#paleontology
1 messages · Page 200 of 1
spino is the best contender i think currently
Wouldn't spino just sink like a hippo because of dense bones
Also there are no truly aquatic or marine dinosaurs that we know of, though I honestly wouldn't be surprised if we find one eventually
actually ig that wouldn't really affect its ability to ambush would it
Yeah penguins might count but at the same time they don't spend all of their lives in the water
it doesnt have to live exclusively in water to be considered aquatic
So does this mean that certain spinosaurs may have fit the bill too?
I mean mabye but definitely not to the degree that penguins do.
Spinosaurids would be aquatic in the same way herons are, whereas penguins spend ¾ of their lives swimming which is almost as much as seals.
Are there any truly parasitic dinosaurs? I know some birds will drink blood but that alone isn't parasitism
Spinosaurids likely can control their bouyency
You'd think they most definitely could looking at crocodilians and even certain birds
Also, that reminds me about the discussion we had on Ankylosaur and nodosaur buoyancy. While they are definitely known to flip over when dead and bloated, isn't there a chance that a living one, which would have a buoyancy somewhat similar to a mammal without it's armor, possibly sink when accounting for that extra density?
There was a study already done on it and yes, armored dinosaurs just sank like rocks
That's what I was referencing as well, but I think stego specifically is skeptical
does this mean hippo anky is just as plausible as hippo lurd
-# (I know it doesnt just let me dream)
We gotta remember that the bird hipped dinosaurs weren't nearly as pneumatic as the lizard hipped ones
Animals that are denser than water can still stay at the surface temporarily by paddling or kicking up from the bottom, so ankylosaurs could probably cross narrow bodies of water just fine. If it took more than a few minutes to swim across then they might get tired and sink
^
imagine a species of dwarf ankylosaurs because they got stuck on an island like 500 meters from the mainland and just couldn't get back
I'm not arguing that they wouldn't be able to do anything about it, I'm talking about neutral buoyancy, even hippopotamus can stay above the bottom with effort
how would an ankylosaur even swim
would it be similar to modern quadrapedal megafauna?
How does a rhinoceros swim? I'd assume it would be semi similar but even more awkward due to the body shape
I doubt it would be similar to large mammalian quadrupeds, that float and bloat study showed that the tail pitches the back half down and the lung volume pitches the front half up. Which is convenient for keeping the head above water. Obviously armor density would be weighing the entire animal down but not in an even distribution. So probably somewhat in this position, kicking up from the bottom with its backlegs and paddling forward with its forelimbs
imagine an anky using its tail club like a paddle
I assume they wouldn't have the range of motion to do that though
It would probably have the range of the motion, the tail just wouldn't generate much thrust due to its shape
Yeah it's literally mostly flat lol
its relent to say that ankylosaurs are prone to capsizing
I have a theory
Bruh lol
non-bloated they don't seem to tip, nodosaurs tip either way though
Ankylosaur hip bones are so massive it's honestly insane and almost alien looking. I was able to look at the hip area alone once and I was shocked
yeah but another thing is the Euo model does not have enough armour
yeah true, these models aren't armored or dense enough
was there an indeterminate velociraptor species in nemegt?
the noidosaur one is fine, but the euo one is not
the mean density for both is less than 900 g/L which I think the eofauna density paper found to be problematic
I wonder if loons count since they can barely walk
Didn't said paper suggest that they would've been slightly denser than water?
There is but I don't know if it's published anywhere outside of books
do we know how big it is?
https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ar.24574 I believe so, 1.05-1.1 NSGs
I would just base it on V. mongoliensis as it's most likely the closest relative (or possibly the same species)
alr
now I just need to wait for my phone to stop misbehaving and let me finish this chart
ngl I might have made it too big for such a small device
i dont think this is confirmed
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04528-0 spino did have dense bones, suggesting some method of controlling its buoyancy in the water
Spino was like a mola mola obviously, using its compressed body to float at the surface of the water when it wasn't actively swimming
Baby elephant ♥️
whats the tyrannosaur in the back, nanuq?
Assumedly
white pelted pack hunting nanuqsaurus at this point is a tropeasaur
I like the idea of nanuq having a pelt similar to arctic foxes where it would go from brown in the summer to white in the winter for camouflage during all seasons
White feathered, yes
Pack hunting? Idk when that was showcased besides Pre Planet
wwd 2013 had pack hunting nanuqs
there were like 4 of them iirc
You might be right, I feel like I've seen it elsewhere though
I guess the things in WWD 2013 were still being called gorgosaurs and modeled after them but that might be what I'm thinking of
3 adults (1 out of frame) and 3 babies
I assume the larger vibrant one is a male and the duller smaller ones are a harem or smth
Correct, the big blue one is Gorgon
they made a documentary version without the voices and referred to it as nanuqsaurus
Auraosaurus
gotcha I've only seen clips here and there I missed the whole thing
the wwd 2013 nanuqs are probably my favourite tyrannosaurs in media ngl
That was a while afterwards tmk
During production, the remains were Nanuqsaurus but they were, at the time, referred to Gorgosaurus
apparently it came out the day before the movie
but then again nanuq was only named 3 months after the movie was made
Surviving Earth still looks good, I'll be watching
on the one hand this looks cool, something about the nanuq reminds me of WWD theropods (but in a good way)
but that bear in the front looks like a skinwalker
Wouldn't some penguins count as marine since they live primarily on sea ice?
it looks like that one planet zoo statue
Since when did bary and sucho also have the thicc boi newt tails?
Am I the only one who’s not a big fan of the tyrannosaur model? Honestly looks lower quality than the other ones
It’s not great
The arms look out of place
I thought that was supposed to be acro
Personally I care more about the portrayal of the show and creatures rather than the model being the best thing in the world
We'll have to see what the actual show is like (hopefully less biased and short-sighted towards animal groups and evolution than Life On Our Planet)
this is also a mock up I think, not the actual models as they’ll appear in the show
because the promos we’ve seen looked higher quality, and they have people like ugueto doing the animal designs
would large sauropods be unable to put in zoo's like modern day baleen whales are?
why do people want to regrow the sahara ?
anyone have a saichania skeletal?
because people want to make the world like it was before humans existed for some reason
same as how people want to "reforest" america despite it historically being mostly grasslands and desert
Would still be nice to rewild certain areas regardless, preferably to their historical state though.
yeah, im not saying we shouldn't rewild, but rewilding in the wrong way would do more harm than good
like if you plant a forest in an area that was a prairie historically, the soil and animals wont be able to handle that many trees and the ecosystem would collapse completely
Exactly, though it still might be better than what we have now...
depends on how far back you go and which part of the country, most of eastern north america was historically forest even before people
150,000 years ago only appalacia and the southeast would have been predominantly forest
why would you go that far back when considering habitat regeneration?
Big reason why whales can’t really be kept in zoo’s is because having a trillion gallons of water to contain a single gigantic animal that needs to eat a ton load of tiny animals a day, is going to be a lot harder than something that just needs enough space on only one axis that requires plants to eat
We can definitely keep baleen whales in captivity but it would be impractical in the long run and detrimental to their health
that feeling when youre nearly finished a chart but there's a few dinos that you just cant find a skeletal for
Sometimes you just gotta scale with relatives
idk where to find the sizes because ik Google is like 50/50
its only 1 ankylosaur, 3 oviraptorids and 2 troodontids I can't find a skeletal for
I could probably scale down tarchia to get saichania and do something similar with the oviraptors
I'm only 5 dinos + a bunch of birds away from having every nemegt archosaur
Meet the snow sloths of the Pleistocene in Prehistoric Planet: Ice Age, narrated by Tom Hiddleston. Premieres November 26 on Apple TV+
Prehistoric Planet: Ice Age is a sweeping new installment of the award-winning natural history series from executive producers Jon Favreau and Mike Gunton, produced by BBC Studios Natural History Unit (“Planet...
Why did all the Pokémon stuff get deleted D : ?
NO WAAAYY
ok thats every non-avian archosaur as far as I'm aware
now do I do the birds or leave it
Birds and turtles
I'm only doing archosauria not archelosauria
I will probably do birds otherwise it isnt really every archosaur but theyre really annoying and theres so many of them
wait nvm theres only 4 birds
how good of jumpers are dromeosaurids?
better than me
small ones would be great jumpers in relation to their body size, probably some of the best out of any vertebrae according to some, but the larger ones like utahraptor and achillobator mabye not so much
idk about that?? They don't really seem built for that to me but idk
For you that are like actually interested in paleontology (or not) what is your favorite dinosaur?
Cool Formation
half of it snacks half of it big chungus no inbetween
pretty sure there was a trackway of a small dromaeosaur using its tail when sprinting giving it the largest stride to body length ratio ever or something
I might be thinking of something else though lemme check
Yeah
Tarbo Goat
fr
the only one I could find that's more or less easy to read is random's but thats only lower nemegt so I figured why not make one for all of nemegt since no-one else will
mine could mabye do with a bit of re arranging considering how clustered it is but its too late in the day for that now
what groups died during the local NA extinction?
