#paleontology
1 messages · Page 213 of 1
I would honestly prefer Nanotyrannosauridae too, but we unfortunately bound by the archaic minutae of the ICZN
Yeah we don’t really know where Nanotyrannus sits specifically.
More accurately, it’s in the “just outside of tyrannosauridae” cabal with Moros and the two Dryptosaurs.
we obviously know that its on baby rex faces because thats what they deserve
if dakotraptor was real, what do you believe is the most possible?
“If”
As if he isn’t still valid
He may be a sussy man in terms of fossils material but he can’t be invalidated properly
Why is -tyrannidae preferable according to the ICZN?
i believe the large dromeosaurid in hell creek is real but the i dont think the genus that is dakotaraptor is real
does that sound stupid? i feel like it does
Nah that’s a pretty average opinion on Dakota or whatever dromie is walking around hc
do we have any american unenlagiidae's?
No north american ones, no
nah, most were in SA or Europe
I like when people make phylogenetic trees that obviously don't work
Like the humble North American Unenlagiid (nothing suggests Dakotaraptor could even be considered to be an Unenlagiid)
Imperobator from Antarctica may be one, there may be some in Australia too. Europe is more controversial
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14772019.2025.2529608 anyone have access?
They appear to consider them entirely Gondwanan
Some say pyroraptor could be unenlagid
Cau mainly
this is the paper they used to justify it https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6626525/
They didn't make it up, that's a legit phylogenetic result. And there has been evidence of unenlagiines in HC mentioned in abstracts, it's definitely not impossible.
Don't say things are wrong when you don't know what you're talking about lmao
I wouldn't take much stock in any result due to possible chimerism but thats an entirely different issue. It's just as likely an unenlagiine as it is anything else
how much of its niche would change if it was actually a unenlagiine?
It would probably be an assumed fish eater + small game hunter
Piscivory is something proposed on a taxon basis, species like Buitreraptor have not been proposed to be piscivorous thus far. But also, there are such things as bad matrices and I doubt the hell creek metatarsal and eudromaeosaurine teeth belonged to an Unenlagiine. It’s also a phylogeny presumably scoring based on the characters provided from the full chimeric taxon as well.
so its unlikely it was a fish eater?
It's only been suggested for Austroraptor and Ypupiara, which are sister taxa
Buitreraptor has strange teeth but it hasn't specifically been proposed to be a piscivore
i wonder, does anyone have any art or something as dakota reconstructed as a unenlagiine?
Bro, I just ordered the tameryraptor and now they show off a taurovenator.
Pnso is actually a really good company. Their stuff very rarely has accuracy flaws, and always looks amazing.
a classmate said to me that despite being an 8-ton powerhouse, Carcharodontosaurus' powerful legs allow them to jump & leap across large distances effortlessly, quickly closing the gap to their prey. this true?
very much no
so my instinct were right
the largest animals capable of jumping are like one ton, and they certainly aren’t leaping
So true carcha could even barrel roll
tbf the jumping limit is way higher at 4, even rhinos can
but carch is not getting even the 1 inch of fortune
rhinos can jump?
like 2 inches yeah
but it is truly ridiculous that they name their models, like this guy Hugo, lmao 😂
Haolonggood figurines are also very good and their colors are sometimes even better than PNSO
and there are other companies of wich their figurines are also of top notch quality
i am pretty sure carchs could do this easily
i have no doubt about it, their legs were very powerful indeed
It's just what the analysis got due to being a chimeric taxon with traits of different clades. It's the same thing that got bird Protoavis.
powerful legs
animal with literally no leg material
Regardless, close relatives like Giganotosaurus or Meraxes definitely didn't have the legs to jump several meters lmao
That humerus was described in 1996, isn't bulky and we don't really have evidence to consider it Spinosaurid. Hell, it could be even Rebbachisaurid.
ok
btw, what are you guys thoughts on david hone's theory that spino may have had longer legs
and short legs we have atm is result of the neotype being a chimera of larger spino's upper body and smaller spino's lower body
like this
why are we using Witton's musculature?
Well apparently we’ve got unpublished spinosaurid material from Morocco and Brazil that have longer legs. So idk wait and see I guess.
Welp david hone's idea of neotype being a chimera of 2 diff sized spinos comes from newly published witton's book
So that's prob why
who the hell is David Hone
Coauthor of witton's spinosaur book that got recently published
GOD THAT MUSCULATURE IS NOT HITTING BRO 😭
Yeah that neck needs more muscles
That’s some lizard level shrink wrapping right there
Indeed
I still find idea of neotype being chimeric interesting
We'll have to see
Man spino is such a mess
the neotype is def not chimeric
My question, if spino did have short legs, why would there be 2 other possible genus/species that have more normally proportioned legs?
Tbf some parts of the neotype are from fossil hunters and spino B's proportions are so different from the neotype
So there is a possibility
Spino B is all the way with the holotype so it would be weird if the two were somehow the same thing
That’s what I’m thinking
I don’t think the neotype is chimeric. Might just seem that way because it’s been excavated in separate occasions since sometimes a single expedition isn’t enough to get everything, based on resources, time, or money.
I heard spino B has longer tibia in proportion to its vert compared to neotype
Could be just individual variation or different species
I also think neotype isnt chimeric but witton and hone's idea is still interesting
Im still on team ibrahim lol
“Individual variation” ❌
yk I forgot Spinosaurus B actually had a tibia
Then team Sereno pulls up with the scimitar spino and Brazilian spino that isn’t even gonna be oxalaia.
Yes
Spino is prob acro proportions taken to extreme btw
Short legs and super heavy tail
- we do effectively have indirect confirmation of at least 2 more species of spinosaurine theropods that lived with spinosaurus and sigil (one COULD be more sigil material but it’s uncertain)
Give me strength, give me fire.
Give me MORE theropods and big fish, or I retire.
MHMMM BARS
And some say msmn is sigil
Could be sigil, could be spino.
Could be robust, could be slender.
I like me a robust spino
"which side are you" ah images
We technically have enough robust dorsal verts to feasibly recreate the entire sail btw.
Same
Still waiting for ibrahim's new recon
With wider ribcage, lower gastralia, more muscle at base of the tail
Is there still an argument going on about what shape the sail was? M shaped or round?
Then you should go out of YOUR way to make a new skeletal based on it. deal?
Great idea! I’ll add it to the list of other stalled promises!
I thought all we had was vert alignment at tje beginning and end of the sail at least according to hartman
WHERE'S MY APATORAPTOR GNG
I feel like he’s just making into a crocodile atp
Turns out when you scroll through eBay et al you find everything you need!
I think he does have bit of rib material which shows it had wide body
Speaking of ebay, theres a big spino femur in priv collection which belongs to 13~14m individual
Oh my god that’s why I started doing these in the first place 😭 😭 when am I ever gonna get to that thing??
Think it got something around ~6 tons in weight at most? Based on measurements provided
Pretty large but not msnm or nhmuk proportions
Well VERY large, on par with tauro and Kenyan giant
13~14m individual would prob weigh around that much
I feel like msmn and nhmuk is average adult spino size btw
There's bunch of fragment around that size
I think histology was done on neotype & it was considered subadult, so it probably wouldn’t have gotten to msnm sizes in full maturity
Then again…archosaur ontogenical size range is crazy. Just look at shant and edmonto. (Or most crocs)
Spino was a slow grower according to study done in 2022
If Im not wrong, that paper mentioned smth like spino likely taking almost twice as long to reach adult as rex
And just about all animals with slow growth have huge size variations so we'll never know ig
I don't know either isn't like just a oviraptor but probably smaller and with some undescribed/unfigured materials?
Honestly every single time I look at something that looks like an oviraptorid it’s a caenagnathid
Everything is caenagnathid
Hone is kind of all over I’m surprised you haven’t heard of him
Uh.. what?
W H A T
"finally I ordered Tameryraptor, my PNSO Carcharodontosaurids collection is finally complete!!!"
the ever humble taurovenator:
Not sure how I feel about PNSO tbh
Like, they don't seem all that high quality in person
To me they look much much more quality in person than pics...
...on the contrary, I have the Eofauna Giga and it looks like nothing from the sites pictures 🙁
I have the PNSO megalodon and its pretty underwhelming ngl
Abeliceratops
Ikr
the keratin paint is
uh
both tamery and tauro
and the yuty I bought a long time ago
Yeah it’s too smooth but whatever.
sone kind of sauce
the paint just ruins the texture of keratin
At least they got lips now.
Maybe they’ll perfect the formula on something like kelmayisaurus.
Until they start remaking the existing figures with lips. 
Mathis is so unbelievably ugly
We probably getting gta 6 before titanovenator is described.
Oh they actually might make kelmayisaurus. How much material do we have for this thing again?
Not much, iirc just part of the skull
Thought there was a bit of vertebra too?
I don’t see why either Shant or Edmonto would be an example here. Both show a fairly reasonable amount of size variation within presumed adult populations (I say presumed since tmk Shant doesn’t have extensive histological work), the only real exception being the two giant Edmonto specimens that may or may not even be Edmonto.
But the fact that we have giant specimens anyways, with how rare fossil preservation is, shows that giant specimens certainly weren’t uncommon.
Same reason why I’d say that tameryraptor keratin horns were probably not individual variation, and maybe more of a subspecies kind of thing. The chances we found the ONE mutation are close to 0.
Do we have any direct evidence or at least reasons to think that carchs or other theropods had some kind of row of scales lining the back like this?
Ceratosaurus has it but idk about others
ceratosaurus is the only one that has evidence of back spines and as fgar as i know there is a bit of play with how they attach. it might be a single row, it might be multiple, it might not be a cohesive line. On the subject of reasons there are two big ones: Display and camoflague. If it's the later it might be usefull to break the animal's outline up.
