#paleontology
1 messages · Page 138 of 1
It's hard to find a good comparison, they lived in Arctic zone that seemed to have relatively warm summers and cold winters (due to polar nights, that's why it's hard to find a modern comparison). At least that's how many articles describe it
palontology fact: i believe the deynonichus is cooler than the velociraptors from jurassic park (they're not even accurate to real velociraptors)
Like new England?
Maybe. Maybe not. The temperature data is not that well constrained. Although apparently amiot’s 2004 paper on latitudinal gradients did isotopic enamel sampling of the teeth recovered from the Prince creek, and the gradient they produced predicts pretty low temperatures at 80 degrees north
Speaking abt twmpatures, wasn't the negment a seasonal region that was able to get snow?
Probably. Its closest competitive in the monsoonal central and northeastern China does get occasional snow even with its very dry winters
The thought of it is very beautiful In my mind
Is Carchar invalid now 😭, I'm LITTERALLY gonna crash out if it is?
Or did it get nerfed to 6.9 ton?
No, it's valid. The Stromer specimen became a different genus
fragmentary taxon, of course its estimates are gonna change. We can't tell if it's 6.9 or 8.2 t.
Oh, I've heard that the range is now 7.2-8.2T
the range is higher, all we have from Carcharodontosaurus is an incomplete skull
When will the 13% bigger Carchar drop? It's kinda starting to need the buff
Its 7.2t not 6.9t tmk
At 11.5 meters it would likely be smaller than 7.2 tonnes
I poster Tamer and Not Carcha Rip
That's very neat. I'd like to see something like that for once, never actually been in a paleonthology/natural history museum. Thankfully, there is a place in my city. They have triceratops skull, would like to see one in real life.
Hahaha now
One sizable fossil I've seen so far is just a replica of megalodon's jaws near the entrance to the aquarium.
Tamer is 10.2m and 4.4 tons
Nanotyrannus valid (real).
What is this museum btw, just curious?
What happend? Ita 7.2-8.2 tonnes right?
Yes
7.2 tons based on Tameryraptor
8.2-8.4t Based on TTT/Tyrannotitan
Both are good to use
Ah ok, thank u. And I'm pretty sure Mr.Random said that 8.4 is too high
Would an Argentinosaurus die on the spot from the second it's feet made contact if this were to have happened in real life or would it's life end the second it's skull crashes into the ground? Gif sending in a second because cooldown
I assume it's the minor inconvenience gif? Cause assumedly it'd die when the internal organs exploded
it didnt die, its just sleeping
I imagine that first it's legs would break, internal organs would probably explode from the falling speed, and then it's skull would crash on the ground, killing it
We can test with a giraffe
I do suppose
Oh and is the 12.0 meters and 3.8 meter tall reconstruction then 7.2 tonnes?
Yes
I think it would die fastly, but not instantly, but again, it's a much different scale than a walrus
wat skin should i use for t.bataar wat about the skin should i use Cinereous Vulture,Lammergeier,Golden Eagle,Whooper Swan,Steppe Eagle,Marley turkey
Did the paper provide measurements and figures with scale bar?
Yellow has more pop to it @stiff osprey @zealous ravine
a close to 5 ton animal would surely need like, minimal coverings if it isnt living in a incredibly cold environment
oooo this looks really good, next one i wanna get i already got 'saurophaganax;
200 mm scale bar, unfortunately no measured length for this specific skull (certain bones at least are if you want to check if the scale bar is any good though)
What's the difference between iguanodon and iguanacolossus?
idrk but hope this helps a bit
these recon don't showcase the difference at all because one is older than the other
Iguanacolossus differs from other iguanodontians in having a contact surface for supraoccipital on caudomedial process of squamosal curved in caudal view, cranial pubic process with concave dorsal margin but little expansion of its cranial end, postorbital process of the squamosal mediolaterally compressed and blade-like, pubis tapers to a blunt point, cranial extremity of preacetabular process of ilium modified into horizontal boot, axial neural spine blade-like and semi-circular in profile, and the dorsal margin of ilium straight.
NERD!!!!
This is quite an amount of smart words.
I mean you aren't gonna get "Iguanocolossus differs from the Iguanodon by being slightly more purple"
Iguanocolossus differs from the iguanodon because it's an older animal from a older formation and it's name is differ and it's smaller than iguanodon and it has less skeletal material to it's name
Oooh ok
I think you’re mistake, it’s different from other iguanodon in that it colossal. Hence the name?
the raptors from JP literally are deinonychus
I was a fool...perhaps this is why the Nanotyrannus is real?
It is real. It will always be real in our hearts.
Basically comparing a pitbull to a great Dane?
idk dogs so I will not comment
Houston museum of natural science
Ramp
Nice.
Sometimes it's so weird seeing something from hundreds of millions of years ago so perfectly preserved, it's almost unnatural.
yeah.
it was staged ofc.
You mean it's a replica? Yeah, very likely ||(probably is, a museum wouldn't display actual fossils like that lol)||, but we do find fossils of similar condition.
yk what i mean'
Paid actors.
2 question at once abt this Carcha
what bone
The ischium or the other guy
What’s y’all’s favorite dinosaur
chicken
That’s a good one?
Come to think of it which birds came from the Dino’s and which didn’t and just came from other species?
All birds come from dinosaurs
Carcha is like
1cm or same height as Cartilage Sue
I mean, they don't come from dinosaurs, they are dinosaurs, theropods.
Oh well yeah but you know what I meant which evolved from dinosaurs because weren’t there birds that weren’t dinosaurs back in the Mesozoic
weren’t there birds that weren’t dinosaurs back in the Mesozoic
I'm kinda confused by this phrasing.
Oh then I’m wrong thanks for letting me know my bad😭. you think I’m not I barely understand my own word choice half the time
Lmao.
Ok, so here's a simple scheme of dinosaur groups. It's in russian, but I think it gets the point across.
Birds are basically just extremely advanced and diverse microraptors.
Literally me man, dw
But keep in mind evolution isn't completely linear so you can see things side-by-side (like us and chimpanzees, for example)
Yeah, that's what people sometimes miss. Evolution can very much be parallel.
Like people who literally think tyrannosaurus evolved into chicken.
The Indian titan
I always think of it linear cause it’s simple to imagine even though I know it’s way more than a line
Yea that's fair
Honestly I don't think about evolution cause it won't affect me
there's no proving (X) animal evolved into (Y) animal unless we witness it evolving or have DNA evidence
That's why visualization is key. It helps us not stress our monkey brains too much.
At the head they are like the same
Carcha is 4m at Hips
Cartilage Sue is 3.9m
Wait, isn't argentino still the biggest sauropod? Or I'm missing something?
Indian titan mugs @stiff osprey
Because it's every other week a new "challenger" arrives, and it turns out argentino still retains the status.
New week? Indian titan been known about for a long time skippy.
No, I meant it's just "oh this sauropod was actually the biggest all this time" and then just "nevermind, wrong".
The Kallamedu giant and Maraapunisaurus are the only ones that have a chance at rivaling Argent, and both are known from the most garbage material that doesn't even exist anymore (the former was lost to poor documentation and the latter was intentionally left to crumble away)
I’m not really familiar with maraapunisaurus
Formerly known as amphicoelias fragillimus
are known from the most garbage material that doesn't even exist anymore (the former was lost to poor documentation and the latter was intentionally left to crumble away)
I love paleontology.
All birds are dinosaurs, you cannot be classified outside of a taxonomic group you belong. That'd be saying the same as "humans evolved from animals", which would suggest we wouldn't be animals. There used to be a way of classification (evolutionist) as such but it's now considered incorrect and no one is using that (we use now phylogenetic classification based on the share of characters and hypothetic common ancestors).
But to answer the question better, birds are avant dinosaurs belonging to Avialae/Aves depending of the definition (as bird is a common name and ot a taxonomic unit). Their last common ancestor with non Avian dinosaurs (crown dinosauria) was somewhere within 170 million years ago and their closest relatives would be Troodontids. Earliest bird of bird like animals would be Archaeopteryx (but that doesn't mean it's an ancestor).
The legend still lives.
Ok yeah that makes more sense
They just published a new dinosaur on only photo evidence so I’m back in my element:
we're gonna act like you dont instantly die or die 1 hour after
in your opinion, what would you say would be more devastating to a carnivore, getting hit with a ankylosaur tail club or getting hit with a stegosaurs thagomizers?
thagomizers
New carchar just dropped
I'd say anky tail club
Tameryraptor. Estimates I’ve seen put it around 4.3 to 4.4 tons
the club would hurt a lot and break some bones, but you'd probably at least survive the inital blow and have an (albeit very small) chance of recovering long-term
the thagomizer would just instantly kill you or leave you with such a devastating wound your practically guranteed to die of infection or blood less later
Giant Ceratosaurus 😁
i love that thagomizer started as a made up word for a silly caveman comic and now its like. in papers.
well they're not even closely related plus the horn in Tameryraptor is much smaller
I know I just said it as a joke lol 😂
isnt a allosaurus shown to survive a tail swing tho?
