the Megalodon, being "Out-competed" by a smaller version of itself
Not EXACTLY but you get it
It would be impossible to point out any one species more than likely given that you probably wouldn't find them in the geological records
the real last non avian dinosaur is mokele mbembe in the amazonian river
North American faunas were probably particularly badly hit by the initial blast, which cooked the surface thousands of miles away from the impact site. The impact record in NJ, some thousands of km away from the impact site, is 10 cm thick. That's a very short period of time
In the terms of megalodon that's not exactly true either. For both, they died out because in one way or another, the environment changed to a point where it couldn't support them.
Unfortunately, most that didn't get killed from the asteroid prolly starved to death or something
Wait till the Kasai Rex becomes relevant again smh smh
that was table being sarcastic
I feel like the usage of "outcompeted" is disingenuous because this implies the Nanotyrannus was punching at the same weight class as T. rex
I don't think there's ever been a recorded instance of outcompetition that wasn't later proven been to have caused by climate change
Fr, maybe they kidnapped all the dino cryptids and are keeping them in a government laboratory or something
Megalodon did not get outcompeted by the great white, the isthmus of panama closed distrupting the flow of nutrients through the global oceans which lead to a die off in its prey
Also we've found like a billion rexes and 5 nanos that are all from lower hell creek iirc. While rexes are found all over the place
Or perhaps mighty maniraptorans like Styginetta
I meann, Nanotyrannus likely picked off any Rex that was young and smaller than itself (Survival mode on Nightmare difficulty)
Like I said earlier, it's more so environmental shifts than competition, and the same goes for the last dinosaurs, just in a more extreme context.
This is because T. rex is gigantic and easily preserves
I don't think T. rex was particularly the most common species in the formation!
I would wager all megafaunal species on the american side of the planet were more or less wiped out on impact day including the polar bear sized nano
That's normal in every environment, leopards kill lion cubs quite often
Some days I wish the meteor would have missed and people were lizards
My mistakes, tho I think it can't be denied that most of the large prey The Meg used to feed off also died out while the smaller ones still had access to smaller prey items so it kind of counted for the few Megs that survived that
have you considered the higher spawn rate for t rex since players found it to be cooler
Yeah, I saw that after
Or perhaps no people at all because we seem to be very harmful
it is not surprising we would find more rex fossils as this means more of them died. unlike the nanosaurus, which rarely died
Further Evidence that Denversaurus was Immortal
99% of the Offspring likely was either Spawn Killed, Skewered by Flying Giraffe or Mauled by other small predators anyway
Bird people from dinosauroids
Time and time again Dinosaurs are LUCKY they died before meeting us smh smh
If they'd become anything like us in terms of relationship with the rest of the world I wouldn't want them honestly
A bit sad we'll never get a good picture of what all the arboreal dinos were like
I mean, yeah, that's what I just said.
The size difference in the prey of megalodon and GWS is almost as substantial as the size difference between the two sharks themselves.
Not to say the White Sharks came out of the miocene unscathed, being a single species genus scattered into several global sub populations that hardly interact is proof of that.
we must raid the secret time machines they have in government facilities to explore the mesozoic and upload it to the internet, thats how they made walking with dinosaurs.
Anyways let's adress the Elephant in the room https://i.pinimg.com/originals/3c/7f/20/3c7f203e38f21554d5c7097df102bd9c.png
Cus HOW, WHEN, WHY or WHAT
maybe oxalaia did look like that 🤷
I'm particularly curious if some species with advanced dexterity and grip evolved
Dino Chimps basically?
That would be a interesting thought
Pretty much I guess, in terms of the arm function
if tree climbing dinos evolved i wonder how they would coexist with the sauropods
This is still just the Troodon Propaganda all over again except it's somewhat WORSE
Spinosaurus was four legged too, I think, but yeah no chimp dinos would be terrifying, either that or lizard people are real and they live among us
Imagine some type of climbing leaf eaters that tried to protect their tree territories by making a fuss or smth
Tbh, feel like they'd be the biggest danger to the little guys that hide in forests due to their small size
The Yixian gives us a decent glimpse at arboreality in dinosaurs and pterosaurs, Kupengopterus was described as having an opposable thumb https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(21)00369-9?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0960982221003699%3Fshowall%3Dtrue
or they evolve to get certain bugs /nutrients in the bark that sauropods can’t access. idk what exactly i’m just guessing
I feel like it sometimes DID walk on it's Knuckles cus like how does it even stand or walk forward without tripping cus of that Long aahh body
They could very well be on any side of the dietary spectrum, and I could easily imagine climbing leaf eaters as well
Yeah no it certainly was four legged, how does something that big with that short of legs even walk on two of them?
Guys, do not troll the new kid, that's not nice
Or well at least sometimes It could've, I personally think It could've been both
Spinosaurus most definitely looked atleast slightly different from what we have rn
If we use Sereno's skeletal filled in with material, we have a finger bone that is incredibly gracile
An indication that putting ~4+ tons of weight on it would not work
True, but I'm assuming we are still missing part of the picture because we usually are.
Ok I know this isn't accurate in the slightest, but, maybe it could have been. Plus its cool
While I heavily doubt therizinosaurus was an insectivore like that, I wouldn't be too doubtful that something similar existed (it would probably need to be significantly smaller)
In my personal Opinion there's a chance it switched from Bipedal to 4-legged, or if not then it likely used it's massive tail as a third limb for balancing itself on land
Technically it could both be a insectivore and herbivore, omnivorous dinos aren't impossible
We already likely had some
Deinocheirus (If i didn't miss anything) likely ate both Fish and Acquatic plants
Guys, check this out:
https://fxtwitter.com/CodyFandom_/status/2023268193251307835
Yeah but that image literally makes it a copy of an anteater, and I don't think that's particularly realistic for the species
this could also be a real pterosaur since pterosaurs are bad at fossilizing.