Large freshwater mosasaur from the Hell Creek Formation https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40850-025-00246-y
If it’s for camouflage, I wonder if it’d be reasonable to assume it was yellowish and spotted like a jaguar or something, to help break up its appearance more among dense trees?
keep in mind dinosaurs can see four base colors while mammals usually only see two. the tiger appears green to it's prey for instance. the base color would depend on the environment a lot
That idea is contradicted by histology and everything else. The neotype isn't a chimera.
Ok, my professor finally got back to me, and he says yes he could see a great white reaching 3 metric tons given the right circumstances
So this is to say camouflage dinosaurs may have been more colorful?
what is yalls opinions on walking with dinosaurs 3D 2013? its what got me into dinosaurs
The dinosaur designs are pretty damn good
But the movie just gets straight up ruined by the voice acting
As a child i onky had the voice acting version and i quite liked it because its easier to understand the story, but again when i re watch it, its gonna have no vocals
i also feel the characters would be much thicker and their horns to be way longer,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAhCXDB6bTU really good video on camouflage theory and coloration in dinosaurs, not just T. rex though it is used as a case study
Please support the show on Patreon https://www.patreon.com/PeopleAreFish
Change of format today, Dr George Hancock explains the fantastic world of prehistoric visual ecology.
Thumbnail art by Andy Frazer @DragonsOfWales for the boardgame Last Titans.
For more from People are Fish:
https://www.instagram.com/peoplearefish
https://www.patreon.com...
prabably duller outside of display areas
also that video is a good reference
https://www.zenhabitats.com/cdn/shop/articles/breeding_leachianus_leachie_geckos.jpg?v=1705363140
-# not from a palaeontological standpoint
But I adored that movie! This movie and Dinosaurs is what got me into Dinosaurs at a young age and I'm extremely grateful :D
I also feel like the movie itself was somewhat educational (Not using 'popular' dinosaurs for the sake of it, having translations for names and then brief descriptions of some of the species).
I'm with mysterydryo, would be a very good movie if the dinosaurs didn't talk
Cliche as it is, various shades of green ranging from dull to vibrant were probably common in dinosaurs living in a jungle environment.
The scene of the Gorgo/Nanuq attacking the pachyrhinosaur herd is one of my favorite hunt sequences in dinosaur media period
And then the characters will be making poop jokes on top of it 🥀
That… makes sense yeah.
I bought my father a tylosaurus as a present for Christmas, it hasn't arrived yet, but it looks very good.
I remember seeing this movie and still getting mixed feeling, liked gorgosaurus tho. The animation is almost the same as WWD 2025 lmao.
If not better.
ngl i dissagree. the animation in this movie seemed way more lively
On a tattoo high after I got my first tattoo, should I get this next? It's my favorite fossil
The prophets have betrayed us
should I lowkey tattoo fragmentary material from a large dromaeosaurid on me
how much brain damage or likely hood of death would this gorgo(?) nanuq(?) be experiencing?
That's why I said if not better.
That just depends if the jaw is broken bud, you should know that bud.
not an expert but an uppercut like that with that much force would probably kill it
ohhh mb i miss reD
Becareful this guy think Saurophaganax is the same size as Tyrannosaurus rex
I like how the number of teeth stay the exact same, even though they are supposed to be flying out of the jaw.
its ceazy how a 2010 animation is more expressive and better then sum in 2025
Knocked out the replacement teeth 
Kicked him so hard the future replacement teeth grew and flew away lmao.
besides the broke jaw, would it be dead?
It holds up very well for its time, anytime tbh.
WWD2 look liked something out of Tubi.
im gonna get a tattoo of patchy when im older im so exiteddd
well yeah, Gorgosaurus only lived a few decades. It's been over 60 million years since the incident
WWD 2025 was a money laundering scheme.
Are you serious bud
They lack the aura of allosaurus so it would not live long enough for this injury to heal, dead before the next morning.
that allo was doing whatever at that watering hole ToT
@spice latch
Y'all think I should get a Mosasaur tooth, Troodontid tooth, or Tyrannosaur tooth for my next tattoo?
Tbh, I think an isolated tooth as a tattoo is going to kinda lack identity
you think we'll ever find a therapod with larger teeth then rex?
It’s starting to tick me off how speculative stuff is getting. We know more than most people think, and there are always more realistic ways to reconstruct an animal. I get that speculative paleo-art is good for “new perspectives” but half the time it’s just wrong.
Tyyy :D I thought it was a lot bigger ngl-
I already did this reconstruction too and I’m keep it as is 😭🤣
Yeah it is one of the most overstated animals of all time
- It is not particularly terrestrial
- It is not 6m long
- It was likely hunted to extinction by humans
- It was one of the smallest predators in it's domain
Is there any crocodilomorph that was huge with long legs
which croc is the bigger fraud
kaprosuchus or deinosuchus
Fraud?
How big is huge in your eyes? Like 5m? 8m?
I can dig up the biggest legged Pseudosuchian for a specific size range
yup, fraud
I’m thinkin around that, yea
There is nothing fraud about them , what’s fraud is the measurements people been doing for them.
The funny thing is the Pseudosuchians with the longest legs are mostly aquatic
I mainly want it cause it looks cool 
i mean, people act like kapro was this croc who was running and rushing down animals on land
BAHHAHA
Okay? Blame the people that reconstructed them , that gave them that thought not the animals.
Are you looking for terrestrial, aquatic, or semiaquatic?
I’m thinking mainly aquatic, and if possible Cenozoic
Was thinking longer legs because I can make that play MUCH differently then deino or sarco
Brachiosuchus is the biggest mainly aquatic pseud with long legs. Well not really long legs but it has long arms
I read Brachiosaurus and was somewhat confused
I really hope your joking
WAIT I ALSO READ IT WRONG
Anyone know what the specimens in “???????” are?
the glory of the other brach
So funny thing, Deinosuchus actually is probably the croc with the longest legs period lol
It just couldn't walk
team giraffititan or team brachiosaurus
Team brachi!!!!
About the best you'll get
They're all marina taxa AFAIK and all late Cretaceous
Actually I love him, thank you so much 
the Dryo I only just realized there’s 3 xD
which him there's 3
Hey wait why tf are these both dryosaurus
Dryosaurus vs Dyrosaurus
Ohhhhhh
What XS said but the croc here isn’t Dyro
Yea ik I misclicked -.-
What's it's name? There are a lot of names on the image, but i don't understand which one is the one.
quinkana
Thanks!
The amount of effort I have put into making clothes for my human is stupid
This is among the lesser imo. Obviously not this exagerated, but I’m honestly a fan of a flesh forehead for sauropods.
It's probably "LOOK!!1!!1!!11 Prehistoric Planet has balloon neck dinosaur things with long necks, this sells, people love it, we must have one too"
Except Prehistoric Planet looks more natural, thought out, and researched.
I hate to make this joke, but was dryosaurus dry?
@tough parcel what if you were a Dinosaur Vtuber?
allosaurus had a huge gape. Get one of an allosaurus skull where the upper jaw goes along your chest and lower jaw down one of your arms
Bird or non-avian?
his choice
I would assume they mean dinosaur as in the big scary mfs
Both are dinosaurs
Yes, but you get what he means, he even clarified which ones
you know what they meant. Don't be pedantic
I know but when people say dinosaur it’s most likely the prehistoric things -.-
Me when " Big scary mfs " includes Phorusrhacids and Ratites
I think they basically sit in the middle atp
Truly horrific beasts they are
Prehistoric Planet meant well with its neck balloons but now everyone doing it & it still looks weird 😭
Don't think you would say that if you were in front of a Ostrich
I feel like I would be more scared in front of a cassowary
Ah yes, the generic cassowary.
Maybe not, but we are talking about a class that includes the Tyrannosaurus Rex
(I've been near ostriches before as well)
But they spooky 
Cassowaries are scarier because they are usually more prone to actually attacking people
I mean yeah
It’s also because they have switchblades in their feet
Both could kill you easily regardless though, in a single well placed kick.
I don't think the place where you get hit by the kick really matters, brother.
Like image having to fight smthn that had claws like this
It definitely does, even if it just means you die slower or faster. Best odds are obviously away from the torso and head
You can't be serious
We are talking about a single hit, I'm not debating whether they're gonna kill you or not.
You are funny, do you know that?
I'm sure plenty of people have survived a cassowary kick because it wasn't aimed at a vital spot
Don't really understand what you mean. I'm not arguing with the fact that they are dangerous. I'm just saying it's still possible to survive a single hit if you are lucky.
The two people in history that were ever killed by cassowaries had both fallen over before being kicked and were kicked in the neck
at least one i know was the case
the idea of randomly being kicked by a cassowary off a cliff....
why do you randomly just get so defensive
Like bro what did I even say other than you won't necessarily always be one tapped?
No need to be a jerk, like come on.
Just making yourself look bad.
i wonder, what would be the more survivalable kick, a kangaroos or cassowarys?
Both are very bad I'm sure, death will come from differing injury though
Bruh ofc
one startled the cassowary when he fell over too it wasn’t really aggressive, the other guy I’m pretty sure it actually knocked him over before kicking him, but yes both were on the ground
You'd probably die faster to the bird moreso than the marsupial because of their differing combat styles. Both are capable of killing you though.
At the very least kangaroos are a lot more plentiful than cassowaries, still a terrible excuse to kill an animal
I just think it's a bit ridiculous to suggest that you could get a chance to survive from a kick of either a Cassowary or Ostrich, based off " Chance " or " Where it hits you ", when in most scenarios that would lead to it, you could get an injury that if not treated immediately could result on your death. Unless you got an injury near civillization, or in a Zoo... Which it has to be asked: How did you even get in that situation in the first place?
the reason cuttlefish said earlier
what even caused a arguement about cassowaries kicking people to death?
