#paleontology
1 messages · Page 136 of 1
randomdinos what do you think about Hector's Ichthyosaur
cool giant fossil, hope we find it at some point (at which point it'll almost def be downsized)
it is probably between sikanniensis and Ichthyotitan size given that its centrum length is in sikanniensis range
👆
Bro only knows to criticize, not to see the fact that after it was explained to me i actually understiod it now
Not everyone has those things embeded in their brains, Einstein
it's way smaller, 7.5 cm
i remembered it being 9 cm, the smallest centrum in sikkaniensis is 8.3 cm
https://www.deviantart.com/diocles305/journal/Reconstruction-of-Hector-s-Ichthyosaur-1070407532 here this has a ton of the stuff complied on it
it's ~45 cm wide, there's also another 38 cm wide centrum and another one is 15 by 2.5 cm
peak
it would just be nice to hopefully find the bones at some point to actually verify the measurements
Alligators survived the asteroid impact, ain’t that cool.
alligators, turtles, ground birds, a few mammals, insects, frogs, snakes
tyrannosaurus rex
333.5 TONS?!?!?
G-GAH DAYUM.
The only dinosaurs that survived were avian dinosaurs
ABSOLUTE UNIT
hey guys i mught sound dum for this but i am knew to all the dinosaur fights but who would win, t rex vs spinosaurus
t-rex easily,altough im a spino fan,Rex´s superior weight and bite force are gonna mark his win against the spino,altough it WON´T be easy
it might end in a draw due to them being one of the strongest Dinosaurs to roam
The Spinosaurus would use its sail like a saw blade to cut the T.rex in half
"one of the strongest Dinosaurs to roam"
“One of the”
there's like more than 100 sauropods above them
technically T.rex is one of the 400 strongest dinosaurs
So half of the dinosaurs are stronger than it?
400 is far less than half but a big chunk of them are
there's like 2000 species of non-avian dinosaur that are valid
Only 1,000 non avian dinosaurs species have been found
not even close, there are 1300 named genera and many genera have more than one species
Actually there’s only about 300 valid genera that have been discovered
Also there's a list of like over 3000 dinosaur non-avian species that someone made
Sauropodomorpha alone has more than 300 genera
^
yo random, do you play PoT?
random have you ever played Undertale
POT, very rarely, Undertale i played exactly one time
Is it reasonable to give a macrocollum,a 70kg unaysaurid sauropodomorph feathers?
what about Deltarune
nop
Your list contains non Dinosaurs though…
Do you think it contains THAT many non-dinosaurs though ?
you can go and count them yourself, excluding non-dinosaurs and invalid genera will give ~1300
Dinosaurs are a diverse group of reptiles of the clade Dinosauria. They first appeared during the Triassic period, between 243 and 233.23 million years ago, although the exact origin and timing of the evolution of dinosaurs is the subject of active research. They became the dominant terrestrial vertebrates after the Triassic–Jurassic extinction ...
this is a screenshot of a paper from 2006, hundreds of dinosaur genera have been named since then
Oh I see the problem I was talking about species
If we look at species, not genera, there would be even more - the issue is the paper you quoted was almost 20 years old
Enjoy
Goat
do feel like wikipedia needs to edit the page title to "non-avian dinosaur genera" because if you add avian genera suddenly the list is a whole lot bigger
yes
@stiff osprey is there a tweet of you saying maip is 2.5-2.7t
A lot of those dinosaurs were identified only by their teeth or bone compared to others, what I’m talking about is absolute certain that it’s a new species not chance
I could've sworn that it used to say non avian dinosaur genera, maybe i'm getting the mungunga effect
why do you think the "Status" column exists there
have you ever considered it
If you are referring to indominus rex then no, indominus rex is uglier
no giga is ugly indom is more goated
lmao, one message in 2 minutes is criminal
Funny how in that book they had T-rex at 8.5 tons at a lower ESR score then Spinosaurus or Giga, since they used a terrible specimen for Rex
note that there are no large Spinosaurine specimens or any Carcharodontosaurus specimens from Bahariya
2-2.5t
Most things listed here are certain to be distinct taxa because they have diagnostic characters... there's a subset of genera that are controversial as to whether they're distinct, or based on remains that have ambiguously diagnostic features, but not nearly to the extent you're suggesting where we lose about half of current valid genera lmao
Giga looks good and rex too and spino is the most handsome
Why are they so light...
2016
tldr you're wrong
"essay" is truly a word for what's effectively a short paragraph 😭
Did carchas have that big nail ?
it was revealed to me in a dream
Okay so we've established there's no meaningful conversation here, cool
we're reaching the levels of maturity of discussion previously unknown to mankind
It’s gandgam style what else is there to talk about
Is this eye in the right spot for a Carnivoran?
maybe a bit higher up? but horizontally it is in the right place
Wdym?
Perfect
Compositing a skeletal for a candidate for the largest amphicyonid
^
the earliest skin impressions from a sauropodomorph are middle jurassic so yes you can give triassic ones feathers
corrected this a bit
Would it be reasonable to give feathers to certain dinosaur due to their size?
This one is accurate not the one wes sent
yeah, the art is fantastic but the head is literally too small if its supposed to be the holotype at least (being around 2.5~ish meters when i measured it), but still having a 1:5 ratio
Were there any frugivore/nut eating pterosaurs?
tupuxara and tapejara are suggested as frugivores last i heard
it isn't, it doesn't have the right proportions and as much as I hate to say it the maximum size is too small
if you mean the livy it does actually have the right porportions if scaled off brygmophyseter, if you mean the meg yeah its a bit dated
no I mean meg, livy is probably too big
livy is the right size, scaling off skull length with other physeteroids ends up with an obscenely chunky animal due to livy's proportionally shortened skull, so skull width is likely more reliable for it (15m and 12.5m livys overlayed over a modern sperm whale)
ofc since we only have the skull and some isolated teeth it's not a certainty but from what i've researched 14-15m seems to be the most likely size for it based on its relatives
tmk 13 meters is the accurate max based off it's close relatives, with larger estimates using more distantly related animals which is inherantly less accurate
IIRC 15 meters is also based on brygmophyseter, but just a different measurement method
livy's phylogeny changes quite a bit, i've seen it grouped with acrophyseter, other raptorials as a whole, basal to modern physeteroids, even one placement basal to kogiids (lol)
using other raptorial physeteroids is likely just the best option rn due to the similiar lifestyles and possible phylogeny over modern sperm whales
yeah apon looking at some other scaling attempts 15 does seem fine
the main issue with the old 16-17.5m estimates was that they themselves used an oversized estimate of zygophyseter at 6.5-7m, when using a corrected brygmophyseter it goes down to around 15m (and you'd likely get very similiar results using corrected zygo as well)
I find nau's comment on this pretty interesting
Good stuff all around
Most Tapejarids along with generalists like Darwinopterus, Pterodactylus and Caviramus
I’d say so, they wouldn’t really want excess heat
Fun theroy: triceratops had quills
Wrong triceratops had feathers @dense spindle
I love you
Nuh uh
Paleo accurate
At least mine makes sense a little 🤷♂️
okay but this art is fire what a cool idea
On a serious note, it almost certainly did not. There is no evidence of it on their fossils
But there is on their skin
we have Trike skin preserved and it doesn't have quills:
I think the quills decompose and aren’t able to mummify still fun to think they might had them
no direct evidence though so your statement was wrong
they didn't have quills, basically in the simplest ways since pisttaco is the only that had them and likely was a left over feature as the group grew larger there was no point in them
https://incertaesedisblog.wordpress.com/2019/11/26/triceratops-skin-photos/
more on trike not having quills
however Psittacosaurus does have quills, so some other ceratopsians could have had it too
Still fun to think about 🤷♂️
How would that make sense?
When we have stuff like Pstiacco with mummify quills
Trike doesn't
Still fun to think about
That is begging the question though, rather than providing evidence or a supported hypothesis as to why any advanced ceratopsian would have quills
Which still doesn't make it a fact
Yeah I just changed it lol thanks
design wise it also just looks dumb 
Fun theory though lol
Fr🥶
unironically it's not because like Vivid say why would a derived ceratopsian like triceratops need such a structure besides maybe a mating display
I mean in that regard I feel it's begging the question too, since they could just have them with no specific purpose
Triceratops were very slow dinosaurs though, so it could use the extra protection from predators like the tyrannosaurs
yeah my fault unc, they just had to look cool
quills aren't doing sh*t for them lol, they didn't need the extra protection from a hypothetical or historical viewpoint
turns around and faces the rex with 2 long horns as a defense mechanism
spiky quills for when bitten in butt, enemy mouth ouch
Why you guys getting so pressed over a theory 😭
who's pressed?
are srumis and lil p some kind of omnh brothers?
What’s a omnh brother 😭
That actually dose look pretty awesome now I wish they did TwT
you were saying
https://tenor.com/view/camel-chew-cactus-gif-18328141
I don’t think T. rex has a specially evolved mouth to withstand the prickles of a cactus to eat it
more like a guess or fun idea than theory tbh
You don't think or you know (not in regards to cacti, just general toughness)
I just want to stress the importance of differentiating between Theory, Hypothesis and Conjecture
12.4-13.5 atm seems to be the max with cross scaling the 15m livys seem to just be ones that are a bit iffy ( tho i have seen 14m hit with a longer tail )
the bigger the animal the less the quills are going to bother it, and at a scale of 5< tons they won’t really matter. there’s a reason why all defensively quilled animals today are quite small
We know Tyrannosaurids were adapt at crushing bone and generally dealing with well armoured prey, so I would assume on that basis they would have a tough mouth pallet etc in order to deal with sharp and hard bone
Camel gives zero fricks
Funny a goat'd idea
“It’s fun to think therefore I will still do it despite it being most likely not true”
This is so real
Me when I say spinosaurus 50 tons 36 M
Especially since the others have posted links and there is direct evidence for the no quills on Triceratops. They would have literally served no purpose or benefit in any form of defense, especially when Vivid stated that tyrannosaurids were adapted to crushing bone. Which is why at this point in time this would be a fairly accurate depiction of Triceratops
It’s been 2 hours bro go do something better 😭
Oi, don’t be rude. I simply was pointing something out.
