#paleontology
1 messages · Page 133 of 1
PNSO has good figures! I have one, it's real nice :]
second one is better
idk it can be anything really but maybe some bird type of coloration
The lack of cheeks bothers me for a ceratopsid figure. And the head is a bit too big. But better than their trike
Def, I have it and it’s one of their best
pnso has great models! I have a spinosaurus, fantastic quality
Heres my spino
I got lokiceratops coming in tomorrow ! Trying to complete the big 3 with , triceratops , Styra and Toro
I wish i had the new Spino, but i already bought the old one and if i started buying repeated figures of the same species i'd go broke in minutes
New spino is worth it tho, no offense to the old spino but I’d give it to my pet dog 😭
Nooo lmao leave him alone
if you ignore the quad pose it's a good 1:35 scale neotype
Currently have spinosaurus , Tyrannotitan , Torosaurus and “saurophaganax” in my proceed and buy on Amazon… trying not to click buy 😭🤣
When people ask just says its allosaurus 🫡
When your yangchuanosaurus is bigger than your carcharodontosaurus 💀
Are they both 1:35 or no
camps theropod
you guys seen the dinosaur models of beasts of mesozoic there fire!!!
Is Safari LTD triceratops still good?
?
is that a ampelo in The back ground i see
Camarasaurus
The closest evidence would probably be Kaiparowits hadrosaurs feeding on fungally degraded wood https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-11538-w it was probably seasonal behavior and mainly about eating the arthropods living in the wood, the fungus would be a nice bonus though
Ohhh this is super interesting, defo gonna check it out.
Thank you!
You're welcome!
in a straight fight no running who winning a giraffe of a allosaurus
allosaurus has like a 2 ton weight advantage even if we are going more conservative
which species
I should note Allosaurus probably wins regardless but it's a very different fight if it's A. anax or A. europaeus
It doesn’t have to be Anax , allosaurus still slams
Yea that's what I said
“Probably wins”
eh semantics who cares
Could Graciliceratops Possibly climb trees?
me when irl Yang is bigger than irl Carcha:
me when I’m pretty sure it ain’t
Me when I don’t know anything
jk mate i'm just make fun of the figure size, not their irl size
W
Still mentally recovering from this
when i look up a.anax i got a tarantula
also how does this crocadile head look
Base color is this so it is fairly accurate
Me when sauropod is lord of the lizard eaters
It looks cool but it looks like it pure red maybe add a secondary and maybe a third layer of it like a black or differe t color red
It is not accurate at all to Utahraptor
This is a fluffy JP Velociraptor @hardy sentinel
Like I said fairly
But it isn't accurate at all aka nada aka not fairly in the slightest
Original
JWE Utah raptor is so beautiful tho
Honestly this is closer to Primal Carnage Novaraptor than any real animal
peak
And a JP raptor is surprisingly similar to a Utahraptor. You don't need to be needlessly rude about a piece of art; rather than say blanketly saying it's inaccurate, you could point out aspects you find inaccurate, especially seeing as the person is asking about that? I'm comparing the drawing to fossils and it looks quite good to me. The head might be a little short and perhaps the neck could be a little thicker but I don't find it that bad : )
he is right it’s not especially similar to utahraptor I didn’t find the response especially rude
Well then could you point out what's inaccurate? /nm
Tbf it is kinda haed to point out whats wrong
Then how can you say it's wrong in the first place? /nm
Considering I'm not in any position to redline
Note the robustness of the skull. This alone sets it apart from the art because the piece clearly has a triangular head like the Primal Carnage Novaraptor, specifically the feathered variants
A few screenshots and renders of the Nova for comparison
Okay, I can see the triangular-ness. I think the angle the head is set at obscures the shape and bulkiness a little, but the premax doesn't look too terribly narrow and shallow to me
Fun fact igs hard to judge the robustness or skmething due to the fact dinosaurs are known for cartilage and such so tbh if it was alive the headshape could be anything but the eyes indicate otherwisd, also you have to take in account that you cant base a whole species off of one skeleton, its not so much as a different genus then it is a unique raptor
The angle of the head does not change the fact the snout slopes downwards like the JP3 raptors, not a rectangular box like the real Utahraptor
Nothing of what you said was true 
The feathers seem to indiccate its a closer to a utah then nova
cartilage would leave marks in the bone no?
No because cartilage does not take up a majority of your skeletal structure unless you are a shark
Yea but thats why its hard to guess how big something is off of the cartilage marks
Cartilage affects nothing in reptilian vertebrates except to cushion bending points (joints and vertebra)
I don't think cartilage leaves marks on the bone, as it's not a harder material like keratin, which does. But I think keratin itself doesn't leave marks, but there's texturing on the bone which is evidence of it being there.
Thats why early palientologists got confused with the triceratops, its hard to guess what something is or what its to look like
Pretend I was using the correct word there lol
That is muscle scarring, not cartilage
And early paleontologists were confused with Triceratops because we had 0 clue what a triceratops was
they aren’t confused anymore though since we have better knowledge now
Thats the point though
But your point falls apart when you realize the argument of "We don't know anything" is based on nothing or outdated information
It is an ignorant excuse that directly invalidates decades of hard scientific research
No the point is its hard to guess what it actually truly looks like off of bones alone
maybe like 100 years ago
We know a lot more stuff now and it is safe to say the artwork is not accurate to Utahraptor
Again, it's not really close to any known fossil raptor
Kindly, both of you are leaning a bit too hard into opposite and incorrect directions. There is a lot of things we can know from fossils, including information on coloration and patterning, habitat, diet, and even certain behaviors, but we cannot know everything off of bones alone and to judge just the bones in an exercise in folly.
You can barely see it first of all, second of all the feathers dont match the nova, and if you look at the teeth it pretty closely matches the other known genus of raptors
I can actually see it really well 💀
teeth are notoriously a good way to identify prehistoric animals
Unfortunately the underlying anatomy is very visible so we can judge off of bones!
Thats why i said it matches the genus of raptors after he had said it doesnt look like any othsr raptors
he was referring to the skull and bone structure
I think y'all're taking this way too seriously
See the problem
See how different these two are from the art prior?
Teeth are notoriously a good way to identify prehistoric animals (im just arguing to argue its fun)
I was being sarcastic
Idk man, both look like big birds I wouldn't wanna run into
If you ask for accuracy judgement, don't handwave it by saying random irrelevant things
Ciao ciao all, gotta wake up early for work
Which lizard wins in a kissing contest ?!
Learning many things, such as how lighthearted and lowstakes bait isn't as fun as people been saying
I weren't even the one asking for accuracy, mate
It's funny if the spectators in the arena aren't liable to take it seriously
Says the evil kitty man
Called knowing your audience, a very important part of dropping jokes!
And yes, the evil kitties actually give me full authority to say many things like how Nanotyrannus will be valid
Yutyrannus kisses you better
Much unlike the Saurophaganaz
Damn man, sorry for not being able to grasp your ability for jokes from a ten minute convo
(saurophaganax is technically still valid btw
)
Hes being sarcastic now we can chill
You're about to find out what happened to Maraapunisaurus bucko
(because it is a nomen dubium and thus can't be outright synonymized with something else)
There's an unknown bone from the composite that could still be Saurophaganax, if we find more of those in a bigger fossil bed that could be our boy
If a megalania grew wings would it be a dragon
Close! It would be a nuclear experiment
No, but you got scansoriopterygidae!
ermmm that’s a wyvern ackshually
🤓
Ermmm blows you up with my mind
Wait its distinct?
No brick is just quirky (getting the quote)
Are there remains of a theropod larger than Utahraptor in the yellow cat member?
Pardon?
there's allosauroid teeth but they're from lower yellow cat as opposed to upper with utah

Iirc the idea they were with Utahraptor is because they were washed in from weather
this is true allosauroids are washed
LOL
iirc the fact that said teeth and later allosauroids such as Siats exist implies that there was one with Utahraptor right?