If you listened to what flab said he was talking about surviving the initial attack outright. Complications after weren't being taken into account.
We were talking about the subjective line between most modern dinosaurs and "big scary MFS"
Cassowaries aren't inherently agressive most of the time, just very willing to defend themselves. I've heard they're quite shy and illusive.
Ostriches have cassowaries beat when it comes to recorded fatal attacks. EDIT: Random and I shared a brain cell right then.
yes their reputation as killers is very overblown, ostriches kill as many people per year as cassowaries killed in the history of humanity
of course we also interact with ostriches way more than we interact with cassowaries but yk i'd be equally wary of both
why no one talking about PP Ice Age
whats everyones opinion on the Stellar sea cow and short faced bear scene?
i'm sure we had this convo already but i doubt a sea cow would survive for long on land
A giant bear tries to make a meal of a wall of flesh and blubber
Apple TV unearths sweeping new trailer for “Prehistoric Planet: Ice Age,” premiering November 26, 2025
Reconstructed with the latest scientific knowledge, “Prehistoric Planet: Ice Age” combines current s...
He had to survive long enough to get his paycheck for the scene
Considering certain toothed whales including orcas CAN spend a decent amount of time on land and survive afterwards if they somehow manage to get back in water, it's not implausible.
would the short faced bear really not have done anything to the sea cow? was it really that fat?
probably, considering the sailors had to use harpoons that hunted stuff like whales to kill them
Stellar is known to have had very tough skin and thick fat. Combined with how wide it is, even Arctotherium would struggle to actually pierce that hide, especially with how short the skull is
Sea cows were also incredibly buoyant so being even in just shallow water would help at least a little more than if another animal was in the same scenario.
Hello! I know that the conversation has moved on, but for future reference, please ensure that this channel remains on-topic, focusing on paleontological discoveries, scientific news, and depictions of prehistoric creatures in media as they relate to paleontology, in line with our pinned guidelines.
I have gone ahead and removed off-topic comments, as they can be considered sensitive to others and not appropriate for this channel. Thank you for understanding
huh?
cassowary death discussion
I believe the only message deleted was the article snippet sent earlier regarding a kangaroo. Which is understandable for sure
Anyone else love the fact they're more closely related to a squirrel than a dog
who?
People
If you think about it, that makes tons of sense.
i mean
both have grubby little hands and like to murder each others children for the sake of it so yeah
makes sense to me
( let alone actual relation i'm aware)
ICYMI: Big freshwater mosasaur from the HCF https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40850-025-00246-y just a tooth but they did cool isotopic studies on it. Hell Creek having rivers large enough and productive enough for 11 meter mosasaurs is pretty cool
They do not. They are very shy animals.
They have a grand total of two fatalities to their name. One was active provocation and the other was startling it in a confined space.
Ostriches have caught more bodies than any other ratite.
granted isn't it from farmed ostriches?
bruh what discord
What if the cassowary was in musth?
Yes. It's a lot like cows. People working around them a lot results in people occasionally getting killed.
Thats fair, the cassowary deal must be super bloated.
Also yeah being more commonly worked around is a big distinction.
Serious debate:
Do you pronounce the 'G' in Prognathodon or not?
i see i see, thought so
also hai scan
I do but honestly, never considered with how it's spelled that ignoring it was optional. I only see that right now.
^ thinking about it, it probably SHOULD be, the same way it should be pronounced "Helico-pter"
Sorry, but it's Prognathodon with a hard G and I refuse to allow the filthy pterosaur namers to win another one
hi
prognathous is pronounced with a hard G for what it's worth
hard G for me
also sounds alot better than pronatho for a fairly fat mosasaur
See but like Archaeopteryx the correct answer is to ignore that fact
I agree. Whether we should or shouldn't is irrespective of my opinion that it is stupid
the hard G sounds so tuff
Yes, the movie is supposed to be stupid and dumb, but this scene alone just gives me so much brain aneurism.
https://youtu.be/ISchr_LQBPc?si=74vcw6rQxox0LzHP
Jonas Taylor leads a research team on an exploratory dive into the deepest depths of the ocean. Their voyage spirals into chaos when a malevolent mining operation threatens their mission and forces them into a high-stakes battle for survival. Pitted against colossal, prehistoric sharks and relentless environmental plunderers, they must outrun, o...
its a cretoxyrhina with gamersupps
Wait a minute this thing's skull is huge
What if someone made a Giganotosaurus called " Mr. G " ?
Mr. Gangsta
What are those lizard things then lol?
juiced up koolasuchus
Oh, I got it: juvenile mosasaurus. They laid eggs like sea turtles, but their young had legs which will eventually turn into flippers as they mature. Completely justifiable.
We only spearhead true science over here at #paleontology
Wait you’re NOT supposed to pronounce the g? Yeah right.
I always spell it like Pro-natho-don oh wait
He used code Caseoh on his order, it all makes sense now
What’s really funny is that those are apparently Ichthyostega
is there anywhere with enough fish to even feed a stable spinosaurus population
Prob have to feed off of nile crocs and hippos
is it even catching a hippo
What’s stupid is that the second book had 3 kronosaurs instead of megs. It also took place entirely in the trench. Funny thing is that this opening scene was the beginning of the first book, where a T. rex chases for some reason a shantungosaurus into the ocean where it’s eaten by the meg.
the air breathing kronosaur, famous inhabitant of the ocean trench
Actually the speculative evolution is interesting in the book. Both the megs and kronosaurs barely resemble their ancient counterparts, looking white and having either useless or no eyes. Kind of goblin shark to alien-like. Kronosaurs had gills too.
Rivers, Oceans even
again, would those rivers really be able to support a population of 8 ton piscivores that havent existed for uhm, 92 millions year?...
Oceans probably.
Ik it’s kind of a frowned upon theory, but I wouldn’t doubt that some spinosaur populations did spend a decent amount of time in or near the ocean.
The funniest thing about this is that the previous movie actually stated that they went extinct within an accurate timeframe
The Nile river -.-
the nile river...
Ok so question, is tarascosaurus invalid?
rate this ourano model based off accuracy
Prob not invalid
Just fragmentary
What game?
Echoes of extinction
Which one was bigger D. Rugosus or D. Hatcheri?
Hatcheri
i love my horsie and my horsie love me
@fossil ingot is Tyrannotitan based Carch actually bulkier than Giga?
Funnily enough, Rex WOULD chase preys in big bodies of water, this is one of those "rex sneaking on raptors at the end of JP" where one silly holliwoodian choice was actually real
Not really it’s just proportioned a bit differently
Oh ok, because using the R=m/l³ Carch got 4.3-4.4 and Giga got like 4.1.
What? I have no clue what that means
My friend told me that's how to calculate robustness, he saw it on a spreadsheet with the theropod weights. R= mass/length³.
That is not in any way robustness, that does not exist because mass/length is just… mass divided by length, you cannot measure robustness from 2 skeletals with different degrees of soft tissue and general proportions
Your friend made that mess up to sound smart 😭
I'm going to flame his ahh right now.
Am sorry but measuring "robustness"
Has to be the STUPIDEST mess I've EVER heard for a measurement for science in my double digits of life
@astral spindle
Where do u see it?
Robustisity is something you refer on a skeletal level. Robustness is something completely different and in reference to an individual's capacity to remain a stable metabolism in a stressful environment. Perhaps you're friend referred robustisity to bulk.
I think that's exactly what he did.
This has to be like the 3rd time this week someone tries to make Giga look stupid :/
What is this game I need it
Hello buddy
Nanotyrannus
Ik
was there ever any freshwater marine reptiles
Freshwater plesiosaurs are pretty common, and we just had confirmation of a freshwater mosasaur in Hell Creek the other day.
So how big is the new mosasaur? Or is it really just teeth..
Funny proportions
Measure the G I R T H
Just teeth
post your favorite prehestoric horse
Proboscidipparion
Lil basic but Equus Giganteus
people are out there saying jaguars could take down Quetzalcoatlus
here are mine
I mean
Quetz isn't THAT much Larger
A Jaguar with an Ambush Prob Hurts
But so does a Peck
also quetz is mainly neck so
guys
the biggest jaguar barely reaches the rex's ankle, the rex has to look up at the quetz
sure the quetz is only 250-300 kilos, but that doesn't matter when it's staring at you about to peck your brains out
quetzalcoatlas was the size of a giraffe >.>
not as heavy, but like I said, weight doesn't matter at all when this is galloping towards you
Yall, how big is the new mosasaur based on teeth?
It's like saying jaguar could hunt a giraffe
A carnivore giraffe who has a monster hunter-bs-level weapon on its face.
...and can fly.
A giraffe is very likely phisically superior to Quetz
And not a Good Comparison
Thats why I said a Peck would hurt, I doubt It would like kill it in 1 Peck but It would Hurt
And I Specifically also mentioned in an Ambush
Which is how Jaguars Hunt
Unlikely but not impossible.
Matchups are more complex than just two animals trying to face tank eachother.
Daeodon superior, jaguar inferior
Cats are good to take down stuff bigger than themselves
I think with a Proper Ambush is def not Impossible
i always viewed quetz as a grabber and slammer with its beak
If the azhdarchid got a solid hold or hits, either blunt or sharp, the cat is probably cooked. But at the same time the cat could severely punish it with proper strategy, which would realisticly be a leap from above, but I don't realistically those large pterosaurs wandering into forests often. Not to mention the cats wouod have to learn how to hunt them and get used to their presence.
If a Jaguar went up against a Quetz it would turn and run because of intimidation
They wouldn't be looking at eachother face to face in the first place
whats the difference btween a jaguar and lepoard...