Yesn't
Cause on a Spectrum we DO know Pterosaurs had a very long "Thumb" or finger in general similar to Bats today that support a Wing structure, And if I recall correctly Quetzalcoatlus likely had this too
This was posted the other day as well, I really hope this doesn't come to be.
Given the general shift of pterosaur varieties over time a fully terrestrial species isn't that implausible
It works as a Spec Evo thing
It could be also couldn't
Neither do I, so care to do me a favor and spread this to other people and servers as well?
I'm pretty sure the discussion is in the context of a theoretical undiscovered pterosaurs, not that known ones were
Wish pterosaurs never went extinct especially, they are the most alien when it comes to the mesozoic for me atleast
Ohhh
Unfortunately, I'm not in any other paleo/nature related servers.
I feel like a pterosaur becoming fully terrestrial is possible, but not plausible because if one did do so, it'd become mincemeat
Also you just gain more from being able to fly between feeding grounds and the like
Birds constantly evolve flightlessness because their methodology of flight is incredibly energy consuming
It would need to become fast and agile on land to survive, and would probably be pressured in a particular environment
A land Pterosaur would be possible if there was a almost complete absence of any large Theropod or Carnivore In general in it's specific Area
Arguably this wouldn't be optimal considering if by some unfortunate event a Small theropod encountered this hypothetical Land-dwelling Pterosaur it's Eggs and Hatchlings would be picked off in record time and there would be almost NOTHING they could do about it since they're now stuck on the Ground
Hatzegopteryx!
The most similar pterosaur to what we have discussed by far, and it's differences between quetzalcoatlus show it
Like I'm sorry but while this is all we have, I doubt the massive muscle attachment on its arm is indicative of being terrestrial
The Dodo Bird fate basically
ngl wonder how bad it would be if pterosaurs existed in the cenozoic, would they just outcompete everything or would they just, replace birds?
I think it's moreso the assumption that the bulkier frame suggests less time flying, alongside the insular region it's found near
Yes and No
Later on the Ice Age would 100% wipe them out
That's not at all what happened with the dodo
The dodo went extinct due to a distinct lack of predator reaction (to humans), slow birthing rates (iirc one egg per season?) and an overwhelming overhunting
Aka environment changing so rapidly and violently you can't really blame them
Yeah but at the same time It's eggs were targeted by Rats and basically they were getting Spawn Killed
That ties into "slow birthing rates"
Doubtful, they had fur of somesorts and the ice age wasn't just global ice
Flying would actually be incredibly favorable on an island species because you can jump between landmasses to forage
The ice age was not 100% cold and not 100% ice, having filaments has no bearing otherwise we would have no reptiles anywhere
Not enough Fur to sustain and protect them from the sheer cold
That's true, and we honestly won't have any conclusion on the matter until we actually find sufficient material. As we've seen both island hoppers and island specialists are common.
considering the amount of mesozoic birds and the specialization of modern birds they definitely wouldn’t replace them
We should also take In consideration that if Large Pterosaurs lived in the Cenozoic and further, with Man being a thing, Climate change wiping off most of the early Giants, Large Pterosaurs would suffer a lot for lack of large food sources.
While if we use small pterosaurs they could make it
As said before, outcompetition is a myth that was really rooted in the mammal-centric era of science
It doesn't happen IRL, it's called being beaten to death by climate change 
ngl wonder what a mammoth hunting or megaherbivore hunting pterosaur would look like, Perhaps they could use sharpbeaks or hookedbeaks to cause massive bleeding
Non-existent 🥀 they are not built to tackle large prey and considering they had the same amount of time to evolve such as the dinosaurs, I doubt they would
What about the whole Terror Bird and Sabertooth Tiger deal?
Untrue and biased for the same reasons
Landmass stuff. The birds were already dying out also.
Given enough time they could get solid enough bones and some like the azdarchids were fast, plus im talking about the shock method or how carcharodontids hunted(sabers also hunted via just climbing on their prey and stabbing their spines)
Life On Our Planet really didn't help with these cruddy outdated views, man.
Phorusrhacids/terror birds died out due to their habitat becoming non-favorable (more wooded, less open) while the cats thrived because their habitat was expanding (less open, more wooded)
If anything, terror birds were keeping the cats down. Smilodon only got big after Titanis died out though this might also be attributed to preferred habitat expansion
With how Well armed a Mammoth was I'd doubt they would risk trying to take down one of those UNLESS if in a life or death situation
Pack hunting, also like sabers.
It's less about a species literally being better than another and more so one being better suited for their environment or the change of such
they co existed for about 3.8 my last i remember
major cooling happened after that most likely did the big birds in
and smaller ones did live on later
potentially to the holocene with 1
Hyper-protective Herds are a thing tho
Even with hypothetical pack hunting it's just not worth the risk
I don't think that's how Smilodon/Homotherium hunted at all 😭 TMK they were only taking out young mammoths that they would dispatch via normal cat method
Also being hit as a pterosaur by (megafaunal prey) is probably a lot more devastating than being hit as a tyrannosaur by (megafaunal prey)
There's no such thing as a truly superior species or class despite some what might try to claim
B-bu-b-but my mammalian cunning 
Thats if the pterosaurs stay flying, I doubt if pterosaurs basically filled alot of the carnivore niches their bones would be as light, hatz also had denser bones
Again, considering they were happy to stay hunting at a certain size for the entirety of the Mesozoic, I doubt they'd do so
Aren't some Racoons today Out-performing Racoon Dogs in the modern day? It's not 100% Outcompetition but like there ARE some species that have a better time surviving than Others
Thats because they had competition, if you remove their competiton they tend to get bigger and a lot more diverse.