What’s a Dino that would be a juvi killer irl
no, the one with the massive injury almost certainly died from it lol
Marshosaurus
just about any predator would rather go after something young/old than something in it's prime tbh
the one that got hit in the kiwis? i thought the fossil had evidence of healing?
Wait what’s this new carchar
big al?
last i heard anyway it didn't show signs of healing, though it may have died of infection after, il have to double check
no not big al, this one's in MUCH worse condition
ooooooo
Finding fossilized bone pathology is so cool
FYM INTENTIONALLY
https://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2014AM/webprogram/Paper247355.html <- yeah no signs of healing, didn't die right away seemingly but of infection a while after
Bone Wars were wild
they hadn't started using resins to preserve fossils yet
the mudstone it came from tended to crumble
so the guy just drew it once and then was like 'well its gonna fall apart anyway so whatever'
some material described in Matley 1929 might suggest another Argentinosaurus sized specimen from Kallamedu but it all needs to be redescribed
I used to be a volunteer fossil preparator, you'd be surprised how much stuff just goes missing or gets lost track of, especially the really old stuff
never gonna forget the first time they took me down to the basement full of fossil jackets. was like an infinite backrooms of 'we have maybe a general idea of what might be in most of these but we dont know for sure'
some of it just sat there waiting to be opened for decades
That's...
Understandable to an extent if they did Stromer levels of diagrams
do you have the paper?
yes but i need to find it meanwhile here's this thing that is either a femur or a humerus and thus scales to either like 40 or 70 t
I can't say that they wanted the bones to be destroyed, but you'd think the bones of the supposed largest dinosaur ever would get them funding to dig them up, or that failing that they'd draw some really detailed diagrams. Instead it got a short description with drawings that look like they were made by a 5 year old, and then the bones were left on the ground to be destroyed by the next monsoon
Indian titan victim
bro disintegrated
That is literally a different specimen of the Indian titan which wasn't lost in a flood
Still gets cooked , tell him @stiff osprey
They're all the same, it disintegrated anyway
This is still my boy
dust
So is Tameryraptor and everyone is having a parade for it 😒
The Tametyrap specimen was well described Bruhathkayosaurus was not
Me when the completion is not even comparable
Question: I gotta know, was mah Boi the Fasolasuchus's size estimate of 8 to 10 meters long and 2 ton weight lowered?
Srry if I interrupted anything, but the most recent thing I could find about it was a news article from Aug 1st last year
Tameryraptor was a formerly under Carcharodontosaurus, one of the most well known theropods of all time, and the original specimen of it, while now contributed to one of the only different looking Carcharodonts. That's a pretty big difference to a poorly described fossil and almost no reliable information regarding it's existence
I mean, I have had people compare Spinosaurus to Amphicoelias lol
💀 hell naw
I have one thing to say and you wont like it: Bahariasaurus solos
Bahariasaurus justice
what's the most complete big azhdarchid specimen?
are we sure that they are not a collective hallucination
are they doomed to be fossilized as a vertebra and a humerus
It's the nature of a large flying animal to suck at preserving
Too big to fossilize rapidly (like the smaller pterosaurs) and too delicate to survive prolonged exposure to the outside world (like dinosaurs)
They're the size of giraffes but with the weight of a bear and hollow chopsticks for bones, fossilization bias does not favor them
dont forget that they have a sword for a mouth
I don't think having a sword for a mouth affects fossilization
this guy seems to have a pteroid fossilized? so cheeky
Yeah but that got bombed, Kallamedu giant just disintegrated
More like a pair of tweezers but that doesn't help fossilzation because we can't even get teeth from them
wicked
I love collecting deranged paleo things
Rapetosaurus had one of the best introductions in prehistoric planet
I swear I wanna do stuff to myself what is this
Also having sauropods displaying varied and interesting behaviors such as fooling around in the mud instead of being overhyped background props or fodder is one of my PhP highlights
The Dreadnoughtus scene with the two huge bulls fighting it out was cinematic
I swear david peters is like, the main villain of paleontology
Is it true that stegosaurus would typically win it's brawls with allosaurus?
Or would it lose
Allosaurus would win most fights due to the fact that predators do not engage prey they don't think they can kill. If the Stegosaurus was too big the allosaur would just not attack it
Somewhat ironically finding evidence of a predator taking wounds from a given herbivore is actually evidence that the predator would normally win since, like random said, predators don't attack things if they expect to die from it
Torvosaurus victims
is stegosaurus really a usual torvo victim?
I can picture an allosaurus managing to bit around a stegosaurus neck/head, keeping to the front of the animal while it tries to tear it apart with its jaws.
A painful death for the stegosaurus if it doesn't manage to shake the allosaur off it.
Yes, but more of a comic relief villain that comes up with the dumbest plans imaginable that always fail, and instead of being the main threat is a plot device secondary to the central conflicts
nuclear bomb victim
I can't think of anyone who is more of a central conflict than him. Jack Horner is like a reformed villain (with him not pushing the scavenger junk anymore) and Robert DePalma's schemes are too low stakes
perhaps the true villain... was big paleo??
Lol big paleo
Big dirt
This is why Stego has neck armor
Exactly right, it's still certainly a gigantic weakspot, but the extra armour may give time for the stego to shake the allosaurus off through whatever means it could.
@stiff osprey Do we have any weight estimates for Tamery?
I'd guess 4-4.5 tonnes
Ty
I can't believe we found the JP3 ceratosaurus
Well, refound.
For Carcharodontosaurus which would you say is more reliable? The one you made using Tameryraptor or the 8.2 ton one?
Neither is reliable, so you can choose either one
(nor is any saharicus skeletal out there)
Who Pinged me
Getting mixed feelings about that.
Thanks
It pains me to see carch become like this. Now it is just more north african uncertain taxa.
Well unmix your feelings then
Perucetus victim
I saw the craziest artwork of perucetus while looking for artwork I haven’t seen of it before and let’s just say I will not post it but I was dumbfounded
Icthytitan victim
In fact, is there a single megatheropod which can be somewhat said as being reliable in Cenomanian north africa at this point?
What does 7shot mean 🤣 I know who it is but like why
In fact, the best might unironically be spinosaurus now 💀
Explain Perucetus victim
Bro is starting a cult.
Perucetus victim
I mean, but being serious. Lie, all Cenomanian north african megatheropods are now known with Crappy remains/Lost/Uncertain taxanomy. That's insane
I mean, it's true for a lot of big theropods. Except Rex, because nature is apparently a very big fan and preserves rexes in thousands.
The perucetus bull patrols its sea , dominating , intimidating any foe who would dare enter his territory, he is now and forever a echo into the past that blue whale might be king today but he was king of yesterday. Thank you.
I kinda agree, and in fact, for most megatheropods that is true, but still can't believe all north african megatheropods cenomanian is either one/two bones, unclear classification or stright up lost
The seas haven’t forgotten
nuclear bomb victim talking
Ratioed by Perucetus
can he beat goku tho?
He is not going to be so intimidating and dominating after I make an elaborately designed bait that initiates ammonia poisoning.
Carcharodontosaurus is more complete than largest Spinosaurus specimens
More complete than acro?
How complete is it without the "holotype" now being reclassified?
To my knowledge, it's just a skull and a bunch of fragmentary reffered specimens
Also, just gonna say, now since they named (reclassfied for those guys) Amphicoelias and tamery off of lost fauna let's rename Hector's ichthyosaur 
Most of the skull. Large Spinosaurine specimens are literally a about and an incomplete dentary
I mean it's not bad, but also frankly not better then the "neotype" (if that thing even is a spinosaurus)
"neotype" is better but it's also 3 t
Yes, I know. I would still throw it in the megatheropod spot for having larger specimens tho
Status as Spinosaurus very doubtful
Fair point, but I was more talking about the list of megatheropods incomplete in north africa, rather then the level of completion for the largest specimens
Perucetus owns u
How heavy was Lisowicia?
Somewhere between 1 and like 2 pounds I think or maybe higher like 2.5 idk it was heavy
??????
I forgor
5 tonnes
specifically 5-7 tons @snow python
Damn that is a lot of pounds, that’s like more than 3 I think
use tons instead of pounds next time but you do you
so funny 🙄
Thanks pal
do we have any fossil evidence of tyrannosaurus having a shattered leg bone or something from ankylosaurus?
No because we don't have a lot of fossils from Ankylosaurus
Ankylosaurus isn't the only one of its family with the big club right?
Nope
You have Euoplocehalus and Anodontosaurus as a couple of examples
Euop was my fav growing up
I love that painting of one tackling a tank
evidence that ankylosaurs’s tail was for display purposes only
What about that recent paper that said it was for intraspecific combat
that was Zuul wasn’t it? ( my original comment was joking if that wasn’t clear )
There's a gorgosaurus tibia/ fibula that got multiple fractures from one and healed iirc
oh ok, interesting! is there a name to it so i can find an article on it?
