#paleontology
1 messages · Page 181 of 1
Because we are playing a game about it🤣
LMAo
🗣️ 🔥
Allow me to present the Allosaurus nut shot from the Stegosaurus thaggomizer
(while ignoring animal basics to push a argument)
the endless amount of paleoart to choose from and you'd rather pick the series known for inaccurate dinosaurs?
Don’t know, but am bored and want to debate this
well one has a 3d model that you can port and use for refrences like poses so yeah
Huincul Formation size comparison by Randomdinos
I'm not the one ignoring animals basics when you are the one saying that Stegos were almost like Ceratopsians🙄
@ashen wedge yes. Difficult to give a nutshot to an Allo when your body can't even sprint lol
well from what I've seen nothing they have is accurate except for maybe the utahraptor
Brand consistency is important for any franchise. I don't know why people act like these very typical of the brand designs are bad.
They're not, they're just mostly innacurate/outdated by design.
no one said they're bad, they just shouldn't be used as references for the actual dinosaurs
slow heavyset animals with a hyper specializing in defensive spikes and plating, one shielding and the other more fencing off, who lived with mega theropods in NA would be comparable lmao
“Velociraptor” without feathers has entered the chat
His plates were not defensive. Search it for yourself ehem. And you also lacked to say he had the brain size of a kitten, a small cute kitten lol
y'all literally arguing with someone called jesus
Allo did have hunting capabilities and was going for neck, rather than tails
and plating, they weren't namely for it yes( also brain size does not equal intelligence you know right, let alone intelligence being a undeterminable thing)
They don't learn right? Lool
Hehe I kidding
Guess what happened, it occurred and the Allosaurus died
Sure. The most successful predator of the Jurassic couldn't kill a slow moving animal. No Stegos died to Allos🤭
this whole "debate" if you can even call it that is like forcing a wolf to hunt like a tiger and wondering why its not doing well
"no stegos died to allos" ok cool so this is just about animal vs. animal and not about how an ecosystem works. yeah sounds about right
Bros defending stegosaurus like he’s one of em
god how i wish they'd do something about the people who come in here and ignore anything scientific to just talk about ooooo my favorite beats your favorite oooo
Please be polite and respectful to other members. If civil discussions cannot be had, we will be handing out mutes. Refer to our #rules.
was any of rex's usually prey faster then it or was it just edmonto?
No, I was being sarcastic😂
@native kindle then you don't need to worry about me no worries. I literally just passed pictures of real triceratops at the beginning
I would imagine they were faster than trikes, could be wrong tho
From what I heard, Rex could be a lil faster than trikes , but he def didn't have good stamina. Neither did trike. But Rex was just taller and 1 step was more meters than 1 step of trike.
They both were just ridiculously sized lol
Erm achtually, what you posted was a specimen of “torosaurus” named “Adam” from southern laramidia 🤓
Tyrannosaurus had great stamina, there's a few papers on that
Don't think even edmontos were faster, probably better at long distance walking though
Lol very true. That's right 😊 . However. Torosaurus still a prey of Rex so that's what I'm saying
But yes, thank you for the correction, I mean it
It would be nice to see Torosaurus and Denversaurus in more media
denversaurus is still in anky's basement
Actually, were there any big differences between Trikes and Torosaurus? They both were very alike. There specimens from both size of similar caliber
I always thought Triceratops was a big, just a bit bit bigger.
However, the Torosaurus in the pic is a monster
Torosaurus has a far larger frill, with either a pointier nasal horn or something similar to pachyrhinosaurus with a boss
True... and Trike was heavier and more muscular overall, right?
Tbh Adam doesn’t really seem that big, it’s just got a really big skull (though still quite large)
whos more of a bobblehead toro or eo?
"doesn't really seem that big" and his entire body (excluding the skull) dwarfs an elephant
I mean, well, for me he's crazy big, imagine you are Rex and you are about to fight and that dude gets on 2 legs and start doing broadcast calls
We don’t know about muscular but we do know that it could’ve definitely gotten larger than torosaurus
could ceratopsians even rear up on two legs?
Probably yeah
Perspective + the mount is reared up, an elephant would probably be about the same size
They would've walked bipedal
I know
For a little bit yes,
Nah they were more bipedal than Hadrosaurs, trust
Rolled around like a cartoon armadillo
Red Enemy Theri
But just like portrayed in the museum. Maybe get up to scream and then back to the floor
the only notable differences are in the skull, I don't think one was more muscular than the other, and tmk both have pretty big specimens
Ceratopsian Post-Cranial Skeletons aren't described very well iirc, so there might be more differences we dunno about
Maybe when Adam gets described in the year 2057
Yes and that will only be the skull description.
Getting Pete III treatment
By the way, talking about T Rex preys , the fact or T Rexs getting killed or injured by Ankylos shows how crazy they were lol
Elvis might be getting that treatment too
Rex could also hunt Quetzals, also curious
??
did you mean Rex?
His azzz is around the same area Willard azz was on a human to human comparison , he is without a doubt massive.
Yes 😂 🤣 😂 🤣 thank you again man
Imagine what a Rex could do to a Stego if its natural contemporary foe was torosaurus
Yo @fluid inlet you should make your pfp a Torosaurus for rage bait purposes
I don't know how this "debate" started, but can we all agree that the Stegosaurus from The Isle needs to be nerfed?
There's no reason that it needs to take three Deinosuchus to fight a Stegosaurus and the Stegosaurus hardly losing health
Just make Deinosuchus one shot Stego if it bites the head or neck, ez
That's the thing, it doesn't work
When did I say otherwise for you to say that
You implied it and inferred it, so I used force counteract force
i believe there is a specimen of a stegosaurus plate with allosaurus bite marks on it but yeah on success ratios doubt its gonna be favoring allo seeing....any large land predator apart from like 4 of em
heartbreaking - fishy is so rotted from pachytorosaurus he considers variable nasal morphology more diagnostic than the things parietal fenestrae
You can't see the success because they usually ended in Allosaurus belly.
I don't think it never ever happened in the whole world a prey having a bigger success rate than a predator lol. Give me just one example
thats...thats literally how prey animals live, by having vastly higher survival rates in a encounter, fight, flight,( most of the time detection and deflection) literally any mid sized complex organism rn
This is how predator prey relationships work, most hunts end in failure
Mm, I just fail to see how a slow dino with a tail as defence could outmaneuver a way faster dinosaur ready to bleed him out, honestly
If you put Stegos 600 speed in PoT we Will see how players can defend against Allos.
I know it's a weird example lol. And real life is way different, but you get more or less what I mean
the ability to turn is how( let alone said normal cases of just...spotting it and calling it out and not having much risk from a hunt)
stego rn for the game niche wise is just off is the thing, it'd need alot of rebalancing seeing being frail and fast for what it is, that and ingame allo is a stat wall
The higher ups won’t allow that.
Out of curiosity: Where's the line between intraspecies variation and new species when dealing with Fossils?
Yes
yes
Yes
yes
still amazed this thing existed
Baby maraapunisaurus 🔥
dicreosaurid maraapunisaurus...
whats the more accurate sizing?
Skeletal you posted, idk why cisio made it so big here
also, y'alls opinions on the patagotitan of jwe3?
some said it was good and someone said it trash, i need more opinions
It’s…fine, especially when compared to other sauropods
is what he said true?
Looks good to me….
But what do the feet look like…
I think they usually go off of frequency of said changes. Take Pachyrhinosaurus for example, it has 3 species with moderate differences. Prerotorum has a much more bulbous head and very minute spikes going up from the head to top of the frill. Canadensis still had a more rounded skull shape but no spikes running up to the frill top, and Lakustai looks more like Achelousaurus with a flatter boss and the 3 defined spikes just behind the brows and up the frill. It was debated whether they were different species or just variations but later time differences and frequency of each “template” aka each species we have defined now lead to them being 3 seperately species. Obviously it can still be debated as we can never know 100%, and Styracosaurus is just a headache. It has so much variation under 1 recognized species and many others being now junior/dubious genus names, like Rubeosaurus, Stellasaurus and Styracosaurus Ovatus. It’s all about frequency to conclude whether it was its own thing or just singular variation.
Thank you for the response, I knew it wasn’t going to be an easy answer.
I like talking about the variation/species argument, so you found the right guy 🤣 still I did miss a few things but it’s my best example right now
It's actually based on the person describing it and whether or not they feel like it's good enough
So typical biologist behavior 
Yup, in the famous words of a certain YouTuber, “If there’s one thing scientists love more than anything, it’s clout.”
It is the reason many people go into the scientific field after all. Might as well go for clout, seeing as scientists don’t get paid 
That’s true, but commissions from museums and institutions can help, like the Chicago Field museum. I donated there once, and there’s a log of donors and what was given.
Hoping to get there soon myself. It’s just far enough away to be a pain to day trip
The upstairs is strictly prehistoric and earth sciences. I won’t spoil much but there’s a looong exhibit of the entire earths history.
i think its pretty good design. Though i do think that the nasal bump that it has is a bit too much. Frontier could have easily had the female not have the nasal bump and only kept it for the males, still a decent design tbf.
💀 excessive censorship is excessive.
As for intraspecies variation, it’s a bit mind-boggling that we are describing things as different species given small differences in skull morphology. Meanwhile our species has pretty “wide” variation between skull shapes as an example
Was told to make the trip to the field museum a multi day trip 
If you make it a multi day trip, think about visiting the Aquarium and planetarium if it interests you. All 3 buildings are in the same 1milex1mile area.
ngl matt dempsey is a weird dude
please stop telling znniug the jwe patagotitan is a good reference, it isn't...
you want some goods ones here
Why?
he's quirky, weird in a good way
Its a good design, its not accurate. Those things aren't necessarily tied to each other.