The competition that would still exist if we assume megafaunal prey makes it past the KT?
Again that moreso plays into performance in certain environments and situations, and in the context of increased urbanization it's not very surprising
only pterosaurs, pterosaurs are very underrated
Climate is not really a problem for Pterosaurs, they and Dinosaurs persisted just fine through cryospheric periods in the Mesozoic, as well as hothouse intervals.
Wasn't there a glacial maximum in the Jurassic far more than the glacial maximum of the ice age?
I'd be really surprised about that
Idk about the Jurassic, in the Cretaceous seems like it happened at least twice
Wasn't the Jurassic pushing some Deepfrying (literal) temperatures at that time?
Unironically if theropods and land crocs went extinct mammals would become megafaunal specialists long before pterosaurs did
Big paleo dictates mesozoic = hot cenozoic = cold, paleontology is all very black and white dontcha know
kinda imagine a flightless pterosaur evolved to hunt megafauna would look like this or similar, basically fast enough to not get hit but strong enough to do damage.
Considering how VERY adaptable mammals are, It's likely
I think it's pretty well understood that the world was hotter back in the Mesozoic, but there's definitely overlap
Mammalian adaptability will surely win the day
Walmart Terror Bird basically
No? It wasn’t the hadean, and global temperatures can very across 10 million year scales a lot, there is no universal ‘Mesozoic climate’
permian temperature
Fried 💀
ah yes supervolcanos and superdeserts my favorite, with acidic oceans and no ozone for radiation
KFC
Kentucky Fried Ceratosaur
How well would Gorgonopsids (both large like Inostrancevia and small) do In the modern day
Now that we're in the topic of the Permian Period
There is an earliest Permian glaciation
The ceratosaur that died of thirst during the scorching drought be like:
people would probably try to get pet permian animals tbh, lystrosaurus and diictodon look cool af
Who named Diictodon and Dicynodon
We should destroy them
all this to get mauled by a rat that grew slightly larger and more robust
Fluffy moschops and anteosaurus real?
Ok this was funny
More in specific how well would Gorgonopsids do In modern day Africa
Other than cetaceans, I don't even think any other warm-blooded vertebrae has completely lost its back limbs like this
due to how pterosaur anatomy works getting better at moving around on the ground means they would buff up their arm muscles, getting better at flying means they'd buff up those arm muscles.
The reason pterosaurs are just not at all comparable to birds in terms of flightlessness, birds need to buff up their legs to be better at moving on the ground, but that makes them dead weight and a hinderence to flight.
The skeleton implies it's more snake-like
Yes! And as we know this covered the equator in a 5 kilometer thick ice sheet!
mammals are very good generalists while pterosaurs are pretty opposite
We all love dicynodonts here.
They can just typically retain proficiency in both thanks to what you explained is what you mean?
Anyways, ohhh Saurophaganax Maximus my baby...Don't worry we still talk about you're Golden ages...
-sniff- I miss you...
Basically birds evolve flightlessness so much because they can't be good at both as it's mutually exclusive, pterosaurs are good at both however
Yeah I get what you mean, just making sure
there's no reason for pterosaurs to lose flight because if they lose their arms they also lose land mobility
and the drawback of losing the small, easily tucked wing membrane is too big to be worth it
So for pterosaurs it's mutually inclusive, meaning flightlessness is much much less likely for them to ever have any evolutionary pressure to evolve.
Their quadrupedal flying/terrestrial build is super generalized and effective basically
Perfect, also, what caused the cryogenian period???
I'm not particularly well versed about history way back when, but I think it was the loss of most greenhouse gases
Greek space mirrors
Let's not forget that when birds become flightless it's mostly either when there's more efficient ways to get food sources in a different enviroment (Penguins) or when there's a complete absence of Predators
Well, you see, when a mobile game is played by a big youtuber once and gains enough popularity to continue development despite not having any direction, eventually very bored people will download it onto their phones and absentmindedly freeze the earth with giant snowballs or freeze rays
Yes but even so pterosaurs in the same scenario wouldn't have nearly as much pressure to gain flightlessness
Ment to reply to message above
Due to oxygen creation and more methane I think, probably caused by early photosynthesis?
Aliens le real?
Crustacean build still Meta btw smh smh
So your telling me, C02 good, I agree we just need to stop killing the things that eat C02
Ik you are joking but the context was very very different back then
Tbh though I can't tell which is more terrifying, a desert with no life or a snowball with no life, pick your mass extinction
Somehow i'd rather take the Desert but just barellyyy
Both are technically deserts in their own right
Nah deserts suck, literally most of the earth was still a desert after the permian extinction and into the triassic.
The tundras and ice sheets of the world are basically cold deserts
Ok but at least Bugs and other things make it
What do you have in a super cold Tundra
Spoiler Alert: ||Nothing||
Deserts are characterized either by a lack of annual precipitation or biomass, they aren't just dry sandy places
I hate sand, its rough and irritating, and very few things can grow in it. plus like, getting baked alive is kinda horrible
I love sand, it’s warm and soft, and it’s great for making sandcastles
I still have sand in my bag when me and a bunch of friends visited a beach on a very windy day.