I mean, they really don’t. They don’t even have teeth on their upper jaw
Also I never really realized how big Stupendemys is until I had found this
Puru food iirc
Dang that’s big
Yeah, rivals Archelon in size
What’s an upper jaw 😭
@stiff osprey @zealous ravine brachiosaurus at the bottom
Hmm that pose is kinda funky looking. Don't like it as much as the argent
LMAO
But also there seems to be other new animals in the pic, a tyrannosaur, a therizinosaur, Dreadnoughtus on the poster in the back, and a therizinosaur
Good eye I didn’t even peep the rest because I was too focused on brachiosaurus
are we being fr right now
Yep that's a Haolonggood rex. Or a zhucheng
So many interesting figures
The theri from this angle looks terrible 😭
Yeah ngl that looks like the Papo theri
I think we are
https://x.com/haolonggood/status/1876124204363399413?s=46 @stiff osprey @zealous ravine
peak dinosaur
Yeah nah I’ve been trolling lmao
For size comparisons if you have any of these currently
oh it’s kind of short
lol what
Even i am taller
Ty! Haven’t seen that yet! Looks like new huayango colors will come with em! I’m quite glad that’s the preorder bonus as now I’ll feel fine not preordering, cause I already have it lmao
I mean like shorter than it should be (holotype is like 15.5m tall), obviously brachi isn’t short lol
the only thing that sucks in that is having to wait for it until march! if you pre-order you will get before the month ends.
looks about right, holotype is only 15.5m if you put its neck straight up like brick did
counterpoint: recapture creek because I want brachi to be taller
recapture creek is either a brachiosaur or a camarasaur depending on which clade i want to be smaller in a given day
In Pot, Titan has a bigger claw than the others, I wonder where did devs take it from
random question why are herbivores typically seen as easy food especially hadrosaurs
They really aren't, a large number of people on the internet seem to think that hadrosaurs would fight and kill tyrannosaurs on the regular
we went too far in the opposite direction
is it just me or we never see any dinosaur angst in anything at all? (yt, insta, twt, tiktok, etc)
Edmontosaurus stomps T.rex bro, wth are these few internet folks on abt 🙏💀
Glad that many think Edmonton stomps tho
Movie tropes from JP started planted this mainstream and the JW kept it going (ankylosaurus shouldn't have lost to I. Rex)
here we go again (Edmonto would rather run from Rex instead of fighting, u do realize running away is also a form of self defence right?)
think of Joseph Joestar's Secret Technique in JJBA
The feeble lion stands no chance against the mighty kick of the zebra, an aggressive herbivore of the same size
(you can count the number of lions killed by zebras in all of history on one hand)
Can we count how many died by the horns of Bufallo tho 😎
Shant a lil taller
JJBA fan detected, opinion invalidated.
All jokes aside, yeah E. Annectens was prey to T. Rex but I'm willing to be 9/10 that if E. Annectens fought back it'd win.
That being said, I don't think E. Annectens would fight back very frequently (ambushes and prey response.)
INVALIDATED?!
least rabid Paleo chat
Considering they're three times the size of a lion and one of the only herbivores with coordinated herd defenses, they'd really suck if they didn't manage to kill a few 
Do we have evidence of simmilar herding defense mechanisms in triceratops ?
I was gonna say lol, that analogy seemed more geared toward Triceratops and Tyrannosaurus
I’m pretty sure in 9/10 of scenarios an edmontosaurus would legit be like 2/3rds the size of a rex
No evidence for it in Triceratops or in any extinct animal. Among modern herbivores it happens in a handful of species out of thousands
99% of the time the rest of the herd will just leave while some poor fool gets eaten
cmiiw but remember someone in this channel says that Trike is a solitary herbivore instead of pack herbivore?
This is probably a common sentiment among 8-year-olds people who’s sum exposure to paleontology is two Jurassic films but as others have said it’s a shockingly rare stance among the armchair community
the powerful hadrosaur armed to the teeth with powerful claws, robust biting surfaces and a terrifying tail whip
hadrosaur deserves its low ranks as a fodder
Fodder is a stupid word to use in ecological discussions imo.
Fodder to me implies an animal that has no predator defense at all, which at most can only really be applied to some isolated animals living on islands and stuff like that, and even some of those are known to be defensive.
I know a who would agree
at the same time people read the term "antipredator defense" and think it means violently murdering the predator when in reality that's about as common as getting struck by lightning
Of course, but that again betrays how many people think everything is a death match.
I guess running away from a predator is dishonorable or something.
Nah, they got the jfc mindset 🙏😭
I just find it silly that the response to "Hadrosaurs are fodder because they would lose to a literal T. rex in a fight to the death" hasn't been "that's not how that works" but instead "actually Hadrosaurs WOULD kill a T. rex in a fight."
It just goes to show that the mentality hasn't really changed at all. Hadrosaur awesomebros are no different than any others, if not worse.
Dryo vs rex jk
In this video we discover what your life would’ve been like if you were born as an Orca. (Also known as the Killer Whale)
To get behind-the-scenes Sneak peaks and Work in progress updates as all my new videos are being made, join the channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCL8_FK5K4vpMGxjiyM76B4w/join
or check out my Patreon: patreon.com/Ja...
Dryo wins low diff
Also to add to this I don't understand why the pushback has focused so much on Tyrannosaurs when it was pretty common for shows to have a single raptor (or at most a small pack) jump on a Hadrosaur dozens of times their own size, only for it to lose the will to live and die instantly.
Sometimes people forget just because it doesn't beat a mega-theropod it's instantly a pushover and everything beats it like yeah Edmontonosaurus isn't beating T-Rex on average but it doesn't mean it can't happen yeah it wouldn't happen often but still it could happen many modern herbivores can beat up their predators pretty badly for them to run away they don't have to fight to death
15 meters are also based off of brygmophyseter. To my knowledge, basing it off of living sperm whales get around 13-14 meters, and some other method of reconning off of brygmo also gets 12.5 meters, so both 12 and 15 meters should be equally plausible
magnapaulia isnt losing to any carnivore
the T rex in question:
the paulivore 9000 in question:
Big Paul, Magnapaulia
i suppose this harkens to the other amusing part of the theropod/hadrosaur discourse of how giant glupshitto specimen, hadrosaur is usually taken with far more grace than giant glupshitto specimen, theropod
x Rex: 😍
giga dentary:😡 it don’t count 😡
Isn't x rex a lot more complete tho?
Idk but probably
PEAK HADROSAUR
BIG PAUL IS SO UNDERRATED
It's a femur and some tail bits iirc
yeah x-rex isn't half bad on account of being half an axial column (even if somewhat hampered by the general lack of an axial description for edmontosaurus)
becky's giant however is very incomplete
I love hadrosaurs but I can't find that doesn't get slandered except shant
Jumpscare
ah
Meraxes
that hipdip is just getting worse and worse
freakish hunchback
OH SHI WAIT I JUST NOTICED THE HUNCHBACK OF NOTRE DAME AHH POSTURE ON THIS DAWG 💔💔💔
he is screaming in agony
The age-old question, what did spinosaurus use its sail for
Most plausible answer would be display purposes and to attract mates
how did Amargasaurus really fought/defended against natural predators?
The crest makes it look like Olorotitan
There were probably some secondary benefits too, clearly it wasn't maladaptive.
It also helped it be more hydrodynamic
Size, breeding fast, or it just didn't have any in its formation for a fully grown one
Full body quill covering Pachycephalosaurus jumpscare (I fw this heavy)
Honestly dig the capybara hair vibes
Real, and I don't see much fossil evidence against it since we don't have Pachycephalosaur skin impressions
How do we know that pachys hard head isnt covered in flesh and skin and such
We know for a fact that they used their dome for headbutting similar to Rams, and ramming heads filled with connective tissue together and causing unnecessary pain isn't exactly evolutionarily useful
correct me if im wrong but pachy skulls (or at least some sort of pachycephalosaur) were found with impact damage in the quadratojugal and squamosal parts of the skull, suggesting impact damage?
iguanacolossus is cooler imo
Correct. I was saying my statement as a way to say they couldn't have had fleshy heads
Imo Asiatyrannus has the weakest Tyrannosaurid name. Just sayin
(Why is the slow mode 2 minutes?)
Real. Ganzhoutyrannus would have been better, since that's the city it was found near
Just saying, in terms of likeability, Asiatyrannus sucks. You literally have Thanatotheristes which means **"Reaper of Death" **
Nanuqsaurus is still my favorite Tyrannosaurid though. I love my Polar Bear Lizard
The more i look at it, the less i hate pachy, it just looks really cute with those quills 
w
I have a question.How do island animals avoid inbred?
Both taxa are questionable it's so funny.
How innacurate is Brunette from jwcc ct compared to an accurate becklespinax ?
If you base a fragmentary questionable taxa on Concavenator : head too small, neck and body too short, feet too big, tail is weird too ?
Also the crests aren't supposed to go above the eye. Jaw muscles are incorrect and look like some sort of skin flap. Also too many vertebrae compose the sail : only 2 (being dorsal 12 and 13) are raised, the sacral are then sorta short.
Well, Becklespinax doesn't exist. However, Altispinax does. In short, it's not too bad, but we really have no idea what Altispinax looks like or what it even really is outside of being a carnosaur, but currently it looks more like Concavenator
Here's Becklespinax nowadays
my question is why they chose becklespinax over concavenator and even altispinax
Becklespinax is Altispinax though.