Chasmosaurs, Lambeosaurs, Daspletosaurini
Not everything from these clades died out, but a large majority did
really? i thought centrosaurines
Whoops yea
Even then, I’m pretty sure only triceratopsins were the only surviving group of chasmosaurs by the end of the Cretaceous so both can count
Triceratopsins & some extra things that were more derived
didnt chasmosaurines live with t.mcreenis? like sierraceratops
Those are the extra things that were more derived
Question: arent frog fossils a lil simular to pterosaur fossils?
they both have fused hips and fused shins but the similarities end there
Pterosaurs have short tails, and then frogs lost it. Do you think that frogs are more releated to pterosaurs than reptiles? I've thought of this as a kid
???
They're not, pterosaur vertebrae are very reptilian and so are their skulls
Frogs fused their shins so they would have better leverage when jumping, pterosaurs did it to reduce their weight for flying. Same as dolphins and sharks look similar but are entirely unrelated
They both hop when running, and both eat fish. Amphibians came before reptiles plus they existed together. My thought is that pterosaurs mightve evolved some traits from frogs
It is
Pterosaurs used their wings to jump, frogs used their legs. And almost every vertebrate group eats fish
They did evolve from amphibians, but not from frogs specifically, more so an extinct line that was also the ancestor of every other reptile
dont pterosaurs use their legs to jump-run?
they do a little 4-legged gallop but 90% of the power is in the wings, the wing bones are like 3x thicker than the legs
is that how quetz can break bones with a punch?
Mods make no sense, they are unbalanced af (especailly saurophaganax)
quetz could probably break small creature´s bones with a punch
???
same as how elephants could probably turn you into mush with a well placed kick
Its reason to my thought. Not ragebait... (Or maybe the message im replying to is ragebait?)
saur is saurophaganax shortned
other thing
This image has me dead
@slow warren let’s discuss here
what are y'all discussing?
About whether current pot rex model is close to accurate t rex or not
First off one of the subs has no lips, and going off of tyrannosaurs and just terrestrial carnivores in general, would be extremely inaccurate
thats a sub
Yeah it's a sub but thats not a free pass to look like my inbred cousin
What about rex’s specie model itself? It has lips.
well, it is his inbred cousin, tarbosaurus
the species model itself is...decent, i guess
the muscle distribution looks off in some places and the snout could be a bit broader
I’d say the horn crest on the head looks bit too small
that, and depending on who you ask, hatchling/juvenile/adolescent could use some feathering. that kinda irks me
thats about it i have to say about it. Otherwise, its fine
I see. Well that’s very insightful
baby models not having feathers is a mechanics issue, it doesn’t really work with the way pot models and growth are coded
well gee diddly whizz im a dinosaur geek not a coding geek, but thanks for the information
I agree with tarbo not having libs. But I also think it might just be subtle reference to more box office movies style of rex
Don't almost all the offiical theropods have a lipless sub?
Only the raptors and I think Alio all have lipped subs
Stupid alio needs to get with the program
The topic is over more or less but I just wanted to add that pterosaurs are currently thought to be most closely related to dinosaurs. the group formerly known as lagerpetidae is now considered a grade of basal species that lead to proper pterosaurs
So they likely evolved from animals like these
EORAPTOR
Venetoraptor and Scleromochlus actually
Were there any non-plantigrade pterosaurs, or if not when did that trait show up in their evolutionary history?
the only one where digitigrade posture has actually held up is noripterus but no one knows why it would do that
So when did David Peters start being, well, David Peters?
Because I know there was a time in my life where I could look up a pterosaur and not see his atrocious skeletals in the results
there is much more wrong with the baby rex models than just lacking feathers. ||cough cough not having feathers is actually a positive and I'm leaving it at that.||
There is nothing wrong with the baby rex models that can actually be fixed by the devs. If the baby rex had more accurate proportions, its animations would break
You are partially correct, but it's also matter of dev time/priority because pt rex has way more accurate baby rex's than alderon rex. Not perfect for the reasons you stated but much better.
its mostly a rig issue
even so that still isn't an accurate baby rex, legs and arms would be bigger
All true, but I still think later in this games lifespan we could see some major improvements not just to baby rex but all our dinos if modders are capable of going this far with the limited tools they have.
I really hope so, I want to be able to go crazy with body models for example if wanted to do feathered babies but the feathers cant be removed for adults + cause lag
if it were accurate adolescent rex wouldn't just be a mini adult
Aside from body proportions. What do you guys feel about pot rex’s skull/head?
its not very accurate to the jurassic park/world trex so i'd say its inaccurate to some extent
I honestly have no idea if this is sarcasm joke or not lol
ofc i mean rexy and bull trex from jp3 and not the trex from the new jw movie
I don’t think jp rex skull has ever been accurate?
bro u joking?
In the film’s time maybe but ehhh lol
I’d say it’s alr
I think it’s head look a little odd at front, when it lowers it head a bit
In what way?
The neck and upper head are similar in size. With angle, the head appears big and circular than it intended to
Given Rex has good inividual variation in the skull
Its fine
how heavy would a 8.5m A. fragilis be
about 1.8 t
It's okay. What bothers me are the facial scales.
It isn't.
The jurassic films have always widened the skulls of the animals, especially the carnivores, which you can clearly see on dilo and velo
Dayum
@wispy stone the skull of the rex subspecies is very accurate aside from the keratin and horns
if you reference dempsey 3d rex skeletal
People will use horns instead of bosses for T. rex because it's cool and then ignore that the lacrimals/postorbits are rounded...
I think bosses look better
Numbers for what
Oh I thought you meant in value, not actual size
No, I think they're good
you sure? The font size rn is 100 but I feel like its a bit too clustered
I could change it down to 70/80 and see how it looks
It's not really cluttered, just kinda incoherent when it comes to how they count
Like Opis(?) is #2 and Saurolophus is #3 when it kinda feels like it should be the other way round but that's not super bad
yeah I might reorder them
should I go back to front, left to right, top to bottom or a mix
left to right starting with the big animals is my preferred method
mabye top to bottom and left to right?
Like opis #1, saurolophus #2, Bagaraatan #3 ect
So opis #1, nemegto #2, theri #3, saurolophus #4?
즐거운 토요일은 최애 공룡과 함께 ~
︀︀Have a nice Saturday with your favorite dinosaur~
︀︀
︀︀#Tyrannosauru #Trex #skull #specimens #AMNH5027 #MOR008 #BHI3033 #Tristan #Tyson
yes
it's going to get messy after the alioramus-gallimimus row but with this chart layout i fear it was inevitable
Somebody add a sickle claw to this deadly predator
yeah it could have been organised a bit better but it would take ages to fix now
I might make a copy of it and reorganise it tomorrow or something
That would be overkill
True, we don't want this ruthless beast to look too ruthless
Did pterosaurs have a keel?
should I add names now or reorganise first
They had huge pecs but I don't think they had highly developed keel iirc
Is it accurate?
allo and what
metri
I would recolor some of the silhouettes tbh. The azdarchid kinda blends in with the darker colors behind it
what colors would you recommend? I have a darker green silhouette done for paralligator on another layer but I dont really see anything else that needs a recolor
You didn't use this model?
why would I use sinraptor to show metriacanthosaurus
I'd make the azdarchid lighter and something that contrasts well with green.
Most of them seem fine but not layering two dark colors on top of each other is my only recommendation
how different would gigantosaurini and Daspletosaurini run? would one group prefer a burst of speed instead of the other one? one group has more indurance? one being able to hold its speed for a prelonged time?
we only have some fragments currently, so its closest relatives are Alpakrush and Sinraptor, right?
im gonna assume gigantosaurini didnt have to move that fast due to their prey, but still, would they be endurance runners?
4 and 3 slots?
3 slots
i forgot they made hatz a 3 slot
Cause Look at Metri's Material
shouldn't that be more than enough to know more or less what it looked like and how big it is
It’s already using sinraptor material as reference to fill in blanks
Using Close to Biggest Dasp and 3rd and 4th Biggest Allo is Crazy
Pitini and his comparisons smh
ik, but that doesnt mean that it was the same size
oxalaia wouldn't be the same size as spino even though you'd use spino material to fill in the blanks
Not really
Thats why Metri Uses Sinraptor to Fill the Stuff missing
Cause Sinraptor is a quite close relative
@coral forge metri is smaller than sinraptor
Tho is not THAT much smaller
metri the goat,give him new role
Just use this and Scale it with the scale bar smh
Like here
I know its the closest relative but that doesnt mean they were the same size or that you should use a sinraptor skeletal instead
Mobi simply say "why didn't you use this model"
He never said Copy the size too
Metri’s skeletal is good, it doesn’t need to use sinraptor to represent it
Besides, Both skeletals are made by the same guy, so I’m certain he knew what he was doing
but they did copy the size which is what I'm saying
I found articles that say most specimens could have been larger or It's me who has to dream
Dan's Metri is just a Downscaled Sinraptor
What was the first known flying animal? I'm 99% sure it was some sort of insect right?
Not like it matters
Allo Dwarfs Both Metri and Dasp anyways smh
more proof that metri is fine and doesn’t need to be fitted in with a proper sinraptor skeletal
metri❤️
Allo Mogs
allo mog it's wonderful, is that Anax?
At that size it’s going to have proportionally similar legs to torvo
either anax or a very large fragilis
You may have already seen it
Oh little baby guy
Fragilis
Anax is slightly smaller at max size
The One I have is I think 12m Along the Centra for Epanterias
Which is Possible tbh.
I forgot
Does your Torvo have Cartilage like the Comp I used?