I spent nearly two hours getting sand out of my eyes
I feel like I would prefer intense heart to intense cold, but it would depend a lot on the surrounding environment/organisms
I already have a problem with overheating sometimes but I rarely have a problem with the cold
Intense heat sucks tbf, turning into a ice cube has you sort of feel warm and cozy right before death while you’re just in complete agony the whole time while boiling on the inside
500, Yutyrannus /j
Most of the world is getting hotter so yeah
This is because humans are descendents of the Dimetrodon (mammal-like reptile!) and since we do not have our sail anymore, we cannot adapt to temperature...
Both are similarly agonizing at the extremes, and they feel the same atp
if I was immortal, and had a time machine I would go back and atleast lessen the permian extinction via moving the earth farther away for a bit, the permian extinction wiped out so many synapsids
I am secretly a Dimetrodon Irl with Internet access he's right
Go back I want to be anteosaurus
I'm in the Hollow Earth guys It's real
Pay me a visit if yall want it's comfy in here
Anyways back to topic can we agree Gorgonopsids are awesome
And have insane aura
I wish Inostrancevia was still alive smh smh
Did any Gorgonopsia inhabit dense forests?
Idk maybe yes maybe no
Hi chat, let's keep the topic on palaeontology please! 
We need a general topic chat because it's literally so easy to diverge
Is It possible to speculate some feathered dinosaurs had mane-like structures on their neck?
Most likely
that would be cute
True fr
Psittacosaurus already has a mane of quills, it's just on the tail instead of the neck
ah yes, The cute dinosaur
I don't think these kinds of forests were particularly common. I also don't think any gorgonopsids like that are known.
Wasn't that more like a Knucles/Sonic/ that one Guy from the Surfer penguins movie type of thing?
I mean it's a row(s) of longer feathers running along the top of the spine
Sounds like a mane to me
another tarbo
Arboreal Gorgonopsid spec evo would sound interesting
Tigers, leopards but gorgonopsid
Idk bro, sounds more like a porcupine with an extremely receding hairline
The humble horse's mane
edmontosaurus real?
a Horse on Steroids
You could say
Leg
I mean hadrosaurs did often try to outspeed or outherd their predators and they both have teeth mind for grinding plants
you sent the same image twice
Horse hair was lowkey a massive downgrade, went from a cool badass mohawk to a boring straight blonde hair 🥀💔 still love them tho, horses are cool
They all likely chose Flight over fight but when they get cornered?
Let's just say the predator won't have the best time of its life
Put it next to Alberto for maximum family diversity
Yeah none of them had obvious defenses tbh, iguanadon isn't even a hadrosaur its a seperate group
Alberto forgot itself
Speaking of which in terms of succesful Dinosaurs Iguanodon is the first things that pops into my mind
Danger thumb that likely could've been used for defense, large size, Wide range of food cus of it being both a quadruped and bipedal
funny thumbspike herd lizard
NOOOOOOO alberto isn't taller!!!!!
Gorgo and Alberto are Comically Leggy
That Tarbo is prob still 2x that Alberto's Weight LOL
The gorgo is just scaled on the 109 cm femur
Amazing image
Alberto having a bigger arm is funny
we got a scale of all 3 current random's tarbo?
I genuinely think that this whole "shantungosaurus solos every land carnivore to ever exist" typa video is just trying to be different and cooler and then just became a trend, there is like, one or two scenarios where a shantungosaurus could actually kill a Tyranossaurus in a direct bloodlust fight to death, not like he would be an easy prey, he would still make him run away even alone but like, they have nearly no effective weapons against large predators yet somehow everyone thinks they solo everything
He only has PIN 551-1 and 107/2
I didn't post the third one it was just 551 scaled down
Pull out random's old 552 from 2018. I have no pc rn or i would
You posted a scaled down 551-1?
Also 11.4m 551-1 makes Torosus Holotype look...
Nah nah the third one is raptorex
yeah which was funny af
If Nanotyrannus made it, we, yes WE are bringing back Troodon /j
When did this Happen

the day i GDIed it
wait Random you know of the multi button feature on DeviantArt that you can use when you want to have multi images in one post?
You made that Edit?
Also did you saw that Bataar Production mentioned that one ZPAL was actually 10.5m with its 122cm Skull or smth
currently I think there's 11 usable tarbosaurus skeletals/edits for big 2026
I did not know that
And the 122cm is probably for the wrong ZPAL, as the one i used definitely has a 113cm skull
2.9m Hip Height is the same as your Dasp but its 70cm shorter is length
Whaos
Is Dasp Comically Long or smth
Or tarbo is just shorter for its length...
what's with Tarbosaurus using different specimen names like "ZPAL", "MPC", and "PIN" is it because some speicmen were poached?
ZPAL has longer legs because it's immature, also tarb has a shorter neck
This Zpal
1/4 has over a dozen measurements all of which are consistent with 113cm and not 125cm, they probably got the wrong specimen number
Its femur is also much smaller than the femur of 107/2 which has a 122cm skull
+10m Tarbo reproduces smh
Idk
Pretty sure it has the same Tail length Proportions as his Dasp
Also i don't think my dasp has enough cartilage
I know cartilage changes the leg lenght but is there a limit to it when it comes to animals like dinosaur, mainly theropods?