I do not know
If there was how would someone be able to infer that the broken bone was caused by an ankylosaur?
This is how I came to love eupo
you would need an impact point that couldn’t just be caused by the animal falling over, so like a fracture on the lower leg with a clear point of impact
it’s a lot easier with stegosaurs because you can tell pretty clearly when something has been thagomized
Tarbosaurus lived with the most ankylosaurids I believe if anyone cares
Was there any nodasaurids in negment or just a bunch of ankylosaurs?
I think dinosaur park has more actually, since euplocephalus got split
How many does dinosaur park have compared to negment?
dinosaur park has 4 genus not counting nodosaurs, nemegt proper has 2 named ones
I swear a formation in Mongolia had a ungodly amount of ankylosaurs
Baruungoyot or Nemegt formation, im not 100% sure.
How many does baruu have?
The world is ending
@neat drum HAve you? 
Dude. I was trying to get some help.
Are links to articles not allowed?
they are
So why did my question get deleted? 😭
Was it too vague?
Gonna be honest, I have no clue, repost it and if the mods delete it, they're on crack
ILL KILL HIM!!!!
Subscribe to my new channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSkUYhWt3Js_P3Cgu_vMv8w?view_as=subscriber
So real
If it got instadeleted, it was the automod. Could complain via modmail I guess.
oh wait I misread what you said as "wrong ending"
Has anyone here read through this article before?
Specifically the section on phylogenetic nomenclature?
Here's the reference so that automod doesn't snipe it.
PADIAN K, CHIAPPE LM. The origin and early evolution of birds. Biological Reviews. 1998;73(1):1-42. doi:10.1017/S0006323197005100
Aerosteon holotype
Great art but holy crap can we please stop giving it a cerato crest
Nevermind, I've managed to sorta figure out my problem.
What have i missed ?
the maip is a megaraptor
Yeah that has been known since it was described aka since 2022
in my honest opinion i think torvosauruses have rectangle head that weak
also could trex jaw lock like tarbosaurus
???
Wow, really, i didn't know that !
It's not like its revonstruction says anything about it
(sorry for the sarcasm, nu i just had to, no hard feelings dude)
im dinoist toward torvos
how cold could hell creek get
now or prehistoric times
Oh hi Mano
now
Now or Prehistoric
largest sauropods
Do we have any Kelmayisaurus skeletal?
Hehehe
prehistoric
smth tells me that this is a theropod more closely related to carcharodontosaurus than to allosaurus
cant quite put my finger on it
All that from a jaw?!
We're the crest even come from
i thought argent was largest
The two larger ones are utter garbage that doesn't even exist anymore ("Bruhathkayosaurus" and Maraapunisaurus)
y
.
What crest? It doesn't have a crest
there's no crest
In the picture 💀
it's ridge
A clamp analysis produced a CMMT of 2.3(?) or something near that. If it’s accurate than it would’ve probably experienced freezing temperatures occasionally though lessened with the reduced diurnal temperature variation at that higher latitude
i see it
Ooh ok
Doesn't stegosaurus have gular armor
And wouldn't it's plates around it's neck make targeting the neck harder
Stegosauurs quite literlaly has thorat armor
Going for it's head seems hard it may not have the strongest bite but it's still could it could be pretty painful
@stiff osprey cooked u ngl champ
all five newtons of stegosaurus bite force would surely deter the allosaurus from attacking it
Random don't you know predators always back down when faced with any sort of resistance or pain!
?
meanwhile Camarasaurus which had the bite force of Suchomimus for some reason
Yeah
the fearsome allosaurus is no match for the powerful bite of stegosaurus
what if its bite removed a scale, causing infection?????????
Clearly too much of a threat to engage at any time
to commit crime
It’s actually quite strong, for its size anyway
I poorly simulated allosaurus vs stegosaurus I guess you guys win
Should I do a rematch
Allosaurus actually hunted stegosaurs by pushing them off cliffs... fascinating theory
Yeah real footage
Peak guy
how good were stegosaurids at rearing up?
Not the best their kinda fat but kentrosaurus might have been able to pretty well
Is that big or small?
Like
Around 5-6KN??
Majunga bites at 7.8kN anyways
Pretty good considering their COG is more towards their back end
oh yeah, dont we have trackways of them walking on their back legs or something?
I'm bad at newtons but yeah that doesn't look small, roughly 600kg
Hard to picture with Suchomimus (at least for me) since it's jaws look like this
here's Afrovenator with the more appoprporite head
Where's the afro
Maybe?
10kN should be 1 ton
So yeah close enough
Would it be possible for Spino to knuckle walk since we haven’t found concrete fossils for it’s arms yet? I for one would believe it to some extent… (I know it’s an outdated question but I’d like to hear your opinions on it)
Tmk Mf would MAYBE stand Still to Crouch
But walking mf would like
Break its writs/arms tmk
Thats why bfo is bipedal
Fair, theropod wrists aren’t made for support anyways. but it’s always a cool concept to think about…
no because even with it's relatively short legs in comparison other similar size theropods there is just no reasonable reason for spinosaurus to need to be move on it's plams
Sucho bites with around 440kgf iirc
Btw so does Camarasaurus
Potentially
I can simulate any battle what should I do first
T. rex vs Thescelosaurus
No
This good
I nearly had a heart attack thinking that was my photo
HMNS ?
So goodzilla vs allosaurus
Yea I was there a few months back and had taken a photo similar to that (or tried to)
But the biggest stegosaurus could beat the biggest allosaurus?
if the Allosaurus mistimed its ambush sure
So on a average allo slams
Has anyone found any arm fossils for spinosaurus
if you were to like put the two in an arena and made them fight to the death I reckon the stego would win most of the time
but like in a realistic scenario see the previous convo
But in the wild allo would win
Unless a herbivore is over double their size, most carnivores do extremely well in an ambush. That's just how hunting goes
The vast majority of predators will seek an ambush opportunity
Wait how would even ambush stegosaurus when it's sleeping or something
like any other predator, waiting behind cover for the target to come close
but yeah sneaking up on it while asleep would also work
Thing about stego is it was the larger than all it's predators as a adult so yong or weak individuals probably got picked off
Attacking a stegosaurus from behind is the worst idea tbh 
Seems like stegosaurus would usually lose guess I'm a allo fan :<
Not at all wad the other way around mostly especially aginst allosaurus we even got a specimen that was impaled in his junk 
tarbosaurus with the Cinereous Vulture skin
Nice
As oogma said, the fact that we have a fossil of an Allosaurus that lost the fight means it would have won most of the time. Predators aren't stupid, they don't pick prey that they think will demolish them
What's with the big dewlap
Why I said weak individuals or Yong were picked off 🤷🏾♂️
sure, most predators prefer the young and injured. That doesn't mean adults are immune to predation
Tell this to the trike fanboys
Probably over weight
Kinda think of it what would overweight dinosaurs look like
it was said to have that under it neck like a turkey
Interestingly though the amount of pathologies thought to be from Allosaurus in dinosaurs from the Morrison is quite extensive if I recall correctly
Technically it's sort of debated as the only direct evidence is a lost fossil which isn't here anymore
But such a size dewlap seems a bit much on the soft tissue said for animal like tarbosaurus
some make it smaller
Possible
@outer tusk yeah
I also think all large dinosaurs were saggy looking like elephants imo
how many different ceratopsians did rex live with from every formation its in?
Uhm idk about that but okay
Again for tarbosaurus specifically we don't know to what extent a dewlap would be in life but it probably was nowhere near the size where it seems to be as wide as the torso
it called a snood
3 and a half, or 4 and a half depending what you label as stupid and not stupid
torosaurus, triceratops ( are we counting both species of it? ) nedo ( if you think its real ) ?
what you depicted isn't a snood
Come now over 5 or even 3 tons and you don't have a single jelly roll or gamma flap you can't say it's not possible
This cd too long
ohhh i thought it was the the one under it neck
Sierraceratops too?
Fr man
1:00?! Oh naw 👋🏾
size technically has no relevance when it comes to features like snood, wattles, and other display feature
Archosaurs don’t exactly work like that sooo, it’s not as simple as saying that imo
technically that's mcraeensis but in any case tmk sierraceratops is the only confirmed ceratopsid in hall lake
Guess I'm a stego fan again:>
Well if we count mcraeensis too, how many ceratopsians then?
Not really a snood thing it's over all just weight with how large you are
At least to sum degree they would had
Still 1:00 wow
regardless such features and the size that they were espeically on large bodied theropods is very much speculative and somewhat up to the user on how they wish to depict it though for the most part likely weren't that visible
Fair I guess
could large marine reptiles devolpe blubber? or their own type, do we have any fossil evidence of that?