@ancient crystal they were asking if its paleoaccurate
I didn't see that anywhere, maybe I'm too tired. But in that case, no, no it is not accurate.
i never asked if it was plaeo accurate..
you implied that when you asked if what I said about it was true
yeah because if i wanted to know what you said was true
is that not contradicting what you just said?
- arguing with me about jwe designs being accurate
thou shall not put thy words into thou's mouth
"You shall not put your words into your mouth"
your using the word your wrong
Doesn't thou translate only to your?
You wanna take this outside ?
i do
@white matrix
how tf did this guy name every species of plant, bacteria, animal, and everything else in just 8 minutes
Wikipedia
THEY GOT SPINOSAURUS PRETTY ACCURATE IN THE PRIMITIVE WAR TRAILER
This ain’t no walk in the park. Watch the full Primitive War trailer now.
'PRIMITIVE WAR' coming to theatres across the USA and Australia AUGUST 21 2025 proudly presented by Fathom Entertainment and Rialto Distribution. Followed by release worldwide.
From director Luke Sparke comes PRIMITIVE WAR based on the popular novel 'The Primitive War'...
look at this fat beauty
for a low budget film it looks nice
I was gonna say its wrinkly but if the budget is that low then its pretty good ig
The film only has a 12 million dollar budget, but this is a beauty regardless
100% gonna go see the movie
damn high tier beauty
dang, that is cheap
It also looks like they're gonna be fighting off either accurate Velociraptors or Deinonychus, can't really tell based on the scene
I should prolly read the book
And the dinosaurs move much more better than the rocks 🪨 of wwd2
Jurassic World Dominion 2 is def a monster
The rex is a bit copy/paste but it has some beauty to it
INCLUDING LIPS BABY
you can pretty much base off the scene that those are either Deinonychus or Dromeosaurus. Velociraptor has a thinner skull
Are you sure that’s Rex this looks like Rex and doesn’t have no spikes on this side of it’s head
Those are feathers, not spikes. I think it's just the angle here that makes it look different
I ain't expecting a lot of accuracy, they got a random hadrosaur herd of what I think are supposed to be edmontosaurus with exaggerated crests. My guess is that the smaller dromeosaurs are gonna be called Velociraptor but we'll all know deep down they are Deinonychus
Excited for the Utahraptors though
they have a sauropod that looks a LOT like JW apato. Also it seems that there are 2 different raptors. The tiny, more colorful ones that are wolf-sized and the Utahs that are brown
Those def thorns or spikes or quills
I don't much like the sauropod or the Rex too much, but I love the two different raptors instead of just having Utahraptor
this is def JW apa, I hope they replace it in the final cut
rex is alright and everything else is peak but please no JW apato
Utahraptor looks pretty good though, size accurate too
So what would your guess on this dino being?
If they make it just dimorphism where one rex has spikes and the other doesn't I am genuinely going to crash out
why
its called an angle
the main antagonists are utahraptor, but I would definitely recommend the first book it’s good (second book is trash)
Because spikes on two Rexes seems cooler than just one if they're going for a spiked Rex
@winter marsh doesn't look like the angle, the spikes would show, or the tiny feathers around the spikes would in some sense
Two different Rexes I’m guessing
they are probably quills and are laid down kind of like how cockatoos lay their feather crest down
What are the tiny raptors if you know? They look kinda like they would be a little significant to get 3 different shots in the trailer
the littler ones are deinonychus iirc
Heck yeah
the vietnamese unleashed their rabid chicken
literally me
Yeah def two different Rexes
oh then yep
upside is they got lips
Finally some Rexes that won't need to deal with tooth decay
and no broken wrists
I know these scene is gonna be so not hype in theaters, too high of a budget needed for a guy to fight off a pack of Dromeosaurs with a knife. My guess is a Rex is gonna come and bite him in half before the fight starts
This movie is gonna be so cheesey but i'm gonna love it
I can’t contain my hype for this movie
I like the Rex that doesn’t have the Quills a lot more.
honestly hope its good, looks nice so far
This is going to be fun
If this was Bollywood the guy would’ve done some sort of martial art and beat all the raptors up like scrat from the second ice age movie
Implying that won’t happen
If it doesn’t I’m giving the movie one star
Honestly kinda dig the feathered lipped JP style Rex, I’d rather have accuracy but the vibe is cool lol
I do wonder if they'll keep the "Freaky-Freaky tongue" that the quetz has in some of the artwork of Primitive War, looks very nice regardless.
Disgusting, fowl, mangy, beast of the damned
A single large stick to the tibia:
what theoretically had a stronger lifting strength, deinocherius or suchomimus?
basically im asking who had stronger arms
@balmy oyster do you have the paper about the last thing abt the megaraptorids?
deinocheirus would have more leverage with the way its hips are oriented
is this finally showing now, bro ? 😮 🥹
I like how they are actually showing dinosaurs being shot- it's something very realistic that the jurassic franchise seems afraid to show nowadays.
as long as it is more realistic than JP, where there is actually lots of people getting eaten, i am all in 👐 🔥
exactly 💯
everyone is sick of unrealistic stuff
not yet bro aug 22
not gonna lie, i can't freakin wait 😅
i already got my 🍻 🍺 ready 😂
Best part is it's gonna be rated R so you know we're in for it
Stego would still give Rex a run for its money if it doesn’t go for the head straight away
Also is there any way that Ugrunaalak is an actual genus?
Vro found Lucy the Australopithecus before GTA 6 💀
Wait how do they know it’s female?
The hips iirc
You can tell the gender of apes (human and non human) based on the hip morphology when it comes to skeletons
yo @stark roost just wanna let you know that you have now sent me down a rabbit hole about Australopithecines. My night is now wasted in the pursuit of knowledge about our ancestors
Its nice to see someone here taking interest in extinct hominids.
lol 😭
Extinct hominids always got my mind, my pfp is literally Ardipithecus with some crappy microsoft paint over it
Oh! I actually couldn't tell what exactly your pfp was from a distance, that's awesome.
my great something or another grand cousin
This reconstruction looks weird to me without the drawn on clothing. I've had this pfp for a few months now and this scares me
African Hominin timeline because i'm bored (wikipedia)
Ape.
look in the mirror buddy, you'll see another one
I think at least a partial reason for you finding it uncanny is how like- directly forwarding and symmetrical she's drawn?
no it's not uncanny, Its just that i've been exposed to my current pfp where she is all dressed up fancy like a rich person, and then I see the original paleoart I drew over and it looks weird
It's like seeing a person you've only seen with a beard without a beard
Oh! I get it! That makes sense.
Mhm! Sometimes I just say ape when looking at one- idk why exactly.
bruh why is the H. naledi page photo aura farming
where did azdarchids punching come from?
just made my own sloppy paint pfp lol but I prob will only use it on steam
Just saw this on paleotok
Is there a accurate size chart for a bunch of sauropods similar to this?
It doesn't matter where Rex bites lol. He would crush everything..
Acting as if stego also didn’t get to a comparable size to trikes, also acting as if stegos thagomizer doesn’t exist
is that a joke?
rex would look at that and say "screw this chit" 💀
by the way, that is a toro, right?
That what you see in the pic was usual fight for T Rex. And yes, it's a toro
freaking massive
what weight you think it was?
8-10t
He was between 6 and 7 tons
That's what the experts says about him hehe
T Rexes were usually between 9 or 10
Rex is usually between 7-8, only 4 Rex’s above 10t well 3 Goliath ain’t described
Actually re looking 10t is a over estimate for it, it looks of a similar size to a 7t trike
There are indeed some Rex specimens that weighted 10 tons. More than 1.
The fact that we can find after ather 66 millions years it means they were not rare at all tbf
I just said there were 3. But out of the Rex specimens we do have they are the minority, with the average for Rex being around 8t
Yep, that's right, but we don't get 10 tons trike for example is what I mean hehe
We do have 10t trikes tho, iirc there’s also 3
On average trike and Rex seemed to get to a similar weight
Even ignoring the two real big edmonto specimens, there were still some decently large specimens at around 8 - 10 tons too
Could I know names?
Rex is “usually” around 7 - 8, 9 - 10 is more of an upper “average”
Oh yes, but just saying maybe they were more usual than expected. Or at least, not as unusual
anyone have access to this paper? I have no idea how to get the article
(btw I still feel like the snout they made is kinda shallow. They only make the braincase deep enough and the whole head looks like a strange narrow triangle. It would be much better if they make the premaxilla and maxilla taller for the adult)
Fun fact the largest herbivore during the permian was the cotylorhynchus, it's barrel shaped ribs and body helped it survive predation. It's name after its tiny head.
Blob of gluttony
I hate that this thing was the size of a small hippo.
Tarbosaurus weight?
See because Megalainia had a crest on its skull would that mean it has a real strong bite force or is that exclusive to mammals?
1: I don't think at full skull is known from megalania, that's probably an estimation of it.
2: With the biting style and jaw mechanics of varanids, it wouldn't make sense if they had a bite that inflicted absurd amounts of force- rather their skulls would be good at withstanding strain from pulling motions.
3: Yes, the jaw muscle attachment points for reptiles and mammals vary drastically.
