#paleontology
1 messages · Page 139 of 1
This means the 16 ton Iggy is Real
reffered with no basis:
the only unique part is the fibula with isnt apart of the other specimen, the tibia and femur are indestinguishable from other Allosaurus species and are A. sp
Same locality, both Allosaurus, both similar sized. What else would it be?
Not anax, is my point
no overlap, no valid refferal. the paper lists it as A. sp
Ok Allosaurus taxonomy sucks
so true
ew that neck
why is his neck so beeg bro
Wait until you see Deinocheirus
oh god.
Actually nevermind Deinocheirus look at the entirety of sauropoda (except brachytrachelopan)
so, i just came home from my trip to Portugal/lourinha, i was talking to one of the AMAZING museum guides, i was telling them that "Torvosaurus and Miragaia are fairly popular", and the guide disheartened me, she was like "is it? i see people only really care if it is a T-rex or not"
What's you guys favorite avian dinosaurs?
do note more recent recon have the tail abit longer than shown here
erm use this one Vivdsky 
Who had stronger arms?
Deinocheirus or Megatherium
look at this legendary find
Megatherium
A is the humerus. B is the ulna. Both in dorsal view.
Other picture is the radius.
Megatherium is stupidely robust.
am gonna be deadass Diocles is a chill dude and love him but this skeletal is just okay
does anyone have a picture of hibber fossils?
he looks so derpy i want one as a pet
what would happen if i gave a hibber a shotgun
Heat death of the universe
fr
I thought I was looking at a face
you are just from above
yeah hibbers eyes are ontop of his head
thanks I'm hungry
Could anyone say if it was possible that Sarcosuchus Hartti (I believe it's how you write it, it's the Brazilian Sarco) could have lived together with Oxalaia and possibly even fought for food
Tmk Hartii is Quite Small
And Oxalalia while now smaller than Sucho(but likely is still Spino now)
Man idk lol
Oxalaia is also like destroyed lol
they lived inn the same place and time right? Spino simps cn finally have a fight between a ripoff of it and a shrinked killer croc
Look at Harti's Skull smh
Now i'm also curious if they shared habitat ngl
About the last part, since all we have of both are jaw fragments we can't know sh*t about what they did but by the law of common sense, if they lived together they absolutely had conflicts for overlapping food sources
does that designed for Rip & Tear?
it looks fine tbh, can definetely grab that guy aand shake him to death
Maybe?
We know Sarco atleast Imperator ate Fish and Larger Prey Equally
Sarco skull isn't as Thin as a Gharial or False Gharial
Its more like that of a Orinoco Crocodile
cousin fight go go go
Oxalaia and Sarcosuchus (even from Brazil) are separated by 20-40 millions of years depending of how deep you go in the strata.
Neeco the Mewing Sauropod???
I will, do nothing
In other words : they never interacted with one another.
RIP
yo im stuipid, how would i describe the Maastrichtian stage more broadly? late cretaceous? is that accurate
latest Cretaceous iirc
It is but late cretaceous is like, almost 40 million years? I say "very end of the cretaceous"
By Epoch, I believe it's just Late Cretaceous
If you think about it, Champsosuchus literally means "crocodilian crocodile".
Would a scientist be dumb enough to give something this name?
What
you mean champsosaurus?
ty
Were Megaraptorans the only theropods able to "pronate" their wrists or am i misguided
Also a real spinosaurus together with a lot of other real squeletons were destroyed during bombing raids in ww2... its so sad.
Torvosaurus on top
wait we're still believing the pronated theropod arms in this big 2025?
“I have zero reading comprehension” award
Imagine time traveler going back into the carboniferous and seeing a 3 meter long arthropleura looking like this
Oh shoot, I didn’t know the nose part was bone
Huge noise syndrome
How possible is this
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
He's just a guy a good one well maybe but he's that guy regardless :P
Fr fr
Now I'm thinking iggy was partly design based around muttaburrasaurus least the ones with big noises 💀
No 💀
It's just that Megaraptorans are often depicted being able to semi pronate their wrists. I just want to know if it's true or not
BoB megaraptor = retro deinocheirus
excellent but i wonder if they could also do 👇
pronated theropods
I knew I wasn't tweaking
Now I know we're that damn fact that was mendella effected in my head came from
If anyone knows,
How big is Stegosaurus St. (YPM COLL)
And how big is the biggest Stegosaurus Ungulatus?
Latest late cretaceous, or uppermost stage of the Mesozoic/cretaceous. Though if you would like to give information on what defines Maastrichtian rocks it's the Iridium rocks from the meteorite impact and some ammonite taxa (Anapachydiscus and Pachydiscus). There are other stratigraphic fossils associated with Maastrichtian and a climate cooling episode, which caused some faunal turnover among marine microfossils and lowered sea levels.
Afaik, YPM coll is the largest Stegosaurus, with an estimated femur size of 137.16cm. It also falls within S.ungulatus.
The weight is estimated to be about ~8 metric tons with a density of 1.03.
Isn't YPM COLL Stenops? Or is it assigned to Ungulatus now?
Depending on what you read and who you ask, S.stenops = S.ungulatus. Maybe I am wrong so gotta ask @hallow spear.
Ok, thx
@stiff osprey to scale a crocodile size by head : body ratio (if of course D.hatcheri respects that which idk if anyone knows), which measurement should be used : skull length or dorsal skull length ?
I know your reconstruction is, as like every other ones of Deinosuchus, to be taken with a grain of salt but I wanted to have a broad idea of how large it would get by using your skull reconstruction.
S. ungulatus needs a reassesment tbh, will probably get one too but not anytime soon
the biggest stego one has yet to be scaled cause im waiting to do that until the new stuff on sophie from dempsey releases to scale / gdi it
YPM Coll is essentially undefined collection of YPM specimen(s?) that are assigned to ungulatus or S. sp
Its YPM Coll because its uncertain or unclear whether it is one specimen, a composite/chimera etc
Whats the bone below the jaw here? Hyoid? Megalania for context.
It's a hyoid
I thought it'd be smaller or something.
Anyone know of any good museums in Louisiana I know there is one in Lafayette that looks decent ,
Dorsal skull length should be used, however I'm fairly sure it has a proportionally larger head than modern relatives, as many extinct giants do
To my knowledge Deinosuchus skull length regression would get a very large deinosuchus using modern crocs. I'm not sure how big though, if I am being honest
most likely you'd get 12m+ using skull length
Which is a good indicator that it had a proportionally large head since the vertebrae do not support this
I still long for someone to make a postcrania
I just find it confusing if the rugosus/hatcheri vertebral column matches up with the regression results, even if they are scalebared
what if you put stomatosuchus into the equation
the skull length one? That would be humongous
L shape
and also obviously not accurate since its skull is like 40 cm wide
What does scaling skull width get btw
idk I don't actually have the equation
IIRC it would be quite small, like 7-8 meters
1/3.5 of its body was its skull, amazing
considering that 90% of its skull is snout yeah that checks out
I would put it closer to 9 m though
9m Stomato or Deino
Stomato
https://x.com/haolonggood/status/1881034538341822595?s=46 @stiff osprey @zealous ravine
huh???
Can I ask what’s the biggest Deino right now weight and length?
That doesn't look like the HLG Brach at all, must be some other company's
I’m confused as well I asked for clarity and he said brachiosaurus lol
using the tail: SVL ratio of fadeno's skeletal gets 11.3 meters and 7.6 tonnes for cm 963
TMM 43632-1 may have been bigger but there is no real evidence of this
it actually has a nice upright posture too
Also
big conc
Deinosuchus hatcheri vs Paleoloxodon namadicus
I been thinking about getting Tyrannotitan but I don’t like what’s going on with the mouth area
Thank you!
https://x.com/theedarkcircle/status/1880925673029878184?s=46 could this happen to dinosaurs too?
Peak
How does the Largest Puru compare to that?
I believe fabio's puru skeletal is 10.4 meters, however puru has a much shorter tail proportionally
Weight Wise I would guess like 6+ tons right?
yeah
Peak Caiman and Gator Moment
No Exact weight estimate I am guessing
Maybe 6.4t? Idk
Do we have any good weight estimate for the Largest Meg?
I think it's sm around that, given modern croc regressions
Also what was Megalania's Closest Relative
I have heard Lace Monitor/Varanus Varius and also Varanus Giganteus/Perentie
Sarcosuchus will always be the most iconic crocodyliform no matter how much people try to kiss up to Deinosuchus and purussaurus
If there were two rumblrjs the other rumblrj would have commented perucetus victims talking rn
Kapro:
how small would the para have to be for this to happen? ( im getting the gif, wait )
okay well, thne full gif dosent show it, but its the chased by dinosaurs clip where a deinosuchus lunges at a charnosaurus and is able to lift it up and drag it into the water, what would the realistic weight that the charnosaurus would have to be for that to be possible?