Prob
So lets add 10cm and make it 3m
For weight bearing elements its usually 1.5-3% the length of the relevant elements iirc
look don't get me wrong I sound dumb af but I legit haven't/didn't or notice how much a cm can still change the outcome of a certain object or reference
Idk
His First Spino was 2.6m but had to Much Cartilage
And Bro lost 10cm
Sue Gained 10cm with Cartilage
So I just 10cm cause idk
my thing is trying to undertsnad does "more" cartilage make a reference more accurate when it does apply or "needs" to be added
My original cartilage didnt take into account that the animal standing up would compress the cartilage under its weight
Elephants for instance are always taller (palm to shoulder distance) when they lie down
this is a species of dinosaur that i belived was once living. it’s technically a bird from the Cretaceous, about the size of a crow and was an omnivore but mainly hunted, smaller prey and could fly, even though there’s no evidence of this dinosaur existing there could be something very similar since we’ve lost thousands of even millions of species due to erosion overtime. What do y’all think? I named it Gallasraptor. i’ve always had this weird connection to chickens, but predatory if that makes sense, this is what I come up with, most males had much longer head feathers used for a display, as well as his tail, these feathers would slowly rise up almost like a mini peacock or could even be used as intimidation, at the very end of these feathers on the head were spiral shaped, black, and gray, while underneath these patterns was yellow, and had a snood, and like turkeys today. It is more prominent on males () and fills with blood to change size and color—becoming bright red when excited or during courtship—and serves as a, mechanism to help regulate body
(galla- meaning Gallus gallus domesticus, and raptor)
That's what I think too, because the Permian was dryer than the Carboniferous, and the Carboniferous is when we had the first forests
Just saw another update on the colossal wolves, apparently they're being considered fully grown and are hunting together now.
And it really sucks because as much as I want to think this is really cool and enthusiastically follow the project, I just know its all a sham. Though it is good the wolves themselves seem healthy and happy.
how old are they?
It's a shame how this is the type of "conservation" that gets all the attention and support
Well it isn't conservation at all tbf, theres no intention of releasing them to the wild
Like a year and a half?
Yeah but they put their general mission under the guise of conservation and it's very depressing
As said many times before, they have and are doing real conservation work
But the resurrection grift has done considerable damage to their initiative and credibility
In my eyes it's very insufficient but it could be my own bias.
So I have a question, I’m no paleontologist but carcarodons are sharks right? But we also have the carcarodontasorus(I probably spelled that wrong) but does it mean shark lizard?
Carcharocles is the shark but (donto) is tooth
So shark-toothed lizard
Oh ok thank you!
Carchar also means jagged (the great white shark is carcharodon, jagged tooth)
But Carcharodontosaurus was specifically named after the shark
Understandable, thou still spread the word to your friends, because maybe they can help?
I'm not really sure what my friends can do, but I have told them.
Is this accurate? I didn't think thal was that big
Thal is big and could absolutely kill a human
yeah its matching the size thal has in game now for the most part
That's awesome. I'm a little out of the loop on pterosaur stuff thal is thought to have been more of a terrestrial predator now right?
Yeah with the short wings and ginormous crest it's not going to be the best flyer
It would not realistically see a human as prey, and you could pretty easily stop one if you had to, but like humans have died to chickens and geese so i can see a particularly dumb or unlucky person dying from a thal attack
Humans actually bite harder than Thal right?
We do
You sound suspiciously well informed on how to defend yourself from a pterosaur
How do you think I got the skeleton in the picture you posted 
If enough people learn about this, it might set in motion a huge number of people demanding that this place be saved.
Will monster Thala be missed?
Absolutely no
I'm glad it finally got its posture and carpal tunnel fix. Looks like an actual animal not not a weird hunchback goblin
Some people genuienly think the new one is worse
Lmao i saw that on tiktok
We go through that every tlc. Personally I support all the new makeovers they've been great
"Ew why is the new thal so skinny and small?!?"
Not even surprised
"It's too skinny now" my brother in christ it can fly
I doubt they even payed attention to thal before the tlc, this tlc was sent from heaven for us thal lovers
It’s so much better
I've long since lost faith in the average PoT player to be able to provide actual well meaning feedback to the game.
People will bombard the devs with insults over what may well be the single greatest jump in quality for a model in the game's history for no other reason I can fathom other than they just can't exist without being angry.
tbh the feathering is pretty conservative.
I wouldn't expect anything else in all honesty given how they've done the other pterosaurs
Not to mention feathering has never been PoT's strong suit when it comes to looking good.
true.
Yeah Feather's in POT aren't the best
Not the worst but you know
TLC Thalass is great for some cinematic silhouette
tbh it is skinny
Alderon should fix the posture of Hatz after all that TLC they didn't bother 😂
Looks like those fried chicken someone have burned once in their life.
whats the most accurate utahraptor model?
BoB
Pt
coolio's
or prehestoric kingdoms
All of them look fairly realistic anatomically
thats the old bob utah
there the new one
me when [dinosaur game] announces their new dromaeosaur...
It will be modelled by Coolio
Life: Ruined.
???
thoughts on dromeosaurids doing this? https://x.com/Jay72594128/status/2023928638568014283
this is actually why they evolved their toe claws
edmusthosaurus after archeraptor turns it into a taxi
acheroraptor would unfortunately be torched by the musthful energy
I wonder if anyone who actually believes in edmusthosaurus has reacted to that new paper
thats why it carries the ultimate counter weapon
how large was the edmonto btw?
clearly the authors are lying about it being an adult edmonto to propagate rex fanboy propaganda
At least the papers provided entire edmonto caudal series which is rare for edmonto to get any sort of figured material
oh, btw, is it our first example of active rex predation in fossils?