5.4t basically just ~5t
However, none of these factors make their bites less lethal by any means. They would be terrifyingly effective at inflicting gashing wounds and cutting through flesh.
Monitor lizards do have exceptionally strong bite forces compared to most other lizards (tegus even more so), but generally lizards aren’t adapted for strong bites, while a lot of mammals are. Crocodilians come out far on top in that category.
Huh that's really interesting actually thank you and @last adder for teaching me this !
Any time! :>
For reference, human bite-force is within 100-200lb psi range, Komodos are in 500-600 range, A lion 600-1000, Crocodiles can get close to 4000lb psi
Yeah, they can still bite down really hard, just not to the same degree as other animals more specially refined for a crushing bite.
when the hell is the Willard description going to be published?
why do everything in paleo takes decades? 😭
Never
PSI...
Pounds per Square Inch
I think the point of the message was that PSI is horrible due to how variable it can be just from the measurement point
6-7
Use Newtons , is just better and more Precise overall
And Tmk Komodo's Bite Forces aren't that Strong, But their Strength Combined with its Teeth is more than Enough go cause major Dmg
Jarvis, please provide an accurate and reliable source detailing how much is reconstructed and how much is real
And even so they don't really use their bite force to their full potential they just 'nibble' to inject the venom
Adam should be about this Complete (ignore the skeletal itself just focus on the Material)
Maybe one day we can get an accurate and detailed description instead of a skeletal mount 
Real
the white is what it's actually known from btw 
Are you /j or /srs
the fact this would be one of the largest land creatures if it was around today...
i need someone to compare this thing to allo, torvo and cerato
The fact we have no idea what it’s size or body shape is based off of just a skull is a thing 😄
then how do we know its a dicreosaurid
Might be the neck vertebrae
only known from the skull, which isnt exactly the most reliable
and WIllard is probably the best contender for most reliable whenever it gets described
Thought there was more to them than just their skulls 🥀
what do y'all think we'll find first, 10 ton reliable trike ot 10 ton reliable stego
smitanosaurus and its victims
Why do I even bother with TikTok commenters bruh
"Even if annectens did have a head crest it would be smaller than the one on regalis" my guy where are you getting this from 🥀
only saving grace is that one regalis speicmen or well some don't depict the crest
I'm fine with either being depicted with a crest, it's just when people say annectens didn't have a crest based on the fact that we haven't found one with a crest
Like gang it's a miracle we found regalis with one
Paleo Conspiracy Theory Time #2: What if Dinosaurs still roam the Earth and we are all ghosts that exist in an after life that were all killed by dinosaurs
shouldnt dinosaurs that were killed by other dinosaurs be here then
It’s because we are the dinosaurs that were killed
The dinosaurs are the friends we made along the way
I like it when people just make headcanons about dinosaurs and present them as reality
Yeah I wouldn't use those, the bars ones aren't accurate at all and the rhamph one is using a younger individual/smaller adult
some of them seem good but I feel that it's problematic to use images that are at very different persepctives
Cool video though, but I would take most of it as actually accurate
I think we have to reduce the size of some species, for example the allosaurus, it is much bigger than normal
I remember getting a snapback by someone about therizinosaurus being hostile and solitary
like dude don't we have therizinosaur nesting colonies? I swore we did
You can blame ark for that one
We don’t have to reduce the size of anything it’s a game not a documentary
I would like to reduce the size of sarco just to make the sarco mains even more angry
Ok then let's make them the same size as the ark and add the velociraptor from jurassic park, is that okay with you?
Nothing in this game size is that different lol
That's assuming you're going based on the type species (Fragilis), and not the biggest one at the time Allo was added (Jimmadseni)
I remember people tried aksong Nizar for his height to scale willard 😭
@stiff osprey is this paper still accurate and can you pls reply ping me for your response? https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.06.13.596099v1.full
He’s 6’2 2 inches shorter than me and 20 inches taller than you.
Rumblr be quite or I’ll show you perucetus current state again 🤫
Is suchomimus 6 tons now?
@opaque kayak
Same
make a move
Isn’t fragilis larger than jimmadseni tho
POT Allo is about 11.3-11.4m
It appears I have been lied to for 3 years and never bothered to fact check
Yes, specially when "Epanterias" is just Fragilis which is just overkill
Instagram is hating 💔🥀
no its not, its based on Loewen 2009
“Epanterias” back into possible validity? 
Lmao it happens to us all
was the apex of the morrison, camarasaurus, also a target of smitanosaurus?
Allosaurus has direct evidence of it iirc
Didn't Random said "Epanterias" was just Fragilis?
Epanterias is valid?
Thought it was just Fragilis, Anax, Jimmadseni and the now debated Europaeus
i knew smitanosaurus hunted allosaurus
I need help for an explanation I'm seeing so many videos of this going around on tiktok and its driving me crazyyy! Is it real fake or is it a just a different dinosaur and is a sauropod i been losing my mind over it!
What’s the name?
This probably does not exist
laeviatanus imperator trust me I search the web for it and found nothing but I still don't know because Google sometimes doesn't show everything
it says in the image
After some looking up, this ain’t real, otherwise there would be more things on it online and through some articles and not devianart
So people just making this thing seem like it's a real thing got it
search up who daniel onguene is
This what you was looking for nothing on Google for him
What is epanterias assigned to then?
What do you guys consider the most underrated dinosaur groups?
Tyrannosaurus rex nobody ever talks about it
I was gonna say pterosaurs and who could forget the dimetrodon
Spinosaurus for sure
Hey this channel is back where its supposed to be
This makes no sense sorry hehe
Pachycephalosauria. Legit never seen a convo abt them for some reason
They are pretty understood and have had like, 2 controversies
Ornithomimosaurs probably, outside of the popular few
What's the average stegos weight?

Holy moly
jobaria the best guy
Jobaria has a j.o.b.
Dempsey after stretching the animal in one direction more than intended to make it 50% larger
Wait a minute
Hold on I didn’t even realize this what did he do to his patagotitan???
Looks like a diplodocid
Worlds smallest sauropod(Its farm sized)
There's smaller
Either dubious or immature
I just scaled cf.argentinosaurus with patagotitan and got 106,934 Kilograms 💀
Dosent magy weigh less then europasaurus?
Magy is the dubious one
Reason why spino would at least be not fully lipped is because the teeth angle out weirdly so if it would’ve had full on lips then they would need to be very excessive and go against what we know about archosaur soft tissue
25 tons carnivor theropod? holy ... 😮
Would spinosauridae not have lips or just spino?
Just spino
and where is that? lol
I don't really see why they would need them, like from a practical perspective they wouldn't need them, hold water? they live in water. Handle Bacteria? they live in bacteria, plus it would be harder for them to eat fish since their lips might get in the way. Plus fish are slippery
Above the meme channel, they swapped
oh, you keep track of that? 😆
I think non-spinosaurine spinosaurids would’ve been more likely to have full on lips since I believe some like Suchomimus’s teeth are more “normal” compared to spino’s
whats your thoughts on this lipped spino
i think looks good with lips and also without 😎
Humans are really dumb that this is “ground breaking”
Thought we all figured this stuff out when we saw crows snowboarding.
lol, and they spend 127 million dollars, and 20 years of research just to come to that conclusion 😂
Looks ugly 👎 and unrealistic 👎
I love the shelled pseudosauropods
Because we're self centered idiots who like to try and separate ourselves from the natural world.
Yeah it’s very annoying
All of us here on this planet really aren't as different as most people like to believe lmao. We're just another type of animal- but a peculiar one at that.
Alongside the lips and excessive soft tissue on the snout (and being incredibly smooth/having no wrinkling/texture variation or imperfections like a lot of modern paleoart fails to include) I also think that the neck looks strangely attached to the body, same with how the head connects to the neck.
And in a perfect world that wouldn't be seen as a negative thing by so many..
Setting yourself above other animals is a good strategy to keep your species alive, just one that isn't true.
Except for me, i'm better than everything.
raptorex victim
I forgot that thing was ever a thing.
The only depiction i've ever seen of it was in Dinosaur Train. I think it had a skateboard in that show.
Not necessarily.
Just see where it's gotten humans now.. slowly creating the perfect conditions to wipe ourselves out thanks to corporate greed.
Long term survival is a mix of collaboration- both direct and indirect- and competition. Everything relies on something else.
Time for another Paleo Conspiracy Theory
What if the Terror Birds are still alive, and governments have kept them hidden to prevent mass outbreaks of panic?
That kind of sounds like the premise of some crazy action adventure movie lmao.
Alright, I will write a movie script (since I am currently a film major and plan on being a director) and find Nicholas Cage and ask him to star in this cheesy film
Quick, I need more ideas to go with this premise
Dam, alright, so I’ll use the plot for 65 have Nicholas Cage star in it and have him go ham with the role
Bruh lmao
You said to be more unique
It could be good if actually done well, yeah.
Unlike the creators of 65, I do know what was around and alive 65 million years ago (aka not the non-avian dinosaurs, but the start of the age of the mammals)
Something like that would be genuinely interesting- exploring a world recently after a mass extinction event took place.
Agreed
I'm sure you could also make a lot of story elements much better than the uh- actual 65 movie..
Yeah, I’ve unfortunately seen parts of the movie, but luckily I’ve seen RickRaptor’s review of it
Apparently there somehow existed 7 meter sharks who survived kpg, or lived right after it 
tbh I bet there were like, a couple of non avians still hanging on
Maybe for at least few thousand years after the KPG, but I think by 65 million they were completely extinct
A lot of times, the devastation of the KT extinction seems to be really undermined- at least to me.