Jaguars are south american and bigger than leopards
Leopards are generally smaller and arboreal ambush predators
I doubt any self respecting jaguar is going to let itself be seen out in the open by something so large.
anyone wanna do a size comparison between a jaguar and quetz...
Quetz are similar heights as giraffes. Jaguars are similar height with leopards according to the size comparison I shared
Yes its very unlikely that the cat would attack a pterosaur like that, but it theoretically has the ability to fatally wound it. Jaguars don't hunt tall prey to my knowledge.
Jaguars don't live with tall prey
They live with bulky prey though
Which an azhdarchid isn't comparatively. But that doesn't mean it's frail and easy to take down by any means.
Tallest animals they live with are probably those hippos in Columbia
But normally their tallest prey items are probably some variety of deer
Guys, hypothetically, what's stopping a 45 ton brachiosaurus from running down and squishing a stegosaurus into a brownish reddish stain approximately 3 meters in Diameter if it angered the brachiosaurus?
A Stegosaurus is faster
no its not
A Stegosaurus ain't fast but it's faster than a Brachiosaurus
Why is this so specific 
I mean technically nothing unless @hallow spear can prove Stegosaurus is faster than a Brachiosaurus
It is probably faster and almost certainly able to out endurance a brachiosaurus lol
Legal repercussions
The Stegosaurus uses its plates to achieve flight and impales the Brachiosaurs head with its thagomizer... (This is very real)
how would the sails being made out of bone affect the species
( censor for gore ) what the hell happened to it
Another Rex or maybe an encounter with an Alamosaurus would be my guess
its shoulder is dislocated, half its face is missing.
it went within 100m of a bull edmontosaurus in musth
He met a goth girl
Quetz would scare jaguar by it's height and mostly it'll try to catch it
The same thing stopping you from stepping on a board full of nails
Nothing because this isn't a specimen that exists
It'd be dead
oh...
Is there any studies on how much force a peck from various kinds of Pterosaurs could generate?
I know pterosaurs have notoriously weak bites but what about their neck strength or whatever is the main thing that generates the force behind a peck.
Yeah, I'm pretty sure this is just gore for the sake of gore 
Brian Engh.jpg
Based on what we know, no actually.
Despite not being as armored as say, ankylosaurus, stegosaurus was about as slow. It’s comparable to sauropods, and thanks to its long legs brachiosaurus was likely surprisingly fast.
To actually answer the question….stegosaurus has nearly meter-long thagomizers. That still hurts and can potentially still be lethal, even to a brachiosaurus, depending on where it hits.
In a dumb death match the brachi is obviously killing it but that’s not the question here.
pretty sure it's invalid
Deinosuchus solos idc and didn’t ask
@hallow spear stegosaurus expert with a degree in stegology, is this true?
It definitely isnt, those estimates were derived from the Thulborn 1980s formula which is safe to say, really bad, Brachi was however surprisingly fast using Larramendis speed formula, albeit it was suggested that it seems to overestimate said animals.. Ankylosaurus assuming a size of CMN 8880 was about 10kmh(using the Sauropod formula), Stegosaurus is likely around 20, although an estimate based on mature stegosaurus proportions have yet to be tested due to the lack of measurements/described mature specimens
Hopefully, apex will change this
what do you mean anky is as fast as a human...
oh okay
10kmh, not MPH
Clearly stegosaurus were sessile organisms, like mussels or oysters, and their "plates" are actually the remains of a large shell
I can however estimate the speed of the Rally road stegosaurus specimen if i wanted to...
If you want to know the MPH it;s acutally 6.2
do you main all 3 of the stegosaurids? im gen curious
Im unsure what you mean, theres more than 3 stegosaurids
In PoT, kentro, mira and stego
@hallow spear what’s the best stegosaurid 
I hate them all (in a loving way)
But i quite like Hesperosaurus
does anyone remember when wueherosaurus was depicted with square plates?
Hey wait that’s just stego but short
Incomplete plate that looks very rectangular
so stupid but so very cute
this is the plate
kinda looks like a wrapped up soft taco!
How cute
is it theoretically possible for a stego to be born without any plates? like, a hypothetical
@hallow spear bless us with your knowledge
i wonder how much living without plates would affect said theroretical stegosaurus's live...
i do not think it would be possible for every single one to not be present
It would be mistaken for a dicraesaur and would live the rest of its life like one with other dicraesaurs
thats one big smitanosaurus...
Chat. guess why Camarasaurus is my 2nd favorite sauropod
bity bite chomp chomp
it's because of PER
because he's just that guy
also I never died as my camara when playing this game like it when two to two with albino giga and was just so good for it's tier
Oh so you respond to them but not me for the exact same question
I'll remember this...
GSP back at it again…
Idk why
wait huh
Prior Extinction Retro
Gilmore Larson tyrannus
I feel like his ultimate goal is to name every individual tyrannosaur specimen as its own species
Does seem like that’s what he’s doing and it’s incredibly scummy with how he’s doing it.
I can't tell if this is satire or not
Hint: it’s Gregory S. Paul.
ah so slow spiral into madness got it
Actual taxonomic vandalism. People are pissed.
Describe it in Minecraft terms
He's trying to bring 1.21.5 to paleontology
Tryna add more mob variants without a good reason
Well what’s your favorite
Omeisaurus
That head looks way too big, I refuse to acknowledge this as a real animal
how dare you assume im not real
Ironically it’s one of the more normal mamenchisaurs
"normal" + Mamenchisaurs seems off 
but camara exists!
what would you guys say was the more effective weapon, a stegosaurus's thagomizer or a ankylosaurids club? , in a vaccum ? i guess
Both are terrible but honestly in terms of lethality stabbing is probably worse.
also, wouldnt stegosaurus be able to swing it with more force? i remember reading somewhere stegosaurids had more force behind their swings then ankylosaurids
Stego thagomizer
Anky’s evolved their club for intraspecific combat and while does work it’s not the most effective. We have evidence of Stego’s thagomizers working just as intended.
that allosaurus could never have kids after that...
Do we know if it died due to that wound or another factor?
Id be impressed if it DIDNT die from the crotch strike
also Stegosaurs had much more flexible tails than Ankylosaurs
you often see depictions of Ankylosaurs defending itself in all directions by doing a scorpion strike over its head or swinging all the way around its side, but both would have been impossible due to their lacking tail flexibility
i feel like both would probably hurt
It was essentially like having a giant baseball bat attached to its butt. There was next to no flexibility aside from the base.
Doedicurus had more tail flexibility, right?
cant ankylosaurs basically pivot quickly while swinging their tail to strike their opponents or would they be fodder to the mighty tyrannosaurus like edmontosaurus meatbag that dies because fat and sluggish and trike foddersome
Triceratops was a lot better at pivoting.
Anky would have to huddle up
Idk I wasn’t there
I can confirm tyrannosaurus was the cause of extinction of all Hell Creek dinosaurs because it was too mighty and powerful and wiped out all of the weak and faulty beasts
only Anzu and Alamosaurus left because those somehow didnt get nerfed to the ground
I’ve got a possibly interesting theory about Triceratops for y’all tonight.
As a life long player of the Carnivores games (if you’re not familiar with them, that’s ok), my favorite animal from any of them is undoubtedly Triceratops from the first Carnviores game all the way back in 1998. I’ve always admired how Tatem Games and Action Forms managed to really capture the style and essence of Zdeňek Burian’s paleoart by basing their designs on it, especially Triceratops which is visibly based on Triceratops prorsus. But something I’ve never really put much thought into until now when it comes to Triceratops is nasal horn usage. Obviously we all know that the brow and nasal horns of ceratopsids are there for intimidation and/or combat, but what if they had other purposes?
In Carnivores, the Trike’s idle animations mainly consist of it digging up the ground in front of with its nasal horn to unearth things like roots and fibrous plants, which along with the entire model is based on Zdeňek Burian’s 1955 Triceratops painting that shows two of them eating and one is doing that exact same thing. Then I got to thinking… could Triceratops prorsus have actually done that? Like… think about it. Compared to Triceratops horridus, prorsus’s nose horn is significantly longer, more forward facing, and placed further forward on its nose. Then there’s the keratin sheath growing on the outside of the horns that could’ve possibly made them a slight bit longer and more curved. Couple that with the fact that Triceratops could reach its beak to the ground when eating (at least I think it could) and you essentially have an animal with a built in dual purpose shovel and intimidation piece on its nose. I know it’s probably something tired and stupid to say, but I donno it’s just something that makes sense to me.
That's a lot of words that I'm too drunk to read, can someone dumb it down for me?
what if trike used its nose horn to dig up roots, like in Carnivores
Okay Tipsy
Prorsus specifically, horridus couldn’t really do anything with its dinky nose horn
new update- Alamosaurus' legs were too weak to support its weight so it rooted itself to the floor to be easy meal for the mighty tyrannosaurus, and Anzu was discovered to have extremely slow metabolism, only being able to walk for short distances
id just like to point out this is where unicorns come from
yknow I could see a trike doing that in my head
do their horns usually get that long without poaching?
well its sorta like people adapting to different things they have, like 6 fingers or missing legs
it really is impressive ngl
bro got funny poking stick in head
they also arent as aggressive as people say (but of course its an herbivore and would infact impale you without a second thought)
do we know how rapidly a ceratopsians horn would grow?
ahhh yes
paul lumping bunch of genuses and now he's splitting them like crazy
hey so uh any of yall have even the slightest clue of what daeodon wouldve sounded like, because I sure dont 
I mean we have a clip of a corvid snowboarding down a roof so I’m inclined to believe it could be play
If anyone were to answer yes to this we would need to interrogate them and figure out where they're hiding their time machine because there isn't any other way to know
Best to keep him away from ceratopsians lol…
Just look at what he suggests for pterosaur taxonomy in his pterosaur books
Birds have unique blood vessel alignment on their legs which prevents them from getting frostbite
( i don't remember in certain but i believe they divert heat away from the feet alongside cycling in hot and cold)
Anzu?