Or at least it was proposed at one point
Not sure what the context is here? Existence of a larger Utahraptor?
unless allosauroids were entirely extirpated from NA that'd be the assumption yeah
but tmk they're absent from upper yellow cat and overlying poison strip so whether that's the result of a legitimate local extirpation or just becoming less common with changes in environment idk
Of a predator larger than Utahraptor in it's environment
i mostly say this because upper yellow cat and posion strip are the only two units without allosauroids and also have utahraptor/utahraptor-like taxa but i doubt there's enough at least published sampling to make any conclusions about that
Oh, based Brick
Understandable
I ask mainly because the idea of it being an apex predator is cool and kinda makes sense seeing how much of a wrecking ball it was, but then you look at the sizes of contemporary animals and... yikes
Think they will ever include Utah in base game? Rather than just in the mods
Achillo is the utah at home so... no
Aren't there evidence of Allosauroids existing in the same region after Utahraptor's age or?
yup
So wouldn't it be possible that there was an Allosauroid that co-existed with Utahraptor?
Is the top most recent?
.
yeah its definitely possible
so what was the verdict from earlier about this being scientifically accurate or not?
Beef the head up
Yes, that’s how stratigraphy works. Unless you’re working with folded belts, in which case, it can get flipped.
The main reason Dromeosaurids got so big in some enviorments is due to lack of a larger carnivore. Utahraptor is the largest carnivore in it's formation. If there was an Allosauroid it would be a smaller member of the family and would fill a more fox-like role compared to more popular, larger Allosauroids
That or it would've been able to fill the role of the second largest carnivore
No
I'm sure we would have found one sooner or later, but in the last 48 years nothing has come up except for more Utahraptor (to my knowledge). I do understand that within the same formation there are larger predators, but in the exact ecosystem and area Utahraptor lived, nothing bigger that primarily eats meat there
I am pretty sure we do not know if that is the main reason Utahraptor got big. And Utahraptor can easily co-exist with a larger Carcharadontosaurid.
That's also true
If a larger Allosauroid was introduced, maybe, but I don't think they would exactly be getting larger in the presence of a megatheropod
but as it stands AS OF THIS MOMENT, Utahraptor was the large hypercarnivore in it's respective ecosystem
If there isn't a second megatheropod, it could probably still grow to such dimensions
I mean Achillobator is right there, which lived with the slightly larger (if not similar sized) Alectrosaurus
We have Allosauroids existing before and after Utahraptor in roughly the similar-ish region (I think?). And while it makes sense Utahraptor grew due to lack or limited amount of larger theropods, I dont think we are sure if that is exactlu the case.
Maybe it was just an environment where the larger predators couldn’t perform as well? I dunno.
@velvet burrow Achillo lived on an entirely different continent.
Speaking of, the Raptor Red book portrayed Utahraptor as descendants of immigrants from Asia, don’t know how accurate that is for the time period since the first Asian immigration came much later.
I don't think it's a coincidence that the only time we haven't found a megatheropod at the same time as Utahraptor, perhaps an extinction event and lack of a megatheropod is the reason Utahraptor was able to even exist in the first place
... huh?
I believe the big Dromeaosaurid from Ubekizstan co-existed with an Allosauroid? Ulughbegsaurus (possibly dubious), but still that indicates that large Dromeaosaurids can get big even with larger theropods around.
If you could name the Dromeosaurid then I would love to look it up, But as smjjames said, Utahraptor may have been in a unique situation where megatheropods couldn't exist there or went exinct
Yea I do not deny the possibility that Utahraptor could have been the largest carnivourous theropod in its environment during its time, but it is also possible it wasn't. The big dromeaosaurid is known as the big Bissekty Dromeaosaurid (from the Bissekty formation, known from an toe bone).
Isn't that the one that was larger than the Tyrannosaurids in it's area?
Timurlengia, and I believe so (But then again it is known from a single toe)
I think I recall an acrocanthosaurus from the book? But then they kind of journey all over the place.
@sir.spicyy Lol, that’s a big raptor for sure.
Could Utahraptor have been an immigrant from Asia or at least descended?
I think that for these kind of arguments, we should remove this raptor from the equation due to it literally being able to go both ways
Unless there was a major extinction event that wiped out Allosauroids before Utahraptor's time (in which case, where did the Allosauroids afterwards come from?), I can easily see Utahraptor co-existing with one during its time. But its also very possible it didn't co-exist with one.
Isn’t Siats an allosaurid? Yes it came much later, I see that.
Ye
Utahraptor could have just been isolated, other Allosauroids existed in different places at the same time in nearby formations. Possible they could have migrated or a relative evolved into one
Unless there was a major geological barrier seperating them, animals travel.
Which side of the Cretaceous midcontinent seaway are we talking about here?
Also, did a big post get made only for automod to slap it? I swear I saw something.
Before PoT thought I said a swear, I was saying it takes hundereds of generations and millions of years to move. And if conditions stayed the same for Megatheropods to not evolve in the same area as Utahraptor then I assume it was prob alone
yeah, I said our genus name and automod slammed it into the ground and made my message bite the curb
Our genus moved around pretty quick, relatively speaking.
Animals in general can cover a wide range. Just look at Tyrannosaurus and Acrocanthosaurus's range in North America (or pretty much many animals today). So if there were Allosauroids in nearby regions during the same time, its possible they would have met Utahraptor or its relatives (unless there were major geological barriers that prevented them from doing so).
exactly, so how long do you think it would take a non arboreal species to move a long distance to an area where megatheropods probably couldn't survive
Though the main thing is whether Utahraptor could evolve to get as big as it is while co-existing with a larger carnivore, which is something I think we do not conclusive know.
we also don't have proof that it or other relatives could. We have evidence of the large Dromeosaurids co-existing with similar sized ones but not with towering megatheropods
Still, even now, animals can move quite large distances on a human timescale, at least when you’re talking about large animals.
Still, animals would take time to become fully established in an area.
Are there any smaller Allosaurids that co existed with Utahraptor?
not to my knowledge (also it's oids, not ids. Oids refers to the larger group, which includes Charchs and proper Allosaurs)
No
... come to think of it small allosauroids are kinda rare
Also since Saurophaganax isn't a thing ig it also tanked the allosauridae family
Autocorrect keeps wanting to say allosauroidea.
Allosauroids are known to be larger theropods, which is relatively rare, even in Tyrannosauroidea and Maniraptora
I mean, depends on how you define "large" (E.g. Metriacanthosaurus, Lourinhasaurus). Certainly large, but I don't think it is the large we are referring to.
Conc though…. And metri
"Large"as in top order predators, rather than mesopredators
top order? You mean apex predators?
Assumedly.
Ye
Allosaurus needs to be an apex in PoT.
Well, "Apex" predator is a broad term that does not nessecarily correlate with size. A ~1000kg Allosauroid co-existing with Utahraptor can still be an "Apex".
Yeah, Allosauroids are known to be large, and relatively speaking there are less small Allosauroids than larger ones to my knowledge
And yes, i know the ingame term is used differently.
jury's still open on whether any allosauroid at all coexisted with utahraptor since every proposed yellow cat carch is actually from different layers
but as of right now, it's just our big feathery friend
I guess it comes down to how we define "large" and "small". Because you have Concavenator, Lajasvenator, Shaochilong, etc
I mean pretty much every "large tier" carnivore in PoT is an apex in it's own environment (now including allo)
isnt utah from the cretaceous period ? allosaurus made it out of the jurassic period?
giganotosaurus is an allosauroid (as is every other carch)
Not Alloasurus, Allosauroid.
Allosauroids, Allosaurus proper is jurassic. Allosauroids are Allosaurs and Charchs (and some close relatives)
thought they meant allosaurus in genereal
Allosaurus proper, no, but its relatives and descendants did.
Random Random if you had to give an answer what would it be? 🎙️
i was speed reading earlier , guess i misread
i'd say no because it would be funnier if allosauroids just vanish from north america for 15 million years and then come back
In terms of whether a certain creature co-existed with another, I am more curious of how common or widespread Sinoceratops or relatives were in Mongolian or Chinese regions at the time, since it is the only Asian Ceratopsid atm.