The Edmontosaurus appears to be an early adult which would probably place it at ~3 tons
also, heres some good news https://vxtwitter.com/ScienceMagazine/status/2023770183806923160
nobody cared when Wosik & Evans 2022 came out and showed that Edmontosaurus ontogeny didn't include them getting to 15 tons so my guess is they'll just ignore it
ironically around 2022 or so is probably when Edmusthosaurus hit its peak too
Saurian gave us edmusthosaurus then died sometime after
truly a gift to the world
Thanks for sending this
one has to wonder why they didnt just like measure the regular ol skull length instead of just quadrate height and extrapolating from there
clearly impossible with this extreme of damage
actually judging by the scale bar the length of the preserved section of the skull seems to be close to a meter already so the estimate of 79-89 cm would be quite the underestimate
weird
tbf the estimate they give is using some premaxilla-halfway-through-quadrate measurement standard
ah ok
the quadrates closest in size (NCSM 23119 and SM R4050) have ~1m total skull lengths give or take (from campione and evans)
so 1m total from the scale bar seems about right
who would you guys say has the worst fan base ( speficially in the paleontology community, not jurassic park, but including paleotok )
edmontosaurus fans
spinofans
tyrannosaurus fans
well, their not tyrannosaurus fans, their rex fans
i dont think thats a very productive convo
we dont wanna bash on people
252+ Atk Choice Band Strong Jaw Dracovish Fishious Rend (170 BP)
vs max def slowbro
why use this as a proxy for regular skull length entirely evades me
i would say edmontosaurus
it's like two orders of delusional instead of just one, delusional in thinking it's a shant-sized hadrosaur and also delusional in how strong they think a shant-sized hadrosaur would be
I appreciate the effort to keep the topic paleontology related, but it does seem a bit unneccesarily inflammatory tbh
besides the answer is all of the above, liking things is for scrubs
joy illegal
are regalis fans like a thing that exists
regalis and mcraeensis are the unloved siblings
tbf it is actually missing a good chunk off the end but idk if it's really enough to avoid just measuring the skull
I've always found it ironic that people only glaze annectens when regalis is like the same average size and lives with a Tyrannosaur like a quarter the size of rex
there was a 3rd edmonto that found freedom.
annectens has got to have like the most scuffed resident tyrannosaur matchup ever yet the poor thing is help as the exemplar relatively giant hadrosaur
what do you think would happen if we found another hadrosaur in hell creek? ( hell creek lambeosaurid gang rise up )
like legit any saurolophine beyond like maiasaura is better off
I think absolute size plays into it but even then
Shant
if it was smaller, would it be treated like fodder and used as a arguement as rex not going after annectens due to it existing?
the online hadrosaur enthusiast should theoretically be incredibly inclined towards beckys giant being saurolophus 2 for the sake of establishing a 15m average hadrosaur in hell creek
" why would rex EVER go after the beast known as edmontosaurus when theres easier and weaker prey such as [hellcreek lambeosaurine]"
Hell creek has three giant extreme herbivores and people chose the one not from the three of which its only defense is being really big very occasionally and herding together
does it even outrun rex
I think tyranno is capable of outstamming it from what I read.
Also it can outswim it too. lol.
idk the actual ratios off the top of my head but going by vibes I've noticed Saurolophus looks like it has a fairly big head compared to other hadrosaurs
would that not reduce the estimated size a bit assuming im not just schizo
i miss hadrosaur whale moose argument guy i wonder what he's up to nowadays
i just realized, does ANY of rex's common prey outrun it
Persons and Currie 2012 indicates Hadrosaurs have better musculature for long distance running
speed estimates tend to place edmonto as faster than rex but idk how accurate they are
the average 'x fan' prolly just really likes the animal tbh, most ppl dont go to bat except for the extremists
also edmont was pmuch built for running so either it worked or they just had to outrun the slow one
Running yes, but rex was also really good stamina wise so it could still keep track of one for miles
I do also want to note that we have no real idea on most extinct animals whether they were built for endurance or not. Cursorial adaptions can indicate efficient walking or fast running, but endurance has way more soft-tissue factors, like big lungs.
Lions are quite long-legged, with efficient walking and fast running, but they aren't exactly endurance hunters.
are wolves endurance hunters? or does more have to do with their pack behavior where one chases, and when it gets tired, another one starts chasing and its just a cycle until the prey is exhausted, or they catch it
I think wolves/dogs are notably better for endurance hunting than felids could be, which is why felids are majorly ambush predators
the toothrow's length 50% longer than osborni (57cm vs 38cm) and maxillary length ~12% longer than the giant anguwhatsit skulls so i dunno the exact number that crunches out but i think it generally falls within the range of the edmontosaurus-based estimates
With hadrosaurs i'm pretty sure the size and placement of the 4th trocanther suggests they could outstamina a tyrannosaurid
which makes sense because they definitely aren't outsprinting a tyrannosaurid, so if they can't outstam it they're kinda just sitting ducks
not saying you're wrong but just to expand on what I was saying earlier:
Hadrosaurs (left) have a lower and larger fourth trochanter, this results in their muscles having more leverage when moving their legs resulting in less muscle fatigue from all forms of movement
granted the edmontosaurus-based estimates produce an increasingly stupidly wide range of estimates the more specimens you look at because this is maxilla/toothrow scaling so i'd imagine more saurolophus specimen measurements would do the same
so basically it's just an unknown level of big
what oogma said
As for the maximum speed estimates, they aren't actually faster than rex since they were done on a juvenile model, and of course juvenile rex is faster than the adult so adult edmonts would likely be slower than juvie edmonts too
yeah its really big and trying to be any more precise than that will likely end in tears
is toro and trike also slower then rex?