Had to you know how cold water gets especially when you go deepsr?! Even salt water crocs are fatter to deal with the cold waters of the ocean
we have body outline preservation from plesiosaurs and it's a lot thicker than you'd expect from just skin and muscle, so yes they probably had blubber
Look at that pretty face is speaks I need help getting up
fat crocodile
this is gonna sound weird but what would be wider/fatter?
sarco or purru? bcuz ik irl caiman are skinny as hell
Probably purr
Sarco was practically a giant Ghar with a mouth targeted towards snatching quick or slippery prey so it was probably a little sleaker at least to swim faster
Yes but I'm using it in reference because it's snout quite was similar meaning with its large size if it got you your not getting out no matter how quickly or slippery ypu are lol
It was likely with that possible semi sleek but giant combo better at ambushing large and even smaller prey with fish on top of that to
It wasn't though
It's closer to that of an Orinoco Crocodile than a gharial by far
What's that? A orinoco crocodile
They seem generally going for the same function to me imo
What does a gharials skull look like compared to sarcos I wonder
Left side or the picture I sent
Gharial skull are very much thinner than an adult sarcosuchus skull top and side view
Sarco skull vs gharial is pretty day and night imo
Yesh not really all that simmilar
Literally long snout with a button just like it one is just giant and strong enough to clamp a dinosaur
Well I wouldn’t expect an apex predator of its era to have a toothpick biter on it tbh.
Like of corse it's going to have thicker and stronger bones to snag dinosaurs plus it's a giant but they literally function and structure the same
I wouldn’t agree on that second part just look at the difference in build , i understand where them being similar comes from but it’s key differences.
snagging dinosaurs and snagging little fish and frogs are pretty different functions ( though sarco probably also snagged fish and frogs, along with much larger game )
Lurdusaurus victim
yup lurdusaurus is a victim
i think this also applies on @tough parcel too ig?
otherwise, this bone
that's the ischium
How big was lurdusaurus?
That's what I said 💀 but I added the fact that sarcos gigantic size would have alowed it to prey on dinosaurs to
you said they served the same function 🤓☝️
Both had a long snout that allows them to cut through water when hunting prey with sharp teeth built towards holding prey down to were they can't loosen
Ischium
it might sound stupid but. are humans and neanderthals the gigas and rex of the hominids, because humans are taller and thinner but neanderthals are shorter and stockier.
probably not since there are more factors that differ Rex from giga other than dimensions
@stable sun also cuz they replied me too
They even ain't tbh
Like they said, An Orinoco is Closer skull wise to Sarco than a Gharial or even False Gharial is to Sarco
@steady rock
Puru.
Puru been a caiman won't make it skinnier by rule.
Puru is like same weight as Deinosuchus when both are the same Length and iirc its Heavier than a Astorgo even at similar Lengths
same weight?
wasn't Puru 6t while Deinos is 9t?
“when same length “
ah silly me
Tomistoma goat mentioned🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🔥
clearly sarcosuchus is analogous to the cowardly fish eating gharial!
there have also been tooth isotope tests on Sarco, Eocarcharia and Sucho to determine what sort of prey they were generally taking, sarco's results indicated it was half and half with aquatic and terrestrial prey
Wait what is this specimen
Torvosaurus Gunyieri
Deino is 8t not 9t and I said same length
Replica* at the Lourinha dinosaur park
Def same thing wdym
Doesn't look to be accurately restored going by Torvosaurus tanneri I think
It definitely isn’t
Ive been looking alot into the different actual and proposed allosaurus species lately... been super sucked into it. Im curious what everyone prefers... Fragilis or Jimmadensi? What are your thoughts on Allosaurus Anax? (I dont think this is an official thing... more of a classification for now since poor fossil evidence, used to be saurophaganax). What are your thoughts on Epanterias Amplexus? Do you really think allosaurus could have had a 40 ft spiecies?
Randomdinos made a chart of all(?) allosaurus specimens that can be decently scaled
- There are 4 known species that likely exist. Allosaurus fragilis, jimmadseni, europaeus and anax.
- What do you mean it isn't an offcial thing? The paper was published.
- Saurophaganax is a separate thing. It's not Allosaurus and it is a nomen dubium genus and likely a sauropod.
- Epanterias amplexus is likely about 11-12 m but the issue is that it is Allosaurus but it's also nomen dubium.
red = A. fragilis
blue = A. jimmadseni
green = A. europaeus
purple = A. sp.
Not all. There's a lot more specimens that can be decently scaled.
A. anax is a better taxon than Sauro, but it's still highly unstable, even if it remains valid it's a mess
It will remain valid.
I don't think certainty to that extent is wise or responsible
It has diagnostic characters not present in other species. I don't see the issue.
Reply to 2: Ok I read something that they were thinking of making it A. Anax but wasn't sure if it was official or not, or just like a proposed thing. Thanks for the clarification. Could you link the paper?
because it's a messy taxon no matter what with the information we currently have
Irrelevant. The holotype has diagnostic characters making it valid.
I think it's pretty dam relevant
No, it isn't. It will remain valid because the holotype can be distinguished from all other species. And that's what matters.
that doesn't prohibit it from being assigned to a separate genus in the future, I'm not saying it will or that there's even a good chance, but I really don't like making such absolutist statements, especially about something so fragmentary
So Epanterias amplexus (amnh 5767) is nomen dubium? Is it because there arent enough defining characteristics to certainly catergorize it as an allo?
esp since most of the referred material doesn't really have any overlap tmk, which whole not invalidating the species of the holotype remains stable, it still makes it something to have an air of caution about, when making such absolutist statements
It is Allosaurus. But it is nomen dubium either way, as a species. It can't be distinguished from other Allosaurus species.
Ahh gotcha that makes sense
Genera are basically arbitrary. Also, if it gets a separate genus... It will still remain a valid taxon. I don't see your point. Fragmentary taxa can be diagnostic.
^ which is to say, it's uncertain if it's a valid species of allosaurus separate from the others, or if it's undiagnostic which would make it "Allosaurus sp.", or if it's just another speciemen of a named species
my point is that I don't think it's stable enough as allosaurus sp. to be stated with absolutist certainty to be valid for the foreseeable future, but rather should be stated to be solidly valid as we can currently tell
It's still a valid species that will definitely remain valid in the future and that's my point. It's also very similar to Allosaurus and so is all of the material in the quarry. It is probably Allosaurus.
Well yeah it is undiagnostic
I was breaking it down more to help others understand it better
Thanks guys for the explanations!
You're not welcome!

^^
Going to be entirely real, having this utter level of confidence in it remaining valid in the future is absolutely insane given that the authors themselves openly express that A.anax may in fact get lumped into another Allosaurus species once individual variation is understood better within the genus.
While the authors throughout the paper are confident not everything can be explained by individual variation, the mere fact that they bring it up as a genuine concern in the conclusion is enough to have at least some level of caution in mind and not make such direct blanket statements on future validity, as you should really have for the majority of highly fragmentary taxa like this.
my thoughts exactly
that level of confidence imo is reserved for the validity of things like Tyrannosaurus rex, or Allosaurus fragilis
Perhaps then we should lump A. fragilis into T. rex to prove you wrong...
Don't let anything of this distrac you from the fact that UK destroyed a real spinosaurus squeleton in Berlin in a bombin raid during 1944
Yea I don't think anyone...doesn't know
Am just curious is the amount of detailing okay
is this a juvenile megalosauroid?
It has 2 fingers 😭
mb i didnt see
It's a juvenile tarbosaurus
And Fragilis would be more valild then lets say, Jimmedensi because there are just a substantial amount more fossil evidence? Strictly confidence level speaking.
Genuinely curious, im still learning haha ^^
no, both are equally valid, tmk. fragilis can only jerpordise the existance of jimmadseni if jimmadseni's key identifing traits are found to be due to individual variantion etc, or just not distinct enough etc. Because fragilis was named before jimm, it take prioity if they're found to be synonymous
is this accurate or nah, cus im seriously doubting this rn
I'm pretty sure these illustrations are still good, also tmk A. europaeus is kinda unstable because we have very few specimens and the ones we have aren't super complete
Yea that makes sense... in all of the reading i have done about allosaurus i feel like Europaeus is rarely even mentioned
it's accurate, Spinosauridae is inside Megalosauria
And by extension, in Carnosauria 
correct me if im wrong but i dont think it was confirmed that megalosauroidae is part of carnosauria, although its likely
With Asfaltovenator, it revived Carnosauria and put Spinosauridae into Megalosauria then Megalosauria into Carnosauria
No? It was real far away from being in there
tmk yes but it's jumps around abit, sometimes it falls out side of it in phylogenetic software.
Which for those who don't know, modern phyogenetic trees are generally made by placing various species into a software with several specific characteristics of their anatomy in order to calculate how close they are toeachother (at least I'm pretty sure that's how it's done)
that was a joke
Fair. I'd still consider it probably valid though.