I mean Sauropods did too but it was for longer iirc
I mean sauropods already did it
Its as if someone dropped a large Ceratopsid in Asia randomly, like where did they come from
My guess on that is we haven't found fossils due to preservation bias
What was the general environment? Seems to have lasted quite a while b3cause there’s a Cf. Utahraptor n at the top of the poison strip sandstone.
sauropods do vanish from NA for a while but that's +40 million years after utahraptor
So it was the allos who (possibly) did the funny first and the sauropods are the copycats
I was making a joke about how stuff randomly dissapeared from places and then returned like nothing happened
oh ok
I guess it's possible they were in north america but just not in utah specifically, like how lions historically were found everywhere around the sahara but not inside it
What was the general environment, like floodplains? Arid? Forest? For where Utahraptor lived.
how accurate is this
Not sure if it’s supposed to be a club to the nuts kind of hit or something else?
A club to the nuts is unlikely, but not impossible.
Or maybe what are you asking is accurate there?
also who think they should make a ultimasaurus mod for pot
this has nothing to do with paleontology!
@outer tusk
Yeah?
what is x= 5.7x(13.45/11.7)^3
Bro am not doing some stupid ass math equation on Christmas break 😭
uh, 0?
Also that ain't paleontology
im trying to scale the unpublished meraxes specimen but for some reason when i tried to scale it a second time it messed up and got 0
0
ah
mb
8,65933
Just plug that into Wulfram Alpha or something.
is meraxes length 11.4 or 11.7
11.7
Am i stupid for thinking that kulindadromeus lived in the campanian/maastrichtian of canada
I love how everyone trying to scale this fella goes by 15% longer or whatever idk. I'd go with 15% heavier tbf because mass is the metric establishing if something is bigger or not, else you'd have jellyfish bigger than blue whales.
Currently, Meraxes is estimated to be 5.5 tons so a 15% larger specimen would be 6.3 tons, resulting is a slightly larger fella (I don't know how much longer it would get though).
I suppose that's the mass estimate if you go by the hypothesis that the fella is 15% longer.
If I go by 15% heavier, I find an animal that's 12.1 meters long.
With Giganotosaurus holotype being ~12.2 meters long, this seems much more likely imo.
Tbf, stating a specimen without many measurements is 15% heavier would be odd
True, but anyway any estimation would be odd given that there isn't any measurements yet. Could be some femoral bullsh*t again.
But if you go by 15% larger/longer and in similar size class to Giganotosaurus you indeed end up with the 13.7 meters titan that weight almost 8 tons and half. So it isn't any better.
I’ll just drop this here and give me you opinion
Historically accurate, i like 👍
Here is the abstract btw.
So I really do wonder what they go by wiht 15% larger given how much they have found.
The only two places one sees this image outside paleontology circles is your local bible church and your local conspiracy Reddit group.
I love that image 💀
It also can depend on what Giganotosaurus estimate they are using cause it's probably not Dan's Giga GDI that every discord paleonerd goes by.
Pretty sure it's based on a joke that got taken a little too seriously.
generally paleontologists will mean linear dimensions when they say that
paleontologists also don't use Sergi's Meraxes skeletal, the published estimate does not lend a Giganotosaurus sized animal if upsized 15% in mass
why dont paleos use it
Anyone know some modern day birds similar to hesperonis
to be fair, we dunno how specific they are when they say "similar in size to giganotosaurus"
Cormorants probably? Auks might be closer, but, you know, extinct.
because they are cringe normies who aren't a part of the based discord servers
Flightless cormorants, loons, grebes.
and is there a published estimate on the second meraxes size estimate
I was thinking seabirds specifically though.
15% larger than the first
ye its 8.6 tonnes and 13.4 meters
if it scales directly to the first yeah
but do we know how complete the second specimen is
in the abstract they talk about the bones found
Right pectoral girdle, forelimb and hindlimb.
so idk how complete it is but is it reiable?
no its dead
so ig i shoudlnt use it 😭
I suppose they use the hindlimbs because this is what this Meraxes specimen has in common with Giganotosaurus (and that's what is the most commonly used for scaling iirc).
Thanks Franoys for showing us what is preserved for Giga 🙏
i mean its still pretty useful, you would be able to build a fort out of it probably
Gigs solos
Bone fort when.
This image ain’t accurate they shoot sonic wave beam out of there crest plus stop such non accurate imagery pls as a para lover this hurts
General chat reminder to remain polite and respectful towards each other and do not provoke or antagonize other users. Refer to our #rules.
the answer is 8.659326667865455
Paleontology Question. Was The ceratosaurus a Canibal
A. Yes
B. No
Answers. A is the Correct answer.
I’m say B
It was C actually
Nothing but fodder for the more evolved and superior Allosaurus
Most likely both options,it honestly likely depended on the conditions a ceratosaurus could´ve been facing.
In some cases,they would indeed occur for cannibalism,but most likely hunted other dinosaurs. (i might be wrong,but idk)
Ceratosaurus was probably a very uncommon animal for it's time
Not a fort, but yea, lol.
Basically all carnivorous animals will resort to cannibalism when conditions are harsh enough. I'd imagine calling any carnivore in specific a cannibal would relate to how frequently they do so, but not only is that distinction arbitrary, but essentially impossible to determine even for theropods much better represented than Ceratosaurus.
✨ fossil bias ✨
What sort of evidences do we have ? Like do we have rackling teeth marks against bones or something ?
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0233115 yes we have extensive feeding traces on Morrison fossils, including on Ceratosaurus. Difficult to ID the maker though
Bite marks provide direct evidence for trophic interactions and competition in the fossil record. However, variations in paleoecological dynamics, such as trophic relationships, feeding behavior, and food availability, govern the frequency of these traces. Theropod bite marks are particularly rare, suggesting that members of this clade might not...
In all likelihood they were cannibals to some degree or another, it's pretty common in archosaurs and diapsids more generally
Likely smaller
Giga Holotype is 12.7m and 8.47t
12.8 if you prefer but eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeehhhhhhhhhhh
This paper specifically talks about Allosaurus fossils with teeth marks on their bones. Which theropod did them is unclear but the 2 main suspects are Allosaurus and Ceratosaurus. The cannibalism interpretation is only valid if this was done by Allosaurus.
Nah its 12.7m, maybe 12.8m if you do some small rounding.
All we know is that its said to be similar size to the Giga Holotype and that its likely bulkier than Mapu
Thats kinda it
15% is kinda vague
12.76 is closer to 12.8 than 12.7 so I round it to the higher.
But anyway this is very much nitpicky.
Like, this guy doesn't has muvh anyways and getting a proper size is complicated
(Atleast its bulkier than Mapu so W)
I personally calculated 12.2 if holotype is indeed 11.7 and 5.5 tons. But you get a 6.3 tons animal if you go by 15% heavier.
Tmk is just 12.7m flat
From what I have been Told and like I showed from my converdation with someone previously
Holotype for Meraxes is more 10.7-10.8m rather than the 11.4-11.7m one that Sergi uses
Uh
that seems too small for a 165mm dorsal vert
I think they just took the skeletal from the paper and reposed it, but paper skeletals are not very good in general
Baryonx look so silly to me idk why
Bc he got dat long face
Can someone pull apart this article and tell me everything right and wrong about it? I just wanna make sure I am getting frustrated at it for a reason
https://hoasrc.com/2023/03/09/paleoartists-are-controlling-what-you-know-about-dinosaurs-part-3/
Yeah, only difference being size, location and the tail shape being different
But honestly, sucho is more related to spino not only bc they both lived in what is now North Affrica, but they both had a sail, sucho's, albeit, quite small, and he still lacked the tadpole-like tail that the spino had
They did/made another skeletal tmk
And actually will update its neck position cause Tauro spawned
Theres also the fact the guy has went and checked stuff related to Meraxes and Giga itself on person(tmk he also gave Dan Info for his Giga)
Tho you can ask @white matrix himself tbh
"home owner's association science"??