How big was truly Megalania? What are the most reasonable estimates?
mine is 11.8 for epanterias
torvo is random's edmarka
11.8m works fine
And Random's Edmark edit with Cartilage or just his without cartilage?
Oh you silly little lad
I dont see a difference other than slightly longer legs
Yeah
Thats what Cartilage does
oh
curious why did K.M made it red?
This is to symbolize the evil that Torvosaurus has within
what if... 
I think I had Hitman do me an edit of this mf next to some
may I see it also do you have an edits of just theropod skeletals
Tarbo and 11.9-12m Edmarka
Nobody would Guess Torvo is the Heavier one
Bro is 800kgs-1t heavier than this Sucho
Then again
That Tarbo is barely 10.9m vs Torvo's 11.9-12m lol
Oh lad
No idea
Then again
Tarbo is Goated
these side views make it weird cuz yk, sucho is visibly chunkier laterally but in a front view its skinny
can I get the solo deino reference?
I wouldn't say its "skinny"
Torvo is also like
Bulky
torvo needs a size nerf like everything else except meg and rex
Let me see if I can find one
Thats why Wiehen is Peak
oh I have the closed mouth verison, I didn't know there was open mouth one
Toxic Gave me that one
Is the one used in the Wiehen Mod
And has Leg Cartilage
Basically an updated one
did he say he would rather use this one over his previous one, just curious?
Well yeah
Its basically the same
But with Leg Cartilage
am I missing anyone?
LOL
Maybe the Allosaurus stuck in the Creationist Museum?
i started this about 2 1/2 years now, yeah about that
i am NOT reading allat
Yo stego get back to ug stat server, ok sir!
me
where is my skeletal
Inside of me
may i have it
is it true isle sorna died due to the spino?
No mom said it's my turn having bones :(
why do they still ache then
how about....
that should be all of them
Fishy you got a chasmosaurus skeletal btw?
Who wants to go with me to Utah to find more siats material , we solving this mystery
work in what way
guess just being a quetz with big ah bat wings
wasnt that just old pterosaur representations
yes
did centrosaurines come from chasmosaurines or the other way around?
Neither, because they’re two entirely separate groups in ceratopsia
How good would ceratopsians realistically taste
Impossible to determine
so they evolved seperately to one another?
They both have a common ancestor and are effectively sisters to one another, so not entirely that separate
But one didn’t diverge from the other, rather both diverged at a certain time
but if im correct, centrosaurines have been discovered earlier?
The line between when the 2 diverge, cus I’m seeing Diablo all over the place (at one point I think I saw it as a chasmosaur?)
But I wouldn’t be surprised if we found centrosaurs earlier in the Campanian
I forget how late Ceratopsids were sometimes
is there any ceratopsian specimen that didnt have a skull associated with it
im trying to think about they'd make a "Default " ceratopsian head for it
Meanwhile pachycephalosaurs existing back when carcha’s were still a thing
Dinosaurs lwk probably moved
but
Does Latenivenatrix's synonymization with Stenonychosaurus mean that Steno's size range was increased?
Alright, so I have to ask, any updates for the Nanotyrannus and Troodon species? Is it valid or invalid?
Nano being a juvi rex is the consensus atm, though there's alot of upcoming work that may suggest otherwise.
She Nano on my tyrannus til I lancensis
If the work proves the other way, will that still be accepted?
Think about that question really carefully before anyone answers
I have, and I still think it’s a good question
That depends of how its proven and the reliability of that Methodology
the tyrannus will always be nano'd
but will it jane till you cope is the real question
That is something that I agree with
"If the work proves the other way, will that still be accepted"
Unless it's the same amount of weird half-baked shodiness as Longrich's Nanotyrannus paper and it proves that NanoT is distinct, then yes, it would be accepted
If it wasn't accepted (this isn't saying don't question w/e), I would say whoever you're talking to is letting their emotions or personal investment cloud judgement
Alright, since I am just curious if it will be accepted in the paleontology community, just like how people are struggling with the loss of the name Saurophaganax for Allosaurus Anax
That falls under the last statement I made
Big difference between "question intelligently" and "cope about your favorite dinosaur name being invalidated"
I am more so with question of intelligently, than the cope of the name, as I’m more curious to see reactions and how the science proves Nano either being a young T-Rex or a new species
how accurate is the new jwe3 deinonychus?
the wrists are pronated and the eye placement looks weird but other than that idk how to feel about it
It’s inaccurate but it’s inaccurate in a good way
It’s like if you gave feathers to a retro deinonychus
yeah
with all the hype that went into it i assumed it was getting a complete remodel not just adding feathers to the current model
The juvenile looks better
the juvenile looks amazing
It’s not really accurate but it’s an actual good retro design which is crazy to me, I love it.
I’ll definitely mod an accurate Deinon in but idk if I’ll use it that much lol
The old one is so ugly in my opinion
true
plus its a jurassic game what can you really expect in terms of accuracy
its kinda weird how they went paleo accurate for all the other new feathered dinos unique to jwe, but for deinon they just slapped feathers on some retro paleoart and called it a day
I think it makes sense, they wanna keep it unique from stuff like Utahraptor, but still make it look good. And I think they did it. Sure a big part of it was adding feathers, but there are also more subtle model changes that rlly improve it. It feels like an og jp concept art design
what does that even mean...
What's the largest ankylosaur? Compared to the largest nodosaur specimen?? Is there some new big nodosaur being or been dug up??
Pretty sure a lot of people (even those in the field itself) think it’s going to be distinct. The “consensus” seems to have changed, or at least nearly completely changed.
That doesn't really matter much until said data is published. Papers will treat Nano as Juvi rex until that is done
A paper also treated bahariasaurus and deltadromeus to be the same while ignoring the entirety of baharia’s material. It’s a paper, so it can be trusted more than proper observations?
Ankylosaurus, idk about biggest nodo but there's sometype of Big nodosaur from Maryland formation iirc
''Priconodon'' is supposedly the largest nodosaur and rivaling or exceeding anky in size, but that's just an internet rumor, no real data behind it. I think the largest known nodosaur atp is Peloroplites
The tibia gets you some pretty large sizes, it’s like the Gomez of ankylosaurs
There is a difference between one paper(Baharia/delta situation) and well, most papers(treating Nano as a juvi rex). So until you can point to something published as "This final thingie is why Nano is unique", its really a "its Juvi rex with current data"
what came first, nodasaurids or ankylosaurids?
Then nanotyrannus will be a juvenile tyrannosaurus for 10 more years because papers until then will be saying this. Have fun
that's how the field works, you can't say something is consensus without a single publication because people on the internet agree
Yup, that's how stuff works
i mean i guess we have longrich's from last year but like. not a single good publication
Esp since those upcoming Publications can have different results from what initial abstracts mention or just never get published for whatever reason.
allegedly table scaled this tibia and got like slightly larger than normal edmontonia size
Curious how Random takes the side of the downsize without doing it themselves...
this is because i am the single paleoartist who has the power to decide the size of animals (reddit et al, 2025)
can you make lingwulong 10 tons
isn't it already? it dwarfs every other dicraeosaur
i heard it was 7.8 tons
Which is still bigger than all of its relatives
It doesn't have to be accurate, just a good design.
Apparently there are a lot of people who are mad it isn't 100% accurate and I think that's really stupid
no. amarga is 8 tons
4.4 tonnes*
am i the only one who cant find this thing being particularly large
Yeah
its supposed to have a 20.6cm circumference which while a good bit larger sauropelta sure but its also already smaller than nodosaurus
at which point one also might question nodosaur tibia shaft scaling as a credible means of scaling anyways
Would love to see what paper or literature or estimate put Amargasaurus at 8 tonnes
hope
What would yall put into a 5 minute college presentation about hell creek ecology
ontogenetic niche partitioning
Is it allowed to send discussion-related videos here?
🥀
5 minutes to present anything is rough
I mean i was gonna mention nanotyrannus/juve rexes briefly
i would also go with ontogenetic niche partitioning because that can be explained pretty comprehensibly in a very short amount of time
I might stick mainly to the 1+ ton animals just for simplicity, especially bevause that means theres only 1 predator to talk about
the diabolical nomadic atroxicarius:
alternatively you could talk about how t.rex differs from the average theropod in hunting style but that's not really ecology as much as pure biomechanics
I mean we were told to present about anything related to biology so like
I could mabye just compare hunting methods of tyrannosaurs and allosaurs instead or smth
Ecology implies some talk of trophic levels, guilds, etc. You could just lay out the ecosystem from a food web perspective, I think you're doing a disservice by excluding smaller animals particularly when we're talking about ecology
this will be a extrememly stupid question but could the apperance of tyrannosaurus have been one of the factors of the local north cretascous exinction event?
Probably not
so many cool smaller animals in hell creek
anzu (which if that one isolated bone is to go off of may have been a lot bigger), thescelosaurus, trierarchuncus, leptoceratops, avisaurus, all the little aquatic animals like habrosaurus, etc.
Absolutely, loads of reptiles and amphibians. Champsosaurs, tons of turtles, invertebrates. It's so well studied we actually get a decent look at the ecosystem with all those small guys despite the preservation and collection biases for the big guys
ngl hell creek might be a bit too diverse/complicated for a presentation
Not if you make a food web, just break it down by trophic level with a few examples for each
It’s perfect for a presentation, you can do all sorts of things with it
In 5 minutes though?