But yeah, I wouldn't doubt that some dinosaur populations survived, probably those on the other side of the planet from the impact site though-
Probably not for long since the dust clouds from the impact would have began choking out the remaining larger populations of all species (including mammals, birds, and non-avian dinosaurs)
Yeah, definitely.
Not to mention that the entire world was going through complete ecological collapse-
Although, I do believe that with the absence of light, most of the plants will not blossom or grow nearly as much, taking out all of the larger herbivores, which then takes out the predators, then the scavengers, and the scavenger’s scavengers to have survived on land at least
I'm pretty sure photosynthesis would've come to a complete stop for many years because of all the atmospheric debris- its possible the surface of the planet wasn't even visible from space.
It’s possible, but I think it would still have continued although not to a large extent
Yeah, I wouldn't doubt that at least some light got through.
Theoretically what's the biggest creature a real life hatz could pick up
Would a Martian-style survival film with time travel and dinosaurs be a good watch?
It's really hard to estimate something like that, but I would assume they'd be able to pick up at least a fraction of their own weight.
I feel like a full grown conc is a bit big for how brittle they look
At the VERY most I'd say something like- 100-200 pounds?
Definitely not like what it can lift in PoT, but I'd assume a smaller end dinosaur would be fair game.
Any dinosaur movie would be awesome right now, JP and JW is a dead franchise
Conc is like the same weight as hatz if not heavier
so definitely not something conc sized
Cowshark?
Xampylodon sp.
Did Albertosaurus have more of a bone breaking bite or flesh ripping bite?
did nanotyrannus have more of a bacterial poisonous bite or an obligate scavenger bite
GOOGLE! What is this?!
I think flesh ripping
?
They added sounds for some dinosaurs
Is there a lore reason why we dont know what dinos sound like? Are we stupid?
yep, almost identical
I think its too coincidental we're the only sentient species
We’re not though
I’d argue we aren’t even the ONLY sapient species either. We may be super advanced, but building structures and weapons does not always equate to sapience.
Other creatures had the chance to rise with us and yet we're the only ones to have established civilizations, globally at that I might add
We’re a special occurrence, we were a decently sized mammal that was prone to speciation and highly adaptable to different climates, as well as being capable of hunting down prey items we shouldn’t have realistically been able to.
It was all just a lot of things that added up to us being able to take over the entire planet, instead of crows or squids.
Not to mention that said other sapient species just don’t require tools or shelters to continue existing. Crows can fly, dolphins don’t really have any limbs but they have echolocation and essentially limitless area to move around in, and octopi are effectively tentacled blobs that can fit into any crevice and do…anything, really.
Either way u wanna think abt it, however u think abt how we came to be, it always boils down to us being special in some way
It’s also important to remember that human development only ever really kicked off from the past ~5000/6000 years. Over the past 5 - 6 million years we haven’t really changed all too much, while in the last 2000 and even last 100 we’ve exploded with innovation
Definitely, what happened with human species seems to be a super rare, if not once a lifetime occurrence
Human evolution is rather interesting, since you’d never expect the balding bipedal apes to be the most successful species
True lol
maybe our adaptability was what made the difference
I’m certain, as well as a pretty lengthy lifespan and our eventual understanding of better ways to care/heal one another, and finally understanding all other food options and means to farm them if possible
I missread what the person I replied to said 💔
Thought he was saying epant was valid so I responded with saying it’s not based on Loewen 2009 which lumps it
given the mind boggling size of the Universe, i do believe there is a huge amount of other sentient species out there
so maybe not so special after all...
Adaptability yes, evolution i just don't see. We've observed adaptation but not evolution. Until those Sea wolves grow gills and Paddle feet i don't subscribe to it
Fragilis
Unknown
Oh cmon you'd think of all ppl you'd know stego
I do, but the average isn’t possible to get atm
Lol
some people might feel uncomfortable, others might say its just conspiracy a theory
but the ufo phenomenon is real, and so i sometimes think that some of the ufo pilots could even be a dinosauroid species that actually survived the asteroid strike 66 million years ago
so intelligent after so many millions of years of evolution that they live on Earth completely undetected (underground, underwater, or even inside the moon and other planets)
throughout history, most people faced ridicule for their groundbreaking theories that were later proven correct (Albert Einstein, Nicolas Copernicous, Alfred Wegener, Ignaz Semmelweis, Robert Bakker, and so on...)
if you don't know why some of these people were ridiculed, look them up, here is such an example:
this guy was institutionalized and died in an asylum, like are you f serious?
all while everyone else laughed and harassed him
Your on that za for sure
paleontologist Robert Bakker was so ridiculed that was even nicknamed the "dinosaur heretic"
by the way, he is the one who theorized that dinosaurs were more bird like than reptiles
don’t you mean to say dinosaurs are more like birds than other reptiles?
Option B:
birds are reptiles so dinosaurs can’t be more like birds than reptiles because that’s illogical
see this?
this is exactly what i am talking about
some people are so comfortable to their beliefs that they just ridicule other's theories without even thinking about the possibility 😅
To be fair you tried to tie in human stupidity with dinosaurs going into space and surviving for 66 million years to come back and harass humanity.
People ridicule theories like yours because they are founded by zero scientific evidence, this is why conspiracy theory’s are disliked so much
personally I prefer believing things because of solid evidence rather than appeal to ignorance fallacy
Not to mention if they did either go into space or stay underground, why would they be humanoid? What’s stopping evolutionary pressure into turning them into some sort of mole like animals
And why would they have even stayed in space/underground after the extinction event had ended???
And if they did go into space there’s no guaranteed they would ever find a reason to return to earth, since if they did leave around the time the asteroid hit they’d rather take their chances elsewhere (and there’s no saying they would even remotely exist for millions of years before extinction)
i am already expecting to be ridiculed, and so that doesn't even bother me 
i know who i am and what i believe in 💥
I’m out now
Because what you said was just…silly. Dinosaurs going into space and becoming humanoid and living on for 66 million years is just silly.
but also, people ridicule what they cannot comprehend
Idk what this conversation is 😭 can we go back to talking about which dinosaur is cooler and why it would win in a fight
yes, Vividsky, with all due respect, some people prefer not to step out of their confort zone
I can’t tell if this is biblical levels of trolling or if you’re losing your mind

🍿
so how would you fellas rank the new hammond collection figures from comic con in accuracy
they could be anything bro, the way they look is up to imagination
why not?
its silly to you and i respect your opinion 
but i know what i am talking about, bro 😉
If aliens are real (and they have a probable chance of being so) there is no reason to conclude they are dinosaurian. At that point I believe aliens being actual extraterrestrial organisms not tied to earth whatsoever would be more realistic than non avian dinosaurs surviving for 66 million years and becoming humanoid.
I’d argue jordan peele’s take on “U.F.O.’s” is more grounded and based on what we know of science and evolution.
At the end of the day though, you shouldn’t be stopped to believe what you think may be true as long as you’re not enforcing it onto others or using it for any other harmful ways. It’s definitely cool to think about if it is true and it has a lot of implications about how we know how civilizations and evolution work.
it is okay to be afraid of the unknown, bro 
Okay what are you even trying to do
I’m not “afraid” of this topic? 😭
Plus also this too, I shouldn’t be the end all for what you believe in as well
of course bro, i only argue that its a possibility
i meant no disrespect 
Why would “alien” dinosaurs continue living in such horrible conditions when the option to just return to their original and natural homes exists???
Why don’t fish evolve powered flight and eat mice
And no alien dinosaurs aren’t something I cannot comprehend it is simply something that is very and I mean VERY unlikely due to the lack of evidence and such
The feeble eagle and cat.. convergence with fish?…
who knows, bro
maybe they just want to be undetected for some reason
i do not know everything, that i totally admit
the world we live in is all kinds of weird, specially now
just look at the news of war and stuff, it almost feels unreal, doesn't it?
While i understand how the conversation got to this point this seems to have moved away from the paleontology topic of the channel. I would suggest to move the conversation to dms or a different discord server, thank you!
i understand, but the lack of evidence doesn't mean it is impossible
Humans have been on the earth for only the past 200k years, the kt extinction has ended millions of years ago so unless the dinosaurs didn’t want to get detected by early cenozoic mammals and reptiles then they have no reason to hide from anything that was on earth back then.
copy that 🫡
Plus if they were intelligent enough to build spaceships they could’ve found a way to clear out the atmosphere quickly and re-establish themselves back on earth
Best guess is IF they did that…they began hating each other like people and blew each other up and continued the extinction event they tried to clear up lol..
i can no longer comment, bro
we were told to change the topic 😅
Penguin
Oh yeah sorry, that reminds me why I originally came to this channel. Wanted to ask if T.mcraeensis is still a valid species of tyrannosaur??
Maybe, really just depends on who you ask. Most consider it valid atm
From what I’ve heard it’s definitely become contested
I think it’s still plausible but for it to become fully confirmed we’d need better material
This punk
Also new Daspleto specimen got described, we have more horneri now
Awesome
Alright thank you very much for the reply
I’ve recently gotten back into paleontology and such so I don’t got a single clue what your on about, that’s a sign that I should start researching into this stuff more soon
the 2nd Daspleto species has another specimen now, from Dinosaur park formation
https://youtu.be/RluFC147aS0?si=vCUMc7q4POwPi6g5 love how it goes from good going to no hope so quick. The story of life.