Spinosaurus has been in Megalosauria way before Asfaltovenator
Woah crazy
But Asfaltovenator is what put Spinosauridae into Megalosauria as of late
Spinosaurs being megalosauroids is a lot better supported than megalosauroids being carnosaurs however
No. They have been in Megalosauria long before that. In 1998 Sereno already considered Spinosaurs and Megalosaurs to be closely related.
Carrano et al. (2012) also recovered that long before Australovenator and used Megalosauria for the Spinosaur + Megalosaur clade.
Spinosaur the goat
"As of late" is the important part 
Not sure what do you mean
Petition to name Marfim carcharodontosauria indet.
"Curupirasaurus brasiliensis" 
Amostradinhosaurus Riodejaneirensis better frfr
( @stable sun ) Yeah, this is meant to be the European one, ANYWAY why is nobody telling me dinosaurs had substitute teeth like crocs and sharks
This can quite easily tip the scales on the lips debate, since all of the debate is about modern land animals who don't regrow them
don't we literally have lizards that do
This also honestly doesn't change the fact that dinosaurs that didn't have beaks or grossly protruding teeth like spinosaurus likely had lips based off of skeletal and phylogenetic evidence
Oh good, if we have proofs they did then ok, but most of the times I herd the debate was just theoretically
Still I am flabbergasted that dinosaurs had real regrowing teeth like crocs and sharks!
Don't make me think about the Camara lip nightmare
That's not my point and you know it
trunked brachiosaurus
pseudo-beaked lips that get shed alongside a battery of teeth all at once (potentially)
It's not all theoretical, but a substantial (imo) argument against no lips is dinosaurs did not have a reason to lose them except specific instances, like Spinosaurus
And because the "default" mode for tetrapods are lips, dinosaurs would've started out with lips
you telling me half their mouth falls offs for shedding, great, like my day couldnt get any frekier
Who says it's just one sauropod
That's not my point and you know it 💀
why did you need to tell me twice
Sup little sarco Victims
this is me irl i would NOT be a sarco victim
would i be a sarco victim
Sarco is a me victim
sarco boots
There’s a reason that john is extinct
I love tarbosaurus
Sarco is kinda your weight with better weapons tho....
Tyrannosaurus bataar?
Sarco peak
species
Are you a bot correcting me
💀 Lmao
Is he ?
Why is there "Beagliam 2.0" 💀
Idk
Yeah we’re the first model?💀
were*
Where*
Auto correct guys i swear
It got deleted
smaller sauropods were able to live with large spinosaurids right?
it has happened a couple times so yeah
i know who beagliam is but why is that guy beagliam 2.0 though
a couple of times? i thought only sucho and nigersaurus
there’s smaller sauropods living with spino as well, granted how those avoided predation by carchs isn’t entirely understood but they didn’t have to worry about spino
Spinosaurus and Rebbachisaurus, Spinosaurus and Aegytptosaurus
Update: nvm rebbachisaurus is 16 tonnes
yeah rebbachi is a bit large, but aegypto the point stands
any sauropods under 5 tons that lived in either swamp, costal or wetland areas? ( magysaurus and eurposaurus dont count )
This is interesting
lil late to the party
Felt like it
How late
56 days
Wait fr? 💀
Where do y'all get your information
Sorry I meant 3 days
That's not so bad
Yea it's not at all, Vivid's just joking because if not, I would have to reveal the true nature of Allosaurus
Is there any paleonews things I could follow to stay up to date
Not really ngl, but the biggest news will pop up here real fast
Wish there was a news channel that was all focused on paleo stuff
Ben G Thomas kinda
top 3 biggest spinosaurids?
im gonna assume
spinosaurus
suchomimus
but what would the third be?
It’s a predator!!
Baryonyx?
what abt this kind of agility on Rex?
its like, 4 tons maybe less? so i dont know
thought you meant size not weight
dosent biggest equate to weight?
I guess
spinosaurus suchomimus oxalia or something
i always forgot oxalia is a thing
Spinosaurus, Sigilmassasaurus, Cristatusaurus Suchomimus
what's the website you got that picture from?
Deviantart
turns out its also the first picture on google lol
i dont suggest using fandom for your prehestoric knowledge, its worse then wikipedia
oxalaia in second and vectispinus in third
im getting alot of different answers, may i have weights ?
ty random
Wb Marfim fm caudal and that larger Protathlitis
did silgammasaurus have a sail or nah?
Does anyone know how to get ioa testing
isnt that a modding team? if it is, best to ask #modding
the picture just shows a small hump
yeah but the skeletal has a spinosaurus sail
we need more fossils
so its unknown if it would've had one or not?
We solo the wannabe giga
its unknown if it even was a thing, some people think it might be a new spinosaurus species or synonym
Spinosaurus, sigilmassasaurus and suchomimus
marfim caudal and the referred Protathlitis would be #4 and 5 probably
marfim caudal before oxalaia is crazy work
wtf I don’t remember oxalia being that “small”
whats a marfim caudal and protathlitis?
oxalaia used to be 14 meters long but they shrank it togther with spinosaurus
oxalaia was never 14 meters long
It was , I confirm I was there when it happened
it was. at the time spino was 18-16
It was when Spinosaurus was 18 m
when ur only fossil remaining got burned within the museum in 2018:
Oxalaia material is 1/5 of a snout that was turned into dust anyway
poor thing
same thing also applies on Spino in 1944
bombed not burned in this case
Why is my Goat Sucho only 5 tons? /j
Honestly it looks weird when Sucho is supposed to be almost spino size
Scale tinest fragments to make a 10 ton robust and slender morph
what
how much do you think it weighs?
not sure which species we're talking about but i'm the one that made the chart
Can we get much higher
Kinda odd looking at it
nah
i wonder if non avian theropods can do this too...
That name needs to be destroyed, cast into the fire
Not really
Spino is Bulkier, Denser and Longer
So it been Heaviee its alr
Dan's Sucho gets to like 5.4 tons tmk at max, And I have seen a model that can go from 4.8-5.6 tons
Then again Sucho is Weird lol
wtf is that neck lol
the model is based on Sereno's scan, so is Dan's
Can someone get me both carnos and galli's speed estimates?
Sauro's sucho is peak
Dan's is Tmk 12.14m and 5.4t
Tho I also like this guy
12m and 5t matches more this guy tmk
did i do a good job at scaling? (original skeletons )
Seems reasonable
Pretty indescript IIRC
well, south america was pretty dry and arid back then iirc so we can assume so was amarga's formation
I need more sucho skeletals smh
I have like 3 but I need more
is sucho your fave dino?
Nah.
Its maybe Carcha or Spino ngl but Sucho is arguably Top 3
I'm scared
use this one
I mean elephants need to look up to giraffes while still weighing more but hight can come in cluch sometimes
why does it look like that
idk ask the amargasaurus
is this better?
Meg appreciation post
yes
Do we know how flexible stegosaurus tail was?
Flexible
found this (idk how accurate this is)
Could it detach and start dancing
what
It's a joke
^
Hey I'm the funniest clown fish around
look at my para isnt it cool
yes
He's on his way
We're exactly? He dosent know but he's getting there ☺️
i just need some reference to finsih it
hes standing still

Also how valid is 8 ton stegosaurus
As valid as every other random big assorted femur
Though large isolated stego material has been scaled I believe so I think it can be valid, just not assignable to any specific species atm
It's the guy who always puts on crazy soft tissue for spinosaurids
let’s return to shrink wrapping 💔💔
Luckily my favorite species of stegosaurus isn't stenops
Better than any of my drawings
does that count as convergant evolution?
He's just a little guy
You will need to ask someone smarter than me
Tiny baby
Yes it would be
parasaurolophus
If in some alternate universe where Torosaurus had turned out to be an adult Triceratops, would Torosaurus be changed to Triceratops because Triceratops came first, or would Triceratops change to Torosaurus because Torosaurus is the adult?
toro ➡️ trike
fatalis what have u done???
hey guys I'm new to this channel and I find the Torvosaurus attractive
I agree
no way I found out the saurophaganax is just a larger allosaurus
always was tbh ( visually)
I used to see this guy in almost all of the dinosaur books when I was growing up, and then never heard of him again. What happened to Sordes?
Thrown into the forgetness pit
Hatze but bebe
omg my shayla
Idk about birds
@merry jewel did you see an Allosaurus 11.7 meters long? I don't think you ever did cause its not on display.
You know, the fact of you going to a museum and seeing a couple of juvies doesn't makes you right
Now with this being said I will go to a school , watch a couple kids 10 years old. And state that humans are 1.20 meters tall
You can state an opinion without being a prick, just saying
The pot one is 10m so its not even max estimates,but again design wise they based off sauro and not allo,i repeated twice and i said to end the convo.