Hello friends, today I found something nearby, is it something interesting or can I throw it away?
Do you mean Parasaurolophus?
wasnt it charno?
Charnosaurus isn’t a thing. Do you mean Charonosaurus? If so then I doubt it, cause Charono is from the China-Russia border and Deinosuchus is from the southern US lol
wait, nvm it was para and it wasnt chased, im getting it confused due to the beach being trhe same as the theri episode
The fraud
actually, better question, whats the lift strenght of a deinosuchus? what would be the largest thing it could grab?
I'd be much more curious to see that for animals instead of just bite force
Saltwater crocs can take 1000 kilo+ horses, cattle, & buffalo so doubling that for deinosuchus might be a good place to start
Looks interesting. Maybe some sort of early worm or mollusk. Try to contact a local natural history museum or some experts if you can.
do you think it was able to lift up the average ceratopsian?
it looks more like an eroded sand dollar to me, when they’ve been out for a while they can wear into weird shapes like that
I imagine it would be more dragging than lifting with very large prey
oh yeah, true, i wonder whats the largest thing it could drag
maybe a juve ceratopsian
Adult hadrosaur
Yeah adult dinosaurs seem well within the capabilities of larger specimens of deinosuchus
underestimating it hard

Maybe. An underside view would be helpful @small perch.
would ankylosaurs and nodasaurids be on the menu or would their armor and spikes would be enough to drive it off?
They'd still fall as preys to the largest predators around.
Turtles aren't free of predation, nor are armadillos or pangolins, neither are hedgehogs and porcupines so I don't see why would Ankylosaur be safe when they reached adulthood. In some formations, they are dwarfed by the local largest theropods, which can bite their head and possibly severely damage them.
Considering how easily modern alligators can crush turtle shells, I think Deinosuchus wouldn't necessarily mind Ankylosaur armor, tho it's probably not as big compared to them as alligators are to the turtles they tend to hunt
where would they grab? like, the head? the side? In Pot its implied the sarco grabs ano from the side to drag ( carry ) it into the water
We even possibly have a predation attempt evidence of a Tyrannosaur on Tarchia.
Either would work for grabbing, if anything biting the head would be likely to take it off entirely though
Also uh, possibly gregarious ankylosaurs. Neat
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0195667120303190
Borealopelta appears to be countershaded similarly to Psittacosaurus and modern animals under strong predation pressure iirc, so that's another line of evidence for them not being as invincible as a lot of people assume
would the best method of dealing with a nodsaruid/ankylosaurid would be going for the head?
probably, especially if you have a strong bite force
As suggested by the fossil evidence, possibly. Their bodies are too wide to actually get a bite on so the head is probably easier.
their low to the ground, i dont think your gonna be getting any belly shots if your a large carnivore
Low to the ground = lower COG = better balancing = harder to move.
Also I suppose their are too heavy anyway to be turned over (for the larger ones) by their predators (if these were gigantic like Acrocanthosaurus and Tyrannosaurus) when they reached adulthood.
cog means center of gravity right?
Kapro not even in the discussion for iconic crocodyliforms
Metriorhynchus 🥺
read this #paleontology message
kronosaurus victim
Perucetus victim @opaque kayak
kronosaurus swims by, takes a chunk of it and swims away to eat the meat chuck
Why are nuke victims talking?
Covid victims taking up space.
Yes (also what makes a cybertronian capable to transform, tho a transform is not defined by their cog, but by the spark that resides in their chest)
whats a cybertronian
transformer
The race of the giant transforming robots in transformers
think of how insane miocene africa was
is this true
on average Saurolophinae's get larger then lambeosaurine's
Table could answer better than me but I don't really think that's true
Granted the largest Hadrosaur is a Saurolophine and there might be a few more particularly large Saurolophines than particularly large Lambeosaurines but there are a ton of pretty generic sized Hadrosaurs from both groups
para is the biggest lambeosaurine right?
no Magnapaulia would be I believe
giant para is like. 10 tons right?
no it's been downsized to like 6 tons
if i had a nickel for every time fadeno scaled a well-known taxon to twice its actual size i'd have at least three nickels which is honestly a lot given the context
😭
so para's max size is 6 tons?
sinoceratops is the largest Centrosaurinae at 5 tons right?
Got epically ignored lol
:(
I'm sure someone on the internet would try and justify this act against God
at least it's not ear lobes
To be fair, it was meant to be cursed as possible
The horrible part is this is the truth............
edmonto looks like plucked deinocheirus and rex looks like... nasty anteosaurus
I refuse this notion
Guys could something like this be within reason for marine reptiles despite not being countershaded
I mean there's less camoflauged patterns in the ocean
maybe. Either way I don't see why every marine reptile should be portrayed as an oreo, I'd like to see some more (but plausible and accurate still) ideas
Snakes
Countershaded Oreo is the most safe reasonable bet for any given high grade marine predator, but there's other reasonable patterns too. And this is pretty reasonable

The colors is based on number 1.
what exactly am i looking at?
Hola una pregunta cómo hago para descargar el juego en mi PC
#português i think
Hello there, In order to play the game on PC, please head over to our website and download the launcher suitable for your device: https://alderongames.com/
Once the launcher is downloaded, you can simply log in to the same account you have purchased the game on 
Y tocó pagar para jugar
If you have not already purchased the game,
Currently In order to play the Path of Titans in its current state as well as the complete game after launch, you will need to purchase it on the Alderon Games store page for PC access. Path of Titans has not yet been fully released, but purchasing the game now gives you access to the current version of the game. You will not need to re-purchase Path of Titans in the future for post launch access, as any purchase made now will include access to our pre-release and full version of the game when they are released at a later date. When you purchase the game for PC, you will also get mobile access for free!
We have several options that are available in our store listed below.
Mobile + PC ($30 United States Dollars).
Mobile + PC + All Backer Skins ($50 United States Dollars).
4-pack that includes 4 copies of Path of Titans ($120 United States Dollars).
Please refer to our store page for more details regarding each perk and its respective rewards.
Our store page is located here at: https://alderongames.com/store/path-of-titans
O ok
sucho allo megalosaurus...
Where do you see megalosaurus
DASP ALLO SUCHO
Based
Suchomimus is the odd one out between Daspletosaurus and Allosaurus, because suchomimus has one species to its name while the rest have 3 ( I choose to ignore A. anax )
well, daspleto could also be considered the odd one out as its really the only apex of its ecosystem, sucho has sarco and allo has torvo
this is a dumb statement while would i say this
Lol
I mean
Sucho was larger than Sarco, I doubt Sarco would try Sucho and Viceversa
Plus Sarco stayed in Rivers more ambushing and Sucho likely stayed more with fish without going to deep into water
you think eocarchia was trying sucho or nah?
damn eo skinny as hell what the hell how is it only 1.8 tons
A 8.3m Allo is 1900kgs so yeah kinda skinny
Would it try Sucho? I MEAN it can Try I personally see Sucho as to Large for it to try
Would be odd for suchominus to go after sarcosuchus
Yeah and would be Odd for Sarco to go after Sucho unless its very deep water
Those 2 likely avoided eachother
Or likely didn't avoided each other but rather just niche parten with sarcosuchus being more generalist and suchomimus being more piscivorous
Since when is sucho 12 meters?
does anyone else forget hadrosaurs lived in south america
Tbh sometimes yea lol
Everyone is always talking about them vs Tyrannosaurs so it gets glossed over
That post got deleted I’m thinking that was Dreadnoughtus? @stiff osprey @zealous ravine
is there a tyrannosaurid and Ceratopsia on every continent or nah?
neither are found in gondwana, so that’s australia, africa, south america, and antarctica
They definitely tried each other in desperate times and ate each others young whenever the opportunity arose but other then that I’d agree they stay cleared of each other.
It was the Showanna Sauroposeidon resin kit
How you know this for certain?
if im right, Sauropodomorpha, Thyreophora, Ornithopoda have been found on every continent ? i feel like i may be forgetting a group
It was confirmed lol
https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=927926882780380&id=100066892290400&_rdr
this here shows it
See posts, photos and more on Facebook.
Where
yep that’s right, those are pretty broad though tyrannosaurids and ceratopsians are a lot more specific
Theropoda as well
oh true, was any group ( group in the vain of ceratopsian and tyrannosaurid ) found on every continent?
Haolonggood will pay for making me think there was another sauropod on the way.
Still no words on pnso 3 months now.