(Probably) not
Emperors aren't actually man height, they're baby
Children
emperor penguins feel like made up animals
like oh yes of course the child-sized seabird that does this every year for some reason at the bottom of the world
i remember watching march of the penguins as a kid and thinking wow all of those birds must have depression
Penguins are such a weird dinosaur , like half human half bird
Meanwhile Galapagos and little blue penguins running around on rocks all happily
Was about to say the small ones seem so happy
Spike
I wonder if the crest is real or if it’s just corythoraptor
crest is not original afaik
Crest is way too optimistic but I’m rolling with it
Knew it.
I just realized the whole thing resembled corythoraptor anyways, down to the mandibles and spherical body.
I would bet they used it as reference for sure
It was for sure a tactic to make it sell for more , naming it spike when the material that is there no way can predict the crest is a big ol spike.
honestly it's not a bad reconstruction given the material. Another dino for some rich guys basement (hopefully not)
to the barricades!
They be chunky…. So that means, more meat to eat
calm down, gorgosaur
He loves meat
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2025.12.10.693447v1.full.pdf+html Paul just be making stuff up now 🥀
Thankfully unlike T. imperator I don’t think the name Gilmorelarsontyrannus is going to stick within academia
Seriously what the hell was GSP thinking? That’s not even google translated Latin it’s just…some dude’s name 
so whats currently happening with rex and all of that stuff?
Dude who likes to make up taxa just made up some tyrannosaurid taxa
is it intentional that GSP splits nanotyrannus and names the new taxon after gilmore just a couple days after curtice says he refused to split alamosaurus because gilmore wouldn't have liked it? probably not, but it was a funny coincidence
That’s hilarious
will nanotyrannus stay valid while the rest of the other taxon die?
Random Random allow me to ask some questions
It’s GSP so they were never valid to begin with
Is this Chilesaurus skeletal good?
but nano stays valid, right?
Obviously
Looks way too sauropodomorph-like to me
That's Chilesaurus for you but yes
The only other skeletal is the description skeletal which... is a description skeletal
It also has what seems like a functional 3rd finger which i'mcurious if it was the case
Chilesaurus last time i checked was said to have 2 mobile fingers plus a third one that's kinda just a vestigial metacarpal
Didnt gsp propose utetitan btw
He did but his “analysis” was also just as flawed
seems like headden just added phalanges to the third digit, none have been found but that doesn't mean it didn't have any
with how incomplete chile's skull is maybe the sauropodomorph head is not that bad. though it does have too many vertebrae and undersized arms
What about the beak
isn't really much of a beak as it has teeth all the way to the forward edge of the jaws
but yeah the premaxilla on this one has a convex shape on the bottom when it should be concave, making it more beak-like
Alr
I saw the skeletal with a fully functional third finger and a skull that, at least to me, doesn't look like it supported a rhamphotheca and i wonder if i'm missing something about Chilesaurus
Btw Random, last question
?
There's this isolated, unnamed vertebra from Bajo de la Carpa formation refered to as a member of Carnotaurinae (the thing tmk is from 2009)
Even though the relationships between abeilsaurids have changed and aren't that stable to begin with, is it possible that it belongs to a more derived carnotaurini? Since there is already a basal brachyrostran and 2 early furileusaurians in Bajo de la Carpa, and the environment is considered to represent a period of transition between cenomanian taxa and later end cretaceous fauna
Seems like that would be consistent with an Aucasaurus-like taxon, i don't know if auca's caudals have been described yet but Skorpiovenator already has carnotaur-ish transverse processes while being earlier
(it's actually from 2001)
Might even be Llukalkan or Viavenator
Are the transverse processes also elevated like in Carnotaurus and Ekrixinatosaurus?
Alr
looks similar to the ~8th caudal of Skorp to me though this one may well be more anterior
whats the most valid thing that gsp says in the paper
It was described as being 4th or 5th. Tmk Viavenator doesn't have anterior caudals, only middle and distals (nevermind it has the 7th one)
oh, not Via then
All of auca's verts have been described iirc
Alr
So unlike the other vert, it can't be somewhat confidently assigned to any clade withing brachyrostra, sadge
What animals are primarily used when reconstructing dinosaurs?
aside from other dinosaurs, mostly alligators (crocodylians in general but we know more about alligator anatomy)
what sense would spino rely on the most when it comes to hunting?
Whichever animal u want bud
I've always thought skorpio has an unusually small skull and Rotund torso for its size compared to other abelisaurids
It'll probably have a more normal looking body once its completely described.
What should I do to install Path of Titan?
The paper skeletal is not the best
Not this channel mate
The Auca Osteo mentions it a bit, its probably something similar to Auca-Lulu and Viavenator
Auca 4th Caudal
Btw what do you think about People saying carnotaurus was not cursorial and used it's Very developed caudofemoralis muscles to help it push Against things or other carnotaurus' in Contest's
We don't have carnotaurus' legs so there's not much of a way to know how cursorial it would be, though if we assume it had similar leg proportions as its close relative of Aucasaurus and Koloken, it was probably more cursorial than similarly sized Allosauroids which have shorter metatarsals but probably less cursorial than Tyrannosaurs which have extremely long metatarsals.
The very well developed CFM would mainly help in pulling the legs back very fast, which would help abelisaurs more with alot of force, so it'd help in accelaration much more than say Top speed.
Interesting thank you
Though this wouldn't be the case for all abelisaurs, some like Majungasaurus and Eoabelisaurus have pretty short legs and were probably not as fast as their Brachyostran cousins
Is it true that allosaurus had Shorter and Wider teeth than torvosaurus and ceratosaurus (and carcharodontosaurids)
I know Torvo and Cerato have Longer teeth than Allo and random once mentioned that Torvo's Teeth are more like Carchs with how thin they are, dunno by how much though.
Torvo has in general just very big teeth. Look at the tooth in the T. gurneyi type maxilla for example.
Tbh I know this may seem like a Hot take but torvosaurus seems more like a "sauropod hunter" than allosaurus due to Its large head and teeth
Could be yeah, hopefully we'll have a better idea of Torvo once Elvis is described
Yes, also I've seen that ceratosaurus Is always portrayed in games and other media as some Angry nasty scavenger, what's the proof of this? Or is this just made up?
its just a trope for cerato pretty much
Allosaurus always gets called lion of Jurassic so maybe people just looks at the smaller guy and go "Hyena of Jurassic!!!" and maybe the whole Hyena = Scavengers idea.
you'd be hard pressed to find a large theropod that wouldn't have evolved to eat sauropods in some capacity, giant easy to see meals are the best thing you could ask for and what gave us all the large carcharodontosaurids
I've also heard somewhere that the premaxillary teeth on ceratosaurus resemble the teeth of baryonychines
To be fair, no theropod ever actually hunted adult giant sauropods
Sauropods.... sauropods everywhere
This is missing that one Andesaurid from Candeleros
that we know of
i will continue to hold out hope we find more confident evidence for such things, it makes too much sense for all these large carcharodontosaurids to be lined up perfectly at the giant sauropods caudefemoralis/weak points to just assume that they never hunted the big fellas
Its also missing a really cool Abelisaur
Which
Mentioned first in 2019
Doesn't really seem described
Oh yeah, still one could just make spectrovenator skeletal bigger and fit it in there
So the freshwater mosasaur is estimated at 11 meters… obviously stupid based on tooth scaling. So how big do yall think this things head was to have teeth that big?!?!
I mean seems fine ish
Well tooth scaling isn’t great, and it’s a freshwater animal. In all likelihood it’s nowhere near 11 meters.
shocker tooth scaling isn't great 😭
Probably bobbleheaded like deinosuchus, which would look really funny on a mosasaur.
why would it be a bobbleheaded and not just a normal mosasaur?
Well the teeth are clearly big, maybe it just had relatively big teeth? I’m just not very inclined to assume it was as big as any ocean-going mosasaur. Not really based on anything, more like a personal “too cool to be true” thing.
yeah i don't think we have much of anything for a bobblehead in any mosasaur or really anything related, wasn't the entire point of that paper redescribing the river ecosystem to be able to support a large mosasaur like that
Was it?
It's standard Prognathodon size, it really isn't anything notable 💀
I guess, yeah.
bro got cut in half lmao
“Are you the strongest because you’re prognathodontine, or are you prognathodontine because you’re the strongest?”
im reading the paper right now, they performed some isotope studies on the teeth of that specific mosasaur and its uh, im not sure of the word im looking for but its isotopes matched closer to the terrestrial animals of the ecosystem than the marine mosasaurs of nearby formations
"Taking these offsets into account, the δ18OSc and δ13C values span much broader ranges from − 11.11 to -1.20‰ and 3.68 to -8.72‰ vs. VPDB, respectively. Notably, the mosasaurine tooth NDGS 12217 yields 3.16‰ δ13C unleached, and 3.68‰ δ13C leached and − 7.12‰ δ18OSc unleached, and − 7.83‰ δ18OSc leached – which is consistently closer to terrestrial taxa than to marine, with the δ13C values exceeding beyond those observed in the terrestrial taxa and, therefore, potentially reflecting diet."
at least thats what i think this means
So it ate terrestrial animals.
is that a suprise?
Or it means it spent more time in freshwater than saltwater
But Idk! I hate funny numbers rn!
this mosasaur ate terrestrial animals enough and so consistently that its more likely for it to have been living there rather than just resting in rivers, yes
they also proposed that salinity levels in the WIS were dropping and rainwater was taking over; requiring mosasaurs to needing to adapt to large rivers like these
trust
Well no, but the values exceeding other terrestrial fauna is.