Beckle is more popular ig, i mean, it appeared in fossils fighters, a pretty well known dinosaur video game
But honestly, conca would be more of a household name in my eyes
so is concavenator? I mean, its literally on the second JW movie so its cannon to the franchise. Also rawr conca solos
Maybe instead of chosing more popular dinos, they wanted more obscure ones ?
they chose the invalid over the valid, fair
It is most likely closely related to Concavenator
I swear i can't tell the difference between it, and conca, it's just that conca has a smaller sail ig
It's like that for most Carcharodonts
But hey, fun sized theropod...
Equals good boi/good girl in my book 
(Now i think an altispinax would make a good pet XD)
There were some taxonomy stuffs that were going on that wanted to rename for whatever reason Altispinax (originally within Megalosaurus because at that time no one was really doing diagnostics and lacked rigor) Becklespinax. Altispinax itself stays questionable as it isn't really diagnostic so it stays for most researchers as Tetanurae incertae sedis (I personally would keep this opinion given the fossil's nature). Naish 2003 however consider it as an Allosauroid.
Concavenator is a true taxon that is unquestionable. The fossil is remarkably complete. If Altispinax is close to Concavenator or should look like one is just up in the air (it has no concrete phylogenetic position so we don't know if Altispinax could be a close relative). You can also reconstruct it as something more like Acrocanthosaurus or another sort of Allosaur and it would still be okay.
When it comes to Jurassic World, they just use whatever name they can find, even invalid ones, to enlarge their roster and have more dinosaurs than there is within the scientific consensus as for now.
Ai?
@sonic wraith Troodontids and Dromeosaurids share a common name being Raptors. Raptor does not belong to one distinct group
It says the sourcing and time it was drawn, Mohamad Haghani, 2014. This is not AI
True-
Common name issue tbf. A raptor is just some sort of predatory """""""""bird""""""""" looking animal that has talons (so it includes Strigiforms, Accipitriforms, Cathartiforms, Falconiforms, Dromaeosaurids, Troodontids and possibly Avisaurids now).
dilong is also kinda lame, not its meaning but just how the name sounds
Dilong is not gonna lie kinda ugly anyway.
Raptor is for birbs of prey, i'd rather refer to pop culture raptors as deinonychosaurians
"it isn't really diagnostic"
Diagnosis- (after Naish, 2011) posterior dorsal spines transversely expanded at tips; large. rectangular hyposphene in posterior dorsals (unknown in Concavenator).
(after Cuesta et al., 2013) (compared to Concavenator) less ventrally constricted centra; anteriorly angled posterior dorsal neural spines; posterior dorsal neural spines distally expanded anteroposteriorly; posterior dorsal neural spines transversely broader.
Yeah ok
Does this help to place it somewhere down the line within Theropoda ?
Source: https://theropoddatabase.github.io/Carnosauria.htm#Altispinaxdunkeri
It is not Tetanurae incertae sedis, it is most likely closely related to Concavenator. This entire diagnosis makes it a diagnostic taxon btw.
Also:
(suggested) accessory centrodiapophyseal lamina on the transverse processes of the posterior dorsal vertebrae (unknown in Eocarcharia and Sauroniops); eleventh and twelfth dorsal neural spines highly elongate (five times the height of the centra), while ninth dorsal neural spine is short (unknown in Eocarcharia and Sauroniops); firm contact between apexes of eleventh and twelfth dorsal neural spines (unknown in Eocarcharia and Sauroniops).
Traits present in Concavenator and Altispinax
If it has its own autopomorphies then sure it is diagnostic. Though calling it closely related to Concavenator by one shared character (if it has then my bad)? I wouldn't be so sure about that and would still take a pinch of salt until possibly more fossils can be attributed to the taxon (also preserving anterior dorsal vertabrae).
I listed the shared characters, there's more than one
(suggested) accessory centrodiapophyseal lamina on the transverse processes of the posterior dorsal vertebrae (unknown in Eocarcharia and Sauroniops); eleventh and twelfth dorsal neural spines highly elongate (five times the height of the centra), while ninth dorsal neural spine is short (unknown in Eocarcharia and Sauroniops); firm contact between apexes of eleventh and twelfth dorsal neural spines (unknown in Eocarcharia and Sauroniops).
Would have been nice for the authors to add that it was found in Concavenator.
Justice duncan will make a updated skeletal of that guy
Raptor means plunderer/thief, birds of prey just got the common name first
Certainly a Macronarian
Love macaroni
Other than the argent this might be their best sauropod
is this true?
Yea i always hear them in the backyard
they found that the structure of its vocal organs is similar to birds, as to what that means the implications are slightly unclear
They found the larynx. The sounds are however unknown.
Ankylosaurids are the only dino that shouldnt be even bird like..then this
Why call them deinonychosaurians instead of just….dromaeosaurs or troodontids
Troodontids are not dromaeosaurids, but could be considered 'raptors'. Same for unenlagiids.
But no one's gonna replace raptor with deinonychosaurian, because that's a 5x clunkier word to remember
Rest in Peace Saurophaganax maximus 😞
1931-2024
he still here bro
Rip
No he's not he is now a nomen dubium.
he's still here... as a sauropod
the theropod however, now belong to a new spesies of Allo; Allosaurus anax
Saurophaganax fans when their fat allosaurus is now actually a fat allosaurus.
Why doesn't pnso or haolonggood make pterosaurs?
Our beloved flying and swimming brothers aren't as popular with the general population
is this count as pterosaur/marine reptile slander?
no
Whoa I love them
good
cuz i'll never tolerate any
Never heard of this guy
No way it's Makatoony! I'm subscribed! I love your animations!!
another Makatoony fans (like me) spotted
What would you guys say are the top 10 biggest herbivorous dinosaurs excluding sauropods
Me
- Chili hot dog and the rest don’t matter
What-
a bunch of hadrosaurs prob
I wish iggy was on the list
why
Didn’t laugh
They could probably do an approximation though? Anyways, would be funny if Anos vocals were made more bird like, cognitive dissonance ahoy.
we can know the ranges possible but never the patterns and songs
I WANT A PET DILONG.
It's like a bird dog 
(Dilong is a certified good boi)
.
imagine waking up to that lanky thing in your bedroom
how big was epanterias?
how big was Allosaurus?
known specimens are between 4.7 m and ~12 m
12m is A.anax, right ?
yes
A. anax still bigger than Torvosaurus
I think
Bigger than ceratosaurus for sure
they're like comparable
I'd think so as well
But who would win in a fight ?
Neither
What's the top 3 largest Thyreophora?
probably like stegosaurus dacenturus and priconodon or something
world's only priconodon rememberer
It's a pile of teeth and a leg bone no wonder
I'd just put anky in prico's place at that point
Miragaia 
I DON'T OWN THIS. ALL RIGHTS GOES TO DISNEY.
then that is ur Epanterias size answer (pick any idrk how big was it)
that's dumb i need a specific number
Would be fun to speculate though.
Does anyone have a skeletal or size comparison of the largest triceratops specimen?? Just curious to see the size of the big tank
Isn't there a triceratops called big John or smth that's the largest is there any pics of it
I think I saw some a ways back?
I searched it up and.....HOLY, THE THING'S MASSIVE
Besides Priconodon, would Edmontonia be the largest nodosaur, or would it be smthn else?
Noice, you gonna get it? And if so which color?
peloroplites takes it, the thing is an absolute monster
Oh yeah fair
Honestly I’m not actually sure it’s bigger than Edmontonia. I’m seeing slightly bigger sizes for Eddy than Pelo
How strong was the bite of an Alioramus in newtons ?
Think I might wait until I see it on Amazon 45$ for 65 day shipping lol and 70$ for standard. It’s a great model but that’s like 2 dinosaurs in 1.
Fair
I think ive seen one that put it a full meter larger.
guys wat were parasaalphas front legs for
Walking
would balance be another reason?
It would still need them when it wants to walk quadrupedally.
do we have studies of dinosaurs point of mass? ( is that the word that im thinking of?? )
What if trex head is actually a parasite and the normal ones have smaller other heads but the parasite is the huge head and if it eats the old small head it becomes the new head and controls the trex
Center of mass/graviyu? yeah there are some
yea that
Igaunadon is kinda small for the biggest igaunadontid don't get me wrong 5 tons is big that's kinda small if you compare it to other hadrosaurs
(yes I know igaunadon is not a hadrosaur)
I mean it was much earlier, they evolved from realatively small ornithopod ancestors so it makes sense the group wouldn't have reached its maximum size potential by the early cretaceous
What are y'all favorite prehistoric fish/sea creature? Mine are Dunkleosteus and Anomalocarsis
Walking, balance, etc (assuming you mean parasaurolophus)
Guys what was the weight of stegosaurus and dacentrurus?
No actually they used them to box eachother for mating rights, I used to live in their neighbourhood
largest stego is 8ish, dace is somewhere in the 7t range iirc
So dace is larger in general?
dace doesn’t have as many specimens and stego is horribly figured so I wouldn’t say that
https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/203/1/zlae153/7942678?login=false new Sauropodomorph Ahvaytum
Yes

spino head cardboared cut out, paleoaccurate?
I say we refer to Cuttlefish's message 🤗
Does dakotaraptor's remains come primarily from basilemys or some other prehistoric turtle from a similar area?
It was one bone out of the entire specimen 😭 it wasn't primarily any turtle
I see, heard that was the case whoops 
imagine how funny it would be if they found like a shell and thought it was part of the dromie
One bone is Axestemys splendida, the rest is Dinosaurian
Very fragmentary lol
what was larger, archelon or stupedemys?