Maniraptora or something
Brachiosaurus x Alamosaurus
has any been found in antartica or australia?
there isn’t really any super specific groups that are on every continent, usually australia throws a wrench in it
is Therizinosauroidea in maniraptora? when i look maniraptora it shows pictures of therinosaurids
therizinosaurs are maniraptorans yeah
i dont know why but im actually really suprised abt that?
birds are in maniraptora
well birds are fake so do they really count?
Does anyone know of any good museums where they got a good sarcosuchus skeleton on display
should i create a speculative ecosystem that i think could work? and u guys rate it
does anyone have any suggestions
Camptosaurus
you have a good skeletal for that?
ty beagliam 2.0 that totally did NOT kill beagliam 1.0
Definitely didn’t 😉
did i scale campto right?
Looks about right, I’m doing a similar project so add Tameryraptor as well
can our formations be next to eachother?
Sure
this is how you scale this stuff right?
Yes
Yea, also here’s like some of the guys on mine so far
Where spino the king
is this good so far?
I would Lowkey replace the sauropod
why? usually theres a smaller and larger sauropod in a formation
add a larger sauropod👍
yes 🥺
Here’s my Spino but Random’s is better I’m just plugging atp
since there’s a large spinosaurus I take that this is a fluvial / wetland environment? I think some fishing birds / pterosaurs and also crocodilians of various sizes would fit
Oh, wow, it's liam, Bro I was collecting your spino skeletals!
Awesome skeletals man!
Thanks bro really appreciate that! I can send you old old wips if you want too if you’re collecting them lol
oh i will, just doing the dinosaurs first
my imagination is like, a landscape full of large riverways but its really flat, with spots of forests littered throughout the large grassy expansions
did that make any sense
basically, yellow stone, but tropical, and with alot more rivers, and flatter
Oh, wow, that's awesome man, thx!
actually, you know what would be fun? make a desert/arid ecosystem, anyone got a list of formations that are arid or desertee?
Was he before or after Camarasaurus or same time period
before, mid jurassic
Before like quinzz said, and also weirdly not super closely related despite how similar they look
Yeah I was thinking they’d might be closely related , which sauropod species was its predecessor?
zby bettert
Zby is also goated
?
?
Few years now
How heavy was Kaiwhekea?
And its confirmed to be 5 tons too?
Or is it still 2.5-5 tons
Yeah
Range can be 5-5.4t or even 4.8-5.6t depending the model or skeletal used
Who did rex have the most beef with?
I see. Always happy to see my boi sucho big like that
Probably on the legs. It would need to be cured though
No like who was rex biggest enemy
Maybe triceratops or dakotaraptor? Dakotaraptor would probably be a big problem if it actually lived in packs
Dakotaraptor, trust
what's this about? looks funny and interesting
Other T rex
like 2-3 tons iirc
probably Tyrannosaurus rex
Oh ok
prob Triceratops
Ankylosaurus was pretty rare in Hell Creek and-
wait a minute what can an Edmonto even do besides running anyway
Edmonto the second they spotted a Rex:
A dakota would do Nothing to a rex even in packs aside from like, stealing food
Either another rex But Triceratops
They had a Predator prey relationship and they both evolved around to kill eachother
So the two could take the other down
Although triceratops didn't necessarily evolved to "kill" a rex
Stealing food, stealing eggs and killing young rexes
They did tho they Both evolved around each other
Also is the dakotaraptor even valid?
They almost like any other predator and prey relationship
Also Dakotaraptor is valid
In the sense that no-one has been allowed to examine the material and make it invalid
But everywhere in the internet it says it is thought to be a chimera
The only element that is confirmed to be chimeric is 1 bone out of the dozen that make up Dakotaraptor
Yeah but Cau suggested more bones aren't Dromaeosaurid
I agree but it's still valid currently
And a very small amount of bones were found too
This isn't how predator prey relationship work, prey are only under pressure to evolve traits sufficient enough to deter predators, weather it's lethal or not
This is anthropomorphizing, they're not using complex strategy or multi generational plans to genocide tyrannosaurus
Bro what are you talking about. Eating the eggs and preying on younger animals isnt something out of this world. Its what predatory animals do
Bro talking like i said they build cars and drive over other dinos
Megaraptorans are medium- to large-bodied tetanuran theropod dinosaurs known from Cretaceous deposits in Asia, Australia, and especially South America. The megaraptoran skeleton is far from well known, and the humerus is one of the least-frequently preserved elements. Here we describe the first-documented adult humerus of a South American megara...
Did anyone get to see the paper? It's paywalled 
tetanuran? so... back in Carcha family?
No
tyrannosaurs are tetanurans
Tetanurae means everything more closely related to modern birds than to Ceratosaurus, which includes Carcharodontosaurids but also includes Tyrannosaurs and even modern birds
I know this is more on game design than paleo accuracy but I was curious would this be okay
for what
How nany mapusaurus would it take to kill a argent
So many Mapusaurus
A whole lot, the highest quality Mapusaurus, one might say
how many mapusaurusu would it take to screw in a light bulb
none because their Giganotosaurus roseae
did hibberoptorous likely eat smaller eurypterids?
probably
hibber hunted argentinosaurus
hibber is god
Fr
Magnapaulia chilling in the water, not worried about you or anything else. You’re simply insignificant to such a specimen.
@stray saddle Hi, are you online? I'd like to know if you or your friend have any measurements of the dorsal centra of DINO 2560
randomly pinging Jesus himself for info on a dinosaur
I already got the sacrum and cervical measurements
@wes well, he was there personally after all
I want this Andrewsarchus so bad 
Oh , how did you know he was my friend?
Yes one second , I will call him
He contacted to the guy that mounted the squeleton but still no response. It was 1 month ago. For now no one knows it.
Alright, thank you anyway
@stiff osprey im sorry for the ping but i just wanna know if your prestosuchus from 2018 is still accurate and update size wise?
Wait hold on what
there's someone who has the measumerents?
Still waiting on a random Japanese professor for a possible answer regarding an obscure Cenozoic genus nobody knows anything about, except for them
what genus is it
it's more or less the correct length but too heavy for this specimen, 1450kg would be better
also did it live in a arid enviorment?
nuh uh it's one of AE's secrets so I can't tell lol
i dont understand how a modding team ( im assuming AE is archic eons ) can gatekeep a prehestoric animal 😢
It is a marine animal though
We're not. But revealing it in this conversation is a direct reveal of our roster, and a secret that got added directly at my request. I'm just trying to get some more specific info on how it lived that greatly influences the model
While i don't see the point of such mixing because most of those formations have solid fauna by themselves (and it's basically like mixing Cloverly, late Cedar Mountain, Dinosaur Park and Hell Creek) it looks fine
is anything in clovely, late cedar mountain and dinosaur park survivng a tyrannosaurus
Sauroposeidon
Sauroposeidon, Price River 2 quarry titanosauriform
thats why sauropods are the GOATS
sonorasaurus and abydosaurus also both count as late cedar mountain so probably them too
Ur pfp is so goofy
In that case Paluxysaurus too
I disagree, since it actually has differences from Sauroposeidon and adult Paluxysaurus was like only about 20 m
What animals from the cenozoic are theoretically impossible to clone in the future? Like at what point in the past does the DNA become too fragile to extract?
peracetus
whos hibber
hibb
Game design I was thinking of doing it because I wanted a decent amount of playable in a certain biome or formation for playable wise
hib
Ye but at the same time you can get double that amount with either Huincul or Allen
I never apologize for pining anyone watch this. @stiff osprey @zealous ravine is this their new tyrannosaurus ?
That’s their carch
No that's their old Carch lol
Also i noticed that for South America you're missing abelisaurids and noasaurids (especially the former)
Wow they definitely need a part 2 for most of the old theropods they have done. Like I think they need to redo Carnotaurus.
Honestly I really like the carnotaurus, even the lack of lips for some reason doesnt bother me that much
It looks good for the time period but it can be improved for sure, which Haolonggood is showing that they are capable of which the recent theropod releases.
Weirdly enough the Carch was done before Carnotaurus but looks much better
i've hired this Shantungosaurus to stare at u
What bars front feet look like ?
There's a good chance they looked similar to Edmontosaurus' feet, which are surrounded by a fleshy mitt and have a single partial hoof on the front side
Love this!
Ty , conc and Tyrannotitan up next
I hope that the case
where’d u get them from
Giga looks kinda small?
I can very much assure you, it is not
Basically, beeg
It looks bald for some reason.
Tauro moment
yeah, it looks like it has a thin neck for some reason
I disagree 🔥
It's apparently virtually the same size with a slightly less robust torso
New compared to Old
I think that one is a really old one from dan
He had a 2024 version, oh nvm it looks same 😭
Its the same
Just openend mouth really
^
Darknix said it appeared larger than Before
But how we know its Torso is slightly less Robust?.