5 minutes can be really slow if the material sucks but really quick if it's good, you can cover a lot either way
Does hell creek qualify as biology?
We have a tyrannosaur specimen from the Judith/two medicine and this was quite a while before the whole local extinction event happened, so likely not
hell creek itself is geography, but the study of the behaviours of animals within is would be biology
Then it'd be best to pick one of them as the main focuz since its just 5 mins
Amarga and 8t
Welcome to the POT server, Matt Dempsey.
There could be a little bit of leeway though
No actual time was given, I'm just going off the fact that the professor gave a 4 minute demo presentation and said ours will be slightly longer
She said it will take more or less the entire day so thats 4-5 hours for like 30 people to present
Get Amarga Heavier than Big Allo first smh
use amargatitan scalings
amargatitanis literally being the same size as amargasaurus
Ironically, it’s a fraction smaller.
Amargatitan is barely Bigger than Amarga
Amargatitanis is there too
And That Guy is either same size as Amarga or smaller
use hopes and dreams
vincelestes vs one of every sauropod
Kallamedu giant solos
No, cause then ppl believe 8-12t Deinosuchus exists
it did at one point until it was later disproven
It never existed
It only existed with Bad Measurements and Fadeno; Only Fadeno Scaled Deino so Big
While the Material itself never showed Deino been close to said size
Then again
Current Deino is Cooler than before
It is not 3-4 tons?
how accurate are fadeno's measurements usually?
wait one of what
Ehhh
90% if not 99% they end up oversized
Like Anky been 8-10t or Para been 12-18t
Or Funny 22t Tylo...
I think there is 2 or 3 skeletals that are fine size wise
didnt fadeno do a 90t baro or smth
where is the the 90 tons stored
Ahh yes
That too
okay can you give me what size it should be 😭
and the 15.4t deino
I'm joking, you're right

Apparently fadeno’s baro’s are all scaled decently, it’s just the giant specimens turned out to be supersaurus instead
thank you for that waste of a joke, I anti-laugh
how much do they weigh as supersaurus
Idk like around 50t
damn
Am geniuely pissed how alot of "deinoS fans" are whining about this when this downsize still gives you a MASSIVE beast
Massive Beast with a Cool ass Big Head
Nah anteosaurus would solo/jk
theyre all tardigrade victims
tbf it might, if it was a lil bit bigger
tmk the porportions on this aren't exactly right
It's a bit iffy because of variation but this reconstruction from last year is likely more apt, and it puts Anteosaurus at 400 kg rather than the 1500 kilos that that reconstruction's at.
This study also gave the only proper reconstruction of an adult moschops tmk, along with size (it's about the same mass as anteo).
so how long and heavy is the current reconstruction of Deinosuchus? I haven’t kept up with it but I know Sarcosuchus got a bit smaller
4.7 - 5.3 tonnes depending on which specimen you use.
sorry, it’s literally a quick scroll up. thanks for humoring me. still a huge animal
Head is still big, mainly just Body/tail that got smaller
yeah it looks so interesting with the new proportions
Its a bit similar to Scott Hartman's Deinosuchus from 2018, though with an even more Robust Skull
Scott Hartman's Deino looks like who of those crappy cgi crocodile movie monsters
how accurate is pots tanystropheus
Pretty accurate, PoT uses up-to-date (at least accurate) skeletals for their models which also includes tanystropheus
Speaking of, what's the most inaccurate and accurate pot playable? Just a question that crossed my mind
Inaccurate is thala based off size alone
whats the oldest playable in PoT? ( playable and ai )
Skeletal wise
Prob Metri, Thala is mainly off from size alone
Metri's Model tho...
innacurate would be Achillo which is you think about it its basically Utah, but others would be Kai cuz lips and Thal cuz of size. Every post TLC playable can be considered extremely accurate
Achillo's Model wise is Very Good, its Posture is fine Too
Its Main Issue is its size
Thala is bad in size and even skeletal based wise.
Metri size its fine but its skeletal is model is yeah...
Pachy can be bad too
Pycno is just Big Carno here
Pachy is pretty bad.
Hating on an animal regardless of a change of our understanding means you are a fake fan
regular subspecies has a very boxy skull which resembles utah more (do we even have achillo´s skull)
Cause Achillo has like
No Skull
Mf is just Utah but skinnier LOL
id do the same cuz utah is the goat when it isnt being used by roleplayers to do weird stuff
We just have this from its head.
Which is why Achillo is just
Slightly Smaller and Slightly Thinnier Utah, Posture should be more upright but this works
the raptor hierchy goes
utah
achillo
dakota
right?
that's what I am saying
If Dakoto exists.
Then prob
thinnier?
Achillo is way bulkier than utah
Ingame Yeah
Irl tmk no, the Achillo Material doesn't show it been Bulkier than Utah
Both are very similar in bulk anyways
Which is why they are almost if not the same size at the same length
from the materials achillo is bulkier than utah
Achillo is wider
Any Comparison?
Cause I have always heard otherwise
Cause tmk Achillo just uses Utah's Dorsal
like, fatter or just wider?
Actually
Ima just ask on the Paleo Server lol
How accurate is our Deinonychus? I can't help but feel it looks off.
wider
I asked in Paleo and got said Utah.
Ima just wait for Random and Stego to answer me there smh
Thanks for all the answers guys : )
Campto is very off. The in game one is about half the width of actual campto and has far shorter and thinner legs than an actual campto. The skull also looks nothing like an actual campto skull. Most of the post tlc models are very accurate as others said.
PoT´s campto feels right but if you look at it its more of a short armed lurdu than an actual campto (that looked like a barrel with long legs)
Everyone keeps telling me the same
Utah is Wider
Is Fadeno’s Prosaurolophus skeletal reliable? (probably not but might as well ask)
it's fine just ignore the two gray silhouettes
Awesome 
his skeletals themselves are good just some of the scaling is bad
I guess so.
did lambeosaurine come before saurolophine? did one evolve from the other?
They diverged from each other from their last common ancestor
Well explained
Hawk tuah
No. Evolution doesn't work like that : they are sister taxa, which means that they diverged from one another from an "hypothetical last ancestor".
Really? That's interesting
what would be a good paleontology topic to present about
Hell creek is proving to be too difficult
also how heavy are spino and giga on average
how can you determine of animals like spinosaurus and giganotosaurus who's specimens don't consist of >10 known specimens compared to the nomrla tatic to determine said average
Spino's big specimens might not even be spino so that's also a problem
idk I'm just curious because if rex is the largest theropod and is 8.1t on average that means spino and giga have to be smaller but ive never seen any lower estimates for them
Giga has one good specimen and it ranges around 8.5 tonnes these days. But it could still be different once its described completely
so would that not make giga the largest on average
I wouldn't suggest it HAS to be rather than it could or maybe
If one specimen is enough of an avg for ya then sure. Rex avg also depends on which rex you consider to be adults
I would highly suggest not for the so fact that it's just pointless
What what defines being an adult, weight estimates are always gonna keep changing like that
8.1 is every rex between Victoria and Scotty in size
Maybe just go for different startegies carchs and tyrannos used when hunting
Tyrannos being fast long legged guys that could probably run for a while and then became bone crushers as they got bigger
yeah i was gonna either do the role of allosaurus as the apex predator of north America during the jurassic or comparing hunting strategies of large theropods
I could probably do more with the latter because ✨ ontogenetic niche partitioning ✨
While carchs had huge and very specilized necks for pulling stuff iirc
I might do allosaurians not just carcharodontosaurids because allosaurus is awesome and I wanna include it
Yeah there's a neck musculature study that covers tyrannosaurs, allosaurus, sinraptor and ceratosaurs which might help with that
yeah, and allosaurus is probably more studied/well known than every single carcharodontosaur combined
Where allo was found to have a pretty flexible neck iirc.
It Definitely is
Should I do the entire first half on tyrannosaurs then the entire second half on allosaurs or compare one aspect at a time
I don't know if this is good picture
its fine
Burgess shale formation
it's like one of the ONLY good skeletal of this taxon
the more I write the more I realise I'm basically only talking about allosaurus vs mid sized tyrannosaurs and not carcharodontosaurids vs tyrannosaurids 💔
ngl this might just turn into the hunting methods of allosaurus
other than usual prey, adaptations and overall hunting methods would there be anything else to compare
If you're just doing allo and Tyrannos, don't think so. you could mention that early tyrannos like the feathered Yutyrannus were probably hunting more similarly to allo than later tyrannos like rex due to their longer arms and thinner teeth
I'm doing tyrannosauridae vs allosauria so my examples of mid sized tyrannosaurs are alioramus and juvenile t.rex
actually would derived carcharodontosaurs have a similar gape and neck musculature/range of motion as allosaurus just less extreme
Fyi for yutu, Sirblameson has one that has a 15% shorter arms and different skull
Oh yeah he's still updating that, still pretty big arms
for such a well studied animal i cant find anything about allosaurus hunting methods that isn't hatchet bite
Don't think so, Allosaurus has a pretty long neck. Though I don't think Carch neck musculature is very well researched, but most of them seem to have some type of locking mechanism with their neck vertebrae considering Acrocanthosaurus and Taurovenator
huh
do you know of any papers talking about it since I need a source for every single pixel on my screen
This one for Tyranno and Allo feeding styles and Allo neck stuff : https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ar.20563
This one for Tyrannovenator : https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384768109_A_new_carcharodontosaurid_specimen_sheds_light_on_the_anatomy_of_South_American_giant_predatory_dinosaurs
thanks
I might also include a chart to show how tyrannosaurids were almost perfectly adapted to be able to grab the throats of their contemporary hadrosaurs
(except rex and qianzhou because they just went "fvck it we ball" and got huge)
It's our FIRST time filming in the hallowed halls of the @AmericanMuseumofNaturalHistory, and we kick off with one of the most exciting discoveries ever made: T.rex! Roger Benson -- Macaulay Curator, Division of Paleontology, AMNH -- explains to Adam Savage the history of the museum's original T.rex skull, and how it not only changed paleontolog...