You keep coming back and forth to me and no i havent seen couple of juvies i saw 3 sub adult skeletons lol
Like in all honesty you may be right or wrong but acting like this level of entitlement is rather childish.Im not an expert, and idk about you, but again the ones i have seen,asking my niece,reading,etc they are max estimates.But on pot case devs said its been said couple times it is oversized "in general" same with achillo and other animals
If you don't know the history we had in the other chat we can't talk🤷. He was the one coming like he was 100000% right when he isnt
Acting childish won't make a difference, you can expose your facts in a proper way without talking that way
When did I act childish? I was just stating the truth the whole time. Going to a museum watching juvies is no proof of anything. But alright, peace
Torvo victims per usual
I didnt say that,i simply mentioned what devs said that is all,but its obvious we disagree and its fine.
From my side i apologise if i made you feel uncomfortabke at some point,im simply saying that with animals and games or irl estimates theres always a lot of room to jiggle on sizes,and design wise alderon chose more of a saurophagonax one than an average allosaurus size
Achillo is def oversized I would say, and we wouldn't have to argue with that
It's all good. I just wish you could hear my voice trought texting, I'm always chill🥹. Sorry if it seemed different lol
Its okay,it simply seemed rather rude when reading but it can happen when using texts lol i just want to make clear i have no beef nor anything,simply that i think from what devs have said and the info ive readed,they went more of a saurophagonax size and design than a PURE allosaurus one on average
I do recognise I may get a little bit picky when I read Allo is oversized, because for me simply it isn't, so I don't know, it kicks in something in me🥹
@merry jewel yeah, no beef at all. Life is short
Understandable we all get hurt when a fav animal gets hit by some comments xD anyways its all good!Have a gd day though
Gd😂 whats your favourite animal by the way?
Overall?Spinosaurus number one,then concavenator and third place is rex/prestosuchidae in general
They should make spino tail attack a special one. Kinda like Barbs have for example.. my man has a giant tail and it makes 10 damage
Its sad hehe
If it had some sort of stun or could apply the wet debuff so it goes well with drenched blows would be amazing.
I do hope when spino gets a tlc, the sail texture is improved and the claws a bit, not that vanilla spino is bad but id love to get it closer to the irl one lookwise
it's a 50/50 chance
sometimes it can be Torvo but sometimes it can be Allo
I agree. He needs some love believe me....
Oh, and by the way.. may I ask which specimens you visited? I can ask my friend if it is know their age. I'm genuinely curious because actually I don't think they are juvies, but not adults as well
I think it’s more 60/40 torvo
Based on what
Based off the same 50/50 he made , a pretty significant stronger bite compared to wanna be hatchet man. Any more questions skippy ?
But their estimated biteforces at the same size are similar
So that argument is pretty baseless example for why they shouldn’t be 50/50
Where’s your source on this skippy
Me, I’ve estimated the biteforce of allosaurus at a larger size, and I used randoms estimate for torvosaurus although maybe it’s a bit old
Same sizes with a stronger bite in a bite fight sounds pretty much 60/40 to me
who's the same size
If we don’t go same size it gets even more unfair for allosaurus
Want to hear the funniest thing? One of the biggest Torvossaurus specimens (E. rex) was eaten by Allosaurus.
And if we use the classic stratigraphy interpretation of Morrison you should know that torvosaurs went extinct way before Allosaurus and the end of the depositional period of the formation
So we have actual evidence of Allosaurus eating Torvosaurus but not the other way around and if someone would want to go bold with hypothesis they could argue Allosaurus outcompeted torvosaurs
Anyone can scavenge a dead body, even you.
Wait hold on what
Also lack of evidence of Torvosaurus eating allosaurus doesn’t mean it didn’t happen, there a lot of stuff lacking in the fossil record that we can make an educated guess for.
Yeah but there's a tooth from Kirkwood formation similar to that of Torvosaurus? ingens, so Torvosaurs survived until Berriasian-Hauterivian in Africa
If I could go back in time I would of saved Torvosaurus 💔
that's literally an accurate parasaurolophus, idk why you guys are confused
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the Allosaurus population in the Morrison physically heavier and larger than the Torvo population there?
Yes
Still doesn’t exclude scavenging.
That’s what the fossil record suggests, like triceratops in hell creek formation it makes up for a good amount of all fossils in that formation if iirc
And scavenging doesn't excludes Allos killing Torvos lol.
I'm aware. It's just giving the odds even better to Torvo not eating Allo much
Also, don’t predators tend not to scavenge other predator corpses? Not saying it doesn’t happen, just that they’d eat a herbivore carcass over a carni one if given the choice.
Aside from the minnesota museum in saint paul and big al i saw the AMNH 680 so those 3 which you can see a difference but they all still look fairly decent
Not eating as much doesn’t mean it didn’t happen if anything it would make it much better odds of a torvo eating allosaurus whenever the circumstances were right as vice versa.
Edmarka is about 5 tonnes what damn Allosaurus could actually hunt it (pretend anax and amplexus don't exist)
it does happen a lot in oceanic ecosystems but there's basically no herbivores in most of those so lol
None of them bro, it was scavenged lol.
Oh thank you so much for answering
Well yeah, it’s structured a bit differently.
I know but as you were the one asking for sources to people just pointed what the actual evidence is, so what you were saying isn't based in any evidence at all just guessed, while the other way around it is science based, of course it could be scavenger but applies to every fossil with bite marks, it has never been proved that a certain dino was hunted and successfully killed by another, only unhealed wounds
I didn’t ask for any sources, don’t put words in my mouth I said Torvosaurus has better odds in killing allosaurus than the other way around. That was the initial conversation, everything else is just changing the goal post.
but any rate large predators rarely hunt other large predators unless theres either a major size advantage (ex orcas and gws) and/or one of them has some sort of major environmental advantage (ex crocodilian and cat interactions), so if a torvosaurus has bite marks, it's likely from either scavenging or some type of territorial behaviour if there's evidence of healing
Anyone know the name of this fossil
Yea, without soft tissue, it’s hard to prove fatal wounds unless it’s some hit to the head that would be 100% definitively lethal, but I don’t think any dinos went for skull crushing.
Largest Jurassic Megalosauroids and Allosauroids both reached similar sizes of ~12 m
You literally asking about the source here 😂
On the bite force of each one being the same size , learn to read.
I thought that was evidence of a fight, not cuddling?
Well considering that in the same formation Allosaurus was larger and lasted longer, potentially outcompeting it, while completely dominating it in terms of abundance, something is being missed
What is this then? all your arguments are based on your guessing, not actual evidence nor studies, just pointed out that and the fact that at least there is a slight evidence for the other way around and nothing more, of course I'm not saying Allosaurus were killing Torvosaurus but to say the opposite is even worse
But they weren't same size, Allo was generally larger
I wouldn't worry about it. Can lead a horse to a library but can't make it read
It’s not an argument, you’re turning it into one. I said biggest to biggest specimens Torvosaurus would win and in same to same sizes I’d favor Torvosaurus because of the stronger bite force. That’s hilarious Wes because all of you literally changed the goal post and cannot read 🤣
The biggest Torvosaurus specimens are the same size as the biggest Allosaurus specimens
Torvosaurus skull is too incomplete to make good test about its bite. It kinda remains a mystery. But definitely it's not aiming to be stronger than Allo
We don't have the bite force for Torvo afaik
Isn’t Torvo a descendant of Allo?
Read bud, and what else did I mention same to same size I favor Torvosaurus because of the bite force , so what are you chatting besides nothing
Yeah but all that is you guessing, not based in actual anything but your opinion
no, different theropod branches that look similiar but aren't very close (allosauroid and megalosauroid)
And then the paleontologist said that Torvo didn't have a bite force advantage and you ignored it
Oh right, it’s a megalosaur, nvm.
Hi forumer named Torvo
Out of the known specimens, yes. But Allosaurus was also much more common and the largest species of Allosaurus (A. anax) didn't coexist with Torvo
And the largest specimens of Torvo didn't coexist with the largest species of Allo either.
*Allosaurus lives in areas of the Morrison where it is much more likely to fossilise and thus appears to be the more common animal
For all we know Torvo is just as abundant as Allo but sticks primarily to the gallery forests where Morrisons preservation is at its lowest
Well my point is that Allosaurus has much more known specimens
Did Allosaurus itself have descendants? 
probably not as far as we know
Actually random mentioned it himself that Torvosaurus would have the stronger bite force , and randomdinos ain’t a liar.
No, he did not. He said it had teeth the size of swords
that's not a higher bite force, that's just torvo's huge teeth giving it a presumably more dangerous bite
@stiff osprey
Torvosaurus has more known 10+ m specimens than Allosaurus despite being there being much less known individuals
actually out of curiosity how big are torvo's teeth exactly?
The bite force is the result of muscle and cranial structure, not necessarily teeth.
That's literally not true, everytime a torvosaurus was found it was found alongside Allosaurus and when it wasn't it was the only vertebrate of the quarry,Torvosaurus is present in Utah (DNM, CLQ), Wyoming (Como Bluff) and Colorado (DM and GP) it is outnumbered by a factor of 10 in the entire Morrison and almost 7 in those areas.