Idk
All I know Stupen was massive
Cause guy lived with Puru(still Puru food)
THE OLDEST LAURASIAN DINOSAUR AND THE 1ST OF 2025
Rethinking dinosaur origins: oldest known equatorial dinosaur-bearing assemblage (mid-late Carnian Popo Agie FM, Wyoming, USA)
Ahvaytum bahndooiveche gen. et sp. nov
https://t.co/4OIXCG4Lv1
Art by @SerpenIllus
Hello guys I have a question. How good are you guys at identifying species on fossils? Cuz I have a random fossil in my house which me and my sister accidentally found while we were younger and I would love to know what it is
I dont know much of anything about fossils but you could try using googles image search and see if that gives u anything
Well then sending it here wouldn't hurt i dont think
It looks like something from the cambrian explosion but I'm not sure
We're trikes solitary?
Thats cool
Thanks
Do you have a higher quality image?
I can go take a picture
Thanks (this 2 minute cool down is gonna be the death of me)
I managed to find the other piece of the rock
It looks like a trilobite of sorts probably a Cambrian animal
It's also what I'm thinking
Your best bet is to take it to a palaeontologist and have them identify it (I hate this cooldown)
Thanks. Now I just have to find one
Good luck
probably not. we have evidence of other ceratopsians being social so it would be weird if trike wasn’t
T Rex size and body. Now... that's an insane build. You will never find another bipedal dino with such a ribcage or jaw. At all. He's an alien lol
What is bro yapping about
not even glaze tbh
This accurate?? For the most part?
Yuh however considering the fragmentary nature of Hatz, I wouldn't really mention how long the neck is
this condition but on dinosaur hatchling?
Is that a kitten with cross eye
how accurate was this for Elrhaz Formation?
https://x.com/j_stocky/status/1876521731067871347?t=ZluO_NhNm-1H-W1x1FozxA&s=19
it's missing something
https://x.com/Vividskyguy/status/1876664425459105874
REBBACHISAURUS?!
It doesn’t say how heavy the Lurdusaurus is though? Just shows chonk. Funny how the sarco is just no thoughts, lol.
no, "Rebbachisaurus"
That looks like a fish?
Could have sworn the paleontology chat slowdown was less? Edit: yea, 2 min, what did you guys do? L9l
3rd image
Got covered by the mobile preview on the bottom, didn’t realize it was there.
best there is rn, it's based on Randomdino's updated Erlhaz formation size/archosaur chart
Sinopterus 😍
Funny how the theyre calling the lurdu short, it’s still taller than 6 feet 7 inches and isn’t much shorter than sucho. Unless they meant length.
Evidence that's the joke?
What’s the resident sauropod supposed to be? The weight for nigersaurus doesn’t match that one.
Proof
I mean what species.
And I mean what weight do you have in your mind for Nigersaurus
I’m not saying the weight in the graphic is wrong, just that if the sauropod in the comic is Nigerasaurus, the weight in the comic doesn’t match the graphic.
Perhaps it is the adult Nigersaurus...
elder indeterminate growth “we will never find the largest individuals” nigersaurus
Did any dinos have indeterminate growth and grew all their lives?
Dayum 5.5 tons?
Nigersaurus is cooked with that small size
How accurate was 2019 PoT allo?
It has no scales 
At first glance head is messed as well
2019 is what, pre-alpha PoT?
I have no clue, I started playing when lamb released
What's the top 3 ,most inaccurate creatures in PoT?
In order
Kaiwhekea: messed up proportions, musculature and have lips
Pachycephalosaurus: messed up musculature, proportions and have lips instead of beak
Eotriceratops: messed up size, proportions and texture/integument
I'm surprised thal didn't make that list
Not to mention the invalid species
I mean, Mira and laten are accurate to what their truly are
When it comes to gameplay laten is probably one of the most inaccurate though
They're not trying to be accurate when it comes to gameplay so that doesn't really matter too much
Their models are really good regardless
Except the ones mentioned above
And rex is Kaiju sized 
Inaccurate how? Just wondering.
wooahh kryptops is miniscule ☠️ mod defo upscaled it
Thal is just the size and probably niche, the others had it worse
And please, don't bring the "strongest bite force in pterosaur" cause they had a bite force equal to a big Chihuahua. So irl would be extremely small game hunter or a 🥜 eater
Real
Thalasso's bite wasn't much higher than that of a 140 gram bat
it was about the same at best, but in most aspects worse than current PoT allo
Do azdarchids have higher bite forces?
They stab and swallow, so probably not
Why the hell is 2 min cooldown
wot is an accurate allo depiction wth is fred
Troodontids are more cursorial and less predatory than dromaeosaurids, with north american troodontids more heavily leaning into omnivory
They turned it into a (relatively) slow and damage oriented ambush predator, arguably what Deinonychus should've been instead
Yas gimme more accurately slow ambush pred raptors like irl
While PoT doesn't try to be accurate with gameplay, none stray from their known niches and physical capabilities as much as laten, deinon and thal
whats the most accurate designs then
Stego?
Achillo, Rhamp, Hatzeg (besides neck), TTT, Iggy, Lamb, Alberta, Kentro, Eurhino
HAtz???? wasnt it thicker
Hatz has that awful noodle neck
What should I change
I do appreciate that the herbivores don't have elephant feet, that's pretty good
rex bars achillo stego sucho pycno
Move Rex down one.
Dinosaur fights, we love 'em and hate 'em.
Here's mine.
A thread of how depicted it 🧵(1/9)
Rex is one of the most complained about, aside from pycno
Metri, Cerato, Eurhino, Sty, Allo, Megalania, Pycno, Hatz are all inaccurate 
What's wrong with styraco?
Mid
knock down; sty, mega, bars and metri by 2
knock down; kentro, rex, hatze, spino, pycno, allo, ano and eurhino by 1
Wait why eurhino
V2
Cause the fossils say otherwise
It's close, but it isn't like TTT or Mira
https://x.com/fishboy86164577/status/1711421179477803348
https://x.com/fishboy86164577/status/1711420402910810326
Eurhino's mouth has some issues mainly with having it's cheeks extend too far forward
@Riamus01 @HuitzilinF_Art They don’t exist. But people will often draw ichthyosaurs with the mouth line terminating where the teeth do. But the jaw musculature is very posteriorly located, behind the jugal (that forms the bottom edge of the eye socket) so the jaw margin should continue down around the eye
I feel like pycno should be in its own "horns??" Tier
Pycno has like an acurrate sub and then it turns into an accurate carno depiction
pycno's more or less on the same level as eurhino, since it being given carno horns for 2 species, aswell as the base sspecies which traditionally is supposed to be the accurate species. This is an issue because carno is several places removed from being pycno's closest relative, which is currently Llukalkan, hence it is overwhelmingly likely to not have carno horns, but wide variety of potential keratin sheaths, hornlets etc as seen in this twitter post
https://x.com/heitoresco/status/1876990367641321506
I like the one that's like pachy pebbles
"Iguana"
Iguana is the best one
bear in mind microraptor is a stand in for ttt, also this accounts for model accuracy and size accuracy
Well hold on, I'd like to point out how many argue that duck probably wouldn't have feathers, but we allow it cuz it looks great
Metri is gonna be stuck in many major issues for a long time
Thays pretty cool tbh, looks kinda like how modern animals fight too kinda
Ngl path metri has me preferring JP metri 
Yep since Sirblameson directly based it on several extant animals
idk how Achillobator is in the substantial issue section, due to its size alone being a barrier to it being in 'perfectly accurate' it should be in near perfect
tbh there's a good few here I'd shuffle around. Campto should probably be in the substantial issue section for example. Bars being in the perfectly accurate section is also just astounding to me. Sucho should likely not be there due to the modern anatomical shifts it's had too
Because it's too big?
I'd make a "Kaiwhekea" tier and rank Kaiwhekea below it
doesn't is have more minor proportion issues?
Yeah it does
How so?
Kai is invalid? Why it stands as fictional then?
Nvm I compared it to a achillobator reference and I could barely see any proportion issues
Nah they mean Kai looks like a fantasy creature cause of its head
Kai isn't invalid what 😭
What accurate metri look like
In game metri is so far off from what metri looked like
What's wrong with kentro?
It does not, I can assure you a modern Achillobator properly restored with Utahraptor would have the proportions of the PoT one
Shouldn't Achillo already be stored with Utah as reference since they're pretty closely related?
We have a very short and very robust cervical
Correct, Utah and Achillo tend to come out as sister taxa, though in reality that's probably just due to a massive lack of data over anything else, but at current you restore one with the other
Did Mira loose its fight to stay valid?
Debatable
How accurate is old alio?
How complete even is Utah raptor?
I've not been able to find a skeletal that matches it really good, it's why it's more of an uncertainty
Nanotyrannus
Someone said achillo uses Scott Hartman skeletal
scott has a skeletal for achillo?
Utahraptor:
Yeah
Conca has several issues though.
guys y would a megasaurpod have a herd that would be a lot of mouth to feed
oh
Added the new Sauropodomorph to my phylogeny tree of Sauropodomorpha
I think it’s the same reason why things like elephants, bison, water buffalo and similar herbivores live in herds. It’s a safety in numbers thing! Living in a large herd with others of your species ensures your own safety and gives more protection to infants.
It could also be like how horses have a herd of mates with one stallion for mating purposes.
All in all it’s most likely for safety reasons
yea but saurpod are like 20x bigger than that i could see a amp or a amarg doing that but thing like braco or argent would be like 400 tons of food per child
Sauropods are built to be extremely energy efficient.
Also y didnt mapu just attack the stomach of argent like there sides that very vulnerable
Here my accuracy list.
Achillo is accurate IF you keep it as sister to Utahraptor, but given the lack of data that's prob the best your can do with how fragmentary it is.
I also didn't account for size, just the model.