Provided to YouTube by IIP-DDS
New Adventures · Lorne Balfe
The First Frontier: Chapter 2 (Soundtrack from the Netflix Series "Life On Our Planet")
℗ Netflix Music, LLC
Released on: 2023-10-20
Producer: Lorne Balfe
Producer: Rufio Sandilands
Producer: Alfie Godfrey
Composer: Lorne Balfe
Auto-generated by YouTube.
Just to recap this is Paleo chat right?
Idk broylent green
What's up with the hype of Laeviatanus imperator? 🤔
Legit?
willing to bet my entire life savings that this isn’t legit
A) Not legit
B) It’s made by a 14 y/o on DeviantArt
C) The soft tissue silhouette is obviously bloated for the very specific reason of being the “largest” theropod
D) This kid has a track record for doing this
E) Why can’t my joke posts blow up like this
Sorry, but no lol
The vertebrae are real btw, they were found in Brazil and described in 2024. The interpretation of it as an obese giganotosaurine named Laeviatanus is fake
Most likely they belong to a basal carcharodontosaurian that rivals if not exceeds T.rex in size, but two partial vertebrae is not enough to say for sure
I don't even know how people look at that image and even consider it being real
LaeviatWHAT
It ain’t legit
Bruh what did I miss here, and why is that image here YET AGAIN-
Don’t know, my best guess is that it reappeared
-
I don't know
-
Either ragebait, or people not understanding the near impossibility of a 25 ton theropod
In all seriousness this is fake from a mile away, all what it takes is a quick google search to see it ain’t real
I'll never understand how people get so infatuated with extremely fragmentary specimens and then proceed to exaggerate and glaze them like a cinnamon roll.
Or just even looking closely at the silhouette. Makes it pretty obvious
It just looks like if we made Saurophaganax Maximus (Allosaurus Anax) more huge and bulkier
guy who has never heard of acrocanthosaurus:
I have heard of it, I just don’t love Acro enough to use it
Can we maybe just like, stop talking about it, and discuss something with actual knowledge behind it?
I think saying it’s fake is little harsh. sure it’s misleading but it’s not a blatant lie
Also I just saw it’s based on a 12t 13m giga estimated lel

At the current moment, it ain’t a theropod, and the creator of that image did say it was fake
what is wrong with discussing paleontology in the paleo channel?
Because the creature being discussed is fake, as it was created by a DevianArt User
@ashen wedge
Something about dragging out a conversation of an extremely bloated theropod conjured from the dreams of a 14 year old just feels wrong.
I saw that, and I’m not disputing the vertebrae, I’m disputing it being a gigantic carcharodontosaur
@ashen wedge @ashen wedge
Did you even read the post? As it says it can’t be certain based on the vertabrae, so stop trying to use this as a gotcha
I think its funny a 14 year old's dinosaur OC has ragebaited this channel more successfully than some people who come here to do it intentionally
“most likely” sounds pretty different to “fake” and “created by a Deviantart user”
The fossil isn't fake, the bloated silhouette and the possible identity of the dinosaur is.
Alright, so you are ignoring what I said, and it’s unlikely to determine what an animal is based on two vertebrae alone, and then to assume it’s a gigantic theropod that exceeds anything in our paleontological record and the name of the dinosaur is fake
Can we switch topics?
I don’t dispute most of what you said
Yes
What parts do you disagree with?
I’m wrong you’re right let’s switch topics
Mhm…. You are a professional ragebaiter, so I’ll just say this, Troodon is the best name for an invalid genius
Carcha Iguidensis is real 🥹
Not disputing that
do you happen to have any link, photos, or more info to the description of that "alleged" 25 ton giganotosaurus ?
any claimed theropod bigger than trex is of great public interest 🥳
"25 ton giganotosaurus"
More like indeterminate Carcharodontosaurian (also bloated weight)
well, yes, of course 😅
A 25 ton giga would be over a quarter the size of the largest terrestrial animal known
bro, and what is exactly your reasoning to claim this to be a "near impossibility" ?
i mean, it does sound outlandish at first, but there could still be all kinds of huge fossils somewhere that we don't even have a clue about
why limiting yourself to the current standard just to agree with the herd, so to speak ?
.
and before anyones asks, no, this is not rage bait 😅
better ref
Brazilsaurus...
GNG WHY IS THIS SO DAMN PEAK ( @kiracuriee ) like gng there are tear in my damn eyes I AM CRYING
I'd love for spino to get a speculative spiky dewlap-beard like Metri or Bars
I really hope Spino will get some spicy subs when it comes to sail, tail and nasal crest
I also hope it won't have weird textures like Sucho does on its face
@ancient crystal
have you read the 70 % bigger trex size estimate 2024 paper ?
so basically, scientists found that trex could have reached 15 tons
Publishing hypothetical estimates instead of making it a small blog was the definition of hidden catastrophe
This is not at all the point of the study lmao
either way, this was not a "devian art" kid making the claims
it was made by actual scientist in the paleo field
wether we like it or not, scientific discoveries are always changing, that is a fact ✅
Whether we like it or not, the situations are not comparable
One is a DA kid making up things so they have a theropod bigger than T. rex
The other is logical reasoning that anyone working with living animals would realize but with a solid number attached to it
the main point i am making here is that what seems strange and ridiculous now, can become a fact later 💥
as history shows
Then explain how I'm wrong in that these situations differ
There's a stark contrast between "I made this up but it'll probably be right in the future because science is always changing 😝"
And "We have a limited number of specimens so the animal could get larger, but by how much, we are unsure." being turned into "Based on alligators, we can hypothesize that the largest hypothetical max for T. rex specifically would be about 70% larger than the largest known T. rex"
it is a normal human behavior to feel threatened by the unknown
usually, nobody likes to realize that everything that was once learned could one day be wrong, we humans tend to get attached to our current knowledge
that is one reason why whenever anyone has any groundbreaking ideas, the majority of people push back, sometimes as if by instict
Ok cool
Now can you properly answer what I asked here instead of some weird preaching behavior you seem to revert to when you're wrong
Carl Sagan```
Always remember this quote! Good one to live by
Guys, they're ragebaiting, there's a reason I haven't reaponded to their pings
and then, whenever humans get triggered for some reason, they start to say things like "you are wrong" and stuff like that 
how did dinosaurs divorce if they dont have thumbs to sign the papers?
They didn't because divorce was invented by Big Paper to sell more paper
and here i thought this channel would be informative XD thanks for showing me its not
what would y'all say was more common for a tyrannosaurids diet, ceratopsians or hadrosaurs?
bro, this quote is so recycled
♻️
to the point that is not effective anymore, lol
and yet here you are still not answering and still just preaching
An isotopic study on Tarbosaurus revealed it didn't care. If it lived in the area, it was on the dinner plate
I think there's been speculative niche partitioning between Gorgosaurus and Daspletosaurus but it's not too bountiful in evidence
Once upon a time it was, still can be on occassion. But being attached to a dinosaur survival game populated mostly by children isn't doing this paleochat any favors
would gorgo and dasp even need to niche partition? also, what was the niche partitioning suggested?
I think it was Gorgo went for the armored prey (ankylosaurs and ceratopsians) whereas Daspleto went for the hadrosaurs
i wonder how they came to that conclusion
I'll also add it's a public chat so the occasional nuisance trying to be funny and reactive will pop up but overall, if you need a question answered, you'll get it answered
do you guys think gorgo and alberta were close enough to cross-breed?
are any other topics discussed here exept from megatheropods?
yes, nanotyrannus
I mean yes, but considering this specific chat is sparked by questions and most questions revolve around large theropods, it's the most common discussion point
If you have anything newer you'd like to ask or discuss, feel free
like brachiopoda or echinodermata? ah okay got it
those words are too big, what are those
They aren't my specialty, but I'm a studying marine biologist so I might have some answers
anything paleontology related, just be careful whenever trying to discuss any topic out of the ordinary as it can trigger some people 
Echidnas not being in Echinodermata is a crime against humanity, I think
Considering how quicker hadrosaurs are to catch probably ceratopians or least the smaller variety mostly
brachiopoda - sea animals with two hard shells like clams. echinodermata - sea urchin and starfish. my question is: why are there siliceous sediments around the antarctic region?
Is there any reason to assume there should not be?
do we know the diving capibilities of prehestoric marine reptiles?
high diatom productivity, upwelling, effective silicon pump, and preservation
these combine to create a region of high diatom abundance and biogenic silica production
that leads to the formation of the "opal belt" of siliceous sediments
i ment what fauna and flora lived there to make such huge deposits possible. siliceouis sedimets stem from dead live like sponges. i just want to know when this was the case and what the enviromet looked like during that time sincew i cant find a fitting answere in my book here. Also it might have something to to with the carbonate compensation dept but i couldnt find a map that shows the dept there
So cold water silica based reefs are a possibility, but I'm away from my notes which would tell me when these would be common
There are other, microbial reasons such as diatoms, but I don't deal in microbiology so I couldn't give you any good information
thx
THEORY: The real reason INGEN created the indominus Rex is to make a dinosaur that could get legally divorced
Hence the thumbs
“The indominus Rex, brought to you by John and sons divorce lawyers”
@robust kite
to be more specific, as i mentioned before, bro
the waters near antarctica are rich in nutrients such a silicic acid (dissolved silica) that fuels the growth of diatoms
the upwelling of circumpolar deep water brings a constant supply of dissolved silicic acid to the surface
the southern ocean acts like a silicon pump trapping and recycling silicas
and then, cold water temperatures contribute to better preservation of diatom shells in the sedimentz

i think there was noting of potential prefferences in diet
I mean yea, but were they not personal preferences
Midtarctica
Yes in a few instances, decompression causes some pathologies and changes an organisms chemistry
im gonna assume itchyosaurs are potentially the deepest diving marine reptile?