i would bloody hope so
so their defense was awareness, fighting and just praying?
terrible terrible terrible
I mean if a triceratops or torosaurus detects it early the rex probably isn’t trying it, could it win the confrontation? sure maybe but why risk it
"boy i wish there was a hell creek herbivore whose main defense was to fight tyrannosaurus"
the humble rex-sized slow moving animal with 4ft spears on its face:
is the answer denversaurus....
the answer is gsp 6t not-denversaurs
I think of triceratops as similar to sloth bears, they kind of just stand their ground when a tiger comes by
Asian Black Bears
question is how did tyrannosaurus regina defend itself from tyrannosaurus rex
also tbf while triceratops/toro are slower than rex, they are close enough in speed that a big headstart would allow them to get away
crazy how every photograph of this thing looks like one of those questionably done medieval drawings
We don't know but we know Rex had 14 Reginas because he kept decapitating them
which is certainly the preferred strategy for the trike/toro
i feel like denversaurus is the forgotten multi-ton animal of hell creek, like absolutely nobody cares about it ToT
this is because calling denversaurus a multi ton animal is really stretching the definition of multi ton
i like gentuinely didn't know it existed until last year ngl
is multi ton when its 10 tons + or just above 1 ton
2 tons
multi means more than 1
is multi-ton not just more than one ton
multi ton is multiple tons which to me means a minimum of 2 tons
then what did you mean about your denversaurus statements?
i do not think denver is over 2t
oh 🙁
dempsey's is pretty consistently 2-3t iirc
denver lives in anky's basement

how does dempsey not have a sue or giganotosaurus or spinosaurus but has a denversaurus of all things
favoritism
he's covering what the other artists don't have the courage to do
i'd say he was in austin but you'd think he would've done lane then
you dont remember it from saurian?
oh there was a digital recon already thats prolly why
cutie patootie
idk i went through a dino phase in like 2016 when i was playing the isle a lot and then i started a new dino phase in 2024 which i am still in
This anaconda lives isolated in a 100-meter-deep hole called “Buraco das Araras” (Macaw Hole) in Brazil. It was first spotted in 2017, and biologists still don’t know how it got there
Free my mans
well apparently its eating good on the birds that nest there
is this a good example of how new species / sub-species are devolped due to ecological isolation?
Nah probably just a case of understanding how to survive
1.00000000001 tons
1.99999999999991 tons
Words came out from big Paul
Favorite book ever
Any chances it could be something from the fabled Giganotosaurus paper that is supposedly meant to come? (I think it was him working on it, but I can't remember 🙁 )
" Denversaurus possesses a surprisingly powerful sense of smell, almost on par with that of Tyrannosaurus. This is used to seek out the herbivore's favoured food items, compensating for its relatively poor sight and hearing" - saurian
is this true?
For some reason i had this one dream about a Spec Evo Spinosaurid that had a Skin membrane around it's whole arms, forming an umbrella in clear lakes luring the fish making them think it's some type of cover
Basically just like that one Stork I forgot the name of
Don’t think it’s about the Giga , but it would be awesome.
It’s gonna be schimitar trust
That would make an awesome creature design
I vaguely recall that it is Coria working on that, not Sereno.
interesting
But anyone who can do better than "vaguely recall" is welcome to correct me.
I think it was coria, sereno’s got his spinosaur and noasaur stuff
Ok thanks, idk why I hear sereno and I associate him with Giganotosaurus... (I checked mid-message) Ah, that's why. He was the one describing it!
He’s apparently has Tyrannosaurus rex material as well so wouldn’t shock me for the confusion
Found a T-Rex while scrolling through Pinterest (The name of the Artist behind it wasn't present unfortunately)
How accurate or believable is it?https://i.pinimg.com/1200x/a2/2b/c2/a22bc29cb487e5b87aac76df93553d4d.jpg
The sound plays a phone ringtone...
https://www.vxinstagram.com/stories/paulserenoofficial/3835023963391313326?utm_source=ig_story_item_share&igsh=em5vaGlzOGZ5MXZ3
Aw that's cute of them
So…. What did I miss?
It does seem to be a trend that ankylosaurians have fairly poor hearing and sight but great smell.
Was about to post that.
Some people are saying it's going to be a new species of spinosaurus.
How long and heavy is the meraxes holotype?
Yup, it was mentioned in an earlier article : #paleontology message
Maybe the famous long-legged spinosaur we herd about like 3-4 years ago?
"Long-legged" as if that's the only distinguishing feature about it 😭 it's not even correct
Hey, I am waiting for more infos about it, how am I supposed to know anything if it was just presented as "long legged big crested spinosaurus paper in the work" only to never hear it ever again.
We all are but it being long-legged isn't even true!
All we know is that the abstract listed it as having slightly longer legs than the neotype with no indication as to how much!
A new leak shows it being this much
analogue horror dinosaur skeletal 
When Dal sasso said Spinosaurus was 17 meters he meant height not length 🔥
"Portions of the femur and a complete tibia show that it may have had somewhat longer hindlimbs than S. aegypticus"
"Somewhat" doesn't equate to "long-legged"
It could still look short and dumb!!! Wait for the paper!!!!!!!!!!
Clearly its hindlimbs were longer than the entire S.aegyptiacus
The other dinos honestly deserve the attention because they are just as cool
What if the real spinosaurus limb proportions were the friends we made along the way?