Achillo is good but not accurate due to size
Wdym we don't have direct evidence of mapusaurus being showcased how they hunt argentinosaurus unless you mean Planet Dinosaurs 😭
Pretty sure deinon is accurate or atleast close
Ya that's accurate deinon is that skeletal
But do think a pair of trex could bet a argent
to ensure no one gets confused later on, this is deinonychus
Argentinosaurus was literally 80 tonnes
those are terrible areas to attack, when it comes to sauropods the caudofemoralis muscle around the thigh to the base of the tail is the main area predators would attack
They went able to take arg but an adolescent or baby they would probably hunt If they hunted in packs but some were silly enough to probably take one
can sombody show me a accurate T.rex
I honestly thought it was bigger
That is not Argentinosaurus though
The classic
... sauropods in general?
moments before being launched into orbit by the tail
Why did the sauropod have a major artery in carcharodontosaur biting range? Are they stupid?
There is something that always feel weird about all Deinonychus depiction in this game (Deino got 2 TLC so far).
What always bugs me is the head and the tail, even on this new model.
The size of Argentinosaurus is crazy
Said to be best accurate reconstruct of a trex this is sue
Nah see a trex could bite the leg will the other one destracat it and then break it leg maybe a back leg or if lucky the front leg
The head looks too long and not deep enough, it lacks some bulk.
assuming the sauropod even lets either of them get that close, I mean it can still kick
yea but the rex could bite the leg and break it if luckyor could try to break one of it leg and push it over
One prove that tyrannosaurids hunted sauropod was tarbosaurs but we know they were pack hunters so 3 or 4 tarbosaurs had hunted sauropod bye theory but never proven
What sort of evidences are there that support group hunting in Tarbosaurus?
The 70 Tarbosaurus bonebed obviously
definite agree here btw, the tail bugs me too
rex them proceeds to get kicked in its face
none, we only know that it likely hunted sauropods in som capacity, otherwise it's more Armchair Palaeontology
Sry but im dinoist toward torvosaurus
That's what I thought.
I love my 2 minutes cool down in paleochat.
Due saying rex hunted in groups then is possible that tyrannosaurids hunted in groups
I’m sorry but what is armchair palaeontology? Not in a rude way I’m just genuinely asking cause I’ve been watching this for a bit and seen it thrown around once or twice
wow then the t.rex we have in game loks like a baby compared to sue
I kinda just came up with it as an analogy to 'armchair general', in where someone with no experience of what they speaking of asserts an easy solution that doesn't really have a basis in reality, such as the above explanations of exactly how tyrannosaurus would second by second take down argentinosaurus phased as if it's a proven or even somehat supported arguement, when such a detail hunting strategdy explaination is flat out impossible outside reasonable speculation
There isn't evidences for T.rex and if there were it would not necessarily say that Tarbosaurus was also hunting in groups. That'd be similar to say something like "all hyenas are hunting in groups" when they are not. Though hyenas have vastly different ecologies between the different species so that may not be that much of a good analogy.
Safest hypothesis is that we don't know. There are chances they possibly did but nothing suggests so.
Oh okay! Thank you! 
I think we need a time machine gang
exactly.
there is no evidence stating tarbosaurus definitely hunted in packs.
there is no evidence that a time traveling, continent hopping Tyrannosaurus would specifically take down an argentinosaurus by hypnotising it to stop it from fighting back, leaving it's legs vulnerable to the tyrannosaurus to gradually shimmy it's jaws around the very wide leg and strip off enough flesh to be actually able to break the massive fibula or tibia.
also to be clear, I'm specifically calling attention to the fact that attacking the lower half of the legs directly is exceptionally dangerous due to how flexible and powerful sauropod back limbs are
and that such specific break downs of hunting strategy should not be phrased as fact
Inferring special behaviors on non avian dinosaurs is something extremely hard because they aren't there anymore.
Some exceptional fossils sites are bone beds and provide insight into this part of their ecology. How to interpret these bone beds however is another story : you first need to determine how thick/old is the strata and if the fossils are first tightly close together (which would suggest they are from the same age so they probably died together). You need to determine if the various individuals preserved died together or not. There also is the possibility of natural disasters that move aways bodies and transport them to deposits, creating a fake accumulation.
Footprints can also help but then these can simply be occasional meetings like predators following a prey, potentially and old or weakened animal.
If the footprints were close together and side by side there may be chances that these animals were regularly hanging out as this is mostly seen in predators with more complex social behaviors than mobbing as it helps to create stronger bounds (that's observed in many extant species today).
Evidences of social dinosaurs exist (even antagonistic interactions are considered social within a specie), but that does not make the rule for all Dinosaurians just like how all mammals aren't necessarily social. You also need to define what you are considering social and to which degree.
Sue was found in a bonebed with 2 younger individuals And a Nanotyrannus
to add to the last point, Tigers and Lions are in the same genus, Panthera
Sue was found in the same locality as two younger individuals (one of which was the Nanotyrannus - it was 3 tyrannosaurs total, not 4)
But we don't know if they were buried at the same time
don’t listen to random he just hates fun sarcasm random don’t hurt me
I thought the excerpt posted by TableSeating listed a sub-adult, juvenile, and Nanotyrannus? Unless the juvenile was technically split into two accidentally
How big would nanotyrannus reach?
Then there is a who'e other different side of biology that's biostatistics which allows you to actually give strong and solid conclusions about things you observe. With living animals, you can repeat said observations and collect those data extremely easily and possibly calculate a frequency for social interactions. When it comes to birds it can be preening one another, chattng, flying in flocks, foraging together etc.
When it comes to palaeontology your sample size is astonishingly small and so conclusions about extinct taxa are much harder to make. Imo phylogenetic backtracking isn't a strong and good option to make such conclusions as we are literally dealing with entire extinct groups that filled various niches that don't have much analogs today.
every time I see "Nanotyrannus" mentioned the JFC narrorator forces their way into my mind and repeats "T-rex" and "Nanotyrannus" in random order over and over again
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFsXCz1h3iU
0:02 - 0:04 & 16:34 - 16:35 over and over and over and over again IN MY HEAD
For over a century, historians and scientists have been piecing together a history of the prehistoric world. This series examines the ultimate fighters of this unique period, gigantic beats that stalked the Earth millions of years ago. Some of these dinosaurs were larger than seven-story buildings, hunted their prey with strategy and cunning, tr...
I have an interesting question, have we seen any jaws similar to parrot jaws in paleontology? What I mean by that is an unfused maxilla with a hinge bone to allow for up and down movement of the top jaw
They assumed it was three because surely the nano-looking material could not belong to a juvenile T.rex, even though there wasn't overlap between them
fish
I should have specified that I meant reptiles in paleontology considering parrots are descendants of them


Oviraptor maybe had a skull like that
Is it true a juvie Rex had a bite force comparable to acro?
considering we have a skull of oviraptor that shows a fused maxilla i doubt that
Well I'm outta guesses than.
Many theropods had mobility in their cranial joints, but unlike parrots, there was no musculature specifically evolved to move the bones around. They just had give to better absorb impacts or to expand when swallowing large items
Nanotyrannus mention=Me Happy
makes me question where on the evolutionary tree they adapted like that, I'm itching to know
its such a specialized adaptation
My hot take is without very very rare and exceptional fossils (Centrosaurus mass death assembalage, Fighting Dinosaurs, nesting Citipati) any hypotheses about dinosaur behavior or ecology are fundamentally untestable. Like sure we can say T.rex was a big predator but that's about it. But that's one of my issues with the Field overall.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/20491039 found a really interesting paper about cranial mobility in dinosaurs if anyone was also curious
apparently its criminally under studied
this paper is interesting too
The only thing that can really help are isotope analysis that give some clues to the climatic conditions and diets. Then you can also possibly suggest some stuffs about their ecologies thanks to comparative anatomy and observation of analogous structures.
Oh damnit did I miss something important 😭
3,850 millimetres I reckon
Cubic?
I just rewatched Fa3 and Fa5 (Flash arena)
And i just realised how innacurate they are
But flash arena 5 actually annoys me quite a lot
Cera (the horned devil from the river of death) is a certain pachycephalosaurid, and when i looked it up, She (idk its gender but i think that it's a female) is a stygimoloch spinifer, wich makes no sense seeing how big she was next to a quetzalcoatlus and especially to Mega the megaraptor. Irl a stygimoloch spinifer would only be a bit smaller than a pachycephalosaurus (,bc styggies are juvi pachies) and guess what, pachy on average weighs more than 2 Times less than a megaraptor, now imagine a slightly smaller, horned version face a 23-25 foot long, 8 foot tall, ~1 ton theropod with nearly 16 inch claws...
So yeah, don't take what i said seriously, i know it's just an animation made for entertainment and not for accuracy, but i just wanted to get this out
Herrerasaurus?
Any cerato speed estimates?
most theropods ran between 30-40 kmh so cerato is probably near the upper end of that
36kmh? Something like that? And also conca and dilo i heard 40-45kmh
from Larramendi's 2019 book:
Ceratosaurus 36 kmh
Concavenator 43 kmh
Dilophosaurus 46 kmh
Ty. A question ive got conca is 5.8meters in length and in ur dilo skeletal dilo is 7.30 meters and from what i heard concas gdi is 605 kg and dilo is 670 kg how's that possible despite dilo being 1.50 meters longer?
Dilo is basically a snake on legs, it may be longer but Concavenator is both deeper and wider
Cool but still dilo is ever so slightly heavier right?