Deepest diving marine reptile is probably Abyssosaurus, a Cryptocleidid plesiosaur. I think some Ichthyosaurs are thought to be deep divers but there are fewer evidences for them.
some would say the deepest diving marine reptile was Spinosaurus
Imo its easily cartorhynchus the sigma sea potat
0/10 ragebait
BRO THIS GIF IS LITERALLY ME 😭 WHY IS IT SO REAL
lol, but at least i do argue that Spinosaurus dived underwater, even though some do not like that 😅
and there are actual paleontology studies that support that
Which, if you could cite them?
if im right, mosauridaes like staying in shallow/near the surface of the water, or am i wrong?
Yeah
i would have to find, bro
i am not home right now
.
and now that i remember, i think i might have shared a few links in this channel before, a few months ago 🤔
I think spino had dense bones which indicate semi aquatic life or smth like that. Similar to hippos
No-one argued that it wasn't semi-aquatic
We're asking if Sea has any evidence to support that Spino actually went deep-diving
considering it lived in river deltas that weren't abysmally deep nor did it have a body build that would indicate fast or powerful swimming
Idk why some people argue that Spino wasnt able to dive when a moose which is literally built like a brick with sticks can dive and swim pretty darn well
that is correct, bro 
A moose does not have a giant billboard taped to its back
spino legs were too short to support likely long hour of diving in deep waters
spino when it went out into the ocean and heard the distant gunshots of a pliosaur shoot out:
I worded that wrong, I was talking about spino being able to dive. MB
exactly, even 6 ton elephants can swim, and people still don't like that, lmao
I know this is bait but why is a mammal being used here
i dont think weight matters swimming wise...
This is because very little comprehension of the anatomical difference between a moose, elephant, and a Spinosaurus
Because we dont have a better example cuz spino is a frickin weirdo
Also moose has like huge antlers dont it
bro, wtf, why do everything that some people do not like to hear has to be rage bait? 😂
but why WHY why either mammal when they literally have NOTHING in similarities with spinosaurus besides being capable of swimming
Idk man, spino being a deep diver idk but it was surely capable of diving cuz why the heck would you evolve so many stuff just to surface swim
because yk you can still be a semi aqautic aniaml without diving? or long hours diving into deep waters YK
some feel more comfortable agreeing with longstanding ideas instead of standing up to their own
that is one of the things i respect about @fluid inlet 🫡
Yes, but they are not a solid wall that catches water. I can see water flowing through/around these better than if Spinosaurus tried to swim to the side to grab a fish
Moose are also not predatory so swimming is more of a "Ima get some stationary plants on the bottom of this water body"
Maybe it's like a pelican where it can jump off cliffs and stay underwater for some time before becoming buoyant
ngl out of all seabirds why pelicans?
exactly 💯
that tail alone, WAS MADE TO SWIM and most likely dive
Why not. They funny
moose when they start hearing clicks and whistles:
Wait. Pelicans dont dive do they
iicr the orcas eating moose is a one type thing that rarely hunted or is rarely documented but do @ me if am wrong, just forgot where I seen it from
The diving were the Spinosaurus we made along the way
Deep diving and semi aquatic lifestyle aren't the same thing.
Deep diving is considered, at least in sport, bellow 30 meters. There is unfortunately no definition with a definitive value for deep diving animals. Still, let's say that deep diving animals are the ones going bellow the twilight zone (so bellow 100 meters and above 1000 meters).
As Spinosaurus is thought, so far, to be a freshwater animal (as the Kem Kem are defined as terrestrial with brackish and freshwater deposits (Cavin et al. 2010))I highly doubt that it would have been in any sort of ways competent at deep diving and that it, anyway, didn't need to as North African river beds weren't even this deep during the Cenomanian.
would you at least be able to not use the same recycled gif? lol
there are so many
thats defiently a gif
YES YES KING SPEEK YO MESS SPEAK YESSSSS
spot on 🔥
Do you recall if it was Sereno or Ibrahim that observed the tail being a poor propulsion device?
all those numbers, 30 meters, 100 meters, etc... are just arbitrary quantities made long ago
Wow, that was your worst attempt at ragebait I've ever seen
I know you can do better bro 💔
Okay like I get gng is ragebait but COME ON
but is not that good 😭 others are better
Is it just me or do conversations here keep getting more stupid?
I mean this conversation is completely valid, it's just Sea Dragon is running out of material so
i am not trying to rage bait anyone, bro 😭
That's almost ever Paleo chat that revolve around a dinosaur game, it's a unfortunate cycle, besides ofc what Falcon said
what would be the top 5 largest animals in PoT? ( heaviest to lightest)
actually, tell me if this is correct
leed - 40 tons
rex - 8 - 13 tons
tylo - 8 tons
stego - 8 tons
eo and bars - 7 tons
Sauropods
Official only or modded included
okay, lets talk about who would win between trex and giga
trex, no, giga, wait... trex had bigger teeth
Wouldn't the heaviest realistically be Rex, Eo, Or Bars?
Of the officials.
Both kind of did? More Sereno than Ibrahim iirc but the tail propulsion isn't very strong.
One funny thing that Sereno pointed out in 2022 in his discussion is about Spinosaurus density:
S. aegyptiacus was incapable of diving, given its buoyancy and incompressible trunk. Full submergence would require 15–25 times the maximum force output of its tail, depending on estimated lung volume.
So, if Spinosaurus trunk was really incompressible, it will make diving really really difficult as it is one key adaptation to deep diving.
Argentinosaurus
still a mod
Well it'd be
- Leedsicthys
- Tylosaurus (pending review of Fadeno's skeletal)
- Tyrannosaurus
- Stegosaurus
- Barsboldia
Oh I meant the currently out ones, but yeah! That makes sense.
isnt stego heavier then eo? last i heard stego reached 8 tons
30 meters defines deep diving in humans because this is when humans start to nitrogen narcosis. The twilight zone is defined because sunlight is mostly absorbed, so you're almost already in pitch black.
If you want to argue for how we defined one meter, I did a whole presentation in physic for that like 3 years ago but I don't wanna explain it myself so here is a short video: https://youtu.be/-R6oPSvDIpk?si=aWL2_YywjOxJ8Y1H
A video exploring the history of measurement
Message me: twitter.com/reecebatts
Email me: rbatts@mail.com
:)
Also just to give the trunk means the back half?
You forgot Triceratops 🔥
We were talking about officials iirc
well eo is basically triceratops ( in game )
Eotrike still look more like a Triceratops
Wait there are eight ton estimates for stego? That’s awesome, didn’t know that
Eotriceratops actually looks like a large-bodied masstrichian chasmosaurinae
Assuming Eotrike is ~4 tons, it'd be beaten by Bars at ~6t for 5th place 
i am eating right now, bro 😭
then eat
It'd make sense if spinosaurus couldn't dive- or at most not dive well. I don't really see a reason for it needing to in its environment?
i can't if i keep getting ganged up by a mob, lol
girl bye
☠️ this isn't even ragebait gng you just loco
@ mods, someone has chat behavior issues here
mind you, all you do is derail our conversations, attempt to be funny, attempt to ragebait, so m,aybe, look in a mirror and realize your the real issue and go back to eating you damn food
at least i don't ask dummi questions every 5 minutes 
.
just wanna eat my chicken 🙏

Well, if you are less dense than water you need to force yourself to generate enough force to go against Archimedes' principle. Spinosaurus is less dense than water so it probably just didn't dive and could stay afloat. However, Spinosaurus was unstable when floating. So you end up with an animal that has a hard time diving AND floating.
I suppose Spinosaurus was able to swim still, but it sure wasn't the greatest aquatic dinosaur the world ever saw (that being penguins).
Is this counting on the 5 ton spino and invisible tyrannotitan
Honestly forgot them
NEW LIST!
- Leedsicthys
- Tylosaurus
- Tyrannosaurus
- Spinosaurus/Stegosaurus
- Tyrannotitan/Barsboldia
You forgot microraptor the largest dinosaur ever
And there's still probably a LOT we don't know about it's anatomy- but yeah. It certainly wasn't an aquatic ace like a penguin.
I mean the neotype is actually incredibly complete
The assumption we don't know a lot about Spinosaurus skeletally is kinda outdated
I actually didn't know there was a lot of material?
Sure, the model used by Sereno et al. 2022 is a chimera, but the Neotype remains >60% complete. So we still have a pretty good idea what the general shape of the animal was like.
The neotype alone, if you're one of the "all Spinosaurus material isn't Spinosaurus aegyptiacus" splitters, is pretty notable for the amount preserved
Neotype + Drawings of the Holotype give us a pretty good idea of what it was like + more material of the neotype is still being dug out every year
Left: complete neotype
Right: composite
The thing is anatomically Spinosaurus is messed up
I genuinely didn't know there was that much material of the dinosaur. (I'm also just not as educated on spinosaurus specifically compared to other dinosaurs.)
Spino, Sucho and bary are all pretty decently complete. Ichty I think is the 4th most complete
Sucho is more iffy because iirc, a decent bit (notably the skull) was referred and not found articulated with the holotype though I might have forgotten a piece of the story
Return of Cristatusaurus....