iirc the debate has leaned pretty heavily in favor of lipped Theropods recently, so that article is just outdated since the most recent paper it references is from 2017, with a sort of handwavy "some paleontologists disagree."
The overall point that reconstructions aren't what the dinosaur looked like but rather the artist's opinion on what it looked like is completely true though, albeit he's leaning too hard into the "we don't really know what they looked like" angle when evidence is pretty conclusive about certain topics.
I know you wanted a more thorough breakdown but the article seems mostly reasonable, just leans too hard into ignorance-maxing.
where utah pack hunter and a harem or did they share them or did they just hunt animals around or smaller than them
Unknown when it comes to how complex the social behaviors would have been
what genus is the terror bird and giant moa related too
Thank god I got angry for a reason
Terror birds is a common name given to large Phorusrhacids. Moas closest relatives are tinamous.
well actually they wouldve used iron man suits
theres loads of terror birds be specific
but the most famous and commonly referred to genus of terror bird is either kelenken or titanis
😂😂😂
There's one I vaguely remember, but I can't quite recall the name, D something, Dimetrys, something like that?
I looked in wiki and I don't see the name I'm trying to remember. Might have been from a different group?
Diatryma, is a gastornithiform not a phorusrhacid
DIatryma, yeah, that one.
And yea, no wonder it's not in the list of extinct flightless birds, it's a synonym of Gastornis now. At least the validity of it is contested.
Aren't those sometimes called terror birds? That's why I thought of it.
My mistake I thought they mentioned both, thanks for clarifying!
is protoceratops pet sized
Can sheeps and goats be pets?
i believe so?
Then you've answered your question. They're also large dog sized kinda.
im trying to figure out wat what genus of bird it is
Gastornis gigantea Is wat i was looking for
Well, the Giant Moa is from an entirely different infraorder.
I was jmtrying to just find the largest non flying prehistoric bird that y
'k
i wanna say the giant moa...is it the same bird as the elephant bird? i forgot
it actually got pulled back out recently
Torvosaurus victim
Biggest Allosaurus Anax victim
does anax mean pot allo can stay a big boy?
nah they're different species but the elephant bird is the largest
if you wanna go by tallest the giant moa is the tallest
Hopefully, Technically you can Make POT Allo bigger now(bigger than Sucho)
yeah I'd rather keep allo the size it is
French Megalosaurid victim
no all torvo had it coming as soon as they hatched they Deserve to get bullied and worst
Is that thing even bigger than 6.5t?
I see it range from 11.4-12.30m and 5.56-6.32
Inconsistant guy smh
it could always stay that size
Lokiceratops has been unlocked
Just finished up with this
10.4t rex while not using the right skeletal
Could not find a good Scotty skeletal for the life of me. Sues is honestly good enough there’s a 100kg difference between the 2
no Randoms sue is just 10000 kg
I asked em. The pelvis was undersized. It’s now 10300kg
whaaaaaaaaaaaaat 10.3t sue

the listing is also a bit off, A. anax & meraxes are missing
I'm also certain that mcraeensis wasn't 9t, at least with lancian's reconstruction of it.
Thing with that Scotty is that I’m not 100% that the cartilage is taken into account which then makes for a smaller looking skeletal without it
you can feasibly add a little more cartilage
other than that this skeletal is pretty much the best you can get regarding scotty
I left them out of the comparison deliberately until I get good Skeletals of them. I included the weights there as those are the weights I confirmed with random
- Why is TTT so Small
- Why is Dentary Giga even there
- Spino was GDI to 7.8 tons tmk
- Why is Torvo 4.8t
- Why is Anax 4.9t
- Sucho can range from 5.4-5.6 depending the skeketal used
- Meraxes Giga is to vague to use tbh
- Carcha can be 8.2-8.4
When was that said?
Are raptors supposedly evolutionarily "designed" to be big game hunters? I mean we have fossil evidience of a solitary Velociraptor going for a 200 pound Protoceratops. And also the one ton Tenontosaurus that was possibly being hunted by 6-10 Deinonychus. Also we know that Achillobator and Utahraptor lived with prey items that were very much larger than them
TT is the recent random skeletal of it. All the weights were what I confirmed with em a couple days ago before finishing it
Asked them earlier today
fair, but if they're not going to be included then maybe you should probably leave them out of the listing for now or stick with the current best skeletals
at least for meraxes, I believe randomdinos re-scaled anax
Random's TTT should still be around 7.3 tons
Unless TTT got that much skinnier cause it hasn't change weight wise
And Spino been that High is weird
The GDI of Random's Spino was 7.85t tmk with a 3ad Model that made it 8.15-8.30t
the second largest is anax I believe
Use the cursed one
I believed that TT was around 7.5 at first but upon asking random I was told 6.7.
With spino I was also told 7.7-8.5 but for the purpose of this comparison I used the higher estimates for them all
you could but it most likely won't be correct.
Since when were you here
not that i actually care about 500kg difference in carchotitanus biggus but isnt 6700kg exactly what you'd expect from random's tyrannotitan scaling down from an 8.2t carch
I was here a long time ago but left, but then re-joined because a lot of hot paleo topics get brought here
Ah, I never noticed you.
Yea it is, but I’m waiting for a lone skeletal to be made which hopefully shouldn’t take too long (I hope)
tbf didn't random say they made TTT first then scaled it up with carcha
Are raptors supposedly evolutionarily "designed" to be big game hunters? I mean we have fossil evidience of a solitary Velociraptor going for a 200 pound Protoceratops. And also the one ton Tenontosaurus that was possibly being hunted by 6-10 Deinonychus. Also we know that Achillobator and Utahraptor lived with prey items that were very much larger than them. Were there any adaptations for this or was it just behavior wise that they went for larger prey with or without a group?
well yeah but like if we assume the carch model is some 8.2t it works both ways
Looking from This yea I’ll swap sue out
Ima summin @stiff osprey so questions can be answered
or just use this lul
I’d be found xd. I could just scale it down to what it should be but 
you don't need to, I just did
if this can have balerion colossus can it have megamonstro too
Oh. Fair nuff
NO WHAT DID I MISS!
also giga is 10t but its the size of the ~8t one?
Can someone address this? I'm really curious
Dentary Giga can burn smh
Bro has less Material than Big Anax
then make the size the holotype
Here's a good reference for MUCPv-95
who ping
🤷♂️ I asked for the giga for it and I was given said giga
you summoned them come here now
Me🫡(Yes I was finally unmuted)
or if you're still willing to use MUCPb-95 just use SIW
its kind of funny how much the mindnumbing carch discussions revolve entirely around random
yeah Spino's giga skeletal is pretty good
Basically question regarding TTT becoming 6.7t from 7.3t and Sue apparently been 10.3t
it's like tagging sisyphus to discuss boulder mechanics
fun fact if sue gets 3% heavier than one volumetric estimate she will explode into a million pieces
where did bro get 6.7 tonnes from 
Tyrannotitan is 6.7t because that's what you get isometrically scaling down from my Carch
ah my apologies, sir'
7.3 t tyrannotitan would require a 9t carch
you forgot a very large Megaraptoran called Bahariasaurus ingens
as well as the Bolivian 1456 meter long Megaraptoran based on footprint
oh boy my favorite glupshitto north african megatheropod
Let bro then 9t then /j
Also another question, did Torvo lost weight? (From 5.2 to 4.8)
And regarding 10.3t Sue?
Unreliable weight so not included
I think you forgot a decimal there.....
4.8 is the estimate you get using the supposedly elvis-accurate shorter version
You have Spino, Sigil and dentary Giga in there
Ok here’s it with Scotty
don't mind torvo he's the world's second biggest bahariasaurus fan
tbf sigil being big literally has like zero impact on anything ever because its spinosaurus #2 in any case
can I use SIW's 8t TTT because I like it more?
Over a thousand meters though?
i wish people were this invested in hadrosaur scaling
rommel (>13.5 t Sue guy) is apparently saying TTT had wider more Tyrannosaur like ribs so go ahead
Ok and Regarding Mcracensis?