And also that means dilo is extremely light for how massive It is
well, massive is a measure of mass, so you can't be light for your mass (unless you live on a different planet). but yes, Dilo is very light for its length
K cool and Who could reallisticly win a fight? Bc i heard dilo has quite a nasty bite
Ew AVA
usually the larger predator wins regardless of anatomy. but in this case the size difference is small enough that it seems like a fair fight, given Dilophosaurus has relatively weaker jaws
K im gonna stop bothering you,Ty.
dilo had quite powerful forelimbs no?
i have a question, what falls under AVA? like, would asking how devenversaurus was survivng trex AVA? would asking who would win between a megalodon and livy pod be ava?
both are technically AVA, but it's not considered a bad thing if the two animals actually coexisted
oh alr, if devenversaurus was attacked directly by a trex ( like, it wasnt able to hide/get away from it ), how would it be defending itself? if im right its like so much smaller then a anky
its getting drop kicked 😭
That denver is undersized, it's smaller than anky but surely not by that much
where´s T.Horridus? (other trike species)
idk i didnt make it
Some animals just rely on not being found/seen by the local predator to survive. Still I think that it could probably hunker down and just let itself laid on the ground trying its best to not be flipped over/bitten. Ankylosaur body plan is sort of like a giant barrel, you cannot really take a good grip on it with jaws.
Still, it could possibly use its tail or shoulder spikes to deter a rex.
Also yeah this Denver is too small.
Skeletal by Get Away Trike, scale bar is 1 meter.
Whys the denver so small lol
also, do nodasaurids and stegosaurids sink like anyklosaurids?
what.
"Nodosaurs" probably are bad swimmers but iirc their buoyancy test is better than that Ankylosaurids as they lack tail clubs.
what? is it not a valid questions? i know ankylosaurids sink so i just wanna know abt the rest of Thyreophora
They didn’t get your question it seems
oh,so ankylosaurids would sink in the water? if they went too deep?
yes
given the decent (i think it's recent anyway) paper about how much energy Ankylosaur armour can withstand I feel ***especially ***in the case of Edmontonia they may be just ramming into predators since there is evidence to suggest nodosaur were kind of just rugby tackling each other full force since their armour allowed them to be pretty reckless with regards to injury, combined with being so short and so heavy for their dimensions, large carnivores would have a real risk of serious leg injuries from an aggressive Nodosaur.
That's my hypothesis anyway.
The Acrocanthosaurus when it hears "TEN-HUT"
damn,ig submarine anky was possible back in the day.
I personally alos feel Edmontonia more than any other Nodosaur is suited to such inter and intra-specific combat with how the spiked osteoderms on it's shoulders are faced and that one iconic double pronged osteoderm just infront of the shoulder
That's a valid hypothesis. Defensive behaviors can come from how some animals actually use their social signaling organs like antlers or horns (though lot of different extant animals don't or do it in some extreme circumstances).
However I don't see these things going fast, though even a good 15-20kmh isn't nothing to complain about as such animal tbf. To check how much forces they threw at each other's we could take a look at stress marks to see if they just were rubbing or going full blow with a charge (I doubt).
I mean they don't need to go fast if the end goal is to drive the predator away, and I would assume they wouldn't need to go faster than 20km/h for a charge to be potentially devestating, since if they hit a Tyrannosaur, they're going to hit the lower to mid leg, which if injured would be devestating to a predator
Do we have any proof that iggy could grow bigger than 4 tons?
That's if they did charge at all even against each other, which I don't have information about that (and hope it isn't just based on vibes and art depictions).
All I see are Magnapaulia victims
edmonto, toro, trike, rex, anky and maybe even denver solo it
Yes, they could grow 4.01 tons!
That's just to say that you're dealing with extinct animals. Sure there are median and average sizes, but you can have outliers. Still that doesn't mean there are 10 tons Iguanodon out there, just that saying X animal is X size isn't very conclusive on how large these guys were.
I don't know how much specimens we have but if several mature specimen found were roughly the same size at 4 tons, there may be a possibility that could be the average mature specimen.
jim kirkland believes it to be very likely citing many nodosaurs have domed (not as extreme as pachycephalosaurids) skulls and were generally built for it, I also think they could have shoulder tackled each other, where more might glace each other abit I feel Edmontonia specifically may have evolved the pronged, bifurcated front pointing osteoderms for helping it to interlock with rivals.
I think it would generally be better for ramming than ceratopsians even since you're not worried about neck or head injuries, and the osteoderms that would be involved are alot more stout combined with the fact that they're osteoderms have more give in a charge and or shoving match
Anyone know the full ecosystem where tyrannosaurs mcraensis was from
I feel particularly strongly about this since a Gorgosaurus here as an example in my opinion wouldn't be in a great position to try and counter attack a charging nodosaur due to the very awkward dimensions and height of Edmontonia on top of it's armour. Which I feel in nature would mean Nodosaur are generally avoided because they're a pain in the ass to take down
There's specimens suggest 5 t or higher (NHMUK R2502, NHMUK R2510). Plus two unfigured 19th century specimens which suggest 10 t but that's questionable since like 5 dindoaurs were known at that time.
Then I have some questions : how does their shoulder blade (unless the armor does indeed absorb very well impacts on precise points, still imma wait for the publication to read it and see their method and discussion) can handle such stress ; how come they aren't thick plates or some sort or large bublous structures if they were ramming one another. I don't see these animals rushing to one another front to front to the interlock with their shoulders.
Maybe that's just me having the wrong idea of "ramming" as I imagine this being something goats do, with strong impacts and important momentum. I can however possibly imagine some behaviors more akin to gazelles, antelopes and cervids when they are using their horns or antlers.
The question is, where does perucetus fit into this conversation
Grogo is such peak Tyrannosaur. Also yeah Denver is Def quite small for its contemporaries.
Also here is what I imagine Nodosaurs maybe doing :
https://youtu.be/4nMGZomlfKo?si=YIEC-3jhhBkpxgj2
https://youtu.be/-xqmBYJUlAY?si=8URskvqMsWzPafCW
It's totally possible I may be underestimating them. If there are publications about their shoulder osteoderms function let me know 🙏
Springboks Locking Horns | Springboks Fighting | Springbok Antelopes
http://www.earth-touch.com/ Those spear-like horns certainly come in handy when the territorial oryx gazelle in this HD video duel for dominance.
in regard to mountian goats, I think it should be noted that their protection is more extreme since they're using their skulls for combat, I am under the assumption there are a ton of animal which run into each other or otherwise bash each other with great force on the rest of the body without particularly specialized anatomy because it's far, far safer.
When I imagine nodosaurs ramming eachother, I imagine something with not a whole lot of speed or run up, just generally trying to overpower the opponent.
Ankylosaurs have spike-, plate-, and club-shaped osteoderms probably used as defensive and/or offensive weapons. Previous studies have proposed the evolution and function of small ankylosaur osteoderms, but histological variations in their defensive weapons are little known. Here, we provide comparisons of the internal structures in defensive we...
So 5t is maximum?
No I said 5 t or higher, one of these specimens is like 8 t
Finished reading so yeah they got thick big resistant osteoderms with collagen fibers aligned that helps to strengthen the structure even more.
Though would be fun to have a larger sample based on current Ankylosaurian taxonomy as much has changed since 2010 so it could help to recheck the evolutionary routes of Ankylosaurs osteoderms.
none
it's already got cooked
8 TONS?!?
And I’ve been naming it grippy boy in ark the entire time 😭
What does that have to do with it
Cause I thought it was like a ton at best not a complete unit
But the word "grippy" doesn't mean anything relating to size???? 😭
There was a paper about how much force they could take actually. I forget the exact number but I believe it was found that they may be able to take a car hitting them. Though that’s very vague and idk how accurate it is so grain of salt as always
Personally I like the idea that they were more shoving matches that anything else, it seems to fit with the osteoderms in more derived species being forward faces
The hands look grippy
Iguanodon was massive what do you mean a ton at best
In ARK
I feel that's an important part
yeah, ark's iggy is ass
Denversaurus my beloved
ark iggy asks for powder...but for all of the year vs winter
Look at those grippers
Did they stick deer hooves on that? The fingers look less like fingers and more like hooves.
Caveat here, a car going at what speed? At some point its going to suffer massive internal trauma.
The cunning Bugatti Chiron vs the indomitable ankylosaur
How about a pinto? One of the worst designed cars ever safety wise (maybe excepting the early ones)
Stegosaurs dont sink
stegosaurs are just the superior thyreophorens tbh
You're right, they stink actually 
None of the portrayal here are overly good
Bro just called the Mark Witton Tarbosaurus not good...
Good message bad output 💔💔
I meam the emoji is not showing an emotion any human being would actually show
So maybe those aren't supposed to be good idk
Would something like this be plausible
I need help I got into an argument with a TikTok streamer cause I asked his favourite dinosaur and he said pterodactyl and I said it wasn’t a dinosaur it was a pterosaur
Just run, run away
RUN
I would've ran the moment he said "tiktok streamer"
Mark witton art called bad. Kneecap privileges revoked
magnapaulia victims above
Not overly good =/= Bad
And he's not exactly the perfect artist for theropods admittedly. I say that while subscribed to his Patreon FYI
slight disagreement = life long resentment smh
Question are there any halfway decent skeletals of jobaria besides this one? Was curious
despite how well preserved it is that’s about as good as it gets, the thing needs a rediscription
Good to know heard the face wasn't the best on this skeletal so was curious 🤔
A very complete sauropod and this is my first time hearing about it? Paleontologist need to do better https://x.com/beagliam/status/1789153580223525108?s=46
Is Alierasaurus actually larger than Cotylorynchus?
unlikely, Coty's larger species is enormous
the paper actually describes it as comparable in size to coty
Had this saved on my phone lol
Is siats a carcharodontosaur or a megaraptor
It’s a dinosaur
came back in this channel and this is the first thing i see. god damn brutal xD
Carcharodontosaur
What's the height of argentinosaurus (head to toe)
iirc 15 meter
why aren’t platypuses and echidnas synapsids?
and why is the african forest elephant loxonta cyclotis not palaeoloxodon cyclotis?
They are synapsids
are there any proof?
All mammals are synapsids
because the African forest elephant isn’t in the genus palaeoloxodon?