Cause Dark said it was wider and more robust then reconstructed before and he Helped Dan make his Giga back in 2022 so ikd
Rahiolisaurus gujaratensis
^
Peak
Would Dark happen to be either Greyback or Giganotosaurus?
Maybe???
I would need to ask cause tmk he told me he was the one who help Dan's by measuring the bones irl and giving him estimates
Primordial Tryants
@sweet briar you wantewd to know the diffrenec ebetween titan and giga right
titan is lighter?? uhm, lived....later and is smaller i think
rate my rightness out of 10 y'all
No he isn’t
perucetus victims
guys you knew how some croc could grow up to 36or larger than normal size could sarco ir deino do the same
the most regal of ceratopsian
what yall think is the most accurate dinosaur in the park/jurrassic world franchise? cuz most of them are innacurate as HECK
All things considered Rexy is somewhat decent
i agree i guess mosa is okay? but it still looks wrong also rexy needs back hairs/fur cuz i think rexes had some?
Mosa,...is pretty bad. Rex probably didn't have as much feathers as you are thinking, and it has many other problems as well, but really, jw standards are bearable
im thinking of hank from prehistoric planet didnt he have a little back fur?
Hank is a little too rotund. there isn’t really evidence for the fur though so I don’t think that’s applicable
Yes but that's only an inferred trait with no direct evidence. There is a good chance rex had some light feathers based on phylogeny but it's not really such a crime to not include them, especially when JP/JW doesn't really include super detailed close up shots very often.
thats fair i hate it when people protray dinosaurs as all feathers and when i say "not all of them had a ton of feathers" they just say "HOW ARE YOU A DINOSAUR NERD IF NOT ALL DINOSAURSHAVE FEATHERS!"
wait till they realise edmontosaurus isn’t beating T rex
a lot of people are quick to go overboard with things, it's sort of the "counterjerk" cycle, like doofus mentioned a lot of people also went overboard with the "Hadrosaurs aren't fodder" thing
i feel like.. i still havent decided im leaning towards edmonta any reasons why rex would win over it?
size, power, weaponry etc etc. edmontosaurus beating T rex is like a doe beating a tiger
It's bigger on average and being a predator is better adapted for killing
by the way who would win 2 velociraptors fully grown or a fully grown hibberoptorous? (i stan the hibber just curios)
It's also important to note that Tyrannosaurus is one of the most overkill predators of all time, so it's extremely dangerous, even to things bigger than it
Hibbertopterus kinda lacks any meaningful offense, but it'd be way more trouble than it's worth for something as small as a Velociraptor. Keep in mind Hibbert is encroaching upon 10× their mass, depending on estimates used
I don’t think either would really be able to hurt eachother
hibber i feel like could win hes 6.6 feet long idk how heavy he is but he could mabye crush them pruely with their weight or idk if this could happen headbutt the raptor aginst a rock crushing it. IF he knows how too do that
couldnt the raptors just like run out of the way? also im not fully sure if hibbertopterus could walk on land
its liike imagine getting smashed against a huge rock or thrown into one could you run away that easy? also yes hibber can go on land.
I honestly think even with its mass hibb just lacks the flexibility or mobility to really do anything to a Velociraptor, and in turn they can't really do anything to it with its armor and size
People tend to underestimate the sheer size of Hibber
But it's also got no meaningful way to hurt.
wes could hibber even walk on land?
most likely. yes
from fossil evidence they said it could run at a few miles per hour so hes still gonna be slow- but i feel like hibber could pull it off not sure about the fossil evidence thing btw because it is REALLY hard to tell.
so could hibber win? i would say yes i dont know how much we have about it so who knows it COULD have a way to MABYE harm something.
velociraptors win by virtue of having lungs imo
but what if the fight happens in water hmmmm???
thats fair i respect your opinion but think about it if hibber gets a hold of one and its near water..then the other raptor couldent really do much to it.
velociraptors win by virtue of coelurosaurian cunning
dang sad but true
hibbers could breath on land but not forever.
yeah but hibber would probably be too slow and clunky to actually get a hold of them. I’m not sure if it’s entirely applicable but you don’t really see horseshoe crabs making mad dashes on land and they are a lot smaller
but then you gotta remember hibber is built like a BRICK. he could just walk into the water and he kinda wings by just hiding or even drowning one of them.
so who wins? it could go either way but i feel like hibber 60% of the time
What was hunting larger prey, sarco or purru?
if the win condition for hibber is just to avoid being preyed upon then it wins 100% of the time by being too large and armored for the raptors to kill and not even living in the same environment as them
yeah i want justice for hibber
hmm well purru is one foot longer but we really cant go off of that so it depends on what ones more argressive and more impressive.
I don't think that's how it works
thats fair im not well educated in this stuff im slowly getting better
You are!
Hibber vs Veloci is just an eagle vs a Galapagos Tortoise
Sure it might technically be feasible but it's not worth the hassle and it's really just a waste of time
naw hiber solos it hunted argentinasaurus fr fr
Prob puru
on one hand puru's skull morphology would indicate it hunted larger prey, on the other hand it simply did not live with animals as large as sarco did
Yeah
like puru hunted giant sloths and giant turtles and all but that's kinda lame compared to hunting like sauropods
Btw if one day for some reason if anyone wants too teach me stuff about paleontology im all ears.
I really don’t think sarco actively hunted sauropods? Probably nothing stopping it from grabbing the head of one that’s drinking, but still.
to be fair the one sauropod we know it lived with happens to be smaller than sarco itself
Smol sauropod.
What’s the name of it?
it's Nigersaurus
How heavy was it?
The South American Sarc though? Although I read that the other stuff in the sediments it was found in were too fragmentary to get a good read or something.
south american sarc is kind of tiny (tiny = saltwater croc sized lmao) so it would be hard to find a sauropod smaller than it
Ok now question how heavy were puru's prey
As if Sarcosuchus would hunt other sauropods than Nigersaurus anyway.
So didn't Purussaurus live with ground sloths as large as Nigersaurus if not larger?
iirc stupendemys is about 2 t and the giant rodents could reach 800kg but i have no idea what giant sloths it coexisted with
wow i was way off phoberomys is 250kg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Granastrapotherium is one of its contemporaries and is 3 or 4 tonnes.
@stiff osprey Might have been thinking of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephoartigasia ? Off of the wiki page for purusaurus.
aha, the largest animal it could have hunted is Hilarcotherium at 6+ tonnes
but aside from that everything is vastly smaller than a fully grown puru
given Purussaurus has adaptations for terrestrial movement i wonder if it ever chased down a giant sloth or glyptodont on foot
Wait it does?
it has three sacral verts (almost all other crocodylians have two) and a more vertical femur posture which are interpreted as high walking adaptations
W3ll you learn aom3thing new everyday
I mean not really if you compare the size differences of the sauropods and giant sloths they were hunting.
I love Sarcosuchus and I’m not familiar of the sauropods in the region but it wasn’t hunting giant adult titanosaurs.
at least Nigersaurus is like close to the size of an adult Sarco, unlike the sloths
Though I guess Hilarcotherium fills that gap in Puru's case, there is a fragmentary specimen that could weigh like 9 tonnes
Didn’t the wiki page for that say other stuff was heavier? Like one I linked would actually be twice as heavy? But you know, wiki….
an adult Purussaurus would be ~6t so Hilarcotherium is the only animal in South America at the time that was heavier than it
What’s the largest specimen for Purussaurus
He just said 6 tons thereabouts.
it's DGM 527-R, a 175cm mandible
I got ghost pinged?
the bot censored RJ for being rude lmao
Largest specimen doofus , 6 tons would be average I’d reckon? And no it got deleted by Alderon cuz I guess the word I said isn’t allowed lol
Coulda meant averages, yea.
No 6 tons is the maximum, 6 ton average for a croc would be bigger than Deinosuchus even. Also can't calculate a good average with like three specimens
Wouldn’t the fragmentary specimen you mentioned be the maximum potentially?
Theoretically.
maximum for the species? Absolutely not, you'd never find the biggest individual ever by pulling out 5 or 10 fossils randomly
There were probably 7,8,9 ton purus at some point but ~6t is the largest supported by the specimens we have
You confusing me Dinos , you said 6 would be the maximum for for Purussaurus and then you tell me the 9 ton specimen would absolutely not be the largest the species can get, I know I ain’t drunk. Lol
Biggest individual ever is probably gonna be afflicted with gigantism or other growth disorder, or just very old.