Tmk it became Smaller with Lancian's Skeletal?
ew rommel!
No the 7387 meters were for the Bolivian Megaraptoran based on footprint
all it needs is a rounded back and it should be solid
What the bs with the numbers?
Also here's my Sauropodomorph phylogeny tree
mcraensis has a dentary toothrow 98% the size of scotty's so if his skeletal is less than 9t i'm afraid that's because it is wrong
Paper skull recon is 1.35 m
tbf wankel also has a toothrow longer than scotty so maybe we should give up on mcraeensis
Or he just scaled it to the lacrimal which is not the largest specimen
Also here's my theropod phylogeny tree
I cant read bruh
it's a tall file, open in browser
Click open in browser
Do u happen to have the 10t one?
I'm making fun of thepaleofreak
hmm nice
Cause I asked and was provided with em and apparently he’s the smaller one 
just take the 8t one and make it 6.5% larger
It's 6.6% random how could you make such a big mistake
SO how big iz Mcraensis?
Cause I see ppl givinv Paper Skukl recon of 1.35m
Another saying The Wankel Specinen gas a longer Toothgrow then Scotty and then Random's Saying the Toothgrow makes it big
Man I am consufed smh
noooo
Oh I’m 100% gonna butcher tryna make it bigger. Wish me luck lol
Kuit posted it already
could you add the 13 m Megaraptoran based on footprint
I literally just posted it
Oh I completely missed it. I shall return
welcome to fragmentary animal scaling people will have different opinions about it
i think we should just like give up on getting a concrete estimate for a partial dentary and two crummy posterior skull bones
Ok
I 😍 Chilantaisaurus tashikouensis
also apparently there's a 1.28 m ornithopod footprint from Maastrichtian Pakistan
it also apparently is sauropod i think
there's gigahippodraco, satan's beloved pet
offtopic but with what we have currently could you say austroraptor is a "semi-aqautic" why or why not
i also love uncertain incomplete taxa known from like a few bones
Lets make a 9m Carcha then
Pycno for example?
no that one is unambiguously Abelisaurid
pycno is exponentially better than three skull bones
oh wait that was in comparison to chilantai not mcrae
9 meters carcharodontosaurus? that's pretty short
Lets downscale Meraxes caus eI hate it now
Carcharodontosaurus but it was given the GAT Allosaurus caudal count
Eocarcharia sized Carcha
Sauroniops is that but in reverse
peak
it's also 0.89 of a skull bone so not amazing
Maip but bulkier, Heavier and Edgier
better Maip
This doesn't use Siats for some reason
i can tell it by the proportionally short vertebral centra
Btw should I change anything for detail?
Ok giga is in
Yuh
three footprints*
Bro is 1m longer than Carcha but now is just Carcha height smh
oh no the 17589 m Megaraptoran based on three footprints guy
no no no no no
Anything to make carcha look smaller (I’m a spino glazer. Carcha is an opp)
there's no evidence Carcharodontosaurus didn't have an incredibly oversized head proportionally and wasn't 5 m
add this
Spino still dies to the All Powerful Carcharodontosaur

ew is that footprint scaling
Add this
yeah you also gonna add sauroniops
Nuh uh the mighty spinosaurus clears
yes, please no prejudices
Also, just for the troll.
Use Random's Carcha but updated with Giga's Tail and Tauro's Neck
Bill Cipher solos
x62 is like 15m scaled to it

Why is bro heavier than my Goat
14.3 m I think
Hydrogen bomb v coughing baby (bill is the baby 🗣️)
U see. Having tyrannosaur in the name just upscales it
okay but the baby in gravity falls can warp universes so Bill wins
But u see, it’s not that baby, just a regular baby
Eotyrannus is thus the greatest theropod ever
Add this Totally reliable guys
Isn't this sauroniops upsized I remember it being smaller
For the fun of it ima add Rudy to the comparison
guys...
huh???
Totally reliable
You can’t reasonably scale sauroniops with eocarcharia so you have to rely on the other best things
Let's be honest it's not like it matters as it's jist a frontal lobe bone that can be scaled at will
From what I’ve learnt just don’t trust Sauro scaling. I’ve seen it at 2.8t and 9t
Sauroniops has largest frontal out of all Carcharodontosaurids
Tibia is but caudals belong to something significantly smaller
Plus I’m certain that iguanacolossus didn’t look like a species of iguanadon, skeletal needs some touchups
Bro doesn't get the joke
Okay but it’s still real
2.8 t is based on nothing
like you can't actually get that result
I had to do it myself...
is this baha or 57274 m Bolivian Megaraptoran
the better one
Lol
i never thought I'd see an even more garbage Giant Megaraptoran than Bahariasaurus but here we are
Brazilian Carch better
megazillaraptoran
never
There’s also the giant Bary and gigahippo
there's an 18 m Carcharodontosaurid in theropod database and that's even larger than this
and so I made it with extremely large feet and it is only 11.2m
Pretty sure this thing is a bit smaller
The group of the cursed
that's what i said
Gomez is like 16 m, Ultraacro is 18 m
at least my thing isnt sauropod
Mortimer told me the verts look theropod
any specifics
they seem apneumatic iirc but at the same time they are incomplete so
The unknown you can say
to pogadali
also the caudal can't be titanosaur because it isn't procoelous

and so shaochilong caudals of putative association and allosaurus caudal measurement of questionable veracity remain brazil's only saving grace
its smaller than it can be (larger estimate is 13m)
It's 16 m because Acrocanthosaurus
also DINO 2560 is actually 12-13 m so your wrong
so maybe ornitischia or other pterosauria
23 cm pterosaur caudal
Ok now that’s the correct one. (Not sure if I sent this one yet)
Based username fr
noo, its not the correct one, please fix it
6 of these are carcharodontosaurids , 🔥
Change Spinosaurus aegyptiacus to Spinosaurinae indet.
7
Giga
Mera
Carch
Mapu
Ttt
Tauro
Acro
I’m not adding it 
Yeah I was about to correct myself, carcharodontosaurids are for sure the most successful family of theropods
specific epithet - small letter
the others are:
- Tyrannosaurid (Tyrannosaurus x2, Tarbosaurus)
- Spinosaurid (Spinosaurus, Sigilmassasaurus, Cristatusaurus)
- Allosaurid (A. anax)
- Megalosaurid (T. tanneri)
Live abelisauridae reaction
they literally existed in middle Jurassic and survived all the way until Maastrichtian
Sucho 😭 and Mcraeensis
Idc
Why
please, my eyes..
Sucho was lumped into Cristatusaurus and mcraeensis* became Tyrannosaurus 2
True
I’m not sure on either of those. I’ve never seen Sucho lumped into cristatusaurus and mcraeensis as of 2 days ago is still its own tyrannosaur
Wym?
.
- That one was a joke but it's possible
- mcraeensis is literally Tyrannosaurus wdym
I’m unsure on what u mean 🧍♂️
Tyrannosaurus rex not Tyrannosaurus Rex
Tyrannotitan not tyrannosaurus
I don’t even know. The way u said it has confused me
what
Cf is bigger and is the one of the skeletal so
Specifically Tyrannotitan chubutensis not Tyrannotitan Chubutensis
TTT
That's also Spinosaurinae indet. (see Chiarenza and Cau 2016)
and they're identical in size
Oh I see the issue. I capitalised the species names. Brb
Random had it as CF so
I still can’t get over that tail
Huh?
okay but it doesn't overlap with Sigilmassasaurus you can't tell if it's Sigil or not
That by default makes it Spinosaurinae indet.
it also has differences from Spinosaurus aegyptiacus proper
Why does that Lad has bit less Leg Cartilage
the other one had too much
Ohh I see
also random do you think NHMUK is Spinosaurus or no
Would that Affect your sigil's Leg size?
no
Sigil is based on Spinosaurus B
Leg
God damn it I added the old spino in not the new one gotta switch that
Yes, if not aegyptiacus, at least in the genus
resurrect spinosaurus maroccanus
The forgotten one smh
I mean spinosaurus maroccanus
That's a Sigilmassasaurus junior synonym
you'd need to make a new species for FSAC
I wonder how this guy will.be called
166 cm skull for Spino?