Spinosaurus is the only spinosaurid with a tibia longer than its femur, this indicates that it was a very cursorial animal
Asset 67
not accurate, head needs to be bigger /silly
I need to ask you something, I remember hearing that apparently by not being able to support spinosaurus weight the "short legs" were hypotized to be a younger exemplar... Fact is, like most stuffs in paleontology I only have herd them once in my entire lifetime, and since it was years ago again, informations might have changed... What can you tell me about it?
I'm not trying to say jp3 spino was real, just genuinely working with the not too rich amount of infos I have on the topic and wanting to know more
Asset 41
The "legs are from a juvenile and the rest of the body was an adult" stems from JP3 spinosaur fan cope, nothing more
Or in a more useful answer, there are no duplicated bones in the quarry, which means it all comes from the same individual. Histology of the ribs and limbs shows that both body and legs are from a 17 year old subadult
Paleontology nerfed my favorite unkillable bloodthirsty monster!!!
Paleontology ruins dinosaurs!
I forgot about the no duplication part
I saw someone say that the only reason fadeno's gigankylosaurus isnt accurate is because paleontologists hate ankylosaurus and are all T. rex fanboys
Spino doesn't have short legs
" Spino's short legs " still remains as the greatest example of optical illusion in paleo ever
its legs are nearly 2x shorter compared to its body than other large theropods
Children today were born in an age where Tyrannosaurus was unbelievably underrated, and they get upset when that turns out to not be true
In 20 years we're going to find like a 16 meter carcharodontosaurid and all the discord teens will be like "paleontologists all hate T.rex!!! When i was a kid it was the biggest theropod, now they keep naming bigger ones!!!"
Yeah yeah, just erase the sail for a sec and you realize it's just the sail giving the impression that Spino has a much larger body, without the sail the legs fit typical theropod proportions, if anything it's similar to most Carnosaurs.
Yeah, I don't think many people remember the early 2000s representation of T. rex especially in comparison to other large theropods.
I remember having a book that said T. rex was overestimated at like 6 tons and was actually 3.
I remember another that said spinosaurus was 4x the size of Tyrannosaurus.
10-15 years ago Tyrannosaurus wasn't even in the top 5 largest theropods (according to popular online opinion), it was wild
I would love to know more about how that happened, because as far as I know it was all on the public perception side of things
Horner is probably to blame...
Published literature was to blame as well. Giganotosaurus was widely considered the largest theropod in papers since 1997, mainly due to the dentary, while pre-2014 Spino was 17 meters and most likely outweighed rex according to Dal Sasso et al 2005
its hip height is 17% that of its total body compared to 30%+ in every other large non-spinosaur theropod
Damn didn't follow my advice did you?
what
Sereno's 1996 carchar paper also stated it was similar in size to Giga (holotype), which prob led people to think it was bigger than rex (other than the fact Carch is a genuinely gigantic skull and can be scaled to longer than rex)
Erase the sail for a second.
Why would erase the sail, its not like its not part of the body
now what
spino built like a sausage
There you go.
Are we pretending the legs exist somehow independently of the structure that makes up the largest proportion of spinosaurus's torso?
Ah. Thank you for the clarification!
i mean they are still short 
its not to be like hahha L bozo spino short
just how the animal is
Hahha L bozo spino short
he just trying to reach the top shelf dont bully him 
My university is having a fossil sale today that they didn't advertise and I'm on the other end of the damned state
nooooo
Not really, spino neotype(11 meters ish) has a femur length the same as that of a 5 meter Utahraptor.
For its body length, it very much is short legged
What would be the best skeletal reference for the Neotype? Just for a sec
Probably the neotype idk
I don't think random's has a scale bar for neotype size, dan folkes spino does though
Ew
You can take random's spino and downsize it by 75.30864198 % to get the neotype size. Just from scaling the femurs
No, I don't think I'll do that
It's a large difference
HOW DARE THEY DO THIS TO ME
yoooo
maybe you can do black market deals
I'm already offering double the price for someone to hold onto something

Also, it's true.
Imagine being under 12 ft looolll shortie ahhh
Unsure of where I’d post this here but I’m trying to spread the word on this as much as possible. Please sign the petition and share this where you can, DO NOT LET THESE ASSHOLES OUR NATURAL HISTORY FOR AI GARBAGE https://x.com/codyfandom_/status/2023268193251307835?s=46
I don't have X, send me any link where to petition.
Take Action 2
What was the Paul Serrano news ?
Tomorrow
The new spinosaur material was blown up by the RAF in a raid
What is the Paul Sereno news?
Who is the Paul Sereno news?
Why is the Paul Sereno news?
its gonna be a Tyrannosaurus was found in the kem kem beds
or Bahariya
either works
trust
Who’s Paul Sereno? 
you
The real Paul sereno were the friends we made along the way
The real Paul Sereno was the fossils we hoarded and never described along the way
Don't worry guys, I will save them
No!!!! I thought we didn’t have this one again
Don’t worry quad spino isn’t real
I don't care what it looks like as long as we learn more
Quad Spino is very much not real and I don't know why Apostle keeps insisting it is
It would be really interesting to find a quadrupedal theropod though
how good of eyesight would ceratopsians need? would it be their most important sense?
Quad spino is based
I did the thing
How much was it?
Would you had Infinite Tyrannosaurus but no Spinosauruses or Infinite Spinosaurus but no Spinosauruses?
Heheh
Only $30, and that was with paying double for someone to hold onto it before I could pick it up
That sounds like such a bargain wow
They made a Dromaeosaur skeleton made of Glass just now.
There was a bison pubis but I would've had to pay $320 so
You could name a new specie off that
I assumed like 50-100, easily.
There were also mosasaur verts, a bunch of fish fossils, used to be some trilobites and a bunch of plant fossils