I never said purus had a 9 ton specimen though. Hilarcotherium has a fragmentary 9t specimen, that's a mammal
Biggest individual would be max size tho, how big is the biggest Deinosuchus specimen ?
biggest deino supported by measurements is currently 7-8 tonnes although there is a shittily described specimen that might have been bigger
I assume you mean TMM?
43632-1, yes
which has a 90% chance of just being another 7-8 t individual but i'm giving it the benefit of the doubt
Good to know, damn thats not what I been hearing for years, but I was never in a paleontology group either.
Wiki page doesn’t mention specific specimens sizes, does mention a particularly large mandible fragment.
I mean, I was told multiple people double checked the methods, so a downsize was not on my list at all, but Ig I was lacking in knowledge abt that
Why do you hate the bahayria formation? Just wondering.
do we know how rigorous the double checking was or was it just like seeing if fadeno's estimated skull size had a reasonable h:tl ratio
i've been saying for a few years that two crocodylians with vertebrae 1cm apart in size would not have had a mass difference of 200% but understandably people are more likely to take a full skeletal reconstruction over "a guy said so"
Whats the biggest sarcosuchus specimen ?
cause it took all of five minutes looking into deino after someone brought it up in the lovely prior extinction server for the 13m+ estimates to seem fishy and i dont know jack about crocs
They recreated Fadeno's method and saw that it worked, and also, and I will say that I never checked it myself, that it was impossible to go below 12 meter off the fundamental basis that CM is far bigger then AMNH, and TMM is even bigger, in which CM is non-scalebared, and the measurements are double checked, and it was less fragmentary then quite a bit of specimens currently used, which made me, and many people along with that assume that
I’m not the one to ask about specimens, sorry.
i suppose the issue there could be amnh skull scaling being based off shreds of bone and plaster after which people decided to ignore the vert scaling
I will say while i didn't agree with 13-14m cm 963 i also wasn't expecting it to fall below 12 meters
in fact i knew about the vertebral regression paper in advance but i dismissed it because i was just that convinced it had to be bigger than 11m
or people not accounting for the condyle because if you include the condyle as the not-condyle length it would have snout-vent length kinda similar to fadeno's
but this of course ignores that you'd be using the objectively wrong metric standard
I also believe there was a lot of people who went with regression to debunk the method, but most estimates using that method was disregarded, as with many problems with regression in comparison to a rigorous, through skeletal like Fadeno's
Are you talking about the nose bulb?
i actually like using regression more than most people but thats because of how much easier grillcourt makes the abelisaur enthusiast's life
ironically the regression is strongly supported by a wide range of closely related animals while the thorough skeletal reconstruction gives it 25% larger dorsals than what the measurements indicate
at least the snout vent length one is, the length including tail regression is weird
When I was young, Bahariya formation was the place I called my home. I had love for the place, and made many friends, Bahariyasaurus, Spinosaurus, Carcharadontosaurus, Tameriforgotnameraptor, Stomatosuchus, "Sarcosuchus", Sigilmassasaurus, 1000 Spinosaurus morphs and Sauronips, who I called my friends. Unfortunately, Three of my friends died by boming, and the rest were fragmentary, which upstarted my resentment to my formal allies. Ever since then, we had fallen out, and hate each other now. (Hater just means we actually love that animal but call it hating for some reason)
probably because croc tail length is stupidly variable intraspecifically
You mean conspecifically?
How accurate is this?
I still feel that a rigorous skeletal is the way to go, and I will favor that method in a case of decently complete remains personally, just personally for distant species
yeah i can understand hesitation with a single equation over a thorough skeletal reconstruction but i was somewhat suspect of deinosuchus exceeding the estimate of an otherwise well supported regression of taxa its bracketed within by like 50% the linear dimensions
intraspecifically is a real word but i think intraspecific and conspecific mean the same thing
especially given apparently a skeletal reconstruction scaled to the measurements does not in fact result in a 13m+ animal
I feel that the tail is longer than neccesary?
After seeing that skeletal vert Frank made I was convinced as well
Yall do these measurements for work , study or for a hobby ? ( don’t mean to offend anyone) just curious.
at least with anky there's apparently an explanation with faulty scalebars but between deino and the megaparas i'm kinda at a loss for how some of these were scaled
Can I ask you how meta and lambo double checked Fadeno's methods?
hobby i would be shocked and probably somewhat distraught if someone was getting paid for browsing measurements in literature
i wish i could get paid for that
IIRC 7 Shots is also a hobbiest who measured the snax material
no clue
if i had a guess it probably presupposed amnh being giant or something like that though rather than scaled from scratch but i wouldn't know
Snax?
fadeno's skull size is actually pretty easy to replicate if you just scale AMNH 3073 by the width of the 5 preserved prenaxillary alveoli
although that wouldn't make it 13m it would just give it a stupidly huge head proportionally
To my knowledge TMM is scalebar measured, so my question is how did he fit in that material if they were that off
perhaps purusaurus is the T. Rex of crocodilians
Alevoli makes me think of lungs.
I mean stuff like this I find valuable, considering museums want as accurate as you can get skeletal replicas in their museums. It’s a shame no one is making a decent penny because the research is significant.
saurophaganax spinosaurid
wait why in that one paper did they give tmm ratio's relative to other tmm did they use mandible fragment measurements instead of like anything actually useful
Tbf people get paid to draw skeletal reconstructions but i imagine the value is more in the art than in just numbers
The only measurement I know from TMM was a humerus piece of sm, which MIGHT be overlappable
i suppose that would be somewhat better than 2.5 unspecified mandible measurements
oh that's the femur
well projected femur based off said 2.5 mandible measurements iirc
TMM does have a femur it's just incomplete
which makes this measurement questionable as they don't list it as an estimate or anything
Apparently AMU-CURS-541 has a near same vert size as CM963 so ig that makes sence why
oh this is where deino being short-legged comes from
should we worried the big headed thing derives from the 14-43% larger than other thing mandible measurements
So, deinosuchus had a lifestyle like a saltwater croc? Except more salt?
although if theyre using this to conclude it was short legged 'd imagine the femur was estimated complete
unfortunately we have an image of the femur in cosette 2018 and it isn't complete
unless someone ate the middle part of the femur in the intervening years
Can’t a reasonable estimate be done?
they do give a proximal end to 4th tronchanter measurement but idk how that aligns with the figured material
well ig if its just the middle missing that could still be consistent with it being 1/3rd gone
if you scale it with the other deino femur via proximal-4th trochanter you get a 63cm femur though
Probably not impossible that deinosuchus has mixed traits, evolution is weird that way.
Just throwing that out there.
unfortunately you can get it like the same size as the 53cm scaling with an alligator by the same measurement
just found out hartman's deinosuchus from like 2012 based on vibes has the same head:body ratio as mine
Is that the fallout guy? Or half life or something.
with that in mind i really do wonder which of fadeno's giants will have the most staying power in the oblivious average paleo enthusiasts mind
it is gabe but that's unrelated the default version of this meme just looked a little stereotypical
I don’t mean the CEO of Steam, but anyways…..
gabe from half life
anyway i hope deinosuchus doesn't actually have a 53cm complete femur for the scientific peer reviewed reason that it would require me to redraw the cool silhouette i did
I one day wish he rises up and makes a 10+ ton spino and mapu
tbf that is the only actual measurement so it may as well be isolated right
This looks like a 10+ ton spino, chonky as hell.
sauropod torvosaurus
Spino still dominates
Anyone have a spino 3D model?
(galton & jensen, 1979)
That posture isn’t correct though? Why is it doing the 19th century tail drag thing.
It was apparently a position which allowed Spino to walk bipedal without falling over
Those are spinosaur arms though.
torvo arms are long like that
Chalk it up to the game, because you just got played.
I’m not a fan of that random dumb lines that pnso decides to add to most their dinosaurs , like in the picture here with baryonyx.
so... remastered this when?
I kinda wish this uses Dan's scotty and spino, since they are from the same artist
What’s up with Rex legs bud?
I NEED these
(Sorry for the ping)
Do you want giga in a neutral pose or a dan pose
Can you add perucetus?
If you let me add nuclear bomb, yes
Dan Folkes 2025 one (the new skeletal)
srry for the late reply i was playing Doom lol
New perucetus paper dropped
The original Great War
It got to like 35-40 tons
?????