Interesting, I usually see it at 148 cm or so
Like 20th times the charm
Spinosaurus newspecies
Yeah, but like
I like the part where Deinocheirus is missing
Edit: oh wait carnivorous nvm
Spinosaurus morOccanus
Yea that’s y theri is also not there
Lets call it
Spinosaurus suchotator trust
You forgot Chilantaisaurus
what
(Meant the Dino)
how
Lets call it Suchomimus Maximumus (trust)
you don't know what's Chilantaisaurus???
It’s one I’ve legit never heard of 😭
^
it was literally sent when you were active
Someone mentioned it today and I found a single skeletal of it and really didn’t think twice about it
Ngl ima just call that new species as "land Soino"
I remember the first time I heard about Chilantaisaurus, beautiful times
i do not remember the first time i heard about Bahariasaurus, bad times
so sad
I remember the first time I heard about Chilantaisaurus and thought it was one of the coolest sounding dinosaur names
the coolest sounding dinosaur name is Yi obviously
Is chil even that heavy? Not really seeing anything on em
that claw
It's nearly as long as Acro and Meraxes
even if it's not in say top 10 biggest theropods ever, the bones we do have of the animal showcase animal over at least >4 tonnes
Also it's actually the last Carcharodontosaurid
how long is Neovenator holotype @stable sun
iirc 7 m
Hmm yea it doesn’t seem like it’s past torvo so they don’t even make the cut
It's a Carcharodontosaurid comparable to Acrocanthosaurus in size
it's literally the same size a torvosaurus gurneyi which is 4.8 tonnes maybe even slightly more
so 10.3m for Chilantai
119 cm femur vs 73 cm femur that's 11.4 m
theropod tibiae get proportionally smaller with size, Chilantaisaurus has a larger tibia than that of A. anax
And 4-5 t at 11.4 m
Also its 11.9 m scaled to Concavenator
I would throw out A.anax and keep Chilantaisaurus and Torvosaurus
I at least have a decent source for anaxs weight but literally nothing for chils
So I'd say Chilantaisaurus is 11.4-11.9 m
The skeletal I found of chil has it at 11.35m
and what about Siats
Upscaling Chilant based on Conca gets 4.5-5 t but as a far larger theropod it was obviously more robust
Could you remind me what was the placement of the Siats dorsal verts
I’ll look more into chil and see what I find and keep that in mind
Okay Siats is 11.6 m based on Concavenator
Na
4, 12, 13
Torvosaurus is at least 50 tons
only 11.6 m? I thought if you scaled Siats via dorsals you got 12.5m
yeah only bc of d4, scaling d12 and d13 gives about 9.5m
why are conca's posterior dorsals so big
i scaled to Neovenator
Is there anything new going on with siats I haven’t heard anything about siats other that it’s a debate if it’s a carcharodontosaurud or a megaraptor
oh
well siats centra are almost as long as those of Sue so it is probably not 9.5m
never a megaraptoran, remember
15cm vs 11cm in Neovenator
the posterior ones are 18cm iirc
wait, one in fact is 18cm
I don’t get the logic at all lol
"Siats is a megaraptoran because the lion is bigger than the leopard" absolutely bonkers
Mhm, wild
i saw this dude time ago
what logic is that 😭
at first i thought the brazilian carcharodontosaur could not be bigger than Giganotosaurus, however I remembered that Brazil is bigger than Argentina, so that makes sense
He sounds like a genius to me, I’d love to do business with him.
posterior one are about 17 and 18cm by paper measurments
Wasn’t it also immature? Tho how immature is unknown
So it’s a carcharodontosaurid? I’m not hip at all.
Idk, I go with carch cause imo it makes sense, after all why would acro be the only NA carch, but I think it’s still in the air
but this one has a large part that is not functional length and I'm not sure if they took that into account
is it actually opisthocoelous or is that just the rim being distorted on one side
Acro and Siats arent closely related
Huh?
No one even knows what siats is , so.
Siats is a megaraptor now?
,,all dorsal centra are platycoelous''
It’s a sauropod 🤓
no no no, never
Saurophaganax moment
Ofc, I just mean acro being the only carch in NA always stood out as odd to me
Capitalsaurus potens moment
if they are platycoelous then that is just distortion on one side
How is this a megaraptor?
you idiot
is that allosaurus anax
now which side is distorted i don't know
Watch your language bud before I call the cops
Siats
its just a recontruction, Siats is badly complete. but it is not a megaraptoran
Can someone please send a pic of all the siats material that is available
How do you go from "Lord of The Lizard Eaters" to "Different Lizard Ruler"
i mean if you translate them the same way it becomes Lord of the Different Lizards
"Im the king of obtuse birds" moment
That's a really long armed carcharodontosaur
basal ones were like that
How are we sure that's a carcharodontosaur anyway? It's bones look super fragmentary
they look more like carcharodontosaur bones than anything-else bones
Wait
If they find a skull it probably wouldn’t even be designated to siats
This is getting morphed into another sauropod potential , but I’m afraid if that happens I will be done with dinosaurs
Siats can be whatever he wants, as long as he's not a megaraptoran
You take that back
Ankylosaurid siats
i mean even if the dorsals of siats somehow were from a sauropod (they aren't), the ilium would still be theropod, as well as the leg material
leg material that is for sure not a coelurosaurian material, same case in Chilantaisaurus.
Tryna compare their skeletons (I don't know why this carchar is so robust)
amazing work man
using stromer's carch to reconstruct carcharodontosaurus is evil
Just turn it into abelisaurid
Some more skeletons
There's are outdated 3D reconstructed skeletons 😭
What
better carcharodontosaurus reference

All I did was search carcharodontosaurus skeleton and this is what came up
Most accurate carch atm tmk
That looks like a toy
It's ai
Are Dromeosaurids supposedly evolutionarily "designed" to be big game hunters? I mean we have fossil evidience of a solitary Velociraptor going for a 200 pound Protoceratops. And also the one ton Tenontosaurus that was possibly being hunted by 6-10 Deinonychus. Also we know that Achillobator and Utahraptor lived with prey items that were very much larger than them. Were there any adaptations for this or was it just behavior wise that they went for larger prey with or without a group?
Still can’t get over just how good these 2 look together , top quality from both Haolonggood and pnso
Was Pannoniasaurus really a freshwater mosasaur? Is there any evidence debunking this?
yes, we have the isotopes in their fossils that show they live in freshwater
How does that work
Scary
I think current ideas on raptor prey restraint would indicate that if anything they primarily targeted prey similar in size or smaller than themselves. That we have a number of finds showing them hunting larger prey might be preservation bias, since smaller prey is more likely to be eaten quickly or even whole.
Fighting Dinosaurs shows the Velociraptor being restrained by the Protoceratops' beak, and the Deinonychus find has been hypothesized to be a predator trap iirc. Basically these are situations where the raptors are less capable than usual of escaping whatever event killed them and caused them to become fossilized.
Also Tigers live with elephants, but elephant hunts are extremely rare. There's not really any reason to think a solitary Utahraptor was regularly attacking adult Iguanacolossus, even if they technically maybe could kill one. Most predators have been found to be capable of hunting prey several times their size, but most also prefer hunting prey their own size or smaller, I remember the paper on Repenomamus hunting Psittacosaurus discussing statistics on this. It's likely raptors were similar.