Kind of hard do tell as it has no cervicals whatsoever but likely about 16 m
it just doesn’t make any sense they say the african forest elephant is more related to p.antiquus but it’s in the genus loxodonta
I think you're getting confused... P. antiquus is a result of reticulate evolution, we've got evidence of introgression from L. cyclotis into what would become P. antiquus but that doesn't mean those two are more closely related than the two Loxodonta species
is brontosaurus still valid?
who said it wasn't???
isn’t brontosaurus just a apatosaurus with a camarasaurus head?
nah
no???
Which Azhdarchid is which?
This was never the case. This was only the case for a reconstructed mount of Brontosaurus because we didn't have a Brontosaurus skull. Species of this genus were always valid.
Brontosaurus was for a long time thought to be a species within the genus Apatosaurus (but this has nothing to do with its skull), however in 2015 it has been shown to be valid genus too. This was literally 9 years ago.
almost everyone between 1903 and 2015 pretty much
Has been since 2015
What's reticulate evolution? /genq
To put it in simple terms, a reticulation event is where two lineages come together to create a third lineage that's distinct from the two parents... so hybrid speciation is an example of reticulate evolution, where hybrid "intermediate" forms between two species go on to become their own species (more common in plants than animals but it does still happen quite a lot)
to put it in the context of this example, the ancestor of Paleoloxodon antiquus was a taxon that diverged before the most basal members of Loxodonta, but still interacted with Loxodonta cyclotis at some point in its evolutionary history (also mammoth but I'll just talk about forest elephants to keep this example simple). Genetic material was introgressed from L. cyclotis into this taxon, and Paleoloxodon antiquus is the resulting species from the union of L. cyclotis and the ancestral Paleoloxodon taxon.
as I said I've slightly simplified the explanation as there is also admixture from Mammuthus into the lineage, P. antiquus gets around 60% of its nuclear genome from the ancestral Paleoloxodon taxon, ~36% from the forest elephant and ~8% from Mammuthus, which is why it's still in the genus Paleoloxodon and not Loxodonta @robust crane
So its when two separate species come together to make a new species?
it’s kinda like cichlids, right?
Yeah cichlids are another example of a group where reticulate evolution is rife
also why do palaeoloxodons have asian elephant shaped head when they share more dna or something with african forest elephants
A underrated real life hybrid is a beluga and a narwhal, a narluga
could modern humans be an example of reticulate evolution, with the hybridisation with other human species?
the closest species to us, the neanderthals are long gone
and they hybridised with us, which is why modern humans have components of Neanderthal DNA
but we didn’t became another species
Homunculus has left the chat
||/j||
Yeah, the general definition is that it's the partial merging of two lineages to form a third distinct lineage. It's worth noting that this is talking at species level, but it can also go down to organelle or gene level too. I'm currently doing a PhD on the evolution of Rhododendron where there is a LOT of hybrid speciation going on, and it's interesting (and sad) that there's a species called Rhododendron publicostatum that is literally being hybridised of existence. Introgression from other species is basically wiping out the ancestral R. publicostatum genome as hybrid plants are inheriting more and more genes from the other parent species.
mr @wary junco can you answer this question?
Yeah reticulate evolution played a huge part in our evolutionary history, we're almost a textbook example for it
what’s that?
now i'm curious abt this...
I can't claim to be an expert on elephant anatomy, so I couldn't tell you exactly why, but it'll be dependent on what genes were introgressed from L. cyclotis into P. antiquus. Having 36% forest elephant genome doesn't mean it'll automatically look 36% more like a forest elephant, it might be that the genes inherited were to do with some internal physiology and not outward appearance at all (this is me just making up an example btw, don't take this as fact haha)
Ther3s a debate In Paleo chat over thal's force over how strong it would be, anyone got anything?
150 newtons
Is it stronger then a humans?
that’s like the same as this one bat I forgot the name of
No.
This reminds me of something I heard in a Paleo cast I never got elaboration on
They made a joke that "turtles evolved twice" like... What for real?
Chat who and why do you think would win irl suchomimus or tarbosaurus?
What even is reticulate evolution? First I’ve heard of that term.
He explained it earlier
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Placodontia These maybe? They resemble turtles with the armor and shape.
Placodonts ("tablet teeth") are an extinct order of marine reptiles that lived during the Triassic period, becoming extinct at the end of the period. They were part of Sauropterygia, the group that includes plesiosaurs. Placodonts were generally between 1 and 2 m (3 ft 3 in and 6 ft 7 in) in length, with some of the largest measuring 3 m (9.8 ft...
No no it was about the shells, the best I got from someone was that they evolved the shells one at a time, but it didn't explain the "turtles evolved twice" comment, just hoping a worker could maybe elaborate more
it looks lkke a fat croc with a very small snout
My small 40 cm dog bites twice as hard than thal 🗿
And a tegu bites ten time harder than a thalasso, and it's 60-80 cm long
If only you were at backer chat when the conversation was being have'd
Would you call a baby thylacosmilus a joey or a cub?
depends whether it's in or out of the pouch imo
If it's a marsupial I'd say Joey
You have my attention 🫡
That's an interesting thought
wombat babies are usually called joeys, quoll babies are called either joeys or pups, and tasmanian devil babies are apparently called imps?
I mean the name fit
I agree
For most marsupials I'd just default to joeys. Cub is reserved pretty heavily for carnivorans imo.
It's actually more closely related to modern lizards and turtles than to crocs, and that skeleton is one of the early members of the group.
and lost children
Can anyone tell me what are these checkermarks at Edmonto's verts?
ossified tendons
Nah they happen in a lot of ornithischians, people just don't bother drawing them for obvious reasons
Would Edmonto haveUncinate processes as well?, Also 2 min type sucks
No, some hadrosaurs have them, not sure all of them do. I think there's some dinos that use them to stiffen the tail? I dunno.
Something certainly took a bite out of it's back.
@stiff osprey Given that they'd affect how the animal moves, you'd think it would be important? I've noticed that sometimes the gastralia aren't always added.
Skin, internal organs, and muscles would also affect how the animal moves, yet they are not drawn in skeletal reconstructions, because it obscures the view of the bones and their appearance and arrangement is highly speculative. The same is true of ossified tendons
As for gastralia, they aren't present in many ornithischians
Are there any good maiasauria skeletals? Been trying to look for one
rip ribs
Found it werid to see minimal maiasauria skeletals considering
considering what...? CONSIDERING WHAT?!?! I MUST KNOW!!
Maiasaura is a pretty well known dinosaur in media
maiasaurua killed my grandma
moderately unfortunate
How is that minimal?
one good skeletal is all you need!
Maiasauria aka jobaria victim
how do we knew a argent or a saurpod would just see and squash because it could
Same reason elephants do
So many smart people (I try study paleontology)
How long is the estimated length for Vasuki indicus? I find 50ft estimates
https://x.com/Dinoh555/status/1781054058112946280 does this help at all?
'Largest' snake ever is misleading, vasuki is probably the longest but Titanoboa is insanely wide. Also Malayopython is nowhere near 10 meters
would titanoboa be the heaviest?
most likely, it is a reticulated python/anaconda situation
Vasuki solos, fish eater ain’t beating the legendary vasuki
even calling it longest is technically wrong because estimates for vasuki range from 10.9-15.2m while titanoboa's range from 12.8-14.3m
Isn't madtsoia the largest snake? I've heard the dinofax say madtsoia or some other snake was larger than titanoboa
dinofax

trusting dinofax was your first mistake
Which one is more likely
real
Mb he said it was vasuki indicus just rewatched the video
afaik vasuki has longer centra than Titanoboa so it may well be longer
although maybe they are just from a different position in the spine
Oh okay
The largest Mesozoic snake
Maybe, Palaeophis lived during the Mesozoic and idk how big the Mesozoic species are
Not as big as Mads. The big one was Paleocene
He fat was spinosaur? Like we made Rex chunkier bc it made more sense but is everything else still shrink wrapped? Is spinosaur bulkier or is he still shrink wrappped?
wut?
Like. All dinosaurs were shrink wrapped with next to no muscles or fat storage. But when that’s done it makes things look weird (look at artist rendition of hippo skeleton done like dinosaurs)
So people made Rex chunkier, have more fat and muscles. Did we also do that with spinosaur or other dinosaurs? Or are they still shrink wrapped?
And is shrink wrapping more realistic or less realistic?
shrinkwrapping isn't accurate at all cause you're making animal whether recon from an extinct or extent animal into anorexic animal
I hate the damage that hippo meme did
In what way
Basically make some people think paleontologists and paleoartists know no sh*t and when reconstructing they just stick skin over the bones.
For starters that practice existed and is severely outdated. Nowadays they use comparative anatomy using the closest living dinosaur relatives (cros, birbs, and to a lesser extent all other reptiles) to figure out the kind of musculature they had and their arrangement. Bones themselves also tell through their shape, size and texture the kind of soft tissue that was attached to them and it's size
Always love pycnemosaurus
But how is the hippo meme damaging? Is that not good then?
The hippo reconstruction the way dinosaurs are reconstructed is misinformation?
Because it’s misinformation at best and outright lying at worst nowadays because adding to what Manoc said, mammal tissue is different from reptiles
He just explained it. It gives off a idea that paleontologists make up stuff about Dinosaurs, and that we don't know how they looked like at all, as well as them looking very different, while it's just not true
No one said that though. You only just said that.