Apparently links are not allowed
DM it
Let me send it via screenshot
interestingly while the tmm femur is proportioned exactly how you'd expect for an alligatorid femur based on the proximal-trochanter length / (presumed complete) femur length the smaller ua specimen they mention has by far the largest residual here
omg Table hi have u ever make a Para Walkeri Gorgo Dasp Torosus (?) size comp?
how do you make these regressions so fast
I paid him
actually my fingers really hurt because i had to manually type two separate measurements for 100 alligator femurs in a google sheet
amazing
i tried just doing it all in the space bar and just copy paste to save time but i missed a couple so that was for naught
I think that there is a way to copy past the whole thing in excel
Lmfao I feel that on excel 🥀
if there is i'd have to save the file in some other format because the pdf in the supp doesn't really lend itself to being copy pasted
although if there is a way to do that that'd be lovely and my fingers would greatly appreciate it
do you want normal walkeri or dinosaur park cf parasaurolophus postcrania with funky proportions and a giant radius
Put the pdf in google docs. It turns it into text
2025 up-to-date accurate Walkeri
well that makes things much easier
evidence i'm a masochist?
Honestly Google doc scks imo
i dont think the cf. para assignment's ever been rebuked so i'll just include em both
wait am i right abt Para's Dasp is Torosus or i'm mischaracterized the Dasp species?
if the tmm skull is indeed 25% larger than the other tmm skull while only having a 53 cm femur that is indeed very small
wonder if that means d.hatcheri had tiny legs or just that my cross scaling of the various specimens is wrong
walkeri lived with daspletosaurus sp. because despite being talked about for like 20 years and they're still indeterminate species
Plz someone tell me is there any new information on siats
I wonder how it looks like visually, and if it even seems plausible
unidentified spesies moment?
jk feel free to put the three Dasp species :v
of course there's also the possibility averaging out three partial mandible measurements with a 25% linear discrepancy doesn't accurately reflect skull length but at the same time i'd hope tmm's other scalebars aren't that bad
well if the authors are to be believed that the smaller tmm is similar in size to the holotype then i'm inclined to think the 14% lower end is more accurate
amnh does have a scapula which could help but idk if crocidilians have consistent scapula proportions
yeah but i don't think any of the others have a scapula to cross scale with
pitiful animal
although maybe we can pretend that the other deinosuchus femur being a weird outlier means something so we can continue ignoring the 53cm estimate
i'm srry but hearing scapula got me thinkin abt spatula
are they happens to be cousins? ||/j||
if you squint they're kinda the same shape
pretend that the torosus has a not torosus skull here and its essentially dp das
ty table
Yo bro finally done
Spinosaurus, Giganotosaurus and Tyrannosaurus by Dan Folkes
its carch
Is that Dan's Spino?
Yup, and Dan's scotty. I felt it was better to have one artist have all the skeletals
Oh, shoot, right, Spino might be a bt longer iirc since it has a couple more caudals
Yeah
Is this accurate i wanna buy it
yo @fossil ingot does this still holds Giga size being 12.7-13.5 meters long & 8.8-10.2 tons or is it just got updated?
wasnt holotype 8.4t?
Based on what Random's Told me? Length is now 12.74m for the Holotype, Weight of Holotype was 8.47-8.8t depending the version of Dan's Used 8.47t with the updated smaller sacrals and 8.8t with bigger sacrals
this one has apparently a less robist Torso, but Bigger Head and Taller Sacrals
Likely is around 8.7-8.8t again?
Dentary idk, that mf might not be as Large anymore
Messed up thinking about how Peru still doesn’t have a non avian dinosaur discovered in big 2025 💔
My heart can’t take this any longer
so 12.74-13.5m?
Possibly???
Dentary is a mess
and so is my heart to Giga 😭💔
dentary is dentary, shouldnt be scaled
thx for the info, Paleo𝓕𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓴𝔂
np gorila
But is a footprint really better?
So in the grand scheme of things did giga just hit the ozempic?
Bahariya Formation Hater when Kem Kem Bed Liker walks in:
the size of the dentary varies among individuals and larger dentary alone do not mean a larger individual, the footprint and consequently the foot is composed of a set of bones, phalanges and metatarsals. This foot measures 88cm, which is longer than any other theropod, including Tyrannosaurus (72cm).
Megaraptorans had large feet, so we get 11.5m which is an enormous size, especially in this group
I'm giving up on exact scaling at the moment, it would be useful to have some pes material from derived megaraptorids, but I don't see an option where it's not a large theropod
I do, it also could be a large sauropod
stop spreading this nonsense or they will believe it, be stupid alone
Shut up
Damn
lmfao
a paper said the giant track belongs to a sauropod
this is absurd, it was originally described as a theropod because that's what it is - it's tridactyl.
I thought I had dispelled doubts when I showed that from the same formation we know more tracks with the same morphology that are clearly theropod
even if, there is a second, clearly theropod track that is 80cm long and then gives 10.4m in Australovenator proportions (and it is not said that forms living 30 million years later had equally proportionally large feet)
but both tracks are clearly theropod and clearly the same taxon
ok arguing over whether it’s a theropod is one thing but unless it’s literally in sequence you can’t reasonably say they’re the same taxon, we’re dealing with a thing that’s notorious for deformation
Any updates on Sereno’s spino
You mean the huge Sereno 10-12 ton mention?
they show equally long digits, creating an asymmetrical form with matatarsus II the shortest. taking into account their similar size and differences from abelisaurids, and the fact that we know more tracks with the same morphology from the same formation, I think it is reasonable to consider them the same taxon
Is that the one with the crazy crest that’s he’s been teasing?
Ohhh, that is scimitar spinosaurus, it's not out yet
Damn really excited about that, feels like it’s been forever. My endgame fr fr
My goat, iirc it seems pretty frag, but is smaller and later
It is said to be due to erosion etc. It is not actually tridactyl
The existence of other tracks shows that there was a large Megaraptoran from there, but it doesn't show the other track is the same taxon.
Thoughts on it being a baby or do we have a dwarf on our hands?
It's def not a baby Spino proper, since it's crest doesn't match
the mere attempt to explain this shape by erosion etc. is far-fetched.
based on photos before cleaning the print
and since you yourself admit that there is a track of large megaraptoran, what is more reasonable - to assume that the second one is also one, or to suggest that the sauropod track was accidentally distorted to perfectly imitate the morphology of this second, theropod track?
Which one looks better?
All but this looks weird
I was thinking it’s a new something , I’m just wondering its age relative to its size, something about that crest being so developed is throwing me off the idea of it being a younger specimen.
stop trolling, I know you are not that stupid (I hope)
@mellow prism
It's very weird, and clearly different, even in skull shape. Also, visually it doesn't quite look like a even younger version maybe except for the big eyes
@stable sun
Such an odd little guy can’t wait to learn more about it, thank you for the information friend
Besides shuno and mammenchi, anyother sauropods with club tails?
How accurate is the new cerato tlc?
what kind of perspective is this anyway?
Besides, it's not something I'm postulating. The entire track is not a "pure foot", there is a heel and a metatarsus imprint, I took all this into account from the beginning, that's why the acropodium is 88cm and not 114cm
I take into account that you may be trolling (or at least I hope so, but I'm explaining it for others)
Cope and marsh in the chat rn
yes, I know it, it is not known what cast it is, and at least one of the authors still thinks that it is undoubtedly a theropod.
I also think it's clearly a theropod, but we can refer to another fact.
both tracks are asymmetrical, with long slender digits where IV is longer than II. in both, metatarsal II is the shortest, and IV is equal to III, they are of similar size and the authenticity of this morphology is supported by other tracks from this formation
Taking this into account, I think it's much more likely that it's a theropod
I find it highly unlikely that the sauropod track was coincidentally distorted in such a way that it perfectly imitates the morphology of an authentic theropod from the same formation
How accurate is the cerato tlc visually?
It’s the same model, only abilities were touched
Oh.
Lowkey want more paleo art of dinosaurs with naturally occurring genetic abnormalities, a tyrannosaurs with polydactyl would be interesting non the less
How true is this statement
False, that hasn't been seriously considered for years (if not actual decades)
@faint mauve semi aquatic cerato has been debunked for decades by now
is female ankylosaurus bigger i was surprised to load up pk and see the female model bigger and i cant find anything online to back up that fact
Nothing for or against it
ah i see thank you🙏
tbh, could fall under same genus being different species, just like Triceratops, Edmontosaurus or Pachycephalosaurus species in NAmerica, or the extremely well known Dimetrodon, with multiple species with different skull shapes, sail shapes and sizes
How big the biggest cerato?
why do i even trust wikipedia with anything anymore..... 😞
7m long and 1 ton
iirc this was also found in nigeria with a 3mya gap from spino proper
However, this theory was challenged by Yun in 2019, suggesting Ceratosaurus was merely more capable of hunting aquatic prey than other theropods of the Morrison Formation as opposed to being fully semiaquatic
Pulled directly from Wiki
still more adapt to hunt aquatic, i read that
"More capable" =/= semi-aquatic
I'm more capable of climbing a tree than a polar bear, but that doesn't mean I'm arboreal
I remember the old theory dilo hunted fish due to its weak jaws, I think it's been disproven ( hopefully )
but it would mean his water speed should be still higher than most other dinos in PoT
which he isnt
Considering the tail also doesn't really stay deep all the way to the end, I have to wonder if it's genuinely associated with water to such a degree or if it just had fat muscles there + wetlands being the perfect palce to preserve an animal
i have no clue about paleontology
but logically, when i hear strong tail and lives near water, it sounds like he would slap the water surface hard and stun the fishys
some dolphins, whales and crocs do that
What are Carnotaurus horns supposed to look like felt like I’ve seen so many different version
I've only heard of thresher sharks doing that to any significant degree otherwise it's done to bash already slow-moving prey (orcas/seals)
Semiaquatic cerato, what?