On the Utahraptor part, theres not bigger predators that live in the area so did Iguanacolossus just acheive what Titanosaurs did? Being too big to be hunted in their ecosystem? Or maybe Utahraptor mobbing took em out
I think there's an isolated Carcharodontosaurid tooth in that formation so probably not
A) The nature of fossilization means it is more likely to be a common event fossilizing over a rare one
B) Repanom-Taco fossil i slikely a hoax
oh damn really
Truthfully, I think it varied from species to species
that's true for A but I have no idea how many fossils we have of raptors with small prey vs raptors with large prey so I decided not to try and bs stats for that. I probably should have just said as much tbh
Formation, but not the same area or time. Formations can span over long distances but in the range Utahraptor lived, no larger predators have been found in the nearly 50 years Utahraptor has been discovered
Dromaeosaurs, like all theropods, have extremely sharp teeth combined with strong bite forces, which naturally makes them good at bleeding out large animals. But they added onto this by having a decent jumping/climbing ability, which helps hunt large prey since you have to be able to reach the prey's weak points somehow
That doesn't mean they hunted only large prey, but a group of Deinonychus is certainly capable of hunting a Tenontosaurus, or even a single Deinonychus if the Tenont is young (which is the case in that one fossil)
friend of mine mentioned it coexisting with utah but he might've been mistaken lol. I even cautioned him that that formation is like 40 million years long but he was pretty adamant.
Utahraptpr couldn't have hunted Iguanacolossus because they never coexisted, but it was probably hunting like subadult sauropods several times its size
It was washed in from an earlier rock formation
40 million years long? Dang I thought formations were only like, 10-15 million years long
understood I was wrong lmao
Cedar mountain should by all means be split into multiple formations, but so far it hasn't yet
Ya learn something new everyday I guess lol
Tried scaling Hadrosaurus and eotrachodon and idk if the scaling is correct
@stiff osprey you wouldnt happen to have a deltadromeus weight estimate would you?
the holotype is like barely over a tonne
Hey Paes if you gonna minute would you say this scaling is okay?
will answer later currently making suchomimus smooth
Sobbing, why did you use the real name
( forgot to ask if I can call you 'Paes' )
What even is smooth
Smooth
Ain't Cedar Mountain like the entire early cretaceous?
Smoothie
scaling is correct yeah (mine are shorter due to walking pose)
paes is fine but if you call me by my last name i'm obligated to kill you
I’m calling the cops
wait really, damn I though eotrachodon was about the same size 😭
taking a guess but hadrosaurus would be about 6 meters here and eotracho would be 3-4 meters?
Is stygi being an immature pachy still debated? Or is it a definite yes/no
AFAIK right now the idea is whether it's a different species from wyomingensis
Still Pachy, but it'd possibly be P. spinifer
is there any fossil evidence of how big Desmodus draculae
wingspan estimated to be 50 cm
"Allosaurus anax (no skeletal yet)"
hey buddy, i got a present for u
ok the math aint mathing becuase it say Desmodus draculae is the largest bat in history but the A.jubatus Has a wing span of 59-67 in long
Torvosaurus Tanneri victim
if i see a torvo it on sight be uase i hate torvos
It's the largest vampire bat, nowhere near the largest bat
Would we say when sizes are that close it comes down simply who has the stronger bite and who lands first right
yes
He will always be my hero
with anax's downsize it and torvo are literally identical now
But Torvosaurus has the deadlier bite right
presumably on account of its teeth being the size of swords yeah
meanwhile anax is slightly faster and more agile judging by limb anatomy, which should make up for the loss in damage
yea but im preying on there down fall so nuh uh
Thanks for the non bias answer, what do we think about this torvo model
raw as hell
I'd buy it if i wasn't so suspicious of the complete media vanishing of dinosaur empire
Not even the largest extinct Carnivorous bat
Let alone extant
it cool. But still i hate every torvo with a passion for no reason
You’re not alone in that everyone seems to hate Torvosaurus 😒
Please keep all discussions in this channel on topic. This channel is for the discussion of past and present paleontological discoveries, scientific news, and depictions of prehistoric creatures in media in relation to palaeontology.
how accurate is this deino
no
it’s 101% accurate this is the best deino model available 
What downsize? anax hasn't been downsized, the biggest elements are still referred to it, stop spreading misinformation, and is still quite bigger than any Torvosaurus individual (Edmarka included)
Looks a bit more like a purussaurus, ngl
Is Giga still the goat of all Carcharodontosaurs?
It's measurements were apparently wrong
D13 gets large results too though
i think the best part is not Stromer's Carcharodontosaurid but the fact that he used a Noasaurid ilium
which Stromer refferred to Carcharodontosaurus
They weren't, just untrained people doing bad scaling and lying online and people believing them, the measurements are mostly the same in every paper
U missed the part about this skeletal being shot. It’s way too big
TBF if Denison is right iirc the verts go to 15.7 cm
"Allosaurus anax found shot in alley" ahh comment 😭🙏
It pretty much was from what I was told lol
They might have been measured in a different way
so OMNH 1188 still can be ~13 m
If you measure it at the bottom of the vert it ends up being 15.7 cm without making 18 cm inaccurate
i thought that 18cm is measurment with condyle (or however it is called) and then centrum would be 15cm. But I got the measurements wrong and this vertebra was 16.7cm which is probably the measurement of the centrum
So Anax went from 6.5t to 4.9t?
5.1 t i think
Also isn't Torvosaurus 5.2 t
? I know Andy I have spoke with him multiple times before the paper was published, about the sauropod identity of the atlas, is the first measurement given to that dorsal (or figured in a published paper), so it can't be downsized from nothing, that's what I was referring to, actual papers, not anyone online scaling with made up sizes of bones that they have never seen.
Did homie just doxx someone
4.9 according to random
The minimum is 4,7 t with femora circumference which underestimate the body mass comparing to volumetric methods, you can't compare weight of different taxa when different methods have been used for each of them. Volumetric for anax should go up to 5,5t or so (didn't calculate it, just a guess based on usual differences)
I still will believe 6.5t Anax cause it sounds cooler than 4.8t Torvo
I think 1188 is 18cm
I'd rather it be smaller because I'm tired of overrated giant carnivores and kids wanting them to be Kaiju sized
Random's skeletal is 5.2 t
Random said Torvo was 4.8t yesterday
Danison said dorsal is 15.7 cm that's the point
that's the estimate you get using the supposedly elvis-accurate shorter version
❌
Yeah thats why he said Torvo is 4.8t and is the size he gave the guy who made the big size comparison
And the point I made is that that dorsal was never been figured nor measured in any previous published paper, so how can it be downsized? Also I fully agree with Andy
Show full convo atleasr smh
Theres more below
That stuff is about mera
A.anax's largest specimen has been nuked, so now the largest is the femur that yields ~4.9 tonnes. Acrocanthosaurus is 5.8 t based on a GDI or 6.1 t based on Bates et al 2016. Meraxes's holotype is 5.7 tonnes based on GDI of Sergi's skeletal, but there is a 15% larger specimen that would weigh ~8.7t. That’s the full thing (forgot Acro was there aswell)
Source: I said so
Tmk about Meraxes
Random said he only knows what the abstract said
And Meraxes rn is still obscure tbh
You can scale it to 10.7m tmk and 15% bigger can be vague so idk
didn't necessarily get nuked
#paleontology message
I said Meraxes
But you guys are still using estimates from random people in the internet, the 5t torvo hasn't been tested nor stated in any paper, then when an actual paper comes out by actual researchers of an actual individual people will go mad because it got "downsized" because they believed the crazy estimates made by someone
Actual researchers
Sergi's skeletal is 11.4m or smth
I have seen skeletals for 10.7m with Dark mentioning he has go and see Meraxes Stuff irl
Mixing GDI and circumference, also Acros biggest femur is 427mm in circumference, that is way less than anax specimens, up to 470mm, and new mexico Allosaurus sp. 461mm
half of paper estimates are literally allometry
how big is Patagotitan by the way is it 37 m and 69 t or is it smaller
Femur circumference mass estimates for large Carcharodontosaurids:
- Stromer's Carcharodontosaurid - 2420 kg
- Taurovenator - 3260 kg
- Acrocanthosaurus Fran - 3590 kg
- Chilantaisaurus - 3710 kg
- Meraxes - 4260 kg
- Mapusaurus largest femur - 4340 kg
- Tyrannotitan paratype - 5780 kg
- Giganotosaurus - 6260 kg
- Tyrannotitan holotype - 6260 kg
W TTT
real mass
- Stromer's Carcharodontosaurid - ~5000 kg
- Taurovenator - ~6000 kg
- Acrocanthosaurus Fran - ~6000 kg
- Chilantaisaurus - ~5000 kg
- Meraxes - ~5500-6000 kg
- Mapusaurus largest femur - ~7000 kg
- Tyrannotitan paratype - ~7500 kg
- Giganotosaurus - ~8500-9000 kg
- Tyrannotitan holotype - ~5500 kg
Any information regarding this? Last I seen is someone thinks is a hadrosaur https://youtu.be/vdiPfT-lqNc?si=j5lw2qBEDUM5gifz
It seems like every few years the news cycle explodes with another new giant theropod set on dethroning Tyrannosaurus. The 90s were full of giant carcharodontosaurid hype and the early 2000s had Spinosaurus as their sweetheart. In 2024, Tyrannosaurus appears to be the reigning champion with its biggest representatives at 10-12 tonnes--but a new ...