At this point we common folk should stay out of the line of fire
That doesn't mention bite force
everyone, to the sauropod shelters!
Untrue, why is people lying everywhere?
Unless you are claiming that fossilisation = direct evidence of an animals abundance in life, something no palaeontologist would ever suggest as the fossil record is inherently untrustworthy on such matters. Then I do not know how you can make the claim that it is untrue that Allosaurus appears to be more abundant simply based on the fossil record alone, something that is well known to be inherently biased to certain conditions.
Bro has a allosaurus poster above his bedroom wall.
I studied geology and geomorphology, with a degree in anatomical scientific illustration and I have been (and currently still) studying morrison allosaruid remains
Check this out bud @white matrix
Because there are direct studies about it? But thinking you have read them is giving you too much credit at this point
Obviously this means that Torvo ate and outcompeted all the Allosaurus
What do you mean untrue?
Dry Mesa skull, Edmarka, ML 1100, ML 632, Elvis, CEUM coll. pubis, MB R 1050, BMNH R 6758, one Portugal vertebrae specimen (i forgot specimen number), that fibula from Tendaguru (refferral uncertain)
No one indicated that.
And instead of linking said studies to enlighten someone you have immediately went straight for an attempted insult. An excellent choice.
Can we chill a bit? We don’t want a 2 min timer in here again.
Theropod turnover in late Jurassic
I would like links to the actual papers so I can read them in full rather than cut out screenshots.
Like they gonna read them
PoT Paleochat is full the of the brightest minds
Unfortunately, unlike the claims maid by MorrisonFPaleo I do read when provided the material. But I prefer to be provided with the full material rather than just bits and pieces of it.
It would be safer to only refer to Morrison torvos and gurney as there are other European giant megalosaurid taxa in the Upper Jurassic as cf streptospondylus altdorfensis, could you be referring to the muja caudal vertebra for the Portugal vertebrate?
I’ll be asking Paleontologists Darius Nau about these subjects as well, hes pretty knowledgeable all around. He’s a good person to refer to.
Paleontology and Geology of the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation: Bulletin 36
And description paper of wiehenvenator
MB R 1050, BMNH R 6758 and MB R 3627 are all from Tendaguru, not Europe
Streptospondylus likely didn't reach such large sizes but ig
I didn't mean MUJA-1913 (also I thought it was Spanish? i also forgot it, so include that too ig), I remember a different individual but I'd need to find the paper
I know those are Tendaguru but as there are giant megalosaurids other than torvo already in Europe, where there is also torvo, the referral of tendaguru elements to the genus torvosaurus is not well supported, and it hasn't been done in any paper as far as I'm aware, (to the genus, not to torvosaurinae), and about streptospondylus, that's why the cf. but that's the name given in the description of the material so we have to refer it like that, and also is 100% not torvosaurus
It is supported though. A recent paper found the teeth of "Megalosaurus" ingens to be most similar to those of Torvosaurus
Streptospondylus largest specimens vertebrae are comparable to those of the Dry Mesa Torvosaurus verts, not anything that huge but fair
Also in the paper of the megalosaurid remains from Iberia, the specimens are referred to as megalosaurid, and the one referred to torvo gurneyi is the other maxilla suspected to be from the same individual of the holotype, I have that paper
there's also the Oles specimen but I am unsure what it even is I just learned about it idk anything on it
Among largest Megalosaurids, the Tendaguru fibula suggests ~12 m and ~5.9 t, the French premaxilla ~12.4m and ~6.6 t and Moroccan prints suggest ~12.6 m and ~6.8 t, but none are definitely Torvosaurus
What species do we think would likely have a harem matriarchal social structure? If anyone wants to be speculative
Oles is the cf. Streptospondylus I was talking about, 100% not torvo as it has 4 premaxilla alveoli
Wdym?
Never was said to be cf. Streptospondylus then.
Also I gtg I'll respond later
That none of the vertebrae where specifically referred to Torvosaurus, they are megalosaurid but for now not diagnostically sufficient
what the hell did I miss 😭
In the very description of the material
4 hour road trip boys take it easy 🍻 be torvo fabulous.
The paper itself says Megalosauridae indeterminate.
Hence the cf in the name
the outline is kind of wack ngl
that's only in one figure caption, everything else says Megalosauridae indet.
Streptospondylus isn't the only Megalosaurid from that formation. The premaxilla had to be put somewhere but that doesn't mean the authors believe it's probably Streptospondylus
filthy different lizards no match for the powerful torvosaurus
I know it's a figure caption by they are completely valid as for literature goes, look at Jensens mess with Dry Mesa sauropods
can somone tell me how was the new carcharodontosaurid named
Those are some rather lumpy dinos.
I'll be back in an hour or so and will respond to that with a long explanation, I don't have time right now but I will respond as soon as possible
Yeah but the paper text says it is Megalosauridae indet.
There's no reason to think that premax is Strepto tbh
And going by the recent Tameryraptor phylogeny, Streptospondylus isn't necessarily a Megalosaurid
by being named
Hey paleobiologogist here. The fossil record is unreliable unless it's mollusks or trilobites and relative abundance in an ecosystem should not be taken into account from it. These papers which I have read much to your chagrin are flawed in this aspect.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
omg another Boondocks reference
I’d just have to say all are awesome by the way Torvosaurus, Allosaurus and Ceratosaurus.
Jurassic is awesome in general, it needs to have more eyes on it in general.
Sauro casually getting bigger after the invalidation:
Because it's always Hell Creek, Hell Creek and Hell Creek. And Hell Creek.
Yeah I agree, it’s not fun seeing one formation getting thrown in the spotlight all the time.
Wdym exactly? Sauro is now "Allosaurus" and it's estimates are getting bigger?
Well, split into Allosaurus and an unknown possible diplodocid (I don't know if confirmed or suspected).
It isn’t, at least last I recall it’s allosaurus Anax now and it got downsized a good bit.
I just want Morrison bruh. And Kem-Kem along with Dinosaur park from Canada, with albertosaurus and such.
I want Burgess Shale.
I’ll take Morrison or Bahariya
Alright, got it.
(It did not get downsized)
Kem-Kem sure doesn't have enough exposure as something that's considered to be one of the most dangerous ecosystems in history of Earth.
how you know this is true or false?
Random Dino is a pretty reliable source, not saying everything he say is fact but he’s who i think most refer to in here.
Usually documentaries about prehistoric life tend to focus too much on North America, simply because of the presence of many flagship creatures. However, I would like something dedicated entirely to one specific region other than that. Like What killed Australia's giants?. It's not entirely what I want, but as the same concept. Documentary with the focus on one specific formation only.
It got bigger, up to 11.7 m
Did I say that they are completely reliable? In any case, I said that unlike the other statement, this one at least had support in the literature. If you don't agree with those studies, that's fine with me, and you could even write a refutation. The fact is that in the entire Morrison Formation, Allosaurus fossils are more abundant, in the order of 170 Allosaurus individuals for 15 Torvosaurus, but the fact is that in the quarries where the two have been found, Allosaurus is still more abundant, in those where the two have not been found, Torvo was the only vertebrate in the quarry, but in the area of these quarries (Louise), such as Como Bluff, Allosaurus is still more abundant. This fact seems to contradict a priori that the rarity of Torvo with respect to Allo is due to a conservation bias due to the type of habitat, since both are found cohabiting in the same areas and quarries. If someone thinks otherwise, they should prove it. As for the biozones of the classic interpretation of the Morrison, Torvo is more abundant in the middle of the formation and is, for now, completely absent from zone 6. This is also difficult to explain by some conservation bias, since other taxa remain present up to this zone.
Ceratosaurus wasn't even mentioned in the post, offense taken
It went up to 6.5 Tons briefly, then brought back to about 4.5-5 Tons
Random thought; Both of these guys coexisted in around the same area of Hell Creek
do people realize that this makes Allosaurus itself Torvosaurus-sized
What's this weird legless axolotl thing called?
Habrosaurus, they're part of a modern family
He's about 5 feet long
Oh, it seems to have outlived the extinction for a couple of millions of years. Pretty neat.
The Cretaceous had the best shark ecosystem in history IMO
How true is that sharks didn’t really reach full potential until after the extinction of dunkleosteus
Ginsu Sharks fr
Same, but at the same time the Jurassic gets hard carried by Morrison, so if we talkd about the jurassic it'd be Morrison, Morrison and more Morrison
Jurassic has a lot of other cool stuff too
true
Torpedo dunkleosteus reaction:
Get Cretaceous Shark'd
I'd consume Cañadón Asfalto media though
King Dunk
I would like to see sth from Europe as well, like miragaia or torvo.
?
Dunk can simply not lose.
That's one big frilled shark, Jesus Christ.
Thank god it'll never be in PoT
Right?
Dinornis
People should make more creepypasta about this rather than megalodon being alive.