Let me be clear. I’m not arguing I’m just autistic and take things very very very face value. I was confused what they were saying the first place
Manoc basically said that though
The hippo meme is just flat wrong because it distills a topic into its bare essence when paleoart has always been informed via observation of skeletal material and living animals. The problem is that unlike modern animals, we could not observe a T.rex doing its own thing so paleoart has needed to evolve based on scientific discoveries
We can actually see this in terms of modern animals when it comes to medieval artist depictions of things like elephants or whales from descriptions then as time went on, artists were able to move past that
So you’re saying basically. shrink wrapping is an old thing not a current thing
That and it’s ignoring the fact reptiles barely have any notable soft tissue extensions beyond your standard spikes, spines, armor, and fun
No trunks or 10 layers of blubber
The hippo meme caused people to make inaccurate assumptions:
-People assumed that paleoartists and paleontologists have no idea what they're doing
-People assumed that Dinosaurs would have been incredibly fat or vastly different looking than what we believe and this spawned a lot of its own inaccurate memes made by people who think they know more than they do
I mena that’s kind of true. I mena my crested geckos have crests that flop and have no skeletal stricter under them. But most of it is actually very tightly wrapped around the body.
But also dinosaurs aren’t reptiles. They are avian like
Birds are classed as reptiles, just like dinosaurs and crocodiles
I don’t care how right it is. That is no way right. How??? They are warm blooded??? They have feathers??? Like I get how they could be but also . NO???
Also birb skin can look "shrink wrapped" under their feathers
how accurate is this columbian mammoth?
Phylogenetically you are a fish.
But even ignoring that, not every dinosaur would have been extremely avian-like even externally. Most ornithischians were mainly scaly and had different respiratory mechanics to saurischians, among other differences.
i love being a fish
Couldn’t we all be brought back to single cells then if you thought that way?
No because we are very definitively made up of multiple cells
Also I don’t think they have vertebra
So do dinosaurs
And crocodiles for that matter. They have genes to synthesize feathers (or feather like scales) and adaptations for endothermy that show they come from a warm blooded lineage
was titanboa a fisher or general aquatic csrnivore that would eat anything it could swallow?
"single cell" is a description of a specific physical trait, rather than a lineage of organisms. Some single-celled organisms are more closely related to dinosaurs and to us than they are to some other single-celled organisms
Oldest common relative I mean.
Also I know dinosaurs have feathers. Most are avian like
I want to do a croc with feather scales. I think k that would be bad as heck. I curse to much and idk how tot talk when I cant
It would act like any other boa would it not? Constricting and killing prey and then swallowing it. Or scavenging
iirc it was more of a fisher
Really? Must have been eating some enormous fish.
@zealous ravine @stiff osprey conc dropped
Lfg!!!!
a question from an online friend
Def going yellow
Prolly same but I’m not sure yet tbh
It's so TINY
(Accurate)
I got too many blue dinosaurs I need some diversity
a number of whales if the rex is underwater for some reason
Anyway blue conca looks more realistic, but I literally just got the blue majunga so if I were to get one it'd probably be the yellow
true but... on land???
nice joke random
apologies to the elephant fans but rex would easily take down an african elephant without a herd
Blue whale
ON LAND!!!
and nothing living on land is stronger than an african elephant, so 🤷
Nothing on land can beat a rex
I'd say an elephant can win but the rex wins the vast majority of the time
so by this logic u just stated...
it's no one then?
what oogma said
Technically nothing but sometimes an African elephant but the vast majority it's the rex
and the point goes to the Rex again
Tech u all wrong Torvosaurus would kill allosaurus Anax
out of topic 💔
That’s my exact thought process, tho I’m worried it may be a bit too big, so I may wait for a review, idk
Problem is I want blue brachiosaurus too but I’m go green
Conca is estimated to be 5.8-6m, so this one is on the upper end of the estimate for 1:35, but it fits
I just noticed the tiny little wings
I’m concerned more about the height, to my estimation a 1:35 conc would be about as tall as the Majunga, yet it’s a good 2+ cm taller
I think I might buy both blue and yellow
And the length given I believe does not account for the curved tail and neck. I may get it anyways tho as I like conc enough to overlook jt. As long as it’s the same size or smaller than the dilo I’ll be fine
God 2 minute slow mode is really too long lol
It’s stupid, especially because what happens in the game never spills into here.
they changed it because of the one spino v rex convo and they never changed it back 
Oh that makes SO much sense. Dinosaur fans suck a little bit
yea, though it wasn't even about them fighting it was just one guy not really making sense about density or something
So they penalize the whole chat? 🤣
Treating the server like a kindergarten classroom
are they not aware that collective punishment is forbidden by the geneva convention???
I don’t think Geneva Convention applies to kindergarten classrooms. Or discord servers
well maybe it should 😤
So it's ok to execute prisoners in kindergarten classrooms? 🤔
well I would know that from experience
I’ve seen it done. Those girls are crazy with the Barbie dolls
You could just ask I guess? Maybe they forgot.
Current convo is going utterly off the rails though.
true and true
Shunosaurus vs Anklyosaurus who wins size parity
anky easily
this doesn't age well 🙂💔
IS the therizinosaurus a REAL dino discovered by SCIENTISTS or IS it just a FAKE movie species? (idc either way i love it)
how is it fake???
I love it when the edmonto fans weep
shantungo enjoyers, RISE UP
let us all praise the ACTUAL giant hadrosaur!! (although edmonto is already a pretty sizeable hadrosaur even for its average size)
thats the thing. is it a FAKE species made by the creators,animated. or is it a REAL species,found with fossils by scientists?
It's real
it's a real specimen???
how come u said it was a fake dino in the first place???
(i'm genuienly confused)
i didnt say it was fake i was asking if it was. i didnt even know..read my question again please
I’m afraid Jurassic world made it up for the easy money grab.
There's a whole family of dinosaurs named after it
new evidence shows that it wasn’t a potentially feathered, large bipedal herbivorous maniraptoran but actually a large burrowing turtle
fortunately it is a real animal and surprisingly JW didn't do too bad of a job for its design
WOAHHH! awesome :D glad to know that.
All paid actors
Oh real I didn't know
it's a rather big animal at that too, meter bar for scale
WOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH. imagine if that was real :OOOO i love it so much. those claws can definitely peirce through a skull of a t-rex if given the chance
Therizinosaurus claws were rather fragile and would probably break if it tried to stab something
So they could have been used for either foraging or for display afaik
thats not cool at all
The claws couldn't handle stress well
WHAT EVEN THEIR SELF DEFENSE?!
or they rather run away and flees?
imagine if that was real
what
Crocodile ancestors were literally warm blooded too
What happened to that blub guy , first scanova and now blub
The what
Their self defence was probably intimidation with their big ol size n claws, most likely sizing stuff up, looking larger etc :0
Allosaurus on top of the claw chain, like a pro
Knowing how crazy big and effective it's claws were you would expect for them to do something else besides bleed in game
That is a phylogeny tree.
I know. Just pointing out Allosaurus has the best claws to attack.
This look like it can be a ancestor of the Therizinosaurus
Pretty sure a combined claw stab would allow it to be able to effectively use its claws for defense
I hate the cooldown here why is it 2 minutes long, this is ridiculous
Though I’d imagine this was most likely the case. Intimidation can go a long way with defense
Explaining ichthyosaurs to an alien would be wild. “Yeah so it’s a reptile that took the shape of a dolphin and has a shark tail, and it has the normal amount of vertebrate digits….unless it doesn’t want to. Then it doesn’t.”
Triassic Therizinosaur
amazing
what
you said "imagine if that was real" but it literally is real though
I think they meant imagine if that was right in front of me
They can't really run either. Their thigh movement is arrested like birds according to a paper I remember hearing about a year or two ago. They waddled
Adorable
therizinosaurs clearly sequestered toxins in their flesh
like a Penguin???
Their size maybe for intimidation?
Largest Theri is still like 5.5 tons
Its also probable Theri lived far away from potential predators (Tarbo).
But Size and intimidation was likely their way
the 5 ton therizinosaurus using its size to intimidate a… 5 ton tarbosaurus
don’t reply ping me on a message that’s over 2 years old
people grow and evolve
Opinions on Avhaytum?
Avhatum kenway
Wtfff
All birds have limited thigh movement
Thing is though that it’s only known from fragmentary leg bones, the whole thing is speculative.
whats new in the paleontological field today
Trump though…. Assuming that even IS Trump.
I wanna know your own personal opinions, do you think we'll ever discover a prehistoric that would've been larger then a blue whale?
Idk how well substantiated this is, but I believe it’s hypothesized that blue whales are basically pushing the maximum size an animal can be and still have effective oxygen transport through its body.
If that’s true, then I doubt we will. We might find things roughly comparable, but nothing substantially larger.
At least if you’re going by mammalian physiology. A creature of different physiology could get bigger, who knows.
Kind of a ‘life as we know it, or at least Terran life’ caveat.
I don't know if I'm happy or sad about that, on the one hand it's so cool we live with the largest creature, but on the other hand it's sad we'll never discover anything bigger
Man this family was weird
I've generally been of the attitude that living with the largest animal ever (to our knowledge) being as unlikely as it is is part of what makes it so cool, but I can understand how it could take the wonder of discovery out of things a bit.
The point about different physiologies is a good one though, perhaps a more avian style lung could allow an even bigger animal- maybe some day we'll find a kaiju sized sauropod (though there are other issues that arise from that lol)
The biggest ones that we know of are small kaiju almost.
How heavy is cryo and A.europaeus?
I see what you did there lmao
Or did you
Was alamosaurus the only sauropod of Maastrichtian america?
peakotherium
A. europaeus 1.6-1.7 t
Named, yes
But there's suspicion there are more that are lumped into Alamosaurus
No.
There's also the unnamed Rough Run titanosaur TMM 45891 which is different.
Is It the smallest Allo especies?
Falcon why are you mad
Someone put a thumbs up emoji
Hard to tell due to the limited specimen sample. Allosaurus jimmadseni (up to about 9.5 m) and Allosaurus fragilis (up to 10-10.8 m) were technically larger but we have more specimens for them. So basically unknown.
There's a 4.7 m adult Allosaurus but it is unknown what species it belongs to.
K Ty
Was there any non Macronaria sauropods of cretaceous america?
What Quinnz said, they put a thumbs up emoji and performed Nanoallus erasure...