It's Taurovenator, not Tyrannovenator. You almost got my hopes up for a new Carcharodontosaurid ;-;
Oh lmao
"Tyrant hunter" would be a cool name if we find some other Large theropod from a different family living with a Tyrannosauroid.
Yeah, totally
Could be something in Asia, since we find big tyrannos in Early Cretaceous like yutyrannus and Sinotyrannus, then later in time we find some type of allosauroid with big arms(Chilantaisaurus)
theres only a preview for the 2nd one 🥀
oh yay thank you
I actually made a spec evo albertosaurinae named tyrannovenator
Something that hunted the newly arrived Asian Tyrannos I imagine, Pretty cool
yeah it's an asian one totally not just dan folkes old gorgosaurus as reference
Before there was time, there was nothing, and before there was nothing, there was monsters.
I’m actually making a paper mache of this fella
Must say, it’s been hard tryna get their physique
Love this animal
-# help him
3050kg for rhinorex
4450kg for kritosaurus
alright noted
do you know if there was any other hadrosaurus that got ambushed by deinosuchus or naw
Well anything that lived with deinosuchus
Gryposaurus Monumentus, Parasaurolophus Cryocristatus, Hadrosaurus Foulkii, Hadrosaurus sp., Kritosaurus sp., Gryposaurus sp., Angulomastacator, Aquillarhinus, Malefica and like 7 indeterminate hadrosaurs
do you think its possible that edmontosaurus wouldve meet deinosuchus? since google ai says so but its unrealible so i have to check,
probably not considering E. regalis was the only edmont species that overlapped in time with deino but didnt live in the same area
Regalis was same time different place annectens was similar place different time
soo do you say 80/20 about that
more like a 0.001/99.999 considering either the canadian/alaskan species of edmont would have to be found over 400 miles south of its current southernmost range or E. annectens would have to live 4+ million years earlier
well thank you for informing me
Fix
Fix
fix
xᴉℲ
Fix
I would like to formally apologize to reddit et al
I opened the post that said this and all the comments were telling OP how it was not one paleoartist and showing the real data behind the deinosuchus downsize
How is Megaraptor not getting that fame as like a rex by the way?I get it rex is large and everything, but Maip macrothorax(If I typed it right)Was a mega theropod!(5 metric tons atleast).
Damn my questions are killing everyone.
Can’t wait for priconodon paper to come out and humble all the non sayers. Buds a tank, bud.
how resistant to a car crash would a ankylosaurid / nodasaurid be?
Priconodon would survive , Anklyosaurus wouldn’t
what?
Force = mass times acceleration. Cars are heavy
( its bait)
anyways yeah waiting on a genuine prico thing that isn't tiny teeth tim
i know wombats have been known to total cars during crashes so im curious
You can easily both total a car and not survive
These little whipper snappers fear bud
Guys How much chance does a megaraptor have to survive a battle with a Rex?30%?
Would’ve been funnier if it was the scene where Godzilla gives the “kiss of death” to the female MUTO
100% if it runs away as soon as it sees the rex
If not it's a <2 ton animal against a >10 ton one. It's not going to survive
Wait who got a downsize?
Everyone
me in 60 years
What are Maip chances?
0
Face for radio ahhh ceratopsian
Our lord and savior Pickle, praised be his name 🥒
Same as megaraptor, an 8 meter animal against a 12 meter one won't go well
Wasn't it a 9-10 meter animal?
Those were the initial estimates I'd guess,
The 2 ton megatheropod:
bahariasaurus will be our megatherapod megaraptoran (trust me bro)
Because it’s very fairly new , T. rex wasn’t famous over night
They're also fighting spinosaurids for the top spot of "most incomplete theropod family"
at this point I don't really expect anything to ever overtake T. rex as the most famous Dinosaur
Not in the foreseeable future that’s for sure
Its had a 120 years of fame, Only ones that come close are triceratops and stegosaurus
brontosaurus too probably, less of a household name now but it was everywhere
Feel like something like argent could prob take brontos spot
velociraptor did actually briefly get more famous than t rex on searches
but yeah rex has been THE dinosaur for a good good while
I still believe in Megalosaurus superiority
The OG shall never fall
for some reason acheulosaurus got in 3rd most searched I think in 2020ish
WHAT
i gotta see this
the only way i can think of that is that friggin one company which used jp remolds
there are pictures in this channel I think
not this channel but its in modding
i see that
but like
what source is that search engine
still achel for some reason dawg
ask @warped peak
wikipedia
a h
that
still doesn't explain why achel but thank you wes
god seriously why achel
cool
This is actually a mystery across the community
IIRC it was featured on a non-dino thing
just looked up achelousaurus, i’m doing my part
do we have any speed estimates on aquatic reptiles?
depends on the specimen for both, but that brachi mod is subject to size changes
holotype brachi is still about the same height or a bit taller than holotype argent though
Not every creature in game has to be max sizes for everything
im just asking
I mean
That Brachio is Basically the size of the Recapture Creek Femur
PT Argent is the size of the Holotype, Aka only Argent
Posture also doesn't Help Argent
PT Argent is oversized (though not by a lot), meaning the brachi is at minimum the absolute maximum size
Prob Recapture Creek Femur, which may or may not be Brachio
But 69t Brachio is funny
they are however the maximum, if you mean the above image
Haven’t touched mods in forever , is brachi out yet?
Actually PT Argent is 36.6m wonder if that is the size of that "refered" thing
Ehh Close Enough
Nop
It’s been in development for some time
it’s in active testing at the moment
if im correct, sauroposiden is the tallest sauropod, right?
I believe Sauroposeidon is tallest in neutral posture depending on how many vertebrae it has, but Xinjiangtitan should be the tallest when neck is up?
i dont wanna sound dumb but like, whats the difference? like, their neck is fully up?
Ye
Mamenchisaurs had a less upright posture for their neck, Brachiosaurs had curved vertebrae at the base IIRC yielding the classic sloped tree pose
sauroposeidon being the tallest also depends on giving it 17 cervical vertebrae, it may have only had 13 we just don’t know (cervical count is highly variable in somphospondyls)
Supersaurus
diplodocus rotated 90°
how agile was stegosaurus? Ik it was very slow but how quick could it turn
Based on endocasts the anterior semicircular canals were very short and poorly developed indicating low vestibular sensitivity, i.e. low agility
Compare them to thescelosaurids or dryosaurids, much smaller animals we can presume were much more agile
So it was essentially a living wall of death?
A brick shithouse, yes
Also all hadrosaurs even the likes of shant and large edmonts would be bipedal runners right?
imagine being a poor allosaurus thinking youre safe going for the neck only to discover the range of motion a stegosaurus has in its tail
Would be an important lesson for any Jurassic theropod
I think Stego mentioned that Stegos were better at turning in place that sauropods atleast, I don't know how they compare to ceratopsians of similar size
I was thinking more in the sense of "That allosaurus is charging right at me and my head will be in its mouth within seconds. Can I pivot quick enough to not die"
That just depends on how far, fast, etc said allo is. How big the stego is etc. Dunno if there's any biomechanical studies on stego pivoting speeds
Would be cool to see how fast some of them could turn say 90 or 180 degrees
Actually i wonder if stego has the least realistic kit not including vocal abilities, group buffs ect
ano might be up there too
Be wary of biomechanical studies, just because you can make something move a certain way in a simulation does not mean it has any bearing on what the living animal could or would do
biomechanically speaking humans can lift over 10x our body weight but that doesn't mean we can do it consistently or without nearly killing ourselves
And if turning the head at a certain speed is going to automatically trigger vertigo in an animal it's not going to be using that to save its life from a predator
unless you're a sauropod because argent headbutt is cool and awesome and totally realistic
Sauropods actually do seem to be pretty adept at head movement neurologically speaking, which makes sense
Even stuff like brachiosaurs where you wouldn't necessarily assume a huge amount of head movement
Maybe they were picking up the local marshosaurus and throwing them into the Stars...
thoughts?
notice how allosaurus jaws are suspiciously baby sauropod sized? Could this mean that allosaurus possibly preyed on young sauropods meaning that contrary to popular belief, the morrison might have had a lot of sauropods?
what is this sky is blue ah question
Wdym? Stegosaurus has been found In many bonebeds likely indicating group activity as well as massive trackways indicating travel in large groups
I’m not sure what you mean tbh
What trackways?
high mobility with plates providing a huge amount of armor
I know of up to like 5-6 individuals together which is the same as Triceratops, one of the least social ceratopsids
the reason we only find 6 ceratopsians together i sbecause 3 +3 = 6 . theres 3 pairs so you get 666 and the reason they do this is because their satanic and have sent jack horner a vision of scavenging trex to curse us all
Their horns, they are not for display, nor weapons, but instead the manisfestation of their evil and cruelty cased inside a hard, but hollow shell
fact
@hallow spear What do you think of Loricatosaurus priscus?