Asfaltovenator - Piatnitzkysaurus
Yangchuanosaurus - Leshansaurus
Allosaurus - Torvosaurus
Neovenator - Ceratosuchops
Carcharodontosaurus - Spinosaurus
Megalosauroids and Allosauroids evolved at the same time, and died at the same time
Morrison 2
chonk
agreed ( art by Mcraelodon )
Even with the nerf dunk still goated
it's still a very large animal even with the "nerf"
Bungartius wins for being objectively more aesthetically pleasing
He thick now, even better.
Chonkleosteus
What's the ecology of that dunk, would it be more like a grouper than an active pelagic shark?
Bink
Probably a grouper.
pleagic shark
Attack Helicopter
Maybe Boeing AH-64 Apache, to be exact?
I do not think cohabitation in those areas with allosaurus really makes it conclusive, Torvosaurus sicking mainly to gallery forests does not mean they cannot occasionally move into habitat they're not adapted to/generally don't live in, imo I think relying on the fossil record for abundance and distribution is reliable at all, otherwise Tyrannosaurus is making up an impossibly large portion of hell creek's mega fauna
Puertasaurus is the second known largest sauropod
I imagine dunkleosteus deploying heat seeking missiles to obliterate it's prey.
It's important to remember that at this point, Pterygotus and similar Eurypterids were doing pretty decent in the sea-floor ambusher niche, so something like Dunkleosteus would definitely be taking advantage of its swimming mobility
because then if we're using the fossil record as the sole or even primary source of how many animals are in and ecosystem, we would have to draw some ecologically impossible conclusions in terms of faunal make-up of formations
Do we know how fast stegosaurus could swing it's tail
not stegosaurus, but I assume this may still be relevant
MIRAGAIA TAIL BIOMECHANICS AND DEFENCES. EVALUATION OF THE TAIL MOBILITY AND RESISTANCE TO LOADINGS AND COLLISIONS.
https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/RIPS/article/view/21688
Miragaia is peak.
It is estimated
I would like to see concavenator, I think it has no media presence whatsoever.
JW:
Concavenator is early Cretaceous
Ginsu sharks are cool
Could Tanystropheus theoretically go bipedal/tripedal? Those are hella beefy legs
And dinos from Spain in general.
Maybe but I dont see a reason why since its neck already does all the job. Kind of like sea lions?
What is a ginsu shark?
Theoretically yes
Oh yeah, my bad.
i'd imagine it could at least rear up, maybe hop a bit
Cretoxyrhina
Yoink
I mean, Jurassic World Evolution 2 has it, but that's about it, really.
And it also was in Fallen Kingdom.... as a statue.
Insert Prehistoric Planet Carno seen, but with Tany
Things with extremely long necks compared to the rest of the body are always so uncanny to me
Kleinwelka Saurier Park!! ❤️❤️❤️
Gonna be honest I never really liked Tanystropheus
However the idea of it Rearing up fully is so stupid I now like it
many games,toys also have it
Xinjiangtitan skeletal by Gunnar Bivens jumpscare
Concavenator is from early cretaceous and while not turbopopular it does have some presence
Yeah! These types of sauropods are uncanny 
First time i saw miragaia I laughed at it for like 5 minutes lmao
stego cosplaying as a sauropod
Conca is definitively quite popular, Neovenator on the other side...
do you know off the top of your head how tall bricks xinjiang is?
It really is! Shhh we won’t tell it

I mean it's one of the most (only) unique carcs out there
If you want something jurassic that actually has 0 media presence even though it should, see Eoabelisaurus
majungasaurus ?
deff not
I didn't know GSP also made majungasaurus 5 tonnes
It's also looking like that silhouette is a bad one sadly
OH, ginsu shark is another name for Cretoxyrhiza iirc
So, ignoring the remains from Tendaguru and Europe that have not been formally referred to the genus Torvosaurus, and sticking to those that we can say with certainty are or have been included in studies, you are left with the specimens from Dry Mesa, Edmarka, Elvis, the Utah pubis, and gurneyi. Starting with gurneyi, the holotype Ml 1100 was estimated to be between 9.6m and 10m in the description by Hendrickx and Mateus in 2015. As for the femur from Portugal, it is incomplete and estimates vary greatly depending on the taxon they are based on. So focusing on the Morrison specimens, you take into account the cranial elements of Dry Mesa, however these elements, like the maxilla, are slightly smaller than the holotype of gurneyi, so a more concrete estimate of these specimens would be around 9.5m, this is consistent with the MNI of the quarry, which is 3 individuals, it is also more consistent with the morphology of Gurneyi and Elvis (since the Dry Mesa maxilla is incomplete) and suggests that the lacrimal that was believed to be from the smallest specimen could actually belong to one of the 2 large ones. This is also consistent with the appendicular elements found in the quarry, since one of the fibulae has EFS, indicating that it was an old adult that had finished growing, so although they are apparently short elements in length they undoubtedly belonged to an adult. As for Edmarka, the jugal is slightly larger than the Dry Mesa equivalent by about 5%, but quite a bit more gracile, so the individual would have been just over 10m, this is also supported by the pubic size of 79cm compared to Brontoraptor and the caudal vertebra of 14cm which is smaller than the caudals of Allosaurus 14.5cm 15cm 18cm and 20cm, and these caudals belong to Allosaurus specimens between 10.5 and 11m. The ribs of Louise's Edmarka are also around the same size as those of an Allosaurus specimen from Garden Park as mentioned in the description of E. rex.
True as well.
... but why?
It's a shark. It's not even got the most knife shaped teeth of a Cretaceous shark
Idk, it's just a name they gave to it, dont ask me why
The problem of concas are 2:
- European
- small
If you think about it the only popular European mesozoic creatures are Hatzegopteryx, why? Because it's the biggest Azdarchid.
What's this? The rumored biggest abelisaurid compared to rex?
Baryonyx
Well I mean stegosaurus also lived in Europe? Portugal, for example? Allosaurus as well, no?
I want a sloth 3 or 4 shark to hunt big prey
@stable sun I can't post the second part of the message with more photos of the individuals, tried twice but server is now not allowing me to put anything so if want more info and photos of the specimens reach me through DM
Turkana Grits Giant Abelisaur
Science names (and deciding what name is Valid) can get Very silly
Okay
- Wrong, the Tendaguru remains have been referred to Torvosaurus https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S089598111930505X
- Strangely I remember the maxilla of gurneyi being comparable to that of the 10.5-11 m Dry Mesa individual
- The complete femur is estimated to be 111 cm, so 11.1 m
- Okay, so the maxilla is actually smaller than in gurneyi? That makes gurneyi larger again. Edmarka has a jugal only 5% larger than the Dry Mesa skull specimen despite being ~11.5 m. The skeletal by paleojoe also puts the specimen at 10.4 m.
- The pubis of Edmarka most likely doesn't belong to it. It doesn't resemble any known pubis bones of Torvosaurus. The caudal is 14 cm which isn't much until you realize that this was the shortest anterior caudal in the series as shown by Brontoraptor. Brontoraptor has a 10.5 cm caudal 1, but all the other caudals are larger. Caudal 3 of Edmarka was likely ~16 cm based on Brontoraptor. The skeletal by randomdinos also puts Edmarka at 11.5 m.
Ok
does anyone know if hibberoptorous actually had a stinger? or was it for a diffrent use.
And Iguanodon
And Allosaurus
And Baryonyx
And Torvosaurus
And Stegosaurus
And Dacentrurus (Miragaia)
And Metriacanthosaurus
And Pyroraptor
And Pliosaurus
And
Gurneyi is bigger than Dry Mesa, there's only one caudal for Edmarka, the other are hypothesized to be bigger but as shown in other tails they only vary 0,5 cm in length at much, and yes I agree the first and biggest pubis referred to Edmarka is not megalosaurid, but rather some kind of sauropod, but in Brontoraptor description another 2 smaller pubis where referred to it. I can't post long messages with links because this servers antispam bot would ban me again, it happened before... so I prefer to continue in DM.
the pointy bit on the end? It's called a telson! as far as i can tell it dragged it around through the sand and stuff so im gonna guess not
oo
I already dmed u
Compsognathus.
Oh yeah Solnhofen
Compsognathus, Archaeopteryx, Rhamphorhynchus, Pterodactylus
Plateosaurus
Ichthyosaurus has remains from Europe.
conca is very popular
iguanodon, megalosaurus, rhamph
also liopleurodon, opthalmosaurus, mosasaurus, and more
it's not north america but a lot of european fossils are still pretty popular
Edmarka caudals and scapulacoracoid are over 30% larger than in Brontoraptor, making it have an estimated femur length of 110 cm
Silly
oh yeah and Edmarka also has an estimated femur circumference of 50 cm, larger than in any A. anax specimen, any Mapusaurus specimen, Meraxes, Acrocanthosaurus, Taurovenator and Chilantaisaurus
Anax preserves no femora from the holotype