So the western interior sea just kinda closed in on them.
wouldn't be surprised if it was something like this as we seen with Primeval mosasurus or more real world example like alligators
That’d be cool.
My issue is that it kind of just….goes against what we know being practically possible.
The largest fully aquatic freshwater animal I know of is the 5 meter 1.2 ton rhizodus.
This mosasaur by what is being said would be at least 3 times that size. I don’t know how such a large creature could permanently live in such relatively confined areas.
That's what [ REDACTED ] want you to think (this is def /srs)
Well apparently it’s not actually that big, more like Sarcosuchus sized.
but there was another freshwater mosasaur being proposed at sizes like that, even if this one isn't
this also isn't even the first mosasaur to live in at the very least brackish/estuarian environments, they named four other ones in the paper (those being Pannoniasaurus, a Canadian Plioplatecarpine, Goronyosaurus and the Breien Mosasaur which was the one proposed at similarly massive sizes)

that was another part of the paper actually, showing that it just wasn't that confined
also yeah i did see what you said falcon, its still 8-9m which is still much larger than what we expect for big freshwater fellas
@hallow spear what do you think a stegosaurus would sound like?
What if they said their names like Pokémon?
Yeah I'm so smart I know
My bad
Also, I forgot prionosuchus exists (Yes it couldn’t go on land).
Is it also possible that abelisaurid leg muscles kinda worked differently from other theropods?
I was gonna say if Deino counts but Deino would simply just Belly Drag Itself like Gharials does so it prob doesn't count
whats the coldest cretascous formation that we know of?
Also iirc Skorpiovenator has less elevated transverse processes than its close relative Ekrixinatosaurus, so does Pycnonemosaurus while Carnotaurus and Aucasaurus are the most extreme cases. Was it more species depenent, with some leaning into it or not depending on their ecology and not really about what they're related to?
Also Majungasaurus tmk has a more normal theropod condition, which ig means they weren't that different
i know we have a Aristonectinae that lived in the artic with like glaciers and ice
That's how animals work yes
They evolve bodies dependent on their ecology and life needs
Ye but a lot of people say "oh carnotaurus fast = every abelisaurid ever fast"
But i'm mainly asking about the degree of plasticity (if that makes sense?)
For Carno and Auca its, Probably due to them being younger and more derived, Brachyostrans as a whole were basically going for the whole huge tail muscles thingie and it reached its most extreme in the younger brachyostrans. The others, yeah probably was just dependent on their environment
Its also something we see in torvosaurus(The brontoraptor specimen)
will eurinho need any sort of visual tweaks when it gets its tlc?
also, is there any theory for the , uhm, nose? i forgot what its called, but the large bill(?) on eurniho and what its used for?
Wait torvosaurus had the weird elevated transverse processes too?!?
I thought that was only for carnotaurus and it's closest relatives
The rostrum
Also its pretty good iirc
theres no way its gonna function like a sailfish's rostrum, so what would it be used for? also, what would its niche / hunting style be like irl?
It probably evolved multiple times within theropods in different lineages. Also its possible the Brontoraptor specimen isn't Torvosaurus but something closely related along with Edmarka
ngl Edmarka rex and Brontoraptor already are some hardest ass names
Non spinosaur megalosaurs seem so Unique but it's a shame they're not popular (anymore) and arent known from good enough remains
Afrovenator is good, has a few new specimens iirc hopefully will be described soon
Well the whole thing about them being unique is that they are pretty plain compared to others, which is why I kind of like the idea of a funny nasal crest.
Leshan is also a pretty cool one, lived with Yangchuanosaurus and Sinraptor hepigenesis
I want yalls input with this. For the tendaguru sauropods, what if I used giraffe patterns for multiple genus of sauropod but a different type of giraffe for every genus I use it on? Not on every sauropod either, more like 2 or 3 genus at most.
sounds good
copy pasting the mammal directly onto a reptile is something i think would be a bit uninspired. based on giraffes with their own unique take would be neat though
Hear me out.
Stripes WITH spots 
What do you guys think the activity schedules(basically at what times of day they would be active at) of various dinosaur groups was? Trying to use this info for a project
I imagine it would be similar to today’s animals, with many predators being mainly nocturnal
It wouldn't be copy and pasted, I did this with paralititan already. And though there was reticulation, it wasn't exactly how it was on a giraffe
I can work with that
https://sci-hub.ru/10.1126/science.1200043 this paper should be helpful
Unfortunately the link doesn't seem to work for me
That that’s a lotta meat, makes me feel hungry
MOOOO
Giant gurgling bellow
the practical effects 😭 😭
It’s beautiful
See posts, photos and more on Facebook.
Lmao.
Wow, that could've been cool. Not enough dumb shark movie and bald british man tho. Scrap it.
3rd movie is already in the works. If it sticks to the books, we’d be getting a uh.. 100+ ft liopleurodon…
Idk exactly what this is, probably an Erythrosuchus.
Shamelessly copied JP/JW rex doesn't even have a throat💀💀💀💀💀💀
And the tongue is wild
I also love that they deliberately went out of their way to make this plagiarized design ugly.
WWD lives on.
Btw, I love how these things have nostrils on top of their head, an actual thought out design, but they live in the trench 11 km deep.
People tend to frown on JW mosa but I catch them always kinda rooting for WWD liopleurodon.
Still a fan of the liopleurodon more. I always had a pop up book with that design in it since I was little, and for the longest time I knew its name without knowing where the design came from.
Was it oversized even for the time? Wouldn't be surprised tho. Rex in WWD is ugly as hell, and inaccurate even for the time, to the point that 1993 JP Rex looks better.
Personally, I'd take WWD Rex compared to Anime-eyes "rExY" from JW.
Well, JW is not a documentary after all.
On the topic, I really didn't understand why people thought that in JW Blue and Rexy talked, after mosa killed Indo. Blue just gurgled a little, and rex just.. looked at her for a second and walked away. And that was very contreversial somehow.
When did Istiodactylids go extinct? And why did they, considering Scavenging flyers like vultures tend to be very successful animals today
I mean... It was VERY cartoony for no reason but making it look cartoonishly corny
Maybe, but saying they're "talking" is also exaggerating this scene lol.
It is made in a way where if they talked it wouldn't even make it that much worse (not because I'm a fan of talking dinosaurs, but because that scene belongs to those kind of corny choices)
And I say this even as a huge fan of JW 2015, everything was great to me until the final battle.
The final battle has so much sauce imo, for me it's juuuuuuusssst enough over the top to not be goofy. Final battle in Dominion sucked hard tho. And was way too quick.
No no you got it wrong, Dominion was so garbage by the final battle I was like numb enough to endure the giga's (favorite dinosaur regardless of the design which I waited ages to see in the franchise) stupid death without even shedding a tear.
Tbh, Jw kinda invented the final battle. Idc if that’s not true, but it certainly feels like it. One of the coolest movie scenes imo to this day.
Jurassic world was kinda perfect aside from the barebones and kinda gross-looking herbivore designs. The only one I’ll let slide is ankylosaurus, which kinda makes sense cause it got the spotlight.
I like Dominion mostly, except giga's design (the only one I hate in the whole franchise) and final battle. Thank god for Chaos Theory.
One of the things I don't like is how often triceratops is sidelined in this whole franchise.
The locusts would have been infinitely better if they were 1. Actually pterosaurs instead and 2. Had the scene where instead of those fire machines trying to eradicate them, people actually went into the tank with flamethrowers and got killed. That was the original concept.
To be honest, that's the problems of herbivores, well... Probably aside from Brachiosaurus, which is still very underrepresented, but milks very well the nostalgia.
The thing I kinda like about the sauropod “wow” scene in Jurassic world being an apatosaurus instead of a brachi is that in the JP novel, that first encounter scene was in fact an apatosaurus.
The media knows nobody goes hype upon seeing a plant-eater, and no matter what, they are right. And I don't mean like "herbivores aren't fun" (hell I got tears of happiness upon seeing the new Edmonto discovery) but it is correct to assume the majority of people only really cares of carnivores (rex specifically) outside of the nostalgia bubble.
I also think Rebirth is at it's absolute worst in this department. Not only is the approach EXTREMELY weird** (dinosaurs appear/disappear into thin air)**, some of them don't even make sense: that worm thing in the water, thing in the bushes. Don't show the bushes rustling, SHOW IT TO ME DAMN IT.
Only titanosaurus had a decent scene, where it was yet again blatant nostalgia and they were docile cows. Anky got 1 second of screen time. Dolores doesn't count because she is an industry plant.
What 😭
What what?
Rebirth was written and directed by Ai change my mind, I refuse to think someone wrote it, someone approved it and someone made whatever those designs are, that's at least 3 filters the movie slipped past.
Oh and it definitively didn't bother asking a paleontologist (not that last time it did any better).
I don't understand the problems here
like in the original film, the dinosaurs only have ~15 minutes of screentime + a few appear and are never featured again
It makes sense animals are gonna be hidden in a dense jungle untouched by a living human for years
I love that the AI boogeyman is rearing its head in a situation we know the circumstances of 😭 like really guys??