What do i think of it? Its a fairly understudied genus, Between it and lexovisaurus theres a vastly lacking data of Middle jurassic european stegosaurs
cool
is there any australian / Antarctic stegosaurs?
Theres no Antarctic stegosaurs but there are stegosaur trackways reported from some sites in Australia
is the only clade who didnt make it to australia are tyrannosaurids?
Do we have Stegosaurs in Thailand?
Yes, from the Phu Kradung formation
Do we have megaraptors in Antarctica?
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1daH6tAugxhuvwSf4JBWcpGbLGGfAW_ugzN0O68kiqDs/edit?usp=sharing
Most stuff didn't make it there iirc. There's just Megaraptors and Carchs found there so far
me when...
yep, luckily stegosaurs have diagnostic dorsal vertabrae so its fine
What do you think it is?
What dO yoU mean? its a stegosaur
Yes, but what type of Stegosaur?
We have them from southern south america and australia, they were likely in Antarctica as well. Especially because that whole continental area is the same pollen province which correlates to dinosaur provincialism in the maastrichtian
Oh its a derived stegosaur
Alright, so…. What class of family do the megaraptors belong too?
Something more derived than a Stegosaurid, Perhaps something at the base of Stegosaurinae
what do y'all consider the largest stegosaurid, dace or stego?
damn, but thanks chief
With reliable remains, probably dacentrurus. But in general, Stegosaurus, uNTIL ONE OF THE LARGER STEGOSAURus IS DESCRIBED THAT IS
They belong in basal tyrannosauroidea I think, idk really
Coelurosauria near tyrannosauroidea or possibly in it
Megaraptora is like the platypus of dinosaurs cuz next think we know is that they are descendants of Silesaurus and are long relatives of all ornithischia
what formation has the most playables in PoT? i believe its either hell creek, morrison or dinosaur park formation, right? or morrison but spain
Base game only has Rex as a hell creek dino I think. So you can rule that one out
pachy: 😢
Can I ask something?
2 is the same quantity as that formation where sucho and sarco were found so yeah (screw pachy)
Sure
morrison: stegosaurus, allosaurus, camptosaurus, ceratosaurus
dinosaur park formation: lambeosaurus, styracosaurus, daspletosaurus
morrison but spain: stegosaurus, allosaurus, ceratosaurus, miragaia
Rhamphy?
what abt rhampy?
Isnt rhamphy from morrison? Or is it dimorphodon? Its one of those 2
neither of those are from the morrison
Reason why they are all dead... rhamphy couldve saved them
I've noticed that Stegosaurus spp. is still usually depicted with a relatively short neck, but I thought that look changed with the description of Sophie The Stegosaurus? Unless I'm not informed well enough...
whats the earliest known flying animal?
Bugs/Insects
I forget the names since prehistoric bugs/insects give me the fear response
Well most megaraptors were about that size but maip macrothorax was 5 metric tons so it WAS a megatheropod.
(Maip is 2.2 tons when scaled properly)
Nothing has ever yielded 5 ton Maip except a single estimate in a paper without any methodologies
Sorry then I found wrong source
Insect wings probably evolved in the devonian but there's a fossil gap at the early carboniferous that makes it hard to ID the first winged or flying forms. Stem-dictyopterans are some of the oldest known with wings.
Stegosaurus spp. Being what? And yes Sophie did show that Stegosaurus has a Cervical-Dorsal count of 13/14 respectively
alright thanks : )
the genus itself, not specifying any particular species
I mean Stegosaurus spp. just means all Stegosaurus specimens not attributed to a specific species
yeah
but 756 mm tibia
Said tibia is from the Composite/chimeric specimen YPM 1853, which also varies in tibia length widely, I’ve seen it figured as 710mm, 690mm etc
is there any measurements of it? Or is that also inconsistent?
That is the measurement, mentioned above. They are heavily inconsistent
well, that doesn't help
I think its fair thats what theyre referring to when they say 700 max
No, that’s the YPM 1388 accession number specimen
so 845 mm tibia is 700 max
YPM 1853 has an accession number of 1271, like I mentioned in the message you responded to. Said measurements of the tibia is variable from 690mm to 756mm
And no, what they are saying is that the largest tibia they could find with that accession number is 700mm
Lmao
@hallow spear also did you see the picture of Sophie i sent while it was still in dirt/rock? you can make out the pelvic bones pretty well
I don’t remember it, but that doesn’t really matter either since Sophie’s scan and quarry map are available
also I have some concerns with the way you oriented the spikes of stegosaurus
The spikes should be oriented like this
you said theyre sweeped towards the ends but the base of many spikes ive seen in photos dont really support that
it looks to be different for every individual
There’s only 2 articulated stegosaurus specimens with a relatively complete articulation, and that is what it is based on. As well as a few other non stegosaurus stegosaurs
yes but you can still tell how they would have sat on the tail by looking at the base just how you can tell how the plates would sit on the spine
Why are you using a random specimen when actual stegosaurus specimens have articulated individuals
to show it isnt the same for all of them
It would be the same for all within the same species + the base is prone to deformation
https://x.com/Brontops_/status/1855711461521133783
that one isnt angled like these are (the image I posted)
Spike orientation is variably ontogenically
looking at the base of this one it seems to be angled a lot
these are also angled differently
what if it's... Subjective? Like, each individual could be different?
very unlikely, its plausible for them to differ from individual use but position wise, they should be similar / the sam,e
the shorter looking one looks to angle backwards but then shoot outwards
I mean, I ask it because Dinosaurs can be pretty inconsistent when it comes to each individual
I dont remember if the tail spikes on apex are real but the ones closer to the base of the tail go outwards at a 75 degree angle unlike this image #paleontology message
thats just mounting difference
oh nice they are
I accounted for that, especiallybecause half of the plates aren't mounted correctly, look at the base of the spikes
If a hatzegopteryx were to land on my roof, would my roof break?
i have looked at them from the scan i have
the spikes are mounted horizontally because its the easiest place to put them on the tail, not because its correct. you can see, especially on this pic that they should be more vertical
im not talking about the way the spikes are mounted dude, im talking about the base of the spikes
on the sketchfab scan they look mounted incorrectly too and in this picture, the angle they would've been in life would be like 70-60 degrees this image doesn't fit with bases of the spikes on apex unless there was some built up connective tissue on the tail
the mount has them at an 80 degree angle which i dont agree with
is that turtle okay? 🙁
yeah, they turtling
Sometimes you hook turtles, not really much you can do
The photo looks like it was taken while someone was trying to take the hook out, you can see the line is still taunt, so its doing better than a lot of turtles that get hooked
yes
a very incomplete maxilla
belongs to some 7-meter-long individual
trying to remember how accurate is this chart
150 newtons for a non azdarchid pterosaur is diabolical
Azcarchids dont really have high biteforces
really? I would have expected the sheer size and weight of the beaks to just naturally give them strong bites
Most of their beaks are empty space so they could still be big but take off
Azhdarkids didn't hunt large prey, they were small game hunters that were just really large
Giant heads on little bodies
No thoughts
Why did California get separa—why am I asking this. It’s very clear why.
Thoughts on why it’s clear ?
Cus California is midddddd
true
Jokes aside this would be a neat spec evo project to do, both with animal & plant life and how humans interacted with it being isolated from the mainland
So many Cali people came to Texas because everything is overly expensive in Cali
california had mammoths... right?
No only homeless
yes
and the homeless
Mammuthus columbi?
Los Angeles had mammoths, go to The La Brea Tar Pits they're awesome
p sure cali had those ja
Mammuthus homeleśś
did any dinosaur that lived in australia experince island dwarfism / gigantism, if not , why?
Columbi and pacificus are found at La Brea
pacificus? isn't that Mammut?
Oh yeah my mistake
What do y'all think of Deinotherium bozasi ?
These are animals with similar bite forces (not the human)
arguably more funny is that the human's bite force mogs them both
I wonder if pterosaurs that had weak bite forces would just peck stuff instead of biting cuz yk, pecking is more potent than biting (in most cases)
i still need to find that az pterosaur punching study
the punching study???
i swear there was one but i genuinely have spent months looking for it to no avail and it annoys me
That cannot be real bro, pterosaurs had hollow bones like birds and their main method of attack was their beaks, yeah some modern birds do but, pterosaurs had membrane wings
Funnily enough I tried referencing your comment earlier today because someone said that thalassodremus would've bene a grounded flier that hunted prey with it's strong bite force
it was( and also there is a whole thing on az pterosaurs needing strong limbs regardless to schmove)
pterosaur arms necessarily would have been extremely strong because they used them to catapult themselves into the air
Either way, unless they were like, big enough to use their weight to push things, it would probably not be worth it, plus their wings are more fragile then that of birds since they use feathers.
which isn't to say they necessarily punched things, the motion of taking flight and the motion of punching are different
so would it be smart to say thalss could crush shells?
this is correct
just there literally was a test done on it
and i still need to find it
why is it nowhere
I mean, they could slap smaller pterosaurs or dinos but they can't really do much outside of it, its why the largest ones, the azdarchids had massive beaks. and yeah even if they could damage things with their wings they could still damage them on accident if something goes wrong, like if it gets badly damage from getting clawed at or bitten.