Angaturama
can someone explain to me how magaryosaurus is dubious?
Hmm I wonder what other spinosaurid has plenty of referred material that does not overlap with the holotype
Oxalalia!!!
siligmasaursu?
Camarillasaurus mueheheheh
Must be Eocarcharia
whats cerato's largest relative?
Saltriovenator
I've not engaged in any of these discussions so far, but as an observer it's really noticeable that there's a repeated pattern of behaviour here. Sea Dragon says something a bit contrarian, then when people respond against their point they retreat behind a defence of "many were told they were too crazy" rather than actually engaging in the discussion. @severe yew, I'm not trying to single you out but I think you'd find these discussions more fruitful if you didn't immediately shut down when challenged on your claims. Nothing wrong with having differing opinions, but generally in scientific discussions (like these, since we're in the paleo channel...) it's preferred that you try to substantiate your argument instead of claiming people aren't open to "new ideas"
Cerato.... is very lonely(in terms of close relatives with very good material)
"Am so lonely all the other theropods don't like me because of my phylogenetic branching"
Still haven't found the 30 ton rodent fossil. 😔
Suchomimus
don't a good half of spinosauridae have or is known from referred materials?
when your bullying a ceratosaurus by water and then it proclaims "
sto chiamando il mio parente Saltriovenator per venire a darti una bella lezione " and you start getting jumped by a invisibely ghostly force:
We charge on bro 
you and your ai pfp's
i welcome constructive criticism, bro 
i don't mean to shut down, its only when getting simultaneously jumped by 5 or 6 people i don't have time to show evidence to support my claims (although maybe i should show evidence more)
thanks for your observation, i'll try to keep that in mind 
Why is the Ceratosaurus speaking Italian, it's range didn't extend there
Saltior did, but why would Cerato be speaking Italian and not Saltiorvenator
He is speaking italian to summon Saltrio
Thank you
Her name is Cera bruh, not Sarah
I wonder hehe
cerato has italian in him

I didn’t make the gif clanker
You did try to justify alien dinosaurs surviving 66 million years using the very logic Okeanos is critiquing you for.
The heck is happening in here?
no Vividsky, that is a totally separate argument
moreover, when you have 5 or 6 people ganging up on 1, there is very little time to have any constructive argument
also, the 1 minute cooldown does not help 😅
imagine trying to have a verbal conversation with 6 people, all having their own thoughts and ideas, talking to you at the same time and demanding an immediate reply, would you be able to have any sort of neutral dialog?
in my opinion, it is similar to the mixpacks in the POT game, when some players only attack in numbers 😂
in a 1 on 1 conversation, there is more time to properly show links, images, scientific papers, etc...
this is discord, not a court of law, bro 
Respect the trike
also, i could share much more about the alien and dinosauroid topic, and would likely make it more persuasive, but unfortunately, it seems that it is not allowed to be discussed in depth here, and we have to respect what the mods say 😆
fun it’s this convo again
the emote doesn't work when nothing hug worthy is going on
ohh boy what is it today
it is good to never take anything personally, bro 🍺
we are all people, drink the same water, have our own sufferings, and make mistakes
Alien dinosaurs and a 14 year old's OC
Everyone please be respectful we all bffs
who the hell is we
U n me little Timmy
when life has been a challenge, you develop a thick skin 💥
and a deeper understanding of others 😉

In all fairness, I know you probably don’t mean anything bad but frequently the way you say things may come off sort of…passive aggressive? Mainly with you claiming you “know things deeper than others” as you just did right now, and the certain usage of some emojis
It’s why sometimes people can get a bit argumentative when there shouldn’t be any argument
It’s also the fact that the topic in question is pretty odd and while it is possible it’s just an overall outlandish take
A reminder to please be polite and respectful when interacting in this server, and to keep the channel on the topic of #paleontology
if you have any issues with a member of this discord please send a message to @feral crane
HUH
LMFAO "NOT DRAKE'"
Me reading this chat
clanker 
if anyone is technically a clanker it's the ones with pfps made by robots, see?
But you used it
And I’ll do it again.
true

Is this an adult Triceratops? (This is a joke)
ugly creature
I can’t help how I look 🥺
are you the elephant, man or alien
It depends on which one you think is prettiest
dead alien that pee'd itself
Dang it I’m the elephant 😔
its actually a mammoth 🥰
IN MY DEFENSE we both said elephant
can't wait to see the almighty Argentinosaurus in person
hopefully soon in Georgia 🙏
lucky
yes bro, i missed my chance when it was in Chicago a few years ago 😭
can't miss another chance
PK's Edmontosaurus regalis is so pleasing to look at
the front feet could be better
What does an accurate Hadrosaur foot look like?
the 2 nails should be relatively the same size, the one in the front shouldn't be so wide
Accurate Edmontosaurus foot*
From other fossils, it seems the flesh mitten is still knocking about
I think Holtz commented on the paper like "Ahha!" but I don't remember when
have we found other Hadrosaur feet that are fossilized as well as the Edmontosaurus's was?
do anyone know if this Argen skeletal is up to date ?
The neck is far too skinny, it needs some more bulk, i would recomend using this or smth simmilar to it, Skeletal by Gunnar Bivens
i see, thanks bro 
it isnt accurate for an edmontosaurs foot
yes which is way better than the one people always talk about...
if you want to see a good edmontosaurus foot look at the feet on the bars model, theyre pretty dang spot on
Me when i'm a hungry Dromeosaurus and the Edmontosaurus herd loses a baby while crossing the river
use this
Real
Brachylophosaurus has better mummies tbh
its for edmonot feet bro 💔
that's not my mummy (btw is this regalis or annectens)
no idea, i think annectens with the shape of the head
do you know the specimen name?
smf r 4036
you were right, annectens
You can use Random's
I wonder why the heck Yi developed skin flap instead of being a regular dinosaur and using feathers to do what it wanted to do aka gliding
Technically, skin membrane is a more normal option for flight than heavily modified stretched out scales
This shark has been through some wars… damn
the thing is it has both feathers and the membranes. Like even its relatives had those wings but nah I wanna innovate
Sometimes you wanna stand out
oh, damn 
would not be surprised if defeated 5 smaller sharks on its last battle 🔥
The majority of those scars around the face and gills are likely mating scars
who is the largest long-necked plesiosaur?
is it still Albertonectes or someone else?
interesting answer
proportionally or just in general?
i'm going for the necks so proportionally
Elasmosaurus
what abt largest in general?
Aristonectes?
I think it's still Elasmosaurus
I think in general Elasmosaurus is just the biggest and longest in everything
Longest neck
Longest neck to body
Longest non-pliosaur Plesiosaur
Biggest non-pliosaur Plesiosaur
oh wow wikipedia lied to me then
wait nvm on biggest, apparently Elasmo was only a few tons
Yep it’s Aristonectes, I believe a couple are longer but Aristo is by far the heaviest, being as long if not longer than elasmo with a proportionally much smaller neck
ok now between Albertonectes & Thalassomedon who's da longest neck?
Thalassomedon for sure
Albertonectes has around a 7 meter neck, while Thalassomedon only has a 6 meter neck
what's the largest male tyrannosaurus specimen found? Is it scotty or is scotty a female or do they not know genders of the rexes except for like sue
No T.rex has a confirmed gender
No dinosaur has a confirmed gender minus the ones with eggs within their torsos
asexual reproduction gedagedigedagedago
Wasn't there a T.rex specimen with found medullary bone?
Nvm
MOR 1125, aka B-rex
Medullary bone isn't as good an indicator of sex as we once thought, as it also forms in response to injury and tyrannosaurus wasn't exactly leading a peaceful life
do we have any trex specimen's without a notable injurey?
Of course not, they're all dead, which is the greatest injury of all.
But in all seriousness, maybe some younger specimens lack any obvious injuries, but I can't think of any adults like that.
Did Jane have any injuries?
Ohhh, I thought Sue was a confirmed female interesting, I assumed the largest male was stan
i think i saw one thing saying males were likely smaller, since with animals that large when mating is concerned having a heavy bulky male might end bad on top
is this still considered to be the case?
afaik it is kinda ambiguous. Birds today, alone, vary a lot in this way among themselves. iirc a lot of large predatory birds have larger females, but other birds have larger males (as do their archosaurian relatives, crocodilians)
idk if its concensus i just remember reading something on that
though at the same time yeah if males fight for breeding rights they tend to be larger
I know what you mean, just saying idk how confidently stated it is
and yeah I think that is the case. slightly unrelated but it's really common to portray sauropod males fighting each other for female access but honestly I disagree with that interpretation. We know sauropods made so many eggs at once and just left em hanging, animals with child care strategies like that don't really discriminate with their mates that much afaik lol
as opposed to things like ceratopsids or thyreophorans, where they have huge obvious weapons and we know their weapons evolved for sexual competition first and foremost
on the flip end when females produce a lot of young they tend to be bigger
that is fair, so I think it's perfectly reasonable to apply larger females on animals with higher clutch sizes. I don't really know the specifics about a lot of dinosaur clutch sizes, but hadrosaurs and sauropods make a lot of eggs tmk
it's up in the air until we find a female in the middle of carrying eggs and there's some specific feature left in the specimen
btw, I swear we have evidence that the oviraptorosaurs that sit on the nest are actually the males?? It would kind of make sense since they are very ratite like and ratites do this iirc
i know it was assumed that the holotype was eating the eggs found with it
then they figured out it was just brooding on the nest like birds today
That's not true as, when it comes to large terrestrial animals, in Probiscians males are larger than females.
there were also dinosaurs much bigger than elephants. it's just one possibility
I just woke up and missed out on paleochat a convo about a theory believing dinosaurs went to space and are noew returning as aliens and a 25 ton oversized two partial caudal nicknamed leviathanus by a deviantart user
that was a rick and morty episode
I just scrolled more and found out we had a convo abt spinosaurus swimming, 50% larger t rex and nanotyrannus 🔥
my favourite paleo method, judging based on aesthetics
It was secretly a male who stole the eggs..