I don't think the Jurassic films have ever cared to consult a paleontologist
There's...significant evidence that's incorrect 🥀
First movies had Horner, yes THAT horner, he used to be an actually serious person, and he did a heck of a job, he had a lot of control over the dinosaur designs, and at the time they were cutting-edge
They also had GSP and others
Ok, but I guess my point is that they shouldn't really need to consult paleontologists to be considered good or not. They aren't those kinds of films
funfact, horner tried getting maiasaurus into every single jurassic park film AND the first jurassic world film
Poor guy
The Designs aren't meant to be accurate for current standards, so I see no issue
Yeah, but like at least show some more herbivores. Better opportunities to sell toys! Especially if it has an interesting design. Like hybrids in this movie served no purpose and were not relevant. Make a herbivore sequence. And also, I get the point about Jurassic Park, but I at least can tell which dinosaur/creature is which for little screen time they have. This isn't supposed to be Skull Island where everything is wildly different.
he is not a poor guy, he married a 19 yr old STUDENT of his when he was 56
"Dinosaurs cooperating with Mosasaurus", calling dinosaurs "unintelligent", saying dinosaurs could "only live in tropical jungles" are clear sign of "we don't need a paleontologist guys, we can just make up wrong stuffs!"
Nah, Keopp just wrote it like this, no AI.
Just cause the Design or more "retro" or fit the Style the Universe has presented doesn't make it bad
A "Good" Design is not just based on "accuracy"
I think I've made my derision of horner clear enough through my time in this chat for that to be understood as sarcasm
oh sorry
Yeah these films are not trying to reflect reality, in fact I'd say that's close to the bottom of their list of priorities
I mean.
Its a Fictional Universe where Giga and Rex Lived Together
That Alone Shows you is not meant to be Paleo Accurate, Rebirth did a quite the things Wrong
But not really with the designs
These are surface-level problems that are being attributed to the wrong sources
Exactly. But I still think Rebirth Quetz's head looks weird for a Quetz. If it was other pterosaur it would be fine. They alreay had great Quetz design. I know we don't have the skull, but still.
Ember my Beloved will always remain my Fav Rex Design by Far
I think rebirths single greatest mistake was redesigning quetz
His name is MOOSE
Still upset he couldn't puncture rubber raft tho 💀. Other than that, yeah he is peak.
Is not even a Redesign LOL
The Quetz in Dominion was made by Byosin who had mainly accurate In universe Animals
While Rebirth Quetz was made by Ingen on an Island Running Tests
That the Museum represents Rebirth's quetz is just a Mistake or likely had a different meaning
That the Museum represents Rebirth's quetz is just a Mistake or likely had a different meaning
It was a mistake, I doubt they even thought about that.
Iirc it wasn’t originally meant to be a quetz but another azdarchid
And other than the Skull, Rebirth Quetz isn't even that bad
They should've called it hategopteryx ngl
Basically Big Quetz Situation
Bro has no head
"Dinosaurs cooperating with Mosasaurus", calling dinosaurs "unintelligent", saying dinosaurs could "only live in tropical jungles"
I was sitting there like:
Are you for real guys?I felt kind of disrespected actually lmfao.
To me aside from the Rex and Mosa, every other design on rebirth was just proof Gareth shouldn't be left unsupervised close to Jurassic material.
And no. Whatever that pug-necked spinosaurus looks like for sure "accurate" isn't in the list.
Tbh I don't think the Spino's Having a Symbiotic I think its called relationship with the St Hubert's Mosa is so bad given the Spino's in promotional Material are said to be rather Smart and the JW Mosa has Canonically Hunted with Orca's so Lol
I like the Design
It has grown on Me
The new spino is literally better than the old version, no don't argue with me, I cannot be convinced otherwise
Yeah, there is some variation in spinos, but the neck is horrible.
Quetz is still cool, just not as Quetz, even with lore reasons of Biosin and InGen mentioned here earlier. But the rest is..... yeah. Titanosaurus is actually kaiju sized.
New one fat
I do think the mosa was one of the best parts of Rebirth, both in design and behaviorally
But you see, they are still stupid and unintelligent.
I prefer JP3's Design but I equally love this guys
It actually gets spooked when the ship it was investigating started chasing it, and THAT is when it returned with the spinos for backup.
Titano is Honestly not that Big when Ignoring the Inconsistant CGI
The quetzal thing is that if they didn't add that cartoonish hook on its beak it would be FINE!!! Not perfect, still fine! Just one little detail gone and it gets decent!
But no... Gareth had to go monsterverse
I feel like there's obviously problems w/ Rebirth (it's still the best JW film imo) but there's a lot of nothing being said here ngl 😭
I've seen people call mosa "too whale-like" and I don't understand, like it's a deliberate design choice that honestly is such a refresher too the over-crocodilified JW mosa
D-Rex is Kong bro, Rebirth is a monsterverse movie, it doesn't feel like the previous 6 at all, at least to me.
I’m confused as to what that even means in this context.
They didn't like the belly (which is the only whale-esque feature btw) and acted like the ONE scene its visible ruins the mosa
People were surprised rex could swim, general audience for the most part is severely behind in their dinosaur knowledge, it's fine.
this chat is something that should never be released into the world
JWR Mosa my beloved
To quote the first book "of course it can swim! Every reptile can swim!" (For some reasons I thought they couldn't when I was a kid, I blame Land Before Time for it)
They can't swim cuz they're all dead 
Well, some people think that even elephants can't swim. They are just not as invested in animal behavior.
Titano is sometimes Kaiju sized cause Average Gareth Edwards moment
Again, this is not JP or JW, it's Kong Skull Island bootleg version (with D-Rex as Kong).
D-Rex is also as big as the plot need it to be.
Well... Depending on WHICH titanosaur we talking about.
Tho I'd argue they could have gone with Argent but caught wind that "Ark's largest dinosaur was Titanosaur"
Real
Yeah
Average Gareth Edwards and JP Moment
Holy moly bruh💀💀💀💀💀💀.
Gareth edwards isn't exactly a director you should expect consisten scaling from
And it really isn't a problem
I could be wrong obviously, but I don't remember anything in JP and JW having this egregious scaling, except mosa, clearly.
Finally one thing I can agree with this chat about
I know it's not the case but I wanna blindly believe it's actually meant to be Wellnhopterus
Nah I like my boi
They serve 0 purpose in the movie, like, at all, but for hybrids the designs are fine. I'm just fuming at their inclusion and them also being wasted at the same time. This movie bro.....
Meh I like D-Rex and have seen ppl like it as well
But it is a indeed a Design that divided ppl
Tapwing solos monster design
Like I said above, it's a fine design for a hybrid antagonist. Too bad it's not relevant, appears only at the end and has no sauce at all.
Tapwing has to be Fred 2 because they never fricking miss 😭
It's cool.
I would've liked it to be ugly. Like, real genetic abomination ugly. I've seen people suggest having eyes inside the mouth, like a frog mutation. That would've been very cool. With competent sequence, of course.
Ngl, I liked D-rex more than indom
It feels very alien and I fw that brand of horror so much even if the Jurassic films haven't ever really approached the horror genre overall
It was supposed to be a "failed hybrid" based on cases of real life mutations, except it looks nothing like a dinosaur OR a malformed mutated animal, it looks ON PURPOSE made to look like an alien/orga/rancor/Cloverfield/quiet place/future predator... Because "the monsterverse guy" wants to "I was here" in the wrong movie.
Well... At least it was wasted in a movie that was written by Koepp using Chatgpt (yes I stay by that theory) and not on something that could have been ruined.
I mean
The Skull is that of a Rex, you can see it alot better after taking whatever is on its head
I like D-Rex Alot cause its just a Animal that Lives and Hunts like a Normal One but does seemingly have dislike to humans(like JP3)
I liked Mutadons alot too
it looks ON PURPOSE made to look like an alien/orga/rancor/Cloverfield/quiet place/future predator
Exactly. Koepp also said D-Rex is a hybrid of Rex and Titanosaurus. I can see that, but eeeeeeeeeh.... Just like mutadons, Raptor + Pteranodon, but really it's just a dragon.
Sirblame made a good rough sketch of it
Leave my Goat out of this
Also, if this island is supposed to be full of mutant freaks, at least compensate the retconning of the previous movie and go full out with this concept.
You can easily recognize a JP T-Rex Style Skull in there as well
D-Rex and Mutadons are fine, not the biggest fan of the designs, but I wish they would just stop pretending, call them hybrids and make them actually relevant to the story (we need their blood).
Mutadon is called a Hybrid some times
Mutant's are just Hybrids gone wrong
Universal had insanely inconsistent marketing for this movie.
This Description is from Prime iirc
Oh. But still, like in general, I feel like the marketing was dogwater.
It waz weird
Dominion which literally had the og 3 cast had much less glazing of the og JP than Rebirth has by a mile.
It was designed as a thanotosdrakon, but was changed to quetz for namesake. I have a hunch that the same goes for spino, was probably meant to be oxalaia or somethin.
Nah Spino was always meant to be Spino
I am aware it was designed to be Thanotosdrakon even though that animal has no real unqiue triats for such a design
Dilophosaurus was also meant to be juvenile rex.
it wasn't
why aint we adressing the fact that both stego and pteranodon are humongous
Perspective
it aint perspective, stego is 5m tall and rex is 4.6, literally says there, while pteranodon is double the size of mutadon
Ember is 4.6m using a Posture from Concept Arts
so the height doesnt match the image? Cuz for me she seems very reared up
4.6m in the Original Size Chart uses the Render of Concept Arts
so its supposed to be a little taller when reared up
I think it was a huge missed opportunity to do something actually unique with the creature. It's just a generic "villain" that doesn't do anything.
For example, the D-rex was supposedly something to feel bad for according to some of the people behind the movie. I think going all out on something like that would have made it way more interesting and less generic in the film.
Make the creature a compelling, ethical dilemma that can truly tie into the rest of the movie instead of having a random last-minute appearance.
If it actually had an interesting, relevant and consistent storyline it could have been such a good entry.
true like an actual mutant
For sure, the design and behavior could have been done better.
Is Paleontology being used to discuss JP again despite it being explicitly against the rules
New cryo skull proposal
hmm, feels shorter than usual no?