Just not optimal
azhdarchids are pterodactyloids
so every azhdarchid is a pterodactyloid with an azhdarchid body plan
okay am stumped just a little is it fair to call Thalassodroemus a "azhdarchid" or a "azhdarchiod"
Not unreasonable IMO
why not? Half the paleocommunity is convinced it would get pulverized if used as a beating stick anyways
what if it was used to pierce things? Like a rapier
their claws barely survive contact with air so if they even just slightly touched another dinosaur they would get pulverized immediately
Maybe...
Qin et al 2023 specifically looks at piercing in addition to hook-and-pull and digging related stresses and found them to be unsuitable for all three. They're also not shaped like a rapier at all so I'm not sure why they would behave that way
so basically its an atomic bomb
Yes, mostly symbolic
It's a bit of a misunderstanding.
Ahzdarchids, tapejarids, and thalassodromids are all families under the clade azhdarchoidea. They're each other's closest relatives. They all had greater ground capabilities than most other pterosaurs. Thalasso is less special in THAT regard and more is the other major pterosaur clade doing the ground hunting thing.
fr like this one dude was just getting on my NERVES with calling Thalass a azhdarchid when it's thalassodromid azhdarchoid
I’ve seen some birds do that , gruesome stuff.
would the animals of gondwa experince island dwarfism or is it large enough for let says, bars to have a stable population there
thoughts on female sinoceratops in jwe3?
I think this is the second time this image has made an appearance today, right? ( Nope, I'm stupid )
how did they make sino look worse
H O W
@hallow spear Don't know if it's appropriate to ask this here, but do you happen to have a Jiangjunosaurus skeletal diagram?
I remember seeing one a year ago, but can't seem to find it for... whatever reason
There’s not a good one
...can I see it?
It’s literally just a Tuojiangosaurus Kentro hybrid, when Jiangjunos phylogenetic position is a basal Stegosaurine
can work with that, no biggy, frankly
Never mind it turns out the photo was removed, lol this is what it’s known from tho
bruh...
It's basically the same thing with a less pronounced frill, right?
So you are telling me that it could barely even rake at things with it's claws?
Probably not because they are estimated to weigh like 300kg max (661 pounds or so)
alright cool thanks, i'll make it nice and cosy for it then
i mean depending on roof and if it tried it could get through some but like
just landing
no yeah
that's fat
Not really for an animal more comparable in dimension to a giraffe
(which can weigh well over a ton)
I mean... I'm just asking out of curiosity at this point, but wouldn't that interfere with it's flight capabilities?
what if 3 hatzes were on my roof though? would it break then?
4, even?
300 kg is around the maximum estimated weight and that's still really light for an animal of that size, only around three (large) adult men or less.
It would most likely still be able to fly but it would obviously take more effort
i mean... Yeah? Yes, it is light for a animal of that size, but... Would it be that simple to make 300 kg fly?
Didn't dan folkes did a skeletal on it?
It honestly depends on how it would have been taking off and what type of musculature it had. Though the general consensus is that they could probably fly.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-023-04552-4 you can read the paper yourself, it's open access
Yeah, Hatzegopteryx is still very fragmentary, right? But like, even then... Isn't 300 kg a bit much for a animal that is also meant to fly?
Why would they have had developed wings otherwise? To get in the way?
I don't think that has anything to do with what I asked, but fair... i guess ?
I mean, tbf, assuming the large azdarchids were flightless and I'm not saying they were, they'd still have wings
Of course, but probably not well developed.
Well, obviously, the large azdarchids, incapable of powered flight, had well developed wings in order to "fly underwater" as modern penguins do
The bony plates of stegosaurus served as offensive weapons; they could cut open other carnivors with the razor sharp plates.
While the primary function of Stegosaurus plates is still debated, they were likely covered in a layer of keratin (the same material as fingernails and rhino horns) which would have given them sharp, cutting edges. This supports the idea that they might have offered some form of offense/ defense.
Note that the pterosaurs are generally thought to have had take offs that could have vaulted them pretty high into the air to begin with. (I'm sure an elevated area would work too) most experts believe that they could fly so idk what to say otherwise.
Yes he removed it
I don't think there's a single pterosaur expert that actually thinks the large azdarchids were flightless
Indeed they are sharp

The material is also abrasive, and also (obviously) shields the spine, while also allowing for extra soft tissue on the body to anchor the plates
I'm gonna assume you are confused. But, I would like to simplify it to you:
300 kg isn't something easy to throw it into the air, neither is it easy to make those 300 kg stable in the air. For the sake of comparison: the P-51 Mustang, approximately weighs from 3.3 tons minimally, to approximately 5.5 tons max ( From whatever source I found ). In order to make something that could be 15x more heavier than, allegedly, a Hatzegopteryx weighs, fly. You need to make very simple questions:
-How heavy is the airframe?
-How powerful it's engine?
-Can it retain it's energy in the air?
Now, it's ridiculous for me to use a aircraft in the comparison to a pterosaur, but the thing is... Similar principles also exists for the Pterosaur. It just doesn't get the benefit of having an engine ( and propeller ), and has a lot more struggle involved, since it's using it's own body to fly ( Special adaptations from the skeleton, and conjunctive tissues )
Again, I apologize? Since, I can only believe that maybe I haven't emphasized my point better, but it wasn't about " Could Hatzegopteryx fly? ", and more so, my point was " 300 kg is too much ".
To be fair, that is the higher end of the estimates. Even still though I wouldn't doubt them being able to fly.
The general weight estimates for the animal are around 200-300 kg, but you can believe whatever you think is the most logical obviously.
How heavy do you think an animal like that would be?
It's also important to note that these animals wouldn't have been constantly flapping once in the air, they most likely relied on soaring with their large wings. Similar to how the in game version behaves.
It's thought that Hatzegopteryx was even more ground based than even other Azhdarchids anyways.
Some believe that giant pterosaurs would've partially relied on air currents for decently long flights as well.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0013982 is the big could azdarchids actually fly paper by Witton and Habib, might be helpful for this discussion. They take 200-250kg to be the absolute upper limit
The size and flight mechanics of giant pterosaurs have received considerable research interest for the last century but are confused by conflicting interpretations of pterosaur biology and flight capabilities. Avian biomechanical parameters have often been applied to pterosaurs in such research but, due to considerable differences in avian and p...
With a skull wider than T.rex, the Hatzegopteryx was an apex predator of the inland seas
Did you mean longer?
Oh no, I totally agree with your two points here. But, I think, especially in your second message, the thing is that... Yes, pterosaur don't constantly flaps, that's one of their unique things. But, the thing is that, if it weighs something like that, the weight would probably create too much drag to the animal in the air, meaning that sorta of weight would only make it waste more energy
It's sorta of similar to that principle I spoke " Can it retain it's energy in the air? ", the point being that it doesn't have too much drastic loss of energy ( and speed ), and does not require to push it's limits, constantly, to remain stable in the air. Since.... If you loose too much of your energy in the air.... Well, that means you will fall straight to the ground.
Aerodynamics:
Yes, we are also counting that. It's like... Hold on, let me remember the name of the thing real quick...
Higher weight in the right places very well could have facilitated some forms of soaring, as the recent posted article suggests.
^
A plane is a poor comparison because you're constantly burning fuel to overtake the drag, that would be the equivalent of the pterosaur flapping constantly throughout flight but we know they weren't doing that
So, like a Kite for example, another ridiculous non-living organism example... How it remains in the air: it's purely based on the wind. It's aerodynamic, but because it doesn't have any source of energy it can produce, neither a way to output this energy. It can be aerodynamic ( I'm sorry for anyone that had a kite that didn't fly... ), so the only energy it can produce to remain on the air... It's purely dependent on how the wind interacts with it
Pterosaurs work... But also don't work like that. They don't work like that, because they have a source of energy, and a way to output that energy when they catapult themselves into the air... But they also work like that, because they don't constantly flap their wings in the air, meaning that their energy in the air... It's purely dependent on how the wind interacts with their own body
I mean, I think you guys get what I mean, I'm just oversimplifying everything, because I frankly have no knowledge of any more complex term or elaboration I could use here, but the point is...
Being dependent on how yourself interacts with the Air, means you cannot take risks where your physic would interact with the air in a negative way. So, for example, being heavy... Has a lot of negative interactions with the air. There's also other things like " You can't be too wide ", " You can't have heavy wings ", etc. But since Hatzegopteryx is pretty fragmentary, and it's appearance would be pretty subjective... I think those things are irrelevant... For now.
It's honestly awesome that the PoT hatze represents this flying style as well. Same with the fairly realistic differences between the smaller ones as well.
Hatzegopteryx and Azhdarchids in general are SO much lighter than others animals of a similar height and proportions would be to the point of near absurdity, like a giraffe weighs 5 to 6 times as much as even the largest ones.
There are tradeoffs in evolution though right and size can be a huge advantage in the right environment, so maximizing size while retaining flight ability is one interpretation of the azdarchid body plan. They seem overengineered for flight in many aspects of their anatomy if they weren't doing it but they likely were hitting some biological limits to what's possible wrt flight and takeoff especially
They aren't heavy for an animal of their size by any means, and basically any dinosaur that isn't several times shorter outweighs them drastically.