Pfff, Cope and Marsh would get timed out and muted quick, their rivalry is legend.
spinofaarus
old theory that's been widely discredited/unfavoured since it cherry picks certain features in favour of ignoring the ones that would disprove it
We need a Proper GDI/Volumetric Analysis for this thing smh
Sup fellas
there will be one
Peak
Wait Gigs got buffed?
Me when people don't read references attached to Wikipedia and still complain wikipedia lies
(there's still some unfinished pages tho, but even then those pages get moderated, specially scientific use ones)
No, I reckon it will be lower than that for the holotype
Lower than 8.4 tonnes!?
IIRC holotype was 8.8 tons min?
I had heard that Dan Folkes downsized the 8.8 tonnes to 8.4 tonnes
The weight is from the most second recent skeletal, not the most recent one below
So how big u reckon it would be?
I personally have no idea, it might be slightly lighter then the old skeletal
I bet between 8.2-8.6t nothing higher for the holotype
it was long time ago
Not really fair to do an average based on two specimens, one of which is literally just a chin
Something something the average is more likely to fossilize than the extremes
Anyone got tyrannotitan measurements? Especially compared to other gigasaurines
doesn't use the new giga skeletal or tameryraptor
Giga and tauro by Dan Folkes, Meraxes by Sergi, Carch, TTT, Mapu edit and Sauron by Randomdinos, Acro by Franoys, Woman by VCube
"On average" and it's just the poorly described holotype and an isolated chin
imo constraining a rex average is honestly way more obnoxious than giga because there's so many more variable to account for with the former
like depending on how you constrain an adult rex an average could be anywhere from like 6t to sue-sized
Sue and Scotty are the only adults to ever exist
You want to kick this up to Darius ?
There's nothing to kick up, that's literally all you have 💀
Tell Darius Nau that he should've materialized out of thin air at least other 5 Giganotosaurus specimens smh /j
sue scotty cope(?) and trix are indeed the only confirmed measured skeletally mature rexes 
this information is not taken out of context whatsoever
I’ll be inviting Darius to the server
i think any biologist worth their degree would agree that an average species estimate based on 1 skeleton and a partial dentary doesn't mean much
In other words, assuming Giganotosaurus is actually the ~0.3 standard deviations larger that simple comparison of means suggests, the probability of there being a statistically significant effect with a sample of only 2 is just 8%.
there we go
like i broadly agree that we can't say rex was outright larger than giga on average but i inversely also question any conclusion that giga is likely larger than rex (especially when even his average rex circumference is identical in size to the only giga preserving postcrania)
Didnt Titan get nerfed to 6.7 tonnes?
What server is this from?
Vividen
ew vividen more like MID!!!
He’s not a bad guy, just likes to discuss very fragmentary things. 😅🤣
he's not a bad guy but sometimes a few fans make me yuck
Skeletals by Gunnar Bivens and Henrique Paes
what creatures are those, that theropod looks absolutely giant....like, a little too large
Maraapunisaurus and Epanterias
Where’s the rest of the skeleton
I think you ought to tell it to them fir them to fix it
I already have talked to him about in the past am not gonna repeat myself cause I feel a gave a very valid response to him
That being said I find it goofy seeing people take private ahh measurements and scans then use them to make estimates, and then promptly declaring it gospel
The whole thing with 7shots… whatever happened there.
i mean be happy the part that is shown doesn't even exist anymore
Yes, and they also don’t let yiu bring it up anymore there, despite having themselves shared the estimates a million times before
Didn’t you get banned ? Or was it someone else for teasing 7shots about Saurophaganax lol
it's 11.8 m long, it's not that incredibly large
I almost did because I had brough why the measurements were wrong, or maybe just different standards. Just bringing it up is problematic there
Yeah I don’t like stuff like that, everyone should be able to discuss their point of view without getting kicked. That’s why I like path of titans paleontology group. We can disagree but at least none of us are getting kicked out from path even if it’s gets chippy.
It’s a fundamental problem to make a estimate on gatekeeped or unreleased data then to make it gospel, and even more when I have tried to tell them problems, and only got ignored or almost banned just for mentioning it in retrospect after the estimate turned out wrong
I will now personally contact John Alderon to remove you from Path of Titans for disagreeing with me...
I’m not sure about vividen but 7shots clearly had/has a bias towards Saurophaganax and to a fault.
I do agree
Giganotosaurus is larger on average
the humble sample size bias :
Me when effectively one (or two) samples
which one is the best for rip & tearring of all that carcharodontosaurs?
Giga mugs the blind and slow scavenger Rex
yeah, I think imo the biggest issue with arguments about average specimens being statistically the most likely to be found, ignores the fact that with a small sample size, you can't know that and that we've found plenty of very not average fossils suggesting to me that the statistics aren't that crazy in favour of average specimens.
aswell as the fact in my personal opinion, in life average specimens may simply behaviourally or habitually be in areas or situations that make them less likely to fossilize
Hardly two lets be real, as I said one of the specimens is literally just a chin
which is to say giga with it's single good specimen cannot be judged to be bigger or smaller than rex on average, thus you can only speak about largest found individuals, or make averages that acknowledge the issues with such low sample numbers for everything except rex
What’s the latest on the tyrannosaurus specimen “cope”
pretty sure it's still a sucky specimen that gets overblown by awesome bros
Sucks to hear
TBF looking at it it does seem to be minimum sue size, and also not that bad in completion
There'd better be a Tyrannosaurus specimen named Marsh. Unless it's not that cope.
There isn't a Tyrannosaurus specimen named Marsh and it is that Cope
how did dinosaurs actually sound? i hear many diffrent versions of grunts and bird noises somtimes straight up roars.
I've liked the idea certain ones make low rumbles to a certain frequency that's sometimes hard to detect
Was downsized to 8.47t
Funny how Giga is almost a ton heavier then Spino in volume, yet ends up about the same weight
We'll never know precisely how they sound because we don't have the soft tissue of the relevant areas and most likely never will since you need the right conditions to preserve soft tissues.
Finding an ankylosaur/nodosaur with a fossilized larynx was an extremely rare and lucky find, even skin impressions are more common.
The best we can do is make some educated guesses as to how they might have sounded.
ah alrighty
ive been hearing rumors that meg is 80 feet long they sound really bs is that true?
Talking about the shark?
Megalania
Definetly bs.
he meant megalodon
Megalosaurus just got the biggest buff
Then why did you say megalania? -_-
Hi i had question about t rex. I saw vidéo of goji center t rex vs Spinosaurus. They talked about t rex ilia making him more agile making t rex turn faster on itzelf
I did some reseach on internet but its not sourced most of the time its daily news. I wanted know more about it this t rex ilia thing i want make feedback for the game?
They seem pretty straight to me, I feel like I always see them a bit curved
source?
You're looking for "The Fast and the Frugal" tyrannosaur paper which should be open access
?
Guys I was referencing this
New Dan Giganotosaurus skeletal jump-scare (updates modified the head shape, the cervical and neural spine accounting for Taurovenator and new measurements + photos that aren't sharable).
Actually, I was thinking meters, not feet, lol.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megalodon
There's one estimate from decades ago that was 80 something feet, but estimates are all over the place.
Funnily enough, TTT vertebrae seem to preserve a hump in the middle of its torso.
how u going to rick roll mr rick roll
someone just said "dinosaurs can be gay" 🙏 i dont think thats true- as animals in general only partner up to mate in general
There are already gay dinosaurs like that penguin couple
For these animals, there is documented evidence of homosexual behavior of one or more of the following kinds: sex, courtship, affection, pair bonding, or parenting, as noted in researcher and author Bruce Bagemihl's 1999 book Biological Exuberance: Animal Homosexuality and Natural Diversity.
Bagemihl writes that the presence of same-sex sexual b...
WHAT-
^In general*, yes, but theres always those exceptions, nature likes to flaunt those contradictions to human morality whenever we try to apply it to nature.