Using Allosaurus or Shaochilong you can get it to relatively normal size though
Why would you use allosaurus?
To not get 20t in size
Because what you sent is a basal Carcharodontosaurid
I’ve seen estimates of 13 tons which sound a whole lot more realistic than the blasphemy you just typed.
also on the basis of the basal ones i guess
Scaling from Acro gets 19 t
19 tons is ridiculous lol
based on Meraxes probably similar
Ye
Wait i thought saurophaganax was like 5-6 tonnes
Here we go again
Which topic lol
It's actually 15 tonnes based on claw
Not that saurophaganax I meant allosaurus anax
The damn size discussion
what does that have to do with what i said the claw still suggests 15 t
Wait what.
It’s 2 things you never do asks a woman her weight and a dinosaur their size estimation. Both off limits.
Fr fr
Never ask
A women her weight
A man his salary
"What's the weight of this dinosaur?"
phalanx scaling
So any news on ichthyotitan?
Big
GNS CD 583
Why do dinosaurs have such weird names? Like allosaurus spinosaurus and triceratops Why not simpler names?
Like Jon glob and gorg
They do have simple names T. rex
Allo
Spino
Trike
We need REALLY simple names
That's up to gen public
We don't call animals by scientific names because people adopted colloquial names for them
Well look at elephants scientific name Loxodonta africana
Except gorilla
Gorilla is it's scientific name
Gorilla gorilla
I think one is even gorilla gorilla gorilla
Gorilla gorilla gorilla gorilla should've been gigantopithicus (even though it's probably not a gorilla)
Wolf = Canis lupus Linnaeus
oh no
Awww bird joke got nuked
the two latest Carcharodontosaurids were both from Asia
the hell did I miss
ted, albert, stephen and terry
New Dubreuillosaurus skeletal by Justice
alot
Oh hey it's aforementioned gorilla gorilla
Would anybody know a good site for finding nearly every single fossil record of extinct animals going as far back to the Triassic or further
Was Kiyacursor more likely a Herbivore or More likely A Omnivore/Carnivore
And Is it having a beak more likely than it having teeth?
No skull preserved
Okay so Both are as Likely as the other
it may have been more like masiakasaurus in terms of diet but also may have been more like limusaurus
so ig yeah
Is Berthasaura Still a Noasaurid? There are alot of people saying it is not and is just a Ceratosaurian in the new group Berthasauridae
I'd say it still is
I don't think naming Berthasauridae was a good choice
That's why I said that one must compare with the same method, by circumference Allosaurus anax is 4,7t, expect it to be much more by volumetric
megalosaurid?
not all masses increase by volumetric
To be fair the vast majority do at least by a little bit. Usually around 100-200kg difference in large animals from a GDI of the same animal for example
Sure but even in the example above the holotype Tyrannotitan's mass actually decreases, so it is possible.
I've not like statistically tested it, but in my experience it seems more gracile builds seem to be more likely to lose mass from volumetric, and Allosaurus is pretty well known for being a more gracile theropod.
Very complete lmao
not anymore
Is that a brain cast? Looks like a brain cast.
Yes
maybe it just had a big brain 🤔
frontal
Frontal
Allosaurus do increase in mass, smaller juvenile and subadult individuals have seen their masses increased from what it was calculated by circumference. Also define gracile, because Allosaurus is almost the only allosauroid with a barrel like rib cage like that of tyrannosaurids, there are Allosaurus specimens with a torso that is wider in absolute terms than that of Acro Fran being a meter or so shorter.
Allosaurus MOR 693 was estimated via allometry to weigh 1270kg, while the volumetric estimate was 1500kg, so the maximum volumetric mass for A.anax is expected to be ~5.6t
If we use DINO 2560 we get a lower estimate for the volumetric, so a 4.8-5.6 t range is appropriate
oki doki
and what specimen are you talking abt anax for 5.6t
OMNH 1371, the largest femur
isnt that fenris?
I don't speak norse
is OMNH 1371 fenris?
fenris doesn't exist, OMNH 1371 is one of the two 11m-class individuals though
Tyrannotitan holotype is too large via allometry despite every other Carcharodontosaurid including Tyrannotitan paratype being too small
Maybe the holotype was really fat
it has the femur circumference of Giganotosaurus
that'd mean 8.5 t at 11 m
so it'd need to be even more robust than any specimen of Tyrannosaurus
thats using the short torso lad, one of the two ways to recon torvo. You can use both randoms and short torso lad. But take elvis's torso with a grain of salt cause no paper/description of the lad is out for him so its hard to say if that is true or not rn. As you can random even stated it as "Supposedly" which means theres some doubts to it
stares at torvo going from 5 tons to 5.2 tons ..... fat mf
anyone want Tylosaurus to be in the game its one of my favorites and its my local provincial dinosaur that i have fallen in love since i was young
Is this scaling okay?
Qianz skull is so damn beautiful
we are not bringing edmusthosaurus into 2025
Are all scale bars equal to one another ?
Edmusthosaurus one shots all carnis
I think but am remaking it anyways
New Sauropodomorph dropped
Good god he's a sausage
these videos have been appearing in my feed so much now
It’s a new slop content format, most of them just barely exceed the 8 minute mark you need for midroll ads.
yeah, with some of these there is so much debate on how they lived that i dont see you making a video any longer than 2 minutes on their lifestyle
this isn't even true
well lishulong but that one isn't that new anymore
such a pin head
You haven't seen dub yet then lmao
uh no
it gets worssssse
got Megalosaurid and Metricanthosaurid are my favorite family of theropods
I was referring to Lishulong 😭
Being a dinosaur in general sucked.
not very new anymore
especially the herbivores,like as a baby it must´ve sucked
Carnivores also had to worry about whether or not they will catch something to eat.
There isn't really a dinosaur you can say "Yes, this is a good dinosaur to live as"
Well actually 1708 and 2114 are larger 1135 and 1160 (supposedly) although yeah 1371 is more robust with the greatest circumference and it is worse preserved, the condyles are clearly eroded or worn and the total length could be as much as the others yes.
yeah true
Do you guys have a favorite dinosaur group as a whole?
Hadrosauridae tbh.
Herons.
Like even tho in media,they are represented as nothing more but defensless snacks for the carnivores,you have to credit them for surviving all the way up to the late cretaceous. And even tho they lack thagomizers,horns or even clubs,their weight alone could keep even the biggest oponents (depending on the size of that carnivore,since there are small hadrosaurids that did get preyed on by large theropods) at bay
Ankylosaurs were just living tanks. Almost nothing hunted these things.
When your biggest opp is your own kind, I'd say you're doing pretty good.
yeah ankylosaurs are also one of my fav groups
Well I wouldn't quite say that, in general Hadrosaurs and Tyrannosaurs in the same ecosystem have comparable average weights. Hadrosaurs appear to have had quite a bit of individual variation but those large individuals shouldn't be taken to represent their species on the whole. Bulk (and biting, Hadrosaurs had sharp beaks which go underrated as a defense mechanism) would be a secondary defense after running.