This includes insight into the arm bones and muscle attachments being of similar builds to smaller species. Which wouldn't make much sense if they couldn't fly.
Similar studies suggest strong bones that would have been well suited to high stresses involved during flight. Which could be a waste of energy developing otherwise.
No denial on that. I'm less objecting those facts... And more so, estimates that would require a lot more explanation on the matter of " How do you make that amount of weight fly? "
I mean you can overengineer something heavy to fly... It would however also come into question if the feats associated with that extra development wouldn't enhance the problem even further...
Muscles and bones don't exactly come for free... They also add weight to yourself ( I would've done another Aircraft example, explaining how, you can't solve the problem of a heavy airframe by... Example: Putting a heavier engine. Like... You know? That would be pretty counterproductive! lol )
Short explanation: In the matter of flight, problems can't exactly be solved by hitting your head against the wall constantly, at some point you need to go around that wall.
Pneumatization is how pterosaurs go around that wall
May I also ask, why would their morphology so heavily suggest flight if it wasn't possible?
If they couldn't fly it literally wouldn't be feasible in a physical or evolutionary fashion to retain such features.
Yes, but it's also like... There's so much you can make your bones hollow...
If for example, your conjunctive tissues are creating all of that 200-300 kg associated with yourself. Well, that's again... Counterproductive.
It's kinda like... Sorry guys, but I feel need to at least poke fun at it...
" See? I have no weight dragging me down now! "
300 kg of conjunctive tissues
It's kinda like... Solving a problem in one area. But... Not the whole problem
Evolutionary tradeoffs like I said, youre thinking too much in terms of machines
Not only that, it's incredibly likely if not certain that pterosaurs had air sacks like other archosaurs to further lighten their bodies and make respiration and therefore energy management while in the air incredibly efficient.
Okay, but given the fact that I've strict myself to using non-organisms that are designed to fly... Don't you think they are also restricted by similar rules?
And like, I get it, right? Because I even said earlier that for example, a Hatzegopteryx wouldn't get the benefit of having an engine. I'm aware of that, my comparisons have been mostly focusing on the fact that... They have to obey similar rules.
In flying animals a lot more is going on than just static weight lying around. Flight styles and mechanics associated with pterosaur flight offset these "drawbacks" and could even be advantageous to their way of flying.
I know that mechanically they're a rather poor analogy, but there are aircraft that outweigh hatz by orders of magnitude
you can make something that big fly
It's clear you don't know how anatomy, animal flight, or pterosaurs work, and you repeating essentially the same thing in every one of your long messages isn't proving any points.
Not trying to be rude, it just needs to be said at this point.
I'm honestly baffled that this debate has been going on for this long.
If increasing muscle results in a proportionately greater gain in lifting capacity than the gain in mass (increases the thrust:weight ratio, essentially) then it would be worth it, mechanically speaking
^^^
You're looking at it like we're designing a creature (or machine) from scratch to overcome an engineering problem, i.e. how do we make a 250kg object fly. We're not doing that. The creature exists, we have its bones and morphological analysis that suggests it was adapted for the stresses and loads associated with takeoff, flapping, and gliding. We are interpreting evidence that exists, not inventing something from nothing.
true, i agree with that possibility.
Its weight undoubtedly made it a less efficient flier, I agree that is a universal physical limit with flight, but that was a tradeoff because it was an organism
I don't think it's very smart to keep going on about something you don't have a lot of knowledge on, especially if it just leads to a repetitive feedback loop in this chat.
So... Do you agree it's dead? Because if you do, then you also would had to agree that we don't have azhdarchids flying out there... Technically, we become responsible on finding " How it would fly? "
And I agree, initially, but my point wasn't like trying to emphasize designing a living organism from scratch... And more emphasizing on the question, with the addition of " How do you make something heavy like that fly? "
I mean, I deeply apologize if I gave you that idea... But it wasn't my point. And frankly, I feel misrepresented here.
I linked you the research, I can recommend more if you'd like. That question of how could it fly is well studied. I'd recommend the book Pterosaurs: Natural History, Evolution, Anatomy by Witton for a deep dive on the subject
Looking at it from a purely mechanical perspective, however, flight is achieved when lift exceeds the gravitational force downwards (resulting in a net upward force). Azhdarchids are hardly my area of expertise but tmk mechanical study based on reconstructions of their wing area, flight muscles, and overall mass estimates indicate that they were in fact capable of generating the required amount of lift.
I'm sorry but simply saying "but it's really heavy" over and over doesn't contribute anything unless you back that up with actual quantitative analysis.
what would've been the largest dinosaur that would be able to jump?
That's an interesting question
Hello, I have a question about the Metriacanthosaurus, does it occupy the same niche as Sinraptor?
Isn't Metriacanthosaurus somewhat fragmentary/doesn't have some important elements known?
nonetheless, it probably did occupy the same niche as Sinraptor, since they are closely related animals of the same size
how are we responsible for pushing the animal thats within the biological possibility of flying
who also have an obscene amount of adaptations to fly
would fly
its not saying: what if t rex flew, build sky rex guys
more: man this thing that has every single thing to fly, would fly
@charred hearth iirc the living max for being able to jump is like 4 tons for the amazing 1 inch vertical
we should start with the most likely, it would be a large megaraptoran right?
If this weight range is true, it's possible that small allosaurs might have been able to jump if properly equipped.
There are some quite large (multi ton I believe) animals alive today that can jump surprisingly well for their size, but yeah, I thinking anything above four tons is probably a bit of a stretch..?
i wouldn't be shocked
ofc bipeds have way way more to figure out for jumping power
but like
i don't think its too crazy to say a 1 ton theropod could get great air time and abit bigger ones SOME
real question is could pachyrhinos get the 2 inches of fame
Lol imagine
one day they'll hit 3
they got plenty of time
would a ceratopsians mass of gravity even allow them to jump
is it center or mass
If at all, not well, given they are front heavy.
Apparently Giant Elands, which approach or exceed a ton in weight, have been recorded jumping nearly or over eight feet, and quite often jump fences.
i wonder if any ornithapods would be able to jump well
Ornithopods are a massive group so I wouldn't doubt it at all, especially ones with lighter frames and strong hind limbs.
https://x.com/LiterallyMiguel/status/1979631509452828979/photo/1 how would y'all rate this alamo reconstruction?
We don't really have that much of Alamo iirc but it looks really nice to me.
smaller ones yea
still crazy that one of alamo's closest relatives is salta
Titanosaurs were an incredibly diverse group of sauropods, coming in lots of sizes.
saltasauridae falls under titanosaurs?
ranging from Magy to Arg is a crazy size range lol
Yeah, it really is. Titanosaurs were such awesome animals imo.
and yet titanosaur isnt even a real dinosaur
There is a species known as titanosaurs, though it's not the best known. (Potentially dubious iirc)
exactly
Titanosaurs are my favorite Sauropods but I'm just a Late Cretaceous ecology enjoyer
what sauropod group was the main one during the early cretascous before the titanosaurs took over for late?
There were a few macronians like sauroposideon and astrodon, but I honestly don't know of much more.
Dicraeosaurids?
Dicraeosaurs also were pretty late surviving in some places though too
dicraeosaurids were somewhat common in south america, rebbachisaurids and brachiosaurids were very common, and a few groups of somphospondyls were pretty widespread
Titanosaurs already existed during the Early Cretaceous but were less dominant than by the Late Cretaceous
Although some of the smaller Sauropods were replaced by Hadrosaurs and other Ornithischians rather than Titanosaurs
Rebbachisaurs. At least in South America, things dominated the continent.
I believe they were prominent during the early Cretaceous but I could very well be wrong.
what other sauropod groups were around during the late cretascous? i dont remember
titanosaurs were doing well in the early cretaceous in SA but only radiated once everything else disappeared, africa too
Ig it also depends on what you count as “early Cretaceous” since some of the formations with a ton of rebbachisaurs are around 100 - 95, which some people can possibly consider to be leaning towards late
#makeAMidcretascous
Would be neat to have a official mid Cretaceous
brachiosaurs were basically everywhere with multiple ghost lineages though
did diplodocids make it the late cretascous? i dont remember
tbf the middle of the Cretaceous is 105.5 ma so 100-95 is just in the second half
Nope, the last were rebbachisaurs and those sadly died out alongside carcha’s and spino’s
so only titanosaurs?
I don't think so but dicraeosaurs and rebbachisaurs were somewhat derived from them
erm fishy they said diplodocids not diplodocoids
#BringBackDiplodocids
Not entirely
We maybe have some basal somphospondyl sauropods that made it to the maastrichtian, I believe we have one in the formation asiatyrannus was found in & another in titanovenator’s formation
thoughts on this post?
there’s a few things knocking around that are more basal than true titanosaurs yeah, diamantinasaurs are the big one
The late cretaceous is dominated by titanosaurs by the looks of it.
Rebirth only made it seem like people didn’t care about dinosaurs anymore because they had to since dominion was so bad and they had to find a way to soft retcon it out
As for the first movie…yeah idk why they had that line
Titanosaurs filled a niche that was kind of just immune to competition from other Dinosaur groups, smaller stuff like Dicraeosaurids would have had a lot more niche overlap with large Ornithopods, for example