Why does tierzoo see herbivorous dinosaurs as weaklings is there evidence?
guys my friend is stuck on a rock? is there a command to report a specific location on console?
Because it’s based on his personal thoughts & not actually any research or papers.
He's also likening life to videogames, where herbivores are typically viewed as weaker than carnivores so there's that
Ranking animals as video game characters is objectively biased to begin with
can we add sea lions as animals that have evidence for having empathy?
It wasn't meant to be a villain, it's a victim
Elvis has entered the building
A lot of animals are capable of empathy
The only victim I see in rebirth is the franchise
Actually wait, this is their dimetrodon.
Lol true.
Whose dimetrodon?
Surviving Earth
Yeah, that's what I thought.
Hmm, that second strike at the ground, is it possible for the right leg to straighten that much?
I’m already a little concerned for this though, dimetrodon isn’t supposed to have scales, or at least these kinds of scales.
Hope it doesn’t drag its tail either, cause it’s resting on the ground in the clip.
What do you mean by "isn't supposed to have scales"?
Well, “isn’t supposed to” is exaggerating I guess. It’s less likely, considering it’s a transitional between reptiles and mammals.
No, is not less likely or anything, they had completely scaly bodies lol
I believe there’s only evidence of stomach scales so far.
Stomach, tail, torso, arms and legs
A paper released recently about that
Oh really? Alrighty then.
Well I guess the only thing now would be the tail dragging, which might just be because it’s stationary in the clip.
Considering how low to the floor they were, I don't see far-fetched tail dragging
Seeing as this paper came out this year, I’d assume that Surviving Earth is using some unreleased information.
I honestly don't know, cause the Dimetrodon OG concept lacked scales
However there's multiple basal Amniota with scales impressed, so logically going with scales would've been the logic choice even if they had no access to that document
Actually it had them.
Belly alone tho, everything else was smooth
You’re right, there’s a note that says dorsally lacking scales.
Hey does anyone have a good adcrocuta skeletal i can use?
According my experience with the animal (I just googled the name, I didn't know it existed
), just use pachycrocuta skeletal and replace head
Ok thanks
Ty i just need a lower jaw
It appears to be the closest or second closest relative of Crocuta itself, so I'd recommend using a Spotted Hyena skeletal as basis
A couple of the images feature a mandible luckily
https://x.com/MAntonPaleoart/status/1755667915607564790 is a good overview by an expert
Meet Adcrocuta, dominant hyaenid of the late Miocene! While researching hyena anatomy for my artwork in the March issue of Nat Geo (preview via link below), I noticed features which Adcrocuta most likely shared with living species, and made these sketches. https://t.co/Q5VrGPkrBd
Ty,im going to make a template like reconstruction so this helps a lot.Appreciate it
I thought we found evidence recently they were scaly
Wtf dude he's literally me
Considering Mr. Dimetrodon himself has confirmed it's fine, I would say it's fine
Minus a few nitpicks apparently but those aren't harmful
Whole show looks very promising to me honestly, you can see the amount of care and time they've been putting into it in just about every aspect.
I just wrote an essay on fricking Prehistoric Planet: Ice Age
Share :D
Cant
Alr
I already submitted, so its no with me rn, and I write in cursive which means half the people wont even understand
Ohhh ok xD
@fossil ingot which size for Giga is more reliable? 8.3-8.4 tons or 9.3-9.7 tons?
The dentary
which individual bro?
u have to tell us which individual first
The dentary specimen
dung material
meaningless and not quite possible to give a exactly size estimation
The holotype Giga is around 8 - 8.5 tonnes, Dentary was probably of similar size though we won't ever really know for sure
It does help us know that the holotype giga was probably a pretty normal sized individual for its species and not some rare individual
Maybe in a 100 years, we'll find its own "Sue"-like extremely large specimen. Or maybe that'll be Meraxes considering we've already found 2 of them
Or we will never find one
Neither really. Gdi for it gave 7.8t. U can’t really assume the dentary specimen is any bigger than the holotype aswell so it’s best to say they are around the same size so giga is ~8t
Random said appearently the Holotype was estimated 7.83 tons and that Dan believes the dentary to be 6.6% larger which would get 9400-9700 kg.
It was a Volumetric model, not a GDI
Ah mb. Thats even better than
The scan team don’t think it’s bigger than the holotype. The last I saw Dan mention the dentary specimen he used the supposed 2.2% bigger if anything
Kinda, there's more room for subjectivity there iirc
That's 8400 kg at best.
Unlikely dentary is even bigger at all
Ah, I thought scans were overall better for size estimates than gdis?
Yeah I doubt the 6.6% now ngl.
Its hard to say, the 6.6% figure was due to it preserving more teeth alveolis iirc
Volumetric is just making a Model in blender or such, scaling it to the appropriate size and getting the volume of the model to estimate its mass from(for theropods it was with 0.97 density). You don't need a scan for that, nor is there any scan of Giganotosaurus material in public.
Yeah, I guess I had forgotten about that. Also, the scales were a very last minute change apparently, cause the concept art was smooth skinned.
idk whether to be happy people are starting to see partial dentary scaling is unreliable or sad about the surge of people pretending dentary giga is smaller than the holotype based on a poorly scaled image of the dentaries
This is shaping up to be a pretty up-to-date documentary. Hopefully it’ll hold up for a while, for the same reason the new Wwd probably will…
why not both
There's room for both.
Is it true that tyrannosaurus channeled the stress of it's biteforce from it's maxilla to the nasals then to the frontals (I think) while tarbosaurus handled the stress of its biteforce to the maxilla straight to the Frontals?
Did dreadnoughtus hold its neck up or down
Sauropods all held their necks “diagonally”.
So was it picture 1 or picture 2 -.-
picture 2, more upright
Thanks 
which one is holding its next diagonally
of course
Both ._.
ones horizontal...
up
I found references for both so I wasnt sure, ty 
the first reference is just ASS even for it's time
Is there anything going against the idea of sauropods having gelatinous foreheads, or nah?
Was going to say is that what you meant?
I suspect they mean something like JW:R's Titanosaurus or WWD'25 sauropod whose name escapes me rn
maybe some extra soft tissue but I wouldn’t assume anywhere near enough to where gelatinous could be used to describe it
Of course not, I was being funny.
Still though, I do wonder how plausible a fleshy forehead would have been, obviously not to the extreme of the jw Titanosaur.
yk what I say to this I anti-laughed
Like, this extent seems good for a Titanosaur, but I wonder if the brachiosaurs would be larger due to having more room.
Guess I need to start drawing lips on sauropods instead of like a beak
Beak…. On a sauropod..?
Was being “creative “ lol
I guess. Honestly, my biggest paleo-peeve is how speculative most art is. Too much “could be” and not enough “should be”.
It's plausible and actually preserved so
Really? Which species.
Camarasaurus iirc
Yeah that’s what I’m reading. Apparently it’s also plausible in diplodocus, brachiosaurus, and apatosaurus.
Kinda makes sense that they would have evolved beaks. Still hard to picture a beaked sauropod..
Though, wouldnt something that big have been incorporated into prehistoric planet?
it’s still iffy, could just be extremely robust gum tissue or a very robust/keratinized lip
It probably wouldn't have really looked like a beak at all, like what cuttlefish is saying, potentially to the point of not really being noticeable visually.
So is the deinosuchus size nerf still under speculation or will I never see my giant crocodilian again 🙁
Bro it's still like 5 times as heavy as the biggest ever seen/measured crocodile of today
A record sized specimen of deino might have been as big as you picture it to be
No like I mean was it similar size as it was before I’m not good with reconstruction and analyze of it but for a head as large as that and huge jaws for any animal especially crocodilians wouldn’t it need a large neck and connects to a huge body?
Considering that it was done from the scan of one specimen, no
Unless dinosaurs were practicing Frankenstein
how accurate is PoTs amarga
Perfectly fine.
too fodder, should have a flamethrower and the ability to seismic toss rexes
That makes more sense
anyone got a good austroraptor skeletal
It is not?
POTs amarga general body is fine but the neck “spikes” are not spikes it should be reconstructed as a dual fleshy structure
I think it is this paper https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Osteohistology-of-the-hyperelongate-hemispinous-of-Cerda-Novas/cebad23375ba2aa1e5e41f9552035532c2dadb4e
the default sub has the fleshy structure on the neck
pretty sure itd be a single "hump" rather than 2 fleshy structures
the spines are very close together and there was other stuff im forgetting about rn
The game provides several variants to allow play as what is thought to be most realistic
So Sergi did you stop making skeletals completely, if you don't mind me asking
Yes but specifically that one was shown so why would I assume that he’s referring to others?
yes but it's never the default like with their "Pycnonemo" where the Carnotaurus is the default species rather than a sub
Nope because it has no diverticuli apparently
i make basic ones that i dont post to help me with stuff, but basically yeah. Its fun but I got other stuff to do, and other people like random are way better than me at it anyways. I only did it for fun a few times to make refs i needed
That's fair I did/do still love your Meraxes skeletal and your Hatz
Wait mb I may have misunderstood it lol, you are likely right
The 2022 Amargasaurus paper specifically disputed this and concluded there was no such diverticulum
my most recent one is a Pelecanimimus. Ive posted it somewhere, unfinished
its quite good but i dont think i'll finish it
That's fair, though personally I don't really see how the sail is that practical unless it was unusually hot or something. Do any reasonable theories exist?
the arrangement could use some work too
ye thats what i meant, makes sense 
My favorite thing about the pot amarga is the front legs, it has slight keratin around where the toes would be, and it's a nice balance between the bare front limbs and the absolutely elephantine ones.
would amarga have a psuedo beak?