At least her exhibit said that she had no injuries as they don’t know why she died
does anyone know how many/which kinds of stegosaurs were able to move on their hind legs? I know their leg structure supported rearing up and there are some tracks that suggest actual bipedal movement in smaller stegosaurs such as Kentrosaurus
idk I feel like what causes that is them stepping on their own tracks like how cats do
My best guess is Kentrosaurus
that's not really what I meant
I mean there is actual evidence and it just kinda felt natural is what I'm saying
I don’t think any of the stegosaurs would have walked bipedal all of the time, but in the case of Kentrosaurus, the bipedal factor is from when they reared up to reach more plant materials
of course. it does look like stegosaurs mostly foraged and moved around on four legs. but their back legs are longer than their forelimbs in a similar situation to hadrosaurs, so picturing small stegosaurs walking around on two legs to forage is pretty cool. from some track evidence it even looks like they were able to walk consistently, not just rear up, which is interesting. I’d kind of like to see that in path’s kentrosaurus, though I don’t think it’d serve much gameplay purpose. I’m not sure if much evidence exists for bigger stegosaurs doing this, which is what I was wondering about
I’m certain that most smaller stegosaurs could possibly have done so, although I suppose it’s hard to know for certain
If quetz has the ability to take off via leaping why wouldn’t hatz
idk something abt it being heavier or summ
At best it would need to do a little gallop before launching to pick up speed, but the point of the quad launch is that the arms catapult the animal fast enough to get off the ground without a run-up
quad launch is a lot more effective ^
Hatz is not that much heavier than quetz to the point it can't take off if at all
i wasnt the one who said it </3
And I didnt say u said it
no, because we need to fight now
?
war
How accurate is pk spino
I have seen a bunch of debate about how fast Tyrannosaurus could run and now I am wondering just how fast is a Tyrannosaurus
If it’s a youngling, faster than a human, if it’s an adult, faster than the average human
Maybe adding in lips, and I’ll say it’s accurate for the time being cause Spinosaurus keeps changing with each new expedition
Is it accurate to 2025
looks good to me
you'll find different estimates depending on where you look
i would say up to around 35 miles per hour is not a bad estimate
.
obviously, the max speed only for very short distances
around 20-28ish kph is prob a good range for adult Rexes
56 kph for a 8-10 Tonne guy is probably a bit much considering those are estimates for Jane sized Rexes
35 might be a bit generous. speed in animals can be hard to measure, though, since they’re not as consistently one speed as machines
regardless, T. rex must have been quick enough to catch up to large herbivorous dinosaurs in a burst. I imagine lunging it would’ve been very fast, possibly even cracking that 30 mph estimate, but running for a distance it seems like most general estimates fall between 15 and 25 mph.
pretty sure those are in kph, mph is way faster
I think so, although tail shape might be weird, cause some people can’t decide on some shape, and I won’t know exactly since I haven’t checked Spino’s tail for a long while
the shape is pretty clear
20 to 25 mph is a reasonable estimate for everyday hunting
although 35 mph could still be around its max speed in short bursts
only the juveniles could reach 35 mph, adults would break their legs going over 20 or so
yeah, Big theropods weren't really running, just walking as fast as possible. JP1 Rex kinda showed that well in the jeep scene
not mph, kmh
why are you just randomly reacting, you were wrong not us lmao
sue me 
Pretty sure some estimates get it to around 5.5-7 m/s
https://peerj.com/articles/3420/
~17.2 mph or 27.7 km/h is the most likely speed for an adult, although it could be a few km faster or slower than this depending on the individual
The running ability of Tyrannosaurus rex has been intensively studied due to its relevance to interpretations of feeding behaviour and the biomechanics of scaling in giant predatory dinosaurs. Different studies using differing methodologies have produced a very wide range of top speed estimates and there is therefore a need to develop techniques...
Now that I think about it, do we actually ever see the JP rexes run or is that something that (aside from the speed hammond says they go) something the movies accidentally got right
Cool I walk faster than that
just one study of many, based on some peoples opinions 🤗
the bias from you is crazy. that isnt an opinion thats a mechanically grounded study using a 3d skeleton model with modelled muscles
the crazy one is you
The Animators and Directors probably understood that it looked weightless for something that big to run like smaller theropods
am i the delusional one saying an adult rex could run 25mph? dont think so!
Idk man
They actually provide evidence from a Paper using actual 3D Models and Stuff while yours is from "Trust me Bro'
i said 35 mph, get it right, timmy
not even going to dignify what was said at me with a response
but yeah the JP animators slowed down the jeep in the chase scene because they rightfully thought 32mph rex looked silly
35mph is like impossible for an Adult Rex,
Thats Literally 3mph faster than the Average JW Rex😭
like i said, just one paper out of many out there
90% of the papers agree with the range random siad lmao
Then show your evidence for your claim??
The Paper is Based on 3D Modeling of the Skeletal of the Animal with Modelled Muscle, there has been no other newer paper thats Better than this one
That is quite literally just Poor Bias lol
wrong
@deft sigil Clear troll in this channel, this channel is supposed to be educational. Sea dragon is very clearly trolling and has a history of such
Unless you ignore CC where Rexy consistantly Keeps up with Gallimamus in Speed and Said Mfs are 32mph.
Kinda.
Buck in TLW was also kinda said go be 25-30mph on the Buss Scene
Argument Over, I've found the answer
I think spino got upscaled last week it’s kind of insane
I'm pretty sure there's a paper out there saying elephants could theoretically run 400km/h
dont forget 50kmh stegosaurus
Please be polite and respectful to other members. If civil discussions cannot be had then mutes will be handed out. Refer to our #rules and channel guidelines.
145% larger than the neotype
I… wouldn’t be so quick to dismiss peer-reviewed studies. I was working off of memory, with the general consensus of every study in the last two decades finding that Tyrannosaurus was somewhere from 15-25 mph. that’s a lot of variance, but 25 is an absolute cap by any widely-accepted study. 17 mph is our best estimate for now - and it wasn’t just a randomly-picked number, that’s a solid mechanics study
Fragmentary but idc I’m a spinotruster
Yes, but also its a Toe Bone
This range seems reasonable to me for the kind of animal tyrannosaurus was- just as fast as it needed to be regularly.
mogged by brazilian carcharodontosaurid known from half of a caudal vertebra
any updated stego skeletals come out yet?
Also sorry if I accidentally pinged*
dempsey has one for sophie
like this month recent?
its recent enough, the biggest issue it has is plates but all stego skeletals have that
can you send me more on this?
can't wait for more scientific papers about Spino underwater
send it
@stiff osprey would you be interested in making a zhuchengtyrannus skeletal using the description of a sub adult?
any edits of this in a neutral pose
im in the progress of doing one
too little material on tarbosaurus out there to make a zhucheng skeletal imo
the irony is tarbo has so much material known
^
60 found. none described
more than that💔 anyways I'll dm you the sub zhucheng if it changes your mind
Most people pointing me to this page for the source https://www.italianjournalofgeosciences.it/297/article-1220/beyond-the-stromer-s-riddle-the-impact-of-lumping-and-splitting-hypotheses-on-the-systematics-of-the-giant-predatory-dinosaurs-from-northern-africa.html
you can download it and the bone description is page 176 onward
Didn’t someone post a paper describing some zucheng postcrania recently?
when did they change Atopodentatus's face?
That’s the old interpretation
not recently, 2010
from what i can tell it's 4 bones and a tooth (most complete zhucheng specimen by far)
oooh kk, weird that National geographic would use the old interpretation
a lot more
than that, I sent pictures
scaling the femur its 8 meters
a mount doesnt meant its all real btw
it isnt a mount💔 don't think it was even published
*six bones my apologies
i would say 8m is too small to use adult tarbosaurus as reference, but then again all known tarbosaurus skeletals use an 8m subadult as reference
6 really good bones🔥
not bad 👏
so youre telling me ican ragebait a trexand not even have to run at full speed to get awaya?
this one is a one weid creature, fr
Yup, though you're probably gonna get tired before it(and most theropods tbh)
you are a pretty quick runner if you think you’re easily topping 17 mph lol
for any animal, even 20 mph is almost nothing, tbf
no. But afaik nanotyrannus could've been one of the few dinosaurs that come near the speed of ornithomimids. I bet that's why they were built like that
This is my Roman Empire
humans average speed is around 10 mph
elephants ave. speed is around 20 mph and these animals can get up to 7 tons
with its very strong legs and size, i wouldn't be surprised if trex could reach 35 mph for very short distances, like in an ambush
35 mph, is like ostrich lvls of speed
I think there is a point in which muscles arent able to compensate for mass anymore
Elephants also like
Run at 4 legs
You cannot compare a Quadrupedal Mammal Anatomy with a Bipedsl Reptile
Those estimates are ussually for guys like this. Extremely leggy, can get airtime and lightly built(relatively).