Why didnt it italicize, weird.
well i learned somthing new.
It's known in over a thousand species
Including… drumroll humans.
Moralize all you want, nature does mot and will mot conform to human morality, whether one group or another.
We’d better get off this topic though before the mods find this.
What about his question? Kind of got glossed over.
Actually mvm.
some dinos gay some aint dont judge
It was a valid question, not used to abuse or bypass server rules in any way, that generated a paleo related discussion. This would be fine, as long as the topic is approached carefully and respectfully, that we stay on the topic outlined by the channel guidelines (refer to pinned messages) and within the boundaries of the server #rules.
Updated Carcha Jumpscare
Ok, just thought you guys would put the hammer to it.
well yes, they can be, we have examples of peguins and other birds having homorelationships
TTT is a better base for Carcha
No, Giga is more derived while Carcharodontosaurus and Tyrannotitan are more basal
There is a ton of recorded homosexuality behaviors among land vertebrates.
Though gay is a social construct so yeah dinosaurs wouldn't be gay as like a person is.
A taxon cannot be more "derived" and the other more "basal" though. It's always just a matter of perspective, who you wanna take a look at and therefor how you set up the matrix. That'd be like saying goblin sharks are more basal than great white sharks, which has no evolutionary logic.
Doesn't eve work for TTT as it falls within Giganotosaurini with Giganotosaurus. It's just that Giga shares more synapomorphies with other taxon than TTT and so has closer phylogenetic relationships with other taxa.
TLDR : basal and derived are terms used when you're talking about biological states of characters and not biological entities.
just don't look up elephants and penguins specifically, they do some unsavoury things, unlike swans, in which gay parents have what I've heard is an 80% higher success rate in raising young (one will mate with a female, then both males will drive the female off when the eggs are layed)
I don't have a source on hand though
Question
Sure, but the point is that Giganotosaurus is more deeply nested within Giganotosaurini (clades together with Mapusaurus, Meraxes and Taurovenator) than Tyrannotitan, while Carcharodontosaurus is outside that clade and is sister to it.
You would use either TTT or giga for carch and with whats going on currently with TTT and the unknown factor with its back and shape of it, its better to use giga until either more marital is looked over or there's a redescription but atm there is no issue with using giga as the base for carch
heck random himself said giga would be okay to use as well
if dan's new giga uses more updated material/better measurements on giga theres now less of a reason to use TTT while we have a better base to use for carch ( even more so with titan having some funkiness going on with its back )
Still i think ark has the most accurate giga and carch
HUH
Facts
You got a opinion on this @stiff osprey @zealous ravine @opaque kayak I’m about to crash out
Perucetus was not heavyweigth (+50 tonnes), dowsized to a length of 15 to 16 m and a mass of 35 to 40 tonnes
https://t.co/5DFpn5zPna
looks right to me idk, not a mammal person lol
Damn what a nerf lol
I mean it's around where pretty recent skeletals placed it"
Although I personally prefer this skeletal as it accounts for more of the overall shape and shows the bone layout to justify it
I’ll see myself out
Real
Is this sarcasm 
Definitely not
It’s rage bait and some of yall fell for it😭
What happend? Any size changes?
oh she looks beautiful (the Carcha, my Carcha is female)
Just new Carcha based on Giga
Size changes? Idk gotta ask KM
Let me know if there is a new GDI king
New Deinosuchus dropped
Big Gator thats 30cm longer than Puru
hey does someone know when path of titans is releasing on pc
This is....quite slim
Is this a adjusted dorsal?
Anyone got a skeletal of Kai and rhizodus?
Are you talking about the conversation in the modding channel
Yeah, I wanna try my hand at making a good size chart without prehistoric wildlife
This is not accurate at all but oh well
What's the more accurate metri, jw or PoT?
The head is so wide lol
Ironically, neither are accurate (following phylogenetic backtracking) but Jurassic World got it much better.
May I ask what phylogenetic backtracking is?
Looking at close more complete relatives to fill the gaps.
Metri has quite poorly preserved material so post of it is based on Siamraptor and Yangchuanosaurus iirc.
Ooh okay
Is there any accuracy difference between jwe sucho and PoT sucho?
Mobi just ig repost what you said here?
What sources to do they show for a 7m long rhizodus?
One would expect the first vertebrates to have reached such sizes to be the rhizodonts, which have often been reported as reaching lengths of 6–7 m [240], but this may not be the case. Jeffery [241] estimates Rhizodus hibberti to have measured approximately 5.63 m in length by scaling from a juvenile individual of Strepsodus anculonamensis [242]. Estimating the total length of R. hibberti from Goolongongia loomesi [243], which is larger than S. anculonamensis but more distantly related and is dorsoventrally flattened, unlike Carboniferous rhizodonts (J. Jeffery, pers. comm.) produces a length of 5.14 m.
Sinraptor not Siamraptor
What I mean is that the species of animals varies according to their environment, you have species bigger than others
I see, so it was re-studied and now its size is 5 long?
This is a small excerpt from the 2023 paper that shrunk Dunk, as it discusses a few other large fossil fish
Moreso it was never actually 7m long, and the size range given included the minimum and the maximum possible size estimates
Did leed get mentioned in that paper?
alr, thank you for enlightening me on this subject
No, although Titanichthys gets a passing comparison
Oh yeah, is titanichtys the largest placoderm? ( that's that what dunk and it are, right? )
It and Dunk are
What's max size of raja? (Length height and weight)
Could it be ~3t?
About 7.7 m and 1300-1500 kg
I knew it, one guy is saying that raja could be 3t because of Ruben moline pérez and Asier larramendi et al's info from 2019 
I will never forgive the metri backer for choosing metri over Austra
this implies the existence of Coraptor and Tanraptor
Oops
The supposed giant Rajasaurus ("Lametasaurus") isn't much larger than the normal 7 meter Rajasaurus holotype (on the left in the table) in any measumerents.
Source for this table:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/30849426_A_New_Abelisaurid_Dinosauria_Theropoda_from_the_Lameta_Formation_Cretaceous_Maastrichtian_of_India
What Molina-Perez and Larramendi did is that they took a 1 m ilium and upscaled Majungasaurus to it, not accounting for any other elements known from the specimen (e.g. a 58 cm tibia) or the allometric growth of ilium in Abelisaurids (for example the ~7.8 m Carnotaurus has a 97 cm ilium, comparable to that of the supposed giant Rajasaurus/"Lametasaurus")
Btw who is saying that and where?
He gonna get them 😭😭😭
Just a discord user, idk 
Thanks for your info! 
in what server though?
No problem.
He just wants to talk to them 
if you get the reference you're a person of culture
Who's the more accurate iggy?
pot iggy
By a lot
May I ask for everything wrong with jwe iggy?
The hands to start, all the soft tissue really
It's neck looks Hella skinny
it has really long fingers
So chat basically the theory is that stegosaurus was a fish eater and used its tail like a fishing rod and allosaurus was a fish eater too and it used its jaws and big arms for fishing. The reason the 2 fought is because they dont want to share the same rivers
☠️
Anyone got the most recent Tylo and mosa weight and length estimates
Tylo is a Bit Longer and at like 9 tons
I always thought mosa was bigger. Also do they same have the same tail or does the tylo have that eel tail or is the eel tail outdated?
eel tail is outdated
Yes
I see. But the tail on the skeleton looks just straight. How do we know it looks like a fin?
the vertebrae in the middle of the tail are bent downwards, and we have soft tissue impressions of the fin
Damn,tylo beeg
Is that puru compared to Deino? If true does that mean puru is bigger?
judging by the posture,it´s most likely a speculative max size for deino
Perucetus victim
Thats Random's Puru which is also 10.7m like his Deino
This is Fabio's Puru that is 10.4m
Random's Puru Posture is also that due to Puru been able to Highwalk
That Deino there is the largest reliable specimen
Tired of yall nerfing everything
a Fadeno skeletal being nerfed isn't really surprising ngl
How much does deino weigh?
somewhere between 6-8 tonnes
Fun
Wow, so mosa and tylo both are bigger
Gggrrrrr
This Means Puru is 6-8t cause I said so
(Puru and Deino are basically same size range now lol)
Dinosaur mafia , how accurate?
Mosa n tylo food 🥱
the neck look the same
Doing a WIP size comparison of various notably large aquatic reptiles
Y is he so skinny
Slender marine predator
He's on a cut.
Because hes slender he was good at hugging. Thats why the name is machimosaurus hugii
he looks like i could use him like a sword
Why are his arms so small
it probably in the water alot so it doesnt need it arm that much
Do we have any mass estimates for Machimo?
T. rex with the true kings of the Cretaceous period
